Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/10/14
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
Has been redirected for a category rather than a page ImperialArchivesRU (talk) 01:27, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Achim (talk) 08:13, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
source : magazine Elle. Image sous copyright Olivier Tanguy (talk) 09:27, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:COPYVIO. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 16:08, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
The logo is not licensed under CC. Source site says "© 2019 CAsB - Clube de Astronomia de Brasília. Todos direitos reservados." In my opinion this is not a simple logo and should be deleted. Taivo (talk) 08:04, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted. False license.-- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:52, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Accidentally uploaded Sarahdietz (talk) 08:04, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted prompt uploader request -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:49, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
uploaded by accident Sissyprissybum (talk) 08:09, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted prompt uploader request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:48, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Shiota est en vie. Je ne vois pas comment cette photographie peut respecter le droit d'auteur. Toyotsu (talk) 08:10, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Artist is alive. How can this picture respect her rights ?--Toyotsu (talk) 08:50, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted Work of living artist; DW by Flickr photographer. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:51, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
There may be a copyright on this artwork (which I was not aware of before); I need to find out this first, before this file can be made available here Michael.riessler (talk) 08:19, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted per prompt uploader request.-- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:54, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. By British rules this is not a simple logo. Taivo (talk) 10:37, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted false license claim. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:34, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Not found at URL. Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:07, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, also unused and dubious license claim. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:33, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Unused made-up coat of arms for a non-existing noble title (Lord & Lady Pightley, which, according to the "Roll of the Peerage" at the College of Arms, which lists *all* British peerages, does *not* exist; see also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Lordship of Westbury Nernewtes Crest.jpg for another fantasy coat of arms by the same uploader) Thomas.W talk 12:05, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted Prank/personal vanity image, OOS -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:03, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Solomon203 (talk) 12:20, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted per nom, clear case, no contributions by uploader since, glitch incomplete upload, OOS. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:45, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted per nom; dubious license claim as well. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:23, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:22, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
I believe that I had mistakenly uploaded this thinking that it might be public domain since the image was posted on the author's website, as well as other news sources. I'm becoming doubtful the image's license, and might be a copyright violation. Nrco0e (talk) 15:16, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted No evidence of claimed license at source site. Thanks for bringing this to our attention. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:22, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
No Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine. Uploader did not create 3D object depicted. Created 1995. No Permission. Nik Deleter (talk) 17:23, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 16:58, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
And other files with No FoP from this category.
No FoP in Ukraine. Created 1995. No Permission from the sculptor Данило Чепіль. Re-uploaded. Микола Василечко (talk) 13:13, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted along with other images in the category where the statue was the sole or clearly primary subject of the photo. (I leave images where the statue is more incidental to others more familiar with Ukraine law; perhaps separate deletion request.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:41, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
ad for cat food - importer is a vandal, blocked as such Hsarrazin (talk) 20:48, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by 1989 at 21:55, 14 Oktober 2019 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 01:06, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Vetallio (talk) 03:52, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 06:42, 15 Oktober 2019 UTC: CSD G7 (author or uploader request deletion) --Krdbot 13:05, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/68162.htm Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:49, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1). Bogus license claim; no CC license at source, to the contrary: "No material produced by NATO is to be sold, used for outside advertising or promotional purposes of any kind"; "Photos, videos and articles are released under the legally recognized terms of 'Fair Use' to members of the press, academia, non-profits and the general public"; etc. --Эlcobbola talk 15:31, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
Wrong license. "TSK" don't have public domain license. Ahmet Turhan (talk) 20:04, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 09:16, 15 Oktober 2019 UTC: Copyright violation: This image has a copyright watermark on it, and there is no evidence that the listed source licenses their content under the CC or GFDL as the uploader has claimed. --Krdbot 13:07, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
Not found at URL. Anyway their videos are not under CC. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:54, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 09:26, 15 Oktober 2019 UTC: Copyright violation: https://www.redbolivision.tv.bo/actualidad/dra-paola-barriga-renuncia-pdc-83038 --Krdbot 13:07, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
Wrong license. Ahmet Turhan (talk) 20:00, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Elcobbola at 15:36, 15 Oktober 2019 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1): https://i.sozcu.com.tr/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/14/iecrop/tsk-menbic-dha1_9685440_16_9_1571045296.jpg?v=5387748 --Krdbot 01:05, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Vetallio (talk) 19:47, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: yesterday by User:Túrelio. --Achim (talk) 20:26, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Vetallio (talk) 20:01, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: yesterday by User:Túrelio. --Achim (talk) 20:27, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
It's not the current Thai highway route shield. (That route is local road not highway) Oum13928 (talk) 16:20, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
Infringement of Copyright Oum13928 (talk) 15:12, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, just use {{Rename}} instead. Whose copyright has been infringed? P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:57, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
This File is stop using Oum13928 (talk) 07:17, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
- Are you saying this type of sign is no longer used? That is not a reason for deletion; it is historic documentation. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:31, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. JGHowes talk 03:22, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
This file is no longer in use. Oum13928 (talk) 12:51, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
Keep: This file is in use on en:Thai highway network and has been since May this year. Until the picture is permanently removed from Wikipedia, it should be kept here under COM:INUSE. --bjh21 (talk) 13:21, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Feel free to rename that file if necessary. --Achim (talk) 12:57, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Delete Lucphan (talk) 00:55, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Hedwig in Washington at 07:21, 17 Oktober 2019 UTC: Missing essential information such as license, permission or source (F5) Media missing permission as of 8 October 2019 --Krdbot 13:01, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
Its a repeat Johnny Shoestring (talk) 08:38, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by ~riley at 06:27, 17 Oktober 2019 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Johnny Shoestring --Krdbot 13:02, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
It is a memorial marker of Luis Dato. Stephentalla (talk) 14:55, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept, it is still valid file. Taivo (talk) 07:33, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
As per COM:FOP Switzerland: …freedom of panorama does not apply to interior spaces. Hence Article 27 cannot be invoked for depictions produced in the staircase or the rooms of a building. …if the place is only accessible to certain categories of persons…, it is no longer "accessible to the public. Sealle (talk) 05:18, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
The picture was taken by the artist, of her own work, is this still an issue in that case? Gab1one (talk) 11:40, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
- Please follow COM:OTRS procedure to confirm this. Sealle (talk) 15:33, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
- Ok I sent a mail to that address, thank you for letting me know about it Gab1one (talk) 21:21, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Ticket:2019101910004219 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 05:00, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per OTRS permission. --Krd 09:39, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Dobrý den, na fotografii je zobrazena moje nemovitost, konkrétně č.p. 35. K zveřejnění jsem Vám nedal souhlas. Prosím aby jste fotku odstranili. 90.182.118.227 07:02, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 03:30, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Abhishek tarar (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos. Out of scope.
- File:Abhishek Tarar signature.jpg
- File:PicsArt 10-25-09.23.07 gghh.jpg
- File:20161111183404aajjcr.jpg
- File:PicsArt 10-25-05.45.04a.jpg
- File:Abhishek Tarar Bishnoi.jpg
- File:Abhishek Tarar 29.jpg
- File:Abhishek Tarar bishnoi.jpg
- File:Abhishek Tarar.jpg
Hindust@niक्या करें? बातें! 16:37, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:45, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Abhishek tarar (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos of non-contributors, all edits are within user namespace. Blocked on en.wiki for being an promo-only account.
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:16, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 03:33, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Copyright holder in EXIF = Stanislaw Machaczek, not uploader (= depicted person). Same for File:PŘEDNÍ STRANA - COVER.jpg. 194.79.55.130 14:25, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:44, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Copa von https://www.senertec.de/der-dachs-pro-20/ RoBri (talk) 14:47, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:44, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:44, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:44, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Tourist snapshot uploaded from Flickr. No clear motive or educational purpose; out of scope. We have a subtantial number of photos of Submarine S323 Sælen and photos of Category:Port of Copenhagen Pugilist (talk) 14:52, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Tourist snapshots of Flickr can sometimes be good illustrations, but not in this case - only shows what Commons already has many better photos of. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:35, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:40, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Facebook photo according to EXIF data. Moreover no freedom od panorana for sculptures in Russia. ~Cybularny Speak? 15:13, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:39, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:58, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:39, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by এহছানুল হক (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: unused private image
- File:Ehsanul Hoque3.jpg
- File:Ehsanul Hoque4.jpg
- File:Ehsanul Hoque6.jpg
- File:Ehsanul Hoqeu.jpg
- File:Ehsanul Hoque2.jpg
- File:Ehsanul Hoque1.jpg
- File:Ehsanul Hoque.png
Cjp24 (talk) 15:58, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:39, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Stills from unfree video.
- File:김소현 BTS 조선로코 녹두전.png
- File:Kim So Hyun at 2019 S-S HERA Fashion Week 1.png
- File:Kim So Hyun at 2019 S-S HERA Fashion Week 5.png
- File:Kim So Hyun at 2019 S-S HERA Fashion Week 4.png
- File:Kim So Hyun at 2019 S-S HERA Fashion Week 3.png
- File:Kim So Hyun at 2019 S-S HERA Fashion Week 2.png
Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:16, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:33, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
Unable to confirm whether Yu Dae-gil (유대길) is part of the team or gave the permission to AJUTV. + watermarked Star Log, while account name is AJUTV. Archived source. See also, Commons:Deletion requests/File:김소현 (Kim Sohyun), 인스타그램 커뮤니티 기자간담회 스타로그 01.png
- File:김소현 (Kim Sohyun), 인스타그램 커뮤니티 기자간담회 스타로그 02.png
- File:김소현 (Kim Sohyun), 인스타그램 커뮤니티 기자간담회 스타로그 03.png
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:14, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:50, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
Derived from a k drama (en:The Tale of Nokdu), thus youtube license is invalid.
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:17, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:50, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
- File:190927 여자아이들 수진 GMP.jpg
- File:190925 Soojin Uh-Oh (2).jpg
- File:190922 Soojin Welcome To The Neverland.jpg
- File:190925 Soojin Uh-Oh.jpg
- File:181220 수진 (Soojin) 여자아이들 ((G)I-dle) KPMA.jpg
- File:180610 Soojin Fansigning Event.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:02, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:36, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Possibly fair use.
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:48, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete surpasses COM:TOO IMO. Masum Reza📞 10:08, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:14, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE, low quality. Ahmadtalk 16:21, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Da svakako već sam dao svoje viđenje ovog pitanja i dalje ostajem iza toga što sam rekao.Sliku ne treba obrisati vec treba raditi na unapredjenu profila, I ako prihvatamo znanje da stranica koja se vde prafi nije profil,blog niti forum ne služi za lično predstavljanje niti je deo predstavljanja I reklamiranje.Ovako izgradjen profil stranice bi doneo da se stvori kvalitetna veya koja bi mogla biti lako proverljiva I sa koje bi se mogli graditi članci koji bi se širili I unapređivali.Da se literature koja bi bila korišćema ne bi morala tražiti na drugim mestima ovako koncipiranim pregledom bi se došlo do kvalitetnog proveravanja I istom mestu gde je članak I napisam jer je sve arhivirano I iza svakog članka koji se napiše ostaje literature koja je korišćena I ista se nalazi kod autora članka stranice.Iz tog razloga I promocije takve vrste stranice moglo bi se dozvoliti da izvor bude svojevrstan profil sa kojeg bi se išlo dalje. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dragan988 (talk • contribs) 14:02, 16 October 2019 (UTC) I da slika jeste autorska I napravljena je za potrebe izrade SV - a, pa I razlozi koji su navedeni, od osobe koja je navela, za brisanje su konverzibilni.
Deleted: per nomination; only used on a promotional WP page. --Gbawden (talk) 06:35, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
I could find File:Practical training for civil engineering students sem6.jpg and File:Civil Engineering Laboratory.jpg ([1]) on the web. Since all these files are similar to each other and none of them has metadata, I think they all need OTRS permission.
- File:Practical training for civil engineering students sem6.jpg
- File:Practical training for civil engineering students SEM4.jpg
- File:Students undertaking practical training and the Dean of the faculty stands between them.jpg
- File:Students undertaking surveying practical.jpg
- File:Civil Engineering Laboratory.jpg
- File:Practical training for civil engineering students.jpg
Ahmadtalk 16:33, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:32, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE. Ahmadtalk 17:21, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:32, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE, promotional. Ahmadtalk 17:21, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:32, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
An unused and uncategorised image. Commons is not a private photo album. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 19:51, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:31, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
An unused and uncategorised image. Commons is not a private photo album. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 19:51, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:31, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by S Ehsanul Hoque (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE.
