Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/05/11
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
|
|
The file will be deleted. 2605:A000:F68D:8600:45B8:2A97:11BB:72AF 01:07, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Vandalism, no valid reason for deletion. --jdx Re: 07:15, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
The file will be deleted seven days. 2605:A000:F68D:8600:45B8:2A97:11BB:72AF 01:09, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Vandalism, no valid reason for deletion. --jdx Re: 07:22, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
The file will be deleted seven days. 2605:A000:F68D:8600:45B8:2A97:11BB:72AF 01:09, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Vandalism, no valid reason for deletion. --jdx Re: 07:24, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Matevcanin018 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not own work. All files uploaded are taken from different websites without permission.
- File:Toponica.jpg
- File:Sopotnica123.jpg
- File:Semce.jpg
- File:Osvinjinac.jpg
- File:Mali Krcimir.jpg
- File:Jaglicje.jpg
- File:Donje Dragovlje.jpg
- File:Gornje Dragovlje.jpg
- File:Gornje Vlase.jpg
- File:Gare123.jpg
- File:Veliki Vrtop.jpg
- File:Paligrace.jpg
- File:LeskovikNis.jpg
- File:Vele Polje.jpg
- File:Jasenovik.jpg
- File:Gornjemedjurovo.jpg
- File:Panorama matejevca 4.jpg
- File:Gabrovacka Reka.jpg
- File:Vinik.jpg
- File:Sutevac.jpg
- File:Ostrovica naselje.jpg
- File:LABUKOVO.jpg
- File:Nisevac.jpg
- File:Lalinske Pojate.jpg
- File:Gornja Vrezina.jpg
- File:Popovac.jpg
- File:Gornja Trnava.jpg
- File:Donji-Matejevac.jpg
- File:Prva Kutina.jpg
- File:Trupale.jpg
- File:Secanica.jpg
- File:Rujnik.jpg
- File:Mramorski Potok.jpg
- File:Lalinac.jpg
- File:Mramor2.jpg
- File:Donje Medjurovo.jpg
- File:Gabrovac.jpg
- File:Bubanj Selo.jpg
- File:Gornja Toponica.jpg
- File:Banja Topilo.jpg
- File:Miljkovac.jpg
- File:Paljina.jpg
- File:Lazarevo Selo.jpg
- File:Radikina bara.jpg
- File:Ostrovica2.jpg
- File:Ravni Do.jpg
- File:Gornja Studena.jpg
- File:Donja Studena.jpg
- File:Cukljenik.jpg
- File:Kunovica.jpg
- File:Knez Selo.jpg
- File:Oreovac.jpg
- File:Donje Vlase by Legi Photography.jpg
- File:Brzi Brod by Legi Photography.jpg
- File:Kamenica by Legi Photography.jpg
- File:Matejevac2.jpg
- File:Горњи Матејевац.jpg
- File:Matejevac by Legi Photography.png
Smooth O (talk) 11:12, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:NETCOPYVIO. --1989 (talk) 11:13, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Because it is Herbert Schomberg (talk) 13:55, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense request by Android app user. --Achim (talk) 14:06, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
dmvdkdsvmdv 2605:6000:1023:C8C1:DD01:4946:865C:C589 14:08, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 14:10, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Not own work. All files taken from various websites, without permission.
- File:Cz12567.jpg
- File:255x160 160936-imk.jpg
- File:50 browning.png
- File:Zastava M91.jpg
- File:Zastava M071.jpg
- File:Zm07af.jpg
- File:Zastava m17.jpg
- File:Ez40 3.jpg
- File:Vojska srbije 4 m17.jpg
- File:MINOBACAC 60mm-manji.jpg
- File:IWI-Jericho-941-11.jpg
Smooth O (talk) 11:55, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:NETCOPYVIO. --1989 (talk) 15:17, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
No evidence this is PD-USGov. Source is merely a direct link to the raw image and is not even on a .gov domain. Image does not match the one on usembassy.gov site (which we already have.) Эlcobbola talk 16:41, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- This image can be found on the U.S. Mission to the EU site. Samtondiaz (talk) 16:50, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Per above - proper link provided. @Samtondiaz: going forward, please note that COM:L requires "information sufficient for others to verify the license status." Raw links directly to images do not allow this and are therefore not adequate. --Эlcobbola talk 17:27, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
"Uploaded a work by Different persons. from Google with UploadWizard" sounds like an Internet image cribbed off from Google. In particular, if "different persons" contributed to the image or the figure, we'd need a licence from all of them. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 13:06, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: ARR @ flickr. --Achim (talk) 19:18, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Copyright violation C1K98Vrespond 07:58, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by 1989 at 11:51, 11 Mai 2020 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 19:47, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Copyright violation C1K98Vrespond 07:59, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by 1989 at 11:51, 11 Mai 2020 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 19:47, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Copyright C1K98Vrespond 08:00, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by 1989 at 11:51, 11 Mai 2020 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 19:47, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Copyright violation C1K98Vrespond 08:01, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by 1989 at 11:51, 11 Mai 2020 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 19:47, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Copyright violation C1K98Vrespond 11:30, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by 1989 at 11:51, 11 Mai 2020 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 19:48, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Metadata credits Susanne Huebner, not the uploader's own work Ytoyoda (talk) 13:33, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by 1989 at 13:38, 11 Mai 2020 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 19:48, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Suspected COM:NETCOPYVIO - low res, no camera EXIF, uploaded in batch of copyvios of same subject matter, all user uploads copyvios. To the extent uploader (Ifazel) is subject (Fazelmashayekhi), the photographer, not the mere subject, would own the copyright. COM:PRP issue. Эlcobbola talk 16:03, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Nevermind - found here. Speeding per F1. --Эlcobbola talk 20:39, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope, used in vandalism on nowp 4ing (talk) 15:30, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 07:53, 12 Mai 2020 UTC: Uploaded for vandal purposes. User globally blocked --Krdbot 13:52, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
COM:ADVERT/COM:NOTHOST junk
- File:Screenshot--2020.05.07-17 02 25ez.png
- File:Screenshot-imgbbb.com-2020.05.07-14 31 27.png
- File:Screenshot-imgbbb.com-2020.05.07-14 30 29.png
- File:Screenshot-storage.googleapis.com-2020.05.05-13 02 29.png
Эlcobbola talk 19:23, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, speedied. --Túrelio (talk) 20:54, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sulmanshah12 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Seemingly personal files, not in use, COM:HOST
- File:Peer Syed ghulaam Dastgeer gillani.jpg
- File:Peer Syed Naseer ud Din Naseer.jpg
- File:Syed Iqbal Shah.jpg
- File:Syed Mosa gillani.gif
- File:Sulman.jpg
Kissa21782 (talk) 09:01, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:51, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by NAACAL GÜNCESİ (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused, uncategorized text files or presentation slides, out of Commons:Project scope. Should be written in wikitext if useful.
- File:SÖZ ELBİSESİ - SON SESLENİŞ.jpg
- File:SÖZ ELBİSESİ - YENİ NESİL BİZLERİN ESERİ.jpg
- File:SÖZ ELBİSESİ - GAYE.jpg
- File:SÖZ ELBİSESİ - ELİM VE VAHİM.jpg
- File:KİTAP TANITIM 1.jpg
- File:İNSANİ SEVDASI.jpg
- File:ANKARA.jpg
- File:ADEM (İLK İNSAN).jpg
- File:TERÖR.jpg
- File:NEDENSİZCE KIYILAN CANLAR.jpg
- File:KARANLIĞA VEDA HUTBESİ- TANRI'NIN EVİ.jpg
- File:EY, Tanrı'm!.jpg
- File:AHDE VEFA.jpg
- File:DÜNYEVİ NİMETLER.jpg
Kissa21782 (talk) 09:09, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:54, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Unused photo of three unidentified people. Unhelpful description. No educational value. Malcolma (talk) 09:10, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:54, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Unused photo. Unhelpful description. No educational value without more info. Malcolma (talk) 09:13, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:54, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Empty or almost empty spreadsheets. Unused, uncategorized, no educational value as is.
- File:Tablero.png
- File:Ascii.png
- File:PrincipalConCaballo.png
- File:CampoCaracteres.png
- File:CampoCaracteres2.png
- File:IngresarCampoCaracteres.png
Kissa21782 (talk) 09:15, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:27, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Unused photo. Unidentified person in out of focus photo. No educational value. Malcolma (talk) 09:15, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:28, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:46, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:28, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Too small, unused and unusable photos.
Smooth O (talk) 11:43, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:28, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:46, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:29, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Government House, Newfoundland
[edit]Out of scope - personal photos
- File:Garden Party at Government House, 2014 (14602251980).jpg
- File:Garden Party at Government House, 2014 (14602346678).jpg
- File:Garden Party at Government House, 2014 (14607591017).jpg
- File:Garden Party at Government House, 2014 (14765955936).jpg
- File:Garden Party at Government House, 2014 (14765991076).jpg
- File:Garden Party at Government House, 2014 (14788603952).jpg
- File:Garden Party at Government House, 2014 (14788605622).jpg
- File:Garden Party at Government House, 2014 (14788983925).jpg
- File:Garden Party at Government House, 2014 (14808774783).jpg
- File:Garden Party at Government House, 2014 (14808778443).jpg
- File:Government House (14608569159).jpg
- File:Government House (14608609519).jpg
Mindmatrix 13:45, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:05, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MarioRoubles (talk · contribs)
[edit]Old photos, unlikely to be own work
- File:Presentación Sobre Verde y del Programa Bosques de Correos (2000).jpg
- File:Recogiendo el Premio Arbor Day de EE.UU. (2000).jpg
- File:Inauguración del primer Bosque de Unicaja, con Braulio Medel entre otros.jpg
- File:Presentación del Sobre Verde y del Programa Bosques de Correos.jpg
- File:Presentación del Sobre Verde y del Programa Bosques de Correos (2000).jpg
- File:Recibiendo el Premio Rolex de Medio Ambiente.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 14:00, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:06, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 00:30, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 00:07, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://static.wixstatic.com/media/e04cc0_962177bb42394c7d830403c9091e90a8.jpg/v1/fill/w_649,h_850,al_c,q_90,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01/e04cc0_962177bb42394c7d830403c9091e90a8.jpg.
- File:Martial Bétirac.jpg
- File:Stade Henri Rochefort.jpg
- File:JuventusStadium.jpg
- File:MaillotJUVE16-17.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability.
Kissa21782 (talk) 14:17, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:06, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability.
Kissa21782 (talk) 14:24, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:07, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 00:10, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:50, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:07, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Portugal.ma (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:ConstruSpace 11.png
- File:ConstruSpace 12.png
- File:ConstruSpace 10.png
- File:ConstruSpace 8.png
- File:ConstruSpace 7.png
- File:ConstruSpace 9.png
- File:ConstruSpace 6.png
- File:ConstruSpace 5.png
- File:ConstruSpace 4.png
- File:ConstruSpace 1.png
- File:ConstruSpace 2.png
- File:ConstruSpace 3.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:13, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AndrenoAri (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:12, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Wahyu sapt (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:12, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:17, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:12, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:13, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tonye.gbale (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:13, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Small unused personal photo, the uploader's only contribution. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 15:19, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:14, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
one image was tagged as "no source". Small images but with metadata, I would keep them as COM:AGF.
- File:Suvid.jpg
- File:Utid.jpg
- File:Ananthailand.jpg
- File:Sattawat.jpg
- File:Kingsang.jpg
- File:Krubaphromma.jpg
- File:Krubavong.jpg
- File:Phrarachatpariyatsunthorn.jpg
Indeedous (talk) 15:19, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:14, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: out of COM:SCOPE. Storkk (talk) 15:19, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:14, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Darul naeem islam BD (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:23, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:14, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
EnergieAgentur.NRW files in Category:Flickr images not found
[edit]License review failed: Files are not/no longer available on Flickr, but the OTRS permission is only valid for Fotos im Flickr-Account der EnergieAgentur.NRW https://www.flickr.com/photos/energieagentur-nrw.
