Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/05/14
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
Double Name Error Mrsupa (talk) 02:03, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Mistake Double Picture Mrsupa (talk) 02:05, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 08:25, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Many times Upload by mistake. Mrsupa (talk) 02:08, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 08:28, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Many times Upload by mistake Mrsupa (talk) 02:10, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 08:26, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
{{duplicate|File:Henry Chaplin, 1st Viscount Chaplin, by Arthur Stockdale Cope.jpeg}} Alsakan (talk) 04:53, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, speedy duplicate-processed. --Túrelio (talk) 06:35, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
{{duplicate|File:1st Viscount Knutsford by AS Cope.jpg}} Alsakan (talk) 05:02, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, speedy duplicate-processed. --Túrelio (talk) 06:35, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyright screenshot A1Cafel (talk) 06:37, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, G7-speedied as filed by uploader on day of upload. --Túrelio (talk) 07:02, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Copyright violation; meme with no encyclopedic value from vandalism-only account. userdude 07:40, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 07:56, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Copyright violation; meme with no encyclopedic value from vandalism-only account. userdude 07:40, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 07:57, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Copyright violation; meme with no encyclopedic value from vandalism-only account. userdude 07:40, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 07:56, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Copyright violation; meme with no encyclopedic value from vandalism-only account. userdude 07:40, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 07:54, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Copyright violation; meme with no encyclopedic value from vandalism-only account. userdude 07:40, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 07:56, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Meme with no encyclopedic value from vandalism-only account. userdude 07:40, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 07:55, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Wikipediaの「SuperCart」記事を英語から日本語に翻訳した際に、英語版記事から誤ってそのままアップロードしてしまった画像で、私Nitanoriの著作物ではありません。 Nitanori (talk) 05:26, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 10:31, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Wrong picture uploaded AstaSR (talk) 11:11, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 11:39, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Because I uploaded the same picture with the right license under the term "Nachfolgefahrplan" I guess Bluewatermelon1 (talk) 11:17, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request, replaced by File:Nachfolgefahrplan.pdf. --Achim (talk) 11:42, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
猥褻 やなぎさ (talk) 13:52, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 13:57, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Picture of crap has been used for the President's picture since 06. I cannot find how to fix it but I wish Wiki would. 2600:6C5A:17F:FCA1:D143:75C:7B24:DE97 18:49, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; problem lies on Wikidata. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 18:52, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, speedied per G7, as filed by uploader 2 days after upload. --Túrelio (talk) 20:45, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
File:The marine mammals of the north-western coast of North America, described and illustrated; together with an account of the American whale-fishery (1874) (14782513004).jpg
[edit]Green book cover only Tibet Nation (talk) 23:42, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination speedy as no EDU content. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 23:57, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Racconish as no permission. It HAS permission w:sr:Википедија:Дозволе за објављивање/Стеван Крагујевић Bojan Talk 19:41, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose - I Don't see what the problem is. -Indy beetle (talk) 21:25, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish 💬 06:31, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Screenshot of a Facebook post. Should upload the original photo if useful and freely licensed. 67.184.0.138 14:46, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:39, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
out of scope, copied from reddit: https://i.redd.it/y9sg1hxw2z841.jpg 77.112.172.4 22:32, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:45, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Copyright Violation from the website of the Czech Ministry of Education MrJaroslavik (talk) 14:47, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Storkk at 08:48, 15 Mai 2020 UTC: Likely copyright violation; see COM:Licensing. If you are the copyright holder, please follow the instructions on OTRS. --Krdbot 13:57, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Because it's not a Galah. It's a Major Mitchell Cockatoo. 58.179.123.206 07:41, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Keep: No valid reason for deletion. File can be renamed. --Achim (talk) 11:28, 14 May 2020 (UTC)- Keep: Maybe I made a mistake in the name of the bird. What about just renaming file with quality image status? --DILIN (talk) 15:10, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- I think, birds' name is Major Mitchell's cockatoo --DILIN (talk) 22:19, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- I learned from ornithologists working in the zoo where this bird was shot, this is really a Major Mitchell's cockatoo. --DILIN (talk) 16:54, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: It is not a valid reason to delete. The file was renamed. ℳaʐbeʟ Work • Talk • Mail 19:11, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Combinativetv (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:15, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
want to reupload again Ivan Humphrey (talk) 07:22, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 18:51, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by DRJ Ridoy khan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE; self promotion. In addition, File:DRJ Ridoy .jpg is likely to be a COM:DW (background), and File:DRj Ridoy Khan.jpg and File:Drj Ridoy Khan.jpg are not selfies.
- File:DRJ Ridoy Khan.ri.jpg
- File:DRJ Ridoy Khan.rjp.jpg
- File:DRJ Ridoy Khan.cc.jpg
- File:DRJ Ridoy Khan.drj.jpg
- File:DRJ Ridoy Khan.rj.jpg
- File:DRJ Ridoy Khan.ridoy.jpg
- File:DRj Ridoy Khan.jpg
- File:Drj Ridoy Khan.jpg
- File:DRJ Ridoy Khan.jp.jpg
- File:DRJ Ridoy .jpg
- File:DRJ Ridoy Khan.jpg
Ahmadtalk 11:13, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:27, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by DRJ Ridoy khan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:27, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
out of scope - previously deleted under a different file name Quakewoody (talk) 20:36, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, small personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 09:37, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Personal promotion E4024 (talk) 21:27, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, inappropriate use of talk pages. --Achim (talk) 13:43, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as no license (No license since) Schwede66 05:25, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- I've clicked the notice, not to challenge the speedy deletion but to give a heads up. I have uploaded quite a few Flickr photos from that particular user before I became aware of the PD issue (and before the Upload Bot stopped dealing with PD licenses). I've tried to talk the user into changing the licenses but to no avail. Therefore, I suggest you go ahead and nuke this photo. Also, it might pay to do a search for the Flickr user name and do a bulk delete so that this does not keep coming up. It's a shame, really, as the person takes very nice photos indeed. Schwede66 05:28, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Speedy keep Changed to CC0 per request. --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 02:50, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- Good work, Mdaniels5757! I've contacted the photographer a few times but he's never reacted to my requests. There are currently a few photos up for deletion; keen to make another approach? If so, contact me via my talk page (or look through the talk page history; have just removed a bunch of notifications. Schwede66 07:34, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jarekt (talk) 01:28, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Gold Coast beaches, and houses and buildings on shore, in poor weather, 19 December 1988.jpg
[edit]Flickr's PDM 1.0 is not a legal notice and needs permission from the copyright holder. See this RFC. A1Cafel (talk) 06:40, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy keep: You should've looked at the other URL. This page clearly has a CC-BY (-3.0-AU) Bidgee (talk) 06:43, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep The copyright owner (State of Queensland) uploaded it to Flickr as PD, by which they meant PD-Australia as Flickr does not provide a way to indicate the different nation's PDs. Kerry Raymond (talk) 07:22, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep as CC-BY-3.0-AU. --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 21:06, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jarekt (talk) 01:27, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Banknotes of Bangladesh
[edit]Copyright belongs to the government of Bangladesh, which we have no proof has licensed the notes freely. Compare with the 1962 law from Pakistan which was used to justify deletion of Pakistani money (Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pakistan commemorative banknote.png).
- File:10 Taka 2006 obverse.png
- File:10 Taka 2006 reverse.png
- File:2 Taka 2011 obverse.png
- File:2 Taka 2011 reverse.png
- File:2 TAKA.JPG
- File:5 Taka 2011 obverse.png
- File:5 Taka 2011 reverse.png
- File:Bangladeshi taka (500, 100, 50, 10).JPG
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:19, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- I'm not an expert, but there is a "no infringement" section of the Bangladesh Copyright Act, 2000 (sec 72). It allows for "review, whether of that work or any other work". --Bequw (talk) 01:48, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
- Please wait for an expert to look into this. Thank you. বব২৬ (talk) 16:45, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Sec. 72 is about Fair use. Fair use is not comapatible with Commons requirements. If the notes are governement copyrights or anonymous/pseudonymus works, they should be copyrighted 6-0 years since published. Otherwose, 60 years since author death. I see no way that they may be PD in US earlier. Ankry (talk) 17:56, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
- Please wait for an expert to look into this. Thank you. বব২৬ (talk) 16:45, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 20:17, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Banknotes of Bangladesh
[edit]Bangladesh is not listed in Commons:Currency. But Bangladesh tends to have the same copyright as Pakistan - and images of currency are not allowed here. Checking https://www.bb.org.bd/currency/note.php - I see no evidence of free use.
- File:10 BDT Obs 2011.jpg
- File:10 BDT Rev 2011.jpg
- File:100 BDT Obs 2011.jpg
- File:100 BDT Rev 2011.jpg
- File:1000 BDT Obs 2011.jpg
- File:1000 BDT Rev 2011.jpg
- File:2 BDT Obs 2011.jpg
- File:2 BDT Rev 2011.jpg
- File:20 BDT Obs 2011.jpg
- File:20 BDT Rev 2011.jpg
- File:5 BDT Obs 2011.jpg
- File:5 BDT Rev 2011.jpg
- File:50 BDT Obs 2011.jpg
- File:50 BDT Rev 2011.jpg
- File:500 BDT Obs 2011.jpg
- File:500 BDT Rev 2011.jpg
- File:Img836 — копия — копия (2).jpg
- File:Img837 — копия (2).jpg
- File:বাংলাদেশী ব্যাংকনোট- ৫ টাকা, ২০১১.jpg
Ronhjones (Talk) 00:52, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 22:31, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Banknotes of Bangladesh
[edit]Copyright in Bangladesh is Publish date + 60 years for government works. As best I can tell, none of these bills are 60 years old. In fact, the presidential decree that created Bangladesh's central bank was issued in 1972, less than 60 years ago (and Bangladesh became independent country in 1971).
- File:Bangladesh 100 taka.jpg
- File:Bangladesh 10BDT 1996 1.jpg
- File:Bangladesh 10BDT 1996 2.jpg
- File:Bangladesh bb 100 taka 2019.00.00 b352k p57 1593703 r.jpg
- File:Bangladesh bb 500 taka 2019.00.00 b353k p58 4920091 f.jpg
- File:Bangladesh bb 500 taka 2019.00.00 b353k p58 4920091 r.jpg
- File:Bangladeshi 10 Taka back bart Circulated 11th oct 1976.jpg
- File:Bangladeshi 10 Taka Front part, circulated 11th Oct 1976.jpg
- File:Bangladeshi 10 Taka Polymer year 2000 Back part.jpg
- File:Bangladeshi 10 Taka polymer year 2000 front part.jpg
- File:Banglaesh 1000taka 2019 r.jpg
- File:Banglaesh 1000taka 2019.jpg
- File:Banglaesh 500taka 2019 r.jpg
- File:Banglaesh 500taka 2019.jpg
- File:Banglaesh 5taka 2019 r.jpg
- File:Banglaesh 5taka 2019.jpg
- File:Banglaesh10 taka 2019 r.jpg
- File:Banglaesh10 taka 2019.jpg
- File:Banglaesh100taka 2019 r.jpg
- File:Banglaesh100taka 2019.jpg
- File:Banglaesh2 taka 2019 r.jpg
- File:Banglaesh2 taka 2019.jpg
- File:Banglaesh20 taka 2019 r.jpg
- File:Banglaesh20 taka 2019.jpg
- File:Banglaesh20 taka 20192 r.jpg
- File:Banglaesh20 taka 20192.jpg
- File:Banglaesh5 taka 2019 r.jpg
- File:Banglaesh5 taka 2019.jpg
- File:Banglaesh5 taka 20192 r.jpg
- File:Banglaesh5 taka 20192.jpg
- File:Banglaesh50 taka 2019 r.jpg
- File:Banglaesh50 taka 2019.jpg
- File:Banladesh 50taka r.jpg
- File:Banladesh 50taka.jpg
- File:বাংলাদেশি ১ টাকা পিছনের দিক, প্রচলন ১৯৭৩ সালের ১৮ই ডিসেম্বর.jpg
- File:বাংলাদেশি ১ টাকা পিছনের দিক, প্রচলন ১৯৭৯.jpg
- File:বাংলাদেশি ১ টাকা প্রথম নোট পিছনের দিক, প্রচলন ২রা মার্চ ১৯৭৩.jpg
- File:বাংলাদেশি ১ টাকা প্রথম নোট সম্মুখভাগ, প্রচলন ২রা মার্চ ১৯৭৩.jpg
- File:বাংলাদেশি ১ টাকা সম্মুখভাগ, প্রচলন ১৯৭৩ সালের ১৮ই ডিসেম্বর.jpg
- File:বাংলাদেশি ১ টাকা সম্মুখভাগ, প্রচলন ১৯৭৯.jpg
- File:বাংলাদেশি ১০ টাকা নোট পিছনের দিক, প্রচলন ১১ই ডিসেম্বর ১৯৯৭.jpg
- File:বাংলাদেশি ১০ টাকা নোট পিছনের দিক, প্রচলন ৩রা সেপ্টেম্বর ১৯৮২.jpg
- File:বাংলাদেশি ১০ টাকা নোট পিছনের দিক, প্রচলন ৭ই জানুয়ারী ২০০২.jpg
- File:বাংলাদেশি ১০ টাকা নোট সম্মুখভাগ, প্রচলন ১১ই ডিসেম্বর ১৯৯৭.jpg
- File:বাংলাদেশি ১০ টাকা নোট সম্মুখভাগ, প্রচলন ৩রা সেপ্টেম্বর ১৯৮২.jpg
- File:বাংলাদেশি ১০ টাকা নোট সম্মুখভাগ, প্রচলন ৭ই জানুয়ারী ২০০২.jpg
The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:51, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:52, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Money of Bangladesh
[edit]Copyright in Bangladesh is Publish date + 60 years for government works. As best I can tell, none of these bills or bill covers are 60 years old. In fact, the presidential decree that created Bangladesh's central bank was issued in 1972, less than 60 years ago (and Bangladesh became independent country in 1971).
- File:Bangladesh 100BDT 2013 1.jpg
- File:Bangladesh 100BDT 2013 2.jpg
- File:Bangladesh 100BDT 2013 folder.jpg
- File:Bangladesh 10BDT 1996 1.jpg
- File:Bangladesh 10BDT 1996 2.jpg
- File:Bangladesh 25BDT 2013 1.jpg
- File:Bangladesh 25BDT 2013 2.jpg
- File:Bangladesh 25BDT 2013 folder.jpg
- File:Bangladesh 40BDT 2011 1.jpg
- File:Bangladesh 40BDT 2011 2.jpg
- File:Bangladesh 40BDT 2011 folder.jpg
- File:Bangladesh 60BDT 2012 1.jpg
- File:Bangladesh 60BDT 2012 2.jpg
- File:Bangladesh 60BDT 2012 folder.jpg
- File:Bangladesh 70BDT 2018 1.jpg
- File:Bangladesh 70BDT 2018 2.jpg
- File:Bangladesh 70BDT 2018 folder.jpg
The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:54, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:54, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/Courtesy photo by Colombian Air Force Public Affairs
[edit]Description said "Courtesy photo by Colombian Air Force Public Affairs", which means these photos are not work from South Carolina Air National Guard
- File:Fuerza Aerea- Colombia.jpg
- File:IAI Kfir- Fuerza Aérea de Colombia.jpg
- File:Fuerza aérea Colombia- Fuerza Aerea Estados Unidos.jpg
- File:140818-Z-ZZ099-007 (15007688258).jpg
- File:140812-Z-ZZ099-014 (15007795788).jpg
- File:140812-Z-ZZ099-016 (15007793828).jpg
- File:140812-Z-ZZ099-017 (15007793068).jpg
- File:140812-Z-ZZ099-005 (15007805697).jpg
- File:140812-Z-ZZ099-009 (15171338926).jpg
- File:140812-Z-ZZ099-013 (15007587269).jpg
- File:140812-Z-ZZ099-006 (15194000542).jpg
- File:140812-Z-ZZ099-007 (15171340836).jpg
- File:140812-Z-ZZ099-011 (15191329781).jpg
- File:140812-Z-ZZ099-008 (15007800438).jpg
- File:140812-Z-ZZ099-030 (15007680860).jpg
- File:140815-Z-ZZ099-004 (15191626101).jpg
- File:140815-Z-ZZ099-019 (15194653185).jpg
- File:140812-Z-ZZ099-024 (15007685640).jpg
- File:140812-Z-ZZ099-027 (15193983652).jpg
- File:140815-Z-ZZ099-002 (15171639036).jpg
- File:140815-Z-ZZ099-007 (15007993630).jpg
- File:140815-Z-ZZ099-009 (15171633966).jpg
- File:140812-Z-ZZ099-033 (15194346895).jpg
- File:140812-Z-ZZ099-029 (15007572919).jpg
- File:140818-Z-ZZ099-001 (15007484399).jpg
- File:140812-Z-ZZ099-019 (15171330836).jpg
- File:140815-Z-ZZ099-001 (15194666285).jpg
- File:140812-Z-ZZ099-032 (15007678710).jpg
- File:140812-Z-ZZ099-025 (15007685240).jpg
- File:140812-Z-ZZ099-023 (15194355465).jpg
- File:140815-Z-ZZ099-008 (15191623171).jpg
- File:140812-Z-ZZ099-031 (15007781298).jpg
- File:140812-Z-ZZ099-026 (15194353215).jpg
- File:140818-Z-ZZ099-006 (15194259605).jpg
- File:140815-Z-ZZ099-006 (15008096447).jpg
- File:140812-Z-ZZ099-001 (15194373915).jpg
- File:140815-Z-ZZ099-017 (15194283302).jpg
- File:140812-Z-ZZ099-015 (15193993082).jpg
- File:140812-Z-ZZ099-003 (15191336351).jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 06:12, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 05:36, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vena Music (talk · contribs)
[edit]Selff-promotion, out of project scope. Commons is not your personal free web host.