Ahmadtalk 20:34, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:30, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE, can be promotional. Ahmadtalk 20:39, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:29, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by KarenTeam.68 (talk · contribs)
[edit]If A self portraits permission of Erin Marie Hogan needed via COM:OTRS.
- File:Erin Marie Hogan.jpg
- File:Erin Marie Hogan Self Portrait.jpg
- File:Erin Marie Hogan New Blood ESports.jpg
- File:Erin Marie Hogan Self Portrait 2019.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:26, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:28, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Jackson Hedden
[edit]Jackson Hedden might be a notable designer but this looks like xwiki self-promotion using several accounts to veil his identity: User:Jackson hedden = User:Ben Hedden = User:Jasonflyfly = User:Henry3600 = User:JJames 1967 = User:Idlover265 = User:Boutique Designers. In addition I doubt that the images are own work.
- File:Bentley Motors industrial design with Jackson Hedden.jpg
- File:Gillette razor sketching Jackson Hedden industrial design.jpg
- File:Gillette shaving Jackson Hedden industrial design.png
- File:Jackson hedden designer.jpg
- File:Jackson Hedden industrial design Kabaq 3d scanner.jpg
- File:Jackson Hedden industrial design playground.jpg
- File:Jackson hedden Industrial designer lamborghini.png
- File:Jackson Hedden industrial designer.jpg
- Jackson hedden
for the record: already deleted are
- File:Jackson hedden apple headphones.jpg
- File:Jackson Hedden industrial design particalboard longboard.jpg
Achim (talk) 22:45, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
I notified User:Boutique Designers about our OTRS procedure. --Achim (talk) 08:49, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
- Ticket:2019101610007678 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 03:00, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Now has OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 06:26, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Poor quality image (crop), unused. Cuatro Remos (nütramyen) 23:26, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 03:37, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Unused image of math equation that could be done in TeX, with in-image caption text that interferes with reuse. DMacks (talk) 05:09, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:10, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Only used on the Portuguese Wikipedia, where the subject's article was speedily deleted in March 2017 as spam. Out of project scope. Additionally, as a professional portrait, this requires COM:OTRS from the photographer. ƏXPLICIT 05:54, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:10, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
An unused and uncategorised image. Commons is not a private photo album. Estopedist1 (talk) 07:06, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:11, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
An unused and uncategorised image. Commons is not a private photo album. Estopedist1 (talk) 07:08, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:11, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Unknown signature. An unused and uncategorised image. Looks like some sort of personal artwork. Estopedist1 (talk) 07:09, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:12, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
An unused and uncategorised image. Looks like some sort of personal artwork. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 07:14, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:12, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Unused file. Description translates as "Mayita and Sam wait for a baby, we are all happy.". Personal message - Out of scope Malcolma (talk) 10:34, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:12, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
no country, party, date of election stated, unused file. c:File:My Parliament.svg is available for testing. Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 12:15, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:13, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Aarif-Mohammad-Gkp (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused userpage images, Out of COM:SCOPE and in conflict with COM:NOTHOST.
CptViraj (📧) 13:54, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:14, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:10, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:15, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:16, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:16, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Logo of some youtube channel with (currently) 367 subscribers. COM:SCOPE? El Grafo (talk) 14:43, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:16, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by H-FINE PRODUCER (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:ADVERT for some youtube channel with (currently) 367 subscribers. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:4K-NEW LOGO 2018.png
- File:H-FINE PRODUCER .2019.jpg
- File:VIZITKA-2019.jpg
- File:Blue-logo2019.png
- File:TAHA.jpg
- File:Logo-4k-2019.jpg
- File:H-fine producer 2019.jpg
El Grafo (talk) 15:10, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:17, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Unused personal picture, unusable due to low resolution. Watchduck (quack) 15:55, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:18, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Unused personal picture. Unusable due to heavy editing. Watchduck (quack) 16:00, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:18, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Too heavily edited to be of any use. Watchduck (quack) 16:29, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:19, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Victor Petals Blade (talk · contribs)
[edit]Band without notability, user blocked at pt.wiki
- File:Demoholocausto2019.jpg
- File:Petalsbladefrompa01.jpg
- File:3540451167 photo.jpg
- File:Petalsbladefrompa.jpg
Stanglavine (talk) 17:13, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:19, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
This image not represented the seminary located in Chemmad. I think the image is the front side of new buildings of Tirurangadi Muslim Orphanage. Kutyava (talk) 03:56, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
- Keep until English Wikipedia stops using it on en:Darul Huda Islamic University (COM:NPOV). --bjh21 (talk) 14:26, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: A wrong description is not a reason for deletion. If the description is wrong, please correct it and also move the image to an appropriate new file name. Otherwise, this image seems to be fine. --Gestumblindi (talk) 18:23, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Publisher likeky G. Llinares, active into the 1920s. PD claim hence uncertain — Racconish 💬 20:55, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 07:43, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
self-request userpage deletion. Superceded by global UP. don't delete discussion page. Classy Melissa (talk) 23:13, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:11, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
América Dance 90's América Dance 90's 00:43, 14 October 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Americadance90 (talk • contribs) 00:43, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. We don't delete user talk pages. --Achim (talk) 21:22, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
Delete Lucphan (talk) 00:56, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: We do not delete user talk pages. --Achim (talk) 21:24, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
Uploaded by all vandalism account. Very unlikely to be own work. 98.114.251.181 01:26, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Worthless, poor quality, non-educational and out of scope. AshFriday (talk) 08:58, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
I agree that this page needs to be deleted ASAP JackBorielus (talk) 14:28, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Rudolphous with rationale "probably DR". Non-admin closure. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 04:56, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
Dubious PD claims
- File:. 00 Église de Saint Christol Colonnes de l'abside.jpg
- File:.Ansouis vue générale du village.jpg
- picture from here. This site tells that picture date is 1945. Hexasoft (talk) 08:52, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
- File:.Ganagobie Crâne du moine fendu par une épée.jpg
- File:.Heinrich Kley Vendanges et pressurage.jpg
- File:.Heinrich Kley Vendanges.jpg
- File:.Henry Edmond 1947.jpg
- here. No date. Hexasoft (talk) 08:56, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
- File:.Potier de Clousclat.jpg
- File:01 Loup-garou ou werewolve.jpg
- postal card by fr:Charles Homualk. No date, but image can be found on many sites. Hexasoft (talk) 09:02, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
- File:1943 Diane Kotchoubey de Beauharnais à Vézelay.jpg
- File:Abbaye de Silvacane Vue de l'abbatiale.jpg
- File:Abbaye de Silvacane Vue générale.jpg
- File:Aix (Aquae Sextiae).jpg
- File:Albin Durand mort à Sarrians 1er août 1944.jpg
- File:Ali Yata, secrétaire général du PCM puis du PLS clandestin.jpg
- picture probably a crop+flip version of 1st picture of this page. Moreover it is stated that picture was taken in 1940s. Yata was born in 1920, I doubt that he is 20-30 years old on this picture. Hexasoft (talk) 08:39, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
- File:Alibert Affiche de Pol Rob 1937.jpg
- File:Alibert dans les années 1930.jpg
- File:Alibert En Avignon.jpg
- File:Alibert Quand on a ces yeux là.jpg
- File:Alibert, Un de la Canebière.jpg
- File:Allauch Chiques du mousse.jpg
- File:Allauch Suce-miel.jpg
- File:Ansouis en 1945.jpg
- File:AOC Caramany Vendanges en famille en 1947.jpg
- File:AOC Frangy et son vignoble.jpg
- picture comes from this selling site. Back of the card is dated 1959, not 1939 as claimed in image description on common. Hexasoft (talk) 09:17, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
- File:Aubagne Thèrèse Neveu (1866 - 1946).jpg
- File:Aubière Cave coopérative La Clermontoise.jpg
- File:Avignon Lavande du mont Ventoux.jpg
- File:Avignon Épicerie Parisienne 1947.jpg
- File:Barret de Lioure Gros rocher dégagé par l'érosion.jpg
- File:Barret de Lioure Vue générale.jpg
- File:Bataille Georges 1940.jpg
- File:Brousse du Rove Élaboration de la brousse vers 1939.jpg
- File:Buis Platanes centenaires et Arbre de la Liberté.jpg
- File:Buis porte Renaissance colorisée.jpg
- File:Buis Porte Renaissance et église.jpg
- File:Buis porte Renaissance N et B.jpg
- File:Buis-les-Baronnies Agriculture.jpg
- File:Buis-les-Baronnies Ancien couvent dominicain.jpg
- File:Buis-les-Baronnies Chapelle Saint-Trophime dite de l'ermitage.jpg
- File:Buis-les-Baronnies Chapelle Saint-Trophime et Rocher Saint-Julien.jpg
- File:Buis-les-Baronnies Chapelle Saint-Trophime.jpg
- File:Buis-les-Baronnies Château du Rieu Chaud.jpg
- File:Buoux Vestiges du fort.jpg
- File:Buoux Vue générale du fort.jpg
- File:Buoux Église primitive.jpg
- File:Bédarrides (Château d'eau).jpg
- File:Bédarrides (Eglise St Laurent & cure).jpg
- File:Bédarrides (Sorgues et Ouvèze).jpg
- File:Bédarrides Mairie.jpg
- File:Cabane traditionnelle en Camargue.jpg
- File:Callas Clocher de l'église.jpg
- File:Callas-du-Var Ruines du vieux château et vue du village.jpg
- File:Camargue Course de taureau aux Saintes-Maries.jpg
- File:Camargue Taureaux et gardian.jpg
- File:Camargue Vers la ferrade.jpg
- File:Caromb Pêches au sirop.jpg
- File:Carpentras Confiture d'abricots.jpg
- File:Carpentras Confiture de fruits confits.jpg
- File:Carpentras G. Eysseric Bigarreaux confits.jpg
- File:Carpentras G. Eysseric Confiture tous fruits.jpg
- File:Carpentras Joseph Rol fruits confits.png
- File:Carpentras Lycée Victor Hugo et église Saint-Dominique.jpg
- File:Carpentras Léon Blanc Aubergines.jpg
- File:Carpentras Léon Blanc Haricots verts.jpg
- File:Carpentras Léon Blanc Tomates coupées.jpg
- File:Carpentras Léon Blanc Tomates entières.jpg
- File:Carpentras église Saint-Dominique.jpg
- File:Caseneuve Constant Delan, berger.jpg
- File:Cavalaire-sur-Mer La plage.jpg
- File:Cavalaire-sur-Mer Le Cap et vue sur Croix-Valmer.jpg
- File:Cave coopérative des Costières de Générac.jpg
- File:Chabrot en Drôme provençale.jpg
- File:Chabrot sur un pot-au-feu albigeois.jpg
- File:Château de Ripaille Cuisine des chartreux de l'Annonciade-delà-les-Monts.jpg
- File:Cogolin Vue generale 1941.jpg
- File:Confection d'un Oreiller de la Belle Aurore.jpg
- File:Crau Anciennes comportes.jpg
- File:Crau Pèse tonneau.jpg
- File:Cruis Intérieur du cloître.jpg
- File:Cuisinières provençales préparant le gros souper en Uzège.jpg
- File:Céreste 1939 Colonie de vacances à la gare SNCF.jpg
- File:Céreste Cuisinière préparant des crêpes pour la Chandeleur.jpg
- File:Céreste La cuisinière préparant un tian.jpg
- File:Céreste Tarte des Alpes.jpg
- File:Côtes du Rhône AOC affiche de 1938 rouge blanc rosé.jpg
- File:Côtes du Rhône buvard côte flambée de 1931.jpg
- File:Danse de la souche en pays d'Apt.jpg
- File:Danse de la souche à Lérins ile Saint-Honorat.jpg
- File:Danse des cordelles gravure début XXe s.jpg
- File:Danse provençale et tambourinaïres.jpg
- File:Danse sur le Pont d’Avignon.jpg
- File:Donjon de Saint-André-de-Lancize Vallée Française.jpg
- File:Dégustation au tastevin.jpg
- File:Dégustation avec un tastevin.jpg
- File:Dégustation de vin au tastevin.jpg
- File:Gonfaron Chapelle Saint-Quinis.jpg
- File:Hautes-Alpes La Vignette de Saint-Martin-de-Queyrières Caves troglodytes.jpg
- File:House of Turenne Vicomté 1738.jpg
- File:IGP Côtes-du-lot Vignes à Albas.jpg
- File:IGP Lavilledieu 1949 cave coopérative.jpg
- File:Intérieur d'une cabane de gardian en Camargue.jpg
- File:Intérieur d'une cabane en Camargue.jpg
- File:Jean Bringer, chef militaire de la Résistance dans l'Aude.jpg
- File:L'aioli Intérieur provençal.jpg
- File:La Balmette Ferme avec sa parcelle de vigne à l'entrée du hameau.jpg
- File:La Balmette maison et pressoir.jpg
— Racconish 💬 15:18, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:ANU + manual review. ~riley (talk) 16:42, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Released by Liebig c. 1960 [2] .
