Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/08/05
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
1 Microsoft W 2001:4898:80E8:3:F5E8:5D7E:6147:D224 03:51, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Test or vandalism. --Achim (talk) 08:32, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Not own work, part of promotional material by Sony Bradipo Lento (talk) 09:32, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio so speedy and gone thanks. --Herby talk thyme 11:03, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Photo also used on dozens of news pages; given its low quality and zero author contributions before I'd challenge that the author created this photo themselves instead of taking it from another place (copyright violation). Malyacko (talk) 09:47, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation: Low resolution photo without exif-data used on multiple news sites. --Alaa :)..! 11:58, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Not originally from VOA, taken from Reuters (as per watermark) and credited at Reuters as "Karim Sokhn/Instagram/Ksokhn + Thebikekitchenbeirut/via REUTERS". P 1 9 9 ✉ 12:28, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- Should be a speedy delete...Intelati (talk) 12:37, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy deleted: apparent copyvio. --BrightRaven (talk) 14:02, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
errore di caricamento Alan Scaffardi (talk) 13:45, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
errore di caricamento Alan Scaffardi (talk) 13:45, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 13:49, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
food DroidFuzzing1 (talk) 23:39, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —DerHexer (Talk) 20:36, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Because it is Nonsense DroidFuzzing1 (talk) 03:37, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —DerHexer (Talk) 20:36, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Because it is Logo DroidFuzzing1 (talk) 03:39, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —DerHexer (Talk) 20:35, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: 
: Soy el autor de esa imagen, por lo que el fundamento esgrimido carece de validez..svg){kind=small}
: I am the author of that image, so the foundation used is invalid! --Diego HC (talk) 17:26, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Because it is DroidFuzzing1 (talk) 05:21, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —DerHexer (Talk) 20:35, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Because it is DroidFuzzing1 (talk) 12:39, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —DerHexer (Talk) 20:34, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Because it is DroidFuzzing1 (talk) 14:44, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —DerHexer (Talk) 20:34, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Omar_Helwany.jpeg Editor67329652 (talk) 20:54, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Omar_Helwany.jpeg Editor67329652 (talk) 20:56, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 23:15, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Hemant Kumar.jpg Hemant 2002 (talk) 07:47, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 08:13, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
File:Hangar 13 (2018 Logo).png Gamziko (talk) 06:16, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 09:23, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
Carlos Yáñez del Pino Cyaneztoledo (talk) 16:08, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:17, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Gigi Shibabaw Photo.png Yitbe (talk) 13:38, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Keep Another finger-trouble nomination. I think you need this image File:Gigi Shibabaw Photo.png, which is up for speedy deletion at present, because of sourcing problems. Please discuss that there, not here. Andy Dingley (talk) 14:19, 21 October 2020 (UTC)- Keep, no valid reason for deletion, and all of the above. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:08, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 18:01, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
Because it is A selfie DroidFuzzing1 (talk) 17:38, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —DerHexer (Talk) 20:33, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
File:ABS-3201.0-AustralianDemographicStatistics-EstimatedResidentPopulationBySingleYearAgeNorthernTerritory-EstimatedResidentPopulation-Female-38-A2158453J.svg
[edit]https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ficheiro:Bras%C3%A3o_da_Fam%C3%ADlia_Sombra.jpg Natanael Sombra (talk) 18:27, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 18:43, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
File:2020-01-20 Freestyle skiing at the 2020 Winter Youth Olympics – Men's Freeski Slopestyle – Qualification – 1st run (Martin Rulsch) 066.jpg
[edit]Because it is Logo DroidFuzzing1 (talk) 19:58, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Marcus Cyron (talk) 20:36, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
falsches Bild hochgeladen Haumei (talk) 20:03, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 20:08, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Reasons for deletion request -Rehanarose (talk) 11:08, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: G7 and poor quality. --Gbawden (talk) 07:37, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
I am uploading in SVG instead Sxologist (talk) 10:02, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Speedy delete per COM:CSD#G7. --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 19:07, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 09:57, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
I will upload a better version of this picture, which includes geolocarion. Leeturtle (talk) 18:08, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per COM:CSD#G7 --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 19:24, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 09:16, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
infringement Victorgrigas (talk) 14:40, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Flominator at 06:16, 6 August 2020 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1): Commons:Deletion requests/File:Beirut hospitals from the explosion - sensitive scenes.png: infringement --Krdbot 14:38, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
soucre doesnt specify cc license Victorgrigas (talk) 17:08, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Flominator at 06:18, 6 August 2020 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1): Commons:Deletion requests/File:Explosion22.jpg: soucre doesnt specify cc license --Krdbot 14:39, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
File:Hotnudity.jpg Rehanarose (talk) 10:44, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1). --Эlcobbola talk 15:21, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Jcfidy as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://vivimoslanoticia.cl/player/. Probably deserves discussion and research into COM:TOO Chile. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:57, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Se ha enviado el correo a OTRS.--Ftjw (talk) 04:47, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Ticket:2020080510002294 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 04:00, 7 August 2020 (UTC)- I have just accepted permission for “File:Vln-color.png” under ticket:2020080510002294. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 21:50, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Discussion is no longer necessary. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:05, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
I uploaded this and please remove it thank you Hoseina051311 (talk) 15:29, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 19:08, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hoseina051311 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Moj "received" these photos from another source (see the gallery page, it says these are "received"/«دریافتی»). In addition, Al Jazeera has attributed some of the photos found on the Moj gallery page to Reuters, some to AFP etc. Moj most probably isn't the copyright holder, and therefore can't release these photos under CC-BY 4.0 (COM:PCP).
- File:2020 Beirut explosions pic 5.jpg
- File:2020 Beirut explosions pic 4.jpg
- File:2020 Beirut explosions pic 1.jpg
- File:2020 Beirut explosions pic 3.jpg
- File:2020 Beirut explosions pic 2.jpg
Ahmadtalk 08:47, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Delete GMGtalk 12:28, 5 August 2020 (UTC)- Delete Per nomination. Frodar (talk) 15:21, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- Delete as per above. EstrellaSuecia (talk) 03:06, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - closing this early because of topic. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 17:04, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
It is supposedly a copyright violation Rckania (talk) 04:15, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by 1989 at 17:09, 10 August 2020 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 08:30, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
Taken from here (https://ke.opera.news/ke/en/entertainment/7c5795213501fd08d7a925d7ca262380 ) or here (https://lovinmalta.com/news/watch-massive-explosion-rips-through-beirut-leaving-at-least-ten-dead-and-hundreds-wounded/ ) Zoozaz1 (talk) 15:38, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Pi.1415926535 at 17:16, 10 August 2020 UTC: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Beirut Explosion.png: Taken from here (https://ke.opera.news/ke/en/entertainment/7c5795213501fd08d7a925d7ca262380 ) or here (https://lovinmalta.com/news/watch-massive-explosion-rips-through-beirut-leaving-at-least-ten-dead-and-hundreds-wounded/ ) --Krdbot 08:31, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
Not permission yet from newspapers "La Montagne" Lacharpente (talk) 09:28, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 14:25, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:04, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by 1989 at 13:43, 11 August 2020 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 20:31, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
Files of User:Saltan.andre
[edit]- File:Сoltello genovese di lusso.jpg
- File:Prototipo di coltello genovese da “esibire”.jpg
- File:Prototipo di coltello genovese con lama segreta.jpg
- File:Prototipo di coltello genovese di foggia antica.jpg
- File:Prototipo di coltello genovese da “lancio”.jpg
- File:Prototipo di coltello genovese con passacorda.jpg
- File:Prototipo di coltello genovese a passacorda.jpg
- File:Прототип генуэзского канонического ножа с острым наконечником, рисунок.jpg
All these files are uploaded under PD-OLD. However, the uploader claimed that the images are taken from the book “Il coltello Genovese, storie di lame, di armi prohibite e di caruggi” by Andrea Buti and stated Mr. Buti as the author. This book was published in 2011 and Andrea Buti was born in 1939 [1]; consequently, if these drawings and/or photographs were created by Buti (and not republished by him after some older sources), they must be copyrighted and non-free. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Saltan.andre. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:34, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:28, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gobbizlive (talk · contribs)
[edit]Appears to be a self-promotional account, no obvious encyclopedic value.
- File:RETRO video shoot.jpg
- File:Abel Meri “RETRO” shoot.jpg
- File:VCU basketball jersey.jpg
- File:Abel Meri profile photo.png
- File:Abel Meri in prayer pose.jpg
- File:Bradley Beal basketball jersey.jpg
- File:Salute Cover Art.png
- File:Smooth EP Cover.png
- File:TNSZ Cover Art.jpg
- File:Abel Meri x5000.jpg
- File:Cover Art -BLM.png
- File:Abel Meri BLM Video Shoot.png
- File:Abel Meri.jpg
Ytoyoda (talk) 03:31, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:26, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MlouNewdigate (talk · contribs)
[edit]Artist died in 2019 so still under copyright. The photo of her is not own work - photo of a photo, needs permission
Gbawden (talk) 07:07, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- [[They are my own photos, I also have the original photographs. I hope to edit and add more notability and impartial references in due course.
Sorry not sure if I am doing this correctly as am new to this.]] MlouNewdigate
- @MlouNewdigate: Maybe you took the photos of the paintings but copyright of the paintings remains with the painter and their heirs 70 years after their death Gbawden (talk) 15:30, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:07, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work. Complex logo is copyrighted and a number of the images have a watermark. Need permission
- File:Dance Centre Myway Logo.jpg
- File:Myway Dance Wear Shop.jpg
- File:Dance Machine абонемент.jpg
- File:Hip-Hop at Dance Centre Myway.jpg
- File:Stretching at Dance Centre Myway.jpg
- File:Myway Dance Awards performance.jpg
- File:Myway Dance Awards.jpg
- File:Зал А.jpg
- File:Dance Centre Myway.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 10:13, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:07, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:43, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:08, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Logo above COM:TOO.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:48, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:12, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Historical advertisement. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Uniphone Kad Arastu.jpg
- File:Uniphone Kad Tulip.jpg
- File:Uniphone Kad Rasuah.jpg
- File:Uniphone Kad Tiger.jpg
- File:Uniphone Kad Merdeka Day 1992.jpg
- File:Uniphone Kad Medan Pasar.jpg
- File:Uniphone Kad Chinese New Year 1994.jpg
- File:Uniphone Kad Kuala Lumpur Landscape.jpg
- File:Uniphone Kad Pantai Perupuk.jpg
- File:Uniphone Kad Kekalkan keindahan alam.jpg
- File:Uniphone Kad My Garden.jpg
- File:Uniphone Kad Genting Theme Park.jpg
- File:Uniphone Kad Leopard.jpg
- File:KadFon Muzium Telekomunikasi Negara.jpg
- File:Uniphone Kad Mahsuri.jpg
- File:Uniphone Kad NGC 2997 Galaxy.jpg
- File:Uniphone Kad Japanese Restaurant.jpg
- File:Uniphone Kad Kampung Batik.jpg
- File:Uniphone Kad Anggerik Batik.jpg
- File:KadFon Lion Fish.jpg
- File:Uniphone Kad Kuala Kedah.jpg
- File:Uniphone Kad Pangkor.jpg
- File:Uniphone Kad Langkawi.jpg
- File:Uniphone Kad Penang.jpg
- File:Uniphone Kad Malacca.jpg
- File:Uniphone Kad OAC Insurance.jpg
- File:Uniphone Kad Wayang Kulit.jpg
- File:Uniphone Kad Jet skiing.jpg
- File:KadFon Children.jpg
- File:KadFon Bilik Gerakan Polis.jpg
- File:KadFon Tasik Cini.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:10, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal image, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:49, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:13, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Paul Kiguba (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal docs and photos, COM:WEBHOST, no educational use, out of scope.
- File:Luganda Wikipedia Training Evaluation.jpg
- File:EVALUATION OF WIKIPEDIA TRAINING PROGRAM.jpg
- File:Invitation to Training in Using Luganda Wikipedia.jpg
- File:Mbazzi Wikicentre Meeting.jpg
- File:Looking for Internet Connectivity at Mbazzi Wikipedia Centre.jpg
- File:INSIDE MBAZZI COMPUTER CENTRE.jpg
- File:Mbazzi writes Wikipedia.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:53, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:13, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Clawscoals (talk · contribs) 1
[edit]See image below.
(I apologise for the long image however converting all images to tables with images and text would take forever so figured this way would be a lot quicker), Thanks. –Davey2010Talk 17:31, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Very long image with deletion reasons given for each file
|
|---|
|
|
- File:50000px x 50000px solid white.png
- File:10000px x 10000px solid white.png
- File:5000px x 5000px solid white.png
- File:2000px x 2000px solid white.png
- File:500px x 500px solid white.png
- File:1000px x 1000px solid white.png
- File:200px x 200px solid white.png
- File:100px x 100px solid white.png
- File:50px x 50px solid white.png
- File:20px x 20px solid white.png
- File:2px x 2px solid white.png
- File:5px x 5px solid white.png
- File:10px x 10px solid white.png
- File:20000px x 20000px solid white.png
- File:Universe Sandbox ² - 20200220-191454.png
- File:Universe Sandbox ² - 20200220-191734 Video.gif
- File:Universe Sandbox ² - 20200220-193653 Video.gif
- File:Universe Sandbox ² - 20200220-191721 Video.gif
- File:Universe Sandbox ² - 20200208-190538 Video.gif
- File:Universe Sandbox ² - 20200208-190040 Video.gif
- File:Universe Sandbox ² - 20200208-190407 Video.gif
- File:Universe Sandbox ² - 20200208-185736 Video.gif
- File:Universe Sandbox ² - 20200206-170610 Video.gif
- File:Universe Sandbox ² - 20200208-185647 Video.gif
- File:Universe Sandbox ² - 20190618-182402 Video.gif
- File:Universe Sandbox - 20200607-220125 Video.gif
- File:Universe Sandbox - 20200803-145513 Video.gif
- File:Universe Sandbox - 20200803-151929 Video.gif
- File:Universe Sandbox - 20200803-151920 Video.gif
- File:Dots .png
- File:Universe Sandbox - 20200803-145527 Video (supernova).gif
- File:Xa2epkl6.gif
- File:Tryui76m76 tngj76 gyjnnj76t 345 cjgngv.png
- File:Tyurjnuyuhty.png
- File:1d tyhjnhh.png
- File:20200803 124156 fghy.webm
- File:20200802 194841 76huuyjh j.webm
- File:20200802 225704 ygku.webm
- File:20200802 000737 hgkj.webm
- File:Gfh658756.jpg
- File:20200801 223743 hujuio.jpg
- File:Żar-2.jpg
File:Czerniakowskie-1.jpg- File:Żar-1.jpg
File:Most Poniatowskiego 4.jpgFile:Most Poniatowskiego 3.jpgFile:Most Poniatowskiego 2.webm- File:Most Poniatowskiego 1.jpg
File:Wisła-2.jpgFile:Fontanna.webm
–Davey2010Talk 17:19, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Clawscoals (talk · contribs) 2
[edit]See image below.
