Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/05/15
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
_(15169714473).jpg){kind=link}
_,_Digvijaysinghrao_Mukne_(left)_and_prince_Mahendrasingh_Rao_Mukne_of_Jawhar_State_founded_by_Jayabha_Mukne.jpg){kind=link}
_(3803481693).jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Size and quality wrong Jomiwe (talk) 06:38, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: F7. --Gbawden (talk) 07:00, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
,ASZ火日大十SHAHGAHGI:LKSKJZLILKLKIYAJFAJFAFKJHGHGHGKDKJ DavidloveCandycream (talk) 06:50, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
ggggggggggggggggggggg Koutakkei (talk) 06:50, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
ewrfcghoip98erdxgfchvbjlopi9075eurjhg,kbl;puy986i75eurtshgfcmkbjlioy886rydfhcmvb,kjlniouyt6rydfhc DavidloveCandycream (talk) 06:51, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
hoytydhcgvkuoythcgmvku6rydhgj,uy7yrdhoy8tdhfcgjuydfcvhgutdfhvjhchf nbki DavidloveCandycream (talk) 06:51, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
sdgfchjuytrgxfcnbvmkutyrsfcgvhbjnkjou8y76r5erdfcgvhbjnk DavidloveCandycream (talk) 06:51, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
yyyyyyyyyyyyy Koutakkei (talk) 06:56, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: OoS. --Gbawden (talk) 06:58, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
File:Le pavillon de l'Australie en construction (Biennale d'architecture 2014, Venise) (15169714473).jpg
[edit]_(15169714473).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(15169714473).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Photo of a copyrighted architect's photo. Image is of no use without that part of it. Lord Belbury (talk) 08:21, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:DW of copyrighted photo. {{Copyvio}} would have worked here. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 08:23, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be considered "own work"; can be found on the internet, most likely on Discogs or on the music artist's pages. JalenFolf (talk) 16:57, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 17:37, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jose1998ayla (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images.
- File:ENSAYO PDF VIOLENCIA CONTRA LA MUJER.pdf
- File:Ppts sobre pdf norma juridica.pdf
- File:MONOGRAFIA NORMA JURIDICA PDF.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:41, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yeleni2001 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.
- File:La interpretacion juridica , monografia.pdf
- File:La interpretacion juridica.pdf
- File:COMO NACE EL DERECHOPPTS.pdf
- File:Como nace el derecho.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:42, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:41, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Andreach2812 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.
- File:ENSAYO DEL DIVORCIO.pdf
- File:MONOGRAFIA TRATA DE PERSONAS (1).pdf
- File:LA TRATA DE PERSONAS PPT.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:43, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Son of holy (talk · contribs)
[edit]not a web host
QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 14:33, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:45, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by CieloCarb01 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.
- File:Presentación de la monografia Nº 2- El Patrimonio Cultural.pdf
- File:Monografia Nº 2 "El patrimonio cultural".pdf
- File:Ensayo Nº 2- ¿Tenemos libertad de expresión?.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:44, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:45, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
{{Delete
|reason=typo in name
|subpage=Category:May 2019 ín Slovakia
|day=15
|month=May
|year=2019
}}
Deleted: per nomination, typo. --Achim (talk) 20:40, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Leonorwood32846 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low-re images, Facebook metadata, unlikely to be own work.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:07, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Unambiguous COM:NETCOPYVIOs. File:Seth Rollins.universal champion.jpg is here, for example. --Эlcobbola talk 22:12, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by TRIA SOHYIB (talk · contribs)
[edit]non notable
Buckaroo bob 91 (talk) 03:58, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Delete low exif and widely used on internet --Alaa :)..! 01:56, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 01:58, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
As the user on Pixabay implies this image was actually taken by Pixabay from Wikimedia Commons.
Alas, it is not a simple duplicate. These three mages I found here:
- File:Africa satellite orthographic.jpg
- File:Africa satellite plane.jpg
- File:Africa (satellite image).jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
The image from Pixabay is most similar to the last one, but not fully identical it seems. Hence only a deletion request, but I could also live with a conversion into a duplicate. — Speravir – 22:31, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
- Oooh, why did this come not earlier into my mind? In fact, File:Map Africa.jpg is a duplicate of File:Africa (satellite image).jpg, confer the 740px wide preview image of File:Africa (satellite image).jpg with the full image of File:Map Africa.jpg. — Speravir – 00:34, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
.jpg/740px-Africa_(satellite_image).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Redirected by Strakhov. --4nn1l2 (talk) 01:10, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
I didn´t want to fileup this photograph Jesperalo (talk) 18:03, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 18:09, 15 Mai 2019 UTC: Copyright violation: Not "Own work". Metadata shows Author and Copyright holder as ©Sergio Cuesta --Krdbot 07:30, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
Not the author's own work, missing metadata. Edjoerv (talk) 19:09, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 20:04, 15 Mai 2019 UTC: Copyright violation: per EXIF data: copied from Facebook --Krdbot 07:30, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
Nonsense upload, not realitically useful for an educational purpose and as the nonsense description and nonsense category show not intended to be useful: Out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 13:08, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 06:19, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 01:47, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:22, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
32 KB file w/o camera EXIF; dubious "own work". E4024 (talk) 16:12, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:52, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
obvious copyvio Oxyman (talk) 17:15, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:47, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
This portrait was incorrectly identified by me. It is now certain that it is of Lord Charles Fitzroy. Kjorford (talk) 10:42, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
- Is there some reason why that makes it useless? You can update the description by using the "Edit" link and ask for the file to be renamed (see COM:FR). --bjh21 (talk) 12:00, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Keep bjh21 is right. Please don’t delete the file, we just need to change the description and the file name. (But first we should close this deletion request, because filemovers are instructed not to rename any file with a deletion request/discussion ;–). --Aristeas (talk) 09:02, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
I agree that this should be renamed. At the time I requested its deletion I could find no way to rename it and I intended to delete then upload a correctly named photo. Keith Orford. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kjorford (talk • contribs) 13:06, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Please rename the file. --Green Giant (talk) 02:22, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
porn is not allowed Buckaroo bob 91 (talk) 04:01, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
The reasoning behind this deletion request isn't valid. Nudity - New uploads applies. The image is different to other male nude selfies due to the shown micropenis. So keep or bring better arguments.--Blah (talk) 11:14, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Was copyright violation. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:21, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
It says Michael Moates as Hannah Thompson... There is no evidence to suggest this photo has anything to dow with Michael Moates 2600:6C56:6F08:1CF:0:464:3322:362B 03:23, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
- COMMENT The user RyanForTrump is currently under sactions on Wikidata for vandalism and edit wars. See Wikidata:Administrators' noticeboard#Sock-puppet IP's and Vandals. This user has posted numerous libelous statement in an attempt to defame an individual. This photo is not notable and will never be used. 2600:6C56:6F08:1CF:0:464:3322:362B 03:24, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
- Any reason not to just move it to an appropriate name? Seemes likely to be in scope, whatever the uploader's motivations. - Jmabel ! talk 04:18, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
- I don't have a problem removing the name and also removing it from the category Michael Moates. But I'm not sure how it would be notable or relevant. The name on this form does not turn up on any major news outlets. 2600:6C56:6F08:1CF:0:464:3322:362B 04:22, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
- I have no problem with killing it, either. Totally neutral here. - Jmabel ! talk 15:08, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 03:28, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
Unused file, nonexistent country, nonexistent parties Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 07:42, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Pi.1415926535 at 14:56, 19 Mai 2019 UTC: Commons being used as file host for external site --Krdbot 07:25, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
File:Maharaja Yashwantrao Martandrao Mukne (right) , Digvijaysinghrao Mukne (left) and prince Mahendrasingh Rao Mukne of Jawhar State founded by Jayabha Mukne.jpg
[edit]_,_Digvijaysinghrao_Mukne_(left)_and_prince_Mahendrasingh_Rao_Mukne_of_Jawhar_State_founded_by_Jayabha_Mukne.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_,_Digvijaysinghrao_Mukne_(left)_and_prince_Mahendrasingh_Rao_Mukne_of_Jawhar_State_founded_by_Jayabha_Mukne.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Whatever the source may be, it is not "own work" - uploaded by a prolific sock on en-WP Sitush (talk) 21:20, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:34, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
No idea where it is from but it is not "own work" - uploader is a prolific sock on en-WP Sitush (talk) 21:40, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:34, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
unused personal image Migebert (talk) 13:44, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:00, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
unused personal image Migebert (talk) 13:49, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:00, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
This is an already published media, owned by AFP. See https://www.elperiodicodearagon.com/noticias/internacional/brenton-tarrant-paso-noche-jerez-febrero-2018_1349805.html Hercule (talk) 13:57, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete copyvio. --Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 13:59, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:00, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Johannes Hutabarat (talk · contribs)
[edit]not a web host
- File:Pemandangan Gunung Sinabung dari Puncak Gundaling, Tanah Kalo, Indonesia 02.jpg
- File:Pemandangan Gunung Sinabung dari Puncak Gundaling, Tanah Kalo, Indonesia 01.jpg
QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 14:22, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:00, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Source says "© 2015 by Christopher Park". No indication page uses CC licenses. Abzeronow (talk) 15:02, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:56, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Source: "© 2015 by Christopher Park". Source gives no indication for a CC license. Abzeronow (talk) 15:04, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:56, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Unused selfie, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 15:25, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:57, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE personal image. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:39, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:56, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Aashish jaatav (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out-of-scope private album.
Roy17 (talk) 21:14, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:40, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Official mocking (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal Photos, unused, out of scope
- File:Mockingvbhvhhvb.jpg
- File:Mocking19.jpg
- File:Mocking18.png
- File:Mocking17.jpg
- File:Mocking16.jpg
- File:Mocking15.jpg
- File:Mocking14.jpg
- File:Mocking13.png
- File:Mocking12.png
- File:Mocking11.jpg
- File:Mocking10.jpg
- File:Mocking9.jpg
- File:Mocking8.jpg
- File:Mocking5.jpg
- File:Mocking7.jpg
- File:Mocking4.jpg
- File:Mocking1.jpg
- File:Official cloth.jpg
- File:Official.jpg
- File:Official mocking.jpg
Ronhjones (Talk) 19:22, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:05, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Official mocking (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope, personal photos. warned before.
Roy17 (talk) 21:10, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:38, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Official mocking (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:NOTHOST - unused, low quality images of non-notable person. Some duplicates of images uploaded by user's sock - see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Aashish jaatav.