- File:02 Begrüßung (9725261168).jpg
- File:04 Grußwort Volkmar Klein MdB.jpg
- File:05 Grußwort Volkmar Klein MdB (9722032597).jpg
- File:07 Rede Prinz zu Sayn-Wittgenstein (9722032043).jpg
- File:10 Rede Prinz zu Sayn-Wittgenstein (9722031225).jpg
- File:11 Rede Prinz zu Sayn-Wittgenstein.jpg
- File:14 Rede Minister Remmel 2 (9722030371).jpg
- File:16 Rede Minister Remmel 4 (9722029357).jpg
- File:18 Tischgespr+ñch (9725256104).jpg
- File:22 Vortrag Cliff Reppel (9725255104).jpg
- File:IRES 2013 (10928351074).jpg
- File:IRES 2013 (10928351584).jpg
- File:Klimafreundliche Lauf- und Sportevents - Klimaschutz bewegt! (11063563216).jpg
- File:Tagung „Ressourcen- und Energieeffizienz im Doppelpass“ (13121929224).jpg
FDMS 4 00:56, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
- Keep I uploaded these directly from the Flickrstream using the FlickrAPI to generate an XML list which included a check to skip files
if record['licence'] != "Attribution License"
— guaranteeing the correct licence, I then put the list through the GLAMwiki toolset. Unless the Flickrstream owner raises a specific request pointing out that they made a mistake that invalidates the original licence, then a bot newly discovering that the file is not on Flickr over 7 months after upload is not a good reason to delete the files now. Note that all our Flickr bots do the same check using the FlickAPI as I did originally. If the OTRS correspondence raises something new here, please publish it in this DR, I no longer have access to OTRS. --Fæ (talk) 01:12, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
- I don't think that you would upload non-free files from Flickr, but trust is not sufficient to be able to keep them, which is why we have a license review process. Also, after all, there must have been a reason why the EnergieAgentur.NRW removed them from their Flickr stream (maybe they didn't have permission to release them). FDMS 4 17:46, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
- This is out of process, we do not several months after a legitimate upload start to revoke supposedly irrevocable licences because the source has gone off the internet. I am a trusted image reviewer and I have several years experience as an OTRS volunteer. If you have a request from the photographer or copyright holder to remove these files because they made a mistake, the situation would be different. When every observer here is 100% confident that these files were officially released on these licenses, then Commons needs a solid rationale to delete in-scope and validly released media. --Fæ (talk) 18:19, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
- As of today, these files do not have a valid release. Anyway, I will contact them via OTRS now to find out why they have removed these files from their Flickr stream. In my opinion, the most likely reason for this is that they didn't own the full copyright in the first place. FDMS 4 19:06, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
- On hold for 14 days, or until answer from the Flickr-stream owner, via OTRS. Josve05a (talk) 19:56, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
- Sure, however legally your statement is incorrect. The images were given a valid licence on Flickr, and I would quite happily provide a statement in court if anyone were to fraudulently claim otherwise. No reuser could be sued for damages as the flickrstream owner is ultimately responsible for their releases. As for "proof", I used an automated process to do the checking, there is no doubt as to the validity of the licence. Just because a bot now says the source has gone, does not change the legal status. Please keep in mind we used to run Commons without these bots and the vast majority of images we confidently host have no license checking against the sources, our confidence comes from the context and a pinch of common-sense when it comes to interpreting what the PRP says about significant doubt. --Fæ (talk) 20:06, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
- As of today, these files do not have a valid release. Anyway, I will contact them via OTRS now to find out why they have removed these files from their Flickr stream. In my opinion, the most likely reason for this is that they didn't own the full copyright in the first place. FDMS 4 19:06, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
- This is out of process, we do not several months after a legitimate upload start to revoke supposedly irrevocable licences because the source has gone off the internet. I am a trusted image reviewer and I have several years experience as an OTRS volunteer. If you have a request from the photographer or copyright holder to remove these files because they made a mistake, the situation would be different. When every observer here is 100% confident that these files were officially released on these licenses, then Commons needs a solid rationale to delete in-scope and validly released media. --Fæ (talk) 18:19, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
- I don't think that you would upload non-free files from Flickr, but trust is not sufficient to be able to keep them, which is why we have a license review process. Also, after all, there must have been a reason why the EnergieAgentur.NRW removed them from their Flickr stream (maybe they didn't have permission to release them). FDMS 4 17:46, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
- KeepReasonable, per what the precautionary principle should say (but doesn't!) --Elvey (talk) 06:32, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Two of those nominated images are manually uploaded by myself. Both were marked with CC-license on Flickr as I uploaded them. And the rest of them were proofed of Fæ. I don't see a need for deleting them. The press relation officer declared that every image is for free use. If it is really necessary, I will ask him for a permission for every nominated picture. alkab (talk) 15:21, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
Please do so.FDMS 4 17:48, 7 November 2014 (UTC) See above.
- Delete We (Wikimedia Commons) need evidence ({{No permission}}) that they were under this license. (Hence the lr-procedure.) Unless such proof of evidence can be presented, we can not assume (no matter which user, admin, OTRS-agent, or IP adress) that the are okey, since they are infact deleted on Flickr, and no licnese review was done. And the OTRS-ticket only cover the files in the stream. (Even if they were in the stream, they might not have the rights to realease them under that licnes, and that's why they got removed, but without evidence we can not ausume anything....I'm starting to repeat myself.) Josve05a (talk) 19:55, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
- Yup, COM:PRP needs fixing. Perhaps there's a cache or archive of a flickr page with the license on it. Anyone look?--Elvey (talk) 23:23, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
Copyright ownership confirmed in ticket:2014042210011645. Fortunately, the EnergieAgentur.NRW got back to us and told us that no images have been removed from the Flickr stream on copyright grounds and that they are copyright holder of these files. FDMS 4 15:59, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted Flickr images from Heriness bear (vick lounge)
[edit]Files from Category:Flickr images not found, recently uploaded but now missing corresponding Flickr pages. The Flickr user, Heriness bear, has other images uploaded, so it looks like each of these was only up temporarily. What's more: these images were previously used around the Internet and show up in online fora with posts dating back years. Either this Flickr user managed to secure all of these pictures alone, across multiple locations and cameras (via EXIF data), or this account is being used for flickrwashing. If these are deleted, I'd recommend blacklisting the Flickr uploader and checking the contributions of VictorPines. Back to work,
- File:Beatmania complete mix 2.jpg
- File:Beatmania core remix cabinet.jpg
- File:Beatmania III append core remix cabinet game.jpg
- File:Beatmania iii the final.jpg
- File:Betmania iidx 18.jpg
- File:Dm v4 cabinet game.jpg
- File:Dm v5 arcade.jpg
- File:Dmv8.jpg
- File:Drummania v5 mix.jpg
- File:Gf dm v5 arcades.jpg
- File:Gf v7 arcade.jpg
- File:Guitarfreaks v7 arcade game.jpg
- File:Kb 3rd mix arcade game.jpg
- File:Sound voltex booth cabinet.jpg
- File:Sv booth arcades.jpg
czar 02:23, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:42, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
Files in Category:Flickr images not found
[edit]The image was however no longer available on Flickr, and its copyright status thus undeterminable.
- File:Cosplayer of cheongsam Rei Ayanami at CWT41 20151212f.jpg
- File:Cosplayer of Emilia, Re-Zero at FF30 20170729a.jpg
- File:Cosplayer of Emilia, Re-Zero at FF30 20170729b.jpg
- File:Cosplayer of Hitagi Senjōgahara, Monogatari Series at CWT41 20151212b.jpg
- File:Cosplayer of Hitagi Senjōgahara, Monogatari Series at CWT41 20151212d.jpg
- File:Cosplayer of Hitagi Senjōgahara, Monogatari Series at CWT41 20151212e.jpg
- File:Cosplayer of Hitagi Senjōgahara, Monogatari Series at CWT41 20151212f.jpg
- File:Cosplayer of Inuyasha at FF30 20170729a.jpg
- File:Cosplayer of Inuyasha at FF30 20170729b.jpg
- File:Cosplayer of Inuyasha at FF30 20170729c.jpg
- File:Cosplayer of Kitakami, Kantai Collection at CWT41 20151212a.jpg
- File:Cosplayer of Kitakami, Kantai Collection at CWT41 20151212c.jpg
- File:Cosplayer of Kitakami, Kantai Collection at CWT41 20151212d.jpg
- File:Cosplayer of Kitakami, Kantai Collection at CWT41 20151212e.jpg
- File:Cosplayer of Mayoko Okino, ZONE-00 at CWT41 20151212b.jpg
- File:Cosplayer of Mio Akiyama, K-On! at HCACG-S5 20150822a.jpg
- File:Cosplayer of Mio Akiyama, K-On! at HCACG-S5 20150822b.jpg
- File:Cosplayer of Mio Akiyama, K-On! at HCACG-S5 20150822c.jpg
- File:Cosplayer of Mio Akiyama, K-On! at HCACG-S5 20150822d.jpg
- File:Cosplayer of Mio Akiyama, K-On! at HCACG-S5 20150822e.jpg
- File:Cosplayer of Sailor Saturn at FF30 20170729e.jpg
- File:Cosplayer of Shimakaze, Kantai Collection at CWT41 20151212a.jpg
- File:Cosplayer of Shimakaze, Kantai Collection at CWT41 20151212b.jpg
- File:Cosplayer of Shimakaze, Kantai Collection at CWT41 20151212c.jpg
- File:Cosplayer of Shimakaze, Kantai Collection at CWT41 20151212d.jpg
- File:Cosplayer of Super Sonico at CWT41 20151212b.jpg
- File:Cosplayer of Super Sonico at CWT41 20151212c.jpg
- File:Cosplayer of Super Sonico at FF30 20170729a.jpg
- File:Cosplayer of Super Sonico at FF30 20170729b.jpg
- File:Cosplayers of Hana Midorikawa and Mari Kurihara, Prison School at CWT41 20151212b.jpg
- File:Cosplayers of Hana Midorikawa and Mari Kurihara, Prison School at CWT41 20151212c.jpg
- File:Cosplayers of Homer and Marge, The Simpsons at CWT41 20151212b.jpg
- File:Cosplayers of Kankichi Ryotsu and Daijiro Ohara, Kochikame at CWT41 20151212b.jpg
Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:25, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:16, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
COM:ADVERT - self-promotion (per username) of non-notable firm. For example, user also created hu:Moon store, which was deleted per the same.
Эlcobbola talk 15:28, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:16, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: out of COM:SCOPE. Storkk (talk) 15:28, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:17, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
cross wiki spam Quakewoody (talk) 15:28, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:17, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
cross wiki spam Quakewoody (talk) 15:29, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:17, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
cross wiki spam Quakewoody (talk) 15:29, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:17, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
cross wiki spam Quakewoody (talk) 15:29, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:17, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
cross wiki spam Quakewoody (talk) 15:29, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:17, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mmukisajoshua (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low res, no camera EXIF, Facebook metadata, uploaded among copyvio of same subject (see File:Honorday.jpg) - Duck COM:NETCOPYVIOs/COM:PRP issue
- File:Hmbonye.jpg
- File:Thegatheringmbonye.jpg
- File:Mbonyeworship.jpg
- File:Mbonyemeditate.jpg
- File:Mbonyeatfellowship.jpg
- File:Mbonyeatchurch.jpg
- File:Mbonye.jpg
- File:Prayermbonye.jpg
Эlcobbola talk 19:39, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:21, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Personal, unused picture. Out of scope. SirEdimon Dimmi!!! 21:10, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:21, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope - personal photos.
- File:St. John's 2014 (12244336475).jpg
- File:St. John's 2014 (12244474623).jpg
- File:St. John's 2014 (12244507553).jpg
- File:St. John's 2014 (12244731114).jpg
- File:St. John's 2014 (12244737714).jpg
- File:St. John's 2014 (12244744034).jpg
- File:St. John's 2014 (12244752854).jpg
- File:St. John's 2014 (12244770914).jpg
- File:St. John's 2014 (12244927886).jpg
Mindmatrix 23:38, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:22, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Futuras pedagogas UT (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:30, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by TOLI-KINDER 1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:Patricia rodriguez.jpg
- File:Yenifer Novoa.jpg
- File:Yenifer N.jpg
- File:Mentefacto jisel paola lopez.png
- File:MENTEFACTO MONICA GUZMAN.png
- File:MENTE-FACTO NUEVO.pdf
- File:SEMINARIO MENTEFACTO.pdf
- File:Mentefacto Yenifer Novoa.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:29, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Red de jóvenes Afroecuatorianos (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyrighted posters, no permission
- File:Red de jóvenes AFROECUATORIANOS del territorio ancestral Chota, La Concepción, Salinas y Guallupe.4.jpg
- File:Red de jóvenes AFROECUATORIANOS del territorio ancestral Chota, La Concepción, Salinas y Guallupe.3.jpg
- File:Red de jóvenes AFROECUATORIANOS del territorio ancestral Chota, La Concepción, Salinas y Guallupe.2.jpg
- File:Logo Red de Jóvenes 2 Red de jóvene AFROECUATORIANOS del territorio ancestral Chota, La Concepción, Salinas y Guallupe.png
- File:Red de jóvene AFROECUATORIANOS del territorio ancestral Chota, La Concepción, Salinas y Guallupe.png
Gbawden (talk) 14:52, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:29, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:28, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:28, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:27, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:27, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:27, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:26, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:26, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:03, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:26, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:04, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:26, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Near-dup of File:Benzimidazol tautomeria2.png, just with larger margins DMacks (talk) 18:24, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- @DMacks: I have uploaded File:Tautomerism of benzimidazole.svg as high-quality vector replacement! Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 19:25, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Extremely poor quality file with pixelated bonds & arrows; opaque (white) background & too wide margins. Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 19:25, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Thanks to the new SVG, and the fact that even the PNG I proposed as replacement has substantial margins and is pixelated, I now also propose File:Benzimidazol tautomeria2.png for deletion. DMacks (talk) 03:21, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 10:06, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
unused, uncategorized, probably out of scope. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 20:08, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:25, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons scope due to very low quality. Many similar, but better images available. MPF (talk) 20:20, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:25, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
COM:PENIS/COM:NOTHOST - junk with no educational value
- File:1aa Male ejaculation during masturbation Matthew Mark Newton, born December 7th 1994, is a male nude photographer from Sudbury, Ontario, Canada. 01.gif
- File:1a Male ejaculation during masturbation Matthew Mark Newton, born December 7th 1994, is a male nude photographer from Sudbury, Ontario, Canada. 02.gif
- File:Matthew Mark Newton.jpg
Эlcobbola talk 22:38, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Worthless, poor quality, redundant and therefore out of scope. AshFriday (talk) 00:08, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:24, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
COM:PENIS: solely self-promotional.