(I apologise for the long image however converting all images to tables with images and text would take forever so figured this way would be a lot quicker), Thanks. –Davey2010Talk 17:54, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Very long image with deletion reasons given for each file
|
|---|
|
|
File:Wisła-1.jpgFile:20200801 184544 ygfyt.webm- File:Kostidfhfgf.png
- File:Small pixel project.png
- File:Very transparent pixel.png
- File:Transparent pixel.png
- File:White pixel.png
- File:Very black pixel.png
- File:Black pixel.png
- File:Very blue pixel.png
- File:Blue pixel.png
- File:Very green pixel.png
- File:Green pixel.png
- File:Very red pixel.png
- File:Red pixel 556654.png
- File:Fggf 1d 5yhg i hghj ☻ kołovb.png
- File:20200731 191034 gfjhhgh.jpg
- File:20200731 191028 gh.jpg
- File:20200731 191031 yt.jpg
- File:20200731 191026 y576.jpg
- File:20200731 191019 ghhj.jpg
- File:20200731 191021 hg.jpg
- File:20200731 191024 hgjhg.jpg
- File:20200731 191013 h.jpg
File:20200731 191010 ty.jpg- File:20200731 191006 rtet.jpg
- File:20200731 190954 rhtryr.jpg
- File:20200731 190952 hhgghf.jpg
- File:20200731 190948 jygIvbbRRhrt.jpg
- File:20200731 190926 gfgf.jpg
- File:20200731 190917 ghjh.jpg
- File:20200731 190848 yyyrt.jpg
- File:20200731 190912fgd.jpg
- File:20200731 190832 uiiu.jpg
File:20200731 190744 gf56trty.jpg- File:20200731 190732 trry.jpg
- File:20200731 190718 hghgj.jpg
- File:20200731 190638 rtyuuyt.jpg
- File:20200731 190657 yghcf5!df.jpg
- File:20200731 190614 gfhg.jpg
- File:20200731 190556 df.jpg
- File:20200731 190554 rtrth.jpg
- File:20200731 190552 hggh.jpg
- File:20200731 190550 u.jpg
- File:20200731 190439 trrhttr.jpg
- File:20200731 190435 ffdh.jpg
File:20200731 185833 rtr.webm- File:20200731 185827 ikygh.jpg
- File:20200731 185821 yuyu.jpg
- File:20200731 185801 tyg jfd☻hj ^hjjh.jpg
–Davey2010Talk 17:54, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Clawscoals (talk · contribs) 3
[edit]See image below.
(I apologise for the long image however converting all images to tables with images and text would take forever so figured this way would be a lot quicker), Thanks. –Davey2010Talk 17:31, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Very long image with deletion reasons given for each file
|
|---|
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_066.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_1961_10-04,_gardien_de_la_paix_et_chauffeur_de_taxi_tués_(Le_Monde_page_???).jpg){kind=link}
_1961_12-06_Légion_d'honneur_3-4.png){kind=link}
_1961_12-06_Légion_d'honneur_1-4.png){kind=link}
_1961_12-06_Légion_d'honneur_2-4.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Chaenomeles_speciosa_-香港花展_Hong_Kong_Flower_Show-_(9193447192).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_066.jpg){kind=link}
_066.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- File:20200731 185728 e.jpg
- File:0123456789 transparent.png
- File:0123456789 ervgoreg.png
- File:67yh11wr4432ygg tgtg (v2).png
- File:67yh11wr4432ygg tgtg.png
- File:Sunset 2333232.jpg
- File:Sunset 73466374455554545345545607892149.jpg
- File:Sunset 20200730 205634.jpg
- File:Sunset 0.jpg
- File:Sunset 765463355.jpg
- File:Sunset 85585748.jpg
- File:Sunset 7654633.jpg
- File:Bazgroły16.png
- File:Bazgroły15.png
- File:Bazgroły14.png
- File:Bazgroły13.png
- File:Bazgroły11.png
- File:Bazgroły12.png
- File:Bazgroły10.png
- File:Bazgroły9.png
- File:Bazgroły8.png
- File:Bazgroły7.png
- File:Bazgroły6.png
- File:Bazgroły5.png
- File:Bazgroły4.png
- File:Bazgroły2.png
- File:Bazgroły3.png
- File:Bazgroły1.png
- File:Bez t4ytułu.png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
–Davey2010Talk 18:25, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:17, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Clawscoals (talk · contribs)
[edit]All out of scope images. The Kopia file could be in scope if it was used somewhere however it's not, Thanks,
- File:Jhkjjky4ttg364gf636fr6rt766we4wew3dq1a3ftvtyty9767fg6vt.png
- File:Wiki commons — kopia.png
- File:CAPTCHA.png
- File:Gdfdgggggdfdgdf.png
- File:3d fractal.png
–Davey2010Talk 17:30, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:37, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Clawscoals (talk · contribs)
[edit]Apologies forgot to include these above - No metadata is included with these files and I'm sceptical that these were made by the uploader. Thanks,
–Davey2010Talk 13:12, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:06, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
I want add new photo Sachith Dilshan Kaluwitharana (talk) 07:58, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; uploader's request. Only used on their own userpage on simplewiki. --Ahmadtalk 06:06, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
I want add new photo Sachith Dilshan Kaluwitharana (talk) 08:00, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; uploader's request. Only used on their own userpage on simplewiki. --Ahmadtalk 06:07, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Derivative work without a licence for the original work. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:36, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- This image is of book cover(s), and the copyright for it is most likely owned either by the artist who created the cover(s) or the publisher of the book(s). It is believed that the use of low-resolution images of book covers to illustrate an article discussing the book in question on the English-language Wikipedia, hosted on servers in the United States by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation, qualifies as fair use under the copyright law of the United States. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nbeeker (talk • contribs) 01:10, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- Fair use isn't permitted on Wikimedia Commons. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:46, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Please see COM:FAIR. --Ahmadtalk 06:11, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Derivative work without a licence for the original work. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:36, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- This image is of book cover(s), and the copyright for it is most likely owned either by the artist who created the cover(s) or the publisher of the book(s). It is believed that the use of low-resolution images of book covers to illustrate an article discussing the book in question on the English-language Wikipedia, hosted on servers in the United States by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation, qualifies as fair use under the copyright law of the United States. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nbeeker (talk • contribs) 01:10, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- Fair use isn't permitted on Wikimedia Commons. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:49, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Please see COM:FAIR. --Ahmadtalk 06:12, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Derivative work without a licence for the original work. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:37, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- This image is of book cover(s), and the copyright for it is most likely owned either by the artist who created the cover(s) or the publisher of the book(s). It is believed that the use of low-resolution images of book covers to illustrate an article discussing the book in question on the English-language Wikipedia, hosted on servers in the United States by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation, qualifies as fair use under the copyright law of the United States. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nbeeker (talk • contribs) 01:09, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- Fair use isn't permitted on Wikimedia Commons. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:48, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Please see COM:FAIR. --Ahmadtalk 06:13, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
File:St-Louis-Cardinals-Baseball-Cremation-Urn-and-St-Louis-Cardinals-Decor-With-Custom-Metal-Plaque-Cremation-Urn-for-Human-Ashes-Front 200x.jpg
[edit]
Appears to be promotional, and the St Louis Cardinals logo on the product photo is copyrighted Ytoyoda (talk) 03:12, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; COM:DW of copyrighted work. --Ahmadtalk 06:16, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 05:14, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: possibly out of scope, and also likely to be a photo of another photo. --Ahmadtalk 06:22, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by SHIPSANACT (talk · contribs)
[edit]EU works claimed as own work, needs permission
- File:EU SHIPSAN ACT History.png
- File:EU SHIPSAN ACT Logo.png
- File:History of EU SHIPSAN ACT Joint Action.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 09:54, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:39, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Unidentified groups of people, no exif. Out of scope or copyvio
Gbawden (talk) 10:02, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:39, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:GB temp logos
[edit]Complex logos, need permission
Gbawden (talk) 10:34, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:11, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:GB temp logos 2
[edit]Complex logos, need permission to be kept
- File:BANDEIRA MUNICIPIO RAFAEL GODEIRO-RN.jpg
- File:Brasão de armas Centrismo.png
- File:Brasão do Bombeiro Comunitário de Santa Catarina.jpg
- File:BRASÃO MUNICIPIO RAFAEL GODEIRO-RN.jpg
- File:Breve aphtatico cotem.jpg
- File:Britco.png
- File:BRUFC.jpg
- File:Bryant & Stratton College - Seal.png
Gbawden (talk) 13:12, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 02:59, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:GB temp logos 3
[edit]Complex logos, needs permission to be kept
- File:Liceo 1depa.png
- File:Liceo 2 sanca.jpg
- File:Liceo 4 Maldonado.png
- File:Liceo 4Maldo.png
- File:Liceo de Aigua.png
- File:Liceo de Cervantes 80 años.jpg
- File:Liceo N°1 Canelones.png
- File:Liceo N°1 Dolores.png
- File:Liceo N°1 Minas.jpg
- File:Liceo N°11 Montevideo.png
- File:Liceo N°2 Chuy.png
- File:Liceo N°2 Montevideo.png
- File:Liceo N°3 de Salto.png
- File:Liceo N°34 Montevideo.png
- File:Liceo N°35 Motevideo.png
- File:Liceo N°4 de Salto.png
- File:Liceo N°6 Salto.png
- File:Liceo N°7 de Salto.png
- File:Liceo N°7 Montevideo.png
- File:Liceo N°8 Montevideo.png
Gbawden (talk) 10:11, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:12, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Erfansaitalpy (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused logos or personal artwork, no educational use, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:46, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:40, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:50, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:41, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Makemyforum (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused logos, no educational use, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:50, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:42, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Unused text doc, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:54, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:43, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Unused Linux logos and screenshots, no educational value, out of scope. Plenty of Linux logos already in Category:Linux logos (and the logos nominated here are not official).
- File:Mac Linux USB Loader icon.png
- File:Mac Linux USB Loader main screen.png
- File:Mac Linux USB Loader Icon.png
- File:Mac Linux USB Loader Main Window.tiff
P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:57, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:12, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Unused screenshots and personal photos, no educational use, out of scope. And uploaded for promotional/advertising purpose too.
- File:Connect-to-learn-2.jpg
- File:Connect-to-learn-1.jpg
- File:NovatiumEnterpriseDesktop.jpg
- File:NovatiumEducationsolution.jpg
- File:Navigator - Managed solution on Android.png
- File:MCaaS - Administrative control.jpg
- File:PCaaS Telecom Story.png
- File:PCaaS.png
P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:58, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:44, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Unused screenshots, tables, and logos, no educational use, out of scope.
- File:Sciencereward-main.png
- File:Sciencereward.png
- File:ScienceReward.png
- File:CAT MAC logo.png
- File:CAT mac screenshot.png
- File:MAC command line.png
- File:MAC screenshot 2.png
- File:MAC screenshot1.png
- File:MAC screenshot.png
- File:Windows screenshot.png
- File:Kaks logo.png
P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:01, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:03, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:30, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:30, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Unused screenshot, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:08, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:30, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative work from non-free software screenshots and music.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
Unused screenshots, no educational use, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:09, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:12, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Unused screenshot and logo, no educational use, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:10, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:12, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:22, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Unused screenshot, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:11, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:23, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Unused screenshots, no educational use, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:13, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:23, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Unused screenshot and logo, no educational use, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:14, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:23, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Unused tables, should be in wiki-table markup if needed, out of scope.
