Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/02/10
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
.jpg){kind=link}
,_Kent_Co._landfill,_8_January_2014_(11840240065).jpg){kind=link}
,_Kent_Co._landfill,_8_January_2014_(11840240775).jpg){kind=link}
,_Kent_Co._landfill,_8_January_2014_(11840524073).jpg){kind=link}
_at_peak_intensity.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Sibelius.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_Februar_2019_(3).jpg){kind=link}
,_Februar_2019_(2).jpg){kind=link}
Screenshot from Sariel visits LEGO: inside LEGO molding factory, LEGO vault & LEGO Ideas House - Alexis Jazz ping plz 00:48, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- Now included in Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Thatonewikiguy. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 01:50, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 06:49, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
unknown license 47.156.0.180 01:52, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy deletion, fair use. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:59, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
“FBMD” in the metadata suggests this is a Facebook photo Ytoyoda (talk) 14:37, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:19, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
copyvio, photographer lived in 1970 Martin Sg. (talk) 15:46, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:53, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
copyvio. Martin Sg. (talk) 15:55, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:52, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Double to File:Hoftechnische Ausstattung bis zur Fremdstromversorgung.pdf Martin Sg. (talk) 16:08, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:03, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
double to File:Hofgebäude und Anlagen.pdf Martin Sg. (talk) 16:09, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:03, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Courtesy of owner of establishment. I was asked to. LowelFrans (talk) 18:20, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 21:53, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violation - source: http://maro2337.id.joe.pl/zdjecia_328407-diablica.html Salicyna (talk) 19:17, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Salicyna: Is this maro2337 the w:copyrighter of the image? What makes you ascribe all rights to this Polish user? If so, the copyright is owned by Tizzone, too. The same must also be said of Oblomov 63 (Russia), SLAVCHEV (the Girl.bg web portal, Bulgary), and Laurence (France). Yet it seems to me that the image is nothing but a desktop wallpaper (in Russian: обои) under the title "she-devil in red" (Бесовка в красном) or "Devil Girl" (Девочка чертовка). The original holder of the copyright is unknown. --Janggun Dungan (talk) 21:24, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: anonymous works are PD 70 years post publication: no evidence to be 70yrs old - speedying. --Ankry (talk) 21:46, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
speedydelete|<reason in prose> or the shortcut SD|<criterion code such as G7 for "author/uploader request", see list>. 195.200.222.50 20:17, 10 February 2019 (UTC) {subst:copyvionote|1=Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tjk tv logo.png176.33.250.34 21:08, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept, vandalistic request, the logo is ineligible for copyright. Taivo (talk) 22:02, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
company did not allow — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 176.33.250.34 (talk) 04:09, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyright violation from http://iwcia36.id.joe.pl/zdjecia_175172-slodka-diablica.html Salicyna (talk) 19:47, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: speedy. --Ankry (talk) 22:20, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Copyright violation from http://maro2337.id.joe.pl/zdjecia_328407-diablica.html Salicyna (talk) 19:49, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy. --Ankry (talk) 22:20, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Delete From the source indicated (https://bjterhaa.home.xs4all.nl/cv.htm) but no license present that is compatible with Commons. Hammersoft (talk) 19:40, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:01, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
https://www.starnow.com.au/ondradorian/photos/7661777
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:47, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- Why? I upload on starnow. --AIGrant (talk) 21:50, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- Website is not free (StarNow Limited © 2019). --Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:58, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Try to get right information. You can choose which memership you would like to get. There is for free.--AIGrant (talk) 22:56, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing. --1989 (talk) 01:16, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Doc Taxon as Speedy (speedydeletion) and the most recent rationale was: please delete because of violence of personality rights and privacy Doc Taxon (talk) 1989 (talk) 17:42, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Author or uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content. Agreement of the depicted persons is missing, see also OTRS-Ticket:2019021210009966. --Ra'ike T C 20:41, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Doc Taxon as Speedy (speedydeletion) and the most recent rationale was: please delete because of violence of personality rights and privacy Doc Taxon (talk) 1989 (talk) 17:42, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Author or uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content. Agreement of the depicted persons is missing, see also OTRS-Ticket:2019021210009966. --Ra'ike T C 20:40, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Doc Taxon as Speedy (speedydeletion) and the most recent rationale was: please delete because of violence of personality rights and privacy Doc Taxon (talk) 17:14, 10 February 2019 (UTC) 1989 (talk) 17:42, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Author or uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content. Agreement of the depicted persons is missing, see also OTRS-Ticket:2019021210009966. --Ra'ike T C 20:38, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Doc Taxon as Speedy (speedydeletion) and the most recent rationale was: please delete because of violence of personality rights and privacy Doc Taxon (talk) 17:15, 10 February 2019 (UTC) 1989 (talk) 17:42, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Author or uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content. Agreement of the depicted persons is missing, see also OTRS-Ticket:2019021210009966. --Ra'ike T C 20:36, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Doc Taxon as Speedy (speedydeletion) and the most recent rationale was: please delete because of violence of personality rights and privacy Doc Taxon (talk) 17:20, 10 February 2019 (UTC) 1989 (talk) 17:42, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Author or uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content. Agreement of the depicted persons is missing, see also OTRS-Ticket:2019021210009966. --Ra'ike T C 20:34, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Doc Taxon as Speedy (speedydeletion) and the most recent rationale was: please delete because of violence of personality rights and privacy Doc Taxon (talk) 17:21, 10 February 2019 (UTC) 1989 (talk) 17:44, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Author or uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content. Agreement of the depicted persons is missing, see also OTRS-Ticket:2019021210009966. --Ra'ike T C 20:33, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 15:03, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 01:59, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
Not public domain in East Timor, because there's a copyright statement on the work itself. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:56, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
- See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Brigadier-General Falur Rate Laek and António Soares da Silva 2019-01-23.jpg. Image is mention there, too. All of these images should be joined in one case. --JPF (talk) 08:51, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: see other request. --Marcus Cyron (talk) 23:27, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
The source file is of low resolution. Bryantriplex (talk) 20:21, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:36, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
The image features significant space not being taken up by the logo itself. Bryantriplex (talk) 20:24, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:27, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Brighton.badi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Nonsense upload, not realitically useful for an educational: Out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 07:35, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:43, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial award ribbons. Should be in SVG if useful. Ar least Ethiopian ones are duplicates (Category:Ribbon bars of Ethiopia).
- File:Etiopia star commander.png
- File:Etiopia star gcross.png
- File:Benin mèrite.png
- File:Togo mono.png
- File:Togo merite.png
- File:Legion d'honore.png
- File:Burkina ordre national.png
- File:Senagal ordre lion.png
- File:Cote ivoire national.png
- File:Cote ivoire merite.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:34, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
unknown license 47.156.0.180 01:55, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:38, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
The source file is of low resolution. Bryantriplex (talk) 20:21, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:31, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
The logo is not used on all of the record label’s platforms . Bryantriplex (talk) 20:23, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:45, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
unused personal photo- OoS --Alaa :)..! 22:51, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 15:27, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
unused personal photo- OoS --Alaa :)..! 22:52, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 15:18, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
Not needed for Wikpedia. I, the uploader want it deleted. Hinderaker it (talk) 01:04, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:50, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by EUNHAN JEON (talk · contribs)
[edit]Spam and copyvio from https://www.overstock.ca.
- File:VE875 BLU.jpg
- File:VJ127 PHC.jpg
- File:VE875 BLKG.jpg
- File:VJ653 RGD (2).jpg
- File:VJ652 BLKP.jpg
- File:VJ615 GRC 2.jpg
- File:VJ177 PK2.jpg
- File:VJ615 BK 2.jpg
- File:VJ147 PK.jpg
- File:VJ147 ORG.jpg
- File:VJ147 GRY.jpg
- File:VJ137 BEG.jpg
- File:VE875 PKG.jpg
- File:VJ127 GRY.jpg
- File:VE871 SIV.jpg
- File:VE871 KHA.jpg
- File:VE862 KHA.jpg
- File:VE863S PK.jpg
- File:VE861 PK.jpg
- File:VE861 SIV.jpg
- File:VE857 BLK.jpg
- File:VE856K GRY.jpg
- File:VE856 CRB.jpg
- File:VE854 PK.jpg
- File:VE850 CR.jpg
- File:VE854 BLK.jpg
- File:VE807 PK.jpg
- File:VE807 BLK.jpg
- File:VE806 GRY.jpg
- File:VE806 BLKW.jpg
- File:VE802 BLKS.jpg
- File:VE801 BLK.jpg
- File:VE787 RGD.jpg
- File:VE787 PK.jpg
- File:VE710 GRY.jpg
- File:VE710 PK(2).jpg
- File:VE870 GD.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Érico (talk) 13:09, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:28, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by DONATELLA SPLENDENTE (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused out of COM:SCOPE personal images.
- File:DONATELLA SPLENDENTE DRAG QUEEN TRASFORMISTA 17.jpg
- File:DONATELLA SPLENDENTE DRAG QUEEN TRASFORMISTA 16.jpg
- File:DONATELLA SPLENDENTE DRAG QUEEN TRASFORMISTA 15.jpg
- File:DONATELLA SPLENDENTE DRAG QUEEN TRASFORMISTA 14.jpg
- File:DONATELLA SPLENDENTE DRAG QUEEN TRASFORMISTA 12.gif
- File:DONATELLA SPLENDENTE DRAG QUEEN TRASFORMISTA 11.jpg
- File:DONATELLA SPLENDENTE DRAG QUEEN TRASFORMISTA 10.jpg
- File:DONATELLA SPLENDENTE DRAG QUEEN TRASFORMISTA 09.jpg
- File:DONATELLA SPLENDENTE DRAG QUEEN TRASFORMISTA 08.jpg
- File:DONATELLA SPLENDENTE DRAG QUEEN TRASFORMISTA 06.jpg
- File:DONATELLA SPLENDENTE DRAG QUEEN TRASFORMISTA 07.jpg
- File:DONATELLA SPLENDENTE DRAG QUEEN TRASFORMISTA 05.jpg
- File:DONATELLA SPLENDENTE DRAG QUEEN TRASFORMISTA 01.jpg
- File:DONATELLA SPLENDENTE DRAG QUEEN TRASFORMISTA 02.jpg
- File:DONATELLA SPLENDENTE 03.jpg
- File:DONATELLA SPLENDENTE 04.jpg
- File:DONATELLA SPLENDENTE 01.jpg
- File:DONATELLA SPLENDENTE 02.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:49, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:29, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE personal images.
- File:Pirozhkov Denis 19.jpg
- File:Pirozhkov Denis 18.jpg
- File:Pirozhkov Denis 17.jpg
- File:Pirozhkov Denis 16.jpg
- File:Pirozhkov Denis 15.jpg
- File:Pirozhkov Denis 13.jpg
- File:Pirozhkov Denis 14.jpg
- File:Pirozhkov Denis 12.jpg
- File:Pirozhkov Denis 1.jpg
- File:Pirozhkov Denis 2.jpg
- File:Pirozhkov Denis 10.jpg
- File:Pirozhkov Denis 11.jpg
- File:Pirozhkov Denis 9.jpg
- File:Pirozhkov Denis 6.jpg
- File:Pirozhkov Denis 8.jpg
- File:Pirozhkov Denis 7.jpg
- File:Pirozhkov Denis 4.jpg
- File:Pirozhkov Denis 5.jpg
- File:Pirozhkov Denis.jpg
- File:Актер - Пирожков Денис Михайлович.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:07, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:30, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own works.
- File:Estadio Nacional del Peru.png
- File:Estadio Nacional del Perú vacio.png
- File:Vista panoramica de San Isidro.png
- File:Vista de edificios en la Costa Verde.png
- File:Estadio San Marcos en remodelación.png
- File:Estadio Ollantaytambo.jpg
- File:Estadio Monumental de la UNSA.png
- File:Atardecer del distrito San Miguel.png
- File:Plaza de Armas de Nuevo Chimbote, Perú.png
- File:Plaza de Armas de Cusco, Perú.png
- File:Plaza de Armas de Piura, Perú.png
- File:Plaza de Armas de Iquitos, Perú.png
- File:Plaza de Armas de Chiclayo, Perú.png
- File:Plaza de Armas de Trujillo, Perú.png
- File:Plaza de Armas de Arequipa, Perú.png
- File:Plaza Mayor de Lima, Perú.png
- File:Escudo de Molinos El Pirata FC.png
- File:Estadio Municipal de San Isidro.jpg
- File:Estadio Ricardo Palma.png
- File:Estadio Melanio Coloma.png
- File:Estadio mariscal nieto ilo.jpg
- File:Complejo Deportivo Niño Héroe Manuel Bonilla.png
- File:Estadio Municipal de Matucana.jpg
- File:Estadio Inca Pachacutec.jpg
- File:Estadio Campeones del 36.jpg
- File:Estadio Manuel Eloy Molina Robles de Huanta.jpg
- File:Estadio Los Chankas.jpg
- File:Estadio Carlos A. Olivares.png
- File:Estadio Municipal de Pallpata.jpg
- File:Estadio Modelo de Ilave.png
- File:Estadio Municipal de Chorrillos.png
- File:Estadio Manuel Gómez Arellano.jpg
- File:Estadio Joel Gutiérrez.jpg
- File:Estadio Manuel Rivera Sánchez.png
- File:Estadio IPD de Puerto Maldonado.png
- File:TRIBUNAS CULMINADAS DEL ESTADIO VICTOR MONTOYA SEGURA DE JAEN 2.jpg
- File:Estadio Caballeros del Deporte, Chosica.png
- File:Estadio La Union.png
- File:Estadio Alejandro Villanueva.png
- File:Estadio Gran Kuelap.jpg
- File:Estadio Lolo Fernandez.jpg
- File:Estadio José Picasso Peratta.jpg
- File:126617 med estadio union tarma.jpg
- File:Estadio Mariscal Cáceres.jpg
- File:Estadio Tupac Amaru Sicuani.jpg
- File:Estadio de la UNI.png
- File:Estadio UNA Puno.png
- File:Nuevo Estadio de la Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos.png
- File:Estadio Mansiche.png
Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:22, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:30, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Image is out of scope Icem4k (talk) 06:39, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 04:20, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Image out of scope Icem4k (talk) 06:42, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 04:21, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Images out of scope Icem4k (talk) 06:43, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 04:21, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Images out of scope Icem4k (talk) 06:44, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 04:22, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Images out of scope Icem4k (talk) 06:45, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 04:22, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Image out of scope Icem4k (talk) 06:46, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 04:22, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Image out of scope Icem4k (talk) 06:46, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 04:23, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Image out of scope Icem4k (talk) 06:47, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 04:23, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 06:58, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- ’’’Delete’’’ non-notable subject (no article), placed on en.disambiguation page--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 12:43, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 04:23, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ajmcbarreto (talk · contribs)
[edit]Too low quality to be useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
- File:Ciknemark Salvador Shopping - 14.jpg
- File:Ciknemark Salvador Shopping - 13.jpg
- File:UCI Orient Paralela - 15.jpg
- File:UCI Orient Paralela - 16.jpg
Ies (talk) 07:34, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- Go ahead. That's okay with me. These images should not have been downloaded in the commons.Ajmcbarreto (talk) 18:42, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 04:25, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ajmcbarreto (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Casa da Cultura Madre Leotavea Zoller - 48762618076.jpg
- File:Casa da Cultura Madre Leotavea Zoller - 48762642771.jpg
- File:Casa da Cultura Madre Leotavea Zoller - 48762324578.jpg
- File:Casa da Cultura Madre Leotavea Zoller - 48762324798.jpg
- File:Casa da Cultura Madre Leotavea Zoller.jpg
- File:Casa da Cultura Madre Leotavea Zoller - 48762329003.jpg
- File:Banco do Brasil 1a. Agência.jpg
- File:Bancos - 48804339227.jpg
- File:Bancos - 48804193216.jpg
- File:Bancos em Boa Vista, Roraima.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:51, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lalaluckybts (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 09:16, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 04:27, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gelu Lucian Balog (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
- File:BBWK6164.jpg
- File:A day in Oxford.jpg
- File:Lucian B. Lucian Balog Gelu lucyanblue.jpg
- File:Lucian B. Lucian Balog.jpg
- File:Lucian B.jpg
- File:Gelu Lucian Balog.jpg
- File:Lucian Balog.jpg
Ies (talk) 11:07, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 04:30, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal images.
