Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/06/28

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive June 28th, 2019
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dup of Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Nabila.selim which was found per phab:T173070.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 08:41, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:56, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Fair use material is not permitted on Wikimedia Commons (F2). -- Geagea (talk) 14:31, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:02, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:42, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:43, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. Used in self-promotion Wikidata item. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:38, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image can be under exclusive copyright. Motoko C. K. (talk) 06:06, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:09, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Arkaitz1974 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not public domain in Georgia. COM:LL

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:52, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 20:05, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Arkaitz1974 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Please provide evidence that images have been shot and first published in Argentina.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:16, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

About the deletion request for file File:Gary Qiqava (born 5 April 1947) — Georgian Footballer, FC Dinamo Batumi (1965–67, 1971–75), FC Dinamo Tbilisi (1967–1968) and FC Torpedo Kutaisi (1969–70) Midfielder and Forward.jpg

Reason for the nomination: Please provide evidence that images have been shot and first published in Argentina.

Gary Qiqava (born 5 April 1947) was a Georgian and Soviet Footballer. This image have been shot and first published in Soviet Georgia, what kind of relation it may have with Argentina?

This image have been shot and first published in 1968 and is public domain in Georgia since 1993

This photo is posted on the website FootballFacts.ru by Gia Mindadze. He allowed its free copying. All permissions were obtained beforehand. For evidence You can contact this website and Gia Mindadze yourself to ask them directly.

Please undelete this photo; there is no copyright violation.

 Speedy delete - Encik Tekateki (talk) 14:22, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment @Patrick Rogel: There are no reasons that the admins should contact the website admins whereas these responsibilities lies upon the uploader themselves. If Arkaitz1974 already have permission, well he should attach it inside OTRS tickets months ago. The final straw, if the website owner really allows it, the website admins should put up the CC logos somewhere on the sites. Speedy delete until OTRS received by Arkaitz1974 - Encik Tekateki (talk) 14:22, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Encik Tekateki: Hi. First, it's useless to ping me 5 times for the same message. I don't know what you are talking about: I'm the nominator here and I've never asked Administrators to contact the website(s). --Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:29, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your assistance and consideration. --Arkaitz1974 (talk) 08:08, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

About the deletion request for file File:Vladimer Eloshvili (1927–2009) Georgian Footballer and Manager, FC Dinamo Tbilisi Defender (1949–1959).jpg

Reason for the nomination: Please provide evidence that images have been shot and first published in Argentina.

Vladimer Eloshvili (1927–2009) was a Georgian and Soviet Footballer. This image have been shot and first published in Soviet Georgia, what kind of relation it may have with Argentina?

This image have been shot and first published in 1959 and is public domain in Georgia since 1984

This photo is posted on the website FootballFacts.ru by Gia Mindadze. He allowed its free copying. All permissions were obtained beforehand. For evidence You can contact this website and Gia Mindadze yourself to ask them directly.

Please undelete this photo; there is no copyright violation.

Thank you for your assistance and consideration. --Arkaitz1974 (talk) 08:14, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

About the deletion request for file File:Luis Adolfo Galván (born 24 February 1948) Argentina NFT Defender (1975–1982).jpg

Reason for the nomination: Please provide evidence that images have been shot and first published in Argentina.

This image have been shot in Buenos Aires, Argentina — during the National Team pre-World Cup 1978 Photo Session and has been published in 1978 by El Gráfico and other sports magazines of Argentina and is public domain in Argentina since 1998, because the copyright of this photograph, registered in Argentina, has expired (date and source of any publication prior to 20 year old must be indicated so anyone can check it, and clear evidence that the image was taken more than 25 years ago must be given).

This photo is posted on the website FootballFacts.ru by Gia Mindadze. He allowed its free copying. All permissions were obtained beforehand. For evidence You can contact this website and Gia Mindadze yourself to ask them directly.

Please undelete this photo; there is no copyright violation.

Thank you for your assistance and consideration. --Arkaitz1974 (talk) 08:17, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete - Encik Tekateki (talk) 14:22, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment @Patrick Rogel: There are no reasons that the admins should contact the website admins whereas these responsibilities lies upon the uploader themselves. If Arkaitz1974 already have permission, well he should attach it inside OTRS tickets months ago. The final straw, if the website owner really allows it, the website admins should put up the CC logos somewhere on the sites. Speedy delete until OTRS received by Arkaitz1974 - Encik Tekateki (talk) 14:22, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


About the deletion request for file File:Alexander Antonovich Dorokhov (1911–1978) Georgian and Soviet Footballer, FC Dinamo Tbilisi Goalkeeper (1928–1939).jpg

Reason for the nomination: Please provide evidence that images have been shot and first published in Argentina.

Alexander Antonovich Dorokhov (1911–1978) was a Georgian and Soviet Footballer. This image have been shot and first published in Soviet Georgia, what kind of relation it may have with Argentina?

This image have been shot and first published in 1936 and is public domain in Georgia since 1961

This photo is posted on the website FootballFacts.ru by Gia Mindadze. He allowed its free copying. All permissions were obtained beforehand. For evidence You can contact this website and Gia Mindadze yourself to ask them directly.

Please undelete this photo; there is no copyright violation.

Thank you for your assistance and consideration. --Arkaitz1974 (talk) 08:22, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete - Encik Tekateki (talk) 14:22, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment @Patrick Rogel: There are no reasons that the admins should contact the website admins whereas these responsibilities lies upon the uploader themselves. If Arkaitz1974 already have permission, well he should attach it inside OTRS tickets months ago. The final straw, if the website owner really allows it, the website admins should put up the CC logos somewhere on the sites. Speedy delete until OTRS received by Arkaitz1974 - Encik Tekateki (talk) 14:22, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


About the deletion request for file File:Ruben Pagnanini (born 31 January 1949) Argentina NFT Defender (1978).jpg

Reason for the nomination: Please provide evidence that images have been shot and first published in Argentina.

This image have been shot in Buenos Aires, Argentina — during International Friendly match Argentina v Bulgaria in 29 March 1978 and first published in 6 April 1978 by El Gráfico — an sports magazine of Argentina.

This image have been shot in Buenos Aires, Argentina and is public domain in Argentina since 1998, because the copyright of this photograph, registered in Argentina, has expired (date and source of any publication prior to 20 year old must be indicated so anyone can check it, and clear evidence that the image was taken more than 25 years ago must be given).

This photo is posted on the website FootballFacts.ru by Gia Mindadze. He allowed its free copying. All permissions were obtained beforehand. For evidence You can contact this website and Gia Mindadze yourself to ask them directly.

Please undelete this photo; there is no copyright violation.

Thank you for your assistance and consideration. --Arkaitz1974 (talk) 08:25, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete - Encik Tekateki (talk) 14:22, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment @Patrick Rogel: There are no reasons that the admins should contact the website admins whereas these responsibilities lies upon the uploader themselves. If Arkaitz1974 already have permission, well he should attach it inside OTRS tickets months ago. The final straw, if the website owner really allows it, the website admins should put up the CC logos somewhere on the sites. Speedy delete until OTRS received by Arkaitz1974 - Encik Tekateki (talk) 14:22, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


About the deletion request for file File:Rubén Galván (1952–2018) Argentina NFT Midfielder (1974–1978).jpg

Reason for the nomination: Please provide evidence that images have been shot and first published in Argentina.

This image have been shot in Buenos Aires, Argentina — during the National Team pre-World Cup 1978 Photo Session and has been published in 1978 by El Gráfico and other sports magazines of Argentina and is public domain in Argentina since 1998, because the copyright of this photograph, registered in Argentina, has expired (date and source of any publication prior to 20 year old must be indicated so anyone can check it, and clear evidence that the image was taken more than 25 years ago must be given).

This photo is posted on the website FootballFacts.ru by Gia Mindadze. He allowed its free copying. All permissions were obtained beforehand. For evidence You can contact this website and Gia Mindadze yourself to ask them directly.

Please undelete this photo; there is no copyright violation.

Thank you for your assistance and consideration. --Arkaitz1974 (talk) 08:41, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete - Encik Tekateki (talk) 14:22, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment @Patrick Rogel: There are no reasons that the admins should contact the website admins whereas these responsibilities lies upon the uploader themselves. If Arkaitz1974 already have permission, well he should attach it inside OTRS tickets months ago. The final straw, if the website owner really allows it, the website admins should put up the CC logos somewhere on the sites. Speedy delete until OTRS received by Arkaitz1974 - Encik Tekateki (talk) 14:22, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


About the deletion request for file File:Andriy Biba (born 10 August 1937) FC Dynamo Kyiv Midfielder (1957–1967).jpg

Reason for the nomination: Please provide evidence that images have been shot and first published in Argentina.

