Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/12/27

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive December 27th, 2019
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

القدسالارابي 2A01:598:A806:ECB0:10D9:8F81:E1CA:FC23 15:14, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 16:15, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too small Get out of house (talk) 17:30, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 17:35, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too small Get out of house (talk) 17:31, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 17:35, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake flickr profile Marjodm (talk) 17:34, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: vandal. --Achim (talk) 17:43, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Marjodm (talk) 17:34, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 17:39, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright false Marjodm (talk) 17:35, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Vandalism. --Achim (talk) 17:48, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality; COM:OOS per COM:PORN. CptViraj (📧) 12:17, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: exhibitionism, not feeding this. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:16, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative copyvio, or are copyrightable aspects de minimis? Ubcule (talk) 21:36, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like EugeneZelenko (talk · contribs) already decided it was the former...! Ubcule (talk) 19:06, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Commons:Derivative works from commercial packaging. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 22:18, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file was used for notability issues on the talk page Dragosdutu (talk) 21:58, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Christian Ferrer at 18:52, 28 Dezember 2019 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 01:49, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file was used for notability issues on the talk page Dragosdutu (talk) 22:01, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Christian Ferrer at 18:52, 28 Dezember 2019 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 01:49, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file was used for notability issues on the talk page Dragosdutu (talk) 22:01, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Christian Ferrer at 18:52, 28 Dezember 2019 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 01:49, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file was used for notability issues on the talk page Dragosdutu (talk) 22:02, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Christian Ferrer at 18:52, 28 Dezember 2019 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 01:49, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file was used for notability issues on the talk page Dragosdutu (talk) 22:02, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Christian Ferrer at 18:52, 28 Dezember 2019 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 01:49, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file was used for notability issues on the talk page Dragosdutu (talk) 22:03, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Christian Ferrer at 18:52, 28 Dezember 2019 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 01:49, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file was used for notability issues on the talk page Dragosdutu (talk) 22:03, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Christian Ferrer at 18:52, 28 Dezember 2019 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 01:49, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file was used for notability issues on the talk page Dragosdutu (talk) 22:03, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Christian Ferrer at 18:52, 28 Dezember 2019 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 01:49, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file was used for notability issues on the talk page Dragosdutu (talk) 22:04, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Christian Ferrer at 18:52, 28 Dezember 2019 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 01:49, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mukhammad-dev (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Lowx-re images, unlikely to be own works.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:17, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Based on the other uploads by this user I am fairly sure these are not own work (and certain in some cases). As such speedy copyvios. --Herby talk thyme 12:44, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mihail.kuznecov.97 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused childish icons, out of project scope.

VLu (talk) 10:03, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:55, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mihail.kuznecov.97 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons project scope: signs of an non-notable organization. Unused since 2013

George Chernilevsky talk 08:58, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:40, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I accidentally edited the wrong page. Kikki9312 (talk) 01:48, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Achim (talk) 13:00, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Haitam.mohammad (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:53, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nom -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:15, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by CreativeDevelopers (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused screenshots, no educational value, out of scope. Likely uploaded for promotional purpose.

P 1 9 9   03:25, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, Unused screenshots, no educational value, out of scope. Likely uploaded for promotional purpose. - FitIndia Talk Mail 05:23, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Santosh Nishad Basti (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s).

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 06:47, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination + unused. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 04:03, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Santosh Nishad Basti (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:15, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:28, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously a derivative work of uncited original, and the compound en:Fluoroboric acid is not covalent F–H DMacks (talk) 11:46, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:28, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously a derivative work of uncited original, and the compound en:Sodium tetrafluoroborate is not covalent F–Na DMacks (talk) 11:50, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:28, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously not "own work" as claimed by the uploader. No useful description or categories, so it is useless. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:51, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:27, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

en:Iron(III) oxide is neither linear-geometry nor covlent-molecular substance DMacks (talk) 11:56, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:27, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image. Poor image of a fridge. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 13:20, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:26, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Some sort of joke that is outside the scope of the Commons Richard Avery (talk) 14:35, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:25, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Barnes360 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self-promotion, out of project scope. No contribs to any wm project, in addition very low quality of the images.

Achim (talk) 19:08, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:41, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Barnes360 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Blatant self-promotion, out of project scope. en:Draft:Daniel Montez Barnes has been declined.

