Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/10/22

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive October 22nd, 2019
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from here. Harshil169 (talk) 04:52, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Obvious copyvio. I marked it for speedy deletion and issued an warning. @Harshil169: Hi thanks for patrolling new files. We usually speedy delete obvious copyrignt violations. Please tag such for speedy deletion from now on. Please also take a look at COM:CSD and COM:SD. Masum Reza📞 05:40, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Masumrezarock100 check my another nomination. —Harshil169 (talk) 05:42, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and has been speedied. --FitIndia Talk Mail 06:34, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from here. Harshil169 (talk) 04:58, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and has been speedied. --FitIndia Talk Mail 06:32, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I mistankingly uploaded it Iictokyo (talk) 05:35, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio. Masum Reza📞 08:43, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I wanted to show this picture as a proof and uploaded it to Wikimedia Commons by mistake. Please delete this file. Thank you very much. ~~ firma meiser128.0.99.242 10:05, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedied per nomination as filed on day of upload. --Túrelio (talk) 13:30, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/Commons:How to detect copyright violations

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence this is a fragment of a Universal Newsreel — Racconish💬 05:19, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Yes there is. Go to the original youtube upload by the FDR Library from which this is extracted. The intro directly indicates this was a newsreel by The Chicago Daily News and Universal Newsreel.SecretName101 (talk) 14:50, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish💬 17:09, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused chemical structural formula; there are some small SVG and layout errors. Superseded by File:Structural formula of 2-methylpentan-1-ol.svg as corrected version with better file name. Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 14:49, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:51, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Thefirefox12537 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1)--File:Momen Penghargaan Pertama Tasya Rosmala.jpg is here; File:Tasya Rosmala.jpg.jpg is here; etc. --Эlcobbola talk 15:20, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused old logo Nakup.esluzby (talk) 11:02, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 14:20, 22 Oktober 2019 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1): Non-trivial corporate logo --Krdbot 19:12, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doublette of thumb|Minéralogie. Arabie Pétrée (Mont Sinaï, Mont Horeb). 1.2. Sinaïtes; 3.4. Roches granitiques; 5. Granit orbiculaire; 6. Roche quartzeuse herborisée (NYPL b14212718-1268708).tiff, uploaded for testing purposes (see here) Gretarsson (talk) 20:15, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: As the uploader supports deletion of this recently added file, we can speed this up per the criteria for speedy deletion. --De728631 (talk) 22:37, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dhananjay3232 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:27, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Out of COM:SCOPE. --FitIndia Talk Mail 01:44, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Okay, I get this book was published in 1893 and it is in public domain. But who is the author? And from where did the uploader get this book? And more importantly, what is it? A book? What kind of book? Well the description doesn't state anything specific. Masum Reza📞 20:10, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Masumrezarock100: This is a novel written by Devaki Nandan Khatri. This file was found on Internet Archive. Author died in 1931. Hope it satisfies your queries. Thanks. --अजीत कुमार तिवारी (talk) 04:08, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for providing the necessary information. It would have been helpful if you had done so in the beginning. Please add all information to the files you have uploaded, and will upload from now on. I am withdrawing this nomination. Masum Reza📞 05:09, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn per above. Masum Reza📞 05:10, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Empresarioslatinos (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:32, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Likely copyvio, see https://jcbmccs.com/compromiso-social/briquet-sembrando-esperanza-con-el-deporte/. --Gbawden (talk) 06:51, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

puts my bussineess in others hand that arent for me. 50.241.53.57 21:13, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept Not a valid reason for deletion. Masum Reza📞 06:46, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apache licence 119.15.154.234 21:46, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Github app 119.15.154.234 21:46, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept There is no Apache license in the page, not I could find any relation to GitHub. Not a valid reason for deletion. Masum Reza📞 06:44, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

こんにちは。私は主にWikipedia日本語版で活動しているMee-sanと申します。英語ができませんので日本語で書かせて頂きます。当該ファイルはデイリースポーツのこの画像 からの転載であり明白な著作権侵害であるためこの画像の削除を依頼します。私は投票資格はありません。 Mee-san (talk) 10:13, 22 October 2019 (UTC) 依頼文面を加筆--Mee-san (talk) 10:17, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 09:56, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source is Facebook, per EXIF. "Author" field reads: "Nica George este autorul imaginilor. Mi-a dat acordul lui pentru încărcarea lor pe Wikipedia.", which means (from Romanian) "Nica George is the author of the images. He allowed me to upload them on Wikipedia.". For such claims, OTRS is needed. Gikü (talk) 14:53, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:24, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality per Commons:Nudity --ghouston (talk) 22:27, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:24, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

screen capture from https://www.bloomberg.com/news/videos/2019-10-15/nobel-economics-prize-winner-kremer-on-his-work-on-poverty-video 190.225.46.79 01:41, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 01:51, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo. Out of project scope‎. ~Moheen (keep talking) 07:10, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 01:48, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Out of project scope‎. ~Moheen (keep talking) 07:15, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 01:49, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:Anbu42xvesna

[edit]

Files from Category:Anbu42xvesna:

