Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/12/29
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
It was wrongly uploaded Kaustubh grasslands (talk) 11:30, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 16:57, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Copyright violation 114.142.173.5 14:07, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: CC BY ND @ flickr source. --Achim (talk) 17:59, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Cirilokuaz (talk · contribs)
[edit]They're marked as self-made, but many of them appear to be video screenshots, similar to the one I already listed or the overhead drone shots.
- File:Hospital IMSS Culiacán.jpg
- File:Hosp General de Culiacán (viejo).jpg
- File:Hospital Civil de Culiacán.jpg
- File:Sushi Factory Culiacán.jpg
- File:Parque La Lomita.jpg
- File:Central de Abastos Culiacán.jpg
- File:Av. Alvaro Obregón Culiacán.jpg
- File:Parque acuático Tres Ríos.jpg
- File:La lomita Culiacán.jpg
- File:Culiacán vista panorámica.jpg
- File:Puente negro Culiacán.jpg
- File:Centro de Ciencias de Sinaloa MATERIA.jpg
- File:Estadio Tomateros.jpg
- File:Rio Culiacán.jpg
- File:Ayuntamiento de Culiacán.jpg
- File:Zona urbana Culiacán.jpg
- File:Parque 87 Culiacán.jpg
- File:Aeropuerto de Culiacán.jpg
- File:Tomateros salon de la fama.jpg
- File:Interior estadio tomateros.jpg
- File:Tarde en Culiacán.jpg
- File:Seguridad Culiacán.jpg
- File:Union Rio Culiacán.jpg
- File:Tres Rios CLN.jpg
- File:Camion Puro Sinaloa.jpg
- File:Tres Rios CLN 2.jpg
- File:Puente bimodal.jpg
- File:MASIN.jpg
- File:Tomateros campeones 12.jpg
- File:Culiacán Culiacán.jpg
- File:Culiacán Tres Ríos.jpg
- File:Biblioteca del Botánico.jpg
- File:Maya y Bary zoo de Culiacán.jpg
- File:Foro TVP Culiacán.jpg
- File:Foro Noticieros Televisa Sinaloa.jpg
- File:Foro TV Azteca Culiacán.jpg
- File:Museo Interactivo sobre las Adicciones (MIA).jpg
- File:Río Culiacán.jpg
Ytoyoda (talk) 16:58, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:35, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Cirilokuaz (talk · contribs)
[edit]From https://www.sinaloa360.com/la-hora-dorada-rio-tamazula-en-culiacan/
Ytoyoda (talk) 00:45, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:12, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Cirilokuaz (talk · contribs)
[edit]Most of the user's work are taken from sineola360.com. The food photo here can be found on Facebook via reverse image search, while the cathedral image has watermarking/type on the bottom right corner.
- File:Tomateros.jpg
- File:Gastronomía Culiacán (3).jpg
- File:Gastronomía Culiacán (2).jpg
- File:Gastronomía Culiacán (1).jpg
- File:Gastronomía Culiacán.jpg
- File:Catedral cln.png
Ytoyoda (talk) 19:54, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: License laundering (F6). --Эlcobbola talk 20:38, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
this page is blank and contains nothing therefore it should be deleted Red-back spider (talk) 06:54, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- I redirected it to my user page on enwiki; you blanked it and are now saying it's empty. No point in deleting whatsoever. HurricaneCovid (talk) 18:49, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Keep, per HurricaneCovid. @Red-back spider: please explain your actions here. Verbcatcher (talk) 23:37, 29 December 2020 (UTC)- Keep – Not blank, and there is absolutely no reason to delete this page at all. BlueHypercane761 🌀 (talk) 01:58, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
(non-admin closure) Keep: @Red-back spider: you blanked the page just two minutes before submitting your deletion request. It seems that you edited the page into a state that would permit it a deletion request in the first place. The page (prior to blanking) was a clear interwiki redirect, and is acceptable in userspace. Blanking another person's userpage for no reason (and even going so far as to request deletion for it) is treading very close to disruptive editing. Since the page clearly isn't empty, and deletion was not requested (and was even contested) by the user page's owner, this deletion request has no solid ground under the deletion policy. As an invalid deletion request, I'll be closing this request. Chlod (talk) 02:47, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
This is a fake picture with copyvio of this picture http://www.domaine-de-gaujac.com/en/region/12-avignon Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 15:57, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Wdwd at 22:10, 29 Dezember 2020 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 03:15, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
useless for wikipedia Hoseina051311 (talk) 15:22, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: seems to be withdrawn. --JuTa 08:06, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
webp image doesn't work with some browsers (can't enlarge, download). I created it by mistake. Please delete. Mabrndt (talk) 22:53, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: G7. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 13:40, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Possible copyvioː picture already found n 2014 according to Tineye CoffeeEngineer (talk) 02:04, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by JGHowes at 15:29, 31 Dezember 2020 UTC: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1) --Krdbot 21:12, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake ASHFAK COYON (talk) 04:56, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Speedy delete deletion requested by uploader within a few days of upload. Verbcatcher (talk) 23:25, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 12:02, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by A.JulianEditor (talk · contribs)
[edit]Photo can be found here: https://www.rottentomatoes.com/celebrity/david_salzman
Howhontanozaz (talk) 20:28, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; speedied as unambiguous copyvio. JGHowes talk 18:55, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 00:45, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
useless for wikipedia Hoseina051311 (talk) 15:21, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: possibly out of COM:SCOPE, but it is also very likely to be a copyright violation. --Ahmadtalk 04:47, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Brooke.2712 (talk · contribs)
[edit]All found elsewhere on the internet, the copyright owner appears to be WWE for most images. There doesn't appear to evidence of a free license on any image and use problematic sources such as Pinterest, the author is labeled as IMDB for some images which is also clearly not true, and some are labeled as own work which is unlikely. It's likely that these are copyright violations given they all appear elsewhere on the internet and the source/author is unclear.
- File:Beth Phoenix WWE.jpg
- File:Natalya Neidhart WWE.jpg
- File:Nia Jax WWE.jpg
- File:Carmella WWE.jpg
- File:Trish Stratus at SummerSlam 2019.jpg
- File:Lita 2004.jpg
- File:Mickie James at Raw.jpg
- File:Nia Jax at TLC.png
- File:Alexa Bliss at Raw.jpg
- File:Sasha Banks at Hell in a Cell.jpg
- File:Charlotte Flair before Evolution.jpg
- File:The Raw Women's Championship.jpg
- File:Becky Lynch at the 2020 Royal Rumble.jpg
- File:Charlotte Flair at SummerSlam 2019.png
Dylsss (talk) 01:07, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 10:37, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Tiny unused image, we have better ones. No need for this one. E4024 (talk) 01:27, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 10:38, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
While a similar image is at the source this one is not — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:33, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 10:39, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Self-promotion. The article was deleted on eswiki. The user has no other contributions and might have a sockpuppet. 189.217.91.167 01:38, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 10:39, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Moustafa Hussein (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not own works but scans of some brochure, copyvio (see also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Feature-Brochure-roro-page11.jpg). And 2 logos, above TOO, and out of scope.
- File:AL HURREYA (13).jpg
- File:شركة تريمف للنقل البحري.png
- File:Cropped-Trimuph-4 (2).png
- File:Feature-Brochure-roro-page12.jpg
- File:Feature-Brochure-roro-page10.jpg
- File:Feature-Brochure-roro-page7.jpg
- File:Feature-Brochure-roro-page6.jpg
- File:Feature-Brochure-roro-page4.jpg
- File:Feature-Brochure-roro-page2.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:05, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 10:41, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Only used on the English Wikipedia, where the subject's userpage and draft were speedily deleted in April 2020 as misuse of userspace and spam, respectively. Out of project scope.
- File:Logo of Debugttm.png
- File:DebugTTM with Sathish.png
- File:DubugTTM - YouTube Channel.jpg
- File:Dubug.jpg
ƏXPLICIT 02:05, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 10:41, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Seminoletheatre (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not own works: missing original authors, dates, sources, and permissions.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:08, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Delete published on the theater's website before upload here.[1] These require licence validation via COM:OTRS. Verbcatcher (talk) 23:22, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 10:41, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of an unnotable person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 02:11, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 10:41, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Only intended for use on the Bengali Wikipedia, where the subject's userpage was speedily deleted in February 2020 as inappropriate use of userpage. Out of project scope. ƏXPLICIT 02:22, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 10:41, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused logo of the uploader's own YouTube channel, who has no other live global contributions. Out of project scope. ƏXPLICIT 03:44, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 10:42, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Harsh bhadoriya (talk · contribs)
[edit]Only used on the English Wikipedia, where the subject's draft was speedily deleted in July 2020 as spam. Out of project scope.
