Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/01/06
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
Seems to be out of scope.
- File:Kleine Bilder Max Rüedi I179985 218751468246089 43063986 n.jpg
- File:Kleine Bilder Max Rüedi I564849 216628495125053 2024565307 n.jpg
- File:Kleine Bilder Max Rüedi I577480 218746614913241 330012010 n-1.jpg
- File:Kleine Bilder Max Rüedi IIMG 1534.jpg
- File:Kleine Bilder Max Rüedi IIMG 1536.jpg
- File:Kleine Bilder Max Rüedi IIMG 1537.jpg
- File:Kleine Bilder Max Rüedi IIMG 1538.jpg
- File:Kleine Bilder Max Rüedi IIMG 1541.jpg
- File:Kleine Bilder Max Rüedi IIMG 1542.jpg
- File:Kleine Bilder Max Rüedi IIMG 1544.jpg
- File:Kleine Bilder Max Rüedi IIMG 1546.jpg
- File:Kleine Bilder Max Rüedi IIMG 1547.jpg
- File:Kleine Bilder Max Rüedi IIMG 1548.jpg
- File:Kleine Bilder Max Rüedi IIMG 1551.jpg
- File:Kleine Bilder Max Rüedi IIMG 1552.jpg
- File:Kleine Bilder Max Rüedi IIMG 1554.jpg
- File:Kleine Bilder Max Rüedi IIMG 1557.jpg
- File:Kleine Bilder Max Rüedi IIMG 1558.jpg
- File:Kleine Bilder Max Rüedi IIMG 1560.jpg
- File:Kleine Bilder Max Rüedi IIMG 1561.jpg
- File:Kleine Bilder Max Rüedi IIMG 1562.jpg
- File:Kleine Bilder Max Rüedi IIMG 1564.jpg
- File:Kleine Bilder Max Rüedi IIMG 1567.jpg
- File:Kleine Bilder Max Rüedi IIMG 1570.jpg
- File:Kleine Bilder Max Rüedi IIMG 1571.jpg
- File:Kleine Bilder Max Rüedi IIMG 1637.jpg
- File:Kleine Bilder Max Rüedi IIMG 1638.jpg
- File:Kleine Bilder Max Rüedi IIMG 1639.jpg
- File:Kleine Bilder Max Rüedi IIMG 1639.pdf
- File:Kleine Bilder Max Rüedi IIMG 1641.jpg
- File:Kleine Bilder Max Rüedi IIMG 1644.jpg
- File:Kleine Bilder Max Rüedi IIMG 1645.jpg
- File:Kleine Bilder Max Rüedi IIMG 1647.jpg
- File:Kleine Bilder Max Rüedi IIMG 1679.jpg
- File:Kleine Bilder Max Rüedi IIMG 1680.jpg
- File:Kleine Bilder Max Rüedi IIMG 1682.jpg
- File:Kleine Bilder Max Rüedi IMG 1506.jpg
- File:Kleine Bilder Max Rüedi IMG 1513.jpg
- File:Kleine Bilder Max Rüedi IMG 1643.jpg
- File:Kleine Bilder Max Rüedi IP1020299.jpg
- File:Kleine Bilder Max Rüedi IP1020380.jpg
- File:Kleine Bilder Max Rüedi IvIMG 1563.jpg
- File:Kleine Bilder Max Rüedi Stubensicht IMG 1505.jpg
- File:Kleine Bilder Max Rüedi stubesicht.jpg
- File:Kleine Bilder Max Rüedi.jpg
Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:45, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Dw no source since 29 December 2018. --Jcb (talk) 12:20, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
File:Saint-Pol-sur-Ternoise - Quatre jours de Dunkerque, étape 3, 6 mai 2016, arrivée (B35).JPG
[edit]Work of architecture by living architect or designer, France does not have Freedom of Panorama ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:09, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
- Withdrawn - Misread summary box. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:25, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn. --Yann (talk) 16:26, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/User:Guru Mylapilli Commons:Deletion requests/User:Independent Nations
Copyrighted photos
Ytoyoda (talk) 17:02, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:11, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
copyright violation Theroadislong (talk) 17:31, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:20, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Error in licence JMCC1 (talk) 22:03, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Racconish at 12:03, 7 Januar 2019 UTC: Failed license review; non-free license (F4) --Krdbot 20:06, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
oi Ottton (talk) 14:05, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected as duplicate. --JuTa 18:34, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
Please delete; uploaded in error. Thanks Altair78 (talk) 08:52, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
the template specifies that photos must be from airliners.net, where this photo cannot be found; it originated from jetphotos.net Altair78 (talk) 08:53, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:09, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Faycal algerie (talk · contribs)
[edit]Self-promotion content out of project scope.
- File:الحياة المهنية.png
- File:ولوج عالم السياسة.png
- File:التسيير.png
- File:الدراسة والتكوين.png
- File:المولد والنشأة.png
- File:نبذة.png
- File:Faycal kerchouche.jpg
- File:فيصل كرشوش.jpg
— D Y O L F 77[Talk] 15:21, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:00, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
When I uploaded this file long ago, I made some mistakes, hence it turned out looking like this. Shortly after, I reuploaded the same image (with success), as a different file.[1] Therefore this file can now be deleted. - LouisAragon (talk) 00:13, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 09:48, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 00:28, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 09:49, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Unused personal photo of an un-notable person. The users only other contributions have been deleted. Green Giant (talk) 01:31, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 09:48, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Picture of a picture, a derivative work. There is no author or licensing information regarding the underlying photo. ℯxplicit 02:12, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 09:49, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Only used on the English Wikipedia, where the subjects' two articles were deleted in February via deletion discussion and as spam, and in March via deletion discussion, respectively. Out of project scope.
ℯxplicit 02:20, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 09:50, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Asiful Islam Saky (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: Commons is no social media site nor a private photo album, see also voluminous file descriptions (vita).
- File:SM SAKY.jpg
- File:বন্ধুত্ব ও বিদ্যালয় 04.jpg
- File:বন্ধুত্ব ও বিদ্যালয় 05.jpg
- File:বন্ধুত্ব ও বিদ্যালয় 03.jpg
- File:বন্ধুত্ব ও বিদ্যালয় 02.jpg
- File:বন্ধুত্ব ও বিদ্যালয় 01.jpg
Achim (talk) 08:22, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 09:53, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Incomplete upload or malformed scan. Please consider uploading a complete scan? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:42, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
- ShakespeareFan00 Done. Hanooz 15:43, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
- Withdrawn as repaired, If someone wants to remove the older upload from the history. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:45, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 09:59, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 10:00, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Informatoredesignato (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 10:01, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:06, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 10:12, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Los Muertos Fotos (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:SCD bella 4.jpg
- File:Brian Herlitz.jpg
- File:Elias Jaramillo.jpg
- File:Fabián Núñez.jpg
- File:JP Moraga.jpg
- File:Los Muertos formacion actual 2.jpg
- File:Los Muertos formacion actual.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:09, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 10:13, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pavel Velichko (talk · contribs)
[edit]Small files without EXIF data, some from Facebook. Please upload the original files, or send a permission via COM:OTRS.
- File:Володимир Журавель на монтажі скульптури.jpg
- File:Авторський колектив пам'ятника Іллі Муромцю.jpg
- File:Василь Вірастюк та скульптор Володимир Журавель .jpg
- File:Робота над монументом 3.jpg
- File:Робота над монументом 2.jpg
- File:Робота над монументом .jpg
- File:Ілля на заходи сонця .jpg
- File:Монумент Іллі Муромця, Київ, 2018.jpg
- File:Віталій Кличко і Василь Вірастюк на відкритті пам'ятника Іллі Муромця, 2018 р.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник Анатолію Кузнецову.jpg
Yann (talk) 14:16, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:47, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pavel Velichko (talk · contribs)
[edit]No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Ukraine.
- File:405A8323.jpg
- File:405A8281.jpg
- File:405A8406.jpg
- File:405A8392.jpg
- File:405A8358.jpg
- File:405A8339.jpg
File:12 Ph. by Volodymyr Zhuravel.jpgTicket:2019100410004112File:10 Ph.by Dariya Tishchenko.jpgTicket:2019100410004112File:11 Ph. by Volodymyr Zhuravel.jpgTicket:2019100410004112File:9 Фото під час монтажу скульптурної 12 Ph. by Volodymyr Zhuravel.jpgTicket:2019100410004112File:8 Фото під час монтажу скульптурної 12 Ph. by Volodymyr Zhuravel.jpgTicket:2019100410004112- File:5 Ph.by Dariya Tishchenko-Zhuravel.jpg
- File:4 Ph.by Dariya Tishchenko-Zhuravel.jpg
- File:3 Ph.by Dariya Tishchenko-Zhuravel.jpg
- File:1 Ph.by Dariya Tishchenko-Zhuravel.jpg
- File:Ілля Муромець, 2018.jpg
- File:6 Foto by Volodymyr Zhuravel.jpg
- File:4 Foto by Volodymyr Zhuravel.jpg
- File:2 Foto by Volodymyr Zhuravel.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
Ticket:2019100810008512 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 08:00, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
- The author of this letter to OTRS claims he is Volodymyr Zhuravel - the author of those sculptures. But his e-mail when googled, gives no results. Maybe I should ask him to somehow prove that this e-mail really belongs to Volodymyr Zhuravel? --Tohaomg (talk) 19:23, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
- Yes you are right. But I found this data in open sources (https://zhuravel.kiev.ua/en/index.html -> contacts; screenshot archived in the ticket) and accepted permission. --sasha (krassotkin) 20:15, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
- The author of this letter to OTRS claims he is Volodymyr Zhuravel - the author of those sculptures. But his e-mail when googled, gives no results. Maybe I should ask him to somehow prove that this e-mail really belongs to Volodymyr Zhuravel? --Tohaomg (talk) 19:23, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:8_Фото_під_час_монтажу_скульптурної_12_Ph._by_Volodymyr_Zhuravel.jpg” under ticket:2019100410004112. --sasha (krassotkin) 20:10, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
- And also ticket:2019100810008531.--Anatoliy (talk) 12:15, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination except OTRS files. --Green Giant (talk) 19:22, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope. Commons is not a social media site ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 14:22, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:48, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Could not be own work and no permission documented
- File:G2Kl4O9DMDQ.jpg
- File:ClassicZoro.jpg
- File:Q I9urK0Woc.jpg
- File:2V0DTkLAbgY.jpg
- File:FGTyfAiTIpU.jpg
- File:BM5-rr2fw-Q.jpg
- File:XcxO-legqYo.jpg
- File:4i3AJQgE8Gc.jpg
- File:Zorosaimov.jpg
Codc (talk) 14:39, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:48, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:21, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:02, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Irrelevant to article about place. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:23, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:02, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/Burj Khalifa
[edit]No Freedom of Panorama in the United Arab Emirates!
- File:Burj Khalifa (211679733).jpeg
- File:Burj Khalifa (32413309).jpeg
- File:Burj Khalifa (30984249).jpeg
- File:Burj khalifa.jpg
- File:Nights of Dubai with a view of Burj Khalifa.jpg
- File:Burj Khalifa Arabemirates Dubai Hd Wallpaper (30164081).jpeg
- File:All the way up Burj Khalifa.jpg
- File:Dubai Mall (225915647).jpeg
- File:Me (65713661).jpeg
- File:Skyscraper (211679681).jpeg
- File:Financial Centre Rd (210371973).jpeg
- File:Botero Horse (211679683).jpeg
- File:500px photo (187963203).jpeg
Ras67 (talk) 15:24, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:02, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:02, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:01, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:01, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by LorenzoCannavo98 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:01, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lavan Barath (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:01, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:01, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:01, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:01, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:01, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Juan Francisco Diaz (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:00, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lgopikrishnan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:LGopikrishnan2.jpg
- File:LGopikrishnan1.jpg
- File:WithSusheelaGopalan.jpg
- File:WithBabu2.jpg
- File:WithDevGowda.jpg
- File:WithDevGowda2.jpg
- File:With K.R.Narayanan.jpg
- File:WithBabu.jpg
- File:WithDhanushkodi.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:00, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:00, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:00, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:00, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:00, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:00, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:00, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:53, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:02, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:53, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
kann wego8uzg876g 2804 (talk) 16:03, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:53, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Kann weg. fd9ufh 2804 (talk) 16:03, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:53, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:05, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:52, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:06, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:52, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:06, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:52, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:07, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:52, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:08, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:52, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:09, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:52, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:09, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:52, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Seems out of project scope. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 16:14, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:52, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
File no longer needed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Neopeius (talk • contribs) 18:58, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: by colleague. --Jcb (talk) 12:50, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Unused personal logo or art, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 16:28, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:50, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by হাসান ইমাম রাসেল (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 16:32, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:50, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
seems not to be CC licensed by Marion Motin. Alice Cimoroni seems to be just a Youtube user. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 16:47, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:50, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Morteziano (talk · contribs)
[edit]Small images without EXIF data, and COM:DW, unlikely to be own works.
- File:لاله زار .jpg
- File:Alfred lazzarian.jpg
- File:Alfred lazarian.jpg
- File:آلفرد لازارین.jpg
- File:ALFRED LAZZARIAN.jpg
- File:بریده جراید 1341.jpg
- File:خبر جراید 1341.jpg
- File:فتح تهران 2.jpg
- File:فوتسال فتح سپاه.jpg
- File:قهرمانی 6 بر صفر در برابر تیم پیروزی .png
- File:فتح تهران.jpg
Yann (talk) 16:53, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:49, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:World Poker Tour
[edit]Uploader request, (G7) but uploads are more than 7 days old. No longer used on wiki. Files all exist as .jpg with otherwise the same filename. Could possibly also be considered as F8.