- File:Natural insemination inside a fertile vagina.gif
- File:Fertile vagina filled with sperm after creampie.jpg
- File:25 year old couple record a natural insemination inside a fertile vagina results in full term pregnancy in slow motion.webm
Mys_721tx (talk) 17:41, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. Just Some Wikipedian (talk) 17:34, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 14:21, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
What educational use do we expect from this image? E4024 (talk) 00:20, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Hello @E4024: yes I do agree. The image which I did upload is none of any educational purposes. It only seem they are chilling in the bathtub. But I think that why all files will fulfill and should follow the criteria of educational use. Some just be like a banner too. Thanks C1K98Vrespond 06:05, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Looks like a screenshot of a copyrighted game. --Gbawden (talk) 11:15, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Another ugly penis image? Why do we need so many of them? E4024 (talk) 00:23, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Hello @E4024: yes I do agree. It's really ugly. I shouldn't upload it. I apologise regarding my mistake. Thanks C1K98Vrespond 06:10, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Worthless, poor quality, redundant and therefore out of scope. AshFriday (talk) 00:06, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:15, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
This looks like a Google map snap to me. MGA73 (talk) 17:35, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:26, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Per metadata, Copyright holder is "Martin Obreque." COM:EVID of permission needed. Эlcobbola talk 17:57, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:26, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Most likely a screenshot from en:Teletubbies TV series (https://www.google.com/search?sxsrf=ALeKk029hqWZhE2z2YY6ivTPVUBe4r8XZQ:1589219856608&source=univ&tbm=isch&q=vacuum+cleaner+Teletubbies) Harold (talk) 17:59, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:26, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Original file on id.wiki says source is http://aboudkiasworld.wordpress.com and I do not see a GFDL on that website. MGA73 (talk) 18:14, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:26, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Repetitive photo Purplesabby (talk) 18:29, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- No, it is not. We only need to know if the gentleman is in scope. As I did not see the categorization here, I DR'ed another image of the same person. In short, tell us why he is notable and let's keep all his pics. Or let's delete them. --E4024 (talk) 01:09, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:26, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Pq no se borrarlo manualmente Viktoromar (talk) 18:47, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Worthless, poor quality, redundant and therefore out of scope. AshFriday (talk) 00:09, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:25, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Not sure about this, but my reading of Commons:Copyright rules by territory/United States is that there is no freedom of panorama for two-dimensional works of art in the United States even if permanently installed in a public place. Sorry if I'm wrong, out of my depth here. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:49, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
All very interesting, thank you for pointing it out. While I might argue that this falls under fair use, I did contact the author specifically and received permission from her to place the image on wikipedia and its wide use for non-commercial purposes, not sure how to change the licensing of the image if necessary. --ArtLosAngeles (talk) 18:39, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Non commerical is not compatible with commons. --Gbawden (talk) 11:25, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Appears to be a fictitious logo or otherwise non-notable/non-education - COM:NOTHOST Эlcobbola talk 19:27, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:25, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. Looks like screenshot, no EXIF data, single upload. Smooth O (talk) 19:31, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:24, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
It creates problems for my privacy Anjali1840723 (talk) 19:41, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:23, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
It creates problems for my privacy Anjali1840723 (talk) 19:47, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: OoS anyway. --Gbawden (talk) 11:23, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata: dubious claim of {{Own work}}. Photographer should confirm license via OTRS. Storkk (talk) 19:41, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:24, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. No EXIF data. Same images can be found online.
Smooth O (talk) 19:50, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:23, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Copied from here: https://docplayer.org/138663425-Wolfgang-demmer-eberhard-haueis.html No release to commons there. Tohma (talk) 19:53, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:22, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Photo is good indeed. Good enough for Instagram or flickr. Down here, it's out of SCOPE. Sorry. Rupert Pupkin (talk) 19:55, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:22, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
copyvio, artist born in 1953, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 20:17, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Permission of the artist in given, do you need a written permission? (User:Judithdaria) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Judithdaria (talk • contribs) 20:30, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:22, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Tiny blurry duplicate of File:Flag of Argentina.svg. Fry1989 eh? 20:19, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:22, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Duplication of File:Garuda Emblem of Thailand (Royal Warrant).svg. Fry1989 eh? 20:20, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Kathisma (talk) 22:29, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete --Nakaret (talk) 01:50, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:22, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
COM:DW of paintings. Artist, fr:Lucien Langlet, died 1985, so not PD until ca. 2056 (1985 + 70 + 1),
Эlcobbola talk 20:25, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:22, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
copyvio, artist died in 1989, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 20:56, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:21, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
copyvio, artist died in 1989 Martin Sg. (talk) 20:57, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:22, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
copyvio, artist died in 1989, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 20:57, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:22, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
copyvio, artist died in 1989, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 20:59, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:21, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
copyvio, artist died in 1989, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 20:59, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:21, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
copyvio, artist died in 2002, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 21:02, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:21, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
copyvio, contemp. artwork (building 1959/1961), no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 21:07, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:21, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
copyvio, contemp. artwork (building 1959/1961), no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 21:08, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:21, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
copyvio, artist died in 1980, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 21:19, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- No reason for deletion. In Austria, freedom of panorama also refers to the interiors of public buildings, see w:de:Panoramafreiheit#Österreich. --Luftschiffhafen (talk) 20:59, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: ✘ interiors of buildings, including churches, museums, and theatres per COM:FOP Austria. --Gbawden (talk) 11:21, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
copyvio, artist died in 1980, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 21:19, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- No reason for deletion. In Austria, freedom of panorama also refers to the interiors of public buildings, see w:de:Panoramafreiheit#Österreich. --Luftschiffhafen (talk) 20:58, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:FOP Austria says ✘ interiors of buildings, including churches, museums, and theatres. --Gbawden (talk) 11:20, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
No evidence that the uploader is the photographer of this image which dates from around WW2 Philafrenzy (talk) 21:24, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:19, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Frances Hodgkins painting in her studio, Corfe Castle village, Dorset, 1945. Photo by Felix H. Man.jpg
[edit]The photographer dies in 1985. The information copied into the file description clearly prohibits commercial use and derivative works. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:45, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Retain. The website from which the file comes https://natlib.govt.nz/records/23156261?search%5Bil%5D%5Bcategory%5D=Images&search%5Bpage%5D=2&search%5Bpath%5D=items&search%5Btext%5D=Frances+Hodgkins says "Using this Item: You can copy this item for personal use, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It cannot be used commercially without permission, please ask us for advice. If reproducing this item, please maintain the integrity of the image (i.e. don't crop, recolour or overprint it), and ensure the following credit accompanies it: Frances Hodgkins painting in her studio, Corfe Castle village, Dorset. Ref: 35mm-00338-E-F. Alexander Turnbull Library, Wellington, New Zealand. /records/23156261" The credit is given accordingly. Though you are right that Felix Mann died 1985 does the above not constitute permission to use the image? Thank you and other editors for clarification on this.Jamesmcardle (talk) 02:20, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. cannot be used commercially without permission = No Commercial use which is not compatible with Commons. --Gbawden (talk) 11:18, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Blatant Flickr washing - scan (COM:DW) of baseball cards, see uncropped at source Эlcobbola talk 22:00, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:17, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Blatant Flickr washing - scan (COM:DW) of baseball cards, see uncropped at source Эlcobbola talk 22:02, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:17, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Duck COM:NETCOPYVIO - very low res, no camera EXIF, all other user uploads copyvios related to this subject Эlcobbola talk 22:05, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:17, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
COM:Logo, not own work Чорний Кіт (talk) 22:07, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:16, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 22:20, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:16, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope, used for vandalisme on fr.wp Gyrostat (talk) 22:22, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:16, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Although there is a claim of copyright ownership, this image appears to be a colourized version of an image found in numerous blogs and pintrest posts. Image appears to be from 1940s so does not fall under public domain. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 23:52, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:16, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Any scope? Notable for smt? E4024 (talk) 02:02, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:00, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Who is she? What makes her in scope? Please add useful cats to be able to keep it or just delete, IMHO. E4024 (talk) 02:07, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:00, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
File is out of scope, because it contains nothing educational other than raw text. 193.210.228.70 04:21, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:01, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope. Logo of a non-notable music label. Failed PR attempt at ro:OverLimitRecords. Gikü (talk) 08:56, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:02, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope. Photo of a non-notable musician. Failed PR attempt at ro:T€O. Gikü (talk) 08:56, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:02, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal photo except for a Wikidata item the guy has created for himself but unlikely to be in scope for Wikidata. Gikü (talk) 08:58, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Quakewoody (talk) 10:49, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:02, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
bad upload, try again Mjrmtg (talk) 10:46, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: corrupted file. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:03, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:48, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:03, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:56, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:04, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Advertisement. Unused, uncategorized, probably out of scope. Estopedist1 (talk) 11:58, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:04, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Advertisement. Unused, uncategorized, probably out of scope. Estopedist1 (talk) 11:58, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:04, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Unknown source. I am not sure this is uploader's face, because file was used in deleted vandalism. Wargo (talk) 12:02, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:04, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Out of Scope Gbawden (talk) 13:42, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:06, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Personal art, unlinked and unused for 10 years Richard Avery (talk) 13:52, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:05, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Kissa21782 (talk) 14:07, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:05, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:06, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: out of COM:SCOPE. Storkk (talk) 15:33, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:07, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
advertisement? Unused, uncategorized, probably out of scope. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 16:34, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:08, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Historical photos and advertisement. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Asa griggs candler ofix blog 5.jpg
- File:Asa griggs candler ofix blog 6.jpg
- File:Asa griggs candler ofix blog 4.jpg
- File:Asa griggs candler ofix blog 2.jpg
- File:John pemberton ofix blog 4.jpg
- File:John pemberton ofix blog 3.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 01:25, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 19:30, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Public domain Mark 1.0 not valid on Commons; delete unless Flickr user willing to change license MPF (talk) 07:56, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, already asked them to change to cc-zero. MoralesKapitan (talk) 23:40, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep, license OK now (@ @MoralesKapitan: - I think someone other than the opener has to close a request, I've an idea it is considered bad form to close one's own nominations) - MPF (talk) 17:47, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy keep now cc0. --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 20:54, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: License changed; CC0. --Ahmadtalk 19:36, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Public domain Mark 1.0 not valid on Commons; delete unless Flickr user willing to change license MPF (talk) 07:56, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy keep. What are you talking about, the image is public domain, we have agreement here on comments [1]. MoralesKapitan (talk) 09:14, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- @MoralesKapitan: Since the Flickr user is talking to you in the comments, I think it's worth asking them to change the license to {{Cc-zero}} or another license that's compatible with Commons. That goes for any other image uploaded with the Public Domain Mark. Ytoyoda (talk) 13:37, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- {{Cc-zero}}?, is that also public domain btw? User:Ytoyoda?. MoralesKapitan (talk) 13:46, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, Cc-zero is an actual public domain license. Ytoyoda (talk) 13:54, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Update, they've change already to cc-zero, this is clear keep now. MoralesKapitan (talk) 23:39, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, Cc-zero is an actual public domain license. Ytoyoda (talk) 13:54, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- {{Cc-zero}}?, is that also public domain btw? User:Ytoyoda?. MoralesKapitan (talk) 13:46, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- @MoralesKapitan: Since the Flickr user is talking to you in the comments, I think it's worth asking them to change the license to {{Cc-zero}} or another license that's compatible with Commons. That goes for any other image uploaded with the Public Domain Mark. Ytoyoda (talk) 13:37, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep with the updated license - nice work, thanks! - MPF (talk) 13:07, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy keep Now cc0. --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 20:54, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: License changed; now CC0. --Ahmadtalk 19:40, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Public domain Mark 1.0 not valid on Commons; delete unless Flickr user willing to change license MPF (talk) 07:57, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep, already asked them to change to cc-zero. MoralesKapitan (talk) 23:39, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep with the updated license - nice work, thanks! - MPF (talk) 13:09, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy keep Now CC0. --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 23:49, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: license changed; CC0. --Ahmadtalk 19:40, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Public domain Mark 1.0 not valid on Commons; delete unless Flickr user willing to change license MPF (talk) 08:03, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, already asked them to change to cc-zero. MoralesKapitan (talk) 23:39, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep with license changed to CC-0 - MPF (talk) 09:56, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy keep Now CC0 --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 14:09, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: license changed; now CC0. --Ahmadtalk 19:41, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Public domain Mark 1.0 not valid on Commons; delete unless Flickr user willing to change license MPF (talk) 08:04, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy keep update the image is now cc-zero. MoralesKapitan (talk) 23:32, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep with the updated license - nice work, thanks! - MPF (talk) 13:10, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy keep Now CC0. --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 20:57, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: license changed; now CC0. --Ahmadtalk 19:42, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Public domain Mark 1.0 not valid on Commons; delete unless Flickr user willing to change license MPF (talk) 08:05, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. Apparently I made mistake, accepting the image. Public domain mark is not accepted in Commons, see COM:L#PD 1.0 and Flickr. I'm sorry. Taivo (talk) 13:24, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy keep update the user owner of the image now changed it into cc-zero. MoralesKapitan (talk) 23:24, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep with the updated license - nice work, thanks! - MPF (talk) 13:11, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy keep Now CC0. --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 20:58, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: license changed; now CC0. --Ahmadtalk 19:42, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
seeking opinions - most likely LTA cross wiki spam from mh6ti. Quakewoody (talk) 12:08, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: one way or another, there are grounds for deleting this file. I'm not deleting this for being out of scope (because it's currently in use), but because it's very likely to be a copyright violation. The claimed source is irrelevant, and the photo can be found elsewhere on the web by using Google search by image/TinEye. --Ahmadtalk 19:48, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Kissa21782 (talk) 14:21, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 19:53, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Japan Expo 2018
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted works. COM:TOYS.
