Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/09/06
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
Error in the name Librero2109 (talk) 00:34, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sreejith K (talk) 04:05, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
File:Victoriya Kalinina of Russia during the National Anthem in the Bronze medal match vs Norway.png
[edit]please delete Qwertyuiopasdfghjkl7201 (talk) 03:36, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
unused file Qwertyuiopasdfghjkl7201 (talk) 03:39, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Please do not open multiple discussions. Just wait. --E4024 (talk) 03:43, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 16:28, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
please delete Qwertyuiopasdfghjkl7201 (talk) 03:37, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Unused flie Qwertyuiopasdfghjkl7201 (talk) 03:38, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Please do not open multiple discussions. Just wait. --E4024 (talk) 03:44, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 16:29, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Foto Bitte löschen Or46Zt (talk) 07:36, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 16:36, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
obvious non-free promo photo, probably stolen from https://www.parichaynetwork.com/sandip-lamichhane/ or https://www.celebrityborn.com/biography/sandeep-lamichhane/15077# Lugnuts (talk) 13:31, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: speedily: Copyvio as this user's other uploads. --Achim (talk) 15:55, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Erreur dans le texte 31NOVA (talk) 14:45, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per author request, unused. --Thibaut (talk) 15:45, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Il s'agit de ma page perso que je ne souhaite plus voir exister. Dimitri.millefiori (talk) 17:39, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, own user space. --Achim (talk) 17:48, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Do we miss anything in Category:Penis? EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
Delete - not even a good image - for me it could be speedy. --Herby talk thyme 16:07, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
- Delete bad quality, heaps of better alternatives available --> this one is out of scope. --Isderion (talk) 03:04, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Out of focus self-pic with the laptop camera. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 12:35, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
Speedily deleted per COM:PORN. --AFBorchert (talk) 12:38, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
Obvious amateur. Abondant pictures of the same penis. Best alternatives. Commons isn't a porn blog : COM:NUDE. FAP (talk) 14:13, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
Keep No valid reason for deletion request (COM:PORN, in use). Together with the others edits from this user i assume vandalism. -- ／人◕ ‿‿ ◕人＼ 苦情処理係 15:02, 27 May 2011 (UTC)- Keep It's in use at w:de:Vorhaut and thus in scope. Proposing files in use for deletion is nigh abusive.--Prosfilaes (talk) 17:31, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Self-shot amateur picture. Florent Pécassou (talk) 20:52, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
- That's not a reason to delete, especially for a photograph that is, by definition, in scope.--Prosfilaes (talk) 21:23, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
- Keep "not censored"; nominator is engaged in mass deletion of sexual content, including longstanding items, without regard for commons policy. rationales given for deletion are cut & paste repeats, with no consideration of the individual merits of the files; deletion rationales also show a lack of understanding/misunderstanding of relevant commons policies Lx 121 (talk) 08:05, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
Kept: Amateur and better alternatives are not reasons to delete. Commons is not a porn blog? I accept that, but have you tried watching new uploads to see how pathetically small the # of sex images is? Oh, and incidentally, we do not have any other photos of this penis. -mattbuck (Talk) 11:26, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
exhbitionistic nonsense 87.123.65.232 10:20, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
- Keep Oh that was quick ! This picture is in the scope. No reason to delete it. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 10:23, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
Kept: No valid reason for deletion. Yann (talk) 07:48, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Masur at 15:13, 6 September 2020 UTC: Mass deletion of pages added by Histsztk, no source, no license, found in the internet --Krdbot 21:05, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Mediocre quality 2600:1700:E34:7740:6575:3A16:E943:C3E1 00:37, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Worthless, poor quality, unused, redundant and therefore out of scope. AshFriday (talk) 01:20, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:48, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Not needed/low quality 2600:1700:E34:7740:6575:3A16:E943:C3E1 00:39, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Worthless, poor quality, unused, redundant and therefore out of scope. AshFriday (talk) 01:10, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:49, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
A film poster has copy rights
- File:Theashing0machine.jpg
- File:Themostdangerous.jpg
- File:Hour0satisfaction.jpg
- File:MossyMossy50.jpg
إسلام (talk) 19:31, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Fair use material is not permitted on Commons. --Regasterios (talk) 19:49, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Fair use material is not permitted on Commons.
- File:Mossy 2.jpg
- File:Hour satisfaction.jpg
- File:Themostdangerousman02.jpg
- File:Thewashingmachine02.jpg
- File:Tiller200.jpg
إسلام (talk) 20:37, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 06:00, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
File:888 = August 8, 2008, 8-8-8, 8 8 8, 8.8.8, 08.08.08, 08082008 or 080808 - morning, Chicago Loop - HDR - flickr888 Day or flickr Day 24 hrs. (2744217176).jpg
[edit]duplicate image SecretName101 (talk) 05:57, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:CSD#F8. --CptViraj (talk) 10:45, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
duplicate image SecretName101 (talk) 20:52, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:CSD#F8. --CptViraj (talk) 10:06, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
duplicate image SecretName101 (talk) 21:28, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:CSD#F8. --CptViraj (talk) 10:27, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
duplicate image SecretName101 (talk) 21:29, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:CSD#F8. --CptViraj (talk) 10:28, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
duplicate image SecretName101 (talk) 21:29, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:CSD#F8. --CptViraj (talk) 10:25, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
duplicate image SecretName101 (talk) 21:29, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:CSD#F8. --CptViraj (talk) 10:41, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
duplicate image SecretName101 (talk) 21:29, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:CSD#F8. --CptViraj (talk) 10:14, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
duplicate image SecretName101 (talk) 21:30, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:CSD#F8. --CptViraj (talk) 10:11, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
review video Kwanele22 (talk) 16:26, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 12:54, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
This file i find more than 50 times in internet google. I think it's not created by the author 2003:DE:3D7:732F:F1EB:93:C5AB:860D 18:28, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
Comment User:Yahadzija is indefinitely blocked on Commons, also there is request for global ban for same user. m:Requests for comment/Global ban for Yahadzija. --Smooth O (talk) 19:33, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per Elcobbola we warn yet to speedy delete the page but global account info must be see by WMFOffice to global ban because a cross wiki abuse on 6 wikis 1 temporary if it already done bet yet to speedied the file added by Yahadzija replying Elcobbola 2602:306:36D5:5690:48BC:482A:4710:AC1A 21:08, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:55, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
File of Yahadzija, deleted once in 2017 Conbo (talk) 23:21, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- I just found out about this user. He is already banned globally. Buiquangtu (talk) 23:23, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: This image was just (6 September 2020) imported from vi.wiki, where Yahadzija had uploaded it on 20 May 2017. That upload was after this image had been repeatedly deleted on Commons (e.g., 6 May 2017, 17 May 2017, etc.) and was done to circumvent the scrutiny and issues here (indeed one of the many reasons for which Yahadzija is globally banned.) This is thus a de facto recreation of content deleted per community consensus (G4) and speediable as such. --Эlcobbola talk 13:21, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
duplicate image SecretName101 (talk) 21:29, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:CSD#F8. --CptViraj (talk) 15:22, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Even the image itself being in {{PD-logo}} (and not CC BY-SA, like the uploader set), as the only use on Celepar in portuguese Wikipedia article and wikidata entry were already replaced with File:Logo Celepar 2019.png, this goes out of COM:SCOPE Jose8122 (talk) 23:51, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 21:30, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Self promo on wikidata. Minoraxtalk 06:11, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 16:05, 4 September 2020 UTC: CSD F10 (personal photos out of COM:SCOPE --Krdbot 21:07, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
doubtfully own work Polarlys (talk) 20:14, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - COM:NETCOPYVIO - here, etc. --Эlcobbola talk 16:52, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
Files without metadata. It may be a possible copyright violation. Suzy Oh tell me 16:04, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Elcobbola. --Minoraxtalk 11:50, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
review video Kwanele22 (talk) 16:15, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: Nonsense request. --Achim (talk) 12:59, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minoraxtalk 11:50, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of project. Sakhalinio (talk) 09:14, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:28, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 08:34, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; copyvio from https://www.idnes.cz/kultura/hudba/elan-turne-padesat-let.A180618_113558_hudba_vha/foto/VHA63065d_12_7_ELAN_0263_NAHLED.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 08:41, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Corrupted file which can't be of any use really, as nothing can be seen here. Glorious 93 (talk) 16:32, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:30, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ThelmaKomana (talk · contribs)
[edit]A mixture of poorly framed, poorly focussed, pictures, none of which have camera details (implying copyvio)
- File:New business of selling masks.jpg
- File:Urban areas.png
- File:Taxi rank during covid19.jpg
- File:Social Distancing.png
- File:Ofentse Mafa.jpg
- File:School during covid19.jpg
- File:Rural areas.png
- File:Msibi.jpg
- File:Khanyile.jpg
Timtrent (talk) 07:12, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:32, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ThelmaKomana (talk · contribs)
[edit]FBMD in metadata. Unlikely to be own work. Copyvio? Correct permission is required See COM:OTRS
Timtrent (talk) 21:56, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:35, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ThelmaKomana (talk · contribs)
[edit]Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:OTRS Potential copyright violation
Timtrent (talk) 21:57, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:35, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope.
Minoraxtalk 07:34, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:22, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sachinsewa (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons is not a personal photo album. Out of scope.
- File:SACHIN KUMAR MEENA.jpg
- File:Sachin kumar meena.jpg
- File:Sachin kr. meena pic.jpg
- File:SACHIN KUMAR MEENA PHOTO.jpg
- File:SACHIN KUMAR MEENA PICS.jpg
- File:Sachin kr. meena.jpg
Minoraxtalk 07:48, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:22, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
unlikely to be own works, watermarks from http://www.ssgd.org/ that don't have a free license
Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:49, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:23, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:36, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: what new could be added to existing collection of explicit materials?
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:13, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- I agree. Delete. --E4024 (talk) 01:27, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:36, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:36, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope. Promo on en.wp
Minoraxtalk 15:14, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:36, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MORALESMARESMARIAGUADALUPE (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:MoralesMaresMaria Guadalupe Ejercicio 3.pdf
- File:MoralesMaresMaria Guadalupe Ejercicio 1.pdf
- File:MoralesMaresMaria Guadalupe Ejercicio 2.pdf
- File:MoralesMares MariaGuadalupe Ejercicioo 6.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 08:54, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MORALESMARESMARIAGUADALUPE (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:MoralesMaresMariaGuadlupe ejercicio 3 mapa Proceso Administraivo.pdf
- File:MoralesMaresMariaGuadalupe Ejercicio 3 Proceos Administrativo 3.pdf
- File:MoralesMaresMariaGuadalupe Ejercicio 3 Proceos Administrativo4.pdf
- File:MoralesMaresMariaGuadalupe Ejercico 3 PAPlaneación.pdf
- File:MoralesMaresMariaGudalupe Ejercicioo 6.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:34, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MORALESMARESMARIAGUADALUPE (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:GENERALIDADES DE LA EVALUACIÓN EN LA PROGRAMACIÓN DIDACTICA.pdf
- File:Generalidad de la Evaluacion Educativa.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:24, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MORALESMARESMARIAGUADALUPE (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:12, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ионова Тамара (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:Памятник Мазепе возле Коллегиума. Чернигов.jpg
- File:Камяница на територии усадьбы. Козелец.jpg
- File:Собор. Козацкое Барокко. Козелец.jpg
- File:Замок. Корсунь.jpg
- File:Труби органа. Белая Церковь.jpg
- File:Замковая Гора Белая Церковь.jpg
- File:Торговые ряды. БЦ.jpg
- File:Внутрішні стіни замку.jpg
- File:Зовнішні мури замку.jpg
- File:Мр. Междибож.jpg
- File:Ржищев. Иван-гора.jpg
- File:Иван-гора. Ржищев. Старина.jpg
- File:Иван-гора. Городище. Ржищев.jpg
- File:Надпись Нахимов. Бюст. Николаев.jpg
- File:Нахимов. Николаев.jpg
- File:Судковский. Музей. Очаков.jpg
- File:Бюст Ушакова. Очаков.jpg
- File:Очаков. Храм.jpg
- File:Вход в Паланок. Мукачево.jpg
- File:Мукачево. Трубочист.jpg
- File:Паланок. Мукачево.jpg
- File:Лавра. Галлерея.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:28, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ионова Тамара (talk · contribs)
[edit]No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Ukraine.
- File:С.Сушки (5).jpg
- File:С.Сушки (4).jpg
- File:С.Сушки.jpg
- File:С.Сушки (2).jpg
- File:С.Сушки (3).jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:10, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ионова Тамара (talk · contribs)
[edit]No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Ukraine.
- File:Лысогорский форт. Схема святилища древних славян.jpg
- File:Мамятный знак погибшим членам экипажа самолета над Словянском 6 июня 2014 года. Борисполь.jpg
- File:Памятник Чубинскому. Борисполь.jpg
- File:Памятник этнографу, автору Гимна Украины. Чубинскому. Борисполь.jpg
- File:Книшевой мемориальный комплекс. Борисполь.jpg
- File:Информационная доска перезахоронения бориспольцев с Кнышевского кладбища. Борисполь. Кнышевой парк.jpg
- File:Информационная доска памятника жертвам политических репрессий. Кнышовый парк. Борисполь.jpg
- File:Информационная доска о памятнике антибольшевицкого востания 1920 года. Борисполь. Кнышовй парк.jpg
- File:Информационная доска о символике Борисполя. Кнышовый парк. Борисполь.jpg
- File:Информационная доска обоснования Кнышевого мемориального парка. Борисполь.jpg
- File:Информационная доска о пяти погибших летчиках и Герое Советского союза Бабкине. Борисполь. Кнышовый парк.jpg
- File:Информационная доска о первом летописном упоминании Борисполя. Кнышовый парк. Борисполь.jpg
- File:Информационная доска о памятнике Чубинскому. Кнышовый парк. Борисполь.jpg
- File:Информационная доска о Магдебурском праве в Борисполе. Кнышовый парк.jpg
- File:Информационная доска о куммунистическом правлении в Борисполе. Кнышовый мемориальный комплексю Борисполь.jpg
- File:Информационная доска о козацком времени в Борисполе. Кнышовый парк Борисполь.jpg
- File:Информационная доска Владимир Мономах и Борисполь. Кнышовый парк.Борисполь.jpg
- File:Информационная доска Борисполь в составе Российской империи. Кнышовый парк.jpg
- File:Репрессированые сталинским режимом. Быковня.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:58, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Ukraine. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:36, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Ukraine. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:37, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Monument to the Motherland, Kiev 1
[edit]No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Ukraine. 1981 monument. See w:en:Mother Motherland, Kiev.
- File:Kiev - Motherland monument2.jpg
- File:Kiev - Motherland monument3.jpg
- File:Kiev - Motherland monument4.jpg
- File:Kiev warmuseum 070611 01.jpg
- File:Mother of the Fatherland - Museum of Great Patriotic War-Kyev-Ukraine.jpg
- File:Mother of the Fatherland Monument, Museum of the Great Patriotic War complex. Kiev, Ukraine, Eastern Europe.jpg
- File:Motherland Monument-2.jpg
- File:Museum of the Great Patriotic War - Kiev - 002.jpg
- File:Museum of the Great Patriotic War - Kiev - 003.jpg
- File:Museum of the Great Patriotic War - Kiev - 004.jpg
- File:Museum of the Great Patriotic War - Kiev - 005.jpg
- File:Rodina Mat' .jpg
- File:Rodina mat'.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
- Ok, they can be deleted, if there is FOP problem. Btw, should all the pictures of the Motherland monument in Kiev be deleted? ---Kulmalukko (talk) 15:06, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
- File:Museum of the Great Patriotic War - Kiev - 002.jpg may fall under {{PD-RU-exempt}} as contains COA of Soviet Union (and it is main object of the photo).--Anatoliy (talk) 15:07, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama. See also w:Mother Motherland, Kiev.
- File:2005-08-15 Motherland Rodina Mat Monument Kiev 312.JPG
- File:2005-08-15 Motherland Rodina Mat Monument Kiev 433.JPG
- File:Detail of The Mother Motherland monument 16m sword - Museum of Great Patriotic War (8600793975).jpg
- File:Mother Motherland (3942763587).jpg
- File:Mother Motherland (3942767265).jpg
- File:Mother Motherland (3943545734).jpg
- File:Mother Motherland (3943547340).jpg
- File:Mother Motherland Rodina Mat statue (8162257793).jpg
- File:Mother Motherland statue (8162375308).jpg
- File:Mother of the Fatherland - Museum of Great Patriotic War-Kyev-Ukraine.jpg
- File:Mother of the Fatherland Monument, Museum of the Great Patriotic War complex. Kiev, Ukraine, Eastern Europe-2.jpg
- File:Mother of the Fatherland Monument, Museum of the Great Patriotic War complex. Kiev, Ukraine, Eastern Europe.jpg
- File:Motherland Monument-2.jpg
- File:Motherland-Kiev.jpg
- File:Museum of the Great Patriotic War - Kiev - 001.jpg
- File:The Mother Motherland monument soaring 102m. above ground level - Museum of Great Patriotic War (8600682945).jpg
- File:The Mother Motherland monument soaring 102m. above ground level - Museum of Great Patriotic War (8600686045).jpg
- File:The Mother Motherland monument soaring 102m. above ground level - Museum of Great Patriotic War (8601782238).jpg
- File:The Mother Motherland monument soaring 102m. above ground level - Museum of Great Patriotic War (8601784042).jpg
- File:Батьківщина-матір (вид з обеліску вічного-вогню).JPG
- File:Батьківщина-матір.JPG
- File:Батьківщина-мати. Місто Київ.JPG
- File:Монумент Вітчизни-матері 01.jpg
- File:Монумент Вітчизни-матері 02.jpg
- File:Монумент Вітчизни-матері 03.jpg
- File:Монумент Вітчизни-матері 04.jpg
- File:Монумент Вітчизни-матері 05.jpg
- File:Монумент Вітчизни-матері 06.jpg
- File:Монумент Вітчизни-матері 07.jpg
- File:Монумент Вітчизни-матері 08.jpg
- File:Монумент Вітчизни-матері 09.jpg
- File:Монумент Вітчизни-матері 1.jpg
- File:Монумент Вітчизни-матері 10.jpg
- File:Монумент Вітчизни-матері 11.jpg
- File:Монумент Вітчизни-матері 12.jpg
- File:Монумент Вітчизни-матері 2.JPG
- File:Монумент Вітчизни-матері 4.JPG
- File:Монумент Вітчизни-матері 5.JPG
- File:Монумент Вітчизни-матері у Києві.JPG
- File:Монумент Вітчизни-матері, Київ.JPG
- File:Монумент Вітчизни-матері, м. Київ.JPG
- File:Монумент Вітчизни-матері.JPG
- File:Монумент Родина-мать.jpg
Stefan4 (talk) 16:56, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
- Delete all, except for File:Museum of the Great Patriotic War - Kiev - 001.jpg which is more of a panoramic photo. Undelete all in 2081 (Borodai died in 2010). russavia (talk) 07:56, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
- Keep also thos one: File:The Mother Motherland monument soaring 102m. above ground level - Museum of Great Patriotic War (8601782238).jpg --178.2.56.234 12:41, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
- Why? The photo clearly focuses on the statue. --Stefan4 (talk) 12:43, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Ukraine.
Stefan4 (talk) 18:06, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per comments McZusatz (talk) 12:03, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Ukraine.
Yevgeny Vuchetich died in 1974, so photos of his Motherland Monument cannot be free until 2044.
- File:Kiev Mother Motherland IMG 6246 1725.jpg
- File:Монумент Вітчизни-матері Monumento a la Madre Patria 3.jpg
- File:Парк Вічної Слави 4.jpg
- File:Стауя київської Батьківщини-матері у Бахчисарайському парку мініатюр.JPG
Josve05a (talk) 09:09, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 19:23, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Monument to the Motherland, Kiev 2
[edit]no FoP in Ukraine - monument designed by Yevgeny Vuchetich who died in 1974
INeverCry 08:59, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
--- Deleted: per INeverCry. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:08, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Monument to the Motherland, Kiev 3
[edit]No FoP in Ukraine. Copyright expires in 2081
- File:80-382-0520 Родина-мать.jpg
- File:Kyiv - Mother monument front.jpg
- File:Kyiv - Mother monument with tanks.jpg
- File:Батьківщина-Мати, Київ (1).jpg
- File:Батьківщина-Мати, Київ (10).jpg
- File:Батьківщина-Мати, Київ (2).jpg
- File:Батьківщина-Мати, Київ (3).jpg
- File:Батьківщина-Мати, Київ (4).jpg
- File:Батьківщина-Мати, Київ (5).jpg
- File:Батьківщина-Мати, Київ (6).jpg
- File:Батьківщина-Мати, Київ (7).jpg
- File:Батьківщина-Мати, Київ (8).jpg
- File:Батьківщина-Мати, Київ (9).jpg
- File:Батьківщина-Мати.jpg
- File:Київ, вул. Лаврська 27, Монумент «Батьківщина-мати».jpg
Off-shell (talk) 22:18, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Monument to the Motherland, Kiev 4
[edit]No FOP in Ukraine (see FOP in Ukraine).
- File:1.Київ 2012 (Батьківщина-Мати).jpg
- File:Kyiv - Mother-land close.jpg
- File:Kyiv - Mother-land.jpg
- File:Монумент «Батьківщина-мати» 01.jpg
- File:Монумент «Батьківщина-мати» 03.jpg
- File:Монумент «Батьківщина-мати» 04.jpg
- File:Монумент «Батьківщина-мати» 05.jpg
Kulmalukko (talk) 12:50, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 09:06, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Monument to the Motherland, Kiev 5
[edit]No FOP in Ukraine. (Built in 1981.)
- File:2018-04-16 Motherland monument in Kiev.jpg
- File:Kiev - panoramio (85).jpg
- File:Kiev 106 Monument to the Motherland.jpg
- File:Pechers'kyi district, Kiev, Ukraine - panoramio (3).jpg
- File:Pechersk 473.JPG
- File:Pechersk 4730.jpg
- File:Statue of Motherland - panoramio.jpg
- File:Монумент «Батьківщина-мати» 02.jpg
- File:Родина-мать (Киев) (1).jpg
Kulmalukko (talk) 18:34, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
- O co dokładnie chodzi? Fafik Napisz coś® 17:46, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
- This statue is protected by copyright law, until the designer has been dead for 70 years. --Kulmalukko (talk) 19:12, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
- OK, i understand. Fafik Napisz coś® 09:12, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
- This statue is protected by copyright law, until the designer has been dead for 70 years. --Kulmalukko (talk) 19:12, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:08, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:Monument to the Motherland, Kiev 6
[edit]No FOP in Ukraine. (The designer died 9 years ago.)
