Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/09/06
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
Parce qu’elle est Un selfie Kabongo franklin (talk) 23:02, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense request by an Android app user who couldn't resist. --Achim (talk) 07:17, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
No evidence of a CC license at source; note also that the photographer can't be the same people depicted in the photo Civitas13 (talk) 06:54, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:32, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
No evidence of a CC license at source. NickolozG (talk) 06:10, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:33, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
File:Landschaftsgarten Bettenburg, 50.15770, 10.55510 Hofheim in Unterfranken 20210307 001.jpg
[edit]Parce qu’elle est Zakiyath YNOUSSA (talk) 08:21, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense request by another Android app user :(. --Achim (talk) 09:25, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Higher quality image available at [1][2] --Baycrest (Talk) 18:14, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 02:11, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
No evidence it is not copyrighted Sahaib3005 (talk) 17:02, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Delete Given link says Reuters. A09090091 (talk) 17:26, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Speedy delete Obvious copyright violation, image from Reuters because it says "© Reuters / Marko Djurica" on the webpage. --Stylez995 (talk) 17:45, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 02:16, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
Image of Zuckerberg adds "nothing educationally distinct" from existing version at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hominidae_(extant_species).jpg, and in fact is notably less representative of homo sapiens from a visual POV.
Primary purpose likely to be vandalism. e.g: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hominidae&oldid=1042599497 Cosmocatalano (talk) 03:45, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and speedy as vandalism/attack. --Gbawden (talk) 12:10, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
The blogger does not hold the copyright of this image. The blogger said "아래는 조혜주 인스타그램 사진들입니다.(@hyejoozz) 여러 사진들을 보니 cf 모습과는 또다른 느낌의 조혜주를 볼 수 있네요^^", which means the photos were saved from the artist's Instagram @hyejoozz. Tim Wu (talk) 17:04, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Promo. A09090091 (talk) 19:17, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: by DMacks. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:10, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. There's no information of COM:TOO in origin country, Nigeria (assumed to be not OK). Also this logo image has been used on English Wikipedia article created by uploader, who is currently blocked as undisclosed paid editor. Stylez995 (talk) 14:20, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:01, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dilcia Cordero (talk · contribs)
[edit]Paintings by an unknown artist. Probably Out of Scope. Would need permission from artist if not
- File:@dilciacordero (5).jpg
- File:@dilciacordero (4).jpg
- File:@dilciacordero (2).jpg
- File:@dilciacordero (3).jpg
- File:@dilciacordero (6).jpg
- File:@dilciacordero (1).jpg
Gbawden (talk) 07:48, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:50, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by WEKlosterLorsch (talk · contribs)
[edit]All of these need OTRS from Michael Thumm or Schlösser und Gärten Hessen or whoever took them. Uploader unlikely to be photographer and a number of images have no meaningful exif
- File:Freilichtlabor Lauresham 7.jpg
- File:Auerrindprojekt Lauresham.jpg
- File:Herrenhof, Michael C. Thumm, 2019.tif
- File:Freilichtlabor Lauresham 6.jpg
- File:Auerrindprojekt-1024x561.jpg
- File:Freilichtlabor Lauresham 5.jpg
- File:Exarc-1024x576.jpg
- File:Freilichtlabor Lauresham 4.jpg
- File:Lauresham Wölbäcker.jpg
- File:Lauresham Garten.jpg
- File:Freilichtlabor Lauresham 3.jpg
- File:Freilichtlabor Lauresham 2.jpg
- File:Freilichtlabor Lauresham 1.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 08:39, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:51, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Louis Pierre-Marie (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyrighted posters and photos for different source. Not evidence that they are free.
- File:Wasyl Slipak devant le Smolny Volodymyr Tkachenko 20140907.jpg
- File:No Mistrals for Putin devant le Smolny Volodymyr Tkachenko 20140907 01.jpg
- File:Visual No Mistrals for Putin.png
- File:No Mistrals for Putin EU poster.jpg
- File:No Mistrals for Putin Les Halles Kirilo Zubko 2010921.jpg
- File:No Mistrals for Putin Trocadéro Maryana Lemak 20140904.jpg
- File:No Mistral for Putin St Michel Paris Volodymyr Tkachenko 20140706.jpg
- File:No Mistrals for Putin mur de la paix Paris Veronika Yunina 20140622.jpg
- File:No Mistrals for Putin République Paris Pierre Raimbault 20140713.jpg
- File:Selfies No Mistrals for Putin.jpg
- File:Canada make an offer France can't refuse 20140730.jpg
- File:Interdisez les essais en mer du Vladivostok 20140905.png
- File:NATO make an offer France can't refuse 20140727.jpg
- File:USA make an offer France can't refuse 20140728.jpg
- File:No-Mistrals forputin banner (4) 01.png
- File:No-Mistrals for putin banner (4) 10.jpg
- File:No-Mistrals forputin banner (4) 12.jpg
- File:No-Mistrals forputin banner (4) 03.jpg
- File:No-Mistrals forputin banner (4) 15.jpg
- File:No-Mistrals forputin banner (4) 13.jpg
- File:No-Mistrals forputin banner (4) 11.jpg
- File:No-Mistrals forputin banner (4) 10.jpg
- File:No-Mistrals forputin banner (4) 01.jpg
- File:No-Mistrals forputin banner (4) 08.jpg
- File:No-Mistrals forputin banner (4) 14.jpg
- File:No-Mistrals forputin banner (4) 09.jpg
- File:No-Mistrals forputin banner (4) 07.jpg
- File:No-Mistrals forputin banner (4) 06.jpg
- File:No-Mistrals forputin banner (4) 04.jpg
- File:No-Mistrals forputin banner (4) 05.jpg
- File:No-Mistrals forputin banner (4) 02.jpg
Anatoliy (talk) 20:38, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:44, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
Wunsch des Hochladers, siehe https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei_Diskussion:Kartebspiel.jpg Kein Einstein (talk) 13:17, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:DW. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:22, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
Doubtful own work - (English Wikipedia attributes http://www.mod.go.jp/gsdf/ as source) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:55, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, surpasses threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 08:08, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. Used in promotional Wikidata item. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:51, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
I made a mistake with the copyright and I need to upload it all over again as Galit owns the rights Freudnotdead (talk) 20:19, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:28, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
Querying Own work claim, Militray insignia are usually owned by the service branch they represent. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:59, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Yann at 17:55, 14 September 2021 UTC: Badges of the Pakistan Army. No free license, not in the public domain. --Krdbot 07:54, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Query own work, Mission patch ? Non-free at English Wikipedia (w:File:Falcon Heavy test flight.png) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:08, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Huntster (t @ c) 06:40, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
Promotional use. The user has threatened to take legal action against eswiki for the deletion of his user page. MexTDT (talk) 20:15, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Notice the information on the page edupro. The portrait of the creator of this pay portal appear front and center. Said portrait was also uploaded to Commons twice [3], [4] — Preceding unsigned comment added by MexTDT (talk • contribs) 21:18, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
--MexTDT (talk) 21:19, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:20, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Promotional use. The user has threatened to take legal action against eswiki for the deletion of his user page. MexTDT (talk) 20:15, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:19, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
copyviol (2019-dated photo, taken at Venezia 76), cf. Google Images — danyele 15:12, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 18:16, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
copyviol (2019-dated photo, taken at Venezia 76), cf. Google Images — danyele 15:16, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 18:16, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Historically, British copyright applies to works with even low originality, and that sheath does look like it may cross the threshold Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 18:59, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- This logo looks very ancient, do we know when it was published? It may already entered PD around the world if before 1929. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 08:12, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
- How does it look "very ancient"? It's the logo of Poundland, a company founded in 1990 - 31 years ago. The presence of ® in the design means that it is a registered trade mark in the UK - if you can find out when it was registered, that'll give some indication of when it was first published. But I'll warrant that it wasn't before 1926. --Redrose64 (talk; at English Wikipedia) 12:50, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:53, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