- File:Adrián Mateos 2016.png
- File:Alan Engel 2018.png
- File:Alex Foxen 2018.png
- File:Almedin Imširović 2018.png
- File:Ana Márquez 2016.png
- File:Anthony Zinno 2018.png
- File:Benny Glaser 2018.png
- File:Bill Perkins 2015.png
- File:Bryan Piccioli 2016.png
- File:Bryn Kenney 2015.png
- File:Byron Kaverman 2015.png
- File:Cate Hall 2015.png
- File:Dan Colman 2014.png
- File:Daniel Strelitz 2017.png
- File:Darren Elias 2018.png
- File:David Peters 2018.png
- File:David Rheem 2016.png
- File:Dietrich Fast 2016.png
- File:Ema Zajmović 2018.png
- File:Fedor Holz 2015.png
- File:Felipe Mojave 2017.png
- File:Gaëlle Baumann 2015.png
- File:Greg Merson 2015.png
- File:Jake Schindler 2018.png
- File:Jessica Dawley 2017.png
- File:Kalidou Sow 2018.png
- File:Kelly Minkin 2017.png
- File:Kelly Minkin playing Poker 2018.png
- File:Kitty Kuo 2018.png
- File:Loni Harwood 2018.png
- File:Maria Ho 2018.png
- File:Marvin Rettenmaier 2018.png
- File:Mustapha Kanit 2016.png
- File:Natasha Mercier 2017.png
- File:Niall Farrell 2016.png
- File:Nick Petrangelo 2018.png
- File:Ole Schemion 2018.png
- File:Paul Höfer 2018.png
- File:Rainer Kempe 2018.png
- File:Sam Soverel 2018.png
- File:Sofia Lövgren 2018.png
- File:Thomas Mühlöcker 2018.png
- File:Tom Marchese 2018.png
- File:Tony Dunst 2018.png
- File:Tony Miles 2018.png
- File:Upeshka De Silva 2018.png
- Alexis Jazz ping plz 19:36, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:49, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
personal photo / low resolution 1989 (talk) 12:23, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:40, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 12:40, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:40, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:2018 New York Yankees season
[edit]Has a proper CC license on flickr but the USA Today Sports watermark suggests this is copyrighted.
- File:MLB Atlanta Braves at New York Yankees (29344919798) (cropped).jpg
- File:MLB Atlanta Braves at New York Yankees (29344919798).jpg
Ytoyoda (talk) 17:07, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:41, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dkmfilmstudio (talk · contribs)
[edit]2 photographs found on the web, 2 are derivative works without source. Own work claim doubtful.
- File:Я в А-ата.jpg
- File:Портфолио 2.jpg
- File:Портфолио 1.jpg
- File:Я В ИНТЕРЬЕРЕ.jpg
- File:Портрет в студии.jpg
- File:Портрет в интерьере студии.jpg
Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:56, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:42, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Danborn111 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Game screens
Ronhjones (Talk) 21:38, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:43, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Logos for the television station WWSB; very unlikely to be "own work" or under the claimed Creative Commons license.
WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 22:22, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Now appropriately licensed and local on en.wiki as WWSB 2018 Logo.png, and no real use on other projects. Nate • (chatter) 06:07, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy delete. Now fair use on en-wiki. --Ronhjones (Talk) 17:57, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
This is my statement regarding copyrights. As a founder of the band I do own the rights to this picture. Kredski (talk) 23:09, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
FBMD in EXIF data, exists elsewhere on the web. Unlikely to be own work. Permission needed. ~Cybularny Speak? 23:04, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:46, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
As a founder of the band I do own the rights to this picture. Kredski (talk) 23:12, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Low resolution, FBMD in EXIF data, unlikely to be own work. ~Cybularny Speak? 23:05, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:46, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
previously deleted. not notable. self-promotion. Lazypub (talk) 23:23, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
- and now the non-notable self-promoter is removing the deletion tag. Lazypub (talk) 02:16, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:44, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
چون اشتباه بارگزاری شده Sh proshat (talk) 13:33, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 15:01, 13 Januar 2019 UTC: Commons:Licensing: poster - --Krdbot 20:03, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Resolution 76.187.211.251 01:24, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, used on multiple pages. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 22:21, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Nová verze Milan Bauman (talk) 09:09, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Hedwig in Washington at 02:00, 15 Januar 2019 UTC: Missing essential information such as license, permission or source (F5) Media missing permission as of 7 January 2019 - --Krdbot 08:01, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
Vyšší rozlišení Milan Bauman (talk) 09:11, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Hedwig in Washington at 02:00, 15 Januar 2019 UTC: Missing essential information such as license, permission or source (F5) Media missing permission as of 7 January 2019 - --Krdbot 08:02, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:59, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Coins of Norway
[edit]Derivatives of non-free coins, see COM:CUR Norway.
Sealle (talk) 22:48, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:59, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
non free image MiguelAlanCS (talk) 20:03, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:29, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
This is a photograph of book cover art. Neither the uploader, nor the named authors (who are the photographers, not the artist) are the copyright holders. This was explicitly admitted at w:Template:Did you know nominations/Selfish genetic element SpinningSpark 11:12, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Delete I agree that the image should be removed from commons. Both book covers still in copyright (1966 & 1976). T.Shafee(Evo﹠Evo)talk 11:49, 6 January 2019 (UTC)- Delete as (perhaps inadvertent) license laundering/derivative work. --Animalparty (talk) 00:22, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted per discussion. Strakhov (talk) 13:47, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
License on Flickr in non commercial - sadly Victuallers (talk) 11:08, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Racconish at 12:42, 26 Januar 2019 UTC: Failed license review; non-free license (F4) - --Krdbot 19:53, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
bad quality, superseded — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rettinghaus (talk • contribs) 2019-01-02T15:43:34 (UTC)
Kept: In use on sister projects. Please change there before requesting deletion. --Storkk (talk) 15:01, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
Not own work. If I try to download the original file from the North Holland Archives, it says they do not own the copyrights, which means we need permission from Jos Fielmich, the photographer. The photo was taken on 20 December 2004, so definitely not PD-old. HyperGaruda (talk) 07:58, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per above. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 09:55, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 15:01, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
File:Fotografia del general martinez. tomada y cortesia del en el museo de la revolucion perkin. 2009.png
[edit]Photo of photo, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:12, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Evidence that the photo is PD should be provided. --Storkk (talk) 15:02, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
Files under Category:Busts of Ioannes Paulus II in Japan
[edit]- File:Bust of Pope John Paul II in Nagasaki.jpg
- File:Bust of Ioannes Paulus II in Nagasaki DSCN0662 20100903.JPG
- File:Urakami cathedral 2010C.jpg
The busts were erected after the Pope's visit to Nagasaki in 1981; not yet in PD, and COM:FOP#Japan doesn't cover such artworks. Yasu (talk) 15:08, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 15:03, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
Artworks on Kuroshima
[edit]- File:Scene of the first encounter with the Dutch.jpg - 2000 picture
- File:3000x2000 Encounter.JPG (redirect)
- File:Bust of William Adams.jpg - erected in November 1986
- File:2000x3000 William Adams.JPG (redirect)
- File:Jan Joosten van Lodensteyn, Kuroshima.jpg - erected in March 2000
Artworks that are not in PD (cf. [2]); thus fall out of COM:FOP#Japan. Yasu (talk) 15:10, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 15:04, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE - un*: unsharp, uncategorized, unusable, unreplacable Herzi Pinki (talk) 21:58, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 15:06, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
This seems to be a screenshot of an unidentified article in an unidentified journal. No evidence of permission. Out of project scope. Stefan2 (talk) 22:54, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 15:07, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
This is a copyrighted image taken from chrisdignam.com without permission 2601:246:C900:2BC5:B077:DD02:3C49:53D3 03:04, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 09:07, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
this is a copyrighted image taken from chrisdignam.com without permission 2601:246:C900:2BC5:B077:DD02:3C49:53D3 03:05, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 09:07, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 14:12, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete missing basic informations. Kathisma (talk) 13:39, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Official work per [3], page 2092. --Rosenzweig τ 00:13, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
This is the work from a private person, Heinz Ritt, who died in 2010. The government license does not apply. To be undeleted in 2081. Jcb (talk) 14:20, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
- I uploaded the original (very small) version of the file from the official village site https://kleestadt.com in 2006, and think the government license should apply. Could you name a source stating that the coat of arms is a private one, by Heinz Ritt, who died in 2010? ThomasPusch (talk) 14:59, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
- As far as I can see https://kleestadt.com is not a government website. I think this is the source you are looking for, see the signature H.R. - Jcb (talk) 17:26, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
- The website https://kleestadt.com claims to be the official website of de:Kleestadt, a part of de:Groß-Umstadt. If not, the owner can be punished by a German court. The coat of arms used on it is the official one of the location (see https://arcinsys.hessen.de/arcinsys/digitalisatViewer.action?detailid=v2630513&selectId=548937%7Cthis site] (thanks to Jcb). In case, the site will not be an official one (e. g., a private website), this use will be also illegal and can also be pubished. So we can be sure, that this coat of arm is official and therefore the government license applies. Antonsusi (talk) 21:55, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
- As I have clearly shown, this CoA is not a government work, so that the government PD license does not apply. This one is copyrighted until 1 January 2081. Jcb (talk) 22:53, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
- The website https://kleestadt.com claims to be the official website of de:Kleestadt, a part of de:Groß-Umstadt. If not, the owner can be punished by a German court. The coat of arms used on it is the official one of the location (see https://arcinsys.hessen.de/arcinsys/digitalisatViewer.action?detailid=v2630513&selectId=548937%7Cthis site] (thanks to Jcb). In case, the site will not be an official one (e. g., a private website), this use will be also illegal and can also be pubished. So we can be sure, that this coat of arm is official and therefore the government license applies. Antonsusi (talk) 21:55, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
- I would tend to agree with JCB Kathisma (talk) 13:38, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Keep it is very uncommmon for Germany the request copyright for a CoA (Kommunalheraldik). Anyway in the time of the creation of this CoA the government license applied to this and is not revocable. (I'm really wondering how Jcb finds so many files for deletion). -- User: Perhelion 22:14, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
- PS: However, it seems the valid File:Wappen Kleestadt.png is superseding. -- User: Perhelion 22:23, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
- The government license never applied to this image, because it was never a government work, as has been clearly shown. Jcb (talk) 23:05, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
- Where is it clearly shown?? The most CoA on arcinsys.hessen.de are government work as this is a government page too (HSTAD Hauptstaatsarchiv). Kleestadt was a independent municipal until 1977, so this was clearly government work.[4] Category:Coats of arms by Heinz Ritt -- User: Perhelion 23:49, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
- The government license never applied to this image, because it was never a government work, as has been clearly shown. Jcb (talk) 23:05, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
Keep Heinz Ritt is not just a "private person" as you call him, JCB. Heinz Ritt is the artist of countless Hessian CoA. I do not see a reason why to have doubts about that certain CoA and agree totally with Perhelion. Fränsmer (talk) 21:36, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
- There is no doubt that Heinz Ritt is the author. The point is: Heinz Ritt was not a government employee! So there is no doubt either about the copyright situation. This image is copyrighted till 1 January 2081. All your keep votes are contradicted by the simple facts that have been presented and repeated in this DR. This is getting ridiculous. Jcb (talk) 22:10, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
- According to Heinz Ritt he has been freelance collaborator for the three Hessian public record offices in Darmstadt, Marburg and Wiesbaden. So in my eyes he has been a government employee. But well, how about the countless official CoA created by people who have never been a government employee? Who just created CoA as commissioned work?
- --
- How about that Flyer for the "Dorffest" in 2018 using the CoA? here you can read, it's been organised by the "village council" of Kleestadt. How about a flag with the CoA or the local fire department?
- kleestadt.com may "only" be a website by S-Tech, a webdesign company of Jürgen Schneider. But have a look at the current "village council". You will see, Jürgen Schneider is a member of that council. You are right saying that website is not official, but well... a small village, a webdesigner in village's politics... seems like that page is a voluntary work; welcome to village life!
- But well, why do I do all that research? Seems like the only way to convince you would be the grant document. Fränsmer (talk) 14:37, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
- Jcb is misunderstanding something (the signature on the original is fully normal and tells nothing about the government work), he did not answer any simple question, where are the evidence for his claims!? So this DR is fully invalid. The CoA is clearly government work (as said many times), Kleestadt was until 1977 a municipal with official government CoA: bestowal (Verleihung). The ignoring of facts by Jcb is getting ridiculous. PS. and concrete: The official approval, S.1171 §965, PDF S.11 -- User: Perhelion 15:16, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you for your research, Perhelion! So I am even more curious, how JCB can say he had "clearly shown", that CoA is no government work. Fränsmer (talk) 15:58, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
- Well, you are showing it yourself as well. You admit that the author was a 'freelance collaborator', so he was not an 'employee'. There is no evidence that the local government has obtained the copyright. Ritt also made CoA's for families. And yes, there are probably more files on our servers with the same problem. Jcb (talk) 17:43, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you for your research, Perhelion! So I am even more curious, how JCB can say he had "clearly shown", that CoA is no government work. Fränsmer (talk) 15:58, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
- Jcb is misunderstanding something (the signature on the original is fully normal and tells nothing about the government work), he did not answer any simple question, where are the evidence for his claims!? So this DR is fully invalid. The CoA is clearly government work (as said many times), Kleestadt was until 1977 a municipal with official government CoA: bestowal (Verleihung). The ignoring of facts by Jcb is getting ridiculous. PS. and concrete: The official approval, S.1171 §965, PDF S.11 -- User: Perhelion 15:16, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Municipal coats of arms are typically official works in Germany. Of course somebody actually created them, but they are released as part of an official decree and thus official works. Anything else would mean the municipalities in question would probably be restricted in the usage of their own coats of arms. Compare File:Hess StAnz 01 1983 S5.png for the decree authorising another municipal coat of arms by Heinz Ritt. --Rosenzweig τ 23:30, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
I can find it at 2400x1597 resolution at https://www.falmouthpacket.co.uk/news/14927213.groundbreaking-falmouth-university-programme-to-bring-over-500-new-jobs-to-the-county-gets-12m/ (specifically https://www.falmouthpacket.co.uk/resources/images/5740884.jpg) so somehow doubt uploader has the original. GRuban (talk) 02:25, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:05, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
User-generated artwork, compilation of copyvios, no educational purpose. Dlthewave (talk) 13:27, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:07, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Not PD-ineligible. Jcb (talk) 13:30, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:07, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
Jan van Delft died in 1952, not yet PD. To be undeleted in 2023. Jcb (talk) 14:05, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:07, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
Promo photo. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: I have kept the one per the 1920 date. The other USA images have unknown dates. The RO images are subject tio the Romanian law which is PMA 70, so it is possible, but unlikely, that they are free of copyright. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:16, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
Claimed as "copyrighted free use" but no source (or OTRS ticket number) given to confirm this ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:36, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:16, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
As the applied banner says Images whose copyright was restored in the U.S. by the URAA are no longer accepted at Wikimedia Commons Ronhjones (Talk) 15:59, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Per a previous debate involving files upload by me, where it was stated: "The supposed copyright in the US is only imaginary. In line with the WMF point of view, the vast majority of admins does not delete files for 'non-UURA' reasons." - Fma12 (talk) 12:00, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - not per nomination - no indication that the author has really been unknown from the beginning, 1930 is way too recent to assume the author would have died before 1949 - Jcb (talk) 12:59, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:17, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Downtown Dubai
[edit]No Freedom of Panorama in the United Arab Emirates!