- File:1 Brillat-Savarin membre de l'Assemblée constituante.jpg
- File:2 Brillat-Savarin fugitif.jpg
- File:3 Brillat-Savarin au Lion d'Argent.jpg
- File:4 Brillat-Savarin en Amérique.jpg
- File:5 Brillat-Savarin secrétaire du personnel de l'armée.jpg
- File:6 Brillat-Savarin intervenant devant des amateurs de gastronomie.jpg
— Racconish 💬 20:45, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
All files deleted by ~riley. Non-admin closure. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 04:58, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
The author wrongly claims this image is their own work. It is actually a misleading crop of the image at https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms14845/figures/4 which was written by Gavin L. Foster, Dana L. Royer & Daniel J. Lunt. JohnnyOneSpeed (talk) 02:22, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:39, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
wrong namespace created Bodhisattwa (talk) 04:14, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Achim (talk) 19:59, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
unauthorized use. the person is not john spyridakis. 2604:2000:E2C3:9500:20DF:C58D:8B84:AA6 13:16, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. Ruthven (msg) 16:49, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
no article exists on person 68.174.123.217 18:15, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: duplicate DR. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:42, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Claimed to be own work but this looks like a newspaper scan. It appears that the uploader has a history of copyright violations. Whpq (talk) 02:43, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 12:36, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
- also file:Schick Shadel Hospital Entrance.jpg
Both photos can be found at https://www.schickshadel.com . Every photo previously published in internet needs OTRS-permission from copyright holder (usually from photographer). Taivo (talk) 08:16, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 12:37, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by LaviniusHispanus (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE.
- File:Lorenzo Peña 2019-09-24.png
- File:Lorenzo Peña 2019-10-01.png
- File:Lorenzo Peña 2019-10-08.png
- File:Lorenzo Peña on his publicly displayed video, 2019-07-30.png
Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:37, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Please, Patrick, can you be specific about why those files are outside Commons:Scope? — Preceding unsigned comment added by LaviniusHispanus (talk • contribs) 15:30, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
- @LaviniusHispanus: You're right: Lorenzo Peña is within scope; I've changed the rationale. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:17, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ~riley (talk) 02:04, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by LaviniusHispanus (talk · contribs)
[edit]Screenshots. "Lorenzo" as author in EXIF.
- File:Lorenzo Peña 2019-09-24.png
- File:Lorenzo Peña 2019-10-01.png
- File:Lorenzo Peña 2019-10-08.png
- File:Lorenzo Peña on his publicly displayed video, 2019-07-30.png
Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:18, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Is "Lorenzo" mentioned as an author in the EXIF of File:Lorenzo Peña on his publicly displayed video, 2019-07-30.png ? I doubt it. Anyway I am the creator of the photographs I can try to delete the EXIF in those photographs, but editing metadata in PNG files is far from easy Yours faithfully Lavinius Hispanus — Preceding unsigned comment added by LaviniusHispanus (talk • contribs) 16:48, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
- You are not intended to remove the EXIF files. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:54, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Then what can I do? I am afraid I have got no control over the EXIF metadata Yours faithfully Lavinius Hispanus — Preceding unsigned comment added by LaviniusHispanus (talk • contribs) 17:07, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 12:35, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Gone. --Herby talk thyme 12:49, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by DominiqueB3 (talk · contribs)
[edit]https://news.expats.cz/design/czech-students-create-unique-forest-dwellings/
- File:Český ostrovní dům, navrhla Tereza Čivrná a Markéta Fraňková.jpg
- File:Český ostrovní dům, navrhl Petr Čmelík a Martin Stark.jpg
- File:Český ostrovní dům, navrhl Daniel Brýda.jpg
- File:Český ostrovní dům, navrhl Vojtěch Lichý, Petr Pávek.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:32, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 12:39, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:47, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 12:40, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Low-re images, unlikely to be own work.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:14, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:26, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Bogus license. Should be sourced & re-licensed if in public domain.
- File:Cyprus anastasiades eucouncil.jpg
- File:Romania iohannis eucouncil.jpg
- File:Kyriakos-mitsotakis eucouncil.jpg
- File:Antti-rinne eucouncil.png
- File:Gitanas-nauseda eucouncil.jpg
- File:MacerataMonumentoLuce.jpg
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:58, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 12:43, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
EXIF says © Sean Malyon, not Donna Sydee? El Grafo (talk) 15:05, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 12:45, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work of the uploader, looks like a screenshot from a video. jdx Re: 15:13, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 12:45, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
© National Portrait Gallery, London Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:18, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 12:45, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
This is obviously a posed publicity photo. See this event notice from Dec 2015 and this press release from Nov 2015 which both predate the upload to Commons. OTRS confirmation that the uploader is the copyright holder would be needed. Whpq (talk) 15:23, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 12:46, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Raje Ghatge (talk · contribs)
[edit]Uploader is the person pictured: unlikely to be own works.
- File:Raje Samarjeetsinh Ghatge With Wife Navodita Ghatge.jpg
- File:Samarjeetsinh Ghatge.jpg
- File:Samarjeetsinh Ghatge Images.jpg
- File:Raje Samarjeetsinh Ghatge Images 1.jpg
- File:Raje Samarjeetsinh Ghatge Image.jpg
- File:Raje Samarjeetsinh Ghatge pictures.jpg
- File:Raje Samarjeetsinh Ghatge Photo.jpg
- File:Raje Samarjeetsinh Ghatge At Airport.jpg
- File:Raje Samarjeetsinh Ghatge Images.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:10, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 12:47, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Low-re image, unlikely to be own work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:20, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 12:50, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
This image of a modern car does not belong on the original early 1900's Spyker page, but rather on the 1999 founded Spyker Cars page. Roxtone (talk) 04:00, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Please reject deletion request. The nominator's objection appears to be not to the picture on wikipedia-commons, but to the use someone has made of it on English wikipedia. Not a reason to delete the image here. However, the nominator may well have some improvements he/she might consider applying him/herself in terms of captions or image usage on English-language wikipedia. Maybe a caption and/or additional article-text is needed to explain its inclusion on the English-language wikipedia article to which (presumably) the nominator objects in its present form. Or maybe it simply does not belong there. Maybe it belongs someplace(s) else on English, Dutch or other language versions of wikipedia? Maybe not. Regards Charles01 (talk) 07:51, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Please honor deletion request. I suggest one takes a look at both Wikipedia pages and then decides on which page this photo belongs. 1) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spyker 2) https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spyker_Cars Removal of a photo can't be done from inside Wikipedia but can only be done in Wikimedia Commons. AFAICS this photo isn't used anywhere else than on the wrong page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roxtone (talk • contribs) 15:32, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Roxtone Totally unnecessary, this user obviously doesn't know how removing images work on here. The images on here are stored on a repository which Wikipedia relay on when displaying images on a article, like when pasting a link, a image embedded is shown on the page. Other then that, this is a ridiculous reasons for this image to be deleted. --Vauxford (talk) 17:10, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Per above. Edit the article if the image should removed from the speciific article. The image is stored on WIkimedia Commons, a media repository, which does not dictate how the editorial content on WIkipedia should be done. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 13:19, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Korean War Veterans Memorial 15
[edit]Copyrighted sculpture (see previous DRs in this category).
– BMacZero (🗩) 18:14, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Speedy delete per nom, all sections above. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 14:56, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 01:43, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
obvious advertisement. The only uploading by this user. Redundant description Estopedist1 (talk) 09:22, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Keep advertisement: yes, -- but a nice picture of a warehouse in Bangladesh! Delete the advertisement, and keep the image!--ProfessorX (talk) 20:45, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Description trimmed and removed. Image kept as it might be usefull. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 13:26, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
Copyrighted image Vauxford (talk) 12:48, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Túrelio. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 13:31, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
Copyrighted image, lack of permission via OTRS and I can't find anything on the author's website stating there on a free license. Vauxford (talk) 12:48, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted Túrelio. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 13:31, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
Very likely to be a COM:DW, it isn't clear if the original image was taken by the uploader and/or published under a free license. Ahmadtalk 16:19, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 13:33, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
False license claim. Yogwi21 (talk) 03:21, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion -- pd textlogo. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Image of plain-text table. I removed it from its use-case as it did not add encyclopediac value, but if so it could easily be redone in wikitext DMacks (talk) 05:06, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Really bad quality and inaccurate version of the coat of arms of Honduras. There is a SVG and accurate version: Coat of arms of Honduras.svg, wich didn't use this one as source. Kes47 (?) 05:37, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - we don;t generally delete pre-existing pngs when an svg is created, In this case the two are very different and the older one renders some of the shield better than the svg. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:19, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
no exif data. stolen from http://tarokaloy.com/deepakhondokar-modelactressofbd/ Dead.rabbit (talk) 05:39, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:19, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
I own the picture. Oded Balilty, who appears in the photo with whom I am in contact, asked me to remove it because it represents him incorrectly and improperly. I would like to fulfill this request. Thanks אורי ברקת (talk) 05:49, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion -- as a rule, we do not delete three year old images at the uploader's request. we also do not delete images at the request of the subject when that request comes from a third party. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Probable copyright violation (the source does not support the license claimed in the description) Renerpho (talk) 05:55, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - no indication of any license at the source. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:23, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Created after 2010. No Permission from the sculptors. Микола Василечко (talk) 06:26, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Created after 2010. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 06:27, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Created after 20100. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 06:28, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
I googled the image. Seems like depicted woman isn't Carrie Lam and she is photoshopped into image instead of real Carrie Lam. Delete as hoax. Taivo (talk) 06:42, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination hoax and copyvio. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:26, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Created 2010. No Permission from the sculptors Володимир Стасюк (Рівне) and Андрій and Володимир Сухорські. Микола Василечко (talk) 06:47, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:26, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Created 2010. No Permission from the sculptors Володимир Стасюк (Рівне) and Андрій and Володимир Сухорські. Микола Василечко (talk) 06:47, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:26, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Created 2010. No Permission from the sculptors Володимир Стасюк (Рівне) and Андрій and Володимир Сухорські. Микола Василечко (talk) 06:48, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:26, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Created 2010. No Permission from the sculptors Володимир Стасюк (Рівне) and Андрій and Володимир Сухорські. Микола Василечко (talk) 16:02, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:54, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Created 2010. No Permission from the sculptors Володимир Стасюк (Рівне) and Андрій and Володимир Сухорські. Микола Василечко (talk) 06:50, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:26, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 06:53, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: A close call on the toy -- perhaps de minimis. However, given that and the fact that it's not a very good cat pix, I decided to delete it. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:29, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Because it is Other Beliag29 (talk) 07:03, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:30, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 08:23, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:31, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Information boards in Tallinn old town
[edit]These photographs are derivatives of non-free works.
- File:2018-04-21-16-24-51-IMG 7580 (46901698702).jpg
- File:2018-04-21-16-54-49-IMG 7671 (46039917675).jpg
- File:2018-04-21-17-08-27-IMG 7731 (39989389503).jpg
- File:2018-04-21-17-14-39-IMG 7743 (46901778362).jpg
- File:2018-04-21-17-24-38-IMG 7777 (39989409423).jpg
- File:2018-04-21-18-21-55-IMG 7963 (39989517743).jpg
- File:2018-04-21-18-01-42-IMG 7895 (46901852902).jpg
- File:2018-04-21-17-02-57-IMG 7712 (33078483128).jpg
--2001:7D0:81F7:B580:A158:9F25:9DE3:F57D 08:36, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:31, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
I don't see any reason for a commons-picture, where ist the release of the photographer? Tohma (talk) 09:16, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: 1967 image must still be under copyright and unknown author certainly didn't license it CC-BY-SA. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:32, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by DAOUD PEINTRE (talk · contribs)
[edit]David Daoud is born in 1970. Copyright violation.