- File:Panamericana (SUBE Social).PNG
- File:Panamericana (SUBE).PNG
- File:Panamericana (monedas).PNG
- File:Maipu (SUBE Social).PNG
- File:Maipu (monedas).PNG
- File:Maipu (SUBE).PNG
.PNG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.PNG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.PNG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.PNG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.PNG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.PNG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:15, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:26, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vlad Baturin (talk · contribs)
[edit]Advertisement. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Принцип работы и конструкция винтового шнекового насоса.webm
- File:Штукатурная станция (шнековый насос).png
- File:Бочковой винтовой насос.jpg
- File:Дозировочный винтовой насос.jpg
- File:Вертикальные винтовые насосы.jpg
- File:Горизонтальные винтовые насосы.jpg
- File:Горизонтальный винтовой насос.jpg
- File:Бочковой насос. Деталировка.png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:17, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:04, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Md Ziyaullah Shah (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:05, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Taken from FB per MD, not own work Gbawden (talk) 09:55, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:11, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope Gbawden (talk) 10:07, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:11, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Out of project scope Leyo 10:21, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:12, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Leyo 10:25, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:13, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Leyo 10:30, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:13, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Leyo 10:31, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:13, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Out of scop Gbawden (talk) 10:36, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:14, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Photographer is clark little, needs permission Gbawden (talk) 10:43, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:21, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vgiraldososa (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope
Gbawden (talk) 10:44, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:15, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Unused very low-res montage, no credits for individual images, and unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:45, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:32, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:52, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:52, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:16, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:53, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:16, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:53, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Unused screenshot of text doc, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:17, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:53, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by SnowyOwl512 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:54, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Historical photos, posters, sound recordings. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Erika.ogg
- File:You Spin Me Round (Like A Record) cover.ogg
- File:Ceausesco in North korea.ogg
- File:Elena Ceausescu song.ogg
- File:Poporul, Ceaușescu, România!.ogg
- File:Learn From Lei Feng's Good Example.ogg
- File:The People of Yanbian Love Chairman Mao.ogg
- File:Sailing the Seas Depends on the Helmsman.ogg
- File:Mao Zedong 1949.jpg
- File:The People of the World Will Surely be Victorious.png
- File:Lei Feng.png
- File:Lei feng Propaganda.jpg
- File:Uz Maršala Tita.ogg
- File:Enver Hoxha with Stalin.jpg
- File:Marshal Josip Broz Tito.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:02, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Airin Ismetov (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Luckyboy.2017.Strandja Tournament ismetov.jpg
- File:Ismetov.50medals.20.03.2015.Ruse.Bulgaria.jpg
- File:2004.Razgrad.Gold medal.Champion.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:03, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Afzal Khan A J (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:00, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:04, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:00, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:04, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Not a real user, not a real own work. E4024 (talk) 03:22, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and FB MD. --Gbawden (talk) 10:50, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
49 KB false ow and OoS. E4024 (talk) 20:49, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:55, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Anybody knows him? Scope? E4024 (talk) 20:54, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:55, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
22 KB, not an ow as declared. E4024 (talk) 20:56, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:55, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
She is not an actress but an Indonesian adolescent who wishes to appear in Commons. E4024 (talk) 21:01, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:55, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
43 KB, not even an own work and less an actor. Please do not categorize these youngsters as "actors from unidentified countries". They are not actors, and our DRs are kind of backlogged. E4024 (talk) 21:07, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:54, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
66 KB dubious ow of a dubiously in scope young woman. E4024 (talk) 21:10, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:55, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
73 KB, not an ow; and dubious scope. E4024 (talk) 21:14, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:54, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
82 KB false own work. E4024 (talk) 21:27, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:54, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
29 KB false own work. Source is hidden at the MD. E4024 (talk) 21:29, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:53, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Anybody knows the cricketer? If so, is this an own work? (See the uploader's TP pls.) E4024 (talk) 21:31, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:54, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
File:Delbeke Raymond 1911-1961, (doc) 1961 10-04, gardien de la paix et chauffeur de taxi tués (Le Monde page ???).jpg
[edit]_1961_10-04,_gardien_de_la_paix_et_chauffeur_de_taxi_tu%C3%A9s_(Le_Monde_page_%3F%3F%3F).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1961_10-04,_gardien_de_la_paix_et_chauffeur_de_taxi_tu%C3%A9s_(Le_Monde_page_%3F%3F%3F).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Immediate suppression : it's a copyfraud from an article (1961). Sammyday (talk) 22:04, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:53, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
_1961_12-06_L%C3%A9gion_d%27honneur_3-4.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1961_12-06_L%C3%A9gion_d%27honneur_3-4.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyfraud : "La reproduction en vue d'un usage privé des images et des notices de la base Léonore est autorisée. Toute diffusion, gratuite ou payante, est soumise à l'autorisation préalable des Archives nationales." Sammyday (talk) 22:05, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
_1961_12-06_Légion_d'honneur_3-4.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:53, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
_1961_12-06_Légion_d'honneur_3-4.png){kind=link}
_1961_12-06_L%C3%A9gion_d%27honneur_1-4.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1961_12-06_L%C3%A9gion_d%27honneur_1-4.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyfraud : "La reproduction en vue d'un usage privé des images et des notices de la base Léonore est autorisée. Toute diffusion, gratuite ou payante, est soumise à l'autorisation préalable des Archives nationales." Sammyday (talk) 22:05, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
_1961_12-06_Légion_d'honneur_1-4.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:53, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
_1961_12-06_Légion_d'honneur_1-4.png){kind=link}
_1961_12-06_L%C3%A9gion_d%27honneur_2-4.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1961_12-06_L%C3%A9gion_d%27honneur_2-4.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyfraud : "La reproduction en vue d'un usage privé des images et des notices de la base Léonore est autorisée. Toute diffusion, gratuite ou payante, est soumise à l'autorisation préalable des Archives nationales." Sammyday (talk) 22:05, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
_1961_12-06_Légion_d'honneur_2-4.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:53, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
_1961_12-06_Légion_d'honneur_2-4.png){kind=link}
Neither an own work nor a known actress. E4024 (talk) 22:12, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:52, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Could not find the actress in internet searches. Tal vez el nombre esta mal escrito? E4024 (talk) 22:32, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:52, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
5 KB false ow. Scope another question mark. E4024 (talk) 22:34, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:52, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
MD with "user comments" may show some previous social media use. Small file. Scope dubious. E4024 (talk) 22:40, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:52, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
22 KB false ow and previously deleted (or forgotton to delete) file of the image of an OoS person. E4024 (talk) 22:47, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:52, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Cover must be copyrighted. E4024 (talk) 22:51, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:51, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Upper left corner WM may imply this is not a real ow. BTW why is a "diva" in an "unidentified" cat? Russian speaking people, know her? E4024 (talk) 22:54, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:51, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
70 KB dubious ow with transmission code. E4024 (talk) 22:59, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:51, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
See WM please. E4024 (talk) 23:16, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:51, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
44 KB dubious OW. The uploader also uploaded a file of hers from Facebook. E4024 (talk) 23:54, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:51, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
25 KB dubious ow by a one-time visitor. E4024 (talk) 23:57, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:51, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ArsaHuajaiit (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 13:06, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 13:06, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 13:06, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. Duplicate. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 13:07, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Low-resolution copy of existing file EcoEnergy EE-02-010.JPG Dmitry G (talk) 06:35, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 16:36, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Low-resolution copy of existing file LEDfilamentLightBulbE27.jpg Dmitry G (talk) 06:37, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 16:36, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Low-resolution copy of LED bulbs 2012.jpg Dmitry G (talk) 06:40, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 16:36, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Low-resolution copy of existing file LED E27 corn.JPG Dmitry G (talk) 06:42, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 16:36, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Low-resolution copy of existing file File:New torch bulb.jpg Dmitry G (talk) 06:44, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 16:36, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Low-resolution copy of existing file LED light (40979).jpg Dmitry G (talk) 06:45, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 16:36, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Low-resolution copy of existing file Sct Mathias xmas illumination 2010-12-14.jpg Dmitry G (talk) 06:47, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 16:36, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Low-resolution copy of existing file LED bulbs.jpg Dmitry G (talk) 06:48, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 16:36, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Low-resolution copy of existing file Led-lampa.jpg Dmitry G (talk) 06:50, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 16:36, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Low-resolution copy of existing file Chip-On-Board COB LED Module.JPG Dmitry G (talk) 06:51, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 16:36, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Not own work Gbawden (talk) 08:46, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:24, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Not own work, historical photo, needs info on PD status Gbawden (talk) 09:50, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:24, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work, from FB per md Gbawden (talk) 10:52, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:25, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Copyright holder KISSKRISZTIII needs permission Gbawden (talk) 11:09, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:25, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Poor quality image - Unlikely to ever be used, Better images in Fiesta cat –Davey2010Talk 20:16, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:26, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Hanooz as no permission (No permission since). Probable copyvio given the uploader's abysmal upload log, including photos of this subject. PRP. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:09, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
- It's written that the user has permission, but we need permission via OTRS. He must send a permission "I have received permission from the original author (not me) to upload the file to Commons." Hanooz 14:12, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
I am allowed to publish it through the Instagram from the owner of the photo
- @Alikaremi: What does that say in English? — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 19:02, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
"I'll allow you to put a photo of me from you on my Wikipedia page." Alikaremi (talk) 03:45, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Alikaremi: Thanks, but this isn't Wikipedia, she probably didn't take that photo, and she certainly didn't authorize release under {{Cc0}}. Please ask her to have the photographer send permission via OTRS. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:56, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
yes Alikaremi (talk) 03:59, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Ronhjones as a re-upload of an already deleted file. --James F. (talk) 18:17, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
this is a copyright image from https://www.niksalehi.com/newspaper/kimia-gilani.html Hoseina051311 (talk) 05:38, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:44, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Please delete. In fact this file is from Mexico, not from Argentina Mutter Erde (talk) 08:09, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (mistakenly uploaded as PD-AR-Photo). --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:45, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
No evidence such flag existed. Clear original research. Used on many Wikipedia's articles Renato de carvalho ferreira (talk) 08:21, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: With "Used on many Wikipedia's articles" you give the reason to keep this image for now per COM:INUSE and COM:NPOV: "It is not the role of Commons to adjudicate on subject-matter disputes" - whether such a flag existed should first be discussed in the projects where it was decided to use this image, not here. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:47, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
No evidence such flag existed. Clear original research. Used on many Wikipedia's articles Renato de carvalho ferreira (talk) 08:21, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: With "Used on many Wikipedia's articles" you give the reason to keep this image for now per COM:INUSE and COM:NPOV: "It is not the role of Commons to adjudicate on subject-matter disputes" - whether such a flag existed should first be discussed in the projects where it was decided to use this image, not here. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:47, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
フェニキアの旗がこれであると裏付ける証拠や、この旗のが不明であり誤情報の可能性があるため。 106.130.156.17 11:59, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep I don't understand what you're saying, but the image is in use in many articles. PaterMcFly (talk) 14:38, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: as per the previous DR. --Yasu (talk) 15:12, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
Small image without sufficient EXIF data, dubious claim of own work A1Cafel (talk) 09:20, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: Cropped from File:Isais Tree Waterford.jpg. --Achim (talk) 16:03, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per Achim (crop made by uploader of the original). --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:52, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
This is infringement. How did the uploader on yourtube upload ALL those videos of the explosion? License laundering! Victorgrigas (talk) 16:13, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- Maybe he has friends in Beirut who were recording it? If the video isn't copyrighted elsewhere before it was uploaded I would think it's free to use. Zoozaz1 (talk) 16:15, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- Copyright is default the person who took the video. If it was taken by a friend the friends would own the copyright and it's still infringement. That said, it's certainly not his. Mvolz (talk) 16:20, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- That specific video might be from here, which is licensed under creative commons as well (or vice versa). Zoozaz1 (talk) 16:24, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- Copyright is default the person who took the video. If it was taken by a friend the friends would own the copyright and it's still infringement. That said, it's certainly not his. Mvolz (talk) 16:20, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- This photo is in the same situation as well. Zoozaz1 (talk) 16:17, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- I saw this vid for the first time here as tweet embeded in a news page. There is a time written and maybe this person who tweeted it could now the orignal author.--Sanandros (talk) 20:55, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- The user even uploaded a video from the air which has been shown on TV in much higher resolution (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3LSqq9fyksc), so clear infringement. --92.213.11.80 21:41, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- Delete The video was previously published at https://twitter.com/BissanCampaigns/status/1290671086951161856 by a Twitter user who claims to have received the video via WhatsApp. Whatever the origin of the video, it requires verification via COM:OTRS. Ytoyoda (talk) 16:02, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: procedural close: already deleted. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:53, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
COPYVIO, image is not user's own work, user is a WP:SPA account, original source: https://player.fm/series/the-openist-podcast-of-democracy-cafesocrates-cafe/how-ron-nirenberg-strives-to-build-bridges-on-local-and-global-scales-an-exchange-with-the-mayor-of-san-antonio-texas SanAnMan (talk) 21:18, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Ronhjones at 04:51, 28 Februar 2019 UTC: Copyright violation: not user's own work as claimed --Krdbot 07:56, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
COPYVIO, image is not user's own work, copyright www.sanantonio.gov SanAnMan (talk) 17:06, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: procedural close: already deleted. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:54, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. Published here (image 16 in the slideshow) in 2018, almost two years before being uploaded here. —Granger (talk · contribs) 19:05, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:59, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
This is outdated as this school is no longer open since we added it Nbfinest1 (talk) 05:27, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: This file is in use in the English Wikipedia article on North Braddock, Pennsylvania. While English Wikipedia is using the file, it should remain on Commons under COM:INUSE. --bjh21 (talk) 14:32, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
- Keep The fact that the photo cannot be replaced (since the school is no longer open) makes it even more important to keep this image. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 06:06, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:21, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
„Nicht-kommerzielle Nutzung“ lt. Beschreibung ist nicht kompatibel mit der Lizenz 2A01:598:B887:6855:BDAB:6B45:5346:47C6 04:18, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- Delete: „Nicht-kommerzielle Nutzung“ = NC --Achim (talk) 08:35, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- I found conflicting informations and asked my Mentee, to correct them, see :w:de:Benutzer_Diskussion:MedienOptimist
- @MedienOptimist: Bitte frage beim Autor nach, ob er kommerzielle Nutzung erlaubt oder nicht, wenn nicht dann muss die Datei gelöscht werden, genauere Infos auf deiner Benutzerseite auf de.wikipedia — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 07:39, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Ich habe versucht, die Lizenzfrage zur Verwendung in Wikipedia Deutschland, zu verbessern. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MedienOptimist (talk • contribs) 16:09, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Info: The NC sentence has been removed by the uploader. --Achim (talk) 17:11, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: User:Krd added OTRS permission in Special:Diff/440239550. — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 18:04, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
Wegen eventueller Lizenskonflikte und da dieses Bild nicht mehr zur Verwendung in dem Wikipedia-Artikel "Klaus Küster" vorgesehen ist, könnte dieses Bild gelöscht werden. MedienOptimist (talk) 14:13, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
- (german) @MedienOptimist: Die Lizenz von File:Klaus_Küster.jpg wurde geprüft und bestätigt, bei File:Klaus_Küster_-_Selbstportrait.jpg gibt es kein offizielle Bestätigung, insofern spricht es aus lizenstechnischer sicht dafür das Bild zu behalten. Wenn eine Datei "gelöscht" wird, liegt sie noch immer auf der Festplatte aber es haben nur mehr Admins Zugriff, insofern macht es keinen Sinn, wenn ein Bild geändert wird das das alte gelöscht wird, wenn man sich Commons:Project_scope/de#Muss_tatsächlich_nützlich_für_einen_edukativen_Zweck_sein geht es um die Nutzbarkeit und nicht um die tatsächliche Nutzung, und da es eingebunden war, ist das kein valider Löschgrund. Da das Bild bereits unter CC-BY-SA 4.0 veröffentlicht wurde kann jeder es wieder unter dieser Lizenz hineinstellen, damit ist es sinnlos es zu löschen. Die einzige Ausnahme die ich sehe, wäre wenn der Hochlader es aus versehen hochgeladen hat und dies innerhalb einer Woche meldet, aber auch das sehe ich (derzeit) nicht. Also ich sehe keine Möglichkeit dieses Bild regelkonfrom noch löschen zu können.