Achim (talk) 12:44, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 05:11, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Barnes360 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Used in self-promotional Wikidata item.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:25, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope? Taivo (talk) 15:43, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:24, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:24, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, this file is my own work and I believe there is no copy anywhere else on the internet, everyone can check that. The photo was not shot with a digital camera. Picture was shot on February 21st 2019 during the round table in Podgorica, Capital City of Montenegro. I request the deletion warning to be removed as I believe there is nothing in dispute with this photo. –User:JovovicPG


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:24, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Srikarluckyrail (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:23, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:09, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:22, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:10, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:22, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Outaouaisrock (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos and album cover. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:14, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


I am the owner of these pictures and am free to do as I please with it. --Outaouaisrock (talk) 20:30, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The metadata tells a different story.
Please upload the original files, provide the sources from where you downloaded the pictures, or contact Commons:OTRS to confirm your statement above and your identity. Ciell (talk) 22:27, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:22, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A manipulated undescribed image that is beyond the Commons scope. The description is the author's name Richard Avery (talk) 16:26, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:21, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, possible copyright violation. Кронас (talk) 17:45, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:20, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of an unknown person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 18:50, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:19, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploader mentioned Pierre Rezus as the copyright holder; so missing permission 84.28.247.111 19:42, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:18, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of copyrighted box art (whether or not copyright in this rightly belongs to manufacturers of this device or not isn't the issue here; it presumably belongs to someone). Ubcule (talk) 20:26, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:18, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sasha Hatal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:20, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:17, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ruadhanc (talk · contribs)

[edit]

low quality vanity spam.

Praxidicae (talk) 14:59, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 14:35, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ruadhanc (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private photo book, no educational content. All unused.

GeorgHHtalk   15:16, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:43, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ankitasharmawriter (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Lock evasion by Swarup Solanki Programmer. Not clear that any of these are in scope. Promotional in nature, for non-notable company/person, even if we could definitively verify the licenses of the photos.

GMGtalk 19:02, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 14:31, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused tiny image of a nondescript building, promotional upload, out of scope. P 1 9 9   03:33, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Basic copyvio. --Herby talk thyme 12:35, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Uploaded by mistake not my photo KressInsel (talk) 12:32, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 17:58, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Youtube capture, not OTRS tickets. cannot find CC-BY-SA license information. Sotiale (talk) 15:18, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:17, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Youtube capture, not OTRS tickets. cannot find CC-BY-SA license information. Sotiale (talk) 15:19, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:17, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Youtube capture, not OTRS tickets. cannot find CC-BY-SA license information. Sotiale (talk) 15:20, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:17, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Youtube capture, not OTRS tickets. cannot find CC-BY-SA license information. Sotiale (talk) 15:20, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:16, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

insufficient data for validatiopn of copyright status; should be fixed (preferrably), or the image should be deleted Jochen Burghardt (talk) 16:43, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:15, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There's two problems here. First, the doesn't seem to be any obvious indication that the source is published under a free license, or at least it's not clear on the linked page. Second, there doesn't seem to be any indication that this image is the original work of the blogger. The site seems to include lots of images with no attribution and no claim that they are own work, including obviously copyrighted book covers on the linked page. GMGtalk 18:38, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:12, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright sign at page 1. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:27, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:11, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vinícius Vigor (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Previously published on various websites. Permission needed. 3 other files that are not tagged doesn't seem to be own work as well.

Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 14:56, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:44, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional logo, out of scope and likely above TOO. P 1 9 9   03:07, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Tomer T (talk) 11:42, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image with t-shirts with promotional logo, out of scope and likely above TOO. P 1 9 9   03:08, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Tomer T (talk) 11:42, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional logo, out of scope and likely above TOO. P 1 9 9   03:10, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Tomer T (talk) 11:43, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional logo, out of scope and likely above TOO. Also included:

P 1 9 9   03:12, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Tomer T (talk) 11:44, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   03:12, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Tomer T (talk) 11:41, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   03:13, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Tomer T (talk) 11:39, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It does not appear that the uploader is claiming to be the subject, while the subject is claimed to be the author. We would therefore need permission send according to directions at COM:CONSENT in order to verify the license. GMGtalk 16:53, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