ƏXPLICIT 03:49, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 10:42, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
duplicate NAJDA files
[edit]When I uploaded NAJDA, there are some files mistakenly uploaded twice. Please delete these files:
- File:NAJDA-160-0152 &-x28ff8;27下.pdf
- File:NAJDA-160-0152 &-x28ff8;13下.pdf
- File:NAJDA-160-0152 &-x28ff8;15中.pdf
- File:NAJDA-160-0152 &-x28ff8;3 寛治2年3月.pdf
- File:NAJDA-160-0152 &-x28ff8;26下.pdf
- File:NAJDA-160-0152 &-x28ff8;25下.pdf
- File:NAJDA-160-0152 &-x28ff8;14 康治元年11月.pdf
- File:NAJDA-160-0152 &-x28ff8;16 康治2年正月別記.pdf
- File:NAJDA-160-0152 &-x28ff8;15下.pdf
- File:NAJDA-160-0152 &-x28ff8;24下.pdf
- File:NAJDA-160-0152 &-x28ff8;21 久安2年自正月至6月.pdf
- File:NAJDA-160-0152 &-x28ff8;4 寛治2年12月.pdf
- File:NAJDA-160-0152 &-x28ff8;18 天養元年自7月至12月.pdf
- File:NAJDA-160-0152 &-x28ff8;7上 康和5年自7月至12月.pdf
- File:NAJDA-160-0152 &-x28ff8;30 久安5年 久安6年.pdf
- File:NAJDA-160-0152 &-x28ff8;8 保安4年正月.pdf
- File:NAJDA-160-0152 &-x28ff8;23下.pdf
- File:NAJDA-160-0152 &-x28ff8;10 天治元年正月.pdf
- File:NAJDA-160-0152 &-x28ff8;2 治暦4年7月.pdf
- File:NAJDA-160-0152 &-x28ff8;11 大治2年7月 6月 5月.pdf
- File:NAJDA-160-0152 &-x28ff8;7下.pdf
- File:NAJDA-160-0152 &-x28ff8;12 保延元長承4年2月.pdf
- File:NAJDA-160-0152 &-x28ff8;25上 久安3年 3 4 10 12月別記.pdf
- File:NAJDA-160-0152 &-x28ff8;6 康和2年自7月至8月.pdf
- File:NAJDA-160-0152 &-x28ff8;13上 康治元年自正月至12月.pdf
- File:NAJDA-160-0152 &-x28ff8;19 久安元天養2年自正月至6月.pdf
- File:NAJDA-160-0152 &-x28ff8;5 嘉保元寛治8年4月.pdf
- File:NAJDA-160-0152 &-x28ff8;23上 久安3年自正月至6月.pdf
- File:NAJDA-160-0152 &-x28ff8;27上 久安4年自7月至12月.pdf
- File:NAJDA-160-0152 &-x28ff8;24上 久安3年自7月至12月.pdf
- File:NAJDA-160-0152 &-x28ff8;15上 康治2年自正月至12月.pdf
- File:NAJDA-160-0152 &-x28ff8;9 保安4年2月.pdf
- File:NAJDA-160-0152 &-x28ff8;26上 久安4年自正月至6月.pdf
- File:NAJDA-160-0152 &-x28ff8;17 天養康治3年自正月至6月.pdf
- File:NAJDA-160-0152 &-x28ff8;22 久安2年自7月至12月.pdf
- File:NAJDA-160-0152 &-x28ff8;20 久安元年自7月至12月.pdf
- File:NAJDA-160-0152 &-x28ff8;28 久安4年記7月3日尽6月8日 婚記1.pdf
- File:NAJDA-160-0152 &-x28ff8;29 久安4年起8月9日尽12月24日 婚記2.pdf
- File:NAJDA-160-0152 &-x28ff8;1 天暦元自正至11 天暦2自正至12 天暦3自正至12 天徳….pdf
Also please delete these redirections.
- File:NAJDA-190-0477 侗庵新論7 delete please.pdf
- File:NAJDA-190-0477 侗庵新論7 tmp.pdf
- File:NAJDA-138-0107 大日本史 57 delete please.pdf
- File:NAJDA-150-0001 武徳編年集成6 delete please.pdf
- File:NAJDA-199-0216 大社 delete please.pdf
--維基小霸王 (talk) 08:10, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 10:44, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Flickrwashing - ©2006 Powell Photography, Inc. All Rights Reserved per exif and flickr account has 0 followers, 0 following. License cannot be trusted Gbawden (talk) 12:21, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 10:45, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal photos.
- File:Mladi srpski inovator Stefan Unić.jpg
- File:Stefan Unić mladi inovator i pronalazač.jpg
- File:Stefan Unić.jpg
Smooth O (talk) 12:39, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 10:45, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused user graphic, uploader's only other live global contributions are unproductive. Out of project scope. ƏXPLICIT 12:46, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 10:45, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused user graphic, uploader has one other live global contribution, which is creating their own userpage. Out of project scope. ƏXPLICIT 12:53, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 10:45, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused user graphic, uploader has no other live global contributions. Out of project scope. ƏXPLICIT 12:57, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 10:44, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Only used on the English Wikipedia, where the subject's userpage was speedily deleted in October 2020 as spam. Out of project scope. ƏXPLICIT 13:00, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 10:44, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from commercial packaging.
- File:Mvsked blvck-DCDF-4B55-BA42-39E4BF0FBC101.jpg
- File:Mvsked blvck-DCDF-4B55-BA42-39E4BF0FBC107.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:25, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 13:52, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
I don't see how these images can be considered educational. If anything they would appear to be promoting brands/style rather than anything else. They are outside our scope as far as I can tell.
- File:Mvsked blvck Snapchat private story.jpg
- File:Mvsked blvck Ig Story 01.jpg
- File:Mvsked.Co X Supreme -Dior style.png
- File:Mvsked.Co X Louis Vuitton—Dior style.png
- File:Mvsked.Co-Dior style 01.jpg
- File:Mvsked.Co Anime box tee 02.png
- File:Mvsked.Co Anime box tee 01.png
- File:Mvsked.Co memes logo box 01.png
- File:Mvsked.Co memes logo boxx.png
- File:Mvsked.Co memes box tee.png
- File:Mvsked.Co X supreme bag.png
- File:Mvsked.Co X Louis Vuitton box tee.png
- File:Mvsked.Co 04.png
- File:Mvsked.Co 03.png
- File:Mvsked.Co 01.png
- File:Mvsked.Co X Supreme box sweatshirt.jpg
- File:Mvsked.Co-mvsked blvck-LV 10.png
- File:Mvsked.Co-mvsked blvck-LV 09.jpg
- File:Mvsked.Co-mvsked blvck-LV 08.jpg
- File:Mvsked.Co-mvsked blvck-LV 07.png
- File:Mvsked.Co-mvsked blvck-LV 05.png
- File:Mvsked.Co-mvsked blvck-LV 06.png
- File:Mvsked.Co-mvsked blvck-LV 04.png
- File:Mvsked.Co-mvsked blvck-LV 01.jpg
- File:Mvsked.Co-mvsked blvck-LV 02.png
- File:Mvsked.Co-mvsked blvck-LV 03.png
- File:Mvsked blvck-DCDF-4B55-BA42-39E4BF0FBC106.png
- File:Mvsked blvck-DCDF-4B55-BA42-39E4BF0FBC96.png
- File:Mvsked blvck-DCDF-4B55-BA42-39E4BF0FBC110.jpg
- File:Mvsked blvck-DCDF-4B55-BA42-39E4BF0FBC108.jpg
Herby talk thyme 13:51, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 10:46, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Semilla Ad (talk · contribs)
[edit]self promotional: user was blocked on en.wikipedia
Pippobuono (talk) 16:45, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 10:47, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:02, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 10:47, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no context, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:03, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 10:47, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no location/context, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:05, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 10:47, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:06, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 10:48, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:07, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 10:48, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by SportFrançais (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photos, no educational value, out of scope. And they look like screengrabs.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:07, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 10:48, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused text-only image, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:09, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 10:48, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused image without clear purpose or educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:10, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 10:48, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photos, no educational value, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:10, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 10:48, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal artwork, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:11, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 10:48, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bernadet Hosanaa (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos, no educational value, out of scope. One was used on userpage of user without meaningful edits.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:15, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 10:48, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused photos of non-notable persons and events, no educational value, out of scope.
- File:Si se pudo.JPG
- File:Grupo de trabajadores de la CPAS.JPG
- File:Caja de Proteccion.JPG
- File:Dr. Tomas Chuman Castillo.JPG
- File:Los Personajes mas destacados del Peru.JPG
- File:Polisalud.JPG
- File:Si Se Puede.JPG
- File:CPAS.JPG
- File:Trabajadores de la Caja de Proteccion y Asistencia Social Ley N°10674.JPG
- File:Personajes destacados del Peru.JPG
- File:Premios obtenidos para el Programa de Recursos Polisalud.JPG
- File:Caja de Protección y Asistencia Social Ley N° 10674.JPG
P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:16, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 10:49, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:17, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 10:49, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:17, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete, not sure why I uploaded this in the first place. --Pierre Rudloff (talk) 21:15, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 10:49, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused text-only diagram, should be in wiki-markup if needed, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:18, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 10:49, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nithin sunil thypparampil (talk · contribs)
[edit]Vanity account. Commons is not your personal free web host. No contribs to any wm project, en:Draft:Nithin Sunil Thypparampil declined.
- File:Nithin sunil thypparampil@T.jpg
- File:Nithin Sunil Thypparampil@h.jpg
- File:Nithin sunil thypparampil @ casp.jpg
- File:Nithin sunil thypparampil @ hope camp.jpg
- Nithin sunil thypparampil
Achim (talk) 18:34, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 10:51, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in nl:Radicaal (scheikunde) with TeX equivalent:
![{\displaystyle {\begin{array}{llcl}{\text{I:}}&{\ce {(CH3)3C-O-Cl}}&{\ce {->[\Delta ]}}&{\ce {(CH3)3C-O}}^{*}{\ce {+Cl}}^{*}\\{\text{P}}_{1}{\text{:}}&{\ce {R-H}}{\ce {+(CH3)3C-O}}^{*}&{\ce {<=>>}}&{\ce {R}}^{*}{\ce {+(CH3)3C-OH}}\\{\text{P}}_{2}{\text{:}}&{\ce {R}}^{*}{\ce {+(CH3)3C-O-Cl}}&{\ce {<=>>}}&{\ce {R-Cl}}{\ce {+(CH3)3C-O}}^{*}\\\hline \Sigma &{\ce {R-H}}{\ce {+(CH3)3C-O-Cl}}&{\ce {->[{\text{40°C}}]}}&{\ce {R-Cl}}{\ce {+(CH3)3C-OH}}\end{array}}}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/e2655565e923375a7086a6b593ef6d73d981d48a)
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 14:12, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:44, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
This is not an own work. If I'm not wrong WhatsApp uses this image; looks a bit improbable that they use an image from Commons. E4024 (talk) 01:29, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:50, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sivagovind R (talk · contribs)
[edit]User has been uploading multiple copies of the same images from different news sources as own work. There's no reason to believe these are own work as claimed. Have already tagged some as copyvio from ANI etc.
