Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/09/14

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive September 14th, 2021
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unnecessary image which does not add encyclopedic value; we already have plenty of similar images. 180.214.232.18 02:54, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use. --Achim (talk) 07:47, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Camilo Jiménez has contacted republica GmbH kindly requesting this photo to be deleted from online sources. As this file originated from our flickr account we have complied with his request and removed the photo from flickr. Please remove this file from Commons as well as Wikidata. 86.56.57.46 09:57, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

the photo hasn't been removed from Flickr Vera (talk) 20:42, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: CC licenses are irrevocable. --Gbawden (talk) 12:37, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While it seems that the file hasn't been deleted properly on our end (on the re:publica flickr account), this is now the case. Camilo Jiménez approached republica GmbH on 27 July with a request to have this photo removed from all online sources (flickr, Wikidata, Commons). In order to respect his image rights I'm hereby re-nominating this file for deletion. Thanks! --Julian (republica GmbH) 86.56.124.179 09:35, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Vera (talk) 09:43, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright Violation. Desesperado3 (talk) 09:29, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, speedied per G7. --Túrelio (talk) 12:19, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Nonsense SAJI003 (talk) 13:15, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Another Android app user who couldn't resist. --Achim (talk) 13:20, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Capressia only exists on nationstates.net, fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 08:32, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 16:39, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Ayan184 (talk) 13:44, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 15:19, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{speedydelete|This image contains identifiable Afghans that may be threatened by the Taliban}} Mclovinplasse (talk) 15:08, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, reasonable, nihil nocere. --Túrelio (talk) 15:39, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [1]. Yann (talk) 09:30, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

oumaima hida Im 7201 (talk) 16:03, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --rubin16 (talk) 16:49, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Zäitleche Oflaf vun der Jeeërausbildung.pdf Dewilda (talk) 15:59, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File not used, replaced by a wikitable. Dewilda (talk) 16:03, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: obviously no valid reason for deletion of the main page discussion. Please file a deletion request for the file you want to nominate. --Rosenzweig τ 19:14, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{speedydelete|This image contains identifiable Afghans that may be threatened by the Taliban}} Mclovinplasse (talk) 16:09, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, seems reasonable, nihil nocere. --Túrelio (talk) 16:11, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [2]. Yann (talk) 09:30, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False filename and description, should read “Materials for reading and understanding the Slavic alphabet, by Lavrentiy Zizani", see its Discussion. Fork of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%D0%9B%D0%B0%D0%B2%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BD%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%B9_%D0%97%D0%B8%D0%B7%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B9._%D0%9B%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%81_(1596).pdf anyway. Zezen (talk) 23:38, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have made a mistake and requested deletion of the Talk page only here. The correct file request deletion can be found here:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Nauku_Czytania_i_Rozumienia_Pisma_Slonsko_Slowenskogo_Gotow.pdf
Zezen (talk) 23:43, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: Accidental creation, follow up Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nauku Czytania i Rozumienia Pisma Slonsko Slowenskogo Gotow.pdf. --Achim (talk) 15:06, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False filename and description, should read “Materials for reading and understanding the Slavic alphabet, by Lavrentij Zizanij", see its Discussion. Fork of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Лаврентий_Зизаний._Лексис_(1596).pdf anyway. Zezen (talk) 23:40, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Duplicate, wrong license, fake information, etc. --Yann (talk) 12:32, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
   {{Delete
    |reason=The preexisting "Oberon (operating system)" category suffices.
    |subpage=Category:Oberon operating systems
    |day=14
    |month=September
    |year=2021
    }} — Preceding unsigned comment added by PeterEasthope (talk • contribs) 16:24, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 01:55, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Delete this Picture Quality is not So Good. WikiLoverFan1007 (talk) 06:52, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The picture quality looks fine. Especially in absence of a better quality image. --Adamant1 (talk) 10:50, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep No relevant reason for deletion. Andy Dingley (talk) 08:27, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 11:14, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious copyright claim WikiLoverFan1007 (talk) 13:16, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep This doesn't meet the threshold of originality. Also, it's a variation of the logo for Saginaw, Michigan. Which is public domain. --Adamant1 (talk) 11:04, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 11:14, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image across all Wikimedia Projects. WikiLoverFan1007 (talk) 13:50, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 11:13, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unnecessary Non-Encyclopedic Image to be Deleted. WikiLoverFan1007 (talk) 13:56, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Countryball. In use; no need for deletion. Vysotsky (talk) 13:59, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep One of a series of bulk nominations, none of which have any merit. Andy Dingley (talk) 08:32, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 11:09, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Map of a Fictitious Continent. WikiLoverFan1007 (talk) 14:02, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. --Yann (talk) 11:04, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ngkhaichuan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused images of non-notable organization and persons, likely uploaded for promotional purposes, COM:WEBHOST, out of scope. And unreliable as own work.

P 1 9 9   01:02, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 09:45, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Weldon Kennedy Flickr stream batch upload "Lamu" set

[edit]

A set of personal vacation photos featuring unidentified people sitting around; batch-uploaded from someone's largely out-of-scope Flickr stream. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 04:42, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:09, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hoangnhan1403 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work, official type headshots, no exif, PCP

Gbawden (talk) 09:03, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:12, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Fitindia: Please delete the new files uploaded by this user. They are found on various websites online. DHN (talk) 18:53, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Penoholic (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own work as claimed, one from hypebeast, others from Insta. Needs OTRS

Gbawden (talk) 09:06, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:13, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Signdata (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Back of copyrighted books and advertising/out of scope promo. The image of him is cropped from a copyrighted book cover

Gbawden (talk) 09:10, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:13, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jackpot369 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author, as the the metadata

CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:46, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:11, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:16, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Antoine-Alain38320 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:16, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Boltoncass (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:15, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:15, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams. Duplicates. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:15, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by A 1 D 6 A (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:15, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

error file and copy Giogana3098 (talk) 06:34, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Useless file Trangmai150809 (talk) 12:16, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Obvious vandalism. — WikiLucas (🖋️) 21:09, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per prompt uploader request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:02, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious copyvio Kingofthedead (talk) 00:08, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:44, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The YouTube uploader does not own the rights on this private picture. Toyotsu (talk) 01:29, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:44, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal picture, picture is bad quality,out of scope. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 09:54, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, now used in bn.wiki on userpage of active user. Taivo (talk) 16:24, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal picture, no educational value, out of scope. Now unused. P 1 9 9   01:58, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:43, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

w:File:Mickey Mouse Mixed Up Adv.png is non-free, The elements here above TOO are the color choices for the font and the mckey ears grpahic in the center bottom panel. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 03:36, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:44, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{SD|G7}} CHEN SHI XUAN (talk) 08:58, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. Free licenses are irrevocable. Beautiful photo. Taivo (talk) 12:08, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:42, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{SD|G7}} CHEN SHI XUAN (talk) 08:59, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. Free licenses are irrevocable. Beautiful photo. Taivo (talk) 12:09, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:42, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{SD|G7}} CHEN SHI XUAN (talk) 09:00, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. Free licenses are irrevocable. Beautiful photo. Taivo (talk) 12:10, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:42, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{SD|G7}} CHEN SHI XUAN (talk) 09:00, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. Free licenses are irrevocable. Beautiful photo. Taivo (talk) 12:11, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:42, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial flag. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:42, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from movie poster. Should be cropped/blanked to keep. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:42, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:42, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:42, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:42, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:42, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 15:33, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:42, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CC-BY-NC on Flickr. COM:TOO has no section about Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan or Tajikistan. Stefan2 (talk) 15:36, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:42, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://lakansining.wordpress.com/2020/06/09/diliman-quadrangle-quezon-city-the-history-of-east-avenue-and-its-government-institutions/ - bio of ARCHITECT RUPERTO CECILIO GAITE, born 1925. includes this 1974 building as his work. No freedom of panorama in the philippines

Mrcl lxmna (talk) 17:50, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:41, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://www.wtcmanila.com.ph/about-us/ - 1996 building by world famous GENSLER AND ASSOCIATES. No freedom of panorama in the philippines. Copyright Gensler and Associates architecture

Mrcl lxmna (talk) 17:54, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:41, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Useless picture Josef Nerušil (talk) 21:32, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Permission from copyright holder required. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:45, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong picture, useless. Josef Nerušil (talk) 22:32, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Permission from copyright holder required. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:45, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Blurry, Nonsense NightWolf1223 (talk) 02:55, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:46, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Blurry, Nonsense NightWolf1223 (talk) 02:59, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:46, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Blurry, Nonsense NightWolf1223 (talk) 03:00, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:46, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution and pretty clearly not own work Kingofthedead (talk) 00:07, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:19, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by FMSky as Copyvio (copyvio) King of ♥ 01:15, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:19, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplication of File:Kuririn Preocupado.PNG. 180.214.232.18 01:59, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion.  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:20, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No License and No Permission. 180.214.232.18 02:10, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion.  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:21, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful own work claim, Film poster art. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 03:46, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:18, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful own work, w:File:Tourism BiH.png is non-free, and attributed to " Tourism BiH" ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 03:55, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:17, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful CC license, this is album cover art w:File:John Mayer - Sob Rock.png is non-free. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 03:55, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:18, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful own work, album cover art w:File:The Weeknd - House of Balloons.png is non-free. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 03:56, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:18, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not useful in wikimedia projects. Private photo. Velma (talk) 05:25, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:17, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Out of project scope‎. ~Moheen (keep talking) 06:50, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:11, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Came via Facebook; their Terms of Use are incompatible with publishing here. Permission from original uploader should be given via OTRS for confirmation. NinjaStrikers «» 07:15, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:11, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tsvetir (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious claim of own work. One from FB per MD, anther from Insta. No meaningful exif, needs OTRS