- File:Mocking 102.jpg
- File:Holi 2019.jpg
- File:Mocking 188.png
- File:Mocking 99.jpg
- File:Mocking 66.jpg
Эlcobbola talk 22:26, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:40, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
selfie, unused personal image Migebert (talk) 22:59, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
- See also user request for deletion on talk-page of the file. --Migebert (talk) 19:26, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:39, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
out of scope, no educational purpose Ezarateesteban 23:14, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:39, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Luca Bove isn't mentioned neither in en.wiki nor in it.wiki. Unused photo about non-notable person, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:15, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:02, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
part of copyrighted software needs discussion 2601:647:101:D030:3DE1:715:51D:9221 00:07, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
- Keep a sentence worth of noncreative text and a black background. Below ToO. Abzeronow (talk) 16:02, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per Abzeronow. --Strakhov (talk) 15:51, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
Hace falta indicar el permiso para subir este archivo FelipeRev (talk) 00:45, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Kept: PD-Simple. --Strakhov (talk) 15:52, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
User page not created by the user but by a visitor who used it as TP. I took the talk to the TP. E4024 (talk) 03:38, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Oops - I never noticed that I'd created a user page instead of a talk page! And I forgot to follow-up on all those selfies. Thanks! Nfitz (talk) 05:02, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 15:54, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
User:Trivialist marked this as {{Copyvio|Image is a screenshot of a video not created by the uploader}}, but I don’t see why that would be a problem for a CC-BY-licensed video (with {{LicenseReview}} already included). Mormegil (talk) 07:24, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
- Keep, obviously. --Mormegil (talk) 07:24, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Kept: License reviewed YouTube CC-BY video. --Strakhov (talk) 15:57, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
out of scope, mom dad and me are no politcal parties Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 07:52, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Unclear scope. --Strakhov (talk) 15:59, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
- also file:نجمة بلاك بلوك.jpg
Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 16:53, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 18:26, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. This version published in 1949, though multi-edition work, so this image quite likely to be in earlier versions, and should not be speedy deleted — billinghurst sDrewth 10:58, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: no license for 7 days. --Jcb (talk) 21:21, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
I work at this college and allowed to update the Wikipedia webpage with this kind of content. Would you like proof of employment? Unfortunately, I do not have the SVG on file, would you prefer I find that copy? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pbilk (talk • contribs) 16:35, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:25, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
- also file:Tippie College of Business Logo.png
Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. If it's impossible to obtain the permission, then the logos should be uploaded locally inti en.wiki. Taivo (talk) 20:57, 15 May 2019 (UTC) - Delete per nom, prp. Please note the existence of Commons talk:Deletion requests/File:TippieCOBlogo.jpg. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 06:36, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
This should be deleted, I uploaded a non-free media version of the logo so that there are no copyright issues that come out of this image. Ekward1998 (talk) 20:46, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion and uploader's request. Ed (Edgar181) 11:57, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
These lyrics are in Tswana, not Swazi. TextClick (talk) 01:49, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 20:19, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
out of scope, virtual diagram of an election that will probably never happen Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 07:51, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:12, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
out of scope, fantasy election (perhaps from Orwell's 1984 ?) Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 07:53, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:12, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
unused file, joke/unrealistic data Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 07:56, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:12, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
unused file, there is no country with such parties Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 07:58, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:12, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
unused file, fictional country Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 07:59, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:12, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
image uploaded to spam on now deleted page at en.wp. Outside of project scope. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:50, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete: Book cover and Fair use image. --AntanO 14:42, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:13, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
non notable person Buckaroo bob 91 (talk) 20:17, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per COM:INUSE, used in fr:Ciceley, so probably notable. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:15, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Divakar Dav Chaubay (talk · contribs)
[edit]not a web host + out of scope
- File:My official.jpg
- File:Office photos.jpg
- File:IMG-20190216-WA0022.jpg
- File:IMG-20190216-WA0023.jpg
QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 05:16, 15 May 2019 (UTC) and also:
--Achim (talk) 19:32, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:03, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Historical photos and document. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:מכתב מחמ"י גבריהו ללשכת נשיא המדינה בדבר שאלת הנשיא לחידון התנ"ך הראשון.pdf this is from the Israeli archives and link is posted in the footnotes
- File:שיעור תנך בבית ראש הממשלה.jpg This is from the deceased private collection
- File:CMIGevaryahu.jpg This picture was taken by Samuel Limor and he has released this to me
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:35, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Appears to be screenshot of online video. User is currently blocked for other copyright violations. Ixfd64 (talk) 20:33, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 19:17, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Uploaded wrong file; please delete it; Pfandler Michael (talk) 16:57, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio. 大诺史 (talk) 13:31, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
Porque fue cargado de modo erroneo. El original ya ha sido vuelto a subir mariex 18:23, 15 May 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mariexflorence (talk • contribs) 18:23, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio. 大诺史 (talk) 13:34, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
Smaller and unused version of File:Vertically rotating roasted lamb.jpg? E4024 (talk) 00:28, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 20:41, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
useless personal composition Pippobuono (talk) 10:54, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Delete Can't see any use for this. Malcolma (talk) 08:31, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 20:43, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
The copyright information of this file is insufficient to determine the copyright status, and is also inaccurate; the source is Spanish for "Image 4" and the author is listed as Google. There is no information here that can be used to prove that the file is free. — pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 13:10, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete — Clearly a non-free variation of a logo copyrighted by Marvel Studios. – PhilipTerryGraham (talk) 02:32, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per above. Normally gradients are not copyrightable, but the design is too unique to ot be above COM:TOO. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:10, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
_(3803481693).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(3803481693).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
copyrighted content not de minimus SecretName101 (talk) 00:36, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
_(3803481693).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:45, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
_(3803481693).jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Turkmen as no permission (No permission since). I don’t think it is own work by the uploader but it is worth examining further given it is from 1821. Green Giant (talk) 02:24, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: bogus license. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:46, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
Modern work of art. OTRS required. E4024 (talk) 02:49, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:45, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope. E4024 (talk) 03:59, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:44, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
out of scope Buckaroo bob 91 (talk) 03:59, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:44, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
out of scope
- File:Persian Sissy Boy Sissy Boi (8).jpg
- File:Persian Sissy Boy Sissy Boi (7).jpg
- File:Persian Sissy Boy Sissy Boi (5).jpg
- File:Persian Sissy Boy Sissy Boi (6).jpg
- File:Persian Sissy Boy Sissy Boi (4).jpg
- File:Persian Sissy Boy Sissy Boi (2).jpg
- File:Persian Sissy Boy Sissy Boi (3).jpg
- File:Persian Sissy Boy Sissy Boi (1).jpg
- File:Persian Sissyboi 2.jpg
- File:Persian Sissyboi i.jpg
- File:Persian Sissyboi 3.jpg
- File:Persian Sissyboi.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Buckaroo bob 91 (talk) 04:01, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete The quality of photos is really good but they are out of scope. Хорошаіграшка (talk) 10:54, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete educationally worthless. AshFriday (talk) 21:49, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:43, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
out of scope Buckaroo bob 91 (talk) 04:03, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:43, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
no indication of how image is within scope — billinghurst sDrewth 04:57, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Plus this string of additions that do not clearly appear within scope and seem more like advertising. — billinghurst sDrewth 05:02, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
- File:Maltese musician Paul Pereira 13.5.19 @ Amavi by Sumera in Goa.jpg
- File:Funny TRIO - Paul Pereira, Sameer Alvares, Alister D'Sousa.jpg
- File:Paul Pereira 13.5.19 @ Amavi by Sumera in Goa.jpg
- File:Duo Paul Pereira and Sameer Alvares.jpg
- File:Maltese musician Paul Pereira.jpg
- File:Paul Pereira.jpg
- File:Paul Pereira 2.5.2019 @ Hang Out Bar.jpg
- File:Musician Paul Pereira.jpg
- File:Professional musician and entertainer Paul Pereira.jpg
- File:Mucisian Paul Pereira Pawlu L-Iswed.jpg
- File:Paul Pereira Greetings from Goa.png
Further images that are personal images of user:Arendaja and not within scope — billinghurst sDrewth 05:07, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
- File:Coach-Writer-Katrin-Aedma2006.jpg
- File:Katrin Aedma, Tallinn.jpg
- File:Ajakirjanik Katrin Aedma.jpg
- File:Coach-Katrin Aedma-Bitihorn.jpg
- File:Katrin Aedma lilledega.jpg
- File:Koolitaja-Katrin Aedma-Delhi.jpg
- File:Koolitaja-Katrin Aedma-Indias.jpg
- File:Katrin Aedma saris.jpg
- File:Katrin Aedma saris-roosidega.jpg
- File:Katrin Aedma Delhi.jpg
- File:Koolitaja-Katrin Aedma.jpg
- File:Katrin Aedma busy.jpg
- File:Lembit Michelson ja Katrin Aedma.jpg
- File:Kirjanik Katrin Aedma Kadriorus.jpg
- File:Kolitaja Katrin Aedma esinemas arstidele.jpg
- File:Katrin Aedma vabariigi aastapaev.JPG
- File:Kirjanik Katrin Aedma kübaraga.jpg
- File:Koolitaja-Katrin Aedma Indias.jpg
- File:Koolitaja ja kirjanik Katrin Aedma ja tema dalmatiiner Bingo.jpg
- File:Avaliku esinemise koolitaja Katrin Aedma.jpg
- File:Kirjanik Katrin Aedma.JPG
- File:Koolitaja Katrin Aedma.jpg
- File:Katrin Aedma Teeninduskäsiraamat.jpg
- File:Koolitaja-Katrin Aedma-hobust-coachimas.jpg
- File:Katrin Aedma.jpg
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:40, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
Screenshots of various software for Windows. No permission.
XXN, 00:27, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:43, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
Copyvio.
- File:奪取元素球.JPG
- File:冰忍被讀取.JPG
- File:新版團體照.jpg
- File:胡大師機械人.JPG
- File:書籍出版1 2.JPG
- File:書籍出版5.png
- File:書籍出版1 1.jpg
Out of scope.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
OOS and low quality.
Roy17 (talk) 20:15, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:28, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ravi Shankar Patel (the RSP) (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal images.
Ixfd64 (talk) 20:42, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:29, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Artist3006 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE personal images.
- File:Anh Konge draw.jpg
- File:Anh Konge black and white.jpg
- File:Anh Konge cute pic.jpg
- File:Editor Anh Konge.jpg
- File:Anh Konge and guitar.jpg
- File:Anh Konge painting.jpg
- File:Anh Konge lovely 09.jpg
- File:Anh Konge lovely.jpg
- File:Anh Konge cute.jpg
- File:Anh Konge cute 01.jpg
- File:Anh Konge - the best artist i have ever know 06.jpg
- File:Anh Konge - the best artist i have ever know 04.jpg
- File:Anh Konge - the best artist i have ever know 03.jpg
- File:Anh Konge - the best artist i have ever know 02.jpg
- File:Anh Konge - the best artist i have ever know 01.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:14, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:32, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
The person in the photo has requested me, the uploader of this photo, to delete this photo. Alex K Chen (talk) 22:45, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: ok. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:34, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
The person in this photo has requested me, the uploader of this photo, to delete this photo. Alex K Chen (talk) 22:45, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: ok. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:34, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
The person in this photo has requested me, the uploader of this photo, to delete this photo. Alex K Chen (talk) 22:46, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: ok. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:34, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Josip Hervat (talk · contribs)
[edit]Dubious claim of own work, looks like taken from books, etc
- File:Janko Bobetko- Sve moje bitke.jpg
- File:Ratni dnevnik 1944.-1945. - 32. divizija - 04.jpg
- File:Ratni dnevnik 1944.-1945. - 32. divizija - 03.jpg
- File:Ratni dnevnik 1944.-1945. - 32. divizija - 02.jpg
- File:Ratni dnevnik 1944.-1945. - 32. divizija - 01.jpg
- File:Donacija BOBETKO hrvatskom povijesnom muzeju 18.jpg
- File:Donacija BOBETKO hrvatskom povijesnom muzeju 17.jpg
- File:Donacija BOBETKO hrvatskom povijesnom muzeju 16.jpg
- File:Donacija BOBETKO hrvatskom povijesnom muzeju 15.jpg
- File:Donacija BOBETKO hrvatskom povijesnom muzeju 14.jpg
- File:Donacija BOBETKO hrvatskom povijesnom muzeju 13.jpg
- File:Donacija BOBETKO hrvatskom povijesnom muzeju 11.jpg
- File:Donacija BOBETKO hrvatskom povijesnom muzeju 10.jpg
- File:Donacija BOBETKO hrvatskom povijesnom muzeju 9.jpg
- File:Donacija BOBETKO hrvatskom povijesnom muzeju 8.jpg
- File:Donacija BOBETKO hrvatskom povijesnom muzeju 7.jpg
- File:Donacija BOBETKO hrvatskom povijesnom muzeju 5.jpg
- File:Donacija BOBETKO hrvatskom povijesnom muzeju 4.jpg
- File:Donacija BOBETKO hrvatskom povijesnom muzeju 3.jpg
- File:Donacija BOBETKO hrvatskom povijesnom muzeju 2.jpg
- File:Donacija BOBETKO hrvatskom povijesnom muzeju 1.jpg
- File:Bulat je huškao Srbe i čekao poraz Hrvatske.jpg
Josip Hervat (talk) 10:45, 16 May 2019 (UTC)Josip Hervat
Gbawden (talk) 09:46, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
- Josip Hervat has sent an email to OTRS regarding these images Gbawden (talk) 09:45, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
Ticket:2019051610004654 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 10:00, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
- OTRS agent (verify): The permission is written in hr (Croatian) but sent to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (in english). Apparently user:Dungodung can read that language, but only has permission for info-hr. I'll see if he can helps. --Ganímedes (talk) 15:29, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
- I can access the tickets in the permissions queue. First of all, they should be merged, as the first one is just a forward of the email that is requesting permission, while the other is just a forward of the email that is "giving" permission. Now, as for the giving, the permission statement states that "Josip Hervat" is allowed to use the photos for purposes of editing the Wikipedia page of Mr Bobetko, which I believe is not a proper permission. --Filip (§) 10:06, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
- Merged and answer (in English. Sorry). Thanks, Filip. --Ganímedes (talk) 12:37, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
- I can access the tickets in the permissions queue. First of all, they should be merged, as the first one is just a forward of the email that is requesting permission, while the other is just a forward of the email that is "giving" permission. Now, as for the giving, the permission statement states that "Josip Hervat" is allowed to use the photos for purposes of editing the Wikipedia page of Mr Bobetko, which I believe is not a proper permission. --Filip (§) 10:06, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
I'm worried about the scope of some files. --Ganímedes (talk) 22:12, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:50, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Josip Hervat (talk · contribs)
[edit]Official documents. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain.