- File:Playing Soldiers At War Memorial (236349933).jpeg
- File:Pechers'kyi district, Kiev, Ukraine - panoramio (225).jpg
- File:Родина Мать - panoramio.jpg
- File:The Motherland Monument - Kiev - Ukraine - 03 (29868142968).jpg
- File:The Motherland Monument - Kiev - Ukraine - 02 (42834941525).jpg
- File:The Motherland Monument - Kiev - Ukraine - 01 (42834942845).jpg
- File:Монумент «Батьківщина-мати».jpg
- File:Київ Монумент «Батьківщина-мати».jpg
- File:Памятник "Родина мать".jpg
- File:Памятник "Родина мать" 4.jpg
- File:Памятник "Родина мать" 3.jpg
- File:Памятник "Родина мать" 2.jpg
- File:Памятник "Родина мать" 1.jpg
- File:Монумент "Батьківщина Мати".jpg
- File:Motherland Statue.jpg
- File:Motherland Statue in Kiev.jpg
- File:Kiev’s Motherland Statue.jpg
- File:Монумент «Батьківщина-мати» в Києві.jpg
- File:Монумент «Батьківщина-мати» в Києві1.jpg
Kulmalukko (talk) 20:23, 13 February 2019 (UTC) Please do not delete. Photos are copyright. No violations. DENAMAX (talk) 15:00, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:20, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Monument to the Motherland, Kiev 7
[edit]No FOP in Ukraine. 1981 monument. See w:en:Mother Motherland, Kiev. The designer died in 2010.
- File:80-382-0520 Монумент «Батьківщина-мати».jpg
- File:Mutter-Heimat-Statue Kiev.jpg
- File:Pechers'kyi district, Kiev, Ukraine - panoramio (268).jpg
- File:Rodina matj.jpg
- File:Батьківщина-Мати 03.jpg
- File:Батьківщина-Мати в Києві.jpg
- File:Батьківщина-Мати.jpg
- File:Мати 0337.jpg
- File:Монумент «Батьківщина-мати» P1140475.jpg
- File:Національний музей історії України у Другій світовій війні DSC 7295.jpg
Off-shell (talk) 22:30, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:23, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Monument to the Motherland, Kiev 8
[edit]No FOP in Ukraine. Built in 1981. The designer died in 2010.
- File:Detail of Rodyna Mat (Mother's Statue) - Museum of the History of Ukraine in World War Two - Kiev - Ukraine - 01 (26735709440).jpg
- File:Motherland Monument.jpg
Off-shell (talk) 15:02, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:37, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Monument to the Motherland, Kiev 9
[edit]No FoP in Ukraine. Built in 1981. The designer died in 2010.
- File:Батьківщина-Мати ввечері 2016.jpg
- File:Батьківщина-Мати.jpg
- File:Монумент «Батьківщина-мати» Киев.jpg
- File:Одина - Мать - автор, funsize - 18 авг 2010 В 1981 году на День Победы этот комплекс открывал генеральный секретарь ЦК КПСС Леони - panoramio.jpg
Off-shell (talk) 17:11, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:37, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Monument to the Motherland, Kiev 10
[edit]No FoP in Ukraine. Built in 1981. The designer died in 2010.
- File:Detail of Rodyna Mat (Mother's Statue ) - Museum of the History of Ukraine in World War Two - Kiev - Ukraine - 02 (27009680365).jpg
- File:Kiev- Motherland Monument.jpg
- File:Kyiv - Mother monument 1.jpg
- File:Mother Kyiv.jpg
- File:Батьківщина-Мати (Київ). Світлина №10.jpg
- File:Батьківщина-Мати (Київ). Світлина №11.jpg
- File:Батьківщина-Мати (Київ). Світлина №12.jpg
- File:Батьківщина-Мати (Київ). Світлина №13.jpg
- File:Батьківщина-Мати (Київ). Світлина №2.jpg
- File:Батьківщина-Мати (Київ). Світлина №3.jpg
- File:Батьківщина-Мати (Київ). Світлина №4.jpg
- File:Батьківщина-Мати (Київ). Світлина №5.jpg
- File:Батьківщина-Мати (Київ). Світлина №6.jpg
- File:Батьківщина-Мати (Київ). Світлина №7.jpg
- File:Батьківщина-Мати (Київ). Світлина №8.jpg
- File:Батьківщина-Мати (Київ). Світлина №9.jpg
- File:Київ. Статуя Батьківщина-мати.jpg
Off-shell (talk) 20:36, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination.--- FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:50, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Monument to the Motherland, Kiev 11
[edit]No FoP in Ukraine. Built in 1981. The designer died in 2010.
Off-shell (talk) 05:16, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Sealle (talk) 17:10, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
out of scope Bodhisattwa (talk) 02:16, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:52, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
out of scope Bodhisattwa (talk) 02:17, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:52, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Unused crop; we have the original which is being used. E4024 (talk) 03:04, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:53, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Chemical nonsense. en:Iron(II) sulfide is not a molecular substance. DMacks (talk) 03:59, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Unused & factually incorrect file. Replaced by File:Iron(II)-sulfide-unit-cell-3D-balls.png as the correct depiction of this chemical compound. Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 07:23, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:54, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Chemical nonsense. en:Mercuric amidochloride is not a molecular substance, and the N–Hg–Cl is not linear even in the crystal. DMacks (talk) 04:00, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Factually incorrect depiction of this compound, unused and hence ready for deletion. Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 07:56, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:54, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Small file without camera EXIF by an occasional visitor; dubious own work. E4024 (talk) 04:40, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:54, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
unused logo of questionable noability, out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:55, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:29, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 11:01, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:29, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
unused logo of questionable notability, out of scope
- File:Santissimo logos.jpg
- File:Santino logo santezevidan.jpg
- File:სანტე ჯი-ემ-თი პროდუქტების ოფიციალური ლოგო.jpg
- File:Official sante gmt products.jpg
Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:34, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:30, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
small size without EXIFs, unlikely to be own work Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:39, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:30, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
very small, unlikely to be own work Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:43, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:31, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Parker4044 (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused and uncategorised files. Commons is not private media repository.
Estopedist1 (talk) 17:15, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:31, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
One of our contributors went to the moon and took this "own work" pic! Hip hip hurrah... E4024 (talk) 23:19, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:46, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Small file without camera EXIF; dubious own work. E4024 (talk) 23:20, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:46, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
This should have been F10'ed the day it was uploaded... E4024 (talk) 23:21, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:46, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Small file without camera EXIF; dubious own work. (It also has a crop.) E4024 (talk) 23:23, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:46, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Small file without camera EXIF; dubious own work. E4024 (talk) 23:24, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:46, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Small file without camera EXIF; dubious own work. E4024 (talk) 23:24, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:46, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Small file without camera EXIF; dubious own work. See the CR mark also. E4024 (talk) 23:42, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:47, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Small file without camera EXIF; dubious own work. E4024 (talk) 23:43, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:47, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Small file without camera EXIF; dubious own work. E4024 (talk) 23:44, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:47, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Small file without camera EXIF left by a one time visitor; also quite out of scope. E4024 (talk) 02:27, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and [1] does not release its content under a free license. --Ahmadtalk 16:32, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Graphical composite of uncited originals (gives poor visual effect as well as being license violation) DMacks (talk) 04:58, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Poor quality due to composite of different uncited fragments. Have File:Anisyl-acetate-3D-balls.png as correct high-quality replacement. Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 11:33, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 21:34, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Multiple poor files at this filename; File:Anisyl acetate.png is to MOS DMacks (talk) 17:20, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Poor-quality chemical structure with incorrect geometry (bond angles). Most likely composite of uncited originals (copyright violation). Have File:Structural formula of anisyl acetate.svg as high-quality & correct vector replacement as well as the mentioned PNG version. Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 09:59, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 21:35, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created 1991. No Permission from the sculptor Д. Стецько. Микола Василечко (talk) 10:23, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 15:44, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
copyright violation http://hiphopsrevival.com/sponsored/upcoming-artist-lil-kei-is-next-up/ 2A00:23C4:E637:4201:C1E8:AB9E:1115:1073 12:24, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Quite oppose. At the link, embeds a Spotify playlist of the artist (cover art is this image), that is most likely to be uploaded by said artist. It is most likely his work, and that the link's writer just took the image. Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 12:26, 6 September 2020 (UTC)Delete. Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 16:09, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- [2] indicates that the uploader is not the artist. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 12:54, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete The uploader (paid to create the article) is claiming to have taken the photo, a similar version of which is at the reference. Minimally, uploader should be queried directly. David notMD (talk) 14:55, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: procedural close: already deleted. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:38, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Das Bild ist von https://www.instagram.com/p/B2JYqP_INqU/ Es ist keine Freigabe des Urheberrechtsinhabers zu erkennen XoMEoX (talk) 13:34, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:44, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Source Own work - false information, company logo. Violation of non Gbielcunha rights O revolucionário aliado (talk) 20:38, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Speedy delete. Non-free logo; it can be viewed at Philco's official website. --Francisco (talk) 22:52, 5 July 2020 (UTC)- Keep Corrected licensing, does not meet COM:TOO#Brazil. JGHowes talk 14:32, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
Speedy keep too simple.--RZuo (talk) 17:24, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Too Simple. --Gbawden (talk) 11:01, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Have added to the file's description that this is the logo and trademark of PHILCO ELETRÔNICOS S.A. in Brazil, which has an article on pt-wiki and may be useful there. Non-svg format is no reason to delete. Instead, have added {{Svg}} tag. JGHowes talk 15:16, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per JGHowes. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:39, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Blurred Image, low quality. Category contains plenty of other useful pictures of the object. Uploader request Giftzwerg 88 (talk) 16:27, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:40, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Screenshot from a video game, no permission Le Petit Chat (talk) 20:19, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:41, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: and no license at all. --JuTa 00:24, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: and no licesne at all. --JuTa 00:24, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by BATRussia2020 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Duplicate. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: and no license at all. --JuTa 00:23, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Argentina A1Cafel (talk) 03:01, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:16, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Argentina A1Cafel (talk) 03:01, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:16, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Argentina A1Cafel (talk) 03:02, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:17, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Argentina A1Cafel (talk) 03:03, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:17, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Argentina A1Cafel (talk) 03:03, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:16, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
I am the author of this photo and I don't want this photo here. I will upload other photo of this author. Satpal Dandiwal (talk) 14:09, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per request. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:18, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Copyrighted image: https://www.adanademirspor.org.tr/kulubumuz/yonetim-kurulu/murat-sancak/ yabancım 09:09, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 21:43, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Copyright infringement. Delbatros (talk) 13:08, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
- Keep The YouTube video clearly states: "Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed)" on it is License section. Günther Frager (talk) 22:36, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per comment. --Materialscientist (talk) 01:37, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted image: https://www.adanademirspor.org.tr/kulubumuz/yonetim-kurulu/murat-sancak/ yabancım 09:09, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 21:44, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Small file without camera EXIF left by a one time visitor; also quite out of scope. E4024 (talk) 02:28, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 16:01, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Small file without camera EXIF left by a one time visitor; also quite out of scope. E4024 (talk) 02:29, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 16:00, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
per COM:TOYS Larryasou (talk) 05:21, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 16:01, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Derivative work of Finnish sculptor Irma Laukkanen, (b. 1958) work, artist page. No FOP for sculptures in finland [3], not in PD. Htm (talk) 20:19, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 16:02, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Tag reverted with the explanation of rv idiot, so moving to DR.
No source is given for the underpinning map, copyright not verifiable. Fæ (talk) 08:03, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, I thought you were an idiot. You are apparently a vandal. It would be one thing if it was an oversight, but intentionally disrupting Commons and wasting our time should get you blocked. That's a Commons map, as any idiot should be able to tell. The source of the info is given. Kwamikagami (talk) 08:09, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- The source of the map is not given. "That's a Commons map, as any idiot should be able to tell" is not a verifiable source, nor is "Commons" a creator and publisher of original maps.
- The source of the "data" is a dead link.
- Please take threats of blocks to COM:AN. This nomination is to discuss the file and copyright.
- Thanks --Fæ (talk) 08:11, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Idiots like you are why I upload to WP-en and tag all uploads as "keep local". Even when the original Commons map is linked, deletion-happy idiots tag them for copy-vio!
- What you're saying is that we cannot use the blank maps on Commons to create other maps? If that's true, then all the images from WP-en need to be moved back to WP-en. Kwamikagami (talk) 08:48, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- What is said is "No source is given for the underpinning map, copyright not verifiable." To fix this you need only provide the link to the appropriately licensed map. Rather than repeatedly calling me an idiot, you could have simply added the link to the image page and removed the tag, rather than forcing this deletion request.
- If you want to try the 'keep local' approach, that's fine, but Wikipedia's fair use rules would not apply to this map and unverifiable images do get removed from there too, when they are noticed. --Fæ (talk) 04:41, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
- What you're saying is that we cannot use the blank maps on Commons to create other maps? If that's true, then all the images from WP-en need to be moved back to WP-en. Kwamikagami (talk) 08:48, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Do you know how many thousands of maps there are on Commons, to expect someone to ID which one this was clipped from a decade after it was made?
- No, on WP they don't delete images just because some nutcase has got a stick up his ass. They expect some common sense. Kwamikagami (talk) 08:48, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
- What an odd nomination. Was there any suspicion at all that this image could be violating somebody's copyright? Again, it's obviously derived from a map of the type you expect to see on Commons. I guess identifying the source is important, but how difficult is it to do that? The map shows a sum total of four labelled features. Just type in the search bar the name of the biggest one, and – lo and behold! – the image you need shows up at the very top of the search results. Uanfala (talk) 13:16, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Original map has been provided. @Kwamikagami: your map was out of copyright compliance, since it didn't credit the author. Fæ can be... hard to work with, but the nomination was valid and wasn't vandalism. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:29, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
@Kwamikagami: Your conduct here was completely out of line. @Magog the Ogre and Fæ: I can't believe the abuse you got Fæ. I don't know your work, but I want to encourage you to keep it up. The maps on Wikimedia Commons are absolutely bad. --Geographyinitiative (talk) 23:00, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Bad image quality Derbrauni (talk) 09:47, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 08:24, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
“FBMD” in metadata indicates the image was first published on Facebook. Ytoyoda (talk) 12:11, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 13:40, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
no real license because it is only for own use Euro know (talk) 00:15, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: dubious own-work claim. --ƏXPLICIT 01:05, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
no metadata, can be found on the Internet, unlike own work. Larryasou (talk) 05:06, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:01, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
Image is licensed as "Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International", but nothing on the group's official English website given as the source of the image indicates this at all. Marchjuly (talk) 12:38, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 06:36, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
No indication given at the source website that this has been released as licensed, and it seems too complex to be {{PD-logo}} per COM:TOO United States and COM:TOO Iran. It's possible that this could be PD in Iran per COM:IRAN#General rules since the en:Democratic Party of Iranian KurdistanI seems to have been established in 1945, but en:File:Pdki logo.jpg is being treated as non-free on English Wikipedia. -- Marchjuly (talk) 11:34, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: According to the administrator you deleted a file with this same name in 2015, this is pretty much the same as the file that was deleted with some minor differences. So, this file may even be eligible for deletion per COM:GCSD#G4. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:24, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:06, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
I want to upload a better file, with more informative file name Kalavut (talk) 13:07, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:00, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
Škoda Auto India Pvt. Ltd. has no rights on this logo. It's only a subsidiary of Škoda Auto a.s. with headquarter in Czechia. Licensing with an allowed commercial usage is reckless. Pan Tau (talk) 11:45, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 151.75.237.106 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Škoda Auto India Pvt. Ltd. has no rights on this logo. It's only a subsidiary of Škoda Auto a.s. with headquarter in Czechia. Licensing with an allowed commercial usage is reckless. Pan Tau ([[User talk:Pan Tau|{{int:Talkpagelinktext
Converted to regular DR, as this should involve OTRS. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:13, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Subsequent to this file's DR nomination on April 20, the nominator removed the license tag on July 27, then replaced the still-open DR nom on Sept. 6 with a Speedy Deletion tag. Aside from these procedural irregularities, suffice it to say there are no grounds for deletion. The OTRS ticket provides bona fide licensing permission from Skoda India, which is part of the Volkswagen Group conglomerate. This meets Commons licensing requirements. Volkswagen Group's internal corporate affairs and its delegation of authority are beyond our purview. I have, however, added a {{Trademark}} tag. — JGHowes talk 20:11, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --ƏXPLICIT 01:03, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
Unnecessary crop used only in Commons and not indispensable because if we have anything abundant here those are the naked people images. Kriptzone (talk) 16:44, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom; we have the original of this important image. E4024 (talk) 15:03, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 00:56, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
Unnecessary crop of file on commons Kriptzone (talk) 17:18, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom; indeed the unused original image is also unnecessary and could/should be deleted. Some people wrongly think that if we delete junk nude images we will be censuring Commons, no we will only be eliminating junk. --E4024 (talk) 03:43, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:04, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
Source states a noncommercial licence, which is not compatible with Commons. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:42, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 00:55, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
Source states a noncommercial licence, which is not compatible with Commons. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:42, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 00:56, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Glorious 93 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: The kit which is present here definitely isn't the original uploader's creation and as a result its copyrights still belong to Puma and Borussia Dortmund. Regasterios (talk) 18:42, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
It has OTRS permission. --Regasterios (talk) 18:43, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
@Regasterios: As a 3d creation (if not taken as a screenshot from a video game like FIFA or PES?) it might have, but the kit is licensed by its rightful owner who's not the original uploader but Puma and Borussia Dortmund. --Glorious 93 (talk) 19:12, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
OK, I understand, however let's don't delete any file speedy which has permission in OTRS. --Regasterios (talk) 19:21, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: kits are de minimis. --ƏXPLICIT 01:08, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
Scope? Own work? E4024 (talk) 23:28, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:02, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
Author request deletion and superceded by Escudo del Municipio Guanipa.svg Daniqui04 (talk) 23:29, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:06, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
No matching file Achim (talk) 11:52, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --CptViraj (talk) 18:10, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
An old picture that appeared to be scanned from somewhere, not likely to be own work. Techyan（Talk） 17:36, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 03:12, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
This looks like it is an upscaled version of File:CAROLE ALEXIS FOTO FRANCIS AUGUSTINE.jpg. Potential copyright issues could be healed by adjusting the attribution and licence, but I think upscaling is undesirable anyway. When you zoom to full resolution, the image is unsharp and blurry which is not the case with File:CAROLE ALEXIS FOTO FRANCIS AUGUSTINE.jpg. So, if both uploaders are the same person, they should provide the original high-resolution image rather than this one. De728631 (talk) 15:07, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:48, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Ayala Museum
[edit]no freedom of pano in the phils that permits free reuse of photos of copyrighted bldgs and sculptures. bldg is from 2004 based on wikipedia entry of this museum
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 16:54, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 06:50, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: FOP Germany does not include building interiors Einsamer Schütze (talk) 20:21, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:24, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:11, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: FOP Germany does not include building interiors Einsamer Schütze (talk) 20:21, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:24, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:11, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: FOP Germany does not include building interiors Einsamer Schütze (talk) 20:22, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:24, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:11, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: FoP Spain does not apply to building interiors Einsamer Schütze (talk) 20:24, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:24, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:11, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
File:Pierolapithecus catalaunicus (Pau) a l'Institut Català de Paleontologia Miquel Crusafont - detall de la cara.JPG
[edit]This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: FoP Spain does not apply to building interiors Einsamer Schütze (talk) 20:27, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:24, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:11, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
File:Pierolapithecus catalaunicus (Pau) a l'Institut Català de Paleontologia Miquel Crusafont (crop).JPG
[edit]This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: FoP Spain does not apply to building interiors Einsamer Schütze (talk) 20:27, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:24, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:11, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
File:Ricostruzione di australopithecus afarensis detto selam, di tre anni circa, da dikika (afar), 3,3 milioni di anni fa.jpg
[edit]This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No FoP in Ethiopia Einsamer Schütze (talk) 20:31, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:24, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:11, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: FoP Japan does not include building interiors Einsamer Schütze (talk) 20:33, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:24, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:11, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: FoP Spain does not include building interiors Einsamer Schütze (talk) 20:34, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:24, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:11, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
File:Capannoli, centro di documentazione archeologica, ricostruzione di lucy, australopiteco afarense 02.JPG
[edit]This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No FoP in Italy Einsamer Schütze (talk) 20:35, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:24, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:11, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
File:Capannoli, centro di documentazione archeologica, ricostruzione di lucy, australopiteco afarense 01.JPG
[edit]This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No FoP in Italy Einsamer Schütze (talk) 20:35, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:24, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:11, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: FoP Spain does not include building interiors Einsamer Schütze (talk) 20:35, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:24, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:11, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: FoP Spain does not include building interiors Einsamer Schütze (talk) 20:35, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:24, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:11, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: FoP Spain does not include building interiors Einsamer Schütze (talk) 20:36, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:24, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:11, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
File:Little world, Aichi prefecture - Main exhibition hall - Diorama - Living of Australopithecines.jpg
[edit]This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: FoP Japan does not include building interiors Einsamer Schütze (talk) 20:37, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:41, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:11, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: FoP Spain does not include building interiors Einsamer Schütze (talk) 20:37, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:24, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:11, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: FoP Spain does not include building interiors Einsamer Schütze (talk) 20:38, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:24, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:11, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: FoP Czech Republic does not include building interiors (this photo, which is a derivative work, requires permission from artist to publish) Einsamer Schütze (talk) 20:38, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:24, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:11, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: FOP Japan does not apply to building interiors Einsamer Schütze (talk) 20:38, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:24, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:11, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: FOP Germany does not include building interiors Einsamer Schütze (talk) 20:41, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:24, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:11, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: FOP Germany does not include building interiors Einsamer Schütze (talk) 20:41, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:24, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:11, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: FOP Germany does not include building interiors Einsamer Schütze (talk) 20:42, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:24, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:11, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: FOP Germany does not include building interiors Einsamer Schütze (talk) 20:42, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:24, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:11, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
File:Reconstitution d'une tête de Néandertalien à partir du crâne de l'homme de La Chapelle-aux-Saints.jpg
[edit]This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No FOP in France Einsamer Schütze (talk) 20:43, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:24, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:11, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: FOP Germany does not include building interiors Einsamer Schütze (talk) 20:48, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:24, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:11, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: FOP Germany does not include building interiors Einsamer Schütze (talk) 20:48, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:24, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:12, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: FOP Germany does not include building interiors Einsamer Schütze (talk) 20:48, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:24, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:12, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: FOP Germany does not include building interiors Einsamer Schütze (talk) 20:48, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:24, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:12, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: FOP Germany does not include building interiors Einsamer Schütze (talk) 20:49, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:24, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:12, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: FOP Germany does not include building interiors Einsamer Schütze (talk) 20:49, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:24, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:12, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: FOP Germany does not include building interiors Einsamer Schütze (talk) 20:49, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:24, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:12, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: FOP Germany does not include building interiors Einsamer Schütze (talk) 20:49, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:24, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:12, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: FOP Germany does not include building interiors Einsamer Schütze (talk) 20:49, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:24, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:12, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: FOP Germany does not include building interiors Einsamer Schütze (talk) 20:49, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:24, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:12, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: FOP Germany does not include building interiors Einsamer Schütze (talk) 20:49, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:24, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:12, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: FOP Germany does not include building interiors Einsamer Schütze (talk) 20:50, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:24, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:12, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: FOP Germany does not include building interiors Einsamer Schütze (talk) 20:50, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:24, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:12, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: FOP Germany does not include building interiors Einsamer Schütze (talk) 20:50, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:24, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:12, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: FOP Germany does not include building interiors Einsamer Schütze (talk) 20:50, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:24, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:12, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: FOP Germany does not include building interiors Einsamer Schütze (talk) 20:50, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:24, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:12, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No FOP in Iran Einsamer Schütze (talk) 20:52, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:24, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:12, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: FOP Germany does not include building interiors Einsamer Schütze (talk) 20:52, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:24, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:12, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
