Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/09/02
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
_Femme_Avec_Fleur_(2).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
_Closeup.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Because this images that I uploaded is the wrong image and its pixilated. B.Creado (talk) 09:54, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 10:38, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
{{Duplicate |file=Leghorn, C.U., '21 LOC npcc.05183.jpg|reason=This photo exists already on Wikimedia Commons.|user=DZwarrior1}} DZwarrior1 (talk) 12:08, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Keep, as per usual practice concerning TIFFs and their JPEG mirrors. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 12:59, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Info Template {{Duplicate}} is meant to be used only in filepages, standalone: It will trigger a speedy deletion process (a boon to all deletionists, it is!). When used in a DR, the mess that can now be witnessed in both the DR and the file pages ensues (and maybe that should be fixed). -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 12:59, 2 September 2021 (UTC)- Keep we can have more than one copy of an image where there is difference, in this case file type. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:23, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion (TIFF -> JPEG). --Túrelio (talk) 14:31, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
This is me and I do not wish this photo of me to appear. Thank you! Colonel Sander's Agent (talk) 14:09, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
Delete per uploader's request. --Contributers2020Talk to me here 08:21, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
Page do not exist and and owner do not want this image uploaded. Sanatkverma (talk) 11:49, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused personal photo. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:47, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
Copyviol from https://www.igapsyd.com/lingiardi/ Antonio1952 (talk) 16:30, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Why Copyviol? The photo by Anna Nadalig is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.en please see here: https://www.igapsyd.com/lingiardi/ --Nicola.nardelli (talk) 16:56, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- Commons does not allow non-commercial licenses. Ixfd64 (talk) 19:31, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, I did not understand the matter thoroughly. Thank you for your reply. However, since I want Wikipedia to contain updated content, I asked the owner to change the license and she did so by removing the restriction for non-commercial use. Can the Copyviol be removed? --Nicola.nardelli (talk) 13:35, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept as image is now available under a free license. (non-admin closure) Ixfd64 (talk) 17:11, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
License only for the video, not for the rest of the screenshot Princess of Ara (talk) 22:44, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 09:07, 3 September 2021 UTC: Copyright violation: License only for the video, not for the rest of the screenshot --Krdbot 20:27, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
erroneously created by myself Ysogo (talk) 15:01, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 05:42, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
This is listed as cc-by-nd-2.0 on Flickr, but as cc-by-2.0 here. Commons claims cc-by-4.0, which I can't find anywhere. The festipedia.org.uk website links to Flickr, so I assume that the Flickr copy is older. I checked web.archive.ord and the only copy I could find was this where it says cc-by-nd, so I see no evidence of cc-by. Stefan2 (talk) 19:11, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - Festipedia iirc has a habit of not being well-versed in copyright. No evidence the free licence there is valid, delete it. -mattbuck (Talk) 23:21, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:25, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
The carboxylic acid group is drawn incorrectly. We have correct, higher quality options such as File:L-Homoserin.svg that can be used instead. Marbletan (talk) 18:20, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 13:33, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
Copyrighted Sahaib3005 (talk) 20:24, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Screenshot of program, probably Commons:TOO. A09090091 (talk) 13:32, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:36, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
A free license permission from the cover author is needed or an evidence that tha Flickr user is the cover author. Likely flickrwashing. Ankry (talk) 20:28, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. A09090091 (talk) 13:31, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:36, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
A free license permission from the cover photo author and/or publisher is needed. No evidence that the Flickr user is authorized to represent the publisher. Likely flickrwashing. Ankry (talk) 20:35, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Implausible that the Flickr account would be in such a position as to license the publisher's cover like this. Andy Dingley (talk) 20:39, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:36, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
Picture of the actress Rita Elmôr. 181.203.11.207 22:39, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep No directly visible copyright violation, your reason is invalid for image deletion. A09090091 (talk) 13:27, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Found here in 2013 - https://alfredojunior.wordpress.com/2013/05/22/rita-elmor-a-riva-de-salve-jorge-esta-na-mira-de-outros-autores-da-globo/ - needs OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 06:35, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
_Femme_Avec_Fleur_(2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Femme_Avec_Fleur_(2).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Near 1:1 low quality crop of File:(Marie Claire Korea) Femme Avec Fleur (1).jpg. Per COM:NOTUSED and COM:Redundant. BriefEdits (talk) 23:04, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
_Femme_Avec_Fleur_(1).jpg){kind=link}
_Femme_Avec_Fleur_(2).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:34, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
_Femme_Avec_Fleur_(2).jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Ülvi Şərifzadə (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused photos of non-notable person, no educational value, out of scope. And likely not own work but DW and photos of existing photos.
- File:Toyotali sekli.png
- File:Usaqliq.png
- File:Esger1.png
- File:Rufet200212.png
- File:Rüfət.png
- File:Rufetbilinmez.jpg
- File:Rufet13.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:57, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Promo. A09090091 (talk) 13:51, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 19:21, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Theshouvik (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:Kreamz logo.png
- File:Kreamzlogo.png
- File:News18Bangla.png
- File:Dainik Statesman Logo.png
- File:Bartaman Logo.png
- File:Ei Samay Logo.png
- File:Anandamela Logo.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 19:18, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ARandomQuizzer (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused badly drawn (by own admission!) and therefore inaccurate tectonic plate maps, unusable, out of scope, and redundant to any map in Category:Maps of major tectonic plates.
- File:Gonave Plate (drawn badly).png
- File:Galapagos Plate (drawn badly).png
- File:Futuna Plate (drawn badly).png
- File:Falklands Plate (drawn badly).png
- File:Explorer Plate (drawn badly).png
- File:Eurasian Plate (drawn badly).png
- File:Conway Reef Plate (drawn badly).png
- File:Coiba Plate (drawn badly).png
- File:Cocos Plate (drawn badly).png
- File:Caroline Plate (drawn badly).png
- File:Caribbean Plate (drawn badly).png
- File:Capricorn Plate (drawn badly).png
- File:Burma Plate (drawn badly).png
- File:Bird's Head Plate (drawn badly).png
- File:Banda Sea Plate (drawn badly).png
- File:Balmoral Reef Plate (drawn badly).png
- File:Australian Plate (drawn badly).png
- File:Arabian Plate (drawn badly).png
- File:Antarctican Plate (drawn badly).png
- File:Anatolia Plate (drawn badly).png
- File:Amur Plate (drawn badly).png
- File:Altiplano Plate (drawn badly).png
- File:African Plate (drawn badly).png
- File:Aegean Plate (drawn badly).png
- File:Adriatic Plate (drawn badly).png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:09, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 19:20, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Martynenko OV (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal images and photos of non-notable persons, COM:WEBHOST, no educational value, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:31, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. A09090091 (talk) 13:48, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 19:24, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by RobertShtirner (talk · contribs)
[edit]Likely not own works: disparate sizes, quality, and styles, missing EXIF data. All photos of politicians running in same election, unlikely that uploader was present at all these diverse settings and events.