- (english summary) I cannot see any valid reason to delete this file any more (since Copyright is clarified and image was COM:INUSE and therefore it can be still educative usefull (i.e. in scope)).
- — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 20:59, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 22:36, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
Removed from the page it was uploaded for. Nbfinest1 (talk) 09:36, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
- Keep No reason for deletion. --Sebari (talk) 22:44, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Numerous images are not used in articles but remain in project scope. Green Giant (talk) 22:59, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
The photo is outdated and no longer featured on the North Braddock page since we uploaded it Nbfinest1 (talk) 05:31, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:34, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
The photo is outdated and no longer featured on the North Braddock page since we uploaded it Nbfinest1 (talk) 05:32, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:34, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
The photo is outdated and no longer featured on the North Braddock page since we uploaded it Nbfinest1 (talk) 05:32, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:34, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
The photo is outdated and no longer featured on the North Braddock page since we uploaded it Nbfinest1 (talk) 05:32, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:34, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
The photo is outdated and no longer featured on the North Braddock page since we uploaded it Nbfinest1 (talk) 05:33, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:34, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Courtesy deletion request. It shows a person and the photo is outdated. Nbfinest1 (talk) 07:11, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
Comment Visible person shown is only incidental and seen from waist down; not identifiable. Vehicle shown does not have license plate visible. I see nothing objectionable. What is the problem? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:01, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:30, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Was removed from the page it was uploaded for. Nbfinest1 (talk) 09:15, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
- Keep No reason for deletion. --Sebari (talk) 22:41, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Numerous images are not used in articles but remain in project scope. Green Giant (talk) 22:57, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
The photo is outdated and no longer featured on the North Braddock page since we uploaded it Nbfinest1 (talk) 05:33, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:34, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Was removed from the page it was uploaded for. Nbfinest1 (talk) 09:20, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
- Keep No reason for deletion. --Sebari (talk) 22:43, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Numerous images are not used in articles but remain in project scope. Green Giant (talk) 22:58, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
The photo is outdated and no longer featured on the North Braddock page since we uploaded it Nbfinest1 (talk) 05:33, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:34, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Was removed from the page it was uploaded for. Nbfinest1 (talk) 09:26, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
Kept: No reason for deletion. Yann (talk) 09:40, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
The photo is outdated and no longer featured on the North Braddock page since we uploaded it Nbfinest1 (talk) 05:34, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:34, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Old picture of the building Nbfinest1 (talk) 09:24, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
- Keep No reason for deletion. --Sebari (talk) 22:44, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 09:39, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
The photo is outdated and no longer featured on the North Braddock page since we uploaded it Nbfinest1 (talk) 05:34, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:34, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Was removed from the page it was uploaded for. Nbfinest1 (talk) 09:18, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
- Keep No reason for deletion. --Sebari (talk) 22:42, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 09:37, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
The photo is outdated and no longer featured on the North Braddock page since we uploaded it Nbfinest1 (talk) 05:35, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:34, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
The photo is outdated and no longer featured on the North Braddock page since we uploaded it Nbfinest1 (talk) 05:35, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- Since you uploaded here or somewhere else? Small file that does not look like ow. --E4024 (talk) 17:50, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 08:35, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Was removed from page Nbfinest1 (talk) 09:12, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
- Keep No reason for deletion. --Sebari (talk) 22:41, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 09:36, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
The photo is outdated and no longer featured on the North Braddock page since we uploaded it Nbfinest1 (talk) 05:35, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:35, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Was removed from the page it was uploaded for. Nbfinest1 (talk) 09:16, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
- Keep No reason for deletion. --Sebari (talk) 22:41, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 09:37, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
The photo is outdated and no longer featured on the North Braddock page since we uploaded it Nbfinest1 (talk) 05:36, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:35, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Unverfiable source statement. No EXIF metadata. The same picture with different resolution has been present on the Internet since 2019 according to Google's image search. 虹易 (talk) 08:40, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:36, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Previously published elsewhere on the web (in a different crop) [5], with a different photographer name than the one claimed by the uploader. No evidence for permission to upload it here under a free license., HaeB (talk) 09:07, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:36, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:36, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
A PR picture and the photographer is mentioned in the file's details. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 15:44, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:44, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:05, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:36, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
False license, copied from non-free source https://ruspekh.ru/people/polozkov-ivan-kuzmich Kamolan (talk) 16:44, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:37, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Not in-use picture of a book. The Commons is not an online photo album and cannot be a repository for just anything. Ldorfman (talk) 16:47, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Regastarios. --Gbawden (talk) 08:37, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Victormutis93 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Plagio Regasterios (talk) 17:12, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:39, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
We have OTRS but we do not know even from which country is this "actor" whose image is not used anywhere... E4024 (talk) 20:35, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Has a WP article. --Gbawden (talk) 08:42, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Small file w/o EXIF. Also see File:Prinz nithik.png by the same uploader. E4024 (talk) 20:39, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Can't find it on the web, can't prove copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 08:40, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
The photo was previously published online in multiple places such as here and here. An OTRS ticket is required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:41, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:38, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Is she in scope? If she received awards I find it difficult that she would not have any WP article. E4024 (talk) 20:44, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:42, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Upload "via imagine channel". Acceptable? E4024 (talk) 20:58, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:40, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
There's no freedom of panorama for 3-D works in South Korea. This particular photo was previously published here. Regardless of the copyright issue, an OTRS ticked would be required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:40, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:32, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
Does commons allow videos of guys getting their dicks sucked? If yes, feel free to quickly close this nomination. Quakewoody (talk) 13:51, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Quakewoody: It's a dildo, not his actual dick.. You can see that he is holding it against his upper thigh for support. Probably in scope either way. ~riley (talk) 02:24, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
- So a girl blows a dude but it is ok because the girl is only a human looking robot and the dude's dick is actually a dick shaped piece of rubber, therefore nothing was "blown" it was simply no different than watching a piston on a car's engine (back and forth, in and out, repetitively). All I am asking is if we allow porn or not. If we do, then we can close this. If we don't, we need to delete it. Quakewoody (talk) 14:47, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
- The problem is not allowing or not porn, but looking at the fast growing numbers of porn images I'm afraid Commons will turn into a pornsite someday rather soon. If I ran the WMF I would make separate sites for porn WPs, porn Commons, porn WD so people who are SPAs (single porn accounts :) could go to those sites, and, hopefully leave us in peace to try to make on-line encyclopedias (which, of course will also refer to porn in context). If you saw some of the uploads of this user that I or others got deleted... (Now he has more buttons like renaming files and I wonder what else I will see. Anyhow, this is within parentheses and can be stricken; no problem.) Delete. --E4024 (talk) 00:02, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- The slippery slope is a discussion for a different venue. Quakewoody (talk) 21:27, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- I would like to thank the community who has been tolerating me. But I would like to highlight it a discussion panel. The file is tagged for discussion for your views. Everyone does mistake, it just a fact that I did alot of mistake. I have been given a last warning already. If this file is deleted I'm sure I will be blocked. What wrong of me having filemover rights. Did I turn rogue after earning it. I'm taking time, consulting fews of the editor. Just because I started with mistake doesn't mean I will just do wrong. Apart from 100+ deleted upload. I too upload some good files too, you can have a look. Thanks C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 15:18, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- The slippery slope is a discussion for a different venue. Quakewoody (talk) 21:27, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. We can't censor something because it offends us. --Gbawden (talk) 08:33, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
This is porn 194.233.96.65 06:13, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept. The fact that it is porn is not a reason to delete it. Taivo (talk) 11:19, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
No EXIF and looks like a posed PR shot. Suggest this is a likely copyvio Timtrent (talk) 14:08, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- That is fake news. I have requested permission in a written document from the owner and photographer to use and post this picture on Wikipedia for educational and research purposes. Josethewonderful —Preceding comment was added at 17:53, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
- Can be found here and here and here and here and here and here and here and some more. You have to follow our COM:OTRS procedure or that image will be deleted. --Achim (talk) 19:01, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
- Here as well. @Josethewonderful: If you have a written release, you can simply follow the procedure here to email the document to a volunteer to verify that it isn't a copyright violation. Otherwise we have no evidence to prove it was released and therefore we must delete it to comply with copyright laws. Nathan2055talk - contribs 17:29, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
- Can be found here and here and here and here and here and here and here and some more. You have to follow our COM:OTRS procedure or that image will be deleted. --Achim (talk) 19:01, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:33, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
Displayed Person asked for updated picture 83.236.156.218 10:20, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Kept: speedy kept, no one prevents you to upload a new image under a new name Denniss (talk) 10:29, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
WP:BIO Mrs. Bortenlaenger is no person of public interest Bahnmoeller (talk) 18:30, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- As former chaiwomen of the Bayerischen Börse AG and now Chair of the Deutsches Aktieninstitut e.V. a person of pubblich interest. --Lutheraner (talk) 19:54, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- I see articles in two WPs?! --E4024 (talk) 21:33, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- I don't get the "no person of public interest" part either as long as there are articles on her, but the copyright situation seems unclear to me. I don't know what the OTRS ticket says, but who is it that really has the copyright? According to this website, it's the Deutsches Aktieninstitut. So how can a user from Börse München upload this image and license it via OTRS ticket? --87.150.12.11 22:47, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Keep if the OTRS ticket is in order (could an OTRS agent please check?). de:Christine Bortenlänger used this photo until recently when it was removed from the article only because it was nominated for deletion here. I certainly can't follow the "no person of public interest" either if there are two Wikipedia articles about her. Gestumblindi (talk) 22:57, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:34, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
uploaded in error. Properly cropped version of the same image uploaded a few minutes later. Mccapra (talk) 15:24, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy delete COM:CSD#G7. --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 19:32, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 15:52, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Doesn't this violate Nickelodeons copyright? Trade (talk) 19:43, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. DW of copyrighted character. --Minoraxtalk 15:54, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by LucianoLucho as Copyvio (Copyvio), but I think this may be below the TOO. Not sure about COM:TOO China, though. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 21:17, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Alno. --Minoraxtalk 15:54, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Essa imagem é minha e não autorizem
— User:Teteu Mallue Special:Diff/436650800
AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:15, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: unlikely to be own work, quite small size, and the uploader already uploaded copyvios. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:01, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
My own request; file has questionable history. I'm cancelling 'NowCommons" tag at enwiki (w:File:PearlHistoricPhoto (11).JPG) JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:16, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
Another reason is that the subject might be copyrighted. I can't find any details of its date of creation that might satisfy it s being PD. plus the author didn't provide definite source of the orig photo at enwiki. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:54, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
- Update: on enwiki, Explicit deleted this photo because "File without a source" JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:32, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: derivative works issue anyway. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:04, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Very pointless map. Poor quality, unused and redundant. Ratherous (talk) 06:21, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:05, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope: The trophy I personally received (I'm the uploader) Aspere (talk) 08:22, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- Comment The image depicts a "Science edit-a-thon (Korean Wikipedia) winner trophy". It seems to be the only image of that specific award we have, and it seems to be in scope for Category:Korean Wikipedia. If your name is on it (I can't read Korean) and you feel uncomfortable with it, maybe the name could be obscured? Gestumblindi (talk) 22:51, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: derivative work issue anyway. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:07, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Trademark or company/product logo with ambiguous source statement and suspicous copyright license. 虹易 (talk) 08:35, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:07, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Found on FB https://m.facebook.com/LVondracekPiano/photos/?ref=page_internal&mt_nav=0 and via Google images. Unlikely to be own work Gbawden (talk) 08:43, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:08, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
This appears to be a sculpture in Washington, no FOP in the US Gbawden (talk) 08:57, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:08, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Cosplay of Boba Fett
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted characters. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Boba Fett, and Com:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Cosplay of First Order Stormtroopers.
COM:COSPLAY says "If the costume is a completely original design (not based on any existing character design), and the designer has released it under a free license, it is permitted.". These are based on existing character designs. So, these are not permitted.
- File:Boba Fett (10584974375).jpg
- File:Boba fett (121521828).jpg
- File:Boba Fett (14018114166).jpg
- File:Boba fett (14086488004).jpg
- File:Boba Fett (7283590022).jpg
- File:Boba fett - norwood christmas pagent.JPG
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 10:10, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:56, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Cosplay of Boba Fett
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted characters.
COM:COSPLAY says "If the costume is a completely original design (not based on any existing character design), and the designer has released it under a free license, it is permitted". These are based on existing character designs. So, these photos are not permitted.
See also the previous deletion request.
- File:Boba Fett, Paris Games Week 2011.jpg
- File:Boba Fett, Singapore Toy, Games & Comic Convention 2009 (3822215609).jpg
- File:C2E2 2014 - Boba Fett (14248597826).jpg
- File:C2E2 2015 - Boba Fett (16685878943).jpg
- File:Dragon Con 2013 Parade - Star Wars (9681596413).jpg
- File:Fan Expo 2014 - Boba Fett (15114915496).jpg
- File:Fan Expo 2015 - Boba Fett & Boushh (21143544004).jpg
- File:Fan Expo 2016 - Boba Fett (32288274124).jpg
- File:Montreal Comiccon 2015 - Boba Fett (19432428786).jpg
- File:New York Comic Con 2014 - Boba Fett (15499473896).jpg
- File:New York Comic Con 2014 - Boba Fett (15499490166).jpg
- File:New York Comic Con 2014 - Boba Fett (15519496151).jpg
- File:New York Comic Con 2014 - Boba Fett (15522640285).jpg
- File:New York Comic Con 2014 - Boba Fett (15522657855).jpg
- File:SDCC 2014 - Boba Fett & Slave Leia (14815301705).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 13:01, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:11, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Cosplay of Boba Fett
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted characters, and per COM:COSPLAY. See also above DRs.
