Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/07/28

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive July 28th, 2019
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

illegal gambling website promotion Veracious (talk) 03:06, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 03:47, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work: google search — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 03:15, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nom; seen in higher res elsewhere on web. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:30, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work: google search. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 04:03, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted False license; false date and authorship claims. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:31, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:ADVERT (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 04:14, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:32, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as no permission (No permission since). -- Geagea (talk) 10:50, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Patrick Rogel, I really do not understand the reason to "No permission since" tag her. Not small file, with EXIF, nothing in Google search. -- Geagea (talk) 10:51, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Moved: Moved to Commons:Deletion requests/File:הרב שמואל אליהו מחלק סידורים לתלמידות בית ספר בבית הכנסת של אביו בירושלים.jpg. -- Geagea (talk) 11:21, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that the uploader is the copyright holder as claimed. David Biddulph (talk) 08:17, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted by Túrelio at 08:53, 28 Juli 2019 UTC: Copyright violation: https://pikdo.net/u/babarazam/1349182865 --Krdbot 13:24, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio Veracious (talk) 03:16, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted and redirected to File:PayPal Logo Icon 2014.svg by Túrelio. (non-admin closure) -- CptViraj (📧) 17:13, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old and unused file, replaced by File:Industrial synthesis of methylamine.svg. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 21:06, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Withdrawn. Ed (Edgar181) 13:37, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused chemical reaction equation; depiction of plain text (could be easily recreated in WikiText like on en:Methylamine), also missing catalyst information. Have File:Industrial synthesis of methylamine.svg as better, high-quality replacement with different representation. Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 07:07, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom. The "replaceable by TeX, even by wikitext" issue was not raised in previous DR, but it's certainly true. Even the catalyst detail is also simple enough to be doable by TeX if someone wanted an inline version (rather than with methyl-group bonding detail). DMacks (talk) 13:56, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:32, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:41, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. Also block evasion by the uploader. --De728631 (talk) 16:32, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

So I can reupload it on Wikipedia Conor M98 (talk) 14:35, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Herbythyme at 15:13, 28 Juli 2019 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 19:25, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Image Upload 32 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:15, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by De728631 at 16:31, 28 Juli 2019 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1): block evasion --Krdbot 19:26, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

illegal gambling site promotion Veracious (talk) 03:04, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy Deleted as per CSD G10 by Túrelio. (non-admin closure) -- CptViraj (📧) 08:03, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). Also reupload. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:07, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:55, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don’t see evidence of the Creative Commons license. 2600:100B:B02D:B25A:286E:2069:FE15:46EF 15:35, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; no license. --Gbawden (talk) 07:57, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly used for self-promo on hi.wiki.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:40, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; SD F10. --Gbawden (talk) 07:56, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo of Baida on the page is from the 1960's and was not part of her original HSU nomination sheet; it is still copyrighted. The text and nomination sheet are PD, but the photo is copyrighted. PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:40, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

But when will it become free, aka can be undeleted? --Túrelio (talk) 18:32, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Túrelio: The earliest publication I could find of the photo was from 2011 when RIA Novosti uploaded it to their website, so it won't be free until 2107. Due to the low quality of this image, I only listed File:Mariya Bayda.jpg in Category:Undelete in 2107. If I find an earlier publication I will notify you and move it to an earlier category. This is not a pre-upload; I just realized that this image was a copyright violation, but slipped through since it was part of a mass deletion request that contained non-violations.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 19:40, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Túrelio: Update: found 1979 publication - Morgunov, Pyotr (1979) Героический Севастополь, Moscow: Nauka. Can be undeleted in 2075, but only listing the quality photo for undeletion.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 01:31, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, speedied as it's currently unfree. --Túrelio (talk) 08:41, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alisgari (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE (fa:اکبر_باباخانی).

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:26, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio based on the watermark. --Gbawden (talk) 07:49, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© BRIDGE NINE RECORDS • 1995-2018 Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:58, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no indication of free release. --4nn1l2 (talk) 08:55, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Takrim.ahmed.49 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE, COM:NOTHOST.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:59, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: SD F10. --Gbawden (talk) 08:10, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by NETA RISHABH PANDIT (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s).

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 04:41, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:27, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ZABIBO123 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious claim of own work. Majority of files do not have any meta data. Some have water marks. Skipped those that have DR, deleting admin please check. Thank you.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 10:50, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Bogus own work claim. Some can be found here. --4nn1l2 (talk) 09:26, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by StammyBoi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). 3 other files in use, so can't be deleted under OOS, deleting admin please check.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:05, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by StammyBoi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST

Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:23, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:19, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by StammyBoi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possibly fufilling F10, edits only in own user space (exception of 2 in template space on en.wiki which was reverted shortly after). Even if the subject is notable, the uploader might not be the copyright holder.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:00, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:15, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Arjun saxena (AS) (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE, COM:NOTHOST.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:46, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: SD F10. --Gbawden (talk) 10:03, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded from Instagram Dansiran (talk) 11:11, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 13:48, 29 Juli 2019 UTC: Copyright violation: From Instagram, no permission --Krdbot 01:20, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

So it can reuploaded locally on Wikipedia Conor M98 (talk) 14:46, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 13:53, 29 Juli 2019 UTC: Fair use is not allowed on Commons --Krdbot 01:21, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

So it can reuploaded locally on Wikipedia Conor M98 (talk) 14:47, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 13:53, 29 Juli 2019 UTC: Fair use is not allowed on Commons --Krdbot 01:21, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation; author is not Notch Sleeps-Darkly (talk) 18:11, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Majora at 23:14, 29 Juli 2019 UTC: Logo above the threshold of originality. --Krdbot 01:21, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted image, cannot be uploaded to Commons. author is not Notch, copyright belongs to Microsoft. Sleeps-Darkly (talk) 18:12, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 20:55, 29 Juli 2019 UTC: Copyright violation: unfree video game screenshot --Krdbot 01:21, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, source site license: Copyright© 2008 MLIT Japan. All Rights Reserved. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 03:25, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 07:34, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo of Baida is from the 1960's and was not part of her HSU nomination sheet; it is still copyrighted and property of RIA Novosti. PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:40, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

But when will it become free, aka can be undeleted? --Túrelio (talk) 18:32, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Túrelio: 2075. Not a pre-upload, it survived an old mass deletion request since non-violations were in it. But this photo actually belongs to RIA Novosti. Published in book by П.А. Моргунов. «Героический Севастополь» (1979).--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 19:43, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Túrelio: Can you delete this one now? Thanks.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:07, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, speedied as clearly non-free. --Túrelio (talk) 10:14, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from the Internet. Source: http://www.qzc.edu.cn/1190/list.htm Larryasou (talk) 16:08, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ellin Beltz at 01:27, 31 Juli 2019 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 07:21, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from the Internet. Same resolution and size. Source: http://www.qzc.edu.cn/_upload/article/images/8b/f3/57c8d4f941299723b82994d78fb2/c73b9afb-4673-473a-a380-b85aa6953e20.jpg http://www.qzc.edu.cn/1190/list.htm Larryasou (talk) 16:13, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ellin Beltz at 01:27, 31 Juli 2019 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 07:21, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s).

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 05:33, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:42, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image was copied from Baidu Baike. You can see its watermark in the lower left corner. Source: https://baike.baidu.com/pic/%E7%84%A6%E4%BD%9C%E5%B8%88%E8%8C%83%E9%AB%98%E7%AD%89%E4%B8%93%E7%A7%91%E5%AD%A6%E6%A0%A1/304397/0/9d82d158ccbf6c81386cf2fbbb3eb13533fa404e?fr=lemma&ct=single#aid=0&pic=9d82d158ccbf6c81386cf2fbbb3eb13533fa404e Larryasou (talk) 06:50, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 14:29, 31 Juli 2019 UTC: Copyright violation: This image was copied from the Internet. Because there is a watermark on the lower left corner. --Krdbot 19:22, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work: google search — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 03:59, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:CSD#F1. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:32, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Skyzerandrew (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s).

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:32, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 08:04, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Skyzerandrew (talk · contribs)

[edit]

low quality COM:PORN

SpanishSnake (talk | contribs) ping me plz 01:48, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:36, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Skyzerandrew (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope. Collection of personal private photos. Not in use.

Smooth O (talk) 09:09, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:21, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This seal is based on origianl workpiece by 刘乐一(Liu leyi) in Shangdong University, It's copyrighted. See http://www.culture.sdu.edu.cn/ln_bs/lnsb.htm Larryasou (talk) 17:01, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ellin Beltz at 01:11, 3 August 2019 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 07:13, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:30, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 06:18, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 06:19, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Unused selfie of unidentified person with no educational value. Voice of Clam (formerly Optimist on the run) (talk) 11:54, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:24, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). Also reupload. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:04, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 06:19, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:NUDITY and possibly oos. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:48, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Obvious copyright violation [1]. --4nn1l2 (talk) 10:59, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work: Copyright © Shizuoka Pref. Police. All Rights Reserved. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 03:21, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 14:13, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 03:22, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 14:12, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality structure with English caption; cf. File:(-)-Amomol A.svg. Wostr (talk) 10:53, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:41, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality structure + background; cf. File:(-)-Baconipyrone C.svg. Wostr (talk) 12:03, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:42, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality structure; cf. File:(+)-Baconipyrone A.svg + File:(-)-Baconipyrone A.svg. Wostr (talk) 12:06, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:44, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation https://picgardens.com/hashtag-fuerzaatleti/ Brgesto (talk) 11:47, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:48, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad upload, try again Mjrmtg (talk) 11:53, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:48, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:04, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:47, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:05, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:47, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:06, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:47, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:51, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:46, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:55, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:46, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:05, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:45, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:11, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:45, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Awwab413 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s).

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:14, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:45, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 9avril official (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s).

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:20, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:45, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:21, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:45, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:23, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:44, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:52, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:44, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:55, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:44, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:05, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:43, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wellington Guimarães (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s).

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:06, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:43, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:08, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:43, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:08, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:43, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:09, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:43, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly COM:OOS (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:10, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:42, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:12, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:42, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo taken from the subjects twitter account https://twitter.com/elliotjames87?lang=en and or his instagram account https://www.instagram.com/elliotjames87/ Domdeparis (talk) 14:35, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FB per MD. --Gbawden (talk) 08:42, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Broken copy of File:Leeds Castle, Kent, England 3 - May 09.jpg with a wrong title Antenor81 (talk) 14:39, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:42, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

So it can reuploaded on Wikipedia Conor M98 (talk) 14:47, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by Turelio. --Gbawden (talk) 08:40, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:40, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:51, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:40, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:08, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:40, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ThatsMR2u (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Photo of photo. low res, might not be own work.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:21, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Needs OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 08:40, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:24, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No indication of free license at source. --Gbawden (talk) 08:39, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dubious claim of own work. This seems like a photo taken by the person herself (selfie). So, how is this the uploader's own work? (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:25, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:39, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad upload, try again Mjrmtg (talk) 15:27, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:39, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:28, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:39, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:29, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:38, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bonguriorakesh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:31, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:38, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Oussama 499 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely own work, no metadata, small files, look familiar.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:50, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 04:49, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Oussama 499 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low-re images, no metadata, unlikely to be own works.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:32, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • C'est effectivement des fichiers que j'ai importés pour améliorer certains articles relatifs aux joueurs cités ci-dessus. Sachez juste que je n'ai jamais eu l'intention d'importer des fichiers soumis à des droits d'auteur, certains sont récupérés d'Internet et de ce fait, je ne peux guère savoir s'il sont libres de droits ou pas. Cordialement --Oussama 499 (talk) 16:25, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete The uploader admits himself (in his message above) that he uploads random images he finds online without knowing what their licenses are. All his previous uploaded images have been deleted for copyvio. A reverse search on Google shows some of the images above are already published on other non-free websites. And I do not trust this user for the others, which seem cropped from bigger ones. --Titlutin (talk) 17:06, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:38, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Arthur bigdog (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). Delete along with Category:The Bigdog MuscleBuilding

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:36, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment more files in cat. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:20, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

copied from cat tp --Achim (talk) 18:07, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Don't delete my stuff please this is motivation others to start gym and live healthy fitness lifestyle. Arthur bigdog (talk) 11:15, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Arthur bigdog (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope.Please delete all images

ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 09:56, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:35, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE personal image. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:37, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:34, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:38, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:34, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:49, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:34, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:58, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:33, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be taken from Facebook, per EXIF. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:09, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:33, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-re image, unlikely to be own work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:14, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:31, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2019 © Cайт створено на Weblium Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:16, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:31, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE personal image. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:23, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:33, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mehdijavadi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE images.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:29, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:32, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is NOT the AFDM5. This is the AFDB that replaced her. 76.28.228.138 17:43, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy keep Misidentification is no reason to delete. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 02:10, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:32, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pournia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Questionable authorship claims based on the low resolutions, missing metadata (except metadata indicating at least one of the photos was grabbed from social media), and the uploader's history.