Doubtful own work - Attributed to http://www.womenonrecord.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/Jaddan-Bai.jpg at English Wikipedia. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 18:28, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Image too old to be own work. A09090091 (talk) 19:13, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:05, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Uploaded with the note "This image is widely available online, is not a professional portrait photograph, and has no copyright," which doesn't work as a justification. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 06:54, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Page says © Next Library Corporation. A09090091 (talk) 14:52, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:36, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Various images with problematic sourcing, dubious licence claims and no evidence of permission (nor in many cases does it seem possible). Uploader has a history of copyright violations and uploading unnecessary duplicate images.
- File:2004BMelectoralmap.png
- File:BM2004election.png
- File:Smithereen.png
- File:2004map.png
- File:Hy-Brasil.jpg
- File:BrasilCoatOfArms.png
- File:GrannyRatTail.jpg
- File:Squonkysquonk.jpg
- File:Sapientosaurus.jpg
- File:Kerguelen.png
- File:Phantomairship2.png
- File:Phantomairship1.png
- File:Loch Niall.png
- File:Lochniall.png
IronGargoyle (talk) 03:28, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:12, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
使用されていないため Northernsongs (talk) 22:47, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- A little
Keep since "not used" are in mostly failed to be a valid deletion reason, you'll need to provide more reasons on why they should be deleted. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:10, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yasu (talk) 15:20, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
使用されなくなったため Northernsongs (talk) 22:48, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- A bit keep per above above (i.e. crossed this one), there's no concerns regarding copyright here. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:14, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yasu (talk) 15:20, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Photo taken by Avinash Lodhi (see here, here), no evidence of permission or free license. Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 01:09, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:33, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Inferior alternative to File:Paris psaulter gr139 fol435v.png, not in use and unneeded. GPinkerton (talk) 01:23, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Too kiw quality for artistic work. A09090091 (talk) 14:55, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:33, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
File:1RA MEXICANA EN SER ACEPTADA EN EL GRAN CAFÉ TORTONI EN ARGENTINA POR SU OBRA LITERARIA.jpg
[edit]La foto la estaba utilizando para una biografía y me la subió al commons y no se por que. Patricio.jorge.fernandez (talk) 02:17, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: derivative work issue anyway. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:34, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from scene background. EugeneZelenko (talk) 02:43, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:37, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Low quality and repetitive COM:PENIS images. No educational use. Out of project scope.
- File:Vista frontal de un pene pequeño.jpg
- File:Vista lateral de un pene pequeño.jpg
- File:Pene pequeño con líquido preseminal.jpg
- File:SmallPenis.jpg
IronGargoyle (talk) 02:59, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:38, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
No evidence that the logo has been provided under the stated license. Neither the source webpage nor the related style guide specify this license. If deleted, the logo may be reuploaded to projects that allow fair use. Mysterymanblue 04:01, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:38, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Copyrighted image; no evidence of Creative Commons. – Rhain ☔ 05:11, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Probably taken from https://www.btlnews.com/blog-the-line/contenders-editors-william-goldenberg-harry-yoon-detroit/ A09090091 (talk) 17:37, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:40, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Palosirkka as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: proprietary software. The software can be cropped out if not considered COM:DM, so I don't think there's a copyright issue here. However, @Joelibeth: please explain how this image is in COM:SCOPE, i.e. useful for furthering Wikimedia's educational mission. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:31, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:42, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 06:48, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:43, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by JuTa as Dw no source since (dw no source since). Should be evaluated against the requirements of {{PD-Iraq}}. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:51, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: not enough infos to determine the copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:44, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
I can't find evidence of the CC0 claim nor is the image available at source Gbawden (talk) 06:52, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:45, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in USA for posters and banners. The photo violates artist's copyright. Taivo (talk) 06:52, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:45, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
There is freedom of panorama in Canada for 3D art, but not for 2D art. The photo violates artist's copyright. Taivo (talk) 07:00, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:46, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Educational value is not shown. Should be .svg, if useful. Taivo (talk) 07:19, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:47, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
This is not a simple logo ( w:File:ENGI Studio logo.png is non-free ) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:54, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:48, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Graphic element (top) tips this over thershsold of originality, (UK has a low standard.) w:File:English Football League Logo.svg is non-free ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:59, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:49, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Doubtful own work claim, and minimal information , w:File:EuroLeague Turkish Airlines logo.png is non-free ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:02, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:49, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Doubtful own work, This looks to be video game coverart ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:03, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:49, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Potentially, Non-free logo w:File:FITEQ Logo.png ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:06, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:49, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Not a simple logo (circles bottom right) - Non-free on English Wikipedia (w:File:FRANCE 24 logo.svg) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:07, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:50, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Querying own work claim - Engliah Wikipedia w:File:Fadma Abi died 2020.jpg attributes "https://fr.le360.ma/societe/video-deces-de-la-premiere-femme-chirurgienne-marocaine-des-suites-du-coronavirus-224398" ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:07, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:50, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Querying own work claim - Wikipedia attibutes this to w:Esprit Barthet (1919–1999) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:12, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:51, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Query own work claim - w:File:Gakushuin University logo.svg is non-free. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:15, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:51, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Doubtful own work claim , (w:File:Gemtech logo.jpg is a non-free logo) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:16, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:51, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
This is not necessarily a simple logo (w:File:Ghana Institute of Architects logo.png was non-free) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:20, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:52, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
This is not a simple logo w:File:Golkar logo.png was non-free ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:24, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:52, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Not a simple logo, Graphic Football elements left tips this over threshold of originality (w:File:HT Prva Liga.png was non-free). ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:27, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:52, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
This is not a simple logo, The Stylized digits (right), and the heart over transmission mast (left) tip those over threhsold of originality ( w:File:IHeartRadio Music Awards 2020 logo.png is non-free.) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:30, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:54, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
No exif, probably from Insta or FB but definitely not own work Gbawden (talk) 09:01, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Promo. A09090091 (talk) 17:32, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:58, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hicran Qarabəyli (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work. Uploader claims to be in photo, no exif, needs OTRS
- File:Hicran Qarabəyli-11.jpg
- File:Hicran Qarabəyli-8.jpg
- File:Hicran Qarabəyli-6.jpg
- File:Hicran Qarabəyli-4.jpg
- File:Hicran Qarabəyli-1.jpg