- File:Al Fahidi (212224805).jpeg
- File:Al Saqr Business Tower - panoramio.jpg
- File:At the Top (Dubai Mall at night) - panoramio.jpg
- File:Bujr Khalifa Dubai Hd Wallpaper (30164079).jpeg
- File:Central Park Towers - panoramio.jpg
- File:Downtown Dubai - Dubai - United Arab Emirates - panoramio (14).jpg
- File:Downtown Dubai - Dubai - United Arab Emirates - panoramio (23).jpg
- File:Downtown Dubai - Dubai - United Arab Emirates - panoramio (3).jpg
- File:Dubai - Damac Maison and the Towers on Sheikh Zayed Road - داماك ميزون وأبراج على شارع الشيخ زايد - panoramio.jpg
- File:Dubai - Marina ^ Al Hawai Tower - 127,09 m ^ Sheikh Marwan Tower 82 m - panoramio.jpg
- File:Dubai - Marina ^ Saeed Tower II - 155 m ^ Al Rostamani Twin Towers - panoramio.jpg
- File:Dubai - Marina ^ Sahara Tower 127.09 m ^ Al Moosa Tower 2 - 122.99 m - panoramio.jpg
- File:Dubai - United Arab Emirates - panoramio (15).jpg
- File:Dubai Downtown - Dubai Mall - The Address - دبي داون تاون - دبي مول - العنوان - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:Dubai ^ Al Manal Tower - panoramio.jpg
- File:Dubai ^ Al Moosa Tower 1 - 90.20 m - panoramio.jpg
- File:Dubai ^ HHHR Tower – Blue tower - 317.00 m ^ Latifa Tower 184.49 m - panoramio.jpg
- File:Dubai ^ Zabeel Tower 114 m - panoramio.jpg
- File:Emirates - panoramio (4).jpg
- File:Emirates - panoramio (7).jpg
- File:Emirates - panoramio (8).jpg
- File:Emirates Twin Towers (222873731).jpeg
- File:Festival City (211679737).jpeg
- File:Fullsizeoutput (232503349).jpeg
- File:Gevora Hotel 4.jpg
- File:Nice Vew for Souq Al bahar ^ Address Hotel - panoramio.jpg
- File:The Address Hotel Downtown Dubai.jpg
- File:Xway-image.de Burj Kalifa - panoramio.jpg
- File:アドレス・ダウンタウン・ホテル(308m) from Brju khalifa - panoramio.jpg
Ras67 (talk) 17:32, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Keep Skylines, DM apply. Delete individual buildings. Wikiemirati (talk) 18:23, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
- There are no "skyline" photos, maximally three or four larger skyscraper with other buildings in the background is not a skyline! The alleged skyline photos show the protected things too big for de minimis. --Ras67 (talk) 10:45, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:18, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
No realistic educational use, likely will only be used for vandalism funplussmart (talk) 17:45, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:18, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
This is not PD because it surpasses the threshold of originality needed to be copyrightable, particularly because of the incorporation of the show‘s star motif into the logo, and the distinctive coloring. Sandstein (talk) 22:46, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Comment Here's the PNG version: File:Steven Universe Logotype.png. -- 1989 (talk) 01:49, 7 January 2019 (UTC)- Pinging Magog the Ogre who moved the file to Commons. -- 1989 (talk) 01:57, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
- I didn't move it to Commons. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:00, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Magog the Ogre: I see. Whether or not you did, you had to check the image before deleting it on enwiki. You didn’t think the logo was above threshold of originality? -- 1989 (talk) 04:34, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
- It's extremely close. I don't remember why I deleted this one, to be honest. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 06:29, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Magog the Ogre: I see. Whether or not you did, you had to check the image before deleting it on enwiki. You didn’t think the logo was above threshold of originality? -- 1989 (talk) 04:34, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
- I didn't move it to Commons. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:00, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. This logo is probably on par with the Disney Junior logo in terms of complexity, which was deleted as a result of Commons:Deletion requests/File:Disney Junior Logo.png. The text alone is likely not complex enough, and the stars are simple shapes, but the combination of elements here is what pushes this logo above the threshold of originality. ℯxplicit 00:32, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 21:16, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
{{duplicate|file=Ben Cline, official 116th Congress photo portrait.jpg|reason=later upload}} Rockhead126 (talk) 23:37, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Inuse, the other versions are different crops. Tag as duplicate if necessary. --Gbawden (talk) 11:47, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Josephintechnicolor (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos, documents, postcards. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected.
- File:BS-Q15-0520-X3.jpg
- File:River Crest Sanitarium BS-Q15-0525-X3.jpg
- File:Gh. Dimitropulo - Coloseul Bagadiru Theatre Director.jpg
- File:COLOSEUL BRAGADIRU.jpg
- File:George Gyftakis Dimitripol.jpg
- File:River Crest Sanitarium.jpg
- File:Rivercrest2.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep File:River Crest Sanitarium.jpg, 1920 date is on the postcard so that is clearly PD in the US Abzeronow (talk) 15:45, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
- Images for deletion
All River Crest Sanitarium images below
- BS-Q15-0520-X3.jpg
- River Crest Sanitarium.jpg
- Rivercrest2.jpg
- River Crest Sanitarium BS-Q15-0525-X3.jpg
were obtained from this web site http://forgotten-ny.com/2009/07/life-on-ditmars-northern-astorias-main-street/ River crest closed down in 1961 and the post cards were made well before that date. I included the said link should I edit the submission? Astoria Historical society has a water mark. I am in contact with Bob Singleton of Astoria Historical society and he knows they are being used online. I will query Bob Singleton of the Astoria Historical Society for images without the water mark.
The images below:
- George Gyftakis Dimitripol.jpg
- COLOSEUL BRAGADIRU.jpg
- Gh. Dimitropulo - Coloseul Bagadiru Theatre Director.jpg
were taken prior to his death in 1917 by the Coloseul Bragadiru photographers. https://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palatul_Bragadiru so that is in the PD. The marketing page was also prior to the year 1917 which is in the PD. The image in the marketing page (Playbill) and the photo are the same likeness. The death certificate was found on the website disclosed Vitals. https://www.vitalchek.com/birth-certificates
Tell me if you want me to update the submission with information I provided. Josephintechnicolor (talk) 22:38, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: One kept, rest deleted already. --Gbawden (talk) 12:20, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
- Hello EugeneZelenko Gbawden
The image of George Dimitrpol was from the wife of Dimitropol in Romania and I will fix that. But can you please tell me what was wrong with the license tags for the below?
- File:Gh. Dimitropulo - Coloseul Bagadiru Theatre Director.jpg
- File:COLOSEUL BRAGADIRU.jpg
- File:George Gyftakis Dimitripol.jpg
Josephintechnicolor (talk) 19:47, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
- These images are definitely not your own work. If they are in public domain source and license tags must be fixed. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Reasons for deletion request -ChangeSKG (talk) 21:55, 3 January 2019 (UTC) Accidentally uploaded wriong picture
Deleted: Uploader requested deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:18, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Already deleted as File:Zvagulis.jpg Papuass (talk) 16:27, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no permission. --Gbawden (talk) 12:19, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
no encyclopedic value — Draceane talkcontrib. 17:05, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:16, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
no encyclopedic value — Draceane talkcontrib. 17:05, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:18, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
Blurred, low resolution, redundant with images of much more better quality in Category:Works of Mercy window in St. Vitus Cathedral. Daniel Baránek (talk) 17:55, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:14, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
Blurred, redundant with images of much more better quality in Category:Stained glass window by Alfons Mucha in St. Vitus Cathedral Daniel Baránek (talk) 17:57, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
- Agreed. Thanks, --Vítek 08:41, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:14, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
Big noise, redundant with images of much more better quality in Category:Stained glass window by Alfons Mucha in St. Vitus Cathedral Daniel Baránek (talk) 17:59, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:14, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
Blurred, redundant with images of much more better quality in Category:Stained glass window by Alfons Mucha in St. Vitus Cathedral, especially with File:St. Vitus's Cathedral, Prague Castle (11) (26210228085).jpg Daniel Baránek (talk) 18:00, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:13, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
Low resolution, blurred, useless, redundant with images of much more better quality in Category:Rose window of St. Vitus Cathedral (interior view) Daniel Baránek (talk) 18:12, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:12, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
Blurred, low resolution, useless, redundant with images of much more better quality in Category:Rose window of St. Vitus Cathedral (interior view) Daniel Baránek (talk) 18:13, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Agreed --Txllxt TxllxT (talk) 10:13, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:13, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
Blurred, redundant with images of much more better quality in Category:Rose window of St. Vitus Cathedral (interior view) Daniel Baránek (talk) 18:13, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:12, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
regénération Atomas42 (talk) 18:27, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
regénération Atomas42 (talk) 18:36, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Already deleted. --Gbawden (talk) 12:11, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Already deleted. --Gbawden (talk) 12:12, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
regénération Atomas42 (talk) 18:28, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
regénération Atomas42 (talk) 18:41, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Already deleted. --Gbawden (talk) 12:12, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Already deleted. --Gbawden (talk) 12:12, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
Unused in any article (orphan). Also it's fan art, so unencylopedic TedEdwards (talk) 19:44, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
- Request to withdraw– Mistake by nominator to nominate it. TedEdwards (talk) 19:47, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Nom withdrawn. --Gbawden (talk) 12:11, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
Request by subject at OTRS ticket:201901061000376. Subject did not consent to release. Subject has requested source website take it down, which they have done. Ronhjones (Talk) 20:19, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete as a courtesy. clpo13(talk) 17:37, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:11, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
Whoops just uploaded higher resolution file of same image ie 'File:Supermarine Spitfire 09.jpg' Gillfoto 20:47, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:10, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
I was the uploder and now don't need this file/picture --Kingacsorgits121 (talk) 20:46, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:09, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE - un*: unsharp, uncategorized, undescribed, unusable Herzi Pinki (talk) 20:58, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:09, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
It seems to be out of scope, categy "politics" is too vague Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:36, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:08, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 07:07, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Yann: Not personal.It is a picture of a place and a stranger appeared by accident although I tried as much as I could not show people and there is a description in English for clarification --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 07:12, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: INUSE. --Gbawden (talk) 12:24, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
Wherever used, it may be replaced by File:مصلحة الشهر العقاري، القاهرة الجديدة 02 (احتياطي).jpg, I think from the same uploader. E4024 (talk) 23:05, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: replaced and deleted. Ruthven (msg) 12:45, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Looks to me fairly out of scope. JuTa 08:48, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:24, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/"Erik Drost" mona
[edit]Very low quality blurry photos, useless as Category:Mona Lisa in the Louvre has many already.
- File:Mona Lisa by Leonardo da Vinci (5986770105).jpg
- File:Mona Lisa by Leonardo da Vinci (5986770133).jpg
- File:Mona Lisa by Leonardo da Vinci (5986770361).jpg
BevinKacon (talk) 09:55, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:24, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
obviously not the author's own work Lugnuts (talk) 10:09, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:23, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
Twitter logo is coyrighted. DM. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 15:28, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:16, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
This is a piece of user-generated artwork; the illustration of "social media addiction" as a handful of pills is potentially misleading and is not useful for any educational purpose. Previous version was deleted in September 2018 due to Twitter logo copyvio; this version raises the same concerns with the remaining logos. Dlthewave (talk) 13:25, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep It is COM:INUSE and therefore COM:IN SCOPE - educational or not. Current version does not have any logos above COM:TOO, therefore no copyright issues. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Josve05a (talk • contribs) 17:20, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:22, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of project scope, unused image. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 14:44, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:22, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Chiraq Bears (talk · contribs)
[edit]USA law stipulate 70 years after author death.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep You're citing post-1978. These were published in 1923 so they're {{PD-US-expired}} Abzeronow (talk) 15:36, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep COM:HIRTLE. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:38, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:21, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
File:Lossy-page1-220px-Inauguração da Ponte da Amizade, entre Brasil e Paraguai, com os Presidentes Castelo Branco e Alfredo Stroessner.tif.jpg
[edit]Redundant Conde Edmond Dantès (talk) 02:26, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. @Conde Edmond Dantès: Please use {{Duplicate}} next time. Ruthven (msg) 18:16, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
Image claims to be created by the user, appears to just be a promotional pic while the user claims it as their own. Source here states its copyright of Rise Above Records.-Andrzejbanas (talk) 22:23, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
Wikipedia Account: Slaughterhousem is run by the band Uncle Acid & the deadbeats You are free to contact us on the following email address: slaughterhousemerch@gmail.com/uncleacidband@gmail.com We own the picture displayed on the page, alongside our record label Rise Above Records. This photo was one taken in a series of photographs commissioned and paid for directly by us (band/label) from Ester Segerra the London based photographer in 2018. We licensed Revolver Magazine to use this picture for the article used as a source. We own the copyright for this photo, along with the other unused photos from the series, as we choose. One use is this wikipedia page in which we help maintain with the rest of the wikipedia community. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Slaughterhousem (talk • contribs) 18:16, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. @Slaughterhousem: You are free to contact us at COM:OTRS. Ruthven (msg) 18:18, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
This is a copyrighted image taken from chrisdignam.com without permission 2601:246:C900:2BC5:B077:DD02:3C49:53D3 03:03, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination + PROMO. Ruthven (msg) 18:18, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
This photo is edited version of the photo given in the website with an application https://m.imdb.com/name/nm7759290/mediaviewer/rm816712448 Iamheentity (talk) 05:11, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: COM:DW. Ruthven (msg) 18:18, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely that the YouTube user owns the footage. Seems pretty certain that they’re repurposing copyrighted video. Ytoyoda (talk) 05:41, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 18:19, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
PD-textlogo? Yann (talk) 06:49, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: the reflection on the logo makes it "complex". Ruthven (msg) 18:19, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Conde Edmond Dantès as no license. Well, there is a CC license, but thats very unlikely own work of the uploader as claimed. JuTa 08:16, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 18:26, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
It seems unclear what the source is, no statement indiciating it is self made. It is a valuable image, though, so it would be nice if the uploader could clarify if they created it. My DR may be premature, as I suspect the author had just filled in the wrong information, but I have contacted them on French Wikipedia.[5] FunkMonk (talk) 08:48, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: no answer after one month and OTRS permission needed. Ruthven (msg) 18:29, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Jotzet as no permission, but I cannot find an external source to doubt own work as claimed. JuTa 09:15, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no proofs of copyviol, file moved from de.wiki. Ruthven (msg) 18:30, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
Used wizard for uploading, should have used 'move' functionality from ca.wiki to commons Alvaro Vidal-Abarca (talk) 11:17, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader's request. Ruthven (msg) 18:28, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by ThatBPengineer as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://media.licdn.com/dms/image/C5103AQG0nCM-z2x1Ow/profile-displayphoto-shrink_200_200/0?e=1548288000&v=beta&t=Xvu1MUFH1tQ-dbIgngmgEgA5vrzvXRXlXZHypeFBkIo — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 11:29, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Not sure if the images are the same here. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 11:32, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Promotional image, in any case. Ruthven (msg) 18:28, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
Broken duplicate version of Coat of arms of Yaroslavl Oblast.svg Akril (talk) 12:58, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: widely in use. Please fix. Ruthven (msg) 18:31, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
User-generated artwork is a compilation of copvio logos and serves no educational purpose. Dlthewave (talk) 13:26, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. Ruthven (msg) 18:31, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama in France. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 18:34, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
Extended content
|
|---|
|
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Burj_Khalifa[edit]There is no FOP in the UAE, and thence these images can't be hosted on Commons.