- File:VENA foto artista vena.jpg
- File:Foto Artista Vena.jpg
- File:Logo vena.jpg
- File:Foto con Il produttore.jpg
- File:Foto di Vena.jpg
Achim (talk) 07:35, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:55, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
unknown people, no descriptions
- File:4T0A0746 (35473971504).jpg
- File:4T0A0748 (35473972684).jpg
- File:4T0A0750 (35473973834).jpg
- File:4T0A0751 (35473977614).jpg
- File:4T0A0757 (35473975114).jpg
- File:4T0A0759 (35473976654).jpg
- File:4T0A0770 (35502600223).jpg
- File:4T0A0771 (35473968904).jpg
- File:4T0A2391 (38084064082).jpg
- File:4T0A2395 (38115342131).jpg
- File:4T0A2398 (37406385534).jpg
- File:4T0A2410 (38084197472).jpg
- File:AICGS Exchange Students Visit the Embassy IMG 8409 (26746290991).jpg
- File:AICGS Exchange Students Visit the Embassy IMG 8410 (26746287651).jpg
- File:AICGS Exchange Students Visit the Embassy IMG 8411 (26813226305).jpg
- File:AICGS Exchange Students Visit the Embassy IMG 8412 (26746282431).jpg
- File:AICGS Exchange Students Visit the Embassy IMG 8416 (26813221215).jpg
- File:AICGS Exchange Students Visit the Embassy IMG 8418 (26746276751).jpg
- File:AICGS Exchange Students Visit the Embassy IMG 8420 (26209119213).jpg
- File:AICGS Exchange Students Visit the Embassy IMG 8422 (26813214125).jpg
- File:AICGS Exchange Students Visit the Embassy IMG 8423 (26746269911).jpg
- File:AICGS Exchange Students Visit the Embassy IMG 8427 (26746266041).jpg
- File:Alumni Mentorship Event IMG 9887 (26282591890).jpg
- File:Alumni Mentorship Event IMG 9888 (26463132372).jpg
- File:Alumni Mentorship Event IMG 9889 (26555468425).jpg
- File:Alumni Mentorship Event IMG 9891 (26463131002).jpg
- File:Alumni Mentorship Event IMG 9893 (26282588910).jpg
- File:Alumni Mentorship Event IMG 9897 (26463129642).jpg
- File:Alumni Mentorship Event IMG 9899 (26489402901).jpg
Mutter Erde (talk) 08:32, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of COM:SCOPE. - FitIndia Talk Mail 09:34, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
unknown people, no descriptions
- File:BBIS Graduation Day Party IMG 1614 (18044648648).jpg
- File:BBIS Graduation Day Party IMG 1615 (18233750991).jpg
- File:BBIS Graduation Day Party IMG 1616 (18228773072).jpg
- File:BBIS Graduation Day Party IMG 1617 (18044654508).jpg
- File:BBIS Graduation Day Party IMG 1618 (18228777812).jpg
- File:BBIS Graduation Day Party IMG 1619 (18206019096).jpg
- File:BBIS Graduation Day Party IMG 1620 (18228781502).jpg
- File:BBIS Graduation Day Party IMG 1621 (17609872524).jpg
- File:BBIS Graduation Day Party IMG 1622 (18233767011).jpg
- File:BBIS Graduation Day Party IMG 1623 (17609878274).jpg
- File:BBIS Graduation Day Party IMG 1628 (18046282249).jpg
- File:BBIS Graduation Day Party IMG 1629 (18206034426).jpg
- File:BBIS Graduation Day Party IMG 1630 (18046286859).jpg
- File:BBIS Graduation Day Party IMG 1631 (18232521765).jpg
- File:BBIS Graduation Day Party IMG 1632 (18206043896).jpg
- File:BBIS Graduation Day Party IMG 1633 (18046295319).jpg
- File:BBIS Graduation Day Party IMG 1634 (18044790930).jpg
- File:BBIS Graduation Day Party IMG 1636 (17611928303).jpg
- File:BBIS Graduation Day Party IMG 1637 (17611926843).jpg
- File:BBIS Graduation Day Party IMG 1638 (18044801710).jpg
Mutter Erde (talk) 11:40, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of COM:SCOPE. - FitIndia Talk Mail 09:34, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
unknown people, no descriptions
- File:Alumni Mentorship Event IMG 9915 (26529454076).jpg
- File:Alumni Mentorship Event IMG 9918 (25950492044).jpg
- File:Alumni Mentorship Event IMG 9921 (26555456965).jpg
- File:Alumni Mentorship Event IMG 9926 (25950489294).jpg
- File:Alumni Mentorship Event IMG 9928 (26282575190).jpg
- File:Alumni Mentorship Event IMG 9931 (25950486244).jpg
- File:Alumni Mentorship Program launched IMG 5226 (21773453522).jpg
- File:Alumni Mentorship Program launched IMG 5228 (21597154640).jpg
- File:Alumni Mentorship Program launched IMG 5231 (21759056666).jpg
- File:Alumni Mentorship Program launched IMG 5232 (21773463052).jpg
- File:Alumni Mentorship Program launched IMG 5247 (21794673411).jpg
- File:Alumni Mentorship Program launched IMG 5249 (21794676811).jpg
- File:Alumni Mentorship Program launched IMG 5255 (21794679801).jpg
- File:Alumni Mentorship Program launched IMG 5257 (21597353768).jpg
- File:Alumni Mentorship Program launched IMG 5259 (21773486552).jpg
Mutter Erde (talk) 13:40, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep In scope as events of Embassy of the USA in Germany. And filename has the description. Tm (talk) 19:55, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: withoiut any names these are useless. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:10, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
unknown people, no descriptions
- File:Bundeswehr study tour group visits the Embassy IMG 5459 (21216452893).jpg
- File:Bundeswehr study tour group visits the Embassy IMG 5460 (21811380546).jpg
- File:Bundeswehr study tour group visits the Embassy IMG 5461 (21847107461).jpg
- File:Bundeswehr study tour group visits the Embassy IMG 5462 (21649661998).jpg
- File:Bundeswehr study tour group visits the Embassy IMG 5463 (21847108891).jpg
- File:Bundeswehr study tour group visits the Embassy IMG 5464 (21216464233).jpg
- File:Bundeswehr study tour group visits the Embassy IMG 5465 (21214760364).jpg
- File:Bundeswehr study tour group visits the Embassy IMG 5467 (21649484830).jpg
- File:Bundeswehr study tour group visits the Embassy IMG 5468 (21847116771).jpg
- File:Bundeswehr study tour group visits the Embassy IMG 5474 (21650651429).jpg
- File:Bundeswehr study tour group visits the Embassy IMG 5475 (21216476613).jpg
- File:Bundeswehr study tour group visits the Embassy IMG 5476 (21649494340).jpg
- File:Bundeswehr study tour group visits the Embassy IMG 5477 (21649495700).jpg
- File:Bundeswehr study tour group visits the Embassy IMG 5478 (21837533385).jpg
Mutter Erde (talk) 06:45, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:24, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
unknown people, no descriptions
- File:Krevoy family visits the Embassy IMG 2813 (18914262092).jpg
- File:Krevoy family visits the Embassy IMG 2814 (18914257572).jpg
- File:Krevoy family visits the Embassy IMG 2815 (18922406991).jpg
- File:Krevoy family visits the Embassy IMG 2816 (18731870528).jpg
- File:Krevoy family visits the Embassy IMG 2817 (18298882063).jpg
- File:Krevoy family visits the Embassy IMG 2818 (18893259696).jpg
- File:Krevoy family visits the Embassy IMG 2819 (18296992834).jpg
- File:Krevoy family visits the Embassy IMG 2820 (18919529555).jpg
- File:Krevoy family visits the Embassy IMG 2821 (18922418891).jpg
- File:Krevoy family visits the Embassy IMG 2822 (18919532425).jpg
- File:Lessinggymnasium Hohenstein-Ernstthal "MeetsUS" IMG 9749 (16683867248).jpg
- File:Lessinggymnasium Hohenstein-Ernstthal "MeetsUS" IMG 9750 (16664177967).jpg
- File:Lessinggymnasium Hohenstein-Ernstthal "MeetsUS" IMG 9751 (16870478781).jpg
- File:Lessinggymnasium Hohenstein-Ernstthal "MeetsUS" IMG 9752 (16249118014).jpg
- File:Lessinggymnasium Hohenstein-Ernstthal "MeetsUS" IMG 9753 (16251506373).jpg
- File:Lessinggymnasium Hohenstein-Ernstthal "MeetsUS" IMG 9755 (16845604526).jpg
- File:Lessinggymnasium Hohenstein-Ernstthal "MeetsUS" IMG 9756 (16684074880).jpg
- File:Lessinggymnasium Hohenstein-Ernstthal "MeetsUS" IMG 9757 (16685348969).jpg
- File:Lunch with the Ambassador IMG 2562 (18337020483).jpg
- File:Lunch with the Ambassador IMG 2563 (18335100484).jpg
- File:Lunch with the Ambassador IMG 2566 (18771462909).jpg
- File:Lunch with the Ambassador IMG 2567 (18771461039).jpg
- File:Lunch with the Ambassador IMG 2569 (18931422086).jpg
Mutter Erde (talk) 08:06, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:59, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yoshi Shairy (talk · contribs)
[edit]User-made drawings/misc art. Not in use. Per COM:HOST.
- File:Yoshi Shairy.jpg
- File:O Príncipe Fauno.jpg
- File:Irmão Glutão.jpg
- File:Indigente Rosa.jpg
- File:Diego, amaranto e sobrancelhas.jpg
Kissa21782 (talk) 10:48, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:09, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by VVasanthii (talk · contribs)
[edit]Corporate logos / maps, not in use. Promotional content, out of scope.
- File:YOU Broadband service locations.jpg
- File:You broadband logo.png
- File:YOUBroadband.gif
- File:Youbroadband.jpg
- File:Youbroadband .jpg
Kissa21782 (talk) 10:51, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:08, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mahamat Ali abdoulaye (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos, no value, COM:HOST.
Kissa21782 (talk) 10:58, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:09, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Suleiman Adams D'bright (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal files, not in use. COM:HOST.
- File:D'bright 1.jpg
- File:Suleiman Adams D'bright.jpg
- File:Adbright.jpg
- File:Adams Bright.jpg
- File:Fashion world.jpg
- File:D'BRIGHT.jpg
- File:D'bright Fashion.jpg
- File:D'BRIGHT FASHION WORLD.jpg
- File:D'bright.jpg
Kissa21782 (talk) 11:03, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:11, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ERICK SALTTO (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work, look like promo photos of a band
- File:ONASIS16.jpg
- File:ONASIS14.jpg
- File:ONASIS12.jpg
- File:ONASIS13.jpg
- File:ONASIS11.jpg
- File:ONASIS10.jpg
- File:ONASIS9.jpg
- File:ONASIS8.jpg
- File:ONASIS7.jpg
- File:ONASIS6.jpg
- File:ONASIS3.jpg
- File:ONASIS4.jpg
- File:ONASIS5.jpg
- File:ONASIS2.jpg
- File:ONASIS1.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 11:36, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:13, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mirandasan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own works: not one consistency in these images, all are small low-res, different sizes and quality. Look more like screengrabs.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:18, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:14, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no educational use, out of scope. And looks like photo of photo, DW. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:19, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:14, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:28, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:15, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Moonpreacher (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:DW - crests/insignia merely photoshoped onto stock beret images. The majority are derivative of these images. DUCK/clear COM:PRP issue
- File:Selous scouts beret.png
- File:Recce.png
- File:GNR GIPS beret.png
- File:Boina UOE.png
- File:Boina COE.png
- File:Irish Army Ranger Wing green beret.png
- File:US Army Special Forces green beret.png
- File:Fuzileiro naval.png
- File:Boina Ranger OE.png
- File:Boina ranger.png
- File:Boina comandos.png
- File:Boina GNR.png
- File:Boina Policia Aerea.png
- File:Boina Mergulhador Marinha.png
- File:Boina Cavalaria.png
- File:Boina exercito.png
- File:Boina Paraquedista.png
- File:Boina Paraquedista FA.png
- File:Boina Fuzileiro.jpg
- File:Boina Ranger OE.jpg
- File:Boina Ranger Operações Especiais.jpg
- File:Boina Comando.jpg
- File:Boina comando.jpg
- File:Ranger ( Special Operations) beret - Portugal.jpg
- File:Boina Ranger.jpg
Эlcobbola talk 20:32, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:01, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Moonpreacher (talk · contribs)
[edit]Obviously cropped (COM:DW) from existing photographs (see poor photoshopping around edges), low res, no camera EXIF, and uploaders m.o. is to crop berets from COM:NETCOPYVIOs (see above). Duck/COM:PRP issue.
Эlcobbola talk 14:29, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:16, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Moonpreacher (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Boina fuzo.jpg
- File:Policia Aerea boina.jpg
- File:MCOE green beret.jpg
- File:Portuguese Army Paratrooper green beret.jpg
- File:Boina comando.jpg
- File:Portuguese Army Special Operations (Rangers).jpg
- File:Boinaranger.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:53, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:30, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:16, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:32, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:16, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
unused, uncategorized, probably out of scope. Estopedist1 (talk) 20:15, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 06:32, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Podocarpusintl (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability.
Kissa21782 (talk) 18:40, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:44, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by God angel 3+7 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Two unused similar images which seem to fall outside of COM:SCOPE due to lack of educational utility.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:04, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete No description nor information about location nor explanation of subject. Poor quality photos without evident compensating usefulness nor importance. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:33, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:42, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yolandasaenzdetejada (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promotional book covers and probably copyvios as well.
- File:Portada antologia anual de poesia en el palacio.gif
- File:Portada a jugar.gif
- File:Portada socorro.gif
- File:Vandelvira.png
- File:Portada diario de un desembarco.gif
- File:Portada corre edith napoleon.gif
- File:Portada tacones de azucar.gif
- File:Alquiler.jpg
Kissa21782 (talk) 19:16, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:42, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Unused suspicious file, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 19:55, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:41, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Marfutkin kirill (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused and uncategorised files. Random description. Commons is not the private media repository.
Estopedist1 (talk) 20:17, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:41, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope. ~Cybularny Speak? 20:19, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:40, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
The unused and uncategorised file. Commons is not the private media repository. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 20:22, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:41, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. Sakhalinio (talk) 21:41, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:39, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Unused photo of an unknown person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 21:42, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:38, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
out of scope - personal photo Mindmatrix 21:43, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:38, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vbprogramer (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal family photos. Not used anywhere.
Smooth O (talk) 09:17, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 16:27, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hanooz 15:32, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hanooz 15:33, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
and:
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hanooz 15:31, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
No indication of user's own work, as image was shared by subject herself 2601:1C0:4501:EBA0:F15D:6AB6:E8B2:4661 00:29, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope, unused. --Jianhui67 T★C 11:14, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
The file has the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, which is not allowed in Commons. Suzy Oh tell me 01:06, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 11:14, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
The file has the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, which is not allowed in Commons. Suzy Oh tell me 01:08, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 11:14, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
It’s a self promotion of a computer company A.R.M. 01:54, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 11:14, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
Not a free file ("© Bütün hüquqlar qorunur. Xəbərlərdən istifadə edərkən www.iсt.az saytına istinad zəruridir.") nor a notable (in scope) person. E4024 (talk) 02:11, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 11:15, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
Small image. No proper exif. Possibility of copyright violations ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 04:13, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 11:15, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
Small image. No exif data. Possibilities of copyright violations ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 04:14, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 11:15, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope. Commons is not personal web repository ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 04:19, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 11:15, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
This is apparently a marketing image that can be found on numerous websites. The Exif says it's by Patrick Leguennec . A license should be obtained from the copyright holder. --ghouston (talk) 04:30, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and COM:PCP. --Jianhui67 T★C 11:16, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
Promotional content/spam
- File:Smk-pujut header.jpg
- File:View smkpujut1.jpg
- File:Slide7 Peratus lulus dan gred matapelajaran.png
- File:Slide6 Lulus 6 MP.png
- File:Slide5 Lulus semua matapelajaran.png
- File:Slide lulus bm sej.png
- File:Slide dashboard.png
- File:Rosimi Eron.png
- File:Rohana binti Zahari.png
- File:Dayang Isah binti Abang Indi.png
- File:Mackinna.png
- File:Logo SMK Pujut.jpg
- File:Madline jayan.png
✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 04:35, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 11:18, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work, not sure about scope either
- File:Mr Koh.png
- File:Cikgu Su.png
- File:Cikgu Christina1.png
- File:Cikgu Madline.png
- File:Cikgu Sharol.png
- File:Cikgu Mat Asan.png
- File:Cikgu TaiCP.png
- File:Cikgu Christina.png
- File:Pengetua.cikgusu.jpg
- File:PENGETUA-removebg-preview.png
- File:Sharol.jpg
- File:Cikgu Mat.png
- File:Cikgu Tai.png
- File:272 Christina.jpg
- File:PENGETUA Madline Jayan.jpg
- File:Pengetua Pn Madline.png
- File:Logo Skolah Transp New.png
- File:Pn. Sumarni.jpg
- File:Sophia limi.jpg
- File:Slide6 Lulus 6 MP.png
Gbawden (talk) 13:52, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 02:11, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Promotional image, uploaded by a corporate editor and only used in one Wikipedia draft that is up for deletion as spam. Passengerpigeon (talk) 06:21, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 11:19, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image ℳaʐbeʟ Work • Talk • Mail 08:20, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 11:20, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
out of scope ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 12:43, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --pandakekok9 12:52, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 11:21, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
Previously published at https://www.giornaletrentino.it/sport/tiro-a-segno-azzolini-%C3%A8-l-erede-di-fait-1.1016176 Ytoyoda (talk) 14:08, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 11:21, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photo of non-notable event, no educational use, out of scope. And previously published, needs COM:OTRS. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:30, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 11:21, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in tabular data, MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 11:21, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational use, out of scope. And above TOO. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:33, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 11:21, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by PHenrique13 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused logos, no educational use, out of scope.