- File:Hicran Qarabəyli-2.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 09:14, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - available in the web. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:00, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Files of User:Jean Bork
[edit]Uploader suggests they are the person in the photos, need credits to the photographers and permission to license the files. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 09:25, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:18, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no permission (No permission since). No older copies found online, let's discuss. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:09, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- May be selfie. May be promo photo. No EXIF, not camera resolution. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:56, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; dubious claim of own work. PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 13:58, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Despite OTRS-permission, the file seems out of project scope. Unused personal photo. Taivo (talk) 07:23, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:58, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
copyright infringement 94.45.0.106 10:48, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep No direct copyright violation, uploader says it hers. A09090091 (talk) 14:45, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete The author Vassily Rublev died in 1994, no heirs' permission provided, delete unless OTRS permission obtained. --ВоскобойниковВ (talk) 10:34, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:54, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
copyright infringement 94.45.0.106 10:48, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep No direct copyright violation, uploader says it hers. A09090091 (talk) 14:45, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:55, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
copyright infringement 94.45.0.106 10:49, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep No direct copyright violation, uploader says it hers. A09090091 (talk) 14:45, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:55, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
copyright infringement 94.45.0.106 10:49, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep No direct copyright violation, uploader says it hers. A09090091 (talk) 14:46, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:55, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
copyright infringement 94.45.0.106 10:49, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep No direct copyright violation, uploader says it hers. A09090091 (talk) 14:46, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:55, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
copyright infringement 94.45.0.106 10:49, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep No direct copyright violation, uploader says it hers. A09090091 (talk) 14:48, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:56, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
copyright infringement 94.45.0.106 10:50, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep No direct copyright violation, uploader says it hers. A09090091 (talk) 14:47, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:56, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
copyright infringement 94.45.0.106 10:50, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep No direct copyright violation, uploader says it hers. A09090091 (talk) 14:47, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:56, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
copyright infringement 94.45.0.106 10:50, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep No direct copyright violation, uploader says it hers. A09090091 (talk) 14:47, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:56, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
copyright infringement 94.45.0.106 10:50, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep No direct copyright violation, uploader says it hers. A09090091 (talk) 14:47, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:56, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
copyright infringement 94.45.0.106 10:50, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep No direct copyright violation, uploader says it hers. A09090091 (talk) 14:47, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:56, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
File:Starr-130319-3163-Casuarina equisetifolia-habit with booby on nest-Kilauea Pt NWR-Kauai (25115539291).jpg
[edit]Badly blurred; part of a large collection so deletion of one poor quality image not a significant loss. MPF (talk) 11:12, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:53, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
No permission from artist or photographer, no FOP for sculptures in the United States. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:35, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- The same considerations (if correct) apply to Reginato Kingfish PhotoByBenAqua 02.jpg. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:40, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- And Smith Amaryllis PhotoByBenAqua 03.jpg. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:06, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Judging from the overlap of contributions on en.wp, this discussion may be relevant here. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:30, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- And Smith Amaryllis PhotoByBenAqua 03.jpg. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:06, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Marked the extra 2 files for the same DR and notified uploaders. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:19, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:53, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:36, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. A09090091 (talk) 14:43, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:51, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of group of employees with no indication of importance. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 12:27, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. A09090091 (talk) 14:43, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:51, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
No permission from the artist, no FOP for sculptures in the United States. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:51, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:51, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Files of User:Ladyboss - P.A.
[edit]The uploader does not appear to be the copyright holder in the metadata of the files. Need permission to license the files. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 13:58, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:50, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation 83.200.72.152 14:25, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep for now, image is not spotted via Google reverse search.--A09090091 (talk) 14:42, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete.--Yaakoub45 (talk) 00:06, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: scope?. --Gbawden (talk) 13:48, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Photographies faites par un photographe, Daniel Gillet, et donc pas un travail personnel. Autorisation nécessaire, voir Commons:OTRS/fr.
- File:Oyonnax Chat Convert-2.jpg
- File:Bourg Point du Jour 12.jpg
- File:Bourg Aubry2 (8).jpg
- File:Semcoda Aubry 1 11.jpg
- File:AUBRY sous la neige (2).jpg
- File:AUBRY sous la neige.jpg
- File:Semcoda Aubry logement locatif SEMCODA et accession propriété Bourg en Bresse.jpg
Shev123 (talk) 14:26, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:48, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by KaKaulla as no permission (No permission since). Uploader is a trusted user (although there are some problemes) with about 34.000 uploaded files. Seems like a documentation issue. He can't answer right now as he is banned since yesterday. Indeedous (talk) 14:41, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete No useful source, so we can't verify and evidently we can't take things from this user on trust either. Andy Dingley (talk) 21:37, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Da in der Exifdaten der Fotograf genannt wird, ist es möglich nach einer Erlaubiss zu fragen um das Bild zu retten. Tschüß -- Ra Boe watt?? 07:10, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
Comment please see Commons:Village pump#Media of a banned user --Indeedous (talk) 09:57, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 13:47, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by KaKaulla as no permission (No permission since). Uploader is a trusted user (although there are some problemes) with about 34.000 uploaded files. Seems like a documentation issue. He can't answer right now as he is banned since yesterday. Indeedous (talk) 14:42, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete No useful source, so we can't verify and evidently we can't take things from this user on trust either. Andy Dingley (talk) 21:38, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Da in der Exifdaten der Fotograf genannt wird, ist es möglich nach einer Erlaubiss zu fragen um das Bild zu retten. Tschüß -- Ra Boe watt?? 07:10, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
Comment please see Commons:Village pump#Media of a banned user --Indeedous (talk) 09:57, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 13:47, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:46, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Used in vanity Wikidata item. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:46, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:46, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Selfie - Nutshinou Talk! 14:53, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Promo. A09090091 (talk) 14:56, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:46, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. A09090091 (talk) 17:28, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:45, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Anonymous g anonymous (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.