- File:Pandalam Montage.jpg
- File:K. Muraleedharan.jpg
- File:K. C. Venugopal MP.jpg
- File:Kannoth Muraleedharan.jpg
- File:P. C. Vishnunath.jpg
- File:V. S. Sivakumar MLA.jpg
- File:Shashi Tharoor MP.jpg
- File:K. S. Sabarinadhan MLA.jpg
- File:K. S. Sabarinadhan.jpg
- File:Rameshji Chennithala.jpg
- File:Ramesh Chennithala.jpg
- File:PKV, CM.jpg
- File:IMG AK Antony.jpg
- File:CAchuthaMenon.jpg
- File:V S Achuthanandan.jpg
- File:A. K. Antony IMG.jpg
- File:IMG Pinarayi Vijayan.jpg
- File:Pinarayi Vijayan IMG.jpg
- File:Oommen Chandy.jpg
- File:C H Muhammed Koya.jpg
- File:R. Shankar.jpg
- File:K. Karunakaran Leader.jpg
- File:Chelat Achutha Menon.jpg
- File:Ramesh Chennithalaji.jpg
- File:K Karunakaran CM.jpg
- File:CM K. Karunakaran.jpg
- File:CM Kannoth Karunakaran.jpg
- File:K Karunakaran.jpg
- File:E. K. Nayanar.jpg
- File:EMS Namboothirippad.jpg
- File:P. K. Vasudevan Nair.png
—SpacemanSpiff 03:26, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Steinsplitter. --Gbawden (talk) 08:52, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
I'm doubting the "own work" claim for this file: please let the copyrightholder contact Commons:OTRS. Ciell (talk) 09:41, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:59, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
Doesn't seem to be in a scope - if it's notable cartoon, not amateur work, then unclear copyright of anonymous uploader. Pibwl (talk) 11:37, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:58, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:OTRS must be used instead. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:19, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:59, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
Likely not own work: found published online ([2]) before upload here, needs OTRS at a minimum if indeed own work. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:33, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:59, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
logo, probable copyvio of a company in Ohio, or self promotional Pippobuono (talk) 16:48, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:00, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation of: http://heartofawanderer.com/2018/11/21/notes-from-a-traveller-vishwas-patel-director-infibeam-avenues-ltd/ Asukite (talk) 17:18, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:00, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of unidentified band and event, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:19, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:59, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dr. Abdullah Shaghi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Text-only files, unused. Out of scope.
GeorgHH • talk 19:07, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:49, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
risk of copyright violation, poster is unlikely to be own work Verbcatcher (talk) 19:31, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:49, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio per Commons:Freedom of panorama#Syria. This was designed by Syrian sculptor Abdallah al-Sayed in 1993.
- File:Salahaddin.jpg
- File:Chatillon in Damascus.jpg
- File:Damasco il SaladinoHPIM3262 2.JPG
- File:Damascus(js) 6.jpg
- File:Damascus(js) 7.jpg
- File:Damascus(js) 8.jpg
- File:Dimashq-salahuddin208.jpg
- File:Standbeeld Saladin Damascus.JPG
- File:Statue of Saladin, Damascus.jpg
Takabeg (talk) 05:08, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
description attributes origin of file to Facebook site, the University also has own website. Very unlikely to be covered by the license claimed by uploader. Previous deletion of file with same name in 2013 for copyvio. Drchriswilliams (talk) 19:33, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; complex logos need permission. --Gbawden (talk) 08:47, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
risk of copyright violation, TV poster, requires validation of licence via COM:OTRS Verbcatcher (talk) 19:33, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:45, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation, screen shot of a TV show Verbcatcher (talk) 19:39, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:40, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
Possible copyvioː screenshot of Twitter CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:13, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:40, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
Likely to be Flickr washing. Flickr account only contains this particular photo which most likely is a screenshot of this YouTube video. Howhontanozaz (talk) 20:21, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:40, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
Exif says "pictureplus All rights reserved" Permission required for free use.
- File:Hon Cecilia Ogwal MP Uganda. (middle).jpg
- File:Faustina Anyanwu.jpg
- File:Divas of Colour Conference.jpg
- File:Divas of Colour Fashion Show.jpg
- File:Trishna Barahdia .jpg
GeorgHH • talk 20:29, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:36, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
Low resolution, no metadata, is this really own work? -mattbuck (Talk) 20:34, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Comment File:Tape Gag Girl.jpg should be considered at the same time; the above appears to be a crop of it.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 21:20, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom - No metadata and the uploaders name seems weird for the girl (IE I would expect the uploaders name to be non-English). I'm not convinced this image is the uploaders work. Delete. –Davey2010Talk 13:20, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and FB in MD. --Gbawden (talk) 08:29, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
The listed source website does not appear to be CC licensed. Rosguill (talk) 20:40, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:33, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
This image does not appear to be CC licensed at the source page. Rosguill (talk) 20:42, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:32, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
This image does not appear to be CC licensed at the source page. Rosguill (talk) 20:43, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:32, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
Goodevening, I'm one of the creators of this page. May I ask how come the image has been nominated for deletion? I asked permission to the owners to use them and I put the copyright information. I'd like to understand what went wrong in order to improve my wikipedia skills and avoid such mistakes in the future. Thank you Galiucc7 (talk) 20:03, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
The source page appears to reserve rights for all content. Rosguill (talk) 20:44, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:32, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
Image source does not indicate a CC-license. Rosguill (talk) 20:45, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:32, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
Image source does not indicate a CC-license. Rosguill (talk) 20:46, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:32, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
Image source does not indicate a CC-license. Rosguill (talk) 20:46, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:33, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
Image source does not indicate a CC-license. Rosguill (talk) 20:47, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:33, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
Image source does not indicate a CC-license. Rosguill (talk) 20:47, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:33, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
Image source does not indicate a CC-license. Rosguill (talk) 20:47, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:33, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
Image source does not indicate a CC-license. Rosguill (talk) 20:48, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:33, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
Image source does not indicate a CC-license. Rosguill (talk) 20:48, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:33, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
ich will es komplett löschen Spaeeee (talk) 20:48, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete by courtesy, not in use. --Achim (talk) 20:53, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:27, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
Image source does not indicate a CC-license. Rosguill (talk) 20:48, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:27, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
Image source does not indicate a CC-license. Rosguill (talk) 20:48, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:27, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
Image source does not indicate a CC-license. Rosguill (talk) 20:48, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:27, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
Image source does not indicate a CC-license. Rosguill (talk) 20:48, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:27, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
Image source does not indicate a CC-license. Rosguill (talk) 20:48, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:27, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
Probable copyright violations, no evidence of permission from the publishers of the published items Verbcatcher (talk) 21:45, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:25, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rafael Boemi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Gumercindo Jr. (2008).jpg
- File:Di Fiori (2008).jpg
- File:Roberto Ramalho (2008).jpg
- File:Mário Carneiro (2012).jpg
- File:Vitor Oliveira (2012).jpg
- File:Ércio Giriboni (2012).jpg
- File:Di Fiori (2012).jpg
- File:Vinícius Válio (2020).jpg
- File:Fuad (2020).jpg
- File:Ricardo Barbará (2020).jpg
- File:Milton Nery (2020).jpg
- File:Simone Marquetto (2020).jpg
- File:Hiram Jr. (2016).jpg
- File:Vitor Oliveira (2016).jpg
- File:Chico do PT (2016).jpg
- File:Simone Marquetto (2016).jpg
- File:Ali Sami Yen Stadı outside.jpg
- File:Ali Sami Yen Stadı inside.jpg
- File:Besiktas Inönü Stadyumu inside.jpg
- File:Besiktas Inönü Stadyumu outside.jpg
- File:Hüseyin Avni Aker Stadyumu crowded.jpg
- File:Hüseyin Avni Aker Stadyumu inside.jpg
- File:Hüseyin Avni Aker Stadyumu outside.jpg
- File:Estádio Olímpico Atatürk crowded.jpg
- File:Estádio Olímpico Atatürk outside.jpg
- File:Fatih Terim Stadyumu inside.jpg
- File:Medical Park Stadyumu crowded.jpg
- File:Medical Park Stadyumu inside.jpg
- File:Medical Park Stadyumu outside.jpg
- File:Sükrü Saraçoglu crowded.jpg
- File:Sükrü Saraçoglu outside.jpg
- File:Yeni Malatya Stadyumu crowded.jpg
- File:Yeni Malatya Stadyumu inside.jpg
- File:Yeni Malatya Stadyumu.jpg
- File:Vodafone Park crowded.jpg
- File:Vodafone Park inside.jpg
- File:Türk Telekom Arena crowded.jpg
- File:Türk Telekom Arena Galatasaray.jpg
- File:Vodafone Park Besiktas.jpg
- File:Timsah Arena Crowded.jpg
- File:Timsah Arena Inside.jpg
- File:Timsah Arena Bursaspor.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 03:25, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete All the various images I have checked randomly fall in one or more of the following situations:
- Low resolution and no Exif data, which is quite odd for a "own work".
- They are reported by tineye.com as having been published by Turkish media.
- Commercial logos.
- It is also very unlikely that a Brazilian young man who lives i Brazil took all those photos of Turkish stadiums, many of them looking like a pro work, others being aerial photos and others dating from when he was a boy or teenager. --Stego (talk) 19:51, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 10:53, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rafael Boemi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Inconsistent resolution, unlikely to be own work.
- File:Denizlispor logo.svg
- File:Fatih Karagümrük S.K..png
- File:Edson Giriboni foto oficial.jpg
- File:TFF 3.Lig logotipo.png
- File:TFF 2.Lig logotipo.png
- File:TFF 1.Lig logotipo.png
- File:Largo dos Amores.jpg
- File:César Eugênio Piedade.jpg
- File:Antonio Barbosa (2004).jpg
- File:Marcos Cunha (2004).jpg
- File:Ricardo Barbará (2004).jpg
- File:Roberto Ramalho (2004).jpg
- File:Süper Lig logo.png
Minoraxtalk 10:54, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:22, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation. João Justiceiro (talk) 00:59, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 06:37, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
Is this the same file we deleted before? E4024 (talk) 23:13, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: OoS. --Gbawden (talk) 08:22, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
Appears to be promotional material from the series w:en:100 días para enamorarnos, I find it unlikely that this is own work.
Dylsss (talk) 23:35, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 08:21, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
Non free logo
Habertix (talk) 23:46, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:21, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
Not a good name and not a good image HDORS (talk) 23:57, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; OoS. --Gbawden (talk) 08:21, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
Political party logo. Assertion that uploader is copyright holder is disputed, as is the claim that this is their own work. Kinu (talk) 14:28, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:14, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
PROJECT:TOY and ins UI is both copyright object. IN (talk) 14:30, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 09:11, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by TSCHAMATOR (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unidentified logos not used anywhere. Out of scope.