Unused and uncategorised images. Commons is not a private photo album. Looks like some sort of personal artwork. --Estopedist1 (talk) 07:42, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 01:46, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of a photo, no permission Gbawden (talk) 08:43, 22 October 2019 (UTC) It is a photo of a photo but who would give permission when Lt. Col Schism passed 16 years ago? — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.65.141.222 (talk) 15:23, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 01:45, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Автор фото неизвестен, источник отсутствует, лицензия подложная Dogad75 (talk) 22:46, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 01:37, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: в метаданных автором является Вадим Шульц. Необходимо обращение в OTRS. Dogad75 (talk) 23:03, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 01:36, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: автор фотографии неизвестен, разрешение на фото неизвестно, необходимо обращение а OTRS Dogad75 (talk) 23:51, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 01:41, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: фотограф и персона снимка-одно лицо. Необходимо обращение в OTRS Dogad75 (talk) 23:52, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 01:41, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Nonsense Jéjé9000 (talk) 22:35, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion; INUSE on a valid article. --Gbawden (talk) 06:31, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:29, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:30, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is uncle Julio. Why did you publish his photo? 191.126.23.149 01:42, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; likely Oos, unused and miscategorised. --Gbawden (talk) 06:40, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 02:51, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:45, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An unused and uncategorised image. Commons is not a private photo album. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 05:46, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; taken from FB per MD. --Gbawden (talk) 06:45, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An unused and uncategorised image. Looks like some sort of personal artwork. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 05:47, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:45, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is almost certainly not published as Creative Commons if the source is "Naver Search" and the creator tvN/CJ. Christian Bolz (talk) 05:47, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:51, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An unused and uncategorised image. Commons is not a private photo album. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 05:48, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:51, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From Facebook per the metadata; need information abou the source and license. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 06:40, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:51, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text-only personal file uploaded as self-promotion. Not in use. Out of Project scope. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 06:47, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:51, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal logo uploaded for the purpose of self-promotion, not in use, the user's only contribution, has no potential educational value/out of scope. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 07:01, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:51, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Other Beliag29 (talk) 07:08, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G10 advertising. --Gbawden (talk) 06:52, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

rubbish.. Mutter Erde (talk) 08:33, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:52, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An unused and uncategorised image. Commons is not a private photo album. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 09:00, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:52, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has "FBMD" in the exif-data, this indicates that the file was downloaded from Facebook.--Kai3952 (talk) 10:04, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:52, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has "FBMD" in the exif-data, this indicates that the file was downloaded from Facebook.--Kai3952 (talk) 10:04, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:52, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by The Bohemian1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:22, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Likely INSCOPE but taken from the web. --Gbawden (talk) 06:55, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In my opinion the logo is out of project scope. We have whole category:Flickr logos. Taivo (talk) 10:35, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:56, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image. Data table with no meaningful explanation. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 10:35, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:55, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file. Plot with no meaningful explanation. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 10:38, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:56, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file. Plot with no meaningful explanation. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 10:39, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:56, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file. Diagram with no meaningful explanation. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 10:41, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:56, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparent copyvio of https://btnrocket.com/vietnam-digital-seo-summit/ Yunshui (talk) please ping me when replying; I'm rarely on Commons 15:13, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:08, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurred and unused image A1Cafel (talk) 15:43, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:08, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurred and unused image A1Cafel (talk) 15:43, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:09, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rohit H Patle (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused file, private image

BrightRaven (talk) 15:47, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:08, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo taken by Jonathan Porter / Presseye, not Northern Ireland Office's work A1Cafel (talk) 16:17, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:07, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo taken by William Cherry / Presseye, not Northern Ireland Office's work A1Cafel (talk) 16:17, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:07, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Davidmoreau as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: tropviellephoto. The file has been 11½ years in Commons and it is used in 5 projects, so I allow discussion. Taivo (talk) 18:08, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep No reason to believe that this wasn't taken by the uploader. Uploader is still an active contributor from what I can see Gbawden (talk) 07:04, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, you are right. User Davidmoreau did not like the photo and uploaded a new photo about himself, which was deleted as copyright violation. Nothing is wrong with the current file. Taivo (talk) 07:08, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Does not look like selfie, maybe copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 18:10, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:57, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of Albert Harlingue [1] (1879 - 1963), still copyrighted: [2] ("Coty" Page 2) at Roger Viollet-inventory number: HRL-627604 Caption: François Coty (1874-1934), French industrialist. DDupard (talk) 21:05, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:56, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marko Bojanic (talk · contribs)

[edit]

https://avaz.ba/vijesti/bih/229993/prijedor-dusan-beric-kandidat-sds-a-za-gradonacelnika

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:38, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:57, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermarked, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:39, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:57, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images uploaded by Oli Dansereau (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All images has "FBMD" in the exif-data, this indicates that they were downloaded from Facebook.