- File:Donacija BOBETKO hrvatskom povijesnom muzeju-2.jpg
- File:Donacija BOBETKO hrvatskom povijesnom muzeju-1.jpg
- File:Darovnica hrvatskom povijesnom muzeju general JB-1.jpg
- File:Darovnica hrvatskom povijesnom muzeju general JB-2.jpg
- File:Bulat je huskao srbe i cekao poraz hrvatske vl jb 4.jpg
- File:Bulat je huskao srbe i cekao poraz hrvatske vl jb 2.jpg
- File:Bulat je huskao srbe i cekao poraz hrvatske vl jb 3.jpg
- File:Bulat je huskao Srbe i cekao poraz Hrvatske vl jb 1.jpg
- File:Rješenje Invalidske komisije pri štabu VI armije 1. str. - Janko Bobetko.jpg
- File:Rješenje Invalidske komisije pri štabu VI armije 2. str. - Janko Bobetko.jpg
- File:X Zg korpus 32 divizija preslik ratnog dnevnika 31 prosinca 1944-5 sijecnja 1945-4.jpg
- File:X Zg korpus 32 divizija preslik ratnog dnevnika 31 prosinca 1944-5 sijecnja 1945-1.jpg
- File:X Zg korpus 32 divizija preslik ratnog dnevnika 31 prosinca 1944-5 sijecnja 1945-2.jpg
- File:X Zg korpus 32 divizija preslik ratnog dnevnika od 31 prosinca 1944 do 5 siječnja 1945-3.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:02, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
Official symbols. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
- @EugeneZelenko these symbols were created by me, while I worked in the organization that uses them officially (2010-2016). I understand that they are indeed in public domain, but I'm not sure which license tag I should use. Can you please help me? Thank you. JonJon86 (talk) 15:37, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
- You need to dig into copyrights law of your country. Were copyrights transferred to organization or you retained them? It may depend on your contract. Some works of government may be exempted from copyrights. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:15, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Busto marques da silva.jpg
- File:Francisco Marques da Silva.jpg
- File:Uniformeparaquedista-portugal.jpg
- File:Portuguese Army's Pandur 2.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
- @EugeneZelenko These are all photos that I have taken or were given to me by the author. Should I provide individual copyright info for each of them? Where should I do it? Thank you. JonJon86 (talk) 15:40, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
- @EugeneZelenko Under Portuguese Law, "All photographs taken until 30 June 1970 are in the public domain in Portugal, as Decree Law n.° 334/97 of 27 November". Also, Freedom of panorama states that It is lawful, without the author's consent, to make the following uses of a work:[100/2017 Art.75(2)] ... use of works, such as works of architecture or sculpture, made to be located permanently in public places;[100/2017 Art.75(2.q)] "Use" includes taking a photograph of such a work and publishing it.[100/2017 Art.68]. As such, I believe the proper tag would be:
|
This work is in the public domain both in Portugal and in the United States because it was first published in Portugal (and not published in the U.S. within 30 days) and it was first published before 1 March 1989 without complying with U.S. copyright formalities, such as copyright notice and it is one of the following:
For background information, see the explanations on Non-U.S. copyrights.
As of 1 January 1996, the following were in the public domain in Portugal: works whose author died before 1946; anonymous works, works deemed to be anonymous, or works by a collective person whose authors were not individually identified, first published or disclosed before 1946; photographic works, works deemed to be photographic works or works of applied art created before 1 July 1970; news articles or economic, political or religious articles, published or disclosed before 1996, provided that rights have not been specifically reserved and mentions, wherever possible, the name of the author and of the publisher, of the title of the work and other elements enabling it to be identified. |
 |
- See Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Portugal for proper copyrights tags. It's hard to tell how permanently photos are. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:39, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
- @EugeneZelenko That's where I got the above tag from. All the photos were taken prior to 1970, so they should be in the public domain, as Decree Law n.° 334/97 of 27 November, shouldn't they? Thank you in advance! JonJon86 (talk) 13:53, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
- If photos are in public domain source/date of creation and license tag should clearly explain why. What about drawing? It's not photo. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:59, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
- @EugeneZelenko That's where I got the above tag from. All the photos were taken prior to 1970, so they should be in the public domain, as Decree Law n.° 334/97 of 27 November, shouldn't they? Thank you in advance! JonJon86 (talk) 13:53, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
- See Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Portugal for proper copyrights tags. It's hard to tell how permanently photos are. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:39, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used or used in promotional Wikidata item.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
- @EugeneZelenko These files were used in a wikipedia page that was, in the meantime, deleted, so it's ok for them to be deleted as well. JonJon86 (talk) 15:32, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
→ I started the OTRS release process and sent an e-mail to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org today. JonJon86 (talk) 08:44, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
- Ticket:2019051610003851 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 09:00, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:55, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination: files seems to have been shot before 1970. As for previous may 2019 batch uploader is welcomed to fill more accurately the Source description instead of "unknown" or "self-scanned".
Photos of photos, no evidence of publication, no authors.
- File:ALF Mota da Costa.jpg
- File:ALF Mota da Costa 02.jpg
- File:Major Luis Tinoco de Faria.jpg
- File:Serafim Soares Leite.jpg
- File:João da Silva Correia.jpg
- File:ADO 1930-1931.png
- File:Francisco marques da silva.jpeg
- File:Fernando R Rodrigues.jpg
- File:Fernando Raimundo Rodrigues.jpg
- File:Inauguracao marques da silva.jpg
- File:Carnaval sujo ovar.png
- File:Carnaval Antigo Ovar.png
Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:00, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
- Hi @Patrick Rogel: !
- All the photos were self-scanned and were originaly taken before july 1970.
- I uploaded them under this license:
|
|
This work is in the public domain both in Portugal and in the United States because it was first published in Portugal (and not published in the U.S. within 30 days) and it was first published before 1 March 1989 without complying with U.S. copyright formalities, such as copyright notice and it is one of the following:
For background information, see the explanations on Non-U.S. copyrights.
As of 1 January 1996, the following were in the public domain in Portugal: works whose author died before 1946; anonymous works, works deemed to be anonymous, or works by a collective person whose authors were not individually identified, first published or disclosed before 1946; photographic works, works deemed to be photographic works or works of applied art created before 1 July 1970; news articles or economic, political or religious articles, published or disclosed before 1996, provided that rights have not been specifically reserved and mentions, wherever possible, the name of the author and of the publisher, of the title of the work and other elements enabling it to be identified. |
|
- That puts them in the public domain without the need for a permission, no? JonJon86 (talk) 17:04, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
- May you precise how you are sure that File:Kaúlza de Arriaga.jpg, File:ALF Mota da Costa.jpg have been created before 1970? Thanks, --Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:17, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Patrick Rogel: I scanned File:Kaúlza de Arriaga.jpg from an army book published in 1961 and the person depicted in File:ALF Mota da Costa.jpg was KIA in 1961.[1] JonJon86 (talk) 22:01, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Patrick Rogel: Beside having access to historic documents and photos, I am a rollbacker in the Portuguese wiki. I fully understand how copyright works and whenever I can't find a photo in the public domain, I upload it to the local wiki under fair use. Please remove the deletion requests to my recent photos. JonJon86 (talk) 22:45, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Patrick Rogel: I scanned File:Kaúlza de Arriaga.jpg from an army book published in 1961 and the person depicted in File:ALF Mota da Costa.jpg was KIA in 1961.[1] JonJon86 (talk) 22:01, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
- May you precise how you are sure that File:Kaúlza de Arriaga.jpg, File:ALF Mota da Costa.jpg have been created before 1970? Thanks, --Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:17, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 22:36, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
One of these four has Metadata showing it was taken by a Joel Leal. Unlikely own work.
- File:Hippies ovar rei 2019.jpg
- File:Hippies ovar 2002.jpg
- File:Hippies ovar 1998.jpg
- File:Hippies ovar 2014.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:43, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Ellin Beltz: That's actually "João Leal" and that's my real name. The "joel" is probably my cam not recognizing the "ã" word. JonJon86 (talk) 17:32, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
- JonJon86 For best results send a note to COM:OTRS as shown on that page. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:05, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Ellin Beltz: Thank you! In the meantime, can you please dismiss the deletion request? Thank you!JonJon86 (talk) 09:32, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
- JonJon86: We both wait for closing administrator. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:46, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Ellin Beltz: Thank you! In the meantime, can you please dismiss the deletion request? Thank you!JonJon86 (talk) 09:32, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
- JonJon86 For best results send a note to COM:OTRS as shown on that page. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:05, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: own work credible, his website address linked from his userpages includes the typo "joaoolealaaee". --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:38, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Speedy delete, COM:CSD#G4 Recreation of content previously deleted per community consensus at Commons:Deletion requests/File:The Birth of Global Art.pdf. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 01:06, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:27, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE.
- File:Портрет Эмира Кустурицы.jpg
- File:Маяковский В.В..jpg
- File:Данилин.jpg
- File:Широков Евгений Николаевич.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:45, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
- The files are in use. Why OoS? --E4024 (talk) 04:59, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
- @E4024: Denisova Olesya Aleksandrovna is OOS though ru:Денисова, Олеся Александровна has been created after the launch of this DR. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:29, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
- User:Иван 1, even if you are the author, modern paintings require an OTRS permission. Please read the page I linked and act accordingly. Cheers. --E4024 (talk) 14:45, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
я автор — Preceding unsigned comment added by Иван 1 (talk • contribs) 15:33, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
- I said "even if you are the author"... --E4024 (talk) 15:42, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
Copyrighted work by Denisova Olesya Aleksandrovna, artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS.