- File:Владимир Медведев.jpg
- File:Евстифеев.jpg
- File:Шишкина.jpg
- File:Храменков.jpg
- File:Андрей Завьялов.jpg
- File:Александр Бочкарёв.jpg
- File:Александр Быков.jpg
- File:ГалинаКлочкова.jpg
- File:ВладиславЕгоров.jpg
- File:Владислав Егоров.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:50, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 19:23, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
Appears to be a re-upload of File:Gemma Collins 2021.jpg that was deleted per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Gemma Collins 2021.jpg, because it came from an obvious Flickrwashing account. The stated source for this file was created after the previous image was deleted. The Flickr account might be legit, though we don’t know the photographer for this photo and if the subject did request this image to be uploaded here, thenI think verifying the ownership and license via COM:VRT makes sense. Ytoyoda (talk) 03:00, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Ticket:2021090210005435 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 01:00, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
I have just accepted permission for “File:Gemma Collins by Gemma Collagen.jpg” under ticket:2021090210005435. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:37, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2A01:4C8:C80:AF4D:B85A:81E9:23D6:909D (talk) 02:12, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
Yo lo subí pero no me es posible conseguir el permiso del autor. Pablo.leyva (talk) 05:40, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: by Fitindia. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:56, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. A09090091 (talk) 13:45, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:56, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. A09090091 (talk) 13:45, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:56, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:43, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, also no evidence of a permission (Copyright © 2018 BGC Agriculture and Food Ltd. ti - Alle Rechte vorbehalten.). --Túrelio (talk) 19:36, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
wrong way of synthesis, new image is already in process Chemsiker (talk) 14:33, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Speedy delete. Uploader's request. Marbletan (talk) 14:48, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Request by uploader. --Leyo 20:12, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
wrong way of synthesis, new image is already in process Chemsiker (talk) 14:34, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete. Uploader's request. Marbletan (talk) 14:49, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Request by uploader. --Leyo 20:12, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
File EXIF shows "Copyright holder Yoshitaka Kono". OTRS permission needed. MKFI (talk) 08:08, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:08, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
self promotion — Preceding unsigned comment added by King Molala (talk • contribs) 2021-09-02T06:09:01 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:07, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
OTRS-permission from author Jéssica Gomila is needed. Taivo (talk) 08:14, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:08, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Personal photo, self promotional - IndrajitDas 08:15, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:07, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Cropped version used as Facebook profile image: https://www.facebook.com/livingstateband/photos/a.261773364541007/305412140177129/?type=3&theater MKFI (talk) 08:34, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Permission from Charles Brooks needed. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:07, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Promo. A09090091 (talk) 13:50, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:05, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Promo. A09090091 (talk) 13:50, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:05, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bramvanberten123 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. A09090091 (talk) 13:48, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:05, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of non-notable person, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:19, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. A09090091 (talk) 13:48, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:05, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. A09090091 (talk) 13:44, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:05, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:Dysplasia hip VS Normal hip 2.jpg
- File:Anatomy of pelvis 2.jpg
- File:Triple pelvic osteotomy new.jpg
- File:Anatomy of pelvis.jpg
- File:Dysplasia hip VS Normal hip.jpg
- File:Triple pelvic osteotomy.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:06, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Exif data says the copyright holder belongs to " (c) Banannaanna | Dreamstime.com"ˑ copyvio Nutshinou Talk! 18:48, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:06, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Unknown man, educational value is not shown. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 18:54, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:06, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal picture. Ixfd64 (talk) 19:18, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Promo photo. A09090091 (talk) 13:34, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:06, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
out of scope (+ probably has copyrighted logos Nutshinou Talk! 19:19, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. A09090091 (talk) 13:35, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:06, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yenotyenot (talk · contribs)
[edit]Pictures of non-notable person, not used in any articles.
Ixfd64 (talk) 19:21, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Promo photo. A09090091 (talk) 13:34, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:06, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
unused file of profile picture for a youtube channel with 2.1k subscribers, unlikely they ever get their own article Nutshinou Talk! 19:22, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Promo photo. A09090091 (talk) 13:34, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:06, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
vandalism Xsandriel (talk) 20:59, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, the description also seems to be an insult. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 12:26, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
@Xsandriel: , you can tag this with "{{Speedy}}" and list it as an "attack page", especially if it's also a direct copyright violation. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 12:27, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
- If there is a DR in place, please don't do that, as it will be rejected due to the DR page. If it is truly problematic then Com:AN and point to the DR so an admin can know to pay special attention. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:33, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
- I disagree strongly. Vandalism like this--particularly where it targets an individual--should be eliminated as soon as possible. I'm a bit baffled why you took the time to comment here but not delete the image. It's not a bad idea to drop a line to COM:AN, but anything to get this gone quickly is good. IronGargoyle (talk) 23:09, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete. As vandalism and attack page. IronGargoyle (talk) 23:12, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:12, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
This template is unused. Zero transclusions. https://linkcount.toolforge.org/?project=commons.wikimedia.org&page=Template:Abna Eyesnore (talk) 12:47, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep not empty anymore 4nn1l2 (talk) 21:28, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination as it now has been transcluded in File:Zakaria ibn Adam Ash'ari Qomi Tomb.jpg. Eyesnore (talk) 17:56, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. --clpo13(talk) 17:47, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Reason 1: Violates copyright as it is taken from Newell's Old Boys official media (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sDfHSXvABwo). Reason 2: Image has not been used in good faith and this image in addition to a wider version has continually been used by IP address users to vandalise the Marcelo Bielsa wikipedia page due to its unsightly nature. There are many better professional images of Bielsa that have already been uploaded that are available to use and are not violating copyright. Wonderr123 (talk) 02:51, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Not a copyright violation and not "unsightly" and its use is not vandalism despite what this SPA thinks. --RAN (talk) 23:19, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Youtube CC appears to be valid. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:04, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Reason 1: Violates copyright as it is taken from Newell's Old Boys official media (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sDfHSXvABwo). Reason 2: Image has not been used in good faith and this image in addition to a wider version has continually been used by IP address users to vandalise the Marcelo Bielsa wikipedia page due to its unsightly nature. There are many better professional images of Bielsa that have already been uploaded that are available to use and are not violating copyright. Wonderr123 (talk) 02:52, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- Comment, this is not a copyright violation as it is was released by the uploader using a CC BY licence (see the file description on YouTube). I agree, though, that a better frame could have been been selected, such as one where the subject doesn't have his mouth open. @Microwave Anarchist: , would you consider uploading an alternative file? Mattythewhite (talk) 14:53, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- I've uploaded a new version where Bielsa's mouth is shut. Microwave Anarchist (talk) 17:23, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Not a copyright violation, and a better screengrab was uploaded. --RAN (talk) 23:18, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Youtube CC appears to be valid. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:04, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Eyesnore as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G2. In my opinion discussion is needed here. Taivo (talk) 16:54, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete – as the person who moved the file formerly at that title to File:International 4700 flatbed Century 19'.jpg, I have no problem with the deletion of the former redirect. Retargetting would also be fine. Graham87 (talk) 16:58, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete as an implausible redirect. It would normally meet G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Eyesnore (talk) 19:27, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:13, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Slimy asparagus (talk · contribs)
[edit]Photos of games cannot be licensed with CC-BY-SA. The subject is copyrighted per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#Board_games
- File:Oceans game at trade fair.jpg
- File:Evolution game in progress.jpg
- File:Action display.jpg
- File:Dominant struggle early game.jpg
Elly (talk) 20:39, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:15, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 11:36, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:04, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yukoner2021 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Photos by others, taken from https://commissionerofyukon.ca/ with no visible free license , claimed as own work.