Oli Dansereau has been uploading in this way since 2015. Should this be reported to COM:ANU?--Kai3952 (talk) 11:05, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; if he took them he needs to provide originals with proper exif. --Gbawden (talk) 07:23, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: logo of a restaurant used for a promotional user page deleted twice from the Italian Wikipedia Lombres (talk) 11:27, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:21, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An unused and uncategorised image. Commons is not a private photo album. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 11:34, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:21, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploaded by mistake Metalbullz (talk) 12:00, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:21, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It should have an overall neutral charge, not 4+. See corrected image File:Mangafodipir.svg for comparison. Ed (Edgar181) 12:36, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete per nom. The charges were definitely incorrect. No idea whether it's better to have the O•••Mn2+•••O as ionic or covalent (or even all the ligand–metal bonds as regular lines with maybe a "II" on the Mn. Maybe User:Smokefoot has a thought about organometallic-complex representations? Separately, might be nice to have each enantiomer (I can work on that sometime). DMacks (talk) 14:50, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete per nomination & reasoning of DMacks & Edgar181: the file is also of poor quality & has transparent background! Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 16:28, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:21, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Link gone, I uploaded it on 24th of July 2018. LR backup is a huge problem. Eatcha (talk) 13:44, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination I emailed them, now it's back and archived with archive.org :) -- Eatcha (talk) 10:13, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Withdrawn. --Gbawden (talk) 07:19, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Link gone, I uploaded it on 24th of July 2018. LR backup is a huge problem. Eatcha (talk) 13:45, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination I emailed them, now it's back and archived with archive.org :) -- Eatcha (talk) 10:14, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Withdrawn. --Gbawden (talk) 07:19, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Link gone, I uploaded it on 24th of July 2018. LR backup is a huge problem. Eatcha (talk) 13:45, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination I emailed them, now it's back and archived with archive.org :) -- Eatcha (talk) 10:15, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Withdrawn. --Gbawden (talk) 07:19, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Link gone, I uploaded it on 24th of July 2018. LR backup is a huge problem. Eatcha (talk) 13:46, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination I emailed them, now it's back and archived with archive.org :) -- Eatcha (talk) 10:11, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Withdrawn. --Gbawden (talk) 07:20, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Link gone, I uploaded it on 24th of July 2018. LR link backup is a huge problem. Eatcha (talk) 13:48, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination I emailed them, now it's back and archived with archive.org :) -- Eatcha (talk) 10:12, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Withdrawn. --Gbawden (talk) 07:20, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Link gone, I uploaded it on 24th of July 2018. LR is slow. Eatcha (talk) 13:48, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination I emailed them, now it's back and archived with archive.org :) -- Eatcha (talk) 10:11, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Withdrawn. --Gbawden (talk) 07:20, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dead link, LR is slow. Eatcha (talk) 13:50, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination I emailed them, now it's back and archived with archive.org :) -- Eatcha (talk) 10:07, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Withdrawn. --Gbawden (talk) 07:20, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mkeleher5092 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:NOTHOST --John123521 (talk) 13:51, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:21, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text-only personal document, out of Project scope. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 08:01, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:38, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused art of non-notable artist is usually considered out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 12:17, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:40, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploaded by mistake Metalbullz (talk) 12:23, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:40, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 12:53, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:40, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:41, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:42, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shayela (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:42, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seemingly a personal image; no educational value at current time Kissa21782 (talk) 16:11, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:45, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused institution template Mike Peel (talk) 16:14, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:46, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo taken by ©Matt Mackey / Presseye, not Northern Ireland Office's work A1Cafel (talk) 13:24, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 13:39, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo taken by ©Matt Mackey / Presseye, not Northern Ireland Office's work A1Cafel (talk) 13:25, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 13:39, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo taken by ©Matt Mackey / Presseye, not Northern Ireland Office's work A1Cafel (talk) 13:25, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 13:38, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo taken by ©Matt Mackey / Presseye, not Northern Ireland Office's work A1Cafel (talk) 13:26, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 13:38, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo taken by ©Matt Mackey / Presseye, not Northern Ireland Office's work A1Cafel (talk) 13:26, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 13:38, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo taken by ©Matt Mackey / Presseye, not Northern Ireland Office's work A1Cafel (talk) 13:26, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 13:38, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo taken by ©Matt Mackey / Presseye, not Northern Ireland Office's work A1Cafel (talk) 13:26, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 13:38, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo taken by ©Matt Mackey / Presseye, not Northern Ireland Office's work A1Cafel (talk) 13:27, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 13:38, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo taken by ©Matt Mackey / Presseye, not Northern Ireland Office's work A1Cafel (talk) 13:28, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 13:38, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo taken by ©Matt Mackey / Presseye, not Northern Ireland Office's work A1Cafel (talk) 13:28, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 13:38, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo taken by ©Matt Mackey / Presseye, not Northern Ireland Office's work A1Cafel (talk) 13:28, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 13:38, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo taken by ©Matt Mackey / Presseye, not Northern Ireland Office's work A1Cafel (talk) 13:33, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 13:38, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo taken by ©Matt Mackey / Presseye, not Northern Ireland Office's work A1Cafel (talk) 13:34, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 13:38, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo taken by ©Matt Mackey / Presseye, not Northern Ireland Office's work A1Cafel (talk) 13:37, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 13:38, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo taken by ©Matt Mackey / Presseye, not Northern Ireland Office's work A1Cafel (talk) 13:38, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 13:38, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo taken by ©Matt Mackey / Presseye, not Northern Ireland Office's work A1Cafel (talk) 13:39, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 13:38, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo taken by ©Matt Mackey / Presseye, not Northern Ireland Office's work A1Cafel (talk) 13:42, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 13:38, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo taken by ©Matt Mackey / Presseye, not Northern Ireland Office's work A1Cafel (talk) 13:42, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 13:38, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by نعیم اقبال (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to be own work and uploaded for xwiki spamming (medical/supplement spam)