LX (talk, contribs) 19:19, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note that instead of participating in this discussion, Pournia has continued to upload files with dubious or false authorship claims. LX (talk, contribs) 22:49, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Pournia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work on these four sports photos.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:22, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:30, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Gbawden: The first four files are still not deleted. LX (talk, contribs) 19:43, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@LX: Done. I only did the 2nd batch but sometimes the gadget does it for all the open noms which is a pain Gbawden (talk) 06:17, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pournia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:13, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A person of no notability. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 19:21, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:30, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Andreiticlean (talk) 20:48, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:30, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It was lifted from a State of Colorado webpage here: http://leg.colorado.gov/sites/default/files/styles/width_300/public/2019a_williams%2C%20angela.jpg?itok=OHGwRQdS Jeffrey Beall (talk) 21:01, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:28, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Out of scope. ~Cybularny Speak? 21:03, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:27, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Say Thu Htet (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:CSD#F10 (personal photos by non-contributors)

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:14, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete all per nom. And also File:Mahagita Vocal Competition .jpg


Deleted as copyright violations. Source – Facebook. Taivo (talk) 08:07, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Danile Tshazibane (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE, COM:NOTHOST.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:54, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:24, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

emptied Chainwit. (talk) 10:37, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:24, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image is too small, and not appeared on any articles at all — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alex Neman (talk • contribs) 2019-07-27T11:39:15‎ (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:24, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

gambling site spam account Veracious (talk) 02:33, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:25, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio Veracious (talk) 03:13, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:21, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source website doesn't clearly state the images are cc-by-4.0. In fact, it states all rights reserved. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:17, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:22, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 0lesson (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Looks like all of these files were uploaded to promote their blog. Already blocked on enwiki as NOTHERE.

‐‐1997kB (talk) 04:04, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete - per norm. --Sreejith K (talk) 06:10, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Using Commons to SPAM. Per nomination. Stanglavine (talk) 13:49, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:20, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 04:20, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:19, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 04:21, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:19, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 04:25, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:19, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rirak1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s).

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 04:27, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:19, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 04:33, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:19, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 04:34, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:19, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 04:37, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:19, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 04:38, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure were I am allowed to comment, so , I will right here. I recently joined, then it prompt me to upload a photo. That is the one of thousands I have and maybe 20 on that topic. What you are seeing here is the clouds very low and a energy bouncing around inside the cloud. This is not some Photoshop, its not a photo of someone else's photo, it my photo taken with my phone. Why would you want to take something so authentic as that down, maybe because people wont believe it and cause them not to believe other things? Or because someone doesn't like it and doesn't know what to think about it so its easy to just take it down, where is this conversation so I can ask this fellow member, why are you hating on my photo Sir or Mam. Please let me know what will cool your jets enough to maybe ask if I got more of this. David D


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:17, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 05:19, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:17, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 05:23, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:16, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 05:25, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:16, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 05:28, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:17, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album/files storage. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:40, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission, take from facebook, moreover, those are out of scope.

Afifa Afrin (talk) 05:28, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:16, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 05:29, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:16, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I made a mistake Omar Sayeed Saimum (talk) 05:49, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:16, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I made a mistake Omar Sayeed Saimum (talk) 05:51, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:15, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 05:55, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:15, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 07:55, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:14, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 08:16, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:14, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 08:41, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:09, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Clubdefansj (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious claim of own work. No EXIF. 3 of 5 files are screenshots.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 08:43, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 09:09, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pdpmlumajang (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious claim of own work. Logos found on google ([2]). Text files possibly OOS.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 08:57, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 09:08, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Janak Bhatta (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE, COM:NOTHOST.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:07, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:08, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 09:37, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:07, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 09:37, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:08, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://twitter.com/bijaysi14846349 + out of COM:SCOPE, COM:NOTHOST.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:39, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:06, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bijay singh style creator (talk · contribs) 2

[edit]

User appears to be the subject in these photos, requires COM:OTRS permission from original photographer(s). Additionally, the contributor's edit on the English Wikipedia suggests self-promotion. Likely out of project scope.

ƏXPLICIT 12:51, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:10, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Toscans (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE, COM:NOTHOST.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:06, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:06, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fathe.xabirii (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s).

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:15, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:03, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hashtag and logo suggest the photo was previously published. Requires OTRS ticket. Ytoyoda (talk) 11:25, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:02, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:27, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:01, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work by Anatoli Timofejewitsch Swerew (d. 1986), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:00, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:32, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AdeC1839 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted work by Anatoli Timofejewitsch Swerew (d. 1986), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:02, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:31, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

blurred, not used, there are better alternatives, e.g. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fraise_des_bois_juin2009.jpg Nefronus (talk) 23:20, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep search is not getting improved by just getting rid of perfectly valid uploads. In scope Multichill (talk) 19:02, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 12:22, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

blurred, alternative: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%D0%97%D0%B5%D0%BC%D0%BB%D1%8F%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B0_%D0%BB%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%8F_(Fragaria_vesca)_f007.jpg Nefronus (talk) 23:22, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep search is not getting improved by just getting rid of perfectly valid uploads. In scope Multichill (talk) 19:01, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 12:22, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

blurred, alt. available: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wald-Erdbeere_-_Fragaria_vesca_-_Bl%C3%BCte.jpg Nefronus (talk) 23:25, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep search is not getting improved by just getting rid of perfectly valid uploads. In scope Multichill (talk) 19:01, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 12:22, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

blurred, alt. available: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wald-Erdbeere_-_Fragaria_vesca_-_Bl%C3%BCte.jpg Nefronus (talk) 23:25, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 12:22, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

used almost duplicate: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Starr_051105-8369_Liquidambar_styraciflua.jpg Nefronus (talk) 23:36, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 12:21, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

blurred, unused, alt: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2_Reife_Himbeeren.jpg Nefronus (talk) 23:55, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep search is not getting improved by just getting rid of perfectly valid uploads. In scope Multichill (talk) 19:01, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 12:21, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

blurred, poor quality Nefronus (talk) 23:56, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep search is not getting improved by just getting rid of perfectly valid uploads. In scope Multichill (talk) 19:01, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 12:21, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Thomasskm (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious claim of own work. Watermarks of "For Wikipedia" makes it even more dubious.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:02, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, 大诺史. I am working for Athis Technologies. I am in charge of the community management. This means that we have the copyright of these photos:
We putted the watermarks of "For Wikipedia" to be sure that this photos can't be reuse or if yes we can see where is from.

Best regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thomasskm (talk • contribs) 17:39, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Thomasskm: Please go via COM:OTRS. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:19, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, no permission. --Wdwd (talk) 14:41, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lo subí por error Katherine Tamayo (talk) 18:00, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content. --Wdwd (talk) 14:39, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

screenshot from Youtube Albinfo (talk) 18:48, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 14:35, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

YouTube screenshot Albinfo (talk) 18:52, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:34, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Youtube screenshot Albinfo (talk) 18:52, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:34, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution, no EXIF data, exists elsewhere on the web. Unlikely to be own work. ~Cybularny Speak? 20:23, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:33, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution, no EXIF data, other version already on the web eg. here. Unlikely to be own work. ~Cybularny Speak? 20:32, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:33, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rafael Magareli (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unfree book covers. Deriviative works.

~Cybularny Speak? 20:35, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:32, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unsourced screenshot. ~Cybularny Speak? 20:42, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 14:32, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unsourced screenshot. ~Cybularny Speak? 20:43, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 14:32, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deriviative work. ~Cybularny Speak? 20:44, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:31, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deriviative work. ~Cybularny Speak? 20:47, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:31, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deriviative work. ~Cybularny Speak? 21:04, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, no permission for shown artwork. --Wdwd (talk) 14:12, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Akash4860 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unfree book covers.

~Cybularny Speak? 21:10, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:09, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cashoutcityent (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE, COM:NOTHOST.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:34, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted, see log. --Wdwd (talk) 14:08, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Selfie, not uploader's own work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:15, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of COM:SCOPE, unused personal image. --Wdwd (talk) 14:02, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE personal image. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:18, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:00, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:49, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:47, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:46, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. SVG version is available. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The graphic is in use now: de:Quidditch (Sport). The SVG-Version is faulty, because I could not upload it without the font disappearing. I would much rather recommend to delete the SVG-Version. --Prismaingwer94 (talk) 20:00, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: file in use. (=in project scope). --Wdwd (talk) 14:46, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Feronica Audria Larkin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

low res images, unlikely to be own work.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:34, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: personal photos, unused; -> out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 14:43, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Of no educational use. Alan Liefting (talk) 02:05, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:08, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly out of scope. File has overlapping letters which should be fixed if kept (See pg 2 & 3). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 08:37, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:10, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 09:41, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:11, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Personal photo. Hindust@niक्या करें? बातें! 09:45, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:11, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cfils (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE (pt:Dji Tafinha).

Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:51, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:11, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality, not used, superceded by File:Mallet Event Center and Rodeo Arena.jpg Nv8200p (talk) 11:14, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused poor duplicate. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:12, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mother0001 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per COM:OOS.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:49, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:13, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:14, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Filippo Espo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Lello Esposito (born 1957) is an active and living Italian artist. In Italy there is no freedom of panorama for artworks. We need the sculptor's permission in order to publish those photos.

Ruthven (msg) 11:22, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:51, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seeing that there is a backlog of five months for deletion requests, I find it necessary to continue the clean-up of fictitious flags uploaded by Santiago RD, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Fictitious flags of municipalities of the Dominican Republic. My apologies for dragging GTRus into this mess.They have done nothing wrong by producing svg files from the SantiagoRd files.

TU-nor (talk) 10:16, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: I haven't checked them all, but a random sample suggests that these are in use on Spanish Wikipedia. Under COM:INUSE, Commons should not delete files that are used by other projects solely because they're alleged to be inaccurate. --bjh21 (talk) 15:20, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Bjh21: They are used in Spanish Wiki because the uploading editor Santiago RD has placed them in the Spanish Wiki template es:Plantilla:DOM. Those flags are not "inaccurate", they are completely fake, they are a hoax. I am sure that COM:INUSE is not meant to protect fake information just because the uploading editor is smart enough to use the uploads in some Wiki. --TU-nor (talk) 16:40, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@TU-nor: Taking the first two files, File:Bandera del Municipio La Caleta.png was added to pl:La Caleta by Janusz J., while File:Bandera del Municipio La Cienaga.png was added to es:La Ciénaga (Barahona) by Aitorembe. Neither change has ever been reverted or even discussed on the relevant talk page. COM:INUSE and COM:NPOV say that we leave content decisions like this up to individual Wikipedias. Once the various Wikipedias have decided that they don't need these files, then we can delete them. --bjh21 (talk) 17:28, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Santiago RD has uploaded hundreds of non-existent flags they have created themselves. I find it difficult to accept that we cannot remove them just because other users in good faith have believed they were real and used some of them in articles. --TU-nor (talk) 07:13, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 17:06, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These files are recreations of fictitious flags removed two years ago in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Fictitious flags of municipalities of the Dominican Republic and Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Flags of municipalities of the Dominican Republic. See also files by same uploader removed recently twice in Commons:Deletion requests/Flags of provinces of the Dominican Republic.

TU-nor (talk) 20:05, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 07:18, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Various versions of these flags have been uploaded in the past and subsequently deleted as fictional in multiple DRs over the years. The main seeming to be Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Fictitious flags of municipalities of the Dominican Republic. So these images should be re-deleted as OOS since there apparently aren't any actual flags for municipalities of the Dominican Republic to begin with. Although I'm more then willing to remove any from the deletion request where there's evidence of it actually being used IRL.

Adamant1 (talk) 04:02, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, although I appreciate your concern, I don't think every image should just be deleted. Regarding your statement of no "actual flags for municipalities of the Dominican Republic", I disagree; many US municipalities use white flags with the seal and no one says they aren't "actual flags".