Érico (talk) 12:53, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 04:33, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico (talk) 13:57, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 04:34, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ejazofficial (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope. Unused personal images.
- File:Ejaz.jpg
- File:EjazAhmadOfficial.jpg
- File:Ejaz Ahmad.jpg
- File:Ejaz0fficial.jpg
- File:EjazOfficial.jpg
Érico (talk) 14:20, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 04:35, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Nao gostei Clesionet (talk) 08:26, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
O arquivo é de autoria desconhecida. Não há como indicar autor etc. Por isso, resolvi deletar o post. Clesionet (talk) 18:59, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
O arquivo é de autoria desconhecida. Não há como indicar autor etc. Por isso, resolvi deletar o post. Clesionet (talk) 08:42, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 06:43, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
unused personal photo- OoS --Alaa :)..! 22:52, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 05:24, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
File:Great Black-backed Gull (1st or 2nd cycle), Kent Co. landfill, 8 January 2014 (11840240065).jpg
[edit],_Kent_Co._landfill,_8_January_2014_(11840240065).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Kent_Co._landfill,_8_January_2014_(11840240065).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope: very low quality, no value MPF (talk) 00:10, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:06, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
File:Great Black-backed Gull (1st or 2nd cycle), Kent Co. landfill, 8 January 2014 (11840240775).jpg
[edit],_Kent_Co._landfill,_8_January_2014_(11840240775).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Kent_Co._landfill,_8_January_2014_(11840240775).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope: very low quality, no value MPF (talk) 00:10, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:07, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
File:Great Black-backed Gull (1st or 2nd cycle), Kent Co. landfill, 8 January 2014 (11840524073).jpg
[edit],_Kent_Co._landfill,_8_January_2014_(11840524073).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Kent_Co._landfill,_8_January_2014_(11840524073).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope: very low quality, no value MPF (talk) 00:10, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:07, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of focus or blurred due to camera movement. Of no practical use. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:20, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. Kaldari (talk) 13:58, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:07, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:22, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:08, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:22, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:08, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 06:17, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:09, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE. Ahmadtalk 01:04, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted. This is the uploader's last remaining contribution. en:User:Lalaluckybts was speedily deleted. Taivo (talk) 09:17, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
Image is Out of scope Icem4k (talk) 06:37, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:09, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
out of scope - unused fantasy election results - https://www.nationstates.net/nation=kyaon Cabayi (talk) 08:31, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:09, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
out of scope - unused fictional election results Cabayi (talk) 08:33, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:09, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
out of scope - unused fantasy election results - https://www.nationstates.net/nation=selvia Cabayi (talk) 09:02, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:10, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of project scope. See here. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 11:05, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete --Alaa :)..! 22:50, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:13, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Commercial advertisement, SPAM: out of project scope. Ies (talk) 12:17, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:13, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico (talk) 12:50, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:13, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico (talk) 12:53, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:14, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico (talk) 12:57, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:14, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by EduardoDelbonoSuarez (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons is not Facebook, unused personal snapshots. Many not own work in the first.
- File:!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!14089151 1422974297718Eduardo Delbono Suarez975 941741583516579436 n.jpg
- File:Eduardo Delbono con su corona de Rey del Bronce.jpg
- File:Eduardo Delbono en Feria de Tristan Narvaja.jpg
- File:Angel de la guarda.jpg
- File:Angelita guardiana1532731.jpg
- File:Nietas menores.jpg
- File:Hijos mios.jpg
- File:Sofia nieta.jpg
- File:MI MADRE.jpg
- File:Emilia nieta.jpg
- File:MI PADRE.jpg
- File:Mi hija y nietas.jpg
- File:Eduardo delbono suarez. rey bronce artistico. san jorge estancia .ecologica.jpg
- File:Eduardo Delbono Suarez Perdil Google.jpg
Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:13, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 18:16, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by EduardoDelbonoSuarez (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope. Unused personal images.
- File:Eduardo Delbono Suarez Dr. Perfiles.23.jpg
- File:EDUARDODELBONOSUARE.jpg
- File:37890723 1728823083861511 4449364562768035840 n - copia.jpg
- File:Eduardo Delbono Suarez .jpg
- File:Nietas menores.jpg
Érico (talk) 13:30, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:10, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Advertising. Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:13, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:14, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ineedtostopforgetting (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:14, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:15, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Angel97gm1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope. Unused personal images.
Érico (talk) 14:54, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:15, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:16, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:16, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
_at_peak_intensity.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_at_peak_intensity.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused fictional image of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
_at_peak_intensity.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:16, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
_at_peak_intensity.png){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:17, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Adribartri (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope. Unused personal images.
Érico (talk) 15:01, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:17, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:17, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:17, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:18, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:18, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Peter Ulber (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:18, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
out of scope ALIGOR1997 (talk) 15:06, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:08, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:19, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:21, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:21, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:21, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Paymanadibi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:21, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
I do not see any educational value, probably out of project scope. Note nonsense categories. Taivo (talk) 15:29, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:22, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:22, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:22, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by নাজমুল ইসলাম স্বপ্ন (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo/drawing album. Not used.
- File:Sass002.jpg
- File:Photo 022Z.jpg
- File:Zcamera-20160512 074027000 01.jpg
- File:Photo002A.jpg
- File:Photo 002N.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:20, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Daryljones541 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused screenshots of questionable notability.
- File:Pim4.jpg
- File:Pim2.jpg
- File:Pim3.jpg
- File:Ems1.jpg
- File:Ems.jpg
- File:Ems2.jpg
- File:Pim1.jpg
- File:Color program.jpg
- File:Temperature Program.jpg
- File:Tiptaxtotal.jpg
- File:Sales.jpg
- File:Rockpaper.jpg
- File:Population Program.jpg
- File:Hospital Program.jpg
- File:Calories.jpg
- File:Calories2.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:20, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:21, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:23, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:23, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico (talk) 15:36, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:23, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:23, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:24, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Udhav Puri Gadchandur (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:25, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hanzalamuhammad53 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 17:35, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:25, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
out of scope Buckaroo bob 91 (talk) 21:27, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:26, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Commons isn't a porn site
Buckaroo bob 91 (talk) 21:30, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:PENIS. Worthless, poor quality, redundant and out of scope. AshFriday (talk) 00:37, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:26, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
out of scope blurry selfie of self Buckaroo bob 91 (talk) 21:31, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:26, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
out of scope, not in use Ezarateesteban 22:00, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:27, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
unuseful graphic, not in use, not categorized Ezarateesteban 22:04, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:27, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
unuseful graphic, not in use nor categorized Ezarateesteban 22:05, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:27, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
unuseful graphic. not in use nor categorized Ezarateesteban 22:06, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:28, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
unuseful graphic, not in use nor categorized Ezarateesteban 22:07, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:28, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
unuseful graphic, not in use nor categorize Ezarateesteban 22:07, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:28, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
unused personal photo- OoS --Alaa :)..! 22:51, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:29, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Victor Moses (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE (en:Vikta JuiceBoy).
- File:Vikta Juiceboy the JUICE.jpg
- File:Juiceboy Vikta.jpg
- File:Vikta Juiceboy.jpg
- File:Vikta Juiceboy plug.jpg
- File:Namibian singer, rapper, writer and dancer Vikta Juiceboy.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:40, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:29, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 23:49, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, corrupted file. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:30, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 23:50, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, corrupted file. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:30, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Bad Musa Mirzeli (talk) 21:22, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:29, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Está publicado bajo licencia CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 en laa web de origen. Nachosan (talk) 00:00, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:14, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Está publicado bajo licencia CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 en laa web de origen. Nachosan (talk) 00:00, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:14, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Está publicado bajo licencia CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 en laa web de origen. Nachosan (talk) 00:00, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:14, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Está publicado bajo licencia CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 en laa web de origen. Nachosan (talk) 00:00, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:14, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Está publicado bajo licencia CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 en laa web de origen. Nachosan (talk) 00:00, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:14, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Otto Peters died in 1970. Delete File:Portrét Eduarda Beneše cropped.jpg as well. Undelete in 2041. Gumruch (talk) 00:12, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:15, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
T shirt design not de minimus. SecretName101 (talk) 01:18, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:15, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Neither the original for this song, nor this recording of it is in the public domain. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:24, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Magog the Ogre: According to the Copyright Act, Kazi Nazrul Islam is the national poet of Bangladesh and he wrote the song in 1931. So, this should be in public domain. However,the song is played via BTV every Eid-Ul-Fitr evening. BTV is a Govt. Channel. Therefore, it can be appeared that the song is not copyrighted.
Thanks-Nokib Sarkar Poke 03:52, 10 February 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nokib Sorkar (talk • contribs) 03:52, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- According to Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Bangladesh, the government would not be the first copyright author of this work, that would be Kazi Nazrul Islam, who died in 1976. The original won't be free in country of origin until 2037. Delete Abzeronow (talk) 15:45, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- According to Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Bangladesh, the government would not be the first copyright author of this work, that would be Kazi Nazrul Islam, who died in 1976. The original won't be free in country of origin until 2037.
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:18, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Without permission of Autosport. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adriel 00 (talk • contribs) 2019-02-06T00:25:10 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:18, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Broken upload, feel free to upload a completed version B dash (talk) 04:23, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: This is a great photo, but we have 120 other photos of this lighthouse. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:20, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
There is no CC BY 3.0 license at the source. Image is likely unfree. Leoboudv (talk) 05:39, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
MY mistake! The rest of these were cc by sa and I forgot to check. Delete. Victuallers (talk) 10:25, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:20, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Stickerbrand (talk · contribs)
[edit]Uploaded to promote products of company namesake of uploader. And File:Stickerbrand 1.jpg is a derivative of other material on the web (a larger format of the the chair/floor/wall, without lamp or decal, is used at [1] so there is clearly some underlying uncited original). No idea if others are similarly COM:DW but they are similar generic style. Have several other alternatives in Category:Wall decals so don't need these.
DMacks (talk) 05:44, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:21, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Solomon203 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Article by Liberty Times (http://ec.ltn.com.tw/article/paper/601348), not Yunlin County Government. ~Moheen (keep talking) 06:31, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- Many thanks for the re-consideration. What we see is a photo of a news coverage on Yunlin County Government written by the LibertyTimes. It signals that the newspaper authorized the Yunlin County Government to use on its website. And according to the copyright policy of its website, all materials in the domain of https://www.yunlin.gov.tw/ are deemed to be in public domain ({{OGDL}}). --It's gonna be awesome!#Talk♬ 17:44, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
- Backup version--It's gonna be awesome!#Talk♬ 17:52, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. It is clear that this work belongs to Liberty Times. Although Liberty Times may have authorized the Yunlin County Government to use this piece on their website, it is impossible for the County Government to further license the free reuse of the content that they do not own at all. In addition, the permission announcement specified that contracted case writings or other works cannot be reused without prior approval ("……專人專案撰文或其他著作，經機關特別聲明須經同意方可使用者"). --Wcam (talk) 23:31, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
- Reply Your translation is wrong. The full translation should be "Some media, images, music notes, contracted case of writings are tagged with the special copyright claim. If you see the special copyright claim besides the material, you need to get special approval in advance. (部分的影音、圖像、樂譜、專人專案撰文或其他著作，經機關特別聲明須經同意方可使用者。) "--It's gonna be awesome!#Talk♬ 06:00, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
- If your assumption is right. Then why would the Yunlin County government issues the OGDL policy when everything on their website still needs approval before use? It doesn't make sense. --It's gonna be awesome!#Talk♬ 06:06, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Discussing the possibility for the County Government to further license the free reuse of the content has not thing to do. Speculation doesn't help. The answer is clear. Is there a OGDL statement under the domain of Yunlin county government? Yes! Was the picture under the domain of Yunlin county government? Yes, the backup version has proved that. So it's a material eligible to be collected by Wikimedia Commons. {{OGDL}} is the sole standard. any self-interpretation for any other information in Chinese is distracting. --It's gonna be awesome!#Talk♬ 05:45, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
- It is simple: you cannot license something that you do not own. Nothing prevents you from making an announcement that a book you did not write may be freely used by anyone for any purpose, but that does not make such an announcement valid. Along these lines, please also see the permission announcement: "應注意不得侵害第三人之著作人格權" (Should be prudential not to infringe upon a third party in moral rights in copyrights). --Wcam (talk) 13:32, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
- hi, thanks for the reply. But it's not a matter of moral rights. It's gonna be awesome!#Talk♬ 11:08, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. This work belongs to Liberty Times.--Wolfch (talk) 13:20, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
- No one denies it's a work of Liberty Times. --It's gonna be awesome!#Talk♬ 09:04, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:22, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Unused and pixelated/small. Have File:Methyl isobutyrate.svg DMacks (talk) 07:38, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete File should be deleted, as DMacks mentioned above, it´s unused & pixelated! Replacement is equivalent and good! I support the deletion! Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 13:05, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:23, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Chemical mistake (carbonyl). Have several alternatives in Category:Methyl isobutyrate, such as File:Isobuttersäuremethylester.svg DMacks (talk) 07:40, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- Sorry, the file was corrected. Claudio Pistilli (talk) 07:57, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete This is still poor quality image with some absurd coloring, completely incorrect based on IUPAC rules. This should be deleted (and any similar images as well). Wostr (talk) 10:04, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete File should be deleted, I completely agree with Wostr: Useless colouring of some atoms, structural formulas should only be drawn by an suitable program (like ChemDraw)! Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 16:27, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:23, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Screenshot (living person) despite the uploader indicating "own work". Larry Hockett (talk) 09:00, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:24, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Map without legend: what colors mean is not clear, this is not of any existing association/union/organisation. No source either, so the encyclopedic significance is doubtful. 91.193.176.157 10:51, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:25, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Malikofori (talk · contribs)
[edit]Questionable authorship claims based on the low resolutions, missing metadata, and the uploader's history.
—LX (talk, contribs) 11:02, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- Keep No one else has the right to these pictures except me, these pictures were sent to me by the manager of this player himself. I don't see any reason why these pictures should even be considered for deletion Malikofori (talk) 00:56, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
- If the photographs were sent to you, they are not your own work and you are not the author. The only ones who actually have the right to claim to be the author of the photographs are the actual photographers whose work you're falsely claiming to be your own. —LX (talk, contribs) 06:27, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:26, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Blurred image that does not add value beyond our existing coverage of the same topic Nv8200p (talk) 12:00, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:28, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Uploader request. Low-quality content that does not add value beyond our existing coverage of the same topic Nv8200p (talk) 12:03, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:28, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
A formal PR picture and the photographer is mentioned in the file's name. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 12:15, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:28, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
A formal PR picture and the photographer is mentioned in the file's name. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 12:16, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
problem in file name Hosenisrael (talk) 08:43, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:28, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
A formal PR picture and the photographer is mentioned in the file's name. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 12:20, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:28, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
A formal PR picture and the photographer is mentioned in the file's name. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 12:24, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:28, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
A formal PR picture and the photographer is mentioned in the file's name. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 12:24, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:28, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
A formal PR picture and the photographer is mentioned in the file's name. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 12:25, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:29, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
A formal PR picture and the photographer is mentioned in the file's name. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 12:27, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:29, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
A formal PR picture and the photographer is mentioned in the file's name. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 12:29, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:29, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - watermark scifinews.de. Kind regards, — TBhagat (contribs | talk) 12:30, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:29, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
copyright is not cc by sa as expected Victuallers (talk) 12:31, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:37, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alberto Davide Lorenzi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Questionable authorship claims based on the low resolutions, missing metadata (except metadata indicating the files were grabbed from social media), and the uploader's history.