Praxidicae (talk) 13:43, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 13:38, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo taken by ©Matt Mackey / Presseye, not Northern Ireland Office's work A1Cafel (talk) 13:57, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 13:37, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo taken by ©Matt Mackey / Presseye, not Northern Ireland Office's work A1Cafel (talk) 13:58, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 13:37, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo taken by ©Matt Mackey / Presseye, not Northern Ireland Office's work A1Cafel (talk) 13:58, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 13:38, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo taken by ©Matt Mackey / Presseye, not Northern Ireland Office's work A1Cafel (talk) 13:59, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 13:38, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo taken by ©Matt Mackey / Presseye, not Northern Ireland Office's work A1Cafel (talk) 14:00, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 13:38, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo taken by ©Matt Mackey / Presseye, not Northern Ireland Office's work A1Cafel (talk) 14:01, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 13:38, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo taken by ©Matt Mackey / Presseye, not Northern Ireland Office's work A1Cafel (talk) 14:02, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 13:38, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Link ROT/Source URL Dead Eatcha (talk) 14:02, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination I emailed them, now it's back and archive with archive.org :) -- Eatcha (talk) 10:06, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ~riley (talk) 13:36, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Edithian (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Photos taken by PressEye employees, not Northern Ireland Office's works

A1Cafel (talk) 14:38, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 13:37, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by الحسين حسان (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 13:36, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Roland Chibiani (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 13:36, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo taken by Kelvin Boyes / Presseye, not Northern Ireland Office's work A1Cafel (talk) 15:52, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 13:37, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo taken by Kelvin Boyes / Presseye, not Northern Ireland Office's work A1Cafel (talk) 15:52, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 13:37, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo taken by Jonathan Porter / Presseye, not Northern Ireland Office's work A1Cafel (talk) 15:52, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 13:37, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo taken by Matt Mackey / Presseye, not Northern Ireland Office's work A1Cafel (talk) 15:53, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 13:37, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo taken by Matt Mackey / Presseye, not Northern Ireland Office's work A1Cafel (talk) 15:53, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 13:37, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo taken by Kelvin Boyes / Presseye, not Northern Ireland Office's work A1Cafel (talk) 15:53, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 13:37, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo taken by Kelvin Boyes / Presseye, not Northern Ireland Office's work A1Cafel (talk) 15:53, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 13:37, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo taken by Jonathan Porter / Presseye, not Northern Ireland Office's work A1Cafel (talk) 15:54, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 13:37, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo taken by Jonathan Porter / Presseye, not Northern Ireland Office's work A1Cafel (talk) 15:54, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 13:37, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo taken by Kelvin Boyes / Presseye, not Northern Ireland Office's work A1Cafel (talk) 15:54, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 13:37, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo taken by Matt Mackey / Presseye, not Northern Ireland Office's work A1Cafel (talk) 16:04, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 13:37, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo taken by Matt Mackey / Presseye, not Northern Ireland Office's work A1Cafel (talk) 16:04, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 13:37, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, taken by Matt Mackey / Press Eye Bettydaisies (talk) 01:35, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:54, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo taken by Matt Mackey / Presseye, not Northern Ireland Office's work A1Cafel (talk) 16:04, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 13:37, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo taken by Kelvin Boyes / Presseye, not Northern Ireland Office's work A1Cafel (talk) 16:05, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 13:37, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 19:16, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 13:39, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Andas999 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Photos of phots, falses dates of shooting, not own work.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:39, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 13:39, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in this photo is the packaging, which is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. The details are neither minimal nor incidental, and is therefore an unacceptable derivative work.

ƏXPLICIT 06:00, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. – Kwj2772 (talk) 18:17, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in this photo is the packaging, which is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. The details are neither minimal nor incidental, and is therefore an unacceptable derivative work.

ƏXPLICIT 06:15, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. – Kwj2772 (talk) 18:18, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical book. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:37, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:36, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:36, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small, low res, no metadata. Unlikely to be own work. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:00, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:36, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Upload of a still from the commercial, non-free animated film The End of Evangelion, passed of as "own work". Alexandra IDV (talk) 15:05, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:35, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious permission. A version of this file can for example be found on this school's main homepage. The EXIF and description suggest that this was taken by a professional photographer commissioned by the school. The author is linked as the name of the school. COM:OTRS permission necessary. Tokfo (talk) 17:25, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:34, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is without evidence of a permission. Though the uploader claimed "own work", immediately after upload changed the author-entry from his/her own username to "AWG", whatever that means. Regrettably, the uploader was active only for a short span in year 2012 and thereby is unlikely to give feedback. I've filed this DR not to have the image deleted, but to get its copyright-state eventually healed. -- Túrelio (talk) 18:48, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:34, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The icon atop the company name is copyrighted, making this a derivative work. — fourthords | =Λ= | 19:14, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:33, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

looks like a screenshot of a youtube film or from TV Albinfo (talk) 19:41, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:33, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fehlerhafter Dateiname Sowiso (talk) 01:32, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content. --Wdwd (talk) 17:27, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work Mhhossein talk 06:02, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 17:29, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplication of File:יחזקאל (שמחה) פלומין.jpg Ldorfman (talk) 08:41, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, add redirection. --Wdwd (talk) 17:36, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's my picture, I also represent the site on which it is uploaded. Thanks PPEscientist (talk) 11:14, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: invalid request. --Krd 16:49, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