- File:JRBRITOPRETO.png
- File:Cravatasl.jpg
- File:FarmáciaViaCerta.png
- File:Cafecom.jpg
- File:PrimeiroUniformeCap.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:34, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 11:22, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:IKECHUKWU.jpg
- File:OBIDIKE IKECHUKWU.jpg
- File:The publisher.jpg
- File:The young obidike at a function at 3 brigades, Bukavu barracks kano.jpg
- File:At a function with my girlfriend.jpg
- File:The young soldier.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 11:22, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: looks like official photo, cropped and published, then taken (screengrab) and upsized. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:38, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 11:22, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photos, no context/location, no educational use, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:39, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 11:22, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in tabular data, MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 11:22, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. Duplicate. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 11:23, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
Despite the attribution by the uploader to the author and the source site https://www.theplatformcanvas.com that site asserts copyright over its contents. Without a release to the current chosen licence here I cannto see how this file can be allowed to remain here.
There seems to be a basic misunderstanding of copyright by the uploader. Unless, of course I am the one! Timtrent (talk) 21:23, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 07:15, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by GuinanDrib555 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal doodles, no educational use, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:42, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 11:23, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 11:23, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
looks like spam and definitely out of scope 67.184.0.138 14:48, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 11:23, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 11:24, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
Unused low-res grainy photo without description/context, no educational use, unusable and out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:05, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 11:24, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Anil Bishnoi2929 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 11:24, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by RITUA PRIVATE LIMITED (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 11:24, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 11:24, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 11:24, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
appears to be purely promotional (see username of uploader) 2A00:23C4:AF0F:F400:192C:BFA0:E964:F998 18:49, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete: DW using a generator, see [1], [2], [3]. Copyright situation unclear. --Achim (talk) 19:11, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 21:45, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
I no longer want this picture on the internet/wikipedia RdRnnr (talk) 01:26, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: No valid reason for deletion. In use. --Achim (talk) 08:21, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. CC licenses are not revokable. --Strakhov (talk) 21:39, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
Delete Being used for vandalism on en.wikipedia ([4]) and no encyclolpedic purpose. Hammersoft (talk) 01:32, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete This is a Snapchat filter. Snapchat filters are copyrighted and licensed for personal use only. --67.184.0.138 14:38, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Speedy delete: G3 content only used for vandalism and F10 personal photo by non-contributor. The Commons uploader is an English Wikipedia vandal-only account. Also would be probable copyvio derivative work as Snapchat filters likely contain copyrighted art from Snapchat, unless proven otherwise. --Closeapple (talk) 03:46, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: unused, probably copyrighted, COM:PRP. --Strakhov (talk) 21:40, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
copyvio: https://scontent-mia3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/41002176_309344133131903_8786709893055774720_o.jpg?_nc_cat=104&_nc_sid=e007fa&_nc_eui2=AeElhrQJhnpd3jzN9PuOP2I1bpLDR6J1-9NuksNHonX707-9U3ejfJ8FggsWCL2He6aMbPluf2O57TJuiUXL0eF4&_nc_ohc=9uIiH1eBXyMAX-_cuwC&_nc_ht=scontent-mia3-1.xx&oh=736efba882013782b16e061883574272&oe=5EE32330 Rennrigor (talk) 04:55, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- now nominated for speedy deletion --Rennrigor (talk) 04:58, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. --Strakhov (talk) 21:45, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
copyvio: https://www.facebook.com/marametal/photos/a.292939401439043/292939344772382/?type=3&theater Rennrigor (talk) 05:03, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- now nominated for speedy --Rennrigor (talk) 05:15, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. --Strakhov (talk) 21:45, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
copyvio: https://mara-metal.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/MARA-Logo.png Rennrigor (talk) 05:09, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I can share this pic so what's the problem ?
- now nominated for speedy. --Rennrigor (talk) 05:14, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. --Strakhov (talk) 21:45, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
Non-free content (newspaper cover) 93.140.20.162 05:14, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: not own work, no reason why it would be free content. --Strakhov (talk) 21:46, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
The image comes from Flickr account with only 2 images, per watermark in upper right corner this is not own work. In my opinion this is Flickwashing. Taivo (talk) 08:13, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PRP. --Strakhov (talk) 21:49, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
The file comes from Flickr account, which consists a lot of newspaper articles, posters and other copyright violations. The Flickr user cannot be trusted and this is Flickrwashing. Taivo (talk) 08:23, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PRP. --Strakhov (talk) 21:50, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Swethakalra999 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - no educational value
ℳaʐbeʟ Work • Talk • Mail 08:31, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep File:Food distributiuon.jpg as that seems to be in scope, and Delete the other --67.184.0.138 14:54, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: both in scope, see d:Q22073991. --Achim (talk) 15:17, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per Achim. --Strakhov (talk) 21:50, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
Copyrighted book covers Gbawden (talk) 08:50, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 21:51, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Вакуленко-К. Володимир (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyrighted book covers
- File:Ми, провінція!.jpg
- File:Монограмота(2008).jpg
- File:Dzerkalo (Зелене(1)число 2009).jpg
- File:Четвер(30)2008).jpg
Gbawden (talk) 08:55, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, a COM:OTRS permission is needed. --Strakhov (talk) 21:52, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jethro Skninner (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyrighted art works
- File:Cover-KOPERNIKUS-Neu-2-page-0.jpg
- File:Dörge-Macbeth-1-page-0(1).jpg
- File:Dörge - HAMLET.jpg
- File:Theater-3-page-0(1).jpg
Gbawden (talk) 09:06, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 21:53, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jethro Skninner (talk · contribs)
[edit](Photo by Zasu Menil.) no permission
Gbawden (talk) 09:07, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. COM:OTRS from Zasu Menil is needed. --Strakhov (talk) 21:54, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
galerie des portraits Jean-Paul Philippon (talk) 11:52, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- This photo has no evidence of permission anyway from the author, so Delete. --pandakekok9 12:29, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:PRP: Uploader and author don't match, no evidence of free license at source,. --Strakhov (talk) 21:57, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Arnold Bartels (talk) 14:05, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, CC licenses are not revokable. --Strakhov (talk) 22:03, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Arnold Bartels (talk) 14:05, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, CC licenses are not revokable. --Strakhov (talk) 22:03, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Arnold Bartels (talk) 14:06, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, CC licenses are not revokable. --Strakhov (talk) 22:03, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Arnold Bartels (talk) 14:06, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, CC licenses are not revokable. --Strakhov (talk) 22:03, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Arnold Bartels (talk) 14:06, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, CC licenses are not revokable. --Strakhov (talk) 22:03, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Arnold Bartels (talk) 14:06, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, CC licenses are not revokable. --Strakhov (talk) 22:04, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Arnold Bartels (talk) 14:07, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: no valid reason for deletion, CC licenses are not revokable. --Strakhov (talk) 22:04, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Arnold Bartels (talk) 14:07, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: no valid reason for deletion, CC licenses are not revokable. --Strakhov (talk) 22:04, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
Above TOO, and out of scope. Only used on a userpage of non-contributing user. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:26, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Probably not own work. It is only used in a talk page. The thread is related to its copyright. COM:PRP. --Strakhov (talk) 22:05, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
Suspected Flickr washing - visual characteristics suggest screenshots from video(s) (COM:DW)
Эlcobbola talk 15:43, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- It should be deleted if the file is copyright and it's original author has not licensed it under creative commons for Wikimedia use. I'm afraid I did mistake once again. Thanks for tagging it. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 01:33, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
- Still expecting to be autopatrolled? --E4024 (talk) 01:46, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Comment all files under Special:Search/insource:love70 should be deleted.--BevinKacon (talk) 19:40, 19 May 2020 (UTC)- Delete all per BevinKacon. I think the closing admin should take the opportunity to warn the uploader that this is not a porn album. --E4024 (talk) 21:28, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:27, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
No evidence of a free license at the source page.
- File:Priya Chauhan 6.jpg
- File:Priya Chauhan 5.jpg
- File:Priya Chauhan 4.jpg
- File:Priya Chauhan 2.jpg
- File:Priya Chauhan.jpg
- File:Priya Chauhan 3.jpg
. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:40, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep, I see "License
Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed)" at https://youtube.com/watch?v=1LTaN6RTMjY . — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 01:09, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Jameslwoodward: @Jeff G.: As the files DR was started by you. But now I have tagged for speedy delete as you suggested. What will happen now. please reply C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 03:12, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
- @C1K98V: You are not a license reviewer and are thus not allowed to use COM:CSD#F4, so I undid your tags. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:48, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: I have tagged few other upload of mine. I have to undo those edits. Please reply C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 03:50, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
- @C1K98V: I undid those, too, but they are off-topic in this discussion so please reply on my user talk page. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 04:09, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: I have tagged few other upload of mine. I have to undo those edits. Please reply C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 03:50, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
- @C1K98V: You are not a license reviewer and are thus not allowed to use COM:CSD#F4, so I undid your tags. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:48, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn by nom. Sorry, the source link was defective in all six files. For all six files, I
- fixed source link
- added License Review
- removed over categorization
. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:30, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
cross wiki spam Quakewoody (talk) 21:44, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Regasterios at 07:51, 24 Mai 2020 UTC: No permission since 14 May 2020 --Krdbot 13:35, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope- unused personal imageℳaʐbeʟ Work • Talk • Mail 08:12, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, used in an article, which is nominated for deletion due to non-notability. The file is deleted as copyright violation: own work is unlikely. I'll delete file:Женя Поликарпова 2019.jpg due to same reason: small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 08:17, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
Unknown date means unknown copyright status. The performer is not even mentioned here. pandakekok9 08:05, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by TonkarLike. pandakekok9 08:07, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:49, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ebersteiner (talk · contribs)
[edit]Apparent bulk COM:NETCOPYVIO upload - low res, no camera EXIF, most (all?) appeared elsewhere before Commons upload (e.g., File:Sandra Coscio, Bolivia 2013.jpg is here; File:Sandra Coscio, Bolivia (2019.jpg is here; etc.), descriptions credit multiple disparate authors (e.g., de Leo Ville, Chema Pics, Leonardo Ville, etc.) and some even watermarked (e.g., File:Sandra Coscio GLASSWING INTERNATIONAL Gala benéfica anual, Nueva York (2018).jpg)
- File:Sandra Coscio. Premios "Lo Nuestro", Miami (2013).jpg
- File:Sandra Coscio, Bolivia (2019.jpg
- File:Sandra Coscio, Premios Grammys. Las Vegas (2012).jpg
- File:Sandra Coscio, Parque Nacional Amboró. Fotógrafo Ángel Silva (2017).jpg
- File:Sandra Coscio, MTV LATINOS. Miami (2003).jpg
- File:Sandra Coscio, Los Premios Oscar. Los Angeles California (2020).jpg
- File:Sandra Coscio, Festival de Cannes. Francia-2019.jpg
- File:Sandra Coscio, Festival de Cannes. Francia (2019).jpg
- File:Sandra Coscio, Los Premios Latin Billboard. Miami (2013).jpg
- File:Sandra Coscio, Bolivia (2017). Fotógrafo Ángel Silva.jpg
- File:Sandra Coscio, Bolivia (2019) Fotógrafo de Leonardo Ville.jpg
- File:Sandra Coscio, Bolivia (2014).jpg
- File:Sandra Coscio, Bolivia (2019).jpg
- File:Sandra Coscio Premio LO NUESTRO.jpg
- File:Sandra Coscio GLASSWING INTERNATIONAL Gala benéfica anual, Nueva York (2018).jpg
- File:Sandra Coscio en los Premios Oscar , Los Angeles California (2020).jpg
- File:Sandra Coscio en set de Contame en los estudios de ATB, Bolivia (2011).jpg
- File:Sandra Coscio en los Estudios de ATB , programa "Contame" (2020).jpg
- File:Sandra Coscio en los Premios Goya del cine Iberoamericano, Sevilla 2019.jpg
- File:Sandra Coscio en la celebración de los 100 años de Montblanc, Miami (2006).jpg
- File:Sandra Coscio, Bolivia 2013.jpg
- File:Sandra Coscio en "PREMIO LO NUESTRO", Miami 2019.jpg
- File:Sandra Coscio, Miami Premios Billboard, 2016.jpg
- File:Sandra Coscio, Bolivia (2017).jpg
Эlcobbola talk 16:46, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:28, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ebersteiner (talk · contribs)
[edit]More of the same - see above
- File:Sandra Coscio y Giannina Azar, diseñadora de JLO, Aruba Fashion Week. (2018).jpg
- File:Sandra Coscio y entrevistando al cantante español Alejandro Sanz en los Premios Grammy . Las Vegas (2012).jpg
- File:Sandra Coscio y Emilio Estefan en ¨Persona del año¨ de los Premios Latin Grammy. Las Vegas (2007).jpg
- File:Sandra Coscio y el periodista y escritor Andres Oppenheimer, en los estudios de CNN en Brickell Key Drive. (2015).jpg
- File:Sandra Coscio y el cantante Colombiano Carlos Vives, Premios Latin Billboard en BankUnited Center. Miami (2016).jpg
- File:Sandra Coscio y el actor Peruano Christian Meier, en Premios Platino del Cine Iberoamericano, Mexico (2018).jpg
- File:Sandra Coscio y el actor Benjamin Bratt, Premios Latin Grammy. Las Vegas (2007).jpg
- File:Sandra Coscio y al actor Argentino Sebastian Rulli en los Premios Latin Grammy, Las Vegas (2012).jpg
- File:Sandra Coscio y Agatha Ruiz de La Prada diseñadora Española en ARUBA FASHION WEEK . Aruba (2017).jpg
- File:Sandra Coscio y Barbara Palacios la ex Miss Universo en la ¨Persona del Año¨de los PREMIOS LATIN GRAMMY, Texas - 2018.jpg
- File:Sandra Coscio y actor Mexicano Eugenio Derbez y el productor Guillermo Moreta en Premios Platino del Cine Iberoamericano, Mexico (2018).jpg
- File:Sandra Coscio y actor William Levy. Bolivia (2017).jpg
- File:Sandra Coscio con los cantantes Italianos IL VOLO en el premio PREMIO LO NUESTRO, Miami-2018.jpg
- File:Sandra Coscio junto con los presentadores del canal de TV TNT, Premios Platino del Cine Iberoamericano. Mexico (2018).jpg
- File:Sandra Coscio junto a Nicolas Felizola y Gabriela Spanic. Premios Billboard . Miami (2006).jpg
- File:Sandra Coscio y Carmen Aristegui en CNN Experiencia 360, Miami (2015).jpg
- File:Sandra Cocio y Prince Royce ( Cantante). Premios Grammy, Las Vegas (2016).jpg
- File:Sandra Coscio en The Orion Star Awards. Londres (2020).jpg
- File:Sandra Coscio y el ex-presidente Alvaro Uribe, en AGRO EXPO COLOMBIA, Bogotá (2005).jpg
- File:Sandra Coscio junto a Celina de Sola y con el periodista Gabriel Rivera Barraza en GLASSWING INTERNATIONAL, Nueva York -2018.jpg
Эlcobbola talk 18:09, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Hello¿ Thank you very much¡ I did´t know, well yuo can proced to delete¡ thank you¡ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ebersteiner (talk • contribs) 18:03, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:28, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
Out of project scope: seems to be a wiki article. 4nn1l2 (talk) 18:00, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hanooz 23:34, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
Out of project scope: promotional logo of a non-notable gaming website. 4nn1l2 (talk) 18:06, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hanooz 15:56, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
Este logo no es de uso libre. Seloponsio (talk) 19:10, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
Este contenido no es relevante y no es de uso libre Seloponsio (talk) 19:12, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
Este contenido no es relevante y no es de uso libre Seloponsio (talk) 00:59, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: PD-text, but unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:48, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
My previous page has been deleted. So I don't want to keep any photos on this site. Dhruba Sanyam Rai (talk) 08:02, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:57, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
I could not save my previous page. I don't want to keep any photos. Dhruba Sanyam Rai (talk) 08:03, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, author's request within first week. --Strakhov (talk) 21:48, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
Replaced by File:Samsyn ordmoln.jpg Axel Pettersson (WMSE) (talk) 10:21, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:57, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Is this really freely licensed as it looks like it could be a copyright violation 1.Ayana (talk) 15:45, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep It consists of a simple shape, and a simple gradience --67.184.0.138 15:58, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Weak keep, I just wrote my thoughts here: Commons:Categories for discussion/2020/05/Category:Instagram logo, i.e. I don’t necessarily agree with the concept of “threshold of originality”, but since it is what is done on Commons with “simple” logos, there is no reason not to keep this one along the millions of other logos here.~ nicolas (talk) 16:54, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Sorry, I replied without actually looking at the file page. It was indeed not licensed tagged or credited correctly, I corrected a couple of things for now, so at least it mentions it’s from the official logo, and not that it is an original creation. ~ nicolas (talk) 17:05, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion -- below TOO. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:58, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Terminator216 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unfree video game content & screenshots.
- File:Скриншот из игры World of Tanks. Карта Харьков.jpg
- File:Способности Танкового Премиум аккаунта.jpg
- File:Ангар в World of Tanks, посвящённый событию "Дорога на берлин".jpg
- File:3D модель танка Тип 64.jpg
- File:3D модель танка Т-116.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:59, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Ellin Beltz this game is unfree, why not speedy delete & block?--BevinKacon (talk) 18:59, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
- @BevinKacon: Because I don't read Cyrillic, and I was not able to 100% be certain of the status. Also, I rarely block. I'd rather get a second opinion in any case that is not 100% obvious and which I cannot 100% justify. Cheers. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:07, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete speedly. --Drakosh (talk) 08:06, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:06, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
NON FREE AT SOURCE
- File:Ashraf Hamza.jpg
- File:MV5BNGFkODI0YTAtMjdjZS00NDgxLTliMTktZjI1YjBjMzY3MDA5XkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyMjkxNzQ1NDI@. V1.jpg
✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 08:30, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 02:08, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
No evidence that TellyChakkar makes its content available under free licenses. 76.68.39.78 16:09, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 02:09, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by HarinMusic (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos and poem. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:The Flute- a Poem by Dunstan de Silva.jpg
- File:Young Dunstan as a Flautist in Radio Ceylon.jpg
- File:Dunstan--Edit.jpg
- File:Dunstan 4 lihgtroom.jpg
- File:Dunstan De Silva 4.jpg
- File:Dunstan-5-Edit-BW.jpg.png
- File:Dunstan lihgtroom.jpg
- File:Dunstan De Silva 5.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 02:01, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:35, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Abhibabamishra (talk · contribs)
[edit]Per COM:SCOPE: The article has been deleted under en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dadasaheb Phalke International Film Festival and the uploader has been indef. blocked on English Wikipedia for using sockpuppets, as such, the article has little chance of recreation. For the non Film fest pics, per COM:NOTUSED.
