Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/03/31

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive March 31st, 2021
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

lo utilixare Claudia Valladares Guzmán (talk) 02:42, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

utilizare Claudia Valladares Guzmán (talk) 02:42, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 07:34, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

utilizare Claudia Valladares Guzmán (talk) 02:48, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 07:39, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

utilizare Claudia Valladares Guzmán (talk) 02:54, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 07:30, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

utilizare Claudia Valladares Guzmán (talk) 02:55, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 07:27, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

utilizare Claudia Valladares Guzmán (talk) 02:56, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 07:32, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not an "own work". E4024 (talk) 13:39, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9   20:20, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

utilizare Claudia Valladares Guzmán (talk) 02:57, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 07:29, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

erreur f Clooche (talk) 09:46, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 11:38, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

utilizare Claudia Valladares Guzmán (talk) 04:03, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept - We do not delete user talk pages. --E4024 (talk) 13:35, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nevhodný obrázek (autor je někdo jiný) MartinCZ1243 (talk) 17:26, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per uploader request. --Yuval Y § Chat § 19:43, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

delete due to another author, I don't want to have a problem MartinCZ1243 (talk) 17:27, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per uploader request. --Yuval Y § Chat § 19:44, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

delete due to another author, I don't want to have a problem MartinCZ1243 (talk) 17:28, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per uploader request. --Yuval Y § Chat § 19:45, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

delete due to another author, I don't want to have a problem MartinCZ1243 (talk) 17:28, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per uploader request. --Yuval Y § Chat § 19:45, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

delete due to another author, I don't want to have a problem MartinCZ1243 (talk) 17:31, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per uploader request. --Yuval Y § Chat § 19:46, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

delete due to another author, I don't want to have a problem MartinCZ1243 (talk) 17:31, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per user request. --Yuval Y § Chat § 19:42, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

delete due to another author, I don't want to have a problem MartinCZ1243 (talk) 17:32, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per user request. --Yuval Y § Chat § 19:41, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

delete due to another author, I don't want to have a problem MartinCZ1243 (talk) 17:32, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per user request. --Yuval Y § Chat § 19:38, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

delete due to another author, I don't want to have a problem MartinCZ1243 (talk) 17:33, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per user request. --Yuval Y § Chat § 19:37, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

delete due to another author, I don't want to have a problem MartinCZ1243 (talk) 17:33, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per user request. --Yuval Y § Chat § 19:36, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Blurry Welch8181 (talk) 18:12, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Another nonsense DR. Android app users shouldn't be allowed to do so. --Achim (talk) 19:52, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Reasons for deletion request -Nabeelhasan31 (talk) 15:20, 31 March 2021 (UTC) I want to delete this image because i have upload already with same image. Please delete this image permanent from wikmedia commons[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 19:26, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

delete due to another author, I don't want to have a problem MartinCZ1243 (talk) 17:30, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Yuval CT at 19:35, 31 März 2021 UTC: Copyright violation: Source "Web site Sedmička, Divadlo na Vinohradech, TN.cz, Aha, EUROzprávy, iDNES.cz" and Author "unknown" - sorry, but these images are not free --Krdbot 02:52, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

اشتباه درباره بارگذاری در نسخه جدید از فایل. لطفا حذف گردد تا آن را اصلاح کنم. Mostafameraji (talk) 21:21, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, per G7. --Túrelio (talk) 09:47, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Plasticbilao.uniplus (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images with self-promotional purposes. Out of project scope.

AlvaroMolina ( - ) 04:02, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:17, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File out of project scope. —AlvaroMolina ( - ) 15:10, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Alvaro. This file is created for competition purpose and i dont see that this file "out of project scope". So can i ask which part is "out of project scope" in this file ? Regards. Norastiningrum (talk) 02:28, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@AlvaroMolina: This file is part of EUforia Wiki4Women competition and we already request the participants to put the references in the description box. Raymond (WMID) (talk) 07:23, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Raymond (WMID): Ok, thanks for the clarification. —AlvaroMolina ( - ) 14:36, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File out of project scope and possible Copyright violation. —AlvaroMolina ( - ) 17:21, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@AlvaroMolina: This file is part of EUforia Wiki4Women competition and we already request the participants to put the references in the description box. Raymond (WMID) (talk) 07:24, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Raymond (WMID): Ok, thanks for the clarification. —AlvaroMolina ( - ) 14:36, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by EugeneZelenko as Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1): Poster. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 05:40, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. The song is from the movie Ayyappanum Koshiyum VicFic2006 (talk) 16:09, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, speedied as copyvio.  JGHowes  talk 18:08, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of unidentified hill. No educational value. Malcolma (talk) 19:39, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per COM:SCOPE used on two items in WikiData. --Gnangarra 15:39, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of unidentified room. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 19:11, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcornelius (talk) 18:12, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of unidentified building interior. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 19:11, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcornelius (talk) 18:12, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{speedydelete|سبب}} {{duplicate|other file}} Bo-rakan-kw (talk) 23:35, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request.  — billinghurst sDrewth 22:37, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Licensing to use is not known yet, discussing with owner 12think (talk) 03:38, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7, uploader request. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 12:59, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source is Wikia, no proper license provided, I can't find where this is originally published. So theres no way to validate the claim of a creative commons license. Zppix (talk) 17:32, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: F1. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 12:57, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lohane Palmeira (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low-re images, unlikely to be own works.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:22, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:15, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lohane Palmeira (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:DW of sculpture - COM:EVID of permission from sculptor needed

Эlcobbola talk 00:52, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 00:25, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not relevant anymore 91.118.165.36 11:53, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:DW of copyrighted logo. The background might be protected by copyright, too. --Ahmadtalk 00:50, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of building with no indication of location or purpose. Out of Scope. Malcolma (talk) 19:32, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcornelius (talk) 02:45, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Afif Fathur Rachman (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images with promotional purposes. Out of project scope.

AlvaroMolina ( - ) 03:32, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 07:37, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dinos121212 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Fake license, all taken from a blog

Gbawden (talk) 07:49, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, obvious copyvios. --Rosenzweig τ 11:49, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploaded by mistake RSSFSO (talk) 11:51, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, per G7. --Túrelio (talk) 06:54, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The ring on the left should have double bonds. Compare with other images in Category:Zolpidem Marbletan (talk) 13:18, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My source was this article. Maybe the authors made a mistake. I am fine with deleting this image since there are many others with the structure already. --Sohmen (talk) 13:24, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it seems the authors made a mistake. The publisher of that article is Hindawi, a notoriously low quality publisher. It does not surprise me that "Journal of Chemistry" would publish a chemistry article in which the authors didn't get the chemical structure of the subject of the article correct and the peer reviewers (likely none) didn't catch it either. Marbletan (talk) 13:53, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:24, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Josy Joykutty (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible Copyright Violation. See Source of The Files: "© Copyright Election Commission of India".

AlvaroMolina ( - ) 13:31, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 04:52, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kari0t (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Appear to be from http://alghadeer.tv/news/detail/102607/

Ytoyoda (talk) 21:00, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:06, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kari0t (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, exifdata is missing because I transferred these images from my phone to my computer by email. That's the reason why exifdata is missing. Secondly, it's quite normal that some resolutions are small for the simple reason that they are mostly portraits of soccer players. Finally, if you think about it, you'll see that my nickname is Kari (0t) which is the opposite of Irak = I am a photographer and I work for the Iraqi Football Association. Finally, these images are public interest images to help and reassure the reader that he is on the right page of the player concerned. Kari0t (talk) 06:36, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 04:55, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kari0t (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear how the uploader can claim ownership of architects’ artistic renderings.

