Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/08/16

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive August 16th, 2019
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recreation of a recently deleted image; seems unlikely that this is the users original work considering that a quick googling revealed many versions of this same image CaptainEek (talk) 09:49, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 11:01, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio (from a book) Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 12:17, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am helping the uploader determine what is needed to keep the file. It's not easy so we need time. Genium (talk) 14:02, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:04, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

larger published at https://www.ttdoil.com/natural-landscapes-of-bejaia Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:50, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:36, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very pixelated, appears in google search to be from somewhere else, but I could not get the source image to load. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:54, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:35, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a rephotograph of a postcard or other image, notice overprinting. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:00, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Speedied as obvious copyvio.  JGHowes  talk 16:09, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

schlechtere Dublette von https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zehn_Gebote#/media/Datei:Tablica_Dziesi%C4%99ciorga_przykaza%C5%84_DSC00275.jpg Mehlauge (talk) 12:09, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request. --Krd 17:15, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Orpener (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unhelpful files

ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 14:28, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violations. --Yann (talk) 16:38, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Maharany Moloch (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possibly out of scope

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:31, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvios, no permission. --Yann (talk) 17:31, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file; no educational value. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 05:56, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by 1989 at 16:00, 16 August 2019 UTC: Derivative work of non-free content (F3) --Krdbot 19:25, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I wrong upload Vanbasten 23 (talk) 07:16, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 21:11, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I upload the wrong picture, sorry. Vanbasten 23 (talk) 07:17, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request. --Ezarateesteban 21:12, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a copyvio of an official photo from https://ghanachurch.com/profile-biography-of-prophet-victor-kusi-boateng/ Nsk92 (talk) 08:11, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by JGHowes at 16:30, 16 August 2019 UTC: Copyright violation, no indication of a free license on the source site (F1) --Krdbot 19:26, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

abortion pill advert Veracious (talk) 02:43, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Advertising. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:02, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted character. Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:05, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Clear DW copyright viol -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:01, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It isn't Bob Marley's photo from this year. Certainly. Karol1111 (talk) 17:38, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nom. Prank photo with false description. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:13, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication on the source website that it is indeed CC BY SA like claimed. Instead the page says "Copyright BBS". TryKid (talk) 18:35, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted False license. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:16, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Nonsense Donkoralle (talk) 21:48, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion; nonsense nomination. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 21:50, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Other Donkoralle (talk) 21:49, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 21:53, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Other Donkoralle (talk) 21:51, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 21:52, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Nonsense Donkoralle (talk) 21:51, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 21:53, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want this image publish to public Truethari (talk) 21:57, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Copyright violation derivative work. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:22, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want this image publish to public Truethari (talk) 21:57, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Derivative work copyright violation. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:30, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want public this image Truethari (talk) 22:03, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:31, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Punjabentourage (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:CSD#F10 (personal photos by non-contributors)

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:00, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 05:24, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/User talk:23.237.16.26

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photograph depicts at least one participant (whom I shall not name, but feel free to contact me directly if you don’t believe me) who I know did/does not wish to be photographed and is identifiable. I believe this photograph to be in violation of the Photography policy. Lucas Werkmeister (talk) 22:37, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]



This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional content, as mentioned and deleted in Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Actor55. Ahmadtalk 17:26, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, speedily as copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 11:24, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional content, out of COM:SCOPE. See Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Actor55. In addition, it needs OTRS permission. Ahmadtalk 21:37, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, speedily as copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 11:23, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio from a book Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 12:18, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am helping the uploader determine what is needed to keep the file. It's not easy so we need time. Genium (talk) 14:06, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Il faut l'autorisation du photographe ; sans autorisation, c'est une infraction à la législation sur la propriété intellectuelle (=droits des auteurs). Il faut détruire cette mise en ligne, et la restaurer si l'autorisation du photographe est envoyée. --Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 15:03, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:43, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio from a book Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 12:21, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am helping the uploader determine what is needed to keep the file. It's not easy so we need time. Genium (talk) 14:05, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Il faut l'autorisation du photographe ; sans autorisation, c'est une infraction à la législation sur la propriété intellectuelle (=droits des auteurs). Il faut détruire cette mise en ligne, et la restaurer si l'autorisation du photographe est envoyée. --Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 15:01, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:43, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:54, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in Sri-Lanka.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:24, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Possible self-promotion.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 04:41, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


No COM:FOP in Sri-Lanka., artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:56, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:21, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Modern art and historical photos. I think artist/photographers identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 03:09, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artworks, book covers & old photographs. Unlikely own work, all on subject of "art in Sri Lanka" appears to be a gallery uploaded for promotion of certain artists.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:41, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:19, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:EDUSE (msali raso 10:19, 16 August 2019 (UTC)) msali raso 10:19, 16 August 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by أحمد الحيدي القرمودي (talk • contribs) 10:19, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:43, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:EDUSE COM:PARTYPICS (msali raso 13:39, 16 August 2019 (UTC)) msali raso 13:39, 16 August 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by أحمد الحيدي القرمودي (talk • contribs) 13:39, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:40, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:EDUSE (msali raso 13:41, 16 August 2019 (UTC)) msali raso 13:41, 16 August 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by أحمد الحيدي القرمودي (talk • contribs) 13:41, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Unused personal photo for non-Wikipedia - Out of scope --Alaa :)..! 14:59, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:39, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo for non-Wikipedia - Out of scope --Alaa :)..! 14:58, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:39, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source of base map. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:01, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 07:21, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source of base map. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:03, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 07:22, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found earlier at http://blog.pkp.in/2008/02/ Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:37, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:24, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fair use, not allowed on Commons Seby1541 (talk) 08:14, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:29, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recently uploaded png file that is redundant to File:Apple logo black.svg (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:36, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:48, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by INITIATOR (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious claim of own work, clearly old photos that have been scanned in.

Gbawden (talk) 07:37, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:42, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by INITIATOR (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:CSD#F10 (personal photos by non-contributors)

Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:14, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:18, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

— Preceding unsigned comment added by INITIATOR (talk • contribs) 03:51, 21 August 2019 (UTC) [reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work. Per File:Sénatrice à la sortie de la chambre (002).jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:42, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per OTRS Ticket#2019081610006791, permission will not be forthcoming.  JGHowes  talk 15:46, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect structure; cf. File:(+)-Macrosphelide B.svg. Wostr (talk) 00:02, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:20, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small undescribed and unused image, likely out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:52, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:21, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal unused image Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:55, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:21, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:56, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:22, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:56, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:22, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image of small size. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:57, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:22, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused JPEG logo, should SVG if useful. Out of scope. Yann (talk) 06:33, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:23, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: COM:PENIS 4nn1l2 (talk) 06:43, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:23, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:EDUSE COM:SELFIE msali raso 09:18, 16 August 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by أحمد الحيدي القرمودي (talk • contribs) 09:18, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:24, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:EDUSE msali raso 09:21, 16 August 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by أحمد الحيدي القرمودي (talk • contribs) 09:21, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:24, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's used to spam 90.70.156.92 09:37, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:25, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo found at Facebook.com Solomon203 (talk) 10:29, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:25, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal family photo batch uploaded from Flickr, not intended for use on Wikipedia, has no educational value. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 10:44, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:25, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising. And for a website that no longer exists. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 10:52, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:26, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal logo uploaded only for the purpose of self-promotion, contains no educational value. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 10:58, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:26, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recently uploaded png file that is redundant to Amazon logo.svg (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:03, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unused poor duplicate. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:27, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Arbajshaikh4242 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Seems to be used on en.wiki for self promo

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:18, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:28, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Arbajshaikh4242 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:CSD#F10 (personal photos by non-contributors)

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:10, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:49, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems like a resume or some sort. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:21, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:29, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

recently uploaded png file that is redundant to File:PayPal Logo Icon 2014.svg (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:38, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:29, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kabbafilmguy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s).