- File:PORTRAIT HUILE SUR TOILE 100 X 102.JPG
- File:LA SOIREE HUILE SUR TOILE 150X168.JPG
- File:LA SOIREE HUILE SUR TOILE 150X167.JPG
- File:LA SOIREE HUILE SUR TOILE 150X166.JPG
- File:LA SOIREE HUILE SUR TOILE 150X163.JPG
- File:LA SOIREE HUILE SUR TOILE 150X164.JPG
- File:LA SOIREE HUILE SUR TOILE 150X160.JPG
- File:LA SOIREE HUILE SUR TOILE 150X159.JPG
- File:LA SOIREE HUILE SUR TOILE 150X158.JPG
- File:LA SOIREE HUILE SUR TOILE 150X156.JPG
- File:LA SOIREE HUILE SUR TOILE 150X157.JPG
- File:LA SOIREE HUILE SUR TOILE 150X155.JPG
- File:LA SOIREE HUILE SUR TOILE 150X153.JPG
- File:LA SOIREE HUILE SUR TOILE 150X154.JPG
- File:LA SOIREE HUILE SUR TOILE 150X152.JPG
- File:LA SOIREE HUILE SUR TOILE 150X151.JPG
Chassipress (talk) 09:38, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:33, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Erik the Red
[edit]Replica of the Seattle statue by August Werner [3] who died in 1980
— Racconish 💬 10:35, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:42, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#Product_packaging. -- Túrelio (talk) 11:00, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. My bad. Also delete the rest here - Category:Biscuits of Sri Lanka. I uploaded 10 more of these. All invalid. Aditya (talk) 12:08, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:42, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Definitely not "own work", but there is another problem here: the translator (B. Bielecka; likely Bronisława Bielecka (fl.ca. 1926-1938)) death date is unknown making its copyright status in both: Poland and US unclear. It might be PD in both if B.B. died before 1.1.1946, but no evidence for this. Ankry (talk) 11:06, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:43, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
No release is apparent for the performance rights or the on-stage artwork. The OTRS ticket is verification that a press certification exists, it has no bearing on performance rights. Fæ (talk) 11:14, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
The same issues arise with several other photographs of the performance at Category:Amon Amarth - Reload Festival 2017. --Fæ (talk) 11:15, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:43, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
cette photo est une publicité pour LG (donc sous copyright) bien qu'elle ait été uploadé depuis flickr. La licence sur Flickr est probablement fausse. Olivier Tanguy (talk) 11:58, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - flickrwashing. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:50, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
File:FILE PHOTO- Priyanka Gandhi Vadra adjusts her flower garlands during an election meeting at Rae Bareli.jpg
[edit]REUTERS/Pawan Kumar/File Photo, COM:LL Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:02, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:51, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Apparent copyright violation (the source does not seem to support a free license) Renerpho (talk) 12:03, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:51, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Está duplicado Antonio Aroca Arques (talk) 12:04, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:51, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Apparent copyright violation (the source does not seem to support a free license) Renerpho (talk) 12:06, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom (image in use in multiple projects) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:00, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:51, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Apparent copyright violation (the source does not seem to support a free license) Renerpho (talk) 12:07, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:51, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Apparent copyright violation (the source does not seem to support a free license) Renerpho (talk) 12:08, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:51, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Author is Florian Strasser per exif. Needs OTRS permission Gbawden (talk) 12:12, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:51, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Probable copyright violation. The file description does not mention PHL/UPR Arecibo, who seem to own the image. Compare http://www.sci-news.com/astronomy/science-gliese832c-potentially-habitable-super-earth-02029.html from 2014. Renerpho (talk) 12:15, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:52, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Derivatives of works with unclear copyright status. Uploader did not create 3D object depicted. Ukrainian copyright law does not contain a general exception for reproductions of works in public places. Микола Василечко (talk) 12:34, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:52, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Created after 2000. No Permission from the sculptor І. Маляр. Микола Василечко (talk) 12:37, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:52, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Created 1972. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 12:37, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:52, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Created after 1964. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 12:47, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:52, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Created 1966. No Permission from the sculptor Н. Чорний. Микола Василечко (talk) 12:50, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:53, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
File:Пам'ятник державному і військовому діячу, гетьману України Хмельницькому Богдану, м.Збараж, вул. Б. Хмельницького.jpg
[edit]And other files from this category.
No FoP in Ukraine. Created 1954. No Permission from the sculptor Я. Чайка, architect В. Скочеляс. Микола Василечко (talk) 12:52, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:53, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Created 1964. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 12:55, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:53, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Created after 1961. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 12:58, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:53, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Created 2009. No Permission from the sculptor Юрій Гав’юк. Микола Василечко (talk) 13:00, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:53, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Created 1991. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 13:03, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:53, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Created 1994. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 13:06, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:53, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Created 1994. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 13:06, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:53, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Created after 1990. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 13:10, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:53, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Created after 1957. No Permission from the sculptor / architect. Микола Василечко (talk) 13:22, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:53, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
And other files with No FoP from this category.
No FoP in Ukraine. Created after 1957. No Permission from the sculptor / architect. Микола Василечко (talk) 13:23, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:53, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Created after 1990. No Permission from the sculptor / architect. Микола Василечко (talk) 13:25, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:54, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
And also
No FoP in Ukraine. Created 1959. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 13:27, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:54, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
File:Пам'ятник державному і військовому діячу, гетьману України Богданові Хмельницькому, смт Скала-Подільська.jpg
[edit]No FoP in Ukraine. Created 1954. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 13:29, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:54, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Created after 2000. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 13:30, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:54, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
File:Тернопіль, б-р Т. Шевченка 21, Барельєф громадсько-політичного діяча В'ячеслава Чорновола.jpg
[edit]No FoP in Ukraine. Created after 2000. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 13:31, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:54, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Created 2008. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 13:32, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:54, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Created 1977. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 13:33, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:54, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Created 1992. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 13:35, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:54, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
The version of this logo is outdated. Current logo can be found here https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:USU_Logo.svg 217.89.145.130 13:47, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - we keep old logos for historical purposes. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:54, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Hervé Mhun died in 1968. No freedom of panorama in France. 86.249.233.253 13:48, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:55, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
The version of this logo is outdated. Current logo can be found here https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:USU_Logo.svg 217.89.145.130 13:48, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion we keep old logos for historical purposes. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:55, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
And other files from this category.
No FoP in Ukraine. Created 2000. No Permission from the sculptor / architect. Микола Василечко (talk) 13:55, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:55, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Created 1968. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 13:57, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:55, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Created 2011. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 13:58, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:55, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Created 2011. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 13:58, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:55, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Created 2011. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 13:59, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:55, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Small, low res, no metadata. Unlikely to be own work. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:00, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:55, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Created after 2000. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 14:09, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:56, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Created 1997. No Permission from the sculptor П. Кулик. Микола Василечко (talk) 14:10, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:56, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Faranjuned (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:COPYVIOs. No indication of user's own work on this gallery of photos of men, covers of modern books, insides of other books, what looks like six pages of school homework, and images obviously photocopied, scanned and uploaded to Commons.
- File:فیضؔ بہرائچی.jpg
- File:دلی مبارکباد.jpg
- File:Bls-logo.png
- File:Shariq Rabbani news.jpg
- File:Book released programme by Shariq Rabbani.jpg
- File:Shariq rabbani.jpg
- File:Novel Gardish e Ayyam by Shariq Rabbani.jpg
- File:ٖFiqr wa Fan by Shariq Rabbani.jpg
- File:Ahsasat-E-Faiz.jpg
- File:Haji Shafiullah Shafi Bahraichi news in hindustan.jpg
- File:Latif book first page.jpg
- File:Latif book cover.jpg
- File:مولانا قاری عبداللّطیف لطیفؔ بہرائچی.jpg
- File:Hasnain.khat5.jpg
- File:Hasnain.khat4.jpg
- File:Hasnain.khat3.jpg
- File:Hasnain.khat2.jpg
- File:Hasnain.khat1.jpg
- File:Hasnain.khat.jpg
- File:Cover of book yaadoon ki saughat by faraz hamidi and translate by Mohammad Hasnain.jpg
- File:Mohammad Hasnain.jpg
- File:Obaid with hamid ansari.jpg
- File:Seminar obaid ghazipur.jpg
- File:Obaidur Rahman Receiving an award.jpg
- File:Obaid.jpg
- File:Izhar warsi.jpg
- File:Shafi-bahraichi color photo.jpg
- File:Wasfi.bahraichi01.jpg
- File:Shafi bahraichi.jpg
- File:Mazar of Syed Salar Masoud Ghazi Bahraich.jpg
- File:ClockTower-Bahraich-By Faranjuned.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:17, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 00:31, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Faranjuned (talk · contribs)
[edit]This group of images contains posters & book covers as well as a series of re-photographed portraits, which are derivative works, not own work of uploader.
- File:Taabishen By Anjum Siddiqui.jpg
- File:Waqar Ahmad Shah.jpg
- File:Doobte Nagmaat By Gareeb Bahraichi .jpg
- File:Rubab Sayda.jpg
- File:Gareeb Bahraichi.jpg
- File:Wasiful Qadri 2.jpg
- File:Shauq-bahraichi.jpg
- File:Afkaar e wasfi cover front 02.jpg
- File:Afkaar e wasfi cover front 01.jpg
- File:Wasfi Bahraichi.jpg
- File:Qamar Rais Bahraichi.jpg
- File:Rafi Ahmad Kidwai.jpg
- File:Aiman Chughtai Nanparvi.jpg
- File:WasifUl Qadri.jpg
- File:NaeemUllah Khayali.jpg
- File:Shafi Bahraichi color photo.jpg
- File:Shafi Bahraichi.jpg
- File:Shriq Rabbani book 2.jpg
- File:Shriq Rabbani book 1.jpg
- File:Mahfooz-ur-rahman-naami.jpg
- File:Madarij-Ul-Khair by NaimUllah Khayali.jpg
- File:Beyan Khairul Bashar.jpg
- File:Mamulat-E-Khair.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:49, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
Ellin Beltz Dear Sir All Photographs are re-photographed portrait with permission by Copholders like his son aur family members if any copyright holder was expaire ,what i need for not deletion these photos .Thanks --Faranjuned (talk) 06:25, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - if you are really the copyright holder, which is very improbable, please contact OTRS. --Jcb (talk) 16:17, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Faranjuned (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Syed Zargham Haider.jpg
- File:Khawaja Khalil Ahmad Shah.jpg
- File:Syed Asghar Mehdi Nazmi.jpg
- File:Salamat Ullah Beg.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:57, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Any evidence it has been published 1950 (if ever). Anyway 75 years have not passed. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:15, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:58, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
file taken from state website no proof of free use OneToughNerd (talk) 15:18, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:58, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gunofficial1998 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Any evidence it has been published at the date stated (if ever). Anyway 75 years have not passed.
- File:ស៊ឹម វ៉ា.jpg
- File:ឃឹម ទិត.jpg
- File:ហ៊ុយ កន្ធុល.jpg
- File:Oum Chheang Sun.jpg
- File:Ieu Koeus.jpg
- File:Yem Sambaur.jpg
- File:ស៊ីសុវត្ថិ វឌ្ឍឆាយាវង្ស.jpg
- File:Sisowath Monireth official.jpg
- File:Son Ngoc Thanh.jpg
- File:Norodom-sihanouk-4.jpg
- File:Norodom-sihanouk-3.jpg
- File:Norodom Sihanouk 1947 (1).jpg
- File:Bio norodom-sihanouk mugshot--archive.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:18, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:59, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Seems similar to https://www.facebook.com/ptcomedy/photos/a.744110782270228/2596077593740195/?type=3&theater Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:22, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:59, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
The bears are a travelling exhibition and thus are not covered by freedom of panorama in Germany. English Wikipedia at some point stated that they have been released under CC-BY-SA, but I was not able to find a confirmation for that, and the English Wikipedia had no source for the statement. I hope I did not overlook any de minimis files.