Ytoyoda (talk) 04:12, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:27, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kari0t (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Several images were uploaded with fake EXIF data, which put the whole series into doubt. See also [1].

Yann (talk) 20:47, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. plicit 05:37, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kari0t (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Per COM:FOP Iraq, there is no freedom of panorama on Iraq and photographs of architecture are considered copyrighted. If the uploader has written permission, they’re welcome to submit it to COM:VRT.

Adeletron 3030 (talk) 13:03, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Editing to add:
I noticed in one of the earlier requests an assertion that the uploader has included fake EXIF data, a claim that seems to be supported by File:Jalal Hassan 2023.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Karbala Stadium.jpg, two uploads with incorrect camera dates, which generally should not happen with iPhone cameras. It's also strange that every photograph is claimed to be taken on iPhone X, despite many of the photographs appearing to be drone photos or DSLR quality.
Finally, the user claims to be working for the Iraq football federation. That raises the possibility that the photos belong to the federation, which would require verification with COM:VRT.
Anyway, because of the user's edit history, unverified claim about the sourcing, and frankly nonsense rationale about the username and the photos being in public interest, COM:PCP applies here. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 18:34, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm, with exception of File:Al-Minaa Stadium.jpg, File:Al-Fayhaa Stadium.jpg and File:Karbalaa Stadium.jpg I fail to see anything above threshold of originality in these images. Is there solid evidence that TOO is really so low in Iran? --Túrelio (talk) 09:28, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Túrelio The honest answer is that I’m not sure. And I realize FOP was my rationale for starting this DR, but given that these images are likely not properly sourced (with faked EXIF data) and (I think) these photos are re-uploads of previously deleted files, I don’t think FOP is that relevant here any more. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 03:06, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, as uploader has demonstrated that we cannot assume good faith. holly {chat} 17:52, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zapp Singh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 04:55, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own work, one of the early uploads of an established user. E4024 (talk) 23:58, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; looks like a photo of an old photo. --Gbawden (talk) 07:49, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cover of a Book. Creative work of a designer. A resized picture of original picture. Clear copyright violation. Suggest to delete. Ranjithsiji (talk) 16:31, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 09:32, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and no license at all. --JuTa 00:28, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and no license at all. --JuTa 23:58, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible non free packaging

Zppix (talk) 00:46, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Zppix: Japanese packages (i.e. File:Various fonts (4416061604).jpg etc.) may not suitable for deletion per COM:TOO Japan§2: "Tokyo High Court's ruling: although the shape is stylized, the text is in a normal arrangement and keeps its function of being read as a sequence of letters." --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:58, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I figured the Ballreich's package was OK since it seemed to me like it was below the Commons:Threshold of originality as it's a logotype. I've been thinking about replacing it with a photo of the chips themselves in a bowl or something though, so if you want to be conservative and remove it that's fine with me. --Mbrickn (talk) 05:53, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: a majority, kept plain packaging. plicit 12:43, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Kissa21782 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: No realistic educational use: please see our project scope AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 01:04, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion, plus it's a complex logo. --plicit 12:46, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably not own work.

AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 01:40, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 12:22, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Could be replaced with TeX equivalent:

Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 12:17, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 12:23, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Could be replaced with TeX equivalent:

Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 12:20, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 12:28, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Could be replaced with TeX equivalent:

Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 12:22, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 12:28, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Could be replaced with TeX equivalent:

Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 12:23, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 12:28, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Could be replaced with TeX equivalent:

Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 12:25, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 12:28, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Could be replaced with TeX equivalent:

Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 12:27, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 12:28, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Could be replaced with TeX equivalent:

Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 12:28, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 12:29, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 12:33, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 12:30, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 12:34, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 12:29, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 12:34, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 12:29, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 12:35, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 12:29, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 12:35, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 12:29, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 12:35, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 12:29, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 12:35, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 12:29, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 12:36, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 12:29, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 12:36, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 12:29, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 12:36, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 12:28, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 12:37, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 12:28, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 12:37, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 12:28, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 12:37, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 12:28, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Could be replaced with TeX equivalent:

Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 12:38, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 12:27, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 12:39, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 12:27, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 12:39, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 12:26, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 12:39, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 12:26, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 12:39, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 12:26, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 12:40, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 12:26, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 12:40, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 12:26, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 12:40, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 12:26, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 12:40, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 12:26, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 12:41, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 12:25, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 12:41, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 12:25, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 12:41, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 12:25, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As per COM:ADVERT , self promotion Ts12rAc (talk) 12:41, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 12:46, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 12:41, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 12:25, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 12:42, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 12:25, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 12:42, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 12:25, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 12:42, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 12:25, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 12:42, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 12:24, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 12:42, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 12:24, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 12:43, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 12:23, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 12:43, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 12:26, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 12:43, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 12:30, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 12:43, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 12:30, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 12:44, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 12:30, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 12:44, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 12:25, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 12:44, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 12:27, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 12:45, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 12:23, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cyrilrobinson (talk · contribs)

[edit]

None are in use. Only category is "Entertainment" which is not useful. No useful descriptions. No identifications. Where there is EXIF, there are several different cameras. Some do not have EXIF, so copyvio is likely.

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:50, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as relative to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zulu_African_Film_Academy_Awards the images may be in scope, however different cameras for the same event means there is likely different photographers therefore the files are unlikely to be own works. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:06, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cyrilrobinson (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:SPAM per Username and file description.

SCP-2000 13:20, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 12:49, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Esther1290 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:08, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Bodhisattwa (talk) 15:40, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 12:45, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Bodhisattwa (talk) 15:40, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 12:45, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mime santhosh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:11, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope stick figure scribble TFerenczy (talk) 18:21, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 12:47, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too much personal Atiq Zawad (talk) 21:41, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
{{speedydelete|<Personal photos by non-contributors>}}

Unused file Atiq Zawad (talk) 03:44, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, unused personal photo, uploader's request. Taivo (talk) 15:30, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Bodhisattwa (talk) 15:40, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Explicit at 12:44, 8 April 2021 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Singga faridkotiya.jpf.jpg --Krdbot 20:37, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Hoseina051311 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: personal use and useless for wikipeida AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 18:18, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of com:PS. --Hanooz 00:07, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small with no substantive EXIF; slightly out-of-focus as if screenshot or crop from other image. DMacks (talk) 23:42, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DMacks, I took this picture with my old mobile phone (Nokia N73), and I remember cropping it before uploading here. Unfortunately I have lost the original photo along with my phone. If you think this photo violates any rules, please feel free to delete it. - రవిచంద్ర (talk) 06:45, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: thanks for verifying!. --DMacks (talk) 14:47, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Collage without proper sourcing. E4024 (talk) 03:06, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 15:27, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File out of project scope. —AlvaroMolina ( - ) 04:07, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 15:27, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File out of project scope. —AlvaroMolina ( - ) 04:17, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 15:27, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File with self-promotional purposes. Out of project scope. —AlvaroMolina ( - ) 04:22, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 15:27, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source is "Christmas Light Show". File is suspicious, considering the uploader has history of questionable uploads (see User talk:Manilaspirit) JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:58, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 07:58, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is User:Manilaspirit Mr. PA0 SALANDANAN? Or did he just gave the image to the uploader or the uploader grabbed it somewhere before? COM:OTRS permission from PAO SALANDANAN photography is required if PA0 SALANDANAN indeed licensed the image as indicated. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:08, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:04, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely stolen: some TinEye results give this link: https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4664/25376050627_ffab13ce07_o.jpg (probably the original image), used at a Skyscaper City forum. The watermark at the bottom right reads "TC Chua 2011". I suspect this image here is a cropped one (to eliminate that watermark). Also, TinEye gives a Flickr mirror "flickrhivemind.net" (now dead), with the Flickr photographer "TC Chua" indicated. Searches on Flickr yield two Flickr accounts bearing this name: [2] and [3], both seem to have made their images private. This investigation raises doubt over this image as really User:Manilaspirit's own work, the uploader having various notices on questionable uploads in their talk page. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:23, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:05, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