russavia (talk) 06:43, 14 January 2012 (UTC) Hi, First of all, thanks for reviewing some articles on wikimedia. To be honest, I have not understood yet the problem with some of my pictures and I haven't got any further explanation on your words (I could see something on the "FOP" link you left) I guess you mean that there are some policies related to the buildings on UAE that my images don't follow. I can say that I took some pictures in there and I have't asked anyone on the UAE if he/she mind about using images of his country. I didn't know I was breaking some rules (I just wanted to contribute with some of my pictures) but in that case, I hardly believe that all of the pictures of the UAE shown on Commons are following that directives So, if it is possible, I just want to know what's the difference between my pictures and "almost every other" picture of UAE shown on wikicommons Thanks for your help, --KeDaO (talk) 23:01, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. MBisanz talk 18:37, 15 February 2012 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Burj Khalifa 2[edit]No FOP in the UAE
russavia (talk) 16:20, 10 July 2013 (UTC) Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:36, 17 July 2013 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Burj Khalifa 3[edit]No COM:FOP in the UAE.
russavia (talk) 19:04, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Burj Khalifa 4[edit]No FOP in the UAE
russavia (talk) 22:30, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Burj Khalifa 5[edit]No FOP in the UAE russavia (talk) 10:37, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Burj Khalifa 6[edit]No COM:FOP in the UAE for buildings.
russavia (talk) 06:09, 30 March 2014 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Burj Khalifa 7[edit]Copyrighted building exteriors and interiors. No Freedom of Panorama in UAE.
Themightyquill (talk) 07:36, 9 January 2016 (UTC) Burj Khalifa and Dubai Metro perfect timing.JPG and Tallest tower vs. the palm trees (5373615733).jpg could be de minimis. I'm not a judge, where is the border between permissibility and copyright violation? --Ras67 (talk) 21:47, 9 January 2016 (UTC) Deleted four, kept two per DM. --Krd 16:18, 16 January 2016 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Burj Khalifa 8[edit]Copyrighted building in UAE which has no freedom of panorama.
Themightyquill (talk) 18:40, 16 January 2016 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination --Krd 11:07, 23 January 2016 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Burj Khalifa 9[edit]No Freedom of Panorama in the United Arab Emirates! None of this buildings are free to photograph!
Ras67 (talk) 19:48, 16 July 2016 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 23 July 2016 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Burj Khalifa 10[edit]Building under copyright, no Freedom of Panorama.
Themightyquill (talk) 13:22, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Sealle (talk) 13:15, 10 February 2017 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Burj Khalifa 11[edit]The same as usual: no COM:FOP.
HyperGaruda (talk) 15:54, 17 October 2017 (UTC) Deleted per nomination. Jcb (talk) 15:15, 24 October 2017 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Burj Khalifa 12[edit]Can we have some clarification as to why these illustrations of a copyrighted building are okay for commons? I don't know how the rules apply here. The copyrighted architecture of the buildings is clearly depicted, but maybe there's some exception I don't understand. Themightyquill (talk) 15:52, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted per above: this is clearly a reproduction of the architectural work. Guanaco (talk) 15:27, 9 December 2017 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Burj Khalifa 13[edit]No Freedom of Panorama in the United Arab Emirates! Ras67 (talk) 23:00, 9 December 2017 (UTC) Deleted per nomination --Ruthven (msg) 12:53, 5 January 2018 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Burj Khalifa 14[edit]No freedom of panorama in the UAE Themightyquill (talk) 13:47, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Burj Khalifa 15[edit]no FoP in the UAE Saqib (talk) 04:11, 25 April 2018 (UTC) Deleted - per nomination - Jcb (talk) 14:51, 3 May 2018 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Burj Khalifa 16[edit]No Freedom of Panorama in the United Arab Emirates!
Ras67 (talk) 15:05, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I believe there is no copyright to these public images in the UAE .Category:Burj Khalifa. Is it possible to give us one reason to delete these images which are public photos and there is nothing wrong with posting them here!?.Usamasaad 17:04, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted - per nomination. Kept only File:Fog on Burj Khalifah.Dubai. - panoramio.jpg and File:برج خليفة في دبي2.jpg. --Ruthven (msg) 18:43, 23 February 2019 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Burj Khalifa 17[edit]No Freedom of Panorama in the United Arab Emirates!
Ras67 (talk) 22:33, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. --Majora (talk) 20:54, 19 July 2019 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Burj Khalifa 18[edit]No Freedom of Panorama in the United Arab Emirates. Burj Khalifa was designed by Adrian Smith.
Ras67 (talk) 16:15, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. It is not de minimis if what is being photographed is the main subject of the photograph. The entry way would still be part of the copyright and we cannot keep any of these. --Majora (talk) 20:58, 19 July 2019 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Burj Khalifa 19[edit]No FOP in UAE
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 05:12, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
|
.JPG){kind=link}
![12 File:"Holy White Child".jpg](#File:"Holy_White_Child".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_full.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_Lindenallee_8,_Informationsschild,_01.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
![[1]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hussein-Ali_Bey,_the_Iranian_Safavid_ambassador_at_the_Habsburg_court_in_Prague.jpg){kind=link}
![02:12, 6 January 2019 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2019/01/06#c-Explicit-2019-01-06T02:12:00.000Z-File:"Holy_White_Child".jpg){kind=link}
![09:49, 13 January 2019 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2019/01/06#c-Dyolf77-2019-01-13T09:49:00.000Z-File:"Holy_White_Child".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_panoramio.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_from_Brju_khalifa_-_panoramio.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(26210228085).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_full.svg){kind=link}
_full.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_full.svg){kind=link}
_full.svg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_tower.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Files in Category:Burj Khalifa 20
[edit]Derived work from copyrighted photos/buildings/designs what we cannot host here! We need the permission of the actual creators for a free licencing of their work.
- File:The making of Burj Khalifa, Dubai (Ank Kumar) 04.jpg
- File:The making of Burj Khalifa, Dubai (Ank Kumar) 05.jpg
- File:The making of Burj Khalifa, Dubai (Ank Kumar) 06.jpg
- File:The making of Burj Khalifa, Dubai (Ank Kumar) 07.jpg
- File:The making of Burj Khalifa, Dubai (Ank Kumar) 08.jpg
- File:The making of Burj Khalifa, Dubai (Ank Kumar) 10.jpg
- File:The making of Burj Khalifa, Dubai (Ank Kumar) 12.jpg
- File:The making of Burj Khalifa, Dubai (Ank Kumar) 13.jpg
- File:The Making of Burj Khalifa, Models (Ank Kumar, Infosys) 01.jpg
- File:The Making of Burj Khalifa, Models (Ank Kumar, Infosys) 02.jpg
- File:The Making of Burj Khalifa, Models (Ank Kumar, Infosys) 03.jpg
- File:The Making of Burj Khalifa, Models (Ank Kumar, Infosys) 04.jpg
- File:The Making of Burj Khalifa, Models (Ank Kumar, Infosys) 05.jpg
- File:The Making of Burj Khalifa, Models (Ank Kumar, Infosys) 06.jpg
- File:The Making of Burj Khalifa, Models (Ank Kumar, Infosys) 08.jpg
- File:The Making of Burj Khalifa, Models (Ank Kumar, Infosys) 09.jpg
- File:The Making of Burj Khalifa, Models (Ank Kumar, Infosys) 10.jpg
- File:The Making of Burj Khalifa, Models (Ank Kumar, Infosys) 11.jpg
_04.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_05.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_06.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_07.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_08.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_10.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_12.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_13.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_01.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_02.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_03.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_04.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_05.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_06.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_08.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_09.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_10.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_11.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ras67 (talk) 17:46, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, COM:FOP UAE, and all the previous sections. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:46, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
Speedy delete as derivative work copyvios. No permissions or OTRS authorizations from model creators, images uploaded by a problematic user (who has uploaded dozens of DW/no FOP violations, as seen in their talk page. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:58, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete all per COM:FOP UAE. Uncensored Burj Khalifa is not something we should ever host in Commons until Adrian Smith gets a bail. --Soumya-8974 (he) (talk • contribs) 15:48, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete all per COM:FOP UAE. All the above photos are of copyrighted works of some sort - the architecture or museum exhibits. -M.nelson (talk) 20:05, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:59, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Burj Khalifa 21
[edit]To the 21st one and eternal further, no freedom of panorama in UAE! Why we are the sole ones who protect Adrian Smith's rights? It seems to me, that the rest of the world is not interested in this case. IMHO the skylines are copyrighted too.
- File:084-DSC07190 (25199382909).jpg Keep General skylines--A1Cafel (talk) 08:05, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:Burj Khalifa (15514231368).jpg Delete Other copyrighted building is too prominent. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:Burj Khalifa (16260269606).jpg Keep General cityscape photo. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:Burj Khalifa (48393167816).jpg Delete Other copyrighted building is too prominent. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:Burj Khalifa (48393239271).jpg Delete Other copyrighted building is too prominent. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:Burj Khalifa (48393322877).jpg Delete Burj Khalifa is main object. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:Burj Khalifa (Pexels-1537493).jpg Keep General cityscape photo. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:Burj Khalifa -4 (10764135213).jpg Delete Burj Khalifa is main object. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:Burj Khalifa Dubai UAE (14159904937).jpg Keep General skylines--A1Cafel (talk) 08:05, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:Burj Khalifa Fountain - Downtown Dubai (6985576394).jpg Delete Other copyrighted building is too prominent. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:Downtown Dubai skylines (Pexels 2403251).jpg
Unsure Other copyrighted buildings are too prominent, but I think it's general cityscape photo. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC) - File:Dubai Burj Arab Burj Khalifa Mall UAE - 043 (15656282153).jpg Keep Focus changed to the garden--A1Cafel (talk) 08:05, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- This must be renamed. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:14, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
- Rename request send - you could do it in the time of writing your comment Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 18:05, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
- This must be renamed. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:14, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
- File:Dubai Fountain show (Pexels 692105).jpg Keep Focus changed to the fountain--A1Cafel (talk) 08:05, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:DUBAI IN COLORS.jpg Keep General skylines--A1Cafel (talk) 08:05, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:Dubai mall-2011-7.JPG Delete Other copyrighted buildings are too prominent. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:Dubai mall1.jpg Keep Focus changed to the lake--A1Cafel (talk) 08:05, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:Dubai Night Time (Pexels-804915).jpg Keep General cityscape photo. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:Dubai Skylines (Pexels 1537493).jpg Keep General cityscape photo. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:Dubai Skylines Alex Azabache (Pexels 3214995).jpg Keep General cityscape photo. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:Dubai Skylines Alex Azabache (Pexels 3848412).jpg Keep General cityscape photo. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:Dubai Skylines at night (Pexels 3787839).jpg Keep General cityscape photo. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:Dubai Skylines at night (Pexels 3787840).jpg Keep General cityscape photo. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:Dubai Skylines Night (Pexels 804915).jpg Keep General cityscape photo. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:Dubai skyscrapers at night 2011.jpg Keep General cityscape photo. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:Dubai skyscrapers.jpg Keep General skylines--A1Cafel (talk) 08:05, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:Dubai street view.jpg Keep General cityscape photo. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:Dubai Sunset (5614220391).jpg Keep General skylines--A1Cafel (talk) 08:05, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:Dubai, United Arab Emirates (Unsplash suv4vuJsH6g).jpg Keep General cityscape photo. Ox1997cow (talk) 17:24, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:Flying from Burjkhalifa.jpg Keep Main object is a bird. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:Fog on Burj Khalifah.Dubai. - panoramio.jpg Keep COM:DM per previous discussion--A1Cafel (talk) 08:05, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - not really de minimis. The title implies the image's main intention: the tower itself. See also Explicit closing input at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Giant Rubber Duck invades Pittsburgh (10023967385).jpg. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:11, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
- @JWilz12345: If so, we can change this file name and keep this file. Ox1997cow (talk) 09:27, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345: And we can also undelete deleted file and rename deleted file. Ox1997cow (talk) 09:31, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
- File:Fountain (4067634603).jpg Keep Focus changed to the fountain--A1Cafel (talk) 08:05, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:Jaguar C-X17 crossover concept in Dubai (10818367515).jpg Keep COM:DM: Focus is on the car--A1Cafel (talk) 08:05, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:Jaguar C-X17 crossover concept in Dubai (10818386576).jpg Keep COM:DM: Focus is on the car--A1Cafel (talk) 08:05, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:Jaguar C-X17 crossover concept in Dubai (10818644523).jpg Keep COM:DM: Focus is on the car--A1Cafel (talk) 08:05, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