—LX (talk, contribs) 12:50, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:37, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yago Noriega (talk · contribs)
[edit]Questionable authorship claims based on the low/inconsistent resolutions, missing metadata (except for one of the photos), and previous publications found elsewhere.
- File:Arapoanga Planaltina.jpg.png
- File:Setor Tradicional Planaltina.jpg.png
- File:Centro Histórico Planaltina.jpg
- File:31 DP Planaltina.jpg.png
- File:Centro Comercial Planaltina.jpg.png
- File:HRP Emergência.jpg – https://www.metropoles.com/distrito-federal/saude-df/bebe-nascido-morto-e-incinerado-no-hospital-regional-de-planaltina
—LX (talk, contribs) 13:03, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:37, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yago Noriega (talk · contribs)
[edit]Files without EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.
Yann (talk) 15:47, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
- Delete, obvious {{copyvio}} screenshots are obvious. The first one was grabbed from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xxmU_cxxvYs. —LX (talk, contribs) 17:37, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 12:26, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
Not a simple logo, but artwork. Requires OTRS. E4024 (talk) 13:06, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:37, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
A formal PR picture and the photographer is mentioned in the file's name. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 13:21, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:37, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
No evidence of free licensing. Uploader argues that it doesn't require copyright permission. Strakhov (talk) 13:39, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- This was put through every door in the constituency. Doesn't that mean it was made available to the public? Rathfelder (talk) 18:16, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- Something "been made available to the public" is not the same as "being in the public domain". The second expression refers to a specific copyright status (the lack of copyright restrictions). Strakhov (talk) 18:33, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:38, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
As mentioned in the file's details, it is copied, hence not free for now. It has no place in the Commons without an OTRS rease note. Ldorfman (talk) 13:49, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:39, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Collage of art works is clearly not a free file. It has no place in the Commons without an OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 13:53, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:39, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Photo of a photo. Freedom of panorama in Thailand has a requirement for permanency of works situated in public places, and probably doesn't cover temporary placards like this one. Paul_012 (talk) 14:24, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:39, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
(c) Alex Alba Photo, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:24, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:39, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Taken from the subject’s LinkedIn page: https://www.linkedin.com/in/mollie-pathman-a753a477 Ytoyoda (talk) 14:28, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:39, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
No date information, so that we don't know whether PD-Italy may apply. Jcb (talk) 14:46, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:40, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
必要がなくなったため Monadaisuki (talk) 14:48, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Wikipediaをやめることにしたため Monadaisuki (talk) 14:50, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Not in reason. It is thought that the person who requests this deletion request does not understand the licensing and deletion policy on Wikimedia Commons.--G I Chandor2 (talk) 08:57, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:41, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
"Copyright violation" Sorry, I got this picture (all versions) from other site. This picture is not mine. Monadaisuki (talk) 04:11, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no new infos, no reason for deletion. see above. Please see COM:LRV. --Wdwd (talk) 11:51, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
I'm not the copyright holder of this picture. I stole this picture from other site. COM:LRV is no valid reason to keep it. Monadaisuki (talk) 16:39, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MB-one (talk) 10:16, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:42, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Wikipediaをやめることにしたため Monadaisuki (talk) 14:50, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Not in reason. It is thought that the person who requests this deletion request does not understand the licensing and deletion policy on Wikimedia Commons.--G I Chandor2 (talk) 08:57, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:42, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
"Copyright violation" Sorry, I got this picture (all versions) from other site. This picture is not mine. Monadaisuki (talk) 04:11, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no new infos, no reason for deletion. see above. Please see COM:LRV. --Wdwd (talk) 11:52, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
I'm not the copyright holder of this picture. I stole this picture from other site. COM:LRV is no valid reason to keep it. Monadaisuki (talk) 16:39, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Monadaisuki: Where do you download the image? Indeed, the image doesn't have EXIF data, which caused doubt on the copyright ownership. However, Google Search and Tineye didn't yield any results before 27 December 2016. Pinging @Jameslwoodward and Wdwd: as the closing admin. --A1Cafel (talk) 14:29, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Small, no EXIF, unknown author, appears in many places on the Web. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:01, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Wikipediaをやめることにしたため Monadaisuki (talk) 14:50, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Not in reason. It is thought that the person who requests this deletion request does not understand the licensing and deletion policy on Wikimedia Commons.--G I Chandor2 (talk) 09:01, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Duplicates : This was replaced by "File:RPL objects in the stack (HP 50g).jpg" Monadaisuki (talk) 06:59, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:42, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
"Copyright violation" Sorry, I got this picture (all versions) from other site. This picture is not mine. Monadaisuki (talk) 04:12, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no new infos, no reason for deletion. see above. Please see COM:LRV. --Wdwd (talk) 11:53, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
I'm not the copyright holder of this picture. I stole this picture from other site. COM:LRV is no valid reason to keep it. Monadaisuki (talk) 16:40, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MB-one (talk) 10:17, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Wikipediaをやめることにしたため Monadaisuki (talk) 14:51, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Not in reason. It is thought that the person who requests this deletion request does not understand the licensing and deletion policy on Wikimedia Commons.--G I Chandor2 (talk) 08:58, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:43, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Redundant : This picture is not used from any pages. Monadaisuki (talk) 05:59, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:43, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
"Copyright violation" Sorry, I got this picture (all versions) from other site. This picture is not mine. Monadaisuki (talk) 04:17, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
I'm not the copyright holder of this picture. I stole this picture from other site. COM:LRV is no valid reason to keep it. Monadaisuki (talk) 16:43, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
- Keep The original deletion reason was をやめることにしたため (Google Translate: "Because I decided to quit"). So this user simply wants to remove all their images from Commons. Because courtesy deletion is no longer possible, (s)he now merely changes tactics to get the image deleted and claims copyvio, which is likely not the case (all their uploads are taken with same camera in the same general area). This particular image is in scope for which there is no alternative. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:33, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:52, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Wikipediaをやめることにしたため Monadaisuki (talk) 14:51, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Not in reason. It is thought that the person who requests this deletion request does not understand the licensing and deletion policy on Wikimedia Commons.--G I Chandor2 (talk) 08:58, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Redundant : This picture is not used from any pages. Monadaisuki (talk) 05:58, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:43, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
"Copyright violation" Sorry, I got this picture from other site. This picture is not mine. Monadaisuki (talk) 04:19, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:06, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
I'm not the copyright holder of this picture. I stole this picture from other site. COM:LRV is no valid reason to keep it. Monadaisuki (talk) 16:43, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:07, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
Wikipediaをやめることにしたため Monadaisuki (talk) 14:51, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Not in reason. It is thought that the person who requests this deletion request does not understand the licensing and deletion policy on Wikimedia Commons.--G I Chandor2 (talk) 08:58, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:43, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Redundant : This picture is not used from any pages. Monadaisuki (talk) 05:58, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:44, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
"Copyright violation" Sorry, I got this picture from other site. This picture is not mine. Monadaisuki (talk) 04:19, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no new infos, no reason for deletion. see above. Please see COM:LRV. --Wdwd (talk) 11:55, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
I'm not the copyright holder of this picture. I stole this picture from other site. COM:LRV is no valid reason to keep it. Monadaisuki (talk) 16:44, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
- Keep All their uploads were originally tagged as をやめることにしたため (Google Translate: "Because I decided to quit"). So this user simply wants to remove all their images from Commons. Because courtesy deletion is no longer possible, (s)he now merely changes tactics to get the image deleted and claims copyvio, which is likely not the case (most of their uploads are taken with same camera in the same general area). This particular image is in scope for which there is no alternative. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:42, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:52, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Wikipediaをやめることにしたため Monadaisuki (talk) 14:51, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Not in reason. It is thought that the person who requests this deletion request does not understand the licensing and deletion policy on Wikimedia Commons.--G I Chandor2 (talk) 08:58, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Redundant : This picture is not used from any pages. Monadaisuki (talk) 05:58, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:44, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
"Copyright violation" Sorry, I got this picture from other site. This picture is not mine. Monadaisuki (talk) 04:20, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no new infos, no reason for deletion. see above. Please see COM:LRV. --Wdwd (talk) 11:55, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
I'm not the copyright holder of this picture. I stole this picture from other site. COM:LRV is no valid reason to keep it. Monadaisuki (talk) 16:44, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. All their uploads were originally tagged as をやめることにしたため (Google Translate: "Because I decided to quit"). So this user simply wants to remove all their images from Commons. Because courtesy deletion is no longer possible, (s)he now merely changes tactics to get the image deleted and claims copyvio, which is likely not the case (most of their uploads are taken with same camera in the same general area). This particular image is in scope for which there is no alternative. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:42, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:52, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Wikipediaをやめることにしたため Monadaisuki (talk) 14:52, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Not in reason. It is thought that the person who requests this deletion request does not understand the licensing and deletion policy on Wikimedia Commons.--G I Chandor2 (talk) 08:59, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Redundant : This picture is not used from any pages. Monadaisuki (talk) 05:58, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:44, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
"Copyright violation" Sorry, I got this picture from other site. This picture is not mine. Monadaisuki (talk) 04:20, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no new infos, no reason for deletion. see above. Please see COM:LRV. --Wdwd (talk) 11:56, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
I'm not the copyright holder of this picture. I stole this picture from other site. COM:LRV is no valid reason to keep it. Monadaisuki (talk) 16:45, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: I don't believe the copyvio claim (based on the original reason and the related DR's) but I did a courtesy deletion because there is a close alternative (File:Akutagawa-shotengai.jpg). --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:54, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico (talk) 14:52, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:44, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Wikipediaをやめることにしたため Monadaisuki (talk) 14:52, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Not in reason. It is thought that the person who requests this deletion request does not understand the licensing and deletion policy on Wikimedia Commons.--G I Chandor2 (talk) 08:59, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Redundant : This picture is not used from any pages. Monadaisuki (talk) 05:57, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:44, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
"Copyright violation" Sorry, I got this picture from other site. This picture is not mine. Monadaisuki (talk) 04:27, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no new infos, no reason for deletion. see above. Please see COM:LRV. --Wdwd (talk) 11:58, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
I'm not the copyright holder of this picture. I stole this picture from other site. COM:LRV is no valid reason to keep it. Monadaisuki (talk) 16:45, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. All their uploads were originally tagged as をやめることにしたため (Google Translate: "Because I decided to quit"). So this user simply wants to remove all their images from Commons. Because courtesy deletion is no longer possible, (s)he now merely changes tactics to get the image deleted and claims copyvio, which is likely not the case (most of their uploads are taken with same camera in the same general area). This particular image is in scope for which there is no alternative. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:45, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:52, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Wikipediaをやめることにしたため Monadaisuki (talk) 14:52, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Not in reason. It is thought that the person who requests this deletion request does not understand the licensing and deletion policy on Wikimedia Commons.--G I Chandor2 (talk) 08:59, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Redundant : This picture is not used from any pages. Monadaisuki (talk) 05:56, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:44, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
"Copyright violation" Sorry, I got this picture from other site. This picture is not mine. Monadaisuki (talk) 04:21, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no new infos, no reason for deletion. see above. Please see COM:LRV. --Wdwd (talk) 11:56, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
I'm not the copyright holder of this picture. I stole this picture from other site. COM:LRV is no valid reason to keep it. Monadaisuki (talk) 16:45, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. All their uploads were originally tagged as をやめることにしたため (Google Translate: "Because I decided to quit"). So this user simply wants to remove all their images from Commons. Because courtesy deletion is no longer possible, (s)he now merely changes tactics to get the image deleted and claims copyvio, which is likely not the case (most of their uploads are taken with same camera in the same general area). This particular image is in scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:47, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:51, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Wikipediaをやめることにしたため Monadaisuki (talk) 14:53, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Not in reason. It is thought that the person who requests this deletion request does not understand the licensing and deletion policy on Wikimedia Commons.--G I Chandor2 (talk) 08:59, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Redundant : This picture is not used from any pages. Monadaisuki (talk) 05:55, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:44, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
"Copyright violation" Sorry, I got this picture from other site. This picture is not mine. Monadaisuki (talk) 04:22, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no new infos, no reason for deletion. see above. Please see COM:LRV. --Wdwd (talk) 11:56, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
I'm not the copyright holder of this picture. I stole this picture from other site. COM:LRV is no valid reason to keep it. Monadaisuki (talk) 16:46, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. All their uploads were originally tagged as をやめることにしたため (Google Translate: "Because I decided to quit"). So this user simply wants to remove all their images from Commons. Because courtesy deletion is no longer possible, (s)he now merely changes tactics to get the image deleted and claims copyvio, which is likely not the case (most of their uploads are taken with same camera in the same general area). This particular image is in scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:48, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:51, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Wikipediaをやめることにしたため Monadaisuki (talk) 14:53, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Not in reason. It is thought that the person who requests this deletion request does not understand the licensing and deletion policy on Wikimedia Commons.--G I Chandor2 (talk) 09:00, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Redundant : This picture is not used from any pages. Monadaisuki (talk) 05:55, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: This file is in use on arz:محافظه اوساكا, en:Osaka Prefecture, and tl:Prepektura ng Osaka. Under COM:INUSE that means it's not redundant. Leaving Wikipedia doesn't mean you get to take your pictures away with you. --bjh21 (talk) 12:50, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
CommentSorry, I didn't realize it. But I don't recommend this picture. Now there are more skyscrapers in Takatsuki city. This picture is old.--Monadaisuki (talk) 05:38, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:44, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
"Copyright violation" Sorry, I got this picture from other site. This picture is not mine. Monadaisuki (talk) 04:22, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no new infos, no reason for deletion. see above. Please see COM:LRV. --Wdwd (talk) 11:57, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
I'm not the copyright holder of this picture. I stole this picture from other site. COM:LRV is no valid reason to keep it. Monadaisuki (talk) 16:46, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. All their uploads were originally tagged as をやめることにしたため (Google Translate: "Because I decided to quit"). So this user simply wants to remove all their images from Commons. Because courtesy deletion is no longer possible, (s)he now merely changes tactics to get the image deleted and claims copyvio, which is likely not the case (most of their uploads are taken with same camera in the same general area). This particular image is in scope and in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:49, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:51, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Wikipediaをやめることにしたため Monadaisuki (talk) 14:53, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Not in reason. It is thought that the person who requests this deletion request does not understand the licensing and deletion policy on Wikimedia Commons.--G I Chandor2 (talk) 09:00, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Redundant : This picture is not used from any pages. Monadaisuki (talk) 05:54, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: This file is in use on ja:Portal:日本の都道府県/大阪府/新着画像ギャラリー/新着画像保管庫2012年3月分, so it's not redundant. --bjh21 (talk) 12:54, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:45, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
"Copyright violation" Sorry, I got this picture from other site. This picture is not mine. Monadaisuki (talk) 04:23, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no new infos, no reason for deletion. see above. Please see COM:LRV. --Wdwd (talk) 11:57, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
I'm not the copyright holder of this picture. I stole this picture from other site. COM:LRV is no valid reason to keep it. Monadaisuki (talk) 16:47, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. All their uploads were originally tagged as をやめることにしたため (Google Translate: "Because I decided to quit"). So this user simply wants to remove all their images from Commons. Because courtesy deletion is no longer possible, (s)he now merely changes tactics to get the image deleted and claims copyvio, which is likely not the case (most of their uploads are taken with same camera in the same general area). This particular image is in scope and in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:49, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:51, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Wikipediaをやめることにしたため Monadaisuki (talk) 14:53, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Not in reason. It is thought that the person who requests this deletion request does not understand the licensing and deletion policy on Wikimedia Commons.--G I Chandor2 (talk) 09:00, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Redundant : This picture is not used from any pages. Monadaisuki (talk) 05:54, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:45, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
"Copyright violation" Sorry, I got this picture from other site. This picture is not mine. Monadaisuki (talk) 04:24, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no new infos, no reason for deletion. see above. Please see COM:LRV. --Wdwd (talk) 11:58, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
I'm not the copyright holder of this picture. I stole this picture from other site. COM:LRV is no valid reason to keep it. Monadaisuki (talk) 16:47, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Uploader is trying to get several uploads deleted stating this reason, but most of them, including this one, have consistent camera Exif data (taken with a Sony DSC-HX5V), with few exceptions, such as some newer ones taken with a DSC-HX60V. As they were trying to get their pictures deleted with a different reason in the past (Google translates をやめることにしたため as "Because I decided to quit"), this rather looks like an attempt to find a reason that we would accept. In this specific case, it is also indicative of own work that the file was originally uploaded with a camera-generated file name (XDSC02418.JPG). Well, if they're so desperate to have their pictures deleted, I think we could consider a courtesy deletion, but some are in use. Gestumblindi (talk) 20:15, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
- I had lied because I have a guilty conscience about uploading stolen pictures. However, it is true that I stole the pictures. It is not uncommon for Japanese people to upload pictures with camera-generated file names into theirown sites. If you don't delete the pictures that I uploaded, you will help my wrongdoing. Please consider deleting the pictures.--Monadaisuki (talk) 02:28, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. All their uploads were originally tagged as をやめることにしたため (Google Translate: "Because I decided to quit"). So this user simply wants to remove all their images from Commons. Because courtesy deletion is no longer possible, (s)he now merely changes tactics to get the image deleted and claims copyvio, which is likely not the case (most of their uploads are taken with same camera in the same general area). This particular image is in scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:51, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:51, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:45, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This map comes from Numismatic Museum in Athens, Greece, so I'm not really sure if it can be considered as having its copyrights holded by the museum... As for the coins, I guess that there's no issue, but still, the map is a creation of the museum... Glorious 93 (talk) 14:58, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- I think, it's just a simple map. And it's just one part of the whole ensemble, not the main focus. Marcus Cyron (talk) 15:31, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - no FOP in Greece. The map is the whole image. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:46, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:46, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Promo photo. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:47, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Still from a copyrighted picture. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:03, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:47, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by 321londholm (talk · contribs)
[edit]Modern art and promo photos. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.