Gbawden (talk) 08:57, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:13, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:18, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:15, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violations - as the new owner of an original photograph by Joseph Rheden - a portrait of Max Jaffé, I ask you to remove this picture from your website. 31.30.175.157 11:25, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Ownership is irrelevant. --Krd 11:44, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Rheden died in 1946. --Achim (talk) 12:40, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion.  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:15, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful CC license - Video game cover art - w:File:CSGOcoverMarch2020.jpg is non-free. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:33, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:16, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful own work claim, Most likely owned by "Planet Grande Pictures" or "Cuppa Coffee Animation" being the production companies responsibel for the media this represents a logo/title card for. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:36, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete It's a screenshot of the intro for the show. Which is likely copyrighted. So I think it's worth deleting. Maybe if it was just a logo that wasn't from a screenshot of the actual program it wouldn't meet the threshold of originality though. --Adamant1 (talk) 11:01, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:16, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful own work , Logo attributed to "English Football League" , UK has a low TOO, and the concern would be the stylized ball logo in the centere of the shield. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:19, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 06:40, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work: screengrab or crop from unknown source, missing essential info. P 1 9 9   01:56, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Picture of a model. --Yann (talk) 21:07, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture quality is not Good. 180.214.232.18 01:56, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Is there a better quality version somewhere? If not, it should be kept until there is. As it's not that bad. Plus it's being used in an article. --Adamant1 (talk) 10:39, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Too complex for PD-textlogo. --Yann (talk) 21:08, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful own work - (English Wikipedia attributes http://www.mod.go.jp/gsdf/ as source)|subpage=File:Japan Maritime Self Defense Force Emblem.png Gameposo (talk) 02:06, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:08, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not necessarily a simple logo (relicenseable under the license shown), The element considered above TOO is the stylized T centre, ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 03:44, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-textlogo. --Yann (talk) 21:09, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lacking evidnece of permission, w:File:Internet-OSI_Standard_War.jpg is non-free and attributed to a Francois Fluckiger ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 03:49, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:10, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

TOO concern, Stylised S shaped ban, center of image. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 03:57, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-textlogo. --Yann (talk) 21:10, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free at English Wikipedia - w:File:Patriotic Party Turkey.png, so doubftul CC license. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 04:01, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:11, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not necessacrily PD, Grpahic element at top of logo above TOO. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 04:02, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

To be honest, I assumed that the emblem of the 1960 Summer Olympics is in the public domain, as is the emblem of the 2020 Olympic Games in Tokyo. If it does not meet the requirements of Wikimedia and the copyright law, you can delete it.--Dimash Kenesbek (talk) 17:44, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:11, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free -w:File:Windows Magnifier.png screenshot of Windows component. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 04:03, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Nothing is (c) Microsoft here. --Yann (talk) 21:12, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a simple logo, The sylised font used for the letters tips this over TOO in my view. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 04:06, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-textlogo. --Yann (talk) 21:12, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful CC license , w:File:Rusty Rivets Spin Master Nickelodeon Logo.png is non-free. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 04:10, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:13, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful CC license , w:File:Beijing-automotive-works-logo.png is non-free. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 04:12, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:13, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful Own work claim - Attributed to "TNI Angkatan Darat " ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 04:14, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:13, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful PD license , w:File:Brasão da UFRJ.png is non-free, and the source field here, mirrors the Non-free use rationale at English Wikipedia. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 04:15, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:13, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful CC license , w:File:DMTF logo.png , Graphic element right , tips this over TOO. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 04:19, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep It doesn't meet the threshold of originality in the United States. --Adamant1 (talk) 10:47, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-textlogo. --Yann (talk) 21:14, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

AI enhanced. Wxmarshall (talk) 05:46, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 21:15, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Whpq as no permission (No permission since). COM:TOO? King of ♥ 06:13, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-textlogo. --Yann (talk) 21:15, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Afeef as no permission (No permission since). COM:TOO? King of ♥ 06:23, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-textlogo. --Yann (talk) 21:16, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 06:23, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:17, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please can the uploader provide further details to confirm this file is their own work. Seemingly a photo from a press conference, which has been published elsewhere with a copyright notice (undated), see [3]. Unlikely to be own work as claimed. mattbr 06:32, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:17, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Kyletv05 as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: -u1
Converted to regular DR as file does not qualify for G7-speedy (in use on project). -- Túrelio (talk) 07:24, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. In use. --Yann (talk) 21:19, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for art in US. Sculpture created in 2016 by still-living artist Andre Carrotflower (talk) 07:28, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:19, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Was deleted by EugeneZelenko but challenged at COM:UNDEL. Appears to be controversial so opening a DR for discussion. King of ♥ 07:37, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-textlogo, as per above comments. --Yann (talk) 21:20, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please check copyrights stated on author website : https://jeanclaudegolvin.com/mentions-legales/ Desman31 (talk) 08:12, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 21:22, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope for WLM Sweden. Name not relevant for the image. First upload from user. Axel Pettersson (WMSE) (talk) 08:56, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:22, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry picture showing nothing Naioli (talk) 10:38, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:23, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Useless image of low quality and low resolution, showing nothing interesting Naioli (talk) 10:40, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:23, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Useless image of low quality and low resolution, showing nothing interesting Naioli (talk) 10:41, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:24, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Credited to Matt Porteus here https://wavelengthmag.com/listen-nick-hounsfield-inspired-surfer-podcast-jimmys/ - and also found on his FB page, think we need OTRS Gbawden (talk) 11:24, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:26, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fictional flag 2601:646:8D01:DE40:28A6:96CE:ACDE:7F06 11:32, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:26, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful own work, logo attributed to "Southern Baptist Convention" at English Wikipedia, However, I would query if a christan cross over a bible would actually exceed TOO anyway. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:34, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep And change ownership information. Likely it doesn't meet the threshold of originality anyway. --Adamant1 (talk) 10:57, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 21:26, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful CC license , Concern would be the Mountain and stars grpahic which is distinctive to Paramount ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:45, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:27, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Comparability poor quality profile-type picture. Potentially a personal picture. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 11:50, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:27, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo/Screenshot of a copyrighted TV program, as described on its description. DerpGunKV2 (talk) 11:52, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:28, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful CC license, w:File:Enter the Gungeon logo.png, No evidence of license on linked repository. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:59, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:28, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No longer needed; only used in my User namespace on a page in development. I decided to go with a different map with a different source SVG file. Please delete this one. Thank you. Eewilson (talk) 12:02, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:29, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please can the uploader provide further details to confirm this file is their own work. The uploader's other contribution was deleted as missing permission due to previously being published. Doubt as to whether this is own work as claimed. No usage on Wikimedia projects. mattbr 12:23, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:29, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It have a new version Trangmai150809 (talk) 12:24, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Obvious vandalism. — WikiLucas (🖋️) 21:09, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:29, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please can the uploader provide further details to confirm this file is their own work. The uploader's other contributions have all been deleted as copyright violations. It is therefore dubious that this file is the uploader's own work as claimed. mattbr 12:29, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:30, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This chart might need to be deleted for two reasons.

ONE: because it does not satisfy the Threshold of Originality for a non-free published chart (image). It does not meet the criteria of PD-chart https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:PD-chart which states that a chart is ineligible for copyright and therefore in the public domain IFF it consists entirely of information that is common property and contains no original authorship. I do not believe that the ANES feeling thermometer is common property nor that creation of the chart required no original authorship.

TWO: Possible copyvio copyright violation due to it being licensed by CCC. The chart source is the Annual Review of Political Science which is free to read online under the Annual Reviews "Subscribe to Open" (S2O) subscription model arrangement as described here https://www.annualreviews.org/page/subscriptions/subscribe-to-open See press release PDF for Annual Review of Political Science 2021 https://www.annualreviews.org/pb-assets/assets/documents/press-release/2021_ARPS_announcement-1621265058450.pdf The specific type of license is unclear. The press release said CC-BY but that isn't mentioned anywhere on the Annual Reviews website nor accompanying the article.

My concern about electronic reproduction of the chart is due to this notice https://www.annualreviews.org/page/about/copyright-and-permissions that is linked to by the Annual Review of PoliSci here https://www.annualreviews.org/journal/polisci Reuse of this particular chart as it appears in the article, 'The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States' https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051117-073034 explicitly requires licensing by CCC at the following link https://marketplace.copyright.com/rs-ui-web/mp/details/journal/124132408 which does not seem acceptable for Commons but I am not certain. FeralOink (talk) 12:36, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

CCC is the Copyright Clearance Center. I forget to explain that above, sorry.--FeralOink (talk) 12:48, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. PD-ineligible, in use. --Yann (talk) 21:31, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1) Dubious Creative Commons claim 2) the map is grossly inaccurate Danu Widjajanto (talk) 12:43, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: © 2020 - 2021 ShahAbbas1571. --Yann (talk) 21:32, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1) Dubious Creative Commons claim 2) the map is grossly inaccurate Danu Widjajanto (talk) 12:43, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: © 2018 - 2021 ShahAbbas1571. --Yann (talk) 21:32, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The map is grossly inaccurate, part of a cross-wiki spam to spread false information Danu Widjajanto (talk) 12:44, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. No source for base map. --Yann (talk) 21:33, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious copyright claim Danu Widjajanto (talk) 12:45, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:33, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious copyright claim Danu Widjajanto (talk) 12:45, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:33, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of focus image, not showing the main subject. Background isn't interesting Naioli (talk) 12:45, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:34, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious copyright claim Danu Widjajanto (talk) 12:45, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Bad quality, not used, out of scope. --Yann (talk) 21:34, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1) Dubious copyright claim 2) The map is grossly inaccurate Danu Widjajanto (talk) 12:45, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. No source for base map. --Yann (talk) 21:34, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The picture at the linked source is not under a compatible copyright. It is attributed to the Bibliotheque de Geneve. While the original device is very old, the photograph is not. Error (talk) 12:54, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:35, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I cannot find any proves of notability of this musician from Togo. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 13:08, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:35, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work. Text could be copyrighted. This seems to the description of a Pesticide. Sreejith K (talk) 13:14, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. It came in bulk upload. pls delete--Manoj Karingamadathil (Talk) 04:08, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:36, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion KetefHinnomFan (talk) 13:50, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