What seems to be a larger and unedited (raw, not brightened) version is found by TinEye at http://callezaragosa.com/gerryruizphotoblog/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/120616PalomponSK-8527W.jpg (2048 x 1152, 2.2 MB), used at http://callezaragosa.com/gerryruizphotoblog/2012/06/tagaytay/ (both have been taken down now, but TinEye still detected it). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:29, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:06, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Manilaspirit (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Given the uploader's questionable uploads, I doubt these last remaining uploads are their own self-photographed images. Inconsistent resolutions and missing or suspicious metadata (some filled with Picasa, others Adobe Photoshop, indicating these alwere edited in attempt to look different from the originals). Since TinEye and Google Images didn't return results for these last set of uploader's uploads, I initiated a deletion request instead.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:35, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, actually I came here to nominate all uploads of Manilaspirit for deletion and found, that you have already done that. Thank you! Taivo (talk) 08:08, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong name given RiQu7 (talk) 14:36, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Non-free sport logo. No permission. --Smooth O (talk) 13:51, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Non-trivial sport club logo. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:51, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused small screenshot without explanation of importance. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 09:43, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:11, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photography of a painting from artist Marlis Albrecht, licencing questionable / Fotografie eines Bildes der Künslerin Marlis Albrecht, Lizenzierung so fraglich Naronnas (talk) 08:12, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:11, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Could be replaced with TeX equivalent:

Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 12:12, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 09:00, 19 April 2021 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files of Jhonn Sucre --Krdbot 14:13, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Could be replaced with TeX equivalent:

Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 12:15, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 08:59, 19 April 2021 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files of Jhonn Sucre --Krdbot 14:13, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The description of this photograph states that this is a captured P-40. I'm almost certein that this is not the case for the following reasons:

  • There is no Swastika on the tail, indicating that the photo was most likely taken post-war.
  • The aircraft is in non-standard markings for captured Allied aircraft.
  • There appears to be victory markings on the rudder. To my knowledge, the Luftwaffe never used captured P-40s in combat.

To me this looks like a photo of a Warhawk playing a German fighter in a movie, which likely means it is a capture of the movie and copyrighted. - ZLEA T\C 12:43, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

More evidence that this is fake is that there are no windows behind the canopy. The aircraft, which is a P-40E based on the nose details and small tail, should have had rear windows as seen in this photo. - ZLEA T\C 14:23, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Whatever it is, it's a COM:NETCOPYVIO: deleted as found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1). --Эlcobbola talk 00:44, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This what-if illustration can be found on Pinterest. Pinterest claims it was saved from Flickriver, which has many similar what-if illustrations but not this exact file. Internet Archive appears to be down at the time I post this, so I can't confirm if the file existed on the website in the past. Nevertheless, this user has a history of uploading non-free images to Commons. ZLEA T\C 14:17, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 00:43, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 12:44, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per DMacks. --Leyo 08:37, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artist signature says Bednářová (Ivana), not own work. Written permission via OTRS necessary (same as File:Krajina eM.jpg) TFerenczy (talk) 17:52, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merge the discussion to Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Karolina Miller. --ŠJů (talk) 23:26, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:52, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photographs, one of which was very briefly (2 minutes, see history) used on a user page on cswiki, which was written as an article. Out of scope, the caveat for contributors having a few personal files is not applicable since the uploader has only one other edit on the same day and none since.

TFerenczy (talk) 18:32, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:57, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation © Notion 2021. All rights reserved Theroadislong (talk) 17:58, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 18:27, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no Freedom of Panorama in Belarus. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:35, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 07:54, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no Freedom of Panorama in Belarus. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:41, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 07:56, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

quality too low to be useful Discostu (talk) 07:37, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 15:32, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:PACKAGING depicted object is protected with copyright and cannot be photographed without permission. Taivo (talk) 11:02, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 15:33, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

may be game screenshot Netora (talk) 12:42, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 15:33, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, not in personal use. Ubcule (talk) 12:48, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 15:33, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, not in personal use. Ubcule (talk) 12:48, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 15:33, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in this photo is the packaging, which is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. The details are neither minimal nor incidental, and is therefore an unacceptable derivative work. plicit 12:56, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 15:33, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in this photo is the packaging, which is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. The details are neither minimal nor incidental, and is therefore an unacceptable derivative work. plicit 12:59, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 15:33, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in this photo is the packaging, which is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. The details are neither minimal nor incidental, and is therefore an unacceptable derivative work.

plicit 13:00, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 15:34, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in this photo is the packaging, which is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. The details are neither minimal nor incidental, and is therefore an unacceptable derivative work.

plicit 13:01, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 15:34, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in this photo is the packaging, which is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. The details are neither minimal nor incidental, and is therefore an unacceptable derivative work.

plicit 13:02, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 15:34, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File with self-promotional purposes. Out of project scope. —AlvaroMolina ( - ) 13:21, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 15:34, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File with self-promotional purposes. Out of project scope. —AlvaroMolina ( - ) 13:37, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 15:34, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible file with self-promotional purposes. Out of project scope. —AlvaroMolina ( - ) 13:38, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 15:34, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible file with promotional purposes. Out of project scope. —AlvaroMolina ( - ) 13:45, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 15:35, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 15:35, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad image quality Derbrauni (talk) 15:38, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 15:36, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 15:35, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant to others in its category, but poorer composition and COM:NOTUSED. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:02, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 15:30, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant to others in its category, but poorer composition and COM:NOTUSED. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:03, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 15:30, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I accidentally uploaded a photo taken by someone else. Please delete this. ArtistAmyKarle1 (talk) 17:27, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Fitindia. --Minoraxtalk 15:37, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Created for spam. IWI (talk) 21:17, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope. Created for spam. Liu Kang III (talk) 22:06, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 15:37, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DerDeutscheFotograf (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small image without adequate EXIF, unlikely to be own work

A1Cafel (talk) 07:07, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@A1Cafel: Diese fotos stammen mir und wurden mir selbst aufgenomen. Sie wurden von den Originalen abgeschnitten, Daher gibt es keine daten da sie kopien de originalen sind

These photos are mine, taken by myself. They have been cropped from for originals, which is why there is no data as they are copies from originals— Preceding unsigned comment added by DerDeutscheFotograf (talk • contribs) 13:36, 1 April 2021‎ (UTC)[reply]

@A1Cafel: File:Herzog und Herzogin zu Westminster Egmont-Palast 03 - Original.jpg This foto is proof of foto data for verification of my edited fotos uploaded - File:Herzog und Herzogin zu Westminster Egmont-Palast 03.jpg. File:D’Arenberg, Calvert und Delafuente - original.jpg This foto is proof of foto data for verification of my edited fotos uploaded - File:D'Arenberg, Calvete und Delafuente.jpg— Preceding unsigned comment added by DerDeutscheFotograf (talk • contribs) 21:31, 1 April 2021‎ (UTC)[reply]

@A1Cafel: Ich habe ihre bestatigung gegeben. Bitte entfernen sie die losch tags aus meinen hochgeladenen fotos.