- File:Ares-drawing-on-wood-by-Petru-Russu.jpg
- File:Petru-Russu-Ares-drawing-on-wood.jpg
- File:Petru-Russu Ares drawing-on-wood.jpg
- File:Prof-Gianfranco-Silvestro,-the-literary-and-art-critic-Dan-Haulica-and-Petru-Russu.jpg
- File:Dan-Haulica-1965.jpg
- File:GiancarloPoliti-and-PetruRussu Stockholm-1995.jpg
- File:GiabcarloPoliti-and-PetruRussu Stockholm-1995.jpg
- File:Calin-Dan,-Viorel-Marginean Alexandru-Balaci ItalianAmbassador Dan-Haulica-and-Petru-Russu---opening-at-Petru-Russu-DECAMERON-on-June-1986-in-Bucharest.jpg
- File:Umberto-Eco and Petru-Rusu Vernisage-on-3rd-of-December1989 Stockholm.jpg
- File:Umberto-Eco and Petru-Rusu Milano-25-June-1989 M.jpg
- File:Petru-Russu-Decameron z6p3-etching.jpg
- File:Petru-Russu-Decameron z9 p3-etching.jpg
- File:Petru-Russu-Decameron z7p8-etching.jpg
- File:Peter 04-Aug-2009 Stockholm.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:16, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Refreshinginfo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Roderick Levi Evans.jpg
- File:Roderick L. Evans.png
- File:Photo of The Refined Poet.jpg
- File:Picture of Roderick L. Evans.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:17, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Photo of David Dayo.JPG
- File:Tropy award.jpg
- File:Photo of DAVID DAYO.jpg
- File:Photo of David.jpg
- File:Ministering in Zulu song.JPG
- File:Ministering in Zulu.JPG
- File:Photos of David Dayo.JPG
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:18, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sashrafi1542 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:18, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Wxmsptwxmspt (talk · contribs)
[edit]Most likely derivative work.
- File:文档1.jpg120 看图王.jpg
- File:V2-7aa961716804836285ba69fd926a6ffd hd.jpg
- File:055945z8dxg6d7qeq8g81s.jpg
- File:V2-8dba82091114002ddde52349e3a39734 hd.png
- File:V2-8e8be65f85a2cd9980f0f308b1b93ffd hd.jpg
- File:V2-5b46f43f932298f1b7f7aac12fe8d6d7 hd.jpg
- File:V2-a7208b7b410144cc79c7c0ca27c31284 hd.jpg
- File:V2-812a29ee44b0bb54d5951350722f03b5 hd.jpg
- File:V2-4ba7fcdba0dffb07dabd76446e16e0db hd.jpg
1989 (talk) 16:21, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:18, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Unused equivalent to File:Beispiel Edman Version 2.svg but alignment looks off DMacks (talk) 04:33, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete File should be deleted. As DMacks has mentioned above, it´s equivalent to the other version, of which the alignment looks better. I support the deletion! Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 15:36, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. Ed (Edgar181) 15:14, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Incorrect Z vs E labels (as tagged). Same uploader supplied File:Ester conformers.png as corrected. DMacks (talk) 07:31, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete I totally agree with DMacks. File is chemically incorrect but the same author provided a corrected version. I support the deletion! Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 20:24, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. Ed (Edgar181) 15:14, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Unused equivalent to File:Newman projection linear anomeric effect.png by same uploader, just with lighter text DMacks (talk) 07:33, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Nearly equivalent & unused file. The thicker font fits better here. I support the deletion! Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 21:40, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. Ed (Edgar181) 15:14, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Equivalent to File:Sigma* Orbital.png except the "sigma*" label has poorer position (the "*" is a key detail but overlaps the arrow) DMacks (talk) 07:34, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Wrong arrangement of text "*sigma". Replacement fixes this issue. I support the deletion! Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 21:42, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. Ed (Edgar181) 15:14, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kleanthosk (talk · contribs)
[edit]Advertisement. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Lampada F.jpg
- File:Lampada Fortuny.jpg
- File:Lampada Fortuny M.jpg
- File:Lampada fortuny Disegnata da Mariano Fortuny.jpg
- File:Lamp Fortuny Mariano Fortuny-1.jpg
- File:Lampada Fortuny nera.jpg
- File:Imm. Lampada Fortuny- Mariano Fortuny.jpg
- File:Fortuny lampada.jpg
- File:FotoFortuny.jpg
- File:FotoLampadaFortuny.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:16, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Verity (statue)
[edit]NOT covered by FOP, as work is "temporarily placed". See prior DRs Commons:Deletion requests/File:Verity (statue).jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Damien Hirsts "Verity" and Ilfracombe pier (geograph 3644689).jpg. Note especially that prior DRs recorded that artist was asserting no FOP to prevent local shops selling postcards
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
- File:Damien Hirsts Verity at Ilfracombe harbour (geograph 3505495) (cropped).jpg
- File:Damien Hirsts Verity at Ilfracombe harbour (geograph 3505495).jpg
- File:The Virgin Mother (209248982).jpg
- File:Verity Damien Hirst Ilfracombe.jpg
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Nilfanion (talk) 20:58, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- In this case, "temporarily" is a misnomer: the work has been lent publicly for a period roughly equivalent to a generation- 20 years. All things are transient, impermanent; for our consideration, the nature of that transience is critical. From some subjective perspective, geographic features are "temporary". The question is, at what point is placement not temporary? 1000 years? 100? 10? For this deletion request to be supported, a judgement must be applied. I'm dubious there is any clarity of temporary nature, and invite efforts to make this point clear.Mavigogun (talk) 11:25, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
- There are a few points with regards to the question of Permanent or temporary:
- What is the "natural" lifetime of the work, when will it decay without intervention?
- Is it on display for a definite fixed term or is it open-ended? Is that period less than the expected life of the work? And what is the intention at the end of that period?
- In the case of this work:
- It has been designed to cope with whatever the weather can throw at it over an extended period. It can be reasonably expected to last much longer than 20 years.
- It was installed explicitly for a fixed timescale. The artist has loaned the work for a fixed term. The council has only granted permission for it to be installed for that same fixed term, with the expectation it is removed.
- Those facts combine indicate that this work is not "permanently situated in a public place" (ie its temporary), and is therefore not covered by FOP.
- However much more serious than my analysis is the fact that the artist's own analysis is the same: By telling local shops wanting to sell postcards they have to use official merchandise and cannot use their own pictures, he is saying FOP doesn't apply (and he can make some more cash out of it).--Nilfanion (talk) 17:26, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
- Highly topical observations, thanks. Limited placement is not the soul characteristic of temporary placement. Intent to relocate at some distant future date is not definitive. As example, I purchase a home in New York, intending to sell it, retire, and move to Florida after my unborn child graduates from high school. Is my housing "temporary"? Not at all. Nor is the residence of this massive work. While the artist may well favor an interpretation of transience that advantages their business- and that position of a vested partisan is of interest -it can't be definitive.
- There are a few points with regards to the question of Permanent or temporary:
- As a related aside, how are the Falles (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falles) to be regarded? The very definition of transient display, no? Shall we parse all images of publicly displayed art that does not include an explicit release? Or is an implicit relationship integral to the act of display? What then of that Infant Trump balloon (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trump_baby_balloon)? FOP is not the singular determining statute. A declaration attached to the image used at that page: "Copyrighted This is a two-dimensional representation of a copyrighted sculpture, statue or any other three-dimensional work of art. As such it is a derivative work of art, and per US Copyright Act of 1976, § 106(2) whoever holds copyright of the original has the exclusive right to authorize derivative works. Per § 107 it is believed that reproduction for criticism, comment, teaching and scholarship constitutes fair use and does not infringe copyright."
- The proposed interpretation of FOP seems entirely based on intent and not conditions- which creates an unactionably subjective standard for consideration. There is, essentially, no difference between saying "I intend to retrieve this in 20 years" and "I or those I convey interest to reserve the right to retrieve this work at an unspecified future date", based on the Nilfanion's proffered regard of "temporary". Simply, "temporary" features loitering on a scale somewhere between holding one's breath and taking up residence. A generational stay is not "temporary".Mavigogun (talk) 16:20, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
- Most of the time this is considered it relates to much shorter timescales: An ice sculpture typically qualifies for FOP because it is "permanently displayed", even though it will be gone after a week. If an ice sculpture is permanent its because of intent, not the objective length of its display, then the same judgement needs to be applied in this unusual case in the other direction.
- One commonality is there is a big difference in intent between "this work will be displayed for this defined period and will be removed at that point" and "this work will be displayed indefinitely (but may be removed at some point in the future)".
- Consider also that precautionary principle indicates when there is serious doubt then onus is to prove the work is fine, not to prove that it isn't.--Nilfanion (talk) 16:37, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
- With regards to the Trump balloon, that is a case of Fair Use. §107 says the work is copyrighted but Wikipedia can use the photo anyway. Commons can't.--Nilfanion (talk) 16:40, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
- Please explain in what way inclusion here is not "fair use"; §107 doesn't specify agent- as you have with Wikipedia; why have you singled out the Commons to be excluded from the provisions of §107? Not a rhetorical question- I'd appreciate education and guidance as to the circumstances that support the statement.
- The proposed interpretation of FOP seems entirely based on intent and not conditions- which creates an unactionably subjective standard for consideration. There is, essentially, no difference between saying "I intend to retrieve this in 20 years" and "I or those I convey interest to reserve the right to retrieve this work at an unspecified future date", based on the Nilfanion's proffered regard of "temporary". Simply, "temporary" features loitering on a scale somewhere between holding one's breath and taking up residence. A generational stay is not "temporary".Mavigogun (talk) 16:20, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
- As to intent, my point was not that there was a complete absence of distinction between the expressions, rather, that merely specifying a date is not definitive of "temporary". The this-therefore-that-must-be rational embodied by the ice sculpture example seems a wishful condition, not a condition in fact- and reminds me we grapple with law and interpretation of law, the fundiments of which are not necessarily built on justice, common good/utility. Unfortunately, poorly contrived law builds in conflict when some condition or regard is presumed to be self evident- leaving us to argue over intent. Is that the case here? Is there any ambiguity in US statute regarding consideration of "temporary" where FOP is concerned, or for who is included or excluded from Fair Use?Mavigogun (talk) 17:05, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
- Commons is excluded from Fair Use. We can only host files on Commons if the work is free from copyright restrictions for any use. Fair use effectively means "this work has restrictions, but we can ignore them because Wikipedia is educational". There is no problem with any of these images being used in the article w:Verity (statue) as long as it is hosted on Wikipedia and complies with WP's fair use provisions. US law is not relevant here, its only about UK law (if we followed US law then we would delete these immediately as US law doesn't provide FOP for sculptures at all).--Nilfanion (talk) 17:41, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Note that Fair Use requires that specific use be fair. Since Commons has no specific use except as a repository from which others can draw, no fiar use rationale can be written for Commons as it can for WP articles. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:54, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
False own work licence, map producer is imprinted at the map margins, original map was created in 1985 Bogomolov.PL (talk) 21:22, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:54, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Neagu Eugenia (talk · contribs)
[edit]Photos of photos, seems out of COM:SCOPE.
- File:Verso Photo , In Photo and Neagu Mihai , Born in 23 November 1924 in Cernauti , Photo from Year 1944 , in Bucharest.jpg
- File:In Photo and Neagu Mihai , Born in 23 November 1924 in Cernauti , Photo from Year 1944 , in Bucharest.jpg
- File:Neagu Mihai , Born in 23 November 1924 , Photo from Year 1944 , in Bucharest.jpg
- File:Neagu Gheorghe , Born in 17 April 1882 in Broscauti - Storojinet , Cerere on Verso.jpg
- File:Neagu Gheorghe , Born in 17 April 1882 in Broscauti - Storojinet , Cerere.jpg
- File:Neagu Mihai , Born in 23 November 1924 in Cernauti , Photo from Year 1949.jpg
- File:Neagu Mihai , Born in 23 November 1924 in Cernauti , Photo from Year 1970 from Bucharest.jpg
- File:Neagu Gheorghe , Born in 17 April 1882 in Broscauti - Storojinet.jpg
- File:Neagu Mihai , Born in Cernauti in 23 November 1924.jpg
- File:Neagu Mircea , Photo from 12 August 2018.jpg
- File:Neagu Mihai , Born in 23 November 1924 in Cernauti.jpg
- File:Neagu Eugenia and Son Neagu Mircea.jpg
- File:Familia Neagu Mihai.jpg
- File:Neagu Eugenia and Son Neagu Mircea , and Neagu Mihai.jpg
- File:Adeverinta Nr.508 for Adomnitii Eugenia , Born in 12 October 1932 in Partestii de Jos - Suceava.jpg
- File:Adeverinta Nr.189 for Adomnitii Eugenia , Born in 12 October 1932 in Partestii de Jos - Suceava.jpg
- File:Neagu Eugenia.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:10, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - also, most are probably copyvios. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:56, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:Toys Elisfkc (talk) 22:20, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:01, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
https://www.facebook.com/galoski/photos/a.157967604259878/1935894086467212/?type=3&theater Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:31, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:01, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
No evidence that the uploader is the artist, en:James Cochran (artist) Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:32, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:01, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Film still: copyrighted. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:37, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:01, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Film still: copyrighted. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:39, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:01, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Too complex for textlogo Ronhjones (Talk) 22:43, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:01, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Screenshot with copyrighted icons. Text should be stored on-wiki with templates such as en:Template:Tweet. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:54, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:02, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
According to EXIF data, files from FB/Instagram. Unlikely to be Own work.