- File:Buddy bear vor Kirgisischer Botschaft 2014-09-13 ama fec.jpg
- File:'Ich bin ein Baerliner' - geo.hlipp.de - 40705.jpg
- File:2011 Berlin-Kudamm.jpg
- File:Berlin - Kurfürstendamm (little Bear).jpg
- File:Berlin, April 2016 - 45.jpg
- File:Berlin, April 2016 - 46.jpg
- File:Buddy Bär Straße des 17 Juni 135 (Charl) Uni Bär.jpg
- File:Buddy Bär Straße des 17 Juni 136 (Charl) Matheon Bär.jpg
- File:Buddybear Athen.jpg
- File:Buddybären am Olivaer Platz 20141110 19.jpg
- File:Charlottenburg Walter-Benjamin-Platz-008.jpg
- File:Charlottenburg-Buddy1.JPG
- File:Charlottenburg-Buddy2.JPG
- File:Denkmal Kurfürstendamm 190 (Charl) 125 Jahre Kudamm.jpg
- File:Denkmal Kurfürstendamm 190 (Charl) Buddy Bär.jpg
- File:Gedenktafel Hardenbergstr 34 (Charl) Study Buddy Bär.jpg
- File:Gedenktafel Kurfürstendamm 213 (Charl) Love Bär.jpg
- File:Gedenktafel Kurfürstendamm 59 (Charl) Buddy Bär Black & White.jpg
- File:Gedenktafel Kurfürstendamm 74 (Charl) Buddy Bär SEM.jpg
- File:Gedenktafel Los-Angeles-Platz 1 (Charl) Buddy Bär Welcome Bär.jpg
- File:Gedenktafel Los-Angeles-Platz 1 (Charl) Welcome Bär.jpg
- File:Gedenktafel Otto-Suhr-Allee 146 (Charl) Buddy Bär Kirgisische Republik.jpg
- File:Gedenktafel Straße des 17 Juni 136 (Charl) Matheon Bär.jpg
- File:Goldbaeren in Berlin.jpg
- File:Quadriga2010.jpg
- File:Sculpture Budapester Str 39 (Charl) Buddy Bär Hertz.jpg
- File:Sculpture Budapester Str 45 (Charl) Buddy Bär Else Bär.jpg
- File:Sculpture Budapester Str 45 (Charl) Buddy Bär Hotel Palace.jpg
- File:Sculpture Budapester Str 45 (Charl) Buddy Bär Pablo Bär.jpg
- File:Sculpture Kurfürstendamm 24 (Charl) Buddy Bär 10 Jahre Neues Kranzler Eck.jpg
- File:Sculpture Kurfürstendamm 24 (Charl) Buddy Bär.jpg
- File:Skulptur Franklinstr 1 (Charl) Beiersdorf Bär.jpg
- File:Skulptur Hardenbergstr 34 (Charl) Study Buddy Bär.jpg
- File:Skulptur Heubnerweg 8 (Charl) ESCP Bär.jpg
- File:Skulptur Knesebeckstr 29 (Charl) Buddy Bär.jpg
- File:Skulptur Kurfürstendamm 193 (Charl) Buddy Bär Cumberland.jpg
- File:Skulptur Kurfürstendamm 213 (Charl) Love Bär.jpg
- File:Skulptur Kurfürstendamm 35 (Charl) Buddy Bär Hotel California.jpg
- File:Skulptur Kurfürstendamm 47 (Charl) Buddy Bär.jpg
- File:Skulptur Kurfürstendamm 59 (Charl) Buddy Bär Black & White.jpg
- File:Skulptur Lietzenburger Str 82 (Charl) Buddy Bär.jpg
- File:Skulptur Los-Angeles-Platz 1 (Charl) Buddy Bär Welcome Bär.jpg
- File:Skulptur Los-Angeles-Platz 1 (Charl) Welcome Bär.jpg
- File:Skulptur Otto-Suhr-Allee 146 (Charl) Buddy Bär Kirgisische Republik.jpg
- File:Skulptur Schlüterstr 38 (Charl) Buddy Bär.jpg
- File:Skulptur Tauentzienstr 12 (Charl) Buddy Bär.jpg
- File:Statue Kurfürstendamm 74 (Charl) Buddy Bär SEM.jpg
- File:Statue of bear in Berlin 20150523 7251.jpg
- File:UNITED BUDDY BEARS-001.jpg
- File:UNITED BUDDY BEARS-002.jpg
- File:UNITED BUDDY BEARS-003.jpg
- File:UNITED BUDDY BEARS-004.jpg
- File:UNITED BUDDY BEARS-005.jpg
- File:UNITED BUDDY BEARS-006.jpg
- File:UNITED BUDDY BEARS-007.jpg
- File:UNITED BUDDY BEARS-008.jpg
- File:UNITED BUDDY BEARS-009.jpg
- File:UNITED BUDDY BEARS-010.jpg
- File:UNITED BUDDY BEARS-011.jpg
- File:UNITED BUDDY BEARS-012.jpg
- File:UNITED BUDDY BEARS-013.jpg
- File:UNITED BUDDY BEARS-014.jpg
- File:UNITED BUDDY BEARS-015.jpg
- File:UNITED BUDDY BEARS-016.jpg
- File:UNITED BUDDY BEARS-017.jpg
- File:UNITED BUDDY BEARS-018.jpg
- File:UNITED BUDDY BEARS-019.jpg
- File:UNITED BUDDY BEARS-020.jpg
- File:UNITED BUDDY BEARS-021.jpg
- File:UNITED BUDDY BEARS-022.jpg
- File:UNITED BUDDY BEARS-023.jpg
- File:UNITED BUDDY BEARS-024.jpg
- File:UNITED BUDDY BEARS-025.jpg
- File:UNITED BUDDY BEARS-026.jpg
- File:UNITED BUDDY BEARS-027.jpg
- File:UNITED BUDDY BEARS-028.jpg
- File:UNITED BUDDY BEARS-029.jpg
- File:UNITED BUDDY BEARS-030.jpg
- File:UNITED BUDDY BEARS-031.jpg
- File:UNITED BUDDY BEARS-032.jpg
- File:UNITED BUDDY BEARS-033.jpg
- File:UNITED BUDDY BEARS-034.jpg
- File:UNITED BUDDY BEARS-035.jpg
- File:UNITED BUDDY BEARS-036.jpg
- File:UNITED BUDDY BEARS-037.jpg
- File:UNITED BUDDY BEARS-038.jpg
- File:UNITED BUDDY BEARS-039.jpg
- File:UNITED BUDDY BEARS-040.jpg
- File:UNITED BUDDY BEARS-041.jpg
- File:UNITED BUDDY BEARS-042.jpg
- File:UNITED BUDDY BEARS-043.jpg
- File:UNITED BUDDY BEARS-044.jpg
- File:UNITED BUDDY BEARS-045.jpg
- File:UNITED BUDDY BEARS-046.jpg
- File:UNITED BUDDY BEARS-047.jpg
- File:UNITED BUDDY BEARS-048.jpg
- File:UNITED BUDDY BEARS-049.jpg
- File:UNITED BUDDY BEARS-050.jpg
- File:UNITED BUDDY BEARS-051.jpg
- File:UNITED BUDDY BEARS-052.jpg
- File:UNITED BUDDY BEARS-053.jpg
- File:UNITED BUDDY BEARS-054.jpg
- File:UNITED BUDDY BEARS-055.jpg
- File:UNITED BUDDY BEARS-056.jpg
- File:UNITED BUDDY BEARS-057.jpg
- File:UNITED BUDDY BEARS-058.jpg
- File:UNITED BUDDY BEARS-059.jpg
- File:UNITED BUDDY BEARS-060.jpg
Ymblanter (talk) 15:47, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
- Only the "United Buddy Bears" belongs to the travelling exhibition! All the others have fixed places and in Germany the freedom of panorama applies to them
|
The photographical reproduction of this work is covered under the article § 59 of the German copyright law, which states that "It shall be permissible to reproduce, by painting, drawing, photography or cinematography, works which are permanently located on public ways, streets or places and to distribute and publicly communicate such copies. For works of architecture, this provision shall be applicable only to the external appearance."
As with all other “limits of copyright by legally permitted uses”, no changes to the actual work are permitted under § 62 of the German copyright law (UrhG). See Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany#Freedom of panorama for more information.
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Mechanical_Engineering.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_1.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_село_Зарваниця_(Теребовлянський_район).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
..jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_%EC%9D%B8%EC%8A%A4%ED%83%80%EA%B7%B8%EB%9E%A8_%EC%BB%A4%EB%AE%A4%EB%8B%88%ED%8B%B0_%EA%B8%B0%EC%9E%90%EA%B0%84%EB%8B%B4%ED%9A%8C_%EC%8A%A4%ED%83%80%EB%A1%9C%EA%B7%B8_01.png){kind=link}
,_%EC%9D%B8%EC%8A%A4%ED%83%80%EA%B7%B8%EB%9E%A8_%EC%BB%A4%EB%AE%A4%EB%8B%88%ED%8B%B0_%EA%B8%B0%EC%9E%90%EA%B0%84%EB%8B%B4%ED%9A%8C_%EC%8A%A4%ED%83%80%EB%A1%9C%EA%B7%B8_02.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_%EC%9D%B8%EC%8A%A4%ED%83%80%EA%B7%B8%EB%9E%A8_%EC%BB%A4%EB%AE%A4%EB%8B%88%ED%8B%B0_%EA%B8%B0%EC%9E%90%EA%B0%84%EB%8B%B4%ED%9A%8C_%EC%8A%A4%ED%83%80%EB%A1%9C%EA%B7%B8_03.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%EC%97%AC%EC%9E%90%EC%95%84%EC%9D%B4%EB%93%A4_((G)I-dle)_KPMA.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
I-dle.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
I-dle_Neverland_logo.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Mechanical_Engineering.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Mechanical_Engineering.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Engineman_Jemaral_Weaver_reflects_at_the_Korean_War_Memorial_during_the_Annapolis_Area_Complex_prospective_Chief_Petty_Officers%5Ersquo,_Heritage_Run.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_1.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
,_1.jpg){kind=link}
,_1.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_%D1%81%D0%B5%D0%BB%D0%BE_%D0%97%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%86%D1%8F_(%D0%A2%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B1%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BB%D1%8F%D0%BD%D1%81%D1%8C%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%B9_%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B9%D0%BE%D0%BD).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_%D1%81%D0%B5%D0%BB%D0%BE_%D0%97%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%86%D1%8F_(%D0%A2%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B1%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BB%D1%8F%D0%BD%D1%81%D1%8C%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%B9_%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B9%D0%BE%D0%BD).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Uni_B%C3%A4r.jpg){kind=link}
_Matheon_B%C3%A4r.jpg){kind=link}
_125_Jahre_Kudamm.jpg){kind=link}
_Buddy_B%C3%A4r.jpg){kind=link}
_Study_Buddy_B%C3%A4r.jpg){kind=link}
_Love_B%C3%A4r.jpg){kind=link}
_Buddy_B%C3%A4r_Black_%26_White.jpg){kind=link}
_Buddy_B%C3%A4r_SEM.jpg){kind=link}
_Buddy_B%C3%A4r_Welcome_B%C3%A4r.jpg){kind=link}
_Welcome_B%C3%A4r.jpg){kind=link}
_Buddy_B%C3%A4r_Kirgisische_Republik.jpg){kind=link}
_Matheon_B%C3%A4r.jpg){kind=link}
_Buddy_B%C3%A4r_Hertz.jpg){kind=link}
_Buddy_B%C3%A4r_Else_B%C3%A4r.jpg){kind=link}
_Buddy_B%C3%A4r_Hotel_Palace.jpg){kind=link}
_Buddy_B%C3%A4r_Pablo_B%C3%A4r.jpg){kind=link}
_Buddy_B%C3%A4r_10_Jahre_Neues_Kranzler_Eck.jpg){kind=link}
_Buddy_B%C3%A4r.jpg){kind=link}
_Beiersdorf_B%C3%A4r.jpg){kind=link}
_Study_Buddy_B%C3%A4r.jpg){kind=link}
_ESCP_B%C3%A4r.jpg){kind=link}
_Buddy_B%C3%A4r.jpg){kind=link}
_Buddy_B%C3%A4r_Cumberland.jpg){kind=link}
_Love_B%C3%A4r.jpg){kind=link}
_Buddy_B%C3%A4r_Hotel_California.jpg){kind=link}
_Buddy_B%C3%A4r.jpg){kind=link}
_Buddy_B%C3%A4r_Black_%26_White.jpg){kind=link}
_Buddy_B%C3%A4r.jpg){kind=link}
_Buddy_B%C3%A4r_Welcome_B%C3%A4r.jpg){kind=link}
_Welcome_B%C3%A4r.jpg){kind=link}
_Buddy_B%C3%A4r_Kirgisische_Republik.jpg){kind=link}
_Buddy_B%C3%A4r.jpg){kind=link}
_Buddy_B%C3%A4r.jpg){kind=link}
_Buddy_B%C3%A4r_SEM.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep per 44Pinguine. The Buddy Bears in Berlin are not part of a traveling exhibition, but are statically displayed. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 16:49, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
- Can we separate these? I clearly see at some of the photos the bears I saw last year in Riga.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:28, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
- Delete the files named "UNITED BUDDY BEARS-NNN.jpg". These seem to be from the temporary exhibition, see File:UNITED BUDDY BEARS-048.jpg. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:34, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
- Keep The Buddy Bears in my photos have permanent places in Berlin and are not part of a traveling exhibition. OTFW (talk) 06:55, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
Info I have one picture listed here. It was taken on a street of Berlin. The figure looked permanent and for sure was not a part of any closed exhibition. ---- Jakubhal 18:08, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: "United", kept the rest per discussion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Source has the CC-BY license on most pages together with the "All Rights Reserved" which contradicts each other. Would prefer an OTRS confirmation. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:55, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Hi. We have already requested the IT team to remove the "All rights reserved" from our movie's official website. The poster we have published is from our independent movie, which we have created ourselves. The CC Mark was put on our official website ( where we have first published the poster) two days ago and we didn't realise the "All rights reserved" further down on the footer but that is easy to fix as we have already requested our team to delete that from all the webpages, which will soon be done. When we go the OTRS page there is a line that says " When contacting OTRS is unnecessary" and at the 3rd line says ""The image was first published on my website, or on my own space of a shared website."" and that is our situation at the moment, this is why we have not requested the OTRS as the OTRS page says is unnecessary in our situation. Please let me know best regards RenatoBpassos — Preceding unsigned comment added by RenatoBPassos (talk • contribs) 16:34, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Dear (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion), I have now managed to remove the all rights reserved and I have placed instead "This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License" I have also added the CC Mark as per procedure on OTRS. I await your further comments. Thank you for your assistance. Kind regards, --RenatoBPassos (talk) 00:08, 17 October 2019 (UTC)RenatoBPassos
.jpg){kind=link}
- Sorry for the late reply, thanks for replacing the license with an acceptable one. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:08, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Published under a Commons incompatible license — Racconish 💬 16:19, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Comment It looks like it's published under two license choices, one Commons compatible. However, this is a derivative work - is the original 1900 postcard image PD? Credit on card is "G. Lourde". -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:08, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
- I see only a CC-BY-NC license at source.— Racconish 💬 20:31, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
- Indeed. Where did that supposed GFDL come from? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:06, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
- I see only a CC-BY-NC license at source.— Racconish 💬 20:31, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
- Delete unless original card can be shown to be PD. (I failed to find anything helpful in a web search for "librairie Amboise" "G. Lourde") -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:06, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
The source page for this image says "Courtesy Photo provided by 92nd Air Refueling Wing Historian". That does not identify the author of the photo. There is no evidence that this is the work of an Air Force employee. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 17:41, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
- This is a frivolous nomination. The image bears a Commons:VIRIN ID "130621-F-BT231-010". These VIRIN ids always have a letter code. A for Army, N for Navy, or F for Airforce, as used for this image.