{{speedydelete|G7}} KetefHinnomFan (talk) 13:52, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The file is used. Taivo (talk) 16:26, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

{{speedydelete|G11 The image appears to have a copyrighted book embedded in it. The book is "Reading the Psalms with Luther." The white rectangles are all the pages of the copyrighted book. If you download the image and zoom into the top left corner, you can see the copyright notice.}} G11 The image appears to have a copyrighted book embedded in it. The book is "Reading the Psalms with Luther." The white rectangles are all the pages of the copyrighted book. If you download the image and zoom into the top left corner, you can see the copyright notice.} HamRadioOperator73 (talk) 23:07, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. --Yann (talk) 21:37, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion KetefHinnomFan (talk) 13:53, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

{{speedydelete|G7}} KetefHinnomFan (talk) 13:53, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The file is used. Taivo (talk) 16:24, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

{{speedydelete|G11 The image appears to have the text of a copyrighted book embedded in it. The book is "Reading the Psalms with Luther." If you download the image and zoom into the top of it, you can see the copyright notice.}} G11 The image appears to have the text of a copyrighted book embedded in it. The book is "Reading the Psalms with Luther." If you download the image and zoom into the top of it, you can see the copyright notice HamRadioOperator73 (talk) 23:10, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:37, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion KetefHinnomFan (talk) 13:54, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Poor quality, not used. --Yann (talk) 21:38, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As an image most likely from the 1930's or 1940's, this image cannot necessarily be relicensed under the license used on Commons. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 03:43, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted bogus license claim -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:03, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong license, This is an image dating from the 1930's or 1940's , so cannot necessarily be under a CC style license. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 03:53, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nom; yoinked from "non-free fair use" photo on en:w with bogus license added. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:02, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An image dating from the 1950's and attributed to a third-party photographer is not necessarily relicensable under the given CC license. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 04:05, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted No actual sourcing; unsupported dubious license claim. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:04, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Concept rendering - needs OTRS from architects who drew it, unlikely to be own work Gbawden (talk) 09:22, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:06, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful own work - Attributed to w:Persik Kediri. at English Wikipedia. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:56, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep and change the ownership information. I see no reason why you can't just do that. Since you know who it originally came from. --Adamant1 (talk) 10:54, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted false license -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:07, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful CC license, This is an image from the early twenteith Century, Atrributed author is the uploader at Find a Grave, not the original photogrpaher. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:17, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted unsupported license claim -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:09, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doutbful own work, Book cover... ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:56, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:11, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is derivative work but the sources for the four original photographs are not provided, supposed copyright violation. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 12:49, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Unsourced collage -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:12, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Centered on copyrighted material. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 14:08, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted DW -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:14, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A photo of another photo without permission of the initial photo author. Oleg (talk) 15:37, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:16, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is rather obviously not a "simple geometrical shape" Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:10, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:51, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

TOO concern, File with this name previously deleted for identical reasons. 88.97.96.89 16:10, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


ReDeleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:15, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful own work, w:File:HPcardSets.jpg is non-free. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:15, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Fraudulent source and license claims. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:19, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful own work, Logo for "Flamengo Esports " under non-free terms at English Wikipedia. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:01, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Likely doesn't meet the TOO terms in Brazil. --Adamant1 (talk) 11:16, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted false source, false license -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:23, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful license, no evidence for license given at source. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:02, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted unsupported license claim -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:24, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small file size, low quality, dubious own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:46, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Likely source found: (C) ARR. --Túrelio (talk) 18:58, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:25, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Moonoverzion (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These seem to be work of uploader who maybe doesn't understand the need to put a license template. Converting to DN to purchase a week more time.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:48, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Still no free license from uploader. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:26, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mainly copyrighted material TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 18:03, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted DW -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:29, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{SD|G7}} CHEN SHI XUAN (talk) 09:00, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. Free licenses are irrevocable. Beautiful photo. Taivo (talk) 12:10, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept per Taivo. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:32, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Este escudo debe de ser borrado de la wikipedia ya que genera conflicto con la entidad del municipio de El Rosal Cundinamarca Colombia por que este no es el escudo oficial del municipio y debe de ser cambiado ya este escudo debe desaparecer. DIFERENCIAS DEL ESCUDO DE ARMAS -los elementos del escudo como la iglesia, vaca, libro, sol y agua son parecidos pero no iguales -los colores usados en el contorno del escudo son parecidos pero no contienen la misma. tonalidad. -las flores que adornan no son las que contienen el escudo original del municipio de El Rosal -la cinta y el tipo de letra no son los mismos. Actuando como encargado de comunicaciones de la alcaldía de El Rosal Cundinamarca se solicita su pronta eliminación mayor informacion al correo prensa@elrosal-cundinamarca.gov.co En la siguiente página web oficial del municipio de El Rosal se evidencia el escudo oficial del municipio de El Rosal Cundinamarca Colombia. http://www.elrosal-cundinamarca.gov.co/buscar?q=escudo Antonio Sánchez Reyes (talk) 22:50, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Este escudo debe de ser borrado de la wikipedia ya que genera conflicto con la entidad del municipio de El Rosal Cundinamarca Colombia por que este no es el escudo oficial del municipio y debe de ser cambiado ya este escudo debe desaparecer. DIFERENCIAS DEL ESCUDO DE ARMAS -los elementos del escudo como la iglesia, vaca, libro, sol y agua son parecidos pero no iguales -los colores usados en el contorno del escudo son parecidos pero no contienen la misma. tonalidad. -las flores que adornan no son las que contienen el escudo original del municipio de El Rosal -la cinta y el tipo de letra no son los mismos. Actuando como encargado de comunicaciones de la alcaldía de El Rosal Cundinamarca se solicita su pronta eliminación mayor informacion al correo prensa@elrosal-cundinamarca.gov.co En la siguiente página web oficial del municipio de El Rosal se evidencia el escudo oficial del municipio de El Rosal Cundinamarca Colombia. http://www.elrosal-cundinamarca.gov.co/buscar?q=escudo 64.76.213.41 16:24, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted False authorship/license claims in any case. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:34, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake CR45MN (talk) 19:50, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --clpo13(talk) 19:26, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo is unpublished Turtleshell3 (talk) 18:59, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Technically-speaking, it is published, simply by being publicly available on the Truman Library website. The publication date would be whenever they put it online for anyone to see or make copies of (see COM:PUB). The source page says "The Library is unaware of any copyright claims to this item; use at your own risk", but that doesn't necessarily mean it's copyright-free. According to COM:HIRTLE, the copyright for something published in or after 2003 (I'm assuming that's the case here, since the Internet Archive record of this site only goes back to 2019) lasts for seventy years after the death of the creator or, if that's not known, 95 years from the date of publication or 120 years from the date of creation, whichever comes first. I don't see any clear information on who took the photo or when (other than prior to 1967, when Waterman died), so we can't definitively say it's public domain or when it will be. That said, seeing as the original uploader is requesting deletion, I see no reason to not go ahead do so (also COM:PCP). clpo13(talk) 19:47, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, uploader request. --clpo13(talk) 19:48, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

logo of a racing team from the UK. TOO in the UK is very low, likely copyright violation FASTILY 09:27, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --clpo13(talk) 17:15, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

не подходящая книга Maribania1988 (talk) 09:31, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, uploader request. --clpo13(talk) 17:04, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

н еопдходит Maribania1988 (talk) 09:35, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, uploader request. --clpo13(talk) 17:03, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in the United States. This mural was installed after March 1989, per COM:PACUSA. See [4]. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:44, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --clpo13(talk) 16:59, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in the United States. This mural was installed after March 1989, per COM:PACUSA. See [5]. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:45, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --clpo13(talk) 16:59, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful CC license , w:File:CloudLinux OS Logo.png is non-free and the given source does not explictly say its under Creative Commons terms. The graphic elements are above TOO ( Spiral left.) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:03, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@ShakespeareFan00 I am really sorry for uploading the cloudlinux os logo in commons. I was quite new in wikipedia and I was editing an article in wikipedia bangla about cloudlinux os. You can delete it. No Problem. Riyadul.mollick (talk) 11:13, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Riyadul.mollick: Alterntively you can do some research and find out what the artwork is licensed as. It wouldn't suprise me if a distro didn't use some sort of free license for logo art (even if it isn't CC). ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:07, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, the terms of use at [6] suggest the logo is non-free. --clpo13(talk) 17:01, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --clpo13(talk) 17:02, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mahmud ale (talk · contribs)

[edit]