- File:Csm2.jpg
- File:Csm1.jpg
- File:Csm vs asjb.jpg
- File:Entrée du village de Mansoura.jpg
- File:احد الحقول موسم حصاد 2018.jpg
— D Y O L F 77[Talk] 10:57, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:15, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
“FBMD” in the metadata indicates this was previously published on Facebook Ytoyoda (talk) 14:31, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:15, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:15, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
“FBMD” in the EXIF suggests this is a Facebook photo Ytoyoda (talk) 14:33, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:15, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Rapport médical marqué "confidentiel" mentionnant un nom complet ; devrait être retiré pour raisons de confidentialité / "Confidential" medical report including a person's full name Milena (talk) 15:20, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:17, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Questionable authorship claims based on the low resolutions, missing metadata, previous publications found elsewhere, and the uploader's history.
- File:Pulamanthole Town Sky view.jpg – found at https://www.skyscrapercity.com/showpost.php?p=134602005&postcount=342 two years and four months before the uploader claims to have created it. The filename there indicates that it was grabbed from Facebook or Instagram.
- File:Poozhithode Power House.jpg
- File:Lower Periyar Power House.jpg
- File:Neriamangalam Power Station.jpg – Google Images returns a match which was previously available as https://www.malayalamexpress.in/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/21AR66.jpg at https://www.malayalamexpress.in/archives/5586/
- File:Kakkad Power House.jpg
—LX (talk, contribs) 15:42, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:20, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
This image has camera metadata (at the source) but also some flickrwashing Is it own work? Leoboudv (talk) 00:03, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Several photos taken with Nikon D40. Also this one, which I assume are his children or other family. Probably not celebrities. And "Ajrah" means Taxi, also with the D40, another personal photo. Also various photos taken with an iPhone 4, all appears to check out. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 00:20, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: This ARR photo also has the same D40 camera metadata as the uploaded image...so the photo under DR is most likely own work. I withdraw my nomination. --Leoboudv (talk) 03:50, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Nomination withdrawn. --Gbawden (talk) 19:09, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
COM:NOTHOST picture of non notable people not hosted anywhere Buckaroo bob 91 (talk) 21:34, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- Keep in use. Illustrative photograph of clothing that surfers wear. Abzeronow (talk) 22:14, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: File is in use on ko:수영복, ko:래시가드, and ne:पौडिपहिरन. Files that are in use are automatically considered useful for an educational purpose by COM:INUSE, so the fact that they're not individually notable is irrelevant. --bjh21 (talk) 01:07, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; notability is not a requirement either. --Gbawden (talk) 19:06, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
porn isnt allowe on commons Buckaroo bob 91 (talk) 21:41, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Speedy keep not pornographic. Illustrative in-use photograph of naked adult man at a nudist beach. @Alexis Jazz: Abzeronow (talk) 22:13, 10 February 2019 (UTC)- Keep @Buckaroo bob 91: COM:NOTCENSORED - Alexis Jazz ping plz 22:29, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- Keep per both "COM:NOTCENSORED" and "COM:INUSE". --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 00:13, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Per discussion and INUSE. --Gbawden (talk) 19:07, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Incorrect license 71.175.84.215 03:47, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
- What should be the correct one? --E4024 (talk) 03:55, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
- File has metadata, and I don't see any reason to doubt the uploader was the photographer. Abzeronow (talk) 05:29, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
It’s copyrighted under a different publication. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Snh999 (talk • contribs) 23:49, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Not currently in mainspace use. The collection already contains a large number of nude male images. AshFriday (talk) 04:51, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete If the above statement is true. I try to avoid looking at exhibitionist images. If someone wishes to keep this kind of images in their personal space, we have (I have been told :) too many of them. --E4024 (talk) 12:34, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
- Comment In mainspace use again. However, the file should still be deleted since there are better examples available. AshFriday (talk) 11:22, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Snh999: if you can point out where it was published prior to upload to Commons, then the image should be deleted speedily as copyvio. Otherwise Keep while it is used. Ankry (talk) 18:22, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
- Keep, nothing has changed since the last request. There should be a policy that discourages people from nominating the same files depicting nudity again and again for deletion, this is not the first time and this won't be the last. Also no reason has been presented why this file is incorrectly licensed. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 19:30, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: An otherwise unacceptable file does not become "in use" if the uploader simply inserts it into an article. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:23, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
Restored per UnDR.. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:09, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
My photo, should be deleted 65.202.39.131 15:07, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Not used. One of too many. --E4024 (talk) 15:26, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep as per the last 2 DRs and Undel. SPA & 2 IPs, raises an eyebrow. --Fæ (talk) 16:00, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
- North American IPs, anybody can say this person could be an American? (Maybe judging by his eyebrows? :) --E4024 (talk) 16:23, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete as per the previous DR. Not currently in mainspace use and Commons already contains a large number of nude male images. AshFriday (talk) 22:06, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Survived DR's and was undeleted and kept. No valid reason - depicts nudity at a nudist beach so could be used. --Gbawden (talk) 09:22, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
It's mine and I want it down Snh999 (talk) 13:23, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per creator's request. Not currently in mainspace use and Commons already contains a large number of nude male images. AshFriday (talk) 22:18, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Free licenses are irrevocable. The file is big and has EXIF data; it has educational value. Especially good is "entering clothed area" sign. Taivo (talk) 09:34, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Free licenses may be irrevocable, but we allow for courtesy deletions. In this case, we should honor the author's wishes. Doing otherwise could discourage photographers from contributing their work for fear that their requests will be dismissed out of hand. AshFriday (talk) 23:36, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
- Of course such requests should be generally dismissed, that's the idea of free licenses. Taivo (talk) 07:46, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
- No, as I said, we allow for courtesy deletions. We don't want to drive away our contributors by appearing too pedantic. AshFriday (talk) 21:26, 10 June 2019 (UTC).
- Of course such requests should be generally dismissed, that's the idea of free licenses. Taivo (talk) 07:46, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
- Keep This is a good depiction of nudism or naturism. Why take it down? It should be on a nudist mainspace. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 185.244.215.196 (talk) 03:39, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
- Commons already contains a large number of nude male images, and this one is not in use on any mainspace. AshFriday (talk) 21:39, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
- Keep per Taivo and the above sections 1 and 3. 68.194.210.136 11:11, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per creator's request as AshFriday mentioned. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5editorph (talk • contribs) 19:46, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
- Keep per multiple previous discussions. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 10:36, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
OP requests it 5editorph (talk) 00:45, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and AshFriday. Actually not a selfie, so permission from photographer is needed. --Yann (talk) 10:19, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
not educational Alek01913 (talk) 05:59, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
- @Alek01913: ..that begs the question why you uploaded it in the first place. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 06:03, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
Speedy delete per COM:CSD#F10. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 09:41, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Gbawden. Reason for deletion: Personal photo by non-contributors (F10). 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:33, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope nude person (dressed up would still be out of scope). E4024 (talk) 03:04, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- If my memory serves me correctly, this is the same image as in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Naked man on the beach.jpg. Brianjd (talk) 03:14, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Brianjd: It appears the uploader of both mistakenly assumed they couldn't fix their licensing mistake. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 09:50, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
Confusing, this file was (or maybe several different-but-same-name files were) nominated several times and successfully deleted as per above, however in 2019 an undeletion request of this file was also successful, maybe @Jeff G., De728631, Ankry, Yann, and Fæ: should explain why their undeletion rationales are still valid for keeping this file, otherwise I would {{Vd}} this per COM:NOPENIS. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:34, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Liuxinyu970226: At least one of the discussions refers to a different-but-same-name file, as it refers to a sign that is not shown in this file. What about the others? It’s too hard to read through all these discussions without knowing what they are referring to. Brianjd (talk) 04:44, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Liuxinyu970226: What undeletion rationales? This appears to be a different photo than the ones discussed in DRs 1-5 above, and should be considered on it's own merits. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 09:50, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Unless there are clear copyvio reasons to delete, this is deletion just because someone doesn't like nudity. In the Beach nudity category, there are just 2 photographs of solo nudist men facing the camera, this is one. Therefore COM:NUDE does not apply because we don't have loads of existing alternatives. For exactly the same reasons this photograph is in scope --Fæ (talk) 10:14, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep per Fæ. OTOH, the uploader's willingness to ignore "Warning: A file by that name has been deleted or moved." is suspect. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 10:53, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- No. "this is not deletion just because someone doesn't like nudity" nor it should be keep "because someone does like nudity". It is a DR asking the deletion of the image of an out-of-scope person, nude or dressed up, just like those hundreds of young men and women smiling at a camera that I proposed for deletion. Most, or almost none of those previous DRs have not attracted any keep votes; therefore I would be right in suspecting that these votes are because some people like nude images, IOW exactly the same subjectivity (personal PoV) that has been tried to accuse me of. Best regards. E4024 (talk) 11:14, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep There are applications for this photo including on the nudity page for simple English. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.90.167.143 (talk) 12:13, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- (Question to the anonymous:) Who are you? The uploader? The photographed? Wife, girl friend, any friend of him? Why do we need this exact pic and not use the other hundreds we already have? E4024 (talk) 13:38, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- @E4024: The anonymous has every right to remain anonymous. You should not be asking them who they are or how they are related to the subject. @Fæ has explained why this image is in scope and you have not responded. Brianjd (talk) 13:45, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- @E4024: I am the photographer. I own the original files. Rumblerumble33 (talk) 02:44, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
- @E4024 and Brianjd: The anonymous user may be uploader Rumblerumble33 per this edit. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:20, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: Hopefully not, since the uploader has since voted under their new name. Brianjd (talk) 13:02, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
- @E4024 and Brianjd: The anonymous user may be uploader Rumblerumble33 per this edit. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:20, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- (Question to the anonymous:) Who are you? The uploader? The photographed? Wife, girl friend, any friend of him? Why do we need this exact pic and not use the other hundreds we already have? E4024 (talk) 13:38, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- simple:Nudity already has plenty of photos, and there are even more photos available that probably do a better job of demonstrating nudity, like File:Both together fully nude.jpg, File:Cambridge WNBR 2016 (27847182306).jpg or File:Nudes a Poppin 2014 (14535427688).jpg. Although a crop of this photo could do a good job too. Brianjd (talk) 12:42, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
- @E4024: Please strike your question. Hassling folx in public, in order to out their identities is not just uncivil, it's against the terms of use of this website. Refer to "violation of privacy" at wmf:Terms of use. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 14:57, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
Notes: 1. I wrote my previous comment above the last one, because although that argument sounds like "delete" it could be seen as a part of the "keep" by an IP. 2. It is not necessary nor correct to add a "number" to the DR pages, because they are not related to the same file, they simply use a "previous file name". 3. An occasional visitor comes and adds an image of an out-of-scope person and we make a fuss around it. They must be happy for this welcome. My suggestion: Let us change our guidelines and not delete anything from now on, on scope basis. Everybody has a right to want to see his/her image on the internet; not only those that dare to expose their genitals in public... --E4024 (talk) 13:45, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- Agree with number 3. We waste too much time arguing over what is in scope or not. Brianjd (talk) 13:47, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- @E4024: Re 2: It is necessary and correct to add a "number" to the DR sections because they are on the same page with each other and browsers will only see the first one if they all have the same exact name. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:24, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- WRT guidelines; this is a pointless straw man argument. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 14:57, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- Any user whose name I hear from time to time as probable candidates to adminship may strike (bolded my consent to make life easier) whatever I have done that deserves being censured in this DR. I do not care. What I am most curious about is, when and if they are elected to the said post, how will they be able to close any deletion request regarding naked people images as I see they -IMHO of course- have a favourable approach to almost all of these without paying attention to the considerations of regular users like myself.
- (BTW bravo, newcomer; you have been received as a hero. You even made me repent having opened this discussion, although I still believe your valuable contribution must be deleted.) E4024 (talk) 15:13, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- @E4024: Strike your own question. If you are writing about me, I cite policies and guidelines directly or indirectly. To be clear, this is 1 of just 2 photographs of solo nudist men facing the camera on this project, and thus is in scope. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 05:15, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
- (BTW bravo, newcomer; you have been received as a hero. You even made me repent having opened this discussion, although I still believe your valuable contribution must be deleted.) E4024 (talk) 15:13, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Image's potential in-scope usefulness would be improved if there was more information. Eg what country/place is this? Is this a beach or park where clothing is optional or nudity is the norm? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:56, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- Comment My memory was almost correct: This appears to be a retouched copy of the image in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Naked man on the beach.jpg. I know this because I saved the latter image at the time. There was more information available on the latter image’s description and talk page, but I did not save this. @Infrogmation: As an admin, you can see this; is it useful? Brianjd (talk) 05:57, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Brianjd: I can fill it in if you give me access to see the info. Rumblerumble33 (talk) 19:18, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Rumblerumble33: Signatures in discussions should include timestamps. I have added timestamps to your signatures. Please sign your posts with four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically include a timestamp. Brianjd (talk) 08:31, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Rumblerumble33: If you are referring to the info in the deleted file File:Naked man on the beach.jpg, I cannot give you access as I do not have access myself. This is why I asked an admin to check. Brianjd (talk) 08:34, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Brianjd: @Infrogmation: Photo coordinates are (40.4585670, -73.9925572), I just don’t know how to list them. I also have the original unedited photo if that helps with EXIF. Rumblerumble33 (talk) 12:36, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Rumblerumble33: Thanks, I added the location for you. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:05, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: Thank you! Rumblerumble33 (talk) 14:12, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Rumblerumble33: You're welcome! What's the name of that beach or area, and what did you retouch? Also, please do not ignore "Warning: A file by that name has been deleted or moved" again. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:22, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: It’s Gunnison Beach in Sandy Hook, NJ. That particular area is a service road and he wasn’t supposed to be there :*) ... I made the photo brighter and colorful as it came out dark due to limited exposure. I’ll make sure to rename if I get that warning again. Rumblerumble33 (talk) 14:36, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: I have other photos of him from that same day. Is it valuable to post them and should I post them raw and unedited? Also should I rename the file given your original message and if so how do I do that? Rumblerumble33 (talk) 15:00, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Rumblerumble33: Please consider how the photos fit into COM:PS before doing so. If you do so, please post the highest resolution raw and unedited version with metadata per COM:HR, and then the edited version with overwrite or a separate name. What new name would you choose for this file? — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:10, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: I am not very creative with names. Perhaps “male nakedness on beach?” Or should it be more precise? I am open to suggestions.
- @Jeff G.: I suggested “File:Naked and barefoot man on Gunnison Beach.jpg” as a file name replacement.
- @Jeff G.: @Brianjd: @Infrogmation: Rename request rejected because this is still up for deletion nomination. Rumblerumble33 (talk) 16:58, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: I am not very creative with names. Perhaps “male nakedness on beach?” Or should it be more precise? I am open to suggestions.