- File:Andy Lopez Cruz millennial poetry genre poem by Angelica G. Allen.png
- File:Millennial Poetry by Angelica G. Allen .png
- File:Millennial Poetry by Angelica G. Allen.png
- File:Brass locke.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:45, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:2007 in Mumbai
[edit]derivative work of an advertisement inside a display window. In my opinion this isn't covered by freedom of panorama in India (not a permanent 3D work) and in this this case it is also the main focus of the photograph
- File:Mumbai, India, Bulgari display.jpg
- File:Mumbai, India, Louis Vuitton Display.jpg
- File:Mumbai, India, Louis Vuitton Window.jpg
TFerenczy (talk) 15:02, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Promo. A09090091 (talk) 19:17, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:45, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Lack of source information; probably not own work Dronebogus (talk) 16:05, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Copyvio https://www.idnes.cz/zpravy/zahranicni/kanibal-z-rotenburgu-v-podstate-jsem-normalni.A071016_111545_zahranicni_tha or https://elpais.com/diario/2005/04/23/internacional/1114207211_740215.html A09090091 (talk) 17:29, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:44, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
This image includes account numbers for personal account at JP Bank. Clover Tigers (talk) 16:18, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete A09090091 (talk) 17:30, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:44, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
This image includes account numbers for personal account at JP Bank. Clover Tigers (talk) 16:18, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete A09090091 (talk) 17:29, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:44, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
most probably copyrighted Syced (talk) 16:27, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:44, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope Kleuske (talk) 16:37, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Promo. A09090091 (talk) 17:30, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:43, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Neither CC-BY-SA, nor public domain. Source: https://cnbbsul3.org.br/ordenacao-episcopal-do-mons-cleocir-bonetti-sera-dia-12-de-setembro/ Alex Pereiradisc 11:45, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:43, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 17:57, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:43, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope: invalid permission to Wikpedia only. This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 18:11, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:42, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal files, out of scope.
GeorgHH • talk 18:12, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Promo. A09090091 (talk) 19:15, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:42, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of the scope: just a test for upload. This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 18:13, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:42, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Not a simple logo, graphic element left above TOO, (w:File:In-Q-Tel logo in color (2021).svg is non-free) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 18:14, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:42, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Not a simple logo, Graphic element (left) above TOO. (w:File:International Planned Parenthood Federation logo.svg is non-free) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 18:16, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:42, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
This is not a simple logo (Stylized comet and question mark). (w:File:Intertel Society Logo and Insignia.png is non-free) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 18:19, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:42, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Doubtful own work claim, This is a brand logo above TOO (w:File:Invicta watch group logo.png is non-free) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 18:19, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:42, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Doubtful own work claim - Attributed to "International Magazine Services photo archive" (W:File:Irene Prador.jpg) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 18:20, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Image too old to be own work. A09090091 (talk) 19:15, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:41, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Source link states this is in copyright. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 18:22, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Image is stated as In copyright on linked website. A09090091 (talk) 19:14, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:41, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Work by painter Georgij Robertovich Brim, who died only in 1999, whereby his works are protected til end of 2069. Uploading account User:Georgbriem might (or not) have a relation to the artist. Anyway, a valid permission is required. -- Túrelio (talk) 19:28, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Same problem with most files in Category:Georgij Robertovich Brim:
- File:3 Gamlet.jpg
- File:42 Магомед Мамед Мамиш.jpg
- File:Wysylka.jpg
- File:„А. Тимур“ Самарканд.jpg
- File:Brim Georg2.jpg
- File:Brim Georgij Skizze3.jpg
- File:Brim Richard.jpg
- File:Buran 3.jpg
- File:Buran1.jpg
- File:Dirigent1.jpg
- File:Dni iskusstw New York.jpg
- File:Faust 5.jpg
- File:Faust 7.jpg
- File:Faust Brim2.jpg
- File:Georgij Brim5.jpg
- File:Golod 1943.jpg
- File:Karmen1 Brim.jpg
- File:Karmen2 Brim.jpg
- File:Maisara Germany Kopie.jpg
- File:Maisara Germany.jpg
- File:Maisara NB Alma Ata 2 Kopie.jpg
- File:Majsara Brim G3.jpg
- File:Otello 4.jpg
- File:Pajaz Brim.jpg
- File:Pogonshiki.jpg
- File:Prodelki8.jpg
- File:Rigoletto 5.jpg
- File:Rigoletto5.jpg
- File:Samarkand 1997gr.jpg
- File:Timur 1996.jpg
- File:Timur на коне.jpg
- File:Wstre.jpg
- File:В списках.jpg
- File:Леонкавалло.jpg
- File:Маисара 4.jpg
- File:Ог ангел.jpg
- File:Паяцы.tif
- File:Спектакль Нодирабегим.jpg
- File:Царь эдип 2015.jpg
- File:Чили jpg.jpg
- File:Шпуть.jpg
- File:Zanaves2.jpg
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:41, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
unused, doesn't seem to be in a scope, no cat. Pibwl (talk) 19:01, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:48, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
Was already deleted as out of PS Anatoliy (talk) 19:46, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:40, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope Askeuhd (talk) 20:12, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; probably copyvio if its from a video game. --Gbawden (talk) 13:39, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 04:32, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: User:FlickrLickr was a reliable Flickr upload bot at the time. As per Category:FlickrLickr images: "Images in this category have been uploaded with the FlickrLickr system. This gives a confirmation of the free status of these images at the time of upload. Creative Commons licences are irrevocable.". --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:28, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
See COM:FOP United States. I wasn't able to identify the sculptor or the age of the statue, so the copyright status is unknown. Stefan2 (talk) 20:33, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:38, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted on Flickr. Copyright status can't be verified. Stefan2 (talk) 20:38, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:37, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted on Flickr. Impossible to verify copyright status. Stefan2 (talk) 20:40, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:36, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted on Flickr. Impossible to verify copyright status. Stefan2 (talk) 20:40, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:36, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted on Flickr. Unverifiable copyright status. Stefan2 (talk) 20:42, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:36, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted on Flickr. Unverifiable copyright status. Stefan2 (talk) 20:46, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:37, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Photoshopped trolling image. Users edits on English Wikipedia shows they added similar troll/meme images to other Phish related pages in 2014, all of which have been deleted but this one. Doc Strange (talk) 21:05, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:37, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dora646566 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be the uploader's own work.