- File:2018-07-05 08-58-39 ILCE-6500 DSC01819 DxO (44315550521).jpg
- File:2018-07-05 09-05-10 ILCE-6500 DSC01865 DxO (44268937572).jpg
- File:2018-07-05 09-46-39 ILCE-6500 DSC02018 DxO (30452564738).jpg
Yuraily Lic (talk) 09:29, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:12, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Japan Expo 2018
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted works.
- File:2018-07-05 15-42-22 ILCE-6500 DSC05889 DxO (43726653944).jpg
- File:2018-07-06 08-46-42 ILCE-6500 DSC07166 DxO (43834953050).jpg
- File:2018-07-06 08-47-01 ILCE-6500 DSC07168 DxO (45602507422).jpg
- File:2018-07-06 08-48-16 ILCE-6500 DSC07176 DxO (31780559868).jpg
- File:2018-07-06 10-09-35 ILCE-6500 DSC07382 DxO (30720296067).jpg
Yuraily Lic (talk) 03:55, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 14:13, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Japan Expo 2018
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted works.
- File:2018-07-08 08-54-57 ILCE-6500 DSC01035 DxO (45242141924).jpg
- File:2018-07-08 08-57-36 ILCE-6500 DSC01042 DxO (45243078544).jpg
- File:2018-07-08 08-58-26 ILCE-6500 DSC01051 DxO (45243083614).jpg
- File:2018-07-08 08-59-11 ILCE-6500 DSC01059 DxO (45918275822).jpg
Yuraily Lic (talk) 01:43, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 14:13, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Japan Expo 2018
[edit]COM:TOYS. COM:DW of copyrighted works.
- File:2018-07-19 16-35-33 ILCE-6500 DSC09329 DxO (32167398718).jpg
- File:2018-07-19 16-37-35 ILCE-6500 DSC09347 DxO (46038193151).jpg
- File:2018-07-19 16-38-43 ILCE-6500 DSC09354 DxO (46038197561).jpg
- File:2018-07-19 16-43-01 ILCE-6500 DSC09384 DxO (45127530945).jpg
- File:2018-07-19 16-49-09 ILCE-6500 DSC09427 DxO (45314933564).jpg
- File:2018-07-19 16-50-35 ILCE-6500 DSC09442 DxO (45127550115).jpg
- File:2018-07-19 16-51-01 ILCE-6500 DSC09451 DxO (45127554855).jpg
Yuraily Lic (talk) 14:22, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 19:55, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from toy. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 19:56, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 19:59, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGING. Yuraily Lic (talk) 14:52, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 20:01, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 20:03, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 19:58, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 20:01, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Copyrighted book covers Clodion (talk) 15:26, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 20:04, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Copyrighted book covers Clodion (talk) 15:28, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 20:05, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 08:44, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hanooz 01:36, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:38, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hanooz 01:35, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:39, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hanooz 01:34, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hanooz 01:32, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 08:43, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hanooz 01:36, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
Facebook image per Metadata, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 08:44, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hanooz 01:36, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata, likely screenshot: dubious claim of {{Own work}}. Photographer should confirm license via OTRS. Storkk (talk) 19:41, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hanooz 01:38, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Rafael Soriano-Working.JPG has a higher resolution different crop at http://rafaelsorianofoundation.org/?page_id=112 so is highly unlikely to be the original. Since these are the only two uploads from this user, on the same subject, and uploaded the same time, I'm going to speculate that the other file wasn't his property either.
GRuban (talk) 23:02, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 10:45, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
Painter has died in 2015 no permission that these images are under creative commons license. possibilities of copright violation
- File:14gg.jpg
- File:12gg.jpg
- File:11gg.jpg
- File:10gg.jpg
- File:9gg.jpg
- File:8gg.jpg
- File:7gg.jpg
- File:6g.jpg
- File:1work.jpg
- File:Soriano’s Studio.jpg
- File:R. Soriano.jpg
- File:Rafael Soriano.jpg
- File:Rafael Soriano Painter.jpg
✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 06:46, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 07:59, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:03, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:46, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Aminghanaei (talk · contribs)
[edit]User emailed a G7 request to OTRS. Although the G7 timer has passed, these don't appear to be in scope anyway.
- File:دنیای کیوکوشین کاراته ---------- مسابقات جهانی سوئیس 2015.jpg
- File:دنیای کیوکوشین کاراته ------- کمپ مربیان کشور در شمال.jpg
- File:دنیای کیوکوشین کاراته --------- کمپ مربیان کشور در شمال.jpg
- File:دنیای کیوکوشین کاراته --- کمپ مربیان کشور در شمال.jpg
- File:دنیای کیوکوشین کاراته ----- کمپ مربیان کشور در شمال.jpg
- File:دنیای کیوکوشین کاراته ---- کمپ مربیان کشور در شمال.jpg
- File:دنیای کیوکوشین کاراته - مسابقات جهانی سوئیس 2015.jpg
- File:دنیای کیوکوشین کاراته -- کمپ مربیان کشور در شمال.jpg
- File:دنیای کیوکوشین کاراته - کمپ مربیان کشور در شمال.jpg
Template:OTRS ticket for those with access.
- Aminghanaei: Not quite sure why you have removed the list of files. Do you object to the deletion? ~~ Alex Noble - talk 12:40, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Restored the list of files. 4nn1l2 (talk) 06:37, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright-wise, the copyright holder is the photographer, not Amin Ghanaei hilmsef, who appears on the photos. Scope-wise, these are promotional in my opinion. --4nn1l2 (talk) 06:39, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Image whose copyright status is not properly verifiable. It's claimed as CC/own work, but per Google Images it has already been used on other websites, in blog entries dated 2013 and 2017, before being uploaded here -- so it's most likely her old "official" government headshot from her time as an MPP, which would mean it's under Crown copyright and thus ineligible for use here. And even if it's actually from somewhere else not restricted by the Government of Ontario per se, it's still impossible to properly verify whether the uploader was the rightful holder of any copyrights on it, or just stole it from a casual web search. Bearcat (talk) 17:18, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Bearcat: It is her MPP headshot ([2]). I am therefore tagging it as speedy delete as copyvio. ミラP 17:23, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Mhhossein talk 07:24, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Uploaded in batch of copyvios of same subject matter, all user uploads copyvios. To the extent uploader (Ifazel) is subject (Fazelmashayekhi), the photographer, not the mere subject, would own the copyright. COM:PRP issue. Эlcobbola talk 20:40, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 05:54, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
I am only nominating for deletion because someone previously nominated for speedy deletion. So I guess it needs to be discussed. Iamreallygoodatcheckers (talk) 03:52, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Everything in the image is in the public domain. I personally took this image, and unless wasp I need to ask the wasp for permission I own the copyright.Iamreallygoodatcheckers (talk) 03:53, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Weak delete With the small white bar at the bottom, I doubt this image is actually a screenshot, and screenshot is a kind of derivative work which required permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder you may either provide the link of your social media account, or send a permission to COM:OTRS. --A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|
- This image is a screenshot, but nothing in the image is copyrighted. The white bar you're seeing is the "home bar" on a iPhone X, when I took the screenshot it hadn't disappeared yet.Iamreallygoodatcheckers (talk) 06:30, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Uploaders explanation is plausible enough, but @Iamreallygoodatcheckers: Taking a screenshot of your photo on your iPhone is not the preferred way of preparing it for an upload to Commons. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:34, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
Only nominating because someone previously nominated for speedy deletion Iamreallygoodatcheckers (talk) 03:59, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete With the small white bar at the bottom, I doubt this image is actually a screenshot, and screenshot is a kind of derivative work which required permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder you may either provide the link of your social media account, or send a permission to COM:OTRS. Apart from that, this image also has COM:TOYS concern. --A1Cafel (talk) 04:08, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- The was a screen shot from a personal photo I took, the white bar is a "home bar" on an iPhone. As for COM:TOYS I have no comment, but I'd like to clarify I was no aware of the policy before hand. Iamreallygoodatcheckers (talk) 01:58, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:TOYS, although I find the explanation for own photo plausible. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:30, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
UnclearM 2605:6001:E7C4:1E00:2551:FA73:E014:8DB5 04:57, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: I don't see the reason for deletion.--Hellerhoff (talk) 07:59, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep, as per Hellerhoff. Mikael Häggström (talk) 18:14, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:38, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
Not public domain 2605:6001:E7C4:1E00:8538:2861:8682:33AB 12:16, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Keep: there's no indication that the copyright claims here are false, and a photo doesn't have to be public domain (just under a free license) Vahurzpu (talk) 12:38, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per Vahurzpu. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:39, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
This file is a compilation of videos circulating around on social media. Some of the clips that I could find: 1 2 3 4. Since ToI is not the author of these individual files, they can't release it under an free license. At best, it is FU. Since there are clips available where there is no hovering text, that means ToI obtained the files from somewhere else. acagastya 02:39, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete as COM:DW, where this compilation has no citation or license-info about those underlying items. Nominator makes a strong case that it's not just a case of TOI not fully demonstrating that they have permission to re-release under a free license, but instead they likely don't have that permission. DMacks (talk) 03:43, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
{{Agreed}} as uploader. // Eatcha (talk) 06:12, 11 May 2020 (UTC)- Neutral // Eatcha (talk) 03:02, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
- Comment @Eatcha: can you please explain why you have changed your vote?
acagastya 21:57, 12 May 2020 (UTC)- I mentioned the reason in my edit summary. I didn't voting keep, why it even matters ? // Eatcha (talk) 02:47, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Eatcha: I am just asking.
acagastya 06:30, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Eatcha: I am just asking.
- I mentioned the reason in my edit summary. I didn't voting keep, why it even matters ? // Eatcha (talk) 02:47, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
- Comment @Eatcha: can you please explain why you have changed your vote?
- Strongly disagree: Must be kept. Absolutely bogus arguments. The random twitter links attached here are uploaded at around 2 pm to 4 pm (IST), 7 May, where as TOI uploaded the video at around 4:50 am (UTC) on 7 May (RIS and upload data) which is around 11:00 am (IST), 7 May. This was first uplaoded by TOI and published by TOI. period. Dey subrata (talk) 12:08, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. TOI has released this with a creative commons license on YouTube: [3] "License Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed)". That videos were also on social media, doesn't say this did not come from a source TOI has or acquired the rights to, or possibly public domain material adapted by TOI. We can't really say that TOI does not have the rights or the ability to release as CC-SA.--Hippeus (talk) 12:53, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Consider a media file with a hovering text on it, which is under a free license. Now consider another media file: same, but without that hovering text. How did people get the version without text, if ToI didn't make that version available? As far as Hippeus is claiming ToI could have acquired the ability to release it under a free license. Yeah they could have. In that case, ToI must attribute to those who were the authors. If that is so, ToI has violated the terms of the license.
If we are going to look when was the file uploaded, and ToI did it at 1100 IST, here 1, 2, 3. Files that showed up on May 7 before 1100 IST.
acagastya 14:10, 11 May 2020 (UTC)- Even if we accept the timeline of publication (not obvious, as TOI could've published individual videos sooner) and the premise that the video was taken by someone other than TOI, TOI could've paid the original creators for an unlimited license without attribution, in which case they would be fully within their rights to re-release as CC-by-SA (as well as publish as they see fit in various publications). We don't know TOI's relationships. We do know that TOI published this with a creative commons license.--Hippeus (talk) 15:05, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- And if that is the case, there needs to be an evidence for that. If there is no sufficient evidence, we just can't keep the file. YouTube has more than fair share of movie clips. Some of them might be tagged under CC BY. But we don't upload them on the assumption they paid the fee. Show a written agreement of that happening.
acagastya 15:10, 11 May 2020 (UTC)- The value of that clip is in thousand or lakhs. If it were not copyrighted by TOI and someone else had the copyright then already YouTube had received a OTRS by now and the video would have been shown as deleted due to copyright violation which is not the case. Secondly, when someone work for an organisation the copyright goes to the organisation not the author, it's totally onto the organisation if it attribute names or not. So once the person is paid for the the work, the copyright automatically goes to the organisation who paid for the work. So need not to give any attribution to the author. Dey subrata (talk) 23:35, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- And if that is the case, there needs to be an evidence for that. If there is no sufficient evidence, we just can't keep the file. YouTube has more than fair share of movie clips. Some of them might be tagged under CC BY. But we don't upload them on the assumption they paid the fee. Show a written agreement of that happening.