Every image (usually ending in ".gif") on Flags of the World I can confirm the existence of. Most are created by FOTW member Randy Young, who is indeed quite reputable. Sadly, I can't confirm the existence of flags for: El Seibo Province, Castañuelas, and Hondo Valle. Now, I can't give you proof regarding the Puerto Plata variant I submitted, but I can tell you I saw this flag quite often; you'll find it somewhere. Perhaps if you search ayuntamiento municipal puerto plata on Google Maps, you'll find it beside the DR flag. Flagvisioner (talk) 04:32, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think the difference between flags for US municipalities versus these images is that the flags for US municipalities are actual flags used by the local governments. Not just digital files that can only be found on Wikimedia Commons or similar sites. Per at least Google's definition of a flag "a piece of cloth or similar material, typically oblong or square, attachable by one edge to a pole or rope." Not that you can't have digital versions of flags, but they should at least exist IRL and outside of Wikipedia to qualify as educational. Otherwise it's just a random image with a solid colored square background, which you'd have to agree isn't a flag and doesn't intrinsically have any educational value. --Adamant1 (talk) 04:46, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, all of the ones I back up have sources on FOTW, linking to an image (sometimes dead). Example is Duvergé, at https://m.facebook.com/202082586503881/photos/a.453801911331946/990152507696881/?type=3. Flags of the World is a quite a reliable source for flags; it functions like a Wikipedia for flags while maintaining reliability through its mailing list, where editors and contributors review information to try and ensure its reliability. I should also add that its likely San Pedro and Puerto Plata provinces might have no flags; I can’t find any images, which the Dominican Republic editor on FOTW has also stated. Flagvisioner (talk) 02:36, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Flagvisioner: According to the Flags of the World website content from there is copyrighthed. So what's your basis for thinking we can use images from it to begin with even if its supposedly a reliable source for flags? One of the problems with this is that we clearly can't even know who made the flags, where they came from, or if they are copyrighted or not if they are non-official/fictional and sourced from a copyright website. --Adamant1 (talk) 03:38, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, as I said in my last post, Flags of the World functions like a Wikipedia for flags while maintaining reliability through its mailing list, where editors and contributors review information to try and ensure its reliability. FOTW always assumes contributors’ very specific interpretations of drawings are copyrighted, though not really the case most often. Also, it is very easy to see who submitted specific information about a flag, as the date of posting and contributor’s name is next to every image/piece of info. Obviously, the images come from https://crwflags.com/fotw/flags/; you can click on the map to be directed to the page of any country. I am assuming you clicked on the link which leads to an image of the flag of Duvergé, which can be seen being held by government employees that work with the municipality; it should be noted it has a nice gold fringe and quality, showing it is meant to be used in a government office. As such, I’m not sure what you mean by “we clearly can’t even know”, you can easily find this by clicking on one of the over 100,000 pages on Flags of the World. Flagvisioner (talk) 16:58, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
FOTW always assumes contributors’ very specific interpretations of drawings are copyrighted The problem is that we have no way of knowing when it is or isn't the case on our end since the flags aren't officially created to begin with and most of these countries don't have exceptions for flags anyway even if they were. But the default is always to assume that any user generated content from another website is copyrighted unless there's evidence to the contrary, which I don't see here. In fact FOTW clearly says "This page is part of © FOTW Flags Of The World website."
I am assuming you clicked on the link which leads to an image of the flag of Duvergé... I assume you mean this link since you didn't specify. I don't see an image of anyone holding the flag in that link. Let alone any government employees that work with the municipality. --Adamant1 (talk) 20:09, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Reading through my message, you will easily find a link at: https://www.facebook.com/202082586503881/photos/a.453801911331946/990152507696881/?type=3&paipv=0&eav=Afb3zs3E6RPqQ-hLQOWqsgEFCFy6MrqiE8alxhA_Oui9ZLXlCq8xGB6ZFNVR4xGwqr4&_rdr; if you clicked both links you would find "the link which leads to an image of the flag of Duvergé". As I was saying earlier, FOTW claims their contributors own the rights to all of their drawings. Flagvisioner (talk) 01:11, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The "flag" is pretty heavily, if not exclusively, comprised of the municipal shield for Duvergé and there is no general clause saying works created by the government of the Dominican Republic are PD. Obviously you can't just take a previously copyrighted image, put a square blue background behind it, and then claim a copyright to it. That's not how things work. So is there any evidence that the shield of Duvergé is in the public domain to begin with? Otherwise it shouldn't be hosted on Commons regardless of how things are on FOTWs end. --Adamant1 (talk) 01:24, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FOTW is copyrighted. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:37, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Even more fictitious flags by the same editor as in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Flags of provinces of the Dominican Republic, but for some reason moved to new category by another (?probably the same) editor (now indeffed) behind the files in Commons:Deletion requests/Again Flags of provinces of the Dominican Republic. In this case, the files are in use in several wikis, but only because the same editors have placed them in Wikidata and in templates in es-Wiki.

TU-nor (talk) 12:08, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:45, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Also:

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as no permission (No permission since). Patrick Rogel, I really do not understand the reason to "No permission since" tag her. Not small file, with EXIF, nothing in Google search. -- Geagea (talk) 10:53, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Geagea: I've asked for the permission of each photographer since though stated "own work" files are by Reem Aminoach and Uriya Heller. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:06, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Patrick Rogel, this file does not contain author or copyrighter name. In the way you have done it it does't clear. In cases when some files contain author name amd some not it have to go through regular DR. -- Geagea (talk) 11:14, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
If other files EXIFs contains no author uploader is welcomed to reupload them at full resolution directly from his/her camera and not from Picasa. Frankly it's very unlikely that the same person followed the same subject to photography him during 7 years with a least 4 different cameras. But you have notified the uploader on Wikipedia in Hebrew; I hope he will explain him/herself here. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:19, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Your argument is valid but it have to processed through regular DR otherwise the fact that files uploaded with EXIF of different photographers is unknown. -- Geagea (talk) 14:50, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. -- Geagea (talk) 21:14, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Golden Mask of Tutankhamu00 (25).jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:53, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Prostitution in Berlin is in scope. No face, no personality rights -> Good. --Strakhov (talk) 15:30, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Testiyuser as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Published on shahvani.com first. just cropped and uploaded here. Kept at DR, so re-nominating.] —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:03, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per above. HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:55, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Testiyuser, Mdaniels5757, and HeminKurdistan: Has anyone verified this? The image here has camera metadata; I checked a random JPEG image from shahvani.com and it did not have any EXIF data. TinEye doesn’t find this image. Brianjd (talk) 12:02, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Currently in use at id:Prostitusi di Jerman, it:Prostituzione in Germania and wiktionary:uk:проститутка, so clearly in scope. Brianjd (talk) 12:06, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Regarding personality rights, see Strakhov’s closing line above and this line from the description: She allowed me to take pictures and share. Also, in Special:Diff/359687143, Хорошаіграшка said: Do not need {{Personality rights}} and removed that template. Brianjd (talk) 12:12, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete -- on 2 basis, number one, is she even Iranian or are we taking the word of the "photographer"?, personality rights may not apply as no 'face' can be seen but taking images of sleeping people does kinda feel suspicious and creepy, he could have taken a pic of her looking at the camera and then distorted the face.. and 2ndly,exif kinda proves the camera information was doctored as no one carrying an IPhone would have the word 'berlin' as a keyword, it was clearly added afterwards to be used on some website used by web bots and crawlers so i'm kinda questioning if the person who uploaded is the photographer or someone who extracted the image from elsewhere and manipulated it which is a clear reason for deletion..--Stemoc 02:31, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion, I hate this, but on porn sites this image seems to be taken from Commons, no earlier uploads found. The nominator did only do a single edit on Commons, so this is not a reliable nomination as well. Therefore decided to keep, as it is use also and therefore in scope. --Ellywa (talk) 21:30, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Template:The Stand News and all files using it

[edit]

Not a valid free license. According to COM:L:

All copyrighted material on Commons (not in the public domain) must be licensed under a free license that specifically and irrevocably allows anyone to use the material for any purpose; simply writing that "the material may be used freely by anyone" or similar isn't sufficient. In particular, the license must meet the following conditions:

  • Republication and distribution must be allowed.
  • Publication of derivative work must be allowed.
  • Commercial use of the work must be allowed.
  • The license must be perpetual (non-expiring) and non-revocable.

which is not the case here. The language of this statement is very vague ("各機構及個人,可隨便使用": any organization or person can freely use) and does not meet such requirements.

--Wcam (talk) 11:56, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep: I do not get the point. Since the Stand News said that "any organization or person can freely use", obviously it means that we can republicate, distribute and use it in anyway. --痛心疾首 (talk) 12:38, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Meanwhile, this DR will make many article lose a lot of images.--Wpcpey (talk) 15:35, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - does not meet COM:L. --Jcb (talk) 15:37, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


FWIW, a list of files deleted (logs):

Extended content
  1. Template:The Stand News
  2. File:嶺南大學校友及學生集會要求驅逐何君堯 20190727.png
  3. File:Old man attack people in Yuen Long Plaza bridge 20190727.jpg
  4. File:立場新聞記者被襲擊一刻.gif
  5. File:便衣警員被指全身沒有展示警員編號亦未佩戴委任證 20190707.png
  6. File:Yuen Long Station White Tee people attack citizen in platform 20190721.png
  7. File:Yuen Long Station White Tee people attack citizen 20190721.png
  8. File:Yuen Long Station people's blood after police force entry 20190727.png
  9. File:TP8431 hat 20190727.png
  10. File:TP8431 20190727.png
  11. File:Tear smoke in Connaught Road Central view2 20190721.png
  12. File:Tear smoke in Connaught Road Central view1 20190721.png
  13. File:Tear smoke in Connaught Road Central view 20190721.png
  14. File:Sing Hallelujah to the Lord in Citic Tower Bridge 20190613.png
  15. File:T98431 weapons 20190727.png
  16. File:Queensway tear smoke 20190612.png
  17. File:Protesters waiting at Eastern Magistrates' Courts outside 20190731.png
  18. File:Protesters use water to resolve tear smoke 20190721.png
  19. File:Protesters outside Office of the Chief Executive 20190620.png
  20. File:Protesters in North Point station 20190730.png
  21. File:Protesters in Kwai Yi Road 20190730.png
  22. File:Prof LAU, Chi-pang, JP 20190727.png
  23. File:Press conference for Hong Kong Police Force 20190613.png
  24. File:Police speak after fireworks incident 20190731.png
  25. File:Police Heaquarter wall after the protest 20190622.jpg
  26. File:Police force use the gun in Connaught Road Central 20190721.png
  27. File:Police force use pepper in Long Yip Street 20190727-2.png
  28. File:Police force showing orange flag in Nam Pin Wai Entrance 20190727.png
  29. File:Police force release tear gas to Long Yip Street 20190727.png
  30. File:Police force prepare release tear smoke in Po Yip Street 20190727.png
  31. File:Police force prepare gun in Sun Kwai Fong Garden shops view 20190730.png
  32. File:Police force prepare gun in Kwai Fong Station Bus Terminal 20190730.png
  33. File:Police force prepare gun in Kwai Fong Station Bus Terminal 2.jpg
  34. File:Police force near Kwai Fong Station Bus Terminal 20190730.png
  35. File:Police force in Mong Kok block Shantung Street sidewalk 20190707.png
  36. File:Police force go to Yuen Long Station Exit A 20190727.png
  37. File:Police force clear the people in Castle Peak Road-Yuen Long bridge 20190727.png
  38. File:Police force clear the barrier 20190622.png
  39. File:People stay TSW Police Station outside 20190731.png
  40. File:People stay at bridge arrested by police force 20190721-1.png
  41. File:People argue with police in Yuen Long Station 20190722.png
  42. File:Passenger with police force want to leave in TKL station 20190730.png
  43. File:Passenger shout with MTR staff in TKL Station 20190730.png
  44. File:One male arrested by police 20190721.png
  45. File:Man protesting Hong Kong's extradition law in Pacific Place 20190615.png
  46. File:Kwong Chun Yu in Castle Peak Road-Yuen Long 20190727.png
  47. File:Kwai Chung Police Station vehicle entrance gate 20190730.png
  48. File:Kwai Chung Police Station outside view1 20190730.png
  49. File:Kwai Chung Police Station outside view 20190730.png
  50. File:KMB staff vehicle crashed after fireworks incident 20190731.png
  51. File:Ken Chow Wing-kan in TSW Police Station 20190730.png
  52. File:Cross-Harbour Tunnel Flash Mob.png
  53. File:Connaught Road Central protesters at night 20190721.png
  54. File:190807 HK Space Museum protest.png
  55. File:190806 HK Sham Shui Po police station protest.png
  56. File:190802 HK civil servant rally - Anson Chan.png
  57. File:190801 HK financial sector flash mob rally.png
  58. File:190721 Yuen Long Stand News screenshot.png
--Roy17 (talk) 16:16, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Restored: as per [3]. Yann (talk) 06:04, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of a screen, DW (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:31, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by 1989 at 19:41, 17 August 2019 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 01:04, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

there is a unicode symbol for this and I changed this img to it in all related floral formula articles (÷), so the image can be deleted Nefronus (talk) 23:14, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:38, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I do not believe this to be an image of Harold Cole. It does not look like him, it is not the only photo of him - there are several in the book Turncoat, The Strange Case of Traitor Sergeant Harold Cole. I have asked for provenance but have received none. Poltair (talk) 18:49, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted as copyvio, like his other uploads. --Gbawden (talk) 06:42, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Enzo1313 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No COM:FOP in France, permission of Rudy Ricciotti needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:40, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:16, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Ticket:2019040410004151, the author requested for fair use, which is not accepted on Commons per COM:FU. 廣九直通車 (talk) 05:41, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 InfoNote that another fair use version w:File:Ceiton-logo-2019.png also exists on English Wikipedia.廣九直通車 (talk) 05:43, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:37, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Swfantasia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Questionable authorship claims based on the low resolutions, missing metadata (except metadata indicating that several of the photos were grabbed from social media), and previous publications elsewhere.