Andriy Biba (born 10 August 1937) was a Soviet and Ukrainian Footballer, FC Dynamo Kyiv Midfielder (1957–1967). This image have been shot in Tbilisi — during the Soviet Top League match between Dinamo Tbilisi and Dynamo Kyiv in 20 July 1964 and first published in Soviet Georgia, what kind of relation it may have with Argentina?

This image have been shot and first published in 1964 and is public domain in Georgia since 1989.

This photo is posted on the website FootballFacts.ru by Mirian Kavsadze. He allowed its free copying. All permissions were obtained beforehand. For evidence You can contact this website and Mirian Kavsadze yourself to ask them directly.

Please undelete this photo; there is no copyright violation. --Arkaitz1974 (talk) 09:25, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 14:25, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jeff Bezos.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep: This doctoral dissertation is already cited in two Wikipedia articles ([1],[2]). Now that its author has kindly released it under a free license, it will likely find its way to additional articles and possibly other WMF projects. Please explain why this particular dissertation is less notable than others listed under Category:Academic_theses_and_dissertations, and why should they be stored in Commons while it moved to Wikitext. Thanks, ליאור (talk) 09:46, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. Being cited in an article is not an inclusion criteria. Commons is not for publishing own theses. P 1 9 9   15:01, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted per requuest. Natuur12 (talk) 16:38, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tagged by Geagea as "no permission". Previously undeleted. — Racconish💬 18:22, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: withdraw. -- Geagea (talk) 21:42, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Used Watermark AbirMahmud1 (talk) 19:16, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: user uploaded new version. -- ~ Nahid Talk 21:09, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Used Watermark AbirMahmud1 (talk) 19:16, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy per user request by email. -- ~ Nahid Talk 21:07, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Used Watermark AbirMahmud1 (talk) 19:17, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy per user request by email. -- ~ Nahid Talk 21:06, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Used Watermark AbirMahmud1 (talk) 19:17, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy per user request by email. -- ~ Nahid Talk 21:05, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Used Watermark AbirMahmud1 (talk) 19:18, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy per user request by email. -- ~ Nahid Talk 21:05, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Used Watermark AbirMahmud1 (talk) 19:19, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: user uploaded new version. -- ~ Nahid Talk 21:08, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Used Watermark AbirMahmud1 (talk) 19:19, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy per user request by email. -- ~ Nahid Talk 21:05, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Used Watermark AbirMahmud1 (talk) 19:19, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy per user request via email. -- ~ Nahid Talk 21:03, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish💬 18:13, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Racconish at 18:14, 28 Juni 2019 UTC: Missing essential information such as license, permission or source (F5) --Krdbot 01:22, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Used Watermark AbirMahmud1 (talk) 19:18, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 20:22, 28 Juni 2019 UTC: Used watermark --Krdbot 01:22, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

hghjhf donbjgsh 797969bopi hhhiu8yr935uiqu9ur. 2601:601:9B80:C30:CDB1:F406:8BF:88DC 16:51, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. Vzeebjtf (talk) 22:13, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Nonsense request. --Achim (talk) 16:14, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Coverage of the Spavinaw Water Project the Tulsa World newspaper 1919.png Thats Just Great (talk) 16:29, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: exact duplicate. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:14, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 17:26, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Info completed. Source page was noticed when re-uploaded. Gumruch (talk) 22:42, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Jcb (talk) 22:44, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: resolved. --Jcb (talk) 22:44, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mohammed Galib Hasan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Majority, if not all, are duplicates of files that are already on commons. Notice that the uploader merge some words together so the files can be uploaded (Landedat instead of Landed at, Saudi ArabianAirlines instead of Saudi Arabian Airlines).

大诺史 (talk) 17:01, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

大诺史 sorry for the inconvenience it was due to Flickr to commons uploads as i thought this pictures contain name problems, i was not informed those are already uploaded. Agree on delectation. Thanks Mohammed Galib Hasan (talk) 17:13, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:16, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mohammed Galib Hasan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Majority, if not all, files are duplicates of files that are already available on commons.

大诺史 (talk) 12:46, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

大诺史 as transferring from Flickr i am not acknowledged about the duplicate except the name change. So i am also agree on delete these files. Thanks, Mohammed Galib Hasan (talk) 12:57, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Mohammed Galib Hasan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Majority, if not all, files are duplicates of files that are already available on commons.

Aside to Jcb & JuTa: User re-uploaded numerous files that are duplicates despite warnings on talk page.

大诺史 (talk) 17:10, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:54, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mohammed Galib Hasan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted work by Kerstin Boel Bernhard (d. 2004).

Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:41, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:47, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mohammed Galib Hasan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal image, oos.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:06, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:08, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Plausibly copyrightable. See COM:TOO Ireland. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:16, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted, uploader consent to deletion -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:32, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Haagendaxh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope.

~Cybularny Speak? 06:09, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:45, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Haagendaxh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope personal photos, commons is not a photo album

Gbawden (talk) 07:19, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:55, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Waterloo1728 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:26, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Parveen saharan halcyon (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE images.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:46, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:18, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Edvinhiltner (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Advertising: Promotion of lotterycodex .com, see also user page User:Edvinhiltner.

Achim (talk) 19:05, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: spam.  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:18, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image of no educational value. O Still Small Voice of Clam 06:32, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:15, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, private photos Joschi71 (talk) 12:19, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:15, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dhavidjesukorede (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possibly COM:OOS and might not fufill contest criteria.

大诺史 (talk) 12:24, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:14, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Picture of an user with no edits outside user space. Hindust@niक्या करें? बातें! 13:19, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also;


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:13, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). 大诺史 (talk) 13:47, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:13, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Akshat Saxena actor (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:08, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:12, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: What new could be added to existing collection of explicit materials?. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:11, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: What new could be added to existing collection of explicit materials?. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:11, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Colibritho (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused screenshots of questionable notability. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:10, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Colibritho (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Extremely small images that do not seem to be created by uploader -else why are they so small and so blurry?

Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:27, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 16:52, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:10, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Luknellow (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo/drawing album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:09, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:09, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Happeningindtla (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album/files storage. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:08, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:07, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. A company logo, unused and having no likely educational purpose. JamesBWatson (talk) 15:45, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:07, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jamesdawson11 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE images (it:James Dawson).

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:20, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:06, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Not useful to illustrate Halloween (nor other in scope topics as far as I see). Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:30, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:05, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE images.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:47, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:05, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE personal image (ru:Марк Французов). Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:12, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:04, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, unknown subjects in a private setting (Commons:Photographs of identifiable people), unlikely to be educationally useful DannyS712 (talk) 19:25, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:03, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Shxahxh (talk) 23:43, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:16, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:55, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Some comic cartoon clip, no permission. Retired electrician (talk) 05:36, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You don't know Russian, you don't know school life. These are your problems with understanding my school jokes. What do you want? I can't understand!Гимназист1748 (talk) 19:31, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:47, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Some starwars-related fan art, not own work, presume copyright. Retired electrician (talk) 05:37, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


It's a joke, but, if you don't know Russian language and Russian students' life, you wouldn't understand it! Гимназист1748 (talk) 19:26, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:48, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work. Found on wikimapia with tag 'Rafa52 uploaded 4 years ago' [3], the uploader there (born 1963) is certainly a different person. Retired electrician (talk) 05:42, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand your long poem, but I took that photo a year ago.Гимназист1748 (talk) 19:29, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:48, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jadjeddo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

© Copyright 2019, All Rights Reserved جميع الحقوق محفوظة لموقع العلاّمة السيد علي الأمين

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:28, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:30, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Timurshah (talk · contribs)

[edit]

This looks like promotionalism or self-promotionalism. Range of photos all of one person, apparently different authors, and cameras.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:02, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:10, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

By size and original transmission information, this appears to have come from Facebook. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:03, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:10, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Woman in image appears to be "Victoria Padial" of whom a professional portrait was deleted as speedy. This image does not appear to be a selfie. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:05, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:11, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Author Alejandra Cano Terrazas" in metadata, doesn't seem to be own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:16, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:10, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be from Facebook (size and transmission data). Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:24, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:10, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