- Even if we accept the timeline of publication (not obvious, as TOI could've published individual videos sooner) and the premise that the video was taken by someone other than TOI, TOI could've paid the original creators for an unlimited license without attribution, in which case they would be fully within their rights to re-release as CC-by-SA (as well as publish as they see fit in various publications). We don't know TOI's relationships. We do know that TOI published this with a creative commons license.--Hippeus (talk) 15:05, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
acagastya 23:46, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Precautionary principle says, take it down unless you can prove otherwise. I understand it's frustrating to lose a video of such an important and historic tragedy, but we have to do things properly. DS (talk) 19:32, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Although it is important footage, we cannot host files without correct licensing. The nominator shows evidence that the underlying videos are unlikely to be under TOI copyright. The burden of proof lies with those who support keeping the file. Whether TOI could have obtained the footage copyright is a question which must be answered by the supporters if keeping the file. It is not enough to just say it might have happened. We need a clear transfer of copyright to be shown. --Green Giant (talk) 21:35, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: No evidence provided to verify copyright licensing of underlying videos. Our guiding principle, the precautionary principle, indicates deletion is most appropriate. ~riley (talk) 19:49, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
There is already an existing copy of this image which was also uploaded by me. Thedarkknightjc (talk) 18:53, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, no oppose votes, the substitution image can be file:Zach Galligan at the Chiller Theatre Expo in NJ, October 26, 2013.jpg. Taivo (talk) 08:50, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
Historical photos and document. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Good day Eugene. All these photos, including the document, were taken by me from my family archive. I am sorry if something I do wrong here because it's my first contribution to Wikipedia and I don't know how to provide the information to determine copyrights status and license.
Files uploaded by Cdavidcz
[edit]Historical photos and document. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. Cdavidcz (talk) 19:16, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Cdavidcz
[edit]Historical photos and document. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. Cdavidcz (talk) 19:21, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Cdavidcz
[edit]Historical photos and document. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. Cdavidcz (talk) 19:24, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: An image "in our family's photo collection" is absolutely not "own work" -- it is the work of whoever actually was the photographer. He or his heirs hold the copyright and your ownership of a paper copy of it does not give you the right to license it. --Gbawden (talk) 10:33, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
This image and File:Muhammad Ali Mirza.png from a newcomer do not look like "own work"s as declared. E4024 (talk) 01:53, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 03:29, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Khawaja Saleem (talk · contribs)
[edit]Official symbols. Proper license tag should be used if in public domain.
- File:Jammu Kashmir Mahaz-e-Istiqlal JKMI Logo.jpg
- File:Flag of Jammu Kashmir Mahaz-e-Istiqlal JKMI.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:23, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 06:42, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Jeff G. as no permission (No permission since).
The speedy tag is inappropriate in this case. Whether the emblem in the upper corner in its current version is free or not should be discussed, but in the case that it is determined not to be there are free historical versions of thise file that can be reverted to. Fry1989 eh? 16:58, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep This file is a combination of 2 public domain files (File:Emblem of the President of Turkey.png & File:Flag of Turkey.svg). So this file is also in the public domain beacuse its creators died more than 70 years ago. --ToprakM ✉ 17:15, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep This file is the state emblem that represents the Republic of Turkey. It is public domain. --Gonuldagi (talk) 17:38, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep According to the Turkish Government, the emblem was in use since 1922 and meets PD-Turkey and in the USA. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 20:03, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep The flag of office of the Presidenct of Turkey pennant was first used in 1922. It can be seen from the history of the related site. As a legal entity, the state's work becomes public domain after 70 years. First used. Uğurkent (talk) 21:40, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Comment The wikitext specifies "Date = 2010-02-19", which does not match any of the above. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:42, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
- That would be the date of the first upload of this file. Don't most files use the date of first upload, rather than date of first creation? Fry1989 eh? 17:47, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:51, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Video uploaded as a .jpg Elisfkc (talk) 23:07, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep, This picture is captured from that video. Larryasou (talk) 13:58, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
KEPT. as a photo it's useful. also, the video as taken by the audience might not have copyright cleared.--Roy17 (talk) 21:05, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
No indication that this is Mehr's work. Marjohn Sheikhi is the author of the text, not the photo. Not attributed to Mehr, and I couldn't find it on any Mehr gallery page. Ahmadtalk 04:53, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 02:09, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
Not useful picture cross-wiki uploaded from the German Wikipedia sandbox, same as File:Glaubensgemälde.jpg FF-11 (talk) 16:05, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Uploader agrees that photo be deleted, see OTRS ticket --Mussklprozz (talk) 05:55, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 08:27, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
the file will be deleted 2605:A000:F68D:8600:88BB:7090:8ED9:5088 13:06, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Vandalism, no valid reason for deletion. --jdx Re: 07:45, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Dubious "own work" by a blocked party. E4024 (talk) 15:48, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
See [4] --17jiangz1 (talk) 19:48, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
- Deleted already. --E4024 (talk) 02:17, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
Small size, lacking metadata, attributed to a third party. Photographer should confirm authorship and license via OTRS.
Storkk (talk) 13:08, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:42, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Organization logo with bogus CC license. Discussion needed whether or not below TOO. Эlcobbola talk 17:44, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Above TOO IMO. --Gbawden (talk) 11:21, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
copyvio per watermark?
- File:FS2015seminar2.png
- File:FS2015seminar.png
- File:FS2015presentation.png
- File:FS2015 6.png
- File:FS2015 5.png
- File:FS2015 4.png
- File:FS2015 3.png
- File:FS2015 2.png
- File:FS2015 1.png
Estopedist1 (talk) 09:28, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:30, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
Uncategorized files containing only text, seemingly from a personal project. Should be written in wikitext somewhere instead.
Kissa21782 (talk) 14:19, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:44, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
This was taken in 1961 by an unknown Italian photographer. Contrary to the assertion in the file, "Unknown photographer, copyright holder is Mimmo Cozzolino,[ one of the subjects]", the copyright holder is the photographer or his estate. It will be PD in Italy 70 years after first publication -- which may be 70 years from its upload to Commons, but in any event not before 1/1/2032 -- and PD in the USA 95 years from creation, on 1/1/2056. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:25, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose: Technically yes, but the details of this photographer are completely unknown, and impossible to know, other than that they were an itinerant street photographer as is supposed by Cozzolino, subject of the article. This kind of picture, while made by a human, has the same artistic status as a 'Photomat' portrait; in effect it is a self portrait of the family as can be read in the arrangement of them and the body language. Cozzolino's history as a migrant, and its subsequent importance to his career and notoriety, is signified in the image which has high relevance in providing a visual representation, hence its choice for the article. Cozzolino provided the unique image, which is in his possession, in good faith. Leave the image, and that gives the itinerant photographer or descendant opportunity to come forward and if they can prove somehow they are the author, it is for Cozzolino, a professional designer and Australian copyright expert, to deal with, since he provided it as is indicted in the file information.Jamesmcardle (talk) 23:09, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
ll of that is a good argument for Fair Use treatment on WP:EN, but it is not at all valid here. There are many images that it would be very good to have available on Commons -- 20th century works of art, for example -- but we do not break the law for them and there is no reason to break the law for this. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:59, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Impossible to grant permission since photographer is unknown. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 11:05, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: still no OTRS confirmed. --JuTa 23:28, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Tiven2240 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Non free image at source They probably meant this for permission, but the license is incorrect. 1989 (talk) 12:59, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Permission granted from the DWB Media Archive: http://archive.dwbn.org/login.php?url=%2F&nocookies=true I also contacted Marcin Muchalski, who has photo credit Badabara (talk) 17:22, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- There is an OTRS email received for “File:Face_view,_Hannah_Nydahl,_Wisconsin,_portrait.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2020051210000699. Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, PL, GSW-FR(ALS). 02:35, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: still no OTRS confirmation yet. --JuTa 21:10, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 09:08, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedied as CSD F10 (personal photos by non-contributors). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 04:50, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Apparenly in conflict with COM:CSM murals, I am the uploader of this photo BuffaloBob BuffaloBob (talk) 00:31, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- This image is a clear copyvio, and the uploader admits as much. What is taking so long with the deletion? -- AndreCarrotflower (talk) 03:59, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: by Ellin Beltz. ƏXPLICIT 02:43, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
Apparently in conflict with COM:CSM murals I am the uploader of this photo - B BuffaloBob (talk) 00:29, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- This image is a clear copyvio, and the uploader admits as much. What is taking so long with the deletion? -- AndreCarrotflower (talk) 04:00, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, by Ellin Beltz on 14th of August. Taivo (talk) 07:38, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Apparently in conflict with COM:CSM murals, I am the uploader of this photo BuffaloBob BuffaloBob (talk) 00:30, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- This image is a clear copyvio, and the uploader admits as much. What is taking so long with the deletion? -- AndreCarrotflower (talk) 03:59, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, by Ellin Beltz on 14th of August. Taivo (talk) 07:37, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
The image was however no longer available on Flickr, and its copyright status thus undeterminable. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 06:17, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per updated COM:PDM. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:46, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
The image was however no longer available on Flickr, and its copyright status thus undeterminable. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:03, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per updated COM:PDM. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:43, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
The image was however no longer available on Flickr, and its copyright status thus undeterminable. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:03, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per updated COM:PDM. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:43, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
The image was however no longer available on Flickr, and its copyright status thus undeterminable. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:03, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per updated COM:PDM. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:43, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
The image was however no longer available on Flickr, and its copyright status thus undeterminable. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:03, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per updated COM:PDM. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:43, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
The image was however no longer available on Flickr, and its copyright status thus undeterminable. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:03, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per updated COM:PDM. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:43, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
The image was however no longer available on Flickr, and its copyright status thus undeterminable. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:04, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per updated COM:PDM. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:43, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
The image was however no longer available on Flickr, and its copyright status thus undeterminable. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:05, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per updated COM:PDM. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:43, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
The image was however no longer available on Flickr, and its copyright status thus undeterminable. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:12, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per updated COM:PDM. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:46, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
The image was however no longer available on Flickr, and its copyright status thus undeterminable. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:15, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per updated COM:PDM. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:46, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
not free image © 2020 Billboard. All Rights Reserved Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) 02:03, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:17, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
out of scope Perumalism (talk) 15:05, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 15:08, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Copyrighted book covers Clodion (talk) 15:31, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 15:09, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Copyrighted book covers Clodion (talk) 15:32, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 15:09, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Cinemaindependente (talk · contribs)
[edit]All are small size, and have no metadata. Photographer(s) should confirm licenses via OTRS.