LX (talk, contribs) 18:12, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:31, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Swfantasia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely authorship claims based on the low resolutions, missing metadata (except metadata indicating that several of the photos were grabbed from social media), and the uploader's history.

LX (talk, contribs) 09:19, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - some images have "FBMD". --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:32, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Swfantasia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:51, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Morocco (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 09:35, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:33, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Leavepuckgackle1998 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own work: copyrighted work by Theo Schoon (d. 1985), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:35, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

These following files are ‘’’not’’’ to be deleted. They are my own work, because I took them myself in a public place, where they were on display. They meet the criteria for remaining on the commons. This is a notable artist who, like many New Zealand-related topics, has been severely neglected as a result of the bias towards any articles not American-related. Wikipedia is a service so many people rely on, and therefore we need to ensure these files remain on the service. Theo Schoon left no next of kin, never married and had no children, and therefore all his works are in the public domain anyway. So what is the point? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leavepuckgackle1998 (talk • contribs)
As already said to you on your Talk page, I don't know where you have taken these photos but there's no COM:FOP neither in N-Z for 2-D "graphic works" nor in Australia for paintings so permission of the artist's heirs is mandatory. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:23, 28 July 2019 (UTC) Besides your claim that images have been shot in Australia is quite dubious. Nevertheless if Schoon has no heirs paintings won't be undeleted before 2035. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:34, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:36, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this image is used on the page of France Venezuela Artists Carlos Cruz-Diez and it is not a work of art by him. We need to have it removed form anything related to Carlos Cruz-Diez. CDAF Paris (talk) 09:36, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - we do not have editorial power over other projects. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:38, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Regentroad52 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Photos of photos, missing permission.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:20, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; one taken from FB per exif. --Gbawden (talk) 13:37, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of own work. This seems like a photo taken by the artiste herself (selfie). So, how is this the uploader's own work? (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:01, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:36, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:04, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@大诺史: 虽然我100%不同意你提删的理由(此图的教育意义在于指出Google爬虫机器人与维基百科的页面会造成水土不服的情况),不过我在中文维基百科写了个页面,这个图片现在已经有使用了。 (talk) 00:52, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I shall withdraw my request per COM:INUSE. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 00:57, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 13:35, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:34, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lo subí por error Katherine Tamayo (talk) 18:00, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Translation in English (Google Translate) - I uploaded it by mistake. -- CptViraj (📧) 04:36, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:34, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

NO COM:FOP in France, illustrator's permission needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:08, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:32, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in Japan for artistic works. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:28, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

But this is a part of architectural work. This is installed on a street, in outdoor location accessible to the public, on the shutter of a building easily seen by the public. 

Japan

Reproduction of the architectural work(s) in this image is permitted under Section 46 of the Copyright Law of Japan, as long as it does not constitute "imitative reproduction of an architectural work and offering it to the public by transfer of ownership of its copies." This permission does not apply to artistic works in general or to buildings that are considered artistic works, unless they are in public domain. See COM:CRT/Japan#Freedom of panorama for more information.

العربية  English  日本語  한국어  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

--Motokoka (talk) 01:15, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No FOP for artistic works. --Gbawden (talk) 13:33, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work by Antonio Giuseppe Santagata (d. 1985), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:11, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:32, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dans (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted work by Edoardo Villa (d. 2011), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:14, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:32, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture with watermark on the lower left corner was copied from the Internet. See https://baike.baidu.com/pic/%E4%B8%AD%E5%B1%B1%E7%BA%AA%E5%BF%B5%E4%B8%AD%E5%AD%A6/63779/0/77c6a7efce1b9d16b514edf3f7deb48f8d546454?fr=lemma&ct=single#aid=0&pic=77c6a7efce1b9d16b514edf3f7deb48f8d546454 Larryasou (talk) 08:13, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Moheen at 06:41, 2 September 2019 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 12:55, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ogele (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No FOP in US for sculptures.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 06:32, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@大诺史 I hope, having deleted the files pending the approval on copyright, this does not have any implication on my article again?

Ogele (talk) 12:07, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; likely copyvios. --Gbawden (talk) 06:41, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Richard Coit (talk · contribs)

[edit]

https://creativeresistance.org/artists/mike-alewitz/ Copyrighted work by Mike Alewitz, artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:30, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I work for the artist who created these images and was asked to post them but he did not give me the copyright information, hence this confusion- however I am filing OTRS requests and would appreciate it if these images were not taken down until those requests are processed (I understand that may take some time) as the artist has given permission and desires this work to be public. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Richard Coit (talk • contribs) 15:25, 29 July 2019‎ (UTC)[reply]
Some of the files now have OTRS permission. --Krd 16:32, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: some images had already been deleted, deleted two without permission, kept the rest. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:42, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Richard Coit (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Taken from Facebook, no permission.


I do have permission from the artist. The images were taken from Facebook as the artist uses the site to collate and display his work, but I was given instruction to download the images and post them here. I have filed an OTRS request. User:Richard Coit

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 10:03, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Some of the files now have OTRS permission. --Krd 16:32, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: a few files had already been deleted, deleted one more without permission, kept the rest. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:46, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Produtora Km 70 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Movie stills: copyrighted.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:54, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Olá! Temos autorização do diretor para o uso das imagens. Como podemos prosseguir com a utilização das capturações? 21:11, 25 July 2019 (UTC)~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Produtora Km 70 (talk • contribs)
@Produtora Km 70: Are you the production company? --Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:48, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Patrick Rogel: Yes! --Produtora Km 70 (talk) 20:48, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Produtora Km 70: Please send a permission via COM:OTRS or reupload the files at full resolution directly from your camera. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:04, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:18, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Produtora Km 70 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious claim of own work, low res images.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 05:57, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:54, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Own work" is claimed, but it was actually cropped from a full 1960s photo used in the 2016 article. Permission is needed to continually use the photo. George Ho (talk) 01:08, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS agent: We've received ticket:2019072810000864. Even so, as author is unknown, there's no way to verify authorship. I think file must be deleted. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 19:32, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:19, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

They are not all electronic filters. Some are power supply circuits. The combination of the two makes it of no use. Alan Liefting (talk) 01:47, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Use {{Rename}} instead and update the description. P 1 9 9   14:20, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Of no educational use. Alan Liefting (talk) 02:06, 28 July 2019 (UTC) Who can say that this picture is "Of no educational use" ? I made it to illustrate the activities of persons interesting with reuse of old computers items. I need this image for the purpose of my research. Le réel n'est pas ce que l'on en pense ! --Bel Bonjour, Ambre Troizat (talk) 10:22, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: marginally useful as per comment above. P 1 9 9   14:24, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low-quality image of...nothing of value that I can tell. We have tons of pictures of people at microphones, people at conferences, bare arms, and lots of Category:Abhisit Vejjajiva of the subject mentioned in the filename. DMacks (talk) 02:28, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:26, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

illegal gambling site promotion Veracious (talk) 02:33, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. P 1 9 9   14:25, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is include in a blog, dated 2012. I think that the user is taking pictures from the web as if he were the author. Luisalvaz (talk) 02:47, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:27, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

illegal gambling website promotion Veracious (talk) 03:07, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@CptViraj: It's an illegal gambling website logo. CSD G10 may apply. Veracious (talk) 02:17, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
There is nothing promotional in the logo. -- CptViraj (📧) 02:45, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: unused logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   14:27, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio Veracious (talk) 03:08, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not above COM:TOO. -- CptViraj (📧) 10:36, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   14:28, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of Commons:Deletion requests/File:LandsForSerbia.PNG Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:10, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:31, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No explanation of why this is public domain. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:12, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:32, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 03:17, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Image not found elsewhere online using Google Images. P 1 9 9   14:34, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No attribution for background image. See derivative work. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:22, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:34, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No attribution for background image. See derivative work. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:22, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:34, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's just an arbitrary and poorly-made flag —Justin (koavf)TCM 04:30, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Koavf: You see that this file is self-made and there is no reason why files like this should not be uploaded here on condition that they are meaningful and this is what is available with this unique flag.--Sakiv (talk) 13:07, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. P 1 9 9   14:41, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Auto Promotion Goéry Valance (talk) 05:04, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused personal photo, many alternatives available. P 1 9 9   14:46, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no consent Goéry Valance (talk) 05:06, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Commnet Not many other photos of this part of the museum in the category Gbawden (talk) 09:18, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: can easily be cropped. P 1 9 9   14:47, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low res version of File:Infinity Train Show logo.png (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 05:47, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:50, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file has been superseded by Golden Mask of Tutankhamu00 (15).jpg. It is recommended to use the other file. Please note that deleting superseded images requires consent.
new file
Goéry Valance (talk) 05:55, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Clearly #14 is much better than #15 which is blurry (maybe a mix up in the nomination?). P 1 9 9   14:53, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file has been superseded by Golden Mask of Tutankhamu00 (25).jpg. It is recommended to use the other file. Please note that deleting superseded images requires consent.
new file
Goéry Valance (talk) 05:57, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:04, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file has been superseded by Golden Mask of Tutankhamu00 (25).jpg. It is recommended to use the other file. Please note that deleting superseded images requires consent.
new file
Goéry Valance (talk) 05:57, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:04, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file has been superseded by Golden Mask of Tutankhamu00 (25).jpg. It is recommended to use the other file. Please note that deleting superseded images requires consent.
new file
Goéry Valance (talk) 05:57, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:04, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file has been superseded by Golden Mask of Tutankhamu00 (25).jpg. It is recommended to use the other file. Please note that deleting superseded images requires consent.
new file
Goéry Valance (talk) 05:57, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:04, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file has been superseded by Golden Mask of Tutankhamu00 (25).jpg. It is recommended to use the other file. Please note that deleting superseded images requires consent.
new file
Goéry Valance (talk) 05:58, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:04, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file has been superseded by Golden Mask of Tutankhamu00 (25).jpg. It is recommended to use the other file. Please note that deleting superseded images requires consent.
new file
Goéry Valance (talk) 05:58, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:04, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file has been superseded by Golden Mask of Tutankhamu00 (25).jpg. It is recommended to use the other file. Please note that deleting superseded images requires consent.
new file
Goéry Valance (talk) 05:58, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:04, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file has been superseded by Golden Mask of Tutankhamu00 (25).jpg. It is recommended to use the other file. Please note that deleting superseded images requires consent.
new file
Goéry Valance (talk) 05:58, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:04, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file has been superseded by Golden Mask of Tutankhamu00 (25).jpg. It is recommended to use the other file. Please note that deleting superseded images requires consent.
new file
Goéry Valance (talk) 05:58, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:04, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file has been superseded by Golden Mask of Tutankhamu00 (25).jpg. It is recommended to use the other file. Please note that deleting superseded images requires consent.
new file
Goéry Valance (talk) 05:58, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: blurry, unusable. P 1 9 9   15:04, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file has been superseded by Golden Mask of Tutankhamu00 (25).jpg. It is recommended to use the other file. Please note that deleting superseded images requires consent.
new file
Goéry Valance (talk) 05:58, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: not superseded, not same angle. P 1 9 9   15:05, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file has been superseded by Golden Mask of Tutankhamu00 (25).jpg. It is recommended to use the other file. Please note that deleting superseded images requires consent.
new file
Goéry Valance (talk) 05:58, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: not a duplicate of #25. P 1 9 9   15:10, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file has been superseded by Golden Mask of Tutankhamu00 (25).jpg. It is recommended to use the other file. Please note that deleting superseded images requires consent.
new file
Goéry Valance (talk) 05:58, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: superseded by File:Golden Mask of Tutankhamu00 (28).jpg. P 1 9 9   15:10, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file has been superseded by Golden Mask of Tutankhamu00 (25).jpg. It is recommended to use the other file. Please note that deleting superseded images requires consent.
new file
Goéry Valance (talk) 05:59, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: blurry. P 1 9 9   15:06, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file has been superseded by Golden Mask of Tutankhamu00 (25).jpg. It is recommended to use the other file. Please note that deleting superseded images requires consent.
new file
Goéry Valance (talk) 05:59, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: blurry. P 1 9 9   15:07, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file has been superseded by Golden Mask of Tutankhamu00 (45).jpg. It is recommended to use the other file. Please note that deleting superseded images requires consent.
new file
Goéry Valance (talk) 06:06, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: not the same angle. P 1 9 9   16:25, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file has been superseded by Golden Mask of Tutankhamu00 (45).jpg. It is recommended to use the other file. Please note that deleting superseded images requires consent.
new file
Goéry Valance (talk) 06:08, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: superseded by File:Golden Mask of Tutankhamu00 (32).jpg. P 1 9 9   16:26, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file has been superseded by Golden Mask of Tutankhamu00 (45).jpg. It is recommended to use the other file. Please note that deleting superseded images requires consent.
new file
Goéry Valance (talk) 06:08, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, low quality. P 1 9 9   16:21, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file has been superseded by Golden Mask of Tutankhamu00 (45).jpg. It is recommended to use the other file. Please note that deleting superseded images requires consent.
new file
Goéry Valance (talk) 06:08, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: not superseded, different image orientation. P 1 9 9   16:24, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file has been superseded by Golden Mask of Tutankhamu00 (45).jpg. It is recommended to use the other file. Please note that deleting superseded images requires consent.
new file
Goéry Valance (talk) 06:08, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: superseded by File:Golden Mask of Tutankhamu00 (32).jpg. P 1 9 9   16:33, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file has been superseded by Golden Mask of Tutankhamu00 (45).jpg. It is recommended to use the other file. Please note that deleting superseded images requires consent.
new file
Goéry Valance (talk) 06:08, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, blurry. P 1 9 9   16:35, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file has been superseded by Golden Mask of Tutankhamu00 (45).jpg. It is recommended to use the other file. Please note that deleting superseded images requires consent.
new file
Goéry Valance (talk) 06:08, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, low quality. P 1 9 9   16:36, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file has been superseded by Golden Mask of Tutankhamu00 (45).jpg. It is recommended to use the other file. Please note that deleting superseded images requires consent.
new file
Goéry Valance (talk) 06:08, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, low quality. P 1 9 9   16:17, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file has been superseded by Golden Mask of Tutankhamu00 (45).jpg. It is recommended to use the other file. Please note that deleting superseded images requires consent.
new file
Goéry Valance (talk) 06:08, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, low quality. P 1 9 9   16:16, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file has been superseded by Golden Mask of Tutankhamu00 (45).jpg. It is recommended to use the other file. Please note that deleting superseded images requires consent.
new file
Goéry Valance (talk) 06:08, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, blurry. P 1 9 9   16:17, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Personality rights Although this work is freely licensed or in the public domain, the person(s) shown may have rights that legally restrict certain re-uses unless those depicted consent to such uses. In these cases, a model release or other evidence of consent could protect you from infringement claims. Though not obliged to do so, the uploader may be able to help you to obtain such evidence. See our general disclaimer for more information.
Goéry Valance (talk) 06:13, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, just add this template to the description. P 1 9 9   16:38, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly used for self-promo on en.wiki. Draft declined as not notable. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 06:30, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:38, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no exif data. uploader is not the photographer. stolen from web. Dead.rabbit (talk) 08:07, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:40, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The picture is duplicated The STB (talk) 09:12, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per self-nomination, superseded by File:Tren dièsel sèrie 3000 de FGC.jpg. P 1 9 9   16:45, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly above COM:TOO Portugal. I can't seem to find this club, seems derived from FC Barcelona's logo. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 09:33, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, likely a hoax. P 1 9 9   16:46, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:20, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:47, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 10:43, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:47, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted character. Yuraily Lic (talk) 10:45, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:47, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Near-duplicate of File:Tiger out of reach - geograph.org.uk - 363460.jpg. This version has been scaled up and converted to PNG format, and has a black line down the right-hand edge. I don't think any of those changes is useful, though. bjh21 (talk) 10:56, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:49, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free screenshot of a video game. —⁠andrybak (talk) 11:26, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:06, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s).