I have provided your verification. Please remove the delete tags from my uploaded photos. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DerDeutscheFotograf (talk • contribs)

 Keep "Small image without EXIF" is neither true, nor any valid reason for deletion. Andy Dingley (talk) 00:27, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep per Andy - "Small image without adequate EXIF, unlikely to be own work" is not a valid reason for deletion - The uploader may of cleared the Exif data before uploading who knows. I do however agree that image noted by Túrelio should be deleted due to the blurryness. –Davey2010Talk 15:39, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: the proof provided by the uploader is sufficient to show "own work" indeed. --P 1 9 9   14:07, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm in the process of handing over 100% copyrights to a photo agency. This request is in good faith as a long-time photo contributor. This is the only one I'm requesting to be deleted to prevent any potential legal issues.


This file was initially tagged by Synth85 as Speedy (db-author). Converting to DR as uploader request >7 days from upload. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 00:55, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It is currently in use at ha:Jerin ƙasashen Afirka. Is there any other valid reason for deletion? MarioGom (talk) 21:39, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes, I'm aware this is being used. When I nominated this for deletion, I was in the process of handing over copyrights of a couple hundred photos to an agency. This photo is included. The handover is nearly completed. I have uploaded some pretty significant photographs in the last couple of years. This is the only one I'm requesting to be deleted due to the copyright ownership transfer. In any case, this would become a public evidence that I did make an attempt to have this removed. The new copyright owner will eventually report this as copyright infringement and I'll have no choice but to point to this request. I'm trying to prevent potential legal tussle here. Synth85 (talk) 12:24, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: in use, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9   19:11, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I sent an e-mail to the uploader explaining that we cannot keep this file without OTRS permission, showing them the right way. E4024 (talk) 01:00, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: coyvio. --P 1 9 9   19:13, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Kissa21782 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: No realistic educational use: please see our project scope AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 01:04, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:13, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Kissa21782 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: No realistic educational use: please see our project scope AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 01:04, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:14, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I sent an e-mail to the uploader explaining that we cannot keep this file without OTRS permission, showing them the right way. E4024 (talk) 01:30, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --P 1 9 9   19:13, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FoP-USonly Junior Jumper (formerly ) 01:51, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per above. --P 1 9 9   19:16, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While the uploader is indeed the photographer (Jack Stone), the presence of Rise.PH watermark and the FB transmission code in the metadata indicates it is a previously published work. Previously published works require formal verification of identity via COM:OTRS email correspondence. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:30, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:22, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

utilizare Claudia Valladares Guzmán (talk) 02:43, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope, no meaningful edits by this user. --P 1 9 9   19:26, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I sent an e-mail to the uploader explaining that we cannot keep this file without OTRS permission, showing them the right way. E4024 (talk) 03:09, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --P 1 9 9   19:13, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is a company logo and must be copyrighted, this is violation of copyright. KillaDesignOffice (talk) 04:47, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9   19:27, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{BadJPG}}: This figure was inappropriately extracted from https://www.boell.de/sites/default/files/2021-01/Fleischatlas2021_0.pdf, where the figures are vector images. File:Geschlachtete Tiere in Deutschland 2019.svg was converted from these vector data. Leyo 06:30, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fine with me, I guess. Can I point out though, that the files, while originally published as part of the source mentioned, are provided by its publisher in this format (and for reuse) as a flickr album - see here: https://www.flickr.com/photos/boellstiftung/albums/72157717373534853 Hbs~dewiki (talk) 18:37, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:29, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source doesn't release its content under a free license. Copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 07:15, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:29, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The link to the source image says that it is only for non-commercial use Mikenorton (talk) 07:50, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:30, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Alte Version Phasus (talk) 08:39, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

nicht aktuell Phasus (talk) 07:56, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

nicht aktuell Phasus (talk) 08:05, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9   19:31, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Anonymisierung Phasus (talk) 08:30, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

nicht aktuell Phasus (talk) 07:57, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

nicht aktuell Phasus (talk) 08:04, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9   19:32, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright infringement 94.45.0.106 08:40, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:34, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright infringement 94.45.0.106 08:42, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:34, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright infringement 94.45.0.106 08:44, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:34, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, nowhere in the source does it say that it's free to use. JurassicClassic767 (talk | contribs) 08:54, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:34, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because it is outdated JesseKingOfVassaland (talk) 09:21, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9   19:36, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake license, © Ministria Arsimit Sportit dhe Rinisë 2021 at arsimi.gov.al Gbawden (talk) 09:22, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:37, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely previously published on Facebook: FBMD code seen at the metadata. Proof of identity verification via COM:OTRS correspondence is required so to confirm if the uploader is indeed the photographer (the copyright holder) of this image and that the photographer (the copyright owner) has applied the license as indicated, as there have been numerous cases on Wiki before (and up to now) that the uploaders just grabbed images from Facebook or other social media sites. Better still, have the original image overwrite this FB-derived image. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:54, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:37, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no way to validate this license - an encrypted google search doesn't prove it is a PD-USNavy photo Gbawden (talk) 10:37, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and not notable, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   19:38, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work per watermark Gbawden (talk) 11:28, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:49, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ancien logo Marketing.villevert (talk) 12:24, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: above COM:TOO. --P 1 9 9   20:13, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file should NOT be deleted but the photo is NOT Gloria Jean. The source for this photo is incorrect. Silentsaregolden (talk) 12:30, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Agree, that's most likely en:Carmen Miranda. The caption reads "Groucho Marx, Carmen Miranda, Andy Russell, Steve Cochran, Gloria Jean in a Sam Coslow musical production". File has to be renamed. --Achim (talk) 14:18, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, use {{Fact disputed}} or {{Rename}} instead. --P 1 9 9   20:18, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Note on Memoria Chilena website (from which the file was taken) clearly states "Este documento es una obra protegida por ley de propiedad intelectual. Su uso y reproducción están sujetos a la autorización de su(s) autor(es) y/o titulares de derechos" ("This document is a work protected by copyright law. Its use and reproduction are subject to the authorization of its author (s) and / or rights holders."). Sfs90 (talk) 12:30, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: old enough to be now PD. --P 1 9 9   20:17, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source not clear, looks like derivative from somewhere else (computer game?) Ubcule (talk) 12:51, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: yes, screenshot of Imperium Galactica computer game. --P 1 9 9   20:16, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from some publication or old photograph. Not an "own work". E4024 (talk) 13:00, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:18, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unsourced gallery (added by two different "usernames"). E4024 (talk) 13:01, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   20:19, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Glorious 93 as Logo Thibaut (talk) 13:16, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Doesn't seem beyond COM:TOO US. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 11:34, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   20:19, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Glorious 93 as Logo Thibaut (talk) 13:16, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like from India, can an Indian users tell us if this is beyond your TOO situation or not? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 11:35, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   20:19, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible file with promotional purposes. Out of project scope. —AlvaroMolina ( - ) 13:47, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi AlvaroMolina, I didn't mean to upload this file; I had clicked on the wrong file and thought it would be cleared when I refreshed. Please feel free to delete. —User:Minekovaa 15:21, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   20:21, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File with self-promotional purposes. Out of project scope. —AlvaroMolina ( - ) 13:47, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use now. --P 1 9 9   20:21, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, self-promotion Discostu (talk) 14:02, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:21, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by -stevie- (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Four uncategorized, unused images of negligible interest (given their low quality among many better ones depicting analogous content) of which at least three are not own work as indicated and of which one or two are likely copyvios. Filenames and description text offered by uploader are obscure, seem to suggest self promotion or other unencyclopedic goal.