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:46, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:30, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Olivas.wiki (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s).

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:54, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:31, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:EDUSE (msali raso 12:55, 16 August 2019 (UTC)) msali raso 12:55, 16 August 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by أحمد الحيدي القرمودي (talk • contribs) 12:55, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:31, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AdnanMAJID922 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s).

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:22, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:32, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Maria GraziaGg (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:OOS --

CptViraj (📧) 14:31, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:33, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Maria GraziaGg (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s).

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:32, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:33, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Reverse image search shows various matches, unlikely that this is the uploader's work. Ytoyoda (talk) 20:17, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete as per nominator Dudek1337 (talk) 12:48, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:28, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:34, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:35, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo for non-Wikipedia - Out of scope --Alaa :)..! 14:58, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:35, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:36, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be used for self-promo. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:10, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:36, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Smoke w (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE (it:Smoke W).

Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:13, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:37, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:27, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:37, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:OOS (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:34, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:37, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Elmostafafekak (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s).

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:14, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:06, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Elmostafafekak (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photo for non-Wikipedia - Out of scope

--Alaa :)..! 15:50, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:38, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jacklosquarta (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:CSD#F10 (personal photos by non-contributors)

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:39, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:38, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-useful unidentified pictures of people and specific project diagrams. COM:OOS and COM:NOTHOST. Kissa21782 (talk) 18:36, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also applies to:

Kissa21782 (talk) 18:41, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:42, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-useful file containing only a generic logo Kissa21782 (talk) 18:47, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:43, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not realistically useful for an educational purpose Pavan santhosh.s (talk) 20:41, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:44, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified man, not currently useful personal file; COM:CSD#F10 Kissa21782 (talk) 20:48, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:44, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:10, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:45, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:11, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:45, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:11, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:45, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:12, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:45, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:12, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:45, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:12, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:45, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:14, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:45, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:14, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:46, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:15, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:46, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:16, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:46, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Evaldo Balbino (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:CSD#F10 (personal photos by non-contributors)

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:34, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:46, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dedentanuwijaya (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:50, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:47, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:12, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:21, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too low quality to be useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 05:05, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:20, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These are derivative works of a copyrighted design. Whilst the photos are taken in Spain where FOP is allowed, they are not free in the US.

russavia (talk) 10:04, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Not permanent, therefore the FOP exception does not apply. .     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:58, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted character.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 05:16, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:20, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not free for use, copyright not as listed; see http://www.metrolinx.com/en/greaterregion/regions/toronto.aspx Joeyconnick (talk) 05:42, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:19, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source page notes that content is copyright, and there's no evidence of permission having been given. Cordless Larry (talk) 06:58, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:19, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This map is not accurate with respect to India-Kashmir and Pakistan occupied Kashmir. Sudhir.khamari (talk) 07:06, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep:Could you elaborate your view? I've drawn this map. I don't understand the Pakistan-India conflict entirely. I don't want to push a view. I don't want to pick a side. I've not urged anyone to use one particular map of mine. I've tried to depict many different views on this region (ranging from de-facto to both India's and Pakistan's de-jure views). Plz see Category:SVG locator maps of provinces in Pakistan (location map scheme) for theses alternative maps. Tell me if you miss one particular map. If you like one of the other maps better, discuss your proposal in the Wikipedia article you'd like to change. Try to reach consensus. Deleting this map and thus taking away an option that some users or editors in the various different language versions of Wikipedia (or other projects) may prefer is the least best option to underscore your view. --TUBS 09:16, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep: This map is widely used, from ar:التقسيم الإداري في باكستان to zh:俾路支省. Under COM:NPOV, Commons shouldn't delete a used file just for being inaccurate. Either the map can be corrected (if it's uncontroversially wrong) or another map can be made reflecting another point of view. --bjh21 (talk) 15:58, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:18, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

My reading of COM:SS] seems to imply this good fiath image is not permitted. I am open to being corrected Djm-leighpark (talk) 09:48, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:18, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo found at Facebook.com Solomon203 (talk) 10:27, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: OoS. --Gbawden (talk) 12:17, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo found at Facebook.com Solomon203 (talk) 10:28, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: OoS. --Gbawden (talk) 12:17, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader suggests with his user name that he is the person in the photo, will need information about the photographer and permission to license their photo. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 10:39, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:17, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doesn't look like "Own work" Albinfo (talk) 11:16, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:16, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doesn't look like "Own work" Albinfo (talk) 11:16, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:16, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Amazsara10 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Three of the user's uploads (marked as own) have been nominated for speedy deletion because of copyright violation. Some of these are a duplicate of another and deserve speedy, but I can't decide which one to keep and which to delete. All files need OTRS permission.

Ahmadtalk 19:36, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unambiguous COM:NETCOPYVIO (e.g., File:EverbrightCentre.jpg is here; File:ChinaPlazaCentral3.jpg is here, etc.). --Эlcobbola talk 18:43, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Amazsara10 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Obvious attempted Flickrwashing is obvious. Mass uploaded to Commons immediately after being uploaded to https://www.flickr.com/photos/183298279@N08/. Several of the photos are the same as the ones listed in the previous deletion discussion. Would not be surprised if they are all out of process recreations of previously deleted content.

LX (talk, contribs) 11:50, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:15, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Can't seem to find any permission at Telegraph's website (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:08, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm new to Wikipedia - this is fine to delete as I don't have a copyright licence. What should I do in this circumstance with my print sources? Livca123 (talk) 14:30, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:14, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PORN (msali raso 13:35, 16 August 2019 (UTC)) msali raso 13:35, 16 August 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by أحمد الحيدي القرمودي (talk • contribs) 13:35, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by Elcobbola. --Gbawden (talk) 12:13, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I called this file Actea rubifolia in late summer, but it should be Diphylleia cymosa in late summer KATHERINE WAGNER-REISS (talk) 14:16, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@KATHERINE WAGNER-REISS: You can ask for the file to be renamed by using the "Move" option in the "More" menu at the top right of File:Actaea rubifolia in late summer.jpg. See COM:FR for details. There's no need to delete it just because the name is wrong. --bjh21 (talk) 15:38, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It has been renamed, I think this can be closed. --ghouston (talk) 07:20, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:13, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to EXIF data, the auhor is Jon Eric Johnson, a commercial photgrapher. There is no evidence of US Government work. Materialscientist (talk) 14:34, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This photo is an official state government portrait from the North Carolina Office of the Lieutenant Governor. It is in the public domain under license tag PD-NCGov. https://files.nc.gov/ltgov/Dan%20Forest.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrew dunn013 (talk • contribs) 15:16, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

{{PD-NCGov}} has been deleted back in 2014; it applied to "public information compiled by the agencies of North Carolina government". We have no evidence that this image originates from North Carolina government. Materialscientist (talk) 15:29, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:13, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think this image is not free, the website indicates that the source is twitter. It does not indicate this license either. Ovruni (talk) 15:02, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:11, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is used in no pages. Bùi Công Chức (talk) 15:43, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:09, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry this picture is not interesting for an encyclopedia NaveenM12 (talk) 16:14, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:08, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Change of categorization. Wikipub (talk) 16:14, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:09, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://penyumalas.blogspot.com/2015/04/diantara-8-prinsip-ttb.html?m=1 copyright violation *angys* (talk) 16:51, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:08, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) Министерски Съвет на Република България Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:52, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:08, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://mobile.twitter.com/DrAhmadSamsuri/status/1027446060342333440 copyright violation *angys* (talk) 16:54, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:08, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by Perhelion as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work: [1] -- User: Perhelion 17:03, 16 August 2019 (UTC) [reply]
The image looks clear after a screenshot from a web-presence or brochure, if the uploader is the author he needs either uploading the original photo or confirmation he is Otto Pfeifer.[2]. -- User: Perhelion 17:17, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:08, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The user has vanished. This page is still reveals the user. It's the best if it be deleted. 85.203.44.156 17:32, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:05, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from Facebook, no permission. Yann (talk) 17:42, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:06, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 白布飘扬 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

What are the date of shooting and the publication dates?

Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:11, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete Sorry, my mistake. Look like those photos are taken from Unsung Patriot: Memoirs Wong Pow Nee which were first published in 2013. Since Malaysian Law categorized the photograph as "artistic work" where the copyright will be only expired after 50 years of photographer's dead, or, for unpublished work, 50 years after the first publication, so, it's still copyrighted. 白布飘扬 (talk) 07:00, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:05, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Glimmering (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Ripped off photographs from an online Swarovski catalog. No OTRS.

Chassipress (talk) 19:46, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:03, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparent false license on Flickr; seen in higher res elsewhere on web. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:59, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Flickrwashing. --Gbawden (talk) 12:04, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Edithian (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Photos taken by PressEye employees, not Northern Ireland Office's works

A1Cafel (talk) 14:38, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 13:37, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad upload, try again Mjrmtg (talk) 22:15, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:02, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file appears to be via Facebook or other small size / low resolution source. Please also see https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Raulgavilavarani.jpg Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:25, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 12:03, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Tulsi Bhagat as Dw no source since (dw no source since). Perfectly correct, but subject died in 1892, meaning this is most likely in the Public Domain. Hoping we can all find a source for General Schmitz photo. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:34, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The source is very probably this website. It confirms the photographer Isidore Alphonse Chalot, who died in 1893. --Ruthven (msg) 08:47, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 I withdraw my nomination I have updated the source information based on Ruthven's research and request that it be retained. Chalot photography was sold to G. Camus in 1890, subject died in 1892. I changed the license as well. If we get dates for Photographer Camus, the license can be refined. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:31, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Nom withdrawn. --Gbawden (talk) 12:01, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP Cambodia, there's no freedom of panorama in Cambodia and the photo violates architect's copyright. Taivo (talk) 10:23, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:00, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP Cambodia, there's no freedom of panorama in Cambodia and the photo violates architect's copyright. Taivo (talk) 10:24, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and likely copyvio based on the watermark. --Gbawden (talk) 12:01, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative image of an original painting. The CC licence at the bottom of the photographer's homepage suggests that this image was taken in Brazil, but as no location has been provided at 500px, we cannot determine whether freedom of panorama is applicable or not. De728631 (talk) 20:58, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi De728631, I've emailed the photographed asking more details about where the image has taken, so that we can clarify if it may be used under FOP or not.-- Darwin Ahoy! 21:18, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, much appreciated. De728631 (talk) 11:17, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hi De728631, the photographer kindly answered my request, clarifying that the photo was taken in Arcos da Lapa, Rio de Janeiro. He also sent an Instagram post where he wrote just that. I believe we can now safely  Keep the photo, as FOP is allowed in Brazil. Thanks for your patience, -- Darwin Ahoy! 14:19, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: Nomination withdrawn since freedom of panorama is applicable. --De728631 (talk) 19:57, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted advertisement. Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:18, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:44, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted advertisement. Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:21, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:44, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Egamarra297 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Last remaining files. 6 files, 5 cameras, one without EXIF, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 06:30, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:44, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope

ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 13:28, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:45, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RIJEESH (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious claim of own work. No metadata. Some are photos of photos.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:12, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:45, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RIJEESH (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Seems to be taken from a book and arabic club seems to be cropped. No permission.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:34, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:01, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ahmadkurdi44 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:45, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ahmadkurdi44 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Apparent COM:NETCOPYVIOs - low res, no EXIF, appear stolen from random product blogs (e.g., File:Huawei nova 8.jpg from here)--note also that visible photographer hands include clearly different races and thus clearly different authors. User also serial copyvio uploader--see talk/deleted contribs. Duck/PRP issue.

Эlcobbola talk 20:53, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete per nomination. --Hajoon0102 💬 04:11, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:06, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:45, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook size, no metadata, low quality image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:02, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 11:37, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be an unused bargraph. Probably out of scope if listed as "own work" without soures. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:02, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 11:37, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by FULANOS MOTO CLUBE (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promotional gallery of images, two logos, one groupshot. Not own work.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:06, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:38, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

By title and meta this appears to be copied from the internet, WhatsApp. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:08, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:39, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of permission; this is likely a screenshot from Top of the Pops, the BBC music show that David "Kid" Jensen used to host. All episodes of Top of the Pops are copyrighted, so this is very likely not free use content. Arbor to SJ (talk) 03:30, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The image origins are unknown

[edit]

This image was taken from a VHS tape and cleaned up in Adobe photoshop, please do not make allegations without asking the uploader of the image. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JakePaulshop (talk • contribs) 20:16, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

But what was in the VHS tape? An episode of Top of the Pops? In that case, even a photoshopped a screenshot from that episode is still copyrighted by the program creator. Arbor to SJ (talk) 15:45, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 11:40, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 04:04, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:42, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted photo. Yuraily Lic (talk) 04:13, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:42, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I thought it was SVG, Now I know it isn't. Calvinkulit (talk) 09:13, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:54, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of a presumably modern, non-free two-dimensional work indoors in Norway. Not covered by any applicable freedom of panorama exceptions. LX (talk, contribs) 10:00, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is under Freedom of Panorama. The place is accessible to public in ground floor of a hotel. There is no reproduction exploited commercially — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mark König (talk • contribs) 10:58, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hotels are privately owned property, not public places, and content on Commons must be free to use for commercial purposes, so the noncommercial restriction for everything except buildings in Norway's freedom of panorama means that it would not be applicable for this type of work, even if it had been located in a public place. LX (talk, contribs) 11:07, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:53, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source and licensing status are not clear, in particular need to see where the Creative Commons license is indicated, at least. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 10:25, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:52, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo was uploaded as "own work" by User:Brihannalasom from en:wikipedia. They now state that it wasn't in fact taken by them, but they took it from Facebook.[3] Bishonen (talk) 10:28, 16 August 2019 (UTC).[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:52, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo from Facebook, no proof the uploader is "Chad". Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 11:20, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:49, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of own work. No metadata, low res. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:15, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:49, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted promotional poster. Kigsz (talk) 13:33, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:43, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low res image, unlikely to be own work (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:02, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:40, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-made fake awards poster, no educational use Kissa21782 (talk) 14:19, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:40, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image cannot be considered too simple not to be copyrighted. As such, it has no place in the Commons without a specific OTRS release note from the artist. Ldorfman (talk) 14:41, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:39, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of own work. A similar image is found at [4] (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:45, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:38, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photograph of not notable person from Israel. Also possible copyright violation as the photo can be seen her and her. -- Geagea (talk) 14:45, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:37, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file. Looks like some sort of personal artwork. Malcolma (talk) 14:53, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:36, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cryshame (talk · contribs)

[edit]

User with 5 uploads, professional studio portraits without EXIF data, unlikely to be free.

Yann (talk) 15:09, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:32, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cryshame (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small images without EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 15:10, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:32, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken by subject herself so it can't be the uploader's own work unless the uploader is the subject herself. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:09, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:31, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted character.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:14, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:30, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small file without EXIF data, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 15:23, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:29, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think that this image is not free, this image has been taken other site that does not indicate this license, in the footer it says "Copyright © | Peru21.peGrupo El Comercio | All rights reserved." Ovruni (talk) 16:15, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:28, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Who is the photographer? Why is there no EXIF data? See also [5]. Yann (talk) 16:42, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:24, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. No license apparent on what seems to be original author's page. No indication uploader's claim of 'own work' is true. Original file location, per Google search - [6] Jbh Talk 17:48, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:24, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gmihail (talk · contribs)

[edit]

False dates of shooting, not own work. Please explain why they are public domain.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:50, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:23, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gmihail (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own work, false dates. Please explain why public domain in Serbia.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:37, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, no response from uploader. Thuresson (talk) 00:44, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gmihail (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Either plain copyvios, or derivative works.