I got hits on all of these with google image search except for the 1920x600 image of ruins, but that size and quality are from Facebook. I think all of these are copies from the internet.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:06, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 15:56, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image contains identifiable Afghans that may be threatened by the Taliban Mclovinplasse (talk) 15:50, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That is not really a reason for deletion. Commons is not censored. The question is whether the image is suitable for Wikimedia Commons. Of course, if WMF office deems that this image is a threat to people around, they may immediately delete as an office action.
I support deletion, but because the image is not being used actively on any Wikimedia projects, which is an indication this image does not seem to be educationally useful. Aasim 22:09, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Considering the evolving situation in Afghanistan, and the increased persecution of Afghans involved with the US and its allies through online digital footprints as has been reported in Al Jazeera, Wired, Reuters this (and the many other images like it on Commons) are a major security threat for Afghans in them. I am sure the Foundation deems this image a threat too but firstly doesn't have the right to just delete it on a whim and secondly does not have the resources to go through all the Wikimedia projects to decide what may or may not be a threat. Understanding the gravity of the situation in Afghanistan I think it is our duty to do what ever we can to protect Afghan who may be threatened. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mclovinplasse (talk • contribs) 09:55, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete I disagree, this is absolutely not pointless because it reduces the scope of access to this image significantly. Secondly, while the image is on this US website or on Flickr or anywhere else we can’t do anything about it, but on Wikipedia we have the agency to change things and we should. While the Taliban is only in the early stages of consolidating their power, no-one can tell how repressive they might still become and what technologies that might have to exert control. As such, this image presents a great security risk for the people within it. Furthermore, the persons quite likely are unaware of its existence and public accessibility making it all the more dangerous. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mclovinplasse (talk • contribs) 08:41, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep, per AFBorchert. Can we also note this image is from 2013; if the Taliban wanted to look for these people from freely viewable US Gov pictures (which they probably have the capacity to do), they would've done so by now. — Berrely • TC 17:19, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • My poll and input (with some emphases): unless there is an official action by the Wikimedia Foundation itself or its legal team, I will lean towards  Keep. Note that Commons does not delete images just because of security or even private owner's property reasons, as these are COM:Non-copyright restrictions. See COM:NOTCENSORED. Prior cases have been discussed at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Rue Vivienne, 47.jpg from France (kept, despite the claim of the nominator that it poses terrorist risk) and Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Ringhals nuclear power plant (kept despite the plant being a highly-sensitive location in Sweden). Commons only deletes images that violate architects', sculptors', and muralists' copyrights if they show recent architecture and public works (like the common "mantra" in many nominations: "no commercial FOP in France", "no FOP in Afghanistan", etc..). But as there are no copyright and scope issues here, this should be kept (again , except of course, if WMF finally intervenes for deletion). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:49, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete I understand, but I respectfully disagree.COM:Non-copyright restrictions has some exceptions pertaining to photographs of identifiable people. While a person's photo taken in public is not subject to their consent to be "published" on Commons, this is arguably an outdated policy. Especially considering the the chilling sophistication and activities of companies such as Clearview AI who prey on exactly this loophole. Now in the context of Afghanistan, who is to say the Taliban will not use such technologies to exert control? Are we willing to take that risk? As for the Foundation, this is an extraordinary situation and considering the limited resources they have, it is up to the community to help, support and protect other communities. There is simply to much content for the Foundation to take note of everything to decide what is appropriate or not, and regardless, this is a community driven platform so it should also be up to us. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mclovinplasse (talk • contribs) 10:04, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    @Mclovinplasse: if you wish you may want to contact Wikimedia Foundation regarding the matter. This page of theirs lists possible avenues for concerns, from information queries and copyvio removals (DMCA) to others, with their relevant email addresses. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:36, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Note: this comment was added by the nominator, who has already added a bolded vote above. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 16:45, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: based on the discussion above, the consensus is against deletion of this image, on the basis that none of our extant policies support deleting it. Matters of security and privacy are best discussed at other venues, such as the Village Pump. --clpo13(talk) 18:20, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This 2D work does not seem a "work of artistic craftmanship", so that it does not comply with freedom of panorama in India. Lymantria (talk) 14:18, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --clpo13(talk) 16:38, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2D art is not covered by freedom of panorama in India. Lymantria (talk) 15:38, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --clpo13(talk) 16:39, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 3

may fufil COM:SPAM. Files nominated basically depicts the same thing, a road. May also fufil COM:FOP Philippines

List of files

大诺史 (talk) 07:19, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment More files that I didn't nominate is at Category:Pulilan-Baliuag Diversion Road (Tarcan-Matangtubig, Baliuag - Inaon, Peñabatan, Balatong, Dulong Malabon-Tibag, Pulilan, Bulacan) - 2019.
These photos include highly educational, relevant and landmark images of Category:By-pass (roads) in the Philippines; Thanks for your message, and good afternoon from hereat Bulacan, Philippines; I respectfully submit the following reasons, supported by news and DPWH data and information on this Bypass Road; a) 9.60-kilometer long road is a Diversion or Bypass that cuts short the travel from Baliuag to Pulilan: to wit: all the SUV or vans going to Dau or San Fernando Pampanga are now passing this instead of the heavy traffic roads of Pulilan Regional Road to NLEx or the San Simon Exit; b) all the vehicles passing Daang Maharlika and suffering the heavy or almost standstill traffic in Tarcan junction, and in Jollibee Pulilan Junction to go to NLEx or Pulilan town proper, will Bypass this Road; c) this is a landmark and tourist attraction road; that is, it is bikers friendly as your can see the white marked bicycle lanes for tourists and Lay-by or rest areas; d) the amount spent for this Bypass is PHP509.60 million to P 1 Billion and finished in record time; e) in Wikimedia Commons, the photos are very educational since the Categories delineates the metes and bounds of the architecture of this work; I took so much enough photos since the road covers 2 barangays of Baliuag and 5 Barangays of Pulilan; here are the news proofs of notability of these photos; in fact Secretary Villar and Pulilan Mayor Maritz Ochoa inaugurated this road with Historical markers I still am looking for as this was headline news in our TVs: Pulilan-Baliuag diversion road The 9.60-kilometer long road begins at Pulilan-Calumpit road in Tibag, Pulilan and ends in Daang Maharlika in Tarcan in Baliuag, Bulacan with cost of PHP509.60 million - Network Development Construction of By-Passes (Pulilan-Baliuag, Bulacan Diversion Roads - Row) very sincerly yours, Judgefloro 07:36, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
As proof of notability I respectfully submit the following DPWH submissions to the public of the cost and descriptions of the project, to wit: P 115 million pesos contract cost [ Phase 1 is P 97 million contract cost Phase 2 is P 251 million pesos contract cost] Phase 3 is P 115 million pesos contract cost Secretary Villar landmark road projects sincerely Judgefloro 08:02, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
9.6-kilometer bike-friendly diversion road in Bulacan opens a four-lane road that features bike lanes Photos of the Inauguration, thus landmark notability on Thursday, May 9, 2019 photos of witnesses Pulilan Mayor Maritz Ochoa-Montejo, Rep. Gavini Pancho and DPWH Regional Director Roseller Tolentino sincerely Judgefloro 08:08, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
 Comment I only agree with you to a certain extent. Some of the images uploaded are just taken on the same road but at different points. The distance between these points doesn't really make anything more visible (i.e. distance between photos taken are too close). Hope you understand my POV. 大诺史 (talk) 15:25, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Agree Although  Keep some of the images of the road since it is pretty notable. Markoolio97 (talk) 03:16, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Exhaustive argument and discussion on notability
Rejoinder
Exhaustive argument and discussion on the notability, landmark, educational, engineering and Philippine record on roads, never before done in past President's since Emilio Aguinaldo to Aquino, Jr. Category:Pulilan-Baliuag Diversion Road
With all due respect, I am hereby submitting the following, in line with the Philosophy of Wikimedia Commons of sharing photos for Wisdom, inter alia, to wit:
Prefatory
First in Philippine History of Road works
Wikimedia Commons Category:By-pass (roads) in the Philippines and Vide Category:By-pass (roads) all over the world on file hereat Commons, including Category:Roads in the Philippines by provinces Category:Roads in Pampanga Category:Roads in Nueva Ecija Category:Roads in Bulacan Laguna (province), inter alia, name them all, one cannot find -
Category:Cycle lanes in the Philippines Bicycle lanes and/or with Rest area Lay-by or Category:Rest areas in the Philippines
Admittedly, in Marikina and Antipolo, Bicycle lanes are innovations to ease traffic by former Mayor Bayani Fernando; in Lumban, there is only one Lay-by but here in Pulilan-Baliuag Diversion Road, not only from start to finish of the 9.6 kilometers consting P 506 million finished in record less than 2 years, Bicycle lanes and/or with Lay-by or Category Rest areas do line up both side of the by-pass road from Barangay Tarcan in Maharlika Highway to Barangay Tibag in Pulilan Regiona Road, both are notable Article of Wikipedia; while a political critic would argue such is waste of Tax money, still from the view of Secretary Villar of DPWH, Biker friendly By pass road was conceived due to the Tourist requirements of Pulilan as Kneeling Carabao Festival capital of the Philippines and Baliuag as Buntal Hat Festival capital of Luzon;
Economic savings due to reduction of travel from Baliuag to Pulilan vice versa from 1 1/2 hours to 20 minutes
Interconnection of 2 Wikipedia articles Philippine highway network Pan-Philippine Highway - Baliuag section and Pulilan Regional Road at Tibag toward North Luzon Expressway Pulilan exit
There are 3 modes of travel between these 2 towns: a) via the traffic conjestion of Jollibee Cutcut Junction and during 2 market days a week traffic standstill in Pulilan Regional Road ad Cut cut to Poblacion to reach NLEx; b) UV express vans from SM Baliuag and/or Poblacion to NLEX via i) San Simon exit or ii) Pulilan exit, to reach Dau Mabalacat of San Fernando Pampanga, takes 1 hour; iii) Travellers from MacAthur Highway from Santa Rita, Guiguinto NLEx and Cabanatuan to Baliuag travelers to reach NLEx need not face the traffic to reach Pulilan NLEx or Baliuag and Pulilan Town Proper due to savings of time reduced to 20 minutes because of this By pass road;
Mark Villar
Marvel and first in Engineering both Civil, mechanical and electrical including the Geodetic aspect vis-a-vis the Tiqui Builders advanced Construction or roads
advanced Cement and enforcement mechanisms of the By pass
I claim that I have not ever seen Philippine roads, except in Duterte's presidency, that cement road no longer need asphalt covering like in NLEx, due to strong quality of Eagles and Republic cement mixed with secret ingredients and with strong steel to withstand the pressures of even 20 wheeler trucks; however, this rainy season, they do not allow trucks and buses to pass to make strong the just inaugurated road but later they can pass;
How I photographed the roads, namely the numbers of photos needed to catch the Category:Paddy fields in Bulacan covering 7 Barangays and the Bicycle lanes and/or with Lay-by or Category Rest areas
I hired a tricyle paying $6 or about 300 pesos to catch the scenery and roads centering on the Bicycle lanes and/or with Lay-by or Category Rest areas: this is 9.6 kilometers and about 25 photos per Barangay of the entire route is modest enough having in mind 3 birds with one stone, namely, 7 barangays, 7 Paddy fields, 7 grasslands, a creek and PBB Bridge; one my ponder that the roads are almost empty of vehicles and they look all the same; but not, since this Bypass has just been opened; one can imagine if may vehicles pass this, then it would enhance the beauty of the photos; Bypass begins at Pulilan-Calumpit road in Tibag, Pulilan and ends in Daang Maharlika in Tarcan in Baliuag, Bulacan with cost of PHP509.60 million - Network Development Construction of By-Passes (Pulilan-Baliuag, Bulacan Diversion Roads - Row) in Barangays Dulong Malabon 14°55'28"N 120°48'38"E Tibag 14°54'23"N 120°49'30"E Inaon 14°56'30"N 120°49'35"E Balatong 14°56'10"N 120°50'33"E Peñabatan 14.9175, 120.8552 Pulilan, Bulacan interconnecting with Barangays Matangtubig 14°57'3"N 120°52'10"E Tarcan 14°55'57"N 120°53'0"E Baliuag, Bulacan, Bulacan Philippine highway network;
A great contribution to Category Real Estate in the Philippines and reduction of Corruption in Public Works due to Jump of Category:Real estate in the Philippines Real Estate prices of mere ricelands without value to inevitable conversion of these lands to Commercial estates for Housing
This project did pop up from nowhere and nobody was notified before the project started, taking into surprise the Real Estate sector; just imagine from not even P 50 per sq. meter, the price of ALL ricelands passed by this Bypass jumped to about a conservative P 3,000 per square meter; deep inside this fact, many were caught unaware of this Real Estate boom done by this Bypass road; without fear, I predict that Villas and Camellas of Villar and others like those I photographed in Bulacan and Nueva Ecija and Laguna, will sprout like mushroom around this Bypass road;
Finally, an Impossible made possible
from paddy fields with creeks, so naive and almost impossible for roads to be constructed upon due to weak and watery foundation
Sec. Villar's genius of Engineering and Architecture made a First in Philippine road history
IN FINE, I respectfully submit that: the same thing happens in Pan-Philippine highway section from Junction Pulilan Cut-cut to Junction Sampaloc, San Rafael: repeated road or Highway works and reblockings failed to correct the once paddy fields and watery foundation resulting to Forever road works; but here in Bypass road, the Marvel of Advance Engineering by Tiqui Construction, and state of the art Engineering coupled with Secret cement additives with strong steel, made this P 506 million Bypass a legacy of the DPWH to Philippine Engineering and Science;
Valued images of Landmark Bypass Road
IN FINE II, not even 1 photo of the landmark Bypass road can justly be found in Commons and internet but here; allow me to subjectively and objectively express my philosophy of sharing wisdom to the future researchers and generaration: unlike other Internet sites, Commons does not resize the photos and the Categories are well delineated to allow readers to easily find the photos; when one opens Category:Cebu City Category:Davao City and the entire Visayas and Mindanao in Commons, one cannot find high quality picture as I did for Luzon 18 provinces; I never concentrated just on Historical Markers or Churches but also on broad overcompassing Categories of Roads, Schools, Buildings, and name them all; not only hard work but huge expenses just to fulfil the Sharing of Wisdom via Commons photos to future generations; many of my photos are intact even if Churches and other buildings are destroyed reconstructed and gone; if the photos of these Bypass roads are gone, by deletion, then, future generations will for sure loose the opportunity to know and learn about the above considerations they can only find in Commons, nowhere else, and for free to the public domain without any considerations whatsoever, very sincerely, Respectfully submitted Judgefloro 09:39, 10 June 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. As per COM:PS: Examples of files that are not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Files that add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject. = meaning we don't need a massive collection of nearly duplicate images. We have told Judgefloro/Ramon FVelasquez many times in the past to be more selective when uploading. And no need to give a long sermon on the notability of the road, that is irrelevant to the number of needless images. P 1 9 9   13:30, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 7