British freedom of panorama doesn't cover graphic works, like posters or murals 219.79.96.15 07:12, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:15, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOO Iran says: "The level of originality required for copyright protection in Iran seems very low." In my opinion this is complex logo by Iranian laws and needs OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 10:31, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:17, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ArvidLundqvist (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Above COM:TOO Sweden

Jonteemil (talk) 10:51, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Given that File:Pitea IF logo.svg and File:Norrby IF logo.svg were deleted from Commons (and then uploaded to Wikipedia) I think these are as simple as they are.Jonteemil (talk) 10:55, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:20, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dead link Eatcha (talk) 13:49, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 11:51, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not found at URL. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:02, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: SPAM!. --Herby talk thyme 11:49, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not found at URL. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:03, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: SPAM!. --Herby talk thyme 11:49, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This seems to be a blank page? -- Deadstar (msg) 09:27, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It appears to be the reverse of a portrait image, but not of the other page the NYPL lists. -- (talk) 09:33, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 11:53, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It says in the flickr page: "Divulgação" which means the uploader is not the owner, he is publishing someone else's image. Paladinum2 (talk) 10:57, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 11:52, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution, replaced by better one Extrasluzby (talk) 16:36, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The new version is an exact duplicate of File:Obrazek-extra-stehovani.jpg. The original version looks like a cropped version of the current one. The original version looks blurry and is of very low quality.  Delete and redirect this file to File:Obrazek-extra-stehovani.jpg. Masum Reza📞 21:59, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 18:52, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant File - Too similar in format to other cartoons in the same series of Hanger 18 cartoons. Also has "no" real educational value. Namronpb (talk) 23:07, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:24, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused old photo Nakup.esluzby (talk) 11:01, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 20:12, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused old file Nakup.esluzby (talk) 18:10, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Dude, you don't need to start another DR to request deletion. A existing DR is already in progress. Wait minimum seven days. Masum Reza📞 20:28, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This should not be deleted. It's my photo and I represent the site from which it is downloaded PPEscientist (talk) 11:15, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: OTRS has been added by Krd. Plese open a new DR if new evidence of being non-free arises. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 00:13, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo taken by ©Matt Mackey / Presseye, not Northern Ireland Office's work A1Cafel (talk) 14:02, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 07:24, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo taken by ©Matt Mackey / Presseye, not Northern Ireland Office's work A1Cafel (talk) 14:03, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 07:24, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo taken by ©Matt Mackey / Presseye, not Northern Ireland Office's work A1Cafel (talk) 14:04, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 07:24, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo taken by ©Matt Mackey / Presseye, not Northern Ireland Office's work A1Cafel (talk) 14:07, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 07:24, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo taken by ©Matt Mackey / Presseye, not Northern Ireland Office's work A1Cafel (talk) 14:08, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 07:24, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo taken by ©Matt Mackey / Presseye, not Northern Ireland Office's work A1Cafel (talk) 14:09, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 07:24, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo taken by ©Matt Mackey / Presseye, not Northern Ireland Office's work A1Cafel (talk) 14:09, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 07:24, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo taken by ©Matt Mackey / Presseye, not Northern Ireland Office's work A1Cafel (talk) 14:10, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 07:24, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo taken by ©Matt Mackey / Presseye, not Northern Ireland Office's work A1Cafel (talk) 14:11, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 07:24, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo taken by ©Matt Mackey / Presseye, not Northern Ireland Office's work A1Cafel (talk) 14:13, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 07:24, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo taken by ©Matt Mackey / Presseye, not Northern Ireland Office's work A1Cafel (talk) 14:13, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 07:24, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo taken by ©Matt Mackey / Presseye, not Northern Ireland Office's work A1Cafel (talk) 14:18, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 07:24, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seem to be as simple or less simple as en:File:EDGE magazine (logo).svg which British courts have ruled to be above COM:TOO UK