  • (Redacted)
  • (Redacted)
  • (Redacted)
  • (Redacted)

Minorax (talk) 12:02, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your warning, categories added to images that listed above. 05F2uIhfx0Rv (talk) 19:41, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Also for private photos, you can see COM:PEOPLE. 05F2uIhfx0Rv (talk) 19:50, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
And without additional categories these photos are in --> Category:05F2uIhfx0Rv --> Category:Wikipedians by name --> Category:Wikipedians, this category is personal. also images are standard and usable as i added categories. 05F2uIhfx0Rv (talk) 20:34, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Please be careful about nomination users personal images for deletion. before it read COM:INUSE (about me, you can see WP:REALNAME, my edits on Wikipedia are with another account.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 05F2uIhfx0Rv (talk • contribs) 21:11, 29 July 2019? (UTC)
Used in categories is not considered inuse. Minorax (talk) 22:51, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@05F2uIhfx0Rv: What account do you use for your edits on Wikipedia?   — Jeff G. ? please ping or talk to me 08:51, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeff G./talk: , Thanks for your request. please write your email addressee here, then i send you some of my accounts.05F2uIhfx0Rv (talk) 08:55, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@05F2uIhfx0Rv: Please see Special:EmailUser/Jeff G. and Template:re.   — Jeff G. ? please ping or talk to me 09:02, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeff G./talk: , Sent.05F2uIhfx0Rv (talk) 10:05, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe one or two could be kept. --Cuatro Remos (nütramyen) 23:49, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Wikimedia is a large community, here we can't say and do whatever we think or want. Like a real society, please use law here too and answer me by linking to polities of commons (exact words and sentence!) that say these files should remove. I read Commons:Policies and guidelines COM:POL again, I checked other files in categories I used for images. Those files are similar to these photographs i uploaded. The only problem ((may!)) i see is about Commons:File naming COM:FN. But per COM:INUSE " The uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page of Commons or another project is allowed as long as that user is or was an active participant on that project " i think i can use my name and user name as files and descriptions as above sentence. Also as i don't use commons as my personal web host COM:NOTHOST, but per COM:REUSE i can use it as a host for the useful images that i choose to upload them here! When there is a category about three quarter view photograph of men, i can upload a photo to that category and etc. and not in use currently is not a good reason for delete an image, some of 55,225,898 freely usable (today statistics) was, are, will or not in use. Please check this _Category:Wikipedians by name_ And _Category:Wikipedians_, look at other people uploads that are like my uploads. I need a logical reason for your insistence to delete my uploads. 05F2uIhfx0Rv (talk) 01:00, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Also a portrait photograph is not a scientific diagram, don't judge it as that kind of content! 05F2uIhfx0Rv (talk) 01:13, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
If you want the files to be kept, please use it on your own user page here or on any other sister projects. As you said “The uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page of Commons or another project is allowed as long as that user is or was an active participant on that project”. And I just checked, the only in-use file in the category and wasn’t nominated for this DR is redacted. Minorax (talk) 03:11, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I used them in my Meta wiki global page.05F2uIhfx0Rv (talk) 08:42, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure what did you mean with that long response to such a short comment. Anyway, I vote  Delete. This user has no edits elsewhere (see centralauth) and there is no point in hosting these photos because, as some others have pointed out, there is no substantive edit history either. Nearly all of his uploads are these selfies.
 Comment Please don't comment or before commenting read whole talk.05F2uIhfx0Rv (talk) 09:37, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Your comment is completely pointless. Sorry. --Cuatro Remos (nütramyen) 16:11, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
if your read other comments you find out this username is not my username for edits. i don't want to explain it again (in this comment) because i wrote about it in this talk page before. Thanks. 05F2uIhfx0Rv (talk) 20:31, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete as likely copyvios. Uploader is the subject of the photos but its clear that he couldn't have taken them. There is no exif either so unlikely to be own work. Also, INUSE is not a hard and fast rule when the photos are only used for self promotion by someone who is not a valid or active contributor. Gbawden (talk) 06:28, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I used a software (exif tag remover), And here in Commons:Exif there's not any rule for delete image that hasn't exif! Also, I'm the owner of images and i can prove it by sending email COM:ET. Also COM:PEOPLE _The right of privacy_ "For a self-portrait, where the subject of the photograph is also the photographer and/or uploader, consent is assumed, provided they are capable of giving appropriate consent (as noted above)", as you see PHOTOGRAPHER AND/OR UPLOADER. I can prove i am (or was) an active user on wikipedia and commons wikimedia, by sending an email if needed.05F2uIhfx0Rv (talk) 08:42, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment If you can prove ownership I would be happy to keep one for use on your user page Gbawden (talk) 10:38, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Images are in right categories, also per COM:FN names, descriptions and categories can be changed (if community think these images are for self-promotion because they are contain the name of uploader). why there are many images like my images on commons wikimedia?what is the problem with them? if the only problem is (my name categories) and (file names & descriptions), i can request to change them.05F2uIhfx0Rv (talk) 08:42, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I edited images descriptions.05F2uIhfx0Rv (talk) 09:17, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment per Gbawden, also, keeping all in use on a single page isn’t going to work either. What if a user uploads 50 images of himself and keep it in apparent use on a single page? Are we going to keep all 50? Minorax (talk) 10:33, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeff G.: Any updates from this user? Minorax (talk) 10:35, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Minorax: Yes, but commenting on them in public would be inappropriate.   — Jeff G. ? please ping or talk to me 10:46, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Minorax: @Gbawden: , if i can prove ownership and request to change name of images to descriptive and more acceptable names, also remove my name and my category from them and their descriptions, can i keep them? for example in useful categories you see in each photograph category like Rembrandt lighting category? 05F2uIhfx0Rv (talk) 10:52, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The problem isn’t about the file names, it is about the copyright holder of the image. Having you inside the file doesn’t mean that you’re the copyright holder. Minorax (talk) 11:19, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Canon EOS 70D, 1/125sec, iso 100, 35 mm. these are exif of those images and for color balance i used photoshop cc 2018. these are my own photographs used timer. if you need prove i can send my other raw and unused images in that time and same location to a verified member, also i can verify my user name however it's my real name even with passport my email and other professional accounts on web. 05F2uIhfx0Rv (talk) 11:29, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Even if you could prove that the copyright holder is you, can you answer the following questions? Minorax (talk) 12:19, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
1. Why shouldn't the files be deleted "per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s)."
2. Why shouldn't the files be speedied under COM:CSD#F10? ~100/156 (151 commons, 5 meta) of your global contribution is related to the nominated files.
3. Why should the files be kept? Is there a need to have 5 pictures of yourself on your user/talk page?
::1- about COM:CSD#F10,i requested to delete my two files:
  • redacted
  • redacted
other files are not selfie or "low-to-medium" quality, they are high quality and can be used (as i used them in right categories, please ::check categories i used for my images and also check other media in that categories to see my works are better than most of them).
2- i wonder why you cite COM:NOTHOST, i never used commons as my free web host but as your and other members said, i requested to delete two of my files that i think under COM:OOS should be deleted.
Quoting from COM:INUSE, "The uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page of Commons or another project is allowed as long as that user is or was an active participant on that project." You created your account on en.wiki on 28 August 2017, which is 23 months ago. Since then, you have only 158 edits (as time of writing this), which is approximately 7 edits per month, this isn't considered as active.
3- about Personal/Private photo(s), i cited COM:IDENT, that clearly wrote there if the "subject of the photograph is also the photographer and/or uploader" i don't see any problem with upload my uploads. as i said if needed i can prove i'm the photographer, the subject and the uploader.
So where do you plan to use it? Such private image collections do not become educational even if displayed as a gallery on a user page on Commons or elsewhere.
4- i don't want to use all of them in my personal page, you forced me to do that. as i wrote do you think all 55,229,633 freely usable media (today main page text) must be used somewhere now?
Clarification, I did not force you. I just said that for a personal file to be in scope, it has to be used. Minorax (talk) 13:06, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
5- i emailed jeff, but if jeff need more details i should think and search more for my forgotten users, uploads and eidts.05F2uIhfx0Rv (talk) 12:43, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Minorax: , I answered your questions before.
1- they are in categories, check that categories and think where you(or anybody) can use them inside wikimedia or outside it COM:REUSE . they are not for my personal use (if you think, then they are not for my personal use only!) they are shared under free licensing not for my personal use. as i said if admins think their names has problem i can change their names to more descriptive names.
Why would other users use your personal image? Is there any use for it on any other page other than your own user page?
2- before you ask new question read my answers! new account in not new member WP:REALNAME, me and jeff conversation is about this that am i a active member or not (by another accounts or ip edits!) 05F2uIhfx0Rv (talk) 13:26, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I nominated your images when they were unused, not based on when you started to edit on any wikimedia project. Furthermore, I only realised that your uploads fufill COM:CSD#F10 after checking CentralAuth. Minorax (talk) 15:03, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
by Wikimedia commons policies (in general) i can keep my photograph. may one say no but i linked to others that say yes. 05F2uIhfx0Rv (talk) 17:09, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeff G.: When user mentioned accounts above, exactly how many are there? Minorax (talk) 11:14, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Minorax: It's tough to tell. Aside from three named users, mentioned works included a cat, Wikipedia articles, and files.   — Jeff G. ? please ping or talk to me 11:33, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeff G.: Could you do a rough check to see if the named users have substantial edits? Minorax (talk) 11:55, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I want to delete
  • redacted
  • redacted
and for other if possible, request me to verify my account, then rename them to descriptive names. then remove my user from descriptions and categories.05F2uIhfx0Rv (talk) 11:04, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Minorax: , which way is faster for delete these two images?05F2uIhfx0Rv (talk) 18:45, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment if you think here is not a place for uploading our photographs (in some cases!) please request to delete all files in this category Category:Wikipedians. 05F2uIhfx0Rv (talk) 17:04, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
We’re already in the midst of clearing the category up. As some users are tireless contributors to wikimedia projects, whether its commons or other projects, their small amount of personal files will not be deleted. Minorax (talk) 22:42, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
A good chunk of those images are either on editors userpages or pages relating to that user, I know over at EN there was a page which had a good chunk of peoples selfies and their names - I assume it was created back when Wikipedia was just getting started ... so those images as well as those on userpages should not be deleted, Also just because there's images in that category that isn't a justification for us to keep yours,
Ofcourse you could now technically use your image on your userpage as a way to keep your images however that's not going to wash either,
Your images are more of a modeling nature than they are "Wikimedianish" so as such IMHO your images should still be deleted accordingly, You're more than welcome to use Facebook or even Insta. –Davey2010Talk 23:17, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your comment but as wikipedia structure, all users have equal rights. if you think my work is wrong, please create a topic in Commons:Bureaucrats' noticeboard, and explain this case to delete all other members uploads too. i think i can keep 3 images (i request to delete two selfie!).05F2uIhfx0Rv (talk) 23:35, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This has nothing do with equal rights - The point of Commons is that you upload images in scope for others internally or externally to use, Back in the day scope wasn't an issue atleast not like it is now, I don't need to go to BN - We have DR which does the job fine. –Davey2010Talk 00:46, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I can't see this tag or template!05F2uIhfx0Rv (talk) 23:35, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I’m requesting the deleting admin to remove it. I added that in because there is no need to sign every single subsection when edited at the same time and it prevents signbot from adding {{Unsigned}}. Minorax (talk) 02:49, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
i requested in admins notice board for delete them.let's talk about my other 3 portraits. 05F2uIhfx0Rv (talk) 23:43, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Davey2010 and I requested for it to be kept open until this discussion has ended. Minorax (talk) 02:51, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, but i thought that two photos effect on users comments on all other photos.05F2uIhfx0Rv (talk) 09:35, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Info My reason and cited policies: Per COM:PEOPLE, COM:ET, COM:INUSE, WP:USERNAME(can prove activity with other usernames), COM:REUSE Delete redacted, redacted and Keep other Or Per COM:FN, COM:OOS, COM:PEOPLE, COM:ET Delete redacted, :: redacted and after change names, and edit categories and description use redacted and redacted in photography related categories like Category:Rembrandt lighting and etc (some categories added). 05F2uIhfx0Rv (talk) 22:02, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete As uploader i vote to delete files.05F2uIhfx0Rv (talk) 23:57, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9  ? 17:12, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:17, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:18, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical publication. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: clearly indicated from 1898. We allow images over 120 years old/. P 1 9 9   17:20, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:24, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