Nearly duplicated images (sets distinguished by the numbers). No need to keep them all. Probably keeping 2-3 of each set is sufficient.

List of files







(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 06:50, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message and good afternoon from hereat Bulacan, Philippines amid stormy weather; with all due respect, I am submitting my following thoughts and discussions on this matter: the photos are not only valued images, but first in the internet, never seen yet, since Calauan is a tourist place or visitor attraction, in fact these 3 days in all front pages and TV headlines due to the Landmark Calauan Mayor Antonio Sanchez case:
a) Category:Calauan Poblacion-Victoria Road (Silangan-Lamot 1-Lamot 2-Santo Tomas-Dayap, Calauan & Masapang, Victoria) contains only 139 pictures which covers 6 Barangays of Silangan-Lamot 1-Lamot 2-Santo Tomas-Dayap, Calauan & Masapang from Masapang Junction; a-1) Category:Calauan Poblacion-Victoria Road Calauan-Victoria Road is very notable since the DPWH technically and formally named it so as new access or by-pass road to ease traffic and to allow commuters alternative routes in going to Calauan and Victoria Calauan Poblacion-Victoria Road, DPWH;
b) Category:Kanluran, Calauan, Laguna has only 75 pnotos, when this Barangay Kanluran , Calauan, Laguna 14.1487, 121.3108 Calauan,_Laguna is very large enough;
c) Category:Balayhangin, Calauan, Laguna has only 108 photos when in fact this Barangay Balayhangin, Calauan, Laguna 14.1298, 121.3164 Calauan,_Laguna is located beteween 2 roads, namely i) the photos about half taken in the Category:Calauan Poblacion-Victoria Road and ii) the other half is taken on the Bay–Calauan–San Pablo Road a wikipedia article which is very notable;
d) Category:Mabacan, Calauan, Laguna List of barangays in Laguna (province) Barangay Mabacan, Calauan, Laguna 14.1344, 121.2885 Calauan,_Laguna is also a very large Barangays and only 118 photos were taken to create to researchers what this village is all about;
e) Category:Paliparan, Calauan, Laguna has only 209 photos when List of barangays in Laguna (province) Barangay Paliparan 14.1205, 121.2722 Calauan,_Laguna is very large comparatively;
f) Category:Perez, Calauan, Laguna List of barangays in Laguna (province) Barangay Perez, Calauan, Laguna 14.1043, 121.2693 Calauan,_Laguna has only 121 photos, which covers only about 1/4 of the sites covered by 1/4 of the Perez Road;
g) these Kanluran - Balayhangin - Mabacan - Paliparan - Perez Road servicing these 5 Barangays from Calauan Pineaapple is the only New Route being constructed to reach Barangay Limao 14.0940, 121.242 Calauan,_Laguna where one can now reach Hidden Valley Springs Resort a Prime tourist destination where a day tour is 2,750 pesos located here and in Barangays Barangay I 14.0629, 121.2555 Barangay II 14.0697, 121.2449 Barangay III 14.0716, 121.2546 Barangay IV 14.0624, 121.2485 Alaminos, Laguna accessed from a very distant location of Category:Alaminos, Laguna National Highway;
h) It takes about 6 hours from my place at Bulacan to reach these Barangays and 6 hours to travel home; the cost of travel and hiring vehicles in the photography amount to about P 1,500, hence, it is submitted that these valued very notable photos are not only rare but treasures for future generations of the public domain in Wikimedia Commons in line with the Philosophy of its founders - sharing of Wisdom; respectfully submitted and very sincerely Judgefloro 10:17, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Additional argument, discussion and submissions on the issue of notablility and sufficiency of the number of photos
Good afternoon from hereat Stormy Jenny Category:Tropical Storm Podul (2019); I respectfully submit the following:
1) Sitios, puroks and villages compose the Category:Barangays of Calauan, Laguna; like before particularly when I was starting here in Commons about 2010 to 2015, I could take specific photos of Health Centers, Barangay Halls, even Chapels and Schools, among other interesting points; I could have taken more tourist spots like falls and Historical markers, but they are too far and I would spend hours to reach them in addition to the long 6 hours to reach Laguna from Bulacan, and 6 hours to be back leaving only 2 hours for photography;
2) The most important problem of my photography is that most of the Barangays are critical or dangerous areas;
3) Hence, I opted to stay inside the vehicle like jeep or tricycle hired to take photos of these Sitios, puroks and villages via Road photography;
4) I beg to disagree on the duplication of photos: because for example, Barangay Mabacan, Calauan is too large a barangay with about 7 Sitios, puroks and villages;
5) The going to or North photos capture only some of the :Sitios, puroks and villages; and the going back or South photos also capture only some of the Sitios, puroks and villages but and but, the scenery is totally different;
6) In Category:Salvacion and San Agustin, Pangasinan 8 December 2015, while I was taking photos while walking when I stepped down of the tricycle, I was locked down in the Barangay Hall and arrested to the Police station; I was asked to sign a waiver that I have no complaint against my detention; I failed to Google this critical area only to have found that Taguinod brothers were shot in Barangay San Agustin;

The subject photos for requested deletion are Highly valued images of the Sites which caught International, Global and Philippine Headlines attentions in 1993 and these Weeks Category:Site of Eileen Sarmenta and Allan Gomez murder (Sitio Paputok, Kilometro 74, Mabacan, Imok, Balayhangin & Erais Farm, Santo Tomas & Lamot 2, Calauan, Laguna)