Smooth O (talk) 09:14, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 16:41, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private files storage. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:15, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 16:42, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:17, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 16:42, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Italy A1Cafel (talk) 02:34, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. The below part of a normal bridge is not copyrightable. Ruthven (msg) 08:24, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Italy A1Cafel (talk) 02:34, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: there are no copyrightable elements in this photo. Ruthven (msg) 08:24, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Italy A1Cafel (talk) 02:34, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Below ToO/not copyrightable. Ruthven (msg) 08:25, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Italy A1Cafel (talk) 02:34, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Below ToO (nothing relevant or protected in this photo). Ruthven (msg) 08:26, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Italy A1Cafel (talk) 02:37, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: bilboard in the center of the photo. Ruthven (msg) 08:28, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Italy A1Cafel (talk) 02:37, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: below ToO. A window is not copyrightable. Ruthven (msg) 08:29, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Italy A1Cafel (talk) 02:38, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Below ToO, and not among the protected architectures of the MiBACT. Ruthven (msg) 08:30, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
Possible copyvio ː screenshot of a defunt website CoffeeEngineer (talk) 13:32, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:31, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
Person in the picture have asked that picture should be taken away from Wikimedia Commons. YleArchives (talk) 11:26, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per identifiable photo of non-public person with request of removal by Commons:Photographs of identifiable people --Zache (talk) 09:48, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pitke (talk) 21:23, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
File:P1080362 France, Paris, l'entrée au musée du Louvre par la pyramide, et l'aile Richelieu (5629739506).jpg
[edit]No FoP in France. Architect I. M. Pei died in 2019, still within the 70 pma of the country A1Cafel (talk) 02:44, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:05, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
proJECT:TOY.-- IN (talk) 14:33, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 13:58, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
Possible copyvioː Magazine cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 13:29, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:31, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag) Darafsh Kaviyani (Talk) 10:13, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by JuTa at 15:42, 29 Januar 2021 UTC: No OTRS permission since 29 December 2020 --Krdbot 20:51, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
copied from [3] not oun work Gahukuro (talk) 12:47, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:34, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
I fail to see how this file isn't a copyright violation, it's clearly watermarked with ©2011 Google, nothing else suggests that this is freely licensed. Dylsss (talk) 15:56, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:38, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from advertisement. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, the photo itself tends to be copyright violation as well. Taivo (talk) 11:51, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Commons:Reproductions#I know that I can't upload photos of copyrighted art (like paintings and statues), but what about toys? Toys are not art!-- IN (talk) 14:37, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:54, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
Commons:Reproductions#I know that I can't upload photos of copyrighted art (like paintings and statues), but what about toys? Toys are not art!-- IN (talk) 14:40, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:53, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
File:MacRenderman was on the shelves of our library when I started here in 1992, but I never got to use it. I think the stuff inside the box is still shrink wrapped. (117804721).jpg
[edit]Derivative work of copyrighted Pixar character TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 07:35, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:23, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Works by Tetyana Duman-Skop
[edit]All files from this category: Works by Tetyana Duman-Skop. Uploaded by Vasylyna Duman. Vasylyna Duman is not Tetyana Duman-Skop. No Permission. --Микола Василечко (talk) 19:30, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
- File:1.A - Tetiana Duman-Skop i Oles Sanin.jpg
- File:1.B - Arkhanhel Mykhail Ikona Tetiany Duman Z Pryvatnoi Kolektsii Olesia Sanina.jpg
- File:10. - Sv. Antonii A.jpg
- File:10. - Sv. Antonii B.jpg
- File:10. - Sv. Antonii H.jpg
- File:10. - Sv. Antonii V.jpg
- File:11. Bozhe myloserdia.jpg
- File:11. Epitafia.jpg
- File:2.A - Lev Skop Tetiana Duman Ta O.Taras Kotsiuba.jpg
- File:2.B - Pokrova Bohorodytsi Ikona Penzlia Tetiany Duman Z Pryvatnoi Kolektsii Kapelana Tarasa Kotsiuby.jpg
- File:3.A - Z Tsyklu Anhely Riatuiut Zhyttia.jpg
- File:3.B - Z Tsyklu Anhely Riatuiut Zhyttia.jpg
- File:3.D - Z Tsyklu Anhely Riatuiut Zhyttia.jpg
- File:3.E - Z Tsyklu Anhely Riatuiut Zhyttia.jpg
- File:3.H - Z Tsyklu Anhely Riatuiut Zhyttia.jpg
- File:3.V - Z Tsyklu Anhely Riatuiut Zhyttia.jpg
- File:4. - Sv. Yosafat Kuntsevych. Ikona Penzlia Tani Duman-Skop 01.jpg
- File:5. - Rozkvitlyi Khrystos.jpg
- File:5. Blazhennyi Omelian Kovch. Ikona Penzlia Tetiany Duman-Skop.jpg
- File:7. Kaminci z Medzhugorya.jpg
- File:8. Свята Анна.jpg
- File:9. - Sv. Yustyna.jpg
- Category:Works by Tetyana Duman-Skop
I added the cat. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 08:36, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:24, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Per COM:PENIS, yet another low quality photo of a penis. -sasha- (talk) 11:52, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. E4024 (talk) 00:43, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Mhhossein talk 11:19, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in de:1,12-Dodecandisäure with TeX equivalent:
![{\displaystyle {\ce {HOOC-R-COOH ->[{\ce {NH3}}] NH4+OOC-R-COO- NA4+ ->[][{\ce {-H2O}}] H2NOC-R-CONH2 ->[][{\ce {-H2O}}] NC-R-CN ->[{\ce {H2}}] H2N-CH2-R-CH2-NH2R=(CH2)10}}}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/42e30c5233dd20090dfd65a4a12631cba37dfd54 "1,12-Diaminododecan-Synthese")
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:29, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- Was soll denn diese "Veschlimmbesserung"? Die Änderung erhöht weder Informationsgehalt noch Anschaulichkeit. Außerdem ist die Eingabe an Umständlichkeit nicht zu übertreffen. Solche Änderungen braucht kein Mensch.--ChemDoc 2010 (talk) 18:42, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- @ChemDoc 2010: , TeX is a de facto standard for publications in several technical and scientifical fields. It's more easily to edit TeX-markup or translate to different languages than it would be with vector graphics or even pixelbased graphics. More than a decade ago this project Wikimedia Commons decided, formulas which can be typesetted by TeX are out of the scope of the project. The transformation from image to TeX-markup is more some kind of cleanup than to provide more information whereas it actually becomes more easily to add more information e.g. by highlighting parts of a formular with colors by using TeX-markup (see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Carbamylation formula.jpg). --WIKImaniac 09:49, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
- As you apparently do not understand German, let me respond as follows: I do not approve with the changes you made in my chemical reaction schemes. They do not increase information content nor clarity and their input is unneccessarily complicated. This is an unwanted improvement for the worse. Please redirect your improvement efforts more at the substance than the style of an article.--ChemDoc 2010 (talk) 11:27, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
- @ChemDoc 2010: , indeed, replacements with TeX are wanted improvements, please have a look at the first sentence in Wikipedia:Richtlinien Chemie/Reaktionsgleichungen or Wikipedia:Richtlinien_Chemie#Reaktionsgleichungen. It says: "Reaktionsgleichungen sind bevorzugt in TeX zu formatieren." The advantages of TeX are apparent. If you need help with TeX feel free to ask or use following page Hilfe:TeX. --WIKImaniac 18:36, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
- The senence you cite says: "Chemical reactions are to be formated preferentially in TeX. As the advantages of TeX are not apparent to me, I prefer to continue with software tools I have been using for more than 10 years.--ChemDoc 2010 (talk) 19:26, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
- @ChemDoc 2010: , one of the advantages of TeX is that no additional software is required for editing. Of course, you can continue to use the software of your choice to create images. --WIKImaniac 18:54, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
- The senence you cite says: "Chemical reactions are to be formated preferentially in TeX. As the advantages of TeX are not apparent to me, I prefer to continue with software tools I have been using for more than 10 years.--ChemDoc 2010 (talk) 19:26, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
- @ChemDoc 2010: , indeed, replacements with TeX are wanted improvements, please have a look at the first sentence in Wikipedia:Richtlinien Chemie/Reaktionsgleichungen or Wikipedia:Richtlinien_Chemie#Reaktionsgleichungen. It says: "Reaktionsgleichungen sind bevorzugt in TeX zu formatieren." The advantages of TeX are apparent. If you need help with TeX feel free to ask or use following page Hilfe:TeX. --WIKImaniac 18:36, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
- As you apparently do not understand German, let me respond as follows: I do not approve with the changes you made in my chemical reaction schemes. They do not increase information content nor clarity and their input is unneccessarily complicated. This is an unwanted improvement for the worse. Please redirect your improvement efforts more at the substance than the style of an article.--ChemDoc 2010 (talk) 11:27, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
- @ChemDoc 2010: , TeX is a de facto standard for publications in several technical and scientifical fields. It's more easily to edit TeX-markup or translate to different languages than it would be with vector graphics or even pixelbased graphics. More than a decade ago this project Wikimedia Commons decided, formulas which can be typesetted by TeX are out of the scope of the project. The transformation from image to TeX-markup is more some kind of cleanup than to provide more information whereas it actually becomes more easily to add more information e.g. by highlighting parts of a formular with colors by using TeX-markup (see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Carbamylation formula.jpg). --WIKImaniac 09:49, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
- Keep I don't see any advantages of using TeX instead. Conversely the text at the reaction arrows are not depicted correctly in my Browser, hence I prefer using the drawn image. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 21:03, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Chem Sim 2001: thank you for your hint. In fact, the spacing can be optimized so that no more parts of the formula are cut off.