File:Art Mural.jpg is credited to Will Sears in the description and has a watermark/logo in bottom left corner. File:Maine State House from Capitol Park.jpg can be found at [5] credited to Sean Pavone and dated 2017, before being uploaded here in 2018. File:Downtown Augusta Aerial.jpg and File:St Augustine Catholic Church.jpg are credited to Dave Dostie in their descriptions. All files are missing EXIF aside from some which have Facebook-like metadata.
- File:Maine State House from Capitol Park.jpg
- File:Mallett Brothers.jpg
- File:Dustbowl Revival.jpg
- File:Downtown Augusta.jpg
- File:People Downtown.jpg
- File:Art Mural.jpg
- File:Meet Me Out Back.jpg
- File:Memorial Bridge.jpg
- File:Market Square Park Augusta.jpg
- File:Downtown Augusta Aerial.jpg
- File:St Augustine Catholic Church.jpg
-M.nelson (talk) 21:16, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:37, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Non-free image. Not original work. – GeMet [talk] 21:58, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:36, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Manipulated (photoshopped) image, which is totally unencyclopedic and might also violate copyright and personality rights. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 22:33, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:34, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
festival commercial brochure without educational value, contains copyrighted company and school logo 182.2.75.219 23:25, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:33, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Gunofficial1998 as no source (No source since). Keep, this falls under "{{PD-Vietnam}}" as it dates before 1960. Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 19:19, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per DT. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:53, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Cover of copyrighted work, author died in 2014, short of the 50 years needed to fall under PD in Vietnam DHN (talk) 02:17, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- The book was written by w:Tô Hoài, who died in 2014. Did he also make the cover, or was the cover made by someone else? I think that most writers do not make their own covers but have someone else doing this for them. --Stefan2 (talk) 20:22, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Far too recent to assume the creator has been dead for 70 years. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:47, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Collection of low-resolution images of universities in Taiwan without EXIF data. Uploader has a history of copyright violations. This includes cropping images to remove watermarks and other elements, so reverse image searches are not completely accurate.
- File:國立嘉義大學新民校區後門.jpg
- File:嘉義市北興國中舊校門.jpg
- File:嘉義師範學校舊校門.jpg
- File:國立嘉義大學附小校門口.jpg
- File:嘉義市立民生國中校門口.jpg
- File:Pingshih Campus of NPTU.jpg
- File:Pingshang Campus of NPTU.jpg
- File:嘉義天后宮.jpg
IronGargoyle (talk) 02:36, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- @IronGargoyle: {{FoP-Taiwan}} can't apply to em? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 08:57, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- No, the issue is not with the architectural copyright, it is with the photographs themselves. IronGargoyle (talk) 12:51, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:47, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
1958 advertisement from the United States, assume it is copyrighted unless there is evidence otherwise Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 04:31, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Comment What about {{PD-US-not renewed}}? A09090091 (talk) 17:36, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Yeah but we'd need more information. KNX still exists, the assumption would be their material is still theirs. Unless someone feels like doing more investigation. If not, the onus is on the uploader to help us out. Thx Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 13:21, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - no notice. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:50, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Montenegro97 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own works. No EXIF, files available on other sources.
- File:Aucas - Estadio.jpg
- File:Estadio de Aucas luminarias.jpg
- File:Estadio Gonzalo Pozo Ripalda iluminacion 2016.jpg
- File:Armagedon.jpg
Smooth O (talk) 08:28, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:51, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
I uploaded this file ages ago and now believe it should not be due to wanting to keep certain photos private. Katbabushkina (talk) 08:43, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - Image is in use, subject is an Olympic athelete, so privacy does not apply. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:53, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
I uploaded this file ages ago and now believe it should not be due to wanting to keep certain photos private. Katbabushkina (talk) 12:34, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:53, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
The license claims that the image is in the public domain because it is either (a) anonymous work published before 1954, or (b) the author died before 1954. As this image was taken in 1964, it is obvious that the license is false. Vanjagenije (talk) 09:15, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- The licence also has a c - a photograph or a work of applied art published before January 1, 1973. --Sporti (talk) 09:26, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep per Sporti. A09090091 (talk) 14:50, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:54, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
The license claims that the image is in the public domain because it is either (a) anonymous work published before 1954, or (b) the author died before 1954. As this image was taken in 1966, it is obvious that the license is false. Vanjagenije (talk) 09:16, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- The licence also has a c - a photograph or a work of applied art published before January 1, 1973. --Sporti (talk) 09:26, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Or, very obviously, c), that the work was published before 1973. 1966(which would have been obvious if the nominator had looked at the source), when this was published, is before 1973. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:19, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep per Sporti. A09090091 (talk) 14:51, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:55, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
File taken from website, no clear permission. 80.62.116.153 09:25, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Which website? Could you provide a specific link? A09090091 (talk) 14:50, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Comment The one already provided as source on the file. 80.62.116.153 22:07, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - The image is not own work as claimed. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:55, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
The license was never reviewed and now, 13 years after upload, the image has disappeared from source site. Hannu stated when uploading: "Free for non-commercial use." NC-licenses are not accepted in Commons. Probably we must now delete the photo. Taivo (talk) 11:21, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:19, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Files of User:Stuart Rowlands
[edit]- File:Stuart Rowlands with Michael and Mario Andretti.jpg
- File:Graham Rahal and Stuart Rowlands 2015.JPG
- File:Stuart Rowlands Lucas Corona 2013.JPG
- File:Stuart Rowlands at IndyCar Series.jpg
- File:Stuart Rowlands Interview.jpg
- File:Stuart Rowlands.jpg
The uploader suggests they are one of the people in the photos; need credit to the photographers and permission to license the files. A couple of them have the photographer's name in the metadata. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 17:48, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:21, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
A picture of a non-Wikipedian person, just to promote themselves Osama Eid (talk) 21:45, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:22, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by G.F.2.G.F.G.F.G.F (talk · contribs)
[edit]These files are all sourced from Ukrainian Military Pages (https://www.ukrmilitary.com) which is licensed CC BY 4.0. This site appears to be license laundering, uploading photos that are not their own without credit. Some of this uploader's files have had their photographer identified as US Military and have been cleaned up and excluded, but the remainder nominated here are of unknown origin, unlikely to have been released under a CC license. Some of the nominated files have evidence of another creator/publisher, like exif crediting autokraz.com.ua or ALICW (?), or a watermark of Defense Express (https://defence-ua.com/).