- The illuminated background is an essential part of the photos and not a casual element. The whole background consists of copyrighted skyscrapers. --Ras67 (talk) 21:20, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- @Ras67: Comment I think main object in this image is the car. Ox1997cow (talk) 22:34, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:Panoramic of Dubai - Nov 2009.JPG Keep COM:DM per previous discussion--A1Cafel (talk) 08:05, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:People taking photos of Burj Khalifa at night.jpg Keep Main object is a smartphone. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- No, the main object is the Burj Khalifa seeing in the smartphone. Without the Burj the picture would not have been taken in this manner. --Ras67 (talk) 21:20, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- Come on - just a general skyline of Dubai in the smartphone. Besides, it could just as well have been any other city in the world. --Botev (talk) 00:41, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Ox1997cow (talk) 22:34, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:Scene outside Dubai Mall (4067633027).jpg Keep General cityscape photo. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:Skyline Downtown Dubai 140514-2096-jikatu (14167168656).jpg Keep General cityscape photo. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:Skyline-Dubai-2010.jpg Keep COM:DM per previous discussion--A1Cafel (talk) 08:05, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:Souk Al Bahar @ Downtown Dubai (15691803028).jpg Delete Other copyrighted buildings are too prominent. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:Sunset of Dubai Terrace.jpg Keep General skylines--A1Cafel (talk) 08:05, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:Taking photos of Burj Khalifa.jpg Keep Main object is a smartphone. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
- No, the main object is the Burj Khalifa seeing in the smartphone. Without the Burj the picture would not have been taken in this manner. --Ras67 (talk) 21:20, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination Ox1997cow (talk) 22:34, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:Tall buildings in Dubai Alex Azabache (Pexels 3254725).jpg Unsure Other copyrighted buildings are too prominent, but I think it's general cityscape photo. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
** Delete this Pexels-sourced derivative work. focus is on tall buildings. Not a skyline image: for UAE, only true skyline images are fine for unrestricted commercial reuses. See also this Adobe help guide, which lists copyrighted buildings and artworks, their copyright holders or authors, and permitted use in images meant for stock/commercial reuses without authors' licensing permission. For both Burj Khalifa and Burj al Arab, skyline image is only allowed, not close cityscape images. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:17, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- @JWilz12345: I read this page carefully. In this page, I found this sentence. "Cityscape, skyline, or vista photos may be acceptable if no single building is the primary subject." It means that both cityscape photos and skyline photos are allowed. And this page contains outdated content. For example, Atomium in Belgium is allowed now because Belgium has freedom of panorama now, but this page explains that Atomium is not allowed. Ox1997cow (talk) 04:22, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Ox1997cow: slashed my vdel input. While the page is outdated for Atomium, it is still relevant for Burj Khalifa and Burj al Arab, as long as there is no acceptable FOP from UAE. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:06, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345: I read this page carefully. In this page, I found this sentence. "Cityscape, skyline, or vista photos may be acceptable if no single building is the primary subject." It means that both cityscape photos and skyline photos are allowed. And this page contains outdated content. For example, Atomium in Belgium is allowed now because Belgium has freedom of panorama now, but this page explains that Atomium is not allowed. Ox1997cow (talk) 04:22, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
- File:Tall buildings in Dubai at night (Pexels 1381722).jpg Unsure Other copyrighted buildings are too prominent, but I think it's general cityscape photo. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:The Bottom Part of the World's Tallest Building (9827329494).jpg Delete Burj Khalifa is main object. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:The Burj Khalifa from the East at sunrise (16398415591).jpg Keep General skylines--A1Cafel (talk) 08:05, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Burj Khalifa from the East at sunrise... - see Explicit's input at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Giant Rubber Duck invades Pittsburgh (10023967385).jpg. The file name already establishes the image's intention: to include Burj Khalifa. The rest of the skyline seems insignificant (making the tower the chief motif). Cropping that tower away will leave this image as redundant to other good Dubai skyline images we already hold. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:22, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
- File:The Dubai Fountain & Burj Khalifa Pixabay.jpg Delete Burj Khalifa is too prominent. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- @Ox1997cow: Focus changed to the lake. --A1Cafel (talk) 16:44, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
- File:The tallest building.jpg Delete Burj Khalifa is main object. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:View of Dubai (Unsplash Zf8fagTPYTo).jpg Keep General cityscape photo. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:एक इमारत जो सपनो को हौसला देती है और जज़्बो को हिम्मत- बुर्ज ख़लीफ़ा - UAE.jpg Keep COM:DM per previous discussion--A1Cafel (talk) 08:05, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Ras67 (talk) 02:41, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- @Ras67: Keep Already in past discussions, it has been concluded that some images were kept covered by DM. Ox1997cow (talk) 04:09, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- @A1Cafel: Comment In my opinion, some of other files you didn't marked maybe to be kept. Ox1997cow (talk) 11:27, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- @Ox1997cow: You may also mark those you think can be kept. --A1Cafel (talk) 13:46, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, COM:FOP UAE, and all the previous sections (except those given keep reasons by A1Cafel or Ox1997cow). — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:42, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- @A1Cafel and Jeff G.: I marked whether delete or keep. I will respectfully accept any objection. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- In my opinion, the skylines are not {{Deminimis}}. Every building in these images is copyrighted, it's not in the "sense" of the law to "stack" copyrighted objects and so make them free. The "deminimised" objects have to be "nonessential" and "casual" elements, what is not the case in the skyline photographs. Regards --Ras67 (talk) 21:20, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- @Ras67: Comment Already in past discussion, it has been concluded that the skylines are DM. Ox1997cow (talk) 22:52, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- @Ras67:
- Comment @Jeff G., Ox1997cow, A1Cafel, and Ras67: if some of the images are skylines, then why categorize them here in the first place??! IMO they should be removed from this "reddish" category and confined only to Category:Skylines in Dubai. Once I inquired Bidgee about removal of FoP templates on categories of objects from countries FOP (User talk:Bidgee/Archive13#FoP templates), and they replied that it only causes clutter. They added: "if there was no FoP, there shouldn't be a category for the object/item/building/memorial/statue etc." JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:50, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345: Lack of freedom of panorama does not mean that we cannot create categories of copyrighted buildings or sculptures. So, why does categories of copyrighted games exist? (Such as Category:StarCraft, Category:Overwatch, Category:Call of Duty, etc...) Ox1997cow (talk) 12:47, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
- If the skyline photo incidentally contains copyrighted buildings, these photos are allowed under de minimis. Categories of buildings or sculptures in countries without freedom of panorama exist for this kind of situation. Ox1997cow (talk) 12:56, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Ox1997cow: see Category:Sólfar (a copyrighted sculpture in Iceland, with all files deleted via Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Sólfar). See also Category:SM City San Pedro. For buildings, they can go under Category:Buildings in Dubai or Category:Skyscrapers in Dubai. This category has been abused IMO, and it seems new uploaders ignore warnings on top. Also if the category needs to be nuked, this should be locked until the year the building falls PD or UAE changes their copyright law. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:31, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345: That's an extreme case. When uploading to the category of copyrighted things, there is no problem if we follow the warning and upload. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:07, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345: By the way, why are you taking the extreme case and giving it as an example? In the previous deletion discussion, you used that only examples of misuse of NoFoP templates were taken as examples, and you claimed that all NoFoP templates should be changed with something like {{NoFoP-Japan}}. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:19, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Ox1997cow: the simple answer is that the {{NoUploads}} are, in my opinion, ineffective. I doubt most uploaders will understand what the template means in relation to copyrighted FOP-reliant works: works like buildings, sculptures, statues, monuments, memorials, and public murals/frescoes. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:41, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345: My opinion is different. The reason is that many users don't know that freedom of panorama varies by country. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:44, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Ox1997cow: the simple answer is that the {{NoUploads}} are, in my opinion, ineffective. I doubt most uploaders will understand what the template means in relation to copyrighted FOP-reliant works: works like buildings, sculptures, statues, monuments, memorials, and public murals/frescoes. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:41, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Ox1997cow: see Category:Sólfar (a copyrighted sculpture in Iceland, with all files deleted via Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Sólfar). See also Category:SM City San Pedro. For buildings, they can go under Category:Buildings in Dubai or Category:Skyscrapers in Dubai. This category has been abused IMO, and it seems new uploaders ignore warnings on top. Also if the category needs to be nuked, this should be locked until the year the building falls PD or UAE changes their copyright law. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:31, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete
allwhere Burj Khalifa is prominent per COM:FOP UAE. Uncensored Burj Khalifa is not something we should ever host in Commons until Adrian Smith gets a bail. --Soumya-8974 (he) (talk • contribs) 15:50, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Soumya-8974:
Oppose Some images were kept due to DM before. Ox1997cow (talk) 04:06, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
- Burj Khalifa should be a trivial landmark (i.e. should not be at the centre of an image) per COM:DM, but it is too prominent in most of the listed images. Apologies for !voting all listed images to delete without seeing them individually. --Soumya-8974 (he) (talk • contribs) 08:23, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Soumya-8974: I and A1Cafel have already marked "deleted" and "kept" on images that are likely to be deleted and images that are likely to be kept. Also, already in the previous deletion discussion, it was concluded that the skyline image is DM as the single buildings might be copyrighted, but the whole panorama is not. Ox1997cow (talk) 10:33, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
- Some skyline images are under discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/Burj Khalifa-related. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:56, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Soumya-8974: I and A1Cafel have already marked "deleted" and "kept" on images that are likely to be deleted and images that are likely to be kept. Also, already in the previous deletion discussion, it was concluded that the skyline image is DM as the single buildings might be copyrighted, but the whole panorama is not. Ox1997cow (talk) 10:33, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
- Burj Khalifa should be a trivial landmark (i.e. should not be at the centre of an image) per COM:DM, but it is too prominent in most of the listed images. Apologies for !voting all listed images to delete without seeing them individually. --Soumya-8974 (he) (talk • contribs) 08:23, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
To end all this mess because of limited exception (broadcasting programs only) in UAE copyright law, are there any attempts by Wikipedians in UAE and Arab Wikipedians to have FOP introduced in the desert kingdom? At the very least, FOP for architecture only (similar to US and Russian exceptions)? @A1Cafel, Ox1997cow, Ras67, Botev, Jeff G., and Soumya-8974: JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:15, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345: I'm sorry, but I've never heard of such a thing. Ox1997cow (talk) 10:08, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
"Why we are the sole ones who protect Adrian Smith's rights" note that I do not care about Adrian Smith's right, I do not care about UAE law. If I nominate things for deletion I do it to protect users of Commons. This law is unjust, though if for some reason I would have influence on UAE I would start from far worse laws being present there Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 18:03, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
- Well said. Dronebogus (talk) 02:32, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
And for this nomination: keep everything, nominate actually problematic ones for a proper review Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 18:03, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Keep as indiscriminate. Cut out any skyline pictures, they are clearly de minimis. Individually nominate the rest. We aren’t here to “right great wrongs” by protecting the copyright of an architect who has low enough ethical standards to work in a country where being gay is illegal. Dronebogus (talk) 02:32, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: followed remarks of @Ox1997cow and A1Cafel: and many thanks for your efforts. In some case followed arguments of other users. General skylines kept according consensus. Thanks all for your efforts. --Ellywa (talk) 15:34, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Burj Khalifa 22
[edit]The architecture is copyrighted e.g. by Adrian Smith, see COM:TOYS!
Ras67 (talk) 02:54, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- @Ras67: Delete They are clearly {{Copyvio}}. Ox1997cow (talk) 04:13, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, COM:FOP UAE, and all the previous sections. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:40, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete derivative work copyright violation: appears to be toys or small-scale models. May also fulfill User:Elcobbola/Models. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:53, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:TOYS--A1Cafel (talk) 07:56, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
deleted, per nomination and discussion. Elly (talk) 21:34, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Burj Khalifa 23
[edit]There is no freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates, per COM:FOP UAE. The Burj Khalifa is still copyrighted. Also derivatives (such as lego models) are copyrighted. Reason: the building was completed in 2008.