File:Little world, Aichi prefecture - Main exhibition hall - Diorama - Living of Neanderthals.jpg
[edit]This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: FOP Japan does not include building interiors Einsamer Schütze (talk) 20:52, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:41, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:12, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: FOP Germany does not include building interiors Einsamer Schütze (talk) 20:52, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:24, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:12, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: FOP Germany does not include building interiors Einsamer Schütze (talk) 20:53, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:24, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:12, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: FOP Croatia does not include building interiors Einsamer Schütze (talk) 20:53, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:24, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:12, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: FOP Germany does not apply to building interiors Einsamer Schütze (talk) 20:55, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:24, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:12, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: FOP Spain does not apply to building interiors Einsamer Schütze (talk) 20:55, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:24, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:12, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: FOP Germany does not include building interiors Einsamer Schütze (talk) 20:57, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:24, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:13, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: FOP Spain does not include building interiors Einsamer Schütze (talk) 20:57, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:24, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:13, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: FOP Germany does not include building interiors Einsamer Schütze (talk) 20:59, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:24, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:13, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: FOP Belgium does not include building interiors Einsamer Schütze (talk) 20:59, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:24, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:13, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No FOP in France Einsamer Schütze (talk) 21:00, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:24, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:13, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No FOP in France Einsamer Schütze (talk) 21:00, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:24, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:13, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: FOP Germany does not include public interiors Einsamer Schütze (talk) 21:00, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:24, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:13, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No FOP in France Einsamer Schütze (talk) 21:01, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:24, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:13, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: FOP Japan does not include building interiors Einsamer Schütze (talk) 21:01, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:24, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:13, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No FOP in France Einsamer Schütze (talk) 21:01, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:24, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:13, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No FOP in France Einsamer Schütze (talk) 21:01, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:24, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:13, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: FOP Germany does not include building interiors Einsamer Schütze (talk) 21:01, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:24, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:13, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: FOP Germany does not include public interiors Einsamer Schütze (talk) 21:01, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:24, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:13, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: reason=FOP Spain does not include interiors of buildings Einsamer Schütze (talk) 21:02, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:24, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:13, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: reason=FOP Spain does not include interiors of buildings Einsamer Schütze (talk) 21:02, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:24, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:13, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: reason=FOP Spain does not include interiors of buildings Einsamer Schütze (talk) 21:04, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:30, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: Per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:13, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: reason=FOP Spain does not include interiors of buildings Einsamer Schütze (talk) 21:04, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:30, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: Per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:13, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: reason=FOP Spain does not include interiors of buildings Einsamer Schütze (talk) 21:04, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:30, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: Per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:13, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: reason=FOP Spain does not include interiors of buildings Einsamer Schütze (talk) 21:04, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:30, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: Per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:13, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: reason=FOP Spain does not include interiors of buildings Einsamer Schütze (talk) 21:05, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:30, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: Per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:13, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: reason=FOP Spain does not include interiors of buildings Einsamer Schütze (talk) 21:05, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:30, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: Per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:13, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: reason=FOP Spain does not include interiors of buildings Einsamer Schütze (talk) 21:05, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:30, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: Per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:13, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: reason=FOP Spain does not include interiors of buildings Einsamer Schütze (talk) 21:05, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:30, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: Per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:13, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: reason=FOP Spain does not include interiors of buildings Einsamer Schütze (talk) 21:05, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:30, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: Per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:13, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: reason=FOP Spain does not include interiors of buildings Einsamer Schütze (talk) 21:05, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:30, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: Per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:13, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: reason=FOP Spain does not include interiors of buildings Einsamer Schütze (talk) 21:05, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:30, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: Per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:13, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: reason=FOP Spain does not include interiors of buildings Einsamer Schütze (talk) 21:05, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:30, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: Per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:13, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: reason=FOP Spain does not include interiors of buildings Einsamer Schütze (talk) 21:06, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:30, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: Per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:14, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: reason=FOP Spain does not include interiors of buildings Einsamer Schütze (talk) 21:06, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:30, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: Per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:14, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: reason=FOP Spain does not include interiors of buildings Einsamer Schütze (talk) 21:06, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:30, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: Per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:14, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: reason=FOP Spain does not include interiors of buildings Einsamer Schütze (talk) 21:07, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:30, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: Per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:14, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: reason=FOP Spain does not include interiors of buildings Einsamer Schütze (talk) 21:07, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:30, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: Per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:14, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: reason=FOP Spain does not include interiors of buildings Einsamer Schütze (talk) 21:07, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:30, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: Per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:14, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: reason=FOP Spain does not include interiors of buildings Einsamer Schütze (talk) 21:07, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:30, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: Per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:14, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: reason=FOP Spain does not include interiors of buildings Einsamer Schütze (talk) 21:07, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:30, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: Per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:14, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: reason=FOP Spain does not include interiors of buildings Einsamer Schütze (talk) 21:08, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:30, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: Per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:14, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: reason=FOP Spain does not include interiors of buildings Einsamer Schütze (talk) 21:08, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:30, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: Per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:14, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: reason=FOP Spain does not include interiors of buildings Einsamer Schütze (talk) 21:08, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:30, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: Per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:14, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: reason=FOP Spain does not include interiors of buildings Einsamer Schütze (talk) 21:08, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:30, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: Per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:14, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: reason=FOP Spain does not include interiors of buildings Einsamer Schütze (talk) 21:09, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:30, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: Per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:14, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: reason=FOP Spain does not include interiors of buildings Einsamer Schütze (talk) 21:09, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:30, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: Per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:14, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: reason=FOP Spain does not include interiors of buildings Einsamer Schütze (talk) 21:09, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:30, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: Per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:14, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: FOP Spain does not include interiors of buildings Einsamer Schütze (talk) 21:09, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ciell at 15:30, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: Per Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP --Krdbot 20:14, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
obvious non-free/promo pic that was not taken by the uploader Lugnuts (talk) 16:04, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:11, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
Because it is A selfie Nexo20 (talk) 17:41, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 02:40, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
File:Detail of David Politzer's video installation titled, "Observation Station, From the Rim." Installed at Artsapce, Cleveland. 6 of 6.jpg
[edit]Copyrighted Jerry Mann (metadata) 2simple (talk) 02:27, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:28, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
57 KB small file without camera EXIF; dubious own work. E4024 (talk) 02:09, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 20:47, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
Highly unlikely not own work as it is more to photoshoot of unidentified models. Encik Tekateki (talk) 02:17, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 20:48, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
Small file without camera EXIF left by a one time visitor; also quite out of scope. E4024 (talk) 02:23, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 20:48, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
Поскольку Логотип Ĩŵąŋ (talk) 13:51, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
- Because the Logo? no valid reason.--ProfessorX (talk) 16:32, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 20:49, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
Photo taken 5 years after he left boxing; dubious "own work". E4024 (talk) 04:44, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 20:50, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
Derivative work of information board, likely copyrighted text & design; no freedom of panorama in Sri Lanka MPF (talk) 07:31, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 20:51, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
Derivative work of entrance sign, likely copyrighted architectural design; no freedom of panorama in Sri Lanka MPF (talk) 07:35, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 20:52, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Source: here -User3204 (talk) 14:13, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 20:57, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
Ложные сведения об авторе: художник-гравёр Н. Ф. Морозов -- Tomasina (talk) 07:42, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
- Не совсем понял правила оформления. Автор пластины Морозов Н Ф, я его пра-правнук. Сделал фото пластины, хранящийся у нас. Пожалуйста переместите фото в локальное хранилище.--Александр Станиславович Максимов (talk) 17:59, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 20:56, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: reason=FOP Spain does not include interiors of buildings Dbachmann (talk) 13:52, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
last time I checked, wikimedia was under US law. I took this image myself, in a museum that allowed photography. Why is this even up for discussion? --Dbachmann (talk) 13:53, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Simply per COM:L, Commons only accept files that are free in both US and Spain, free in US doesn't always mean free in Spain. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:44, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 20:58, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: reason=FOP Spain does not include interiors of buildings Dbachmann (talk) 13:53, 6 September 2020 (UTC) last time I checked, wikimedia was under US law. I took this image myself, in a museum that allowed photography. Why is this even up for discussion? --Dbachmann (talk) 13:55, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Read Commons:Freedom of panorama. The artist is still the copyright owner of the sculpture, and you must provide a reason why publishing a picture of the sculpture (a derivative work) without explicit permission by the artist is legal Dunkleosteus77 (talk) 14:22, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Simply per COM:L, Commons only accept files that are free in both US and Spain, free in US doesn't always mean free in Spain. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:44, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 20:58, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: reason=FOP Spain does not include interiors of buildings Dbachmann (talk) 13:54, 6 September 2020 (UTC) last time I checked, wikimedia was under US law. I took this image myself, in a museum that allowed photography. Why is this even up for discussion? --Dbachmann (talk) 13:54, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Read Commons:Freedom of panorama. The artist is still the copyright owner of the sculpture, and you must provide a reason why publishing a picture of the sculpture (a derivative work) without explicit permission by the artist is legal Dunkleosteus77 (talk) 14:21, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Simply per COM:L, Commons only accept files that are free in both US and Spain, free in US doesn't always mean free in Spain. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:44, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 20:58, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: reason=FOP Spain does not include interiors of buildings Dbachmann (talk) 13:54, 6 September 2020 (UTC) last time I checked, wikimedia was under US law. I took this image myself, in a museum that allowed photography. Why is this even up for discussion? --Dbachmann (talk) 13:54, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Read Commons:Freedom of panorama. The artist is still the copyright owner of the sculpture, and you must provide a reason why publishing a picture of the sculpture (a derivative work) without explicit permission by the artist is legal Dunkleosteus77 (talk) 14:22, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Simply per COM:L, Commons only accept files that are free in both US and Spain, free in US doesn't always mean free in Spain. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:44, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 20:58, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
File:Пам'ятник поету, письменнику, художнику Тарасові Григоровичу Шевченку, вул. С.Бандери.jpg
[edit]There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created after 1960. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 13:54, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 21:05, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
File:Пам'ятник Т.Г.Шевченку (територія Чортківського навчально-наукового інституту підприємництва і бізнесу ТНЕУ.jpg
[edit]There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created after 1960. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 13:54, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 21:06, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 21:09, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
Per COM:PACKAGING. Wcam (talk) 15:14, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 21:11, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 21:11, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: FOP Germany does not include building interiors Einsamer Schütze (talk) 20:20, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- The photo is a derivative work of the sculpture. The copyright laws of Germany mandate that, before publishing the photo, you must get permission by the artist, which has not been demonstrated here Dunkleosteus77 (talk) 20:22, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 21:14, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
File:Pierolapithecus catalaunicus (Pau) a l'Institut Català de Paleontologia Miquel Crusafont.JPG
[edit]This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: FoP Spain does not apply to building interiors Einsamer Schütze (talk) 20:26, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- The building interior is not the subject of this photo. The background doesn't even look like a building structure, but a some kind of infoboard. --Kulmalukko (talk) 23:20, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 21:14, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: FoP Netherlands does not include museum interiors Einsamer Schütze (talk) 20:33, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- When I took this picture, I assumed there is no copyright on this (or any other) reconstruction of the fossil of Lucy. Consequently, FoP is not the reason why I thought I could publish the picture. As additional evidence of the copyfree aspect of this reconstruction the following: All images on the website of the Museum are CC-BY-NC (link), and a photo of this reconstruction of Lucy is present in the database of the museum (link). Therefore I think the photo - made by me - can be published on Commons or anywhere else, with CC-BY-SA license. Kind regards, Elly (talk) 17:58, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 21:14, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: FoP Netherlands does not include museum interiors Einsamer Schütze (talk) 20:34, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- When I took this picture, I assumed there is no copyright on this (or any other) reconstruction of the fossil of Lucy. Consequently, FoP is not the reason why I thought I could publish the picture. As additional evidence of the copyfree aspect of this reconstruction the following: All images on the website of the Museum are CC-BY-NC (link), and a photo of this reconstruction of Lucy is present in the database of the museum (link). Therefore I think the photo - made by me - can be published on Commons or anywhere else, with CC-BY-SA license. Kind regards, Elly (talk) 17:58, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 21:14, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: FoP Spain does not include building interiors Einsamer Schütze (talk) 20:35, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- KeepThe building interior is not the subject of this photo. --Kulmalukko (talk) 20:46, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 21:14, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: FoP Spain does not include building interiors Einsamer Schütze (talk) 20:36, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Nonsense. אילן שמעוני (talk) 22:17, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 21:14, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No FoP in Ethiopia Einsamer Schütze (talk) 20:36, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- This qualifies under criteria for speedy deletion F1 "Content is apparently a copyright violation, with no good evidence of Commons-compatible licensing being issued by the copyright holder or status as a free work". The artist of the sculpture is the copyright holder, and there is no evidence that permission was received from the copyright holder to publish a photo (a derivative work). In some countries, this is permissible under Freedom of Panorama (FoP) laws. Ethiopia has no such law. Therefore, this is a copyright violation Dunkleosteus77 (talk) 15:23, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment file has been deleted due to a broader DR at Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:25, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 21:14, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: FOP Germany does not include building interiors Einsamer Schütze (talk) 20:52, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Please wait with the deletion request, I wrote to the museum yesterday. --Fährtenleser (talk) 04:51, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 21:14, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
What proof do we have that this really representing Homo heidelbergensis? Comments at the flickr image also state that this depicts a neanderthal. Narayan (talk) 10:11, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
- Comment: If so, nominate it for renaming, and tag it with Category:Unidentified Hominidae, where it can be found by keen specialists and swifly recategorized (and even renamed). Do not nominate for deletion if the file is in-scope and there’s no permission issues. -- Tuválkin ✉ 11:24, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: FOP Spain does not include building interiors Einsamer Schütze (talk) 20:58, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 21:15, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: FOP Germany does not include building interiors Einsamer Schütze (talk) 20:59, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep The building interior is hardly seen in this photo. --Kulmalukko (talk) 23:24, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep per above comment. -- Editor-1 (talk) 12:21, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 21:15, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: FOP Germany does not include building interiors Einsamer Schütze (talk) 21:01, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Please wait with the deletion request, I wrote to the museum yesterday. --Fährtenleser (talk) 04:52, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 21:15, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
low quality image Odsnapojdjsjsjjs (talk) 19:53, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Educationally worthless. AshFriday (talk) 01:13, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Sexually explicit; not for the faint of heart. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 18:49, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:29, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- What happened? The image was used on nlwiki for educational purposes. https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top,_bottom_en_versatile Please re-add this image. --Hannolans (talk) 10:54, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
Small file without camera EXIF; dubious own work. E4024 (talk) 23:46, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Weak keep, not dubious enough for the precautionary principle, this file is clearly cut to make it square and I think that the black bar was added to the bloke's face to make him anonymous and to protect his privacy, many file editing software override the original EXIF data, so by assuming good faith this file is likely "Own work". --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 13:40, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
- If you have a look at the talk page of the uploader you may have more precaution about their "own works". --E4024 (talk) 23:48, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Image can be found here in a resolution twice as large. Dubious own-work claim. ƏXPLICIT 01:00, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 15:24, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Murals in the Philippines 1
[edit]Subject is a mural by Antonio Dumlao (1912-1983). (source) Won't be public domain in the Philippines until 2034 (50 years after his death). There is also no FoP in the Philippines.
- File:FEU Mural 01.JPG
- File:FEU Mural 02.JPG
- File:FEU Mural 04.JPG
- File:FEU Mural 05.JPG
- File:FEU Mural inside the Administration Building.JPG
- File:Mural 03.JPG
Howhontanozaz (talk) 09:29, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 07:13, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Murals in the Philippines 2
[edit]"Ang Mamatay Ng Dahil Sayo" murals are works of art by AG Sano, who is still living. No freedom of pano in the phils for fotos and other reproductions of artworks made by ppl (architects sculptures engineers designers visual artists architecture firms and or their heirs) who are still livibg or have been dead for not less than 50 yrs
- File:BagongIlogFlyoverPasigAngMamatayNgDahilSayoAGSañoMurals20190210Alternativity-Pedestrians.jpg
- File:LiliosaHilaoMuralbyAGSañoBagongIlogPasig20190210Alternativity-Island.jpg
- File:LiliosaHilaoMuralbyAGSañoBagongIlogPasig20190210Alternativity-Motorcycles.jpg
- File:LiliosaHilaoMuralbyAGSañoBagongIlogPasig20190210Alternativity-Sedans.jpg
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 06:46, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 07:13, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Murals in Manila
[edit]No Freedom of Panorama in the Philippines. Murals look recent.
- File:Manila, makati, graffiti nella galleria sotto il de peninsula 01.jpg
- File:Manila, makati, graffiti nella galleria sotto il de peninsula 02.jpg
- File:Manila, makati, graffiti nella galleria sotto il de peninsula 03.jpg
- File:Manila, makati, graffiti nella galleria sotto il de peninsula 04.jpg
- File:Manila, makati, graffiti nella galleria sotto il de peninsula 05.jpg
Howhontanozaz (talk) 10:09, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 07:14, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
Subject is a mural by en:Alfonso A. Ossorio (1916-1990). Won't be public domain until January 1, 2041 (50 years after his death). There is also no FoP in the Philippines. Howhontanozaz (talk) 09:43, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 03:57, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
Mural is a work by the collective artists of the University of the Philippines Artists’ Circle and was completed only in 1996. (source) There is also no Freedom of Panorama in the Philippines. Howhontanozaz (talk) 09:58, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete sadly. Undelete when FOP is introduced in the Philippines (if ever the subject of this file qualifies for the future Philippine FOP), just like the cases of Armenian (2013) and Belgian (2016) architecture and artistic works, when FOP was introduced in both countries. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:34, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 03:50, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
No Freedom of Panorama in the Philippines. Howhontanozaz (talk) 11:27, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- I'm not sure about this, but usually such exhibits are seasonal and not permanent. But per COM:PCP Weak delete. See also the discussion at Commons talk:Copyright rules by territory/Philippines#Freedom of panorama for religious works and properties — it is the uploader's burdern to prove the PD status of religious artistic works. The declaration on deed is only relevant between the owner of the establishment and the creator of the religious artistic works. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:36, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 03:49, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
Subject is a mural by en:Alfonso A. Ossorio (1916-1990). Won't be public domain until January 1, 2041 (50 years after his death). There is also no FoP in the Philippines. Howhontanozaz (talk) 09:41, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 04:55, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
Subject is a mural by en:Alfonso A. Ossorio (1916-1990). Won't be public domain until January 1, 2041 (50 years after his death). There is also no FoP in the Philippines. Howhontanozaz (talk) 09:44, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 04:55, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
No Freedom of Panorama in the Philippines. Howhontanozaz (talk) 11:20, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete sadly. Still, no freedom of panorama in the Philippines. Undelete when FOP is introduced in the Philippines (if ever the subject of this file qualifies for the future Philippine FOP), just like the cases of Armenian (2013) and Belgian (2016) architecture and artistic works, when FOP was introduced in both countries. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:22, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 04:47, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
possible copyrighted sculpture. no freedom of pano in the phils that allows all and free forms of reuse of photos of copyrighted bldgs and sculptures that doesnt compromise the rights of the creators Mrcl lxmna (talk) 17:41, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- This photo is personally shot by yours truly so the copyright remains on me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrchrisaquino (talk • contribs) 00:39, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep silhouetted subject which caused the copyrighted elements of the sculpture to blacken. Hence no copyrightable elements visible. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:58, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no visible copyrighted elements. ƏXPLICIT 07:05, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
https://www.philstar.com/2009/06/29/481655/73-hectare-rizal-shrine-complex-open-vizcaya says it was inaugurated in 2009 and a creation by Mahmoud Asfour who is perhaps still living. no freedom of panorama for copyrighted sculptures and buildings in the phils Mrcl lxmna (talk) 18:00, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
The link above is not correct. The link is https://www.philstar.com/places-festivals-traditions/481655/73-hectare-rizal-shrine-complex-open-vizcaya. My Comment it seems that the Jordanian-born Filipino Mahmoud Asfour seems to waive his moral rights on the monument, as alluded in:
A retired bank official in the Middle East and a known philanthropist here, Asfour, whose wife hails from this province, said the Rizal shrine is possibly his "greatest gift to the Filipino people" and is what he envisioned to be a "symbol of Filipino unity and hope."