What is the location of the artwork and is there Freedom of Panorama at that location please. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:30, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:11, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mcserrano (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images appear to be of the same person with different awards - or in a studio. Suggest this is a promotional or self-promotional gallery with copyright issues.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:32, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:11, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems an unlikely own work if its correctly described. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:38, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:11, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nix01 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious claims of own work, NBA stars and what looks like an anime composite.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:51, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:11, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nix01 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Majority, if not all, logos are apparently taken from google images. so no permission? Some are copyright violations or complex logo.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:45, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ymblanter. Clear copyright violations. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:37, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contains a logo, copyright protected Huji (talk) 02:21, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 13:15, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Englishhigheditor (talk · contribs)

[edit]

https://twitter.com/bootssebj

Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:19, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:11, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promo photo. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:12, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:12, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jmworldmusiccom (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:12, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SeanAUS120 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:12, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by El Conde Negro (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:11, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sopranom1n (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:12, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Mishi dar (talk) 06:57, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per original nomination (in the version history; I suppose that the uploader overwrote it due to a lack of knowledge of how things work here) and uploader request. --Gestumblindi (talk) 18:50, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FBMD in EXIF data and COM:PACKAGING. ~Cybularny Speak? 06:10, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:19, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No apparent use since being uploaded in July 2018. Incredibly pixelated, unidentified and likely non-notable subject. Out of project scope. ƏXPLICIT 06:40, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Taken from FB per MD. --Gbawden (talk) 09:35, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by $hockmedusa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Only used on the English Wikipedia, where the subject's draft was speedily deleted three times in June 2019 as promotional. By extension, this should be nipped in the bud. Out of project scope.

ƏXPLICIT 06:53, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; likely copyvios too. --Gbawden (talk) 09:35, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photographer is on the right in the the original. Bystander group selfie. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 08:08, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed there was more.. Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:William Zabka. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 08:14, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 I withdraw my nomination After reading m:Wikilegal/Authorship and Copyright Ownership#The Example of the Third Party Photographer I'm no longer convinced this is actually an issue. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 04:51, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Nom withdrawn. --Gbawden (talk) 09:34, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photographer is on the right in the the original. Bystander group selfie.

- Alexis Jazz ping plz 08:14, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand why my upload was nominated for deletion? Clarification? Nesnad (talk) 17:19, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Nesnad: Rob DiCaterino (the stated author) released the photo with a Creative Commons license on Flickr. Rob DiCaterino however, is seen on the right in this photo. So he's not behind the camera. The photo was most likely taken by a bystander (or Lanza, someone else who was with them) and the copyright is with the photographer, whoever that was. Not Rob from the looks of it. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 02:45, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Do you have evidence that the uploader is really in the photograph and not just claimed or that the license wasn't given to the Flickr user? Further, it could be a tripod for all we know. It seems like you are making a lot of assumptions. However, clearly even if a bystander took the photo no reasonable person would expect them to suddenly claim copyright on it. I think you are being too fastidious about that. Nesnad (talk) 03:32, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Nesnad: I doubt they would carry a tripod around when going to an event. Also, the angle changes between File:Chiller Theatre Expo, Parsippany, NJ, 27 April 2013.jpg and File:Chiller Theatre Expo, Parsippany, NJ, April 27, 2013.jpg. That would mean they adjusted the imaginary tripod. The description says "pictured (left to right): Greg, William Zabka, and Rob (me)", should we doubt this? I agree the bystander (or Lanza) is unlikely to claim copyright, but bystander selfies have been discussed before. Commons:Own work/Bystander selfie never became policy. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 03:54, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
We don't know if they had a tripod and moved it. I have a tripod. It could be a drone. It could be many things. I just think it's weird to be all fastidious about this upload. Further, from your own link it's clear there is no consensus on deleting bystander photos, so you are going out on your own trying to delete these. Nesnad (talk) 04:02, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Nesnad: I am not on my own, this is the current practice. If we have significant doubts about copyright ownership (and Commons:Own work/Bystander selfie is no policy yet), COM:PRP suggests deletion. The scenario where this photo was taken with a tripod is just really not that likely. While not impossible, it's not likely. As I was searching around, I found more information and the current practice could change in the not-too-distant future as a result. Probably not before this DR is closed, although, the backlog is pretty huge so who knows. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 04:20, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
But if you do not if it was a tripod or a drone or if the bystander signed over rights to uploader, how can you nominate for deletion just on your own "feeling" that it is a bystander photo? Just seems like taking the letter of the law and over applying it to feel good about stomping on things. We should be here making things not finding weird conditions to stomp on things. I don't know, that's just my feeling I guess. Nesnad (talk) 04:24, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Nesnad: You don't know me at all, do you? If anything, I would probably be considered an inclusionist. I only came across this image because someone else nominated it first for another reason. And as I said, current practice will possibly change in the not-too-distant future now as Commons:Own work/Bystander selfie will probably be proposed again with better arguments. You're welcome btw. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 04:41, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 I withdraw my nomination After reading m:Wikilegal/Authorship and Copyright Ownership#The Example of the Third Party Photographer I'm no longer convinced this is actually an issue. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 04:41, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Nom withdrawn. --Gbawden (talk) 09:33, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry this picture is not interesting for an encyclopedia Akashnik636 (talk) 08:35, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader requested deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:32, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising. Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:21, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; likely copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 09:31, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfree coin from Denmark. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:50_%C3%B8re_coin.jpg for licensing issues. Also blurry. Ich (talk) 10:55, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:31, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission from Mario Molina Jcb (talk) 12:14, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:30, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope private photos Joschi71 (talk) 12:19, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:30, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These banknotes are still copyrighted. See: COM:CUR Netherlands 119.94.167.255 14:14, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:29, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As far as I am aware, Michigan is not among the US states that release their official works into the public domain. GMGtalk 14:24, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; copyright at source. --Gbawden (talk) 09:28, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I did not give permission to 'Mr.choppers to take this photo of me, my car and my license plate and post it on the internet and on wikimedia. This is a intrusion of my privacy. Please remove this image. Thank You.. 120ZACK120 (talk) 15:09, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Face blurred, plates anonymized. Freedom of Panorama. Also, you were at a car show! mr.choppers (talk)-en- 15:15, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:24, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I did not give permission to 'Mr.choppers to take this photo of me, my car and my license plate and post it on the internet and on wikimedia. This is a intrusion of my privacy. Please remove this image. Thank You.. 120ZACK120 (talk) 15:10, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No face in this picture, I anonymized the plates (go ahead and delete the earlier upload, as a goodwill gesture). Freedom of Panorama applies and this was taken at a car show. mr.choppers (talk)-en- 15:19, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:24, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I did not give permission to 'Mr.choppers to take this photo of me, my car and my license plate and post it on the internet and on wikimedia. This is a intrusion of my privacy. Please remove this image. Thank You.. 120ZACK120 (talk) 15:13, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No face and no plates shown. Freedom of Panorama applies and this was taken in public, at a car show. mr.choppers (talk)-en- 15:20, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:23, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
120ZACK120 (talk) 15:15, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Face blurred, nothing else shown. Also this is taken in public, at a car show. mr.choppers (talk)-en- 15:17, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No valid (or other) reason for deletion provided. Image potentially useful. Charles01 (talk) 16:54, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:23, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© 2018 The Codemasters Software Company Limited (“Codemasters”). All rights reserved. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:21, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:21, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work by Marwan Kassab Bachi (d. 2016), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:53, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:21, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Crespla (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted work by Marwan Kassab Bachi (d. 2016), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:55, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:20, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unfit image, other options avaiable in Category:Anass Achahbar Agora (talk) 17:44, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

