User talk:Totorvdr59

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Totorvdr59!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 21:17, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Station d'épuration sur le territoire d'Aubevoye.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

--Krdbot 09:01, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Portrait de Louis Napoléon Suchet d'Albufera.JPEG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

--Krdbot 06:00, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:François Antoine Teste.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

--Krdbot 07:00, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Pont sur la Seine à Courcelles.jpg

[edit]

Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  français  hrvatski  italiano  日本語  മലയാളം  Nederlands  sicilianu  Tiếng Việt  +/−


A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Pont sur la Seine à Courcelles.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY), BY SA (CC BY-SA), CC0 (CC0) and PDM (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Elisfkc (talk) 19:51, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pont sur la Seine à Courcelles.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Elisfkc (talk) 19:53, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Pont-route Gare Aubevoye 2016.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 12:24, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Tournebut chapelle 466 001.jpg

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Tournebut chapelle 466 001.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Tournebut chapelle 466 001.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Gunnex (talk) 14:09, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Marie-Emmanuelle Bayon (1746-1825).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

--Krdbot 18:01, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Le sculpteur Raymond Rivoire.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Le sculpteur Raymond Rivoire.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Martin Sg. (talk) 23:17, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Robert Mallet-Stevens at home.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:36, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mallet stevens menkes.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:42, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rob mallet stevens 1927.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Harlock81 (talk) 00:02, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rob mallet stevens 1945.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Harlock81 (talk) 00:20, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pavillon Tabac Mallet Stevens 1937.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Harlock81 (talk) 00:50, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pont-Audemer

[edit]

Bonjour, j’ai rétabli Category:Pont-Audemer pour les deux bas-reliefs héraldiques dont vous aviez changé la catégorie pour Category:Église Saint-Ouen de Pont-Audemer. En effet, ils ne se trouvent pas sur l’église Saint-Ouen, mais sur la façade de l'hôtel de ville. Baronnet (talk) 10:45, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merci. Cela rend service à chacun, pour une meilleure connaissance de la ville.Totorvdr59 (talk) 10:50, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Berlet - Berliet

[edit]

Bonjour Skblzz1, vous avez rajouté le 4 septembre dernier une photo sur la page Marius Berliet supposant qu'il s'agissait de Marius Berliet faisant référence à la couverture de La vie au grand air du 1 juillet 1898, sauf qu'il s'agit de Jean Baptiste Berlier dont il est rappelé en introduction du texte de la page de ne pas les confondre. Merci de supprimer la photo quand vous le pouvez. Amisfond--Amisfond (discuter) 9 septembre 2016 à 11:12 (CEST) De la même manière il y a erreur sur l'interprétation des deux photos parues précédemment du soi-disant Marius Berliet au volant d'une voiture Peugeot en 1896. Sur les documents d'origine on évoque un Monsieur Berlet, Marius Berliet n'ayant pas participé au rallye en question et encore moins sur une Peugeot.--Amisfond (discuter) 9 septembre 2016 à 11:25 (CEST) (Skblzz1 (talk) 19:03, 27 January 2018 (UTC))[reply]

File:Espanita Cortez Lido Serge btv1b531404437.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

90.43.38.193 12:42, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Affiche Berliet protégée par le droit d'auteur

[edit]

Salut !
Deux petites remarques concernant cette affiche (fichier : Marque_berliet_1.jpg) : le droit d'auteur étant ce qu'il est en France, tu ne peux t'en attribuer la paternité, même (et surtout ?) après un simple recadrage. Et, sa publication datant des années 50 ou 60 (le GLR est un camion de cette époque), elle ne devrait tomber dans le domaine public que d'ici 3 ou 4 ans, dans le meilleur des cas : la durée de protection d'une œuvre, en France, est de 70 ans après la publication (fr, en) pour un document collectif ou anonyme.
Commons ne pouvant héberger des documents non libres, et partant du principe de la simple méconnaissance de ta part concernant les droits d'auteurs (et comme ça m'embêterait de rajouter un nouvel encart de suppression à ta "collection" déjà bien fournie) : pourrais-tu demander la suppression de ce fichier, s'il te plaît ? Merci d'avance. -- BarnCas (talk) 00:26, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Marque berliet 1.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