"It’s all sheer love and respect for the Filipino people that I dedicate this shrine honoring the bravery of Dr. Jose Rizal and other heroes of the country," he said.
Is it possible that this shrine is now common Filipino property? (if my interpretation of this and other passages in the article is correct) If so, I might say Weak keep.JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:43, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Describing a shrine as a gift or dedicating it to Filipino doesn't remotely touch upon copyright. ƏXPLICIT 06:37, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
Mural is a work of Amadeo Manalad who died only in 1984. (source) Thus this work shoud enter the public domain only on January 1, 2035 (50 years after his death). There is also no Freedom of Panorama in the Philippines.
- File:09919jfHiyas ng Bulacan Museum Blas Ople Malolos Cityfvf 01.jpg
- File:09919jfHiyas ng Bulacan Museum Blas Ople Malolos Cityfvf 02.jpg
- File:09919jfHiyas ng Bulacan Museum Blas Ople Malolos Cityfvf 03.jpg
- File:09919jfHiyas ng Bulacan Museum Blas Ople Malolos Cityfvf 04.jpg
- File:09919jfHiyas ng Bulacan Museum Blas Ople Malolos Cityfvf 05.jpg
- File:09919jfHiyas ng Bulacan Museum Blas Ople Malolos Cityfvf 09.jpg
- File:BlasFOple5621monumentMalolosCityfvf 04.JPG
- File:BlasFOple5621monumentMalolosCityfvf 06.JPG
- File:BlasFOple5621monumentMalolosCityfvf 07.JPG
- File:BlasFOple5621monumentMalolosCityfvf 08.JPG
- File:BlasFOple5621monumentMalolosCityfvf 09.JPG
- File:BlasFOple5621monumentMalolosCityfvf 10.JPG
- File:BlasFOple5621monumentMalolosCityfvf 11.JPG
- File:BlasFOple5621monumentMalolosCityfvf 12.JPG
- File:BlasFOple5621monumentMalolosCityfvf 13.JPG
- File:BlasFOple5621monumentMalolosCityfvf 14.JPG
- File:JfMalolosHardin5636Oplebuildingfvf 01.JPG
- File:JfMalolosHardin5636Oplebuildingfvf 02.JPG
- File:JfMalolosHardin5636Oplebuildingfvf 03.JPG
Howhontanozaz (talk) 10:53, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for your messages and good afternoon from hereat Bulacan; with all due respect, may I humbly Suggest both as Editor and as Regional Trial Court Judge, based on the express provisions of Philippines Laws and settle jurisprudence and for this matter, I respectfully reproduce herein as part hereof my my reply and inputs my Consolidated Reply, Rejoinder and Noting of Suggestions by -Ianlopez1115 (talk) and Sources and evidence New "Copyright Rules for the Government" released by IPOPHIL Memorandum Circular 2020-024 July 3 2020 By IPO Director Rowel S. Barba - Sec. 3 a on Fair Use, and 4 which clearly states that NO PRIOR Approval is needed for use or photography of statues and all Government whether local or national works like Town City Halls facades etc. Judgefloro (talk) 07:33, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 07:13, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AndreyZakatin556 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyrighted logos from the internet
Stolbovsky (talk) 11:35, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 12:51, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
Blurry image - Wont ever be used, plenty of better images of the vehicle at Renault Kangoo I, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 17:46, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 12:52, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
A better version can be seen in here, copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 18:55, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 12:52, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
Photo from numerous of auto news website. Not likely own photo. Vauxford (talk) 22:24, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 12:52, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
Not an own work nor we know anything about scope. E4024 (talk) 23:16, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 12:52, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
Small file without camera EXIF; dubious own work. Scope? E4024 (talk) 23:29, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 12:52, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Dancing Rings, "Ang Pagbabago: Peace-Love" (Jose F. Datuin, Rizal Park, Manila)
[edit]Sculpture designed by Joe Datuin which made him the Grand Prize winner at the 2008 International Olympic Committee Sport and Art Competition. (source) There is also no Freedom of Panorama in the Philippines.
- File:09855jfDancing Rings Rizal Park Manilafvf 09.jpg
- File:09855jfDancing Rings Rizal Park Manilafvf 10.jpg
- File:09865jfDancing Rings Rizal Park Manilafvf 01.jpg
- File:09865jfDancing Rings Rizal Park Manilafvf 02.jpg
- File:09865jfDancing Rings Rizal Park Manilafvf 03.jpg
- File:09865jfDancing Rings Rizal Park Manilafvf 04.jpg
- File:09865jfDancing Rings Rizal Park Manilafvf 05.jpg
- File:09865jfDancing Rings Rizal Park Manilafvf 06.jpg
- File:09865jfDancing Rings Rizal Park Manilafvf 15.jpg
- File:09880jfDancing Rings Rizal Park Manilafvf 02.jpg
- File:09880jfDancing Rings Rizal Park Manilafvf 03.jpg
- File:09880jfDancing Rings Rizal Park Manilafvf 04.jpg
- File:09885jfDancing Rings Rizal Park Manilafvf 07.jpg
- File:09900jfDancing Rings Rizal Park Manilafvf 15.jpg
- File:09915jfDancing Rings Rizal Park Manilafvf 02.jpg
- File:09915jfDancing Rings Rizal Park Manilafvf 07.jpg
- File:09915jfDancing Rings Rizal Park Manilafvf 12.jpg
Howhontanozaz (talk) 11:38, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for your messages and good afternoon from hereat Bulacan; with all due respect, may I humbly Suggest both as Editor and as Regional Trial Court Judge, based on the express provisions of Philippines Laws and settle jurisprudence and for this matter, I respectfully reproduce herein as part hereof my my reply and inputs my Consolidated Reply, Rejoinder and Noting of Suggestions by -Ianlopez1115 (talk) and Sources and evidence New "Copyright Rules for the Government" released by IPOPHIL Memorandum Circular 2020-024 July 3 2020 By IPO Director Rowel S. Barba - Sec. 3 a on Fair Use, and 4 which clearly states that NO PRIOR Approval is needed for use or photography of statues and all Government whether local or national works like Town City Halls facades etc. Judgefloro (talk) 07:33, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Judgefloro: According to COM:FAIRUSE, "Wikimedia Commons does not accept fair use media files (such as non-free logos, covers, screenshots, or reproductions of other copyrighted works) because fair use laws vary from country to country—thus, content deemed acceptable under, for instance, US fair use concepts is not usable in the majority of other countries." Also, there is no proof that the sculpture's design is a government work. The designer himself won an award (1st place) from the International Olympic Committee for this very sculpture. Howhontanozaz (talk) 08:36, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for your messages and good afternoon from hereat Bulacan; with all due respect, may I humbly Suggest both as Editor and as Regional Trial Court Judge, based on the express provisions of Philippines Laws and settle jurisprudence and for this matter, I respectfully reproduce herein as part hereof my my reply and inputs my Consolidated Reply, Rejoinder and Noting of Suggestions by -Ianlopez1115 (talk) and Sources and evidence New "Copyright Rules for the Government" released by IPOPHIL Memorandum Circular 2020-024 July 3 2020 By IPO Director Rowel S. Barba - Sec. 3 a on Fair Use, and 4 which clearly states that NO PRIOR Approval is needed for use or photography of statues and all Government whether local or national works like Town City Halls facades etc. Judgefloro (talk) 07:33, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:32, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Dancing Rings, "Ang Pagbabago: Peace-Love" (Jose F. Datuin, Rizal Park, Manila)
[edit]In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Philippines.
- File:09855jfDancing Rings Rizal Park Manilafvf 05.jpg
- File:09855jfDancing Rings Rizal Park Manilafvf 06.jpg
- File:09880jfDancing Rings Rizal Park Manilafvf 05.jpg
- File:09885jfDancing Rings Rizal Park Manilafvf 01.jpg
- File:09885jfDancing Rings Rizal Park Manilafvf 02.jpg
- File:09885jfDancing Rings Rizal Park Manilafvf 03.jpg
- File:09885jfDancing Rings Rizal Park Manilafvf 04.jpg
- File:09885jfDancing Rings Rizal Park Manilafvf 05.jpg
- File:09885jfDancing Rings Rizal Park Manilafvf 06.jpg
- File:09885jfDancing Rings Rizal Park Manilafvf 08.jpg
- File:09885jfDancing Rings Rizal Park Manilafvf 09.jpg
- File:09885jfDancing Rings Rizal Park Manilafvf 10.jpg
- File:09885jfDancing Rings Rizal Park Manilafvf 11.jpg
- File:09885jfDancing Rings Rizal Park Manilafvf 12.jpg
- File:09885jfDancing Rings Rizal Park Manilafvf 13.jpg
- File:09885jfDancing Rings Rizal Park Manilafvf 14.jpg
- File:09885jfDancing Rings Rizal Park Manilafvf 15.jpg
- File:09900jfDancing Rings Rizal Park Manilafvf 01.jpg
- File:09900jfDancing Rings Rizal Park Manilafvf 02.jpg
- File:09900jfDancing Rings Rizal Park Manilafvf 03.jpg
- File:09900jfDancing Rings Rizal Park Manilafvf 04.jpg
- File:09900jfDancing Rings Rizal Park Manilafvf 05.jpg
- File:09900jfDancing Rings Rizal Park Manilafvf 06.jpg
- File:09900jfDancing Rings Rizal Park Manilafvf 07.jpg
- File:09900jfDancing Rings Rizal Park Manilafvf 08.jpg
- File:09900jfDancing Rings Rizal Park Manilafvf 10.jpg
- File:09900jfDancing Rings Rizal Park Manilafvf 11.jpg
- File:09900jfDancing Rings Rizal Park Manilafvf 12.jpg
- File:09900jfDancing Rings Rizal Park Manilafvf 13.jpg
- File:09915jfDancing Rings Rizal Park Manilafvf 03.jpg
- File:09915jfDancing Rings Rizal Park Manilafvf 04.jpg
- File:09915jfDancing Rings Rizal Park Manilafvf 11.jpg
- File:09915jfDancing Rings Rizal Park Manilafvf 13.jpg
- File:09915jfDancing Rings Rizal Park Manilafvf 14.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 04:03, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:58, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
User:ShohagS/copytag and 3 files which transclude it
[edit]Mumbo-jumbo. Does not specify the restricted re-uses. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:13, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: Thanks, Jeff. Please explain what you are trying to say. ~ A. Shohag (pingme||Talk) 12:15, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- @ShohagS: What are the "certain re-uses" you "legally restrict"? — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:21, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: What does the {{Personality rights}} have to say about personality rights? That's personal picture, I am the copyright holder. I can change the copyright issue in case. Doesn't that mean that I can restrict "certain reuses"? ~ A. Shohag (pingme||Talk) 12:27, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- @ShohagS: You didn't use {{Personality rights}}. You have to explain "certain reuses". — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:45, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: Exactly how? What more could be specified than a copyholder? I'd like to draw @1989: 's attention here. Please, need your opinion. ~ A. Shohag (pingme||Talk) 12:48, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- @ShohagS: Now, I see that you have specified {{Personality rights}} and included verbiage about model releases. I'd like to see those model releases per Child Protection and Obscenity Enforcement Act (18 U.S.C. § 2257). See also COM:USER#Not acceptable. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 17:18, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: Exactly how? What more could be specified than a copyholder? I'd like to draw @1989: 's attention here. Please, need your opinion. ~ A. Shohag (pingme||Talk) 12:48, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- @ShohagS: You didn't use {{Personality rights}}. You have to explain "certain reuses". — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:45, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: What does the {{Personality rights}} have to say about personality rights? That's personal picture, I am the copyright holder. I can change the copyright issue in case. Doesn't that mean that I can restrict "certain reuses"? ~ A. Shohag (pingme||Talk) 12:27, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- @ShohagS: What are the "certain re-uses" you "legally restrict"? — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:21, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep As these files are not obscene or by any stretch of imagination a form of pornography, there is no reason to delete the files. As for the warning, I think it needs to be fixed. If it talks about incorporation of these images into some form of pornographic collage, then it is the US law that disallows it, not the copyright holder. If it talks about something else, it needs to be made clear and potentially it will contradict licence that is chosen, at which time we can give uploader a choice to delete the files or to accept the free licence. At no time should we force an uploader to distribute personal information of children depicted in the images. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 05:45, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
- I would like to summarize it. Before that, I have question, why en:Child Protection and Obscenity Enforcement Act is coming along? These are my personal pictures. And why would you need to involve this?
- I used {{Personality rights}} at first with my custom tag (Which is another form of {{Personality rights}} tag with just a green copyright icon), Then User:1989 corrected me having a small conversation. He indicated it as redundancy and replaced {{Personality rights}} tag with my custom tag. That's just it. If anyone can use {{Personality rights}} tag for their personal pictures, then why can't I use my custom tag along? Before closing, I'd like to hear from @1989: , if he is in wiki. ~ A. Shohag (pingme||Talk) 09:00, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
- I think this may have been some sort of misunderstanding. Perhaps somebody has misread what the template has said or something like that. I would personally prefer to use existing tags when they already exist rather than inventing personal ones, perhaps you can go back to using {{personality rights}} and the whole issue would be moot. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 13:38, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Files are not owned by the subject itself. Permission needed, otherwise should be deleted. ~Moheen (keep talking) 14:51, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Moheen: I didn't get you. What permissions you are talking about? ~ A. Shohag (pingme||Talk) 03:50, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
- @ShohagS: ছবিগুলো আপনার তোলা নয়। তাই আলোকচিত্রশিল্পীর অনুমতি প্রয়োজন। ~Moheen (keep talking) 07:18, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Moheen: I didn't get you. What permissions you are talking about? ~ A. Shohag (pingme||Talk) 03:50, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: and replaced it with {{Personality rights}} on the images. --JuTa 12:50, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
eduardo castrillo (d 2016) is thesculptor so UNFREE. NO freedo. of pano in phils Mrcl lxmna (talk) 17:30, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
After research on links related to "Category:Philippine FOP cases/pending", going to those grouped under "deleted", i visited [[Commons:Deletion requests/Bonifacio Shrine in Manila which also eliminated the photos pf the sculpture. So i have a legal precedent to conduct this deletion request. Mrcl lxmna
- Delete sadly. Kartilya ng Katipunan Shrine is certainly by w:Eduardo Castrillo who died in 2016. Still, no freedom of panorama in the Philippines. Undelete when FOP is introduced in the Philippines (if ever the subject of this file qualifies for the future Philippine FOP), just like the cases of Armenian (2013) and Belgian (2016) architecture and artistic works, when FOP was introduced in both countries. Nevertheless, IPOPHL has indicated in a November 2020 email reply to Higad Rail Fan that they are open for a dialogue with the Wikimedia Foundation with regards to FOP matter. When will this dialogue (to be initiated by WMF according to the email-reply) occur is yet to be seen, but hopefully sooner than later. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:28, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 13:09, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Doesn't seem to be much but an implausible redirect. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 08:56, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
- Keep Is the existence of this redirect any kind of a problem that it needs to be deleted? --Mormegil (talk) 09:40, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
- Comment Of course if it is useful it should be kept, could you explain how it is used, or expected to be used? --Tony Wills (talk) 09:49, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
- To access the Commons’ Main Page in English, you just go to http://commons.wikimedia.org; to access the Main Page in Czech, you need to go to http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Hlavn%C3%AD_strana, which is quite a nuisance when you are trying to send people to Commons. I would use just cs, but that goes to Caesium (which is probably correct). --Mormegil (talk) 18:12, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
- Keep It has a use, no reason to delete --Tony Wills (talk) 20:24, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
- To access the Commons’ Main Page in English, you just go to http://commons.wikimedia.org; to access the Main Page in Czech, you need to go to http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Hlavn%C3%AD_strana, which is quite a nuisance when you are trying to send people to Commons. I would use just cs, but that goes to Caesium (which is probably correct). --Mormegil (talk) 18:12, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
Kept Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 18:37, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
Completely unneeded redirect and no longer in use. Leonel Небојша Sohns 17:26, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
And also:
Talk:/cs --Leonel Небојша Sohns 17:38, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Did you read the above? What has changed since then (what does it mean “no longer in use”)? Is there any new way how to send people to the Commons Main Page in Czech? --Mormegil (talk) 08:27, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
This is an redirect to Wikimedia Commons Main Page in Czech, The Main Page in Czech is in the page 'Hlavní_strana' and the redirect is completely unneeded and i entered the word 'no longer in use' because no other pages link to the page '/cs' --Leonel Небојша Sohns 14:00, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, I know what this is. Once again: Did you read the above? The redirect was never “in use” in the sense other pages on Commons would link to it, so “no longer in use” does not make sense.
- Even though with the w.wiki URL shortener, we have another possibility now. However, old links still lead to it. Is the existence of this redirect any kind of a problem that it needs to be deleted? We have already spent more space and energy debating it.
- --Mormegil (talk) 09:45, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 00:18, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
architect is the still alive Felino Palafox born in 1950. built in 2011. no freedom of panorama in the phils guaranteeing free and unrestricted reuse and reuse of photos of copyrighted architecture and sculptures
- File:Cotabato City Grand Mosque Bird eye view.jpg
- File:Sultan Hajji Hassanal Bolkhia Mosque 1.jpg
- File:Sultan Hajji Hassanal Bolkhia Mosque 2.jpg
- File:Sultan Hajji Hassanal Bolkhia Mosque 3.jpg
- File:Sultan Hajji Hassanal Bolkhia Mosque 4.jpg
- File:Sultan Hajji Hassanal Bolkhia Mosque 5.jpg
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 17:46, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 12:13, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
Photographs of the Leyte Landing Memorial
[edit]See Commons:Deletion requests/Photographs of the Leyte Landing Memorial "The photographs are public domain or appropriately licensed, but the statues are installed in Philippines, a country with no freedom of panorama (Commons:Freedom of panorama#Philippines); the photographs are derivative works of the statues and the permission of the statues' copyright holders have to be obtained (Commons:Derivative works). The memorial is commissioned by Ferdinand Marcos,[4] which would put the erection during 1960s–1980s. The artist is Anastacio Caedo (1907–1990),[5] which means the statues are copyrighted until 2041 under Phillipines laws (Commons:Licensing#The Philippines)."
- File:Commemoration of Op Damayan, 2014 141116-M-WN441-446.jpg
- File:Gen. Douglas MacArthur Landing Monument 01.JPG
- File:Gen. Douglas McArthur.jpg
- File:General MacArthur.JPG
- File:I shall return!.jpg
- File:Leyte Landing Memorial.jpg
- File:Leyte Landng Memorial.jpg
- File:Mac Arthur Landing.jpg
- File:MacArther Park - Leyte - Tacloban - panoramio.jpg
- File:MacArthur Landing Memorial National Park, Leyte.jpg
- File:MacArthur Landing Memorial National Park.jpg
- File:MacArthur Landing Memorial, Palo, Leyte.JPG
- File:MacArthur Landing Site in Palo, Leyte, Philippines.jpg
- File:MacArthur Landing Site, Palo, Leyte, Philippines.jpg
- File:MacArthur Landing Site.JPG
- File:MacArthur Leyte Landing Memorial in Tacloban City.jpg
- File:MacArthur Leyte Landing National Memorial Park.jpg
- File:Macarthurpark.JPG
- File:McArthur Landing Site.JPG
- File:McArthur Park.jpg
- File:Phils Leyte MacArthur Landing Memorial Palo.JPG
- File:Tacloban Red Beach.JPG
- File:US Navy 041020-N-0493B-003 Backed by a monument marking the location of Gen. Douglas MacArthur's return to the Philippines 60 years ago, a Philippine Marine Corps honor guard stands at attention during the playing of Taps.jpg
Howhontanozaz (talk) 13:44, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
- Keep File:US Navy 041020-N-0493B-003 Backed by a monument marking the location of Gen. Douglas MacArthur's return to the Philippines 60 years ago, a Philippine Marine Corps honor guard stands at attention during the playing of Taps.jpg as de minimis. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:56, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
- Keep for that one ^ because de mimis. Multichill (talk) 20:55, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
- Delete all but the US Navy file.
Can the nominator strike that one out and we can discuss the remaining ones? A number do seem problematic.The others are problematic. The remaining seem to be problematic. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 01:23, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination except one file. --Green Giant (talk) 17:01, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Leyte Landing Memorial
[edit]Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Leyte Landing Memorial. No Freedom of Panorama in the Philippines.