6) The subject photos for requested deletion are Highly valued images of the Sites which caught International, Global and Philippine Headlines attentions in 1993 and these Weeks;
7) Eileen Sarmenta and Allan Gomez murder Antonio Sanchez (politician) Site of the Eileen Sarmenta and Allan Gomez murder-rape is Km. 74 Brgy. Balayhangin Calauan Laguna 14°7'53"N 121°18'44"E along Category:Calauan Poblacion-Victoria Road Barangay Balayhangin, Calauan, Laguna 14.1298, 121.3164 Calauan,_Laguna and List of barangays in Laguna (province) Barangay Mabacan, Calauan, Laguna 14.1344, 121.2885 Calauan,_Laguna and Barangay and Erais Farm 30-hectare farm in Santo Tomas, Calauan, Laguna 14.1711, 121.3367 Calauan, Laguna Calauan Poblacion-Victoria Road‎ (Silangan-Lamot 1-Lamot 2-Santo Tomas-Dayap, Calauan & Masapang, Victoria) from Victoria (Masapang) Duck Junction Calauan - Victoria Road Calauan-Victoria Road Erais Farm Site of Eileen Sarmenta and Allan Gomez murder (Sitio Paputok, Kilometro 74, Mabacan, Imok, Balayhangin & Erais Farm, Santo Tomas & Lamot 2, Calauan, Laguna) Eileen Sarmenta and Allan Gomez murder Antonio Sanchez (politician) People vs. Antonio Sanchez, et al xxx"'The next destination was a sugarcane field in Sitio Paputok, Kilometro 74 of Barangay Mabacan. It was here that Luis announced that it’s time for the group to feast on Eileen (the exact words of Luis were “Turbohin na rin natin ang tinurbo ni Boss”)." xxx " Both vehicles then headed for Erais Farm situated in Barangay Curba, owned by the Mayor." xxx "The next destination was a sugarcane field in Sitio Paputok, Kilometro 74 of Barangay Mabacan." 'xxx a dead female loaded inside a Tamaraw van was found in Barangay Mabacan." " a card gambler was able to retrieve a pair of white shorts lying near the national highway in Barangay Balayhangin. In the morning of June 30, 1993, the Mayor, with some companions, jogged towards the direction of Barangay Mabacan and at the same time inquired from residents whether they noticed anything unusual on the night of June 28, 1993. A certain “Mang Torio” told the Mayor that he found a pair of “maong” pants lying at the side of the road but left if there. After inspecting the dirty “maong” pants, the Mayor instructed Mang Torio to keep the pants as the former will send someone back to pick it up."
7a) I respectfully appeal and with due respect submit my humble thoughts and reply on these issues, very sincerely Judgefloro 06:07, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

Kept: Google Streemaps-like photos. I certainly wouldn't encourage anyone to make photos like these, and some photos are certainly not necessary, but I don't want to make that decision, since we'd keep a sizeable amount. If someone wants to nominate individual photos, feel free to. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 16:05, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 8

COM:ADVERT (advertisements) — COM:NOTUSED no forseeable educational use.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:36, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Functus officio - the photos were educational advertisements inviting learners to be interested in Tourism of the Philippine for the specific events therein mentioned - as tarpaulin advertisement billboards, they are very informative and educational; but now they are merely remains of the past and were removed after the occasions; even if I consistently objected to deletions of photos vis-à-vis the 4 year Philippines and Commons - US Jurisprudence on Extinctive prescription, I have no objection to the deletion of these already used photos based on the foregoing considerations Judgefloro (talk) 06:53, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Judgefloro: see User talk:Clindberg#About Judgefloro's claim of "extinctive prescription" for RA 8293 for my question about the applicability of "extinctive prescription". And no, it is not relevant to Commons — it comes into effect 4 years after the file/s has/have been deleted, because there are no more files that reusers may exploit and potentially infringe creators'/authors' copyrights. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:10, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:15, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 9

Redundant to both File:0067jfLandscapes Quezon City Santa Mesa Manila Boundary Magsaysay Aurora Boulevardfvf 15.jpg and File:0087jfLandscapes Quezon City Santa Mesa Manila Boundary Magsaysay Aurora Boulevardfvf 03.jpg. Almost duplicate, COM:NOTUSED.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:27, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No objection to the deletion and Maraming Salamat po sa inyong pagtangkilik at paglilinis ng puspusan sa aking mga Road and Landscapes pictures; in my anglebyangle walking photography of road and overpasses, I am really at a loss when I gaze at the sun and the views thereunder; I could not keep my hand careful in too many photos; I had a trauma lately when Taal Exploded: you know - why should I have not taken so many pictures of Category:Agoncillo, Batangas and Category:San Nicolas, Batangas - they were - are annihilated and obliterated almost by Category:2020 Taal Volcano eruptions; I would like to take photos of the NLEX from Guiguinto to Balintawak, but even my sibling has 5 cars, he has no jeepney without glasses; I was told that all vehicles must close their windows; I do not like to take photos with the car or bus or truck glasses blocking my camera; I also wanted to take the Skyway, but they would not permit yet the 400 cc motors; just telling my storytale ... sincerely ....Judgefloro (talk) 07:07, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:17, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 10

COM:ADVERT, advertising tarpaulin/s, and a random listing. COM:NOTUSED and out of COM:SCOPE.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:24, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I was at a loss in searching for the jurisdictional boundaries of Caloocan barangays, and after asking people, I found this Tarpaulin : sayin Barangay 21 a) it is required by law DPWH and LGUs should post notices on public places regarding i) amount, source, beginning and finishing of project b) and of course the winning bidder, to tell people, file Graft case if there is ghost, white elephant projects or road to neverland; well of course, the handsome politicians smile; I asked so many trike drivers, why? they could not answer correctly - pampapogi, level up, for the next election, I said no: the correct song is: they are very very very happy jumping with ecstasy for they will be richer, and it is one way of winning the lotto;
Off-topic lecture on tarpaulins

when I was in Br. 73, RTC, Malabon, Fiscal now Retired Judge Judge Edmundo T. Acuña, Regional Trial Court, Caloocan City, Branch 123 WHEREFORE, respondent Judge Edmundo T. Acuña is found GUILTY of impropriety and is REPRIMANDED therefor. He is STERNLY WARNED that the repetition of the same or similar act shall be dealt with more severely.; he repeatedly told me that my arch enemy Br. 72, is bragging of winning Sweepstatkes, and even had a certificate; I told Judge Ed, the crying Judge of Calokohan City, when in only son Ed at age 24 died of aneurysm and after finishing Law and passing the Bar exams; He could not accuse me of Cursing since As Philippine Angel of Death, I told him repeatedly, Don't be afraid, I won't hurt you! but Mark my work, they will regret it! (taking my robes, gavel and golden throne Br. 73); he confessed that my suspension was born and cooked at Malabon Canteen, which with all court salas except mine was totally burned exactly on 2000 July a year after I was suspended for 69 months; he also confessed that he encountered many pera pira temptations; he asked me to pray for him;

I write this tale of the reason why the Law on procurement, now requires the tarpaulin announcement of transparency; hence I submit the matter of deletion to the sound judgment of the Commons Community
No objection to the deletion of these 2 photos this one is obsolete finished product so to speak hence functus oficio
@Judgefloro: then be more selective in uploading, like what P199 and several other editors have told you. Commons is not a place to host your personal images showing addresses and redundant directional signs, just because these images only served as your guide to not get lost. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:07, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This one is the official Category:Mass schedules in the Philippines created on 2014 as sub-category of Category:Mass schedules ; it is very informative and tells the faithful the Category:Schedules in the Philippines hence I submit the matter of deletion to the sound judgment of the Commons Community sincerely ....Judgefloro (talk) 09:55, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'm afraid this is too redundant already to related images in the category you mentioned. Also this is COM:NOTUSED. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:07, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Rejoinder and good point: I always wanted to take photos of interiors of very important Parish Churches with open lights; this only happens during Sundays; more often, when I arrive in Churches from Batangas to Isabela, most Churches are closed and if open their ligths are not open; so, if my itinerary is near the place, I would drop by the Church again; my main problem is the exact time of the Mass beginning or ending; more often than not, Mass schedules are posted poorly and erased in time, except those by Jollibee or Malayan Insurance; hence, I did file a good comment on the Mass schedule, for I think it is the only one remaining; Category:Mass schedules in France has only 20 photos and most are poorly built; here, when Parish Priests are transferred, Mass schedules are changed, and I had to get them ... submitted to the sound discretion of the Commons Community sincerely ....Judgefloro (talk) 07:09, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:10, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 11

A set of redundant images. See COM:SPAM and COM:NOTUSED. Uploader has been notified to be more selective in their uploads. Only 2 or 3 images for each person or child depicted is enough (those that I didn't nominate).

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:30, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

With all due respect ...

Good argument and discussion: My photos used by International public domain I took time to search them in Google, since I accidentally saw when browsing, that many of my photos are and were used continously by International books, magazines and newspapers inter alia; and no one could guess, what picture of the 1.7 million files they would use; so, as many editors here listened to me, I did ask often: why should we or they or anyone prevent the Public Domain World Planet from being choosy, weird and or ignorant of the good or better photos that they should use?
And I desire to UNDERSCORE my Lamentation like that of Jeremiah, why why and why did I not put in Commons floods of Photos of the ERASED Annihilated Category:San Nicolas, Batangas and Category:Agoncillo, Batangas and nearby almost obliterated Towns due to Taal Explotion?
IN FINE here, a) I desire to quote here what Justice Category:Regino C. Hermosisima, Jr. said to console me 36 hours of my no-sleep on July 20-22, 1999, Longest Suspension of a Judge in World History: "She was appointed by Cory, but she just sits down reading Briefs ... she did not experienced what I and many Trial Judges had ... I went home Sats and Sundays bringing volumes of Transcripts ... !" She is the Ponente who Signed your Suspension ... if only Category:Andres Narvasa had not retired at 70 ... I repeatedly told CJ Davide my Cebuano ... "It would be a feather on your cap if you can put Floro and Category:Arturo Brion the husband of my seatmate classmate Tonette Brion ... b) It is utterly different when you go to the field of great dangers, take photos of villages for 4 hours, and travel from Bulacan to Pangasinan or Isabela, Ilocos Sur or Batangas for 16 hours and then sit down to edit and upload vis-a-vis, sitting down and Putting Nominations for Deletions; b) perhaps, the Inclusionary Philosphy of many here is not shared by some, and this is the heart of Commons which is Not Censored; c) It is just on what side of the coin you are, or were, or did change habits as in FOP and Com Spam; d) I am ahead of my time, I am not of this world, and ergo, I leave the matter to the sound discretion of the Commons Community; sincerely ....Judgefloro (talk) 07:33, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
* Vide: Category:Groups of children in the Philippines Category:Close-up photographs of children and * Category:Close-up photographs of children eating in the Philippines sincerely ....Judgefloro (talk) 08:01, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per nomination. These certainly are redundant to the many near-duplicate images already in its category. --P 1 9 9   20:19, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 12