Nominator can't seriously be suggesting that the "92nd Air Refueling Wing Historian" placed civilian photographers aboard USAAF bombers, during wartime. Geo Swan (talk) 23:34, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
- VIRIN stands for "Visual Information Record Identification Number". It is not a license. Having a VIRIN associated with an image does not mean that the image is necessarily public domain. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 21:27, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
- Did you read what I wrote, above? Every VIRIN code has a one letter code, indicating its source. An "F" code means the image was taken by an employee of the Air Force. Geo Swan (talk) 02:06, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
- I read it and addressed it. Once again - a VIRIN code is not a license. It isn't intended to be a license and we shouldn't use it as indicating copyright status. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 02:31, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
- Did you read what I wrote, above? Every VIRIN code has a one letter code, indicating its source. An "F" code means the image was taken by an employee of the Air Force. Geo Swan (talk) 02:06, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
- This appears to be a scan from a book or magazine. The date was 21 June, 2013, according to the VIRIN information. Any fantasies about the "92nd Air Refueling Wing Historian" placing civilian photographers anywhere in wartime or any other time are nonsense and nothing to do with establishing copyright status. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 21:27, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
- VIRIN stands for "Visual Information Record Identification Number". It is not a license. Having a VIRIN associated with an image does not mean that the image is necessarily public domain. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 21:27, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Commons:VIRIN is very clear that that the photographer can be military or civilian. It is entirely possible that an employee of the manufacturer took this image. It is also notable that if it is actually a 1943 image, it is a USAAF image, not USAF. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
The source page for this image says "Courtesy Photo provided by 92nd Air Refueling Wing Historian". That does not identify the author of the photo. There is no evdence that this is the work of an Air Force employee. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 17:41, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
- Obvious keep, as this image as a Commons:VIRIN id - 130621-F-BT231-009, confirming it is a public domain Air Force image. Geo Swan (talk) 23:38, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
- VIRIN stands for "Visual Information Record Identification Number". It is not a license. Having a VIRIN associaited with an image does not mean that the image is necessarily public domain. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 21:20, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
The source page for this image says "Courtesy Photo provided by 92nd Air Refueling Wing Historian". That does not identify the author of the photo. There is no evdence that this is the work of an Air Force employee. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 17:41, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
- KEEP A really lame nomination. Only someone official would be taking this photo. There's no need to delete since it come from 1943. Secondarywaltz (talk) 18:47, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
- There are two problems with your assumptions. The first is that the date of 1943 doesn't come from the source. I assume it comes from Geo Swan's imagination. The second if that really have no information about this photo that would let us guess that it was taken by "someone official". And guessing isn't what we do with images stored on Commons. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 19:57, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
- Keep utterly frivolous nomination. The image has a Commons:VIRIN id, 130621-F-BT231-008, confirming it is a public domain Air Force image. Geo Swan (talk) 23:42, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
- VIRIN stands for "Visual Information Record Identification Number". It is not a license. Having a VIRIN associaited with an image does not mean that the image is necessarily public domain. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 21:20, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by OleksandraKlid (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not own work, all uploads lifted from web, meta data all different, watermarks on some, low res, File:Лат. фестиваль пісні і танцю в Межапарку.jpg copied from File:Latvian song festival by Dainis Matisons, 2008-2.jpg.
- File:Лат. фестиваль пісні і танцю в Межапарку.jpg
- File:Румунський Атенеум хол.jpg
- File:Румунський Атенеум.jpg
- File:Фестиваль у Румунському Атенумі.jpg
BevinKacon (talk) 18:56, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Organization's logo, from [4]. Site is marked all rights reserved, no indication of release under a free license or that it is uploader's own work; appears to be owned by the organization. Too complex to qualify as PD-logo. Several other of uploader's uploads were deleted as logo copyvios. Seraphimblade (talk) 19:47, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
- Like any other file in the Category:Sail emblems, it depicts the the emblem of a sailing class. The drawing is mine, just the drawing, and I released that image.--Banderas (talk) 19:58, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
- Banderas, if you based it off a copyrighted work, it is a derivative work and still a copyvio. Are you claiming you're the original artist, or did you just draw a rendition based upon the already-existing work? Seraphimblade (talk) 00:42, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
I'm saying that I made the drawing I uploaded. That bird's shape is a mark for the sails and it is not a copyrighted work as far as I know. It's not the crest of SCIRA (here), which does have copyrights.--Banderas (talk) 07:42, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
- Any original artistic work is copyrighted, unless either its copyright has expired or its author has explicitly agreed to release it to the public domain. It is not uncopyrighted just because it lacks a notice of copyright. Seraphimblade (talk) 19:24, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - he snipe is a US class, designed in 1931. Since tthe class emblem has appeared on sails since 1931 without notice, this is PD. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
COM:FOP US only applies to buildings and logo seems to be above COM:TOO US Jonteemil (talk) 21:23, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
A formal PR picture that seems to be copied as it appears in several places on the web. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 21:10, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:02, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Not sure about the copyright as some content of Bhuvan is utilised. Arjunaraoc (talk) 09:41, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:49, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Web sourced but a claimed CC-zero licence which I can't source. Might be PD by age (1930, US, unknown), but that's not the same. There's a larger version at that same source page too. Andy Dingley (talk) 09:46, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Here’s the Getty Images page: https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/members-of-the-american-white-supremecist-organisation-the-news-photo/3334909. No clarity on authorship, but rights are clearly managed by a professional agency so “no notice” shouldn’t apply, and it’s too recent to have an expired copyright. Ytoyoda (talk) 03:20, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
- We can't place any credence on a claim by Getty to own or to control an image. Their lists are chock-full of very clearly PD images. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:08, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
- Fair point, and that's why we have Category:Media licensed by Getty Images I guess. I did a reverse image search, but everyone is crediting Getty Images, and the Getty description doesn't provide any useful information—not sure how certain we are about the age, even. Probably safe to wait until 2024? Ytoyoda (talk) 15:13, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
- We can't place any credence on a claim by Getty to own or to control an image. Their lists are chock-full of very clearly PD images. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:08, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:51, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
And also
- File:Пам'ятник Тарасові Шевченку (Великі Чорнокінці).jpg
- File:Пам'ятник поету, письменнику, художнику Тарасові Григоровичу Шевченку, село Великі Чорнокінці.jpg.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
No FoP in Ukraine. Created 1962. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 12:49, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:52, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
- File:Пам'ятник Тарасові Шевченку (с.Великі Чорнокінці, Чортківський район).jpg? --Микола Василечко (talk) 16:59, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:06, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
https://www.centrodemocratico.com/ This image is based on a copyrighted logo, it is too similar to the original and consists of complex geometric shapes, so it does meet the threshold of originality. Also, it is not the work of the uploader. Felviper (talk) 20:15, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:09, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Seems to be above COM:TOO US Jonteemil (talk) 21:12, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:10, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Seems to be above COM:TOO US Jonteemil (talk) 21:16, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:11, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
No author or source has ever been provided for this file. The sole use of the username was to upload it, back in 2007. Low resolution, lacks metadata. MichaelMaggs (talk) 21:20, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:11, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
The Lucifer logo contains two swords with their unique shapes and colors shifting from one to another, making the logo complex enough for copyright protection. If that's the case, the logo should be deleted. George Ho (talk) 00:00, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:12, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Also File:Klonglan waterfall 07.jpg.
Per discussion at Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/File:Klonglan waterfall 03.jpg both these photos have been Photoshopped to change the yellow-green leaves to bright orange Autumn colours. Compare with File:Klonglan waterfall 01.jpg and File:Klonglan waterfall 08.jpg taken at the same time. As fakes, neither photo have any serious educational value and hosting them brings our repository into disrepute. The deletion is complicated as 03 is a Wiki Loves Earth winner and did well at the POTY contest and both have been added to some Wikipedia pages. Presumably those adding them have done so unaware that they are fakes (the "retouched" templates and other notes are recent). Further complicated since some of those Wikipedias are in languages many Commoners will have difficulty editing/communicating. Suggest any usage of the 03 or 07 images be replaced by the 01 image. -- Colin (talk) 11:45, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
- Keep. I find a bit ridiculous the idea that it's never appropriate for Commons photos to use color enhancement or take artistic license, or that doing so is inherently misleading to readers no matter the context in which the photo is presented (and, frankly, I find alarmist statements like "hosting [this photo] brings our repository into disrepute" more than "a bit" ridiculous). That policy would exclude HDR images, for example, which is a standard feature in most newer-model smartphone cameras that a lot of photographers probably don't even realize they're using. -- AndreCarrotflower (talk) 18:27, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
- AndreCarrotflower, that's not what I claim, and I'm the author of HDR, long exposure, B&W, ICM and other enhanced or non-straightforward photos on Commons. The point is they are either realistic or obviously not faithfully representing reality (e.g., B&W). This appears at first glance to be real, but in fact is completely fake. It isn't even an example of its own fakery, since recolouring foliage to look like autumn isn't AFAIK a "thing", whereas all sorts of other filters and techniques are common. As for my "alarmist" comment, did you look at the usages? Multiple Wikipedias and Wikivoyage have all been taken in by this con and are currently displaying this as an example of the natural beauty of Thailand. Wikimedia boast about it at See the stunning winning photographs from Wiki Loves Earth 2015. And Commons, to its shame, celebrates it at Commons:Wiki Loves Earth 2015/Winners, plus hundreds of people voted for it at POTY. So, we're already looking stupid and disreputable.