Storkk (talk) 15:34, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 15:10, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Metadata credits Caninde Soares, who should confirm license or transfer of copyright by following the instructions on OTRS. Storkk (talk) 15:37, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 15:10, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Flickr washing - image is low res, no camera EXIF, appeared elsewhere before August 2007 Flickr upload (e.g., here in June 2007), and Flickr stream is replete with copyvios/works obviously not belonging to Flickr user (e.g., [5], [6], etc.), and Flickr user is already blacklisted (uploader did not upload Flickr image "correctly" so bot did not flag.) Duck/clear COM:PRP issue. Эlcobbola talk 15:42, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy delete An obvious copyright violation from a known Flickrwashing account. Ytoyoda (talk) 20:13, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 15:10, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused presentation of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 15:11, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Flight simulator screenshot Gyrostat (talk) 16:54, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 15:12, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Flight simulator screenshot Gyrostat (talk) 16:55, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 15:12, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
modern building from 2007,no FoP in Abu Dhabi / UAE 2.207.63.107 13:29, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:03, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
no Freedom of Panorama in UAE Ralf Roleček 13:22, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:03, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
no FOP in UAE Ralf Roletschek 18:46, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 15:13, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
No fop in abu dhabi Ralf Roletschek 10:30, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:23, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
no FOP in UAE Ralf Roletschek 18:54, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 15:13, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
no FOP in UAE Ralf Roletschek 18:54, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 15:13, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
no FOP in UAE Ralf Roletschek 18:54, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 15:14, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
no FOP in UAE Ralf Roletschek 18:55, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 15:14, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Low res, no camera EXIF, uploaded with other copvios of related subject matter. COM:PRP issue. Эlcobbola talk 19:47, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 15:15, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Low res, no camera EXIF, appears to be from the same set as this. COM:PRP issue. Эlcobbola talk 19:50, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 15:15, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused Jonteemil (talk) 07:47, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 06:34, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Saudi Arabia A1Cafel (talk) 08:53, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 06:34, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Saudi Arabia A1Cafel (talk) 08:54, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 06:34, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Saudi Arabia A1Cafel (talk) 08:54, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 06:34, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Saudi Arabia A1Cafel (talk) 08:58, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 06:35, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Saudi Arabia A1Cafel (talk) 08:58, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 06:35, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
Useless 1x1 image. Not used. Gikü (talk) 09:07, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 06:36, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Saudi Arabia A1Cafel (talk) 09:05, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep General skylines. The building is COM:DM. --219.78.190.111 03:13, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep The individual buildings are de minimis. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 18:45, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 18:45, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Delete Probably out of scope and also probably a copyvio. I doubt very much that the uploader is the author and photographer of the work shown here. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:10, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:25, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
The image was however no longer available on Flickr, and its copyright status thus undeterminable. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 09:37, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: It is from 1853 so it is safe tu assume that the copyright is expired. --MGA73 (talk) 09:15, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
The image was however no longer available on Flickr, and its copyright status thus undeterminable. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 09:43, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
I have added the new flickr address for this image. Thank you for bringing this to my attention:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/seriykotik/46578090332/in/album-72157675271190437/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seriykotik1970 (talk • contribs) 10:25, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: According to https://wellcomecollection.org/works?query=%22Freeman%2C%20William%20Henry.%22 then the author lived in 1842-1897. Therefore the engraving is PD so we do not need to see the file on Flickr. --MGA73 (talk) 08:37, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
The image was however no longer available on Flickr, and its copyright status thus undeterminable. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 09:46, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: According to https://wellcomecollection.org/works?query=%22Freeman%2C%20William%20Henry.%22 then the author lived in 1842-1897. Therefore the engraving is PD so we do not need to see the file on Flickr. --MGA73 (talk) 08:38, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
The image was however no longer available on Flickr, and its copyright status thus undeterminable. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 09:56, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: According to https://wellcomecollection.org/works?query=%22Freeman%2C%20William%20Henry.%22 then the author lived in 1842-1897. Therefore the engraving is PD so we do not need to see the file on Flickr. --MGA73 (talk) 08:45, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
Historical photos, newspapers, coat of arms. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Julio gonzalezpola sonriente.jpg
- File:Julio gonzalezpola uniformado.jpg
- File:Julio gonzalezpola en su vehiculo.jpg
- File:Julio gonzalezpola vitoreado.jpg
- File:Julio gonzalezpola conduciendo.jpg
- File:Julio gonzalezpola con amigos.jpg
- File:Julio gonzalezpola coche.jpg
- File:Julio gonzalezpola cartel carrera.jpg
- File:Julio gonzalezpola noticia fallecimiento.jpg
- File:Julio gonzalezpola mercedes.jpg
- File:Julio gonzalezpola apoyado en su vehiculo.jpg
- File:Julio gonzalezpola ferrari.jpg
- File:Julio gonzalezpola conduciendo otra perspectiva.jpg
- File:Julio gonzalezpola ultima foto.jpg
- File:Marca Juliogonzalezpola.jpg
- File:Escudo gonzalez-pola digitalizado.jpg
- File:Reproduccion fisica gonzalezpola.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Unknown sources and unclear licence status. GeorgHH • talk 05:48, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:12, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Copyrighted book covers Clodion (talk) 15:30, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:12, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata: dubious claim of {{Own work}}. Photographer should confirm license via OTRS. Storkk (talk) 15:31, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:12, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Likely professional shot, uploader has uploaded previous copyright violations. Photographer should confirm license via OTRS. Storkk (talk) 15:33, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:12, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata: dubious claim of {{Own work}}. Photographer should confirm license via OTRS. Storkk (talk) 15:36, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:14, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Depicted people are both photographers. One is self-evidently a self-portrait, the other is likely also a self-portrait. If Davis9029 is one of these people, and is able to license both files, they should confirm this via OTRS. Alternatively, the photographers should confirm the free licenses via OTRS.
Storkk (talk) 15:44, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:14, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata: dubious claim of {{Own work}}. Photographer should confirm license via OTRS. Storkk (talk) 15:44, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:14, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
{{delete|one's own privacy}} 220.79.43.108 15:45, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete No scope (unknown firefighter playing football). --E4024 (talk) 02:20, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:15, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Historical photo, logos and document. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Leontos.jpg
- File:EAGLE BEER.png
- File:ΑΞΙΟ ΤΕΚΝΟ ΒΟΥΛΗ ΚΥΠΡΟΥ.pdf
- File:Arxigos.jpg
- File:OEFEK.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:15, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
File:2015년 10월 강원도 강릉시 강남축구공원 강릉소방서 의무소방대 축구시합 강릉소방서 의무소방대원들 20151014 최광모 SONY DSC-RX10 DSC04321 20151024.jpg
[edit]one's own privacy 220.79.43.108 15:48, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete A group of friends playing football. Looks OoS. --E4024 (talk) 04:01, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:15, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Moritztraub (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical document and stamp. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:16, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Historical photos and coat of arms. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Athénée royal victor horta ca1900.jpg
- File:Promotion 1916 Athénée Saint Gilles.jpg
- File:Isa gdg pbatiment.jpg
- File:Isa gdg avion.jpg
- File:Isa gdg.jpg
- File:Gilbert Gondry, Alfred Gondry et Oscar Pichon.jpg
- File:Oscar Pichon.jpg
- File:Genly.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:16, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
unused, uncategorized, probably out of scope. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 16:13, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:18, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
apparent copyvio, sourced to random website Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:14, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - There is no evidence of a free license at the provided source. -- Whpq (talk) 12:09, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:18, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
I could not confirm free license. In my opinion the source site is not freely licensed. Taivo (talk) 16:56, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: OTRS permission is needed. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:18, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. No EXIF data. Similar photos from same photo session can be found online on several sources. example 1, example 2
Smooth O (talk) 17:35, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:19, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Duplication of File:Flag of the Prime Minister of Pakistan.svg. Fry1989 eh? 20:19, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:19, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Think this is not correct according to the Wikipedia rules. No source and no suitable category Riquix (talk) 18:06, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
will update another version later SriSriSriPatrick (talk) 11:30, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Think this is not correct according to the Wikipedia rules. No source and no suitable category. And uploader reverted deletion request. And change the text from request.--Riquix (talk) 15:24, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. --Gbawden (talk) 10:06, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
The data do not look plausible, in particular the large day-to-day variations. No place name is given, nor any information how the data were collected. Hence the diagram is of little use, if any. Schlosser67 (talk) 13:32, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 11:12, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 09:09, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 02:52, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
Very blurry photograph, there are better alternatives in Category:Electronic medical thermometers. Robert Weemeyer (talk) 08:26, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 04:18, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
Doesn't seems own work. We have many images of Mona Lisa. ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 13:11, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 04:19, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
I was working on an assignment and I don't believe I am allowed to upload this photo. MurGoyle (talk) 13:24, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 04:20, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
I was working on an assignment and I don't believe I am allowed to upload this image, please delete it for me. MurGoyle (talk) 13:28, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 04:20, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
I was working on an assignment and I don't believe I am allowed to upload this image, please delete it for me. MurGoyle (talk) 13:28, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 04:20, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
Screenshot of non-free content, COM:SS Kissa21782 (talk) 14:14, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 04:20, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:F. Malu wa Kalenge.jpg
- File:F. Malu wa Kalenga à l'AIEA.jpg
- File:F. Malu wa Kalenga aux côtés du Président Mobutu Sese Seko.jpg
- File:F. Malu wa Kalenga et ses proches.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 04:25, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 11 May 2020 (UTC) THIS PHOTO I TAKED FROM A POSTER LOCATED IN LOCK 7 OF THE CASTILLA CHANNEL. THE ORIGINAL PHOTO AS IT CAN BE SEEN, IS PROPERTY OF THE DIPUTACIÓN DE VALLADOLID — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yolandoska (talk • contribs) 14:57, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, DW. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 04:23, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 04:22, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dimitra Rekka (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical publications. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:To teleutaio simeioma poster.jpg
- File:O klyklos ton mataion praxeon.jpg
- File:Odyssey kalouta theater.jpg
- File:Betty valassi.jpg
- File:Koundouros-o-nikos-koundouros-thimatai.jpg
- File:Koundouros-stop-carre.jpg
- File:Koundouros-grammata-apo-tin-krimaia.jpg
- File:Koundouros-mnimi-apeitharxiti.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:21, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 04:22, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
Historical publication. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:21, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 04:22, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 04:21, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
COM:NOTHOST - nonsense image with no realistic educational value Эlcobbola talk 20:45, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 04:25, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
TV screenshot Gyrostat (talk) 22:05, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 04:26, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
COM:TURKEY does not include any information on the threshold of originality AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 22:09, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 04:26, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
unlinked image, with little educative value Richard Avery (talk) 22:19, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 04:26, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
Self. Outdated, compare https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:CoViD-19_pandemic_cases_in_South_Africa,_Western_Cape_municipalities.svg -- Jeandré, 2020-05-11t09:48z 09:48, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Should be kept for historical purposes (was used in a disucssion on enwp). --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 22:54, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Photographs by Jiří Tondl
[edit]These are derivatives of an artwork, which is the main object of a photo, so the photographer's permission is not enough.
VLu (talk) 09:00, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:09, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Not own work; also available at https://nearmetrade.com/local/public/vendor/411588795946-gyenocology-services-in-jai.jpg DannyS712 (talk) 02:28, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:30, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
very bad quality, low resolution better File:Bernardo Bellotto, il Canaletto - The Moat of the Zwinger in Dresden - WGA01828.jpg, File:Bernardo Bellotto Zwinger Waterway.jpg, File:Bellotto - The Moat of the Zwinger in Dresden.jpg File:Bellotto - The Moat of the Zwinger in Dresden.jpg Oursana (talk) 02:46, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
No reason to delete - you may not use this version. The other version has less color. I dont know which one is true. --Bahnmoeller (talk) 11:03, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:32, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
The source of the sculpture in the photograph (and thus its licensing) is unclear. In the original upload, the object was said to be from "Private collection, New York". Later this was changed by the uploader to "National Museum of the Republic of Kazakhstan". Clearly at least one of these is false. I tagged the file with dw-nsd, but this was removed and two paragraphs added to the description, the first copied verbatim from the museum website and the second a promotional blurb that is completely unsubstantiated. Kanguole (talk) 08:25, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support per nom. This photo is clearly of dubious provinience. Without supporting reliable sources, it should not be in use in any Wikimedia site. –Austronesier (talk) 11:11, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support per nom and to prevent further ethnocentric non-neutrality and socking. Serial Number 54129 (talk) 12:19, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Suppport per nom. I also did two image sources, found nothing. That doesn't prove anything of course, but backs the comments above to an extent. Doug Weller (talk) 11:45, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
- NOT Support. They want this picture removed because they're racist. They know a black man put up this picture. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 178.89.51.100 (talk) 03:46, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
- Comment given that I found 2 socks created by the originator of this image, I've no doubt that the IP is another one. Doug Weller (talk) 14:58, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
- NOT Support. Source of pic - https://artdaily.com/news/125153/Heavenly-Horses#.Xv90lIiFPIW — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 37.151.213.118 (talk) 18:19, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
- NOT Support. Found it especially for stupid people. Source dated Jul 24, 2013 years: https://medium.com/@stanmars7/in-what-ways-did-the-ferghana-horse-breed-influence-chinese-history-ac4acdd68542 — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 178.91.101.224 (talk) 15:40, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
- The profile photo on that blog is of Alex O'Loughlin. Kanguole (talk) 23:29, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete: Unclear copyright situation. Published previously, so COM:OTRS required. --Achim (talk) 15:45, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
- NOT Support. If you listen then more than half of the site will be left without photos, please leave me the documents on all your photos. Otherwise I will be suing you gentlemen. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 178.91.101.224 (talk) 15:53, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
- NOT Support. You guys don't know what to find out anymore, you just have to hide your stupidity without a trace. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 178.91.101.224 (talk) 16:05, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:35, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
