User talk:Ailbeve
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 08:55, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
Image without license
[edit]
This message was added automatically by MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 13:02, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
SVG (Scalable Vector Graphics)
[edit]In other languages (translate this)
|
---|
|
Thank you for uploading some images!
Did you know that Wikimedia Commons recommends the SVG (Scalable Vector Graphics) format for certain types of images? Scalable Vector Graphics are designed to look appropriate at any scale, and SVG images are easier to modify and translate, helping Wikimedia to distribute knowledge to all of the world. A lot of modern programs support SVG export. If you encountered problems or have questions, don't hesitate to ask me, a member of the Graphic Lab, or the Graphics village pump. Uploading images in SVG format isn't mandatory, but it would help. (To avoid any misunderstandings, please don't just put raster images into an SVG container as embedded raster.) Thanks, and happy editing!
|
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
Гюльчехра Бобокулова
[edit]Коллега, если Вы хотите вернуть в статью про убийство Анастасии Мещеряковой фотографию Гюльчехры Бобокуловой с отрезанной головой девочки, то Вам надо не ретушь на фотографию накладывать, а оспорить итог Соловьёва. Например, в украинской версии статьи эти фотографии присутствуют, поскольку админы украинской Википедии заняли следующую позицию: "раз фотографии не нарушают авторское право, то нет никаких оснований для удаления фотографий из статьи" и забанили бессрочно участника, который пытался удалить фотки из украинской версии статьи, ссылаясь на то, что против публикации фотографий возражала мать убитой девочки. Раммон (talk) 14:30, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
File:Зубков и львица.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
VLu (talk) 10:56, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
- u:VLu я указал лицензию, под которой материал был опубликован. В чем конкретно проблема?Ailbeve (talk) 11:01, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
- Вы указали подложную лицензию, которой нет в описании ролика. --VLu (talk) 11:03, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
- На тот момент указание на лицензию было. В настоящей момент она отсутствует. Что вы можете посоветовать?Ailbeve (talk) 11:06, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
- На момент загрузки полагается сразу проставлять рядом с лицензионным тегом шаблон {{LicenseReview}}. Кроме того, что это - требование для загрузок с ресурсов, где высокое количество нарушений АП, после проверки это позволяет не переживать за судьбу файла, если статус поменяется. А сейчас - или искать на web.archive, или ничего - т.е. уже поздно. --VLu (talk) 11:12, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
- Возможностей для неудаления не вижу: лицензии нет, кди не проходят. Засим, нужно удалить. Ailbeve (talk) 11:16, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
- На web.archive - только за 2 декабря, и там - то же самое. Но этот ролик и не мог распространяться под свободной лицензией, т.к. включает несвободную музыку. --VLu (talk) 11:17, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
- На момент загрузки полагается сразу проставлять рядом с лицензионным тегом шаблон {{LicenseReview}}. Кроме того, что это - требование для загрузок с ресурсов, где высокое количество нарушений АП, после проверки это позволяет не переживать за судьбу файла, если статус поменяется. А сейчас - или искать на web.archive, или ничего - т.е. уже поздно. --VLu (talk) 11:12, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
- На тот момент указание на лицензию было. В настоящей момент она отсутствует. Что вы можете посоветовать?Ailbeve (talk) 11:06, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
- Вы указали подложную лицензию, которой нет в описании ролика. --VLu (talk) 11:03, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:VisualEditor - Media editing 3-ru.png
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:VisualEditor - Media editing 3-ru.png, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
And also:
Yours sincerely, VLu (talk) 17:34, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
File:Скриншот Tampermonkey.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|