How exactly is it unfit? For me it's OK — Dudek1337 (talk) 13:30, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Heavily in use and not many photos in cat. --Gbawden (talk) 09:19, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://www.lostradone.eu/fabio-luisi-il-direttore-musicale-del-festival-della-valle-ditria-famoso-in-tutto-il-mondo/ Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:32, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: publication is later than upload on Commons. Ruthven (msg) 17:32, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo:Gianfranco Rota, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:03, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; PCP; found on http://www.lostradone.eu/luisi-artisticamente-sono-nato-al-festival-della-valle-ditria/ around date of upload. --Gbawden (talk) 09:17, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Mitte27 as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish💬 18:12, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 09:15, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© www.lasvegas-jp.com Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:54, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:13, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© Ministerio de Cultura y Deporte Patrick Rogel (talk) 19:01, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:14, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook size - also notice it looks cut out and on a background. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:15, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; vlcsnap indicates it could be a screenshot. --Gbawden (talk) 09:13, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
  • Keep I don't think it should be deleted. The image that I uploaded was commissioned by Jared Knabenbauer himself, and was used to just represent him in social media. He never made any attempt to copyright the image, so I believe that it is fair use to upload the image onto Wikimedia Commons. Also, the images aren't owned by Instagram or Twitter, as they are not the original creators of the image in question. ProJared uploaded it to his social media accounts as a profile picture. KingSkyLord (talk) 23:23, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Fair-use is not a valid argument Commons:Fair use. --SVTCobra (talk) 01:25, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • DELETE: You do not have any authority to upload these images. Fair use is not acceptable in Wikipedia Commons. Secondarywaltz (talk) 02:03, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:12, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fan on the right did not consent. PaunchStevenson (talk) 07:34, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep And both of them are out of scope. @PaunchStevenson: Cropped, no more out-of-scope Greg and Lanza. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 09:01, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep All people in the photo are clearly posing for the photograph, proposing that some of them didn't "consent" seems unlikely. While I don't actually object to Alexis's cropping of the photo, it should not have been necessary. (Now I'm going to have to copy and past this 15 or so times for all the identical nominations of images from this series - sheesh!) --GRuban (talk) 14:02, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept current version; deleted old uncropped version as courtesy request discussed at Commons:Village_pump#Requesting_a_Large-scale_Courtesy_Deletion_of_Personal_Images_of_Myself. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:23, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fans pictured did not consent PaunchStevenson (talk) 07:40, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep @PaunchStevenson: Greg was abducted. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 10:27, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep All people in the photo are clearly posing for the photograph, proposing that some of them didn't "consent" seems unlikely. While I don't actually object to Alexis's cropping of the photo, it should not have been necessary. (Now I'm going to have to copy and past this 15 or so times for all the identical nominations of images from this series - sheesh!) --GRuban (talk) 14:05, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept current version and one previous; deleted uncropped old version Flickr photographer courtesy request, discussed at Commons:Village_pump#Requesting_a_Large-scale_Courtesy_Deletion_of_Personal_Images_of_Myself-- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:18, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fans pictured did not consent PaunchStevenson (talk) 07:41, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep @PaunchStevenson: Cropped, no more out-of-scope Greg and less DW. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 08:49, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@GRuban: you forgot some. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 02:02, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep This wasn't one of my uploads. But, yes, keep for the same reasons as on the other 15 or so. whimper. gleep. sob. --GRuban (talk) 14:51, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept current cropped version. Deleted old uncropped version - Flickr photographer courtesy request per Commons:Village_pump#Requesting_a_Large-scale_Courtesy_Deletion_of_Personal_Images_of_Myself -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:15, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fans pictured did not consent PaunchStevenson (talk) 07:42, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep @PaunchStevenson: Cropped, no more out-of-scope Greg and Lanza. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 08:46, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep All people in the photo are clearly posing for the photograph, proposing that some of them didn't "consent" seems unlikely. While I don't actually object to Alexis's cropping of the photo, it should not have been necessary. (Now I'm going to have to copy and past this 15 or so times for all the identical nominations of images from this series - sheesh!) --GRuban (talk) 14:06, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept current cropped version; deleted uncropped previous version courtesy deletion request per discussion at Commons:Village_pump#Requesting_a_Large-scale_Courtesy_Deletion_of_Personal_Images_of_Myself -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:13, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fans pictured did not consent PaunchStevenson (talk) 07:44, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep @PaunchStevenson: Cropped, no more out-of-scope Greg or DW. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 08:24, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@GRuban: you forgot some. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 02:02, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep This wasn't one of my uploads. But, yes, keep for the same reasons as on the other 15 or so. whimper. gleep. sob. --GRuban (talk) 14:51, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept cropped version; deleted uncropped courtesy deletion request per discussion at Commons:Village_pump#Requesting_a_Large-scale_Courtesy_Deletion_of_Personal_Images_of_Myself. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:07, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fans pictured did not consent PaunchStevenson (talk) 07:45, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep @PaunchStevenson: Cropped, no more out-of-scope Greg or DW. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 08:21, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep All people in the photo are clearly posing for the photograph, proposing that some of them didn't "consent" seems unlikely. While I don't actually object to Alexis's cropping of the photo, it should not have been necessary. (Now I'm going to have to copy and past this 15 or so times for all the identical nominations of images from this series - sheesh!) --GRuban (talk) 14:08, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept cropped version; deleted uncropped version as courtesy deletion, per discussion at Commons:Village_pump#Requesting_a_Large-scale_Courtesy_Deletion_of_Personal_Images_of_Myself. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:04, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio: https://www.insidesport.co/ipl-moneyball-rishabh-pant-the-rising-star/ Zaxxon0 (talk) 06:09, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:40, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-free, taken from Getty Images, on sites such as https://www.cricbuzz.com/cricket-news/107180/the-making-of-rishabh-pant Lugnuts (talk) 10:12, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:45, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not taken by the uploader, obvious professional image taken from elsewhere Lugnuts (talk) 18:40, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:59, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Risk of copyright violation, unlikely that the YouTube channel owns the rights to this photo. Crop of a larger image published in a Tweet by the International Cricket Council, dated before the YouTube video.[4] Photo has appeared in two newspaper sites, both dated before the YouTube video.[5][6] Verbcatcher (talk) 03:21, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also delete the cropped version File:Rishabh Pant (cropped).jpg Verbcatcher (talk) 03:22, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:16, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fans pictured did not consent PaunchStevenson (talk) 07:35, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep @PaunchStevenson: Cropped, no more out-of-scope Greg and Lanza. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 09:04, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep All people in the photo are clearly posing for the photograph, proposing that some of them didn't "consent" seems unlikely. While I don't actually object to Alexis's cropping of the photo, it should not have been necessary. (Now I'm going to have to copy and past this 15 or so times for all the identical nominations of images from this series - sheesh!) --GRuban (talk) 14:03, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Current version Kept. Uncropped old version deleted per Flickr photographer request Commons:Village_pump#Requesting_a_Large-scale_Courtesy_Deletion_of_Personal_Images_of_Myself -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:51, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fans pictured did not consent PaunchStevenson (talk) 07:39, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep @PaunchStevenson: Cropped, no more out-of-scope Greg. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 08:53, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep All people in the photo are clearly posing for the photograph, proposing that some of them didn't "consent" seems unlikely. While I don't actually object to Alexis's cropping of the photo, it should not have been necessary. (Now I'm going to have to copy and past this 15 or so times for all the identical nominations of images from this series - sheesh!) --GRuban (talk) 14:05, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept current version. Deleted one old version as courtesy deletion per Flickr photographer request ( Commons:Village_pump#Requesting_a_Large-scale_Courtesy_Deletion_of_Personal_Images_of_Myself). -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:55, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

この画像は、権利者の 219.123.74.37 00:11, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

この画像は、権利者の許諾のない二次著作物です。 219.123.74.37 00:14, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:TOYS. --Yasu (talk) 16:22, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, contemporary artwork, no fop, artist died in 2017 Martin Sg. (talk) 18:51, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Die Werke von Alf Lechner befinden sich meist frei zugänglich im öffentlichem Raum, die Ausstellung war eine Hommage des Museums an den Künstler!--Chrisi1964 (talk) 01:39, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

copyvio, contemporary artwork, no fop, artist died in 2017 Martin Sg. (talk) 04:15, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Das geht gar nicht! --Martin Sg. (talk) 04:16, 28 June 2019 (UTC) Die Werke von Alf Lechner befinden sich meist frei zugänglich im öffentlichem Raum, die Ausstellung war eine Hommage des Museums an den Künstler! Das müsste doch eigentlich jeder verstehen!--Chrisi1964 (talk) 11:15, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:13, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, contemporary artwork, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 18:33, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Das Bild zeigt kein Kunstwerk, sondern Bauteile, die Besucher selbst zusammensetzen sollen!--Chrisi1964 (talk) 00:45, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

copyvio, contemporary artwork, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 04:17, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Sowas nicht nochmals! --Martin Sg. (talk) 04:19, 28 June 2019 (UTC) Das Bild zeigt kein Kunstwerk, sondern Bauteile, die Besucher selbst zusammensetzen sollen! Hoffentlich haben es diesmal alle verstanden!--Chrisi1964 (talk) 11:13, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:14, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by LMLM as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish💬 18:00, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, source site has license "© All rights reserved". Taivo (talk) 19:36, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 18:13, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 07:11, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chinatown10431128 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Too low quality to be useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 05:50, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:54, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chinatown10431128 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No permission from 洪連輝, 廖進德, 傅士峰...