Another set of redundant and repetitive images of a same subject - Wish FM Bus parked at a mall in Bulacan. Redundant to both File:9723FM Bus of Wish 107.11.jpg and File:9723FM Bus of Wish 107.6.jpg. The judge-uploader has been notified several times to be more selective in choosing which images to be uploaded. Uploading redundant images is leaning towards COM:SPAM as treating Commons as a "cloud / webhost" laden with numerous unused images.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:28, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Category:Wish FM Bus has only 12 photos, Vide very notable articles DWNU Breakthrough and Milestones Productions International; patrickroque01 and Author Julan Shirwod Nueva and Own Author Kindrei with one each; and I only took 9 photos in different area, and mine is at SM Baliwag; but the shots were taken at different angles, since it is very hard to take a complete shot of the entire bus; please take a closer look and the angle by angle photography, there are no look alikes or redundancy; hence, I submit my comment for the sound discretion of Commons as Community ....Judgefloro (talk) 06:39, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Judgefloro: the angles may be different, but these images are same to each other: these depict the same subject. There is redundancy. You can only tell it's not redundant if the two subjects are different, either the subjects themselves or the location where the subject is situated. For example, one image depicts the bus in Marilao, and the other image depicts the same bus in Cabanatuan (not the same bus in the same spot of Marilao, but in different angle). If you desire images of the same subject at different angles, perhaps two or three is enough. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:10, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per nomination. Redundancy doesn't make sense when we already have near-duplicate images in its category. --P 1 9 9   20:23, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 13

In the Philippines, the Safe Spaces Act prohibits "uploading or sharing of one’s photos without consent". (See also this explanation.) There's no indication that the subjects consented to having their photos taken or uploaded here.

List of files

Genericusername57 (talk) 01:49, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • I checked two of these images randomly and that was enough to see that this is yet another BS DR motivated likely by nothing else than spite at the uploader’s place at the top of the chart, regardless of value of the rationale stated: Individual privacy laws are a concern for public candid shots, but when faces take up a dozen blurry pixels that concern is misplaced and being misused as a mere prop in the neverending deletionist war.  Keep all, obviously — if there’s anything here that should be deleted, lets have a proper reason. -- Tuválkin 12:07, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • My input: upon checking several files, it appears there are no issues regarding consent. In particular, the guy at File:9610Cuisine food of Bulacan Baliuag 35.jpg appears to be smiling at the photographer which means he agreed to be photographed. None of the images I check depict persons that are "topless" (is the biker guy here topless? I don't think so). Meaning to say, it is acceptable to host them here (no topless persons shown, as far as within the scope of my review, as I haven't review all files). File:9568Baliuag, Bulacan Province 56.jpg depicts a normal street scene where it is unavoidable to include folks. Lean towards  Keep (but that is per my checking as, I repeat, haven't checked them all). But  Delete File:0452Angat San Roque Santo Cristo Santa Cruz Poblacion 03.jpg as a possible no Philippine FOP violation, and it is accepted here that architecture is a form of artistic work, as long as a degree of hard work is exerted, "irrespective of their mode or form of expression, as well as of their content, quality and purpose." (Sec. 172.2 of RA 8293). Undelete it if FOP is introduced here, maybe next year or around Yuletide season, but not as early as month of fall (as it seems involved stakeholders on potential impacts of FOP are yet to be consulted). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:35, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment: Isn't the whole point of the law to prevent harassment in public spaces? A quick ctrl+f for "photo" or "video" seems like the part of the law related to media is in relation to the likelihood of the photo being used for harassment. Because it's not like they banned the use of CCTV (in fact they encourage it). And the whole "uploading or sharing of one’s photos without consent", is that referring to the photos that the victims already possess (like on their phones) or like the photos that others take of them? I recognize that the law is written in a confusing manner, but such a strict interpretation that prevents any persons to appear in videos or photos without explicit consent would mean that news outlets like ANC 247 or Inquirer.net are breaking the law right? — BriefEdits (talk) 23:31, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept some per discussion above. But deleted many. Some were indeed too personal (like portrait photos of non-notable persons). And as with many of Judgefloro's uploads, they are uncurated: near duplicates, bad compositions, unusable. Also kept File:0452Angat San Roque Santo Cristo Santa Cruz Poblacion 03.jpg because it is a plain box building, nothing really propriety there. --P 1 9 9   14:54, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 14

COM:SPAM and fulfill COM:WEBHOSTing. Commons is not a social media platform where dozens of relatively useless images are being dumped hour by hour. Yet another set of contributions by the now blocked uploader, who is suspected to be w:Florentino Floro.

List of files

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:07, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   13:44, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 16

All files in Category:Ants of the Philippines eating Bibingka and Puto Bumbong are leaning towards COM:SPAM and COM:WEBHOSTing. Additional contributions by now-blocked uploader. All are COM:NOTUSED.

List of files

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:33, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment there are more such images in most (if not all) of subcats of Category:Ants of the Philippines. Some may be useful, but I cannot review them all as the COM:WEBHOST-type images have intermingled with them. Admins or veteran users' intervention may be needed. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:10, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   13:38, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 18

These images are all near-duplicates of: File:01071jfManggahan Floodway Sunsets Daang Pasig River Bridge Rosario Weir Flood Gatesfvf 04.jpg, File:01071jfManggahan Floodway Sunsets Daang Pasig River Bridge Rosario Weir Flood Gatesfvf 06.jpg, File:0954jfManggahan Floodway Sunsets Daang Pasig River Bridge Rosario Weir Flood Gatesfvf 13.jpg, and File:0954jfManggahan Floodway Sunsets Daang Pasig River Bridge Rosario Weir Flood Gatesfvf 16.jpg, which better show the floodway structure as well as an object attached to it. More COM:WEBHOSTing files.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:52, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:09, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 20

Violation of Alphabet Inc.'s copyright. While the billboard/announcement may be ineligible for protection as it just contains non-original wording in predictable layout, the map used is not: it is a screenshot of Google Maps. COM:Derivative work as a result.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:27, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. And just a random sign, not particular useful. --P 1 9 9   02:52, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 21

COM:SPAM and COM:WEBHOST-ing by now-blocked Judgefloro. The following are unused files that oversaturate Category:School children in Bulacan. Redundant to all other images of similar school children of the very same province that is already "over-covered" here on WikiCommons (as opposed to distant provinces away from Bulacan).

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:41, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 18:26, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 24

[edit]

Redundant photos to others found at Category:Cutcot Bridge 1 (Pulilan). COM:NOTUSED, COM:WEBHOST content by now-blocked Judgefloro (talk · contribs).

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:48, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:57, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful own work, 1933 photo. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:46, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; own work is clearly impossible; unclear copyright status. --Gestumblindi (talk) 23:06, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Emil.akhmatbekov (talk · contribs)

[edit]

According to the EXIF, the photos were taken by the uploader, but the copyright belongs to the university or its public affairs department. If the copyright is owned by the university, then permission is needed from the university.

Stefan2 (talk) 15:42, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, probably taken from https://www.akdn.org/gallery/university-central-asia-khorog-campus. --Gbawden (talk) 10:10, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doutbful own work, English Wikipedia attributes " Aileen Archive" as copyright owner. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:55, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:07, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photograph of modern painting. Artist is still alive. No evidence of permission. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:23, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:09, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: photographs from a defunct website with an autor differrent from the uploader CoffeeEngineer (talk) 17:37, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:07, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Little Savage as no permission (No permission since) Yann (talk) 19:29, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. PCP. No exif, unlikely to be own work. --Gbawden (talk) 10:06, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickrwashing? The Flickr account seems to have been created around the time of this upload. The Flickr account has no other uploads. Stefan2 (talk) 21:56, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:05, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Kanye West in 2019

[edit]

Possible copyvio. No evidence that these files are the uploader's own work or that they're freely licensed. --RoanDM (talk) 23:37, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: at first I thought this was a fan picture of the artists, but it actually appears to be uploaded by an account named after The Modes Empire. It seems unlikely that this is actually the case unless any indication can be given by the account that this is the official account of The Modes Empire and that the account owner has ownership of the copyright. The account could have very easily just downloaded the image from a website it was previously uploaded to and uploaded it to Wikimedia by falsely presenting it as their own work/falsely presenting themselves as The Modes Empire. Without any evidence this isn't the case I think they should be deleted. Alduin2000 (talk) 23:54, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: PCP - no exif, unlikely to be own work. --Gbawden (talk) 10:24, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A formal PR picture and the photographer is mentioned in the file's details. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 23:38, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 10:05, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This was created by Transport for London, this file is not creative commons/copyright free. https://www.ltmuseum.co.uk/collections/collections-online/ephemera/item/2018-4996 Turini2 (talk) 14:28, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Any pages that do use this file have several quality copyright free files to choose from at Docklands_Light_Railway_maps.Turini2 (talk) 14:30, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted unsupported license claim -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:54, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Little Savage as no permission (No permission since) Yann (talk) 19:31, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep No valid reason for deletion. These are claimed as own work and licensed accordingly. Writing "no permission" on a file doesn't make it so. No evidence or even indication has been given that the own work claim and licence isn't valid.
This is one of several identical deletions and they should have been bundled as such. Andy Dingley (talk) 21:27, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Closed as Kept; unclear whose "permission" would be needed or why. No obvious problem seen. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:00, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Misleading address in filename (actually across the road from this address) Tappinen (talk) 20:14, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted prompt uploader request. (For future reference, images may be renamed without deletion) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:58, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found on https://bw-group.com/newsroom/media-gallery/, potential unauthorized upload. 4ing (talk) 20:45, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted License violation -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:56, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Mel22 (talk) 21:01, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted DW -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:55, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's not the own work of the uploader, and since we don't know the creation date, we can't say if it's a PD or not. Nanahuatl (talk) 01:01, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   23:00, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nemico401 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Nemico describes these as being (A) their own work, and (B) the work of Alexander Dosuzhev. This would be fine if Nemico were Dosushev; but they're not, because (according to Nemico) Dosushev died years before the files were uploaded. So the copyright status of the files is obscure.