- File:Boba Fett.jpg
- File:Chewbacca is Captured by the Empire - C2E2 2015 (16661603103).jpg
- File:Gen SW 2010 2.jpg
- File:Halloween Parade 2015 (22256911656).jpg
- File:Paris Manga 8 (34).jpg
- File:Paris Manga 8 (35).jpg
- File:Spielemesse5.jpg
- File:Star Wars (8367925009).jpg
- File:Star Wars Celebration II - Boba Fett and Jordan (4878242893).jpg
- File:SWCA - Boba Fett and Mandalorian (17015164378).jpg
- File:SWCA - Boba Fett cosplay (17015149228).jpg
- File:Troopers on break? (14049800429).jpg
- File:WW St Louis 2014 - Boba Fett (14043037384).jpg
- File:WW St Louis 2014 - Star Wars (14039350412).jpg
- File:WW Toronto 2012 - Boba Fett (6997589822).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:58, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Per below. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:52, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 18:16, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Cosplay of Boba Fett
[edit]per above DRs.
- File:Alien abduction (4020916585).jpg
- File:Faceless Villains (14703154).jpg
- File:MEFCC 2012 - Star Wars (7249634558).jpg
- File:Special Edition NYC 2014 cosplayers (14244630388).jpg
- File:Star Wars Celebration II - Han and Chewie face off with Boba Fett (4878248603).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 23:05, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
- Keep, It's fan cosplay. Read Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#Costumes_and_cosplay Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Spiderman_and_child.jpg, case by case decision. --Clodion (talk) 09:20, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Clodion, please see above DRs. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 00:50, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Per @Jim in this case, not a valid reason for deletion, please also consider requesting undeletion for your "successful" deleted files, thx. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:51, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Comment Liuxinyu970226, Please accept these results.
--Yuraily Lic (talk) 01:54, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
- Comment In Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Cosplay of Jango Fett, Clodion's claim was rejected and the files were deleted. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:57, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
- Comment : Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#Costumes_and_cosplay said « Present consensus is that files that merely show people cosplaying are acceptable. » and « costumes may be copyrightable in certain circumstances subject to a complicated legal ». Clodion (talk) 15:10, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: I have once seen one closure here on Commons about the differencve about acceptable cosplay and protected costume. If we see the person's face - it is more likely to be cosplaying, if it is a completely full costume closing face - it is more likely to be copyrighted costume as there is no focus on a person, just on a protected DW of the character. --rubin16 (talk) 18:20, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 09:38, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- アヒルはメインの被写体じゃないです。--Oilstreet (talk) 13:16, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: duck is too large to apply de minimis. --Yasu (talk) 15:32, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 09:38, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- アヒルはメインの被写体じゃないです。--Oilstreet (talk) 13:16, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: duck is too large to apply de minimis. --Yasu (talk) 15:34, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Looks OoS. E4024 (talk) 19:48, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:15, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Anybody knows this actor? De qué pais viene este actor? Pq no tiene una entrada (articulo) en alguna parte? E4024 (talk) 22:39, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:16, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Forgot to convert to outlines, so text was out of line. Sxologist (talk) 10:13, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:47, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Derivative work of non-free art Batholith (talk) 14:20, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:47, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
author request Sgsfrangible (talk) 16:01, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: too long on Commons to qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:50, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Author request Sgsfrangible (talk) 16:03, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: too long on Commons to qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:50, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
This photo is outdated and no longer relevant to the page since we added it Nbfinest1 (talk) 05:24, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- Is this your "own work"? --E4024 (talk) 17:45, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --PierreSelim (talk) 14:46, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Courtesy deletion request. It shows a people without permission. Nbfinest1 (talk) 07:14, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Shows people at public ceremony (and seen from the back, do not seem identifiable). I see no privacy/personality problem. Photo seems in scope. I see no reason for deletion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:08, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We can't identify any of the people. The photo is in scope as it's one of the few images of this type we have for this area and subject. If one wishes to renominate this file with another policy-based rationale, they are able to do so. Happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 15:45, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
This photo is outdated and no longer relavent to the page since we added it over ten years ago Nbfinest1 (talk) 05:24, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: This file is in use on the English Wikipedia article North Braddock, Pennsylvania. If it's of use to Wikipedia then it should stay on Commons even if it's outdated. See COM:INUSE for details of this policy. --bjh21 (talk) 14:28, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
- 50 KB w/o camera EXIF. Is this an "own work" as declared? --E4024 (talk) 17:47, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --PierreSelim (talk) 14:47, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Was removed from the page it was uploaded for. Nbfinest1 (talk) 09:19, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Numerous images are not used in articles but remain in project scope. Green Giant (talk) 22:58, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
This media is outdated an no longer relavant since administration has changed since we added it Nbfinest1 (talk) 05:27, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --PierreSelim (talk) 14:47, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Courtesy & privacy deletion request. It shows individual names and privacy issues with phone numbers. Nbfinest1 (talk) 07:14, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Why was that not a problem when you uploaded this in 2013? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:03, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Regardless of what the uploader wants - it's honestly promotional or not useful for the project. I really think the project can survive without this graphic. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 15:44, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
No evidence that the author agreed to publish his photo under cc-by-sa-4.0 license. Not original size, no metadata, probably copied from internet. --Interfase (talk) 18:32, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Interfase: , you can ask Mr. Shoujounian directly. He sent me lots of photos and agreed to publish them here. Գարիկ Ավագյան (talk) 06:53, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
- Everyone can create the account on Facebook and claim that he is the author of any photo. This is not reliable source. If he really the author of the photo, ask him to upload the original photo with metadata and high resolution. Even if Shoujounian sent you this photo it does not mean that he is copyright holder of this photo. It still looks like the copied version from somewhere. There is no any evidence that the real author of the photo agreed to publish his photo under CC license. Interfase (talk) 08:49, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Interfase: Here is the article with the name Aram Shoujounian below as the author of the photos and his Twitter account link. So, you are free to ask him to have confirmation. This photo is not published anythere other than Wiki and also, this is the highest resolution what he've sent to me. I'm not gonna ask him again for one more photo with another resolution. If you want, do it. Գարիկ Ավագյան (talk) 09:36, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
- First of all, this photo is not published on that web-site, so it does not prove that Shoujounian is a real author. Secondly, if you want to keep the photo, you must ask the author to upload the original version of the photo with metadata. Without this there is no any guarantee that he is the real author and agreed to publish his photos here under CC license. Interfase (talk) 14:52, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
- P. S. " this is the highest resolution what he've sent to me" - if so, he lied to you that he is the author, because if he had the original photo, he would have sent it to you. This is not the original photo, because the resolution of the original is much higher and it has metadata (like this one), where you can see Camera model, Lens focal length, Date and time of digitizing etc. --Interfase (talk) 19:35, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
- I'm saying one more time, the author of the photo sent me lots of pictures done by himself via Facebook. And guess what - Facebook lowers image resolution automatically. This photo is not published anywhere apart from Wikipedia, read this part again slowly and more carefully. I left his contact details. Why you don't contact him if you have questions? Գարիկ Ավագյան (talk) 20:01, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
- "done by himself" - we do not know that.
- "This photo is not published anywhere" - we do not know that. Maybe was on some social media and then deleted, who knows.
- "Why you don't contact him" - I shouldn't. You insist that the author allegedly agrees to publish, you must prove this. What's stopping you from contacting him and getting the original version? --Interfase (talk) 20:25, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
- I'm saying one more time, the author of the photo sent me lots of pictures done by himself via Facebook. And guess what - Facebook lowers image resolution automatically. This photo is not published anywhere apart from Wikipedia, read this part again slowly and more carefully. I left his contact details. Why you don't contact him if you have questions? Գարիկ Ավագյան (talk) 20:01, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Interfase: Here is the article with the name Aram Shoujounian below as the author of the photos and his Twitter account link. So, you are free to ask him to have confirmation. This photo is not published anythere other than Wiki and also, this is the highest resolution what he've sent to me. I'm not gonna ask him again for one more photo with another resolution. If you want, do it. Գարիկ Ավագյան (talk) 09:36, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
- Everyone can create the account on Facebook and claim that he is the author of any photo. This is not reliable source. If he really the author of the photo, ask him to upload the original photo with metadata and high resolution. Even if Shoujounian sent you this photo it does not mean that he is copyright holder of this photo. It still looks like the copied version from somewhere. There is no any evidence that the real author of the photo agreed to publish his photo under CC license. Interfase (talk) 08:49, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
@Yerevantsi: jan, could you help? Does the author of the photo have to send a copyright permission for publication if the photo hasn't been published anywhere? Գարիկ Ավագյան (talk) 20:04, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
- My dear, jan (I did not know we Turks and Armenians used the same word :) this is a Facebook file, they are copyrighted and we normally "speedy delete" whenever we see them. I am happy I'm not an admin and saw this before the DR, then we would not have any discussion. The following part is out of the DR issue (I already wrote my opinion) but just for curiosity: What are these Canadian Armenians protesting in July 2020? The unprovoked assault of Armenia on Azerbaijan in July 2020? Or the fact that Armenia is invading a great part of Azerbaijan since the 1990s and does not end its illegal occupation against various resolutions of the international community? Or maybe on the occasion of the July 2020 Armenian assault on Azerbaijan they remembered the sad memories of more than a century ago and they decided to protest them? BTW I really and frankly wonder when and where Mr Aliyev pronounced those words alleged on the banner? He is always open to talks with his Armenian counterpart and almost at every occasion they met the initiative came from Mr Aliyev. Therefore I wonder how he might have said those words (I generally follow his declarations and do not remember having seen something like that.) Best regards. E4024 (talk) 13:39, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
- @E4024: Yes, this photo was sent to me through Facebook (as well as many others). Here you can read about the statement of Mr. Aliyev. Here about the clashes on the border of Armenia and Azerbaijan and and its consequences. Գարիկ Ավագյան (talk) 09:07, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- Just as I had already imagined he is referring to the "Armenian lobby" whose modus operandi I know quite well: "Show everything upside down", if you attack a country, show the other party as aggressors, if you invade their land, ask for your lost territories. Would you like me to show you an example of their work in WM projects (I can show you many, but only one now; more if you ask): Please look at the article about Bedros Kapamajian at EN:WP. He was an Ottoman Armenian, and mayor of a city, Van, with a large Armenian population. He was assassinated by Aram Manukian, the initiator of Armenian terrorism in Turkey/Ottoman Empire now seen as a national hero by the Armenians. I will not enter into details, only want to show you how those people ("Armenian lobby" WP scribes, not "Armenians") destroy WP in every language, including Turkish: The former article refers to the death (murder) of Bedros Kapamajian only with these words "Mayor Kapamajian's funeral was attended by a large crowd including non-Armenian residents of Van and consuls of major powers. He was buried in the Armenian cemetery in the Bağlar district." Let alone saying that he was murdered, the article does not even refer to the poor mayor's death. It does not even say "he died in x year". Only his funeral! Why? because he was a loyal Ottoman citizen and because the assassin later became an "Armenian statesman and revolutionary" as you may see at his article. Remember the name? Aram Manukian, a.k.a. "Aram". Best regards. --E4024 (talk) 13:05, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- @E4024: Yes, this photo was sent to me through Facebook (as well as many others). Here you can read about the statement of Mr. Aliyev. Here about the clashes on the border of Armenia and Azerbaijan and and its consequences. Գարիկ Ավագյան (talk) 09:07, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- Deleted. EXIF data show that this photo comes from Facebook (and or Instagram) but has not been uploaded by the person who is claimed to be the photographer. Thuresson (talk) 15:33, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
2010年出版的图书封面根本不可能是公有领域 Jarodalien (talk) 12:17, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Jarodalien: Duplicate: Commons:Deletion_requests/File:弘一法師_《四分律比丘戒相表記》（封面）_，珂羅版影印弘一法師手跡_，大開線裝本，民國二十四年（1935年）出版.jpg. This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 13:26, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- User:Taiwania Justo, Two cover, different publisher, different date.--Jarodalien (talk) 13:29, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Jarodalien: 請見also的部份。This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 13:30, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- User:Taiwania Justo, Two cover, different publisher, different date.--Jarodalien (talk) 13:29, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: by Mys 721tx. --Minoraxtalk 05:21, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Pajolito
[edit]- File:Josefina López de Serantes. Año 1995.png
- File:Escritora Josefina López de Serantes.jpg
- File:Josefina López de Serantes. Año 1943.jpg
Reasons for deletion request: All works between 1943 and 1997 declared as OWN WORK, I don't believe --Adelfrank (talk) 14:22, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. 2 already done by Gbawden. --Minoraxtalk 05:21, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
this is infringement Victorgrigas (talk) 14:38, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- This video was checked and it is published under a license which is compatible with Wikimedia Commons. Therefore I close this "discussion". TheAmerikaner (talk) 14:54, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- This could be License laundering. The Flickr user has a lot of other videos that are clearly taken from somewhere else. I can't be sure about this video to pass the license review. Another admin should review it also. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:33, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Flickr user posts third-party content, unlikely to be their own. Ytoyoda (talk) 18:54, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:22, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Doubtful license status. User:André love moto clearly not the author of the picture. This is a kind of book illustration. Venzz (talk) 10:15, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 18:58, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Cosplay of Ghostbusters
[edit]COM:DW of a copyrighted character Stay Puft Marshmallow Man.
And, COM:COSPLAY says "If the costume is a completely original design (not based on any existing character design), and the designer has released it under a free license, it is permitted". These are based on a existing character design. So, these photos are not permitted.