BarnCas (talk) 22:08, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Chassipress (talk) 20:15, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you have again added Tavernier de Jonquières as the creator of this drawing, but you have not provided any evidence that this is indeed the case. and the BnF does not identify the artist, so why do you add it? --Robert.Allen (talk) 21:51, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello ! I have good hope that BNF works better on this document. I try to contact it. There no question of evidence, but in french, il s'agit là d'une évidence. Un faisceau de présomptions : le style de dessin, le sujet (département de l'Aisne), la collection : Hippolyte Destailleurs est la personne grâce à laquelle Tavernier de Jonquières aurait disparu du paysage des dessinateurs. I'll probably create an article about this man, even if we don't know lots of details about his life. His drawings will talk for him, at least. See you. --Totorvdr59 (talk) 12:48, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Fine with me. I won't remove it again, but I may add a 'ref needed' tag. Best, --Robert.Allen (talk) 00:37, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Here is the text of the answer I received on Wed. 01.22 : Monsieur, Je vous remercie pour cette attribution, qui a été ajoutée à la notice (ce qui sera visible à partir de la semaine prochaine dans le catalogue, à la prochaine mise à jour). Cordialement Pauline Chougnet Bibliothèque nationale de France Département des Estampes et de la photographie Conservateur. Chargée des collections de dessins 01 53 79 84 06 pauline.chougnet@bnf.fr Quod erat demonstrandum. Best.--Totorvdr59 (talk) 08:46, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You probably noticed, I added an "Attributed to" prefix to the creator template. That's probably good enough for now. Thanks for responding. Best, --Robert.Allen (talk) 22:34, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gedenkstein Pont Charlemagne 01 10.jpg

[edit]

Lire et essayer de COMPRENDRE!

Car la photo est dans la catégorie Pont Charlemagne qui est elle même catégorisé dans la catégorie Michel Hollard.

Alors réfléchie un peu est lis ce que j’ai déjà écrit! Tu aurais pu demandé avant de changer de nouveau! Et tu participe assez long temps au projet pour avoir compris le système da catégorisation. --Хрюша ?? 09:27, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Désolé, mais ma modif a été supprimée sans mot dire. Cette cascade de catégories n'est pas de la meilleure analyse : pour un lecteur qui passe par là par hasard, on aurait pu imaginer qu'Hollard fût l'architecte du pont. C'est la stèle qui doit être catégorisée à part, ça sert à ça une stèle. L'histoire propre du pont n'a pas à être confisquée par la Seconde Guerre mondiale. Le jour où le pont sera détruit puis reconstruit, la stèle n'aura pas changé : elle sera chargée de l'histoire des lieux. Telle est ma façon de réfléchir, analytique et pas globale.--Totorvdr59 (talk) 09:44, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Sans mot dire? Il semble que tu as la peine à lire. Dans la ligne de commentaire était écrit: remove doublecat. Et si tu veux discuter le système des categories fais ça ailleurs. Tes argument sont ridicules. Il est bien lisible pourquoi Hollard et les Poncets sont indiques sur la stèle! Et le pont jouait un rôle important car là passait la ligne de démarcation. --Хрюша ?? 10:00, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Pitoyable, inutilement agressif et hautain; remove double cat : ce ne sont pas des explications, c'est du jargon. Je vous laisse tel un confiné.--Totorvdr59 (talk) 10:26, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See here. I originally based the name on David Thomson's Les plus excellents bastiments de France par J.-A. du Cerceau. See also Rosalys Coope's article on Salomon de Brosse, who states he was born in Verneuil-sur-Oise and his father worked on the Château Verneuil-sur-Oise [1]. It is probably an old name. --Robert.Allen (talk) 08:35, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour. Je n'aurais eu aucune objection à maintenir le nom initial si j'en avais trouvé la mention dans l'article dédié à la commune de Verneuil-sur-Halatte. Ce n'est pas le cas. Internet ne renvoie pas non plus grand'chose sur Verneuil-sur-Oise. Des clichés Mérimée mentionnent la commune actuelle, …Bref, vu du 21e siècle, le principe de moindre surprise milite en faveur du choix d'un nom moderne. Toutefois, j'inscris le nom Verneuil-sur-Oise sur wikidata. Cordialement. --Totorvdr59 (talk) 09:14, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the changes, which I think were an improvement and also you cleared up some confusion, and also for creating the Wikidata page. I have some references. Perhaps I can add some more info to Wikidata. I think it was built before Salomon de Brosse became an architect, but it heavily influenced him. I'll check on that. --Robert.Allen (talk) 09:39, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Coope in her 1972 biography of de Brosse says his maternal grandfather Jacques Androuet du Cerceau was the first designer, beginning in 1568. After it was acquired by Henriette d'Entragues, De Brosse probably designed parts which had not been completed, e.g., the entrance pavilion and the square-domed pavilions. Her book may be somewhat dated. --Robert.Allen (talk) 10:04, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Jonteemil (talk) 14:42, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cathédrales du Havre, de Rouen...