- We are a repository of educational media, and our reputation depends on not falling for frauds. None of these Wiki sites are displaying this because it is an illustration of fraudulent photography but because they trusted Commons to host honest photos of Thailand and award photos that had educational value and depict what they say they depict. We let them down. The author of this photo has altered their photograph to mislead, not just to enhance what is natural. We have other photos that can be substituted and offered instead. This image has no realistic educational use on any Wikipedia site or other educational resource. -- Colin (talk) 19:17, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Deserves to be stripped of its medals, but Commons is a repository for all images with any educational value - including if that value happens to be self-referential. At this point these images have gained enough notoriety that passersby would be curious to see what such a manipulated image would look like. No need to hide the image from their view, just slap a big warning on the image description page that it's fake. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:04, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
- Keep exactly per KoH. Color-altered pictures have value, just not as normal photos. For example, we have at least one infrared view that has been given special notice. I can think of one that failed to win a star but was approved for VI within the scope "Infrared urban panorama". No-one claims the city of Montreal really looks like this to the human eye, but that doesn't make the photo lack value. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:54, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
- Ikan Kekek, King of Hearts, the images have not gained notoriety yet outside of a handful of FPC regulars. The infrared photo is clearly labelled in its filename and does not look real any more than any B&W photo looks real. You say "no-one claims...really looks like" but the problem is with this photo that we have and our wiki sites still do. The "self-referential" claim is the weakest possible claim one can make for "educational value" and only really works if the photo is a great example of a notable technique. This isn't AFAIK a notable thing to do with photos, just something this photographer did. We don't host accidental mobile phone photos of your knee because they are examples of their own failure. There are plenty manipulated images in the world and on Commons, that isn't a reason to host this one. People aren't going to read some obscure "retouched" template on Commons -- most folk reuse Wikipedia images directly from the site (hence credit goes to Wikipedia).
- Are you planning to post a message to each of the twelve Wikipedias who used our repository image in good faith and trusted us that an FP of a waterfall in Thailand was actually real? Are you planning in telling WikiVoyage, WikiLovesEarth, WMF, Martin Thoma, SG Magazine, Asia-City.com, Atlas Obscura, and countless others? If we keep this, how do you plan to fix all the incorrect reuse and confidently prevent future use? Is it worth that effort to save one "example of manipulated photo" -- Colin (talk) 07:30, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
- We're already discussing this on Wikivoyage. I didn't know Commons had a policy of deleting all accidental photos of someone's knee or whatever. What is your standard for deleting photos? A lot of poor-quality photos are hosted on this site, and I don't think photos have to be good to be here, so what is it? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:42, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
- I'm afraid you may be overreacting to getting burned. We were fooled. OK, that doesn't mean the photo is of no value as an example of manipulating color. Why, even the story of how it fooled us is useful enough to keep it around as an object lesson! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:44, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
- Ikan I didn't vote for it at FPC or POTY nor was I a judge at WLE. It wasn't me who got fooled but a couple of hundred other folks happily voted for this and used it. I'm reacting to the fact that Wiki projects and external projects used this photograph widely, as an example of a Thai waterfall, and they all look foolish now but it was Common's fault. I think the easiest solution is just to remove it. We don't keep things just to remind ourselves lessons. We keep things that are educationally useful and this is not. I assume you are volunteering to notify all 12 Wikipedias too? -- Colin (talk) 10:47, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
- Colin - The issue of Wikipedia et al. being misled is easily solvable by altering the filename and/or description to make it clear that the images have been retouched. Deleting the file is an overreaction. It still has educational value. For example, you could place the file side by side with the original and have a fine example to use in illustrating a hypothetical article about photo retouching. -- AndreCarrotflower (talk) 13:42, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
- The file description and everything except the file name has already been fixed. --Cart (talk) 13:47, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
- Colin, I was one of the people who suspended disbelief that there could be a fall season somewhere in Thailand. My bad, but not IMO a reason to remove the photo from the site. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:35, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
- The file description and everything except the file name has already been fixed. --Cart (talk) 13:47, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
- Colin - The issue of Wikipedia et al. being misled is easily solvable by altering the filename and/or description to make it clear that the images have been retouched. Deleting the file is an overreaction. It still has educational value. For example, you could place the file side by side with the original and have a fine example to use in illustrating a hypothetical article about photo retouching. -- AndreCarrotflower (talk) 13:42, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
- Ikan I didn't vote for it at FPC or POTY nor was I a judge at WLE. It wasn't me who got fooled but a couple of hundred other folks happily voted for this and used it. I'm reacting to the fact that Wiki projects and external projects used this photograph widely, as an example of a Thai waterfall, and they all look foolish now but it was Common's fault. I think the easiest solution is just to remove it. We don't keep things just to remind ourselves lessons. We keep things that are educationally useful and this is not. I assume you are volunteering to notify all 12 Wikipedias too? -- Colin (talk) 10:47, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
- I'm afraid you may be overreacting to getting burned. We were fooled. OK, that doesn't mean the photo is of no value as an example of manipulating color. Why, even the story of how it fooled us is useful enough to keep it around as an object lesson! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:44, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
- We're already discussing this on Wikivoyage. I didn't know Commons had a policy of deleting all accidental photos of someone's knee or whatever. What is your standard for deleting photos? A lot of poor-quality photos are hosted on this site, and I don't think photos have to be good to be here, so what is it? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:42, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
- Are you planning to post a message to each of the twelve Wikipedias who used our repository image in good faith and trusted us that an FP of a waterfall in Thailand was actually real? Are you planning in telling WikiVoyage, WikiLovesEarth, WMF, Martin Thoma, SG Magazine, Asia-City.com, Atlas Obscura, and countless others? If we keep this, how do you plan to fix all the incorrect reuse and confidently prevent future use? Is it worth that effort to save one "example of manipulated photo" -- Colin (talk) 07:30, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination and I don't think we can compare it to an artistic genre of photography. For me it looks like the waterfall photo was heavily photoshopped in order to mislead people including the WLE jury, and unfortunately it worked. The photo looks by no means artistic to me, it's just like it provides a completely wrong impression of this particular place. It's nothing but deception and lie, simiularly as Korean Friendship Bell in water or a straightened Pisa Tower. To me clearly missing any educational value and yes, the article usages have to be replaced before deletion. --A.Savin 01:38, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per Colin and Alexander --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:20, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Yes, the photo should be stripped of the badges, a notice about accuracy placed on it and it should be replaced in articles but deleting it feels a bit vindictive to me. The fault is ours and not the uploader's. I wouldn't read any great malicious intent into this. The photo was uploaded by a newbie during the WLE campaign and they only contributed again at WLM. They have no idea about our policies and how templates should be placed on photos for this and that. Like many creative photographers they played around in Photoshop and came up with some images they thought looked cool and submitted them. Many WLM and WLE newbies love to dig deeply into the Photoshop Play Box and we get thousands of photos oversaturated to 300% or looking nothing like the original, still we don't delete them. (This top 10 example in WLE Sweden 2018 is taken right where I live and I can assure you the habitat looks nothing like that!) We should just learn to check photos better before voting on them for something. I have added Category:Digitally manipulated photographs to these two photos, which is where they belong. If digitally altered photos are not in scope with the project, why do we have a category for them? --Cart (talk) 09:00, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
- Most of the overprocessed/manipulated photos uploaded for WLE/WLM don't get reused because they are, to be frank, shit, and obviously not natural. This one is educationally harmful and misleading and that's just a historical fact, and I don't think any amount of templates on the file description page is going to stop people finding and reusing it when so many wiki and WMF sites are singing its praises. -- Colin (talk) 10:50, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
- At least both photos are now removed from all articles on all Wikis. --Cart (talk) 11:52, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
- peeK Who is to blame here, the uploader or the jury? The participant uploaded several images of the same waterfall: This one was "fake" (digitally modified), while others were not. All were equally visible during the voting process. As a competitor you have better ways to hide a trickery if you really want to deceive
. Thus, perhaps the idea behind this modification of the natural colors was simply a genuine (and clumsy) attempt to make the image even more "beautiful" than it was. And it worked, for the jury, who did chose this version instead of any other with a natural aspect. It is overprocessed, yes, like so many pictures hosted here (example now a current vote on Wikipedia English to promote a similar candidature with artificial tones, the creator / nominator using the filters of their smartphone seems totally unaware that the landscape doesn't look natural, or maybe they just enjoy it that way). With the winners of WLM 2016 USA linked by A.Savin above, it is quite incredible the second place arrives behind the winner (a photomontage), inferior on all levels IMHO (quality and realization), but well, is the jury educated? how is it selected? it's an other question. The author of this image here nominated for deletion is not a regular of Commons. Several of their uploads won prizes (2nd place POTY, POTY finalist, etc.) while many of their creations are clearly overprocessed (1, 2, 3, 4, etc.) but 
Question Should we delete all of them, the winners and the non-winners, as a punitive treatment for having bad tastes? In the "quality image guidelines", Wikimedia requires to alter the perspectives of a natural shot of a building to fit its standards in QIC and FPC, this is clearly a first step to "fake" images (looking strange), after all. But that's a matter of preference (and policy). Philosophically, the success is educative, since it indicates what kind of pictures become popular, and what kind of post-treatments generate a strong wow among the viewers. The current POTY certainly got the first place by its striking appearance, although this photomontage (fake image of its kind) is actually displaying a blue sky coming from a different sequence than the one containing the tornado. Scam for a few of us, and "strong wow" for others. The image is now one of the Wikimedia's ambassador: Picture of the year, categorized in "natural phenomena". For sure, all the users here (and viewers outside) logically interpret they will have great chances of success with Photoshop unreal skies and fake colored leaves, in any further competition. Wikimedia's responsibility: If this platform accepts and promotes digitally altered images in general, why this file here is different from Photomontage (Forggensee Panorama) -2.jpg? This is a bit sad, but the Korean Bell of Friendship teaches us that fake images produce more positive emotions (statistically) than natural ones (The Bahá'í House of Worship in Wilmette in particular). As a consequence, these images are educative in a special way. They also teach us "realistic digital manipulations" (invisible for everybody). Perfect for documenting Wikipedia articles like Image editing (we like this style or not). As long as there are no rules against such uploads, for me these pictures are part of the repository. With a description as accurate, honest and informative as possible, to understand what we're looking at. Not sure we can change the results of past POTY and WLE challenges, but at least this FP will be delisted soon. I have included the alternative version with more realistic colors in the file page. And now my speech is finished, I have to say the truth "sorry guys, you've all been fooled, since everything in my comment, and even my vote is fake", ha ha 
-- Basile Morin (talk) 12:45, 15 October 2019 (UTC) - Info Well here is an interesting twist. AndreCarrotflower (and Ibaman) is clearly happy to keep the altered photo on Wikivoyage simply because of its placing in POTY. Edit summary by AndreCarrotflower: "The fact that colors were retouched on a photo does not make them "fake" and is not a reason to replace it with a different photo. The retouched-colors photo was a finalist for Picture of the Year 2016 at Commons so clearly is superior and should stay". --Cart (talk) 13:25, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
- This is IMHO a shame, because particularly on Wikivoyage pictures shall depict realistic views. Ikan Kekek, what would you say? --A.Savin 13:37, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
_-2.jpg){kind=link}
- Cart - I'm willing to admit that I was wrong about the image's usefulness on Wikivoyage given that the colors of the leaves on the trees in Klonglan don't change with the season. But the thing is, that's not the image's fault - that's my fault for not doing my homework. As I said in my comment to Colin above, that issue "is easily solvable by altering the filename and/or description to make it clear that the images have been retouched. Deleting the file is an overreaction. It still has educational value. For example, you could place the file side by side with the original and have a fine example to use in illustrating a hypothetical article about photo retouching." -- AndreCarrotflower (talk) 13:49, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
- AndreCarrotflower, no problem, I voted for 'Keep' for about the same reasons (see above, seems like we both missed reading part of the discussion :-) ) I just wanted it removed from the article(s) and it would be great if you could help with that. The description and an almost side-by-side are already added to both images. Take a look at the file pages. --Cart (talk) 13:56, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
- File-rename is not trivial and does not fix the file usage. If allowed per policy, that would be the minimum step we could take. But I still think it will end up falsely used since WLE and other places will continue to promote the image and nobody will look at the filename. As for the "illustrating a hypothetical article about photo retouching" that really is the lowest of the lowest argument for keeping any file, and we don't actually have the original. We have thousands of images that would be better examples of photo retouching. On balance that hypothetical (i.e. non-existent) possible use should be balanced against the very real usages that really do exist and every single one of them is educationally misleading. -- Colin (talk) 13:59, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