- File:General MacArthur landing site, Leyte.jpg
- File:Leovlauzon3089 0009.jpg
- File:MacArhur Landing Memorial Park.jpg
- File:McArthur Landing.jpg
Howhontanozaz (talk) 12:53, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Move MacArhur Landing Memorial Park.jpg (and crop out the excess space above) to English Wikipedia and upload under fair use as the main image for . Other images has issues to be of use (watermarks, too much contrast making the sculpture details undistinguishable)Hariboneagle927 (talk) Delete the rest. 08:18, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 12:19, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
Busts at Category:Mabini Shrine in Tanauan
[edit]Probably copyrighted busts and paintings plus flat arts. the bust inside was designed by G.T. Nepomuceno (https://www.thepoortraveler.net/2012/03/apolinario-mabini-shrine-tanauan-city-batangas/) who died in 1974 (https://www.flickr.com/photos/28098727@N00/34122540564). no freedom of pano in the phils that allows all and free forms of reuse of photos of copyrighted bldgs and sculptures that doesnt compromise the rights of the creators or their heirs within the 50 yr copyright duration period
- File:Apolinario Mabini bust.jpg
- File:Apolinario Mabini Tomb in Tanauan.jpg
- File:Apolinario Mabini's Tomb.jpg
- File:Mabini Shrine (Tomb).JPG
- File:Mabini's tomb.JPG
- File:MabiniShrinejf8845 03.JPG
- File:MabiniShrinejf8845 04.JPG
- File:MabiniShrinejf8845 05.JPG
- File:MabiniShrinejf8845 06.JPG
- File:MabiniShrinejf8845 07.JPG
- File:MabiniShrinejf8845 08.JPG
- File:MabiniShrinejf8845 09.JPG
- File:MabiniShrinejf8845 16.JPG
- File:MabiniShrinejf8845 17.JPG
- File:MabiniShrinejf8845 20.JPG
- File:MabiniShrinejf8845 21.JPG
- File:MabiniShrinejf8845 31.JPG
- File:MabiniShrineTanauanjf8721 20.JPG
- File:MabiniShrineTanauanjf8721 21.JPG
- File:MabiniShrineTanauanjf8721 22.JPG
- File:MabiniShrineTanauanjf8721 23.JPG
- File:MabiniShrineTanauanjf8721 25.JPG
- File:MabiniShrineTanauanjf8721 26.JPG
- File:MabiniShrineTanauanjf8721 27.JPG
- File:MabiniShrineTanauanjf8754 02.JPG
- File:MabiniShrineTanauanjf8754 03.JPG
- File:MabiniShrineTanauanjf8754 04.JPG
- File:MabiniShrineTanauanjf8754 05.JPG
- File:MabiniShrineTanauanjf8754 06.JPG
- File:MabiniShrineTanauanjf8754 07.JPG
- File:MabiniShrineTanauanjf8754 08.JPG
- File:MabiniShrineTanauanjf8754 09.JPG
- File:MabiniShrineTanauanjf8754 13.JPG
- File:MabiniShrineTanauanjf8754 14.JPG
- File:MabiniShrineTanauanjf8754 20.JPG
- File:MabiniShrineTanauanjf8754 21.JPG
- File:MabiniShrineTanauanjf8754 22.JPG
- File:MabiniShrineTanauanjf8754 23.JPG
- File:MabiniShrineTanauanjf8770 21.JPG
- File:MabiniShrineTanauanjf8770 22.JPG
- File:MabiniShrineTanauanjf8770 24.JPG
- File:MabiniShrineTanauanjf8770 27.JPG
- File:MabiniShrineTanauanjf8770 28.JPG
- File:MabiniShrineTanauanjf8770 30.JPG
- File:MabiniShrineTanauanjf8770 32.JPG
- File:MabiniShrineTanauanjf8770 33.JPG
- File:Memoir of the Former President.jpg
- File:Statue of the former President.jpg
- File:Tanauan,BatangasShrinejf8814 04.JPG
- File:Tanauan,BatangasShrinejf8814 10.JPG
- File:Tanauan,BatangasShrinejf8814 11.JPG
- File:The Tomb of Apolinario Mabini.jpg
- File:Tomb of Apolinario Mabini.jpg
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 18:24, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
4 years prescription since 2015 under the New 2019 SC Circular vis-à-vis Copyright law to question any FOP matter: a Legal Bar due to Extinctive Prescription to delete my photos and of User:Ramon FVelasquez as tagged by the Smart One September 2020 Mass Deletions
[edit]- I sincerely hope that Editors will note my Underscoring of the 4 years Legal Bar on Deletion of FOP photos, I repeat from 2016, thus the tons of Mass Deletions tags by the Smart One on RamonFVelasquez should be stricken off the Talk Page as grave violations of Criminal Law ...
- The shrine statue are owned by the Local and National Government, hence outside the bounds of Copyright FOPs
- Keep Keep Because the Nominator has been blocked recently due to mass deletion nominations. It is fervently petitioned that - going to keep this for now until someone else can nominate if they see fit; Wherefore premises considered I humbly register my Strong Objection to this and the Mass Deletions Requests of this Single Editor, respectfully respectfully Judgefloro (talk) 08:10, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 12:30, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
copyrighted by jose m mendoza in 1973 based onhttp://www.ayalatriangle.com/attractions/sultan-kudarat-monument. no freedom of panorama in the phils
- File:09032jfUrdaneta Zuellig Building Sultan Muhammad Kudarat Paseo de Roxas Makati Avenuesfvf 27.jpg
- File:09032jfUrdaneta Zuellig Building Sultan Muhammad Kudarat Paseo de Roxas Makati Avenuesfvf 28.jpg
- File:09032jfUrdaneta Zuellig Building Sultan Muhammad Kudarat Paseo de Roxas Makati Avenuesfvf 29.jpg
- File:09032jfUrdaneta Zuellig Building Sultan Muhammad Kudarat Paseo de Roxas Makati Avenuesfvf 30.jpg
- File:09032jfUrdaneta Zuellig Building Sultan Muhammad Kudarat Paseo de Roxas Makati Avenuesfvf 31.jpg
- File:09032jfUrdaneta Zuellig Building Sultan Muhammad Kudarat Paseo de Roxas Makati Avenuesfvf 32.jpg
- File:09032jfUrdaneta Zuellig Building Sultan Muhammad Kudarat Paseo de Roxas Makati Avenuesfvf 33.jpg
- File:09032jfUrdaneta Zuellig Building Sultan Muhammad Kudarat Paseo de Roxas Makati Avenuesfvf 34.jpg
- File:09032jfUrdaneta Zuellig Building Sultan Muhammad Kudarat Paseo de Roxas Makati Avenuesfvf 35.jpg
- File:09032jfUrdaneta Zuellig Building Sultan Muhammad Kudarat Paseo de Roxas Makati Avenuesfvf 36.jpg
- File:09032jfUrdaneta Zuellig Building Sultan Muhammad Kudarat Paseo de Roxas Makati Avenuesfvf 37.jpg
- File:09032jfUrdaneta Zuellig Building Sultan Muhammad Kudarat Paseo de Roxas Makati Avenuesfvf 38.jpg
- File:09032jfUrdaneta Zuellig Building Sultan Muhammad Kudarat Paseo de Roxas Makati Avenuesfvf 41.jpg
- File:09032jfUrdaneta Zuellig Building Sultan Muhammad Kudarat Paseo de Roxas Makati Avenuesfvf 42.jpg
- File:09032jfUrdaneta Zuellig Building Sultan Muhammad Kudarat Paseo de Roxas Makati Avenuesfvf 43.jpg
- File:09032jfUrdaneta Zuellig Building Sultan Muhammad Kudarat Paseo de Roxas Makati Avenuesfvf 44.jpg
- File:09032jfUrdaneta Zuellig Building Sultan Muhammad Kudarat Paseo de Roxas Makati Avenuesfvf 45.jpg
- File:09032jfUrdaneta Zuellig Building Sultan Muhammad Kudarat Paseo de Roxas Makati Avenuesfvf 46.jpg
- File:09032jfUrdaneta Zuellig Building Sultan Muhammad Kudarat Paseo de Roxas Makati Avenuesfvf 47.jpg
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 17:10, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for your messages and good afternoon from hereat Bulacan; with all due respect, may I humbly Suggest both as Editor and as Regional Trial Court Judge, based on the express provisions of Philippines Laws and settle jurisprudence and for this matter, I respectfully reproduce herein as part hereof my my reply and inputs my Consolidated Reply, Rejoinder and Noting of Suggestions by -Ianlopez1115 (talk) and Sources and evidence New "Copyright Rules for the Government" released by IPOPHIL Memorandum Circular 2020-024 July 3 2020 By IPO Director Rowel S. Barba - Sec. 3 a on Fair Use, and 4 which clearly states that NO PRIOR Approval is needed for use or photography of statues and all Government whether local or national works like Town City Halls facades etc. Judgefloro (talk) 07:36, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
@Judgefloro: that is wrong. You MUST need permission from the heirs of Jose Mendoza before taking photos and uploading them here. Ownership and copyright are different. Makati City or other entity doesnt own the copyright of this statue. Its the heirs of Mendoza. Do you have permission from Mr. Mendozas heirs? Mrcl lxmna (talk) 13:26, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Because the photos are unimportant DE MINIS so to speak and the photos are part of Tourist attractions or Heritage of the Local or National Government and theTourism Office of the Philippines, including the Museum of Political Arts etc. granted me express permissions to take Tourist and interesting points photos for it is for their political advantages in the comming election, hosting for free in a great encyclopedia; hence DE MINIS in Commons and Phil Law; No copyright exists in them, and
- In support of my stance, opposition to the deltion and inputs, I am respectfully submitting to the editors and Commons adminstrators my legal treatise on the matter as I copy paste and discuss Strong Evidence against the Nominators Mass Deletion Requests, to wit:
FOP matter update: Rejoinder
|
|---|
Rejoinder II : the case of Yuraily Lic is 100x different in the Philippine Mass Deletions: Reason: our 2012 Cybercrime and Stalking Law is absolutely different from theirs, if any: I have no objection to Deletions by any editor or administrator regarding FOP cases in Philippines, but, but and but - the Mass Deletions Requests placed on my talk page since September by a single new editor falls squarely with the 4 corners of Cybercrime * (My midnight thoughts out of no FOP in the Philippines frustration) It seems you are a "disciple" or follower of Yuraily Lic! I can notice your DR's nearly similar to their's, and Yuraily had an issue similar to yours at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 79#Yuraily Lic, mass tagging and nominating copyrighted buildings and artworks for no FOP reasons with little or no evidences (other than links to Commons pages). Just my thoughts only. BTW, you seem to have some luck today, as the latest (as of today) copyright-related webinars in our country — the October 30, 2020 FB Live webinar of the Office for Alternative Dispute Resolution (OADR) (in which important people from IPOPHL were among its principal guests) — has no mention of FoP, de minimis or whatsoever. But nevertheless, our call and advocacy for full FOP in the Philippines continues, albeit intermittently now. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:20, 9 November 2020 (UTC)"
Rectifying my mistakes and instead report here phil bldg and sculpture photos Hello everyone. Its my biggest mistake to have made mass deletions. I sincerely appologise most esp to the moderator @Mutichill:. I will not do those deletions by myself again. Instaed i will forward here some violations on phil photos of bldgs and sculotures.
|
I fervently hope that Commons editors would wait for the Reply or replies to my 2 letters or your would be filed draft to final letters to IPO or DOJ secretary; in the meantime; : "Respectfully submitted ..." as I register my Strong Objection to the Mass Deletions of a single Nominator very sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 08:04, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:26, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Most likely copyrighted sculpture and no freedom of pano in the phils
- File:09718jfLiwasang Bonifacio Bridge MacArthur Statue Landmarks Ermita Manilafvf.jpg
- File:09719jfLiwasang Bonifacio Bridge MacArthur Statue Landmarks Ermita Manilafvf.jpg
- File:09720jfLiwasang Bonifacio Bridge MacArthur Statue Landmarks Ermita Manilafvf.jpg
- File:09721jfLiwasang Bonifacio Bridge MacArthur Statue Landmarks Ermita Manilafvf.jpg
- File:09722jfLiwasang Bonifacio Bridge MacArthur Statue Landmarks Ermita Manilafvf.jpg
- File:09723jfLiwasang Bonifacio Bridge MacArthur Statue Landmarks Ermita Manilafvf.jpg
- File:09724jfLiwasang Bonifacio Bridge MacArthur Statue Landmarks Ermita Manilafvf.jpg
- File:09725jfLiwasang Bonifacio Bridge MacArthur Statue Landmarks Ermita Manilafvf.jpg
- File:09726jfLiwasang Bonifacio Bridge MacArthur Statue Landmarks Ermita Manilafvf.jpg
- File:09727jfLiwasang Bonifacio Bridge MacArthur Statue Landmarks Ermita Manilafvf.jpg
- File:09728jfLiwasang Bonifacio Bridge MacArthur Statue Landmarks Ermita Manilafvf.jpg
- File:09729jfLiwasang Bonifacio Bridge MacArthur Statue Landmarks Ermita Manilafvf.jpg
- File:09730jfLiwasang Bonifacio Bridge MacArthur Statue Landmarks Ermita Manilafvf.jpg
- File:09731jfLiwasang Bonifacio Bridge MacArthur Statue Landmarks Ermita Manilafvf.jpg
- File:09732jfLiwasang Bonifacio Bridge MacArthur Statue Landmarks Ermita Manilafvf.jpg
- File:09733jfLiwasang Bonifacio Bridge MacArthur Statue Landmarks Ermita Manilafvf.jpg
- File:09734jfLiwasang Bonifacio Bridge MacArthur Statue Landmarks Ermita Manilafvf.jpg
- File:09735jfLiwasang Bonifacio Bridge MacArthur Statue Landmarks Ermita Manilafvf.jpg
- File:09736jfLiwasang Bonifacio Bridge MacArthur Statue Landmarks Ermita Manilafvf.jpg
- File:09737jfLiwasang Bonifacio Bridge MacArthur Statue Landmarks Ermita Manilafvf.jpg
- File:09963jfErmita Manila Theater Liwasang Bonifacio East Overpassfvf 45.jpg
- File:09963jfErmita Manila Theater Liwasang Bonifacio East Overpassfvf 46.jpg
- File:09963jfErmita Manila Theater Liwasang Bonifacio East Overpassfvf 47.jpg
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 17:17, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for your messages and good afternoon from hereat Bulacan; with all due respect, may I humbly Suggest both as Editor and as Regional Trial Court Judge, based on the express provisions of Philippines Laws and settled jurisprudence and for this matter, I respectfully reproduce herein as part hereof my my reply and inputs my Consolidated Reply, Rejoinder and Noting of Suggestions by -Ianlopez1115 (talk) and Sources and evidence New "Copyright Rules for the Government" released by IPOPHIL Memorandum Circular 2020-024 July 3 2020 By IPO Director Rowel S. Barba - Sec. 3 a on Fair Use, and 4 which clearly states that NO PRIOR Approval is needed for use or photography of statues and all Government whether local or national works like Town City Halls facades etc. Judgefloro (talk) 07:38, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Because the photos are unimportant DE MINIS so to speak and the photos are part of Tourist attractions or Heritage of the Local or National Government and theTourism Office of the Philippines, including the Museum of Political Arts etc. granted me express permissions to take Tourist and interesting points photos for it is for their political advantages in the comming election, hosting for free in a great encyclopedia; hence DE MINIS in Commons and Phil Law; No copyright exists in them, and
- In support of my stance, opposition to the deltion and inputs, I am respectfully submitting to the editors and Commons adminstrators my legal treatise on the matter as I copy paste and discuss Strong Evidence against the Nominators Mass Deletion Requests, to wit:
FOP matter update: Rejoinder
|
|---|
Rejoinder II : the case of Yuraily Lic is 100x different in the Philippine Mass Deletions: Reason: our 2012 Cybercrime and Stalking Law is absolutely different from theirs, if any: I have no objection to Deletions by any editor or administrator regarding FOP cases in Philippines, but, but and but - the Mass Deletions Requests placed on my talk page since September by a single new editor falls squarely with the 4 corners of Cybercrime * (My midnight thoughts out of no FOP in the Philippines frustration) It seems you are a "disciple" or follower of Yuraily Lic! I can notice your DR's nearly similar to their's, and Yuraily had an issue similar to yours at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 79#Yuraily Lic, mass tagging and nominating copyrighted buildings and artworks for no FOP reasons with little or no evidences (other than links to Commons pages). Just my thoughts only. BTW, you seem to have some luck today, as the latest (as of today) copyright-related webinars in our country — the October 30, 2020 FB Live webinar of the Office for Alternative Dispute Resolution (OADR) (in which important people from IPOPHL were among its principal guests) — has no mention of FoP, de minimis or whatsoever. But nevertheless, our call and advocacy for full FOP in the Philippines continues, albeit intermittently now. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:20, 9 November 2020 (UTC)"
Rectifying my mistakes and instead report here phil bldg and sculpture photos Hello everyone. Its my biggest mistake to have made mass deletions. I sincerely appologise most esp to the moderator @Mutichill:. I will not do those deletions by myself again. Instaed i will forward here some violations on phil photos of bldgs and sculotures.
|
I fervently hope that Commons editors would wait for the Reply or replies to my 2 letters or your would be filed draft to final letters to IPO or DOJ secretary; in the meantime; : "Respectfully submitted ..." as I register my Strong Objection to the Mass Deletions of a single Nominator very sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 08:05, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:19, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
no freedom of pano for copyrighted bldgs and sculptures in the phil
- File:0211jfPlazuela Madre Francisca del Espiritu Santo de Fuentes Intramurosfvf.jpg
- File:0219jfPlazuela Francisca Baluarte de San Gabriel Intramurosfvf.jpg
- File:0220jfPlazuela Francisca Baluarte de San Gabriel Intramurosfvf.jpg
- File:0221jfPlazuela Francisca Baluarte de San Gabriel Intramurosfvf.jpg
- File:0222jfPlazuela Francisca Baluarte de San Gabriel Intramurosfvf.jpg
- File:Beaterio de Sta. Catalina.JPG
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 17:25, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for your messages and good afternoon from hereat Bulacan; with all due respect, may I humbly Suggest both as Editor and as Regional Trial Court Judge, based on the express provisions of Philippines Laws and settled jurisprudence and for this matter, I respectfully reproduce herein as part hereof my my reply and inputs my Consolidated Reply, Rejoinder and Noting of Suggestions by -Ianlopez1115 (talk) and Sources and evidence New "Copyright Rules for the Government" released by IPOPHIL Memorandum Circular 2020-024 July 3 2020 By IPO Director Rowel S. Barba - Sec. 3 a on Fair Use, and 4 which clearly states that NO PRIOR Approval is needed for use or photography of statues and all Government whether local or national works like Town City Halls facades etc. Judgefloro (talk) 07:38, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Because the photos are unimportant DE MINIS so to speak and the photos are part of Tourist attractions or Heritage of the Local or National Government and theTourism Office of the Philippines, including the Museum of Political Arts etc. granted me express permissions to take Tourist and interesting points photos for it is for their political advantages in the comming election, hosting for free in a great encyclopedia; hence DE MINIS in Commons and Phil Law; No copyright exists in them, and
- In support of my stance, opposition to the deltion and inputs, I am respectfully submitting to the editors and Commons adminstrators my legal treatise on the matter as I copy paste and discuss Strong Evidence against the Nominators Mass Deletion Requests, to wit:
FOP matter update: Rejoinder
|
|---|
Rejoinder II : the case of Yuraily Lic is 100x different in the Philippine Mass Deletions: Reason: our 2012 Cybercrime and Stalking Law is absolutely different from theirs, if any: I have no objection to Deletions by any editor or administrator regarding FOP cases in Philippines, but, but and but - the Mass Deletions Requests placed on my talk page since September by a single new editor falls squarely with the 4 corners of Cybercrime * (My midnight thoughts out of no FOP in the Philippines frustration) It seems you are a "disciple" or follower of Yuraily Lic! I can notice your DR's nearly similar to their's, and Yuraily had an issue similar to yours at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 79#Yuraily Lic, mass tagging and nominating copyrighted buildings and artworks for no FOP reasons with little or no evidences (other than links to Commons pages). Just my thoughts only. BTW, you seem to have some luck today, as the latest (as of today) copyright-related webinars in our country — the October 30, 2020 FB Live webinar of the Office for Alternative Dispute Resolution (OADR) (in which important people from IPOPHL were among its principal guests) — has no mention of FoP, de minimis or whatsoever. But nevertheless, our call and advocacy for full FOP in the Philippines continues, albeit intermittently now. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:20, 9 November 2020 (UTC)"
Rectifying my mistakes and instead report here phil bldg and sculpture photos Hello everyone. Its my biggest mistake to have made mass deletions. I sincerely appologise most esp to the moderator @Mutichill:. I will not do those deletions by myself again. Instaed i will forward here some violations on phil photos of bldgs and sculotures.
|
I fervently hope that Commons editors would wait for the Reply or replies to my 2 letters or your would be filed draft to final letters to IPO or DOJ secretary; in the meantime; : "Respectfully submitted ..." as I register my Strong Objection to the Mass Deletions of a single Nominator very sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 08:05, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:18, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:The Heritage of Cebu Monument
[edit]No Freedom of Panorama in the Philippines.
- File:Cebu city heritage monument.jpg
- File:Cebu Heritage Monument.jpg
- File:Heritage monument Cebu City.jpg
- File:Heritage of Cebu Monument, Cebu City - Pedro Calungsod.JPG
Howhontanozaz (talk) 11:43, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
I would love to have my entry deleted since I have been wanting it to be removed since this photo was accidentally uploaded.