- File:George Maclean small.jpg
- File:George Norris Williams small.jpg
- File:2Arthur Wilson.jpg
- File:Doug Phillips portrait small.jpg
- File:1geraldine van bibber.jpg
- File:Gingell Judy small.jpg
- File:Jack Cable.jpg
- File:Ken McKinnon.jpg
- File:Ione Christensen.jpg
- File:Frank Fingland.jpg
- File:Art Pearson.jpg
- File:James Smith 2.jpg
- File:Wilfred George Brown.jpg
- File:Gordon Robertson Cameron.jpg
- File:F H Collins.jpg
- File:George MacKenzie 2.jpg
- File:Small Fraser.jpg
- File:Angélique Bernard.jpg
- File:Gibson 2.jpg
- File:Gibben.jpg
- File:Jeckell.jpg
- File:Percy Reid.jpg
- File:Z.T.Woods.jpg
- File:1William WB McInnes.jpg
- File:Alexander Henderson small.jpg
- File:2John Lithgow.jpg
- File:Douglas bell.jpg
- File:Group photo with Thomas Fawcett included.jpg
- File:Close up of Charles.jpg
- File:Cogdon.jpg
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:43, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:14, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Taken from https://www.facebook.com/Nostra17/posts/210037841124524, no evidence of CC-Zero license
Ytoyoda (talk) 12:46, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:57, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mehman Baltalı (talk · contribs)
[edit]Likely not own works: low-res web-sized images all with FB code in EXIF data.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:16, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:56, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Delete Taken from this source, with no evidence the work is that of the uploader. No license at the source that is compatible with Commons licensing. Copyright violation. Hammersoft (talk) 13:19, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:57, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Delete Taken from take your pick. No evidence to prove the work is that of the uploader. Copyright violation. Hammersoft (talk) 13:20, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; probably from Insta. --Gbawden (talk) 06:57, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by HomeUpload (talk · contribs)
[edit]Likely not own works: disparate sizes, quality, and styles, missing or inconsistent EXIF data. Especially obvious is the bar across the top of File:Barauni Fertilizer Plant.jpg --> clearly cropped from an unknown source.
- File:Barauni Refinery 2.jpg
- File:Barauni Railway Station.jpg
- File:Barauni Mokama Bridge.jpg
- File:Barauni Fertilizer Plant.jpg
- File:Barauni Thermal Power Plant.jpg
Also added:
- File:Barauni Town.jpg (montage that relies on 4 of the images above)
P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:34, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:56, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely own original work or DW of unknown source map. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:51, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:56, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:54, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:56, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of non-notable person, no educational value, out of scope. And likely not own work but COM:DW (photoshopped) judging by the format. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:55, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Promo. A09090091 (talk) 13:51, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:56, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:55, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:56, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:56, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:56, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused screenshot of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:56, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:56, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
These files, showing former bishops or their coats of arms, were all uploaded as the uploader's own work from 2018, which they quite obviously are not (like a photo of a man who died in 1958). They should either be given proper sources, attributions etc. showing that (and why) they are in the public domain or under a free license, or else they should be deleted per the precautionary principle.
- File:Orbin, Johann Baptist.jpg
- File:Vicari-Hermann von.jpg
- File:Boll, Bernhard Erzbischof 1.jpg
- File:Schäufele, Herrmann Erzbischof I.jpg
- File:Eugen Seiterich 1.jpg
- File:Rauch, Wendelin.jpg
- File:Georg Ignaz Komp 1.jpg
- File:Oskar Saier.jpg
- File:Hermann Schäufele.jpg
- File:Eugen Seiterich.jpg
- File:11 Wendelin Rauch.jpg
- File:Konrad Gröber.jpg
- File:Karl Fritz.jpg
- File:Thomas Nörber.jpg
- File:Georg Ignaz Komp.jpg
- File:Johann Christian Roos.jpg
- File:Johann Baptist Orbin.jpg
- File:Lothar v. Kübel.jpg
- File:Hermann v. Vicari.jpg
- File:02 Ignaz Demeter.jpg
- File:Wappen Bernhard Boll.jpg
Rosenzweig τ 13:58, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:57, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. And above COM:TOO. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:58, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep in use. --RAN (talk) 23:26, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: While INUSE this is a complex logo and requires OTRS. Own work it is not. --Gbawden (talk) 06:55, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ervikasbhargava (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:00, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:55, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Unused screenshot, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:01, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:55, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:55, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Unused screenshot, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:11, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:54, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Unused low-res image of nondescript place/building, little educational value, unusable and out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:18, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:54, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from photos. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:53, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kissinger111 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not own works: see description and EXIF data in File:Аида Ибрагимовна Абибуллаева.jpg. Missing permission.
- File:Сарсенбаев Булат Сергазиевич.jpg
- File:Аида Ибрагимовна Абибуллаева.jpg
- File:Алтай Абибуллаев.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:28, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:53, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Unused poster fragment, no clear purpose, nor educational value, unusable and out of scope. Unknown copyright status. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:33, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:53, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Highly unlikely own work: found online published prior to upload here. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:37, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:53, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hristijan Kicho (talk · contribs)
[edit]I seriously doubt any of these uploads are the uploaders own work.