- File:Гавриляченко Сергей Александрович.jpg
- File:Портрет поэта и актера Олега Груза.jpg
- File:Сидоров Ю.М. Народный артист балета.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:20, 17 May 2019 (UTC) ок.я все отправила — Preceding unsigned comment added by Иван 1 (talk • contribs) 07:36, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
- Ticket:2019051810001761 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 08:00, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Сидоров_Ю.М._Народный_артист_балета.jpg” under ticket:2019051810001761. --Ganímedes (talk) 18:20, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: most, kept one with an accepted permission. --Jcb (talk) 16:14, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
Copyrighted poster. Fallaner (talk) 06:10, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:26, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
Copyrighted poster. Fallaner (talk) 06:10, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:26, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
advertising Pippobuono (talk) 06:45, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:26, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Halimlounnas11 (talk · contribs)
[edit]All this photo are copyvio end or out of scope and small
- File:ALGER 5 OF ALGERIA.jpg
- File:Vol-algerie.jpg
- File:Eglise D alger.jpg
- File:Halim Algeria.jpg
- File:Desert flower1-Custom.jpg
- File:Téléchargement (2) Algiers mosque.jpg
- File:Algiers mosque new 2019.jpg
- File:Téléchargement (3) Algiers mosque.jpg
- File:Téléchargement (1) Algiers mosque.jpg
_Algiers_mosque.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Algiers_mosque.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Algiers_mosque.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Reda Kerbouche (talk) 08:14, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:27, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
Maybe not his/here own work, no Meta Data. small Reda Kerbouche (talk) 08:08, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Pi.1415926535 at 05:27, 19 Juni 2019 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Halimlounnas11 --Krdbot 12:51, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
Source doesn't match photograph and source site gives no basis for CC license. Likely copyvio. Abzeronow (talk) 14:54, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, I deleted a lot of his/her uploads due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 09:48, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This particular file may be "own work", but it also may be a derivative work of en:File:Bharatiya Janata Party logo.svg. If it is a considered a derivative work, then I don't think that it or the files File:Bharatiya Janata Party (icon).jpg, File:Lotus BJP Symbol.svg or File:Lotos flower symbol.svg can be kept per COM:PCP, unless the original lotus logo shown at bjp.org is within the public domain. The BJP is claiming copyright ownership over all of the content (inlcuding its logo/symbol) appearing on its website, and there's no indication they've released the lotus imagery under a free license. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:48, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
- Just going to add that there are other similiar files of the party's symbol found in Category:Bharatiya Janata Party. These too would seem to be derivative works. If the original imagery is considered to be protected by copyright, then these may also need to be deleted. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:04, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
- Image licensing is not my strong suit, so I'm not going to opine on this discussion specifically. However, this particular symbol keeps reappearing on en.wiki, frequently after being uploaded by a drive-by editor. If this discussion determines that the symbol is inappropriate for commons, perhaps it would be worth requesting an edit filter, which flags images containing "political party symbol" and permutations thereof in the description? Vanamonde93 (talk) 16:05, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Because I think it is not a copyvio because it comes from a website with proper license.--√Tæ√ 06:52, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
- I think you're referring to File:Lotus BJP Symbol.svg. The source given for that file is openclipart.org/detail/179379/lotus-bjp-symbol, but the link is dead. That particular version of the BLP's symbol might be freely licensed, but the actual version of the symbol being used by the BLP (en:File:Bharatiya Janata Party logo.svg) doesn't seemed to be released under a free license. I'm not sure whether the clip art version is a derivative of the actual logo, or whether it's an unintentional case of COM:LL, even by the BLP iself if they got the image from somewhere else. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:11, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
Please don't mix the deletion requests for several files together. --Furfur ⁂ Diskussion 14:33, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: There is no evidence that this drawing has been released under free license or that the author gave permission. The drawing has complex shapes and is clearly above COM:TOO. This file and the COM:DW are going to be deleted. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 16:03, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
- Keep This is an SVG version of a black and white Lotus flower sketch as usually used in Indian elections. This symbol has been printed for decades on virtually billions of ballot papers during Indian elections. It is not copyrighted. See here: File:India National Level Parties symbols.JPG. --Furfur ⁂ Diskussion 14:32, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
- Keep as above. 大诺史 (talk) 07:23, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: There is no evidence that this drawing has been released under free license or that the author gave permission. The drawing has complex shapes and is clearly above COM:TOO. This file and the COM:DW are going to be deleted.
@Furfur: The fact that is has been printed on ballots is not a valid rationale. It doesn't mean that it's not under copyrigjt. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 16:04, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Arthur Crbz: please look at File:India National Level Parties symbols.JPG. --Furfur ⁂ Diskussion 16:29, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
non notable Buckaroo bob 91 (talk) 03:56, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no meaningful contributions. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:05, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
unused personal image. Zinnmann (talk) 07:30, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, only used on self promotional draft page, not a meaningful contributor. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:12, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
Stated as depicting deleted wikidata:Q84364433. Promotional image. No educational value and therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 09:36, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:01, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
I feel this is above the threshold of originality, especially considering it's a UK logo. Ixfd64 (talk) 07:37, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:12, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
Advertisement for a non-notable company. Ixfd64 (talk) 07:40, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:13, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
Advertisement for non-notable company. Ixfd64 (talk) 07:43, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:13, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Photo already uploaded some years ago, sorry : File:1985 at Mae Sai-Tachileik Bridge. Spielvogel Archiv.jpg Spielvogel (talk) 07:44, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, duplicate of File:1985 at Mae Sai-Tachileik Bridge. Spielvogel Archiv.jpg. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:14, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
The globe is likely above the threshold of originality. Logo is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 07:44, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:15, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
maybe not his/here own work, out of scope Reda Kerbouche (talk) 08:16, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:18, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
no longer used. per request. Gcd822 (talk) 08:19, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:18, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
Some photos are Copyvio the rest is out of scope and maybe not his/here own work
- File:البريد المركزي بالجزائر العاصمة.jpg
- File:أعالي جبال بجاية.jpg
- File:قسنطينة من السماء.jpg
- File:مبنى يعود للقرن 19 -وهران.jpg
- File:مسجد الأمير عبد القادر.jpg
- File:حديقة بمنطقة المنصورة -الجزائر.jpg
- File:المسجد الأعظم -الجزائر.jpg
- File:مسجد الأمير عبد القادر من داخل الأسوار.jpg
Reda Kerbouche (talk) 08:21, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:19, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
This is my photo and some people use it for commercial purposes. I want also to delete all of my works from this page. How can i do this? Samirzahirovic (talk) 08:55, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Speedy keepWhen you license an image under a CC license, you are permitting anyone to use that image for any purposes, including commercial purposes. It should also be advised that CC license are non-revokable, so this deletion request would be invalid.廣九直通車 (talk) 10:27, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per above. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:20, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
I want to add to all my photos "NonCommercial NonCommercial (nc)" , I am not allowing people to use this for commercial purposes. Othervise please delete all my photos. Samirzahirovic (talk) 18:48, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Licensing on Commons is irrevocable. Andy Dingley (talk) 21:20, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose The argument given by Andy is solid. Sadko (talk) 00:03, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:51, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
Please delete. I am the photographer and please do what i'm asking 2A02:27B0:4C00:DDF0:895A:3C19:AF00:1990 07:52, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Creative Commons licences are irrevokable. Please stop filing multiple requests. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 08:30, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
Please delete, Its my work and i dont want it to be here anymore 2A02:27B0:4C00:68A0:CD44:CB25:99EE:6F2E 19:19, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
Kept: As before. Please stop filing these, they aren't getting deleted. Any more and your IP space will start getting blocked. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:08, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
Please delete this photo. This is my work and i would like to delte all my files from wikimedia. Give me some e-mal from legal department i dont have tim to watch this stupid forums and search for messages., Samirzahirovic (talk) 19:42, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --1989 (talk) 19:44, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Unused files. Out of Com:PS.
- File:Maymunah bint harith.png
- File:زین العبدین 001 JPG.jpg
- File:Husayn Ibn Ali 003.jpg
- File:Abbas Bin Ali Calligraphy.jpg
- File:Al Anbiyah The Prophets.png
Hanooz 09:01, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:21, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nairabele kob (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope personal photos
- File:Nairabele3.jpg
- File:Nairabele1.jpg
- File:Nairabele88.jpg
- File:Nairabele09.jpg
- File:Nairabele8.jpg
- File:Nairabele34.jpg
- File:Nairabele90.jpg
- File:Nairabele66.jpg
- File:Nairabele345.jpg
- File:Nairabele.jpg
- File:USER SCOPED TEMP DATA orca-image-1556351738203.jpg 1556362215454.jpg
- File:Nairabele85.png
- File:Nairabele998.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 09:28, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:37, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
out of scope - unused & unusable election results Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 11:28, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:38, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
unused file ; election that never happened, out of scope : this category is for actual elections, not fantasy Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 12:49, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:38, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
unused test file Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 12:54, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:39, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
unused personal image Migebert (talk) 13:50, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:39, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. Used on user page. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:40, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:40, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:40, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:40, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
Unused personal photo of unknown person not realistically useful for educational purposes. Nv8200p (talk) 17:17, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:41, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
Out of project scope, because it is very blurry. Taivo (talk) 17:49, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:41, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
Unused personal image, and probably from Facebook. E4024 (talk) 18:28, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per E4024.--Roy17 (talk) 13:25, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:42, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
Out of project scope? Taivo (talk) 18:32, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:42, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
low quality mspaint doodle of Category:North Dawu Mountain. Roy17 (talk) 19:49, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:43, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
Sorry, in my opinion text spoils the photo. Out of project scope due to bad quality. Taivo (talk) 20:02, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:44, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
Because It is one error Gureesku (talk) 20:15, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:44, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
unused personal image, advertising Migebert (talk) 22:25, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:44, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
Per File:Александр Морозов.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:34, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
- Ticket:2019060410009287 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 22:00, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:28, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
Small file without camera EXIF, by a newcomer. Dubious "own work". E4024 (talk) 14:18, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
- User uploaded 3 other images, 2 have Exif and one is an has been extracted of an image with OTRS. All 3 original images aren't found on Google. Why not assume good faith? DGtal (talk) 11:40, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
- Why? Why don't you assume good faith on this scribe? The third image you are referring to belongs to Noa Kirel. I made her category. Then I was good and now am bad? If a newcomer uploads some images with EXIF, and some without, we may check that. It's a routine operation. Please try to avoid casting doubt on established users. The closing admin is as intelligent as both of us, BTW. --E4024 (talk) 18:35, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: https://13news.co.il/10news/celebs/174574. -- Geagea (talk) 05:51, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Employee1450 (talk · contribs)
[edit]I don't see any educational value in these texts.