- File:Dadasaheb Phalke International Film Festival Logo - DPIFF.png
- File:अभिषेक मिश्रा.jpg
- File:Ravish Kapoor - Pioneer of Innovative Invitations.jpg
- File:Dadasaheb Phalke International Film Festival Awards 2019 - Trophy.png
- File:Dadasaheb Phalke International Film Festival Awards 2020 - Trophy.png
Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, PL, GSW-FR(ALS). 02:18, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:36, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rajatgupta129 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promotion, out of project scope. Commons is not your personal free web host.
- File:Singer Ankur Tomar Photo.jpg
- File:Ankur Tomar During Recording.jpg
- File:Ankur Tomar(Singer).jpg
- File:Ankur Tomar .jpg
- File:Ankur Tomar.jpg
Achim (talk) 11:36, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- File:Ankur Tomar During Recording.jpg seems decent enough. Maybe re-catting these files might help. DMBFFF (talk) 00:34, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:38, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by LopezSebast11 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Ariel Rodriguez Serna, Creador del Filmbiodrama.jpg
- File:Ariel R. Serna Actor.jpg
- File:Ariel Rodriguez Serna, Actor y Modelo.jpg
- File:Ariel Rodriguez Serna.jpg
- File:Ariel Rodriguez Serna, Actor.jpg
- File:ArielRodriguezSerna.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:39, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Representación de los Invasores en el Centro Gabriela Mistral.jpg
- File:Egon Wolff junto a Víctor Jara y el elenco de Los invasores.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:42, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
Appears to be copyvio screenshot; if not, COM:NOTHOST indeed per title ("fan art") Эlcobbola talk 15:03, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:42, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Arvindyadavpersonal (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Duplicate. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:43, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:11, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:44, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
Unused diagram without context, little educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:16, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:44, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own works but screengrabs from corporate website. Logos are above TOO.
- File:Tirion TriRetrograde 1919 Limited Edition (TIRI600).jpg
- File:TriRetrograde Mechanisme.jpg
- File:Milus - Logo des années 40'.jpg
- File:Milus - Logo des années '30.jpg
- File:TIRI701 1193 Internet.jpg
- File:P8004C with Swiss Made 616 Internet.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:18, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:46, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sashaelhajj (talk · contribs)
[edit]Duck COM:NETCOPYVIOs - modelling shots, two lacking EXIF and low res, previously appeared elsewhere (e.g. File:Rebecca modeling for her project.jpg is here), etc.
- File:A shot from the book.jpg
- File:Rebecca modeling for her project.jpg
- File:Rebecca Khouri Nassar.jpg
Эlcobbola talk 15:40, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:47, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Amilton Rodrigues
[edit]Promotional images and logos for non-notable person, out of scope. Articles on WP already deleted. And questionable copyright status for many. All unused.
- File:Amilton de Cristo durante congresso no Brasil.jpg
- File:Amilton Rodrigues cristo official signature.jpg
- File:Amilton Rodrigues decristo's signature 2020.jpg
- File:Amilton Rodriigues de Cristo in Brazil.webp
- File:Autor pastor amilton amazon.png
- File:Capa do Livro O Verdadeiro Avivamento de Amilton de Cristo.jpg
- File:Capa do Livro Retorno a Glória de Deus de Amilton de Cristo.jpg
- File:Gideões Missionários da Última Hora - GMUH.jpg
- File:Gideões missionários nada última hora pramiltonDeCristo2020.jpg
- File:Ginasio dos Gideoes Missionarios da ultima hora - Amilton d. Cristo.jpg
- File:Logo Amilton de Cristo.jpg
- File:No aeroporto internacional com pr.amilton cristo.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:04, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete all. Globally locked LTA User:AMILTON DE CRISTO has had his 10 years socking anniversary, so let's celebrate it. --Achim (talk) 21:12, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:50, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tech GetSet (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely own work. See over printing on at least one image, sizes are very small and quality poor.
- File:All recipe.webp
- File:Risotto Recipe.webp
- File:Best French Toast .webp
- File:Yelopixels-good-morning-image.webp
- File:RJ-Recipe.webp
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:57, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:57, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jhendersonp (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely own work. File sizes, lack of quality, Facebook metadata on some images could have permitted them to be speedied, but I am nominating entire group to show the single topic gallery, and that other images are clearly copyvios.
- File:Equipo médico de transplante.jpg
- File:Quinto Aniversario de Enhorabuena con Gusella y Camucha Negrete.jpg
- File:Jorge Henderson obtiene su primer trofeo Circe.jpg
- File:Jorge preparando la Revista del Momento.jpg
- File:Reencuentro entre Jorge y Camilo Sesto.jpg
- File:Quinto aniversario del programa Enhorabuena con Cecilia Bracamonte.jpg
- File:Entrega del trofea Circe en el Teatro Municipal de Lima.jpg
- File:Jorge Henderson Palacios y Enhorabuena.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:01, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:54, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Andreea Robu-Movila (talk · contribs)
[edit]This gallery focuses on architecture. All images claimed as own work. Multiple cameras in exif, or no cameras at all. At least one is a model. One is a collage. At least one has over printing showing true source. None appear to be own work.
- File:Proiect de concurs pentru Catedrala Neamului.jpg
- File:Pavilionul Romaniei Aichi 2005, Japonia.jpg
- File:Locuinta colectiva str. Eminescu Bucuresti 220.jpg
- File:Euro Tower Bucuresti.jpg
- File:Colegiul Mesota Brasov.jpg
- File:Cascade Buiding, Bucuresti.jpg
- File:Sediul BCR, sucursala Ghencea, 1996, Bucuresti, România (1996).tif
- File:Biserica Sfintii Ioan ,„Cartierul nou”, Alba Iulia (2010-2016).jpg
- File:Opera Center Bucuresti.jpg
- File:Clubul Twice Bucuresti.tif
- File:DSBA - Taiwan Tower.jpg
- File:- Centrul Internațional „Constantin Brâncuși”, Craiova, România (in curs de executie 20014- );.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:03, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:00, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/"Disney Channel Canada"
[edit]Yes, some videos uploaded by Disney Channel Canada appear with a CC-BY license on YouTube. But it is highly unlikely that this license is for real. Normally, I wouldn't question free licenses apparently issued by the copyright owner, but this seems too much like the infamous Ubisoft case. To refresh memories: Based on a correspondence with a guy from Ubisoft Germany's PR, people assumed that Ubisoft released screenshots of its games under a free license, until Ubisoft headquarters, asked by Wikimedia France, told that they had never heard of such an agreement and don't wish to release media under a free license. So, it was actually a representative of Ubisoft people relied upon for their assumption (not from the legal department, not authorised to give such a broad license), but common sense should have made clear from the beginning that this is an impossible thing. Ubisoft, notoriously keen on protecting their rights, suddenly releasing their intellectual property under a free license? Anyone could now freely use Ubisoft game characters commercially, print them on T-shirts or mugs and sell them? For that's what the free license would have meant. That was so extremely implausible that the ultimate outcome should have been clear to everyone from the beginning.
And now Disney. Disney! Probably no other big media company is so associated with their insistence on their copyright, and their attempts to extend it as far as possible. They're one of the leading parties behind the Copyright Term Extension Act of 1998, after all. If they would now start to release some of their content under a free license, this would be a massive sensation, an earth-shaking revolution in the world of copyright. Disney embraces CC-BY! This would mean: As, for example, the trailer to Big Hero 6: The Series is uploaded under CC-BY to YouTube (and now here on Commons), you could now use any of the characters in this trailer for your derivative works, also commercially, only attribution is needed. Print them on T-Shirts, make your own animated series with them, whatever you want.
Well. This is so massively unlikely that COM:PCP dictates that we should delete that content. It is far more plausible that some employee of Disney Channel Canada chose the wrong license when uploading to YouTube, not aware of what exactly a CC-BY license means, than that the legal department of Disney has suddenly decided: "We think we no longer want money from people using our content, anyone should be able to use it commercially for free". Of course, there will be arguments along the lines of "but such a big company surely knows what they are doing! If Disney decides to release content under CC-BY, we shouldn't question it but be glad!" To this I answer that such uploads are not done by a monolithic "big company" entity that exactly knows what happens everywhere in its structure, but by some (PR) employee of a branch of this company, and would reject that argument. The Ubisoft case should be a lesson.
- File:Big hero six series trailer.webm
- File:Z-O-M-B-I-E-S Disney Channel.webm
- File:Sofia Wylie.jpg
- File:Olivia Rodrigo.png
- File:Meg Donnelly.jpg
- File:Joshua Rush.jpg
- File:Jenna Ortega as Harley Diaz.png
- File:Madison Hu.jpg
- File:Jenna Ortega as Harley Diaz 2.png
- File:Jenna Ortega on Stuck in the Middle.png
- File:Kayla Maisonet on Stuck in the Middle.png
- File:Cozi Zuehlsdorff 2018.png
Gestumblindi (talk) 20:34, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep It is an official Disney Youtube Channel and a valid licensing. The bare assumption (based on a previous case many years ago where a completely different company made an error) that the licensing could be a mistake is not a sufficient reason to delete these files. Thus there is no other reason than this assumption these files are to be kept.
- In the previous discussion on German WP I already suggested that someone should write an e-mail to Disney so that we could verify wheter this was a mistake or intented. If Disney then tells us that this was a mistake we still can delete these files. Chaddy (talk) 21:01, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- I knew that you would write this here, too. "It's an official channel! It's valid!" I really think we can spare us the repeated "Ubisoft" exercise, trying to get through to someone from Disney's legal department to tell us that Disney, of course, is not releasing content under a free license, and for once just apply common sense and COM:PCP. Gestumblindi (talk) 21:59, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- As a side note — before someone thinks it needs pointing out —, I notice now that I actually decided to keep File:Madison Hu.jpg in a previous deletion request last year, per the CC-BY license at YouTube and nominator's withdrawal of the request, but I must not have noticed the Disney provenance back then. Gestumblindi (talk) 22:38, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- The Ubisoft case does not matter here. It IS a valid license and we have to believe bona fide what stands there as it is NOT an obvious mistake - there is NOT a significant doubt about the licensing. There is no valid reason for deletion. I do not agree switching our standards to deleting files with valid licencing from official sources just because we think the licencing seems unrealistic or just because we do not believe the copyright holder really wanted what he explicitly did.
- If we apply this standard we would have to delete EVERY file where we speculate that the license seems unrealistic, therefore in fact almost everywhere where we don't have an explicit OTRS documented permission (and also this would not be enough, see the Ubisoft case).
- And yes, of course we should invest the time to get through to someone from Disney's legal department to tell us what's the case here! Chaddy (talk) 23:56, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- As I note below, Disney Channel Canada is not an official outlet owned and controlled by The Walt Disney Company. It is owned and controlled by Corus Entertainment who licenses some Disney content and the brand Disney Channel for use in Canada. Geraldo Perez (talk) 05:31, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete It is implausible to the point of being risible that Disney would release any of its intellectual property for unrestricted free-use. This is an obvious mistake supported by the fact that no other country's Disney outlets releases Disney content free-use. Geraldo Perez (talk) 22:47, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- It is not to us to decide if this licensing is a mistake or intended. We have to believe bona fide what Disney did there. As long as this license is stated there it is legally valid - until Disney declares it was a mistake (if so). Thus we also do not get into difficulties because we acted in good faith as we literally can not know if Disney just made a mistake there. There is NO reason to delete these files. Chaddy (talk) 23:56, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Disney has nothing to do with what happens in the Corus Entertainment outlet labeled Disney Channel Canada, they just let Corus use their content under license, Corus will not have the authority to re-license it for free-use, only Disney proper can do that. Geraldo Perez (talk) 05:04, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Can someone contact them please? That would remove the doubts! --Mhhossein talk 07:41, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- Gestumblindi douts the license information on the Youtube Channel so I think it would be up to him. Though I wrote an e-mail to Disney Channel Canada now. Let's see what they answer. Chaddy (talk) 14:49, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- Did you explicitly point out in your e-mail that this is about a license that allows full commercial re-use and derivative works? Because, if read at all, it will probably be answered first by some PR person, maybe the exact same PR person who mistakenly chose that license for their uploads, and then we have the same case as for Ubisoft (sorry for always using that comparison, but I think it's fitting) with misleading statements by someone who is not actually in charge of legal affairs. So, if I would ask (which I don't think necessary, as the mistake is that obvious), then very clearly along the lines of "Did you really intend to release your content under a license that allows commercial re-use of the content, and for example making your own animated series with these characters? Is that the new Disney approach?", so that even a PR person without knowledge of legal details might understand that there's something wrong. Gestumblindi (talk) 18:05, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Note that Disney Channel Canada is not a part of Disney, it is owned by Corus Entertainment who licenses some Disney content and the Disney name for use in Canada. See W:Disney Channel (Canadian TV channel). Corus will not have the authority to release Disney content to free-use, only The Walt Disney Company can legally do that, and there is no way in hell that would ever happen. Geraldo Perez (talk) 04:57, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Geraldo Perez has provided good points along with the nominator on why the images should be removed from this project. As Disney Channel Canada is just a distributor of the material in question, they can't override non-free licensing that's owned by the Walt Disney Company, home of the United States. 1989 20:27, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/"Disney Channel Canada"
[edit]Per rationale above.
King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:59, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:20, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: low-res, and the bar on the right shows it was cropped or a screengrab from somewhere else. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:57, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:13, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
Unused low-res photo of non-notable person, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:48, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:45, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
unused, uncategorized, probably out of scope. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 15:46, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:09, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Personal picture. Out of scope. SirEdimon Dimmi!!! 07:18, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Achim (talk) 19:25, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no educational use, out of scope. And likely not own work: if uploader is in the photo, then he can't be the photographer. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:52, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:28, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Not part of the commons category system, we should not try to replicate the en-wiki category tree on commons. Xgeorg (talk) 06:54, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete, Category:Kontinental Hockey League draft picks as well. Overcat, Category:Kontinental Hockey League drafts has one single subcat which has one single subcat. --Achim (talk) 19:21, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Kept: IMHO valid cat with content. --JuTa 04:51, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Apparently out of scope. It's just a picture of a person (I suppose it's the uploader) against a background of a road, without any current use, and without any potential use that I can envision. Aside from this image, the uploader has edited only three pages: a bn:wp userpage (text only), an en:wp userpage (text only), and File:Md arfat.jpg, which I'm about to nominate for deletion as well. Nyttend backup (talk) 10:01, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:14, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
Apparently out of scope. It's just a picture of a person (I suppose it's the uploader) against a background of a hillside and covered with lots of Facebook "like" icons, without any current use, and without any potential use that I can envision. Aside from this image, the uploader has edited only three pages: a bn:wp userpage (text only), an en:wp userpage (text only), and File:Md Arfat.jpg, which I'm about to nominate for deletion as well. Nyttend backup (talk) 10:02, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:14, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
The photograph is a derivative work of the Bust of Kyösti Kallio, a 1926 sculpture by Yrjö Liipola (1881–1971, Q11903032), located in the Government Palace in Helsinki, Finland. The original work (the sculpture) is still under copyright and thus not in public domain. FOP in Finland is for buildings only. Apalsola t • c 23:10, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Comment This issue has already been discussed in the Finnish Village Pump (permanent link). The file has also been uploaded to the Finnish Wikipedia as Tiedosto:Kyösti Kallion rintakuva by Yrjö Liipola Tasavallan presidentin esittelysalissa Valtioneuvoston linnassa 2020-02-07.jpg. ––Apalsola t • c 23:19, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 10:11, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
Copyright violation 30ChuaPhaiLaTet (talk) 23:58, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 18:41, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
Because of the black space, this is probably a screenshot of some social media. Also out of scope 67.184.0.138 14:28, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 06:09, 20 August 2020 UTC: No permission since 12 August 2020 --Krdbot 12:59, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Copyright notice in the top right, with a different name than the uploader. Kissa21782 (talk) 10:53, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 17:53, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
Not own work, but work of Luis Anberto Pérez. When he died? How old the anthem is? Taivo (talk) 10:59, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 17:54, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
File:Выступление группы "Парк Горького" на совместном концерте с группой Scorpions. Ленинград, 1988 г.jpg
[edit]The only left uploader's contribution, can be found at the band's website: [5] + [6] among others from the same show. OTRS permission is required. VLu (talk) 11:50, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 17:54, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
Copyright violation [7] [8] 2A02:2168:A01:35FB:0:0:0:1 12:31, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Replaced with free [9][10]--Shakko (talk) 15:22, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: now licensed properly. --Sealle (talk) 17:56, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
COM:NETCOPYVIO. 2A02:2168:A01:35FB:0:0:0:1 12:36, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 17:54, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
And also
- File:Monument to Lesia Ukrainka, Kyiv 01.jpg
- File:Monument to Lesia Ukrainka, Kyiv 02.jpg
- File:Лесі Українці 0060.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник Лесі Українки, Київ.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник Лесі Українці (Київ).JPG
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created after 1973. No Permission from the sculptor Г. Н. Кальченко / architect А. Ф. Ігнащенко.