-- Tuválkin 14:12, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:22, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:23, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:23, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 80.12.67.54 14:51, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:24, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 80.12.67.54 14:52, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:24, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 80.12.67.54 14:52, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:24, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{A}}

User:PeroITA, do you withdraw this deletion request? --Achim (talk) 19:32, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   20:25, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, no meaningful edits by this user. --P 1 9 9   20:29, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rdzenny (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons:Derivative works from movies/games characters.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

These are works made by the artist Sebastian Kucharski. They don't come from movies and games. Please check what the movie characters or game characters look like. https://youtu.be/OGnzhpIXWpI Here is a video of how these works are created by this artist — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rdzenny (talk • contribs) 18:21, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 04:54, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution Image. No camera data. Resized picture from original. Clear copyright violation of original photographer. Suggest to delete. Ranjithsiji (talk) 16:32, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination, taken from FB. --P 1 9 9   20:29, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I was told this file is not helpful, so I want it deleted. Doggo19292 (talk) 18:39, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I was told this file is not helpful, so I want it deleted. Doggo19292 (talk) 18:36, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Who told you it's not helpful? We don't have lots of nice pictures of ordinary street gutters with flowing water. Think about keeping this image.--ProfessorX (talk) 16:34, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete It is hard to tell what the picture represents and the resolution is poor. There are already quite a few picture of water-filled gutters (File:Rainy_steeplechase.jpg, File:The_Ohio_State_University_(32503955525).jpg, File:Upper_Arlington,_Ohio_(30120054516).jpg, File:Caniveau.JPG, File:Street_gutter_in_Old_Town_Stockholm.jpg, etc), I honestly cannot see a use for this one. Malparti (talk) 15:10, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and User:Malparti. --P 1 9 9   20:30, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Original video isn't listed under the CC-By-3.0 license. HeyitsBen talk 19:06, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:31, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No more picture. I need this file name to an other picture Navigator84 (talk) 19:16, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused redirect. --P 1 9 9   20:32, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private Picture - Out of project scope Schlurcher (talk) 19:17, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:31, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope Schlurcher (talk) 19:41, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:32, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i used an image with CC NC by mistake Libasstref (talk) 20:29, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:33, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ebrahimfathi21 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The subect is the uploader and claims that he is the author. Since they are obviously not selfies, that is probably not correct. We cannot keep them without permission from the actual photographer.

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:38, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9   20:37, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Birgokhanavci (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to be own work

Didym (talk) 21:19, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9   20:36, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Potential copyvio, likely sourced from the York University website, per summary details for each image.

Mindmatrix 21:34, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:35, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by IZNASSEN123 as duplicate (duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: Territoire des Beni Iznassen.png. Not an exact or scaled down duplicate, converting to DR as author requests deletion >7 days after upload. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 00:37, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: close duplicate, redundant. Redirected. --P 1 9 9   15:18, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hors critères d'admissibilité, fichier non libre, demande de suppression immédiate. Manchesterunited1234 (talk) 00:38, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:15, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader is not the author of the picture. Cf. the Edit summary in pl:wiki: 'adding a photo from the archives of the Gdańsk University of Technology, photo: Krzysztof Krzempek'. Michał Sobkowski (talk) 07:10, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:19, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 86.212.245.156 07:43, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, missing essential info. --P 1 9 9   15:20, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 86.212.245.156 07:44, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, missing essential info. --P 1 9 9   15:20, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate (of slightly less file size) of File:Ларин Андрей Алексеевич Портрет.jpg Jochen Burghardt (talk) 11:28, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:21, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ciprian Aileni (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted album covers

Gikü (talk) 11:32, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Am acordul artistei (Viorica Macovei) sa folosesc fotografiile!!! Una din coperți File:Coperta-album-Viorica-Macovei.webp este designul meu. --Ciprian Aileni (talk) 16:12, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Translating from Romanian: "I have permission from the artist (Viorica Macovei) to use the photos!!! It's her page".
@Ciprian Aileni: We can't take your word for it. Please go through the procedure of getting copyright holder's permission through COM:OTRS. The copyright holder may not necessarily be Mrs. Macovei, but rather the photographer(s) and/or graphic designer(s). Gikü (talk) 13:35, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Gikü: Una dintre coperti este designul meu. Cum ar trebui sa dovedesc asta. Help. MultumescCiprian Aileni (talk) 16:07, 2 April 2021 (UTC)}}[reply]

@Ciprian Aileni: V-am scris: urmați procedura descrisă la COM:OTRS. Aveți acolo o serie de opțiuni din care puteți alege. Gikü (talk) 16:56, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Undeleted if ever OTRS has been received. --P 1 9 9   15:23, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Đức Anh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Per Commons:Bad sources#Pexels.com. Images published after 4 July 2018 do not fulfil Commons license requirement.

Urara Haru 麗春 14:00, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:29, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Have better versions. And dublicate of the --Dr.Wiki54 (talk) 08:00, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:01, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hardly useful, since the surname is not given; there are many articles containing "Игорь Павлович" (deepl.com translation "Igor Pavlovich") at ru.wikipedia, but all of them require a surname. The description text "За работой" ("At work") is not helpful, either. Jochen Burghardt (talk) 11:09, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I found two more photos, File:Лихие 80-е.jpg and File:Семья Игоря Павловича.jpg, all uploaded on 14 Mar 2017 by Nastasiushka12 (talk · contribs), and all apparently showing the same person. The description of the latter ("Городецкий Игорь Павлович с дочкой Анастасией", translation "Igor Gorodetsky with his daughter Anastasia") gives a surname; however, a search for "Городецкий Игорь Павлович" ("Gorodetsky Igor Pavlovich") on ru.wikipedia didn't yield any results. Nevertheless, further investigations may be appropriate before deciding on deletion. I suppose to deal with all 3 photos in the same way (delete, or keep and join in an own category). - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 11:43, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, out of scope and DW. --P 1 9 9   16:01, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found on twitter inter alia - https://twitter.com/SpokespersonMoD/status/1234366016186019840/photo/1 - not own work. Might be PD but needs sourcing etc Gbawden (talk) 11:21, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:59, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Terrible quality - looks like a capture of screenshot. Vensatry (Ping me) 11:53, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 11:27, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image does not appear to have the CC-BY-SA license, there isn't anything that appears on the gallery page or on the specific image page. BUT (and there's always a but...) two other images in that same gallery [4] and [5] do have the CC-BY-SA license noted on the specific image page. I *think* it means this image (and the prior version) is not covered by the license. The uploaded and I discussed on their EN talk page and decided this was the best way forward. Ravensfire (talk) 14:36, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also noticed that the image contains metadata asserting copyright. Ravensfire (talk) 13:18, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:02, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this is a mystification Lesless (talk) 15:59, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9   16:03, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This draw by Zdeňka Bauerová will lack the permission by the author (rest of images by Zdeňka Bauerová will have the permission soon) Vojtěch Veselý (talk) 17:38, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:03, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader is clearly not the author of this tweet nor of the photo in it Nil Einne (talk) 18:29, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:04, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image uploaded under improper copyright. It's claimed as CC/own work, but it's actually the cover art of an album and is thus under preexisting copyrights not compatible with CC. (The album's article has also been deleted at EN as advertising/promo, as it consisted entirely of an unreferenced statement of existence followed by offsite links to each individual track's Spotify stream, so in addition to being non-free it's also unused.) Bearcat (talk) 19:21, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The spotify links are infact free as spotify is free to listen with commercials. The album artworks is accurate and I (as part of this band and album's management team) am leagally within bounds of using it as well as having permission from the Record Label (Carry On Music) and the artists (Walking Papers). The Spotify and YouTube links were added to make a direct link of information so readers have the freedom to inventigate further regaurding the album. Links only help the sources of information (which in fact is accurate). Taking this page down is depriving interested readers of direct and accurate information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MKULTRAMC (talk • contribs) 20:47, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The freeness of Spotify streams is irrelevant.
A Wikipedia article needs to be referenced to media coverage about the album, not to the Spotify stream of the album — because notability is not established by verifying that a thing exists, it's established by verifying that independent attention has been paid to the thing by sources that don't have a vested personal interest in promoting their own stuff. As part of the band and album's management team, you don't have a right to use Wikipedia as part of the band's marketing strategy — we are an encyclopedia, not a free public relations or advertising platform, so notability is established by using reliable sources (i.e. media coverage) to establish the significance of the topic, not just Spotify streams verifying that the topic exists.
And the album cover also still has copyrights on it, which means that even if a properly referenced article can be written about the album to establish its notability, it has to be uploaded directly to Wikipedia as non-free content with a fair use rationale, and cannot be uploaded to Commons as CC. Bearcat (talk) 14:01, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:04, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Khabat4545 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work. Evidence: File:Zh.Hosein.png and File:Z.Hosein.png are likely to be screenshots; the person portrayed in these photos (Jila Hosseini) died in 1996, and these photos were taken, according to the description, sometime between 1988 and 1992. File:Bahara.png seems to be a photo of a photo; same goes for File:Khamin.jpg, especially because it was apparently taken in the 1970s in Iran, when digital cameras weren't available. File:SunGirl.png is small, lacks metadata and is low res, so it's likely to be a copyvio. Moreover, it may also be out of COM:SCOPE, since the person depicted in it has not been identified. File:SanaBarzanja.png is a selfie taken by a musical artist, (Sana Barzanja/Barzanje) and it's also small and lacks metadata, so I think the "own work" claim is dubious.