There is no evidence that this is Cleomen's coin I. Science does not know the coins of this king. Perhaps it is a fake or coin Cleomenes III/ The first Spartan coins began to be minted under Areus I. Venzz (talk) 20:40, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Regardless of if its fake or not shouldn't deletions be based on if the upload breaks copyright? If its fake but free to use then its just a cultural depiction like any other painting or sculpture.*Treker (talk) 00:23, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:36, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
Appears to be derivative work A1Cafel (talk) 02:50, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep I took this image with my own camera. Its not derivative work, it's not like there's some copyrighted thing as the main subject. This is meant to show panic buying during a pandemic. This is kind of like the example on COM:DW with the girl eating ice cream with Mickey Mouse in the background at Disneyland, as long as the girl is the main idea the image is not copyrighted. In this case the shelves being empty is the girl, or the main idea of the photo. Iamreallygoodatcheckers (talk) 03:56, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per uploader's claim, AGF. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:15, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
high probability of copyright violation: there are many captions that might come from video clip or television. Matlin (talk) 08:06, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:17, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted screenshot A1Cafel (talk) 08:08, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:17, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted screenshot A1Cafel (talk) 08:09, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:17, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:23, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
Small size, metadata contains only FBMD: likely copyright violation. Photographer should confirm license via OTRS. Storkk (talk) 15:30, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:24, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama in France. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- That picture was taken in Belgium. There is freedom of panorama in Belgium. But I am not sure the freedom of panorama is the point here: on the picture we only see the commemorative plaque, nothing else. --Dodeeric (talk) 12:35, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: not in France, plaque in scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:27, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
Source information is inadequate for verifiability, and even if true, the license tag doesn't apply, because the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department is not part of the U.S. Federal Government. —Mahāgaja · talk 19:00, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:30, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
Source information is inadequate for verifiability, and even if true, the license tag doesn't apply, because the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department is not part of the U.S. Federal Government. —Mahāgaja · talk 19:01, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:30, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
no authorization from the author - exemple of utilisation before the upload : in "Gallery" Tyseria (d) 19:38, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:31, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
no authorization from the author - exemple of utilisation before the upload [7] Tyseria (d) 19:38, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:31, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
Original on id.wiki mention http://heritage.kereta-api.co.id/?p=2409 and original uploader have uploaded many files from the internet. MGA73 (talk) 19:28, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 16:47, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
Appears to be derivative work A1Cafel (talk) 02:50, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep I took this photo with my own camera. I'm not an expert on this derivative work thing or copyright law, but from my understanding you think I need permission from whoever built that structure? Here's a source I found [8] (seems to be a credible source written by an attorney) it says that as long as the building or architectural work is in public view the photographer holds the copyright of the image. I took this photo from a public road (a road funded by the United States government); therefore, I exclusively hold the copyright and can do whatever I want with the image. Iamreallygoodatcheckers (talk) 03:45, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per uploader's claim, AGF. Same as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Empty shelves amid coronavirus pandemic.png. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:54, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
Only nominating because previously nominated for speedy deletion Iamreallygoodatcheckers (talk) 03:59, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Just because its a screenshot doesn't mean its a copyright violation, it would be copyright violation if something copyright was in the screen shot. I took this photo myself. Iamreallygoodatcheckers (talk) 04:01, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Weak delete With the small white bar at the bottom, I doubt this image is actually a screenshot, and screenshot is a kind of derivative work which required permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder you may either provide the link of your social media account, or send a permission to COM:OTRS. --A1Cafel (talk) 04:07, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- This image is a screenshot, but nothing in the image is copyrighted. The white bar you're seeing is the "home bar" on a iPhone X, when I took the screenshot it hadn't disappeared yet.Iamreallygoodatcheckers (talk) 06:27, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per uploader's claim, same as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Empty shelves amid coronavirus pandemic.png. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:58, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
jag vill lada en ny bild utan vattenstampel Bechir Ouali (talk) 06:23, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Bechir Ouali (talk • contribs) 06:32, 11 May 2020 (UTC)Deleted: courtesy deletion. Superseded by File:Gamla Uppsala högar.jpg. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:58, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
No proper licence on source page. Copyright violation. Matlin (talk) 08:00, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no free license at source website. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:02, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 08:41, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: insufficient reason for deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:03, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
Derivative work, someone probably has copyright on the painting Kissa21782 (talk) 14:35, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:05, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
Derivative work, someone probably has copyright on the painting Kissa21782 (talk) 14:35, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:05, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
Because it's the copy of another file of the same name but without the "_1" at the end. Venenoso Biscocho01 (talk) 20:50, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:09, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
Because it's the copy of another file of the same name but without the "_1" at the end. Venenoso Biscocho01 (talk) 20:51, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:09, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
Another bad transfer. This one is mentioned to come from http://yiiphygallery.blogspot.com/2012/04/candi-angin-jepara.html MGA73 (talk) 20:52, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Failed COM:LR. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:10, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
Because it's the copy of another file I made of the same name but without the "_1" at the end. Venenoso Biscocho01 (talk) 20:52, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:09, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
Because it's the copy of another file I made of the same name but without the "_1" at the end. Venenoso Biscocho01 (talk) 20:53, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:09, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
Because it's the copy of another file I made of the same name but without the "_1" at the end. Venenoso Biscocho01 (talk) 20:53, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:09, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
Copied from id.wiki where the source is http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-MPjn83Dd-uQ/U7f6GBpbiGI/AAAAAAAAAwE/EagV1X-2l6Q/s1600/tmp-giri-dharma.jpg but do we know if that is PD? MGA73 (talk) 21:07, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Failed COM:LR. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:11, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
Copied from id.wiki where the source is http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-oNxI9ztb7vk/VmF7tDmtxhI/AAAAAAAAACg/HH7mhg7DR_w/s1600/ArchitectureJeparaneseGatePaduraksa_Mantingan_Gate_Jepara_Garden_Park_gerbang_gapura_keagungan_arsitekturOrnament.jpg but is that PD? MGA73 (talk) 21:09, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Failed COM:LR. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:11, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by FeliciaR22 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Per author fields, taken by "Jacque Gonzales, Jacque Gonzales family member, or Jacque Gonzales personal friend" - uploader is not the author (these were "taken of her by friends or family"), and does not even know the author, let alone provide evidence that they have been freely licensed. Gonzales is the mere subject, and thus is not the author.
Эlcobbola talk 12:25, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 12:29, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
Mexican film does not apply PD-US-no notice Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) 02:05, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:19, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Mexican film does not apply PD-US-no notice Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) 02:05, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Aurelio de Sandoval But we can keep this one since its a publicity photo for the film and there is no author of the picture shown anywhere, we can used it according to this:
- "Publicity photos have traditionally not been copyrighted. Since they are disseminated to the public, they are generally considered public domain, and therefore clearance by the studio that produced them is not necessary."
Film industry author Gerald Mast, in Film Study and the Copyright Law (1989) p. 87, writes:
- "According to the old copyright act, such production stills were not automatically copyrighted as part of the film and required separate copyrights as photographic stills. The new copyright act similarly excludes the production still from automatic copyright but gives the film's copyright owner a five-year period in which to copyright the stills. Most studios have never bothered to copyright these stills because they were happy to see them pass into the public domain, to be used by as many people in as many publications as possible."
Got it? TheBellaTwins1445 (talk) 06:42, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
- @TheBellaTwins1445: en esta no encuentro que diga impreso en U.S.A, o U.S.A, además no creo que sus leyes apliquen para filmes mexicanos--Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) 21:26, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination _ unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:21, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Mexican film does not apply PD-US-no notice Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) 02:05, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
It does apply because, at the very bottom of the poster from which it was taken, it says "Printed in USA". There is no copyright notice and it was published in the United States in the mid-1960s.--Jaliscan (talk) 11:53, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Jaliscan: Creo que si tienes razón dice perfectamente impreso en U.S.A en inglés, disculpa mi error, lo que pasa es que no se ve claramente, está muy distorsionado, puedes hablar con un administrador Strakhov porque el habla español, para que cierre esta discusión, pero de las otras imágenes aún tengo dudas.--Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) 21:11, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:21, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Mexican film does not apply PD-US-no notice Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) 02:06, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:22, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Source is not marked as PD and I cannot confirm that images and video by the ICTR are public domain. According to [9] judgements are PD but that doesn't mean images are. Most UN works are copyrighted. Buidhe (talk) 03:59, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Please refer to Article 11 (8) of the MICT's (International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals) Access Policy, available here [10], which states that unclassified and undistorted ICTR/ICTY records may be reproduced with proper credit. I have also confirmed with the MICT's archives that screenshots in particular may be used in this way. PZAJ (talk) 18:09, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
- It doesn't explicitly say anything about copyright. I read "Nothing in or relating to this Policy shall be deemed a waiver, express or implied, of any of the privileges and immunities of the United Nations", which to my mind would include copyright on UN works. I understand that the ICTR has expressly released some images, eg on Flickr, but that doesn't mean that others are free. Of course, if there's some OTRS that could be applied, that would override. Buidhe (talk) 18:53, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you, I have forwarded the email to OTRS. It says "Regarding copyright, you may use material of the tribunals as long as it is not distorted and the source acknowledged." PZAJ (talk) 09:56, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:24, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Also affected:
These are derivaties of non-free text and/or drawings. 2001:7D0:81F7:B580:C4BF:5052:F326:ABA1 07:23, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- This image (File:Tartu Landmarks 37.jpg) shows an information poster on permanent public display, presumably freely endorsed for public viewing by tourist and other entities represented at the bottom of the poster. This fact presumably also applies to all copies and derivatives as conveying the expressed information to the 'general public' is presumably the intent of the poster in the first place. In addition it would appear that "FoP-Estonia" applies ("permanently located in place open to the public") which also applies to File:Viljandi Landmarks 46.jpg which should also be 'undeleted'. Thanks --SM1 (talk) 10:53, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- There is no freedom of panorama in Estonia (COM:FOP Estonia) and depicted work is the main subject on both images. Regardless of the intent of the poster it is proper to presume that depicted works are copyrighted unless stated otherwise (see COM:PCP). 2001:7D0:81F7:B580:954:6571:E069:82C3 11:14, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- From an earlier message on my user talk page, "As indicated previously, some information is generally better than no information at all unless there is actually an intent to discourage interest beyond the local area. Please consider creating your own user talk page so others may openly communicate with you and think about adding information via photos and/or text that may be helpful to third parties, without either your background or local knowledge, rather than removing or deleting the work of others who are earnestly endeavoring to encourage greater interest in other countries and the interesting histories of those countries." Thanks ... --SM1 (talk) 15:40, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
- There is no freedom of panorama in Estonia (COM:FOP Estonia) and depicted work is the main subject on both images. Regardless of the intent of the poster it is proper to presume that depicted works are copyrighted unless stated otherwise (see COM:PCP). 2001:7D0:81F7:B580:954:6571:E069:82C3 11:14, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - FoP issue. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:26, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Saudi Arabia A1Cafel (talk) 08:59, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:29, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 09:13, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:30, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Outdated, compare https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:CoViD-19_pandemic_cases_in_South_Africa.svg -- Jeandré, 2020-05-11t09:47z 09:47, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:31, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Outdated, compare https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:CoViD-19_pandemic_cases_in_South_Africa.svg -- Jeandré, 2020-05-11t09:49z 09:49, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Hello. Yes, out-dated. Ear-phone (talk) 14:50, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: used. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:32, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by FunkMonk as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyrighted toy. It looks like a dinosaur made by LEGOs. Not sure if this is eligible for copyvio speedy. 1989 (talk) 10:38, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: DW. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:33, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by FunkMonk as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyrighted toy. It looks like a dinosaur made by LEGOs. Not sure if this is eligible for copyvio speedy. 1989 (talk) 10:39, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- It is not Lego, but Nanoblocks, a kind of Lego rip off. this is the design suggested by the company, not some original idea by whoever uploaded it, so you'd assume the shape is copyrighted. FunkMonk (talk) 11:24, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- It's indeed a Nanoblock model. To be honest I'm a bit surprised, because there is hundreds of Lego models on Commons, so I don't understand why that would not be authorised. Are they all to be deleted too ? When can we post a picture of a toy and when can we not ? Asmoth (talk) 04:19, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: DW. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:33, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. Clearly a scan of an older photo. So ivf has been with us 50 years or so. So this has to be younger than that. So clearly within copyright in any jurisdiction. Headlock0225 (talk) 11:31, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:34, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Tierpark Arche Warder
[edit]No freedom of panorama, private grounds. Park policy (German) only allows photography for private use.
- File:Angler Sattelschwein, Sau , Portrait.jpg
- File:Angler Sattelschwein, Sau.jpg
- File:Buntes Bentheimer Schwein, Ferkel solo.jpg
- File:Buntes Bentheimer Schwein, Ferkel.jpg
- File:Buntes Bentheimer Schwein, Sau & Ferkel.jpg
- File:Buntes Bentheimer Schwein, Sau & Ferkel.ogv
- File:Buntes Bentheimer Schwein, Sau & säugende Ferkel, im Tierpark Arche Warder.jpg
- File:Buntes Bentheimer Schwein, Sauen & Ferkel, im Tierpark Arche Warder.jpg
- File:Dänisches Sortbroget Schwein (2).jpg
- File:Dänisches Sortbroget Schwein (3).jpg
- File:Dänisches Sortbroget Schwein (4).jpg
- File:Dänisches Sortbroget Schwein (5).jpg
- File:Dänisches Sortbroget Schwein (6).jpg
- File:Dänisches Sortbroget Schwein (7).jpg
- File:Dänisches Sortbroget Schwein (8).jpg
- File:Dänisches Sortbroget Schwein (9).jpg
- File:Dänisches Sortbroget Schwein.jpg
- File:Girgentana-Ziege, Bock, Warder (2).jpg
- File:Girgentana-Ziege, Bock, Warder.jpg
- File:Girgentana-Ziege, Geiß, Warder (2).jpg
- File:Girgentana-Ziege, Geiß, Warder (3).jpg
- File:Girgentana-Ziege, Geiß, Warder.jpg
- File:Girgentana-Ziege, Kitz, Warder.jpg
- File:Heckrind Kuh (2).jpg
- File:Heckrind Kuh.jpg
- File:Heckrind Stier.jpg
- File:Im Teletubbyland - panoramio.jpg
- File:Matthias Suessen Kiel-6367.jpg
- File:Matthias Suessen Kiel-6391.jpg
- File:Matthias Suessen Kiel-6399.jpg
- File:Mittelalterspiele.jpg
- File:Poitou-Esel im Tierpark Arche Warder (1).jpg
- File:Poitou-Esel im Tierpark Arche Warder (2).jpg
- File:Reetdach Steinzeitdorf - panoramio.jpg
- File:Schildwall.jpg
- File:Thüringer Waldziege, Bock, Portrait, Warder.jpg
- File:Thüringer Waldziege, Bock, Warder.jpg
- File:Thüringer Waldziege, Geiß, Warder.jpg
- File:Thüringer Waldziege, Kitz, Warder.jpg
- File:Ungarisches Steppenrind, Kuh & Kalb.jpg
- File:Ungarisches Steppenrind, Kuh & Stier.jpg
- File:Ungarisches Steppenrind, Stier.jpg
- File:Warder Floegeln-Langhaus.jpg
- File:Warder Holzsteg.jpg
- File:Warder Ornehus.jpg
- File:Warder Speicherbau.jpg
- File:Warder Steinzeitturm.jpg
- File:Warder Turopolje-Schwein.jpg
- File:Warder Wittenwater-Haus.jpg
Discostu (talk) 11:48, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Unfortunately confirmed:
Das Filmen und Fotografieren für private Zwecke ist erlaubt. Gewerbliche und für den kommerziellen Nutzen erstellte Aufnahmen (analog oder digital) sind nur nach vorheriger schriftlicher Zustimmung durch Arche Warder gestattet.