On it. Marnanel (talk) 21:47, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Images kept. OTRS received and processed. --GMGtalk 22:17, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no indication of early enough publication to be PD as claimed PlanespotterA320 (talk) 00:48, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:40, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doubtful to be own work, uploaded by repeat copyright violator PlanespotterA320 (talk) 02:38, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:40, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Zoom Earth images are copyrighted, see © Zoom Earth on the website A1Cafel (talk) 03:23, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:40, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted character A1Cafel (talk) 04:58, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

support for deletion request. --Ranjithsiji (talk) 07:07, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:41, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted character A1Cafel (talk) 04:58, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

support for deletion.--Ranjithsiji (talk) 07:08, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:41, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image does not have a Creative Commons license: The links says "© Akademie der Naturwissenschaften Schweiz (SCNAT) 2018" Levi bernardo (talk) 05:43, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:41, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image does not have a Creative Commons license: The links says "© Akademie der Naturwissenschaften Schweiz (SCNAT) 2018" Levi bernardo (talk) 05:44, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:41, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Some people on this pictures (Or their legal tutor) changed their mind and don't wish to appear on Wikipedia Daniel Ompusunggu (talk) 07:59, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9   17:42, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Some people on this pictures (Or their legal tutor) changed their mind and don't wish to appear on Wikipedia Daniel Ompusunggu (talk) 08:01, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9   17:42, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scaled down version of File:Murjāņi, Sējas novads.jpg Papuass (talk) 08:47, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:44, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Nonsense Ferdinand0101 (talk) 09:46, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9   17:50, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Lotje (talk) 13:24, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah it is unused now. But it came from Wikitravel where I guess someone could make an article about the hotel. --MGA73 (talk) 14:56, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@MGA73: in that case, it could be added to Category:Buildings in Essaouira I guess. Lotje (talk) 15:03, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: added to Category:Buildings in Essaouira. --P 1 9 9   17:53, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

One of very many brochures published by SFI, about how to fund research in Norway. Not used in any current Wikipedia page, and probably never will. Ketil3 (talk) 13:31, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   17:54, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused graph without context, no educational value or use, out of scope. P 1 9 9   03:15, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 09:26, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused graph without context, no educational value or use, out of scope. P 1 9 9   03:16, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 09:26, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused graph without context, no educational value or use, out of scope. P 1 9 9   03:16, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 09:26, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused graph without context, no educational value or use, out of scope. P 1 9 9   03:17, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 09:26, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused graph without context, out of scope. P 1 9 9   03:23, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 09:26, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9   03:24, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 09:26, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   03:26, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 09:26, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused process graph without context, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   03:30, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 09:26, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   03:31, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 09:27, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of non-notable person, out of scope, and looks also like a screengrab, copyvio. P 1 9 9   03:32, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 09:27, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low quality graphic, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9   03:44, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 09:27, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this is old Ilham pashayev69 (talk) 13:09, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ilham pashayev69. If you wish to delete this photo, you can add {{SD|G7}} to the file's page. Ahmadtalk 13:17, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copyvio per watermark, no exif, unlikely to be own work. --Gbawden (talk) 09:00, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy to https://www.facebook.com/mizanurrahmanazhariofficial/posts/2536418189799610/ Delwar12:25, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy. ~ Nahid Talk 18:48, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Youtube capture, not OTRS tickets. cannot find CC-BY-SA license information. Sotiale (talk) 15:20, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

힘든상황에 있는 개인의 모습을 희화화하고 모욕감을 주기위한 사진입니다. 인물을 대표하는 사진도 아니고, 인터넷 명예훼손및 당사자에게 사이버 폭력이될 수 있는 컨텐츠입니다. 업로더는 위키백과의 객관성과 중립성을 훼손하고 인격모독의 도구로 위키백과를 이용하고 있습니다. 빠른시일내로 삭제 부탁드립니다. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CarterIM3HI (talk • contribs) 14:43, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 07:33, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Comes from ABS CBN website: https://sa.kapamilya.com/absnews/abscbnnews/media/2018/news/12/12/20181212-baguio.jpg I don't know if ABS CBN has files which are considered freely licensed or in PD. A discussion is needed. JWilz12345 (talk) 11:43, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: delete as copyvio. --P 1 9 9   14:08, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrightVanderism from [http://www.crueltyfreebeauty.jp/310/detail/id=71 Gahukuro (talk) 12:18, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:24, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Julius Hüther (1881-1954). Please delete and undelete in 2025 Mutter Erde (talk) 12:54, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:22, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not found at URL. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:25, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:21, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not found at URL. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:24, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: LR+. --Krd 17:20, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably out of COM:SCOPE (en:Draft:Mohammad Amin Karimpour). Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:40, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 23:10, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no have permissions for use. Кронас (talk) 17:43, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:42, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no have permissions for use. Кронас (talk) 17:43, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:42, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Stylephoto22