- File:Панорама на Пехчево.jpg
- File:Поглед на Македонска Каменица и езерото Калиманци.jpg
- File:Панорама на Македонска Каменица.jpg
- File:Винарската визба „Тиквеш“.jpg
- File:Аква паркот во Пробиштип, еден од најголемите во Македонија.jpg
- File:Панорама на дел од Пробиштип.jpg
- File:Влезот на Демир Хисар од страната на Битола.jpg
- File:Стара панорама на Демир Хисар.jpg
- File:Панорама на Куманово ноќе.jpg
- File:Плоштадот во Куманово.jpg
- File:Манастирот „Св. Ѓорѓи Победоносец“ во Бучин.jpg
- File:Панорама на дел од Бучин.jpg
- File:Стариот римски мост во Бучин.jpg
- File:Споменик на револуцијата во паркот во Струмица.jpg
- File:Споменик на Димитар Поп Георгиев - Беровски во центарот на Берово.jpg
- File:Споменик на Стив Наумов на Широк Сокак во Битола.jpg
- File:Споменик на Свети Никола во центарот на Свети Николе.jpg
- File:Кратово - Карпош.jpg
- File:Споменик на Свети Ѓорѓи Кратовски во центарот на Кратово.jpg
- File:Споменик на патронот на градот - Гоце Делчев.jpg
- File:Споменик на Круме Кепески во центарот на Прилеп.jpg
- File:Споменик на Дедо Кољо Добровенски во Новаци .jpg
- File:Панорама на Дебар.jpg
- File:Црквата „Св. Петка“ во Кавадарци.jpg
- File:Панорама на Кавадарци од 1955 година.jpg
- File:Црквата „Св.Атанасиј“ во центарот на градот.jpg
- File:Гевгелија во почетокот на XX век.jpg
- File:Стариот споменик на Олга Мицеска на Китино Кале.jpg
- File:Старо Кичево.jpg
- File:Градот од левата страна и главната улица „Булевар Ослободување“.jpg
- File:Стадионот во Штип.jpg
- File:Споменик на Кирил Пејчиновиќ во Тетово.jpg
- File:Споменик на Свети Гаврил Лесновски во Пробиштип.jpg
- File:Споменик на бежанците од Егејска Македонија во Струмица.jpg
- File:Биста на Драге Богески во Кичево.jpg
- File:Кичево - Јанко Михајлоски - Јанчица.jpg
- File:Возот Ќирчо во близина на автобуската станица во Кичево.jpg
- File:Споменик на Пере Тошев во прилепската чаршија.jpg
- File:Панорама на дел од Кочани.jpg
- File:Споменик на Никола Петров - Русински во центарот на Берово.jpg
- File:Споменик на грабнатото бекче.jpg
- File:Мало езеро во струмичкиот парк.jpg
- File:Паркот во Струмица.jpg
- File:Биста на цар Самоил во струмичкиот парк.jpg
- File:Поглед на плоштадот во Струмица.jpg
- File:Фрески во надворешниот дел од манастирот.jpg
- File:Фрески во манастирот.jpg
- File:Центарот во Стар Дојран.jpg
- File:Плажа и главното шеталиште во Стар Дојран .jpg
- File:Споменик на Дојрана во Стар Дојран.jpg
- File:Панорама на Гевгелија.jpg
- File:Центарот во Гевгелија.jpg
- File:Споменик на Сава Михајлов во центарот на Гевгелија.jpg
- File:Спомен табла во чест на Гемиџиите по повод 80-годишнина од Солунските атентати.jpg
- File:Театарот „Јордан Хаџи-Константинов-Џинот“ во Велес.jpg
- File:Портрет од Кочо Рацин и песната „Копачите“ на зграда во Велес.jpg
- File:Споменик на Кочо Рацин во центарот на Велес.jpg
- File:Спомен обележје посветено на Гемиџиите од 1903 г..jpg
- File:Пешачки мост во Велес.jpg
- File:„Т'га за југ“ од К. Миладинов на табла покрај кејот на Црни Дрим.jpg
- File:Црн Дрим во Струга.jpg
- File:Споменик на девојка со стомни за вода во Струга.jpg
- File:Споменик на Петар Карпош во Кратово.jpg
- File:Фреска 2.jpg
- File:Фреска музеј.jpg
- File:Панорама на Кичево со Китино Кале.jpg
1989 (talk) 01:41, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:37, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hristijan Kicho (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Панорама на Демир Хисар.jpg
- File:Панорама на Штип.jpg
- File:Натпис на Делчево.jpg
- File:Натпис на Делчево со дрвени букви.jpg
- File:Плоштадот „Златко Владов“ во Градско.jpg
- File:Споменик-рудар во Пробиштип.jpg
- File:Влезот на Штип ноќе.jpg
- File:Споменик на Скендербег во ценарот на Дебар.jpg
- File:Споменик на Свети Гаврил Лесновски.jpg
- File:Паркот со црквата „Свети Кирил и Методиј“ во позадина.jpg
- File:Плоштадот во Македонска Каменица.jpg
- File:Кочо Рацин и песната „Копачите“ на ѕидот на зграда во Велес.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:29, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 13:50, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hristijan Kicho (talk · contribs) 3
[edit]Likely not own works: low-res web size, crop marks, and almost all have FB or transmission code in EXIF data. Unreliable uploader, see previous DR's.
- File:Gorno Orizari.jpg
- File:Панорама на Кичево ноќе.jpg
- File:Плоштадот во Штип.jpg
- File:Музеј Штип.jpg
- File:Света Петка - Штип.jpg
- File:Штип Архитектура.jpg
- File:Панорама на Штип ноќе11234.jpg
- File:Панорама на Штип 1123.jpg
- File:Панорама на Штип 112.jpg
- File:Панорама на Штип ноќе.jpg
- File:Панорама на Штип ноќе11.jpg
- File:Свети Петар и Павле - Кичево.jpg
- File:Музеј-галерија Кавадарци.jpg
- File:Китино Кале1.jpg
- File:Радовиш плоштад.jpg
- File:Коритото на Радовишка Река.jpg
- File:Плоштадот во Радовиш.jpg
- File:Плажа во Стар Дојран1.jpg
- File:Центарот на Стар Дојран.jpg
- File:Стар Дојран за време на летната туристичка сезона.jpg
- File:Фонтана со споменик на Дојрана, девојката по која според легендата, градот добил името.jpg
- File:Дојран плоштад.jpg
- File:Плоштадот во Стар Дојран.jpg
- File:Плажа во Стар Дојран.jpg
- File:Дојранското Езеро.jpg
- File:Центарот во Стар Дојран.jpg
- File:Шеталиштето во Дојран.jpg
- File:Панорама на Дојранското Езеро со поглед на Стар Дојран.jpg
- File:Споменик на Александар Македонски во центарот на Штип.jpg
- File:Панорама на Штип.jpg
- File:Кејот на реката Отиња во Штип.jpg
- File:Центарот на Демир Хисар.jpg
- File:Споменик на НОБ во Демир Хисар.jpg
- File:Панорама на Демир Хисар.jpg
- File:Склуптура во Гостивар со името на градот.jpg
- File:Кејот покрај реката Вардар.jpg
- File:Споменикот „Четири бандере“.jpg
- File:Кружен тек во Куманово.jpg
- File:Спомен-обележје од букви „Куманово“ во центарот на градот.jpg
- File:Панорама на Куманово.jpg
- File:Староградска архитектура во Ресен.jpg
- File:Центарот на Ресен.jpg
- File:Градскиот плоштад.jpg
- File:Спомен-бисти во центарот на Ресен.jpg
- File:Плоштадот во Ресен.jpg
- File:Плоштадот во Крива Паланка.jpg
- File:Градскиот парк во Богданци.jpg
- File:Главната улица во Богданци.jpg
- File:Шеталиштето во Струмица1.jpg
- File:Шеталиштето во Струмица.jpg
- File:Центарот на Струмица.jpg
- File:Куќата на Лазо Топаловски во Дебар заштитена како културно наследство.jpg
- File:Поглед на Дебар и брегот на Дебарското Езеро.jpg
- File:Главната улица во Дебар.jpg
- File:Панорама на дел од градот.jpg
- File:Панорама на Македонска Каменица.jpg
- File:Фонтаната на градскиот плоштадот.jpg
- File:Плоштадот во Македонска Каменица.jpg
- File:Багер од рудникот „Саса“ како реквизит во градскиот парк.jpg
- File:Панорама на Велес навечер.jpg
- File:Винарската визба „Вила Марија“, лозови насади и автопатот на влезот во Демир Капија.jpg
- File:Панорама на дел од Кавадарци.jpg
- File:Црквата „Света Петка“ во Кавадарци.jpg
- File:Parkkavadarci.jpg
- File:Градскиот парк во Виница.jpg
- File:Bucin5.jpg
- File:Bucin4.jpg
- File:Bucin3.jpg
- File:Bucin2.jpg
- File:Bucin.jpg
- File:Bucin1.jpg
- File:Stojanov most na Pchinja.jpg
- File:Panorama na Kichevo.jpg
- File:Centarot na Demir kapija.jpg
- File:Sveti Ilija Rotino.jpg
- File:Rotinsko Ezero.jpg
- File:Panorama na Strumica.jpg
- File:Панорама на Единаковци.jpg
- File:Црквата „Свети Атанасиј“.jpg
- File:Панорама на Богданци.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:42, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Comment Is 960 × 720 px "low-res web size"? In previous DRs the reasons were "serious doubt" and "could be found" (but were not?) elsewhere, +"inconsistent resolutions" (natural if the user crops them). Too little said in those DRs to draw any conclusions about the contributor or about these files. Looking at those previous files could say something, but as they are deleted, I cannot see use any such information. –LPfi (talk) 16:42, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, for pictures supposedly taken in 2020, 960x720 with a filesize of about 150 KB is certainly low-res! Most telling is the FB code in the EXIF data. If previously published on FB, it will need OTRS at a minimum. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:44, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- If published on FB (or anywhere). Images uploaded to FB but not published (such as those viewing of which was restricted to family members) do not need OTRS. And not all nominated files have an FB code. Is also a night view of 1 620 × 1 080 (1.3 M) "low-res web size"? I'd like to have all files nominated fulfil the stated reason for nominating them, and I do not like referring to a previous DR where nothing much was said. –LPfi (talk) 08:51, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Unlikely to be own work, despite the size. Those without FBMD probably came from Insta or similar. PCP especially based on the uploader history. --Gbawden (talk) 06:54, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hugo Villarreal (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial diagrams and logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:Psicologia Endocentrica lg.png
- File:Psicologia Endocentrica.png