- File:كعب بن لؤي.png
- File:مرة بن كعب.png
- File:كلاب بن مُرة.png
- File:قُـصَيّ ابْـن كِـلَاب ابْـن مُـرَّ.png
- File:عبد مناف المغيرة بن قصي.png
- File:Hamzahibnabdulmutalib.jpg
- File:Rinchin.jpg
- File:Bulbul Shah.jpg
- File:Alfathnameofallah2.png
- File:Alfathnameofallah.png
- File:Karj.png
- File:Rajtirangani.png
- File:مولانا طارق جمیل.png
- File:عمران نزار حسين.png
- File:بان٘گِ دَرا بان٘گِ دَرا.png
- File:محمد اِقبال.png
- File:ورقه بن نوفل بن أسد بن عبد العزّى بن قصي القرشي.png
- File:بحيرى.png
- File:أَبُو طَالِب ابْن عَبْد ٱلْمُطَّلِب.png
- File:هاشم بن عبد مناف.png
- File:شيبة ابن هاشم عبد المطّلب.png
- File:Moulana Tariq J.gif
- File:Moulana Inamul Hasan.gif
- File:Moulana Yousuf.gif
- File:Moulana Ilyas.gif
- File:Haji Abdul Wahab.gif
- File:عبدالله بن محمد.png
- File:Qasim Ibn Muhammad.png
- File:Aminah bint Wahab.png
- File:Abdullah ibn Abd al-Muttalib.png
- File:Maymunah bint al-Harith al-Hilaliyah.png
- File:Safiyyah bint Huyayy.png
- File:Rayhāna bint Zayd.png
- File:Ramla bint Abi Sufyan.png
- File:Juwayriya bint al-Harith.png
- File:Zaynab bint Khateeja.png
- File:Mariaqibtiyah.png
- File:Abu Talib.png
- File:Bahira.png
- File:Waraqah.png
Hanooz 08:45, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
- P.S: The uploader added some of these to the Wikipedia articles en:Special:Diff/873961980/877612459. Hanooz 08:47, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: pure text, out of scope. --4nn1l2 (talk) 10:00, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
not necessarily in the public domain: https://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/html/object_page/lu3_1.html
The hosting page contains this note:
(Luna 3-1, Russian Space Agency, not necessarily in the public domain)
either way, I think the original reason the photo was credited to public domain, that it was wholly created by NASA, is clearly inaccurate since it's a photo from a soviet probe. 2405:B000:602:2:0:0:120:173 05:23, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Not necessarily in the public domain, does not mean it is not. Photo is shared on NASA site and it is irrelevant what probe took the photo. Jirka.h23 (talk) 12:14, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete clearly under copyright Kees08 (talk) 15:53, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. Image by the Soviet Luna-3 lunar flyby, not produced by NASA. Images by the Russian space agency, both former and current, are not released under a free license by default, and there is no evidence this image is any exception. Simply being hosted on the NASA website does not mean an image is released from copyright. — Huntster (t @ c) 23:13, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- Not Delete image is not under copyright per PD-RU-trivial-securitycam Chinger (talk) 02:42, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
- Chinger, this situation likely fails the last sentence of {{PD-RU-trivial-securitycam}}...even back then, the images were post-processed in some way, shape or form, even if it was simply taking individual film tracks and laying them out side by side, and rephotographing the result. That template is really only for unaltered, raw security/surveillance cam footage. — Huntster (t @ c) 03:16, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
- What film tracks? It was translated on Earth by radio and there was no way to make any real post-processing back in this time Chinger (talk) 23:55, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
- See en:Lunar Orbiter program#Data availability for a contemporary example of this kind of thing. At least in that example, there was most certainly human interaction to achieve the final product. I would suspect the Soviet process was fairly similar, unless you have evidence to the contrary. — Huntster (t @ c) 03:55, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
- I think this is made directly from the raw data received on Earth. I've seen versions in which the noise in the transmission was airbrushed out, but this is before that change. Bubba73 (talk) 17:38, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
- And since this is a surveillance photo taken by an automatic camera, with no alteration by humans, I don't think there is any copyrightable content. Bubba73 (talk) 15:15, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
- The problem is proving there was no human interaction; it's not something we can assume. Personally, I find that highly unlikely, especially for material dating back to the early days of spaceflight. — Huntster (t @ c) 20:40, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
- You can see that this is unaltered because it has all of the transmission noise in the image. Compare it to the version that WAS altered by people: File:Image invisible hemisphere of the Moon from Luna-3.gif. Bubba73 (talk) 23:45, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
- That is the appearance, that is not necessarily the fact. There is a very distinct difference between those two concepts. This requires facts from the Russian agency in charge, which someone is attempting to get. Unfortunately, so far there has been no answer. Without that information, we are forced to fall back on COM:PCP. — Huntster (t @ c) 02:15, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
- The image appears that it is not altered by people. So there is no reason to believe otherwise, unless someone proves it.Jirka.h23 (talk) 07:16, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
- You can see that this is unaltered because it has all of the transmission noise in the image. Compare it to the version that WAS altered by people: File:Image invisible hemisphere of the Moon from Luna-3.gif. Bubba73 (talk) 23:45, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
- The problem is proving there was no human interaction; it's not something we can assume. Personally, I find that highly unlikely, especially for material dating back to the early days of spaceflight. — Huntster (t @ c) 20:40, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
- And since this is a surveillance photo taken by an automatic camera, with no alteration by humans, I don't think there is any copyrightable content. Bubba73 (talk) 15:15, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
- What film tracks? It was translated on Earth by radio and there was no way to make any real post-processing back in this time Chinger (talk) 23:55, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
- Chinger, this situation likely fails the last sentence of {{PD-RU-trivial-securitycam}}...even back then, the images were post-processed in some way, shape or form, even if it was simply taking individual film tracks and laying them out side by side, and rephotographing the result. That template is really only for unaltered, raw security/surveillance cam footage. — Huntster (t @ c) 03:16, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
- Keep I think this falls under en:WP:FU in a pretty straightforward manner. The first image of the far side of the Moon has self-evident gravitas for human understanding as a whole and is clearly relevant in the articles for which it's present. There's no other "first picture" of the far side of the Moon we could replace it with. That being said, the attribution is clearly wrong. SirCmpwn (talk) 17:15, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
- I have emailed the NASA curators of the photo. I don't expect a reply for a few days because of July 4 holiday. Bubba73 (talk) 23:56, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. There is nothing in the Russian copyright law that exempts this image from ordinary copyright protections. Ruslik (talk) 20:26, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
- Update The other day I asked about this at Commons:Village_pump/Copyright#Russia/USSR_copyright_question and they only gave a vague answer that it was the same as other spacecraft photos. I assume that means that it isn't copyrighted. Since this photo was taken automatically, and there was no human creating it, I don't think it is subject to copyright. Bubba73 (talk) 22:46, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
- Why on earth would you assume it means a *lack* of copyright? Copyright is the rule, not the exception. In other words, our precautionary principle holds that the lack of copyright must be proven, rather than the other way around. — Huntster (t @ c) 04:09, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
- Yeah, so according to the response, it seems that it is not subject to copyright. The same as other spacecraft photos, since no human created it. Jirka.h23 (talk) 07:16, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
- All spacecraft photos are protected by copyright. Ruslik (talk) 21:01, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
- Of course, this is under USSR law, so I don't know. But in US copyright law, a person has to do something creative to it to be copyrightable. That isn't the case of a photograph taken automatically by an unmanned spacecraft. Also under US law for 1959, a copyright could be registered for 27 years and then it could be extended once for an additional 27 years. In the US, that would have expired. I don't know what USSR law was. Bubba73 (talk) 22:38, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
- USSR does not exist any more and its laws are irrelevant. What really matters is the contemporary Russian law. Ruslik (talk) 18:27, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- Of course, this is under USSR law, so I don't know. But in US copyright law, a person has to do something creative to it to be copyrightable. That isn't the case of a photograph taken automatically by an unmanned spacecraft. Also under US law for 1959, a copyright could be registered for 27 years and then it could be extended once for an additional 27 years. In the US, that would have expired. I don't know what USSR law was. Bubba73 (talk) 22:38, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
- Keep From appearance this photo looks un-stitched and doesn't look post-processed in any other way. In Russia photographs taken with automatic cameras do not get not copyright, because such work "is made by technical tool without creative human activity".
Also in the US this photo did not obtain copyright because Soviet 25 years copyright expired in 1984, and URAA which retrospectively restored w:Berne Convention copyright terms, importantly did not "if the restored copyright would be owned by a government or instrumentality thereof", which clearly includes Soviet space agencies and this photo.[but see below - still no US copyright as Soviets not a Berne Convention party in 1959.] Also Berne Convention terms for plain photos are a minimum of 25 years, so even without this exemption, it would still be expired rather than restored. So it appears no copyright in RU or US. More detail on this argument is in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Image invisible hemisphere of the Moon from Luna-3.gif. Rwendland (talk) 10:12, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
- ... Struck out incorrect info above, the foreign government exemption only applies to IPR once administered by the Office of Alien Property Custodian. Need to reflect if on my Keep vote above now. Am doubtful this photo is an "original works of authorship" which URAA restores. Rwendland (talk) 13:49, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
- ... But US copyright still does not apply to this image as the Soviet Union was not party to the Berne Convention in 1959 at first publication (Russia first joined 1995-03-13), and U.S. Code § 104(b)(2) says US copyright only applies to works published "in a foreign nation that, on the date of first publication, is a treaty party". So my conclusion that there appears no copyright in RU or US stands. Rwendland (talk) 15:11, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
- The camera was not automatic. It was programmed by humans to take those image at specific moments of time, looking into pre-defined directions and with pre-defined exposure times. Ruslik (talk) 19:55, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
- Do you have a cite to back up your view of what an "automatic camera" is in this context? I have a cite, an academic level book published by Springer Science titled "Soviet and Russian Lunar Exploration", that says on page 188 that Zond 6 had an "automatic camera" to take moon photos. It's very likely its operation principles were fairly similar to the Luna 3 camera, so this is reasonable evidence that Luna 3 had an "automatic camera". Also the w:Luna 3 article says "a photocell was used to detect the Moon and orient the cameras toward it. Detection of the Moon signaled the camera ... to start automatically." That doesn't concur with your description above of how the camera was programmed. Rwendland (talk) 21:59, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
- The camera was not automatic. It was programmed by humans to take those image at specific moments of time, looking into pre-defined directions and with pre-defined exposure times. Ruslik (talk) 19:55, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
- that's right - it was made to start taking photos automatically when it detected the light from the Moon. Bubba73 (talk) 16:23, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
- Does everyone realize that there were no people on Luna 3? Who is the "author" of the photograph? Bubba73 (talk) 17:18, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
- Bubba, the question is not authorship per se, it's who the copyright holder is. That would be the then-Soviet/now-Russian government. I absolutely agree that the camera was automatic and pre-timed to perform its function. My argument is that we have absolutely no idea whose hands it passed through prior to being published, and I guarantee you that it was handled in some fashion. Even NASA cleans up and digitally manipulates in various ways the formally published imagery from their spacecraft. Believe me, the raw material from Hubble, for example, is not fit for a newspaper. If humans were involved in Luna-3 image, then it invalidates the "PD-RU-exempt-autocam" argument, which is what everyone seems to have been stuck on. Unfortunately we have no way to prove yes or no to that question...my emails to Roscosmos have certainly been ignored, at least. Ultimately, Commons lives or dies by the precautionary principle. Ignoring that violates the policy of this project. — Huntster (t @ c) 18:15, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
- Just from visual appearance, this photo looks like an untouched image, and File:Image invisible hemisphere of the Moon from Luna-3.gif looks like a cleaned up version. It is hard to believe this image has been cleaned up given its state with gross issues like dropped or un-synced lines. I'd keep this one in commons and delete File:Image invisible hemisphere of the Moon from Luna-3.gif. NB If you want more info on the Luna 3 radio image downloads read Jodrell Bank's and the CIA's account of monitoring the signals. Rwendland (talk) 00:15, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
- Bubba, the question is not authorship per se, it's who the copyright holder is. That would be the then-Soviet/now-Russian government. I absolutely agree that the camera was automatic and pre-timed to perform its function. My argument is that we have absolutely no idea whose hands it passed through prior to being published, and I guarantee you that it was handled in some fashion. Even NASA cleans up and digitally manipulates in various ways the formally published imagery from their spacecraft. Believe me, the raw material from Hubble, for example, is not fit for a newspaper. If humans were involved in Luna-3 image, then it invalidates the "PD-RU-exempt-autocam" argument, which is what everyone seems to have been stuck on. Unfortunately we have no way to prove yes or no to that question...my emails to Roscosmos have certainly been ignored, at least. Ultimately, Commons lives or dies by the precautionary principle. Ignoring that violates the policy of this project. — Huntster (t @ c) 18:15, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: as per Rwendland above. --Yann (talk) 05:20, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
It is a modified and low resolution version of this pic, which is copyrighted to the official website of Hisar district. NitinMlk (talk) 23:40, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 14:00, 25 Juli 2019 UTC: Copyright violation: low-resolution, modified version of a pic from https://web.archive.org/web/20110519085027/http://hisar.nic.in/historyhisar.aspx --Krdbot 18:34, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ponymusic47 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Sole uploads of the user but photos taken in 2013 and 2006. Dubious claim of own work, PCP
Gbawden (talk) 11:43, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:04, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
contemporary artwork, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 13:46, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
- Hallo Martin, warum fällt dieses Bild nicht unter Freedom of Panorama, die übrigen aber schon?--Submeir (talk) 16:23, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
- Die anderen (bislang von mir gesehenen) stammen aus dem Aussenbereich, die Panoramafreiheit greift hingegen nicht im Inneren.... Gruß, --Martin Sg. (talk) 18:11, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
- Im Prinzip richtig. Konsequent umgesetzt, müssten damit leider viele informative Bilder in Wikipedia wegfallen. Das eigentliche Problem liegt darin, dass Wiki zu Recht Gemeinfreiheit für Bilder beansprucht, aber Künstler, Architekten nicht die Bilder ihrer Werke gemeinfrei stellen wollen, die dann für jedermann verwertbar sind. Ausschließliche für Wiki würden Urheber/Rechteinhaber wohl eher freigeben, aber eben nicht gleich gemeinfrei. Hierfür sollte Wikipedia bitte nach einer praktikablen Lösung suchen. --Submeir (talk) 08:14, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
- Die anderen (bislang von mir gesehenen) stammen aus dem Aussenbereich, die Panoramafreiheit greift hingegen nicht im Inneren.... Gruß, --Martin Sg. (talk) 18:11, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:03, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
copyvio, artist died in 2012, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 13:52, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:02, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
copyvio, artist died in 2012, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 13:52, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:00, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
copyvio, artist died in 2012, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 13:53, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:59, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
copyvio, artist died in 2012, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 13:53, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:58, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
copyvio, artist died in 2012, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 13:53, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:57, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
Does this painting image not require OTRS? E4024 (talk) 16:50, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:53, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
Fake licence. Drawings most probably are got from a technical papers http://dkwr.ru/ Bilderling (talk) 17:16, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:52, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
Fake licence. Drawings most probably are got from a technical papers http://dkwr.ru/ Bilderling (talk) 17:17, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:52, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
Fake licence. Drawings most probably are got from a technical papers http://dkwr.ru/ Bilderling (talk) 17:17, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:52, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
Fake licence. Can't be own or free. Drawings most probably are got from a technical papers http://dkwr.ru/ . Lots of drawings are available there in PDFs.