[edit]

All these files violate COM:WATERMARK. Promotional fotos. The author is the same. Andriy.v (talk) 22:26, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. COM:OTRS required. ƏXPLICIT 01:45, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in the United States. This sculpture was installed after March 1989, per COM:PACUSA. See [1]. Magnolia677 (talk) 17:30, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Permission has been granted by the artist, per the project manager. Written permission is coming. Is there any particular phrasing needed? Example available? Jlundell (talk) 17:29, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Jlundell: please send the permission as described at Commons:OTRS--Ymblanter (talk) 17:14, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Ymblanter: I have received informal permission, and have sent artist suggested template; waiting for response. Jlundell (talk) 16:26, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:04, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

La fuente del archivo es un blog, y Lacoste expone en sus "Términos y Condiciones": "está prohibido copiar, reproducir, modificar, crear obras derivadas, distribuir o mostrar públicamente cualquier contenido (excepto tu propia información) del Sitio web sin previo consentimiento por escrito". Rjelves (talk) 12:41, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Non-free logo. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 09:33, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation from [2] Jakob Gottfried (talk) 12:42, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 13:49, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no have permissions for use, possible copyright violation Кронас (talk) 17:44, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 12:09, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not educationally useful MalemuteD (talk) 14:07, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:58, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Potentially non-free. Awesome Aasim 00:47, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: com:SS. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:55, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is old file Ilham pashayev69 (talk) 13:10, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: author request. --ƏXPLICIT 11:33, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is old file Ilham pashayev69 (talk) 13:10, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: author request. --ƏXPLICIT 11:33, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is old file Ilham pashayev69 (talk) 13:10, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: author request. --ƏXPLICIT 11:33, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is old file Ilham pashayev69 (talk) 13:10, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: author request. --ƏXPLICIT 11:33, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is old file Ilham pashayev69 (talk) 13:11, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: author request. --ƏXPLICIT 11:33, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as no permission (No permission since) but it is labeled CC BY at the source (see "Info" link at https://wellcome.ac.uk/what-we-do/our-work/wellcome-photography-prize/2019#&gid=8&pid=3 ). Daniel Mietchen (talk) 09:16, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Properly licensed. Mdaniels5757 (talk) 20:39, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Indeedous (talk) 13:11, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as no permission (No permission since) but the image is labeled CC BY at the source (see "Info" link at bottom of https://wellcome.ac.uk/what-we-do/our-work/wellcome-photography-prize/2019#&gid=4&pid=2 ) Daniel Mietchen (talk) 09:20, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Properly licensed. Mdaniels5757 (talk) 20:40, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Indeedous (talk) 13:11, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as no permission (No permission since) but the image is labeled CC BY at the source (see "Info" link at bottom of https://wellcome.ac.uk/what-we-do/our-work/wellcome-photography-prize/2019#&gid=4&pid=2 ) Daniel Mietchen (talk) 09:21, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose deletion request given CC BY on source. Klbrain (talk) 08:37, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Properly licensed. Mdaniels5757 (talk) 20:40, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Indeedous (talk) 13:12, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as no permission (No permission since) but the image is labeled CC BY at the source (see "Info" link at bottom of https://wellcome.ac.uk/what-we-do/our-work/wellcome-photography-prize/2019#&gid=4&pid=2 ) Daniel Mietchen (talk) 09:21, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Properly licensed. Mdaniels5757 (talk) 20:41, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Indeedous (talk) 13:12, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file will not be in the public domain in its home country (Serbia) until 1 January 2028 (died 1957. Life + 70 years) Coldcreation (talk) 10:14, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Indeedous (talk) 13:14, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file will not be in the public domain in its home country (Serbia) until 1 January 2028 (died 1957. Life + 70 years) Coldcreation (talk) 10:15, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Indeedous (talk) 13:14, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file will not be in the public domain in its home country (Serbia) until 1 January 2028 (died 1957. Life + 70 years) Coldcreation (talk) 10:15, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Indeedous (talk) 13:14, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file will not be in the public domain in its home country (Serbia) until 1 January 2028 (died 1957. Life + 70 years) Coldcreation (talk) 10:16, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Indeedous (talk) 13:15, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file will not be in the public domain in its home country (Serbia) until 1 January 2028 (died 1957. Life + 70 years) Coldcreation (talk) 10:16, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Indeedous (talk) 13:15, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file will not be in the public domain in its home country (Serbia) until 1 January 2028 (died 1957. Life + 70 years) Coldcreation (talk) 10:17, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Indeedous (talk) 13:15, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Colddcillo 12 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not public domain in Spain yet.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:22, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Indeedous (talk) 13:16, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to this discussion Commons:Forum#Kopierschutz_überwinden referencing the BGH decission known as the REM-Urteil this image is a copyright violation in Commons. C.Suthorn (talk) 13:21, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. According to the “discussion” mentioned above, it is a matter of interpretation and opinion whether a simple photographic reproduction of a painting in the public domain is a protected work in the sense of copyright law or not. The so-called REM-Urteil (file no. I ZR 104/17) is highly debatable and obviously not founded on common sense. For instance, in my opinion the term „Lichtbild“ does not apply in the context of the case. Another court could easily have come to a completely different verdict… --Gretarsson (talk) 17:37, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The linked text is not the judgement, but an statement by the press department of the court (see left on top). To discuss the issue it is necessary to know about the full text of the decision in all its details. So long as this is not provided and discussed, there is no reason to delete the file, therefore  Keep. Furthermore, a decision of just one court (even if it is the BGH) has no effect on other countries or even other cases with differend circumstances. A decision is not a law. And much less if international rules are concerned. --Josef Moser (talk) 22:02, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep. Commons:When to use the PD-Art tag says that if 2D art is in the public domain, so is simple photographs of it for our purposes. The WMF is on good legal ground in the US, and if they're worried about that Commons policy, they'll tell us.--Prosfilaes (talk) 11:19, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Indeedous (talk) 13:19, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Кронас as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: possible copyright violation. Big photo with EXIF. Let's discuss it for a week. Taivo (talk) 15:01, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Indeedous (talk) 13:20, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Кронас as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: possible copyright violation. Big photo with EXIF. Let's discuss it for a week. Taivo (talk) 15:04, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Indeedous (talk) 13:20, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Кронас as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: possible copyright violation. Big photo with EXIF. Let's discuss it for a week. Taivo (talk) 15:14, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Indeedous (talk) 13:19, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rom1art (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical paintings and book cover. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep all. Clearly public domain works. Fixed information. Abzeronow (talk) 17:15, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Indeedous (talk) 13:20, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Privacy to author TheBartgry (talk) 20:41, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This image is more than 3 years in Commons. I don't understand the argument of privacy. Wouter (talk) 15:26, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I’d prefer if the authors name, visible in history, would be removed. This image has no added value anyways. TheBartgry (talk) 10:29, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion; personal information should be removed now. --Indeedous (talk) 13:30, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This does not appear to be a selfie, while the uploader apparently claims to be the subject of the photo. It's not clear then how this is their own work. GMGtalk 21:17, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