- @Rumblerumble33: Please consider how the photos fit into COM:PS before doing so. If you do so, please post the highest resolution raw and unedited version with metadata per COM:HR, and then the edited version with overwrite or a separate name. What new name would you choose for this file? — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:10, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Rumblerumble33: You're welcome! What's the name of that beach or area, and what did you retouch? Also, please do not ignore "Warning: A file by that name has been deleted or moved" again. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:22, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: Should this be in Category:Beaches at Sandy Hook, New Jersey? This seems like a surprising result (which we are told to avoid, though I cannot find a relevant policy). Brianjd (talk) 10:40, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Brianjd: Would you prefer Category:Sandy Hook, New Jersey or Category:Gateway National Recreation Area, as the location isn't exactly on Gunnison Beach? Perhaps we need a Gunnison Beach cat that isn't surprising? — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:16, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Brianjd: @Jeff G.: You need a Gunnison Beach cat. There are about 12 separate beaches in the Gateway National Recreation Area. Gunnison is the only nude beach of the 12. It’s the furthest from the old military equipment and will be the only one where you will find nudist people and signs about nudity. It has a life and aura of its own. Rumblerumble33 (talk) 01:59, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: I was using the phrase "surprising result" in the same sense as User talk:Etsidun#Avoid surprising results, that is, nudity in a non-nudity category. Apparently you are not supposed to do this. Brianjd (talk) 05:19, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: @Brianjd: I agree we should create the Gunnison Beach cat. How can I help do that? NudistPhotographer (talk) 11:25, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
- @NudistPhotographer: See Commons:Categories. This page contains a quick guide to categorisation, followed by details. Brianjd (talk) 13:02, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: @Brianjd: I agree we should create the Gunnison Beach cat. How can I help do that? NudistPhotographer (talk) 11:25, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Brianjd: Would you prefer Category:Sandy Hook, New Jersey or Category:Gateway National Recreation Area, as the location isn't exactly on Gunnison Beach? Perhaps we need a Gunnison Beach cat that isn't surprising? — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:16, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: Thank you! Rumblerumble33 (talk) 14:12, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Rumblerumble33: Thanks, I added the location for you. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:05, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Brianjd: @Infrogmation: Photo coordinates are (40.4585670, -73.9925572), I just don’t know how to list them. I also have the original unedited photo if that helps with EXIF. Rumblerumble33 (talk) 12:36, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Unobjectionable, potentially useful. Location identified as Beach at Sandy Hook New Jersey - seems to be the only media of beach nudity in that state. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:31, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: @Infrogmation: EXIF data for the photo. I don’t know how to transfer it. Rumblerumble33 (talk) 15:33, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
<Exif Metadata> Aperture: f/6.3
Aperture (APEX): 5.375
Aspect Ratio: 3 × 2
Camera Maker: Canon
Camera Model: Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark III
Camera Lens Model: 8.8-36.8 mm
Color Model: RGB
Color Space: sRGB
Components Configuration: 1, 2, 3, 0
Custom Rendered: Normal
Date Taken: Jun 7, 2020 02:50:33 PM
Depth: 8
Digital Zoom: 1
DPI Width: 72
DPI Height: 72
EXIF Version: 2.3.1
Exposure Bias Value: 0 ev
Exposure Mode: Auto
Exposure Program: Program AE
Exposure Time: 1/1600s
File Name: IMG_0011.JPG
File Size: 9.9 MB
Flash: No Flash
Flash Pix Version: 1.0
FNumber: f/6.3
Focal Length: 8.800000000000001 mm
ISO: 125
Metering Mode: Multi-segment
Orientation: Normal
Profile Name: sRGB IEC61966-2.1
Resolution: 20 MegaPixels
Scene Capture Type: Standard
Shutter Speed Value: 1/1579s
White Balance: Auto
Author: Emily Claire Braston
- Comment Hoping we can vote on this soon. If we aim to keep I want to change the name and then upload the other raw files. Rumblerumble33 (talk) 12:58, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
- @NudistPhotographer: It is not actually a vote. The “votes” (sometimes people call them “!votes”) are just there to make the discussion easier to read. The person who closes the discussion uses their own judgement, guided by the entire discussion. Brianjd (talk) 13:02, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy keep I never got to vote on my own deletion request. I vote to keep of course. NudistPhotographer (talk) 16:55, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. ƏXPLICIT 10:22, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Note: The file discussed in this section was renamed to File:Nude and barefoot man on beach.jpg 11:50, 1 April 2021 (UTC) and then deleted 12:10, 10 April 2021 (UTC) per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nude and barefoot man on beach.jpg. The filename was salted 14:28, 10 April 2021 (UTC). — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:37, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
duplicate of file:Philosophical Transactions - Volume 053.djvu
I uploaded this because of a problem with File:Philosophical Transactions - Volume 053.djvu which has the same content. That problem was fixed by a user, so this PDF version is now unnecessary. MartinPoulter (talk) 22:51, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Wdwd. --Gbawden (talk) 19:07, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Low quality, not used picture of the turkish model Hasan Huseyn. No metadata available. Very probable copyright violation. Harlock81 (talk) 23:21, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Unused pic of OoS person. --E4024 (talk) 23:40, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 19:04, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 23:39, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 19:04, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
必要がなくなったため Monadaisuki (talk) 14:47, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Not in reason. It is thought that the person who requests this deletion request does not understand the licensing and deletion policy on Wikimedia Commons.--G I Chandor2 (talk) 08:56, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Wikipediaを Monadaisuki (talk) 14:48, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Wikipediaを Monadaisuki (talk) 14:49, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Wikipediaをやめることにしたため Monadaisuki (talk) 14:49, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:41, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
"Copyright violation" Sorry, I got this picture (all versions) from other site. This picture is not mine. Monadaisuki (talk) 04:14, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no new infos, no reason for deletion. see above. Please see COM:LRV. --Wdwd (talk) 11:50, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
I'm not the copyright holder of this picture. I stole this picture from other site. COM:LRV is no valid reason to keep it. Monadaisuki (talk) 16:38, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:53, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:39, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pablojavier6912 (talk · contribs)
[edit]unlikely to be own work
- File:Carlos Pellegrini, Est. de Subte.jpg
- File:Gee en estacion entre rios.jpg
- File:Entrada a Catedral.jpg
Didym (talk) 20:40, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- FBMD in MD. --E4024 (talk) 20:45, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:36, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1083384839372505088/xmg4tDUO_400x400.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:52, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:36, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Sibelius.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Sibelius.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
non free screenshot Ezarateesteban 22:01, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Sibelius.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:36, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Sibelius.jpg){kind=link}
Photo: volegov.com Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:05, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:36, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ua7r socks
[edit]Seem to be copyright violations: the uploaders User:Aomine9 and User:AarN71 have been blocked as socks of User:Ua7r on English Wikipedia.
- File:Udit Narayan 2019.jpg: User claims to have taken this in January 2019, but versions of this were aready present on various websites in 2015, 2016 and 2017
- File:Aditya Narayan in 2019.jpg: Lifted from [2], cropped to remove the watermark
- File:Udit Narayan Jha Autograph.jpg (uploaded by Aomine9): From [3], cropped
- File:Aditya Narayan signature.jpg: Given the user's history, seems to be copied from somewhere or made up
Utcursch (talk) 15:01, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:44, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Ukraine. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:01, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- What is the evidence for there being no FoP in Ukraine? I have never seen any. It's red on the map in Commons:Freedom_of_panorama, but nothing is cited to support this. I think the assertion above needs to be proven before it is acted upon.--Smerus (talk) 19:06, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Ukraine is under former Soviet Union on that page; the absence of FoP is very well established. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:42, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Russia for sculptures. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:10, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:40, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violation. In the footer of site of origin is written that "all rights reserved since 2016". Leon saudanha (talk) 17:28, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:37, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
Unencylopedic porn. I question whether the uploader is actually the copyright holder, as this picture seems to be in a lot of places: https://www.google.com/search?q=big+nipples+small+breasts&tbm=isch&tbs=simg:CAQSlwEJ_1Up9f6Db5rQaiwELEKjU2AQaBAhDCBUMCxCwjKcIGmIKYAgDEij4G-AQ8hydHaQf_1x68EJ0a8RyqGsk8yjyiMq4ysTKcMq0yxjyyMtUsGjBanmAaGlbRrbO2n0e3HaPk9cf6dZr2w4IHYyRK6cvfxBkBoc4zzRQBbamdb5aVVWogBAwLEI6u_1ggaCgoICAESBFpP_18gM&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwitnZ6O3LHgAhWqjFQKHVH9BXcQwg4IKygA&biw=1372&bih=947#imgrc=9154oyRPtNYeZM: Clayoquot (talk) 17:48, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:PORN and COM:Nudity. Image is redundant, out of scope and a likely copyright violation. AshFriday (talk) 00:42, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:37, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
Public domain status is not established. The author is not established, and was likely the subject's mother, Mary Hastings Bradley, a writer of (inter alia) travel books who died in 1986, so that any life-of-the-author-plus-70-years copyright has not expired. If the photo appeared in one of Bradley's travel books, published between 1921 and 1929, it is possible the copyright has expired or was not renewed, but that has not been established. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 19:19, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:35, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
- Restored: as per [4]. Yann (talk) 16:28, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
![[4]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests&oldid=340007874#File:Alice_Sheldon_aka_James_Tiptree,_Jr._with_Kikuyu_people.jpg){kind=link}
Came from here: http://www.dagospia.com/mediagallery/dago_fotogallery-55580/380164.htm Skyfall (talk) 19:42, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:30, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
This photo was previously published at https://palermocalcio.it/en/news/afternoon-session-for-the-rosanero_36410/, requires OTRS ticket Ytoyoda (talk) 20:12, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:29, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
Photo: Paragon Inc., missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:57, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:25, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
The user uploaded this picture with other three ones which resulted copyright violations (from here). I didn't find any copy of this picture on Internet, but for quality and subject I suspect that it is a copyright violation as such as the other pictures. Harlock81 (talk) 23:11, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:24, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
The permission on twitter only gives the person who asked the photographer the right 'to use' the image 'on Wikipedia'. It does not "allows anyone to use it for any purpose including unrestricted redistribution, commercial use, and modification" as the template describes. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:42, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- No objections from my side, mistake in my youth. :) Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 20:48, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:23, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
violation of the rules of commons.wikimedia.org, false use of the name of User:Шуҳрат Садиев, нарушение правил commons.wikimedia.org ложное использование имени User:Шуҳрат Садиев- (talk) 17:42, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 14:07, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
The watermark and source says: "Photo by, or sourced by, Archivio Perini@ . Cardesignto@gmail.com" Does the flickr account owner own the rights to this image? Leoboudv (talk) 20:19, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- I was the uploader, and I agree. The image should be deleted. Ketil3 (talk) 09:45, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --whym (talk) 13:29, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
requested by IP User_talk:37.55.239.246, his/her reason:"You can check that Silver Pilawa is not the coat of arms of Buchach in German, Ukrainian, Polish and others wiki. Thank's ))" 94rain Talk 08:56, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- Jest to poprawny polski herb Buczacza z dwudziestolecia międzywojennego. Pilawa winna być srebrna, a nie złota. Poznaniak (dyskusja) 17:35, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Moved File:POL Brody COA.svg to File:POL Buczacz COA.svg over the redirect. Also updated the file description. --jdx Re: 19:02, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
Not enough information on the copyright of this file. Lolo456367 (talk) 15:29, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata, likely copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:42, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by JuTa as no license. Uploader added a license later, but changed author and source to own too - see here. Doubtfully own work. JuTa 09:04, 10 February 2019 (UTC) --- Hi, there is no copyright issue here. while creating this file, I didn't know what to enter in the author and source section. It was my first upload in wiki commons. --Appushere (talk) 04:13, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; copyvio, found online at https://www.filmfare.com/awards/filmfare-awards-south-2017/malayalam/winners. --Gbawden (talk) 08:07, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
dead 1967 ; the firt publication was in french around 1925 http://www.artnet.fr/artistes/emilio-vila/cr%C3%A8me-simon-BT5LAPEYYOi1KEEOQDYTyA2 Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 19:34, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 17:50, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Codc as no permission (No permission since). Probably not PD by age, but the copyright owner apparently released it into the PD. However, this still needs a confirmation via OTRS. Didym (talk) 20:14, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Die OTRS-Einverständniserklärung wurde am 12.3.2019 permissions-de@wikimedia.org übermittelt. --Mewa767 (talk) 16:43, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
There is an OTRS email received for “File:Thiepvalkaserne_(AK_Gebr._Metz_1939_TPk117).jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2019021210006807. --Didym (talk) 21:44, 16 February 2019 (UTC)- I have just accepted permission for “File:Thiepvalkaserne_(AK_Gebr._Metz_1939_TPk117).jpg” under ticket:2019021210006807. -- Ra Boe watt?? 19:50, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
Kept: confirmed via OTRS. --Didym (talk) 20:21, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
file will be updated to the new versions Syahrialdi1994 (talk) 06:13, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
this file will be changed to new version with some revision. Syahrialdi1994 (talk) 07:13, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - Complex logo w/o OTRS. --E4024 (talk) 20:28, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:05, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
See Commons:Deletion policy. Low-quality file. The file is not in use anymore. Alternative picture available. File:Ferfried Prinz von Hohenzollern Geburtshaus Schloss Umkirch.jpg 188.194.57.99 02:07, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- Keep There's only one alternative photo, which is also low resolution and of unclear source, uploaded by a user whose name stretches belief. Nemo 10:30, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
- OK. Keep. Why not.--188.194.57.99 21:40, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: low quality, but one of only two files of the subject. --Rosenzweig τ 22:36, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
copyvio, contemporary artworks, no fop (church built 1962–1965) Martin Sg. (talk) 16:31, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: no FOP in Germany for interiors. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:47, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
copyvio, contemporary artwork, no fop (church built 1962–1965) Martin Sg. (talk) 16:32, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: no FOP in Germany for interiors. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:52, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Most likely owned by Pasquale D'Angiolillo. A similar image of this person shown was deleted due to the metadata showing the copyright holder. This requires OTRS permission. 1989 (talk) 01:31, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: apparently copyvio from [5]. Ruthven (msg) 16:01, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
I don't see a CC BY 3.0 license at the source. Leoboudv (talk) 05:39, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- oops, again! Victuallers (talk) 12:26, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: by Ellin Beltz. Ruthven (msg) 16:01, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Seeming dup of File:Wandtattoo Stilvolles Ornament.jpg (just difference in shade used to remove watermark in lower-right corner)? DMacks (talk) 05:57, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:01, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Louis-Fabrice Jean (talk · contribs)
[edit]unlikely to be own work
- File:Nicolas Sarkozy à Gilley lors du lancement de la campagne des élections régionales le 5 septembre 2015.jpg
- File:Alex Polizzi.jpg
- File:"Modulation entre harmonie et mathématique" par Roger Pfund (Rolex Learning Center EPFL Lausanne Suisse).jpg
- File:Louis Jourdan’s Villa located 1139 Maybrook Drive in Beverly Hills Inside Dining-room 2017.jpg
- File:Louis Jourdan’s Villa located 1139 Maybrook Drive in Beverly Hills Inside Living-room 2 2017.jpg
- File:Louis Jourdan’s Villa located 1139 Maybrook Drive in Beverly Hills Inside Living-room 1 2017.jpg
- File:Louis Jourdan’s Villa located 1139 Maybrook Drive in Beverly Hills Outside Backyard and Pool 2017.jpg
- File:Louis Jourdan’s Villa located 1139 Maybrook Drive in Beverly Hills Outside Front Door 2017.jpg
- File:Louis Jourdan’s Villa located 1139 Maybrook Drive in Beverly Hills Outside Driveway 2017.jpg
- File:RoboAction(s) A1 K1 Performance de Dragan Ilic avec le robot industriel Kuka lors du Festival Ars Electronica, Linz, Autriche, septembre 2015.jpg
- File:RoboAction(s) A1 K1 Performance de Dragan Ilic avec le Robot Kuka lors du Festival Ars Electronica, Linz, Autriche, septembre 2015.pdf
- File:Bristol 410 Bordeaux (1968).jpg
- File:Jensen Interceptor MK III bleue.jpg
- File:Peugeot 607 argentée (2000).jpg
- File:Never Die Alone 2004 DMX Earl Simmons alias King David Stutz-Blackhawk Caramel.png
- File:Columbo 1978 Murder Under Glass Louis Jourdan alias Paul Gerard Stutz-Blackhawk 2 tones.png
- File:Columbo 1976 The Forgotten Lady John Payne alias Ned Diamond Stutz-Blackhawk Grey.png
- File:Paysage automnal du Saugeais depuis le Crêt Monniot (1141 m.).jpg
- File:Ferme La Grange Brûlée La Montagne de La Chaux de Gilley Ete 2010.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_A1_K1_Performance_de_Dragan_Ilic_avec_le_robot_industriel_Kuka_lors_du_Festival_Ars_Electronica,_Linz,_Autriche,_septembre_2015.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Didym (talk) 11:28, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Hallo Didym ! Good evening Didym !