Jonteemil (talk) 16:07, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 07:28, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I suppose this is an erroneous license. The licensed exception applies to the party with the sign of the postage. That is, where the postage stamp is printed. But the flip side is protected by copyright. Andrey Korzun (talk) 09:24, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please. Please not again. I'm so tired of this, we go through a similar discussion every month (example, example). Please educate yourself: Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Soviet_Union#Stamps ("... the tag {{PD-RU-exempt}} [...] also applies to images of postage stamps, stamped covers and stamped post cards (postal stationery) of the RSFSR and USSR.") YES, the flip side (along with the entire postcard) WAS protected by copyright in 1982 -- until in 2006 it was relegated to public domain by Article 1259 part 4 of the Civil Code or Russian Federation. -- Wesha (talk) 17:49, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • You're not right. You cannot interpret the law widely. You are not a lawyer, so you are mistaken. These postcards were deleted many times. Free from copyright only postage stamp side. Only it is a "sign of postage". As in the Russian law. The illustrated side without a postage stamp is still protected by copyright. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 11:42, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    This is an old problem. It was discussed many times in the Russian Wikipedia. Look for links [3], [4]. There is a clear consensus on Russian Wikipedia that there is a “postage sign” and that this does not apply. The illustration on the reverse side of the postcard is not a sign of postage. And it can not be free from copyright. Only the front side is free: where the stamp is printed. (According to international rules, the side with the postage stamp is called the front. The side with the illustration is called the reverse). --Andrey Korzun (talk) 12:03, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    I already offered that if you give me a US lawyer whose opinion you will trust, I am willing to hire that lawyer to provide a legal opinion and end these BS conversations once and forever. As of Russian Wikipedia, I do not see "clear consensus" there the way you describe it; to me, the consensus is that "the whole item" (envelope/postcard + printed stamp on one) is PD, but art cut out of it is not. -- Wesha (talk) 22:51, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Your offers to hire a lawyer are inappropriate here. Contact the Wikimedia Foundation. This image must be deleted. There is no convincing evidence that it is subject to copyright exceptions. In addition to your peculiar interpretation of Russian law. On the contrary, many participants in Russian Wikipedia think differently. Many of them have a law degree. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 06:22, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Why is it not appropriate? I'm starting to question your motives here. Is your motive to protect Wikipedia from lawsuits? Then the legal opinion should suffice. Is it... something more nefarious, like trying to hide 30-year-old works from the general public? Well, I doubt the community will agree with THAT. -- Wesha (talk) 15:52, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Discussing the motives of other users is not fair play. Avoid transitions to personalities. This does not honor and is not an argument in the discussion. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 18:57, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    "Transition to personality" is when I say something to the tune "X is a bad person", and at no point in this discussion I said anything like that. However, you are attempting to uphold the law that you are not qualified to interpret. Neither am I, but I'm making a perfectly reasonable offer of involving a certified professional who *is* qualified to answer such question (which you reject). Rejecting a reasonable offer that does not require *anything* from you personally does not rate you highly at being a reasonable person. -- Wesha (talk) 20:58, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    You read inattentively. The consensus is that the copyright exception applies to the front side with a printed postage stamp. (Front side of postal card = where the postage stamp is printed.) If there is an image of a printed stamp: there is a copyright exception. In your illustration there is NO image of the printed stamp: there is NO copyright exception, the illustration is protected by copyright. This is the art cut, as you say. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 06:51, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:40, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted: {{PD-RU-exempt|type=postal cards}} Yann (talk) 18:39, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 12:26, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:42, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FOP UK is not OK for 2D "graphic works", see Template:FoP-UK

Jonteemil (talk) 12:43, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Did not realize this applied to mass-produced commercial artifacts. Presumably all flags would also be covered by this. Would this also apply to all commemorative plaques fixed to the walls of buildings, etc? 20.133.0.13 12:49, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@20.133.0.13: I think this answers your question:
”Section 62 of the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 is broader than the corresponding provisions in many other countries, and allows photographers to take pictures of
  • buildings, and
  • sculptures, models for buildings and works of artistic craftsmanship (if permanently situated in a public place or in premises open to the public).
without breaching copyright. Such photographs may be published in any way.
Note that under UK law, "works of artistic craftsmanship" are defined separately from "graphic works". Graphic works are defined in Section 4 as any painting, drawing, diagram, map, chart or plan, any engraving, etching, lithograph, woodcut or similar work. The freedom provided by Section 62 does not apply to graphic works - such as a mural or poster - even if they are permanently located in a public place. These cannot be uploaded to Commons without a licence from the copyright holder.”, from COM:FOP UK.Jonteemil (talk) 13:14, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:43, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Solomon203 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyrighted Evian products.
Converted by me to regular DR to allow for discussion about whether the possibly infringing elements (IMO only the woman's image in the right lower part) might not fall under de minimis. -- Túrelio (talk) 13:25, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:45, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I translated it to Arabic yet it appears in English باسم (talk) 13:31, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:47, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