Yann (talk) 17:16, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 09:10, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claim "own work" apparently unwarranted. Presumed author stated in the upper right corner of the image. Likely extracted from artistic video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qu--VCLQ13w or other sources of the Internet (several hits by Google). Archie02 (talk) 18:22, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:23, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low resolution, probably not a own work but a screenshot Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 20:19, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:21, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not found at URL. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:24, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:21, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Datei wurde versehentlich hochgeladen D4912 (talk) 21:26, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:20, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author unknown, date unknown. No proof of free license GAndy (talk) 21:27, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:20, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of own work, small size, low quality, no metadata. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:26, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:20, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata shows authorship by a name not apparently connected to uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:27, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:19, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Exhibit catalogs are not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:39, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:19, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mtwawpnt (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work. Two appear historical, several are very small, three are extremely blurry, and one is a group shot.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:55, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:19, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING. Yuraily Lic (talk) 04:39, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:00, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING. Yuraily Lic (talk) 04:40, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:59, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 04:43, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:58, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small file without EXIF data, last remaining image, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 06:50, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:56, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Охоник (talk · contribs)

[edit]

After today identifying +10 uploads as copyvio (grabbed from different Panoramio accounts, blogs, news sites etc., details at User talk:Охоник) it´s difficult to believe that these remaining files would be own work: IMHO untrusted user uploading a bunch of copyrighted material (small/inconsistent resolutions, missing exif) so these ones (per COM:PRP) can't be believed either.

Gunnex (talk) 18:14, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:10, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Охоник (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Obviously not own works. Please provide a source, and a valid license.

Yann (talk) 06:58, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:55, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small file without EXIF data, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 06:59, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:55, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small file without EXIF data, last remaining image, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 07:14, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:55, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright Vanbasten 23 (talk) 07:18, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:54, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This appears to be someone else's work. 2601:1C0:6D01:2E10:CCDF:5F24:A0C8:5843 07:57, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:54, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted advertisement. Yuraily Lic (talk) 13:40, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep You can't just iterate every photograph in Japan and claim that it's a copyright infringement per COM:DW. The artistic content here is extremely minimal and below COM:TOO. Andy Dingley (talk) 23:53, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, surpasses threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 10:22, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW. The explanation boards are copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 13:08, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

COM:DW. These explanation boards are copyrighted works.

史跡訪問して帰って画像UPでヘトヘトなので特に異議は唱えませんが 天野遠景は墓と離れていてい背景化は不可、北条時頼は俳句追加、子之神社は本文1473に対応、影隠地蔵は背景とし地蔵の方が本体とか 他のFileも説明があればより理解が深まりますが、最近日本語版も本文の参考文献出典範囲注釈が厳しいので画像なら問題ないかですが 権利関係で問題があれば削除はやむをえません I can speak english a little.Visiter walking monument easy、But copyright rules of Japan must protect。 --C2revenge (talk) 14:19, 17 August 2019 (UTC)C2revenge会話[reply]

(日本語で失礼します)File:Shindo-haiji, setsumeiban.jpgですが、「説明板付近の遺跡風景」が写真の主題であって、「説明板の内容」が写真の主題ではないのは画角の通りです。解像度の都合上で説明板が読めてしまってダメだというのであれば、異議は唱えません。--Saigen Jiro (talk) 10:37, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep File:Shindo-haiji, setsumeiban.jpg - I uploaded a redacted version. whym (talk) 14:05, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

COM:DW. Photos and text are copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 08:52, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I cropped one more picture. If you do not like it, you can re-nominate it for deletion due to out of scope, but at moment it is used. Taivo (talk) 13:26, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW. The explanation boards are copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 14:31, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination except File:Ooe mine Station Ruins Information signboard 20200331.jpg. ƏXPLICIT 02:06, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW. The explanation boards are copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 00:42, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I can speak English a little, so I'm writing in Japanese. 以前議論になったものも含め、私のUPした画像が含まれています。すべてあまり気にせずUPしてしまったものですので、削除もやむを得ないと考えています。ただ、File:Ruin of Chōfuku-ji Temple 20201119 02.jpgのように、看板そのものを映したわけではないものについては、カットしてあげなおしたほうが良いかなと思います。--先従隗始 (talk) 06:27, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Includes my uploaded images, including those that were previously discussed. I have uploaded everything without worrying too much, so I think it is unavoidable to delete it. However, for things that do not show the signboard itself, such as File:Ruin of Chōfuku-ji Temple 20201119 02.jpg, I think it is better to cut it again.
translator: Google Translate via   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 04:26, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Export to other image repository?

[edit]

As C2revenge wrote above, these texts are important references, they are often the only written source of information about a local event or place. I totally understand that they can't be kept on Commons unless the text is blurred. Ideally, how about copying these pictures to a more lenient repository (such as Flickr or other) before deleting? That would prevent the loss of information, as these boards often fall apart or get removed to make place for urban development. This would also allow the pictures to be re-imported into Commons once copyright expires. Cheers! Syced (talk) 01:26, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: It is easier to undelete on Commons than re-import from an external repository. Anyone who wants to see the text for reference may ask an admin for a copy. --King of ♥ 23:04, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted artwork. Yuraily Lic (talk) 13:11, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:21, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted advertisement. Yuraily Lic (talk) 13:11, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 15:58, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Wikiherkules as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: I simply don't want this picture up anymore
Converted by me to regular DR as file does not qualify for speedy. However, I support a courtesy-deletion. -- Túrelio (talk) 13:50, 25 July 2019 (UTC) Delete the image out of courtesy — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikiherkules (talk • contribs) 21:54, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:16, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Attribution: COCO VIKING deleted this vedio but you are distributing deleted videos 223.62.162.83 05:08, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


i am the model in the vidio. You stole my photo and video my name without permission. The first uproader to Youtube , cocoviking, is currently in litigation with unauthorized portrait use. so you should delet this page ASAP 223.62.188.65 00:32, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Dont make me upset.


i am the woman in the vidio. You stole my photo and video my name without permission. The first uproader to Youtube , cocoviking, is currently in litigation with unauthorized portrait use. so you should delet this page ASAP 211.248.183.181 01:11, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Attribution: COCO VIKING deleted this vedio but you are distributing deleted videos 211.248.183.181 00:54, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep this video depicts usual public activity, not privacy things. also it's uncertain what the ip user is truly the person of the video (video source info is archived) Puramyun31 (talk) 07:21, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


@Infrogmation: I uploaded sound removed-version of File:머슬마니아 함슬옹.webm. also as i said above, this video depicts usual public contest event, not privacy things. Puramyun31 (talk) 17:16, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