Микола Василечко (talk) 13:16, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 17:57, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
Historical newspaper. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 17:57, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 17:57, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
As mentioned by the uploader in the description, it was taken from the artist's TikTok profile. Here's the link: https://p16-sg-default.akamaized.net/aweme/720x720/tiktok-obj/1662765753456642.jpeg from site Emperork (talk) 18:41, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. Copyvio. --Paul_012 (talk) 21:00, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 17:58, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
False "own work made today", definitely a scan of old hardcopy photo (standalone or from a book) Tatewaki (talk) 18:42, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 17:58, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
Its source is unclear. I have checked http://photosub.co.uk/?m=201502 and https://www.photosub.com/ which are "Underwater Photography"! Editor-1 (talk) 15:49, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: no permission. --ƏXPLICIT 06:49, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
Delete Giving the photo to someone to put online doesn't provide an appropriate, traceable license history. We don't know if Tata had rights to this image to give away, or that it was available under the license stipulated. Openly available on the Internet [11], we have no way of knowing the provenance of the image. Hammersoft (talk) 13:29, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- The uploader (@CJSK9: ) is now saying the image wasn't given to them, but instead came from USA today [12]. That page has tagged the image as coming from the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT). Looking at the terms of use page on the NC Department of Transportation site [13], it says that it does not allow commercial use or derivatives, making this image incompatible with Commons licensing requirements. CJSK9, a "public photo" does not make the image available under a free license that is compatible with Commons. Simply because something is on a website for the public to view doesn't waive rights to the image. Otherwise, everything on the web would be free of copyright, and that is obviously not the case. --Hammersoft (talk) 21:45, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
- This is CJSK9 replying to (@Hammersoft: ). To be clear, I was not claiming to have received the image from a different source. I was attempting to address your concern about its origins. We are now actively seeking written permission to use this image and abide by CC BY-SA. Thank you for your concern. --User:CJSK9\CJSK9
- Given that he was a general in the Army, it's likely there's a free image of him available on an Army site somewhere. I would try that. --Hammersoft (talk) 13:03, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
- Other free images from 2013 and 2014 are already available on Commons. – Maliepa (talk) 14:34, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:03, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Esteban leonard
[edit]All of the uploads made by this user come from websites. He has included the websites themselves in each upload. Recently, he has started uploading previously deleted files claiming they are his own, but they are the same files that were previously deleted. He has even uploaded posters from movies.
Files affected (every single one of his uploads):
- File:Forajidos20150420 d3cda.jpg
- File:Batalla de san marcial.jpg
- File:John Wick poster promocional.jpg
- File:Los novios.jpg
- File:Tercera batalla de tiocajas.jpg
- File:Batalla de yahuarcocha.jpg
- File:Ibarra 1823.jpg
- File:TERREMOTO de IBARRA.jpg
- File:Batalla de pichincha.jpg
- File:Batalla de pichincha ecuador venezuela.jpg
- File:Batalla de Camino Real.jpg
- File:Batallas09.jpg
- File:Batalla-de-Pichincha-24-de-Mayo.jpg
- File:Batalla de Tanizagua.jpg
- File:Batalla de pichincha cuadro.jpg
- File:Quito cima de la libertad batalla pichincha.jpg
Best regards--Freddy eduardo (talk) 16:03, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Ibarra 1823 and Batalla de Tanizagua as PD, rest were already deleted. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:35, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Because it is MahriGurbanova (talk) 23:00, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted OOS, apparent copyright viol -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:11, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
moved without permission of the uploader, wrong license, the license must not be free, and removed immediately in Indonesia Wikipedia Ezagren (talk) 02:02, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jalan poros Sepaku 2.jpg. Unused and replacable. Unclear copyright status. --MGA73 (talk) 08:59, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted Apparent license fraud -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:12, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of the project scope. Promotional. Edslov (talk) 17:37, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Adelfrank (talk) 20:53, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:08, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as no license (No license since) Rasbak (talk) 06:27, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- I put the license to it:
|
I, the copyright holder of this work, release this work into the public domain. This applies worldwide. In some countries this may not be legally possible; if so: I grant anyone the right to use this work for any purpose, without any conditions, unless such conditions are required by law. |
- Keep in scope and licensed as public domain by original author --67.184.0.138 14:41, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept per above. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:15, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
out of project scope Didym (talk) 13:56, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- entry for Commons:Wiki Loves Earth 2020. Let the competition's jury decide.--Raugeier (talk) 21:12, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete obvious photomontage of unclear copyright status Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:44, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:17, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Bogus CC license and bizarre recreation of File:Bouguereau - Lady Maxwell - 1890.jpg Эlcobbola talk 14:54, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- This bloke has been doing xwiki spam. Now blacklisted. The file itself will be public domain, so whether we just wish to rehash that component. — billinghurst sDrewth 03:12, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted Underlying artwork of which this is derivative is PD, but no evident in scope usefulness for this modified version; dubious claims, licensing, & source per above. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:20, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Unused logo of iKon Gikü (talk) 16:09, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:21, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of the project scope. Promotional. Edslov (talk) 17:39, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted Unused personal image; no evident in-scope usefulness. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:22, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of the project scope. Self promotional. Edslov (talk) 17:44, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted Unused low-res personal photo; no evident in-scope usefulness. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:23, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Unused failed photo, unusable, out of scope. Superseded by better one. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:13, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:52, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
The unused and uncategorised file. Commons is not the private media repository. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 16:11, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:52, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
out of scope Perumalism (talk) 13:20, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:33, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:34, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope. Only used on userpage but no other contributions. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:15, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:34, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
COM:DW - merely a pencil rendering of this image Эlcobbola talk 16:26, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:35, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
User page image of a user with no contributions except on his personal page. Gikü (talk) 16:39, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:35, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope. Failed self-promo attempt at ro:Engleza Tuturor. Gikü (talk) 16:49, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:35, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
and File:Sangelito oficial.jpg
Out of the project scope. Self promotion. Edslov (talk) 17:28, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. I agree, not in COM:SCOPE. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 15:42, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:36, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
out of scope Quakewoody (talk) 17:40, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:36, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
out of scope Quakewoody (talk) 17:41, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:36, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
out of scope Quakewoody (talk) 17:41, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:36, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of the project scope. Self promotional Edslov (talk) 17:49, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. & no permission, from instagram. --Minoraxtalk 12:37, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Duplicate to File:Vishi_Anand-29-4-17.jpg and defect/ less quality. Steak (talk) 18:07, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:37, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Blurry duplicate of File:Flag of Greenland.svg. Fry1989 eh? 18:24, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:37, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Banknotes of Bermuda
[edit]There's no specific mention of the copyright status of currency in COM:BERMUDA, but chapter XI of the 2004 copyright act gives Crown (government) works a term of "until the end of the period of 125 years from the end of the calendar year in which the work was made", so none of these are in the public domain.
- File:Bermuda 10 dollar.jpg
- File:Bermuda 10 dollarb.jpg
- File:Bermuda 10 Dollars banknote 2009 Blue Angelfish.jpg
- File:Bermuda 10 Dollars banknote 2009.jpg
- File:Bermuda 100 dollar.jpg
- File:Bermuda 100 dollarb.jpg
- File:Bermuda 100 Dollars banknote 2009 Red Cardinal.jpg
- File:Bermuda 2 dollar.jpg
- File:Bermuda 2 dollarb.jpg
- File:Bermuda 2 Dollars banknote 2009 Bluebird.jpg
- File:Bermuda 20 dollar.jpg
- File:Bermuda 20 dollarb.jpg
- File:Bermuda 20 Dollars banknote 2009 Whistling Frog.jpg
- File:Bermuda 5 dollar.jpg
- File:Bermuda 5 dollarb.jpg
- File:Bermuda 5 Dollars banknote 2009.jpg
- File:Bermuda 50 dollar.jpg
- File:Bermuda 50 dollarb.jpg
- File:Bermuda 50 Dollars banknote 2009 Longtail.jpg
- File:Bermuda 50 Dollars banknote 2009.jpg
The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 18:30, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:41, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
COM:TOYS and copyrighted promotional tools.
- File:KEN00123 (37259122091).jpg
- File:KEN00124 (37259122671).jpg
- File:KEN00125 (37259123551).jpg
- File:KEN00126 (37259124051).jpg
Yuraily Lic (talk) 18:34, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:42, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Kissa21782 (talk) 18:44, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:42, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Carloszuiga (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal files, COM:HOST.
Kissa21782 (talk) 18:49, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:42, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
unlike to be own work. See TinEye search. Source: Facebook? Estopedist1 (talk) 20:28, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:43, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
out-of-focus image of unidentified fungus Imedeiros (talk) 22:10, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per above. — Draceane talkcontrib. 11:59, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:44, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
image is unidentifiable and not useful Imedeiros (talk) 22:20, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:45, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Image is low quality and it is doubtful that it is own work (file name says screenshot) Imedeiros (talk) 22:23, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:45, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Copyvioː obtained from [14] Upwinxp (talk) 21:35, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 20:37, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
Copyvioː obtained from [15] Upwinxp (talk) 23:05, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 20:34, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
Copyvioː not own work, obtained from [16] or some other page Upwinxp (talk) 23:10, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 20:37, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
Not own work, copied from [17] or some other site Upwinxp (talk) 23:11, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 20:37, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
Na prośbę rodziny zmarłego - At the request of the deceased's family Archi74 (talk) 11:47, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Na prośbę rodziny zmarłego Archi74 (talk) 08:21, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:53, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
_(14782513004).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![179 File:Выступление группы "Парк Горького" на совместном концерте с группой Scorpions. Ленинград, 1988 г.jpg](#File:Выступление_группы_"Парк_Горького"_на_совместном_концерте_с_группой_Scorpions._Ленинград,_1988_г.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(15069568592).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![289 File:Japanese movie " The Red Throwing Star" Poster in 1965.jpg](#File:Japanese_movie_"_The_Red_Throwing_Star"_Poster_in_1965.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(14782513004).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14782513004).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_beret_-_Portugal.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![[1]](https://mir-s3-cdn-cf.behance.net/project_modules/fs/c7346b74709029.5c379e2f9855a.jpg){kind=link}
![[2]](https://mir-s3-cdn-cf.behance.net/project_modules/2800_opt_1/f3c56f77542557.5c8a70f577724.png){kind=link}
![[3]](https://creativedog.ru/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Office1.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
%D1%87%D0%B8%D1%81%D0%BB%D0%BE_2009).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
2008).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
._Fot%C3%B3grafo_%C3%81ngel_Silva.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Fot%C3%B3grafo_de_Leonardo_Ville.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
._Premios_Grammy,_Las_Vegas_(2016).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
;.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![[6]](http://gorkypark-band.ru/images/photos/bandphotos/GP_SNC_archive-5.jpg){kind=link}
![[8]](https://proleksis.lzmk.hr/slike1/x_j-d200.JPG){kind=link}
![[9]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:PlautillaProvIgnota-MNRPalMassimo1.JPG){kind=link}
![[10]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Vatican_Museums-5_(135).jpg){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
![[12]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File%3ATony_Tata_official_photo.jpg&type=revision&diff=420051150&oldid=419131528){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
The picture depict a false image of algerian War hero Larbi Ben Mhidi , while i can understand the persone behind it might mwanted to give fresh and you style to its portrait , i would however condemn the heavy use photoshop , and the use of a look alike model wich can be easily compared with exsiting picture of him you will notic that the most obious trait is that the nose is diferent as well as the model a more round face compared to the somhat square face of that Labi, i would argument also argument that this is a false picture as larbi died in 1957 so this high quality picture could not have being produced , as well as make you remember that during his time fighting the ocupant , he did not have the luxury of taking this kind of portrait, now if the author would argue that this is a true photo , i would reauest that he shows the orignal picture plus the negetif if he has them or at least the soource, which i doubt as i said earlier Larbi Ben Mhidi died in 1957. , plus this picture magicaly showed up in 2020 2001:BB6:31F2:9858:82C:6E1B:E439:B19C 17:40, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. A heavily retouched image, overlain by a stock photo or similar of a model does not make an "own work". --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:23, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Reportedly released under CC-BY-NC-ND https://www.inspai.cat/Inspai/es/imatge/768705/El+President+de+la+UCD+Landelino+Lavilla+a+Girona Asqueladd (talk) 10:06, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:23, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Kissa21782 (talk) 10:35, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:23, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
Contemporary sculpture. Per COM:FOP SK, there is no freedom of panorama in South Korea.
ƏXPLICIT 12:48, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:22, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
Contemporary sculpture. Per COM:FOP SK, there is no freedom of panorama in South Korea.
ƏXPLICIT 12:56, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:22, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
According to this newspaper article by The Hankyoreh, this sculpture was completed in remembrance of an incident where a poacher shot one of the few remaining Asian black bears in Seoraksan, which eventually died. It took place in May 1983, so this statue did not exist before then. There is no freedom of panorama in South Korea. The statue's copyright expires 70+1 years after the author's death, but without any information of the sculptor, there is no determinable year to restore this file on Commons.
ƏXPLICIT 13:25, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:22, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
Image of painting created by Zhang Daqian who dies in 1983. China and Taiwan's copyright duration is life + 50 years therefore not PD until 2034. It is a "forgery" in a sense that it is a derivative work based on the ancient painter's style [18], which is entitled to its own copyright, rather than an exact duplication of an ancient work. Wcam (talk) 13:48, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:21, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
Appears to be a screenshot of a broadcast video Ytoyoda (talk) 13:56, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:19, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
Historical photo and song. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:19, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
Official document. Proper license tag should be used if in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:19, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. Contains promotional features and is out of scope - no educational value. ℳaʐbeʟ Work • Talk • Mail 14:44, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 13:19, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
JSJModelYGKPLUS! Emepl (talk) 09:31, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Kept: more detailed info is needed. --Yasu (talk) 15:56, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no educational use, out of scope. And possibly not own work. Uploader tried to nominated their own image for deletion after upload (but probably didn't understand how) and changed the author and source from "own work" to something else. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:46, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:17, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be uploader's copyright. Horus (talk) 14:48, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:17, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be uploader's copyright. Horus (talk) 14:48, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:17, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mona Mjøen McKiernan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photo and document. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:15, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Screenshot of Instagram post. No evidence of permission, should upload original image if there's permission. 67.184.0.138 14:49, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:15, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Very low resolution, text is not very clearly readable 67.184.0.138 14:51, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:15, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
Likely copyvio: uploader/author doesn't match credit in EXIF data. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:51, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:15, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
Bogus CC license and bizarre recreation of File:Madame adelaide de France.jpg Эlcobbola talk 14:53, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- This bloke has been doing xwiki spam. Now blacklisted. The file itself will be public domain, so whether we just wish to rehash that component. — billinghurst sDrewth 03:12, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:15, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by مشروع عربى (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused logo and graphic (that should be in wiki markup if needed), no educational use, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:00, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:15, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
Because it is God angel 3+7 (talk) 15:41, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: unlikely to be own work. old photo. --Gbawden (talk) 13:14, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
No previous uploads, file has no metadata. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:41, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 13:13, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
Unlinked, no description, no obvious educational value. Richard Avery (talk) 15:42, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:14, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:13, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
Historical publication. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:13, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
The unused and uncategorised file. Commons is not the private media repository. Estopedist1 (talk) 15:54, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:13, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
Wohl falsche Lizenz: Hochlader isr BUK Beats, abgebildet ist BUK Beats, Urheber soll BUK Beats sein - das Bild ist aber zweifelsfrei kein Selfie , daher irgendwas falsch Lutheraner (talk) 16:02, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:13, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
No evidence of being licensed under a free license. 67.184.0.138 16:04, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:14, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
Wegen Copyright wird das Bild gelöscht und stattdessen ein gültiges Bild mit Copyright Vermerk hochgeladen ("Fahrplan zur Unternehmensnachfolge") Bluewatermelon1 (talk) 16:15, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- File:Nachfolgefahrplan-2020-CC.jpg wird gelöscht werden, weil CC-BY-NC-ND hier auf Commons leider nicht zulässig ist, siehe Commons:Licensing. --Achim (talk) 16:25, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:09, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
Recent artwork (no earlier than 2013) Gikü (talk) 16:19, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:09, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Photo belongs to Insidefoto / PR Photos, not the Flickr account Ytoyoda (talk) 17:02, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:07, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
Low res, professional shot of notable person, all other user uploads blatant COM:NETCOPYVIOs, including of this subject. Duck/COM:PRP issue. Эlcobbola talk 17:04, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:07, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
_(15069568592).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(15069568592).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
On-image caption suggests this is not the Flickr account's original work. Ytoyoda (talk) 17:07, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
_(15069568592).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:07, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
_(15069568592).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
AP photo: https://www.deseret.com/2008/4/13/20081877/dalai-lama-urges-hope, Flickrwashed image Ytoyoda (talk) 17:10, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:06, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Flickrwashed image, from https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/day-2-dispatches-the-dalai-lama-at-qwest-field/ Ytoyoda (talk) 17:11, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:06, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files in Category:Celeste Bonin
[edit]1) Requires COM:OTRS evidence of permission as previously published here and 2) Uploader (Paul Billets) is a subject. Copyright would be held by the photographer, not the subject unless formally transferred in writing. Such a conveyance would also need to be provided to OTRS.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Эlcobbola talk 17:11, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Small file w/o camera EXIF uploaded as "own work" and its crop; delete both. E4024 (talk) 15:47, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:06, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
Replaced with better photo/example Porterhse (talk) 17:11, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Please, do not delete this photo. The other photo is not "better" as stated here. The other is not clear on small lettering. This photo is much better. KEEP both.--Tibet Nation (talk) 04:57, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 13:07, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Likely Flickrwashed image, see http://www.rfi.fr/ha/asiya/20110808-rantsar-da-sangay-matsayin-shugaban-tibet-masu-gudun-hijira Ytoyoda (talk) 17:14, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:04, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Flickrwashed, from PR Photos Ytoyoda (talk) 17:15, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:04, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Available at a much higher resolution at https://www.veethi.com/india-people/baba_ramdev-photos-474-4871.htm, probably Flickrwashed Ytoyoda (talk) 17:17, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 13:04, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files in Category:Christine Gregoire
[edit]From an account with tons of Flickrwashed photos, see File:HH Dalai Lama and Chris Gregoire 1 (2841615555).jpg and File:HH Dalai Lama and Chris Gregoire 4 (2842449642).jpg
- File:HH Dalai Lama and Chris Gregoire 2 (2841614911).jpg
- File:HH Dalai Lama and Chris Gregoire 3 (2842450256).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ytoyoda (talk) 17:25, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:59, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work. Singer would be unlikely to be photographed by amateur. File is small and of low quality, likely copied from unattributed source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:43, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:55, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
Screenshot containing derivative work and view of non-free software. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:47, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:55, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
Unused file, very small, possibly correctly licensed possibly not. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:55, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:55, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
Portal Płock watermark, unlikely to be own work. ~Cybularny Speak? 20:08, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:52, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
FBMD at MD. E4024 (talk) 20:42, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:52, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Killerdrummer1211 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not free, copyvio, spam.