complex geometric shapes Larryasou (talk) 17:43, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:27, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Molynes United F.C Logo.jpg Kariba200 (talk) 17:45, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. P 1 9 9   17:27, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

appears from the descritpion to be merely an attack on a living person. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:47, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:29, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright protected book cover Albinfo (talk) 18:53, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:29, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zuzannadolega (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:47, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A request to preserve images for the following reasons

[edit]

The following works has educational value. These images are self-created artwork. The artist has been trained to use the Wikimedia Commons and has been asked to upload her work. The artist collaborates with Wikimedia Poland as part of the Wiki-GLAM project. The uloaded files were needed to illustrate the article on Wikipedia: Zuzanna Dolega. The artist uses a unique technique of pyrography, which gives the work an educational value.

The following works were uploaded by the artist because she established cooperation with Wikimedia Polska as part of the GLAM project. The artist was asked to upload them from her own account. The works "Miesz(k)ając (w) przeszłości" and "G8 Gdyńska Grafika Kobieca" are collages using works in the public domain and uploaded by Polish cultural institutions as part of Polish GLAM projects. The works have a high educational value, because they will serve as an example of the possibilities that artists can use works in the public domain for their own creativity. The works are to be an example of works for the planned GLAM remix competition, which Wikimedia Polska plans to organize. The uploaded files were needed to illustrate the activity report.

The following works were uploaded by the artist because she because she took part in the Public Domain Day ("Dzień Domeny Publicznej 2019") by conducting workshops at the Digital Center. The event was organized in cooperation with Wikimedia Polska and the artist was asked to prepare the documentation and make it available through Wikimedia Commons. The situation was the same in the case of the photographs taken during workshops for creating Warsaw collages ("Warsztaty tworzenia warszawskich kolaży"). During the workshop materials from the public domain were used.The uploaded files were needed to illustrate the activity report.

Celina Strzelecka (WMPL) (talk) 07:44, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, kept the in-use files. Commons is not for showcasing personal artwork. P 1 9 9   17:38, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted per request at Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Zuzannadolega. De728631 (talk) 20:47, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not used, the labels are not working + there is an usable version of the same image (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Earth_cutaway_schematic-en.svg) Nefronus (talk) 23:06, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:39, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pronunciation is inaccurate, as the stress is on the fifth syllable ("a-po-se-ma-TI-sm") when it should be on the fourth ("a-po-se-MA-ti-sm"). See "wikt:aposematism". — SGconlaw (talk) 18:00, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. P 1 9 9   17:28, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@P199: kindly reconsider. I have removed the file from the sole entry at the French Wiktionary it was in, so it is now no longer in use. — SGconlaw (talk) 18:28, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, no longer in use. P 1 9 9   18:48, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 1

No FOP in the Philippines

LGA talkedits 04:29, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I was in the midst of the Bustos town fiesta festival when I chanced to discover this almost hidden or by the side Monument; Thanks for the message; in Commons:Derivative works, I ponder that the logo and seal is part of the Cultural heritage, monuments and memorials in Bulacan or in the Philippines emanating from the Tourism aspect for the site is 100 years marker and landmark of the town. No objection to the deletion, though.--Judgefloro (talk) 04:43, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:21, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 2

no FoP in Philippines. Though maybe some can be considered DM

Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message and good morning; I looked at the photos of the Wikipedia Takes Manila for example this 2012 Image of the Public Market 6 photos taken by this Project in the Category; this market which is now reconstructed, hence, I presume that the photos of the facade and interior are well within the Philippine projects; I just passed by this place to hear mass at the Church near this market; at any rate, I have no objection to the deletion, Category:Santa Ana Public Market, Manila includes 6 photos of the same facade by the the Wikipedia Takes Manila

sincerely --Judgefloro 19:30, 17 July 2016 (UTC) (talk)


Deleted: most, kept two as DM. --Jcb (talk) 14:12, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 4

No COM:FOP in the Philippines, artists' permission needed via COM:OTRS.

List of files

Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:40, 22 June 2019 (UTC)\[reply]

Good morning from hereat Bulacan, Philippines; thanks for your message;
With all due respect, I am submitting here the legal ramifications on the matter, to wit:
Express permission to photograph any and all subjects objects of Rizal Park was granted to herein photographer editor by the Head of the Visitor Centre of Rizal Park, as evidenced by the so a) many photos of the said Visitor Office of the Park including the Tourist Map Category:Tourist map of Rizal Park;
Category:Rizal Park Visitor's Center the head explained to me each and every numbers corresponding to the places of the tourist spots of the park, including the subject Sentinel of Freedom or Lapu-Lapu monument which is now the property of the Government; b) she assisted me in the photography of the Park's Tourism information center and even pointed to the bust of Jose Rizal for me to take photo of;
All my photos fall within the Express exceptions provided by the Copyright law of the Philippines, thusly: "xxx On the other hand, works not protected by the copyright law are (1) unprotected subject matter and (2) works of the government.xxx Works of the Government On the other hand, no copyright shall be applied in any work of the Government of the Philippines. xxx Limitations on Copyright The following acts shall not constitute infringement of copyright: The use of a work under the direction or control of the government or other institutions for the purpose of informing and public. It must also be compatible with fair use. xxx Category:Colossal brass statue-monument of Lapu-Lapu (Sentinel of Freedom), Rizal Park Fair Use A fair use, in its most general sense, is the act of copying of copyrighted materials done for purposes such as commenting, criticizing, or parodying a copyrighted work without the permission from the copyright owner. It is used as a defense under copyright infringement. xxx Reproduction of Published Work Under Subsection 187.1 of the Intellectual Property Code of the Philippines,[4] the reproduction of a published work shall be permitted without the owner's authorization given that the reproduction was made for research purposes.xxx
In fact, everyone is doing Selfie and many photographers like me do take millions of photos of these Tourist landmark sport; Most respectfully submitted, and very sincerely Judgefloro 02:57, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
@Judgefloro: First they are works of the respective sculptors even if commissionned (which remains to be proved). Concerning the Sentinel of Freedom monument it has been founded by the Korea Freedom League so it can hardly be a Pinoy Government work. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 06:41, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment If all of the above files are deleted, deleting admin should consider nuking all of the uploads under COM:FOP Philippines as they are taken by the same person within the same area. 大诺史 (talk) 05:34, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Good morning and thanks for your notes as I respectfully submit my Rejoinder Buildings and sculptures as works of art; However,
I would like to differ in the application, interpretation of the cited Article Sec. 172 of the IP Code of the Philippines, and other related provisions, for the following reasons: in Statutory construction, the spirit and intent of the Copyright law in its related provisions should be looked into so as not to make absurd the Section; in this case the Rizal Park administration, that is Rizal Parks Develoment Committed through the Head of the Visitors Office, paid all the labors and works of the architect or sculptors, and all the foreman and manual laborers to build in in Agrifinal Circle; the same can be said of all thousands works now owned or transferred to the Government of the Philippines; as in our Government, the Rizal Park Board owns as Corporate entity all the properties of the Park irrespective of who crafted or built the church; in fact a Park cannot be created and the Attractions or Tourist spots thereat cannot be exposed to Public domain if the architect, laborers and lot owner will not transfer title to the Park and Government; this is the difference between the moral rights of the Copyright holder and one who lost all his rights when he is paid his job or works by Board or Committed of the Park; hence, the Visitors Center and Committee has control and jurisdiction over the Park and sculptures; I respectfully submit this Rejoinder, for this is a National Cultural Treasure as declared by Law and even evidence by the Historical Markers, and by the Declaration List of National Cultural Treasures in the Philippines Rizal Monument declared a National Cultural Treasure Under Philippine Law, to wit, REPUBLIC ACT NO. 10066 should be read with the Philippine Copyright Law; and all the Tourist spots in the Tourist Map of Rizal Park including the Category:Soul Waves - Filipino-Korean Soldier Monumentincluded in the given Map by the Visitor's Center fall within the Express Exception to FOP, hence the Lost Rights of Sculptors, inter alia, that is all now of the Public Domain, because of being Government Property; here with Express Permission of the Head of the Visitors Center; I respectfully submit this Rejoinder, References
Sculptor is Filipino Juan Sajid Imao who was paid, and lost all his rights since this work is upon Bilateral Relations of Korea and Philippines; The hard evidence to Donations or Full transfer to Rizal Park, National Government are the 2 Historical Markers Monuments that state so and the name of the Sculptor Juan Sajid Imao is engraved therein; for this matters, I respectfully submit that the same 3 Sculptures including Lapu-lapu monument are of the Public Domain of the Government of the Philippines expressly falling with the Exceptions of the Copyrright Law as I respectfully underscore the Express Assistance and Permission to photo by the Management of Rizal Park Tourist Visitor Center, very sincerely Judgefloro 04:48, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
References of the Filipino Sculptor and Donation are the marker and marker 2 very sincerely Judgefloro 04:50, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

 Agree with the deletion of the rest of the images given rule on FOP and that most, if not all, of these artwork's authors (esp. Jose M. Mendoza, author of Bisig) are still living which means not suitable for PD-Philippines. Markoolio97 (talk) 03:08, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep the following images since the artwork is not the main focus of the image but the surrounding Agrifina Circle Markoolio97 (talk) 03:08, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:9283Statue of the Sentinel of Freedom 09.jpg
File:9283Statue_of_the_Sentinel_of_Freedom_07.jpg