- File:E-1-0.9r.jpg
- File:Дсе-2,5-14шп-2.jpg
- File:Де-16-14-380гмо.jpg
- File:Ке-4-14С.jpg
- File:Дквр-20-13с.jpg
- File:Е-1-0,9гм.jpg
- File:Дсе-2,5-14шп.jpg
Bilderling (talk) 17:17, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:52, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
Very low quality NMW03 (talk) 17:55, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
- @Jcb: --NMW03 (talk) 11:47, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:51, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
copyio, artist died in 2012, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 18:16, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:50, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
copyvio, contemporary artworks, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 18:16, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:49, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
copyvio, contemporary artworks, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 18:17, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:49, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
copyvio, contemporary artworks, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 18:17, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:49, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
copyvio, contemporary artworks, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 18:19, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:49, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
copyvio, contemporary artworks, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 18:19, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:48, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
copyvio, artist died in 2012, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 18:20, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:46, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
copyvio, artist died in 2012, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 18:20, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:44, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
copyvio, contemporary artwork, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 18:21, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:43, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
20 KB dubious own work. E4024 (talk) 18:29, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:42, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
3 KB, no EXIF. Dubious "own work". E4024 (talk) 18:30, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:41, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
Uploaded after Commons:Deletion requests/File:Robert Marty en toge.jpg (same case) and same file name with a deleted file. E4024 (talk) 13:43, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; unlikely to be own work. --Gbawden (talk) 07:31, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
If author is really Lobo Velar, then OTRS-permission is needed. No evidence, that uploader Isalgadof is the same person. Taivo (talk) 19:08, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:41, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
This cannot be 2018 photo, because depicted person died in 2011. Uploader has problems with copyright (look his/her talkpage). Small size, no metadata. I suspect copyright violation again. Taivo (talk) 19:18, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:40, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
image is sold on pictures, this is only a copy. see https://twitter.com/1404al/status/772132538638893056 Migebert (talk) 22:55, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:36, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks
- File:Memorial Demidovcev 6.jpg
- File:Memorial Demidovcev 7.jpg
- File:Memorial Demidovcev 5.jpg
- File:Memorial Demidovcev 3.jpg
- File:Memorial Demidovcev 4.jpg
- File:Memorial Demidovcev 2.jpg
- File:Memorial Demidovcev.jpg
- File:Monument to сossack Diomid P. I.jpg
- File:Sobchak's Grave.jpg
- File:Memorial plaque of A. S. Khomyakov.jpg
- File:Bust Chekhov.jpg
Dogad75 (talk) 06:05, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Comment - the images in question have {{OTRS pending}} tags. Ixfd64 (talk) 20:16, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:10, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
It is not clear where the photograph is located on the website given, but the website has copyright information. The metadata also contains the name of the author. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 08:05, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Hi, the picture was sent to me by the artist on my request. Should I ask for one other than the one that is on her website? Thank you. Femagap --Femagap (talk) 16:22, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
- Ticket:2019072510003634 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 16:00, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:14, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violation: https://www.flickr.com/photos/danielcheong/2364196202/in/album-72157603722308697/ . Original photographer's complaint submitted via OTRS #2019051510003031 Yunshui (talk) please ping me when replying; I'm rarely on Commons 13:31, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
- Support: @Yunshui: WikiCommons is not a place for pictures/photos with questionable copyright nature. I already replaced this pic in Tagalog Wikipedia articles with freely-licensed alternative onces, which are quite abundant (exempli gratia: File:KL_at_night.jpg, File:KL Night Scene 301015.jpg, File:Moonrise_over_kuala_lumpur.jpg, and File:KL Sentral at Night.jpg. So I support deletion with no objection.JWilz12345 (talk) 07:59, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:51, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I cannot see anything educational nor any Godiva chocolate in here. Godiva has enough money to make its own advertising, we should not support them. E4024 (talk) 16:30, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete educationally worthless. AshFriday (talk) 21:52, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
- Keep it's a play on words: en:Lady Godiva. If the mention of a brand name is so offensive, the file can easily be renamed. clpo13(talk) 19:38, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:46, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Ytoyoda as Dw no source since (dw no source since). However, the uploader claims to have taken the two component photos. This is an opportunity for them to demonstrate they own the copyright. Green Giant (talk) 20:00, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:45, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
This is coat of arms of ru:Тюкалинский уезд based at Tobolsk viceroyalty period (1785-1794). But historically this region has no CoA since 1867. So this file is original research and fake. Rave (talk) 05:00, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 06:49, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
Probably too complex to fall under the threshold of originality. Ixfd64 (talk) 07:42, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 06:50, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Cultural Center (Tbilisi)
[edit]The building is brand new, and there is no freedom of panorama. It is subject to copyright restrictions.
- File:0084 - Kaukasus 2014 - Georgien.jpg
- File:2014 Tbilisi, Centrum Kultury.jpg
- File:2014 Tbilisi, Park Rike (01).jpg
- File:2014 Tbilisi, Park Rike (03).jpg
- File:2014 Tbilisi, Widok z Mostu Pokoju na rzekę Kura i jej okolice (06).jpg
- File:2014 Tbilisi, Widok z Mostu Pokoju na rzekę Kura i jej okolice (08).jpg
- File:Stadtansicht Tiflis 17.jpg
- File:Stadtansicht Tiflis 6.jpg
- File:Stadtansicht Tiflis 8.jpg
- File:Tbilisi - center (9460900442).jpg
- File:Tbilisi IMG 5052 (27316770896).jpg
- File:Tbilisi IMG 8963 1920.jpg
- File:Tbilisi IMG 8978 1920.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Themightyquill (talk) 08:28, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 06:52, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
I couldn't find free license in the provided source. Hanooz 08:54, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete non free.--Roy17 (talk) 13:40, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 06:53, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
Image:Aswiki2019-Guwahati (10).jpg uploaded with a high quality Bishnu_Saikia (Talk) 10:46, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 06:54, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of paronama in South Korea B dash (talk) 12:37, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 06:57, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of paronama in South Korea B dash (talk) 12:41, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 06:57, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Historical photos. Not sure if own work.
- File:Назим Гаджиев с Александром Шелепиным на XII съезде ВЛКСМ 1956 год (Ширина 1024 Высота 768).jpg
- File:НАЗИМ ГАДЖИЕВ 1956 ГОД.jpg
- File:12 Н.С. Хрущев с В.Ю. Ахундовым, Н.М. Гаджиевым, В.Е.Семичастным, Ниязи и К.А. Каревым в Баку 1960 год (Ширина 2400 Высота 1800).jpg
- File:6 3-5 (Ширина 2400 Высота 1800).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Дима Г (talk) 07:43, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:02, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
- File:Назим Гаджиев среди делегатов XX съезда КПСС с высшим руководством СССР 1956 год (справа во втором ряду десятый, стоит над В.М. Молот.jpg
- File:2 Назим Гаджиев среди делегатов XX съезда КПСС с высшим руководством СССР 1956 год (справа во втором ряду десятый, стоит над В.М. Моло.jpg
- File:2 6 3-5 (Ширина 2400 Высота 1800) (Ширина 640 Высота 480) 2.jpg
_(%D0%A8%D0%B8%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B0_640_%D0%92%D1%8B%D1%81%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%B0_480)_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
With a possible exception of this, the user did not upload any own works and lied about authorship all the way. I speedied four other uploads by this user under COM:CSD #G4 – see the request above. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 06:37, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Their last upload has camera data and looks fine so I left it alone. --Majora (talk) 19:38, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
duplicate of File:ডেচ্দিমোনা কাব্য.djvu Gitartha.bordoloi (talk) 08:37, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. PDF link redirected. --Majora (talk) 19:41, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:কঃ পন্থাঃ.djvu Gitartha.bordoloi (talk) 08:49, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. PDF link redirected. --Majora (talk) 19:42, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Italy and the photo violates sculptor's (still living) copyright. OTRS-permission from Luca Pignatelli is needed. Taivo (talk) 11:34, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 19:43, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative work of a copyrighted object B dash (talk) 16:18, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 19:50, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative work of a copyrighted object B dash (talk) 16:18, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 19:50, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Copyrighted character Ymblanter (talk) 18:03, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 19:50, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Jordan and the photo violates architect's copyright. Taivo (talk) 21:34, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 19:49, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
It is Public Domain Mark. Some users argue that PDM leads to deletion. However, https://www.flickr.com/people/mturdestinos/ says, Todas as fotos com a tag MTurDestinos são de domínio público e tem permissão de uso livre e por tempo indeterminado para uso total e irrestrito e gratuito em praça nacional e internacional, exceto as imagens com a tag “fotos humanizadas 2018” que possuem pessoas onde o direito de uso é pelo período de 05 (cinco) anos a contar do dia 03 de Abril de 2018. I support Keep. Roy17 (talk) 21:41, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
- Personally I do not handle English and I understand very little the language of WikiCommons. The license was changed only by the 1.0 (the same as the photo on Flickr), when before it was, erroneously, the "Zero". Fixed up? --Adriel 00 (talk) 02:40, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
- Note: please close this only after a broad consensus is reached.--Roy17 (talk) 22:15, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
- For interested users, I had elaborated on the reasons to keep at Commons:Deletion requests/File:GleidsonSantos Igreja de Sao Francisco Paulo Afonso BA.jpg Commons:Undeletion_requests/Archive/2019-05#photos_from_MTur_Destinos.--Roy17 (talk) 19:00, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:PDM is not an acceptable license unless some other acceptable license also applies. --Majora (talk) 19:47, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
- @Majora: the Portuguese statement is All photos tagged MTurDestinos are in the public domain and are free to use indefinitely for full and unrestricted free national and international use except images tagged with “humanized 2018 photos” that contain people where right of use is for a period of five (5) years from April 3, 2018. (translated by Google). It is explicitly free and unrestricted. I believe that's enough.--Roy17 (talk) 20:08, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
- It's comparable to the wording in {{PD-self}}—for any purpose, without any conditions.--Roy17 (talk) 20:16, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
COM:NUDE, out of scope funplussmart (talk) 22:36, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Educationally worthless. AshFriday (talk) 22:35, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Okay coming back here I realize that this file has a derivative work (File:Mooning butts crop.jpg) that does appear to be in good faith use. Due to the fact that this file would have to be kept for copyright reasons I do withdraw my nomination. funplussmart (talk) 16:10, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn and in scope anyways in my opinion. --Majora (talk) 00:11, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Екатерина Борисова (talk · contribs)
[edit]No COM:FOP in Russia.