The photo was taken with a tri-stand. While my husband was there to assist it was ultimately my camera and my equipment that took the photo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Keri Deziel (talk • contribs) 21:42, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: see otrs and discussion. --Indeedous (talk) 13:31, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file was used for notability issues on the talk page Dragosdutu (talk) 21:59, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request. --Indeedous (talk) 13:32, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file was used for notability issues on the talk page Dragosdutu (talk) 22:00, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request. --Indeedous (talk) 13:32, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The files are images of Special Action Force Monument, Angeles City, Pampanga, the Philippines, in memory of the Mamasapano clash happened in 2015. However, per COM:FOP Philippines, there is no FOP in the Philippines. Given that the clash happened in 2015, the monument itself is also unlikely to be in public domain. These files are therefore likely to be copyrighted and unfree.

廣九直通車 (talk) 12:11, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Happy New Year and Best of Seasons from hereat Bulacan, Philippines; thanks for your messages; allow me to state that no one in Angeles City can take pictures of these images without the permission of Category:Santo Rosario (Poblacion) and Pulungbulu, Angeles City, Pampanga specifically a) Barangay captain or secretary and b) the Police station, both infront of the landmark Santo Rosario (Poblacion), Angeles City, Pampanga Barangay Hall & Angeles City Police Office PRO 3, Police Station 1; hence, out of respect and protocol, I went to both Hall and Stations to log in and seek permission and I was granted; hence, with all due respect, I humbly submit that Express Permission by the Local Government Unit is an exception to FOP, since works of the government whether local or national, are out of the prohibitions; at any rate I respecfully submit to the sound discreation of Commons considering this is one of the finer points of Philippine law and jurisprudence, since at this time, there is no Judicial opinion for no single case has been elevated to the High Tribunal Santo Rosario (Poblacion), Angeles City, Pampanga Barangay Hall sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 08:19, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Judgefloro: So, you say the local government is the copyright holder of the monument itself? Then, if possible, it will be better for them to send a permission statement in accordance to OTRS.廣九直通車 (talk) 09:25, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It took me a long time to ponder how I could state a rejoinder to the discussion; I do not want to be off-tangent, but I wish that non-Filipinos would understand how dangerous it is to take photos in villages or barangays due to the past and present fear, anxiety and general norms of political fightings resulting to election offenses and of course, vengeance and contiuous thinking that photos are done by those assets who roam around; to wit:

a) While I was taking photos of the houses in San Agustin, Pangasinan, I was detained and trasferred to the Santo Tomas Police Station and verified to 2 hours, since there was no charge and I was asked to sign waiver of filing cases against the barangay officials; b) my Nikon camera was forcibly taken by a man claiming to be guard of this school when I was taking photos of the Clock the Principal apologized for the unruly behavior c) It took me 1 week to take photos of my own Baliuag Town Hall c) in my very own home barangay of Banga, Meycauayan, a teacher scolded me and ordered me to write a letter before I take photo of my very own school;

In this Angeles City landmark, I am just one of thousands who do Selfie photos of this monument; verily there is no question that the Landmark monument is owned by the Local government and or local police of Angeles City vis-a-vis hundreds of these monuments and memorials for slain police; I ceased doing lawyer or judge research or job since I was dismissed or suspended from 1999 and 2006 and I admit that I am no longer and authority on this finer point of Phil Copyright Law; however, from a closer look of the landmark, many copy paste from internet of photos of the slain police plus a just normal statue done not my artists but maybe by machines or even shops; I can write a letter to these locals and ask for written permission for submission to commons, but I accept that without influence or power, I cannot do it fast; local governments and many offices do not know how to send emails to Commons for permission;
In fine, when I approached Director Ludovico D. Badoy Executive Director III, NCHP to ask for written permission to take photos for Commons for I told him my problem with dangers in Barangays, he scolded me and told me that as a Judge I should know that our Laws grant permission to take photos per Freedom of the Press and Expression; he told me that granting me permission is Gross Ignorance of the Law; instead, he kindly ordered me to take photo of himself and tell all including Commons that he and the law grant permission; so I took his photo; I respectfully submit to the sound discretion of Commons in this matter very sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 09:27, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Judgefloro: I don't yet see any valid rationale based on copyright law why these photos can depicted copyrighted artwork. Please elaborate. --Krd 17:27, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. There appears to have been a confusion between being allowed to take photos and being the sole copyright holder of the photos, able to relicense them and all IP they contain to other people. We only accept media in the latter category. Since Filipino FOP does not grant an exception to copyright law for monuments/statues/buildings, photographs of such monuments/statues/buildings are violations of the copyright to those works. Being allowed to photograph them is irrelevant. --Storkk (talk) 16:24, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alain MOUQUET (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:CSD#G10

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:01, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