- File:084-DSC07190 (25199382909).jpg Keep Burj Khalifa is blurry. Ox1997cow (talk) 10:42, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- File:Burj Khalifa (48393167816).jpg
- File:Burj Khalifa (48393322877).jpg
- File:Burj Khalifa (8276722353).jpg Keep Burj Khalifa is not prominent. Ox1997cow (talk) 10:42, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
File:Burj Khalifa (Pexels-1537493).jpg Keep General cityscape. Ox1997cow (talk) 10:42, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- This image is deleted per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Burj Khalifa (Pexels-1537493).jpg. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:47, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- File:Burj Khalifa (worlds tallest building) and the Dubai skyline (25781049892).jpg Keep Burj Khalifa is silhouette and General skyline. Ox1997cow (talk) 10:42, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- File:Burj Khalifa -4 (10764135213).jpg
- File:Burj Khalifa -5 (10764136183).jpg
- File:Burj Khalifa Fountain - Downtown Dubai (6985576394).jpg
- File:Burj Khalifa from a ferry, Dubai.jpg Keep General skyline. Ox1997cow (talk) 10:42, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- File:Burj Khalifa from the sea, Dubai.jpg Keep General skyline. Ox1997cow (talk) 10:42, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- File:Burj Khalifa IMG 5776 (25901811255).jpg Keep Burj Khalifa is silhouette and General skyline. Ox1997cow (talk) 10:42, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- File:Burj Khalifa Interpretation Centre.jpg
- File:Downtown Dubai skylines (Pexels 2403251).jpg
- File:Dubai (11535337084).jpg Keep Burj Khalifa is blurry and General Road View. Ox1997cow (talk) 10:42, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- File:Dubai Burj Khalifa (40219696641).jpg Keep General skyline. Ox1997cow (talk) 10:42, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- File:DUBAI IN COLORS.jpg Keep Burj Khalifa is silhouette and General skyline. Ox1997cow (talk) 10:42, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- File:Dubai mall-2011-7.JPG
- File:Dubai Police Agusta A-109K-2 in flight at sunset.jpg Keep Main object is a helicopter. Ox1997cow (talk) 10:42, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
File:Dubai skyline 2010 (censored Burj Khalifa).jpg Keep General cityscape photo. Chronus (talk) 21:17, 3 October 2021 (UTC)- File:Dubai skyline 2010.jpg Keep General cityscape photo. Chronus (talk) 21:17, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
- File:Dubai Skylines Alex Azabache (Pexels 3214995).jpg Keep General cityscape. Ox1997cow (talk) 10:42, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- File:Dubai Skylines Alex Azabache (Pexels 3848412).jpg Keep General cityscape. Ox1997cow (talk) 10:42, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- File:Dubai Skylines at night (Pexels 3787839).jpg Keep General cityscape. Ox1997cow (talk) 10:42, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- File:Dubai Skylines at night (Pexels 3787840).jpg Keep General cityscape. Ox1997cow (talk) 10:42, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- File:Dubai skyscrapers at night 2011.jpg Keep General skyline. Ox1997cow (talk) 10:42, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- File:Dubai skyscrapers.jpg Keep Burj Khalifa is silhouette and General skyline. Ox1997cow (talk) 10:42, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- File:Dubai street view (censored Burj Khalifa).jpg Keep General cityscape. Ox1997cow (talk) 10:42, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- File:Dubai street view.jpg Keep General cityscape. Ox1997cow (talk) 10:42, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- File:Dubai Sunset (5614220391).jpg Keep Burj Khalifa is silhouette and General skyline. Ox1997cow (talk) 10:42, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- File:Dubai, United Arab Emirates (Unsplash suv4vuJsH6g).jpg Keep General aerial view. Ox1997cow Ox1997cow (talk) 22:59, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- File:Lego Architecture Dubai.jpg
- File:Lego burj khalifa 21008.jpg
- File:Lego burj khalifa 21031.jpg
File:Muslims looking at Burj Khalifa.jpg. Is cropped to remove largest part of building.- File:Panoramic of Dubai - Nov 2009.JPG Keep General cityscape. Ox1997cow (talk) 10:42, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- File:Scene outside Dubai Mall (4067633027).jpg Keep Main object is a lake. Ox1997cow (talk) 10:42, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- File:Souk Al Bahar @ Downtown Dubai (15691803028).jpg Keep cropped and now Burj Khalifa is not prominent. --A1Cafel (talk) 14:15, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- File:The Bottom Part of the World's Tallest Building (9827329494).jpg
- File:The Making of Burj Khalifa, Models (Ank Kumar, Infosys) 02.jpg
- File:The Making of Burj Khalifa, Models (Ank Kumar, Infosys) 03.jpg
- File:The Making of Burj Khalifa, Models (Ank Kumar, Infosys) 06.jpg
- File:The tallest building.jpg
- File:एक इमारत जो सपनो को हौसला देती है और जज़्बो को हिम्मत- बुर्ज ख़लीफ़ा - UAE.jpg Keep Burj Khalifa is silhouette and General skyline. Ox1997cow (talk) 10:42, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
_and_the_Dubai_skyline_(25781049892).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Elly (talk) 21:12, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
- Agree not to delete File:Dubai skyline 2010 (censored Burj Khalifa).jpg, because the tower is blackened and details cannot be seen. Elly (talk) 21:39, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete all but File:Dubai skyline 2010 (censored Burj Khalifa).jpg per Elly. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 22:39, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete all but Dubai skyline 2010 (censored Burj Khalifa).jpg and Dubai street view (censored Burj Khalifa).jpg, where I have blackened the tower. I will black the other instances of Burj Khalifa in Commons. --Soumya-8974 (he) (talk • contribs) 07:21, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
- I have blacked out एक इमारत जो सपनो को हौसला देती है और जज़्बो को हिम्मत- बुर्ज ख़लीफ़ा (censored) - UAE.jpg (Hindi for "A building that gives encouragement to dreams and courage to the spirit - Burj Khalifa (censored) - UAE") as a separate file. --Soumya-8974 (he) (talk • contribs) 07:41, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
- Comment It looks like File:Muslims looking at Burj Khalifa.jpg has correctly been withdrawn from this nomination for deletion. If so, shouldn't the deletion nomination tags be removed from the file? I wanted to check so as to not risk taking a unilateral action someone might object to. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:51, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
_-_UAE.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete all except File:Dubai skyline 2010 (censored Burj Khalifa).jpg per Elly SHB2000 (talk) 11:22, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Could some of these image be covered under the de minimis exception? --ShyAlpaca482 (talk) 23:33, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- I don't understand. Surely most/all those other buildings are subject to copyright as well. Either all buildings in this image (including Burj Khalifa) de minimis or all are subject to copyright restrictions, no? -- Themightyquill (talk) 07:56, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Themightyquill: Already the decision has been made that the single buildings might be copyrighted but the whole panorama is not. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Skyline-Dubai-2010.jpg. Ox1997cow (talk) 10:42, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Ox1997cow: That was my understanding as well - so I didn't see the need to black out the tower in that image. - Themightyquill (talk) 06:10, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
- Maybe a sub-category like Category:Skylines in Dubai including the Burj Khalifa would be useful? -- 06:13, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Themightyquill: Not bad. Ox1997cow (talk) 06:52, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
- And we can make a sub-category like Category:Skylines in Seoul including Lotte World Tower. (There is no freedom of panorama in South Korea, too.) Ox1997cow (talk) 06:59, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Ox1997cow and Themightyquill: impractical, and can lead to abuse. The best approach is that all skyline inages must be categorized under Category:Skylines in Dubai and similar categories. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:26, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345: I don't think it's impractical, but I suspect you're right about leading to abuse. Just a thought - I'm not determined. - Themightyquill (talk) 11:52, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Ox1997cow and Themightyquill: impractical, and can lead to abuse. The best approach is that all skyline inages must be categorized under Category:Skylines in Dubai and similar categories. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:26, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- Maybe a sub-category like Category:Skylines in Dubai including the Burj Khalifa would be useful? -- 06:13, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Ox1997cow: That was my understanding as well - so I didn't see the need to black out the tower in that image. - Themightyquill (talk) 06:10, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Themightyquill: Already the decision has been made that the single buildings might be copyrighted but the whole panorama is not. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Skyline-Dubai-2010.jpg. Ox1997cow (talk) 10:42, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- I have marked {{vk}} on images that can obviously applied de minimis. Ox1997cow (talk) 10:42, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Ox1997cow: I have signed your markings for you. Please sign such markings yourself in the future. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:43, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: Oh, that's my mistake. Ox1997cow (talk) 13:39, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- Comment: Has anyone contacted Adrian Smith to request permission? If so, then I'm assuming he said no? Ixfd64 (talk) 01:44, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
- If I've not misheard, Adrian Smith is currently in a jail in Saudi Arabia. --Soumya-8974 (he) (talk • contribs) 08:22, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Soumya-8974 and Ixfd64: for a more eternal or longterm approach, has anyone including Arab Wikipedians and Wikipedians based in UAE have taken steps to introduce FOP there, at least "for buildings only" (yellow countries)? I expect dozens of more copyvio images to be uploaded here, including: this one. I'm not sure if people aren't aware of no FOP there or just intentionally "testing our no-FOP policy on UAE". I would also want to suggest filtering out exactly the words "Burj Khalifa" so that new users will no longer be able to upload images either containing the said words in their file names or in their file descriptions, at least temporarily (while UAE has no FOP for photos). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:16, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- If I've not misheard, Adrian Smith is currently in a jail in Saudi Arabia. --Soumya-8974 (he) (talk • contribs) 08:22, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345: Excessive file name restrictions are bad. Suppose someone uploaded a file name of the Dubai Skyline with Burj Khalifa as "Remote view of Burj Khalifa". Skyline photos with Burj Khalifa are allowed even if there is no freedom of panorama in UAE, as last deletion discussion concluded that they were OK. If you ban the use of "Burj Khalifa" in file names, we won't be able to upload acceptable skyline or cityscape photos. Ox1997cow (talk) 11:57, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345: And many people do not know freedom of panorama. I also mistakenly thought that the copyright of a building or sculpture photo belonged to the person who took it, until I saw numerous photos of the building or sculpture deleted from Wikimedia Commons. Ox1997cow (talk) 11:59, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Ox1997cow: no, de minimis photos can still be uploaded, thru titles like "Dubai skyline 20211103.JPG", "Skyline of Dubai, UAE as seen from the Marina in 2019.jpg." If images bearing such file names continue to be uploaded, the location filled with millions of deleted files from late-2006 may become "crowded" in the very distant future. Besides files do not get "deleted" in real life, but rather all "deleted" files are still there, just hidden from non-admins (as per Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) on his reply here). See also w:Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2006-06-19/Image undeletion on the mechanism of files deleted on Wikipedia (which also applies to all Wiki sites). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:33, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345: And many people do not know freedom of panorama. I also mistakenly thought that the copyright of a building or sculpture photo belonged to the person who took it, until I saw numerous photos of the building or sculpture deleted from Wikimedia Commons. Ox1997cow (talk) 11:59, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345: You're thinking too extreme. A lot of users will use the copyrighted building name in the file name, but can we ban the copyrighted building name in the file name? And did you think about typos? (For example, "Bur Kalifa", "Buri Khaljfa", etc.) Ox1997cow (talk) 15:37, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345: I've known you're an extreme claimant since you had the deletion discussion related NoFoP templates. Even in that discussion, you brought only cases where NoFoP templates were misused and insisted that use of NoFoP templates should only be used in category namespace. Even if use of NoFoP templates is changed to be used in category namespace, there is no guarantee that it will not be misused. Ox1997cow (talk) 15:46, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Ox1997cow: I look on longterm solutions and not "band-aid" solutions. Thus it is best to filter out such names. Actually Commons has already did a version of what you call very extreme approach: indefinite protection of file names that is comonly misused. Example: File:Burj Khalifa.jpg. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:21, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- That approach of locking the file name prompted me to suggest such. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:26, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345: I've known you're an extreme claimant since you had the deletion discussion related NoFoP templates. Even in that discussion, you brought only cases where NoFoP templates were misused and insisted that use of NoFoP templates should only be used in category namespace. Even if use of NoFoP templates is changed to be used in category namespace, there is no guarantee that it will not be misused. Ox1997cow (talk) 15:46, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345: Keep that in mind. Such long-term solutions can hurt many users. Even though it is forbidden to use only "Burj Khalifa" in a file name, I know that using a file name containing "Burj Khalifa" is difficult to ban. Ox1997cow (talk) 16:46, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Ox1997cow: and also take note of COM:CARES. The copyright holders include the architects and artists of national monuments. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:53, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345: Keep that in mind. Such long-term solutions can hurt many users. Even though it is forbidden to use only "Burj Khalifa" in a file name, I know that using a file name containing "Burj Khalifa" is difficult to ban. Ox1997cow (talk) 16:46, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Soumya-8974: I couldn't find anything about Adrian Smith being incarcerated. His article on the English Wikipedia doesn't say anything either. Could you provide a source? Ixfd64 (talk) 17:43, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oh, thank you! I have probably misheard a piece of news related to the still-unfinished Jeddah Tower, also designed by Adrian Smith. --Soumya-8974 (he) (talk • contribs) 17:53, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- As a compromise, how about using the edit filter to just warn the user if they try to upload a picture containing the name? Ixfd64 (talk) 17:44, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Ixfd64: It's not bad. Ox1997cow (talk) 06:14, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
- File:Burj Khalifa from a ferry, Dubai.jpg Keep General skyline despite the name. —Jpbowen (talk) 18:58, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- File:Burj Khalifa from the sea, Dubai.jpg Keep General skyline despite the name. —Jpbowen (talk) 18:58, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
And see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Burj Khalifa Interpretation Centre.jpg. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:43, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep skyline images. De minimis use of the Burj Khalifa, there’s a precedent for this. The freedom of panorama page of English Wikipedia literally shows a skyline in a non-FOP country. I struggle to see why the images that just show the base aren’t de minimis but that’s not my expertise. The blacked-out version is artistically interesting but a ridiculous solution to a nonexistent problem (buildings are not more copyrighted because they’re famous and impossible not to notice in a generic panorama!) Dronebogus (talk) 15:06, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept General DR like this one is clearly not helpful. Yann (talk) 21:05, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Monument of Jan Joosten van Lodensteyn at Yaesu Shopping Mall
[edit]- File:Detail Monument Jan Joosten van Lodensteyn, Yaesu shopping mall.jpg
- File:Jan Joosten van Lodensteyn, Yaesu shopping mall.jpg
- File:Monument Jan Joosten van Lodensteyn, Yaesu shopping mall.jpg
Work by Dutch sculptor L. P. J. Braat († 1982). Copyright is still in effect, and COM:FOP#Japan doesn't allow such artworks. Yasu (talk) 15:12, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 18:46, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:13, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 18:46, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
Claim of own work is not credible. The same image appears in the facebook page and is dated from September 2015, two years prior to the upload date to Commons. Whpq (talk) 15:16, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 18:46, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
Promo photo. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:21, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 18:45, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
Logo design, these are typically held by the organisation they represent so a clarification is needed as to how this can be own work. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:38, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 18:45, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW, no permission. Yann (talk) 17:14, 6 January 2019 (UTC) l'immagine è opera non creativa risalente a più di 50 anni e realizzata in italia, come tale libera da vincoli.
Sesono stato impreciso nell'asttribuire la licensa ti sarò grato se vorrai aiutarmi a sanare l'errore. grazie un saluto --Canismaior --Canismaior (talk) 19:26, 6 January 2019 (UTC) (discussione — Preceding unsigned comment added by Canismaior (talk • contribs) 18:58, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. @Canismaior: Devi farci arrivare un'autorizzazione dal giornale o dal fotografo a permissions-it
wikimedia.org perché i diritti d'autore non sono tuoi. Ruthven (msg) 18:50, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW, no permission. Yann (talk) 17:15, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 18:50, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW, no permission. Yann (talk) 17:15, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
l'immagine è opera non creativa risalente a più di 50 anni e realizzata in italia, come tale libera da vincoli.