- File:L434 "Сватове".1.jpg
- File:Плавучий док Юрій Олефіренко.jpg
- File:Xwe56xprjf711.jpg
- File:Mk VI.7.jpg
- File:DSA2b.jpg
- File:DSA2d.jpg
- File:Mk VI.1.jpg
- File:FILIN-150.jpg
- File:Neptun-tm.jpg
- File:Neptun5.jpg
- File:Neptun7.jpg
- File:Neptun tzm.jpg
- File:200207 Neptun-5.jpg
- File:Neptun.01.jpg
- File:200207 Neptun-4.jpg
- File:Loire- 01.jpg
- File:HMMWV М998 praktika med.jpg
- File:M1114 SBU Odessa.jpg
- File:Trophey.jpg
- File:Dpsu-mariupol.jpg
- File:HMMWV 200 002.jpg
- File:HMMWV на навчаннях.jpg
- File:КТА-25.1.jpg
- File:An-2-bortovyj-nomer-07-na-ozbroyenni-10-morskoyi-aviatsijnoyi-brygady.jpg
- File:R10-1.png
-M.nelson (talk) 22:32, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:24, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
使用されなくなったため Northernsongs (talk) 22:47, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Unlike above, there's a valid DR concern that this rule can't apply to Japanese 2D artworks, thus permissions from the shrine is needed? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:12, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:23, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
It is a fictitious flag for a non extisting province 2A00:23C8:A889:B700:CD86:A7D2:4A6A:BBBD 23:58, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:24, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
copyright infringement 94.45.0.106 10:52, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep No direct copyright violation, uploader says it hers. A09090091 (talk) 14:46, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: We need details of the artist and their permission to keep via OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 13:53, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Video wrongly uploaded as still photo. Re-upload from Flickr source as video, delete still & redirect to video. MPF (talk) 00:06, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep WHy not both? I can still see plenty of use to a static photo of this. Andy Dingley (talk) 00:11, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Both video and image would have utility. Image is currently in use. IronGargoyle (talk) 04:25, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep per above. A09090091 (talk) 14:55, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 14:36, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Der Urheber ist sicher noch keine 70 Jahre tot. Xocolatl (talk) 19:09, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Teile der Ausstattung stammen aus der alten Kirche. Das Bild zeigt allerdings auch Elemente von 1961. {{--Tilman2007 (talk) 19:48, 6 September 2021 (UTC)}}
Deleted: per discussion; also, the building itself is a modern work of architecture for which German FoP only applies to outside views. --Gestumblindi (talk) 14:37, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Vermutlich ein urheberrechtliches Problem... Xocolatl (talk) 19:27, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Die Kirche wurde lt. Recherche 1960/61 erbaut. Das Kunstwerk ist wahrscheinlich zeitgleich entstanden. {{--Tilman2007
Deleted: per discussion; also, the building itself is a modern work of architecture for which German FoP only applies to outside views. --Gestumblindi (talk) 14:38, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Wrong format. Should have used .png. NFarras (talk) 06:00, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Commons contains alot of logos both png and svg. A09090091 (talk) 14:53, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted prompt uploader request, not used. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:49, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 188.123.231.13 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyrighted film screenshot. Should be checked for PD first given its age. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:34, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted false license, false claims; nothing else offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:52, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 188.123.231.13 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyrighted film screenshot. Should be checked for PD first given its age. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:34, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted False license & false authorship claims -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:51, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
File taken from website, no clear permission. 80.62.116.153 09:25, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Which website? Could you provide a specific link? A09090091 (talk) 14:50, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Comment The one already provided as source on the file. 80.62.116.153 22:07, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted License claim unsupported by source site. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:55, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
This is fake. Schrike (talk) 09:26, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted Description and license - at least one must be false. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:57, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Videos from Polissons et galipettes
[edit]- File:Agenor fait un levage.ogv
- File:L'atelier faiminette.ogv
- File:L'heure du thé.ogv
- File:La coiffeuse.ogv
- File:La fessée à l'école.ogv
- File:La voyeuse.ogv
- File:Massages.ogv
- File:Miss Butterfly.ogv
- File:Mousquetaire au restaurant part 1.ogv
- File:Mousquetaire au restaurant part 2.ogv
- File:Mr. Abbot Bitt at Convent.ogv
Per discussion at COM:VPC, there are 11 segments from 2002 pornographic film The Good Old Naughty Days, it remains unpublished before it was discovered by producer Michel Reilhac. The unpublished work is protected by French copyright and the rest of the European Union after 25 years of publication. --49.150.116.127 09:08, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- I understood that these films had already been shown in brothels at the beginning of the 20th century. They are not "unpublished". [6] HaguardDuNord (talk) 12:12, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep To the "random" IP, there is a thing called lost film, i.e. something that was rediscovered, after being exhibited and them lost. This what happened with the films in the "Polissons et galipettes" collection".