Betreff. :
RE ː
- ːFile:En bleu, le Venezuela et ses principales îles sur la carte de l'Europe de l'ouest avec la ville de Caracas placée sur Paris.jpg
- ːFile:En bleu, l'île de Cuba et ses principales îles sur la carte de l'Europe de l'ouest avec La Havane placée sur Paris.png
- ːFile:En rouge, les principales îles de Polynésie française sur une carte d'Europe avec l’île de Tahiti placée sur Paris.png
- ːFile:Taille de l'Île de Saint-Barthélémy par rapport à la Ville de Paris 3 11 2018 Bis Saint-Barthélémy∝Paris.png
- ːFile:Taille Nouvelle-Calédonie Par Rapport à la Métropole 2 11 2018 Bis Nouvelle- Calédonie∝France.png
- ːFile:Nicolas Sarkozy à Gilley lors du lancement de la campagne des élections régionales le 5 septembre 2015.jpg
- ːFile:Alex Polizzi.jpg
- ːFile:"Modulation entre harmonie et mathématique" par Roger Pfund (Rolex Learning Center EPFL Lausanne Suisse).jpg
- ːFile:Louis Jourdan’s Villa located 1139 Maybrook Drive in Beverly Hills Inside Dining-room 2017.jpg
- ːFile:Louis Jourdan’s Villa located 1139 Maybrook Drive in Beverly Hills Inside Living-room 2 2017.jpg
- ːFile:Louis Jourdan’s Villa located 1139 Maybrook Drive in Beverly Hills Inside Living-room 1 2017.jpg
- ːFile:Louis Jourdan’s Villa located 1139 Maybrook Drive in Beverly Hills Outside Backyard and Pool 2017.jpg
- ːFile:Louis Jourdan’s Villa located 1139 Maybrook Drive in Beverly Hills Outside Front Door 2017.jpg
- ːFile:Louis Jourdan’s Villa located 1139 Maybrook Drive in Beverly Hills Outside Driveway 2017.jpg
- ːFileːRoboAction(s) A1 K1 Performance de Dragan Ilic avec le robot industriel Kuka lors du Festival Ars Electronica, Linz, Autriche, septembre 2015.jpg
- ːFile:RoboAction(s) A1 K1 Performance de Dragan Ilic avec le Robot Kuka lors du Festival Ars Electronica, Linz, Autriche, septembre 2015.pdf
- ːFile:Bristol 410 Bordeaux (1968).jpg
- ːFile:Jensen Interceptor MK III bleue.jpg
- ːFile:Peugeot 607 argentée (2000).jpg
- ːFile:Never Die Alone 2004 DMX Earl Simmons alias King David Stutz-Blackhawk Caramel.png
- ːFile:Columbo 1978 Murder Under Glass Louis Jourdan alias Paul Gerard Stutz-Blackhawk 2 tones.png
- ːFileːColumbo1976 The Forgotten Lady John Payne alias Ned Diamond Stutz-Blackhawk Grey.png
- ːFile:Paysage automnal du Saugeais depuis le Crêt Monniot (1141 m.).jpg
- ːFile:Ferme La Grange Brûlée La Montagne de La Chaux de Gilley Ete 2010.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_A1_K1_Performance_de_Dragan_Ilic_avec_le_robot_industriel_Kuka_lors_du_Festival_Ars_Electronica,_Linz,_Autriche,_septembre_2015.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Alle diese Dateien sind das Ergebnis umfassender Untersuchungen und großer Kreativität, die das Verständnis eines Themas erleichtern sollen.
All these files are the result of a far-reaching research and of a great deal of creativity intended to facilitate the understanding of any given matter.
Ein Löschen dieser Dateien wäre für Wikipedia -und uns alle- ein Verlust.
Deleting them would be a big loss for Wikipedia and for us all.
Um so mehr als diese beiden letzten Dateien definitiv 200 % von mir erstellt sind :
All the more so as these two last files are 200 % my own work :
- ːFile:Paysage automnal du Saugeais depuis le Crêt Monniot (1141 m.).jpg
- ːFile:Ferme La Grange Brûlée La Montagne de La Chaux de Gilley Ete 2010.jpg
Deshalb bitte ich Sie höflich, die « Nomination » aufzuheben.
Therefore I kindly ask you to cancel the nomination upon receipt.
Danke für Ihr Verständnis.
Thank you for you understanding.
Louis-Fabrice Jean (talk) 23:39, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: these are screenshots from movies, without permission from the copyright holders (producer/director/screenwriter depending on the countries). Ruthven (msg) 16:04, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
uploader request --Alaa :)..! 13:26, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:04, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:TV25 Logo.svg Malo95 (talk) 14:58, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose - I don't understand why this logo should be deleted as the new logo is just the same version of the previous one with a slightly different type of green. Better uploading another updated version of the old one rather than deleting it to replace it by a new but same logo. Ngagnebin (talk) 16:23, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- Comment - Before I uploaded the new svg version I only found this (File:TV25Logo cmyk.jpg) file. So I uploaded the svg version (File:TV25 Logo.svg) and replaced the logo everywhere. Some days later I found your version (File:TV25.svg) and replaced your version at the french wiki.
I thought my file should stay and yours should be deleted because my file has the correct colors, the name is similar to File:TV24 Logo.svg and it's used in the articles. But we can do it also the opposite around.--Malo95 (talk) 08:35, 11 February 2019 (UTC)- Ok, Thank you for your comment. :) I would have rather started a discussion with me prior to deleting the file and then ask to comment. I don't understand the need to change the name of the file when it didn't pose any trouble and was correctly put in the right categories. As I said, your correct colour version could have been uploaded over my file, that is usually how it works (it seems to me but I can make a mistake though). I realised also with your comment above that you did the same for TV24. :-/ Have a nice day. Ngagnebin (talk) 14:07, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
- Comment - Before I uploaded the new svg version I only found this (File:TV25Logo cmyk.jpg) file. So I uploaded the svg version (File:TV25 Logo.svg) and replaced the logo everywhere. Some days later I found your version (File:TV25.svg) and replaced your version at the french wiki.
Deleted: per discussion. Ruthven (msg) 16:05, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
The picture shows the wrong item. The actually meant gate is on the other side of the property. 2003:C6:EF32:9200:D1A5:7DED:AF52:1CBC 15:06, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Rename, fix description and remove from de:Liste der Baudenkmäler in Tegernsee. No need to delete the picture. --тнояsтеn ⇔ 06:39, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
- Keep According to Google Maps, the IP is correct. I (a) delist the image from de:Liste der Baudenkmäler in Tegernsee and (b) perform a renaming. Well, let this picture just be a nice old gate. --Mattes (talk) 17:47, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 16:05, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
,_Februar_2019_(3).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Februar_2019_(3).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyrighted work by Keith Haring (d. 1990), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:02, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
,_Februar_2019_(3).jpg){kind=link}
- Not in Germany: Kunstwerk im öffentlichen Raum. -- Kürschner (talk) 16:03, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per Kürschner: there is FOP in Germany. Ruthven (msg) 16:06, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
,_Februar_2019_(3).jpg){kind=link}
,_Februar_2019_(3).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
The previous closure is wrong: COM:FOP Germany does not cover works indoors. By the location of this artwork it is evident that this is indoors. German FOP is for outdoors / exteriors only. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:09, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
- It is NOT indoors. It is in the outside entrance, visable from the street. -- Kürschner (talk) 09:57, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Kürschner: the only question is, does that entrance a "street, way, or public open space"? Not every "publicly-accessible place" in Germany are covered by German FOP. See also COM:Germany#Public. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:02, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
- It is seen from the public street. Everything else may be decided by others. Bye, have a nice day. -- Kürschner (talk) 11:28, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Kürschner: however, it appears you (the photographer) are not on the public street. The German FOP is very particular on the photographer's location. That's why the nature of the entrance (where you, the photographer, took a photo of the artwork) is important. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:55, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
- It is seen from the public street. Everything else may be decided by others. Bye, have a nice day. -- Kürschner (talk) 11:28, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Kürschner: the only question is, does that entrance a "street, way, or public open space"? Not every "publicly-accessible place" in Germany are covered by German FOP. See also COM:Germany#Public. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:02, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: The artwork is contemporary (it looks like a Keith Haring) - it's likely a derived work by Haring. Better to be safe than sorry. To me, this would violate the US copyright due to being a contemporary artwork. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 17:07, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
,_Februar_2019_(2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Februar_2019_(2).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyrighted work by Keith Haring (d. 1990), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:03, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
,_Februar_2019_(2).jpg){kind=link}
- Not in Germany: Kunstwerk im öffentlichen Raum. --Kürschner (talk) 16:06, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per Kürschner: there is FOP in Germany. Ruthven (msg) 16:06, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
,_Februar_2019_(2).jpg){kind=link}
,_Februar_2019_(2).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
The previous closure is wrong: COM:FOP Germany does not cover works indoors. By the location of this artwork it is evident that this is indoors. German FOP is for outdoors / exteriors only. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:07, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 17:06, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
non inserito nella categoria giusta. Lucianux021279 (talk) 18:44, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 16:07, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Delete taken from [6], which does not have a license compatiable with Commons. No evidence to indicate the work is actually the work of the uploader. Hammersoft (talk) 19:24, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:08, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Tagged as no source. Obviously public domain engraving of early 19th Century. Abzeronow (talk) 19:36, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- Keep - {PD-old} is fine for this file - Jcb (talk) 19:51, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: nonsense DR. @Abzeronow: In those cases, just correct the license, thanks. Ruthven (msg) 16:08, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Most likely derivative work. No EXIF. User has uploaded copyvios before. See talk page. 1989 (talk) 20:59, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:09, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Conflicting indications : "Jews in Germany" and "this group has been treated in a Quebec hospital". Where was the photo taken, in Germany or Quebec ? As the information is insufficient the picture seems not useful for educational purpose. And is it a personnal work (as the facts go back to 1903) ? 2A01:CB00:980:7A00:BD71:B60C:A04A:49CE 21:20, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- Since the file is in use on fr:Pogroms antisémites en Russie, it is automatically useful by COM:INUSE. On the other hand, I am mildly suspicious of its copyright status. --bjh21 (talk) 01:03, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per {{PD-Canada-anon}}. Ruthven (msg) 16:19, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Photo of photo, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:48, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:19, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
https://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?p=143922573 Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:14, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:20, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Low quality, not used picture maybe of the turkish model Hasan Huseyn. No metadata available. Very probable copyright violation. Harlock81 (talk) 23:24, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- Photo on user page. If the user is active, it may be kept. (I doubt he or she is.) The depicted person is not a "Turkish" model BTW. --E4024 (talk) 23:42, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- You are right. I thincked it was a sandbox. Anyhow, picture and user page seems both out of the purpose of our projects. --Harlock81 (talk) 18:12, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. Ruthven (msg) 16:20, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Sorry to bring it again, but this was uploaded by the depicted person (per their AZ:WP user page). If they are looking at their own tripod, how come the result is a profile pic? Does EXIF help us? E4024 (talk) 15:27, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: no longer in use, now out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:26, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
i can do new flag - ร้อยตรี โชคดี (talk) 08:24, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: This file is in use on en:Thailand National Games and th:กีฬาแห่งชาติ. @ร้อยตรี โชคดี: You can make make your new flag and either upload it as a new version of this file (if it's a small change) or upload it under a different name. Neither of these requires this file to be deleted. --bjh21 (talk) 00:45, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:04, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
(c) Pavol Funtal, funtalfoto@yahoo.com, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:24, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:00, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
With all due respect to the uploader, this appears to be a professional photograph, and I doubt he would have taken it at thirteen years old.[7] Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:37, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- This is a picture of my late father, yes it's true I didn't take it personally, but it's a family possession and I thought it's acceptable to add it his Wikipedia page. User:Laith_al_jazi (talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Laithabdallah (talk • contribs) 12:29, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Laithabdallah: actually, yes, that is useful. Do you speak legally for your family when you released the picture? Cheers. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:18, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; uploader needs to provide permission to OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 12:00, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
Authors request: I, Juan R. Lascorz, as author of this file and thus ultimate holder of its rights, ask for the file to be deleted from Wikimedia Commons. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lascorz (talk • contribs) 2019-02-08T15:42:37 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ℯxplicit 00:40, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
https://www.htby.co.il/%D7%92%D7%99%D7%95%D7%A8%D7%90_%D7%96%D7%99%D7%A0%D7%92%D7%A8?id=2938 Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:11, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:00, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Exif data indicates not own work. Tekstman (talk) 08:05, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
What exif data is there now? --Roeten (talk) 13:33, 10 February 2019 (UTC) The new upload does not show the exif either. My bad. Gets lost in png. Should I upload in jpg? Thanks. --Roeten (talk) 15:05, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:30, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
Verdacht auf Urheberrechtsverletzung: "Painting from ca. 1950" laut Beschreibung Haster2 (talk) 10:11, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- Und wie darunter beschrieben, liegt entsprechende Erlaubnis vor --Olivhill (talk) 22:55, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
- Nur: Wer der Verwandten hat das Urheberrecht geerbt und wer hat die Erlaubnis erteilt? Das ist nicht ansatzweise ersichtlich. Es ist davon auszugehen, dass die Kinder das Urheberrecht geerbt haben (und ggf. auf ihre Kinder weitervererbten). Das bedeutet, dass alle eine entsprechende Genehmigung erteilen müssen. Haster2 (talk) 04:01, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- Also nicht die Erlaubnis von Verwandten muss vorliegen. Es muss ausdrücklich die Erlaubnis des/der Urheberrechteinhabers vorliegen. Bei mehreren aller. Dass das der FAll ist, ist zumindest fraglich. Haster2 (talk) 08:33, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, missing legal information. --Y.haruo (talk) 17:41, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
Unused map with incorrect content: Uzbekistan and Tajikistan are shown as Observers, but were not them officially neither in 2015 not now. The only observer of Union is Moldova (since 2018). 91.193.176.157 10:39, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- Not used. Delete per precaution. --E4024 (talk) 20:30, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Y.haruo (talk) 17:44, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
Not own work Yilku1 (talk) 01:14, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Question @Yilku1: Any proof of that? --Ruthven (msg) 15:59, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
- The description says it is a police photo, it's super pixelated and appears in other sites.--Yilku1 (talk) 16:03, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
- This one is the same photo. Source is needed. -- Geagea (talk) 20:55, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: No source and apparently a photo which can be used as fair use (not on Commons). Ruthven (msg) 05:39, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
Unclear license. The original uploader (the creator) licensed it as CC-BY-SA 3.0, but also wrote "om ni vill använda får ni kontakta mig först, dinaria.deviantart.com" (translation: "if you want to use it, you should contact me first, dinaria.deviantart.com"). (It could be construed as "you may contact me", but that's likely not what was meant.)