- If TeX is used instead of an image, the caption can be translated into the desired language, to name just one advantage of TeX over images. And that actually happens, as you can see here, for example. --WIKImaniac 17:58, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
![{\displaystyle {\begin{array}{l}\\{\ce {HOOC-R-COOH ->[{\ce {NH3}}] NH4+OOC-R-COO- NA4+ ->[][{\ce {-H2O}}] H2NOC-R-CONH2 ->[][{\ce {-H2O}}] NC-R-CN ->[{\ce {H2}}] H2N-CH2-R-CH2-NH2R=(CH2)10}}\\\;\end{array}}}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/ad11941cc50a6f1c8459580e9937c60096a104be "1,12-Diaminododecan-Synthese")
Kept: Caption can be added manually and it's better to have such a complicated text as an image. --Minoraxtalk 01:15, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
This image is possibly copied from here . No copyright information listed. Richard Avery (talk) 11:34, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
@Richard Avery: Hi, Dear sir, as am not a user friendly for wikipedia, there may be some missing data or some empty space to fill up more detailed information. But as per my knowledge, I have provided the link from where this image is copied. Kindly see it. If some information is missing, please help me to correct it. If you delete the image without correcting me, then how can learn to use the wikimedia and help it to add more info.
Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 16:44, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in es:b:Electrónica de Potencia/Diodo de potencia/Problemas de diseño with TeX equivalent:
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:54, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 13:07, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in es:b:Electrónica de Potencia/Diodo de potencia/Problemas de diseño with TeX equivalent:
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:54, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 13:07, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
This image is copyrighted, and it is vandalism Alejitao123 (talk) 00:50, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- You have given no evidence that this is copyrighted. In what way is it vandalism? If you are nominating this on the grounds of bad taste then please say so. However, Delete as this has been published elsewhere before upload here.[4] Verbcatcher (talk) 22:51, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 13:06, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Out of Scope. No encyclopaedic use. Dandelo (talk) 09:51, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 13:23, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 11:03, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- Could be replaced with TeX equivalent:
- --WIKImaniac 19:02, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
![{\displaystyle {\begin{matrix}{}\\{\ce {R-H + Br-\!#\!-R' ->[{\ce {CuBr}}][{\ce {NEt3}}] R-\!#\!-\!#\!-R'}}\end{matrix}}}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/6c62453907871a7873da033d572aaca898485deb)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 13:07, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 11:16, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 13:08, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
replaced in en:b:Proteomics/Post-translational Modification/Amino Group Modification with TeX equivalent:
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 13:02, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete JackPotte (talk) 13:14, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 13:08, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 13:04, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 13:08, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 13:10, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 13:08, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 15:20, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 13:08, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 15:21, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 13:08, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 15:23, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 13:08, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 15:24, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 13:08, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 15:25, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 13:09, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 15:27, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 13:09, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 15:28, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 13:09, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 15:28, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 13:09, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 15:28, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 13:10, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 15:28, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 13:10, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 15:28, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 13:10, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 15:29, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 13:10, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 15:29, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 13:10, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 15:29, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 13:10, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 15:29, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 13:10, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 15:30, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 13:10, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 15:30, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 13:10, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 15:30, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 13:10, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 15:30, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 13:11, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 15:30, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 13:11, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from toy. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 13:23, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in en:User:Tristandilbeck/sandbox with TeX equivalent:
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 15:36, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 13:11, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
replaced in en:b:Advanced Inorganic Chemistry/Vibrational Spectroscopy of Linear Molecules with TeX equivalent:
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 16:17, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 13:11, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 16:25, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 13:13, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 16:25, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 13:13, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 16:26, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 13:13, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 16:26, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 13:13, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 16:26, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 13:13, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 16:27, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 13:13, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 16:28, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 13:13, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 16:28, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 13:13, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 16:29, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 13:13, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 16:29, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 13:13, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 16:30, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 13:13, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in en:b:Introduction to Inorganic Chemistry/Review of Chemical Bonding with TeX equivalent:
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 16:43, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 13:13, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in vi:Phương trình hóa học with TeX equivalent:
![{\displaystyle {\begin{matrix}{\ce {P2O5{}+3H2O->2H3PO4}}\\{\ce {2KNO3->[{\text{heat}}]2KNO2{}+O2}}\\{\ce {Al4C3{}+12H2O->4Al(OH)3{}+3CH4}}\\{\ce {C}}_{n}{\ce {H}}_{2n}+{\frac {3n}{2}}{\ce {O2->[{\text{heat}}]}}\ n{\ce {CO2}}+n{\ce {H2O}}\end{matrix}}}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/28872480122cbc75f55bcdacfcfd7a9dae2e9795 "Phương trình hoá học")
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:03, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 13:14, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:07, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 13:14, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:08, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 13:14, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:08, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 13:14, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:09, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 13:14, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in de:1,12-Dodecandisäure with TeX equivalent:
![{\displaystyle {\ce {H2C=CH-(CH2)8-COOH ->[{\ce {CO}}{\ce {+}}{\ce {H2}}][{\ce {RhH(CO)(PPh3)3}}] OHC-(CH2)10-COOH ->[{\ce {O2}}] HOOC-(CH2)10-COOH}}}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/c107c075006b4aad1aa8306b3b263ba0fb5c79d1 "DDDA aus 10-Undecensäure")
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:29, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- s. Kommentar zur Änderung von File:1,12-Diaminododecan-Synthese.svg. --ChemDoc 2010 (talk) 18:44, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- @ChemDoc 2010: , TeX is a de facto standard for publications in several technical and scientifical fields. It's more easily to edit TeX-markup or translate to different languages than it would be with vector graphics or even pixelbased graphics. More than a decade ago this project Wikimedia Commons decided, formulas which can be typesetted by TeX are out of the scope of the project. The transformation from image to TeX-markup is more some kind of cleanup than to provide more information whereas it actually becomes more easily to add more information e.g. by highlighting parts of a formular with colors by using TeX-markup (see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Carbamylation formula.jpg). --WIKImaniac 09:50, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 13:14, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:31, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 13:15, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:32, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 13:15, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:33, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 13:15, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:33, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 13:15, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:33, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 13:15, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:33, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 13:15, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:33, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 13:15, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:34, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 13:15, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:34, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 13:15, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:34, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Jeffrey Beall (talk) 15:41, 23 February 2021 (UTC).
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 13:16, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:34, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 13:16, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:34, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 13:16, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:36, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 13:16, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in es:b:Electrónica de Potencia/Diodo de potencia/Problemas de diseño with TeX equivalent:
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:54, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 13:16, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in es:b:Electrónica de Potencia/Diodo de potencia/Problemas de diseño with TeX equivalent:
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 21:24, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 13:16, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 21:28, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 13:17, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 21:29, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 13:17, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 21:30, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 13:17, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 21:30, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 13:17, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 21:31, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 13:17, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 21:31, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 13:17, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
No FOP for illuminated Eiffel Tower (Illumination copyright in France) Alabasterstein (talk) 12:53, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- Any insight here, @Yann: , who was involved in restorations of illuminated Eiffel Tower recently? JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:26, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: No copyright for light. --Yann (talk) 15:47, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
Files of provinces of Panama
[edit]- File:Panama - Bocas del Toro.svg
- File:Panama - Chiriqui.svg
- File:Panama - Cocle.svg
- File:Panama - Colon.svg
- File:Panama - Darien.svg
- File:Panama - Panama.svg
- File:Panama - Panama Oeste.svg
- File:Panama - Ngabe-Bugle.svg
- File:Panama - Madugandi.svg
- File:Panama - Los Santos.svg
- File:Panama - Herrera.svg
- File:Panama - Guna Yala.svg
- File:Panama - Embera-Wounaan.svg
- File:Panama - Veraguas.svg
- File:Panama - Wargandi.svg
- File:Mapa de Panamá (subdivisiones).svg
These images were uploaded by me, but I decided to delete them to have only one file in commons and that it was easier to update. I nominated them for speedy delete but they said they weren't eligible --Milenioscuro (talk) 16:17, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 13:08, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
File:Frederico Lapenda announces at the WVC 1 that Marco Ruas will Fight Oleg Taktarov in a Superfight at the WVC 2.jpg
[edit]Risk of copyright violation: possible screenshot or magazine scan, small size, no metadata, other dubious uploads by this user Verbcatcher (talk) 19:49, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Dubious sourcing, license and author. --Green Giant (talk) 22:14, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 02:33, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 06:35, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Anastasiya8 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Artworks of en:Stass Shpanin (born 1990). No permission.
- File:Trialectics 5.jpg
- File:Trialectics 4.jpg
- File:Trialectics 3.jpg
- File:Trialectics 2.jpg
- File:Trialectics 1.jpg
- File:Joseloff Gallery instalation view.jpg
Smooth O (talk) 09:06, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:19, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by PerezCarolina (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work. Images of various tools that can be found on different websites. No original author or sources.