- @2001:4454:14c:4600:cfb:b235:4531:b450: which entry (or photo)? Please answer or respond at the "main" discussion page, not this talk page of the said discussion page as this is usually skipped by most admins. Thank you. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:26, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:22, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
bldg seems modern. no freedom.of pano in phils
- File:09080jfUrdaneta Bel-Air Zuellig Building BDO Paseo de Roxas Makati Avenuesfvf 27.jpg
- File:09080jfUrdaneta Bel-Air Zuellig Building BDO Paseo de Roxas Makati Avenuesfvf 28.jpg
- File:09080jfUrdaneta Bel-Air Zuellig Building BDO Paseo de Roxas Makati Avenuesfvf 37.jpg
- File:09080jfUrdaneta Bel-Air Zuellig Building BDO Paseo de Roxas Makati Avenuesfvf 38.jpg
- File:09080jfUrdaneta Bel-Air Zuellig Building BDO Paseo de Roxas Makati Avenuesfvf 39.jpg
- File:09080jfUrdaneta Bel-Air Zuellig Building BDO Paseo de Roxas Makati Avenuesfvf 43.jpg
- File:09080jfUrdaneta Bel-Air Zuellig Building BDO Paseo de Roxas Makati Avenuesfvf 44.jpg
- File:09080jfUrdaneta Bel-Air Zuellig Building BDO Paseo de Roxas Makati Avenuesfvf 45.jpg
- File:09080jfUrdaneta Bel-Air Zuellig Building BDO Paseo de Roxas Makati Avenuesfvf 46.jpg
- File:09080jfUrdaneta Bel-Air Zuellig Building BDO Paseo de Roxas Makati Avenuesfvf 47.jpg
- File:09080jfUrdaneta Bel-Air Zuellig Building BDO Paseo de Roxas Makati Avenuesfvf 48.jpg
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 17:00, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for your messages and good afternoon from hereat Bulacan; with all due respect, may I humbly Suggest both as Editor and as Regional Trial Court Judge, based on the express provisions of Philippines Laws and settle jurisprudence and for this matter, I respectfully reproduce herein as part hereof my my reply and inputs my Consolidated Reply, Rejoinder and Noting of Suggestions by -Ianlopez1115 (talk) and Sources and evidence Judgefloro (talk) 07:34, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Because the photos are unimportant DE MINIS so to speak and the photos are part of Tourist attractions or Heritage of the Local or National Government and theTourism Office of the Philippines, including the Museum of Political Arts etc. granted me express permissions to take Tourist and interesting points photos for it is for their political advantages in the comming election, hosting for free in a great encyclopedia; hence DE MINIS in Commons and Phil Law; No copyright exists in them, and
- In support of my stance, opposition to the deltion and inputs, I am respectfully submitting to the editors and Commons adminstrators my legal treatise on the matter as I copy paste and discuss Strong Evidence against the Nominators Mass Deletion Requests, to wit:
FOP matter update: Rejoinder
|
|---|
Rejoinder II : the case of Yuraily Lic is 100x different in the Philippine Mass Deletions: Reason: our 2012 Cybercrime and Stalking Law is absolutely different from theirs, if any: I have no objection to Deletions by any editor or administrator regarding FOP cases in Philippines, but, but and but - the Mass Deletions Requests placed on my talk page since September by a single new editor falls squarely with the 4 corners of Cybercrime[edit]* (My midnight thoughts out of no FOP in the Philippines frustration) It seems you are a "disciple" or follower of Yuraily Lic! I can notice your DR's nearly similar to their's, and Yuraily had an issue similar to yours at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 79#Yuraily Lic, mass tagging and nominating copyrighted buildings and artworks for no FOP reasons with little or no evidences (other than links to Commons pages). Just my thoughts only. BTW, you seem to have some luck today, as the latest (as of today) copyright-related webinars in our country — the October 30, 2020 FB Live webinar of the Office for Alternative Dispute Resolution (OADR) (in which important people from IPOPHL were among its principal guests) — has no mention of FoP, de minimis or whatsoever. But nevertheless, our call and advocacy for full FOP in the Philippines continues, albeit intermittently now. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:20, 9 November 2020 (UTC)"
Rectifying my mistakes and instead report here phil bldg and sculpture photos Hello everyone. Its my biggest mistake to have made mass deletions. I sincerely appologise most esp to the moderator @Mutichill:. I will not do those deletions by myself again. Instaed i will forward here some violations on phil photos of bldgs and sculotures.[edit]
|
I fervently hope that Commons editors would wait for the Reply or replies to my 2 letters or your would be filed draft to final letters to IPO or DOJ secretary; in the meantime; : "Respectfully submitted ..." as I register my Strong Objection to the Mass Deletions of a single Nominator very sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 08:03, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:39, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
no freedom of pano in the phils that allows all and free forms of reuse of photos of copyrighted bldgs and sculptures that doesnt compromise the rights of the creators or their heirs within the 50 yr copyright duration period
- File:2163Imus City Barangays Landmarks 07.jpg
- File:2163Imus City Barangays Landmarks 08.jpg
- File:2402Imus City Barangays Landmarks 27.jpg
- File:2402Imus City Barangays Landmarks 29.jpg
- File:2402Imus City Barangays Landmarks 30.jpg
- File:2402Imus City Barangays Landmarks 31.jpg
- File:2402Imus City Barangays Landmarks 32.jpg
- File:2402Imus City Barangays Landmarks 33.jpg
- File:2402Imus City Barangays Landmarks 35.jpg
- File:2402Imus City Barangays Landmarks 36.jpg
- File:2402Imus City Barangays Landmarks 37.jpg
- File:2402Imus City Barangays Landmarks 47.jpg
- File:2460Imus City Barangays Landmarks 01.jpg
- File:2460Imus City Barangays Landmarks 02.jpg
- File:2460Imus City Barangays Landmarks 03.jpg
- File:2460Imus City Barangays Landmarks 04.jpg
- File:2460Imus City Barangays Landmarks 05.jpg
- File:2460Imus City Barangays Landmarks 06.jpg
- File:2460Imus City Barangays Landmarks 07.jpg
- File:2460Imus City Barangays Landmarks 13.jpg
- File:2460Imus City Barangays Landmarks 14.jpg
- File:2460Imus City Barangays Landmarks 15.jpg
- File:2460Imus City Barangays Landmarks 16.jpg
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 18:29, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for your messages and good afternoon from hereat Bulacan; with all due respect, may I humbly Suggest both as Editor and as Regional Trial Court Judge, based on the express provisions of Philippines Laws and settled jurisprudence and for this matter, I respectfully reproduce herein as part hereof my my reply and inputs my Consolidated Reply, Rejoinder and Noting of Suggestions by -Ianlopez1115 (talk) and Sources and evidence New "Copyright Rules for the Government" released by IPOPHIL Memorandum Circular 2020-024 July 3 2020 By IPO Director Rowel S. Barba - Sec. 3 a on Fair Use, and 4 which clearly states that NO PRIOR Approval is needed for use or photography of statues and all Government whether local or national works like Town City Halls facades etc. Judgefloro (talk) 07:38, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Because the photos are unimportant DE MINIS so to speak and the photos are part of Tourist attractions or Heritage of the Local or National Government and theTourism Office of the Philippines, including the Museum of Political Arts etc. granted me express permissions to take Tourist and interesting points photos for it is for their political advantages in the comming election, hosting for free in a great encyclopedia; hence DE MINIS in Commons and Phil Law; No copyright exists in them, and
- In support of my stance, opposition to the deltion and inputs, I am respectfully submitting to the editors and Commons adminstrators my legal treatise on the matter as I copy paste and discuss Strong Evidence against the Nominators Mass Deletion Requests, to wit:
FOP matter update: Rejoinder
|
|---|
Rejoinder II : the case of Yuraily Lic is 100x different in the Philippine Mass Deletions: Reason: our 2012 Cybercrime and Stalking Law is absolutely different from theirs, if any: I have no objection to Deletions by any editor or administrator regarding FOP cases in Philippines, but, but and but - the Mass Deletions Requests placed on my talk page since September by a single new editor falls squarely with the 4 corners of Cybercrime[edit]* (My midnight thoughts out of no FOP in the Philippines frustration) It seems you are a "disciple" or follower of Yuraily Lic! I can notice your DR's nearly similar to their's, and Yuraily had an issue similar to yours at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 79#Yuraily Lic, mass tagging and nominating copyrighted buildings and artworks for no FOP reasons with little or no evidences (other than links to Commons pages). Just my thoughts only. BTW, you seem to have some luck today, as the latest (as of today) copyright-related webinars in our country — the October 30, 2020 FB Live webinar of the Office for Alternative Dispute Resolution (OADR) (in which important people from IPOPHL were among its principal guests) — has no mention of FoP, de minimis or whatsoever. But nevertheless, our call and advocacy for full FOP in the Philippines continues, albeit intermittently now. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:20, 9 November 2020 (UTC)"
Rectifying my mistakes and instead report here phil bldg and sculpture photos Hello everyone. Its my biggest mistake to have made mass deletions. I sincerely appologise most esp to the moderator @Mutichill:. I will not do those deletions by myself again. Instaed i will forward here some violations on phil photos of bldgs and sculotures.[edit]
|
I fervently hope that Commons editors would wait for the Reply or replies to my 2 letters or your would be filed draft to final letters to IPO or DOJ secretary; in the meantime; : "Respectfully submitted ..." as I register my Strong Objection to the Mass Deletions of a single Nominator very sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 08:06, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:41, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
the wikipedia entry of the phil hero states that this shrine was opened in 2010 so most likely copyrighted. no freedom of pano in the phils that allows all and free forms of reuse of photos of copyrighted bldgs and sculptures that doesnt compromise the rights of the creators or their heirs within the 50 yr copyright duration perio
- File:Malvar,Batangasjf8018 07.JPG
- File:Malvar,Batangasjf8018 08.JPG
- File:Malvar,Batangasjf8018 09.JPG
- File:Malvar,Batangasjf8018 10.JPG
- File:Malvar,Batangasjf8018 11.JPG
- File:Malvar,Batangasjf8018 12.JPG
- File:Malvar,Batangasjf8018 13.JPG
- File:Malvar,Batangasjf8018 14.JPG
- File:Malvar,Batangasjf8032 01.JPG
- File:Malvar,Batangasjf8032 02.JPG
- File:Malvar,Batangasjf8032 04.JPG
- File:Malvar,Batangasjf8032 06.JPG
- File:Malvar,Batangasjf8092 12.JPG
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 18:08, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
4 years prescription since 2015 under the New 2019 SC Circular vis-à-vis Copyright law to question any FOP matter: a Legal Bar due to Extinctive Prescription to delete my photos and of User:Ramon FVelasquez as tagged by the Smart One September 2020 Mass Deletions
[edit]- I sincerely hope that Editors will note my Underscoring of the 4 years Legal Bar on Deletion of FOP photos, I repeat from 2016, thus the tons of Mass Deletions tags by the Smart One on RamonFVelasquez should be stricken off the Talk Page as grave violations of Criminal Law ...
- The statue is owned by the Local and National Government, hence outside the bounds of Copyright FOPs
- Keep Keep Because the Nominator has been blocked recently due to mass deletion nominations. It is fervently petitioned that - going to keep this for now until someone else can nominate if they see fit; Wherefore premises considered I humbly register my Strong Objection to this and the Mass Deletions Requests of this Single Editor, respectfully respectfully Judgefloro (talk) 08:09, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination except File:Malvar,Batangasjf8032 04.JPG, no copyrightable elements. ƏXPLICIT 12:12, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Century City Mall
[edit]a stylish and elaborate mall bldg from 2014, no freedom of pano in the phils that would safeguard reusers against architectural lawsuits
- File:09371jfSalamanca Neptune Street Kalayaan Avenue Hotels Makati Cityfvf 07.jpg
- File:09371jfSalamanca Neptune Street Kalayaan Avenue Hotels Makati Cityfvf 08.jpg
- File:09371jfSalamanca Neptune Street Kalayaan Avenue Hotels Makati Cityfvf 09.jpg
- File:09371jfSalamanca Neptune Street Kalayaan Avenue Hotels Makati Cityfvf 10.jpg
- File:09371jfSalamanca Neptune Street Kalayaan Avenue Hotels Makati Cityfvf 11.jpg
- File:09371jfSalamanca Neptune Street Kalayaan Avenue Hotels Makati Cityfvf 12.jpg
- File:09371jfSalamanca Neptune Street Kalayaan Avenue Hotels Makati Cityfvf 15.jpg
- File:09371jfSalamanca Neptune Street Kalayaan Avenue Hotels Makati Cityfvf 16.jpg
- File:09371jfSalamanca Neptune Street Kalayaan Avenue Hotels Makati Cityfvf 17.jpg
- File:09371jfSalamanca Neptune Street Kalayaan Avenue Hotels Makati Cityfvf 18.jpg
- File:09371jfSalamanca Neptune Street Kalayaan Avenue Hotels Makati Cityfvf 19.jpg
- File:09371jfSalamanca Neptune Street Kalayaan Avenue Hotels Makati Cityfvf 20.jpg
- File:09371jfSalamanca Neptune Street Kalayaan Avenue Hotels Makati Cityfvf 21.jpg
- File:09371jfSalamanca Neptune Street Kalayaan Avenue Hotels Makati Cityfvf 22.jpg
- File:09371jfSalamanca Neptune Street Kalayaan Avenue Hotels Makati Cityfvf 23.jpg
- File:09371jfSalamanca Neptune Street Kalayaan Avenue Hotels Makati Cityfvf 24.jpg
- File:09371jfSalamanca Neptune Street Kalayaan Avenue Hotels Makati Cityfvf 25.jpg
- File:09371jfSalamanca Neptune Street Kalayaan Avenue Hotels Makati Cityfvf 26.jpg
- File:09371jfSalamanca Neptune Street Kalayaan Avenue Hotels Makati Cityfvf 27.jpg
- File:09371jfSalamanca Neptune Street Kalayaan Avenue Hotels Makati Cityfvf 28.jpg
- File:09371jfSalamanca Neptune Street Kalayaan Avenue Hotels Makati Cityfvf 29.jpg
- File:09371jfSalamanca Neptune Street Kalayaan Avenue Hotels Makati Cityfvf 34.jpg
- File:09371jfSalamanca Neptune Street Kalayaan Avenue Hotels Makati Cityfvf 35.jpg
- File:09371jfSalamanca Neptune Street Kalayaan Avenue Hotels Makati Cityfvf 36.jpg
- File:09371jfSalamanca Neptune Street Kalayaan Avenue Hotels Makati Cityfvf 37.jpg
- File:09371jfSalamanca Neptune Street Kalayaan Avenue Hotels Makati Cityfvf 38.jpg
- File:09371jfSalamanca Neptune Street Kalayaan Avenue Hotels Makati Cityfvf 39.jpg
- File:09371jfSalamanca Neptune Street Kalayaan Avenue Hotels Makati Cityfvf 40.jpg
- File:09371jfSalamanca Neptune Street Kalayaan Avenue Hotels Makati Cityfvf 41.jpg
- File:09371jfSalamanca Neptune Street Kalayaan Avenue Hotels Makati Cityfvf 42.jpg
- File:09371jfSalamanca Neptune Street Kalayaan Avenue Hotels Makati Cityfvf 43.jpg
- File:09499jfCentury CityMakati Mall Properties Sunsets in Makati Cityfvf 29.jpg
- File:09499jfCentury CityMakati Mall Properties Sunsets in Makati Cityfvf 30.jpg
- File:California Pizza Kitchen Century City Mall.JPG
- File:Pepper Lunch Century City Mall.JPG
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 17:03, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- A previous matter regarding this was raised Commons talk:Copyright rules by territory/Philippines#Application of recent Philippine Supreme Court decisions on mere allegations of copyright here at another thread regarding photos of the Peninsula Manila hotel. I echo the sentiment of perhaps not rushing into judgement.Ominae (talk) 02:42, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for your messages and good afternoon from hereat Bulacan; with all due respect, may I humbly Suggest both as Editor and as Regional Trial Court Judge, based on the express provisions of Philippines Laws and settle jurisprudence and for this matter, I respectfully reproduce herein as part hereof my my reply and inputs my Consolidated Reply, Rejoinder and Noting of Suggestions by -Ianlopez1115 (talk) and Sources and evidence Judgefloro (talk) 07:35, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Because the photos are unimportant DE MINIS so to speak and the photos are part of Tourist attractions or Heritage of the Local or National Government and theTourism Office of the Philippines, including the Museum of Political Arts etc. granted me express permissions to take Tourist and interesting points photos for it is for their political advantages in the comming election, hosting for free in a great encyclopedia; hence DE MINIS in Commons and Phil Law; No copyright exists in them, and
- In support of my stance, opposition to the deltion and inputs, I am respectfully submitting to the editors and Commons adminstrators my legal treatise on the matter as I copy paste and discuss Strong Evidence against the Nominators Mass Deletion Requests, to wit:
FOP matter update: Rejoinder
|
|---|
Rejoinder II : the case of Yuraily Lic is 100x different in the Philippine Mass Deletions: Reason: our 2012 Cybercrime and Stalking Law is absolutely different from theirs, if any: I have no objection to Deletions by any editor or administrator regarding FOP cases in Philippines, but, but and but - the Mass Deletions Requests placed on my talk page since September by a single new editor falls squarely with the 4 corners of Cybercrime[edit]* (My midnight thoughts out of no FOP in the Philippines frustration) It seems you are a "disciple" or follower of Yuraily Lic! I can notice your DR's nearly similar to their's, and Yuraily had an issue similar to yours at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 79#Yuraily Lic, mass tagging and nominating copyrighted buildings and artworks for no FOP reasons with little or no evidences (other than links to Commons pages). Just my thoughts only. BTW, you seem to have some luck today, as the latest (as of today) copyright-related webinars in our country — the October 30, 2020 FB Live webinar of the Office for Alternative Dispute Resolution (OADR) (in which important people from IPOPHL were among its principal guests) — has no mention of FoP, de minimis or whatsoever. But nevertheless, our call and advocacy for full FOP in the Philippines continues, albeit intermittently now. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:20, 9 November 2020 (UTC)"
Rectifying my mistakes and instead report here phil bldg and sculpture photos Hello everyone. Its my biggest mistake to have made mass deletions. I sincerely appologise most esp to the moderator @Mutichill:. I will not do those deletions by myself again. Instaed i will forward here some violations on phil photos of bldgs and sculotures.[edit]
|
I fervently hope that Commons editors would wait for the Reply or replies to my 2 letters or your would be filed draft to final letters to IPO or DOJ secretary; in the meantime; : "Respectfully submitted ..." as I register my Strong Objection to the Mass Deletions of a single Nominator very sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 08:04, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 09:04, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
possible unfree copyrighted sculptures. no freedom of pano in the phils that guarantees free and unrestricted reuse of photos of copyrighted bldgs and sculptures without compromising the architects engineers designers sculptors or architectural firms
- File:Apolinario Mabini on dim clouds 1.JPG
- File:Apolinario Mabini on dim clouds 2.JPG
- File:Apolinario Mabini on dim clouds 3.JPG
- File:Beaterio de Sta. Catalina.JPG
- File:Benavides Monument - Founder of UST.JPG
- File:Benavides Monument.JPG
- File:Chinese Garden Entrance.JPG
- File:Chinese Garden, Rizal Park.JPG
- File:Closer view of Benavides Monument.JPG
- File:Female "Oble".JPG
- File:JonesBridgeSculptureLuneta.JPG
- File:JonesBridgeSculptureRizalPark.JPG
- File:NATIONAL HEROES MONUMENT,MANILA CITY HALL PARK.jpg
- File:National Press Club and its Tribute to the Journalist Victims of the Maguindanao Massacre.jpg
- File:Rizal Monument 01.JPG
- File:Sculpture Detail - University of Santo Tomas.jpg
- File:The founder.JPG
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 17:36, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 08:56, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
possible copyrighted sculptures. no freedom of pano in the phils that allows all and free forms of reuse of photos of copyrighted bldgs and sculptures that doesnt compromise the rights of the creators
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 17:57, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 08:53, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
possible unfree sculptural works. no freedom of pano in the phils that allows all and free forms of reuse of photos of copyrighted bldgs and sculptures that doesnt compromise the rights of the creators or their heirs within the 50 yr copyright duration period
- File:Felipe Agoncillo y Encarnacion House.jpg
- File:Jose P. Laurel Monument Santo Tomas Batangas.JPG
- File:Malvar Shrine.JPG
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 18:10, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 08:54, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Statues in the Philippines
[edit]no freedom of pano in the phil that would guarantee free ans commercial ans non fair use resuses of copyrighted bldgs and sculptures in the phil. sculptures are copyrighted until 50 yrs after the death of their sculptor
- File:10-foot Stone Buddha.JPG
- File:Andres Urdaneta monumentua, Urdaneta City, Philippines.jpg - collaborative by the ff. Artists: sculptor Napoleon Abueva, sculptor Abdulmari Asia Imao, landscape artist Ildefonso Santos and writer Dr. lejandro Roses - https://news.abs-cbn.com/nation/regions/12/26/08/fray-urdanetas-monument-culmination-rediscovery-and-birth
- File:Bambangjf3642 08.JPG
- File:Beloy.jpg
- File:Bsucollege66jf.JPG
- File:Cavitejf9971 01.JPG
- File:ChurchofBayjf4192 08.JPG
- File:Commemorative Monument of Peace & Unity.JPG - evidence is http://davaocitybybattad.blogspot.com/2012/07/commemorative-monument-of-peace-and.html?m=1 - artist Ray Mudjahid "Kublai" Millan, 1998
- File:Don boscojfc.JPG
- File:Ermita2jf.jpg
- File:Ermita3jf.jpg
- File:Fountain of Wisdom.jpg
- File:Heiwa Kannon.JPG
- File:Isdaan Restaurant (Gerona, Tarlac) (2136363403).jpg
- File:Jardin Maria Clara Llobregat (19).JPG
- File:Jardin Maria Clara Llobregat (20).JPG
- File:Jardin Maria Clara Llobregat (28).JPG
- File:JfNorzagaray1049PoblacionBulacanfvf 12.JPG
- File:JfNorzagaray1049PoblacionBulacanfvf 22.JPG
- File:JfNorzagaray1049PoblacionBulacanfvf 24.JPG
- File:JfNorzagaray1147ChurchRIverBulacanfvf 10.JPG
- File:JfNorzagaray1147ChurchRIverBulacanfvf 15.JPG
- File:JfNorzagaray1705ChurchStAndrewfvf 07.JPG
- File:Lagoon Monument.JPG
- File:Laya at Diwa park.JPG
- File:Leona Florentina's statue.JPG
- File:LeonaFlorentinoStatute.jpg
- File:Maloloscathedraljf.JPG
- File:Manilajf0292 30.JPG
- File:Manny Pacquiao statue.jpg
- File:Manuel quezon tomb.jpg
- File:Mariang Makiling statue at the University of the Philippines in Los Baños.jpg
- File:MarikinaCityjf9960 03.JPG
- File:MarikinaCityjf9960 04.JPG
- File:MarikinaCityjf9975 13.JPG
- File:MarikinaCityjf9975 14.JPG
- File:UPmuseumjf3028 04.JPG
- File:Montemaria Statue.jpg - see my poll (and all other polls) below. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:33, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- File:Monument in SBFZ.JPG
- File:Mt.CarmelChurchjf1010 04.JPG
- File:Paghimud-os sculpture Capitol Lagoon Bacolod City Philippines.jpg - a work by Eduardo Castrillo, died in 2016
- File:Pangasinanjf7887 28.JPG
- File:Plaza Mabini.JPG
- File:Restaurant Tarlac1.jpg
- File:Rizal Park Tacloban.jpg
- File:Rizal,NuevaEcijajf8689 14.JPG
- File:Rodriguez Memorial Hospital Tala outside.JPG
- File:Saint Aloysius Statue.jpg
- File:San Francisco Church, Naga City, Camarines Sur.jpg
- File:Sandugo-Bohol.JPG - by NapoleonAbueva (2018 died) https://www.bohol-philippines.com/blood-compact-site.html
- File:SMSP (Grotto).jpg
- File:St Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park Bayambang Pangasinan 360 - Mapillary (OMueiLu38Mb73wZBPzeqKA).jpg 2018 by JQS Builders as said at https://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/1066754
- File:Tacloban government building.JPG
- File:The Pegaraw and the UPLB Main Library.jpg
- File:University of Santo Tomas' Main Building and Fr. Miguel de Benavides' Monument.jpg
- File:UPmuseumjf2997 03.JPG
- File:UPmuseumjf2997 05.JPG
- File:UPmuseumjf3028 02.JPG
- File:Zamboanga City Hall y Rizal Monument.JPG
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 01:51, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for your messages and good afternoon from hereat Bulacan; with all due respect, may I humbly Suggest both as Editor and as Regional Trial Court Judge, based on the express provisions of Philippines Laws and settle jurisprudence and for this matter, I respectfully reproduce herein as part hereof my my reply and inputs my Consolidated Reply, Rejoinder and Noting of Suggestions by -Ianlopez1115 (talk) and Sources and evidence New "Copyright Rules for the Government" released by IPOPHIL Memorandum Circular 2020-024 July 3 2020 By IPO Director Rowel S. Barba - Sec. 3 a on Fair Use, and 4 which clearly states that NO PRIOR Approval is needed for use or photography of statues and all Government whether local or national works like Town City Halls facades etc. Judgefloro (talk) 07:32, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Because the photos are unimportant DE MINIS so to speak and the photos are part of Tourist attractions or Heritage of the Local or National Government and theTourism Office of the Philippines, including the Museum of Political Arts etc. granted me express permissions to take Tourist and interesting points photos for it is for their political advantages in the comming election, hosting for free in a great encyclopedia; hence DE MINIS in Commons and Phil Law; No copyright exists in them, and
- In support of my stance, opposition to the deltion and inputs, I am respectfully submitting to the editors and Commons adminstrators my legal treatise on the matter as I copy paste and discuss Strong Evidence against the Nominators Mass Deletion Requests, to wit:
FOP matter update: Rejoinder
|
|---|
* (My midnight thoughts out of no FOP in the Philippines frustration) It seems you are a "disciple" or follower of Yuraily Lic! I can notice your DR's nearly similar to their's, and Yuraily had an issue similar to yours at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 79#Yuraily Lic, mass tagging and nominating copyrighted buildings and artworks for no FOP reasons with little or no evidences (other than links to Commons pages). Just my thoughts only. BTW, you seem to have some luck today, as the latest (as of today) copyright-related webinars in our country — the October 30, 2020 FB Live webinar of the Office for Alternative Dispute Resolution (OADR) (in which important people from IPOPHL were among its principal guests) — has no mention of FoP, de minimis or whatsoever. But nevertheless, our call and advocacy for full FOP in the Philippines continues, albeit intermittently now. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:20, 9 November 2020 (UTC)"
|
I fervently hope that Commons editors would wait for the Reply or replies to my 2 letters or your would be filed draft to final letters to IPO or DOJ secretary; in the meantime; : "Respectfully submitted ..." as I register my Strong Objection to the Mass Deletions of a single Nominator very sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 08:02, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
4 years prescription since 2015 under the New 2019 SC Circular vis-à-vis Copyright law to question any FOP matter: a Legal Bar due to Extinctive Prescription to delete my photos and of User:Ramon FVelasquez as tagged by the Smart One September 2020 Mass Deletions
|
|---|
|
- Comment to @Judgefloro: you mentioned fair use here. See Commons:Fair use: fair use material is not allowed here on Commons. Also, prescriptive extinction is only relevant after the file has been deleted, as the existence of file means continuing exploitation (per Clindberg at my inquiry at his talk page). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:20, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
As per COM:FOP Philippines, while the amendment to the copyright law is pending, the current status still applies. However, several nominated images here show statues that are already in public domain. Here is my poll for the nominated images. _ JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:33, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Delete
- File:Andres Urdaneta monumentua, Urdaneta City, Philippines.jpg - per w:Urdaneta Park Landmark Monument this sculpture was a joint work of four artists: Napoleon Abueva (d. 2018) and Abdulmari Imao (d. 2014) for the monument itself, Ildefonso Santos (d. 1984) for the landscaping, and Alejandro Roces (d. 2011) for the literary texts in the monument.