Hoary (talk) 06:12, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   23:01, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

to replace ii with a better picture. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sophie in Sydney (talk • contribs) 09:44, 25 September 2021‎ (UTC)[reply]

Better quality replacement 203.206.242.84 03:30, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete me 203.206.242.84 03:31, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused personal photo. --P 1 9 9   23:02, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We have two sources listed, but it looks like https://www.planepictures.net/v3/show_en.php?id=1336645 is the source and the Flickr is just a copy? Ytoyoda (talk) 13:51, 14 September 2021 (UTC

But this user used pro account, if it's copy, why use pro flickr account? Maybe this user already got the permission from planepictures one.Mil Mi-888 (talk) 17:02, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: image was uploaded at planepictures.net 2 years before Flickr. --P 1 9 9   23:10, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No information about the artwork. May be copyrighted. Not de minimis. Also File:RZ Hiroshima Hatchoza 2020-07 (17).jpg TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 18:04, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   23:12, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Moson81 as Copyvio (Copyvio) King of ♥ 18:08, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused personal image, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   23:13, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be the uploader's own work as claimed. The subject died in 1958 and the original image date is not stated. Potentially public domain in Chile if the original image date and author can be identified? mattbr 18:53, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   23:16, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The picture is wrong. That person is a random person of internet who didn't give permission to post this picture. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 190.19.41.37 (talk) 18:30, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   23:18, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://arquitectonica.com/architecture/project/sm-mall-of-asia/ - architecture and master planning by ARQUITECTONICA. No freedom of panorama in the philippines. Copyright Arquitectonica Mrcl lxmna (talk) 18:00, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Per COM:FOP Philippines only buildings completed prior to December 15, 1972 can be freely published. Photos of more recent buildings cannot be published because there is no freedom of panorama in the Philippines. The building on this photo appears to be built after mentioned date and therefore the image must be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 17:23, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work but historic photo missing essential info: original author, date, source, and permission. P 1 9 9   00:39, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Could be own work. There exists people who are becoming so old that they shot this pic on their own.--Sanandros (talk) 20:43, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
As an admin, your experience should make you know better. Especially since the uploader claims the date as 2018... --P 1 9 9   02:03, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Although Sanandros is right that we have some very old users who could be able to upload surprisingly old photos that are really their own work - Kmarawer still made edits in German Wikipedia at the age of 97 - in this specific case I agree with P199 that the claimed "own work" is not plausible, especially given the supposed 2018 date and in the context of the user's other uploads. --Gestumblindi (talk) 20:16, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely created by user. Needs valid source & license Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:54, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

הזמנת העבודה והנחיה שלה נעשו על ידי, בכל מקרה שלחתי במייל אישור של הגרפיקאי שעבד על המסמכים לשימוש בערך. --NetiHR (talk) 08:19, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per VRTS. Ruthven (msg) 10:09, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Brochure is unlikely to have been created by user, also PDF format and Many Illustrations without permission Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:55, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

הזמנת העבודה והנחיה שלה נעשו על ידי, בכל מקרה שלחתי במייל אישור של הגרפיקאי שעבד על המסמכים לשימוש בערך. --NetiHR (talk) 08:19, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per VRTS. Ruthven (msg) 10:08, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work, no source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:55, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

הזמנת העבודה והנחיה שלה נעשו על ידי, בכל מקרה שלחתי במייל אישור של הגרפיקאי שעבד על המסמכים לשימוש בערך. --NetiHR (talk) 08:19, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per VRTS. Ruthven (msg) 10:08, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Я передумал. Больше не хочу чтобы было доступным публично Dikolaff (talk) 15:21, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I changed my mind. I don't want it to be public anymore
translator: Google Translate from Russian -M.nelson (talk) 20:32, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:05, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please can the uploader provide further details to confirm this file is their own work. Seemingly a publicity image, see [7] and [8]. Potentially not own work as claimed. mattbr 18:37, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:17, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please can the uploader provide further details to confirm this file is their own work. Appears to be a publicity image and previously the subject's Twitter profile image (see TinEye)? In png format and missing metadata. Potentially not the uploader's own work as claimed. mattbr 19:19, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:18, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not necessarily under the correct license, It's a document issued in the 1960's by the Argentine government. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 03:40, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. I do not think the Template:PD-AR-Photo is valid. This photo is possibly not published, at least there is no COM:EVID that it has been published more then 25 years ago. --Ellywa (talk) 11:13, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Túrelio as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: © 2020 Partido Democratas. Todos os direitos reservados. COM:TOO? King of ♥ 15:37, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This very similar logo might be included in this discussion: File:DEM2.jpg and File:Logo do Democratas até 2018.png. --Túrelio (talk) 18:28, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done King of ♥ 18:41, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep This is questionably not to the threshold of originality. Since it's just a tree and from what Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Brazil says it sounds like the Brazil has pretty strict standards for what can be copyrighted if the work is based on a similar object. --Adamant1 (talk) 11:12, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Although TOO in Brazil is higher then in US, I consider these logo's above threshold. None of the three versions give evidence that they are published by the authors with a free licence. Considering TOO is always a bit subjective, so please give you arguments on COM:UNDELETE if you do not agree with my decision. --Ellywa (talk) 11:18, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These files have file names indicating that they were copied from Facebook or other websites. I think that we need OTRS permission from the account holders on these other websites in order to support the "own work" claims.

Stefan4 (talk) 00:20, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The first two need an explanation why they are in scope. --Jonund (talk) 17:27, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that too. --Stefan4 (talk) 17:59, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1982 medal. No evidence of permission from medal designer.

Stefan2 (talk) 16:13, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 11:19, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence to suggest that:

  • The composition and lyrics to this file is under a CC 4.0 license
  • The singer(s) and people involved in the creation consented to this being under a CC 4.0 license
  • The uploader on archive.org being authorized to upload this file under a CC 4.0 license

SpanishSnake (talk | contribs) ping me plz 16:44, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Without information to the contrary, the copyright rules and agreements of Islamic Republic are presumably the same.—SpanishSnake (talk | contribs) ping me plz 03:25, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Even if this could be treated as a government work (which is very much an open question), the copyright law of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan did not release government works into the public domain, and there is no evidence of a Taliban law that does so. ― Tartan357 Talk 20:33, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and discussion. Per COM:EVID, nothing shows that this recording is published in PD or with another free licence. --Ellywa (talk) 11:40, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag) But it is dated 1923 and the text below licensing adds information as to age. Perhaps we could encourage the user to add a license tag? See my user page if you need help figuring out which one. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:51, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: according to the description on the file page this is a postcard. So it has been published and is now in public domain. Therefore the image can be kept. --Ellywa (talk) 13:53, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Little Savage as no permission (No permission since) Yann (talk) 19:31, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: although uploader did not comment on the deletion request, I have no reason to beleive this is not their own work. Therefore the image can be kept. --Ellywa (talk) 13:55, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Little Savage as no permission (No permission since) Yann (talk) 19:32, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: although uploader did not comment on the deletion request, I have no reason to beleive this is not their own work. Therefore the image can be kept. --Ellywa (talk) 13:55, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Little Savage as no permission (No permission since) Yann (talk) 19:33, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: although uploader did not comment on the deletion request, I have no reason to beleive this is not their own work. Therefore the image can be kept. --Ellywa (talk) 13:56, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Микола Василечко as Dw no source since (dw no source since) Yann (talk) 20:06, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. On this page https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%92%D1%96%D0%BA%D1%96%D0%BF%D0%B5%D0%B4%D1%96%D1%8F:%D0%92%D1%96%D0%BA%D1%96_%D0%BB%D1%8E%D0%B1%D0%B8%D1%82%D1%8C_%D0%BF%D0%B0%D0%BC%27%D1%8F%D1%82%D0%BA%D0%B8/%D0%A2%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%BF%D1%96%D0%BB%D1%8C%D1%81%D1%8C%D0%BA%D0%B0_%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D1%8C/%D0%91%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B6%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8 the statue is listed, but no date is included when this was built. Per COM:PRP the file has to be deleted, because the design is possibly still copyrighted. If a date can be provided the image can be undeleted. --Ellywa (talk) 14:02, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Микола Василечко as Dw no source since (dw no source since) Yann (talk) 20:08, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no reason to think the uploader did not make this photo. The statue appears old enough to be photographed, although there is no FOP in Ukraine. --Ellywa (talk) 14:08, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same case as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Пам'ятник на честь 2000–ліття Різдва Христова, Харків.jpg. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:27, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:41, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Микола Василечко as Dw no source since (dw no source since) Yann (talk) 20:08, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no reason to think the uploader did not make this photo. The statue appears old enough to be photographed, although there is no FOP in Ukraine. --Ellywa (talk) 14:09, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Микола Василечко as Dw no source since (dw no source since) Yann (talk) 20:08, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no reason to think the uploader did not make this photo. The statue appears old enough to be photographed, although there is no FOP in Ukraine. --Ellywa (talk) 14:09, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful own work, attributed to "All Elite Wrestling" at English Wikipedia ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:50, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep and change ownership information. As it doesn't meet the threshold of originality. Since it's essentially an image taken from the Greek Eye of Medusa. --Adamant1 (talk) 11:23, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Inspired by Medusa's eye, it still has its own creativity and is above threshold of originality imho. So therefore has to be deleted regretably. --Ellywa (talk) 14:12, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See COM:TOO Australia. Stefan2 (talk) 21:21, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 14:12, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]