- [https://www.theguardian.com/film/2004/mar/12/2 Per this Guardian, this films were exhibited in Paris, as said "But these films were an extension of the clandestine world of the brothel (...) Perhaps inevitably, the films were co-opted by the brothels themselves. Knowledge of the blue movies filtered out through the prostitutes borrowed from the huge Parisian whorehouses that the vast majority of French men visited. (...) The films were to provide an important function for those yet to be initiated into the sexual life. (...) The films started to be shown in Paris brothels," explains Reilhac. "We found printed programmes that showed how they were screened at regular hours in the waiting rooms - young men would find out how sex went by watching them before losing their virginity to a prostitute." Wealthy private collectors, who in turn commissioned more dirty movies, bought some of the films - the grandfather of this respectable family house was one, as was King Alfonso XIII of Spain, who had a passion for women with enormous breasts. In this way the pornographic film industry was born." Tm (talk) 13:50, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- The unreleased film, same as "unpublished" work and it is under copyright in France, because these compilation was released in 2002. --49.150.116.127 23:00, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- To the '''random'' IP. Files was exhibited in brothels, i.e. released publicly, i.e. published publicly. Tm (talk) 14:55, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
- The unreleased film, same as "unpublished" work and it is under copyright in France, because these compilation was released in 2002. --49.150.116.127 23:00, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep If they were sold to others, including Paris brothels, and especially third-party collectors, then they were published.--Prosfilaes (talk) 23:28, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep These aren't "11 segments from 2002 pornographic film" they are 11 short pornographic films which were issued in a compilation released in 2002. As per the Guardian statement, there were copies made, so that constitutes publication. For obvious reasons, these were not "released" in the sense of being shown in public cinemas, but that is irrelevant to their publication by being copied. The compilation, as a separate entity in itself, can be copyrighted as a whole, especially if it has any truly "original" material - a soundtrack, commentary or other explanations, but that does not cover the multiple, previously published shorts, used in the compilation. - Arjayay (talk) 16:41, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Films published anonymously in France between 1905 and 1930, so in the public domain according to French copyright law. Vysotsky (talk) 19:33, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Closed as Kept per discussion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:10, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Old newspaper clippings, need permission or proof that they are PD
- File:Cricket Cuttings-6.jpg
- File:Cricket Cuttings-12.jpg
- File:Hilal 1.jpg
- File:Hilal .jpg
- File:The Pace setter.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 12:08, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete They date back to 89', 90', 90' and 93. Last should be deleted per COM:PRP. A09090091 (talk) 17:41, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted DW, false license claims. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:59, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
not verified MohankumarSiva (talk) 14:44, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Useful for backgrounds.--A09090091 (talk) 14:57, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Hypothetically useful or not, requested for deletion by uploader within minutes of upload -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:02, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted prompt uploader request -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:02, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
File uploaded from the university website, unlikely the university would license it's logo under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license as claimed by the uploading editor. Gab4gab (talk) 19:13, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted Unsupported license claim -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:04, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
No evidence that the club has released their old logo under a free license. C.Fred (talk) 21:50, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- So it can't be used under the fair-use policy, like the current logo? ItsKesha (talk) 11:35, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
- Fair use images are not allowed on Commons. Please read Commons:Fair use. Ytoyoda (talk) 04:02, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:05, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation and incorrect license. LukeHarkness (talk) 23:14, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:06, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
No indication of a free license at the source page. — Rhododendrites talk | 18:31, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:19, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Presumably copyvio, non-free content, no permission cited. Plus wrong license, no own work. The name of the painter is not given, but Poschinger died in 1990, the painting was probably created after 1982, when his term as president of the Bavarian Senate ended. FordPrefect42 (talk) 16:48, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 23:12, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Possible Copyright Violation: Uploader is NOT the author (regarding the uploader's user page). Source is a 404. There is NO Ticket (OTRS or VRTS). Urheberrechtsverletzung nicht auszuschließen. Erläuterung vorstehend auf englisch. KaKaulla (talk) 08:16, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Have fixed the source back to Wayback Machine. However, that page has the following (German) text: "Please understand that the images can only be used free of charge if the source is given. Commercial use and placement in external databases require our approval" (Emphasis added). I think we would need VRTS approval. Rodhullandemu (talk) 08:55, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Keep In der Kategorie Category:Images from CDU/CSU-Bundestagsfraktion befinden sich über 400 Dateien von der Homepage der Fraktion. Über viele Jahre befand sich unterhalb der Bilder ein Hinweis, dass die CC-Lizenz zutrifft. Offenbar wurde die Seite dieses Abgeordneten in dieser Zeit nicht von der wayback machine gespeichert, dennoch sind CC-Lizenzen unwiderruflich. Leider habe ich bei meinen ersten Uploads noch nicht mit Commons:License review gearbeitet, daher gibt es keine unabhängige Bestätigung. Die gibt es aber bei 99% aller anderen Uploads auf Commons auch nicht, also müsst ihr wohl entweder mir glauben (Commons-Admin, >10 Jahre hier) oder es auf Betreiben eines 8 Tage angemeldeten Profils löschen. Eure Entscheidung. --Indeedous (talk) 14:50, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Korrekter Link mit freier Lizenz: https://web.archive.org/web/20140118092733/http://www.cducsu.de/abgeordnete/patrick-sensburg --Indeedous (talk) 15:02, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Keep Per further info from Indeedous. Rodhullandemu (talk) 15:37, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Lymantria (talk) 16:47, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Incomplete unverifiable source. Stefan2 (talk) 21:09, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted Lacking info needed to determine license status -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:39, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
This is definitively not simple enough to be uncopyrightable Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 18:58, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 07:02, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo above COM:TOO in origin country, Australia. In order to host file on Commons, it must be free both in origin country and the US. Stylez995 (talk) 14:36, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom; was not in use. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:31, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Probably fake license. Wikisaurus (talk) 04:16, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:02, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
This file is a downgraded copy from this map. Also, the map's author has been misattributed. Cukrakalnis (talk) 12:21, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:04, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
Better scanned file of the same edition available here Bodhisattwa (talk) 20:00, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: inuse, processing as a duplicate. --Gbawden (talk) 11:05, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
wrong image in serie ChristiaanPR (talk) 18:23, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
It is all right, please do not remove, ChristiaanPR (talk) 18:28, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 19:03, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
ID card from a government agency, not own work. 80.62.116.153 09:25, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep from govermental POV, they are PD but Delete beacuse it reveal personal info. A09090091 (talk) 14:49, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:49, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
Flickrwashing. 0 followers - dodgy flickr account Gbawden (talk) 12:06, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Regardless of copyright status, seems COM:OOS as a portrait of a non-notable person. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:43, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
Doubtful own work claim - Attributed to http://www.ivyleaguesports.com (w:File:Ivy League logo.svg) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 18:26, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:43, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Luanfbbsdf
[edit]I believe those files should be deleted because i don't know if the institution that digitalized it has copyrighted the content.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Luanfbbsdf (talk • contribs)
- Keep They are PD per Brazilian law, no legit reason to delete.--A09090091 (talk) 17:25, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- The OGG file only has a sound recording copyright tag, but you also need a copyright tag for the underlying work. Both files also need copyright tags for the United States. --Stefan2 (talk) 18:37, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: The sound recording is old enough to keep (dates from 1902, 120 years old) the film is too recent, dates from 1937. --Ellywa (talk) 20:32, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
Video wrongly uploaded as still photo. Re-upload from Flickr source as video, delete still & redirect to video. MPF (talk) 00:05, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Have you uploaded the video? If so, link please? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:47, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
- Comment @Infrogmation: - sorry for the late reply (I only just noticed your comment now!); no, I have not uploaded the video, as I don't have the necessary video conversion software. If I try, it just comes up as a jpg still (like in the case of this DR!) - MPF (talk) 17:08, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Can be deleted if necessary when somebody uploads the video. --Ellywa (talk) 10:40, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/Awad Hajali Ahmed
[edit]Taken from FB per MD, no meaningful exif, I think we need OTRS
Gbawden (talk) 07:43, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Would Template:PD-Sudan apply? Fwiw, the image was uploaded after the discussion here. I assumed the man himself took a selfie and uploaded it himself. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 10:29, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The image was taken from facebook according to the meta data info. @Zeinab mandour: please closely follow the procedure on VRT to show you have permission from the copyright holder to publish the image on Commons with a free license. If successful, the image can be undeleted. Ellywa (talk) 10:45, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
File:(L'abbé Gavois, propriétaire de la plus vieille voiture du monde, une Panhard-Levassor de 1891 surnommée "Antoinette") - (photographie de presse) - Agence Meurisse.png
[edit]This file was initially tagged by Le Petit Chat as duplicate (duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: L'abbé Gavois, propriétaire de la plus vieille voiture du monde, une Panhard-Levassor de 1891 surnommée "Antoinette".jpg
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion as to-be-deleted version seems to be retouched and may have its own value. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:45, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- I do not think the image was retouched. They can be compared below. The Media Viewer helps to see that the second file only have a lower resolution.