Deleted: per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Philippines#Freedom of panorama unfortunately. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:48, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 5

per COM:FOP Philippines

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 09:51, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message and Good Afternoon from hereat Cloudy Bulacan Philippines due to LPA; please allow me to let the researchers consider that Laborers or Paid Workers and not artist, work per piece or per day with minimum daily wages paid by Employers, here, the University Board; Love arts are scattered all over the Philippines; and here in my country, no artist will execute a work in the streets or outside the Schools; I ♥ love Landmark are manufactured by petty workers, hence, no Moral Value or rights exist, hence outside the scope of Copyrights law; at any rate, I respectfully submit to the sound discretion of Commons in this matter; Very very sincerelyJudgefloro 09:59, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
It isn't up to you to say "manufactured by petty workers, hence, no Moral Value or rights exist", it is the copyright law of the country (Philippines) which follows the law of the U.S.. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:17, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Unsure With regards to current standing of the Philippines on FOP, I agree yet the subject of the image is a mass-produced generic work and does not violate the Commons:Threshold_of_originality rule, thus the subject having no copyright. Markoolio97 (talk) 01:26, 6 September 2019 (UTC) {{Pd-ineligible}} — Preceding unsigned comment added by Markoolio97 (talk • contribs) 01:31, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: unclear TOO in the Philippines. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:52, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 6

No FOP in Philippines for sculptures

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 07:27, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message and good afternoon from hereat very cloudy Bulacan province in Philippines; with due respect, this Events place was just painted and restored from the original dilapidated, haunted and eerie Old Mansion of Calamba; if I am not mistaken, this house including the sculptures dates before WWII, or less than 100 years old; hence the input category of Category:Old houses in Laguna; at any rate, I respectfully remain neutral in the sound discretion of editors of Commons on this matter, very very sincerely Judgefloro 07:35, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
 Keep This might apply for PD-Philippines tag given that the subject of the images are examples of old-style of architecture (around early 1900 to late 1960) Markoolio97 (talk) 02:25, 16 August 2019 (UTC) {{PD-Philippines}}[reply]
  •  Comment Looks to be rather generic mass-produced garden fountain and decoration figures. Many of the photos don't even show the "sculptures". How old is the building? If old enough to not be a FOP concern, I don't think a fresh coat of paint changes the status. (I'd lean keep but I'm not familiar with the history of the building nor details of Philippines copyright.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:49, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Here are a few examples of similar architecture reference 1, reference 2. I have been looking on the subject and references. and there are some hints that point to the subject being a recently-built structure that was designed to look similar to the old style of houses. This image shows a set of glass doors in the upper level of the house which continues through the windowed portion of the house, an uncanny and not period-correct design. The stone design on the left also looks artificial and attached only and not period-correct. Apart from these, there are not enough information available to correctly date the structure. Markoolio97 (talk) 01:40, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I have done a quick look in Google Earth and the structure is visible as of the earliest satellite image, April 25, 2004. It also shows that the place had been renovated sometime between March and October 2015 which might explain the uncanny and out-of-period design of the place. I'm going for keep (see above). Markoolio97 (talk) 06:02, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: kept most, deleted a few where the sculpture or fountain were a clear focus. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:54, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 15

COM:Derivative work of a model of the city. There is no freedom of panorama for 3D model works in the Philippines, and also as per User:Elcobbola/Models.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:57, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   13:38, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 17

COM:Derivative works: of a map and various photographs. There is no freedom of panorama for such works. The map is undated but I suspect the map dates to 90s or 2000s considering the print and age of map degradation. For others, the photos look as if they are recent and the photographers must be still alive. COM:VRT correspondence of permissions from the heirs of the map's author and photographers of the photos are required.

Map
Photographs

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:31, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   13:38, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 19

Derivative work violation. Billboards, no COM:FOP Philippines, and missing COM:VRT correspondence of authorization for Judgefloro's use of commercial license from the graphic artists.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:12, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:09, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 22

[edit]

Modern-looking statue. But there is no freedom of panorama here. Google Street View imagery shows this statue is no longer existing in public space. Hence it can be questioned its eligibility for future FOP as proposed (House Bill 799 and House Bill 2672).

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:11, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 18:26, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logo per Commons:TOO China.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:30, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment China has a very low TOO. A logo as simple as this is copyrighted. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:31, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment May be infringed, delete it.Zhn2019 (talk) 04:15, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I don't see how these logos or texts involved are against not OK examples in COM:TOO China. No handwriting texts or complex text designs as listed in TOO China. --TechyanTalk12:30, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, too simple to be protected. --痛心疾首 (talk) 12:35, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The Gang Heng logo is also very simple, simple text in and between 2 semi-circles. The CCTV files mentioned above have a double/traced text (i.e. 2 different lines to form the CCTV wordmark) which is different from File:CCTV.svg where it only contains a bolded text, as such they may be a complex logo. In addition, the bubble to the right of the CCTV wordmark containing words/numbers may also be considered as complex as it is not a simple geomatric design, like a circle. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:00, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete! Alright, after some research, I decide to take my words back. These logos may be copyrighted. --TechyanTalk12:49, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete! Copyright infringement.Learnlawboy (talk) 00:07, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment File:CCTV Olympics new.svg may be too simple to be copyrighted. -- 06:30, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
yeah,  Keep only File:CCTV Olympics new.svg since this one is simple text+olympic logo.  Delete all others with the stylised CCTV.--Roy17 (talk) 19:45, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: As above, minus 1 kept. ~riley (talk) 23:51, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Above COM:TOO China.

10:04, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 08:54, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JeyReydar97 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious claim of own work. Also, No FOP in Romania.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 05:37, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 02:16, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JeyReydar97 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Probably all copyvios (low resolution and user who uploaded copyvios)

Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 12:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:47, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tayeb omar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No FOP in Moroccoo

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 05:49, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 02:15, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly still under copyright protection, the university opened in 1991 so how can its logo be in the public domain? Also, it may be above TOO. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 08:02, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 02:14, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in Russia. Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:32, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 02:14, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS

Yuraily Lic (talk) 10:39, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 02:13, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS

Yuraily Lic (talk) 10:43, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 02:13, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't know how this process works really and I'm not sure if this is the right place to make my commentary, but I submit that the probability that Bandai is going to sue Wikipedia over a photo of a Gundam, something that exists in literal quantities of billions on the internet and promotes their product, is about as likely as the Earth being struck by a meteor and eradicating all life and you could reasonably ignore this infinitesemal possibility and assume that it might be covered under fair use if it were ever tested.Gravislizard (talk) 04:20, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

COM:TOYS. COM:DW of a copyrighted character.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 03:26, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Hello, Gravislizard. I recommend you to read Commons:What Commons is not, especially COM:CARES. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 19:43, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 07:36, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS. COM:DW of a copyrighted character.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 03:45, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 07:37, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 03:48, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 09:57, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS Yuraily Lic (talk) 10:49, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see where is the problem. I don't think that this picture is a commercial or advertisement picture. I propose not to delete the file. --Éric Messel-2 (talk) 13:16, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Ditto, it's a simple toy. 93.23.248.47 08:37, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is a toy or statue of Goldorak. Copyrighted character. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 04:18, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 02:13, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was uploaded in 2005 and deleted for missing information (check also the Revision history of the file). At the time, it came from a random website. I doubt that this version is the original photo; more probably it was uploaded on Commons -> copied on fr.wiki -> deleted on Commons -> moved from fr.wiki to Commons. Ruthven (msg) 12:07, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 02:11, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

en:William Wauer was a German sculptor who died in 1962. This is a work from Germany, the image was taken in Germany, so German copyright applies: 70 years p.m.a., the sculpture will not be free before January 1, 2033. Commons requires that works are in the public domain (or freely licensed) in the US as well as in the country of origin. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Herwarth Walden by William Wauer 1917, Albertinum, Dresden.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Herwarth Walden (Georg Lewin) by William Wauer, 1917, plaster - Germanisches Nationalmuseum - Nuremberg, Germany - DSC02449.jpg (sorry, should have grouped these requests). Gestumblindi (talk) 13:35, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 02:10, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

en:William Wauer was a German sculptor who died in 1962. This is a work from Germany, the image was taken in Germany, so German copyright applies: 70 years p.m.a., the sculpture will not be free before January 1, 2033. Commons requires that works are in the public domain (or freely licensed) in the US as well as in the country of origin. Gestumblindi (talk) 13:37, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 02:10, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jim 'Eagle' McLeod (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Songs. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 02:10, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical document. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


@EugeneZelenko: I'll be writing to the author of w:de:Rudolf_Singer_(Politiker,_1915) to clarify the situation because he's not very experienced, and on his and the article's Talk Page nobody has given him advice as yet what he needs to do. This appears to be a family document that he's scanned, but I'll make sure. Off the top of my head I seem to remember that all documents from the Nazi era are not protected by copyright in DE, but I'll investigate. I'll also suggest that an image would be preferable to a PDF.
== Peter NYC (talk) 06:27, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
See Commons:Copyright rules by territory (most likely Germany) for relevant country to find out if such documents are in public domain, and if it's, what is correct license tag. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:19, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Please see COM:UDR if there is evidence in support of restoration. --Green Giant (talk) 02:09, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical logo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 02:08, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Laszlo212 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted work by Lucien Smith, artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:40, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 02:08, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in Russia. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:52, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per User:Brateevsky. --Green Giant (talk) 02:07, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Zverev died in 1986, so this painting is still copyrighted. Therefore we cannot keep any derivative photos. De728631 (talk) 16:02, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 02:07, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS Yuraily Lic (talk) 11:13, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:26, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(Sorry french) la source indique aucune licence qu'elle soit compatible avec Commons ou que ce soit sous Copyright Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 07:11, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. howcheng {chat} 18:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Japan Yuraily Lic (talk) 11:44, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. howcheng {chat} 18:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Japan Yuraily Lic (talk) 11:49, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. howcheng {chat} 18:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from http://www.sydhavnenshistorie.dk/sydhavnens-historie/pigtraadsgrupper/bachelors/ In fact both image, description and permission text is copied. So the permission is only the source's permission to have the content. There is no indication of a CC-BY-SA-4.0 license. Dipsacus fullonum (talk) 12:01, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. howcheng {chat} 18:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BarbaraPG (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low-re images, no metadata, unlikely to be own works.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:31, 28 July 2019 (UTC) It is low-res image because I cannot find the original, so I used the reproduction that appeared in her death notice. I certify that the original is indeed my own work, I took that photo myself in 1977 or 1978. Please do not delete. (Someday I will go through my archives and find the original, then I will upload a better copy.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by BarbaraPG (talk • contribs) 18:56, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: COM:AGF. howcheng {chat} 18:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Of no educational use. Alan Liefting (talk) 02:07, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use at en.wikiversity. P 1 9 9   18:53, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Of no educational use. Alan Liefting (talk) 02:07, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use at en.wikiversity. P 1 9 9   18:53, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Of no educational use. Alan Liefting (talk) 02:08, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use at en.wikiversity. P 1 9 9   18:53, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Of no educational use. Alan Liefting (talk) 02:08, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use at en.wikiversity. P 1 9 9   18:53, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Of no educational use. Alan Liefting (talk) 02:08, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use at en.wikiversity. P 1 9 9   18:53, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Of no educational use. Alan Liefting (talk) 02:08, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use at en.wikiversity. P 1 9 9   18:53, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Of no educational use. Alan Liefting (talk) 02:11, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use at en.wikiversity. P 1 9 9   18:53, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Of no educational use. Alan Liefting (talk) 02:11, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use at en.wikiversity. P 1 9 9   18:53, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Of no educational use. Alan Liefting (talk) 02:11, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is one of a large number of similar images that are of no use. Alan Liefting (talk) 02:31, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:54, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Of no educational value. Alan Liefting (talk) 02:20, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use at en.wikiversity. P 1 9 9   18:54, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No attribution for background image. See derivative work. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:26, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I originally moved this from Wikipedia with the exporter function - I see the wallpaper is the same one that's present on the LineageOS website. Looking at their legal, it might need further info to provide attribution to the image. It might need to be resized to low resolution. The Grid (talk) 13:53, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:56, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of Commons:Deletion requests/File:LandsForSerbia.PNG Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:10, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep for these reasons MONUMENTA Talk 19:52, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, irrespective of the discussion on Wikipedia. --Green Giant (talk) 22:19, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy of Microsoft Office PowerPoint (2000–02).svg JessydeVilly (talk) 15:41, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, in my opinion below COM:TOO.--Wdwd (talk) 12:43, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Wdwd. --Green Giant (talk) 22:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pierre Holtz for UNICEF. I dont think Humanitarian and Development Partnership Team in the Central African Republic (HDPT CAR) had the authority to license the photos.

I cant find Pierre Holtz's online presence. And if UNICEF is the holder, and no waiver is given, then this batch can probably be undeleted in 2007+95+1=2103.