Roy17 (talk) 12:15, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --1989 (talk) 09:51, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chinatown10431128 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope charts, derivative work, internet images, needed permission through OTRS (原作者廖進德 = Original author Liao Jinde)

1989 (talk) 17:48, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:28, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo of a tv-screen, the tv-signal is copyrighted Quedel (talk) 00:13, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:24, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo of copyrighted tv-signal from the screen. Additional copyrighted logo under the screen, where FOP not applies Quedel (talk) 00:15, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:25, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Shev123 as no permission (No permission since) - however, the uploader's name is same as author name, the file is large and has meta data. Please provide more information on the issue. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:52, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 15:25, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non free logo violates COM:FAIRUSE DBigXray 14:55, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:13, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I hold the copyright to this image and I authorize its use on wikipedia. Best, Genehunter66 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Genehunter66 (talk • contribs) 17:14, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; please provide permission via OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 09:49, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata contains FBMD.Pic was captured from Facebook. AlexLeeCN (talk) 18:43, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 04:33, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparently not own work. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 20:09, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 12:22, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Billinghurst as no permission (No permission since) - and while I don't disagree, I did of course search the image online and found that this one is the largest one. The uploader name is same/similar to the subject. I am converting this to a Nomination to gain more time and derive consensus. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:59, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I don't disagree with your assessment Ellin Beltz. It was initially marked as copyvio, and I converted to "no permission" due to the account name and again to stop immediate deletion.  — billinghurst sDrewth 02:41, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment This is a professional portait (see also EXIF). We need to be sure that the uploader has a permission from the photograper. I would like a confirmation via OTRS. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:28, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Needs OTRS, Photo by Shigeto Imura per his website. --Gbawden (talk) 08:48, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

개인정보 보호를 위해 - 아이디 노출 Pgy0844 (talk) 13:02, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It would facilitate things if you could explain yourself in a European language (English, French, German, or Spanish). In any case, this design is probably too simple to be copyrightable under United States law... AnonMoos (talk) 15:00, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Rationale of the request is: "privacy issue - ID revealed". But it is no valid reason for deletion. – Kwj2772 (talk) 14:49, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fans pictured did not consent PaunchStevenson (talk) 07:38, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep @PaunchStevenson: Cropped, no more out-of-scope Greg and Lanza. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 08:58, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep All people in the photo are clearly posing for the photograph, proposing that some of them didn't "consent" seems unlikely. While I don't actually object to Alexis's cropping of the photo, it should not have been necessary. (Now I'm going to have to copy and past this 15 or so times for all the identical nominations of images from this series - sheesh!) --GRuban (talk) 14:04, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Kept after original upload removed. This was a BLP removal request. --Majora (talk) 03:47, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fans pictured did not consent PaunchStevenson (talk) 07:39, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep @PaunchStevenson: Cropped, no more out-of-scope Greg and Lanza. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 08:56, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep All people in the photo are clearly posing for the photograph, proposing that some of them didn't "consent" seems unlikely. While I don't actually object to Alexis's cropping of the photo, it should not have been necessary. (Now I'm going to have to copy and past this 15 or so times for all the identical nominations of images from this series - sheesh!) --GRuban (talk) 14:04, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Kept after original upload removed. This was a BLP removal request. --Majora (talk) 03:47, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fans pictured did not consent PaunchStevenson (talk) 07:41, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

{{Vd}} because the photographer is in the picture. Bystander group selfie. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 08:04, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep After reading m:Wikilegal/Authorship and Copyright Ownership#The Example of the Third Party Photographer I'm no longer convinced this is actually an issue. Also, Greg is gone. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 04:47, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep This wasn't one of my uploads. But, yes, keep for the same reasons as on the other 15 or so. whimper. gleep. sob. --GRuban (talk) 14:54, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Kept after original upload removed. This was a BLP removal request. --Majora (talk) 03:47, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fans pictured did not consent PaunchStevenson (talk) 07:42, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep @PaunchStevenson: Cropped, no more out-of-scope Greg or DW. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 08:47, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep All people in the photo are clearly posing for the photograph, proposing that some of them didn't "consent" seems unlikely. While I don't actually object to Alexis's cropping of the photo, it should not have been necessary. (Now I'm going to have to copy and past this 15 or so times for all the identical nominations of images from this series - sheesh!) --GRuban (talk) 14:06, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Kept after original upload removed. This was a BLP removal request. --Majora (talk) 03:48, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fans pictured did not consent PaunchStevenson (talk) 07:43, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep @PaunchStevenson: Blurred, no more out-of-scope Lanza. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 08:42, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep All people in the photo are clearly posing for the photograph, proposing that some of them didn't "consent" seems unlikely. While I don't actually object to Alexis's cropping of the photo, it should not have been necessary. (Now I'm going to have to copy and past this 15 or so times for all the identical nominations of images from this series - sheesh!) --GRuban (talk) 14:07, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Kept after original upload removed. This was a BLP removal request. --Majora (talk) 03:49, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fans pictured did not consent PaunchStevenson (talk) 07:43, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep @PaunchStevenson: No more out-of-scope Greg. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 08:35, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep All people in the photo are clearly posing for the photograph, proposing that some of them didn't "consent" seems unlikely. While I don't actually object to Alexis's cropping of the photo, it should not have been necessary. (Now I'm going to have to copy and past this 15 or so times for all the identical nominations of images from this series - sheesh!) --GRuban (talk) 14:08, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Infrogmation: We do? Where? (not in Category:Lou Diamond Phillips, that's for sure..) - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:01, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Kept after original upload removed. This was a BLP removal request. --Majora (talk) 03:49, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fans pictured did not consent PaunchStevenson (talk) 07:46, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep @PaunchStevenson: Cropped, no more out-of-scope Greg or DW. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 07:54, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep All people in the photo are clearly posing for the photograph, proposing that some of them didn't "consent" seems unlikely. While I don't actually object to Alexis's cropping of the photo, it should not have been necessary. (Now I'm going to have to copy and past this 15 or so times for all the identical nominations of images from this series - sheesh!) --GRuban (talk) 14:09, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Infrogmation: That crop has no license review and a somewhat better crop is possible. A better crop couldn't be based on that narrow crop, you'd need this file for that. (or the original from Flickr, but we shouldn't rely on that) - Alexis Jazz ping plz 09:02, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Kept after original upload removed. This was a BLP removal request. --Majora (talk) 03:49, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fans pictured did not consent PaunchStevenson (talk) 07:46, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

{{Vd}} because the photographer is in the picture. Bystander group selfie. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 08:04, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep After reading m:Wikilegal/Authorship and Copyright Ownership#The Example of the Third Party Photographer I'm no longer convinced this is actually an issue. Also, Greg is gone. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 04:48, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep This wasn't one of my uploads. But, yes, keep for the same reasons as on the other 15 or so. whimper. gleep. sob. --GRuban (talk) 14:54, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Kept after original upload removed. This was a BLP removal request. --Majora (talk) 03:50, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fans pictured did not consent PaunchStevenson (talk) 07:48, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep @PaunchStevenson: Cropped, no more out-of-scope Greg or DW. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 08:02, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep All people in the photo are clearly posing for the photograph, proposing that some of them didn't "consent" seems unlikely. While I don't actually object to Alexis's cropping of the photo, it should not have been necessary. (Now I'm going to have to copy and past this 15 or so times for all the identical nominations of images from this series - sheesh!) --GRuban (talk) 14:09, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Kept after original upload removed. This was a BLP removal request. --Majora (talk) 03:50, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be some sort of personal artwork. Only upload by this person and unused. Uploaders name implies some sort of connection with the image. Cannot find any evidence of notability. Malcolma (talk) 07:56, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 14:41, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality photo of house in unknown location. Description seems to describe some sort of juvenile game. No educational value I can see. Malcolma (talk) 07:59, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 14:40, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image was uploaded some months ago as own work by the uploader, here and on AlamyImages (non free). However, the EXIF data contain the statement "credit: Getty Images", which suggests, the image may belong to Getty Images agency. I don't suggest it to be a blatant copyvio, but this needs some clarification. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:10, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The same problem has File:Statue of the poet Abbas Ibn Firnas.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 10:11, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 14:39, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© 2018 Big Blue Moon Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:48, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:45, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RedNax63 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Facebook images, missing pêrmission.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:06, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:44, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparently not own work. No permission. Jcb (talk) 17:24, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:43, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bmasi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