- File:Bambangjf3642 08.JPG - the plaque on the pedestal below (seen from this image) bears the year 2009, likely the year of unveiling.
- File:Beloy.jpg - while unsure if this is the bronze statue (by Napoleon Abueva) being referred to at this article, considering that w:Evelio Javier died in 1986, this is a recent sculpture.
- File:Commemorative Monument of Peace & Unity.JPG - per this article by MakeItDavao, it is the work of still-living sculptor Kublai Millan.
- File:Jardin Maria Clara Llobregat (19).JPG,
- File:Jardin Maria Clara Llobregat (20).JPG, and
- File:Jardin Maria Clara Llobregat (28).JPG - while no info about the statue is found, the person it depicts (the late Zamboanga City mayor w:Maria Clara Lobregat) died in 2004, and this statue (in the 3 images) is most likely recent.
- File:Lagoon Monument.JPG - according to SunStar this was a work of Negrense sculptor Felix Garzon (who seems to be alive during 2010), while others like Lakad Pilipinas.com also considers Guillermo Tolentino (d. 1977) as the creator. Either way, the sculpture is not yet public domain.
- File:Laya at Diwa park.JPG - according to w:Cavite State University#Laya at Diwa Monument, this monument from 2006 was a creation of Jonnel P. Castrillo.
- File:Manilajf0292 30.JPG - statue is silhouetted. But the building itself is problematic (no FOP also for copyrighted Philippine buildings)
- File:Manny Pacquiao statue.jpg - see [6] and [7]. The artist, Fred Baldemor from Paete, seems alive.
- File:UPmuseumjf3028 04.JPG - file description page states this is a 2008 statue by Napoleon Abueva
- File:Montemaria Statue.jpg - artistic work of w:Eduardo Castrillo (d. 2016), in public domain 2067 (50+1 years after Castrillo's death) but COM:URAA, undelete in 2117 (95 years plus 1 year after "publication" which is the opening date of 2021).
- File:Monument in SBFZ.JPG - confirmed to be a post-Pinatubo (1991) sculpture called Children of the Sun Returning or Subic Volunteers Monument, which honors thousands of men and women who helped protecting the former Subic Naval base facilities from looting, after the departure of the Americans in 1992[8].
- File:Paghimud-os sculpture Capitol Lagoon Bacolod City Philippines.jpg - unveiled in 1975 and designed by Eduardo Castrillo (d. 2016)[9]
- File:Sandugo-Bohol.JPG - according to Bohol Philippine Travel Guide, the creator was Napoleon Abueva
- File:St Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park Bayambang Pangasinan 360 - Mapillary (OMueiLu38Mb73wZBPzeqKA).jpg - the statue was unveiled in 2019 and designed by JQS Builders, headed by Arch. Jerry Suratos (Philippine Star article)
- File:The Pegaraw and the UPLB Main Library.jpg - while the statue is perhaps de minimis, the building itself is problematic (online sources indicate it was an architectural work of Leandro Locsin, d. 1994). De minimis couldn't work here in any way, as both elements are recent works covered by copyright.
- File:UPmuseumjf3028 02.JPG - shows "Magdangal" by Napoleon Abueva.
Unsure because there's not much info. (COM:PCP = Weak delete?)
- File:10-foot Stone Buddha.JPG - per this article from BenjieLayug.com this is a "10-ft. high Jibo-Kannon stone Buddha" in the Japanese Garden of Peace in Corregidor. Exact details of its unveiling and creator not known, even by multiple blogs and travel sites, but it is most likely post-WW2 (the garden itself was established with the help of funds generated by a Japanese private group), so most likely it is of Japanese (sculptor) origin. Perhaps 50s or 60s? Or more recent?
- File:Bsucollege66jf.JPG - statue of renowned poet Francisco Baltazar in Bulacan State University. No immediate substantial info found.
- File:Cavitejf9971 01.JPG - no immediate info found for Ang Magkakape statue in Amadeo, Cavite
- File:Isdaan Restaurant (Gerona, Tarlac) (2136363403).jpg - a sculpture "guarding" a restaurant in Gerona, Tarlac is most likely recent
- File:JfNorzagaray1049PoblacionBulacanfvf 12.JPG,
- File:JfNorzagaray1049PoblacionBulacanfvf 22.JPG,
- File:JfNorzagaray1049PoblacionBulacanfvf 24.JPG,
- File:JfNorzagaray1147ChurchRIverBulacanfvf 10.JPG, and
- File:JfNorzagaray1147ChurchRIverBulacanfvf 15.JPG - these five images of various 3D icons inside a Norzagaray church. While there is no info behind the sculptures' creation, their appearance and paint tone/hue suggests recent creation of sculptures.
- File:Leona Florentina's statue.JPG - details are meager and are more focused on the house of the poetess behind it which was from 1797. The statue doesn't look old, however
- File:Maloloscathedraljf.JPG - such images of the Virgin Mary look recent
- File:Mariang Makiling statue at the University of the Philippines in Los Baños.jpg - unsure if the statue was registered with copyright office (then-prevailing copyright law, Act 3134 of 1924, required such and provided 30 years copyright duration), and it is difficult to find registration records. Existing info suggests this sculpture was part of a field project of the graduating class of 1960, and its sculptor was Renato Rocha (who died in 2001).
- File:MarikinaCityjf9975 13.JPG and
- File:MarikinaCityjf9975 14.JPG - no info found behind the sculpture depicted in these two images
- File:Pangasinanjf7887 28.JPG - also no immediate info found for this San Nicolas, Pangasinan statue
- File:Restaurant Tarlac1.jpg - a sculpture "guarding" a restaurant in Gerona, Tarlac is most likely recent
- File:Rizal Park Tacloban.jpg - no immediate info on who sculpted the Rizal Monument of Tacloban
- File:Saint Aloysius Statue.jpg - old or more like a recent statue that is made to look like an old one? COM:PCP
- File:UPmuseumjf2997 03.JPG and
- File:UPmuseumjf2997 05.JPG - unsure if this warrior statue guarding the entrance of the 1980s museum[10] is an import (of an older statue) or a recent sculpture created for the museum.
Keep as meeting {{PD-Philippines-artistic work}} (to closing admins: pls. add this tag to the following files after keeping them)
- File:ChurchofBayjf4192 08.JPG - while uncertain and no immediate info found, judging from its appearance it looks an old religious sculpture (of Virgin Mary)
- File:Don boscojfc.JPG - also judging from its appearance it seems an old sculpture
- File:Ermita2jf.jpg, and
- File:Ermita3jf.jpg - both seem old. The sculpture itself is a silent reminder to the grim tsunami of 1735 which almost wiped Baler off the map.
- File:Fountain of Wisdom.jpg of UST, most likely old.
- File:JfNorzagaray1705ChurchStAndrewfvf 07.JPG - looks old.
- File:MarikinaCityjf9960 03.JPG and
- File:MarikinaCityjf9960 04.JPG - both show the 1957 statue of Don Laureano Guevarra. Assuming that was the publication date and the sculptor is anonymous, it would have fell into public domain in 2007 since it fell under the scope of new copyright law in 1972 during its 30-year copyright protection period.
- File:Mt.CarmelChurchjf1010 04.JPG most likely PD. Though unreadable, the plaque at *this image seems to imply that it was from 1600 (or 1900?)
- File:Rodriguez Memorial Hospital Tala outside.JPG - as w:Jose N. Rodriguez Memorial Hospital was established in 1940, we can assume this statue as in public domain too.
- File:University of Santo Tomas' Main Building and Fr. Miguel de Benavides' Monument.jpg - both the statue (de minimis) and the building are public domain. The statue itself was designed by Tony Noël who died in 1909.
- File:Zamboanga City Hall y Rizal Monument.JPG - most likely PD: the plaza seems to date from early 20th century ([11])
Keep as meeting de minimis
- File:Heiwa Kannon.JPG - probably de minimis as the Jibo-Kannon Buddha sculpture of Corregidor is not the chief motif here.
- File:Manuel quezon tomb.jpg - probable de minimis
- File:Plaza Mabini.JPG - the bust is de minimis, while the plinth it stands is claimed to be 100 years old.
- File:Rizal,NuevaEcijajf8689 14.JPG - de minimis probably
- File:San Francisco Church, Naga City, Camarines Sur.jpg - likely de minimis
- File:SMSP (Grotto).jpg - de minimis
- File:Tacloban government building.JPG - probably de minimis
Kept: per en:WP:TRAINWRECK, different cases, please renominate as separate DRs. --Anatoliy (talk) 12:46, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
accidental upload in maps.wikilovesmonuments.org Susanna Ånäs (Susannaanas) (talk) 10:22, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anatoliy (talk) 13:37, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
accidental upload with maps.wikilovesmonuments.org Susanna Ånäs (Susannaanas) (talk) 10:25, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anatoliy (talk) 13:37, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Source states a noncommercial licence, which is not compatible with Commons.
- File:Put a condom on and dive into pleasure without playing with fire.jpg
- File:A naked man puts a condom on the penis of another man who holds his nipple against a mottled background; advertisement for safe sex by the Comité SIDA aide Montréal. Lithograph by Robert Laliberté and Robert Ouellet, 1989.jpg
- File:Naked men in a shower with a message about sweating, syringes and safe sex. Lithograph for Deutsche AIDS-Hilfe e.V.jpg
- File:A naked man stands with his arms around another man with the recommendation to use safe sex. Colour lithograph by Will McBride and Detlev Pusch for the Deutsche AIDS-Hilfe e.V.jpg
- File:A naked man wearing a condom; advertisement for safe sex by the San Francisco AIDS Foundation. Lithograph, 1988.jpg
- File:A naked man is held by another who looks directly at another man in the foreground; an advertisement for safe sex by the Deutsche AIDS-Hilfe e.V. Colour lithograph by Norbert Heuler and Detlev Pusch.jpg
- File:Advertisement for safe sex.jpg
- File:Hot Rubber Company Deutschland.jpg
-mattbuck (Talk) 17:47, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- I might be wrong (and something might have happened since 2014), but I think pretty much all the AIDS-related posters with suitable licenses in the Wellcome collection had been uploaded a while ago, see Category:Lithographs about AIDS in the Wellcome Collection. We had some discussion about it at some point, IIRC. Nemo 18:08, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: CC BY-NC. --Anatoliy (talk) 13:39, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Erzianj jurnalist (talk · contribs)
[edit]Photos made by various photographers, no evidence that the museum owns copyright. Likely to be license laundering.
- File:P S Kirillov with his wife.jpg
- File:Group of writers of Mordovia, 1930.jpg
- File:Kirillov PS 1950.jpg
- File:Kirillov PS.jpg
- File:Kirillov PS 1938.jpg
- File:Artists of the MASSR choir, 1946.jpg
- File:Antonova MN, 1960s.jpg
- File:Antonova Maria Nikolaevna, 1985.jpg
- File:Students of the Saratov Conservatory, 1943-1945s.jpg
- File:Song and dance ensemle of the MASSR, Saransk, 1958.jpg
- File:Solosts of the Mordovian State Philarmonic, Saransk, 1950.jpg
- File:Maria Nikolaevna Antonova, 1985.jpg
- File:Maria Nikolaevna Antonova, 1982.jpg
- File:Maria Nikolaevna Antonova, 1956.jpg
- File:Maria Antonova, Dmitry Eremeev, Praskoviya Yurtaykina, 1957.jpg
- File:Maria Antonova, 1971.jpg
- File:Maria Antonova, 1964.jpg
- File:Maria Antonova, 1959.jpg
- File:Maria Antonova with father and mother, 1970s.jpg
- File:Maria Antonova with a collegue, 1950s.jpg
- File:Maria Antonova with her daughter Nadia, 1962.jpg
- File:M. N. Antonova with writers and journalists of Mordovia, 1971.jpg
- File:Maria Antonova on tour with Illarion Yaushev, 1958.jpg
- File:M. N. Antonova on television, 1971.jpg
VLu (talk) 18:27, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anatoliy (talk) 12:50, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by PlanespotterA320 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: No indication of early enough (pre-1950) PUBLICATION to be PD in country of origin, doesn't matter how old it is. 2010 book not early enough! AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 20:53, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anatoliy (talk) 13:40, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by PlanespotterA320 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: Property of TASS (photo #1045273). No indication of early enough (pre-1950) PUBLICATION to be PD in country of origin, doesn't matter how old it is. 2010 book not early enough! AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 20:53, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anatoliy (talk) 13:41, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by PlanespotterA320 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: No indication of early enough (pre-1950) PUBLICATION to be PD in country of origin, doesn't matter how old it is. 2010 book not early enough! AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 20:53, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anatoliy (talk) 13:41, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
It's an image taken by phone, it's not reliable that uploader (Newone) is its author (maybe created 3D, rendered or used Photoshop) Conbo (talk) 23:00, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- I agree. All we have is his assertion that he created the photo. Buiquangtu (talk) 23:04, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- It is my photo which I taken myself by my iPhone.
Newone 09:33, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
- It is my photo which I taken myself by my iPhone.