@Infrogmation: oops I reuploaded as overwriting, upload error occurred. so I reuploaded as file:머슬마니아 함슬옹 (1).webm instead. Puramyun31 (talk) 17:31, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Infrogmation: the overwriting error of this video File:머슬마니아 함슬옹.webm is fixed. sound-removed version now. sound removed version is  Keep per as i said above. sound-included version uploaded was an unintentional mistake. Puramyun31 (talk) 17:44, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

p.s.: The ip user added apparently threatening comment which contains offensive words at my talk page. (you must be "crazy"...) If such comments are added repetitively at the pages related this discussion, the comments can be considered a legal threat. Puramyun31 (talk) 10:21, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: the version without sound. --Jcb (talk) 10:51, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am the woman in this video. You do not seem to understand what I am saying. I hope you read my article correctly and deal with it as soon as possible. When YouTube's first uploader of this content, a distributor named 'Cocovking' deleted my video for legal reasons, what rights does it distribute? Erase the following two videos. Delete them quickly. You have not answered or deleted them. I will sue legally. 211.248.183.181 16:32, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 10:51, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am the woman in this video. You do not seem to understand what I am saying. I hope you read my article correctly and deal with it as soon as possible. When YouTube's first uploader of this content, a distributor named 'Cocovking' deleted my video for legal reasons, what rights does it distribute? Erase the following two videos. Delete them quickly. You have not answered or deleted them. I will sue legally. 211.248.183.181 16:33, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 10:51, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Puramyun31 is illegally copying and distributing the video. 222.110.175.215 03:00, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You are in error in more ways than one. Not User:Puramyun31 is distributing the video, but Wikimedia-Commons is. Though Puramyun31 uploaded this video-file from Youtube, when it was offered on Youtube under a free license, he/she has neither authority nor ability to delete it from Wikimedia-Commons. This requires an administrative action, which might be taken (or not) after a decision has been made. --Túrelio (talk) 07:14, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In case we want to decide this case on-wiki, I support deletion, as this video, which has already been stripped of its sound-track, is useless (and actually unused). --Túrelio (talk) 11:57, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Video was removed from YouTube, an no way to check the license (neither on the archived versions). Ruthven (msg) 20:47, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i am the woman in the vidio. You stole my photo and video my name without permission. The first uproader to Youtube , cocoviking, is currently in litigation with unauthorized portrait use. so you should delet this page ASAP if you want to talk to me ewhain@icloud.com send me email 223.62.188.65 00:28, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

i am the woman in the vidio. You stole my photo and video my name without permission. The first uproader to Youtube , cocoviking, is currently in litigation with unauthorized portrait use. so you should delet this page ASAP if you want to talk to me ewhain@icloud.com send me email 211.248.183.181 01:10, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Attribution: COCO VIKING deleted this vedio but you are distributing deleted videos 211.248.183.181 00:53, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep this video depicts usual public activity, not privacy things. also it's uncertain what the ip user is truly the person of the video (video source info is archived) Puramyun31 (talk) 07:21, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 10:49, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am the woman in this video. You do not seem to understand what I am saying. I hope you read my article correctly and deal with it as soon as possible. When YouTube's first uploader of this content, a distributor named 'Cocovking' deleted my video for legal reasons, what rights does it distribute? Erase the following two videos. Delete them quickly. You have not answered or deleted them. I will sue legally. 211.248.183.181 16:34, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 10:49, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Puramyun31 is illegally copying and distributing the video. 222.110.175.215 02:59, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You are in error in more ways than one. Not User:Puramyun31 is distributing the video, but Wikimedia-Commons is. Though Puramyun31 uploaded this video-file from Youtube, when it was offered on Youtube under a free license, he/she has neither authority nor ability to delete it from Wikimedia-Commons. This requires an administrative action, which might be taken (or not) after a decision has been made. --Túrelio (talk) 07:14, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In case we want to decide this case on-wiki, I support deletion, as this video, which has already been stripped of its sound-track, is useless (and actually unused). --Túrelio (talk) 11:56, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Túrelio: , You said "which has already been stripped of its sound-track, is useless", I don't agree for the reasoning since there is no requirement that uploaded video on Commons must include sound, and Commons doesn't necessarily require files on Commons must be used in Wikimedia projects. also, as I said in previous DR, this video depicts usual public activity (fitness contest, a sports competition, so in scope), not privacy things. also it has archived pagehtml code of license info (cc license is irrevocable)Puramyun31 (talk) 12:43, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand that the claimant wants it deleted for privacy issues. And a CC license (as any other) is only irrevocable if it had been legitimate. As I understand it, the latter is disputed. --Túrelio (talk) 13:07, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Túrelio: the claimant seems not a videographer of the video, but seems the depicted person. your comment "stripped of its sound-track, is useless" That seems nonsense, there is no requirement that uploaded video on Commons must include sound, Commons doesn't necessarily require files on Commons must be used in Wikimedia projects. video depicts usual public activity (fitness contest, a sports competition, so in scope (not such as a simple selfie video)). Puramyun31 (talk) 13:11, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Is it copyvio? No, licence been verified.
  2. Is it out of scope? No, it shows a beauty pageant.
So the remaining question is, whether Commons should delete the video because the (alleged) subject depicted wants it deleted.--Roy17 (talk) 14:45, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Roy17, as I stated above: AFAIK, the license on YT has not been verified, but just recorded. We have scores of uploads from Flickr with at-time-of-upload recorded CC license, which we nevertheless deleted, after we found that the Flickr-user had wrongfully claimed a free license for not-own images. --Túrelio (talk) 15:31, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Roy17:

1.In this case Cocoviking (a videography studio which has a official youtube account, this video is from the account, this site has a link to a video of the Cocoviking's youtube account), so it's not a fake account.
2. As i mentioned at previous DR, the video depicts usual public activity (fitness contest, a sports competition), so the "remaining question" as you said it's not a valid reason for DR. The user who opened the DR is blocked because of legal threat Puramyun31 (talk) 15:45, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Túrelio: then have you watched the video before commenting? What say the watermarks on the video? Have you also checked https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCCqEWp27zVFQqeYBKqjWq5A/videos to see whether the youtube account is violating copyright?--Roy17 (talk) 16:11, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep If the YT video was deleted and the uploading YT account was not blocked, I think that deletion reason was unrelated to copyvio. Ankry (talk) 18:18, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. Video was published under a free license on YouTube. Ruthven (msg) 20:44, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be some kind of copy, rounded corners, low quality, small size. No indication of own work Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:56, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted DW -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:18, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted posters. Yuraily Lic (talk) 04:30, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:19, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that the uploader is the copyright holder David Biddulph (talk) 10:19, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Very dubious license claim. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:22, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As this is a Swedish logo, COM:TOO Sweden applies and it states that "A simple general rule is that if it is unlikely that two persons would create, for example, a text identically or similarly, the text is probably sufficiently original to qualify as a protected work. (..) Often, the requirements for copyright protection are considered to be relatively low." (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:18, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete it, I now possess knowledge which I previously did not.Jonteemil (talk) 14:48, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted uploader concurs. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:23, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted: as per [7]. Yann (talk) 21:19, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As this is a Swedish logo, COM:TOO Sweden applies and it states that "A simple general rule is that if it is unlikely that two persons would create, for example, a text identically or similarly, the text is probably sufficiently original to qualify as a protected work. (..) Often, the requirements for copyright protection are considered to be relatively low." (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:28, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete it, I now possess knowledge which I previously did not.Jonteemil (talk) 14:49, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted Uploader concurs.-- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:24, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted: as per [8]. Yann (talk) 21:19, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think this image is not free, this seems to be a cropped image of a similar one. On the site indicates the footer "Ⓒ Centro de Estudios Estratégicos del Ejército del Perú." https://ceeep.mil.pe/2018/11/28/discurso-del-sr-gral-de-ejercito-don-jorge-orlando-celiz-kuong-al-asumir-la-comandancia-general-del-ejercito/ Ovruni (talk) 15:13, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted False license. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:26, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of own work. Possible copyright violation. No EXIF. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:50, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted unbelievable license claim. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:32, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

liscene not match with Commons current policy *angys* (talk) 16:33, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted NC is not free for Commons; no support for uploader's added GFDL claim seen at source. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:36, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Invalid license as per Commons:Deletion requests/Template:The Stand News.