Sesono stato impreciso nell'asttribuire la licensa ti sarò grato se vorrai aiutarmi a sanare l'errore. grazie un saluto --Canismaior (talk) 18:43, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. @Canismaior: È una foto di scena quindi, per definizione, opera a carattere creativo. Ruthven (msg) 18:51, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW, no permission. Yann (talk) 17:15, 6 January 2019 (UTC) L'immagine è di mia proprietà ed è comunque risalente a più di 20 anni fa e senza valore creativo. Se sono stato impreciso nell'asttribuirela licensa ti sarò grato se vorrai aiutarmi a sanare l'errore. grazie un saluto --Canismaior (talk) 18:39, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. @Canismaior: "Di tuoa proprietà" nel senso che l'hai scattata tu? In tal caso, scrivi a permissions-itwikimedia.org. Ruthven (msg) 18:51, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
Source is not free on Flickr. Yann (talk) 17:28, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 18:53, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 17:29, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 18:53, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Overexposed, redundant with images of much more better quality in Category:Pentecost window in St. Vitus Cathedral Daniel Baránek (talk) 17:46, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: the stained glasses are not underexposed and they are the main focus of the photo. Ruthven (msg) 18:53, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
the title is wrong. it should say a TURKISH WOMAN not a Frankish Woman. See my note in Discussion. I don't know how to correct this. Either delete or correct it. False info should not be in the databases. Meat Eating Orchid (talk) 17:49, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
- The painting is owned by the Nelson-Atkins Museum of Art, where it was formerly titled A Frankish Woman and Her Servant.[6] They have changed the title to A Lady in Turkish Dress and Her Servant, which should be the new name of the file here. Ewulp (talk) 00:05, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
- Do we know that? it seems a remarkable error. The file information has "Turkish", but of course stupid Wikidata is wrong as always. Not a reason to delete. I've requested a rename anyway - see the file page. Johnbod (talk) 01:38, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: I've renamed the file following the holding institution's title here: https://art.nelson-atkins.org/objects/3567 --bjh21 (talk) 01:57, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 18:52, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
Blurred, low resolution, useless, possible to crop out a duplicate from images in Category:Window of the Holy Trinity and Bohemian Kings in St. Vitus Cathedral. Daniel Baránek (talk) 17:50, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 18:53, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Blurred, redundant with images of much more better quality in Category:Works of Mercy window in St. Vitus Cathedral. Daniel Baránek (talk) 17:52, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: photo is fine and have EDUSE. Ruthven (msg) 18:54, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Low resolution, blurred, overexposed, redundant with images of much more better quality in Category:Works of Mercy window in St. Vitus Cathedral. Daniel Baránek (talk) 17:54, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 18:54, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Blurred, redundant with images of much more better quality in Category:Works of Mercy window in St. Vitus Cathedral. Daniel Baránek (talk) 17:54, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep. Quality of this image is also not so bad. --Interfase (talk) 19:01, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep No valid reason for deletion --Mehman 97 15:14, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 18:54, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
Uploader's request. This djvu has pages missing in its original scan. I'll need quit some time to prepare one myself as I can't find a good djvu scan. In the meantime, please delete this one as it's an incomplete scan wasting space. MonsterHunter32 (talk) 18:02, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
- @MonsterHunter32: From this file, several pages were extracted and are used in en.wikisource.org. It's much better that you upload the modified file overwriting this one. --Ruthven (msg) 18:56, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per above. Ruthven (msg) 18:56, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
Est-ce que cette photo est libre de droits ? Sa résolution et les marques blanches laissent penser qu'elle a été découpée quelque part. Vérification nécessaire auprès de la personne qui l'a déposée Pierrette13 (talk) 19:20, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Basse résolution, pas de metadata. Écrire à COM:OTRS/fr. Ruthven (msg) 18:57, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
par ce que je suis ibraham Langevin, c'est ma photo et je ne veux plus qu'elle soit sur internet 78.114.75.111 21:10, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: promotion or self-promotion. Ruthven (msg) 18:59, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
Obvious derivative work Discasto talk 21:11, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 18:59, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work, small size withput EXIFs, the other upload are already deleted Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:40, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 18:59, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
Copyrighted work by Alfredo Romagnoli (d. 2008), permission of artist's heirs needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:40, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 18:59, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
Photo for abandoned draft: w:Draft:Richard Pierzchajlo Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:21, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
- No objection from me; I just transferred it over from enwiki. ~ Rob13Talk 18:44, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 18:58, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
very low resolution, bad quality, better File:Rembrandt - Margaretha de Geer, wife of Jacob Trip - National Gallery.jpg Oursana (talk) 22:28, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete! Heavy Horse (talk) 20:54, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: in use. Ruthven (msg) 18:58, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Perchè è una foto molto vecchia Gaetano Ceravolo (talk) 22:36, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 18:57, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - false claim of source as "Own work" while it's clear the document was produced by SQS and Vijayrai90, given his contributions here and on enwiki, is an undisclosed employee of Fischer. Cabayi (talk) 08:10, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (license problem). --DMacks (talk) 04:10, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Despite the title, this is an image of the Urban Light installation at the Los Angeles County Art Museum. There is no freedom of panorama for 3D artworks in the U.S. Barte (talk) 21:46, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination (3D art not architecture). --DMacks (talk) 04:14, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
PD-textlogo? Yann (talk) 06:49, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 14:04, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama in France. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 14:08, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
,_Lindenallee_8,_Informationsschild,_01.jpg){kind=link}
,_Lindenallee_8,_Informationsschild,_01.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Photo may be own work, what about the information sign shown? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:41, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
,_Lindenallee_8,_Informationsschild,_01.jpg){kind=link}
- First, this could be accepted as public domain
{{FoP-Germany}}
- Okay, but don't forget to send the OTRS queue a copy of the permission.. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 18:17, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
- I will do so as soon as I get the CD, because of the files and that photos are not under
{{FoP-Germany}}
- I will do so as soon as I get the CD, because of the files and that photos are not under
- Keep FoP for this. --Wilhelm Zimmerling PAR (talk) 07:30, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: FoP. --DaB. (talk) 14:09, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
,_Lindenallee_8,_Informationsschild,_01.jpg){kind=link}
אחת המצולמות ביקשה את מחיקת התמונה Nizzan Cohen (talk) 08:49, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
One of the subjects asked for the picture to be erased Nizzan Cohen (talk) 22:14, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
One of the subjects asked for the picture to be erased Nizzan Cohen (talk) 22:18, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: We rarely remove an image at the request of a subject and never at the request of a third party, who might be an enemy or a vandal. A request may be made by the actual person using OTRS. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:30, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Courtesy deletion requested. In the previous DR and ticket:2019052210009932, the uploader says that the women depicted do not wish the pictures to be kept in association with the uniforms. Since a redacted version has been uploaded (File:Dror Israel and Hanoar Haoved Ve'Halomed uniforms.png), we will lose little by accepting the wish. whym (talk) 11:24, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- thank you very much, whym. Nizzan Cohen (talk) 17:39, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted per above. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:53, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 189.150.6.16 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: violation of copyright Maybe the logo does not surpass threshold of originality, that case the file can be in Commons. Taivo (talk) 07:30, 05 January 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 187.147.216.156 (talk) 09:47, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Too simple. --DaB. (talk) 14:11, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
es:Playnux was deleted thrice and en:Playnux once. Probably the company is non-notable and the logo is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 08:09, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:43, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Uncertain copyright, same image as found in this website (except that the CTV logo on the mic has been covered up) - http://www.ottawacitizen.com/health/reporter+Stephen+Andrew+legislature+been+living+with+stage+kidney+cancer+since+2006+will+speaking+upcoming+conference+kidney+cancer/8036633/story.html Hzh (talk) 19:24, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 14:11, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://vk.com/id410111435 Remote image smaller, could not be the full source, but is earlier date. Ronhjones (Talk) 21:13, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Looks like we are the source. --DaB. (talk) 14:14, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Uploader request 1989 (talk) 12:17, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
- Merge histories with File:VignetteEulerIdentity.svg; don’t whitewash records of this user. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 13:22, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
- I, the uploader of the image, has asked for its removal, because 1) is has a font problem and 2) I have made another version, which does not use any fonts. So dump it, please. --AstroOgier (talk) 08:41, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete; the image hasn't any use. (I didn't understand Incnis Mrsi's point, so I don't have an opinion about that.) - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 12:06, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:SCOPE and alternative at File:VignetteEulerIdentity.svg. --Эlcobbola talk 17:00, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
No evidence that this is the correct logo (challenged at OTRS ticket:2019010310004328). Web archive does not show logo. No cc-by-sa-4.0 permisson on the Metrolink web site (https://www.metrolink.ie/#/news = Copyright © 2019 Transport Infrastructure Ireland - All rights reserved ). Correct logo is at File:METROLINK-Logo-Outlined-RGB.png Ronhjones (Talk) 20:06, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ℯxplicit 07:13, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
Files from Westboro Baptist Church
[edit]- All original material on this web site is © 1955-2004 Westboro Baptist Church. You may use any of our material free of charge for any reason.
Nothing concrete about unrestricted redistribution, commercial use, and modification.
- File:WBC - Dead Miners 2006.jpg
- File:20051129 northlake-il7.jpg
- File:20051129 northlake-il6.jpg
- File:20051129 northlake-il5.jpg
- File:20051129 northlake-il4.jpg
- File:20051129 northlake-il3.jpg
- File:20051129 northlake-il2.jpg
- File:20051129 northlake-il.jpg
- File:WBC 20051202 sacco-topeka9.jpg
- File:WBC 20051202 sacco-topeka8.jpg
- File:WBC 20051202 sacco-topeka7.jpg
- File:WBC 20051202 sacco-topeka6.jpg
- File:WBC 20051202 sacco-topeka5.jpg
- File:WBC 20051202 sacco-topeka4.jpg
- File:WBC 20051202 sacco-topeka3.jpg
- File:WBC 20051202 sacco-topeka2.jpg
- File:WBC 20051202 sacco-topeka10.jpg
- File:WBC 20051202 sacco-topeka.jpg
- File:Westboro - Fags Are Worthy of Death.jpg
- File:Westboro - Sows Wed.jpg
- File:Fred Phelps on his pulpit.jpg
- File:God Hates America.ogg
Kobac (talk) 23:22, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
- Keep "any of our material free of charge for any reason" is pretty unambiguous. No restrictions are placed on redistribution, commercial use, or modification, so the permission stands as written. Fat&Happy (talk) 01:22, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
- Keep -- As above. Linas (talk) 22:20, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
- Keep, agree with astute analysis provided by Fat&Happy (talk · contribs), above. ;) Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 07:27, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
Kept by MBisanz. Ices2Csharp (talk) 20:59, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
Images of Leila Araghian
[edit]Request by subject at OTRS Ticket:2017112910010534. Subject did not give permission for publication. Subject has had Flickr images removed.
- File:Leila Araghian TEDxTehran 2015 - 1 (cropped).jpg
- File:Leila Araghian TEDxTehran 2015 - 2.jpg
- File:Leila Araghian TEDxTehran 2015 - 1.jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
Ronhjones (Talk) 20:34, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep A TEDx talk is not a private birthday party. Added {{Personality rights}}. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 20:47, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
- On second thought, Commons:Photographs of identifiable people doesn't list Iran. If Iran requires consent to take/publish a picture, maybe delete. We'd have to discuss whether or not giving a TEDx talk is implicit permission in that case. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 20:49, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
- @4nn1l2: do you know more about that? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 20:50, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Alexis Jazz: This academic article [7] (in Persian, published Jan-Feb 2016, subscription needed), states Iran has no laws with regard to photographing identifiable people. It specifically mentions a 2007 Iranian law [8] which forbids 1) photographing women-only places such as public bathes and swimming pools; 2) taking inappropriate photographs of private and familial parties (wedding ceremonies, etc). That being said, if this Iranian woman wants her pictures removed from the Internet, I don't oppose it, considering many cultural factors which may not be tangible for a typical Western reader. However, she had better refrain from appearing in eye-catching public stages in the future. On the other hand, if the Wikimedia community decides to keep her pictures, I'm certainly okay with that. All in all, I am
Neutral in this case. 4nn1l2 (talk) 03:07, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for the research, I'll add it to Commons:Photographs of identifiable people. If the picture actually endangers her somehow, I'd reconsider. But without any indication of that, I'm sticking with my keep vote. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:56, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Alexis Jazz: This academic article [7] (in Persian, published Jan-Feb 2016, subscription needed), states Iran has no laws with regard to photographing identifiable people. It specifically mentions a 2007 Iranian law [8] which forbids 1) photographing women-only places such as public bathes and swimming pools; 2) taking inappropriate photographs of private and familial parties (wedding ceremonies, etc). That being said, if this Iranian woman wants her pictures removed from the Internet, I don't oppose it, considering many cultural factors which may not be tangible for a typical Western reader. However, she had better refrain from appearing in eye-catching public stages in the future. On the other hand, if the Wikimedia community decides to keep her pictures, I'm certainly okay with that. All in all, I am
- Keep - taken in a public place - this edit may be interesting - Jcb (talk) 20:56, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --ℯxplicit 07:15, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
أنا صاحب هذا العمل أطلب حذفه لأنني اكتشفت أنه يتضمن أخطاء Ibentiris (talk) 05:11, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
- Note that Jelloud Najem, Ibentiris, and ابن تيرس, the three substantive contributors to this file, are probably all the same person. I've reverted a couple of violations of COM:OVERWRITE, but I have no objection to deletion. --bjh21 (talk) 13:39, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: File too old for this. --JuTa 05:29, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by MifterBot as no license. Well there is a {{PD-SpanishGov}}, but is this a valid license in this case? JuTa 08:08, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
- The document is part of the Revisión Simplificada of the Plan General de Urbanismo of the City of València (Spain). Therefore, it makes part of an Spanish oficial norm, so it is within PD-SpanishGov. B25es (talk) 08:13, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: seems to be OK. --JuTa 05:19, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by MifterBot as 'no license. 'Well there is a {{PD-SpanishGov}}, but is this a valid license in this case? JuTa 08:11, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
- The document is part of the Revisión Simplificada of the Plan General de Urbanismo of the City of València (Spain). Therefore, it makes part of an Spanish oficial norm, so it is within PD-SpanishGov. B25es (talk) 09:47, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: seems to be OK. --JuTa 05:18, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
not required on wikipedia Idaz09 wikipedia (talk) 12:53, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
violate copyright 49.199.28.102 19:49, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --JuTa 05:30, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
Functionally a duplicate of File:BSicon ubvvWSLg+l.svg. Jc86035 (talk) 13:05, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