- File:Sachin from Marshall Sachin ( Stay The Same) Media Featuring .png
- File:Marshall Sachin ( Stay The Same) Media Featuring .png
- File:Sachin Shahi’s Newspaper Featuring (Marshall Sachin- an Electronic Experimental Duo).jpg
- File:Rolling Stone Magazine.jpg
- File:Sachin Shahi (Ableton Live- Novation -Launchpad).jpg
- File:Sachin Shahi Logo.png
_Media_Featuring_.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Media_Featuring_.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Aasim 20:50, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:52, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Killerdrummer1211 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not free
- File:Sachin Shahi Grafitti Photoshoot .png
- File:Sachin Shahi PHOTOSHOOT .jpg
- File:Sachin Shahi Explore Apparel Endorsement Photoshoot .jpg
- File:Sachin Shahi in Hotel Intercontinental, Fujairah (UAE).jpg
- File:Marshall Sachin ( Stay The Same).jpg
- File:Marshall Sachin.jpg
- File:Sachin Shahi.jpg
- File:Memorable Picture.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Aasim 20:53, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: PCP, unlikely to be own work. --Gbawden (talk) 12:52, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
Not in-use picture of an unknown teenager. The Commons is not an online photo album and cannot be a repository for just anything. Ldorfman (talk) 21:00, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- re-uploading of an image that was before somewhere here and was deleted (I don't remember which one was). Euro know (talk) 05:57, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:49, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
unnecessary crop ShadZ01 (talk) 21:02, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: No free license. --Gbawden (talk) 12:50, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
Personal picture. Out of scope. SirEdimon Dimmi!!! 21:25, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; likely copyvio too. --Gbawden (talk) 12:46, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
Although OoS and personal promo, at first I was hesitant to get this file deleted, because I thought it was a good, representative image of a Turkish man. Afterwards I noticed they used also the discussion page of a Commons essay for their own promotion. Then I have no doubts: Remove the image of this out of scope person who is abusing Commons for self promotion. E4024 (talk) 21:34, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:47, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
File is not used anywhere. I am the original author. Mhare (talk) 21:44, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:48, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
File is not used anywhere. Mhare (talk) 21:49, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy keep In scope. No valid reason for deletion. Brianjd (talk) 17:23, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
- Comment I am original author. The picture is not up to quality as the .svg version that is identical. Mhare (talk) 10:57, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Mhare: From what I can remember, this is not normally considered a valid reason, but let’s see what other users think. Brianjd (talk) 11:07, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:45, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
Although the file has camera MD, it seems to have been taken from a CR'ed site (https://www.last.fm/music/Ana+Mena/+images) by a one-time visitor. It is quite a professional shoot. IMHO a permission is needed. E4024 (talk) 23:01, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:44, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Kissa21782 (talk) 19:07, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:24, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
As can be seen at the original source, this emblem was not designed by the US Army Institute of Heraldry but shows a Walt Disney character. So this is copyrighted and non-free. The Creative Commons licence is also outright false because if it had been a work by the Institute of Heraldry it would be public domain. De728631 (talk) 19:50, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Also nominated for not having been designed by the Institute of Heraldry:
- File:6605 USAF Hospital emblem.png (Mickey Mouse, source)
- File:536 Bombardment Sq emblem.png (Bugs Bunny, source)
De728631 (talk) 20:31, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Creative commons is a result of a stray click and has been removed. I believe the issue is whether emblems that have been officially adopted by units of the US military fall under the provisions of 18 U.S.C. § 704, even if the original design was an outside source. I believe the statutory language indicates that they do (Aber, ich bin kein Anwalt). --Lineagegeek (talk) 20:44, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- 18 U.S.C. § 704 is about "Medals and Decorations" and it doesn't have anything to do with unit insignia. § 705 is about "Badge or medal of veterans’ organizations", and it prohibits the sale of insignia approved for veterans' organisations. So neither of these address the copyright issue. De728631 (talk) 20:56, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Actually, it is interpreted to include emblems of the US military services. AFI 84-105 paragraph 3.5 discusses this, along with the implementing section of the Code of Federal Regulations. This is the second post that has not posted correctly for me in this thread. --Lineagegeek (talk) 22:11, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- Ok, but an officially approved emblem still does not need to be public domain. Even if Disney or Warner Bros. gave their consent for the characters to be used in the official badges, it does not mean that anybody else can use them. De728631 (talk) 23:48, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: This is not an official emblem. A unit emblem using works from Disney which are non free. --Gbawden (talk) 11:23, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Two statues; impossible to tell when the statues were published from either here or source; see Commons:Public art and copyrights in the US. DalefromCleveland (talk) 23:58, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:22, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Statue; impossible to tell when the statues were published from either here or source; see Commons:Public art and copyrights in the US. DalefromCleveland (talk) 23:59, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:22, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
This file is a copyright violation as the uploader claimed this is their own work when it is clearly not their own work. No permission. YoungForever (talk) 03:22, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Comment It may be under COM:TOO. Strakhov (talk) 21:44, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept Very simple text; false claims removed. In use. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:14, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
- Reclose. --Minoraxtalk 09:26, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
No evidence of a 1965 poster being licensed under Creative Commons; as it was under copyright in 1996, it is not in the public domain in the United States. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 01:35, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
![01:35, 14 May 2020 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2020/05/14#c-Brainulator9-2020-05-14T01:35:00.000Z-File:Japanese_movie_"_The_Red_Throwing_Star"_Poster_in_1965.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 04:34, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
![04:34, 6 December 2020 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2020/05/14#c-P199-2020-12-06T04:34:00.000Z-File:Japanese_movie_"_The_Red_Throwing_Star"_Poster_in_1965.jpg){kind=link}
moved without permission of the uploader, wrong license, the license must not be free, and removed immediately in Indonesia Wikipedia Ezagren (talk) 02:03, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jalan poros Sepaku 2.jpg. Unused and replacable. Unclear copyright status. --MGA73 (talk) 08:58, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 04:34, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
moved without permission of the uploader, wrong license, the license must not be free, and removed immediately in Indonesia Wikipedia Ezagren (talk) 02:02, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jalan poros Sepaku 2.jpg. Unused and replacable. Unclear copyright status. --MGA73 (talk) 09:00, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 04:34, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
moved without permission of the uploader, wrong license, the license must not be free, and removed immediately in Indonesia Wikipedia Ezagren (talk) 02:02, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Comment I moved it to Commons with FileImporter so the file history is visible for everyone. If you check the version before I moved to Commons you can see that this:
- |Source ={{Own}}
- |Author =Arief R. Randan (Ezagren) (bicara / talk)
- {{Self|Cc-by-sa-3.0}}
- Ezagren did not give a reason why the license is wrong. As you can see above everything looks right and there are no problems with COM:DW so my only guess is that uploader do not like files to be on Commons. But perhaps Ezagren would explain why the license is wrong? --MGA73 (talk) 06:48, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
- This photo belongs to my colleague. My colleague no longer allows the photo to be on Wikipedia and I want to delete it this month but suddenly you move it to the commons. Ezagren (talk) 10:02, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you for your reply. You uploaded the photo and you wrote that it was own work and that you are the author. I had no way to know that it was not correct.
- Uploading photos under false copyright claims is of course not allowed. I think we should delete the photo. --MGA73 (talk) 11:41, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
- This photo belongs to my colleague. My colleague no longer allows the photo to be on Wikipedia and I want to delete it this month but suddenly you move it to the commons. Ezagren (talk) 10:02, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Unused and replacable. Unclear copyright status. --MGA73 (talk) 08:59, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 04:34, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
moved without permission of the uploader, wrong license, the license must not be free, and removed immediately in Indonesia Wikipedia Ezagren (talk) 02:02, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jalan poros Sepaku 2.jpg. Unused and replacable. Unclear copyright status. --MGA73 (talk) 09:00, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 04:34, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope — Draceane talkcontrib. 08:05, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 04:35, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
out of project scope Didym (talk) 13:55, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Weak keep it may be the only picture depicting a human being in Category:Pietzmoor. It may be useful for ...wikivoyage? Not great quality, though. Strakhov (talk) 22:02, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. No point keeping such low quality image. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:49, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
A equivalent file exists which is of much higher quality, specifically File:Divide large.gif —The Editor's Apprentice (Talk) 17:08, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
I was not aware that animated GIF could be resized, but I guess I was wrong. I agree the low resolution one should be deleted after making sure non of the links to it get broken. --Theislikerice (talk) 18:11, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:49, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Low quality image for which better quality versions now exist: Amateur re-creation of logo, with non-uniform color and weird font, supposedly PNG but with source with JPEG artifacts, does not match any version at https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.1079nashicon.com/ from 2014 to present. File:WOGT-FM-sitelogo-REG.png and File:WOGT-FM Nash Icon 107.9 logo non-transparent.png are now uploaded as more direct versions. Closeapple (talk) 21:19, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:50, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Apparently obtained from a commercial graphics editing app. A license from the source should be provided instead of "own work". --ghouston (talk) 04:37, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Delete These photos are copyrighted and PicsArt doesn’t allow free use so this is not a free photo , and shouldn’t be here. Note that Wikimedia Commons does allow only free content.--Alejitao123 (talk) 16:52, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:51, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
I'd like more input on whether or not this meets the requirements as PD text. My gut tells me it's enough originality to meet copyright status but I'm not sure. DalefromCleveland (talk) 23:20, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:51, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
File:Sophie Thériault, Full Professor and Vice-Deanin the Faculty of Law at the University of Ottawa.jpg
[edit]
Probable copyvio. Although the source website claims a free license and the uploader wrote that the author is the subject, it does not look like a selfie. It looks like a version of the photo on the U of Ottawa website [19]. With the background and back lighting, it is exactly in the same style as many other photos of the faculty members [20], which strongly suggests that it is by a photographer for the U of Ottawa. Asclepias (talk) 01:28, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for this - the file was uploaded as a CC-BY-40 at https://globalyoungacademy.net/stheriault/ (subject is the vice dean of the law school) --PPEscientist (talk) 06:41, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Dear Asclepias you are absolutely right, will follow this up & either check photographer or upload a different one. --PPEscientist (talk) 07:55, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Dear Asclepias, I found the *real* photographer now (indeed a university photographer) and will ask about the license. Thanks for finding out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PPEscientist (talk • contribs) 12:34, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:46, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
File:Sophie Thériault, Full Professor and Vice-Deanin the Faculty of Law at the University of Ottawa.jpg
[edit]
This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no permission (No permission since) The picture has been provided by a dean of a the legal department of a university.. There will be a picture. One problem is that these pictures have all been marked and not for all there is a problem GerardM (talk) 11:54, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
Looked into this. I received the permission by the photoprapher (http://www.melanieprovencher.com/index-eng.html) some time ago. Please delete the deletion request. PPEscientist (talk) 12:37, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
- Saying that an individual received a permission is not a publicly verifiable free license declaration by the photographer. Either the declaration by the photographer must be available to the public, for example on the website of the photographer, or Wikimedia must receive from the photographer the declaration of free license. Was a declaration posted on the media of the photographer or sent from www.melanieprovencher.com to Wikimedia? There is no ticket tag or even a OTRS pending tag. You didn't even fix the authorship information to credit the photographer. The situation is still unresolved after a month. In the present state, this file must be deleted. It can be restored if the photographer posts or sends a free license. -- Asclepias (talk) 21:09, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:46, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Double Picture Mrsupa (talk) 02:07, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:51, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 04:20, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:52, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Found in a pdf before upload - https://www.thalys.com/sites/thalys.com/files/2018-07/1433834630_15.06.08._Nouvelle_campagne_Thalys.pdf - unlikely to be own work Gbawden (talk) 08:54, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:53, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work, he died in 1972 Gbawden (talk) 09:08, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:53, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Not simple logo. According to Commons rules we need a evidence of OTRS permission from the team in order to proof the validity of CC-BY-SA 4.0 license. The same problems applies for images File:EQUIPACION ALICANTE SHARKS 01.png and File:EQUIPACION ALICANTE SHARKS 02.png but it may be only needed to blank/crop the parts of the images that shows the logo. Civitas13 (talk) 12:11, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:52, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:14, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:54, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Also
File:Greg Grandin 4072356.jpg- File:Ida E. Jones 5182799.jpg
- File:Jonathan roth 5182943.jpg
- File:Lorene Cary 5183058.jpg
File:Nell Freudenberger 4092379.jpg
No permission. It was marked on flickr as "Public Domain Mark", which has no legal effect -- it's as if there was no license at all. The uploader also marked it as PD-author, but there was no documentation of this on Flickr. There was, however, a link to the Flickr user's Commons page, which said that they were blocked indefinitely for sockpuppetry. Mdaniels5757 (talk) 02:27, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep on the source page at https://www.flickr.com/photos/73455099@N07/47825666182/ the image is clearly marked "Public domain", and it is also quite clear that it was uploaded there by the the photographer. For such images we use {{PD-Author}}. I agree that images coming from flickr need to be checked to ensure that we know which PD template to apply and to ensure that there are no clear signs of uploading other people's images but I have done that already. --Jarekt (talk) 02:41, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Jarekt: There's an important difference between the w:en:Public Domain Mark and {{PD-Author}} -- the fallback license. The fallback license makes sure that the work may be used freely even if "the public domain" doesn't have legal meaning in their country. As the consensus at Commons:Requests for comment/Flickr and PD images found, "we can only accept images licensed under Public Domain Mark 1.0 if they fall under another PD-templates scope, such as {{PD-old-100}} or {{PD-USGov-DOD}}, or if the author on Flickr has specified that they grant anyone the right to use this work for any purpose, without any conditions, unless such conditions are required by law." --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 03:00, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Mdaniels5757, I contribute a lot of images to Commons and to Flickr, and on flickr whey you are choosing which license you want to pick for your photo, one of the licenses in "Public Domain". Then flickr displays prominent "Public Domain" on the page with a link to PD Mark because PD Mark is the only think to link to. Here on Commons PD templates like {{PD-old-100}}, etc. also have a link to PD Mark which does not invalidate the template. Could you point to anything on flickr page that makes you doubt that author of the image released it to the public domain? I do not, and public domain images are allowed on Commons. --Jarekt (talk) 04:18, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- The thing that makes me doubt that the author released the photo into the public domain is that they did not. As Creative Commons explained: "The PDM is not a legal instrument like CC0 or our licenses; there is no accompanying legal code or agreement. It should only be used to label a work that is already free of known copyright restrictions around the world, typically very old works. It should not be used to attempt to change a work’s current status under copyright law, or affect any person’s rights in a work.... PDM is not legally operative in any respect – it is intended to function as a label, marking a work that is already free of known copyright restrictions worldwide." Of course, using the PDM to mark images that are actually in the public domain (e.g. {{PD-old-100-expired}}) is fine. However, as this author did not legally release the photo into the public domain, the photo is not in the public domain, and not acceptable for Commons. --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 15:31, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- In flickr you do not choose PD-mark, you choose option called "public domain" and flicker displays it as a "public domain" on the images. So as an author when you choose the release terms as "public domain" that means the same as when commons user choose to use {{PD-Author}}. The link to PD-mark does not mean PD-mark is a legal instrument, just like our links to the same place from out PD templates. We do have special procedures related to such flickr files, to ensure that files are released to PD by the authors, which I verified. --Jarekt (talk) 13:18, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
- In flickr you have a choice between "Public Domain Work" (which is the PDM) and "Public Domain Dedication (CC0)" (which is the CC0 deed). As an author, legally, one has effect, the other does not. The PDM is only for use when there is some other reason that the work "is already free of known copyright restrictions around the world" (Source: Creative Commons FAQ. Of course, for our other PD templates, there is such a reason: the reason listed in the template. Since there is nothing making the work legally in the public domain, it should be deleted unless permission is properly given. I think I already did, but I'll link (again?) to the consensuses on these: RFC, Public Domain Mark 1.0-related deletion requests. --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 15:06, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
- I agree that flickr's CC-0 license is more clear than their "Public Domain" designation and I prefer if people use that license. However their "Public Domain" designation by photographers is identical to out {{PD-Author}} which is still a valid copyright tag on Commons. Also all this legal nuance and preference of Commons is not very well explained on flickr and their CC-0 was a rather recent addition for for years if you wanted to release to public domain than "public domain" option was your only choice. --Jarekt (talk) 04:39, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