- File:Fan Expo 2012 - Stay Puft Marshmallow Man (8143115739).jpg
- File:Fan Expo 2012 - Stay Puft Marshmallow Man (8143147544).jpg
- File:Fan Expo 2013 - Stay Puft (9666405525).jpg
- File:The Stay Puft Marshmallow Man in Newburyport Massachusetts 2017.png
- File:Toronto 2015 - Stay Puft Marshmallow Man (16723839347).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 14:29, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:00, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Cosplay of Ghostbusters
[edit]COM:DW of a copyrighted character Stay Puft Marshmallow Man.
And, COM:COSPLAY says "If the costume is a completely original design (not based on any existing character design), and the designer has released it under a free license, it is permitted". These are based on a existing character design. So, these photos are not permitted.
- File:Cosplay at the 2011 Fan Expo Canada (6129087187).jpg
- File:Cosplay at the 2011 Fan Expo Canada (6129091753).jpg
- File:FXC17 Stay Puft.jpg
- File:Montreal Comiccon 2016 - Stay Puft Marshmallow Man (27634004273).jpg
- File:Montreal Mini-Comiccon 2014- Mandalorian vs. Stay Puft Marshmallow Man (15784077118).jpg
- File:Montreal Mini-Comiccon 2014- Mandalorian vs. Stay Puft Marshmallow Man (15784168870).jpg
- File:Montreal Mini-Comiccon 2014- Mandalorian vs. Stay Puft Marshmallow Man (15784169510).jpg
- File:WW Chicago 2014 Contest - Ghostbusters (15067978092).jpg
- File:WW Chicago 2014 Contest - Ghostbusters (15068292362).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 14:36, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 19:02, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
no proper licence by the creator Sandra Ramírez Bahnmoeller (talk) 18:37, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:05, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
Brasão da Família Sombra.jpg Natanael Sombra (talk) 18:38, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request+unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:06, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
This is an image from a blacklisted flickr account. Leoboudv (talk) 19:26, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- Why is this flickr account blacklisted? And various other images from the same flickr account appear all over wikimedia commons anyway - Cement4802 (talk) 05:29, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
- Multiple images from this Flickr account were deleted because of license laundering, including this image. Yes, there are other images from this account, but it looks like they were all uploaded before it was blacklisted. That's not a reason to keep this particular image though. If anything, it's more a reason to consider the older uploads for deletion. Ytoyoda (talk) 13:23, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Looking at past deletion discussions, it seems like the problems with the account were out-of-scope concept images and the occasional Flickrwashing. But it seems like most of the photos on the account are by the user (they're taken on Canon or Panasonic digital cameras). This particular image seems fine. Ytoyoda (talk) 15:32, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
- Keep I think that whoever add an account to the blacklist should add a link to a DR where it is possible to see what the problem is. It seems that this DR was the course. In my opinion adding a user to a blacklist does not mean that we should delete ALL photos. It just means reviewers should be careful with the images. Using Google and Tiney gives me no other versions indicating that this photo was taken from the internet. --MGA73 (talk) 20:23, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: Only P199 can resolve this problem as I cannot licensereview this image. Maybe P199 can? Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:52, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion above. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:09, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
Uploader claim that several days earlier he made photo of person who died more than 20 years ago Axakov (talk) 19:46, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - unlikely to be own work. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:09, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
Obviously that photo couldnt be made in 2015 Axakov (talk) 19:49, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- Axakov: I just saw the notice at my talk page. To be clear: I am not the file uploader, I am just the last one who did the photo improvement ("contrast improved, cropped")
As a side observer: obviously it is not a photo of 2015. A regular new uploader misunderstanding of 1) when a photo was made and 2) when the uploaded electronic version was made
For the 1) - it is from the USSR officer ID, made at May 1939. The Commons copyright rules about governmental IDs has been changing so many times in so many ways that I'm not sure about the current consensus. So leaving the decision to others. --NeoLexx (talk) 13:38, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:10, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
Obvioulsy that photo made far earlier Axakov (talk) 19:51, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:10, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
Obvioulsy that photo made far earlier Axakov (talk) 19:52, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:11, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Obvioulsy that photo made far earlier and no any indication that uploader has any rights on this image Axakov (talk) 19:54, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination - unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:11, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Not an own work. E4024 (talk) 20:38, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: unlikelyt o be own work. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:12, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The license tags on this file are completely bogus, the author named ("German Army Official Photographer") is highly unlikely considering that the soldiers shown are apparently Americans, and pinterest as a source is not really known for accurate description. All in all, we do not have robust information about this photo (who took it? where is it? when was it?), and it should be deleted per the precautionary principle unless convincingly shown to be in the PD or under a free license. Rosenzweig τ 21:18, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination - unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:14, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
не нужно Ailbeve (talk) 22:08, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:14, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
Subject requests deletion:
I would like for this image to be deleted this is a very bad photo that it is being used in other Wikipedias and other Google pages. As an actress when a producer looks at my pages, this is always the first image that comes up and this is very detrimental for my carrier. The photographer that took this picture had invaded all Wikis around the world with his photos and I want it stopped
— User:Arly Jover Special:Diff/424743711
AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:09, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- Comment It's a rather good quality "natural" photo unlike for example File:Arly-Jover-3.jpg which is also a good photograph, but of the "promotional" type. It's also similar to File:Arly Jover Press Conference A Prominent Patient Berlinale 2017 02.jpg from the same event which isn't nominated for deletion. So I don't quite see the point in deleting that specific image, but as it's not in use in any Wikimedia project anymore, a courtesy deletion could be possible. I wonder what the photographer Queryzo might have to say regarding this case? Gestumblindi (talk) 22:41, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- As we have enough good quality pictures of her, this one could be deleted. I am not quite a professional photographer, so the selection of pictures is bad in some cases. I see the point, why this picture might feel her uncomfortable, so we should delete it. Queryzo (talk) 06:30, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept, I do not see valid reason for deletion. The photo isn't number 1 in Google anymore, it's number 5 at moment. Taivo (talk) 13:46, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
To nie jest jezioro Błądzimskie lecz maleńkie jeziorko Wiejskie w centrum wsi Błądzim, a właściwie taki większy staw.Więc informacja jest błędna. Należy zmienić tytuł fotografii na jezioro Wiejskie lub fotografię usunąć. Taktoperz77 06:59, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata. Own work is not sure, I'll delete it as copyright violation. I'll delete also file:Błądzim 1.JPG due to same reason. These are the uploader's last remaining contributions. Taivo (talk) 13:53, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 09:30, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- Keep This is part of the exterior architecture of the building, and therefore has FoP in the US per copyright law regarding architecture and court decisions regarding artworks which are an intrinsic part of the exterior architecture of buildings. Beyond My Ken (talk) 11:09, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- See also:
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:UnionSquareMetronome crop.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:UnionSquareAtomicClock.JPG
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Unionsq metronome.gif
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Union Square (3982592596).jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:JonesGinzel05.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:99A Metronome 7 (108.2KB).jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:99A Metronome 6.jpg
- Beyond My Ken (talk) 11:23, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Per above, COM:NOTCENSORED. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:32, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, so is it architecture or not? Authors en:Jones and Ginzel are neither called nor categorized as architects, so their work isn't architecture, but other kind of art and not covered with US freedom of panorama. Taivo (talk) 14:14, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 09:30, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep This is part of the exterior architecture of the building, and therefore has FoP in the US per copyright law regarding architecture and court decisions regarding artworks which are an intrinsic part of the exterior architecture of buildings. Beyond My Ken (talk) 11:09, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- See also:
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:UnionSquareMetronome crop.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:UnionSquareAtomicClock.JPG
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Unionsq metronome.gif
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Union Square (3982592596).jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:JonesGinzel05.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:99A Metronome 7 (108.2KB).jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:99A Metronome 6.jpg
- Beyond My Ken (talk) 11:23, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Per above, COM:NOTCENSORED. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:32, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, so is it architecture or not? Authors en:Jones and Ginzel are neither called nor categorized as architects, so their work isn't architecture, but other kind of art and not covered with US freedom of panorama. Taivo (talk) 14:16, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 09:31, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- Keep This is part of the exterior architecture of the building, and therefore has FoP in the US per copyright law regarding architecture and court decisions regarding artworks which are an intrinsic part of the exterior architecture of buildings. Beyond My Ken (talk) 11:12, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- See also:
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:UnionSquareMetronome crop.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:UnionSquareAtomicClock.JPG
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Unionsq metronome.gif
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Union Square (3982592596).jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:JonesGinzel05.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:99A Metronome 7 (108.2KB).jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:99A Metronome 6.jpg
- Beyond My Ken (talk) 11:23, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Per above, COM:NOTCENSORED. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:32, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, so is it architecture or not? Authors en:Jones and Ginzel are neither called nor categorized as architects, so their work isn't architecture, but other kind of art and not covered with US freedom of panorama. Taivo (talk) 14:18, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 09:31, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep This is part of the exterior architecture of the building, and therefore has FoP in the US per copyright law regarding architecture and court decisions regarding artworks which are an intrinsic part of the exterior architecture of buildings. Beyond My Ken (talk) 11:10, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- See also:
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:UnionSquareMetronome crop.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:UnionSquareAtomicClock.JPG
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Unionsq metronome.gif
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Union Square (3982592596).jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:JonesGinzel05.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:99A Metronome 7 (108.2KB).jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:99A Metronome 6.jpg
- Beyond My Ken (talk) 11:23, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Per above, COM:NOTCENSORED. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:32, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, so is it architecture or not? Authors en:Jones and Ginzel are neither called nor categorized as architects, so their work isn't architecture, but other kind of art and not covered with US freedom of panorama. Taivo (talk) 14:19, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 09:32, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- Keep This is part of the exterior architecture of the building, and therefore has FoP in the US per copyright law regarding architecture and court decisions regarding artworks which are an intrinsic part of the exterior architecture of buildings. Beyond My Ken (talk) 11:11, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- See also:
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:UnionSquareMetronome crop.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:UnionSquareAtomicClock.JPG
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Unionsq metronome.gif
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Union Square (3982592596).jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:JonesGinzel05.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:99A Metronome 7 (108.2KB).jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:99A Metronome 6.jpg
- Beyond My Ken (talk) 11:23, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Per above, COM:NOTCENSORED. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:32, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, so is it architecture or not? Authors en:Jones and Ginzel are neither called nor categorized as architects, so their work isn't architecture, but other kind of art and not covered with US freedom of panorama. Taivo (talk) 14:21, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 09:32, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- Keep This is part of the exterior architecture of the building, and therefore has FoP in the US per copyright law regarding architecture and court decisions regarding artworks which are an intrinsic part of the exterior architecture of buildings. Beyond My Ken (talk) 11:11, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- See also:
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:UnionSquareMetronome crop.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:UnionSquareAtomicClock.JPG
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Unionsq metronome.gif
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Union Square (3982592596).jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:JonesGinzel05.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:99A Metronome 7 (108.2KB).jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:99A Metronome 6.jpg
- Beyond My Ken (talk) 11:23, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Per above, COM:NOTCENSORED. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:31, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, so is it architecture or not? Authors en:Jones and Ginzel are neither called nor categorized as architects, so their work isn't architecture, but other kind of art and not covered with US freedom of panorama. Taivo (talk) 14:23, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 09:32, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- Keep This is part of the exterior architecture of the building, and therefore has FoP in the US per copyright law regarding architecture and court decisions regarding artworks which are an intrinsic part of the exterior architecture of buildings. Beyond My Ken (talk) 10:54, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- BTW, I'm feeling harassed by A1Cafel's numerous unwarranted nominations of my images. If this editor undertands policy and the law so correctly, why have so many of their images been deleted? Beyond My Ken (talk) 10:56, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- Also, all the "Metronome" images nominated by A1Cafel should appear in the same nomination, and not be spread out through numerous separate nomination pages. Beyond My Ken (talk) 10:59, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- See also:
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:UnionSquareMetronome crop.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:UnionSquareAtomicClock.JPG
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Unionsq metronome.gif
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Union Square (3982592596).jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:JonesGinzel05.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:99A Metronome 7 (108.2KB).jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:99A Metronome 6.jpg
- Beyond My Ken (talk) 11:23, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Per above, COM:NOTCENSORED. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:31, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, so is it architecture or not? Authors en:Jones and Ginzel are neither called nor categorized as architects, so their work isn't architecture, but other kind of art and not covered with US freedom of panorama. Taivo (talk) 14:25, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
car il me concerne et je ne donne pas mon accord pour l'utilisation de mon image via cette photo, postée sans mon accord 193.57.120.15 09:36, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept, permission is not needed. Taivo (talk) 14:31, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
Would be a valuable picture, but I don't belive this is self-published, since the date of this picture is very unlikely 2016. This is more like 1960 and looks like one of the BArch-Images. PaterMcFly (talk) 15:19, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- Of course it is not an "own work". OTOH, adult people may choose what to do with their lives, be naturist etc, but the position of the kid in the front is not acceptable, IMHO, in a place like Commons which has to be very careful about anything that even remotely might be seen as infringing children's integrity. Delete. --E4024 (talk) 02:40, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; unlikely to be own work. --Gbawden (talk) 10:27, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
89 KB dubious ow. Cropped from what? Please upload the original file. E4024 (talk) 15:58, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination; unlikely to be own work. Please link to source. --Gbawden (talk) 10:29, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
speedy چطوری تصویرم و پاک کنم ؟ لطفا کمک کنید که تصویری که اپلود کردم و پاک کنم نمیخام این تصویر و برارم ممنون Ho ma (talk) 16:28, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:29, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
It clearly isn't the plant that the name indicates (it is a fern, not a fruiting tree). Nadiatalent (talk) 17:19, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Fix description or move if needed. Not a reason for deletion. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 13:41, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:29, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
Uploader claims image is their own work, but this appears to be a screencap taken from some form of video media. While I notice that the uploader shares a name with the daughter of the founder of en:Vyjayanthi Movies, even if they were the same person, it is not clear that she would have authority to release this into the Creative Commons. I suspect the uploader might not understand the implications of Creative Commons Public Domain release. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:51, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:30, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
2015年出版的书籍，版权属中华书局，不属公有领域 Jarodalien (talk) 12:21, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept, this is not a book. This is only book cover. The book is copyrighted, but its cover is ineligible for copyright. Taivo (talk) 12:56, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
Uploader has a history o copyright violations. This image was uploaded the same day as some other files which were all copyright violations (claimed as own work). No good reason to beleive the claim of own work for this image. Whpq (talk) 12:45, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, this is not a trusted user and this is his/her last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 13:05, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
There's no freedom of panorama for 3-D works in Bulgaria. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:37, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 13:08, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
Doute sur les autorisations d'utilisation Melienes (talk) 14:16, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept, 1823 drawings are in public domain due to age. Uploader's request is valid reason for deletion during first week after upload, here half of year has passed. Taivo (talk) 13:18, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
Doute sur les droits d'utilisation du fichier - demande de suppression avant d'avoir confirmation Melienes (talk) 14:17, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept, 1823 drawings are in public domain due to age. Uploader's request is valid reason for deletion during first week after upload, here half of year has passed. Taivo (talk) 13:26, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
I uploaded a SVG-Version File:RUAG Logo.svg and replaced this version Malo95 (talk) 14:25, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- Keep There's already a link from JPEG to SVG. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 13:40, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Gone Postal: Why do why need the bad jpg version? If I upload a SVG version I always nominated the old version for the deletion and they always get deleted.--Malo95 (talk) 12:08, 14 August 2020 (UTC)?