-
HD image -
"Duplicate" .png
_2.jpg){kind=link}
_Logo.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_144.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![169 File:(L'abbé Gavois, propriétaire de la plus vieille voiture du monde, une Panhard-Levassor de 1891 surnommée "Antoinette") - (photographie de presse) - Agence Meurisse.png](#File:(L'abbé_Gavois,_propriétaire_de_la_plus_vieille_voiture_du_monde,_une_Panhard-Levassor_de_1891_surnommée_"Antoinette")_-_(photographie_de_presse)_-_Agence_Meurisse.png){kind=link}
![[2]](http://imgs.focus.cn/upload/news/7768/a_77678953.jpg){kind=link}
_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_2.jpg){kind=link}
_2.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_01.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_10.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_12.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_03.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_15.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_13.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_11.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_10.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_01.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_08.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_14.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_09.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_07.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_06.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_04.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_05.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_02.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
![[3]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Investigador_de_%22educaci%C3%B3n_medi%C3%A1tica%22_y_%22alfabetizaci%C3%B3n_informacional%22.jpg){kind=link}
![[4]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Shaban_Roman_Petrovich.jpg){kind=link}
_Logo.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Logo.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_Logo.png){kind=link}
_Logo.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_-_144.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_144.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_-_144.jpg){kind=link}
_-_144.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_(photographie_de_presse)_-_Agence_Meurisse.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_(photographie_de_presse)_-_Agence_Meurisse.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_-_(photographie_de_presse)_-_Agence_Meurisse.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per COM:REDUNDANT. The alternative has a much higher resolution and the differences are minimal / if any exist. --Ellywa (talk) 10:47, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
Maria Racal photos
[edit]
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Thanks for your excellent motivation. The archived link shows "Copyright © 2017". --Ellywa (talk) 10:50, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
The crowned portcullis device is public domain in the US and UK. However, the arrangement of the text and device would not necessarily be PD in the UK. I have therefore replaced this with a file at en (en:File:House of Commons of the United Kingdom logo 2018.svg) and this file should be deleted. Ninetyone (talk) 12:40, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. I understand COM:TOO UK is very low, but I think this falls under it. In Commons:Deletion requests/Two British logos, both logos contained creative embellishments either to the typeface or extra graphical elements. As you point out, both the crowned portcullis and text itself is public domain. The arrangement of said elements is a simple arrangement lacking creativity: Logo at left, text at right. This would be the default way the logo would appear if combining these two elements simply in software like Microsoft Word for example. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:09, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Comment The "crowned portcullis" artwork at left would seem to be PD-Old per [7]. This states that there are restrictions on use of the symbol, but they seem not to be copyright related. The latter link includes a UK telephone number to call for more information. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:36, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Ellywa (talk) 10:51, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:10, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Probably {{PD-textlogo}}. Yann (talk) 10:04, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: I think this fits in Category:Interlaced triquetra, so could be of use in that context. --Ellywa (talk) 10:53, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
Better quality scan of the same edition is here Bodhisattwa (talk) 15:48, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, i do not think the scan is better, it is just different imho. --Ellywa (talk) 10:56, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
sembra una foto di una foto, non è possibilie stabilire la genesi delle licenze, inoltre chi l'ha caricata la dichiara opera proopria e non derivata Threecharlie (talk) 16:58, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: translation of the text; "it looks like a photo of a photo, it is not possible to establish the genesis of the licenses, furthermore those who have uploaded it declares it their own and not derived work". The meta data show it is a photo. I do not see a reason to delete the image. --Ellywa (talk) 10:57, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
immagine molto sfocata per essere eseguita con lo smartphone indicato dai dati Exif, assieme alla bassa risultzione risulta possibile essere foto di altra foto Threecharlie (talk) 17:01, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: translated: very blurry image to be performed with the smartphone indicated by the Exif data, together with the low result it is possible to be photos of another photo. I agree, were blurry and therefore not of educational use and out of COM:SCOPE. --Ellywa (talk) 11:00, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
In light of the examples mentioned at Commons:Threshold of originality#China I am rather dubious that this logo would be free in China Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 19:02, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Although the originality in China is very low, this logo is a C with another C bigger , and the word China Eastern.--EEIM (talk) 06:53, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Per EEIM, {{PD-textlogo}} applies. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 08:10, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The logo is showing more then a simple bigger C. Therefore I think it is above threshold, which is low in China, per COM:TOO China. --Ellywa (talk) 11:02, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
I am not sure if the railroad graphics are uncopyrightable per US law; they may not be simply a combination of letters and basic geometric shapes as some of the items cited as "uncopyrightable" at COM:TOO Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 19:06, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Probably we can keep it by removing that icon, so the logo remains only texts and hence {{PD-textlogo}}? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 08:08, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
- Maybe, but since the company's webpage uses the full logo I am not sure that it would have educational scope when it's cut like that. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 20:33, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion. It is not shown per COM:EVID that this association is state owned. --Ellywa (talk) 11:03, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
Клон уже существующего логотипа RBC — https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:RBK_logo.svg Dipish mot (talk) 21:51, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and COP:DUPE. This image is not in use on the projects, so it can be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 11:05, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