https://www.artsy.net/artwork/lara-porzak-morpho

Patrick Rogel (talk) 19:14, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:35, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lower resolution version of File:HNL Wiki Wiki Bus.jpg DannyS712 (talk) 19:33, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:34, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Studio portrait, unlikely to be own work. Uploader has no other contributions. Paul_012 (talk) 21:09, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:29, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LucianaFischbach (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work on this letter and older photos, one of which has overprinting.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:01, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Please. They are mine. Don´t delete these. Thanks! Regards. Luciana--LucianaFischbach (talk) 00:12, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep to the file thanks! --LucianaFischbach (talk) 17:34, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:28, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by FromKarts2Cars (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promotional gallery with variable authors unacknowledged. One is exactly facebook sized, the others have "original transmission" meta which strongly suggest not originals.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:10, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:27, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Praxidicae as no permission (No permission since) - however it is only an extracted image. Please provide more information on your intention. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:26, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

are you asking me to provide more information?Praxidicae (talk) 01:39, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, Praxidicae because it is extracted from File:Gunnar_Gehl_Images.jpg with same author. I do not find a larger version on the web. Please provide the reason you sent it to "no permission." Thank you! Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:48, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Source deleted as a copyvio. --Green Giant (talk) 16:48, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not the updated official logo of the Civil Service Commission of the Philippines. There is a new one adopted by the Commission effective April 2018. Csc.pmrd (talk) 02:36, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: We do not delete files just because there is an updated version. Please tag the file with the {{Superseded}} template. --Green Giant (talk) 16:50, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image shows the locomotive at Fayle's Tramway. It arrived there in 1948, so this cannot possibly be a WWI image, and therefore cannot be uploaded under this license Railfan23 (talk) 03:16, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for being vigilant. en:Russell (locomotive) was built in 1906, and I am not sure, where and when the photo was taken. If it was taken before WWI, the caption would need to be updated. On closer examination, the fine grained black and white photo could be after WWII. In that case, it would need to be deleted. I am sorry for having caused confusion. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 04:00, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It's after 1924, when Russell was cut down to work through on the FR. I am almost certain it is not on the WHR or FR - they didn't use tipper wagons pre-preservation, and the scenery is wrong. So it is almost certainly after 1942. It could be well be at Brymbo, before the leading pony truck was removed later in WWII. I'd guess this is around 1943. Either way, it can't be claimed as a pre-1923 public domain image, sadly. Nice photo though it is. Railfan23 (talk) 04:28, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
In that case, it needs to be deleted, please. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 04:37, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and the subsequent discussion. --Green Giant (talk) 16:51, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

misnamed, very low quality duplicate image of Nieuport 17.jpg NiD.29 (talk) 03:24, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: not a duplicate and has been renamed. --Green Giant (talk) 16:52, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, artist died in 2017, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 04:25, 28 June 2019 (UTC) Nachdem das Bild jahrelang auf Wikipedia zu sehen war, soll es damit plötzlich ein Problem geben. Da will sich wohl einer besonders wichtig machen.--Chrisi1964 (talk) 11:11, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:10, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This logo (derivative of en:File:Guangzhou Charge logo.svg) is owned by Chinese Overwatch League team Guangzhou Charge. Per COM:TOO China, the file is not free in its home country. Many simple typefaces are not free in China. Pbroks13 (talk) 05:14, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination I agree with Piotr Bart. Pbroks13 (talk) 13:38, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Nomination withdrawn. --Green Giant (talk) 16:53, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Modern sculpture in Russia (1993), no freedom of panorama. Retired electrician (talk) 05:44, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 16:54, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused listing with no obvious educational value. Seems to be part of some sort of camaign. Source file quoted no longer exists. Malcolma (talk) 07:47, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Unused and also out of scope. Cannot see how it helps to illustrate anything in Wiki project. --Encik Tekateki (talk) 10:18, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Could easily be reproduced as a wiki table if needed. --Green Giant (talk) 16:54, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fijilive.com does not permit re-use of material: https://fijilive.com/terms.Fijilive. DrKay (talk) 08:17, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note that the source was changed after nomination for deletion: [7]. Also, that the metadata says the author is Ashok Chand, not Jon Sullivan or Kavai Damu. DrKay (talk) 11:15, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete: No new copyright would be generated per COM:2D copying so this probably could've been tagged with {{No permission since}} or maybe even {{Speedy delete}} instead of bringing it to DR since it's highly unlikely that whomever took the photo created the document being photographed. However, now that it's here I don't think this can be kept per COM:PCP without OTRS verification of the copyright of the original document. Even if the licensing of the original document can be verified, the quality if pretty poor and the document is for all practical purposes unreadable; so, it's not clear what kind of encyclopedic value there would be in keeping it per COM:SCOPE. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:44, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and Marchjuly. --Green Giant (talk) 16:55, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously scanned from a book or newspaper. DrKay (talk) 08:19, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and Marchjuly. --Green Giant (talk) 16:55, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hochlader offensichtlich nicht identisch mit Urheber / Rechteinhaber Lutheraner (talk) 08:25, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:08, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hochlader offensichtlich nicht identisch mit Urheber / Rechteinhaber Lutheraner (talk) 08:26, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:08, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Rafinsh Ramin Zeynallı (talk) 08:40, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep no reason for deletion. 大诺史 (talk) 14:54, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
What's te reason for deletion, Ramin Zeynallı? - I think it is (you) the user himself who wants his picture removed!? - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 14:56, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Green Giant (talk) 16:56, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not found at URL. Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:42, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 16:56, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not found at URL. Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:44, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Reverted to my upload description, which shows the corresponding link. Please check the history journal first and nominate for deletion if it doesn't match after.Ionutzmovie (talk) 19:05, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: one version deleted. --Green Giant (talk) 16:57, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tibor Inkey was the still photographer of this film, see here (p. 10 in PDF) or here . Probably he took this photo. He died in 1998, see here Regasterios (talk) 12:07, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 16:58, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tibor Inkey was the still photographer of this film, see here (p. 14 in PDF) or here . Probably he took this photo. He died in 1998, see here. Regasterios (talk) 12:46, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 16:58, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photographs of the Leyte Landing Memorial

[edit]

See Commons:Deletion requests/Photographs of the Leyte Landing Memorial "The photographs are public domain or appropriately licensed, but the statues are installed in Philippines, a country with no freedom of panorama (Commons:Freedom of panorama#Philippines); the photographs are derivative works of the statues and the permission of the statues' copyright holders have to be obtained (Commons:Derivative works). The memorial is commissioned by Ferdinand Marcos,[8] which would put the erection during 1960s–1980s. The artist is Anastacio Caedo (1907–1990),[9] which means the statues are copyrighted until 2041 under Phillipines laws (Commons:Licensing#The Philippines)."

Howhontanozaz (talk) 13:44, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination except one file. --Green Giant (talk) 17:01, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Leyte Landing Memorial. No Freedom of Panorama in the Philippines.

Howhontanozaz (talk) 12:53, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Move MacArhur Landing Memorial Park.jpg (and crop out the excess space above) to English Wikipedia and upload under fair use as the main image for . Other images has issues to be of use (watermarks, too much contrast making the sculpture details undistinguishable)Hariboneagle927 (talk) Delete the rest. 08:18, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 12:19, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very low-quality image, there is better (ang lighter) vector version: File:Coat of Arms of Sakha (Yakutia) (1992-2016).svg. 83.220.237.228 14:02, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: We don’t delete just because there is a better version. Please use the {{Superseded}} rag instead. --Green Giant (talk) 17:02, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial flag of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:04, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 17:01, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in USA for statues. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Do we need to know the age of the statue? WCCasey (talk) 19:50, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It'll be helpful to know if statue is copyrighted or not. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 01:10, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 17:03, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical book. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 17:03, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as no permission (No permission since). Out of scope. — Racconish💬 15:34, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:03, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Smaller, no EXIF metadata from camera.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 15:37, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:55, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploaded by a new user - with this (so far) unique contribution -, probably copyviol from Saso Arts. 79.35.196.228 15:38, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:46, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Upload with non-standard name, my mistake, sorry. Already loaded the correct file as File:CoA mil ITA rgt cavalleria 22.png, this one is a duplicate with wrong name, to be deleted. Sorry again, Arturolorioli (talk) 19:51, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 17:09, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not public domain in Georgia yet. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:05, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

About the deletion request for File:Vladimer Eloshvili (1927–2009) Georgian Footballer and Manager, FC Dinamo Tbilisi Defender (1949–1959).jpg

Reason for the nomination: Not public domain in Georgia yet.