Ahmadtalk 21:37, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Thanks for writing a comprehensive DR rationale. --P 1 9 9   16:06, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Création personnelle, il vient d'être dessiné en mieux par un autre wikipédien, de concert avec moi Sergio1006 (talk) 23:04, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Le blason qui le remplace est File:Blason de l'abbé Guillaume Bodenvlas de Lubbeek (Belgique).svg. --Sergio1006 (talk) 23:07, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, superseded. --P 1 9 9   16:08, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:Terminatorforce123

[edit]

PCP deletion. Screenshots of a public figure, no evidence of permission from the photographers or TV channels. Bilorv (talk) 23:07, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:08, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Création personnelle que j'ai affinée sous un autre nom. Sergio1006 (talk) 23:11, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Le blason qui le remplace est File:Blason abbé be Melchior Nysmans 2.svg. ----Sergio1006 (talk) 23:12, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, superseded. --P 1 9 9   16:09, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Création personnelle, ce blason est remplacé par une deuxième version sous un autre nom. Sergio1006 (talk) 23:17, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Voici le blason qui le remplace : File:Blason abbé be Gérard Van Goetsenhoven 2.svg. --Sergio1006 (talk) 23:18, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, superseded. --P 1 9 9   16:09, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely previously published on Facebook: FBMD code seen at the metadata. Proof of identity verification via COM:OTRS correspondence is required so to confirm if the uploader is indeed the photographer (the copyright holder) of this image and that the photographer (the copyright owner) has applied the license as indicated, as there have been numerous cases on Wiki before (and up to now) that the uploaders just grabbed images from Facebook or other social media sites. Better still, have the original image overwrite this FB-derived image. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:14, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:40, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shawn7711 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely copyrighted posters/social media pics

Ytoyoda (talk) 11:10, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:49, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shawn7711 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Most likely previously published on Facebook: FBMD code seen at the metadata. Proof of identity verification via COM:OTRS correspondence is required so to confirm if the uploader is indeed the photographer (the copyright holder) of this image and that the photographer (the copyright owner) has applied the license as indicated, as there have been numerous cases on Wiki before (and up to now) that the uploaders just grabbed images from Facebook or other social media sites. Better still, have the original images overwrite these FB-derived images.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:00, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:41, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shawn7711 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small files, no metadata, most probably copied from elsewhere.

Yann (talk) 11:42, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:00, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Es list offensichtlich, dass die Lizenz fehlerhaft ist. Angeblich ist Urhebr Ocean Care der mit Eigenes werk lizenziert. OceanCare ist aber eine Orgsnisation und kann deshalb vielleicht der Rechteinhaber , nicht aber der Urheber sein Lutheraner (talk) 11:58, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 11:40, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fictuous, no official relevance, and potentially offensive. Snow Lion Fenian (talk) 22:16, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If it has no legitimate purpose, just defamation or slander, then that would be a strike against it... AnonMoos (talk) 04:38, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly keep: If I found such relevance to that flag, it is Anti-Zionism and criticism against the Israeli regime. This flag shows critics that they compared Israel to Nazi Germany however. One picture from The Times of Israel shows a house in Sacramento decorated with swastikas angering neighbours. -FreshCorp619 (talk) 19:46, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep This has been used by various anti-Israeli movements, making it notable. Fry1989 eh? 17:16, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Fry1989 and the rest of discussion. Ruthven (msg) 11:53, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image encourages hatred against a people and a state 80.246.141.194 10:52, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Of course it is offending and derogatory, but that's IMO not a reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 13:44, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose/Keep: Per User:Fry1989 in the 2018 discussion, this is still used by various anti-Israeli movements because the people had compared Israel with Nazi Germany. Close discussion. —184.148.150.235 00:49, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's anti-Semitic 71.172.236.198 13:11, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept. The file is used and cannot be deleted because it is anti-Semitic or offends somebody. Taivo (talk) 10:46, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by MiguelAlanCS as Logo above the threshold of originality Thibaut (talk) 22:54, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. plicit 07:05, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same building as that of Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:SM Aura Premier. FOP not yet existing: restore only when FOP is introduced here. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:41, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Geni (talk) 18:30, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Has not "Free" content. Alejitao123 (talk) 14:39, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep main focus of image is his face, not his shirt. De minimus SecretName101 (talk)

 Keep as per User:SecretName101. Moreover, a simple crop could easily solve this. --Mosbatho (talk) 15:31, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: shirt is not focus of the image. Probably fine. --Geni (talk) 18:24, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Geni (talk) 18:23, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Italy. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Geni (talk) 18:21, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama for 2D works in the United States. Photo is a COM:DW of the poster and permission from copyright holder is needed. Howhontanozaz (talk) 18:06, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Geni (talk) 18:20, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama for 2D works in the United States. Photo is a COM:DW of the poster and permission from copyright holder is needed. Howhontanozaz (talk) 18:09, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Geni (talk) 18:20, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As the source book for this image was deleted citing need for copyright Arjunaraoc (talk) 21:50, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and Commons:Deletion requests/File:ShivaTandavam.djvu. --Geni (talk) 18:19, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work? E4024 (talk) 22:43, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Geni (talk) 18:18, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own work, one of the early uploads of an established user. E4024 (talk) 00:00, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Geni (talk) 18:17, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Извините, это изображение не для энциклопедии A.Morgunovskaya (talk) 23:00, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Geni (talk) 18:48, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

. Alvianaruri7 (talk) 07:12, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Nonsense as usual by Android app users. --Achim (talk) 18:35, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunatelly, no FOP for indoor artworks in the USA, the @Achim55: 's keep reason "Nonsense as usual by Android app users." won't work Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:05, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Nonsense. The interior is quite blurry and thus covered by 'de minimis'. At best one could consider a lack of COM:EDUSE as a reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 08:03, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Achim55: Huh of Huh? There are some film posters on the view of third parts (LTR) of window, and why you want me to play such a "trick or treat" game? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 08:08, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hm, are we talking about different images? In question is this one: File:Austin Community College Highland Mall Campus 5.jpg where I didn't discover film posters. --Achim (talk) 08:15, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: not seeing any artworks of significance. Appears it may be the wrong image being nominated. --Geni (talk) 18:47, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:CUR#Pakistan.