Roy17 (talk) 11:15, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep I fail to see what the nominator is complaining of. These are sourced from Flickr, CC-by-sa, from https://www.flickr.com/people/hdptcar/ Why should I believe the nominator, rather than the original source? Andy Dingley (talk) 14:35, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment The UN and HDPTCAR appear to have been partners in various initiatives (see e.g. [4], [5]) so it's plausible that HDPTCAR had the authority to release them. Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:16, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: Holtz photographed for the European Photopress Agency. See for example Mia Farrow visits Central African Republic 01358314, which is File:Mia Farrow in discussion with EUFOR soldier (2530868572).jpg. "Source EPA". See also EPA terms of use. He also photographed for UNICEF. UNICEF's copyright terms do not seem to allow free sub-licenses. (From EXIF of a photo by another photographer: "Rights - © Notice: UNICEF photographs are copyrighted and may not be reproduced in any medium without written permission from authorized UNICEF staff. Permission is available to UNICEF partners and bonafide national/international media for specified use relating to UNICEF-supported issues or programmes. Permissions are granted for one-time use in a context that accurately represents the real situation and identity of all human beings depicted. All reproductions MUST be credited, including, at a minimum, the copyright symbol - © - UNICEF and the last name of the photographer. Reproductions without credit are not authorized. Image content may not be changed by digital or any other means, except cropping. Images may not be used in a commercial context; may not be archived by any non-UNICEF entity; and are not available for personal use.") -- Asclepias (talk) 04:17, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
That is a very general observation. It is certainly no indication that UNICEF cannot re-licence its licences to whoever it feels like!
As far as I can tell from looking at Flickr, there is a project HDPTCAR which had some collaborative work with UNICEF, and indeed with Pierre Holtz. They have published images from that work themselves, under a free licence (And please note, that these works still are in copyright! Copyright and free licensing are not exclusive). This is all a fairly typical situation for such and entirely in accordance with hosting them here. It raises no suspicions.
To oppose this, I would have to take the word of a single Commons editor against HDPTCAR's public claims through their public Flickr channel. It's not impossible, but it's highly unlikely. If Pierre Holtz was asking this, and gave some reasonable indication (such as OTRS, or a public posting on their own off-wiki and traceable blog) then I might give it more credence. Likewise for UNICEF. But as it is, I'm extending good faith to HDPTCAR and I have no reason to start doubting them. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:42, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


I had nothing to add on to my nomination, but since User:Andy Dingley chose to comment ad hominem repeatedly, I would like to make some clarification.
  1. These photos were created by Pierre Holtz for UNICEF. Crystal clear.
  2. HDPT CAR was not a parent nor a subordiante of UNICEF, so it had no authority to license UNICEF's photos.
  3. As User:Asclepias has pointed out, UNICEF reserves all rights for all their works.
  4. On the other hand, https://www.flickr.com/photos/hdptcar/ published not only photos from UNICEF but also many different organisations under various CC licences.
Conclusion: an obvious case of an organisation's poor management and disregard of other organisations' copyright.
Now take a look at what Andy Dingley has said so far. Clumsy arguments of assuming good faith in a flickr account, when I have pointed out in my nomination that HDPT CAR identified itself as a collaboration platform of many organisations, which would be quite unlikely to have control over partners' copyright, and copy-pasting personal attacks. I chose not to respond to such baseless attacks because I believe any other sensible users could weigh in.--Roy17 (talk) 10:19, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Claiming ignorance of our 'bot policy and saying "bots don't need to be approved" is going to need more to back it up than, "Oh, he's being mean to me and it's all just an ad hominem". Andy Dingley (talk) 10:23, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: correctly licensed per Flickr source. If you believe the Flickr uploader incorrectly licensed the photos, contact them and ask them to change the license on Flickr first. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:03, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very small photos. some from facebook.

Roy17 (talk) 11:44, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep "small" and "from Facebook" are not valid reasons for deletion. Nor (for at least some of those here) are they even true. These are claimed to be "own work", and no reason has been given to dispute that. I would point out too that, even if also uploaded to Facebook, the rights holder may also upload them here. If the claim is "This is sourced solely from Facebook and is not the work of the uploader", then at a minimum the nominator would need to link to that source page in order to demonstrate that. An unsupported claim is not enough.
I am concerned too that previously I've seen no editing history from the nominator here, until seeing a number of bulk deletion requests in recent days: see Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with "Pierre Holtz". As yet, none of them appear even slightly plausible. Making false, or even grossly careless, bulk deletions is likely to be seen as disruptive and could attract sanctions. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:53, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I have a question about the sentence you said: "I would point out too that, even if also uploaded to Facebook, the rights holder may also upload them here." It's easy to register for an account on Wikimedia.Commons. If someone impersonated the rights holder and claim that the photo was taken by myself, no one will know that the "real" rights holder has not yet registered an account. That's why we need a proof via OTRS.--Kai3952 (talk) 16:44, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Are you claiming that these are your images?
It is our regular practice that when editors here upload something and claim it as their own work, then we believe them, in the absence of some evidence to the contrary. They're welcome to use OTRS (everyone is), but it's not a requirement. Nor does that change because they're listed for deletion, with no plausible reason given. Andy Dingley (talk) 21:31, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
No, I never said these images is mine! Why are you asking this question? Do you mean that I have no right to express my opinion about what you said? The word "believe" does not mean that we allow anyone to upload copyvio images. If someone to upload images to facebook, and also upload to Wikimedia.Commons, who knows if uploader is the "copyright holder" or not? Also, I have never objected to the deletion of 創造未來,迎接康莊's uploaded images, but I don't think what you said is "right". You know what I'm saying?--Kai3952 (talk) 06:20, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Can you please clarify:
  • Where is the policy for "Delete if no EXIF" ?
  • What is the "Facebook mark" that you refer to here?
  • What "evidence" of own works do we require? What is the policy here?
  • Why are you already deleting these whilst the DR is still running?
Andy Dingley (talk) 15:23, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Facebook files are a no-no. They are deleted as obvious copyright violations. Therefore the other files source is dubious. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:19, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
What do you mean by "Facebook files" ? I can't see any of these sourced from Facebook. No Facebook source URLs were given. I can see no evidence that they were from Facebook. Andy Dingley (talk) 16:33, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yann, please report in this discussion the evidence that (some of) these are from Facebook (reverse image search, metadata, tell-tale details?) and do not rush to delete them while a discussion is in progess. -- Tuválkin 20:54, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
So 4 / 22 had EXIF with an FB stamp in it. None of the others. None of them found by reverse image search or checking the user account etc. (and "from Facebook" isn't reason to delete, only "from someone else's Facebook" is clear evidence for it). And still, none of these are "very small photos".
Has the purpose of Commons changed? Is it now that GF editors upload content here, and then another group of editors (for whom I'm asked to assume equal GF) have a game of finding ways to get as many as possible deleted, on the thinnest and most contrived of grounds? Because that's not what I signed up to contribute my time for. Andy Dingley (talk) 21:26, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
One thing I am sure, is that User:Andy Dingley uttered these tirades without checking every single photo. He said none of these are "very small photos", but for example File:THU's academic dress.jpg with a resolution of 1,280 × 960 but only 85 KB is a very small photo.
When a uploader has all of the following, FBMD/no EXIF/high-res but small size/PNG/digitised old photos, it's too suspicious. On the other hand, the uploader was able to take a bunch with cellphones/cameras that have consistent EXIF and file sizes of 2Mb+.--Roy17 (talk) 10:15, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
1,280 × 960 is not a "very small photo". It might have an unusually small filesize, it might be over-compressed into oblivion. But one thing it clearly is not is "very small". If you claim that "One of these photos is compressed so much as to become unusable per COM:SCOPE", then you have to say that in your nomination, not make a random false statement and then try to justify it afterwards. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:22, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
85 KB is very small. For anyone who doesnt know what average size a photo of a certain resolution should have, this is for 1280*960: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=filewidth:1260,1300%20fileheight:940,980%20filemime:jpeg%20prefer-recent:,7&ns0=1&ns6=1&ns12=1&ns14=1&ns100=1&ns106=1 . Photos of this resolution but having a size of <100KB are taken a decade ago: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=filewidth:1260,1300%20fileheight:940,980%20filemime:jpeg%20prefer-recent:,7%20filesize:%3C100&ns0=1&ns6=1&ns12=1&ns14=1&ns100=1&ns106=1 . File:THU's academic dress.jpg is said to be taken in 2016.
I'm done with this user's unsubstantiated, pointless arguments.--Roy17 (talk) 11:04, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • User:Roy17 explains this matter for «anyone who doesnt know what average size a photo of a certain resolution should have», that JPEGs “should” have a given filesize, given only their nominal resolution. I’m indeed impressed — not only at the crude lack of understanding of a really simple matter, what affects a JPEG filesize, but also at the chutzpah with which this very weak argument is brandished about, as it it were the most formidable blunderbuss.
Yet, everybody knows that JPEG filesizes can vary wildly for the same given pixel size (tl;dr: =resolution), much more than other filetypes (tl;dr: due to its lossy compression). (Grab a camera and go take identically sized photos of varying subjects with varying settings — and then see how much the resulting filesizes vary.) Furthermore, as with so many other abusive references to averages, its standard deviation is forgotten — and indeed this average JPEG filesize has a standard deviation so wide that 95 kB fits nicely within the expected range — and how could it not, since this is a JPEG file with that filesize at that resolution.
But then the goal posts moved again: Since the photo in question has indeed 95 kB for 1280×960 px and yet it is undeniably in scope and its quality is acceptable (even with a small filesize — because the JPEG algorithm is awesome like that), then the whole deal with the 95 kB become a proof not of lack of scope but of the uploader’s unreliability — because cameras generating that kind of ultra compressed JPEGs are from «a decade ago». Okay, I bite: Although it could be argued that this effect could be achieved, on a 2016 photo, by some convoluted method (say, camera takes a RAW, then RAW is magicked into an old school JPEG in Photoshop or some such), the most likely explanation is that a 10-year old camera was used to take a photo in 2016. Anyone saying that’s not possible?
Frankly, find proof of prior publication and then get this photo deleted as copyvio; until such time, it (and most of these) should stay. And maybe go find off-scope PDFs to delete, there’s probably half a million of them -- Tuválkin 03:47, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
TLDR: cherry-picking to argue the uploader could be using a decade-old camera in 2016 and omitting the fact that the uploader was using a Sony Xperia TX LT29i in 2014 and a Sony Xperia XZ2 H8296 in 2019 that produced much larger photos, and that the uploader has a number of copyvios deleted (even right here on this page a bunch from facebook has been deleted).--Roy17 (talk) 09:11, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy close When a nominator replies "TL;DR" to a valid question from another editor, that whole nomination should be scrapped. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:16, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • I was not cherry-picking anything, Roy17, I was mererly replying to a statement you made, about one photo, in defense of your blanket statement that these are all small photos. And I did not ommit anything about the other cameras myself, you are the one who ommited all those arguments in your sloppy DR nomination. Work harder next time: Having 5 files deleted when you nominated 22 is a poor job, and totally worthless, relying on others (like Yann and Gbawden) to find support to your unbased argument. You could just as well nominate for deletion all 50-something million files of Commons and expect others would find all the copyvio and offscope ones — surely many correct deletions would be achieved, but it’s not the right way to go at it. -- Tuválkin 05:34, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep, per Andy. -- Tuválkin 20:54, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Roy didn't perhaps explain himself but given that these photos vary so much and some were clearly from FB per MD they need to be deleted per PCP. This image mentioned by Tuvalkin File:THU's academic dress.jpg while may be in scope is found online 2 yrs before the upload date by Tineye. That is sufficient to tell us we need OTRS permission for this image. And since so many images uploaded by this user have dubious provenance (FB in MD, no exif, found online elsewhere) it is enough to delete them as a precaution under PCP Gbawden (talk) 09:00, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
"is found online " Source? It is not enough for a DR to claim "It's from FB" or "It's a copyvio", the nominator must actually show this. Vague handwaves are not enough. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:16, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@創造未來,迎接康莊: Regardless of the file size and resolution, perhaps you could help clarify the situation by explaining why many of your photos of publicly accessible spaces (like bridges, temples 1 2, 3, buildings and streets) have exif data (indicating the camera model used to take the photo and when it was taken), but other images that are undeniably less accessible to the public (field-level photos of baseball games, personal moments with professional athletes, engineering clean rooms do not? - Themightyquill (talk) 14:11, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: a few photos were alredy deleted. Deleted the rest, considering the various qualities and inconsistent EXIF data, I doubt these are the uploader's own work. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:06, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from TV/radio broadcast. Audio should be removed to keep. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What that quiet sound in the background ? 2003:6:1396:344:41E4:EFE1:C06C:50ED 19:50, 6 August 2019 (UTC) If someone wants to remove the Audio Spur of the Video he got my permission. But if no one wants to edit the Video should be kept in any case KnochenJochen (talk) 18:05, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:06, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TheTrench8 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Где и какие доказательство мне нужно предоставить? Эти фотографии делал мой покойный дедушка. сейчас они принадлежат мне. почему я не могу их загружать
Обладание физической копией не означает обладанием авторских прав. Советую прочитать w:ru:Авторское право. Вы единственный наследник дедушки? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:35, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per uploader's comments: copyright owner via inheritance. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:08, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]