- To answer the question that you've posed: I don't need either JPEG or SVG, but the fact that I don't need it or do need it is not what is being discussed here. To reply to your statement: Yeah, I know, I have noticed many admins doing that, it's a sad situation, we have many admins which shock me that they are admins, they are trigger happy and enjoy deleting content way too much. Think of this in the following way, you have spent time creating this file, let's say tomorrow somebody comes in and creates a derivative of your file in Super-SVG format and get your file deleted, not only may this make you want to stop contributing (which is quite bad), but it can easily destroy the trust in Commons as the source for Free Media, other projects can easily rely on our project for the history of their files. Deleting superseded files adds nothing to the project and sometimes creates negative effects, so it's a dangerous action with no benefit. Of course, when the file is actually misleading, corrupt, copyright violation, etc. then we should delete, but I am opposed to "I've done better, delete all else". ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 12:21, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Gone Postal: Why do why need the bad jpg version? If I upload a SVG version I always nominated the old version for the deletion and they always get deleted.--Malo95 (talk) 12:08, 14 August 2020 (UTC)?
Deleted, Gone Postal, you are too easily shocked. Taivo (talk) 13:34, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Cosplay of Jango Fett
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted characters. See also Com:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Cosplay of First Order Stormtroopers.
COM:COSPLAY says "If the costume is a completely original design (not based on any existing character design), and the designer has released it under a free license, it is permitted". These are based on existing character designs. So, these photos are not permitted.
- File:Course of the Force 2012 - Jango Fett cosplay (14158282664).jpg
- File:Dragon Con 2013 Parade - Mandalorian Mercs (9681610507).jpg
- File:London Comic Con Oct 14 - Jango Fett (15441369930).jpg
- File:WW Chicago 2011 - Jango Fett & Stormtrooper (8168358694).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 21:01, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:06, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Cosplay of Jango Fett
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted characters. See also Com:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Cosplay of First Order Stormtroopers.
COM:COSPLAY says "If the costume is a completely original design (not based on any existing character design), and the designer has released it under a free license, it is permitted". These are based on existing character designs. So, these photos are not permitted.
- File:Fetts (15525608502).jpg
- File:Montreal Comiccon 2016 - Jango Fett (27633910933).jpg
File:SWC4 - Pair of Fetts (512823048).jpg- File:WWC 2009 - Jango Fett & Darth Maul (3820105566).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 14:45, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Comment: To whom it may concern, please be advised that the file titled "SWC4_-_Pair_of_Fetts_(512823048).jpg" is published by the official Star Wars account on Flickr under the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic licence, which indicates that the image has been consented by the current copyright holder to exist on Wikimedia Commons (unless consent is expressly withheld) with some rights reserved: to share, to copy, distribute, transmit the work, to remix and to adapt the work, under the condition of attribution. Any administrator considering the deletion of this file or any file under the category :Category:Files from the Official Star Wars Flickr stream should decline the nominator's request as it is invalid. Haleth (talk) 07:05, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Thank you, Haleth. I canceled File:SWC4 - Pair of Fetts (512823048).jpg. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 01:01, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
COM:DW of a copyrighted character, and COM:COSPLAY. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Jango Fett.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 08:56, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
- Keep, It's fan cosplay. Read Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#Costumes_and_cosplay Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Spiderman_and_child.jpg, case by case decision. --Clodion (talk) 09:11, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Clodion, please read what I wrote above. These are based on existing character design. So, these are not permitted. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 01:31, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted. Taivo (talk) 13:42, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Cosplay of Jango Fett
[edit]per above DRs.
- File:Evolution of clone trooper & stormtrooper armour, illustrated by cosplayers.png
- File:Mandalorians at Star Wars Celebration VI 2012.jpg
- File:Mandalorians at Star Wars Celebration VI 2012 (cropped).jpg cropped version of the above. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 10:30, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:44, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Yuraily Lic: I created the armour evolution compilation; I understand it's only up for deletion because the first picture on the left of Jango Fett (taken from File:Mandalorians at Star Wars Celebration VI 2012.jpg) may be in violation of Commons:DW? Yet the Category:Cosplay of Jango Fett does allow some photos that have passed an official review. The discussion above also shows that you cancelled the deletion of File:SWC4 - Pair of Fetts (512823048).jpg for this reason. I'm prepared to change my compilation with a different photo of a Jango Fett cosplayer, as long as I can get a guarantee that one won't be deleted. Would File:Wait, the Jedis are with Jango Fett? (196297543).jpg be a good candidate? It passed an official review on 25 June 2019. Greetings, Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 10:05, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
- PS: Alternately, File:Chewbacca & friends.jpg is my second candidate for a Jango Fett crop. At the time I made my compilation in April 2021, it was up for deletion, but apparently kept upon review. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 10:45, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
- PPS: My third and fourth candidates are File:Montreal Comiccon 2016 - Mandalorians (27644143414).jpg and File:WW Philadelphia 2013 - Mandalorians (9052863158).jpg. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 10:47, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete Derivative works/copies of a copyrighted design. The fact that some have passed a flickr review is not particularly relevant; that just means that they had the correct license attached to the photograph, but the question has to do with the copyright in the designs, not the copyright in the photograph. Mysterymanblue 08:34, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and remark of Mysterymanblue. --Ellywa (talk) 21:23, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
@Ellywa: I would assume that File:Evolution of clone trooper & stormtrooper armour, illustrated by cosplayers.png must now also be deleted if File:Mandalorians at Star Wars Celebration VI 2012.jpg, which is now deleted as a copyvio, features in the former compilation? Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 16:29, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, Nederlandse Leeuw, I overlooked that file, thanks for reminding me. Ellywa (talk) 19:16, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Cosplay of Scout troopers
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted characters. See also Com:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Cosplay of First Order Stormtroopers.
COM:COSPLAY says "If the costume is a completely original design (not based on any existing character design), and the designer has released it under a free license, it is permitted". These are based on existing character designs. So, these photos are not permitted.
- File:Scout Trooper.JPG
- File:Star Wars @ the Discovery Science Center - Biker Scout (7034250407).jpg
- File:Star Wars Celebration Orlando Scout Trooper Sniper 1.jpg
- File:Star Wars Celebration Orlando Scout Trooper Sniper 2.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 20:22, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:16, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Cosplay of Scout troopers
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted characters. See also Com:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Cosplay of First Order Stormtroopers.
COM:COSPLAY says "If the costume is a completely original design (not based on any existing character design), and the designer has released it under a free license, it is permitted". These are based on existing character designs. So, these photos are not permitted.
- File:Comic Con 2013 - Scout trooper (9335938790).jpg
- File:Comic Con 2013 - Storm Shadow and a Scout trooper (9333169935).jpg
- File:MCM 2013 - Troopers (8978438817).jpg
- File:Romics 2011 55.JPG
- File:Star Wars Celebration II - Biker Scouts on the streets (4878855648).jpg
- File:Star Wars Celebration III - Biker Scouts looking for trouble (4878258255).jpg
- File:Tired Stormtroopers.jpg
- File:Wien Sommernachtskonzert 2010 (4685554496).jpg
- File:WonderCon 2011 - Clone troopers and a Biker Scout outside the Moscone Center (5593926590).jpg
- File:WW Toronto 2012 - Jedi & Troopers 01 (7143676505).jpg
- File:WW Toronto 2012 - Jedi & Troopers 02 (6997590706).jpg
- File:WW Toronto 2012 - Jedi & Troopers 03 (7143681559).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:44, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Addition,
- File:C2E2 2014 - Scout Trooper (14271312834).jpg - (Com:Deletion requests/File:C2E2 2014 - Scout Trooper (14271312834).jpg)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
--Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:47, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted. Taivo (talk) 13:58, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Cosplay of Snowtroopers
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted characters. See also Com:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Cosplay of First Order Stormtroopers.
COM:COSPLAY says "If the costume is a completely original design (not based on any existing character design), and the designer has released it under a free license, it is permitted.". These are based on existing character designs. So, these are not permitted.
- File:Long Beach Comic & Horror Con 2011 - snowtrooper found some Jedi (6301172509).jpg
- File:Long Beach Comic & Horror Con 2011 - Star Wars cosplay (6301699318).jpg
- File:SnowTroopers.jpg
- File:Snowy Fire Mission.jpg
- File:Star Wars Celebration 2015 - Snowtrooper arrest (17398494364).jpg
- File:SWCA - Snowtrooper (16582700143).jpg
- File:SWCE - Dutch Outpost 1 (811360622).jpg
- File:WonderCon 2014 - Snowtrooper (13931852406).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 09:41, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:56, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Cosplay of Snowtroopers
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted characters. See also Com:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Cosplay of First Order Stormtroopers.