- File:Москва, пер. Достоевского, батальное полотно 04 (фрагмент).jpg
- File:Москва, пер. Достоевского, батальное полотно 01.jpg
- File:Москва, пер. Достоевского, батальное полотно 03 (фрагмент).jpg
- File:Москва, пер. Достоевского, батальное полотно 02 (фрагмент).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:42, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 00:22, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Екатерина Борисова (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not own works as claimed by the uploader, but derivatives of non-free (due to their age) sculptures. No FoP in Russia and Ukraine for such artworks.
- File:Ermilovo. War memorial 02.jpg
- File:Ermilovo. War memorial 01.jpg
- File:Manola. War memorial 01.jpg
- File:Manola. War memorial 02.jpg
- File:Парк Победы. Шахматно-шашечный павильон. Скульптура Фронт.jpg
- File:Парк Победы. Шахматно-шашечный павильон. Скульптура Тыл.jpg
- File:Кингисепп. Мемориал в Роще 500 02.jpg
- File:Кингисепп. Мемориал в Роще 500 03.jpg
- File:Приозерск. Ленин в Разливе 01.jpg
- File:Приозерск. Ленин в Разливе 02.jpg
- File:Приозерск. Памятник Ленину 01.jpg
- File:Приозерск. Памятник Ленину 02.jpg
- File:Пушкин. Памятник Тельману 4.jpg
- File:Пушкин. Памятник Тельману 2.jpg
- File:Кингисепп. Скорбященская церковь 02.jpg
- File:Кингисепп. Памятник партизанам.jpg
- File:Москва, Спиридоновка, памятник Блоку.jpg
- File:Москва, Преображенская площадь. Памятник С. Л. Бухвостову 2.jpg
- File:Москва, Преображенская площадь. Памятник С. Л. Бухвостову.jpg
- File:Усадьба Измайлово. Памятник Петру.jpg
- File:Колпино. Ленин.jpg
- File:Приморский парк Победы, памятник Кирову04.jpg
- File:Приморский парк Победы, памятник Кирову03.jpg
- File:Приморский парк Победы, памятник Кирову01.jpg
- File:Приморский парк Победы, памятник Кирову02.jpg
- File:Каменноостровский, 14 05.jpg kept
- File:Каменноостровский, 14 04.jpg kept
- Качество и размер не позволяют полноценно увидеть барельефы на этой и предыдущей фотографиях, дабы оно хоть как-то вышло за De minimis. Сами доски при этом тривиальны и состоят только из текста. Красный wanna talk? 21:43, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- File:Измайловский сад. Ангел Петербурга.jpg
- File:Московский парк Победы. Гречко.jpg
- File:Остров Декабристов. Братская могила рабочих завода имени Калинина 02.jpg
- File:Мартышкинский мемориал. Южная часть. Тимченко.jpg
- File:Мартышкинский мемориал. Южная часть. Андреев.jpg
- File:Мартышкинский мемориал. Южная часть. Щербаков.jpg
- File:Мартышкинский мемориал. Южная часть02.jpg
- File:Мартышкинский мемориал. Северная часть 02.jpg
- File:Мартышкинский мемориал. Северная часть 03.jpg
- File:Стрельна. Мемориал на Стрельнинском кладбище 04.jpg
- File:Стрельна. Мемориал на Стрельнинском кладбище 03.jpg
- File:Красное Село. Бюст Можайского.jpg
- File:Всеволожск. Мемориал 'Румболовская гора'.jpg
- File:Усадьба Измайлово. Собор Покрова Пресвятой Богородицы, мем. доска.jpg
- File:Мясницкая 21. доска 1980 года.jpg kept
- Ну, если въедаться, то конкретно эта доска является производной работой от известной картины и портрета, оба на момент создания мемориальной доски уже находились в общественном достоянии. Красный wanna talk? 19:58, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- File:Гагарина 27, Гастелло 30.jpg
- File:Гагарина 21, Фрунзе 29.jpg
- File:Памятник Калинину на пл. Калинина02.jpg
- File:Памятник Калинину на пл. Калинина03.jpg
- File:Памятник Калинину на пл. Калинина01.jpg
- File:Крупская у ДК Крупской04.jpg
- File:Крупская у ДК Крупской03.jpg
- File:Ленин у Невского завода03.jpg kept
- File:Ленин у Невского завода04.jpg kept
- File:Ленин у Невского завода02dif.jpg kept
- Ленин у Невского завода изготовлен в 1926 году, автор умер в 1930 году. Сделала соответствующие добавления в описаниях фотографий и в категории памятника. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 20:55, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- File:Памятник Володарскому03.jpg
- File:Памятник Володарскому01.jpg
- File:Памятник Володарскому02.jpg
- File:Памятник Героическому комсомолу04.jpg
- File:Памятник Героическому комсомолу03.jpg
- File:Памятник Героическому комсомолу02.jpg
- File:Памятник Кирову01.jpg
- File:Памятник Кирову02.jpg
- File:Пушкин. Памятник Тельману.jpg
- File:Кобона, воинский мемориал, памятник02.jpg
- File:Кобона, воинский мемориал, памятник03.jpg
- File:Лысьва. Церковно-приходская школа (ул. Мира 6)01.jpg
- File:Лысьва. Памятник погибшим за Советскую власть на Урале01.jpg
- File:Onezhskaya Embankment, Victory Park & Fishermen sculpture01.jpg
- File:Onezhskaya Embankment, Victory Park & Fishermen sculpture03.jpg
- File:Onezhskaya Embankment, Victory Park & Fishermen sculpture02.jpg
- File:Памятник П. Ф. Виноградову, Троицкий пр. 02.jpg
- File:Памятник П. Ф. Виноградову, Троицкий пр. 01.jpg
- File:Ржевская улица, знак Ржевский коридор03.jpg
- File:Ржевская улица, знак Ржевский коридор02.jpg
- File:Литовская 2И 02.jpg
- File:Крупская у ДК Крупской02.jpg
- File:Крупская у ДК Крупской01.jpg
- File:Московская площадь. Ленин02.jpg
- File:Московская площадь. Ленин03.jpg
- File:Московская площадь. Ленин01.jpg
- File:Обелиск Севера08.jpg
- File:Обелиск Севера07.jpg
- File:Обелиск Севера06.jpg
- File:Обелиск Севера05.jpg
- File:Обелиск Севера04.jpg
- File:Обелиск Севера02.jpg
- File:Обелиск Севера03.jpg
- File:Обелиск Севера01.jpg
- File:Segezha07 2.jpg
- File:Сквер Андрея Петрова.jpg
- File:Страстной б-р, памятник Твардовскому.JPG
- File:Сретенский бульвар, памятник Шухову.JPG
- File:Б. Никитская 13. Памятник Чайковскому.JPG
- File:Арсенальная, памятник Саше Кондратьеву.jpg
- File:Дусьево.jpg
- File:Лагерный сад.Монумент славы.jpg
- File:Nikita7549.JPG
- File:Kiev3169.JPG
- File:Kiev3168.JPG
- File:Парк Победы.Мальчик06.JPG
- File:Парк Победы.Мальчик05.JPG
- File:Парк Победы.Мальчик04.JPG
- File:Парк Победы.Физк01.JPG
- File:Парк Победы.Зоя02.JPG
- File:Парк Победы.Зоя01.JPG
- File:Парк Победы.Мальчик03.JPG
- File:Segezha07.JPG
- File:Segezha02.jpg
01.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
VLu (talk) 07:00, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- Судя по вашей странице обсуждения, вам можно писать по-русски. Я понимаю суть проблемы, однако впервые сталкиваюсь с формулировкой "Not own works as claimed by the uploader". Обычно пишут "No FoP in Russia" и этого достаточно для обозначения сути претензии. Поэтому прежде всего возникает вопрос: должна ли я дополнительно доказывать, что фотографии сделаны именно мною, или все-таки будем обсуждать свободу панорамы (или ее отсутствие) для того или иного снимка? То, что не я сама сотворила все изображенные памятники, надеюсь, обсуждать не требуется. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 16:54, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- Екатерина Борисова, если вы это понимаете, удивительно, что в описании этих фотографий, равно как и фото других объектов, срок охраны АП которых истёк согласно законам стран происхождения, вы, имея целый набор флагов, которые должны демонстрировать уважение к авторским правам и понимание необходимости их соблюдения в данном проекте, не указываете ни авторов, ни даты создания оригинальных произведений, ни статус ваших фотографий как производных работ. Для этого имеется, в частности, удобный шаблон {{Copyright information}}. --VLu (talk) 17:18, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- Я прошу прощения, но мне не менее удивительно, что вы не обратили никакого внимания на описания фотографий, большинство из которых загружено на конкурс Wiki Loves Monuments и снабжены соответствующим шаблоном объекта культурного наследия России (cultural heritage object in Russia) с номером объекта. По клику на номер можно получить карточку с полным описанием объекта, а по клику на описание шаблона (guidelines) - исчерпывающее объяснение, каким образом загружаются подобные снимки. Это всё используется много лет и, казалось бы, должна выработаться уже определенная схема взаимодействия между всеми участниками процесса, но, тем не менее, находятся люди, которые не считают нужным ничего читать. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 17:31, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- Ваша попытка перехода в атаку крайне неуместна. Если я правильно понял эту тираду, вы загружали эти изображения, заведомо зная, что они грубо нарушают авторские права создателей и правила Commons. Это, знаете ли, очень плохо сочетается с наличием у вашей учётной записи нескольких флагов. --VLu (talk) 17:35, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- У меня нет ни малейшего желания кого-либо атаковать, однако я все-таки настоятельно прошу вас изучить шаблон культурного наследия России, который создавался, в числе прочего, еще и для того, чтобы не приходилось вступать в такого рода дискуссии. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 17:40, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- Ваша попытка перехода в атаку крайне неуместна. Если я правильно понял эту тираду, вы загружали эти изображения, заведомо зная, что они грубо нарушают авторские права создателей и правила Commons. Это, знаете ли, очень плохо сочетается с наличием у вашей учётной записи нескольких флагов. --VLu (talk) 17:35, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- Я прошу прощения, но мне не менее удивительно, что вы не обратили никакого внимания на описания фотографий, большинство из которых загружено на конкурс Wiki Loves Monuments и снабжены соответствующим шаблоном объекта культурного наследия России (cultural heritage object in Russia) с номером объекта. По клику на номер можно получить карточку с полным описанием объекта, а по клику на описание шаблона (guidelines) - исчерпывающее объяснение, каким образом загружаются подобные снимки. Это всё используется много лет и, казалось бы, должна выработаться уже определенная схема взаимодействия между всеми участниками процесса, но, тем не менее, находятся люди, которые не считают нужным ничего читать. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 17:31, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- Екатерина Борисова, если вы это понимаете, удивительно, что в описании этих фотографий, равно как и фото других объектов, срок охраны АП которых истёк согласно законам стран происхождения, вы, имея целый набор флагов, которые должны демонстрировать уважение к авторским правам и понимание необходимости их соблюдения в данном проекте, не указываете ни авторов, ни даты создания оригинальных произведений, ни статус ваших фотографий как производных работ. Для этого имеется, в частности, удобный шаблон {{Copyright information}}. --VLu (talk) 17:18, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
@VLu: Хотя формально вы правы насчёт несвободы панорамы, следует всё-таки воздерживаться от таких утверждений, как "Not own works". Фотографии сделаны Екатериной и являются её работой с соответствующими правами, другое дело, что согласно политике Викисклада их нельзя сюда выкладывать. --A.Savin 19:08, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: com:FOP. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 10:10, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
There are recognisable people and this is not allowed in Mexico as explained here: Commons:Country specific consent requirements GiorgioGaleotti (talk) 21:35, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Kept: According to this, "portraits" are not allowed without consent. People here are hardly recognizable. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:23, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Trivialist as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Image is a screenshot of a video not created by the uploader — billinghurst sDrewth 10:56, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
- This video, screenshot or audio excerpt was originally uploaded on YouTube under a CC license. --Trade (talk) 13:36, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete w:Yandere Simulator is unfree.--Roy17 (talk) 13:44, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per User:Roy17. --Y.haruo (talk) 20:45, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Screenshot, similar to https://rus.tvnet.lv/6463924/nikita-mihalkov-u-yuriya-dudya-cenzura-gei-i-bad-comedian Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:50, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 20:50, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
i dont want it. I have a better version of it Shiba.molekoa (talk) 19:28, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: the creator requested deletion of page: author's request on creation week. --Y.haruo (talk) 21:02, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
я хочу удалить свое фото MariaSemionova (talk) 19:52, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: the uploader requested deletion of page: author's request on creation day. --Y.haruo (talk) 21:03, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
Fonte Trabalho próprio pelo carregador. Não existe fonte que á o autor do brasão. Source Own work by the loader. There is no source that the author of the image O revolucionário aliado (talk) 21:11, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 21:08, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
Fonte Trabalho próprio pelo carregador. Não existe fonte que á o autor do brasão. Source Own work by the loader. There is no source that the author of the image O revolucionário aliado (talk) 21:14, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 21:09, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
copyvio, contemporary artwork (p. 1990), no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 13:54, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 22:35, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
almost same as File:Benassal - 12.jpeg Triplecaña (talk) 15:35, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 22:36, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by César Omar Muñoz Arias (talk · contribs)
[edit]All the flags are unused and almost identical, keeping only the most recently uploaded version – File:BANDERA DE LA ENCARNACIÓN DE DÍAZ JALISCO.png + white square, out of scope/pointless.