- File:Anatomía del instituto de investigación CIT, CEI y TIP.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:51, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
just a test deletation Ldjnog (talk) 14:59, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. --Gbawden (talk) 06:51, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Павлова М.Е. (talk · contribs)
[edit]2 images not own works (source: Архив организации = Organization archive), missing essential info. 2 unused logos, out of scope.
- File:Тереза Ганнибаловна Дурова.jpg
- File:Teatrium logo.jpg
- File:Teatrium on serpukhovka.jpg
- File:240x240.JPG
P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:01, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:51, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:51, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by EmilianoIsaja (talk · contribs)
[edit]Ejnar Nielsen died in 1956.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:13, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:50, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Unused random and poor image of nondescript body of water, nothing visible, no educational value, unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:26, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. A09090091 (talk) 13:43, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:50, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Unused random and poor image of nondescript body of water, no educational value, unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:26, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. A09090091 (talk) 13:43, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:50, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Looks like brochure picture. Cjp24 (talk) 15:35, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Taken from https://tomosmotorji.weebly.com/apn-4.html. A09090091 (talk) 13:42, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:50, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Looks like brochure picture. Cjp24 (talk) 15:37, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:51, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by LorenzPimentelRegio48170 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Likely not own works: taken from FB as per EXIF data.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:52, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:49, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Indianhelplines (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promotional uploads with no educational purpose; out of COM:SCOPE.
𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 16:20, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Probably copyrightable too. A09090091 (talk) 13:41, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Considering this is promotional, I suppose the uploader might as well be the copyright owner. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 15:53, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Comment The name says it all. A09090091 (talk) 18:52, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Considering this is promotional, I suppose the uploader might as well be the copyright owner. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 15:53, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:50, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Book cover, OTRS needed. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 16:27, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:49, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Probably not an own work. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 16:36, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. A09090091 (talk) 13:40, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:49, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Logos of non-notable company.
Ixfd64 (talk) 19:24, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:49, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
out of scope. Nutshinou Talk! 19:25, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Also Mojang is copyright holder for the game design. A09090091 (talk) 13:33, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:49, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Plain text, out of projet scope Achim (talk) 19:30, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. A09090091 (talk) 13:33, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:49, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
This is a screen shot, not a camera picture. Even though the uploader is the subject of the image, it is doubtful he has permission to use it. >>> Green Jello, Green Jello Vision. Snackmurat (talk) 22:16, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
I am part of the Grrenjellovision show and in the Green Jello band and this is me as Johnny Rock on the show. Bill Manspeaker has given me the right to use any photos of me and the show anywhere it will bring attention to the project. Thank you for your concern. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Miki.Hornsman.account (talk • contribs) 19:01, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; please provide permission from the photographer via COM:OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 06:48, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
No indication of compatible license on the source website provided -- DaxServer (talk) 12:02, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:15, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by JuTa as no permission (No permission since)
I think that we need evidence that this is from 1970, not evidence of permission. If it's from 1970, it maybe counts as a "non-creative photographic or audiovisual work" as listed in the template. Stefan2 (talk) 19:15, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- The file was just deleted by User:DMacks, although without closing this request. --Stefan2 (talk) 19:08, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (film is 1970 ar:عين_الحياة_(فيلم)), clearly a creative work. --DMacks (talk) 02:35, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Aranya as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Previously deleted for copyvio: github.com/ninjamuffin99/Funkin/blob/master/art/preloaderArt.png. Should be discussed for COM:TOO considering File:Cyberpunk 2077 logo.svg. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:41, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- You can go on ahead and delete this anyway. I didn't know that it was originally deleted, as I was unaware I was uploading it to Commons. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) 10:31, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- I don't know, the splashes seem like they might pass over the mark, if barely. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 01:02, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted false license claim -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:58, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
error file and copy Giogana3098 (talk) 06:34, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Useless file Trangmai150809 (talk) 12:16, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
- Obvious vandalism. — WikiLucas (🖋️) 21:09, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per prompt uploader request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:02, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
Extremely poor resolution 2603:8081:1600:DD6B:A8FA:B49B:BA1E:B6A2 01:02, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Krd 14:32, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Querying on the basis of Threshold of Orignaility in logo design centre. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:31, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Kept because there are only three letters in the center of the logo. -- 32X (talk) 01:17, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Pbrks as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Non-free logo that falls above COM:TOO Germany. Not blatantly above TOO, requires discussion. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:40, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: as before. --Krd 14:33, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope, private biografie of a belgian human Xgeorg (talk) 06:47, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:34, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
I didn't see the exact same file (File:DieBasisLogo.svg) - so my file is redundant. Welkend (talk) 10:21, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:35, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
Zitat aus dem Impressum der Webseite, auf der das Unternehmen dieses Bild veröffentlicht (https://www.capri-sun.com/group/en/imprint/):
"The copyright for published material created by the author remains solely with the author of the pages. Copying or use of such graphics, audio files, video sequences, and texts in other electronic or printed publications is not allowed without explicit consent of the author."