- Colin - Re: "...does not fix the file usage", we at Commons ultimately can't control how any of our files are used. If "other places will continue to promote the image [because] nobody will look at the filename" then that's not Commons' fault, that's the fault of those who can't be bothered to read filenames or descriptions. As long as we have accurately represented the file for what it is, i.e. an image whose colors have been retouched, then we've done our duty as far as not misleading people. -- AndreCarrotflower (talk) 14:39, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
- Sorry, you can't just blame other people for being careless/stupid/etc, especially, em, when you are one of them. We are curators of an educational medial repository which hosts images that have a reasonable expectation of educational use. Currently/previously all usage of this image has been negatively educational in that it misleads. I have little doubt all future use of this image will be negatively educational regardless of the filename. If that isn't a COM:SCOPE argument for deletion, I don't really know what is. Far too many people here voting on some strange principle or making WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS arguments, and not really considering the practical benefit/harm of hosting this. The score so far is 0 beneficial usage and about 20 harmful usage. -- Colin (talk) 14:54, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
- Yes, and in my above comment I gave an example of a way this image could be used educationally, which remains valid despite your individual subjective opinion that "we have thousands of images that would be better examples of photo retouching". Also, "the score so far" is 5 votes to keep vs 3 votes to delete. -- AndreCarrotflower (talk) 15:04, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
- Andre, you really didn't given an example of a way the image could be used educationally, and it never will be used for that purpose.. We delete lots of images that "are an example of themselves, photographically". Selfies, blurred photos, accidental photos of someone's knee, etc, etc. It is certain that if this image is retained it will continue to be used misleadingly. Deletion requests are not a vote, btw, and the closing admin can consider the strength of arguments put forward, policy and law. It is typically impossible to get an image that is in-use deleted on COM:SCOPE grounds. I hoped that perversely the in-use situation here is actually evidence for deletion, rather than against. But you can't fight against folk voting keep on purely dogmatic grounds. -- Colin (talk) 16:49, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
- Sorry, you don't get to deny the existence of the example I gave of how the image could be used educationally just because it puts a hole in your argument that the file should be deleted. That's not how debate works. And unless you own a crystal ball, there's no way for you to definitively say "it is certain that if this image is retained it will continue to be used misleadingly". Keep in mind also that WMF sites are not the only places where Commons' content is reused; there are many images that are not used anywhere on the WMF but are used by other publications; I know because I'm the author of several. -- AndreCarrotflower (talk) 17:34, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
- Ok, I should have inserted the word "credible" before "example". Your "example" usage isn't credible. And my prediction is as certain as I can be. I'm really not interested in debating the non-credible and the not even remotely likely. That's why we have the words "realistic chance of educational use" in COM:SCOPE. The only uses so far have been non-educational, and will continue to be, both on wiki and off-wiki. I don't think I've anything more to add to that, and frankly I should have unwatched this when folk stared edit warring on WikiVoyage to keep it. Unwatching now. -- Colin (talk) 20:49, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
- I think there will not be future edit warring on Wikivoyage, but I haven't changed my view that this photo should not be removed from Commons. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:42, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
- Ok, I should have inserted the word "credible" before "example". Your "example" usage isn't credible. And my prediction is as certain as I can be. I'm really not interested in debating the non-credible and the not even remotely likely. That's why we have the words "realistic chance of educational use" in COM:SCOPE. The only uses so far have been non-educational, and will continue to be, both on wiki and off-wiki. I don't think I've anything more to add to that, and frankly I should have unwatched this when folk stared edit warring on WikiVoyage to keep it. Unwatching now. -- Colin (talk) 20:49, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
- Sorry, you don't get to deny the existence of the example I gave of how the image could be used educationally just because it puts a hole in your argument that the file should be deleted. That's not how debate works. And unless you own a crystal ball, there's no way for you to definitively say "it is certain that if this image is retained it will continue to be used misleadingly". Keep in mind also that WMF sites are not the only places where Commons' content is reused; there are many images that are not used anywhere on the WMF but are used by other publications; I know because I'm the author of several. -- AndreCarrotflower (talk) 17:34, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
- Andre, you really didn't given an example of a way the image could be used educationally, and it never will be used for that purpose.. We delete lots of images that "are an example of themselves, photographically". Selfies, blurred photos, accidental photos of someone's knee, etc, etc. It is certain that if this image is retained it will continue to be used misleadingly. Deletion requests are not a vote, btw, and the closing admin can consider the strength of arguments put forward, policy and law. It is typically impossible to get an image that is in-use deleted on COM:SCOPE grounds. I hoped that perversely the in-use situation here is actually evidence for deletion, rather than against. But you can't fight against folk voting keep on purely dogmatic grounds. -- Colin (talk) 16:49, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
- Yes, and in my above comment I gave an example of a way this image could be used educationally, which remains valid despite your individual subjective opinion that "we have thousands of images that would be better examples of photo retouching". Also, "the score so far" is 5 votes to keep vs 3 votes to delete. -- AndreCarrotflower (talk) 15:04, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
- Sorry, you can't just blame other people for being careless/stupid/etc, especially, em, when you are one of them. We are curators of an educational medial repository which hosts images that have a reasonable expectation of educational use. Currently/previously all usage of this image has been negatively educational in that it misleads. I have little doubt all future use of this image will be negatively educational regardless of the filename. If that isn't a COM:SCOPE argument for deletion, I don't really know what is. Far too many people here voting on some strange principle or making WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS arguments, and not really considering the practical benefit/harm of hosting this. The score so far is 0 beneficial usage and about 20 harmful usage. -- Colin (talk) 14:54, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
- Colin - Re: "...does not fix the file usage", we at Commons ultimately can't control how any of our files are used. If "other places will continue to promote the image [because] nobody will look at the filename" then that's not Commons' fault, that's the fault of those who can't be bothered to read filenames or descriptions. As long as we have accurately represented the file for what it is, i.e. an image whose colors have been retouched, then we've done our duty as far as not misleading people. -- AndreCarrotflower (talk) 14:39, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
- Cart - I'm willing to admit that I was wrong about the image's usefulness on Wikivoyage given that the colors of the leaves on the trees in Klonglan don't change with the season. But the thing is, that's not the image's fault - that's my fault for not doing my homework. As I said in my comment to Colin above, that issue "is easily solvable by altering the filename and/or description to make it clear that the images have been retouched. Deleting the file is an overreaction. It still has educational value. For example, you could place the file side by side with the original and have a fine example to use in illustrating a hypothetical article about photo retouching." -- AndreCarrotflower (talk) 13:49, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
Not done Image description informs users that this photo has been retouched and Wikivoyage has switched to use File:Klonglan waterfall 01.jpg instead. Thuresson (talk) 01:09, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
In my opinion the tourist spoils the photo. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 14:48, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Lessens the quality of the photo, but IMO does not spoil it. Person only seen in bottom 3rd of the photo; could be cropped should someone wish. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:33, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Not done It's not the greatest photo from a Samsung cellphone but at least one user believes it can still be used. Thuresson (talk) 01:18, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Hi Eugene, and thanks for leaving the message on my user page about this deletion request. The image belongs to a pair of pairs of diagram. The corresponding image within the pair is File:Moller-t-channel 2.png, so you should have this conversation about both images at the same time. The other pair is Image:Moller-t-channel.png and Image:Moller-u-channel_1.png, which are used in the corresponding article in the German Wikipedia. The new pair is an updated version according to suggested new layout rules for Feynman diagrams in the German Wikipedia (see here for the German discussion). And it is a tech demo for generating new diagrams, which the Physicists at de.wp appeared to be a bit scared of (hence the source code in the image description). I was under the impression that PDF can be inserted into articles and is a lossless format, but I am not a graphics design expert. You are obviously free to convert it to SVG. I even put it under a license that allows you to do so without having to worry about attribution to my PDF version. --timo (talk) 16:08, 14 October 2019 (UTC)- I did not click the link and automatically assumed this refers to the two images I uploaded yesterday, not the almost ten year old diagram this is actually about. The diagram in question is a common alternative way to express File:Moller-u-channel 1.png. I originally created both versions because it was not clear which one would be preferred by the community and to have the option to switch. I have no deep feelings about keeping or deleting the image. In theory it is nice to have the alternative version lying around, and I did explicity reference the alternative in the image description. But in practice, the chance that anyone really starts to search for the alternate diagram is near zero (at least when it comes to diagrams for Wikipedia articles). Proposal: Whoever finds it important to delete the image also takes responsibility to fix the image description in the partner image.--timo (talk) 16:20, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
- Deleted. Not in use. Image description updated. Thuresson (talk) 01:22, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Ungültige Lizenz, own work kann nicht sein Biberbaer (talk) 20:30, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
- Not done Thank you for the nomination. Artist died in 1917 and license has been changed to public domain. Thuresson (talk) 01:40, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
This sighature is copyrighted in its source country, China. 予弦 07:15, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:10, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ayayron joans (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unwanted self-advertizing, see en:Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive_827 and en:User talk:Ayayron joans.
El Grafo (talk) 14:56, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
- Keep It appears as if the person depicted is Hank Boone. File:Aaron Jones at Mooney Grove Park.jpg is a better version of File:Hank Boone at Mooney Grove.jpg Gbawden (talk) 06:43, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Gbawden: Well spotted. But who is the author of that photograph then? Both User:Aaron Daniel Lee and User:Chaosinquest are claiming authorship, it can't be both … The uploads by User:Aaron Daniel Lee have complete EXIF, the bad one by User:Chaosinquest doesn't (but apparently it has OTRS?). Also, who is Hank Boone? Seems like the Wikidata Item just disappeared while I was typing this. IMDB says about Boone [5]: "Hank Boone is a business owner, producer and actor living in Riverside, CA. He is fully committed to taking his craft to the next level and bringing outstanding performances for a variety of different avenues. […]" and en:Draft:Hank Boone doesn't look much better. I'd say: delete them all, including Category:Hank Boone and its contents … --El Grafo (talk) 10:14, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
- Hi @El Grafo: I am always reluctant to delete images with OTRS. Hank Boone sounds like a relatively new actor looking at his credits. I would give him the benefit of the doubt as being in scope Gbawden (talk) 10:17, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Gbawden: OK, let's assume for the moment that File:Hank Boone at Mooney Grove.jpg shows Hank Boone, that the OTRS Ticket on it is fine and that pictures of Hank Boone are in Scope.
- That would mean that the two pictures nominated here do not show Aaron Jones/Aaron Daniel Lee/Ayayron joans
It would also mean that User:Ayayron joans/Aaron Daniel Lee can not be the author of File:Aaron Jones at Mooney Grove Park.jpg- It would not mean that the OTRS ticket for File:Hank Boone at Mooney Grove.jpg also applies for the better, unedited, uncropped File:Aaron Jones at Mooney Grove Park.jpg.
Note that in 2018 (when these images were first uploaded) User:Ayayron joans tried to publish a Wikipedia article about himself. en:Draft:Aaron_Jones_(actor) was deleted for "Unambiguous advertising or promotion" and the account was blocked. I can not see whether the images were part of that page or not, but given the file names and the timing of the uploads I'd bet they were. And then the same image is uploaded for another actor? Something's strange there. Maybe a look at the deleted draft at en: could help, maybe the OTRS ticket contains some useful information? Maybe someone from OTRS could try to re-establish contact and ask for clarification?I mean, a possible explanation could be that "Hank Boone" is a recently-adopted stage name … --El Grafo (talk) 15:15, 21 October 2019 (UTC)- (insert your favourite swear word here) Q63559843 seems to confirm the above, although no sources are given. Still, OTRS permission would be required for the two files nominated here. --El Grafo (talk) 15:21, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Gbawden: OK, let's assume for the moment that File:Hank Boone at Mooney Grove.jpg shows Hank Boone, that the OTRS Ticket on it is fine and that pictures of Hank Boone are in Scope.
Deleted: source of the two images is doubtful. Probably not own work, if depicted version is indeed uploader as the uploader's user name suggest. Enough doubt for the COM:PCP to apply. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:01, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
..jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
..jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Magog the Ogre as no license (No license since). 1929 Danish photograph with a photographer that is not named. Seems artistic enough that a death date of the photographer is needed, but filed a DR since that could be debated. Abzeronow (talk) 20:38, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
..jpg){kind=link}
OTRS-Einverständniserklärung liegt vor. OTRS-Kennzeichnung von dem Benutzer vergessen. Mewa767 (talk) 18:06, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
..jpg){kind=link}
- {{PD-Denmark50}} is available for Danish non-artistic photographs. This particular photograph does not have any artistic merit. Thuresson (talk) 01:49, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: posed photo, as such I'd claim "artistic merit" low as it may be in this particular case. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:03, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
..jpg){kind=link}