- File:TRINCHETA.jpg
- File:Sacabocado.jpg
- File:Aguja de coser lana.jpg
- File:Cortado de agujeros.jpg
- File:Hilo LUPOLINO.jpg
- File:Tipos de agujas a crochet.jpg
- File:Herramientas de Repujado.jpg
Smooth O (talk) 09:10, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:19, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
unused picture of an unknown metal music group Pippobuono (talk) 09:58, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:16, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
Flickrwashing. Account has 0 followers, 0 following, cannot be trusted Gbawden (talk) 10:38, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Although I can't found it but because account has 0 followers --> deleted per precautionary principle. StayC, Bae173 and music fans [ talk to me ] 04:34, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:07, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/96538504@N06
[edit]Flickrwashing. 0 followers, 0 following, cannot be trusted
Gbawden (talk) 10:56, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:16, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
Flickrwashing, 0 followers, 0 following, cannot be trusted Gbawden (talk) 10:58, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:17, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
advert spam, along with File:Plastik Gelembung Dinoyo Malang, 0851-0308-8255 (Tsel).jpg and rest of uploads. Pibwl (talk) 11:34, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:17, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
copied from [5]. not oun work Gahukuro (talk) 12:49, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:18, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
Facebook is not a license-fee source Albinfo (talk) 14:40, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete This indeed is from Facebook, a copyrighted website. It also does not have a Creative Commons license, making this a copyvio. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 00:21, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:18, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
Possible copyvioː book cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:23, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:18, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
Weil ich als Mitbesitzer dagegen bin, dass dieses Gebäude veröffentlicht wird. 46.128.29.97 16:12, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: Kein Grund für eine Löschung, wir haben in Deutschland Panoramafreiheit. --Achim (talk) 19:30, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Kein Löschgrund. Aufnahme von öffentlichem Grund, keine persönlichen Informationen am Haus abgebildet. Keine Verletzung von Hausrecht, Eigentums- oder Persönlichkeitsrechten erkennbar. Was da erkennbar ist, kann jeder Passant dreimal so gut und jeweils aktuell sehen. Das Bild ist sicherlich nicht einmal eine Hilfe für Einbrecher. --Dehio (talk) 19:50, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- Ergänzung und Lesetipp für Antragsteller: Es gibt kein Recht am Bild der eigenen Sache in Deutschland. --Dehio (talk) 15:33, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 10:05, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Please delete now, and undelete in January 2023. Thank you Mutter Erde (talk) 16:44, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 15:30, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
This is a third party logo, (see file at enwiki), so I am not sure how it qualifies as self. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:35, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete
Unused,no source, no valid claim of author. What are you waiting for? —Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 14:44, 27 July 2016 (UTC) - Was unused; now it is used on Russian Wikipedia. Codename Lisa (talk) 08:48, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --INeverCry 00:34, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Inferior and unused duplicate of File:Corsairlogo new.png. I have replaced the version used on ruwiki. — Desoda [D] [B] 17:46, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and COM:DUPE. --Elly (talk) 07:36, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
low quality personal image of a non-notable person, out of project scope Krd 17:57, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Elly (talk) 07:37, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
selfpromo Jan Myšák (talk) 18:53, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- "selfromo" is not a valid reason for deletion, if the photo has an encyclopedic or educational value. However, this one is insufficiently described, i.e. out of scope. --ŠJů (talk) 22:52, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per remark Sju. --Elly (talk) 07:37, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
The county outlines are too small. TylerKutschbach (talk) 01:43, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- Keep This is, at best, a minor stylistic quibble.--Ibagli (Talk) 13:17, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, per Ibagli. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 10:49, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 16:07, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Redundant with File:Texas Presidential Election Results 1956.svg 174.207.37.143 00:52, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:16, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
While a similar image is found at the source, this one is not — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:32, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- While there is a different image at the declared source[6], it is a crop of the image here with the background changed. If the {{PD-CA-Gov}} claim is valid for the image at the declared source then it is also valid for the original unmodified image. This image is on a different page of the California State Senate website.[7] Verbcatcher (talk) 23:07, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: I'm not at all sure that this image was actually created by someone working for the state as required by {{PD-CA-Gov}}, the image could just as well have been supplied by the politician herself. So I'll delete the file per the precautionary principle. --Rosenzweig τ 10:54, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
While a similar image is at the source, this one is not — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:39, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete This is a crop of the image at the declared source, but there is no evidence of a free licence at the source. The source is a Republican Party website, not a California State Assembly website, so {{PD-CA-Gov}} is unlikely to apply. Verbcatcher (talk) 23:15, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 10:46, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Image not at source — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:42, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Even if this were from the Assembly website, i don't see a CC license there. The source for this specific image is probably her Facebook account. --Rosenzweig τ 10:44, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Image not at source — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:44, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 11:00, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Image not at source — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:44, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 10:59, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Image not at source \ — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:45, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Made some improvements, believe image should be good now -- §hepTalk 02:18, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Apparently the image was taken from some website of the Democratic caucus of the Assembly, so not a state website. So I'm not at all sure that this image was actually created by someone working for the state as required by {{PD-CA-Gov}}, the image could just as well have been supplied by the politician himself. So I'll delete the file per the precautionary principle. --Rosenzweig τ 10:58, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Image not at source — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:43, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: The image is now on the Senate website at https://www.senate.ca.gov/senators. But even so, I don't see a CC license there. And I'm not at all sure that this image was actually created by someone working for the state as required by {{PD-CA-Gov}}, the image could just as well have been supplied by the politician herself. So I'll delete the file per the precautionary principle. --Rosenzweig τ 11:04, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Image not at source (similar one is) — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:46, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 11:12, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Claimed source "Ana B." doesn't match with uploader User:Linkinparc. Probably not own work by the uploader. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:21, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PRP. --Rosenzweig τ 17:46, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Perhaps not own work. See another file by the uploader at Commons:Deletion requests/File:LPdsseldorf235.jpg. See also their talk page (User talk:Linkinparc) to see several notices of copyright violations. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:23, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PRP. --Rosenzweig τ 17:46, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sebaschef cocina sana (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work. Same photos can be found published on various sources on-line.
Smooth O (talk) 08:05, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 17:48, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
empty category with incorrect ENI — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ein Dahmer (talk • contribs) 21:13, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: This is now one of several category redirects just like this one. --Rosenzweig τ 17:52, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
copyright violation; artist died in 1973. Martin Sg. (talk) 20:19, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 22:10, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Risk of copyright violation, photograph of a painting of or by Mary Ammirato-Collins, who was alive in about 1975, requires evidence of permission from the artist or their heirs Verbcatcher (talk) 21:50, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 22:12, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Inferior and unused duplicate of File:Corsairlogo new.png. — Desoda [D] [B] 17:42, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Duplicate - in the future please use {{duplicate}}. Mysterymanblue 07:00, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, duplicate-processed. --Túrelio (talk) 07:09, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
No FoP in France. Architect I. M. Pei died in 2019, still within the 70 pma of the country A1Cafel (talk) 02:42, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:00, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Shot from unknown video, possible copyvio. 91.193.178.174 15:08, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:02, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Not own work, not 2020 Lesless (talk) 15:42, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:02, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Historical photo, uploaded by the serial copyright violator, likely not own work. 188.123.231.42 17:23, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:03, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
my first contribution and didn't know how to properly cite MagikSquash (talk) 19:57, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Thank you for being proactive about this. Copyright violation. Is predated at least to 2018 per this tineye result. Likely is from even earlier. This is likely what the nominator meant when they say they "didn't know how to properly cite". Mysterymanblue 06:58, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:03, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 15:24, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: was just a redirect to a now deleted file. --Rosenzweig τ 22:36, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
This spoken article of the French Wikipedia now corresponds to a disambiguation page. Hérisson grognon (talk) 09:18, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. It's a historic version of that article anway. --Rosenzweig τ 07:34, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
This spoken article of the French Wikipedia now corresponds to a disambiguation page. Hérisson grognon (talk) 09:43, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. It's a historic version of that article anway. --Rosenzweig τ 07:34, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
元URLで削除していますが、 165.76.128.238 04:38, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
Oppose This file had a valid license, which was checked by the review bot. Rudolphous (talk) 07:17, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:54, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
大元で提供が中止しています 165.76.128.238 04:39, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose This file had a valid license, which was checked by the review bot. Rudolphous (talk) 07:17, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:55, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
削除というか、位置情報を 2404:7A83:6680:8100:293A:4257:86AF:602D 15:08, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
元の作者ですが、削除というか、位置情報を消して頂けないでしょうか。よろしくお願いします 2404:7A83:6680:8100:293A:4257:86AF:602D 15:11, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- Keep and remove GPS data from EXIF for privacy reasons. --Achim (talk) 19:25, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Problematic revisions were suppressed. SCP-2000 07:01, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 07:38, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 83.237.189.128 as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: copyvio; no evidence provided for claim — billinghurst sDrewth 07:28, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete insufficient information to establish copyright status. "Source: Russian archive of photos (SPb)" may mean the Central State Archives of St. Petersburg,[8] but the existence of a photo in an archive is not evidence of a free licence. Verbcatcher (talk) 23:46, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 15:16, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
File:ΣΥΝΤΡΙΒΑΝΙ ΕΡΝΣΤ ΤΣΙΛΛΕΡ, (ΣΥΝΤΑΓΜΑ) 1872. THE FOUNTAIN OF ERNST ZILLER, (SYNTAGMA SQUARE) 1872.jpg
[edit]I want to re-upload a finer version. Apaleutos25 (talk) 09:47, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: So what is stopping you? No valid reason for deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 15:18, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
Unabsichtlich hochgeladen / unintentionally uploaded Mitterbauer (talk) 14:36, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, courtesy deletion as requested by the uploader. --Rosenzweig τ 21:35, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 21:36, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
NoFop in France - Photographie d'une sculpture récente réalisée par la sculptrice Gloria Coronas et inaugurée en juillet 2014. (https://www.ladepeche.fr/article/2014/08/03/1928816-un-memorial-inaugure-en-juillet.html) Poudou99 (talk) 11:41, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- Arinsens 13/01/2021: Please note that I confirm that I took this photo on the day of the innauguration of the sculpture. I therefor have ownership and rights to the photo. Similarity to the photo in La Depeche is coincidental.
- (Google translation:) Veuillez noter que je confirme avoir pris cette photo le jour de l'inauguration de la sculpture. J'ai donc la propriété et les droits sur la photo. La similitude avec la photo de La Depeche est fortuite. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arinsens (talk • contribs) 09:44, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Arinsens: . Le problème ne concerne pas la photo elle-même, mais le sujet qui est photographié. En France, on ne peut pas publier librement la photo d'une œuvre récente en l'occurrence, ici, il s'agit de la sculpture. Il n'y a pas de "liberté de panorama" en France. Pour que la photographie de l'œuvre d'un artiste (ou même l'œuvre de quiconque) puisse être publiée librement il faut que son auteur soit décédé depuis plus de 70 ans. Ce qui n'est pas le cas pour cette sculptrice.