- In flickr you have a choice between "Public Domain Work" (which is the PDM) and "Public Domain Dedication (CC0)" (which is the CC0 deed). As an author, legally, one has effect, the other does not. The PDM is only for use when there is some other reason that the work "is already free of known copyright restrictions around the world" (Source: Creative Commons FAQ. Of course, for our other PD templates, there is such a reason: the reason listed in the template. Since there is nothing making the work legally in the public domain, it should be deleted unless permission is properly given. I think I already did, but I'll link (again?) to the consensuses on these: RFC, Public Domain Mark 1.0-related deletion requests. --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 15:06, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
- In flickr you do not choose PD-mark, you choose option called "public domain" and flicker displays it as a "public domain" on the images. So as an author when you choose the release terms as "public domain" that means the same as when commons user choose to use {{PD-Author}}. The link to PD-mark does not mean PD-mark is a legal instrument, just like our links to the same place from out PD templates. We do have special procedures related to such flickr files, to ensure that files are released to PD by the authors, which I verified. --Jarekt (talk) 13:18, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
- The thing that makes me doubt that the author released the photo into the public domain is that they did not. As Creative Commons explained: "The PDM is not a legal instrument like CC0 or our licenses; there is no accompanying legal code or agreement. It should only be used to label a work that is already free of known copyright restrictions around the world, typically very old works. It should not be used to attempt to change a work’s current status under copyright law, or affect any person’s rights in a work.... PDM is not legally operative in any respect – it is intended to function as a label, marking a work that is already free of known copyright restrictions worldwide." Of course, using the PDM to mark images that are actually in the public domain (e.g. {{PD-old-100-expired}}) is fine. However, as this author did not legally release the photo into the public domain, the photo is not in the public domain, and not acceptable for Commons. --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 15:31, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Mdaniels5757, I contribute a lot of images to Commons and to Flickr, and on flickr whey you are choosing which license you want to pick for your photo, one of the licenses in "Public Domain". Then flickr displays prominent "Public Domain" on the page with a link to PD Mark because PD Mark is the only think to link to. Here on Commons PD templates like {{PD-old-100}}, etc. also have a link to PD Mark which does not invalidate the template. Could you point to anything on flickr page that makes you doubt that author of the image released it to the public domain? I do not, and public domain images are allowed on Commons. --Jarekt (talk) 04:18, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Jarekt: There's an important difference between the w:en:Public Domain Mark and {{PD-Author}} -- the fallback license. The fallback license makes sure that the work may be used freely even if "the public domain" doesn't have legal meaning in their country. As the consensus at Commons:Requests for comment/Flickr and PD images found, "we can only accept images licensed under Public Domain Mark 1.0 if they fall under another PD-templates scope, such as {{PD-old-100}} or {{PD-USGov-DOD}}, or if the author on Flickr has specified that they grant anyone the right to use this work for any purpose, without any conditions, unless such conditions are required by law." --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 03:00, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete (as tagger) per my part in the discussion above. --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 15:06, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. --A1Cafel (talk) 14:19, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep It is Slowking's work, and they are ardent public domain, so a modicum of realism and sensibility in any re-interpretation of the license as applied. If you are unsure, then go and ask them at enWS. Watch out for wikilawyering. — billinghurst sDrewth 07:44, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
@Mdaniels5757: The file File:Katherine young 5182935.jpg was relicensed on flickr to cc-by-sa-2.0, however since licenses on commons can not be revoked that file has now {{PD-Author}} and {{Cc-by-sa-2.0}}. I think that should solve the issue with that file. Can you remove your DR nomination for that file? --Jarekt (talk) 04:59, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Jarekt: Yes. As File:Katherine young 5182935.jpg is now compliant with COM:L,
I withdraw my nomination for that file. --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 14:14, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
- File:Greg Grandin 4072356.jpg and File:Nell Freudenberger 4092379.jpg were also re-licensed on flickr. --Jarekt (talk) 23:01, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep A consensus is developing at Commons:Village pump/Copyright#Double standards for Public Domain Mark to treat PDM as {{PD-author}} if it is clear that the uploader is the creator. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 15:31, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per COM:PDM. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:22, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image ℳaʐbeʟ Work • Talk • Mail 08:25, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: in use, so now in scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:23, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Flag has another PNG version with correct corporate colours as well as a vector version. VileGecko (talk) 08:25, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:23, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
I uploaded this more than ten years ago and may have been too confused by copyright law; there is no indication this was either published in 1952 or by the listed author. FunkMonk (talk) 08:45, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- The online source of the photo has been identified, but there is no clear indication on its original author and time of publication (The website commonly reuses images from the public domain or adapts published scientific works). I have sent an email to what I believe may be an address to the site's maintainer regarding the status of this image. Macrophyseter (talk) 20:26, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- UPDATE: I have received a response from Mike Everhart, the maintainer of the website. He stated that the photograph was likely taken during the 1950s by George F. Sternberg but the copyright was likely transferred to Fort Hays State University upon his passing in 1969. Regardless of who took it, Everhart stated that the original photo in the collections of the Sternberg Museum. The photo appeared on the Oceans of Kansas website by explicit permission by the University, indicating that they have copyright ownership of it. As a result, this file is very likely a copyright violation and thus I recommend having it deleted on those grounds. Macrophyseter (talk) 23:25, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- The online source of the photo has been identified, but there is no clear indication on its original author and time of publication (The website commonly reuses images from the public domain or adapts published scientific works). I have sent an email to what I believe may be an address to the site's maintainer regarding the status of this image. Macrophyseter (talk) 20:26, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per above, COM:PRP. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:24, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Old photo, not own work. Needs more info to determine PD status Gbawden (talk) 09:26, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:25, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Bill is dated 2008 and is almost certainly copyrighted by the Bangladeshi government. Invalid claim of own work/COM:DW.. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:19, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:49, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation - the figure copied from PDF without an appropriate license to upload the file to Commons Michał Sobkowski (talk) 07:16, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:50, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation - the figure copied from a document without an appropriate license to upload the file to Commons Michał Sobkowski (talk) 07:16, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:50, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation - the figure copied from a document without an appropriate license to upload the file to Commons Michał Sobkowski (talk) 07:17, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:51, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation - the figure copied from a document without an appropriate license to upload the file to Commons. Original paper is copyrighted: https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/pdf/2009/15/aa11454-08.pdf Michał Sobkowski (talk) 07:19, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:52, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation - the figure copied from a document without an appropriate license to upload the file to Commons. Michał Sobkowski (talk) 07:20, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:52, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation - the figure copied from a document without an appropriate license to upload the file to Commons Michał Sobkowski (talk) 07:21, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:53, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation - the figure copied from a document without an appropriate license to upload the file to Commons. Original paper: https://studylibpl.com/doc/1215903/detektory-i-nadajniki-optoelektroniczne or https://docplayer.pl/19323448-Detektory-i-nadajniki-optoelektroniczne.html - p. 76 Michał Sobkowski (talk) 07:37, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:56, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Same as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Heil dir im Siegerkranz (recording version).ogg. Unknown copyright status, as we don't know who did the performance. The CC-BY-2.5 license is also nonsense. pandakekok9 08:16, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Technically, the performers don't get a copyright, though there are performer's rights. The recording itself has a copyright though, and I don't see that licensed at the source. Presumably that is what the CC license is for, but I don't see it mentioned on youtube. Performer's rights may be a thorny issue, though usually those are about authorizing themselves being recorded, so if the recording was done with their authorization (you would think it was) it may be OK, but the recording itself would need a copyright license. The music and lyrics are of course fine. Carl Lindberg (talk) 13:55, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Oh, the youtube page mentions the actual source of https://archive.org/details/GottErhalteFranzDenKaiser for the recording. No license there, and that probably was not uploaded by the copyright holder either. It may have been an official performance, but no information on the recording at all. The CC license would have to come from somewhere. Delete unless more information can be supplied. Carl Lindberg (talk) 14:02, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete The sound file at Archive.org is totally different from the YouTube soundtrack: Not vocals with a piano accompaniment but a full orchestra version without lyrics (which is also shorter). De728631 (talk) 16:41, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:00, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Flag has another PNG version with correct corporate colours as well as a vector version. VileGecko (talk) 08:22, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:01, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Majority of image is an advertisement that is also copyright protected. AFAIK de minimis is not applicable. Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 13:12, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Maybe I am stupid and Commons:Freedom of panorama applies? In that case I am sorry for bothering everyone. Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 17:07, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - I don't think that an advertissement can be considered as "permanetly" displayed. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:08, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Possibly Flickrwashed images from the Lha Socialwork Flickr account
[edit]A Flickr account with a large amount of Flickrwashed images like File:S Rinpoche 254 (15036588861).jpg. Many, even most, images look like they're original - they're high res with the camera EXIF data - but I think any low-res web photos should be deleted.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- File:Rinpoche at Lha (33675974156).jpg
- File:Samdhong Rinpoche portrait.jpg
- File:Samdhong Rinpoche reading Tibetan Buddhist scripture.jpg
- File:Samdhong Rinpoche praying.jpg
- File:Samdhong Rinpoche signing a document.jpg
- File:Samdhong Rinpoche with Tenzin Gyatso, the 14th Dalai Lama of Tibet with Jetsun Pema (far right).jpg
- File:Srinpoche at TCV (33716653765).jpg
- File:S Rinpoche 254 (15036588861).jpg
- File:S Rinpoche 217 (15039662475).jpg
- File:Rinpoche (49) (15066904111).jpg
- File:Rinpoche (35) (15046931616).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(15066904111).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(15046931616).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ytoyoda (talk) 17:23, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Ytoyoda and Tibet Nation: Hey, the image [21] which is sourced to [22] is listed as 'CC BY 2.0'- should be no problem, right? --Geographyinitiative (talk) 05:38, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
- I agree @Geographyinitiative: CC BY 2.0 should not have been nominated, even if low res. Samdhong Rinpoche is one of the highest ranking "Geshe" (equivalent to a western Ph.D., a Tibetan Buddhist taking up to 20 years to attain). As a "Rinpoche" (Honorific) he is one of the most esteemed in Tibetan Buddhism today. Also, he served as "Kalon Tripa" (a government position now called "Sikyong" or "President" now represented by the Harvard Law graduate, Lobsang Sangay) of the Tibetan Government-in-Exile in McLeod Ganj, India. As with any high ranking religious figure, a Tibetan refugee from Kham Province of Tibet as well as a President of the Government-in-Exile, (established by the Nobel Peace Prize-winning Tenzin Gyatso, the 14th Dalai Lama of Tibet) it is not in the interest, nor the mission of the Wikipedia Foundation to have his photos deleted. Low Res or not, these photos and others photos uploaded from the Lha's Flickr account page range over 30 years and are relatively rare and represent a critical period in Tibetan culture and a critical figure in modern Tibetan history. If higher resolutions of identical photos are uploaded in the future, only then should they be replaced. Consenquently, all these photos should not be deleted. Additionally, the "Lha Charitable Trust" of India launched Samdhong Rinpoche's official website in 2014. See: [23] and [24] This close relationship between the Lha non-governmental organization, which is a registered Charitable organization with the Government of India and Samdhong Rinpoche is why these images were never "Flickrwashed" as assumed in this nomination by @Ytoyoda: . Respectfully --Tibet Nation (talk) 05:39, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Tibet Nation: I'm not sure what any of this has to do with the image's copyright status, which is the only thing that matters for our purposes. Ytoyoda (talk) 06:10, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Geographyinitiative and Ytoyoda: - Ytoyoda, It is good that you NOW say that the "... only thing that matters for our purposes" is the copyright. So your previous mention of "low res" photos needing deletion is not now an issue. Thank you for your concession. So. that leaves the ONLY one photograph on this page that should be deleted is File:S Rinpoche 254 (15036588861).jpg, since it has "exposay.com" marked on the photo. All the other photos are either Public Domain 0 (zero), which is allowed on Commons from Flickr (and Not "version 1.0 of the Creative Commons Public Domain Mark" like your upload here File:JRW 225 series Set I7 JR Kobe Line Rapid at Hyogo Station 2017-07-12 (36605328450).jpg (I have made the same error) and the others are CC BY 2.0. Thanks, Tibet Nation (talk) 08:12, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Tibet Nation: I'm not sure what any of this has to do with the image's copyright status, which is the only thing that matters for our purposes. Ytoyoda (talk) 06:10, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
- I agree @Geographyinitiative: CC BY 2.0 should not have been nominated, even if low res. Samdhong Rinpoche is one of the highest ranking "Geshe" (equivalent to a western Ph.D., a Tibetan Buddhist taking up to 20 years to attain). As a "Rinpoche" (Honorific) he is one of the most esteemed in Tibetan Buddhism today. Also, he served as "Kalon Tripa" (a government position now called "Sikyong" or "President" now represented by the Harvard Law graduate, Lobsang Sangay) of the Tibetan Government-in-Exile in McLeod Ganj, India. As with any high ranking religious figure, a Tibetan refugee from Kham Province of Tibet as well as a President of the Government-in-Exile, (established by the Nobel Peace Prize-winning Tenzin Gyatso, the 14th Dalai Lama of Tibet) it is not in the interest, nor the mission of the Wikipedia Foundation to have his photos deleted. Low Res or not, these photos and others photos uploaded from the Lha's Flickr account page range over 30 years and are relatively rare and represent a critical period in Tibetan culture and a critical figure in modern Tibetan history. If higher resolutions of identical photos are uploaded in the future, only then should they be replaced. Consenquently, all these photos should not be deleted. Additionally, the "Lha Charitable Trust" of India launched Samdhong Rinpoche's official website in 2014. See: [23] and [24] This close relationship between the Lha non-governmental organization, which is a registered Charitable organization with the Government of India and Samdhong Rinpoche is why these images were never "Flickrwashed" as assumed in this nomination by @Ytoyoda: . Respectfully --Tibet Nation (talk) 05:39, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
![[21]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Samdhong_Rinpoche_portrait.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:10, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Coins of Bermuda
[edit]There's no specific mention of the copyright status of currency in COM:BERMUDA, but chapter XI of the 2004 copyright act gives Crown (government) works a term of "until the end of the period of 125 years from the end of the calendar year in which the work was made", so none of these are in the public domain.
- File:10 cents 1978 BMU006.JPG
- File:10 cents Bermudian dollar (1997) front.JPG
- File:10 cents Bermudian dollar (1997) reverse.JPG
- File:25 cent 1970 BMU005 obverse.jpg
- File:25 cent 1970 BMU005 reverse.jpg
- File:25 cent 1970 BMU005.JPG
- File:Bermuda 1 cent b.jpg
- File:Bermuda 1 cent.jpg
- File:Bermuda 1 dollar b.jpg
- File:Bermuda 1 dollar.jpg
- File:Bermuda 10 cent b.jpg
- File:Bermuda 10 cent.jpg
- File:Bermuda 25 cent b.jpg
- File:Bermuda 25 cent.jpg
- File:Bermuda 25 centBermuda 25 cent.jpg
- File:Bermuda 5 cent b.jpg
- File:Bermuda 5 cent.jpg
- File:Bermuda 5 dollar c.jpg
- File:Bermuda 50 cent b.jpg
- File:Bermuda 50 cent.jpg
- File:Bermudian Fifty Cent Coins.jpg
- File:Bermudian Fifty Cent reverse.jpg
- File:Corona de bermuda BMU002.JPG
_front.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_reverse.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 18:28, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, there's some copyright issues here. However, these photos are actively used on Wikipedia, should fall under UK's fair dealing. If possible, we should move them to the wiki and add rationale.(for example, like this) I can certainly do this for the images I've authored here. Forbes72 (talk) 19:15, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Forbes72 I recommend you pick one image to represent the batch of coins - say File:Corona de bermuda BMU002.JPG, which shows the front and back of the same coin. If you bring over all of the images, it'll run afoul of en:WP:NFCC 3a, and I am actively in the process of nominating for deletion excessive non-free images in currency articles on that project. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:48, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- The Squirrel Conspiracy Appreciate the fact you're going through this. You're correct that copying all the coins would run afoul of 3a, since we don't need duplicates of coins from the same series. On the other hand, having different denominations represented presents information that just one coin would not. See for comparison: Wikipedia:Category:Coins of the United Kingdom. So the plan would be to move the following out of the commons and correctly label under fair dealing:
- Forbes72 I recommend you pick one image to represent the batch of coins - say File:Corona de bermuda BMU002.JPG, which shows the front and back of the same coin. If you bring over all of the images, it'll run afoul of en:WP:NFCC 3a, and I am actively in the process of nominating for deletion excessive non-free images in currency articles on that project. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:48, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- File:Bermuda 1 cent b.jpg
- File:Bermuda 1 cent.jpg
- File:Bermuda 1 dollar b.jpg
- File:Bermuda 1 dollar.jpg
- File:Bermuda 10 cent b.jpg
- File:Bermuda 10 cent.jpg
- File:Bermuda 25 cent b.jpg
- File:Bermuda 25 cent.jpg
- File:Bermuda 5 cent b.jpg
- File:Bermuda 5 cent.jpg
- File:Bermuda 5 dollar c.jpg
- File:Bermuda 50 cent b.jpg
- File:Bermuda 50 cent.jpg
- File:Corona de bermuda BMU002.JPG
And fully delete as duplicates:
- File:10 cents 1978 BMU006.JPG
- File:10 cents Bermudian dollar (1997) front.JPG
- File:10 cents Bermudian dollar (1997) reverse.JPG
- File:25 cent 1970 BMU005 obverse.jpg
- File:25 cent 1970 BMU005 reverse.jpg
- File:25 cent 1970 BMU005.JPG
- File:Bermuda 25 centBermuda 25 cent.jpg
- File:Bermudian Fifty Cent Coins.jpg
- File:Bermudian Fifty Cent reverse.jpg
I can fill in the rest of the table at Wikipedia:Bermudian dollar to make sure we follow Wikipedia:WP:NFCC 7.Forbes72 (talk) 22:30, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Wikimedia Commons is not Wikipedia. Each language Wikipedia has its own policies; Commons also has different policies. In particular, while the English Wikipedia allows fair use under certain conditions, Commons never allows fair use. Brianjd (talk) 15:32, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:17, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Banknotes of Namibia
[edit]There is no mention of currency in Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Namibia, however their standard copyright term is 50 years + life or publish, and all of these bills are less than 50 years old.