Wcam (talk) 23:30, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Per Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#Commons:Deletion_requests/Template:The_Stand_News, I demand a speedy keep. ΣανμοσαThe Trve Lawe of free Monarchies 15:06, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Do not reopen without any new argument. --Yann (talk) 15:15, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by F00700I (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eugene,

Hope you are well. In regards to the nominated files for deletion;

The below 3 files can be deleted any time, asp really and without any discussion, 2 of them are not used for quite a while on GFK Tikvesh page.


But for the other 6 files I would kindly ask you if you can advise or help to tag the correct licence and to resolve the issue. Obviously they are very old photos, some of them even older then 70 or 80 years, and the author or the date are unknown, so I'm not sure what can be done for those files to be used. I appreciate your help. Kind Regards F00700I (talk) 03:37, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

See Commons:Copyright rules by territory for relevant country(ies). --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:02, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eugene,

Thanks a lot for your prompt reply. I think some of the nominated images are in public domain. We can definitely determine the approximate date of creation. I had a close look at the link which you suggested, do you think the following License tag Template:PD-North Macedonia can help in any way, as some of the images are definitely published before 1946 or 1971. Just so you know the images have been freely used in the past by multiple parties on social media, football book, football forums, sports portals, flyers etc. Kind Regards F00700I (talk) 07:52, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You still need to fix source information and license tag in each image in public domain. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK great, just to clarify before I start adding info on the images as I don't want to make some unintentional mistake and make it worse, would it be sufficient if I add the above mentioned tag and in source specify a football portal or forum where the file is already in use, also I'll add a year which the photo is created. Thank you, F00700I (talk) 16:14, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Source information and License tag update done on 5 images. Kind Regards F00700I (talk) 18:46, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2nd source added on 4 images as per request. Kind Regards F00700I (talk) 09:24, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The additional explanation to the source is updated on all of the files. Hopefully the tags for deletion can be removed now. Kind Regards F00700I (talk) 18:00, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Licenses and sources were fixed. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by JuTa as no license (No license since) Is this license valid? Yann (talk) 13:23, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • на сайте Президента ПМР http://president.gospmr.org/ стоит лицензия - All content on this site is licensed under: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International, на фотографии она же указана с источником, в чем проблема? или не видите ее? так она внизу сайта прописана. --Kodru (talk) 05:14, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 08:15, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

同じ写真がアップロードされており、また同じファイル名の画像が存在しているため。瀬部 嵐 (talk) 17:58, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected as duplicate of File:徳島県立城西高等学校.jpg. P 1 9 9   16:18, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image appears to be old, however it is sourced to "own work" which it's not and claimed to date from 2017, which is unlikely. Needs proper information and license. We also have an image in the same category which is properly identified. This one may be a derivative or other edition of that image, but they are not the same. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:59, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: dubious source and author. P 1 9 9   16:22, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I would like to know why such a recent image is considered CC0 when it was uploaded by a museum and not a photographer? Those large foam hands are not that old. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:07, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mexico City Government licensed all of their photos as CC0 on Flickr, including those who are located on museums they manage. --Luisalvaz (talk) 18:03, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
As we can read in the foam hands the picture is from 1986. But the point here is not the time but the source. All this pictures come from Museo Archivo de la Fotografía which is a museum that is part of the Culture Ministery of Mexico City Government [9]. It's an historical archive of the pictures taken by Mexico City oficial photographers, that means, civil servants, so the pictures are property of such government. With that legal status, that government dedicated the pictures to the Public Domain, since are pictures coming from public sources, according to local laws and as is stated in their Flickr page [10]. Salvador alc (talk) 19:21, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per above. P 1 9 9   16:25, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted photo. Yuraily Lic (talk) 04:22, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:26, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING. Yuraily Lic (talk) 04:26, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:26, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING. Yuraily Lic (talk) 04:29, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:26, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted artworks. Yuraily Lic (talk) 04:35, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:27, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING. Yuraily Lic (talk) 04:36, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:28, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING. Yuraily Lic (talk) 04:40, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:28, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Иван Эрднев (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyright violation. Old photos, first dates of publication unknown.

Maxinvestigator (talk) 04:47, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:34, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING. Yuraily Lic (talk) 05:18, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:34, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted advertisement. Yuraily Lic (talk) 05:25, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:35, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted advertisements and illustration. Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:41, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:37, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it's superseded by the nicer and regularly updated File:Cost per Genome.png Akeosnhaoe (talk) 11:02, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:39, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted character [11]. Yasu (talk) 15:02, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 15:45, 9 März 2019 UTC: Derivative work of non-free content (F3): Non-trivial logo --Krdbot 20:00, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted character. [12] And, File:あん巻き太郎.jpg was once deleted. [13] Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:16, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:40, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photographers permission is required GeorgHHtalk   12:54, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:40, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recently uploaded png file that is redundant to File:Ooredoo1.svg (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:33, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:41, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted promotional poster. Kigsz (talk) 13:33, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:42, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly a complex logo per COM:TOO UK. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:41, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete over COM:TOO UK.--Roy17 (talk) 18:39, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:42, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted advertisements and illustration. Yuraily Lic (talk) 13:48, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:43, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted doll. Yuraily Lic (talk) 14:46, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:43, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A book cover, so technically a fair use file that should be deleted. Someone could perhaps argue that this doesn't surpass threshold of originality though. Kissa21782 (talk) 18:33, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: retouched version of File:What Happened (Hillary Rodham Clinton) book cover.jpg. P 1 9 9   16:49, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hello, I was trying to replace the outdated logo with this updated logo but had clicked the commons button by mistake. This logo is under copyright and needs to replace old chevron logo. Cityofstcatharines (talk) 19:21, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This might be lower than COM:TOO Canada.--Roy17 (talk) 18:31, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: below TOO. P 1 9 9   16:55, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Congo-brazzaville-abside-interieure-de-la-cathedrale-le-jour-de-noel-1912 Colorise (cropped).jpg should replace this file Le Petit Chat (talk) 20:34, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:56, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in Italy. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:03, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:59, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Reddle (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Violation COM:FOP Russia

Maxinvestigator (talk) 04:17, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:09, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file is a painting in Yue Fei Temple, Hangzhou, China, and the uploader claims that the file is eligible for Template:PD-US. However, a date of publish was not given. Given that Yue Fei Temple receives maintenance after the Cultural Revolution, it is not sure when did the painting was created (created in ancient times, recovered in recent modern times, or even added recently?), so the file may not be eligible for Template:PD-US. 廣九直通車 (talk) 04:43, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: It is not a US work, so PD-US certainly does not apply. As the comment says, without knowing when the work was created, we cannot keep it here. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:10, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING. Yuraily Lic (talk) 05:21, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:11, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted artwork. Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:10, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:11, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted photo.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:12, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:12, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted illustration. Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:16, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:12, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong license. Yann (talk) 06:40, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hola, me gustaria saber que problema existe con este archivo que he subido. Dicho archivo esta alojado en una web http://rabida.uhu.es/dspace/handle/10272/2620?show=full con licencia Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España, y asi lo he subido --Jesusrh30031965 (talk) 13:06, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Both NC and ND licenses are not allowed on Commons. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:13, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:46, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:14, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted character. [14] Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:09, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:14, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Buckaroo bob 91 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: logos above COM:TOO Yann (talk) 15:26, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:14, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, wrong license - the uploader is not the author of the medal Michał Sobkowski (talk) 17:47, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 23:52, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by A1Cafel (talk · contribs) 1

What says the 2013 OTRS permission, please?

Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:30, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@A1Cafel: Each person its job, please: you should tell us, you are the uploader after all. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:40, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per Jeff G.-- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:30, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by A1Cafel (talk · contribs) 2

Any evidence that they are photos by an employee of the Office of the Speaker as part of that person’s official duties. Besides uploader states Nancy Pelosi as creator but she ios obviously not.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:37, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep, this is an "an official Twitter (social media) account of the Speaker". No matter it is a selfie or not, the image is still in PD. --A1Cafel (talk) 14:39, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Info false author info: the images does not seem to be selfies. Ankry (talk) 10:35, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Pending further information. You cannot simply take a photo from an official twitter account, or even from a .gov website or an official government report unless you can demonstrate that the photo was the work of a US federal employee and taking that photo was part of their official duties. At the very least, this normally requires some form of clear attribution. GMGtalk 19:14, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • Ridiculous. If it is the case, then all images from Twitter/Facebook/Instagram of the US Government have to be deleted. --A1Cafel (talk) 05:28, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
      • If we don't know who took the picture, then we don't know whether they are public domain. This image was posted the same day on the Facebook page for Gavin Newsome. Was it taken by a staffer for Pelosi, a staffer for Newsome, an employee of the Democratic party (not a government employee at all) or any other person present at the governor's association conference taking place at the time? If the photographer was actually associated with either Pelosi or Newsome, were they a paid employee or were they an unpaid intern? Unpaid interns are not employees and their works are not public domain. Unless we know who took the picture we have no way of knowing whether the image is public domain.
Pelosi (or more likely some intern or low-level staffer) has apparently posted hundreds (thousands?) of images on her twitter account, and there is no guarantee that she understands copyright law, or has thoroughly inspected the nature of the image with regard to it's copyright status. Government websites and social media accounts regularly post content either under fair use, or (like 90% of people on the internet) without regard to copyright whatsoever. Because of that merely appearing in one of these outlets is not sufficient to determine the copyright status of the work. GMGtalk 13:59, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Unpaid interns working for Congress should fall under PD-USGov. It's still a work for hire, paid or not, I'm pretty sure -- it is part of duties ordered by the employer. I think my best look at that question is here, where agency law still applies to volunteers. (I think Congress is about to make sure that interns get paid going forward, anyways.) All of these photos are of people visiting Washington, where the Congressional staffers are most likely to be present. People operating official Twitter accounts for senators or representatives should have a reasonably clear idea of copyright. It would make sense that such a photo would be supplied to the visiting California governor (and would be PD-CAGov if taken by his staffers anyways). Yes, it's always theoretically possible that someone else took such a photo, but those do not seem to be reasonable doubts, and the usual assumption by publishing on official government sites is that such works are treated as PD-USGov even if it was not technically that way prior. I would certainly treat elements being published on official Twitter accounts the same thing as being published on their governmental website. If there is a strong indication that a particular photo was taken by someone else, please nominate that one individually. Carl Lindberg (talk) 15:35, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
As to volunteers, Community for Creative Non-Violence specifically examining copyright, stated that among the reasons Reid was not considered an employee (and retained the copyright to his work) was because the organization did not pay his payroll taxes, provide any benefits, or contribute to unemployment insurance, and in fact, the court simply presumed method of payment as one of the essential determining factors in defining employment (not whether he was paid, but how he was paid).
Regardless, the onus is not on me to provide a strong indication that it was taken by someone else; the onus is on the uploader to demonstrate the content is in the public domain. Whether it was published on this Twitter account simply has no bearing on US copyright law any more than the person depicted does. The only thing US copyright law cares about it who created the work. If someone wants to demonstrate that this image is public domain, then they should email Pelosi's office and ask who the creator was. Otherwise, the only way we keep it is by simply throwing COM:PCP out the window. GMGtalk 16:18, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
That specific court case says that agency law determines "employee", and Reid was determined to be an independent contractor instead of employee by that definition. Agency law however says that:
(a) an employee is an agent whose principal controls or has the right to control the manner and means of the agent's performance of work, and
(b) the fact that work is performed gratuitously does not relieve a principal of liability.
So it is not the lack of payment that determines employee, but other conditions. The court case primarily said, Reid engages in a skilled occupation; supplied his own tools; worked in Baltimore without daily supervision from Washington; was retained for a relatively short period of time; had absolute freedom to decide when and how long to work in order to meet his deadline; and had total discretion in hiring and paying assistants. In other words, it depends on how much control the employer has over them; it is a distinction between "employee" and "independent contractor". Congressional interns are not independent contractors, as the employer has as much control over their activities as paid employees. Reid was paid, but in the manner of a contractor, not employee.
COM:PCP is for *signficant* doubts, not just theoretical possibilities. These do not qualify, in my opinion. We allow claims of "own work" all the time, even though those are similarly not proven. For a DR, someone needs to supply a significant doubt. Carl Lindberg (talk) 16:40, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The significant doubt is that we do not know who the author is and we regularly delete modern works where the author is unknown. Posting on the twitter account merely tells us who the author might be and who might be able to tell us. GMGtalk 16:48, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, just completely disagree. Stuff posted to congressional websites is presumed to be PD-USGov all the time. We do not need to identify the photographer's name in every case. For works where we don't even know the source of initial publication, absolutely unknown authors create significant doubts. Not the case here. Where we do know the place of initial publication, and no author is named, that is then "anonymous" and different laws can apply which we then use. For PD-USGov, the distinction is irrelevant. If it's overwhelmingly likely to be done by a staffer (paid or otherwise), that is generally enough. Carl Lindberg (talk) 16:59, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
"Nobody knows who the copyright owner is, so it really doesn’t matter." GMGtalk 17:14, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
That part of PCP is for a completely different situation than this. Again, that policy is for significant doubts as to copyright status. We don't require the actual employee name on every PD-USGov upload we have -- by your logic we should delete them if we don't. We don't require that "own work" uploads identify who they are -- user accounts are just as anonymous, and the "own work" claim is assumed there. If further information comes up -- such as the existence of an "own work" photo elsewhere on the net (and especially with a differently-named author), or (in this case) the appearance of the photo elsewhere which would indicate it was not PD-USGov, then we nominate then. But we have to make some assumptions on nearly every upload. Stuff like this is far more likely to be OK than an "own work" upload, and at that point it's not worth forcing uploader to come up with unreasonable detail. Carl Lindberg (talk) 17:43, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
As a matter of course, yes, content tagged as PD-USGov needs to have sufficient information about authorship to determine that it was the work of a US government employee. Ideally, that is done like this (U.S. Navy photo by Erik Hildebrandt/Released) or this (Image credit: ESA/Hubble & NASA) or this (Air Force Staff Sgt. Jordan Castelan). If you don't have this information then you do not know the copyright status of the work and merely taking it from a government website is not a guarantee of authorship. GMGtalk 18:25, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep for me. The official Twitter accounts are generally done by staff, i.e. employees of the government. The photos in question above look to be of the type made by staffers. A claim of "Nancy Pelosi" of author is really just claiming it came from her staff, realistically. While it's theoretically possible for these to be photos taken from outside sources, I don't think that rises to a reasonable doubt per COM:PRP at least for the ones above. We would not have any issue if they were published to a .gov website, and I don't see why official Flickr accounts would have a different assumption. If some aspect of the photo makes it more likely it came from a non-USGov source, that could be reason to question the license, but all of the above look to be situations where her staffers would be present. Carl Lindberg (talk) 14:19, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep per Carl and caution A1Cafel to stop alleging false author info.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 16:49, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I second Carl Lindberg's points. These five photos were taken with phones by someone that is most probably the staff. A challenge is possible only if for example it is shown to be (almost) identical to a non-staff person's photo. Or for example https://twitter.com/SpeakerPelosi/status/1159919184127692800 is obviously not a work of Pelosi's staff.--Roy17 (talk) 20:28, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've cluttered up this DR enough already, but if someone reuses this in their book or website, I have serious doubts that "probably staff" is going to give them much comfort if they get threatened with a lawsuit. GMGtalk 13:56, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Same goes for any "own work" upload, which is far more likely to be a problem than this. As Commons:General disclaimer basically says, nothing here is guaranteed so re-users should look at the evidence provided and determine their own comfort level. Carl Lindberg (talk) 18:49, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per Carl. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:41, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by A1Cafel (talk · contribs) 3