- Pour plus d'information sur le sujet, vous pouvez lire cette page. --Poudou99 (talk) 13:11, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete @Arinsens: yes it is your photograph, but you took a photo of a copyrighted artwork. Regrettably French FOP is insufficient as it is noncommercial. The only solution is to contact the artist and ask if she wants to have your image of her artwork licensed commercially. If so, she needs to send a correspondence via COM:VRT. The VRT page has a French translation which is at COM:Volunteer Response Team/fr. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:05, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 08:33, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by MiguelAlanCS as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10 — billinghurst sDrewth 06:47, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: in use on the Spanish wikipedia. --Rosenzweig τ 11:52, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
File:Point Reyes Lighthouse 2019 Time Capsule- Newspaper- The Marin Independent Journal- October 30, 2018- Front Page and a Junior (da758493-7147-4410-9cf2-0a25126386a9).jpg
[edit]Copyright violation of the newspaper, the Marin Independent Journal is not published by the National Parks Service Verbcatcher (talk) 18:09, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete This one is interesting. The photo does come from National Park Services and is in public domain. However, as the nominator states, this image has a copyvio as it includes the newspaper. Marin Independent Journal is a copyrighted source. I don't think leaving the coin and badge (while blacking out the newspaper) would be useful in this case. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 00:18, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
- Also delete:
- Photo of the same newspaper without the coin and badge
- Photo of an edition of the w:en:Point Reyes Light (newspaper)
- Photo of an edition of w:en:The Press Democrat newspaper
- These photographs all relate to the same event and were all posted to a National Parks service website. None of the newspapers shown were published by the National Parks service or by the US government. Verbcatcher (talk) 00:50, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:46, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
File:"Yeniləşən Dövlətə Dəstək" İctimai Birliyinin Sədri Nəbi Qafarovun Öndər TV-yə verdiyi müsahibədən.png
[edit]Risk of copyright violation, appears to be a screen capture of a webpage Verbcatcher (talk) 19:16, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete While I haven't found this exact article, Onder TV has a copyright notice on their website. While the uploader's username suggest they are related to this website, Onder TV does not have a CC license. Therefore, this is a copyvio unless the user gives OTRS permission. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 02:10, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete GeorgHH • talk 10:40, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:44, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
unused screenshoot, out of scope, as well as File:Hà nội.png. The other two unused bad quality photos of documents doesn't seem to be in a scope either File:Bằng khen.jpg, File:Lhan.jpg. Pibwl (talk) 22:01, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete File:Khen.png as a lower quality duplicate of another file; Keep the other two files mentioned because they have not been properly noticed. Mysterymanblue 06:50, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:44, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
The size of the state is too narrow. TylerKutschbach (talk) 01:45, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Not a valid reason for deletion; all maps are distorted in some way. Mysterymanblue 07:06, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:51, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
PNG is a bad format for this type of image and the state is misshapen in this file 2600:1009:B06C:30DC:AC0E:50C0:723A:7E94 06:03, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Unused, low quality, redundant with File:North Dakota Presidential Election Results 1976.svg. Consigned (talk) 20:13, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_team_with_Chairman_Abrar_ul_Haq.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![114 File:NOPC Vol 20-2015 "Twenty Years".jpg](#File:NOPC_Vol_20-2015_"Twenty_Years".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_SA.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![242 File:Name is "Don Pallette" (34886856964).jpg](#File:Name_is_"Don_Pallette"_(34886856964).jpg){kind=link}
_1872._THE_FOUNTAIN_OF_ERNST_ZILLER,_(SYNTAGMA_SQUARE)_1872.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![252 File:"Yeniləşən Dövlətə Dəstək" İctimai Birliyinin Sədri Nəbi Qafarovun Öndər TV-yə verdiyi müsahibədən.png](#File:"Yeniləşən_Dövlətə_Dəstək"_İctimai_Birliyinin_Sədri_Nəbi_Qafarovun_Öndər_TV-yə_verdiyi_müsahibədən.png){kind=link}
_(20204767260).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_team_with_Chairman_Abrar_ul_Haq.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_team_with_Chairman_Abrar_ul_Haq.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_team_with_Chairman_Abrar_ul_Haq.jpg){kind=link}
_team_with_Chairman_Abrar_ul_Haq.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
_6.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_7.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_8.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
![13:29, 29 December 2020 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2020/12/29#c-CoffeeEngineer-2020-12-29T13:29:00.000Z-File:NOPC_Vol_20-2015_"Twenty_Years".jpg){kind=link}
![17:31, 18 January 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2020/12/29#c-P199-2021-01-18T17:31:00.000Z-File:NOPC_Vol_20-2015_"Twenty_Years".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_SA.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_SA.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_SA.jpg){kind=link}
_SA.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
![04:38, 9 February 2019 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2020/12/29#c-165.76.128.238-2019-02-09T04:38:00.000Z-File:Name_is_"Don_Pallette"_(34886856964).jpg){kind=link}
![13:54, 20 February 2019 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2020/12/29#c-Jameslwoodward-2019-02-20T13:54:00.000Z-File:Name_is_"Don_Pallette"_(34886856964).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-3){kind=link}
_1872._THE_FOUNTAIN_OF_ERNST_ZILLER,_(SYNTAGMA_SQUARE)_1872.jpg){kind=link}
_1872._THE_FOUNTAIN_OF_ERNST_ZILLER,_(SYNTAGMA_SQUARE)_1872.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Delete redundant. Taylor 49 (talk) 18:58, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 20:24, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
The size of the state is too narrow TylerKutschbach (talk) 01:48, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Not a valid reason for deletion. All maps are distorted in some way. Mysterymanblue 07:05, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:51, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
This type of election map is done with SVGs nowadays with File:Idaho Presidential Election Results 1976.svg replacing this png file TylerKutschbach (talk) 23:20, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 09:54, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
PNG is a bad format for this type of image and the state is misshapen in this file GraydenCat (talk) 02:30, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Disruption by sock. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:40, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
PNG is a bad format for this type of image and the state is misshapen in this file 2600:1009:B055:740:B5BE:8FEE:1DE4:F0D5 01:40, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
- Are you GraydenCat disrupting here again? This is a bad deletion rationale. I mean it is not valid. ─ The Aafī (talk) 05:46, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted as the aspect ratio of Idaho is badly wrong beyond recognition in this image. And this image is unused, hence this is simply out of COM:SCOPE. The corresponding en:wp article uses File:Idaho Presidential Election Results 1976.svg instead where the aspect ratio is correct. --AFBorchert (talk) 18:47, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
logo of a school in Costa Rica, dubious CC license FASTILY 01:59, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:50, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Myalane323 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Old photos claimed as own work, needs OTRS from person who took them
Gbawden (talk) 09:18, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:52, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
Blurred and badly framed photo Hérisson grognon (talk) 09:52, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unusable. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:50, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
Blurred and badly framed photo Hérisson grognon (talk) 09:52, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unusable. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:50, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
Blurred, dark and dull photo Hérisson grognon (talk) 09:55, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unusable. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:50, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
Blurred and badly framed photo Hérisson grognon (talk) 09:58, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unusable. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:50, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
some corporate spam with Polish inscriptions, sole remaining upload. Pibwl (talk) 11:41, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:47, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
copied from [9]. not oun work Gahukuro (talk) 12:50, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Speedy delete contains logo from [10] -- Netora (talk) 01:31, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:48, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
Lower quality image than an existing file William Ellison (talk) 13:26, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, superseded by File:Juana Romani - Théodora.jpg. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:48, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
The photo was uploaded before here [11] . Possible copyright violation. C messier (talk) 13:56, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:49, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
The photo was uploaded before here [12] . Possible copyright violation. C messier (talk) 13:56, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:49, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
Useless redirect Angelus(talk) 15:05, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:47, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
and:
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:17, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Copyrights were generously given by the owner, Yuval Torem MD. The letter was reported in the media (e.g. https://www.mako.co.il/news-lifestyle/2020_q4/Article-19159ea416b7671027.htm). Soon the file will be used in Hebrew Wikipedia. I am new here, please advise how to correct any issues. Tsabarn (talk) 05:20, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:46, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
Flickr user Ninian Reid (2nd request)
[edit]Please see previous DR Commons:Deletion requests/Flickr user Ninian Reid and Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2020/02#Flickr user Ninian Reid, as well as File:USA-NEW YORK.jpg, a Reuters photo. Most of these Flickr users's photographs are fine, and they're taken on smartphones or point-and-shoot cameras, but these are likely/clearly not their own work.
- File:Soon-to-be First Minister Nicola Sturgeon visits the Sick Kids hospital in Edinburgh (15642075260).jpg
- File:West Mercia Police.jpg (metadata says © 2014 Newsquest Media, all rights reserved)
- File:Richard Gordon Jedburgh Provost in 2017.jpg
- File:Joanna Cherry in 2018 (Plaid).jpg
- File:McDiarmid Park, Perth 14724054510 6d313ea5ce.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ytoyoda (talk) 19:37, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Was alterted to this as the uploader of the Joanna Cherry photo: I took it in good faith that the Flickr user in question truly had taken this photo, but it seems we indeed can't be sure of that, and it's better safe than sorry. YorkshireLad (talk) 19:54, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- OK guess the loader misunderstood Victuallers (talk) 09:33, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:53, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
The editor uploading this photo, User:Zmf4, claims it as own work and licenses it accordingly. The photo of Zamoyski as a lieutenant-colonel, as the title of the photo states, must date from around 1940, when he held this rank and would have been in his mid-30s, which would be in accordance with his looks in the photo. User:Zmf4 in posting to English Wikipedia in 2015 in the article 'Adam Zamoyski' (Stefan Zamoyski's son) has noted (but without formally declaring an interest) "At the behest of Adam Zamoyski himself, amendments have been made which more accurately describe the matters described above" . It must therefore, at the very least, extremely doubtful that the photo of Stefan Zamosyski is User:Zmf4's own work. User:Zmf4, if s/he were indeed the photographer, would have been aged around 100 at least in 2019 when uploading it, and would be around 100+ now (s/he is still posting on English Wikipedia). The licence therefore cannot be valid. Smerus (talk) 10:32, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Since the person depicted was Polish it's reasonable to assume the photographer was also Polish and the location where the image was captured was in Poland. This would mean that the image is Public Domain per Template:PD-Poland and Copyright law of Poland. Update license text and keep the image. TommyG (talk) 11:04, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- Keep This commonly-encountered situation is poorly handled on Commons and isn't easily represented in our metadata model. We shouldn't blame uploaders for the project's shortcomings.
- An editor doesn't need to be the photographer to assign a licence to an image, they need to be the rights holder or their agent. It's entirely possible for an image such as this to be uploaded by such a person (typically a descendant or executor).
- We should fix the creation date. If the best we can do is a range or "circa", then we should do that.
- We need to address the authorship, and thus the licensing, of the image. Did the rights to this image clearly rest with the subject of the photo? (Commons has a huge problem and lack of clarity over "self portraits" (broadly) and this single image isn't the place to start trying to clear that mess up.) If so, then there is probably a simple inheritance issue and the uploader (who I'm told is Adam Zamoyski, the son of the subject here) is probably the rights holder and perfectly at liberty to license it like this. We even have License tags for transferred copyright for that.