Die User-Seite des Uploaders user:Leschneck ist noch leer und gibt entsprechend keinen Hinweis, dass er authorisiert ist, das Bild unter eine freie Lizenz zu stellen. KaiMartin (talk) 11:16, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:36, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:27, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. A09090091 (talk) 13:53, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:36, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
See COM:PACKAGING. Stefan2 (talk) 17:35, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- The uploader is complaining on the talk page. I think that the uploader should read COM:PRP, point 3, and sv:WP:BDF. --Stefan2 (talk) 18:08, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:37, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
Contemporary published advertisement, would be copyrighted. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 18:07, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Promo photo. A09090091 (talk) 13:36, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:37, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
Can be rendered using MediaWiki markup, not used in any articles. Ixfd64 (talk) 19:20, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:37, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
kein samuel Fischer zu sehen, da gibg wohl was schief Donna Gedenk (talk) 20:47, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:38, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kissterico (talk · contribs)
[edit]All of these are watermarked. Most don't have any meaningful exif. Uploader has a history of copyvios, I think we need OTRS to confirm that the uploader is the same person as mentioned in the watermark.
_actuando_en_Santander_2019.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ex-Bar%C3%B3n_Rojo.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gbawden (talk) 10:15, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 07:27, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
The uploader claims that this is licensed under cc-by-sa-2.5, but it says all rights reserved on Flickr. It looks like flickrwashing as well.
The uploader claims that the copyright has expired. The uploader also claims that the photo is from 1998, but provides no evidence of this. There is no date on Flickr. If it is from 1998, then it is too recent to be in the public domain. Stefan2 (talk) 19:02, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 07:04, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by MiguelAlanCS as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:CSD#F1, Possible copyright violation: No evidence of a free license at the claimed source. Clearly needs to be discussed per PD claim. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:57, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted Unsupported license claim. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:59, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Very low quality. Looks like it was taken from a published source. Unlikely own work. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 16:50, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Promo. Taken from https://www.smashwords.com/profile/view/akmnazir. A09090091 (talk) 13:38, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:01, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
file in copyviol: not a free-use logo — danyele 22:41, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted Unsupported license claim. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:03, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
file in copyvyol: not a free-use logo — danyele 22:44, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted false license -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:03, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Rendered images without sources and permission.
- File:Torpedera República.jpg
- File:Lancha Torpedera Aldea.jpg
- File:Monitor Loa.jpg
- File:Monitor Victoria.jpg
- File:Humberto.gif
- File:Torpederas Janequeo, Aldea, Glaura, Tucapel y Guacolda.jpg
- File:Lancha Urcos.jpg
- File:Torpedera 2° Janequeo.jpg
- File:Lancha Arno.jpg
Smooth O (talk) 07:36, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:03, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Per previous deletion request.
- File:Monitor Loa en goleta.png
- File:Blindado CSS Virginia.jpg
- File:Torpedera Rayo.jpg
- File:Cañonero Puno.jpg
- File:Cañonero Yapurá.jpg
- File:Pontón Miraflores.png
- File:Barca Miraflores.gif
- File:Cañonera Pichincha.png
- File:Goleta Guayaquileña.png
Smooth O (talk) 07:19, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:42, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
There is freedom of panorama in Argentina for architecture, but not for sculpture. This sculpture was erected in 1973 and it is still protected with copyright. Taivo (talk) 11:16, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --Contributers2020Talk to me here 03:44, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:03, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
An official document, which is an attempt to promote only Osama Eid (talk) 11:22, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:03, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
If it's from 1988, then it doesn't meet the year requirements in the PD template used. Note that there are Wikipedia-style fair use rationales on the file information page. Stefan2 (talk) 19:36, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Sanandros at 20:31, 8 October 2021 UTC: Unfree Flickr license: https://flickr.com/photos/193720503@N08/51398439943 is licensed under All Rights Reserved, Furhtermore no Fair Use --Krdbot 01:25, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Due to COM:FOP Japan. According to the jawp article, the author of this statue died in 1994. In Japan, the copyright is kept by 70 years since author's dead. Thus, this media cannot be accepted in commons. Netora (talk) 06:00, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
I want to delete this picture because too small, but I don’t know to delete,therefore I updated other file. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 240B:C010:4C3:B62A:A493:3F71:9B4:5 (talk) 09:23, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 05:56, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Zoozaz1 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: NC license according to source: https://www.newframe.com/copyright/. Two-year old transfer, discussion required to ascertain whether the license may have changed. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:45, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- King of Hearts, Looking at the archive link from early 2019, it was even more restrictive then than now; "photography and other visuals used in New Frame can only be licensed with written permission from the Visual Editor," and there is no VTR ticket or indication that they gave permission. Zoozaz1 (talk) 02:16, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:00, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Suspected copyvio of commercially produced portrait. See similar images on Africa Legal, ImpactHer Facebook page, and Business Day. Edge3 (talk) 02:54, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- Another user astutely noted that the image's metadata matches the uploader's username, so this image might actually be correctly licensed. Just wanted to bring this up. Thanks. Edge3 (talk) 04:07, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Note that the only thing in the EXIF is the photographers name -- the EXIF did not come out of the camera, but was added later. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:04, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Per: COM:FOP Bosnia and Herzegovina. No freedom of panorama in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Author is en:Antun Augustinčić (died 1979).
- File:Banjbrdo1.jpg
- File:Banjbrdo2.jpg
- File:NKD 123 spomenik palim borcima bosanske krajine na banj brdu.jpg
- File:Споменик палим борцима Босанске крајине на Бањ Брду (на Шехитлуцима).jpg
- File:Споменик палим крајишницима.jpg
- File:Споменик палим Крајишницима.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Smooth O (talk) 07:58, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Smooth O: Shouldn't be deleted. I don't see how the cited law is being violated, nonsense.--Ivan VA (talk) 11:15, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Freedom of panorama in BiH is allowed for noncommercial purposes. This is a non-prof right? Btw, two of the photos were made during a Wiki-loves-monuments in Republika Srpska, the next tour is scheduled in a week or so, and they explicitly obide by bh. laws (see 'Слобода панораме' heading). --Ivan VA (talk) 11:30, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- Comment @Ivan VA: Usage for commercial purpose must be allowed for images to be on Commons. Read more in Commons:FOP, and also see all discussions for all previously deleted images per FOP in B&H (Category:Bosnia and Herzegovina FOP cases/deleted), including image of same monument (Commons:Deletion requests/File:NKD 123 Spomenik palim borcima Bosanske Krajine na Banj Brdu.jpg). --Smooth O (talk) 11:48, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
@Bojana Wiki PG: Could u get this please? Coz u're organising the next Wikilovesmonuments in RS/BiH. --Ivan VA (talk) 12:01, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Ivan VA: To be more clear, FoP is not problem with majority of monuments listed here: sr:Списак културних добара Српске, but FoP applies only to "modern" monuments and buildings in Bosnia and Herzegovina where author or architect is not dead more than 70 years. For example most frequent cases of uploaded images in RS are Category:Dolina heroja and Category:Monument to the Revolution (Kozara). --Smooth O (talk) 13:02, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Smooth O: That's half of the list. --Ivan VA (talk) 16:13, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - the images infringe on the sculptor's copyright. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:06, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
_Closeup.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Closeup.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Possibly out of COM:SCOPE. File was used as an evidence to keep a then-AfDed article at w:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DZRV-FM. However, I cannot see its true educational and encyclopedic purpose: assuming it comes from the National Telecommunications Commission of the Philippines, it should be publicly available via NTC's website (and a link from that page should have been cited in AfD to counter the AfD nomination). The list can also be replicated via Wikitext only, making this a needless text-based file. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:12, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
_Closeup.jpg){kind=link}
- Info the original uploader at enwiki was w:User:Superastig. It was moved to Commons on August 21, 2021 by Nathan2055. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:14, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:07, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
_Closeup.jpg){kind=link}
Certainly not own work. Probably not PD either because of year of origin. Tekstman (talk) 10:41, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:07, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
No sources 83.200.72.29 11:32, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:07, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Three files uploaded the same day already deleted as copyvios, another one (Lumbini - Mayadevi Temple from South, Lumbini.jpg) is a scaled down reupload without attribution. It is safe to assume that the lowe-resolution rest is also copyvio.