William Barr was a private citizen when he wrote this letter, so the PD-USGOV-DOJ rationale shouldn't apply. Ich (talk) 13:32, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:47, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Link gone, I uploaded it on 24th of July 2018. LR backup is a huge problem. Eatcha (talk) 13:44, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete While a dead link is usually no big deal provided that the license was reviewed timely (not the case here), the doubtful license status of the music tracks is in any event a problem. --A.Savin 14:33, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Disappointing. I could've sworn I looked at one of these a while ago because I wasn't sure about the music. I don't remember what I concluded, but did remember the license checking out. Didn't think to see if it needed review, though. :/ — Rhododendrites talk16:56, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:48, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photographer is unknown, so we can't say that this 1909 photo is in the public domain yet. Lord Belbury (talk) 14:02, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:48, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work by Marc Chagall (d. 1985), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:38, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:49, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work by Marc Chagall (d. 1985), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:41, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:49, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is used on site http://charliemikecomix.com/ with no evidence that the uploader is the copyright holder. Steel1943 (talk) 20:47, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:49, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is used on site http://charliemikecomix.com/ with no evidence that the uploader is the copyright holder. Steel1943 (talk) 20:48, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:50, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source of this image is a report very clearly dated June 1997 on the front cover. It is unclear where User:Geo Swan gets the idea that the map depicts the area as it was in 1917, since it has a legend beneath it that says "Jackson and North Creeks, Hospital Grounds 1936". Until Geo Swan cropped it today, that legend was part of the image uploaded here. But perhaps that is why he put 1936 as the date of the image. It is more likely that the date is 1997, the same as the report. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 22:24, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Here we have another frivolous misleading wasteful nomination from a guy who spent months wikistalking me on en.wiki, until he earned a well-deserved indefinite block there, who has transferred his wikistalking energy here to commons.
  • Yes, the report "Toward The Ecological Restoration of South Etobicoke" is dated 1997. It is highly misleading to note that date, because the authors used images from decades earlier, because their goal is to restore aspects of the ecology to the situation decades ago, in particular, to restore the creeks which were buried, decades ago.
  • Note: World's Lamest Critic tacitly acknowledges that this is a frivolous, time-wasting nomination, when his nomination notes the map bears the caption "Jackson and North Creeks, Hospital Grounds 1936". Geo Swan (talk) 22:57, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • With regard to WLC's speculation that "It is more likely that the date is 1997, the same as the report." First, his baseless supposition directly contradicts the document [5], Second, I had a girlfriend, in 1996, who lived on 11th street, about 200 metres east of the property. The mental hospital was closed and turned into the campus of a Community College circa 1980. If the map was from 1997, it would have been labelled Humber College. We routinely walked her dog in Colonel Sam Smith Park, and on the College campus. The map shows the park, built on landfill, below this property. The park was about ten years old, then. Geo Swan (talk) 00:01, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Geo Swan: Thank you for fixing your "1917" error in the description. The map depicts the area as it was in 1936 (per the caption), not the area as it was in 1997. The accompanying text discusses the history of the area shown in the map. The report was made in 1997. There is no indication that the map was made earlier than 1997. If you are still in touch with your former girlfriend, perhaps she or her dog can explain this to you. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 02:46, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • KEEP The caption reads "Jackson and North creeks, Hospital Grounds 1936" which indicates that this is a historical map from 1936. There would be no point in replicating that outdated style in 1997 when modern cartography would have produced a clearer image and the creek has since been moved. Secondarywaltz (talk) 04:56, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: It's probably a 1936 map, but why is it PD?. The license template says:

This Canadian work is in the public domain in Canada because its copyright has expired due to one of the following:
1. it was subject to Crown copyright and was first published more than 50 years ago, or
it was not subject to Crown copyright, and
2. it is a photograph that was created prior to January 1, 1949, or
3. the creator died more than 50 years ago.

It is certainly not a photograph, so (2) does not apply. There is no evidence that it was Crown Copyright or that the author has been dead more than fifty years. Therefore PRP requires that we assume it is still copyrighted. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:53, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, grabbed from Facebook (see metadata). Sealle (talk) 22:53, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

These are my photos that I shared on Facebook. Beterbiev is also my fellow countryman. I will upload another photo. --Takhirgeran Umar (talk) 07:56, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:57, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Castillo blanco as no source (No source since)

Uploaded in 2009, should probably be {{Own}} but I don't understand Hebrew. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 01:52, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No evidence found for it to not be own work. --Green Giant (talk) 11:19, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Castillo blanco as no source (No source since)

{{Own}} according to [6]. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 02:11, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Per User:Alexis Jazz. --Green Giant (talk) 12:20, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Invalid licenses: PD-Austria-1932 is not accepted anymore. No indication why this would be an anonymous work. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 06:05, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Why not accepted anymore? The picture was made 1924 or 1925, before electrification of the route there (no overhead catenary visible). According to the source (see http://www.bildstrecke.at/Archiv-1930/Images/detail/16337?filter=Stadtbahn ) there is no author known, it seems the copyrights belongs to "Wiener Linien", the public transport company of vienna... --Firobuz (talk) 19:45, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Per Commons:Deletion requests/Template:PD-Austria-1932. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:11, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
PD-A-1932 ist nun draußen. Laut der Bildquelle = Bildstrecke.at, das Bildarchiv der Wiener Linien, ist das Foto mit Datierung und Urhebervermerk "10.06.1920 Wiener Linien", also pseudoanonym und demnach mit offensichtlich abgelaufenem Urheberrecht. (Vgl. http://www.bildstrecke.at/Alle/Images?Suchbegriff=stadtbahn&Category=Alle&Fotograph=wiener+linien.) Nicht Löschen. --Elisabeth (talk) 22:50, 24 October 2019 (UTC) (Und dem Benutzer könnte mal bitte jemand erklären, dass ordentliche Beschreibungen und Kategorisierungen beim Hochladen von Bildern gefragt sind hier wie auch auf .de, statt aktionistisches Hochladen um "seins" zu Bebildern. SCNR.)[reply]