Stefan4 (talk) 19:52, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:47, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status, per previous DR and COM:CUR#Pakistan. Supposed "own works" derivated from modern Pakistan banknotes, copyrighted by the issuer en:State Bank of Pakistan.

Gunnex (talk) 08:23, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Spezial cases
per en:Pakistani rupee a Hajj banknote of Pakistan (issue of special notes for the express use of the pilgrims), used 1960–1969.
sported both Urdu and Bengali until 1971 (circulated between 1947-1971)
Gunnex (talk) 08:27, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: As per COM:CUR#Pakistan, the two special cases are also Pakistanese currencies made by the State bank as the others (see WP articles). --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:36, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:CUR Pakistan, currencies of Pakistan are copyrighted unless they have been published for 50 years.

A1Cafel (talk) 07:11, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Geni (talk) 18:44, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:CUR Singapore A1Cafel (talk) 07:52, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No complete banknote is visible. Doesn’t that suffice? — Cheers, JackLee talk 10:33, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination even partial is still a deriviate work of the notes. --Geni (talk) 18:42, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:CUR Sri Lanka A1Cafel (talk) 07:54, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Geni (talk) 18:40, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:CUR Sri Lanka A1Cafel (talk) 07:54, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Geni (talk) 18:40, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:CUR Sri Lanka, haven't been published for 70 years A1Cafel (talk) 07:55, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Geni (talk) 18:39, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:CUR Sri Lanka, haven't been published for 70 years A1Cafel (talk) 07:55, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination only 3 years to go mind. --Geni (talk) 18:40, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:CUR Sri Lanka, haven't been published for 70 years A1Cafel (talk) 07:55, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Geni (talk) 18:39, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:CUR Taiwan A1Cafel (talk) 08:09, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On http://jidanni.org/geo/nt1000/ is the background story of this image... part of the historical record which the bank wished never existed. Jidanni (talk) 01:35, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Geni (talk) 18:36, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:CUR Taiwan A1Cafel (talk) 08:09, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


On http://jidanni.org/geo/nt1000/ is the background story of this image... part of the historical record which the bank wished never existed. Jidanni (talk) 01:35, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Geni (talk) 18:36, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See COM:CUR#Taiwan.

Stefan2 (talk) 11:02, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 16:50, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:CUR Taiwan, currencies of Taiwan are copyrighted.

A1Cafel (talk) 08:11, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Geni (talk) 18:36, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Delete per COM:CUR Taiwan. Johnj1995 (talk) 22:45, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 16:48, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no indication that Thai banknotes are free for any reason, and there is no section COM:CUR#Thailand.

Stefan4 (talk) 21:24, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Deletion would constitute lèse majesté. --84.61.176.82 17:06, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
That's a non-copyright restriction and not a valid reason to keep a potential copyright violation. --Stefan4 (talk) 13:39, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:27, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:CUR Thailand, currencies of Thailand are copyrighted.

A1Cafel (talk) 08:15, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Geni (talk) 18:35, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:CUR UAE A1Cafel (talk) 08:17, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Geni (talk) 18:34, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:CUR Vietnam, haven't been published for 50 years A1Cafel (talk) 08:19, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Geni (talk) 18:33, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:CUR Vietnam A1Cafel (talk) 08:19, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Geni (talk) 18:33, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:CUR Vietnam A1Cafel (talk) 08:19, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Geni (talk) 18:33, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader is unlikely to be the copyright holder. The image seems to be by Anaplan itself, and it's being uploaded by a blackhat marketing agency. The same image was previously uploaded as "Own work" by a different user to English Wikipedia. See context here: en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Yoodaba/Archive#16 March 2021. MarioGom (talk) 10:16, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note that the uploader may have worked for an Anaplan contractor, but that doesn't guarantee it has obtained permission from the copyright holder to license the image here. In any case, an OTRS ticket would be required. MarioGom (talk) 12:38, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination the odds of a contractor relationship getting this right are minimal. --Geni (talk) 18:32, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: http://www.georg-eparhia.ru/georg-blagochinie.html, http://georg-eparhia.ru/uploads/posts/2019-07/1562160789_940-1-b.jpg Karaagash (talk) 14:47, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nominator rationale. Veverve (talk) 07:17, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination confirmed on internet archive. --Geni (talk) 22:01, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Słaba jakość WaEa91 (talk) 17:12, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: quality looks fine. --Geni (talk) 21:51, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:Traineek

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work. The files are most likely scanned from books or screenshots. As a side note, these are all cross-wiki uploads from English Wikipedia, and the uploader has been blocked there. --Esiymbro (talk) 01:46, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:PRP. --Rosenzweig τ 12:38, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GRuban (talk · contribs)

[edit]

This is the much smaller follow up to Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with reviewer GRuban hastemplate:PD-IDGov - see that one for details. These are the files that I personally uploaded with PD-IDGov that either have a copyright notice on the page, or, in a couple of cases, are government images from the subject's Instagram stream, so we can't be sure the original government publication of them was without a copyright notice.

GRuban (talk) 01:08, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 20:15, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source states - Official Web Site of the Maine House Democrats - Copyright © 2007 All rights reserved.

Needs OTRS

Gbawden (talk) 09:40, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Hello--I am the person who uploaded these photos. I have been in contact with the owner of these photos to clarify their usage rights and I provided their email response to WC when originally asked (I think the first photo I uploaded from the site was of Rachel Talbot Ross). Once I provided the email, the photo remained. These were obtained in the same way. I am happy to re-provide the email if needed. Light&highbeautyforever (talk) 13:25, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Light&highbeautyforever: If you follow the same COM:OTRS process we will be able to keep them. Gbawden (talk) 07:34, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Email sent, thank you for your help. Light&highbeautyforever (talk) 00:12, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:34, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Glorious 93 as Logo
Probably below COM:TOO or the author could send permission to COM:OTRS. Thibaut (talk) 13:20, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, il s'agit du logo officiel d'Agir ensemble pour les droits humains. IL a été réalisé par les ateliers chenapans. Je ne comprend pas pourquoi cette demande de suppression. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Agir-ensemble-droits-humains (talk • contribs) 13:31, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: pd-textlogo. --Krd 17:32, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AmazingVoiceovers (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons:Derivative works from movie poster. Should be blanked to keep.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:21, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:32, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Beni-Iznasen as duplicate (duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: Territoire des Beni Iznassen.png. Not an exact or scaled down duplicate, converting to DR as author requests deletion >7 days after upload. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 00:36, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no need to delete, is not an exact duplicate. --Ellywa (talk) 19:25, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Philippines banknotes are non-free, see COM:Currency#Philippines.