File:Pashupatinath-temple.jpg – can't be googled/tineyed but has a watermark
File:Nepal-Kathmandu-Valley-Changu-Narayan.jpg – many hits, (example https://www.imagekhabar.com/news/144730/)
File:GoNepal-blogs2015Jul31-07-01-08.jpg is crop of File:The Monastery of World Peace, Lumbini.jpg probably obtained elsewhere (see filename)
File:10-scenic-valleys-that-you-need-to-visit-2.jpg is not even in landlocked Nepal but "Nā Pali Coast State Park" in Hawaii with hundreds of google/tineye hits...
etc.
- File:Pashupatinath-temple.jpg
- File:Nepal-Kathmandu-Valley-Changu-Narayan.jpg
- File:Makalu Base Camp Trek 1460397339.235.jpg
- File:Makalu-base-camp.jpg
- File:GoNepal-blogs2015Jul31-07-01-08.jpg
- File:Lumba Samba Trek.jpg
- File:GoNepal-blogs2015Jul31-07-00-11.jpg
- File:GoNepal-blogs2015Jul31-06-54-43.jpg
- File:Badi malika.png
- File:10-scenic-valleys-that-you-need-to-visit-2.jpg
- File:Arun-valley.jpg
- File:074-laliguras22.jpg
TFerenczy (talk) 13:53, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:08, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
This is a copyright violation.
The text to sv:Vi gå över daggstänkta berg was written by sv:Olof Thunman (1879-1944) and first published in 1906. The text is in the public domain in both Sweden and the United States.
The song was composed by sv:Edwin Ericsson (1874-1968) and the musical notes were first published in 1908. The music is in the public domain in the United States and enters the public domain in Sweden on 1 January 2039.
The illustration from sv:Nu ska vi sjunga was made by sv:Elsa Beskow (1873-1953) and first published in 1943. The illustration enters the public domain in Sweden on 1 January 2024 and in the United States on 1 January 2039.
Per COM:L#Interaction of US and non-US copyright law, files on Commons must be in the public domain in both the source country and the United States. While the text is permitted on Commons, the musical notes and the illustration are not permitted on Commons until 2039. Stefan2 (talk) 15:37, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- You mean the COM:URAA? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 22:47, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- This file, or parts of it, is currently unfree in both Sweden and the United States. It is unfree in the United States because of URAA, but the unfree status in Sweden isn't related to URAA. --Stefan2 (talk) 11:19, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:09, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Elsa Beskow
[edit]The artist Elsa Beskow died in 1953. The illustrations are not permitted on Commons until 2024.
Stefan2 (talk) 15:45, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:10, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
- Undeleted in 2024 No US copyright concerns. Platonides (talk) 00:16, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
Can be found at https://businessmirror.com.ph/2018/03/08/making-the-case-for-bagani/ and https://www.pressreader.com/philippines/the-philippine-star/20180302/282321090502351 so uploader needs to explain how she is the copyright holder of an image that showed in two different high circulation newspapers in early 2018. GRuban (talk) 16:30, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:10, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Wrong attribution, possible copyvio, because original author is not mentioned Rainer Halama (talk) 16:36, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- Deletion ist ok. I have no infomation about the picture. -- Clemens Franz (talk) 19:15, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:10, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
includes account numbers for personal account at JP Bank. Clover Tigers (talk) 16:47, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:11, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
File:Starr-130910-0696-Casuarina equisetifolia-habit with sign frigate birds and noddies-Camp-Laysan (25129373671).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Very blurry; numerous other much better photos from same photo collection, so not an important image to keep. MPF (talk) 16:47, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:11, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Allowing usage on Wikipedia is insufficient for upload on Commons. Please have the uploader change the license on Flickr or submit a COM:VRT email.
- File:R-1 Romanian tank reconstruction 5.jpg
- File:R-1 Romanian tank reconstruction 4.jpg
- File:R-1 Romanian tank reconstruction 3.jpg
- File:R-1 Romanian tank reconstruction 2.jpg
- File:R-1 Romanian tank reconstruction 1.jpg
Ytoyoda (talk) 18:32, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- Hey, User:Ytoyoda. I see. I actually particularly asked the uploader about posting the photos on Wikimedia Commons (not Wikipedia) and he agreed. I typed in "Wikipedia" in the photo's description because I always associate Commons with Wikipedia, i.e. when I upload something on Commons, I upload it to post in on Wikipedia. I am going to change the description. Is this enough, or do I still need him to change the photos' description? Kind regards, Lupishor (talk) 18:40, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- EDIT: If it's not enough, please don't delete the photos yet. Give me some time to ask the uploader whether he can change the license, instead. I will message him tomorrow; he usually replies quickly. Lupishor (talk) 18:42, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Lupishor: Hi, thanks for responding. Deletion discussions take a while so the images won't be deleted any time soon. Anyway, the distinction between Wikipedia and Commons isn't that important. It's more that the copyright owner needs to allow use anywhere, for any reason, in any manner, since the point of Wikipedia is to be a copyright-free resource that can be used without restrictions. If the Flickr user is okay with their photographs being used for profit or modified in any way, then it's fine. But permission just for use on Wikipedia is too restrictive. Ytoyoda (talk) 18:47, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- Hey again, User:Ytoyoda. The uploader has changed the license. I hope it's alright now. Lupishor (talk) 16:38, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Lupishor: Thanks for following up. I'm happy to withdraw my request. Ytoyoda (talk) 17:37, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Ytoyoda: No problem, thanks for the friendly approach. Kind regards, Lupishor (talk) 17:40, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Lupishor: Thanks for following up. I'm happy to withdraw my request. Ytoyoda (talk) 17:37, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
- Hey again, User:Ytoyoda. The uploader has changed the license. I hope it's alright now. Lupishor (talk) 16:38, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Lupishor: Hi, thanks for responding. Deletion discussions take a while so the images won't be deleted any time soon. Anyway, the distinction between Wikipedia and Commons isn't that important. It's more that the copyright owner needs to allow use anywhere, for any reason, in any manner, since the point of Wikipedia is to be a copyright-free resource that can be used without restrictions. If the Flickr user is okay with their photographs being used for profit or modified in any way, then it's fine. But permission just for use on Wikipedia is too restrictive. Ytoyoda (talk) 18:47, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:13, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Useless undersized image, and the one on the right is nonsense (it's a filter for making clean air into dirty) Andy Dingley (talk) 19:52, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:14, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
User:Agora1950/gallery poesie0 and its contents
[edit]It is a self-published poetry collection of the user. Out of scope of the project. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 20:32, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. A09090091 (talk) 13:30, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:18, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
No source. Rename cities. Fake map Masoud bukani (talk) 20:41, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:19, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
There is an identical version of this svg-logo. File:PASOK logo 2012.svg Welkend (talk) 21:29, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:19, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