- If the author of the photo is an anonymous and unknown photographer, then we're looking at the unknown author PD rules for age, on a photo that's over 80 years old (and possibly under UK law rather than Polish). Again, it's quite likely that this has entered PD by now.
- I'd welcome @Zmf4: 's comments here. As a historian himself, I'm sure he can appreciate what we have to deal with here. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:12, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
In fact it is not "reasonable to assume the photographer was also Polish and the location where the image was captured was in Poland." Zamoyski was ADC to Sikorski in London throughout World War II, and the photo might well have been taken then.--Smerus (talk) 12:50, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
- I suppose you're right. The distinctions on his shoulders seem to indicate that he had the rank of Captain in the polish army (three stars untill 1952). He received this rank in April 1940 underway to help defend Norway. He was promoted to major in early 1945, so we can pretty much limit the time this image could have been taken to some time between April 1940 to January 1945, which means, as you say, the assumption the photograph was taken in Poland, is wrong. TommyG (talk) 14:08, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:PRP. Per discussion it's likely NOT PD-Poland; else we don't have enough information to be able to keep this file. --Rosenzweig τ 07:43, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
No evidence to show this bank logo has been released into public domain. Larryasou (talk) 19:27, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:09, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
no indication of pre-1946 PUBLICATION required to be public domain in US+Russia 198.48.143.196 04:18, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- Considering she died in 1932, and Stalin (from what I can tell) didn't specifically seek to publicly address the death of his first wife by suicide, I thought it a safe bet that this picture is public domain. Additionally, I got the file from flickr at this link, which lists it as belonging to the public domain. It could have been mislabeled by the person who uploaded it (admittedly, it does say the photo was taken in February 2018, which is clearly incorrect), but like I said I find it hard to believe that this picture was published post-1946 considering all the above factors. --JohnHawkinsBois (talk) 09:48, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
- The same image was deleted in April 2020. As I noted then, the earliest publication I can confirm for it dates to 1953, though I suspect it was likely published as early as 1932, I just haven't been able to confirm that. I haven't changed my view since then, and would support keeping it here. Kaiser matias (talk) 07:44, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination and precedent at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nadezhda Sergeyevna Alliluyeva (1901–1932).jpg - unfortunately no proof of pre-1946 publication. If it was first published in 1953, when would it become public domain? -M.nelson (talk) 22:49, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: no proof of early enough publication. --rubin16 (talk) 13:21, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
zaměstnanecké dílo, nelze uveřejnit St64478 (talk) 06:42, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: unused file, requested for deletion by the uploader shortly after the upload itself. --rubin16 (talk) 14:10, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
zaměstnanecké dílo, nelze uveřejnit St64478 (talk) 06:43, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: unused file, requested for deletion by the uploader shortly after the upload itself. --rubin16 (talk) 14:11, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
zaměstnanecké dílo, nelze uveřejnit St64478 (talk) 06:43, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: unused file, requested for deletion by the uploader shortly after the upload itself. --rubin16 (talk) 14:11, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
File:The President, Shri Pranab Mukherjee presenting the Padma Shri Award to Smt. Aruna Mohanty, at the Civil Investiture Ceremony, at Rashtrapati Bhavan, in New Delhi on April 13, 2017.jpg
[edit]
This image has been claimed to be non-free at the Help Desk. Apparently the Open Data Policy does not apply to any and all publications by the Indian government. De728631 (talk) 19:18, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
For the record, the metadata in the photo file claim copyright for "Ministry of Information and Broadcasting Govt of IndiaPhoto Division". De728631 (talk) 19:21, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Before Commons:Deletion requests/Media in Category:Unreviewed photos of GODL-India, the scope of the GODL license had been assumed for a time to be much wider than it really is -- it's not a general license for Indian government works, but rather only for data.gov.in (and even there, likely no images). We would need to see a source which explicitly licensed a photo GODL in order to use it -- the status cannot be assumed. This looks like it was uploaded under an erroneous assumption (regardless if the copyright is owned by the government or the photographer). Carl Lindberg (talk) 16:43, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 14:16, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
File:Bonner zoologische Beiträge - Herausgeber- Zoologisches Forschungsinstitut und Museum Alexander Koenig, Bonn (1976) (20204767260).jpg
[edit]_(20204767260).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20204767260).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
As a German publication from 1976, this image is certainly not PD in the country of origin. However, the journal in question offers all content under CC-by-4.0 per this website. It is questionable though if such a licensing can be applied retroactively to material that was published before the inception of Creative Commons. We have seen this before for thousands of photos from public archives, but instead of changing the licence tag for this file I would rather start a discussion. De728631 (talk) 00:29, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- Well that checks out (the site linked certainly says CC-BY-4.0), we can undelete a lot of the items that were either deleted as copyvio, or were under previous DR's. You want to file an undelete request, or remove the speedy tags on media still extant?
- Have you asked the originating journal to submit OTRS in respect of the earlier issues back to 1950 or so? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:25, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- No, I haven't contacted the journal and I'm not planning to do so. If we can get consensus at Commons that their relicensing is valid, then we can just undelete the whole lot. De728631 (talk) 16:50, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete this comes from a book uploaded to the Internet Archive with a CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 license (which is unacceptable on Commons).[13] It was uploaded to the Internet Archive by
'Zoologisches Forschungsinstitut und Museum Alexander Koenig', whose name implies a direct link with the original publisher[correction] the Smithsonian Libraries. It is unclear that the licence applied to new content by the Bonn Zoological Bulletin is applicable to this. The Flickr claim of 'No known copyright restrictions' is unreliable. Verbcatcher (talk) 22:36, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- Confused/Object - are we proposing that the Smithsonian have given images to the internet archive for publication on the web is unauthorised and illegal and that we know better? If there is a mistake (unlikely IMO) then its the Smithsonian who need to worry about the risk - not wikicommons. Victuallers (talk) 11:18, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- The journal containing the images was uploaded to the Internet Archive by the Smithsonian Libraries with a 'Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0' license. The images were then uploaded to Flickr by the Internet Archive marked with 'No known copyright restrictions'. We should trust the license applied by the Smithsonian Libraries, but not on the statement on Flickr. The Smithsonian Libraries' license is unacceptable for hosting these images on Commons. Verbcatcher (talk) 12:56, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- Add to that, that even the Smithsonian is not in a position to relicence this journal for use outside the US where it is still copyrighted. De728631 (talk) 23:41, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- The journal containing the images was uploaded to the Internet Archive by the Smithsonian Libraries with a 'Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0' license. The images were then uploaded to Flickr by the Internet Archive marked with 'No known copyright restrictions'. We should trust the license applied by the Smithsonian Libraries, but not on the statement on Flickr. The Smithsonian Libraries' license is unacceptable for hosting these images on Commons. Verbcatcher (talk) 12:56, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- Confused/Object - are we proposing that the Smithsonian have given images to the internet archive for publication on the web is unauthorised and illegal and that we know better? If there is a mistake (unlikely IMO) then its the Smithsonian who need to worry about the risk - not wikicommons. Victuallers (talk) 11:18, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep: assuming that Web-site is that of the publisher of this journal, which holds the copyright, they are fully within their rights to re-license the works under a CC license. In addition, other volumes of this journal should be kept for the same reason. The licensing at the Internet Archive is irrelevant, if there is a valid listing under an acceptable license, the most usable license may be considered. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 02:02, 14 January 2021 (UTC).
- Keep that convinces me. (The proposal that creative commons cannot be applied to 20th century works would need to be challenged very strongly if it had any legal basis.) Victuallers (talk) 11:25, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
- @TE(æ)A,ea.: what is the 'Web-site is that of the publisher of this journal'? The only external links on the file page are to Flickr and the Internet Archive. The license on the Internet Archive is unacceptable and the copyright statement on Flickr is unreliable. Verbcatcher (talk) 12:55, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
- Verbcatcher: “[T]he journal in question offers all content under CC-by-4.0 per this website.” It is clearly marked at the top of this discussion. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 15:04, 14 January 2021 (UTC).
- Thank you for that clarification. The question now is whether the content policy of the Bonn zoological Bulletin can be applied retroactively to publications from before that policy was announced. The Bonn zoological Bulletin was formerly the Bonner zoologische Beiträge,[14] so we can treat it as the same journal. The DAOJ listing for the journal was added on 11 March 2011,[15] so we can be confident that it is applicable after then. I agree with De728631 in the first post in this discussion, that it is unclear that this licence should be applied to older publications. Verbcatcher (talk) 16:16, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
- It should also be noted that under German law you cannot transfer copyright at all. It will remain with the original author, so it is questionable whether the "right of use" that the publisher got from the authors enables the former to retroactively grant CC licences. De728631 (talk) 22:06, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you for that clarification. The question now is whether the content policy of the Bonn zoological Bulletin can be applied retroactively to publications from before that policy was announced. The Bonn zoological Bulletin was formerly the Bonner zoologische Beiträge,[14] so we can treat it as the same journal. The DAOJ listing for the journal was added on 11 March 2011,[15] so we can be confident that it is applicable after then. I agree with De728631 in the first post in this discussion, that it is unclear that this licence should be applied to older publications. Verbcatcher (talk) 16:16, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
- Verbcatcher: “[T]he journal in question offers all content under CC-by-4.0 per this website.” It is clearly marked at the top of this discussion. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 15:04, 14 January 2021 (UTC).
- @TE(æ)A,ea.: what is the 'Web-site is that of the publisher of this journal'? The only external links on the file page are to Flickr and the Internet Archive. The license on the Internet Archive is unacceptable and the copyright statement on Flickr is unreliable. Verbcatcher (talk) 12:55, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete There's no indication that the publisher's current copyright policy applies retroactively to this publication. -M.nelson (talk) 22:45, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: I have reviewed different snapshots of the website since 2015 (the earliest available, when there was no CC statement). I would say that even now the declaration isn't perfect as when you go through the upload form and read all requirements and legal regulations, there is no place where you as an author give consent to a free license. Though there is a general statement on the website, we can't be sure that the author actually saw it before uploading the manuscript. I have also reviewed all upload forms before - there is no consent on specific copyright license, even more, it states: " Authors retain full copyright of their published papers, and are encouraged to share them with colleagues and post the original pdfs on their personal website or elsewhere for non-commercial use." So, I think it is correct to delete the file. --rubin16 (talk) 13:31, 12 November 2021 (UTC)