L'ensemble de ces images POSIBLOC P1 à P20 permettent de comprendre ce que réalise le système POSIBLOC TM, qui le produit et comment il est jugé par les utilisateurs sur les chantiers. il s'agit de mettre en évidence le dénigrement des images publiées par Clascertification dans WIKIMEDIA COMMONS, dans un but purement mercantile, sur la base de fausses informations (un bloc bleu n'est pas posé, posé il est vert!) et d'interprêtations trompeuses. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alain MOUQUET (talk • contribs) 16:00, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Delete I think at least some of these are in scope as descriptions of an important way of creating breakwaters. However, I am sure that they are all copyright violations, requiring a free license from an authorized official of the company via OTRS. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:30, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Alain Mouquet est le gérant de la société MESURIS qui installe le système POSIBLOC et vend les fournitures. Il n'est de ce fait pas impartial. La société MESURIS a perdu un procès contre la société CLAS suite à un jugement du Tribunal de Commerce de Montpellier en date du 19 Septembre 2019 et tente de faire retirer les informations apportées par la société CLAS concernant le système POSIBLOC en s'adressant directement aux sites de publication d'informations. La société CLAS ne fournit pas de service concurrent au POSIBLOC et n'est pas en concurrence avec le système POSIBLOC. Les informations apportées par la société CLAS sont loyales et impartiales. La société CLAS peut produire le jugement qui a vu le rejet de toutes les demandes de la société MESURIS, sur simple demande adressée à son gérant: es@clascertification.com. Le dossier est suivi par Maître Bruno Carbonnier avocat au barreau de Montpellier.--46.172.233.206 16:34, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mr Eric Skerniewski de la société unipersonnelle CLAS a effectivement volé des images sur chantier pour y apposer son logo sans aucun droit et produire des commentaires dénigrants qui n'ont rien à voir avec la réalité. Il le sait très bien et c'est par pur intérêt mercantile qu'il pollue avec de fausses informations différents médias du WEB pour soutenir ses activités avec plongeurs. Ceci dure depuis 10 ans et constitue l' obsession de Mr Skerniewski qui porte ainsi atteinte aux intérêts de ma Société disposant du droit exclusif de produire et vendre la technologie POSIBLOC TM. Ce comportement malhonnête, persistant, malfaisant d'un homme sans foi ni loi est indigne d'un "expert" qui ne respecte rien que son propre intérêt et finira par être condamné par une juridiction compétente s'il n'a pas l'intelligence de mettre fin à ses pratiques mensongères en ce début d'année. Signé: Alain MOUQUET CEO MESURIS SARL. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alain MOUQUET (talk • contribs) 16:26, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per Jim. --Storkk (talk) 16:27, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be "own work"; here is a wider image from 2017 : https://portdattache.bzh/videos/comprendre-elevage-de-porcs-en-2-minutes/ Drongou (talk) 09:38, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

From the same user (Block on WP:bg for inappropriate name bg:user:Kurzakriso) I add: The statue of Liberty : File:99571-004-6A06F834.jpg ; The Eiffel Tower : File:Vcvccdedd edd.jpg - Drongou (talk) 09:47, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 12:49, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Calligraphy is protected in China (COM:TOO China). Creator Zhu Kezhen dies in 1974 and copyright duration is life + 50 years; not PD until 2024. Wcam (talk) 03:11, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the note, but I would like to vote for  Keep this file. This vector file is my own work. In the description, I referred that Dr. Zhu Kezhen proposed this as a school motto, it does not mean this is a work of Dr. Zhu, neither a stone-rubbing nor a counterdrawing. According to "Compendium II of Unite State Copyright Office's Practices" (which is the legal reference for Wikimedia Commons and its host Wikimedia Foundation Inc.) section 503.02(a) example 1), "calligraphy is not copyrightable as such, notwithstanding the effect achieved by calligraphic brush strokes across a striated surface". Back to this discuss, these two characters are written in common cursive/semi-cursive script. From Chu Suiliang (AD 596-658), Cai Xiang (AD 1012-1067) to Zhu Kezhen (AD 1890-1974) and Mao Zedong (AD 1943-1976), the handwriting of these characters varies very little, anyone with preliminary Chinese handwriting experience can easily reassemble a similar work.--Pion (talk) 08:29, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per Roy17, this appears to be a COM:DW of the top two characters of images.app.goo.gl/brCdAJYy6hBkUcXx5 (link blocked by spam filter, and will probably go stale anyway), just vectorized. --Storkk (talk) 10:38, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You know nothing about calligraphy.--Pion (talk) 05:27, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a cropped copyrighted material from a file using under the de minimis principle (File:A párt a mi várunk fortepan 105430.jpg). See Commons:De_minimis#Crops of de minimis images.

Regasterios (talk) 09:47, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:05, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Redraida (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical coats of arms. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:08, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:06, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

intentional duplicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Phanfone_2019-12-26_0530Z.jpg FleurDeOdile (talk) 16:51, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