Kept: per User:Elisabeth59. --Green Giant (talk) 15:38, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It says in the flickr page: "Divulgação" which means the uploader is not the owner, he is publishing someone else's image. Paladinum2 (talk) 10:54, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. The Flickr-user appears to be a news organisation that seems to be re-using someone else’s photo. --Green Giant (talk) 15:47, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It says in the flickr page: "Divulgação" which means the uploader is not the owner, he is publishing someone else's image. Paladinum2 (talk) 10:55, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. The Flickr-user appears to be a news organisation that seems to be re-using someone else’s photo. --Green Giant (talk) 15:47, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It says in the flickr page: "Divulgação" which means the uploader is not the owner, he is publishing someone else's image. Paladinum2 (talk) 10:56, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Disagree. "Divulgação" means the uploader is not the owner of the image for who? You? Chronus (talk) 23:12, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
As I said in the other request, its quite common in the journalism in Brasil. "Divulgação" is used for images when you are publishing it in the news but you are not the owner, as you can see in those examples: Here, also here and here too. It's quite common. Paladinum2 (talk) 03:17, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. The Flickr-user appears to be a news organisation that seems to be re-using someone else’s photo. --Green Giant (talk) 15:47, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FOP UK isn’t ok for 2D graphic works. ”Section 62 of the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 is broader than the corresponding provisions in many other countries, and allows photographers to take pictures of buildings, and sculptures, models for buildings and works of artistic craftsmanship (if permanently situated in a public place or in premises open to the public). without breaching copyright. Such photographs may be published in any way. Note that under UK law, "works of artistic craftsmanship" are defined separately from "graphic works". Graphic works are defined in Section 4 as any painting, drawing, diagram, map, chart or plan, any engraving, etching, lithograph, woodcut or similar work. The freedom provided by Section 62 does not apply to graphic works - such as a mural or poster - even if they are permanently located in a public place. These cannot be uploaded to Commons without a licence from the copyright holder.”

* File:Liverpool FC crest on Walton Breck Road.jpg * File:Liverpool FC crest, Main Stand.jpg

Jonteemil (talk) 13:23, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, didn’t check the uploader.Jonteemil (talk) 15:01, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I also recommend you look at those files at the highest zoom level. Rodhullandemu (talk) 15:15, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough, should’ve noticed.Jonteemil (talk) 15:22, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I see these two nominations are still not withdrawn. For the avoidance of doubt, here are side views of the two signs to show depth of approx. 2 cm: File:Liverpool FC crest, Main Stand - side view.jpg, File:Liverpool FC crest on Walton Breck Road - side view.jpg. Rodhullandemu (talk) 19:53, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

They were de facto withdrawn. Just hadn’t removed {{Delete}} :).Jonteemil (talk) 23:56, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Mostly 3D images including the knitted badges. I deleted the Welton Rovers image because it is clearly not PD per File:Welton Rovers F.C.png. --Green Giant (talk) 16:08, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Eventhough all these three logos were nominated in the previous nomination I've decided to nominate them again. The reason for this being that I don't really think the previous discussion said anything on these logos. The nomination mostly focused on the Liverpool 3D work. I would like to have a discussion about these logos this time. Are they okay or not?

Jonteemil (talk) 22:29, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

None of these are permanently located outside which I think is the thing that makes them not okay per COM:FOP UK.Jonteemil (talk) 22:33, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - not permanently displayed. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:01, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in the UK, sophisticated copyrighted logos.

Ytoyoda (talk) 20:56, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleting per nomination. Thanks for participating in Deletion Requests and for assuming good faith in my decision. If you disagree, please visit COMMONS:Undeletion requests before you visit my talk page. Thanks and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:15, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused creator template Mike Peel (talk) 18:26, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 16:17, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Eatcha as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Hari Om Sharan died 17 December 2007, Queens, New York, United States. The lyrics is in PD but not the musics.
Converted by me to regular DR to allow for discussion, as on its source the file is indeed tagged CC-Zero. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:35, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Túrelio SEE track 8 at https://play.google.com/music/preview/Ta3rqv4ekkfrcbmhtqr75pbkuci?play=1 -- Eatcha (talk) 10:06, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The source does say CC-0, but it also credits Shri Hari Om Sharan ji as the author. He died in 2007. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:43, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Carte existant déjà au format .svg : voir File:Eknomos battle.svg Augusta 89 (talk) 12:17, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion-- in use. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:47, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Carte existant déjà au format .svg : voir File:Battle of Cape Ecnomus.svg Augusta 89 (talk) 12:21, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - widely used. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:47, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

My name is Paul Amaroli. This is an unattributed redrawn copy of my copyrighted map which appears as Figure 7.4 on page 198 of my book published in 2015, "Arqueología de El Salvador" ISBN 9789996105760. OCLC 979997295. 190.86.199.217 16:27, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion -- We do not respond to claims from anonymous IP users. Please make your claim using [[OTRS}} and include a scan of the page from the book. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:49, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of a copyrighted logo which is above COM:TOO Sweden Jonteemil (talk) 17:31, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:49, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Above COM:TOO Sweden

Jonteemil (talk) 10:59, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:45, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Some might be above COM:TOO Sweden which states that "A simple general rule is that if it is unlikely that two persons would create, for example, a text identically or similarly, the text is probably sufficiently original to qualify as a protected work. (..) Often, the requirements for copyright protection are considered to be relatively low."

Jonteemil (talk) 11:07, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Noteworthy is that File:Norrby IF logo.svg and File:Pitea IF logo.svg were deleted because they were above COM:TOO Sweden.Jonteemil (talk) 11:09, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:46, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

3 files undeleted as per [7]. Yann (talk) 21:18, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]