I also cannot find any further licensing info at https://www.deviantart.com/dinaria/art/Fire-s-Falling-80275108 Skalman (talk) 09:24, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. No OTRS ticket. There is no a well-described license on his DeviantArt site. —Vercelas (quæstiones?) 13:35, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 05:41, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
What are commentator and editor dates of life? EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- @EugeneZelenko: commentator date is anonymous. Editor's death was in the year 1944. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R._Shamasastry. Soorya Hebbar (talk) 04:42, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. Ruthven (msg) 05:41, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
Low resolution, no EXIF, coloring filter (Instagram?). Most likely derivative work. See their talk page. 1989 (talk) 16:15, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- Keep not a real deletion rationale. Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 14:04, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: cannot find other copies on the Net. Ruthven (msg) 05:44, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
File was removed from Flickr, can't determined copyright status B dash (talk) 16:19, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Oppose: I don’t think that is enough of a reason – we don’t have any influence over what Flickr does. Unfortunately, the file description pages there haven’t been archived (maybe that should be done automatically, like with weblinks in Wikipedia). I don’t know why it took FlickreviewR two years, but I can assure you these photos were properly licensed when I uploaded them and I have no doubts that Katherine Tompkins was the author. As a side note, we don’t have many images of the Kia Brisa (none of them good) and aren’t likely to find many more. Cheers • 
• hugarheimur 19:21, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The whole idea of using files from flickr is that we can confirm that they are published with a valid free license. Ruthven (msg) 05:43, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
File was removed from Flickr, can't determined copyright status B dash (talk) 16:19, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose: I don’t think that is enough of a reason – we don’t have any influence over what Flickr does. Unfortunately, the file description pages there haven’t been archived (maybe that should be done automatically, like with weblinks in Wikipedia). I don’t know why it took FlickreviewR two years, but I can assure you these photos were properly licensed when I uploaded them and I have no doubts that Katherine Tompkins was the author. As a side note, we don’t have many images of the Kia Brisa (none of them good) and aren’t likely to find many more. Cheers • • hugarheimur 19:22, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. File should have had the license reviewed before its removal. Ruthven (msg) 05:43, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
I uploaded this picture today. Unfortunately it turned out to have too few pixels to be good enogh for Commons. Please, remove this picture. Sjunnesson (talk) 16:29, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- You are the photographer. Don't you have a better (larger) version of this photo?—Paracel63 (talk) 16:35, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader's request. Ruthven (msg) 05:44, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Chiyako92 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Posted to source as cc-by-nc. Non-commercial restriction is not allowed on Commons. 1989 (talk) 16:42, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Stifle (talk) 09:18, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Chiyako92 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Posted to source as cc-by-nc. Non-commercial restriction is not allowed on Commons. 1989 (talk) 16:42, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Stifle (talk) 09:18, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1949. Jcb (talk) 18:24, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Source is a GLAM. No author mentioned. Yann (talk) 18:49, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- The GLAM is not the author. We have agreed to use 120 years as a safe age in cases like this. 1920 is not yet 120 years ago. Jcb (talk) 18:51, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- Diese Fotos stammen aus einem Album, das vermutlich von einem Mitglied der Gesellschaft zusammengestellt und teilweise mit Namen beschriftet worden ist. Leider ist nicht bekannt von wem und wann es dem Institut für Geschichte der Naturwissenschaften gegeben worden ist. Im April 2003 hat die Fotostelle der Universität Hamburg die Bilder eingescannt. Einige Fotos sind vermutlich einzigartig (Roch, Pohlke), andere besonders detailliert (Runge, Kummer). (underscored by me) Runge died in 1927. Hence PD-anon-70-EU.--Roy17 (talk) 21:32, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- Especially for Germany, PD-anon-70-EU can hardly be used at all, because German laws give no room to interpret 'unknown' as 'anonymous'. You have to show that the author wilfully did not disclose their identity, which is practically impossible. Jcb (talk) 21:41, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: too unclear to be surely in PD, sources show is slightly different picture (with name as watermark) and we alread have other picture of this person. --VIGNERON (talk) 10:45, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
Some icons (such as the twitter logos which are included intentionally and therefore not COM:DM) are copyrighted (see {{Logo}}). --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:49, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Josve05a: Which specific icons need to be removed to make this free? We can just black out those specific characters in the SVG so it can be indicated that these were omitted rather than portraying the selected set as complete. A vast majority should easily meet {{Pd-logo}}. Opencooper (talk) 00:13, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:PRP. --JuTa 19:58, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
- @JuTa: Wtf, I even reached out offering to remove the problem icons while the nominator, User:Josve05a (an admin), never replied. So much easier to just drive-by tag files without bothering to try to fix any issues. And then you have admins like you deleting on the shoddy basis of "PRP" (the go-to "I can't be arsed" reason) when the problem was actually surmountable and the font itself was under an open license (hardly a case of "significant doubt"). Really says a lot about the project and how broken its processes are. Opencooper (talk) 06:56, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Snowhite98 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 20:04, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Thatonewikiguy (talk · contribs)
[edit]I am nominating everything - because we need to check everything. And not just the license. See also Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 75#ThatBPengineer.
- File:Old Petronas Logo 1974 - 1990.jpg was ridiculously oversized and broke the Mediawiki thumbnailer. It may or may not hold something malicious. Better revdel.
- File:Plastic Production From Raw Material.png Keep Flowchart, probably {{PD-shape}}. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:58, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- File:Oxygen480-mimetypes-image-x-generic-icon.png PNG that was uploaded in 2017 when we already had the SVG in 2015. No harm, no use.
- Keep
- Commons:INUSE
- The SVG blurring is not rendered correclty
- Correct lizense: GNU LGPLv3 see https://techbase.kde.org/Projects/Oxygen/Licensing
- — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 08:49, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- @JoKalliauer: In use, yes, they added it to Comparison of icon sets themselves. But I see the SVG renders differently, so yes, keep. But please let the nominator strike, okay? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 13:56, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- File:Plastic Defects Percentage.png Keep Pie chart. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:58, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- File:Inject mold machine diagram.png
- File:US114945 - Patents for Injection Moulding by John Wesley Hyatt (Diagram 2).png
- Keep
- Public domain patent file from 1871--Countakeshi (talk) 04:45, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:58, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- File:US114945 - Patents for Injection Moulding by John Wesley Hyatt (Diagram 1).png
- Keep
- Same as above--Countakeshi (talk) 04:45, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:58, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- File:Lego Mould showing the gating and spruce.png Screenshot from Sariel visits LEGO: inside LEGO molding factory, LEGO vault & LEGO Ideas House, see outline
- File:Blow Molding of Plastic Bottles.webm
- File:Workers change over the plastic mold.jpg nicked from https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/692213374/the-porthole/posts/362126
- File:Bull dog dentist toy.png COM:TOY
- File:A white bread toaster.png
- File:A pink coloured OEM washing machines.png
- File:A silver coloured OEM Electric Oven.png Delete heavily butchered version of https://www.pbbemall.com/s/Product/butterfly-oven-48-liter-beo-1148/2525. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 16:46, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- File:A 200W green colored OEM hair dryer.png
- File:Plastic Defects - Burn Marks Defects.png COM:DW of COM:NETCOPYVIO
- File:Plastic Defects - Sink Mark Defects.jpg COM:DW of COM:NETCOPYVIO
- File:Plastic Defects - Splay Defects.png COM:DW of COM:NETCOPYVIO
- File:Plastic Defects - Short Mould Defects.png COM:DW of COM:NETCOPYVIO
- File:Plastic Defects - Discoloration Mark Defects.png COM:DW of COM:NETCOPYVIO
- File:Plastic Defects - Delamination Defects.jpg COM:DW of COM:NETCOPYVIO
- File:Plastic Defects - Contamination Defects.png COM:DW of COM:NETCOPYVIO
- File:Plastic Defects - Blister Defects.png COM:DW of COM:NETCOPYVIO
- File:Tooling for Injection Moulding Machines.png
- File:Injection Molding Machine.jpg
- File:Pink Coloured Plastic Laundry Baskets.jpg
- File:Assembly Line in America.JPG
- This set are all comparable:
- File:Polymer Chain - Elastomer.svg
- File:Polymer Chain - Semicrystalline.svg
- File:Polymer Chain - Armorphous.svg
- for purposes of discussion...
- {{PD-chem}}? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 16:58, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- Not "chem" enough IMO, and I think above TOO also. It's not identified as a specific chemical, but instead an artist's conception of certain attributes of what some chemical might look like. DMacks (talk) 02:33, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
- {{PD-chem}}? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 16:58, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- File:Polymerization of Vinyl Chloride to Polyvinyl Chloride.svg
- {{PD-chem}}? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 16:58, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- Agree, PD-chem. DMacks (talk) 02:33, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
- {{PD-chem}}? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 16:58, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- File:Plastic Product From Injection Moulding.jpg
- File:John Wesley Hyatt.jpg
- Keep
- Commons:INUSE
- Original photo from 1914.--Countakeshi (talk) 04:48, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Countakeshi: This user has engaged in such levels of fuckery that I wouldn't mind seeing a reliable source. For all we know, that's a picture of his grandfather the snake oil salesman. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 16:58, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- Looks a bit different than the person in File:John Wesley Hyatt, Jr.jpg. I can't find that picture in https://www.ptonline.com when (apparent website of cited source) searching by "Whai" (cited author) or "Wesley" or "Hyatt" and google-searching for that magazine-name with any of those terms likewise gives no hits apart from Commons/Wikipedia mirrors. COM:PCP delete. DMacks (talk) 02:48, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
- File:Ultrasonic Welding process.ogv
- File:Injection moulding display.webm COM:DW of the software on that machine
- File:Plastic Moulding - Bottle Caps.ogv
- File:Fillet Designs for Plastic Components.png Keep {{PD-shape}} - Alexis Jazz ping plz 16:58, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- File:Plastic chair - Injection Moulding.ogv
- File:Plastic Injection Moulding -Short Shots Defects.png
- File:Coffee Cup - Plastic Injection Moulding.ogv
- File:Plastic Injection Moulding Ejection Phase.gif
- File:Plastic Injection Moulding Cooling Phase.gif
- File:Plastic Injection Moulding Injection Phase.gif
- File:Plastic Injection Moulding Clamping Phase.gif
- File:Mesh network multi hop.gif Keep {{PD-shape}} - Alexis Jazz ping plz 16:58, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- File:VitroxLogo.png Likely {{PD-textlogo}}, unless the COM:TOO for Malaysia is extremely restrictive. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 16:58, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- File:Mesh network self healing.gif Keep {{PD-shape}} - Alexis Jazz ping plz 16:58, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- File:Mesh network self forming.gif Keep {{PD-shape}} - Alexis Jazz ping plz 16:58, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- File:Compression Molding of Terminal Block.ogv clip taken from longer YouTube video
- File:Extrusion Molding for PVC pipes.ogv
- File:Rotational Molding of Large Water Tank.ogv clip taken from longer YouTube video
- File:Multi Material Injection Molding for Sporks.ogv
- File:Polymer Chain - Thermoset.svg Keep {{PD-shape}} - Alexis Jazz ping plz 16:58, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- File:Intel Factory in Kulim, Malaysia.jpg Transfer from enwiki, uploaded by Chinesestar. Assuming we can even trust the upload log! http://kokaho.com.my/kokaho/index.php/intel-kulim shows a larger version of this image.
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
- Alexis Jazz ping plz 01:48, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete all “Plastic Injection Moulding….gif” series (four files; the PNG appears to be own) as tineye.com traced the origin to 2008, and of course Delete JPEGs in the “Plastic Defects” series (eight files; the PNG can pass as {{PD-trivial}}) per Alexis; also Delete Intel_Factory_in_Kulim… as obvious copyvio. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 12:22, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
- Also Delete Plastic_Product_From_Injection_Moulding.jpg – FBMD, another person as the author in Exif, and possibly ultimately originates from https://www.ec21.com/ec-market/power-tools.html . And, of course, Delete Injection_moulding_display.webm as derived from an unfree software, per Alexis. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 17:32, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
- Also
- Delete all per nom and pcp, but keep Polymer_Chain_-_Elastomer.svg and VitroxLogo.png, as well as the ones with keep !votes. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:38, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: some images, such as Polymer_Chain_-_Elastomer.svg and VitroxLogo.png, are bluntly too trivial to be protected (and deleted) on copyright grounds. Certainly the uploader betrayed our trust, but Commons may not retaliate with vandalistic deletions. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 07:45, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: I agree with Incnis here. The only reason I nominated all was because I found File:Old Petronas Logo 1974 - 1990.jpg to be botched. Not a copyright violation, but something was wrong with the file. So all need to be checked. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 20:03, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
- File:A silver coloured OEM Electric Oven.png is so heavily butchered compared to the original with all kinds of perspective correction it proves once more absolutely no photos from this user can be trusted. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 16:46, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- IMHO this PNG has little to do with pbbemall.com, and rather is a sibling of https://www.homeaholic.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/toaster-oven.jpg , while any direction to their common parent appears to be lost by now. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 16:25, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
- The homeaholic.net image is identical to the Commons image (it has some additional compression artifacts) and likely originates from Commons. The image on pbbemall.com has a lower resolution so the actual source is elsewhere (may or may not exist anymore), but that image (with a higher resolution) is the source for File:A silver coloured OEM Electric Oven.png. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 16:47, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
- IMHO this PNG has little to do with pbbemall.com, and rather is a sibling of https://www.homeaholic.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/toaster-oven.jpg , while any direction to their common parent appears to be lost by now. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 16:25, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
General notice: processing and closing this request may be IMHO done by any sysop except for 1989 due to a long and persisting “history” within the case of Thatonewikiguy, such as this recent edit to a Thatonewikiguy’s sock page. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 20:42, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: most, kept some. --JuTa 20:30, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Edoderoo as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://nab.no/nordberg-jenta-spas-a-bli-norges-nye-skoytestjerne/19.18063#nyhetbilder 1989 (talk) 16:34, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- Comment I found the image on Flickr and it credits the user. However, OTRS may be needed to verify identity. -- 1989 (talk) 16:35, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- The file on commons has a watermark, Flickr has no watermark. There is no proof that the named photographer has uploaded the image, though it might be possible. OTRS will answer all those questions indeed. NB: There are a lot of uploads from this user that are comparable. Edoderoo (talk) 16:39, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- I know for sure that the uploader are the same as the photographer, but he isn't that used to this wikimedia-site just yet. Please be gentle with the user and try to help instead, he has good intent. I met him last weekend 1.–3. February 2019 at Hamar World Cup in long track speed skating where he took loads (a few thousands) of pictures and he said that he will upload many pictures from that event later. He asked me there, how he could upload many pictures fast and easy. And i told him about the Commonist, but didn't get to show him how he could do it... Best wishes Migrant (talk) 17:16, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- Hi, I am the photograher EF Sportsfoto. EF stands for Eivind Flensborg. I have been taking profilpic`s of the national speedskaters team in Norway. Both me and Norges Skøyteforbund can use them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eivind FLensborg (talk • contribs) 18:02, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- Well, in that case: thanks for sharing your pictures with us, and hopefully you'll forgive us (or even support it) that we act on possible copyright violations so promptly. It is not to bother you, nor that we don't want your images (the contrary), but unfortunately it happens too often that people upload "found by Google Images" as own work over here. Edoderoo (talk) 19:22, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
Kept: has been withdrawn. --JuTa 20:32, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