@FleurDeOdile: Non-intentional duplicate. Image that it replaced was a snapshot of the solar eclipse image (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Typhoon_Phanfone_eclipse.jpg) and this image is slightly different in the size and positioning of the other image. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Super Typhoon Eden (talk • contribs) 17:47, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Redirected to File:Phanfone 2019-12-26 0530Z.jpg. --A1Cafel (talk) 11:18, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation: duplicate of File:Microtus guentheri.jpg König der Ratten (talk) 17:53, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Additional information: the uploader not only pretended to upload an own work, but left it as the image of another vole species. Therefore, numerous wikipedia took the image for Microtus bavaricua, but it shows Microtus guentheri. --König der Ratten (talk) 18:21, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Speedy delete Copyright violation. The real author is User:Dûrzan cîrano. Larryasou (talk) 16:01, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyright violation Кронас (talk) 17:37, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: TinEye couldn't find this, and I didn't see it on 5element's site (though I could have missed it). Renominate if you find an exact source. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:53, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyright violation Кронас (talk) 17:38, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: TinEye couldn't find this, and I didn't see it on 5element's site (though I could have missed it). Renominate if you find an exact source. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:53, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyright violation. no have permissions Кронас (talk) 17:39, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment This photo is found on the official website of 5element. An COM:OTRS is needed. Larryasou (talk) 16:21, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:48, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Magog the Ogre as no license (No license since) Artur Andrzej (talk) 10:54, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per Magog the Ogre. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr. 07:12, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It doesn't appears in the given source, however it appears in 2016 in a non free website http://noge-town.net/?p=9002 Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:52, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr. 07:14, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Harshil169 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep these are my own work. I doubt if the nominator can find exactly similar images on google or on any website. Because these are my own work. I took them on my SLR, got it on android through laptop and on my iPhone from my whatsapp. I uploaded them from my iPhone. These are not violations of anyone’s copyrights but these are my own work. —Harshil169 (talk) 16:00, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
You could upload photos in original resolution with EXIF to proof your authorship. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 18:40, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Is there compulsion to upload that because it’s difficult for me to upload those using my phone which is not okay? Also, another thing is these photos have 15 MB size which makes difficult to upload at my place. —Harshil169 (talk) 13:48, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@EugeneZelenko: Wouldn't an OTRS confirmation by this uploader suffice? User:Harshil169's work on en-wiki seems quite credible, well-intentioned and related to Gujarat. That is where these photos seem to have been taken. @Harshil169: Did you upload one or more of these photos on another website or any social media platform before donating it to wikimedia? If you did, please disclose and clarify. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 07:34, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Ms Sarah Welch: I didn't upload for any website but yes, I sent them on Whatsapp to my friends who joined me. Maybe they have uploaded it on Social media but by reverse research, I am seeing no results for it.--Harshil169 (talk) 02:16, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Vanamonde93: Actually, there were some problems with laptop and internet which I was facing at that time. I don't use laptop much for Wiki work. So, I uploaded these from my desktop mode of my iPhone. --Harshil169 (talk) 02:16, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Harshil169: I know that's what you did, and I have no problem with it. I am asking whether, to address EugeneZelenko's concern, you can upload the original files from your laptop now. Vanamonde93 (talk) 06:17, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Does uploading from a laptop necessarily add the EXIF data that EugeneZelenko was looking for? One can take photos without recording location and other EXIF data, or delete the EXIF data after taking photos to protect one's privacy... so I have been told. That is okay with Wikimedia. Harshil169: Thanks for the clarification above. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 12:04, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. For possibility of undeletion, the actual photographer should send permission and a specific release under an acceptable free licence using OTRS. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr. 07:16, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

screenshot FleurDeOdile (talk) 16:52, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lmao. What a great reason to nominate for deletion. I got it off of EOSDIS Worldview... Hurricaneboy23 (talk) 19:59, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
its obviously a discord screenshot and not from worldview FleurDeOdile (talk) 20:49, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete: This image appears to come from another source, because I can't find the same on NASA Worldview. --A1Cafel (talk) 02:24, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr. 07:17, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

afecta a la privacidad JeserMohina (talk) 17:29, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:SCOPE. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr. 07:59, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Regasterios as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:CSD#G4, per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Szenasi. This was published in 1941, converting to DR to see whether it might be out of copyright already. Ymblanter (talk) 18:50, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Justh Zsigmond died in 1894. Although the work was published in 1941 (47 years after his death), the work was made public within 70 years from the first day of the year following its creation (in 1885). As such, the copyright of the text expired in 1956, per COM:HUNGARY. However, the cover itself could be considered as a seperate work. While it might be now in PD in Hungary, it wasn't in 1996, and as such COM:URAA and U.S. copyright laws may apply. If they do, the earliest possible date for undeletion would be 1 Jan 2037. Deletion was per COM:PCP. If you disagree, please submit a request at COM:UDR. Thank you. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr. 07:46, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]