- File:30 Namibia Dollar note back.png
- File:30 Namibia Dollar note front.png
- File:Back side 10 Namibia dollars.jpg
- File:Back side 100 Namibia dollars.jpg
- File:Back side 20 Namibia dollars.jpg
- File:Back side 200 Namibia dollars.jpg
- File:Back side 50 Namibia dollars.jpg
- File:Billet namibien.jpg
- File:Front side 100 Namibia dollars.jpg
- File:Front side 20 Namibia dollars.jpg
- File:Front side 200 Namibia dollars.jpg
- File:Front side 50 Namibia dollar.jpg
- File:Namibia 10 Dollar 1.jpg
- File:Namibia 10 Dollar 2.jpg
- File:Namibia 100 Dollar 1.jpg
- File:Namibia 100 Dollar 2.jpg
- File:Namibia 20 Dollar 1.jpg
- File:Namibia 20 Dollar 2.jpg
- File:Namibia 200 Dollar 1.jpg
- File:Namibia 200 Dollar 2.jpg
- File:Namibia 50 Dollar 1.jpg
- File:Namibia 50 Dollar 2.jpg
- File:Namibia-Dollar 10 hinten - 2012.png
- File:Namibia-Dollar 10 vorne - 2012.png
- File:Namibia-Dollar 10 vorne - 2013.jpg
- File:Namibia-Dollar 100 hinten - 2012.jpg
- File:Namibia-Dollar 100 vorne - 2012.jpg
- File:Namibia-Dollar 20 hinten - 2012.jpg
- File:Namibia-Dollar 20 vorne - 2012.png
- File:Namibia-Dollar 20 vorne - 2013.jpg
- File:Namibia-Dollar 200 hinten - 2012.jpg
- File:Namibia-Dollar 200 vorne - 2012.jpg
- File:Namibia-Dollar 50 hinten - 2012.jpg
- File:Namibia-Dollar 50 vorne - 2012.jpg
- File:Profilometrie.jpg
The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:26, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Usage is generally granted for media without prior permission through §6 at POLICY ON THE REPRODUCTION OF IMAGES OF THE NAMIBIAN CURRENCY by BoN. --Chtrede (talk) 05:44, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Chtrede: Thank you for linking to that document. Unfortunately, the permission granted in §6 is very narrow in scope - it applies only to "editors of the print media and television producers" and then only for "Financial and business news". I don't see anything in that document that puts images of the bills into the public domain, or indicates that they can be used under a free license; in fact the opposite seems to be the case. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:15, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- Nope, 6.1 clearly states ..."in the print and the electronic media, and deems this as a manner in which the Bank’s ongoing banknote awareness campaign is promoted..." Only further details are in the following paragraphs given for print and TV, which do not apply to other media. You may trust my understanding, I am working in media/being a journalist in Namibia. Regards --Chtrede (talk) 08:39, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Chtrede: Thank you for linking to that document. Unfortunately, the permission granted in §6 is very narrow in scope - it applies only to "editors of the print media and television producers" and then only for "Financial and business news". I don't see anything in that document that puts images of the bills into the public domain, or indicates that they can be used under a free license; in fact the opposite seems to be the case. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:15, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; only for media permission unfortunately not sufficient for Commons. --A.Savin 17:18, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
File:Stevan Kragujevic, Milivoj Jugin, vazduhoplovni inzenjer, konstruktor, tv komentator, publicista, na jednom od putovanja.JPG
[edit]
This file was initially tagged by Racconish as no permission. It HAS permission w:sr:Википедија:Дозволе за објављивање/Стеван Крагујевић Bojan Talk 19:41, 14 May 2020 (UTC) Bojan Talk 19:42, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Comment see here. — Racconish 💬 10:30, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
I have just accepted permission for “File:Stevan_Kragujevic,_Milivoj_Jugin,_vazduhoplovni_inzenjer,_konstruktor,_tv_komentator,_publicista,_na_jednom_od_putovanja.JPG” under ticket:2021012410002705. Filip (§) 18:40, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jianhui67 T★C 12:46, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Racconish as no permission. It HAS permission w:sr:Википедија:Дозволе за објављивање/Стеван Крагујевић Bojan Talk 19:41, 14 May 2020 (UTC) Bojan Talk 19:43, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Comment see here. — Racconish 💬 10:30, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Stevan_Kragujevic,_Marko_Todorovic_kao_Tito,_u_Tv_seriji_Save_Mrmka,_1986.JPG” under ticket:2021012410002705. Filip (§) 18:39, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jianhui67 T★C 12:47, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Racconish as no permission. It HAS permission w:sr:Википедија:Дозволе за објављивање/Стеван Крагујевић Bojan Talk 19:41, 14 May 2020 (UTC) Bojan Talk 19:43, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Comment see here. — Racconish 💬 10:31, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Milivoje_Jugin_and_Pavel_Popovič.jpg” under ticket:2021012410002705. Filip (§) 18:38, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jianhui67 T★C 12:47, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Racconish as no permission. It HAS permission w:sr:Википедија:Дозволе за објављивање/Стеван Крагујевић Bojan Talk 19:41, 14 May 2020 (UTC) Bojan Talk 19:43, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
OTRS ticket #2014010610003771. -- Bojan Talk 19:45, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Comment see here. — Racconish 💬 10:29, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Stevan_Kragujevic,_Marsal_Josip_Broz_Tito.jpg” under ticket:2021012410002705. Filip (§) 18:40, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jianhui67 T★C 12:47, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Racconish as no permission. It HAS permission w:sr:Википедија:Дозволе за објављивање/Стеван Крагујевић Bojan Talk 19:41, 14 May 2020 (UTC) Bojan Talk 19:43, 14 May 2020 (UTC) OTRS ticket #2014010610003771. -- Bojan Talk 19:45, 14 May 2020 (UTC) Bojan Talk 19:45, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Comment see here. — Racconish 💬 10:28, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Stevan_Kragujevic,_Marsal_Tito,_pedesetih.jpg” under ticket:2021012410002705. Filip (§) 18:40, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jianhui67 T★C 12:47, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Racconish as no permission. It HAS permission w:sr:Википедија:Дозволе за објављивање/Стеван Крагујевић Bojan Talk 19:41, 14 May 2020 (UTC) Bojan Talk 19:43, 14 May 2020 (UTC) OTRS ticket #2014010610003771. -- Bojan Talk 19:45, 14 May 2020 (UTC) Bojan Talk 19:47, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Comment see here. — Racconish 💬 10:26, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Stevan_Kragujevic,_Marko_Markovic_i_Dunja_Lango.JPG” under ticket:2021012410002705. Filip (§) 18:39, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jianhui67 T★C 12:47, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Racconish as no permission. It HAS permission w:sr:Википедија:Дозволе за објављивање/Стеван Крагујевић Bojan Talk 19:41, 14 May 2020 (UTC) Bojan Talk 19:43, 14 May 2020 (UTC) OTRS ticket #2014010610003771. -- Bojan Talk 19:45, 14 May 2020 (UTC) Bojan Talk 19:47, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
- Comment see here. — Racconish 💬 10:26, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Milica_Babić-Jovanović_1961_(cropped).JPG” under ticket:2021012410002705. Filip (§) 18:38, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jianhui67 T★C 12:48, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Racconish as no permission. It HAS permission w:sr:Википедија:Дозволе за објављивање/Стеван Крагујевић Bojan Talk 19:41, 14 May 2020 (UTC) Bojan Talk 19:43, 14 May 2020 (UTC) OTRS ticket #2014010610003771. -- Bojan Talk 19:45, 14 May 2020 (UTC) Bojan Talk 19:48, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Comment see here. — Racconish 💬 10:25, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Stevan_Kragujevic,_Dragoljub_Micunovic_Skupstina_90tih.jpg” under ticket:2021012410002705. Filip (§) 18:39, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jianhui67 T★C 12:48, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Racconish as no permission. It HAS permission w:sr:Википедија:Дозволе за објављивање/Стеван Крагујевић Bojan Talk 19:41, 14 May 2020 (UTC) Bojan Talk 19:43, 14 May 2020 (UTC) OTRS ticket #2014010610003771. -- Bojan Talk 19:45, 14 May 2020 (UTC) Bojan Talk 19:48, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
It definetely has permission and published under CC 3.0 Unported :) --Id-a-lgo (talk) 20:17, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Comment see here. — Racconish 💬 09:36, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Stevan_Kragujevic,_Marko_Markovic,_decembar_1977.jpg” under ticket:2021012410002705. Filip (§) 18:39, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jianhui67 T★C 12:48, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Racconish as no permission. It HAS permission w:sr:Википедија:Дозволе за објављивање/Стеван Крагујевић Bojan Talk 19:41, 14 May 2020 (UTC) Bojan Talk 19:43, 14 May 2020 (UTC) OTRS ticket #2014010610003771. -- Bojan Talk 19:45, 14 May 2020 (UTC) Bojan Talk 19:48, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Comment see here. — Racconish 💬 09:35, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:József_Kasza.jpg” under ticket:2021012410002705. Filip (§) 18:35, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jianhui67 T★C 12:48, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
Unused pixillated image Rodrigolopes (talk) 19:03, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Essentially, uploader's request Ymblanter (talk) 20:59, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
This is actually a picture of Imre Madách, not Joseph Déjacque. Libertatia (talk) 04:49, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- You're right, apologies for incorrectly posting this. I just saw it on the front cover of some of Dejacque's work so I assumed it was him. I've seen other pictures apparently of Dejacque around, namely this one. Would this be a better replacement? Grnrchst (talk) 08:16, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- That's a picture of Ravachol. As far as I know, there are no pictures of Déjacque. Libertatia (talk) 19:59, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks for looking into all this! Grnrchst (talk) 14:18, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
- That's a picture of Ravachol. As far as I know, there are no pictures of Déjacque. Libertatia (talk) 19:59, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Closing admin, please move this file to "Imre Madách". Thanks. --E4024 (talk) 01:55, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: moved to new name & kept. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:35, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
inferior version of File:99.5 NASH FM - WPKR.png Closeapple (talk) 19:28, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Redirect to File:99.5 NASH FM - WPKR.png: This file would be {{Duplicate}} but we don't speedy delete across file types. This JPEG has visible artifacts and the same user uploaded both. --Closeapple (talk) 19:34, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep and redirect: Per above. SCP-2000 09:33, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected to other file. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:46, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
As best I can tell, this is not from the 1931 bill set, the bill that this is a COM:DW of is not public domain. See Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Iraq#Currency. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:12, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Delete agree with Squirrel Conspiracy - no acknowledgement that this is DW and probably DW of a non free image--
Headlock0225 (talk) 23:10, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:46, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Msales~commonswiki
[edit]
- File:Penile nerve block dorsal.jpg
- File:Plastibell circumcision.jpg
- File:Dorsal penile nerve block.jpg
- File:Penile block ventral.JPG
- File:Injection ventral.JPG
This image likely contains a child's penis. Another image is recommended, one which doesn't involve the genitals of a child. Any non-genital image of pinched skin is entirely sufficient. Hosting this image on the internet may be a crime in certain regions. 71.172.237.77 00:11, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Comment tbh i can't really seem to understand the law regarding what is considered child pornography. Commons hosts other medical images of a child's genitals--67.184.0.138 14:36, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Educationally worthless. AshFriday (talk) 01:33, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete I'm sure there's definitely better images to illustrate medical pinching. I get that Commons is not censored, but this is a case of replaceable. --67.184.0.138 20:11, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
- Comment The same uploader uploaded four other related images; these images should also be considered for deletion.
- A couple of comments that apply to all five images:
- Comment There are three other pictures of same procedure in uploader's gallery. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:02, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
- I don’t know about “same procedure”, but all four images apparently depict a child’s penis. Brianjd (talk) 09:49, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
Comments above this line were specifically related to File:Penile nerve block dorsal.jpg.
- Comment I have nominated the other images for deletion. Brianjd (talk) 09:47, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
- I have merged that DR into this one, let's keep the conversation in one place. -mattbuck (Talk) 09:23, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Mattbuck: This DR was open for some time and received several comments before I nominated the other files. The existing comments were made in the context of one file; the commenters may have other thoughts about the other files. This is why I created a separate DR. I am not aware of any policy or guideline about this. Brianjd (talk) 11:36, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Brianjd: Fair point, I've made a note. I just figure easier to discuss as one, don't think there's any specific policy. -mattbuck (Talk) 11:55, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Mattbuck: This DR was open for some time and received several comments before I nominated the other files. The existing comments were made in the context of one file; the commenters may have other thoughts about the other files. This is why I created a separate DR. I am not aware of any policy or guideline about this. Brianjd (talk) 11:36, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
- I have merged that DR into this one, let's keep the conversation in one place. -mattbuck (Talk) 09:23, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep - Nudity is not the same as sexual. These images are medical in nature, not prurient. I agree that there have got to be better images for medical pinching (and I tool the BOLD step of removing the image from the enwp article on the principle of least astonishment), but I see these images as decidedly within our project scope. -mattbuck (Talk) 09:28, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep And as always the scare tactics of child porn appears again, but this does not hold one cent as this images clearly not sexual, but medical in nature. Moralist crusaders should at least know how to distinguish what is child porn (a abhorrent crime in almost or every country in the world) and contextualized\sanitized\medical images of naked underged persons. Besides that the scope is clear as File:Penile nerve block dorsal.jpg is in use in hi.wikipedia.org खतना and fa.wikipedia.org نیشگون; File:Plastibell circumcision.jpg in use in es.wikipedia.org Pene humano, hi.wikipedia.org खतना, rw.wikipedia.org Gusiramura and sn.wikipedia.org Dzingiswa, File:Dorsal penile nerve block.jpg in use in az.wikipedia.org Regional anesteziya, de.wikipedia.org Regionalanästhesie and ru.wikinews.org Обсуждение:Обладатель искусственного пениса впал в кому после первого секса. Tm (talk) 13:49, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per Mattbuck and Tm; these are medical images, not sexual. --4nn1l2 (talk) 15:51, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
This doesn't seem to be the same scan found at the Internet Archive link: on page six, the copyright date is 1952. In any case, this is a work by a British author, which won't be public domain in the UK until 2041, which I think makes it unfree under Commons rules, even if an earlier printing was found. --ghouston (talk) 04:54, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Well, the earlier scan is available at the IE link, if my interpretation of Commons requirements is wrong. It could be uploaded to replace this one. --ghouston (talk) 04:56, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Which scan(s) are you talking about? What "same scan"? What "earlier scan"? The file on Commons under discussion is the same scan as linked from the description at IA and it was downloaded from IA; it even has the same stain on the cover. 1952 was the date of US copyright renewal [26], and that renewal has now expired. The work was published in both the US and UK in 1924, so it has dual country of origin, and the US copyright has expired. --EncycloPetey (talk) 15:35, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep It is exactly the same scan as at IA; I'm unsure why the nominator says otherwise. This is a book published and printed in the United States as indicated on the colophon page, making this an edition from the United States. The US copyright was registered in 1924, and renewed in 1952, but that copyright has now expired. It is therefore unclear to me what reason the nominator has for proposing the deletion. --EncycloPetey (talk) 19:56, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- The other scan is https://archive.org/details/passagetoindiasyed00fors/mode/2up. I see now I got to it by following the link to open library as given in the summary, OL15111472M. There's some minor mixup. Do you think it may be still worth taking that scan instead, since it has a 1924 copyright notice instead of 1952?. I have no idea if it's truely identical throughout. The other point is that it's just a US printing of a work by a British author, and Commons requires the work to be free in the "source country", which I assume is the UK. --ghouston (talk) 01:44, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
- An example of application of "source country" is Commons:Deletion requests/File:Aboriginal Flag.JPG where a photo of a flag taken in Israel was deleted because the "work" (not necessarily that particular copy of the flag) originates in Australia where it's under copyright. I don't know how this has been applied to books. --ghouston (talk) 01:48, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
- If the only change in that printing is the addition of the 1952 copyright renewal date, then I guess it's no big deal which scan is used. --ghouston (talk) 01:57, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
- Since the work was dually published in the UK and US, the US edition should have a source country of US. It's equally a US version of a UK work and a UK version of a US work; publication was synchronous. The UK edition might very well have been differently edited, but since the UK edition is still under copyright, I don't have access to a copy to check.
- Source country refers to the work, not the author, otherwise works written by immigrants to the US would have a source country based on where the author was born, rather than where the work was published, which makes no sense. A book published in the US has a source country of US, and a book published in the UK has a source country of UK.
- A flag is a visual item, not a textual one, and the laws will be different. With the flag, the rights were never granted for outside use, but with a US edition, the edition is published under US copyright law. --EncycloPetey (talk) 04:01, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Based on earlier comments/findings this does not seem to be a copyright violation (which is the premise of the deletion request) and unless there is something else significantly wrong with the media, other issues (like does we need multiple versions and/or different versions) can be discussed elsewhere (.e.g, on the respective medias' talk pages). —Uzume (talk) 00:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
- It's not a copyright violation in the United States, but it's a copyright violation in the UK, and it was by a British author and I believe it was first published in the UK. However, it was also published in the USA in the same year, and I don't know the exact dates. It's just an issue about how you interpret the Commons requirements, I don't know myself at this point. --ghouston (talk) 05:08, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
- There must be plenty of previous examples, although it's more likely that they will apply to illustrations in books rather than entire book scans. I found Commons:Deletion requests/PJ Smit, where in the discussion Stefan4 says that the country of origin can be determined from the exact dates of publication. But again here, we don't have the exact dates of publication, just the year. --ghouston (talk) 05:33, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
- I found some dates at [27]: "A Passage to India was published on 4 June 1924 by the British imprint Edward Arnold, and then on 14 August in New York by Harcourt, Brace and Co." If so, the country of origin is the UK. --ghouston (talk) 05:44, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
- The example you cite is a question of illustrations, not of a published text. We know the US edition was published in the US under US copyright law. --EncycloPetey (talk) 15:04, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Keep not a copyright violation either in the UK or USA, in my opinion--Headlock0225 (talk) 14:09, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- How could it be public domain in the UK? E. M. Forster only died in 1970, and they use a copyright term of life + 70 years. --ghouston (talk) 01:16, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
- I mean, you can do what you like with it in the US, since it's public domain there, but Commons:Licensing says that the work should also be free in its country of origin, which is apparently the UK since that's where it was first published. --ghouston (talk) 01:19, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
- This deletion request is heading for its first anniversary, I guess it's in the "too hard" basket. --ghouston (talk) 01:27, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 18:13, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
This is from the A Course in Phonetics website, not the UCLA Phonetics Lab Archive (which is in CC BY) as claimed by the uploader. See [28], which explicitly says "permission for their use outside the site cannot be given".
Also the first versions of Alveolar nasal.ogg, Velar lateral approximant.ogg, Alveolar lateral flap.ogg, and Labial-palatal approximant.ogg (perhaps the last two should be deleted altogether as the later versions lack attribution and licensing). Nardog (talk) 12:48, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 22:22, 17 March 2021 (UTC)