This image have been shot and first published in 1959 and is public domain in Georgia since 1984.

This photo is posted on the website FootballFacts.ru by Gia Mindadze. He allowed its free copying. All permissions were obtained beforehand. For evidence You can contact this website and Gia Mindadze yourself to ask them directly.

Please undelete this photo; there is no copyright violation.

Thank you for your assistance and consideration. --Arkaitz1974 (talk) 08:02, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Arkaitz1974: Please re-read your Talk page and COM:EVID. Nevertheless and even if published 1959 (which remains to be proved) image will be public domain in 2030. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:55, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Patrick Rogel: Here's the original source of the imageVladimer Eloshvili (1927–2009) Georgian Footballer and Manager, FC Dinamo Tbilisi Defender (1949–1959) — from left to right: Vladimer Eloshvili (1927–2009), Vladimer Barkaia (born 29 July 1937), Unknown Person (Person's name is not indicated).

This photo is posted on the website of the The National Parliamentary Library of Georgia by Lasha Goduadze.

This photo is from the collections of Digital Library "Iverieli". Digital Library "Iverieli" offers the users digitalized copies of journals, newspapers, photos and rare editions from the collections of the National Parliamentary Library of Georgia.

Terms of Use of photos are indicated by The National Parliamentary Library of Georgia here in Georgian: „ივერიელში“ გამოქვეყნებული ყოველი ეგზემპლარი წარმოადგენს მფლობელთა და საქართველოს პარლამენტის ეროვნული ბიბლიოთეკის საკუთრებას. მასალის გამოქვეყნების შემთხვევაში გთხოვთ, დაასახელოთ წყარო — საქართველოს პარლამენტის ეროვნული ბიბლიოთეკა, ციფრული ბიბლიოთეკა „ივერიელი“ და კოლექციის მფლობელი. იგივე პირობები ვრცელდება როგორც ციფრულ ბიბლიოთეკა „ივერიელზე“, ასევე მის Facebook-ის ოფიციალურ გვერდზე.

Which means the following:

Each copy published in Digital Library "Iverieli" is the property of the owners and the National Parliamentary Library of Georgia. If you want to share, copy, distribute or publish the work please give appropriate credit — The National Parliamentary Library of Georgia, Digital Library “Iverieli” and Collection Owner. The same terms apply to the digital library "Iverieli" and its Facebook page.

Please undelete this photo; there is no copyright violation.

Thank you for your assistance and consideration. --Arkaitz1974 (talk) 00:17, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 17:09, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Justlettersandnumbers as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish💬 16:52, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: professional photo, suspect user (blocked for socking on enwiki, no significant other pictures here), no EXIF, small size: COM:PCP. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:17, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as no permission (No permission since). Out of scope. — Racconish💬 16:53, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:18, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 122.8.245.79 as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish💬 16:53, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: uploads consistent with user's other uploads from that time. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:20, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Микола Василечко as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish💬 16:56, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Found in the depicted person's vk.com profile from an earlier date: https://vk.com/photo-95989862_432341261. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:22, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Frood as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish💬 16:57, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: unclear deletion rationale, image has permission. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:23, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Mitte27 as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish💬 17:01, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unlikely that uploader is author of all the photos used for the collage. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:24, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Source link https://www.peopleofar.com/2012/10/20/art-of-rubik-kocharian/ (tite: Tigranakert in its Glory) Kareyac (talk) 17:38, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:43, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Permission link doesn't contain any permission to publish this as PD. The source page in the IA further states in its terms that the images are under copyright and e.g. "The maps may not be included as they exist on this site in any kind of commercial, shareware, or freeware product without my permission.". Drummyfish (talk) 17:40, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per [10]. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:48, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Was initially tagged for speedy deletion as "non-free media" by User:Lordtobi. I declined the speedy as this is a borderline case. Opening DR to allow discussion on if this is below COM:TOO. 74.221.203.103 04:05, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is also a much higher quality svg version for this: File:Watch Dogs.svg. 74.221.203.103 04:06, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: clearly {{PD-textlogo}}. --ƏXPLICIT 00:16, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

request for personal upload to be deleted Ishida639 (talk) 11:12, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Licenses are irrevocable. We do not delete files simply because the author changed their mind. --Green Giant (talk) 23:29, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low-quality image; author request due to privacy Ishida639 (talk) 18:11, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Quality is fine. How is it a privacy issue? Brianjd (talk) 15:28, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:21, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work B dash (talk) 13:23, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Had some wonky image transferring back when I first uploaded this. I don't have access to the original file anymore (taken in July 2011) but this is indeed my own work. I was employed and interned at the NHC for 7 years; members of WPTC who know me personally can verify this. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 17:16, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed I can verify that @Cyclonebiskit: worked at the NHC for several years.Jason Rees (talk) 21:08, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --ƏXPLICIT 00:19, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

license does not match copyright of book cover with photograph Deanlaw (talk) 13:27, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 00:21, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The better alternate was uploaded Voltmetro 16:20, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: author request. --ƏXPLICIT 00:31, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright infringement: source. Ավետիսյան91 (talk) 16:27, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 00:32, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of photo, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:00, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 23:42, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of photo, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:01, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 23:42, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too low quality to be useful for an educational purpose

Ies (talk) 18:10, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep most of these files were uploaded over a decade ago and taking over two decades ago, so yes, these might be slightly lower resolution than what we do these days. These are in scope and shouldn't be deleted. Multichill (talk) 21:01, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: In scope and decent quality. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:39, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 22:26, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:37, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 22:28, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:38, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of Facebook profile picture, no permission to reuse 大诺史 (talk) 14:19, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: OOS. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:31, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{subst:delete2|image=File:WHITE-ALFORD HOUSE, MCCOMB, PIKE COUNTY, MS.jpg|reason= — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 104.232.177.234 (talk) 16:26, 28 June 2019 (UTC) This photograph contains my image and was taken and posted without my permission.I did not give consent for my image or the photo of my home to be posted on a public site. I would appreciate it if this photo were removed from this site.[reply]

This man trespassed onto my personal property, walking around my fence, and began taking pictures while my husband and I were sitting on the porch. My husband walked towards him to ask him if he could help him with something. The man said "nope" and he quickly fled to his car and sped away. This is clearly inappropriate and perhaps illegal behavior. Had he introduced himself and told us what he wanted a photo of our home for, that's one thing. He clearly had the opportunity to introduce himself and ask permission,but he did not do that. I would have gladly let him take an APPROPRIATE photograph had he done the right thing. Please remove this photograph from this site. Thank you. 104.232.177.234 15:08, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:32, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Justlettersandnumbers as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish💬 15:22, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Questionable authorship. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:34, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Justlettersandnumbers as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish💬 15:24, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Questionable authorship. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:34, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Justlettersandnumbers as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish💬 15:27, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Questionable authorship. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:34, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DW rather than own work. No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 17:51, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep as uploader explicitly stated that its their own work by providing their username as author's name. I see no reason to doubt that placement of text and other possibly creative elements are uploader's own work. Boundaries are generally understood to be non-creative, so there's no reasonable doubt that someone else's copyrights are being violated (see also COM:DW#Maps). Pikne 16:00, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is OBVIOUSLY not own work and the underlying base map is obviously not too simple to be eligible for copyright. Jcb (talk) 16:21, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Uploader probably did use some non-creative source data, but to say that creative elements are obviously not their own work is to obviously excercise bad faith. I just pretty much replied to this at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe.PNG. Pikne 16:37, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No evidence that the uploader did not create this map. It's a fairly basic GIS map that a beginner can create in a matter of minutes, and the shapefiles required to do so are not usually copyrightable. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:36, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by DienHN as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: License violated
Converted by me to DR, as this needs discussion. Why should a "license be violated" on your own upload? -- Túrelio (talk) 09:42, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 11:41, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scheibe died 1964 Goesseln (talk) 11:50, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 11:42, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Mitte27 as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish💬 17:49, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 11:45, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Gbawden as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish💬 17:50, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly a studio portrait unlikely to be own work of a new user, and the uploader is in the photo Gbawden (talk) 06:34, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 11:46, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish💬 17:50, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Likely own work. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 11:48, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Mitte27 as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish💬 17:52, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: all over the web, copyvio. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 11:49, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Микола Василечко as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish💬 17:53, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: webcopy. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 11:50, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Mitte27 as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish💬 17:54, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: webcopy. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 11:51, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish💬 18:02, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: webcopy. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 11:51, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1949. Jcb (talk) 18:56, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: IMHO {{PD-Switzerland-photo}} applies. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 11:57, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not public domain in Russia yet. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:07, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

About the deletion request for file File:Andriy Biba (born 10 August 1937) FC Dynamo Kyiv Midfielder (1957–1967).jpg

Reason for the nomination: Not public domain in Russia yet.