[edit]

Bonsoir, merci d'éviter de surcatégoriser. S'il y a bien qqch d'inutile, c'est bien la surcatégorisation. Bonne soirée. --Birdie (talk) 22:51, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Depuis mai 2017 ! Ca fait un bail. Ca ne vaut pas la peine de s'emporter pour si peu. A l'époque, j'étais débutant. Je ne ferais probablement pas cette erreur de nos jours.--Totorvdr59 (talk) 10:13, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Et en 2019, ya pas si longtemps, tu retires "Seine-Maritime" pour Étretat pour mettre "Calvados". C'était une blague ??? voici l'horreur !. --Birdie (talk) 14:13, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
GNA GNA GNA GNA --Totorvdr59 (talk) 14:18, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fichier Simonne Legrand (Menier)

[edit]

Bonjour Totorvdr59.

Je viens de m'apercevoir que vous avez demandé le renommage de mon fichier Simonne Legrand Menier (20) en Simone Legrand Menier (20). En prime, vous avez également modifié toute la description en conséquence.

Il aurait été plus correct de m'informer avant votre prise de décision. Le prénom qui nous intéresse comporte bien deux « n » sur l'ensemble des documents d'état civil de Simonne Legrand. Vous pensez bien qu'avant d'importer les fichiers sur Wikimedia Commons, j'ai effectué les recherches nécessaires. D'autant plus que je suis le rédacteur principal de l'article consacré au château de Chenonceau sur la Wikipédia francophone et que je travaille en partenariat avec le domaine de Chenonceau. Voir à ce propos sur le site de Chenonceau : Visites inédites « L’histoire des Dames de Chenonceau » et vous verrez que Simonne Menier comporte bien les deux « n » sur le prénom.

Je sais très bien que des sites officiels comme le Musée d'Orsay commette cette confusion dans l'orthographe et que le prénom Simone est plus répandu aujourd'hui que celui de Simonne. Mais on ne refera pas l'Histoire.

Bon, en attendant que fait-on ?

Cordialement, LIONEL76 (talk) 17:40, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bonsoir. Simonne reste choquant, mais si vous avez passé des heures sur le sujet, je m'aligne et repasserai sur mes corrections (j'ai dû commencer hier soir à mettre mon nez sur Commons sur le fatras de la famille Menier) au fur et à mesure. Pour la peine, je créerai un wikidata sur ce personnage. Sans rancune ? --Totorvdr59 (talk) 17:45, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Re-bonsoir Totorvdr59. Non, bien sûr, sans rancune. C'est vrai que j'ai passé beaucoup de temps sur le sujet.
Je vois que vous poursuivez vos demandes de renommage sur mes autres fichiers et que vous annulez vos modifications dans les descriptions. Heu… le lecteur lambda va je pense, ne plus rien comprendre et je ne suis pas sûr que les autres contributeurs renomment les fichiers dans le sens inverse…
Sinon de mon côté, je peux apporter une précision pour l'état civil sur l'article de Chenonceau. Cordialement, LIONEL76 (talk) 18:16, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Rehabmamet (talk) 20:09, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, VIGNERON (talk) 12:04, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fontaine Saint-Cande

[edit]

Bonjour, j'ai refusé vos demandes de renommage sur la fontaine Saint-Candé, car elle s'appelle vraiment comme cela et non Fontaine Saint-Cande: https://www.pop.culture.gouv.fr/notice/merimee/PA00100830

--PierreSelim (talk) 10:11, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ce n'est pas la première fois que Mérimée comporte des erreurs matérielles. L'église Saint-Cande-le-Jeune, MH aussi est là pour en attester, dont le titre courant n'a pas résisté aux discussions entre wikipédiens. Un peu de littérature Totorvdr59 (talk) 10:16, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]