COM:COSPLAY says "If the costume is a completely original design (not based on any existing character design), and the designer has released it under a free license, it is permitted.". These are based on existing character designs. So, these are not permitted.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:54, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Addition,
- File:Long Beach Comic & Horror Con 2011 - snowtrooper (6301702462).jpg - (Com:Deletion requests/File:Long Beach Comic & Horror Con 2011 - snowtrooper (6301702462).jpg)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
--Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:57, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- Both this DR and the last one are subject to this comment: I don't think that line from COM:COSTUME was meant to be taken as "if A, then B; therefore, if not A, then not B", but rather that photographs of potentially or otherwise non-free costumes have unclear status on Commons. See also: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Cosplay at NYCC (60421).jpg, Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2020/01#Sesame Street, and the last sentence of COM:COSTUME (Present consensus has adopted the view that in order to be a copyright violation, "[t]he photo would have to be primarily of the mask or other separable element of the costume, e.g. focusing on the expression inherent in the mask distinct from that of the general character."). -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 02:03, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Needless to say, the mask is point. As you can see, the subjects in these photos are wearing a mask. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 09:11, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted. Taivo (talk) 14:24, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
Redundant of File:Roxas Blvd near Quirino Ave 2012jf.jpg. Again, in accordance with Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Judgefloro#Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 3, to quote P199's verdict: "As per COM:PS: Examples of files that are not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Files that add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject. = meaning we don't need a massive collection of nearly duplicate images. We have told Judgefloro/Ramon FVelasquez many times in the past to be more selective when uploading. And no need to give a long sermon on the notability of the road, that is irrelevant to the number of needless images." JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:00, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 14:38, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
No FOP in the Philippines. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:02, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
I'm speedily withdrawing and cancelling this DR. I've been warned by some of my friends who said this act is tantamount to "cyberbullying." JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:08, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Reinstating and continuing my DR. According to @Marchjuly: at enwiki, photos of Philippine statues and monuments are not allowed on enwiki under numerous quantities and full, original qualities because the US FoP which at least puts "safety net" to photos of 3-D works of art that are static structures in countries outside the United States only "protects" buildings. Hence in de jure terms, if photos of Philippine statues and monuments are not allowed on enwiki (except low quality, "fair use" images), then these are certainly not allowed on Commons. Pls see the recent reply at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Fastily&diff=973827725&oldid=973825534 JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:31, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
- I’m not sure why I was pinged to this discussion, but I believe it has to do with en:User talk:Fastily#Restoration of a deleted file. The point of my comment in that discussion was that en:Template:FOP-USonly seems to only cover architectural works which are considered to be habitable structures like buildings, not artistic works. English Wikipedia allows non-free content to be uploaded and used under certain conditions; Commons, however, doesn’t allow non-free content (i.e. fair use content) to upload under any condition per c:COM:FAIR. So, on English Wikipedia, a photo of a 3D work of art like a statue publicly displayed in the US is sometimes allowed when the work is subject to c:COM:FOP United States if (1) the photo of the work is freely licensed and (2) the photo is used in accordance with en:WP:NFCC. It’s assumed that if the statue is publicly displayed that anyone can freely photograph it; so, a non-free license for a photo isn’t allowed. However, if the statue is considered to be still protected by copyright, a non-free license like en:Template:Non-free 3D art is needed for that statue. Since the file is not 100% free in that sense, it’s usage is considered to be subject to Wikipedia’s non-free content use policy (WP:NFCC). I’m not sure how that applies to c:COM:FOP Philippines except that if any part of a file is non-free for English Wikipedia’s purposes, then the entire file is considered to be non-free. That’s not quite the same as saying such photos are “not allowed” on English Wikipedia; they may be allowed, but only if relevant English Wikipedia policy is met. — Marchjuly (talk) 21:36, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Marchjuly: what I meant is that full-resolution and original quality photos of such statues are not allowed on enwiki, unless they are to be used on articles in compliance with fair use guidelines of enwiki (e.g. if they are subject of a critical discussion accompanying the content of the article). Such usage is to be minimal, photos should be reduced to inferior quality, and their quantity should be minimal. If such original quality photos are not allowed on enwiki, they are certainly 100% not allowed on Commons. I'm referring to the original, raw photod that haven't been modified to suit the NFCC of enwiki. Take note, there are numerous photos of copyrighted Philippine statues that are also hosted here on Commons. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:27, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you for clarifying. My apologies for misunderstanding that part of your post. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:44, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Marchjuly: what I meant is that full-resolution and original quality photos of such statues are not allowed on enwiki, unless they are to be used on articles in compliance with fair use guidelines of enwiki (e.g. if they are subject of a critical discussion accompanying the content of the article). Such usage is to be minimal, photos should be reduced to inferior quality, and their quantity should be minimal. If such original quality photos are not allowed on enwiki, they are certainly 100% not allowed on Commons. I'm referring to the original, raw photod that haven't been modified to suit the NFCC of enwiki. Take note, there are numerous photos of copyrighted Philippine statues that are also hosted here on Commons. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:27, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
Update I hereby put this DR on hold in response to a renewed discussion at Commons talk:Copyright rules by territory/Philippines#Application of recent Philippine Supreme Court decisions on mere allegations of copyright. (mentioning @Marchjuly: to notify about the current situation). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:52, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, per COM:FOP Philippines. Taivo (talk) 14:42, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
Copyright per www.sanantonio.gov SanAnMan (talk) 17:05, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept, per Brainulator. Taivo (talk) 14:44, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Timtrent as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Low quality, and appears to be a screenshot. The copyright is owned by the organisers of the event or the camera operator if freelance, not the uploader Regasterios (talk) 17:14, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- Comment There's something weird going on with this photo. It's been uploaded by another user as File:Ardeshir Pashang at Press conference.jpg at a higher resolution. Which is fine, except it's sourced to a Flickr image that was uploaded today (the image page doesn't show the upload date, but it was uploaded after another image that was uploaded in the past day). I would assume good faith and trust that the Flickr user is legit, but the photostream shows a lot of agency photos. Ytoyoda (talk) 02:53, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 14:50, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
_Chaenomeles_speciosa_-%E9%A6%99%E6%B8%AF%E8%8A%B1%E5%B1%95_Hong_Kong_Flower_Show-_(9193447192).jpg){kind=link}
_Chaenomeles_speciosa_-%E9%A6%99%E6%B8%AF%E8%8A%B1%E5%B1%95_Hong_Kong_Flower_Show-_(9193447192).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
It is not the species that is claimed, it is a Camellia. Nadiatalent (talk) 17:34, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- Well, a wrong filename is no reason for deletion. This can be changed. Rudolphous (talk) 19:31, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept, we can change filename and description. Taivo (talk) 14:57, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
Not used on any project. Regularly used to create an article not eligible on French Wikipedia, which is always deleted by administrators. The person pictured here doesn't seem to be notorious enough for an encyclopedia. Titlutin (talk) 18:24, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- Treizième et dernier enfant de l'Empereur Bao-daï du Vietnam Patrick Édouard Bloch est né le 21 avril 1958 à Strasbourg Au cours d'une partie de chasse en 1957 il rencontre Christiane Bloch Carcenac Très proche de Bao dai il accompagna son père dans des séjours à l'étranger et venait le voir régulièrement dans son appartement parisien du 16e arrondissement jusqu'à sa mort en 1997. Note François Joyaux livre Nam Phuong la dernière impératrice du Vietnam 2019 page 270. Journal québécois Numibec Volume 3 numéro 6 février 2016 page 14. Interview et vidéos empereur bao-daï et bloc Patrick Édouard le 18 juillet 2020 Dernières Nouvelles d'Alsace France actualités — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2A01:E0A:25C:B360:F5B0:C4BF:E47E:4667 (talk) 22:52, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- This message above (as well as this) is an example of the problem we faced on French Wikipedia. After the deletion of the main article, several IP addresses started to add this man's biography to the talk page of the file, until it was deleted and protected by an admin. --Titlutin (talk) 11:48, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
- Even apart from all that, imo this fuzzy 48 KB image is not useful for any educational purpose. Wutsje 04:35, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
- This message above (as well as this) is an example of the problem we faced on French Wikipedia. After the deletion of the main article, several IP addresses started to add this man's biography to the talk page of the file, until it was deleted and protected by an admin. --Titlutin (talk) 11:48, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, still unused, deleted as out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 15:02, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Image is blurry and unlikely to ever be used - few images of this colour at cat - this is a much better image of the vehicle –Davey2010Talk 19:56, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
_front_MJ.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:05, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Ce croquis est une pure invention. Il reprend des éléments d'une bannière bourguignonne conservée, en effet, mais en y ajoutant des éléments héraldiques assez farfelus. Bonnefont le reprend alors qu'il a déjà été prouvé que ce dessin était faux : "Cet écusson, composé d'éléments incohérents, ne peut avoir aucune valeur historique. Ce n'est qu'un caprice d'artiste." (Renet, Beauvais et le Beauvaisis dans les temps modernes, 1895, p. 604) Praundo (talk) 18:49, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- Même s'il s'agit d'une pure invention, il se trouve dans un document et il est libre de droits ==> nous n'avons aucun motif à le supprimer (regardez bien nos règles de conservation et de suppression). Bien-sûr il faut le tenir pour un canular et l'indiquer dans l' usage que l'on pourrait en faire. --François GOGLINS (talk) 18:56, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept, the file cannot be deleted due to that reason, because it is still used. Taivo (talk) 15:16, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Still protected in the United States until 2032 unless someone can find that this work was published in the United States before 30 October 1936, but I doubt it since it's a Spanish-language ad. The fact that it contains off-model depictions of Mickey and Minnie Mouse does not help its case. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 20:12, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 15:14, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files in Category:Cosplay of Clone troopers
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted characters. See also Com:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Cosplay of First Order Stormtroopers.
COM:COSPLAY says "If the costume is a completely original design (not based on any existing character design), and the designer has released it under a free license, it is permitted". These are based on existing character designs. So, these photos are not permitted.
- File:Clone Trooper cosplayer cosplayer at WonderCon 2010.JPG
- File:Cosplay of Clone troopers, asociación fans Star Wars Sevilla, España, 2015 01.JPG
- File:Cosplay of Clone troopers, asociación fans Star Wars Sevilla, España, 2015 02.JPG
- File:Cosplay of Clone troopers, asociación fans Star Wars Sevilla, España, 2015 03.JPG
- File:Dragon Con 2013 Parade - Star Wars (9684839738).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 20:31, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
- Hi, if I understand it right, in fact the whole category Category:Cosplay of Star Wars should be removed? Ferran Cornellà (talk) 19:02, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:16, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Cosplay of Clone troopers
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted characters. See also Com:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Cosplay of First Order Stormtroopers.
COM:COSPLAY says "If the costume is a completely original design (not based on any existing character design), and the designer has released it under a free license, it is permitted". These are based on existing character designs. So, these photos are not permitted.
- File:Clone Trooper (7271127830).jpg
- File:Clone trooper - C2E2 2015 (17283052401).jpg
- File:Clone Trooper C2E2 2016 (25944422146).jpg
- File:Clone trooper cosplayer at WonderCon 2007.JPG
- File:Clone Trooper.JPG
- File:Dragon Con 2013 Parade - Star Wars (9681599977).jpg
- File:Etna Comics 2013 Stormtrooper Commander (501st Legion Italica Garrison).jpg
- File:Fan Expo 2014 - IMperial forces (14951370457).jpg
- File:Fans of Star wars with costumes. Barcelona Comic Fair 2016.JPG
- File:Geek Fashion Show 2013 - Carlyfornia - Kimmie Soler (8844813733).jpg
- File:Geek Fashion Show 2013 - Carlyfornia - Kimmie Soler (8845435218).jpg
- File:Gen Con Indy 2008 - costumes 122.JPG
- File:Impaled clone trooper at Dragon Con 2010.jpg
- File:SDCC 2011 - Clone Trooper (5973636324).jpg
- File:SDCC 2011 - Stormtroopers (5973072459).jpg
- File:Star Wars Celebration III - Clones, Zuckuss, and Vader (4878257767).jpg
- File:Star Wars Celebration IV - A lone Clone trooper patrols the street outside the LA Convention Center (4878282213).jpg
- File:Star Wars Celebration V - a Clone Trooper is downed by Yoda (4944254710).jpg
- File:Star Wars Celebration V - Scuba Clone Trooper (4944261474).jpg
- File:Star Wars EP1 3D (6820618793).jpg
- File:Star wars TGS -0951.jpg
- File:Supanova pop culture exhibition 2014 (14423988672).jpg
- File:SWCA - Slave Leia and a Clonetrooper (17015167758).jpg
- File:WonderCon 2011 - Clone Troopers (5580822579).jpg
- File:WonderCon 2011 - Clone Troopers (5593926486).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 18:34, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- Hi, if I understand it right, in fact the whole category Category:Cosplay of Star Wars should be removed? Ferran Cornellà (talk) 19:02, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- Indeed, I don't understand the selective choice of images for this deletion, when hundreds of similar ones exist. We should be consistent. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 02:02, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
- Salve a tutti colleghi wikipediani. Sé ho capito bene il problema è legato alla copyright dell'aspetto. Tecnicamente si può definire una violazione solo sé chi a fotografato a acquisito una immagine che contiene materiale ufficiale protetto da copyright, mentre foto di questo genere (amatoriali) non rispecchiano l'effettivamente un soggetto che indossa materiale ufficiale, ma copie non conformi o custom. Il soggetto che ho acquisito è un individuo che non indossa un costume ufficiale e non alcuni elementi sono custom realizzati per assomigliare.---0 Noctis 0 (talk) 11:45, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
- Indeed, I don't understand the selective choice of images for this deletion, when hundreds of similar ones exist. We should be consistent. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 02:02, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
- @F3RaN: Not all pictures from this category, actually there are some pictures which were published by the official Star Wars account on Flickr under free licence, most of them are in this category : Category:Files from the Official Star Wars Flickr stream. --Cody escouade delta (d) 18:41, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:05, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Cosplay of Clone troopers
[edit]per above DRs.
- File:Clone troopers in the spotlight.jpg
- File:Clone troopers march.jpg
- File:Star Wars Celebration IV - 501st Legion troop gathering (4878900832).jpg
- File:Star Wars costumes Pittsburgh Comicon.jpg
- File:WW Chicago 2012 - Clonetrooper (7785995046).jpg
- File:WWC 2009 - Clone trooper and Mara Jade (3809485039).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 22:43, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
Delete. Taivo (talk) 15:07, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
The original BBC Arabic upload says nothing of this license: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j1iwI2ZwENg FunkMonk (talk) 23:35, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- The original Urdu upload clearly does use an open license. Looks standard, so good to know: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j1_Lb2KXwlQ Jane023 (talk) 08:47, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
- BBC Arabic and BBC Urdu are the same organization. the Urdu one published it under cc-by, so that makes it cc-by. Victorgrigas (talk) 00:10, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
- here's the archive link https://web.archive.org/web/20200805154349/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j1_Lb2KXwlQ Victorgrigas (talk) 00:53, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
- Not necessarily, we don't know that the Urdu branch would even have the power to change the license from the original, that wouldn't make much sense. And would BBC even hold copyright to the footage filmed by the laptop of the non-BBC employee that was interviewed? FunkMonk (talk) 10:24, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
- (Off topic)
- would BBC even hold copyright to the footage filmed by the laptop of the non-BBC employee
- I just happened to raise some similar questions at Commons:Village_pump/Copyright#Copyright_of_video_call_screenshots.
- The interviewee's camera captures the visual. Some software (owned by BBC or not owned by them, I cant tell) transmitted the visual across the Internet. BBC broadcasts the visual (otherwise the footage would not even be recorded?). So, who owns copyright?--RZuo (talk) 16:54, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
- Interesting question, I'd assume the person who set up the camera, but maybe there's precedent we can go by. FunkMonk (talk) 20:53, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
- Large institutions like the BBC are usually well versed in copyright issues and secures the right from the interviewee before recording. Also, from the point of explosion, there is no copyright to own since there was no human involved in framing the shot (similar to the famous monkey case). Ainali (talk) 16:38, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
- So why would they upload the same video under different licenses? And what explosion are you talking about? In this video, you have to cameras set up by the interviewee and the interviewer. FunkMonk (talk) 09:53, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
- At 0:14 there is an explosion and the camera to the right gets dropped to the floor. Ainali (talk) 20:07, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
- So why would they upload the same video under different licenses? And what explosion are you talking about? In this video, you have to cameras set up by the interviewee and the interviewer. FunkMonk (talk) 09:53, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
- Large institutions like the BBC are usually well versed in copyright issues and secures the right from the interviewee before recording. Also, from the point of explosion, there is no copyright to own since there was no human involved in framing the shot (similar to the famous monkey case). Ainali (talk) 16:38, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
- Interesting question, I'd assume the person who set up the camera, but maybe there's precedent we can go by. FunkMonk (talk) 20:53, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
- Not necessarily, we don't know that the Urdu branch would even have the power to change the license from the original, that wouldn't make much sense. And would BBC even hold copyright to the footage filmed by the laptop of the non-BBC employee that was interviewed? FunkMonk (talk) 10:24, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
This is a zoom interview, the interviewee (based on the video) is not the host. That means the BBC was the host of the video, hence the owner of the copyright. Ircpresident (talk) 16:46, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
- The BBC didn't position his camera, the inteviewee did. FunkMonk (talk) 09:53, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
- And the interviewee agreed to be recorded on camera by the BBC Victorgrigas (talk) 00:18, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
- Keep I think we're confusing here "moral rights" with "copyright". The interviewee of course has the "moral rights" on the video. But the question of "copyright" is not tied directly to "who set the camera". It's "who has commissioned the work?" which is BBC in this case. BBC would have acquired permission to record before the interview and in the same agreement they would have asked for the rights to publish it on their platforms. That's a standard practice in broadcasting, and I'm sure an organization like BBC would have followed these protocols. Both BBC Arabic and Urdu are owned by the same BBC the corporation. So, they can decide if they want to broadcast/publish the same video under a copyright on one channel and under a free license on another. --Psubhashish (talk) 05:50, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - per discussion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:34, 21 December 2020 (UTC)