Andriy Biba (born 10 August 1937) was NOT Russian — but was a Soviet and Ukrainian Footballer, FC Dynamo Kyiv Midfielder (1957–1967). This image have been shot in Tbilisi — during the Soviet Top League match between Dinamo Tbilisi and Dynamo Kyiv in 20 July 1964 and first published in Soviet Georgia, what kind of relation it may have with Russia?

This image have been shot and first published in 1964 and is public domain in Georgia since 1989.

This photo is posted on the website FootballFacts.ru by Mirian Kavsadze. He allowed its free copying. All permissions were obtained beforehand. For evidence You can contact this website and Mirian Kavsadze yourself to ask them directly.

Please undelete this photo; there is no copyright violation. --Arkaitz1974 (talk) 09:33, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Arkaitz1974: http://www.fc-dynamo.ru is a Russian website and is not published under cc-by-sa-4.0. Besides image is neither public domain in Russia nor in Ukraine: "A Ukrainian or Ukrainian SSR work is in the public domain in Ukraine if it was published before 1 January 1951." --Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:47, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Not PD yet. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 12:01, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not public domain in Georgia yet. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:08, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 12:02, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not public domain in Georgia yet, http://footballfacts.ru/players/108293-shengeliya-ramaz-aleksandrovich. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:28, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 12:03, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not public domain in Georgia yet. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:30, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 12:04, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file appears to be taken from https://www.facebook.com/Kilbourn-Place-409742933116716/, and I'm skeptical that it is eligible for Commons. From what I've gathered from Facebook's terms of use, images uploaded to the site are licensed to Facebbok, not the uploader (see here). I was unable to find out what that license is exactly, but I doubt it is Commons-compatible. Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 22:05, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Images from Facebook need OTRS permission. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 12:09, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work by Alicia Carletti (d. 2017), permission of her heirs needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:18, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 12:09, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Who is the painter and why should it be public domain? Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:54, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:52, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Who is the painter and why should it be public domain? Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:55, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:51, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An incorrect pronunciation was recorded, [a'tʃ:endere] instead of [a'tʃ:ɛndere] 94.34.144.33 19:25, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Prosfilaes. --Majora (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An incorrect pronunciation was recorded, [a'tʃ:ento] instead of [a'tʃ:ɛnto] 94.34.144.33 19:28, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Prosfilaes. --Majora (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An incorrect pronunciation was recorded, [atʃetaldeˈide] instead of [atʃetalˈdɛjde] 94.34.144.33 19:33, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Prosfilaes. --Majora (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The better alternate was uploaded Voltmetro 16:19, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:47, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The better alternate was uploaded Voltmetro 16:19, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:47, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logo per COM:TOO Taiwan. Wcam (talk) 02:25, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Shizhao as no permission (No permission since) This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 15:28, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. howcheng {chat} 17:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1949. Jcb (talk) 18:50, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. howcheng {chat} 17:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Микола Василечко as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish💬 17:49, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Unclear why it was tagged with "no permission". Not found on Google Images, Tineye or Facebook. --Green Giant (talk) 20:41, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

French image: any reason for Argentinian law to apply? Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:13, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

About the deletion request for File:Oscar Alberto Ortiz (born 8 April 1953) Argentina NFT Winger (1975–1979).jpg

Reason for the nomination: French image: any reason for Argentinian law to apply?

1. French image

This image have been shot in Buenos Aires, Argentina — during International Friendly match Argentina v Bulgaria in 29 March 1978 and first published in 6 April 1978 by El Gráfico — an sports magazine of Argentina and later used for VIGNETTE STICKER, so this is NOT French image.

2. Any reason for Argentinian law to apply?

This image have been shot in Buenos Aires, Argentina and is public domain in Argentina since 1998, because the copyright of this photograph, registered in Argentina, has expired (date and source of any publication prior to 20 year old must be indicated so anyone can check it, and clear evidence that the image was taken more than 25 years ago must be given).

Please undelete this photo; there is no copyright violation.

Thank you for your assistance and consideration. --Arkaitz1974 (talk) 07:56, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per the URAA still copyrighted in the US. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 12:33, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not public domain in Georgia yet. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:26, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Patrick Rogel: Here's the original source of the imageVakhtang Koridze (born 24 December 1949) FC Dinamo Tbilisi Midfielder (1975–1980) — Note: first row, left to right: Vakhtang Koridze, Vladimir Gutsaev, Manuchar Machaidze, Vitaly Daraselia, Davit Mujiri (senior).

This photo is posted on the website of the The National Parliamentary Library of Georgia by Jumber Patiashvili.

This photo is from the collections of Digital Library "Iverieli". Digital Library "Iverieli" offers the users digitalized copies of journals, newspapers, photos and rare editions from the collections of the National Parliamentary Library of Georgia.

Terms of Use of photos are indicated by The National Parliamentary Library of Georgia here in Georgian: „ივერიელში“ გამოქვეყნებული ყოველი ეგზემპლარი წარმოადგენს მფლობელთა და საქართველოს პარლამენტის ეროვნული ბიბლიოთეკის საკუთრებას. მასალის გამოქვეყნების შემთხვევაში გთხოვთ, დაასახელოთ წყარო — საქართველოს პარლამენტის ეროვნული ბიბლიოთეკა, ციფრული ბიბლიოთეკა „ივერიელი“ და კოლექციის მფლობელი. იგივე პირობები ვრცელდება როგორც ციფრულ ბიბლიოთეკა „ივერიელზე“, ასევე მის Facebook-ის ოფიციალურ გვერდზე.

Which means the following:

Each copy published in Digital Library "Iverieli" is the property of the owners and the National Parliamentary Library of Georgia. If you want to share, copy, distribute or publish the work please give appropriate credit — The National Parliamentary Library of Georgia, Digital Library “Iverieli” and Collection Owner. The same terms apply to the digital library "Iverieli" and its Facebook page.

Please undelete this photo; there is no copyright violation.

Thank you for your assistance and consideration. --Arkaitz1974 (talk) 07:11, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Arkaitz1974: The National Parliamentary Library of Georgia says Copyright © 2012, The National Parliamentary Library of Georgia and the photo is not hosted at Digital Library "Iverieli". --Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:48, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Patrick Rogel: Digital Library "Iverieli" is the project of The National Parliamentary Library of Georgia

Here — The Ilia Chavchavadze National Parliamentary Library of Georgia is a governmental organization under the Parliament of Georgia. It is the main book depository of Georgia, as well as the most important cultural, educational, scientific, informational and methodological centre.

Here — The digital library gives the reader the opportunity to read complete texts of publications in electronic format, and consists of several projects:

1. The Greenstone Project of UNESCO – a digital collection of Georgian literature, including all famous authors’ works of Georgian classical literature and the authors’ short biographies. There are also complete texts on civil education.

2. A digital collection of printed archive and dissertations – complete texts of the books and theses. There are also scanned versions of printed publications in PDF format.

3. Digital Library "Iverieli" offers the users digitalized copies of journals, newspapers, photos and rare editions from the collections of the National Parliamentary Library of Georgia.

And the photo is hosted at Digital Library "Iverieli" (which is the project of The National Parliamentary Library of Georgia) and each copy published in Digital Library "Iverieli" is the property of the owners and the National Parliamentary Library of Georgia and in Terms of Use of photos are indicated by The National Parliamentary Library of Georgia following: If you want to share, copy, distribute or publish the work please give appropriate credit — The National Parliamentary Library of Georgia, Digital Library “Iverieli” and Collection Owner. The same terms apply to the digital library "Iverieli" and its Facebook page.

The National Parliamentary Library of Georgia says Copyright © 2012 also about this — Ilia Chavchavadze (1837-1907) (which is also hosted at Digital Library "Iverieli") and many other photos and works first published in Georgia before 1907 and now in the public domain because a copyright protection has expired but it does not mean that there is copyright violation.

Please undelete this photo; there is no copyright violation. --Arkaitz1974 (talk) 13:42, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Arkaitz1974: First deletion or undeletion will be performed by an Administrator, not by me. Second Copyright © 2012, The National Parliamentary Library of Georgia doesn't mean "free". Besides, and concerning your 1907 example, the mention "Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated" is added to this copyright notice. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:59, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: no indication why this would be free image according to COM:L. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 12:35, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]