- = personal use only, commercial use requires written permission. --Achim (talk) 14:27, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep File:Busdorf - Am Haddebyer Noor - Halbkreiswall 04 ies.jpg. This image was NOT taken at Arche Warder, Zentrum für alte Haus- und Nutztierrassen e.V. (Langwedeler Weg 11, 24646 Warder). As the description clearly says this image was taken at the "Halbkreiswall des Danewerks um Haithabu, Am Haddebyer Noor in Busdorf". This is 38 km away from the park (beeline) in a public area where FoP-Germany is valid. -- Ies (talk) 15:09, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Sorry, I have removed that file from the deletion request. Will this change your vote? -- Discostu (talk) 07:58, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
I'm in contact with Arche Warder to get permission
„5snake5 (talk) 05:00, 30 May 2020 (UTC)“
I've got permission to use these pictures in Wikimedia Commons, but the license has to exclude comercial use. „5snake5 (talk) 07:28, 29 July 2020 (UTC)“
- Keep Freedom of panorama is not relevant, it relates to photographs of things that are subject to copyright, such as sculptures. Most of these are photographs of animals which are not subject to copyright. The park's rules are a matter between the park and the photographer, and do not affect the copyright status of the photographs. Wikimedia Commons and all other third parties are not subject to such a contract. See Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter#Museum and interior photography. Verbcatcher (talk) 19:31, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment as per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#Museum_and_interior_photography: "It is up to the photographer to decide whether s/he wishes to upload images which have been taken in breach of any private rules of the museum." Note that several photographers are involved with the nominated files, and if they were not aware of the park's rules (or if they ever have trouble with the park) then it is up to them to nominate their own files for a courtesy deletion. I do not guarantee the success of such courtesy deletions but for my part I will not mind. Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:53, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: as per my comment above. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:54, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
no FOP in UAE Ralf Roletschek 18:46, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 21:19, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
no FOP in UAE Ralf Roletschek 18:53, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 21:18, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Lithuania.
- File:Universiteto gatvė 14.jpg
- File:Universiteto gatvė. Atminimo lenta Tarasui Ševčenkai.jpg
- File:Niūronys. Arklio muziejus 10.jpg
- File:Atminimo lenta Algirdui Mykolui Brazauskui.jpg
- File:Švento Jono gatvė 4.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:02, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 11:22, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Stanislovas Algis Kavaliauskas.png
- File:Romas Kazlauskas (futbolo treneris).jpg
- File:Anykščių bažnyčios degantis kairysis bokštas 1956 m. birželio mėn.jpg
- File:S. Pundzevičiaus tėvų sodybos Laibiškyje nuotrauka, daryta iš lėktuvo 1929 m. 1.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:03, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:29, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
copyviol Frullatore Tostapane (talk) 20:25, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 11:18, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
Il logo è una vecchia versione ormai obsoleta e sostituita con una più recente versione ormai da tempo. LCrosti90 (talk) 16:46, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
ːNO, anche le vecchie versioni sono mantenute (vedi Consip, Sogei, ecc.). --Carlo Dani (talk) 20:36, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Meglio tenerla: i loghi storici sono comunque utili nella voce dell'azienda/ente a appartengono. --Neq00 (talk) 19:58, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --ƏXPLICIT 07:10, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Claims to be uploaded under a non-commercial license, which is AFAIK incompatible with Commons Fram (talk) 08:38, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- There are many images from the Imperial War Museum database that have been uploaded onto Commons. I have added {{PD-UKGov}} to the Licencing section which I hope deals with this matter. Daemonickangaroo2018 (talk) 09:31, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- As it is now over a month since this image was nominated for deletion with no further input, I have removed the deletion tag from th4 image. Daemonickangaroo2018 (talk) 21:48, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: PD-UKGov should be sufficient. Daemonickangaroo2018, please do not remove deletion templates from a file page until the discussion is closed. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:09, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Shizhao as no permission (No permission since) Solomon203 (talk) 09:54, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
PD-ROC-exempt. --Solomon203 (talk) 04:12, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Solomon203 Why you think this image meet {{PD-ROC-exempt}}? SCP-2000 14:10, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- Slogans and common symbols, terms, formulas, numerical charts, forms, notebooks, or almanacs. --Solomon203 (talk) 00:34, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Although text meet {{PD-ROC-exempt}}, the design of the schedule is complex and meet Commons:TOO Taiwan. SCP-2000 02:16, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:06, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Tiven2240 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No indication that these images are free at source! They probably meant this, but the license is incorrect. 1989 (talk) 12:58, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Permission granted from the DWB Media Archive:
http://archive.dwbn.org/login.php?url=%2F&nocookies=trueBadabara (talk) 15:55, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- I contacted representative from DWB Archive. He said he filled out the OTRSBadabara (talk) 21:16, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: These picture collections are publicly accessible, and all pictures may be used freely for Diamond Way Buddhist projects and publications. per website. Can be undeleted if OTRS permission is received. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:08, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
Does the uploader have the right to licence this image? It looks like a logo. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 13:28, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Jo-Jo Eumerus! Yes, I have made it myself. It is not an exact copy of the copyrighted logo but rather my own version, and it is me that has vectorised it for the first time. The existing versions are of very low quality and slightly different. See: [11][12] --Cantabrucu (talk) 19:12, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Derivative work of a copyrighted logo. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:07, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
No exif - this looks suspiciously like a screenshot from a video, unlikely to be own work Gbawden (talk) 13:49, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- This appears to be the source of the screenshot. The license of the video is Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC BY 3.0). DoSazunielle (talk) 23:07, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
- Keep per above. SCP-2000 10:11, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per comments. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:27, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Gunofficial1998 as no source (No source since). Source is "own work". Author uploaded different political pictures over a period of 2 years, some with source and some as own pictures. I would COM:AGF and keep it. Indeedous (talk) 15:10, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Difficult to believe that this is own work, particularly with no EXIF. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:11, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:17, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Response from Mdyer2020: Indeed both photos are my own original work taken by me on the date cited in the location cited. They are not found on other websites unless, of course, you've landed on my personal Facebook album where the photo is also stored where I save my own original work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mdyer2020 (talk • contribs) 15:30, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:12, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
Modern building in France, a country with no Freedom of Panorama Storkk (talk) 15:27, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:13, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
File:An Act to Amend the Supreme Court Act (Public General Acts of Canada, 1949‑09‑15–1949‑12‑10, 1st Sess., 21st Parl., 13 Geo. VI, Part 1, c. 37, pp. 247–251).pdf
[edit]Official document. Proper license tag should be used if in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Seems likely this is {{PD-Canada-Crown}}. --Lcawte (talk) 15:26, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:13, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
Original at id.wiki says sourde: detik.com and I see no sign that it is GFDL MGA73 (talk) 16:50, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support Having poked around a bit, detik.com seems to use a watermarked version of this image a number of times, citing the source as "pool". Other stories use the unwatermarked version and cite Detik.com as the source. Detik.com works are copyrighted, as per their copyright page, and it unlikely the uploader is the photographer in the press pool. Without OTRS permission to back this up, I'd certainly say this is non-free --Lcawte (talk) 15:46, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:14, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
COM:DW of tile mosaic Эlcobbola talk 18:22, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
The object in the image is U.S. government property, owned by the tax payer (public). It was a permanent fixture in a public/U.S. government building, in the floor, which people walked on for more than 50 years. The building was completely demolished in 2015. The only reason this former section of floor was not buried in a land fill with the rest of the building was due to an effort to save it by concerned alumni. The former piece of floor now resides on permanent display in the new federal government building as a piece of the Department of Defense School's history. This public floor piece is not a copyrighted work of art. [Major Major 26]
Kept: Unlikely that the work is still under copyright given its age. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:15, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
no FOP in UAE Ralf Roletschek 18:53, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:15, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
Uploaded as fair use on id.wiki in 2014 MGA73 (talk) 19:08, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:15, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
Duplication of File:Flag of the United Arab Emirates.svg. Fry1989 eh? 20:21, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
KeepDifferent file format. Also is used in some userpage. SCP-2000 04:11, 9 January 2021 (UTC)- Being a different file format doesn't mean anything. It is a duplication of a pre-existing image in a superior format, which can easily be replaced and scaled to the desired size by using |XXpx]]. In fact, it was most likely uploaded because the user did not know about or understand the scalability of the SVG file. Fry1989 eh? 15:38, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom. Those use of this file can be replaced by File:Flag of the United Arab Emirates.svg.--SCP-2000 10:29, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Two usages have been replaced. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:17, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
copyvio, contemp. artworks (chruch built in 1968/1969), no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 20:23, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:18, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Gesundheitsamt Dortmund
[edit]copyvio, contemp. artworks (building 1959/1961), no fop
- File:Gesundheitsamt Dortmund Treppenhaus.jpg
- File:Gesundheitsamt Treppenhaus.jpg
- File:Gesundheitshaus Dortmund Deppe 1. Etage.jpg
- File:Gesundheitshaus Dortmund Kuhn 5. Etage.jpg
- File:Gesundheitshaus Dortmund Kuhn 5. und 6. Etage.jpg
- File:Gesundheitshaus Dortmund Kuhn 6. Etage.jpg
- File:Gesundheitshaus Dortmund Lindgens 4. Etage.jpg
- File:Gesundheitshaus Dortmund Strauß 2. Etage.jpg
- File:Gesundheitshaus Dortmund Viegener 3. Etage.jpg
- File:Gesundheitshaus Dortmund Viegener Detail 3. Etage.jpg
Martin Sg. (talk) 21:10, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Diesen pauschalen Löschantrag finde ich etwas undifferenziert. Das Gebäude ist ein öffentlich zugängliches Gebäude gewesen, das Gesundheitsamt der Stadt Dortmund, es steht unter Denkmalschutz und das Treppenhaus ist halt das Treppenhaus des Gebäudes. Die Wände sind von unterschiedlichen Künstlern gestaltet, jedoch sind die Kunstwerke zumeist kaum zu erkennen, da sie nur Beiwerk im Treppenhaus sind. Warum soll hier gelöscht werden? Oppose zur Löschung. --Itti (talk) 11:14, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:26, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
According to its source, http://www.environment.gov.au/cgi-bin/heritage/photodb/imagesearch.pl?proc=detail;barcode_no=rt35878, this is a 1995 image with a Crown Copyright. The copyright will expire fifty years after 1995, so it will be PD on 1/1/2046. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:40, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Remove: Thanks for discovering this error Jim. I received permission to use this file via email from the Department of the Environment and Energy. I won't chase them up again for copyright release in the midst of Covid-19 and being a govt department that would be slow or impossible. Can't track down the original photographer but I am obtaining release for another, earlier historical image. The building has been turned into apartments and no longer has this appearance, otherwise I'd go and photograph it myself. Jamesmcardle (talk) 01:37, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
- More precisely, it is an image with a Crown copyright of which a copy is offered under a CC by 4.0 license on the government website (at least in the resolution available there), as specified in the copyright-statement. So, one of two actions could be taken: A) If the email received by Jamesmcardle mentions that the emailed copy is also under a specified free license, then keep, provided the OTRS team accepts a copy of the email (a direct email is prefered but I think OTRS sometimes accepts a copy when there is no reson to doubt the authenticity). Or B) If the email does not mention a free license for the emailed copy, then delete and replace with the website's CC by 4.0 copy. -- Asclepias (talk) 04:55, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. Thank you Asclepias for your helpful input. I have replaced the colour image with a more suitable older B&W taken while Pinacotheca was in operation for which a CC by 4.0 license has been granted by the photographer. Jamesmcardle (talk) 09:50, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:23, 20 January 2021 (UTC)