Missing EXIF informations + photographer's watermarks on files.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:53, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio. --A1Cafel (talk) 08:16, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by A1Cafel (talk · contribs) 4

https://www.gettyimages.fr/photos/gandhi-downing-street?family=editorial&phrase=Gandhi%20Downing%20Street&sort=mostpopular#license

Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:06, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@A1Cafel: May you explain what {{PD-India}} has to do with British pictures? --Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:25, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
There were a bunch of photographers standing around making photos of that scene. So each different photo can have its own copyright status, depending on where it was first published (probably which company the photographer worked for) and the like. Some of those may have been first published in India (or some other country who had correspondents there taking pictures), and some may have been simultaneously published in many countries. So, we need to track down sources, and unfortunately some of these are all over the net. Many are probably PD today, but some are probably not.
The first one above can be found here, with a credit of "J Gaiger" of the Topical Press Agency, whose archives were bought by Getty. That looks like a raw source version. So, probably first published in the UK, and with a named author it's not PD-UK-unknown meaning we would need to know the death date. That was discussed a decade ago at Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Gandhi Downing Street.jpg and was deleted due to lack of information. Maybe we could find more info now, but it would seem as though Getty would indeed hold the copyright if it still exists, and it's not just a PD picture that Getty is claiming ownership of (which does happen).
The second one, yes it's on Getty here. They claim a source of "Daily Herald Archive/SSPL". There is another copy here with a claimed copyright owner of "Camera Press". It's been on covers of books too. There is an SSPL source here, where they say the source is a gelatin print. So they are likely claiming copyright ownership because they own a print that was distributed in 1931. If anything, they can only claim copyrights on that particular scan, and probably valid in the UK at most (if even there). But, not sure who the source of the original print was. If it was anonymous UK, then it's PD-UK-unknown today. If it was also simultaneously published in the U.S., it would avoid the URAA as well (if not, it would be Not-PD-US-URAA until 2027). Sure feels like most of the world is treating it as PD, but not sure we know the true source either. Carl Lindberg (talk) 22:28, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: based on the analysis by Carl. In the second case the PCP applies due to the uncertainty. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:22, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by A1Cafel (talk · contribs) 6

Commons:Derivative works from posters.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:59, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per User:A1Cafel comment above. --P 1 9 9   13:51, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by A1Cafel (talk · contribs) 7

where does it say that the twitter account is also covered by OGL?

RZuo (talk) 20:25, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep UK government Twitter channels become archived at the end of the year at nationalarchives.gov.uk, when they become explicitly OGL3. See webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk for this one. You could argue that the link to to the number10.gov.uk website on the Twitter author page, which website also explicitly has the OGL 3.0 license, is enough. Carl Lindberg (talk) 21:04, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
ok. users should specify that the video became ogl by way of being included in the archives like https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/twitter/10DowningStreet/post/bd72bc8e-963d-11ec-b845-62848c3126f2/video , though. i dont agree that the licence on another website can be interpreted as covering twitter, unless someone can find ogl websites in which twitter posts are somehow embedded. RZuo (talk) 10:28, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Quite possibly not, though you know the contents will definitely become OGL at the end of the year, so it's arguing over technicalities and timing. If the same content is on the website then it's definitely fine, but unsure if it was on the website when uploaded. It would be helpful if they mentioned a licensing statement on the Twitter author page, for sure. Carl Lindberg (talk) 13:48, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Question Are we sure the music in the background is freely licensed? I agree that it would appear to be under the OGL, but I don't think the U.K. government can extinguish the copyright of a music recording just by placing an excerpt in a video that they then post to social media. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 01:01, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
you're right. it seems to be the first 40s of "Music Of Filmmaker - My Lord - Song by Yarin Primak" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gjQOI_2Anfs . i didnt watch the video beyond a few seconds initially.
difficult to isolate and remove the music. muting it renders the video useless.  Delete.
the footage of bojo speaking is from house of commons, though. so it's actually possible to find those raw footage. RZuo (talk) 07:48, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 22:39, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by A1Cafel (talk · contribs) 8

No FOP in South Africa.

Edelseider (talk) 09:52, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment I hate giving an answer to this because I am against deleting South African images on Commons for FOP reasons as the law in South Africa is in the process of changing to include a FOP copyright exception. If I had to give an answer it would be... maybe, bridges might (but if so then perhaps not always) also exceed COM:TOO. I have a vague recollection of photographs of South African bridges on Commons having being deleted in the past. That's why copyright exceptions tend to use the term "public works" dropping the term "art" or some other word that might imply creativity so as to be as broad as possible. Also because the law recognizes that it is not a good judge of what is "art" or not but instead tries to use tests for novelty in patents and creativity (or "sweat of the brow" intellectual work that does not plagiarize) for copyright. However, it must be noted that many bridges, it can be convincingly argued, are effectively simple objects consisting of geometric shapes. In this interpretation bridges that do not have a decorative facade would not be copyrightable but ones with such a facade would be. The same would be true of buildings. I can get a legal opinion on this later this week as I am no IP law scholar. Then I can give a better answer. Either way I can see this falling into a gray area.--Discott (talk) 14:26, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:27, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by A1Cafel (talk · contribs) 9

Duplicates.

RodRabelo7 (talk) 20:34, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment Always the same problem with A1Cafel using Flickr2Commons without due diligence. He has been told so many times to avoid creating duplicates, which is in fact very easy: stay away from Flickr2Commons, use the Upload Wizard instead. @Jmabel: this raises again the question of the usefulness of F2C (see [15]). --Edelseider (talk) 21:04, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@RodRabelo7: If they are duplicates, why a DR instead of {{Duplicate}} to speedy-delete them? - Jmabel ! talk 22:06, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment matter was discussed at Commons talk:Flickr2Commons#Duplicates 2 but it seems no one takes this thing seriously. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:22, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I take it very seriously and have raised it multiple times in the past. There is only so much you can do when the designer of this tool doesn't fix it. F2C is responsible for millions of duplicates that have appeared and been deleted here over the years. It's also very helpful when it is used properly. Edelseider (talk) 14:19, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Looks like they were already converted to redirects. holly {chat} 21:08, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files from jihel.net

[edit]

All files uploaded by Soisik64 (talk · contribs) are from jihel.net website, but there is no permission to use these files with CC license, or maybe if was not able to find it. --Smooth O (talk) 13:20, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. I can't find any evidence anywhere on that website that these images are under an acceptable license. Deleted 65. --Majora (talk) 00:24, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Diego Díaz Hierro died in 1979, many years before the Creative Commons licenses existed, so the licensing claims seem to be completely made up. We have no information on whether signatures are ineligible for copyright protection in Spain. LX (talk, contribs) 09:44, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, template fixed. — Racconish💬 08:32, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bust by the contemporary artist Philippe Robin, inaugurated in 2013. No freedom of panorama in France.

Chassipress (talk) 20:15, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

On se sait pas si le buste en cause est revendiqué par son auteur. A-t-il signé ? S'est-il plaint ? Qui était le statuaire original ? A-t-il autorisé la copie de son œuvre ?- En tout état de cause, je veillerai à rediffuser mes clichés en floutant le buste : pas de raison de laisser l'ensemble du monument dans les mains d'un restaurateur. J'espère qu'on sera aussi malin quand, un jour viendra, des millions de clichés de l'extérieur de la cathédrale Notre-Dame rénovée (je pense à sa flèche) seront téléversées. Du boulot en perspective pour les chasseurs.--Totorvdr59 (talk) 12:47, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Qui est ce chevalier blanc : 86.249.111.225 ?--Totorvdr59 (talk) 17:50, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 08:33, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]