- File:Bandera de la Encarnación.png
- File:Bandera de la Encarnación de Díaz.png
- File:Encarnación de Díaz Bandera.png
- File:Bandera de la Chona.png
- File:Blanco.jpg
TFerenczy (talk) 19:40, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 22:37, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
1943 image, by George Bull (1910-1996). Source states copyright unknown. No indication whether government work or not, so cannot apply crown copyright. Best guess is 1996 death so out of copyright in 2067 — billinghurst sDrewth 10:52, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
- Comment If the decision is to delete, then move to English Wikipedia prior to deleting as it is a minimal image and should be able to be hosted with appropriate licence. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:54, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Reuploaded directly to enwiki. --Majora (talk) 19:49, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope. Mhhossein talk 13:24, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Also affected:
-Regards. --Mhhossein talk 12:09, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 19:51, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
date and source of any publication prior to 20 year old must be indicated so anyone can check it, and clear evidence that the image was taken more than 25 years ago must be given. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:24, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The person died over 25 years ago but we don't know when it was first published so unfortunately there is not enough information to confirm the license. --Majora (talk) 22:57, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
viola derechos personales Ozymandias69 (talk) 17:59, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused, out of scope image. --Majora (talk) 22:58, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
We do not have any article in WPs about the slain police officer. We have another pic of the lady though: File:IBRAHIM LEBAR (8532767369).jpg. I think two pics of an out of scope person are too many. Keep one of them in case. E4024 (talk) 18:38, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
- Well, now I find out that we also have the daughter: File:IBRAHIM LEBAR (8533876466).jpg. --E4024 (talk) 18:45, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Comment If we're going to delete one, delete File:IBRAHIM LEBAR (8532767369).jpg since it's less useful and lower quality than this one. clpo13(talk) 19:40, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: All three mentioned are out of scope for this project. No need to have non-notable identifiable people per COM:BLP. --Majora (talk) 01:57, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
National Library for Ireland on the Commons does not permit commercial use ... http://www.nli.ie/en/flickr-commons.aspx Djm-leighpark (talk) 20:55, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- No known copyright restriction so they can't rule out possible commercial re-use. --Denniss (talk) 10:58, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
- Given their link above now is playing up (at least for me) here is the link to [a previously archived version at 1 May 2019 https://web.archive.org/web/20190501110209/http://www.nli.ie/en/flickr-commons.aspx]. There it is explicitly stated: Images in our Commons photostream are available for research for a non-commercial purpose or private study. ... which I assume is not compatible with Wikimedia Commons.Djm-leighpark (talk) 11:06, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
- It also says The Library's images within The Commons have no known copyright restrictions; this means that the National Library of Ireland is not aware of any current copyright restrictions on the photographs, usually because the Library owns the copyright or the term of copyright has expired. (emphasis mine). I'd guess this is a case where they're trying to assert rights over the digital reproductions of public domain works (like the National Portrait Gallery), a stance which is explicitly rejected on Wikimedia Commons per Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp (see COM:ART and COM:SCAN). clpo13(talk) 19:33, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
- It's best to quote the totality of the statement: The Library's images within The Commons have no known copyright restrictions; this means that the National Library of Ireland is not aware of any current copyright restrictions on the photographs, usually because the Library owns the copyright or the term of copyright has expired. ... I've bolded usually. My understanding is Mr. J.P. O'Dea passed away in 1992 so the term of copyright will typically not have expired. [2] also has information (NB: Press show/hide). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Djm-leighpark (talk • contribs) 09:08, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
- It also says The Library's images within The Commons have no known copyright restrictions; this means that the National Library of Ireland is not aware of any current copyright restrictions on the photographs, usually because the Library owns the copyright or the term of copyright has expired. (emphasis mine). I'd guess this is a case where they're trying to assert rights over the digital reproductions of public domain works (like the National Portrait Gallery), a stance which is explicitly rejected on Wikimedia Commons per Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp (see COM:ART and COM:SCAN). clpo13(talk) 19:33, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
Delete It is unfortunate but as User:Djm-leighpark states the photographer died in 1992 as stated on the NLI website, so their work will remain in copyright until 2063. User:clpo13 suggests copyfraud but that not the case, NLI just don't know the copyright status because editors have made direct inquiries in the past. They have some great images on Flickr and their own website but they must be used with care. Their images require some investigation and some of their images have been deleted once the photographer details are found. Ww2censor (talk) 22:16, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- The impact is quite high ... I count probably just over 150 images from transferred from NLI/Flickr-commons from this photographer ... at a guess maybe 30 used on articles (some used on more than one) and maybe up to 50 usable on articles, some currently hard to replace. But if they have to be mitigated the sooner this is obvious the better. I don't know the basis the NLI got the this collection ... whether it was bought or donated. .... I really just like to know exactly where I am writing articles. .... Hmmm. Djm-leighpark (talk) 15:27, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
- At the bottom of the Flickr The Commons license template it states: Please add additional copyright tags to this image if more specific information about copyright status can be determined. See Commons:Licensing for more information. so that's what we are doing here, determining the copyright status. You could of course ask at the NLI. I happen to be in Dublin next week but do not have the time to visit them. Please remember we don't have any deadlines on such matters, so they really only crop up when someone asks or discovers a possible issue. Unfortunately if the impact is high then so be it, I wish it were not. Perhaps a wider discussion should be started elsewhere. Ww2censor (talk) 17:32, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
- The ticket below was actually a email to the NLI by myself about another O'Dea image I would like to use which I cc'd to OTRS. I didn't get a response. But I'll try again nicely at some point. I somehow have a feeling the intention was not that these would be unavailable for use, but the commercial aspect of the require Wikipedia license is possibly a stick point. Thankyou.Djm-leighpark (talk) 20:34, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
- At the bottom of the Flickr The Commons license template it states: Please add additional copyright tags to this image if more specific information about copyright status can be determined. See Commons:Licensing for more information. so that's what we are doing here, determining the copyright status. You could of course ask at the NLI. I happen to be in Dublin next week but do not have the time to visit them. Please remember we don't have any deadlines on such matters, so they really only crop up when someone asks or discovers a possible issue. Unfortunately if the impact is high then so be it, I wish it were not. Perhaps a wider discussion should be started elsewhere. Ww2censor (talk) 17:32, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
- Ticket:2019093010006056 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 09:00, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per Ww2censor. If there are additional images by this photographer on Commons they should be examined and probably put to DR as well. --Majora (talk) 02:01, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
the correct flexion of the adjectiv 'angehimmelt' is 'angehimmeltsten, see German Wiktionary angehimmeltsten -> wrong pronunciation Jeuwre (talk) 10:40, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 16:46, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
missspelling, see German Wiktionary: beschwatztest, a surrogate pronunciation example is already produced, hear Jeuwre (talk) 12:03, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 16:46, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
derivative work of manual 12.187.140.126 20:04, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Kept: This is substantially similar to File:MMLOrigin.jpg, which was kept after addressing the issue of derivatives. Components of a manual appear either to be de minims or below the threshold of originality. If this is to be renominated, a more articulate and specific rationale is needed. --Эlcobbola talk 16:51, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
Because it is not used for any purposes and it was only uploaded for a joke LuciusofRome (talk) 20:38, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - requested by uploader and poor quality, unused image of (apparently) non-notable person. --Эlcobbola talk 16:57, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
This is the original source of the file on the web as far as I've been able to determine. However, I don't know where it was scanned from originally. According to the page, the machine depicted was patented in 1962 and that, combined the black-and-white nature of the image, leads me to believe that this image might be in the public domain. However, I'm unable to determine whether the copyright was renewed. I don't know the original source and the website of the Copyright Office (linked at Commons:PD) isn't working for me anyway. I'm nominating this for deletion instead of using the copyvio tag in case someone has the time and detective skills to determine the copyright status. -- Veikk0.ma (talk) 21:20, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:NETCOPYVIO - e.g., here in 2015, well before 2016 upload. Evidence of permission/provenance required. --Эlcobbola talk 17:01, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
While this work contains PD-NASA data from the MOLA instrument on Mars Global Surveyor, the composition of the work is unique enough that a new copyright can be derived. Source for this work is https://planetarymapping.wordpress.com/2016/01/28/topographic-map-of-mars-2008/. The PDF has a clear copyright mark, and there is no evidence I can find that this has been released under a free license. — Huntster (t @ c) 23:26, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
- I transwikied this image from Wikipedia, where it was uploaded by @Hargitai: While there may be an assertable copyright in the referenced PDF, the image as uploaded is of such low resolution that it is questionable that it actually conveys any of the content that can be covered by a copyright. The text is illegible, and the remainder is a rather formulaic arrangement of public domain images. BD2412 T 13:50, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
- I'd have to argue that a copyrighted work, regardless of composition and, especially, if it can be recognized as such, isn't going to be any less copyrighted simply because it is of a reduced resolution. — Huntster (t @ c) 22:48, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 17:03, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Flags of Balochistan, Pakistan
[edit]These files were initially tagged by Wcam as Dw no source since (dw no source since). However, the older file has been here for several years, so I think it is worth giving a fresh opportunity for input on the copyright status of this image and the derivative.
Green Giant (talk) 20:51, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Kept: unclear DR rationale. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:33, 29 October 2019 (UTC)