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
-sulfide-3D-vdW.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_a_l'Institut_Català_de_Paleontologia_Miquel_Crusafont_-_detall_de_la_cara.JPG){kind=link}
_a_l'Institut_Català_de_Paleontologia_Miquel_Crusafont_(crop).JPG){kind=link}
,_3,3_milioni_di_anni_fa.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_new.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Paranthropus_Boisei.JPG){kind=link}
_-_Homo_Rhodesiensis.JPG){kind=link}
_-_Homo_Neanderthalensis.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Homo_Heidelbergensis.JPG){kind=link}
_-_Homo_Heidelbergensis_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
![227 File:Detail of David Politzer's video installation titled, "Observation Station, From the Rim." Installed at Artsapce, Cleveland. 6 of 6.jpg](#File:Detail_of_David_Politzer's_video_installation_titled,_"Observation_Station,_From_the_Rim."_Installed_at_Artsapce,_Cleveland._6_of_6.jpg){kind=link}
_a_l'Institut_Català_de_Paleontologia_Miquel_Crusafont.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
_a_l'Institut_Català_de_Paleontologia_Miquel_Crusafont.JPG){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(1).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Museum_of_the_History_of_Ukraine_in_World_War_Two_-_Kiev_-_Ukraine_-_01_(26735709440).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Museum_of_the_History_of_Ukraine_in_World_War_Two_-_Kiev_-_Ukraine_-_02_(27009680365).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
._%D0%A1%D0%B2%D1%96%D1%82%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B0_%E2%84%9610.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
._%D0%A1%D0%B2%D1%96%D1%82%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B0_%E2%84%9611.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
._%D0%A1%D0%B2%D1%96%D1%82%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B0_%E2%84%9612.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
._%D0%A1%D0%B2%D1%96%D1%82%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B0_%E2%84%9613.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
._%D0%A1%D0%B2%D1%96%D1%82%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B0_%E2%84%962.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
._%D0%A1%D0%B2%D1%96%D1%82%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B0_%E2%84%963.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
._%D0%A1%D0%B2%D1%96%D1%82%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B0_%E2%84%964.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
._%D0%A1%D0%B2%D1%96%D1%82%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B0_%E2%84%965.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
._%D0%A1%D0%B2%D1%96%D1%82%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B0_%E2%84%966.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
._%D0%A1%D0%B2%D1%96%D1%82%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B0_%E2%84%967.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
._%D0%A1%D0%B2%D1%96%D1%82%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B0_%E2%84%968.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
._%D0%A1%D0%B2%D1%96%D1%82%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B0_%E2%84%969.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-sulfide-3D-vdW.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-sulfide-3D-vdW.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
-sulfide-3D-vdW.png){kind=link}
-sulfide-unit-cell-3D-balls.png){kind=link}
-sulfide-3D-vdW.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_a_l%27Institut_Catal%C3%A0_de_Paleontologia_Miquel_Crusafont_-_detall_de_la_cara.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_a_l%27Institut_Catal%C3%A0_de_Paleontologia_Miquel_Crusafont_-_detall_de_la_cara.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_a_l%27Institut_Catal%C3%A0_de_Paleontologia_Miquel_Crusafont_(crop).JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_a_l%27Institut_Catal%C3%A0_de_Paleontologia_Miquel_Crusafont_(crop).JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
,_3,3_milioni_di_anni_fa.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_3,3_milioni_di_anni_fa.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_new.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_new.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_new.jpg){kind=link}
_new.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Paranthropus_Boisei.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Paranthropus_Boisei.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_-_Paranthropus_Boisei.JPG){kind=link}
_-_Paranthropus_Boisei.JPG){kind=link}
_-_Homo_Rhodesiensis.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Homo_Rhodesiensis.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_-_Homo_Rhodesiensis.JPG){kind=link}
_-_Homo_Rhodesiensis.JPG){kind=link}
_-_Homo_Neanderthalensis.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Homo_Neanderthalensis.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_-_Homo_Neanderthalensis.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Homo_Neanderthalensis.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Homo_Heidelbergensis.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Homo_Heidelbergensis.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_-_Homo_Heidelbergensis.JPG){kind=link}
_-_Homo_Heidelbergensis.JPG){kind=link}
_-_Homo_Heidelbergensis_(cropped).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Homo_Heidelbergensis_(cropped).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_a_l%27Institut_Catal%C3%A0_de_Paleontologia_Miquel_Crusafont.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_a_l%27Institut_Catal%C3%A0_de_Paleontologia_Miquel_Crusafont.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
![[4]](http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-GFwbC6tVA7w/TcIkK1PEQnI/AAAAAAAAB-U/tVHE9ol41GI/s1600/mcarthur.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(2136363403).jpg){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Anatoliy (talk) 13:42, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Horse statue (A.P. Reyes Avenue, Philippine Racing Club, Inc. - Circuit, Makati)
[edit]perhaps copyrighted. no freedom of pano in the phils
- File:07759jfA.P. Reyes Street Santa Ana Park Circuit Carmona Tejeros Makatifvf 14.jpg
- File:07759jfA.P. Reyes Street Santa Ana Park Circuit Carmona Tejeros Makatifvf 15.jpg
- File:07759jfA.P. Reyes Street Santa Ana Park Circuit Carmona Tejeros Makatifvf 16.jpg
- File:07759jfA.P. Reyes Street Santa Ana Park Circuit Carmona Tejeros Makatifvf 17.jpg
- File:07759jfA.P. Reyes Street Santa Ana Park Circuit Carmona Tejeros Makatifvf 18.jpg
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 17:13, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for your messages and good afternoon from hereat Bulacan; with all due respect, may I humbly Suggest both as Editor and as Regional Trial Court Judge, based on the express provisions of Philippines Laws and settled jurisprudence and for this matter, I respectfully reproduce herein as part hereof my my reply and inputs my Consolidated Reply, Rejoinder and Noting of Suggestions by -Ianlopez1115 (talk) and Sources and evidence Judgefloro (talk) 07:37, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Because the photos are unimportant DE MINIS so to speak and the photos are part of Tourist attractions or Heritage of the Local or National Government and theTourism Office of the Philippines, including the Museum of Political Arts etc. granted me express permissions to take Tourist and interesting points photos for it is for their political advantages in the comming election, hosting for free in a great encyclopedia; hence DE MINIS in Commons and Phil Law; No copyright exists in them, and
- In support of my stance, opposition to the deltion and inputs, I am respectfully submitting to the editors and Commons adminstrators my legal treatise on the matter as I copy paste and discuss Strong Evidence against the Nominators Mass Deletion Requests, to wit:
FOP matter update: Rejoinder
|
|---|
Rejoinder II : the case of Yuraily Lic is 100x different in the Philippine Mass Deletions: Reason: our 2012 Cybercrime and Stalking Law is absolutely different from theirs, if any: I have no objection to Deletions by any editor or administrator regarding FOP cases in Philippines, but, but and but - the Mass Deletions Requests placed on my talk page since September by a single new editor falls squarely with the 4 corners of Cybercrime[edit]* (My midnight thoughts out of no FOP in the Philippines frustration) It seems you are a "disciple" or follower of Yuraily Lic! I can notice your DR's nearly similar to their's, and Yuraily had an issue similar to yours at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 79#Yuraily Lic, mass tagging and nominating copyrighted buildings and artworks for no FOP reasons with little or no evidences (other than links to Commons pages). Just my thoughts only. BTW, you seem to have some luck today, as the latest (as of today) copyright-related webinars in our country — the October 30, 2020 FB Live webinar of the Office for Alternative Dispute Resolution (OADR) (in which important people from IPOPHL were among its principal guests) — has no mention of FoP, de minimis or whatsoever. But nevertheless, our call and advocacy for full FOP in the Philippines continues, albeit intermittently now. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:20, 9 November 2020 (UTC)"
Rectifying my mistakes and instead report here phil bldg and sculpture photos Hello everyone. Its my biggest mistake to have made mass deletions. I sincerely appologise most esp to the moderator @Mutichill:. I will not do those deletions by myself again. Instaed i will forward here some violations on phil photos of bldgs and sculotures.[edit]
|
I fervently hope that Commons editors would wait for the Reply or replies to my 2 letters or your would be filed draft to final letters to IPO or DOJ secretary; in the meantime; : "Respectfully submitted ..." as I register my Strong Objection to the Mass Deletions of a single Nominator very sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 08:04, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:34, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
Urheberrechtsstatus: Geschützt Snoopy1964 (talk) 13:07, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Exif data of the camera containing "Copyright status: Copyrighted" alone (what the nominator is referring to) wouldn't necessarily be grounds for deletion, as this is generated by the camera, and copyright is the base of a free license, too - so, if you, as the photographer, release your photograph under CC-BY-SA, for example, it's still copyrighted, but freely licensed. But in this case, the author's name in Exif ("ERIC-KEMNITZ.com") doesn't match the uploader's ("Lisa Pio"), and the source given is the website of that retail center, so an OTRS release would be needed. --Gestumblindi (talk) 18:33, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Logo of a well-drawn dog and what looks like a phonograph is certainly likely to be over the threshold of originality in Japan. Even if it were not legally original there, it is certainly likely to be original in the United States, and thus cannot be kept on Commons. Nominating this for deletion instead of reporting a copyright violation to play it safe. FreeMediaKid! 09:08, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: logo above ToO. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:18, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Bad image quality Derbrauni (talk) 09:50, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:17, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Small photo without metadata and the uploader's only contribution. I suspect copyright violation. In addition, depicted Melike Külahçı is not mentioned in en.wiki and only once in tr.wiki, here is notability problem as well. Taivo (talk) 10:38, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Taivo, I learned the "small file" issue from you but never used it for a 1,36 MB file. As regards scope, she is a renown surgeon. I can fill this page with direct references to her and to her work from the Turkish press. I made her cat three years ago, before I left this place, but had forgotten to make her WD item. Please look at those data. She was elected president of the council of her worldwide professional association (International Society of Hair Restoration Surgery) as early as 2012. She is 100% in scope of Commons and also is notable for "any" WP. I do not like to talk much about the two WPs you refer to above, as I was ousted from one of them and I quit the other, but a successful female surgeon in a world dominated by men well deserves that I make an exception to "being good": If she were Greek or Armenian or Kurdish EN:WP would not have made an article for her but also other two for her sister and brother. As regards TR:WP, it cannot be a reference due to number of articles. Best. --E4024 (talk) 15:51, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- So copyright problem remains. Does not look like own work. Taivo (talk) 06:05, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - unlikely to be own work. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:16, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Small size, any metadata, fiction name. Most probably the uploader is not the author. No Permission. Микола Василечко (talk) 11:23, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Not used. Delete in peace. --E4024 (talk) 00:59, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:15, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
content not de minimus — Preceding unsigned comment added by SecretName101 (talk • contribs) 2020-08-30T19:48:34 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:11, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
per File:Kim Jong-gak.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kim Jong Un Makes Statement (2017).jpg Finnusertop (talk) 13:57, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:11, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Uploaded at Alamy (Stock photo) HansenHimself (talk) 15:01, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- @HansenHimself: Are you Daniel Holm Hansen (the author, per Alamy)? —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:20, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Yes, I am. :) You can also confirm it here: http://dhh.portfoliobox.net
Deleted: ok, courtesy deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:09, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
This image portrays me, Ana Ularu. It was published without my consent, it is taken out of context from an interview and it is not only irrelevant to me as an actress but also causes embarrassment. I do not know why the person who published - user Leoboudv - it decided to do so and would really like him to stop intervening in my page. Thank you in anticipation. 26and26 (talk) 15:04, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep No, it was actually uploaded by me, Leoboudv just reviewed it to confirm that it was freely licensed. It was the best freely licensed image I could find. We'd love a better photograph, but it needs to be freely licensed, I wrote as much in more detail on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:26and26 minutes ago.
- And ... umm, no offense, but ... if you are Ana Ularu, then you really shouldn't be editing the page about you. It's not "your page", it's not your resume, or your Facebook, or your Linked-In, or your Instagram, there are plenty of pages on the Internet that can be yours. It's the page about you, and it's supposed to be unbiased. Readers won't be able to trust that it's telling them the truth if you wrote it. I hope you can understand why that is: would you trust that an article about a politician, or a company, or a business executive were telling you the entire unvarnished truth if they or someone working for them wrote it? Surely not. The same, I'm afraid, is true for actors, and pretty much everyone actually. The policy about that is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Autobiography.
- I'm going to copy this back to your EN talk page, because it's important, even more important than one image. If you can't license that image you tried to replace it with, now that I know you don't like this particular image from the HotNews Romania interview, I can try to grab a different one that you might like better, but I can't do anything about the Autobiography policy.
- Thank you for your contribution and your understanding. --GRuban (talk) 15:15, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:06, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
As can probably be seen in the earlier deletion request of 2020-09-06, Ana Ularu, the subject, doesn't like this picture. Now, however, she has released a noticeably better image (File:Ana Ularu.jpg), roughly a week ago. This one has been mostly replaced throughout, and she is asking for this one to be deleted "to be safe". Now, honestly, I still think this image isn't terrible, and "I don't like it" normally isn't a great reason for deletion, but there is also "Wikipedia isn't here to make people sad", as our founder once said. We have a noticeably better image now, enough so that I don't see anything this old image provides that the new one does not, so I think we can afford to lose this one. GRuban (talk) 20:21, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep The fact that this image is still in use means it cannot be given a courtesy deletion. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:33, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep, better looks here.186.175.130.9 21:54, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- Minutes after making this comment, this IP user commented in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Peru lama.pdf, asking "Es Vd llama?" - "Are you a llama?". I suspect the IP user is trolling us. --GRuban (talk) 14:13, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep I don't support wishes of people about their Wiki-Pages. It's not Facebook, the photo is not disgusting or anything like that. So there is NO reason, to delete or even remove it (from the de-wiki page). One can even argue that it is better suited for an encyclopedia than the new picture, where her face is not as good to be seen and she is harder to recognize, than in this one. We may not be here "to make people mad" but we're also not here to support poeples quirks about nothing. --Mirer (talk) 16:02, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: still in use. And consensus for keep. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:28, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Based on a copyrighted musical composition. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 16:19, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- when I uploaded this file to commons, the description of the YT video stated that the video is licensed as CC-BY https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/2797468. This description is now updated, I'd assume because the creator never had the license for the original song in the first place. It's unlikely that Nintendo released any soundtracks under a free license. Delete --Œ̷͠²ð·¨´´̢́̕͘³͏¯̞̗ (talk) 15:56, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:04, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
No evidence provided that this is PD. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 17:20, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:03, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
This image originates from a blog. There is no evidence that its author has waved his rights. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 17:22, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:02, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Il s'agit d'une oeuvre personnelle que je ne souhaite plus partager. Dimitri.millefiori (talk) 17:38, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:01, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: reason=FOP Spain does not include interiors of buildings Einsamer Schütze (talk) 21:02, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: derivative work. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:58, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
because the copyright is incorrect. i wanted to upload it as a copyright that is most likely owned either by the artist who created the cover(s) or the publisher of the book(s). It is believed that the use of low-resolution images of book covers to illustrate an article discussing the book in question on the English-language Wikipedia, hosted on servers in the United States by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation, qualifies as fair use under the copyright law of the United States. Other use of this image, on Wikipedia or elsewhere, might be copyright infringement. See Wikipedia:Non-free content for more information. Gd123lbp (talk) 01:15, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: This image is well below the threshold of originality in the United States, and based on the phrase "Charter Schools" I suspect that's where it was published. I've reinstated the {{Information}} template and added {{PD-ineligible}}. --bjh21 (talk) 14:14, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Bjh21. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:09, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
Dubious "own work" assertion from 2013; subject died in 2013. Larry Hockett (talk) 01:23, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:10, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Map is copyrighted by Land Transport Authority (LTA) ZKang123 (talk) 03:25, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:11, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Glorious 93 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Wrong license and logo still under copyrights. Sreejith K (talk) 03:52, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: below TOO, but out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:12, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Bad image quality Derbrauni (talk) 07:55, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:14, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Useless too blurry photo. Solomon203 (talk) 08:45, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:14, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I forgot about the top part of the picture when I exported the file. Calvinkulit • t • c 04:33, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: superseded by numerous alternatives in Category:Netscape (web browser). --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:18, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
File:Medaille van de VN voor vredesmissie MINURSO in de Sahara Mission des Nations unies pour l'Organisation d'un Référendum au Sahara Occidental.gif
[edit]
Bad quality with wrong color, per this site. Better no image than a wrong one. 2001:1C01:33CA:F400:E2D5:5EFF:FE86:3380 13:49, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:14, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
Copied from an online news article. No evidence or reason to believe it is PD. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 19:52, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:20, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
Copied from an online news article. No evidence or reason to believe it is PD. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 19:53, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:20, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
Not used anymore, duplicates with Paul Doumer – portrait officiel.jpg. Cheep (talk) 22:36, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. Near identical photo uploaded by the same user. No added value whatsoever of keeping the two pictures. Place Clichy 15:39, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:21, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
Georges Guiraud died in 1989. No freedom of panorama in France. 83.204.217.227 18:38, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:18, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Big Brother (Portuguese television programme)
[edit]- File:Ana Catharina do BB2020.png
- File:Diogo do BB2020.png
- File:Iury do BB2020.png
- File:Kasa do Futuro.png
- File:Noélia do BB2020.png
- File:Sandrina do BB2020.png
- File:Soraia do BB2020.png
- File:Zé Maria Seleiro.png
All from TVI and say "originally uploaded on YouTube under a CC license" but no mention of licence at YouTube. Most were uploaded by User:Yaircohen90 who has had several files deleted for copyright violations; File:Zé Maria Seleiro.png was uploaded by User:Emmanuel Sosa, who has edited many of the same articles and has uploaded files "originally posted to Flickr by Yaircohen90". --Peter James (talk) 21:00, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 20:43, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by PlanespotterA320 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: No indication of early enough (pre-1950) PUBLICATION to be PD in country of origin, doesn't matter how old it is. 1978 book not early enough! AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 20:56, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator. 1978 publication makes it PD in 2049 in Russia and pre-1950 creation makes in PD in 2071 in US. Ankry (talk) 12:10, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:00, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by PlanespotterA320 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: licencing bullshit. Just because a website says they don't own the copyright to the photos they use doesn't automatically render them PD. And we have no evidence of early enough PUBLICATION of this image to be PD AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 20:56, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:13, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
According to the cited website, "Copyright University of South Carolina. All rights reserved." Howhontanozaz (talk) 06:12, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: the internet says that this speech was translated on the Philippines television at that time (1929). So, it was published in Phillipines and local copyright rules are applied. "It is an audiovisual or photographic work and 50 years have passed since the year of its publication" - so, free. --rubin16 (talk) 13:32, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Aguinaldo Monument
[edit]https://m.facebook.com/emilioaguinaldomuseum/photos/a.199450276769289/199450386769278/ states this is a work of Anastacio Caedo who died in 1990 acc. to google. no freedom of pano in the phils that allows all and free forms of reuse of photos of copyrighted bldgs and sculptures that doesnt compromise the rights of the creators or their heirs within the 50 yr copyright duration period
- File:Aguinaldojf0847.JPG
- File:Aguinaldojf0850 07.JPG
- File:Aguinaldojf0850 08.JPG
- File:Aguinaldojf0850 09.JPG
- File:AguinaldoMonumentjf0836 03.JPG
- File:AguinaldoMonumentjf0836 04.JPG
- File:AguinaldoMonumentjf0836 06.JPG
- File:AguinaldoMonumentjf0836 07.JPG
- File:AguinaldoMonumentjf0836 08.JPG
- File:AguinaldoMonumentjf0836 09.JPG
- File:AguinaldoMonumentjf0836 10.JPG
- File:AguinaldoMonumentjf0836 11.JPG
- File:AguinaldoMonumentjf0836 12.JPG
- File:AguinaldoMonumentjf0836 13.JPG
- File:Emilio Aguinaldo's Equestrian Statue.jpg
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 18:05, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment The statue being requested for deletion here is not the statue talked about in the Facebook post. The one in the the Facebook post is the statue located in Baguio City while these photos are of the statue in front of the Aguinaldo Shrine in Kawit, Cavite. -Howhontanozaz (talk) 03:04, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
4 years prescription since 2015 under the New 2019 SC Circular vis-à-vis Copyright law to question any FOP matter: a Legal Bar due to Extinctive Prescription to delete my photos and of User:Ramon FVelasquez as tagged by the Smart One September 2020 Mass Deletions
- I sincerely hope that Editors will note my Underscoring of the 4 years Legal Bar on Deletion of FOP photos, I repeat from 2016, thus the tons of Mass Deletions tags by the Smart One on RamonFVelasquez should be stricken off the Talk Page as grave violations of Criminal Law ...
- Keep Keep Because the Nominator has been blocked recently due to mass deletion nominations. It is fervently petitioned that - going to keep this for now until someone else can nominate if they see fit; Wherefore premises considered I humbly register my Strong Objection to this and the Mass Deletions Requests of this Single Editor, respectfully respectfully Judgefloro (talk) 08:08, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
- Keep the nominator cannot give further information about who designed this monument. And also per Howhontanozaz: this is not the monument that was made by Anastacio Caedo. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:04, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
Striken out my keep input, as I found some clues at [12] and [13] which may indicate the bronze equestrian statue of Aguinaldo as probably recent. The park where it stands now was a busy strest with a few dwellings which were all removed in 1998 to pave way for the establishment of the park, and finished on June 11 just in time for the Centennial Anniversary of the Philippine independence. While there's no sufficient info on who desiged or created it, it is likely that this was erected in 1998 together with the park. Delete now unfortunately, also Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle may apply. Restore all if ever FOP is finally introduced here. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:33, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 13:38, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
no freedom of pano in the phils that allows all and free forms of reuse of photos of copyrighted bldgs and sculptures that doesnt compromise the rights of the creators or their heirs within the 50 yr copyright duration period
- File:Battle of Alapan Monument in Imus Heritage Park.jpg
- File:Battle of Alapan Monument.jpg
- File:Battle of Imus monument - 1.jpg
- File:Battle of Imus monument - 2.jpg
- File:Battle of Imus Monument.jpg
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 18:32, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Weak keep for photos of Battle of Imus monument. File:ImusCavitejf0696 12.JPG seems to allude that this was commissioned by the government. But I'm not sure. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:32, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. Unless there's evidence provided otherwise, the monument was erected by the city government of Imus and thus enjoys freedom of copyright per the Intellectual Property Code of the Philippines. The files should maybe be tagged with {{workDepicted-PD-PhilippinesGov}} to indicate the uncopyrighted status of the monument and its sculptures. —seav (talk) 03:56, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
- Striken out my earlier input. Even commissioned works are still copyright-protected by its creators. The fact that Castrillo's heirs still hold the copyright of the publicly and government-owned w:People Power Monument proves that. Under Section 178.4, "In the case of a work commissioned by a person other than an employer of the author and who pays for it and the work is made in pursuance of the commission, the person who so commissioned the work shall have ownership of the work, but the copyright thereto shall remain with the creator, unless there is a written stipulation to the contrary." Written stipulation must be presented via COM:OTRS, but without that, I'm leaning towards Delete all. Restore only when FOP is formally introduced here. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:35, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
- Striken out my earlier input. Even commissioned works are still copyright-protected by its creators. The fact that Castrillo's heirs still hold the copyright of the publicly and government-owned w:People Power Monument proves that. Under Section 178.4, "In the case of a work commissioned by a person other than an employer of the author and who pays for it and the work is made in pursuance of the commission, the person who so commissioned the work shall have ownership of the work, but the copyright thereto shall remain with the creator, unless there is a written stipulation to the contrary." Written stipulation must be presented via COM:OTRS, but without that, I'm leaning towards
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 13:37, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by PlanespotterA320 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: No indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be PD in Russia (all works by unknown authors must have pre-1950 publication to be PD, no matter how old they are), sourcing insufficient ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 20:07, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment I am unsure about the status of this file, however, in the event of the file that has previously survived a deletion request, speedy deletion tag should not be applied. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 20:10, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep with
|
This work was published on territory of the Russian Empire (Russian Republic) except for territories of the Grand Duchy of Finland and Congress Poland before 7 November 1917 and wasn't re-published for 30 days following initial publications on the territory of Soviet Russia or any other countries.
The Russian Federation (early Soviet Russia, RSFSR) is the historical heir but not legal successor of the Russian Empire, and the Russian Empire was not party to the Berne Convention (it was not country of Union for the protection of the rights of authors in their literary and artistic works), so according to article 5 of the Convention this work has no country of origin except:
¹ - Author who is not a national of a country of the Union but who has his habitual residence in a country of the Union, be assimilated to national of that country. The exclusive rights to this work do not extend on territory of the Russian Federation according to article 1256 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation (details), because this work does not meet the requirements on the territory of publication, on the author's nationality, and on obligations for international treaties. If applicable, {{PD-Russia-expired}} should be used instead of this tag. This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published (or registered with the U.S. Copyright Office) before January 1, 1929. |
 |
Deleted: no information about publication. --rubin16 (talk) 13:28, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: FoP Poland does not apply to building interiors Einsamer Schütze (talk) 20:27, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: that's a monkey, not interior. --rubin16 (talk) 13:23, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: FoP Poland does not apply to building interiors Einsamer Schütze (talk) 20:28, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: I don't think that this monkey could be called interior. --rubin16 (talk) 13:23, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
_a_l%27Institut_Catal%C3%A0_de_Paleontologia_Miquel_Crusafont.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_a_l%27Institut_Catal%C3%A0_de_Paleontologia_Miquel_Crusafont.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: FoP Spain does not include building interiors Einsamer Schütze (talk) 20:37, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: I don't think that this monkey could be called interior. --rubin16 (talk) 13:35, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
COM:TOO South Korea seems low, and there's no fop. erring on the side of caution, i'd say delete. RZuo (talk) 20:39, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment a signature, not FOP-reliant underlying work. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:33, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: I think it could be kept per COM:SIG South Korea. --rubin16 (talk) 13:22, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dunkleosteus77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: The artist, Norberto Montecucco, died in 1978, so it has not entered PD, and there is no FOP in France Einsamer Schütze (talk) 20:43, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- No, he died 1943 [14]. --Einsamer Schütze (talk) 20:45, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: I have found sources for 1942 and 1943, not 1978. So, PD. --rubin16 (talk) 13:21, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by PlanespotterA320 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: No indication of early enough (pre-1950) PUBLICATION to be PD in country of origin, doesn't matter how old it is. 2010 book not early enough! AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 20:53, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 13:16, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by PlanespotterA320 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: No indication of early enough (pre-1950) PUBLICATION to be PD in country of origin, doesn't matter how old it is. 2010 book not early enough! AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 20:53, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 13:16, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by PlanespotterA320 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: RIA Novosti property. No indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be PD in Russia, no evidence that photograpger (Karpov) has been dead long enough. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 20:55, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Виталий Карпов is not the author of this image from 1925. He is digitizer at RIA Novosti, who uploads all sorts of images on their photobank. http://visualrian.ru/search/?query=%D0%92%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%B9%20%D0%9A%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%B2&area=author I assume a person who made this photo is dead either in terror of 1937, or in WW2. Macuser (talk) 11:48, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 13:16, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by PlanespotterA320 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: No indication of early enough (pre-1950) PUBLICATION to be PD in country of origin, doesn't matter how old it is. Yandex search engine not sufficient source AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 20:55, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 13:16, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by PlanespotterA320 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: No indication of early enough (pre-1950) PUBLICATION to be PD in country of origin, doesn't matter how old it is AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 20:56, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 13:15, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