Sealle (talk) 22:41, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • According to {{PD-PhilippinesGov}}, all works by the government of the Philippines are in the public domain. I'd imagine that banknotes are government works, so the template currently contradicts the section you linked to.
Note that the copyright tag has been listed for deletion twice because of unclear things in the law, and there's the contradicting template w:Template:Non-free Philippines government which has also been listed for deletion twice. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:52, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It is true, in the same way that in the English Wikipedia has been requested several times to change that template. Note that the two templates reflect the consensus reached in both projects, although they contradict. I am not an expert in laws, the aforementioned law says "legal tender bank note", that is, bills that are currently in circulation. Note that such regulation makes reference to the falsification of money. I think that copyrights are independent, as are brand rights or personality rights. The problem is not the copyright, but what you do with the images (Template:Currency)). Ultimately, these images can be transferred to other projects since the restrictions are compatible with fair use (which are not the same size as real bank notes, which have an educational purpose, etc.). Note that the only thing not allowed are the faithful printed or engraved representations and the same size, larger images and digital images are allowed. --Metrónomo's truth of the day: "That was also done by the president" not an excuse. 01:01, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
In the chapter on coins only prohibits their representation "on metal", they are clearly restrictions against counterfeiting of currency, not against copyright. --Metrónomo's truth of the day: "That was also done by the president" not an excuse. 01:24, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I'm not 100% expert in Philipine copyright law (or, specifically, in PH case law), but I do know for a fact that imitation/toy banknotes and plastic coins are widely sold in bookstores and even in department stores in the Philippines (with the requisite "SPECIMEN" or "PLAY MONEY" or "FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY" markings on them), despite the apparent "non-free" status of Filipino banknotes (as alleged by the nominator). (Here is a sample, from an online seller.) No one has been sued or jailed for printing or selling those, if I'm not mistaken. As mentioned by "That was also done by the president" not an excuse, I think the intent of the law is against the counterfeiting of money, and all other images or reproductions especially intended for educational purposes would probably not be covered by the BSP regulations. --- Titopao (talk) 11:35, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: COM:Currency conflates anti-counterfeiting laws and copyright restrictions. It appears that these are all works of the Philippine government and therefore public domain. Restrictions against counterfeiting should be indicated with the appropriate template such as {{Currency}}. --Guanaco (talk) 10:54, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most of these banknotes are not allowed to be here per COM:CUR Philippines.

  — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 05:17, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • The Central Bank of the Philippines was established in 1949. How can their prohibition apply to notes issued prior to 1949? Furthermore, the Philippine Island Treasury Proofs were designed, engraved, and printed by the US Bureau of Engraving & Printing when the Philippines was a U.S. Territory and as such they are in the public domain.-Godot13 (talk) 05:41, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Godot13: Then COM:CUR United States would apply for those older notes.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 05:54, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
WWII occupation notes were issued by the Japanese Government, the 1898 note was issued by the Spanish Government when the Philippines was part of Spain...-Godot13 (talk) 06:00, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Godot13: Then COM:CUR Japan and COM:CUR Spain would apply for those older notes. You really don't have to duplicate these posts on my user talk page.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 06:03, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
My apologies.-Godot13 (talk) 06:06, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Applicable law (per the bank [6]) regards the illustration of legal tender Philippine notes. I understand that to mean currency with current monetary value (I may be wrong), which notes prior to 1949 do not have.-Godot13 (talk) 06:17, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
For the file "File:BSP Peso Announcement Sign.JPG", the sign was made by BSP. PD-PhilippineGov can work, unless COM:CUR Philippines still stands. Ominae (talk) 10:27, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
COM:CUR Japan would not apply at all for those notes, I don't think. The Philippines was a territory of Spain and then the U.S., but it had its own law at the time, and the laws of the other countries often were not directly applied, or altered a bit when they were, and other local laws were also in effect. You have to go through Philippine legal history specifically. Secondly, the regulations in question are part of the anti-counterfeiting laws, and are a non-copyright restriction. Anything which is not legal tender in the Philippines would pretty much be outside the scope of those regulations (which, as mentioned below, I think restrict printed reproductions only anyways). So any pre-1949 notes should be OK, as long as the copyright status checks out (per Philippine law). Carl Lindberg (talk) 17:44, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm leaning  Keep per the closure of the previous DR -- I'm not so sure those regulations apply to photographic reproductions. The regulations specifically say "object" and refer to printed reproductions, and do not mention photographs. There are certainly non-copyright restrictions which apply to printed versions, just like the U.S., but I'm not sure they rise to the point that hosting them here violate the regulations. Carl Lindberg (talk) 17:35, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Per the BSP website: Current banknotes and coin “in circulation issued by BSP” include coins (1995-present), New Generation Currency Coin Series (2018-present), and New Generation Currency Banknote Series (2010-present). [7] The Old Banknote Series (NDS), launched in 1985, was demonetized and replaced with the New Generation Currency (NGC) launched in 2010. [8] The last day for redemption of the NDS was 30 June 2017. As of 1 July 2017 the NDS had no monetary value. [9] Demonetized coin series include the English Series (1958–66), Pilipino [sic] Series (1969–74), Ang Bagong Lipunan (1975–82), Flora and Fauna Series (1983–91), and Improved Flora and Fauna Series (1992–94). [10] While I won’t make any assumptions, it likely follows that paper currency series pre-1985 have also been demonetized. The rules and regulations for series 2010 on I can't say.-Godot13 (talk) 20:44, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    @Clindberg and Godot13: Please feel free to strikeout any links to depictions of banknotes that have been demonetized.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 23:11, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    @Jeff G.: Will do, thanks. A list of demonetized banknote series can be found at [11].-Godot13 (talk) 02:24, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    @Clindberg and Jeff G.: I can't speak to the Peso Announcement Sign near the top, but any note not crossed out is current issue circulating legal tender.--Godot13 (talk) 03:11, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    @Godot13: Thanks.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 10:27, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:13, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:CUR Philippines, currencies that are legal tender in the Philippines are copyrighted.

A1Cafel (talk) 07:49, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. This deletion request is a misreading of COM:CUR Philippines. As stated there, copyright does not exist in works of the government of the Philippines and this includes banknotes. (Hence, why we have the {{PD-PhilippinesGov}} template.) What is restricted are reproductions (aka facsimiles) of legal tender banknotes in order to prevent counterfeiting. However, none of the nominated images can reasonably be construed to be reproductions of whole banknotes since they are either photos of small portions of banknotes, or are oblique photos of whole banknotes that cannot be used for reproducing counterfeits. —seav (talk) 07:57, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:1000 Peso Bill ENGC 2020.png and Commons:Deletion requests/File:1000P Front Enhanced.jpg--A1Cafel (talk) 06:19, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. These are details from banknotes. Per COM:CUR Philippines, material is copyrighted: Any handbill, advertisement, placard, circular, card, or any other object whatsoever bearing the facsimile, likeness or similitude of any legal tender Philippine currency note, or any part thereof, whether in black and white or any color or combination of colors, without prior authority therefore having been secured from the Governor, BSP or his duly authorized representative. (Bold or any part thereof' by me). Thefore the images must be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 19:30, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Beyond COM:TOO China. SCP-2000 08:00, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This might be a good reference: Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Logos of companies of China. ——ClayM300 (talk) 12:52, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and COM:TOO China, China has a relatively low threshold of originality standard, this is imho above a low threshold. --Ellywa (talk) 19:33, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The signature was extracted from a congratulatory letter. Thus, it doesn't meet the first item: ...documents of legislative, administrative and judicial nature... Larryasou (talk) 09:01, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per COM:SIG China, note in header "exceptions". --Ellywa (talk) 19:36, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]