There is a svg-version, no one uses the jpg-version and the quality of the jpg-version is bad. Welkend (talk) 21:38, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep There can be subtle errors when you convert from jpg to svg, and the only way to detect them is to compare to the original. Read any of the arguments made over flags or coat-of-arms in the past here at Commons where people argue over the color or the roundness of a curve. The website that the original came from might not be around in 50 years. --RAN (talk) 23:07, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:19, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Possible license laundering, uploader's last contribution after only 3 uploads Film Enthusiast (talk) 21:40, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:20, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
There is a svg-version and the quality of the jpg-version is bad. Welkend (talk) 22:01, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:20, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Unfortunately, this photo fails COM:LR: the original source is Wikimapia and the original author there has numerous warnings about copyvios. This is a file from an unreliable author at an unreliable source. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:13, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:39, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Copyright infringement, no real source is mentioned DZwarrior1 (talk) 12:12, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, fails COM:LR. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:25, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Template:Subst : delete Coffee18 Cool (talk) 12:44, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- Comment DR was started by the uploader (who is not the author) less than an hour after the upload. There's no reason given by Coffee18 Cool, but ts seems like there's something wrong with the copyright status. The file itself says (below the legend) that it's licensed CC-BC-NC-SA 4.0. I can't read the messenger exchange given as proof of permission, but it only mentions that specific license. Unless someone who can read Chinese can confirm that the rest of the text contains a permission to abandon the NC part of the license, we should probably consider it not compatible with COM:L and Delete it. --El Grafo (talk) 09:35, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per above. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:27, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Yumeto as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G2. In my opinion discussion is needed here. Taivo (talk) 16:51, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: no discussion either way. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:29, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
According to sv:Nu ska vi sjunga, the illustrator is sv:Elsa Beskow (1874-1953). In Sweden, the copyright expires 70 years after the death of the illustrator, so the cover art enters the public domain in Sweden on 1 January 2024.
According to Wikipedia, this was first published in 1943. In the United States, the copyright expires 95 years after publication, so the cover art enters the public domain in the United States on 1 January 2039.
Per COM:L#Interaction of US and non-US copyright law, files on Commons must be in the public domain in both the source country and in the United States. The file may therefore not be on Commons until 2039. Stefan2 (talk) 15:30, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- Note that there is information on the deletion request talk page. --Stefan2 (talk) 17:34, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:20, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
No quiero dar información sobre mis creaciones por el miedo al plagio y por otros problemas personales. Así que por favor solicito borrado rápido o mejor dicho dominar a borrado esta foto que yo subí. Maxingrado301 (talk) 22:12, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Self-requested, no clear scope. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:21, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by C1K98V as Copyvio (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F1|[1]. Appears in validly licensed Youtube video source, but worth a discussion over whether they own the copyright to this image. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:51, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. I do not see how this high resolution image can be taken from the film. --Ellywa (talk) 21:55, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rmpenyaranda (talk · contribs)
[edit]I nominated the first one, File:Film Director - Bagani.jpg, separately, (see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Film Director - Bagani.jpg) then decided to look at user's other uploads. I found the second one File:DirekLester1.jpg, is a crop from https://twitter.com/LesterPimentel/status/917274158618177536 - you can see the other person's crossed arms in the lower left corner of our image. I'm going to assume the others are similarly suspicious. User's EN profile page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Rmpenyaranda says she is a food technologist at a group of restaurants in the Philippines, which means it's possible she works for the subject - Pimentel is apparently an impressive person, who owns a chain of restaurants as well as being a director. But we'd need proof of this. User, if you are Direk Lester Pimentel, or a representative, please write as much to Commons:OTRS and explain it, otherwise we will need to assume you don't own the copyright to these images. Except for possibly File:Ynna.jpg, since that's not a picture of him but just a selfie of you.
- File:Ynna.jpg
- File:Film Director - Bagani.jpg
- File:DirekLester1.jpg
- File:Wangfu1.jpg
- File:Athlete2.jpg
GRuban (talk) 16:58, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination and per COM:PRP . Uploader did not comment to explain the authorship and copyright situation of this image. I also deleted Ynna.jpg, this is not a selfie, imho it is made by a proffesional photographer, we would need their permission as well. --Ellywa (talk) 07:58, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
per Commons:When to use the PD-signature tag#United Kingdom and Commons:Deletion requests/PD ineligible signatures DrKay (talk) 17:41, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Ellywa: Perhaps you would be able to offer some insight, since you had previously argued for keeping Catherine Middleton's signature while arguing that Diana's could be copyrighted. I wonder if you still hold that view. Keivan.fTalk 03:23, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
- In COM:SIG United Kingdom it is stated: Alan Story LLM, in "Owning Diana: From People's Princess to Private Property" accepts it is that possible ("though debatable") that there may be copyright in Diana's signature as an original artistic work. This is of interest, in that Story accepts this even though he is writing from an anti-protectionist angle. Notheless this explicit example, three versions of the Diana signature are available on Commons:
- Based on this, I concluded on Commons:Deletion requests/File:CatherineSignature.svg that the Commons community is of the opinion that Diana's signature is not copyrightable. In addition, I agreed with the comment of another user on that DR. Based on these two points, I concluded that Catherine's signature could be maintained. I hope I sufficiently explained my thoughts. Elly (talk) 08:40, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep per Ellywa --Timpernest (talk) 08:58, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
- @King of Hearts: , could you please close this DR based on all arguments? I am closing many old DR's myself, but I think I should not close this one, because I mentioned my opinion about it already. Ellywa (talk) 22:04, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. Other admins are not interested to close this request. Please nominate again if you do not agree with my decision. This has been open for too long. --Ellywa (talk) 14:19, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:SIG UK, not just "a scribbled line or two" A1Cafel (talk) 03:06, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per Commons:When to use the PD-signature tag#United Kingdom and Commons:Deletion requests/PD ineligible signatures. DrKay (talk) 17:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep I disagree. Nothing really fancy about this signature. --PaterMcFly (talk) 07:59, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
- No new arguments beyond discussed in 2022 --Zenwort (talk) 22:57, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: As discussed here and here, COM:SIG UK misstates the relevant law and the cited sources, and the user who wrote it no longer stands by it. A1Cafel appears to have nominated a handful of signatures for deletion on this incorrect basis. He has been pinged several times about this issue. In light of the above, it would seem appropriate for him to weigh in as to whether he believes the nominations are still appropriate. --Usernameunique (talk) 23:41, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —holly {chat} 19:55, 1 February 2024 (UTC)