- I didn't know that file existed, and as they're almost identical and serve the same purpose I have no problem on deleting the file I uploaded --Snooze123 (talk) 13:49, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 05:23, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
I haven't found this photo in the source. This magazine (Tér és Forma) is available online (with purchase). You can see photos about this buildings in p. 183 but this photo is not there. Unknown copyright situation. Regasterios (talk) 13:31, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 05:41, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The template {{Attribution-PresidenciaBr}} is only valid for photos published on http://www.info.planalto.gov.br/ and copied to Commons before July 2011. This photo is not from that publication nor copied to Commons before July 2011. The fact that the copyright is somehow connected to Palácio do Planalto does not mean that the permission published on their website does apply to this photo. Martin H. (talk) 14:45, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 05:33, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per Commons:Deletion_policy#Out_of_scope, due to both being "Not educationally useful" and "Self-promotion or vandalism/attack", or due to a combination of them. Specifically, per 2.2.1 ("Not educationally useful"): "Self-created artwork without obvious educational use." (because the obviousness in its educational usability may be somewhat absent, indeed I always lacked a genuine intent to upload any file, and as explained at this discussion, I turned into a self-created works uploader only as consequence of an unfortunate contribution). And 2.2.2 ("Self-promotion or vandalism/attack"): "Files apparently created and/or uploaded for the purpose of vandalism or attack." (per various blocks I faced and keep on facing as a direct consequence of editing the topic of suicide since exactly 10 September 2017 at wikipedia I am NOT HERE: most recent examples would be here at Western world and here at World Suicide Prevention Day, enforced after this sockpuppet investigation). SuperSucker (talk) 15:56, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
.svg#commitment_towards_more_professional_(mathematically_proportionate)_shades){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
- Discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by User:SuperSucker (myself) on the topic of suicide please. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 14:15, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --JuTa 05:34, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per Commons:Deletion_policy#Out_of_scope, due to both being "Not educationally useful" and "Self-promotion or vandalism/attack", or due to a combination of them. Specifically, per 2.2.1 ("Not educationally useful"): "Self-created artwork without obvious educational use." (because the obviousness in its educational usability may be somewhat absent, indeed I always lacked a genuine intent to upload any file, and as explained at this discussion, I turned into a self-created works uploader only as consequence of an unfortunate contribution). And 2.2.2 ("Self-promotion or vandalism/attack"): "Files apparently created and/or uploaded for the purpose of vandalism or attack." (per various blocks I faced and keep on facing as a direct consequence of editing the topic of suicide since exactly 10 September 2017 at wikipedia I am NOT HERE: most recent examples would be here at Western world and here at World Suicide Prevention Day, enforced after this sockpuppet investigation). SuperSucker (talk) 15:56, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- Discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by User:SuperSucker (myself) on the topic of suicide please. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 14:15, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --JuTa 05:38, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per Commons:Deletion_policy#Out_of_scope, due to both being "Not educationally useful" and "Self-promotion or vandalism/attack", or due to a combination of them. Specifically, per 2.2.1 ("Not educationally useful"): "Self-created artwork without obvious educational use." (because the obviousness in its educational usability may be somewhat absent, indeed I always lacked a genuine intent to upload any file, and as explained at this discussion, I turned into a self-created works uploader only as consequence of an unfortunate contribution). And 2.2.2 ("Self-promotion or vandalism/attack"): "Files apparently created and/or uploaded for the purpose of vandalism or attack." (per various blocks I faced and keep on facing as a direct consequence of editing the topic of suicide since exactly 10 September 2017 at wikipedia I am NOT HERE: most recent examples would be here at Western world and here at World Suicide Prevention Day, enforced after this sockpuppet investigation). SuperSucker (talk) 15:56, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- Discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by User:SuperSucker (myself) on the topic of suicide please. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 14:15, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --JuTa 05:39, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per Commons:Deletion_policy#Out_of_scope, due to both being "Not educationally useful" and "Self-promotion or vandalism/attack", or due to a combination of them. Specifically, per 2.2.1 ("Not educationally useful"): "Self-created artwork without obvious educational use." (because the obviousness in its educational usability may be somewhat absent, indeed I always lacked a genuine intent to upload any file, and as explained at this discussion, I turned into a self-created works uploader only as consequence of an unfortunate contribution). And 2.2.2 ("Self-promotion or vandalism/attack"): "Files apparently created and/or uploaded for the purpose of vandalism or attack." (per various blocks I faced and keep on facing as a direct consequence of editing the topic of suicide since exactly 10 September 2017 at wikipedia I am NOT HERE: most recent examples would be here at Western world and here at World Suicide Prevention Day, enforced after this sockpuppet investigation). SuperSucker (talk) 15:56, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by User:SuperSucker (myself) on the topic of suicide please. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 14:15, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --JuTa 05:37, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per Commons:Deletion_policy#Out_of_scope, due to both being "Not educationally useful" and "Self-promotion or vandalism/attack", or due to a combination of them. Specifically, per 2.2.1 ("Not educationally useful"): "Self-created artwork without obvious educational use." (because the obviousness in its educational usability may be somewhat absent, indeed I always lacked a genuine intent to upload any file, and as explained at this discussion, I turned into a self-created works uploader only as consequence of an unfortunate contribution). And 2.2.2 ("Self-promotion or vandalism/attack"): "Files apparently created and/or uploaded for the purpose of vandalism or attack." (per various blocks I faced and keep on facing as a direct consequence of editing the topic of suicide since exactly 10 September 2017 at wikipedia I am NOT HERE: most recent examples would be here at Western world and here at World Suicide Prevention Day, enforced after this sockpuppet investigation). SuperSucker (talk) 15:56, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- Discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by User:SuperSucker (myself) on the topic of suicide please. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 14:14, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --JuTa 05:27, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per Commons:Deletion_policy#Out_of_scope, due to both being "Not educationally useful" and "Self-promotion or vandalism/attack", or due to a combination of them. Specifically, per 2.2.1 ("Not educationally useful"): "Self-created artwork without obvious educational use." (because the obviousness in its educational usability may be somewhat absent, indeed I always lacked a genuine intent to upload any file, and as explained at this discussion, I turned into a self-created works uploader only as consequence of an unfortunate contribution). And 2.2.2 ("Self-promotion or vandalism/attack"): "Files apparently created and/or uploaded for the purpose of vandalism or attack." (per various blocks I faced and keep on facing as a direct consequence of editing the topic of suicide since exactly 10 September 2017 at wikipedia I am NOT HERE: most recent examples would be here at Western world and here at World Suicide Prevention Day, enforced after this sockpuppet investigation). SuperSucker (talk) 15:56, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- Discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by User:SuperSucker (myself) on the topic of suicide please. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 14:14, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --JuTa 05:35, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Την ανέβασα πειραματικά και δεν θέλω να κοινοποιηθεί. Ανδρέας Αλεξανδρίδης (talk) 22:11, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: uploaders request at upload day. --JuTa 05:43, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
Functionally duplicates of File:BSicon ubvvWSLg+lr.svg and File:BSicon uexbvvWSLg+lr.svg. Both are only used within bot-generated reports and WikiProject BSicon discussion and catalogue pages.
Jc86035 (talk) 13:10, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
It may be preferable to keep these for posterity (since they are used to illustrate different icon designs in a discussion), in which case I (being a file mover) would instead rename the files to indicate that they are experimental. Jc86035 (talk) 13:12, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - no longer in use in a discussion. --Jcb (talk) 00:31, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The template {{Attribution-PresidenciaBr}} is only valid for photos published on http://www.info.planalto.gov.br/ and copied to Commons before July 2011. This photo is not from that publication nor copied to Commons before July 2011. The fact that the copyright is somehow connected to Palácio do Planalto does not mean that the permission published on their website does apply to this photo. Martin H. (talk) 14:45, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 03:00, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Historical maps. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected.
- File:Exrait carte 1771-1785 Souchouniou.jpg
- File:Cartes 1950 Chuchuniou source Géoportail.jpg
- File:Photographie aérienne 1950-1965 château de Suscinio et son allée - source Géoportail.jpg
- File:Extrait carte Cassini Château de Suscinio Ploujean.jpg
- File:Carte état-major 1820-1866 Suscinio.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep File:Exrait carte 1771-1785 Souchouniou.jpg & File:Carte état-major 1820-1866 Suscinio.jpg, these are public domain maps. Fixed licensing. Abzeronow (talk) 15:34, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: still unsourced. --JuTa 02:59, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:SuperSucker (myself) on the topic of suicide
[edit]- File:Male_suicide_rates_2015_(crude).svg
- File:Female_suicide_rates_2015_(crude).svg
- File:Male-Female_suicide_ratios_and_rates_2015_(crude).svg
- File:Male-Female_suicide_ratios_2015_(age-standardized).png
- File:Male_and_female_suicide_rates_by_country_(2015_age-standardized).png
- File:Male-Female_suicide_ratios_and_rates_2015_(age-standardized).svg
These images were all uploaded by me (User:SuperSucker) on the topic of suicide, in the last 15 months.
Per Commons:Deletion_policy#Out_of_scope, due to both being "Not educationally useful" and "Self-promotion or vandalism/attack", or due to a combination of them. Specifically, per 2.2.1 ("Not educationally useful"): "Self-created artwork without obvious educational use." (because the obviousness in its/their educational usability may be somewhat absent, indeed I always lacked a genuine intent to upload any file, and as explained at this discussion, I turned into a self-created works uploader only as consequence of an unfortunate contribution). And 2.2.2 ("Self-promotion or vandalism/attack"): "Files apparently created and/or uploaded for the purpose of vandalism or attack." (per various blocks I faced and keep on facing as a direct consequence of editing the topic of suicide since exactly 10 September 2017, I am NOT HERE at wikipedia: most recent examples would be here at Western world and here at World Suicide Prevention Day, enforced after this sockpuppet investigation). --SuperSucker (talk) 16:14, 6 January 2019 (UTC) Also:
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Male suicide rates 2015 (crude).svg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Female suicide rates 2015 (crude).svg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Male-Female suicide ratios 2015 (age-standardized).png
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Male-Female suicide ratios and rates 2015 (crude).svg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Male-Female suicide ratios and rates 2015 (age-standardized).svg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Male and female suicide rates by country (2015 age-standardized).png
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
- Keep charts based on WHO data. @SuperSucker: What is this, some sort of attempted rage quit? Don't bring Wikipedia drama here, we have enough of our own! - Alexis Jazz ping plz 14:14, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
- Keep – with the exception of File:Male and female suicide rates by country (2015 age-standardized).png, all the charts are in use on other projects, making them automatically educationally useful. clpo13(talk) 16:58, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Clpo13: I think you meant to add a comma after your vote. It now reads like the exception is for the vote.. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 17:49, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Alexis Jazz: thanks for the notice. I always forget to separate the !vote templates from the rationale. clpo13(talk) 17:52, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Clpo13: I think you meant to add a comma after your vote. It now reads like the exception is for the vote.. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 17:49, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
- Keep, no valid reason for deletion, most are in use. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:21, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
So you don't think they may be non-educational or resembling vandalism? Too simplistic to describe as rage quit, it's also a 15-month-long observation about Wikipedia (or is it that wikiPedia and wikiMedia are separate portals that have nothing to do with one another?). As explained, it makes me wonder that my contributions at WP are blindingly hampered (see World Suicide Prevention Day, even small uncontroversial corrections of mine get reverted) by the "you're banned" excuse, while those at WM are not? Am I better questioning the educational purpose of my work (in this given case in which I do not understand why my conduct at WP is unquestionably inappropriate, as in it being vandalism indeed), or am I to believe that there's something else I can't understand and that I'm not supposed to know, based on which my contributions at WM are fine but those at WP are not? The contributor is the same whether uploading these at WM or editing articles at WP: same user (myself), SuperSucker (contribs) (I'm male and 30+ years old, not a young girl) as generously admitted in more than one occasion whenever questioned (using IPs). So I wonder why'd my contributions at WP be revertable yet those here at WM end up at WP welcomed openly anyway. Isn't that a contradiction? I would understand if someone had suicided after contributing to the articles I'm too or something on that line, but even in this extreme case it still looks to me as a very stupid internet game of exploitation of own work (drama, indeed), dear to many wiki users (particularly admins) and that I've always sought to reject since I first noticed it being a norm. I have no time to play these internet games, sorry. Since I'm reverted at WP but welcomed through WM then, I don't trust this whole thing and need to either have these available (and exploitable, since on wide platforms which WM and WP are) charts of mine removed, or understand why my old WP ban is yet so exploited, arbitrarily enforced. In short, this Wiki platform is not appealing to me anymore, but if you like my works.. you can keep them obviously (I wish you'd keep them all actually, including my work at Wikipedia instead of reverting it so often and arbitrarily). I know the topic very well ("suicide and the media".. oh my), and detest the idea of my own works being exploitable by anonymous internet users (admins). 2A00:23C4:7116:D500:2DE5:1A53:9D47:EC76 19:36, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
- Commons is not Wikipedia. Take Slowking4 for example: valued contributor here, indefblocked on Wikipedia. We have some 20000 photos from Dr. Bernd Gross: banned from Commons, yet continued to contribute by uploading photos to German Wikipedia and a bot imported them to Commons. So yeah, you could have been a valued contributor here regardless of what other wikis think about you. After your death threat at my address however, I doubt it. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 20:14, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
- At your what? I threatened you, but you're now defaming me. I don't know who this user is (or think he/she is), and surely I do not know the home (or work?.. thinking about it..) address. Let's move on please, I know you're not serious and just teasing, but if you wish, we can meet and fight: I live in England at the moment. 2A00:23C4:7116:D500:2DE5:1A53:9D47:EC76 20:26, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
- "I threatened you, but"
- Most epic "but" ever. I guess "at my address" can't be translated directly into English. It just means the threat was aimed at me, you were addressing (directing speech) me, it has no relation to any physical address. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 20:38, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
- It's clear. I apologize deeply. 2A00:23C4:7116:D500:2DE5:1A53:9D47:EC76 20:55, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
- It's okay. As I said, Commons is not Wikipedia. English Wikipedia blocked you. I don't know why and Commons doesn't care. Your charts are also used on Spanish, French, Polish, Portuguese, Hungarian and Chinese Wikipedia. Those Wikipedias didn't block you. And they all have their own policies for various things, as does Commons. No project is the same. What is considered notable on Spanish Wikipedia may not be considered notable on English Wikipedia. And if you happened to be paid (not saying you are, just an example of another difference), Commons and a few other projects don't require you to disclose that while most projects do. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 22:40, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
- You nailed the point (all of you): they're all educational enough (I did not work so many months to have much doubt about it). The problem as stated, is that at the English Wikipedia where I am banned, the few (yet the most viewed) articles that do make use of my charts are arbitrarily controlled: meaning that some of my edits are allowed while others are reverted without reasonable motivations. The given example above is eye-opening because it's 100% non-controversial to correct wrong table data (you can also have a read at the Talk Page where I was basically muted). Thus, while this is the case I prefer not having these charts available on this Wiki platform, if that's possible. It appears this is unlikely to happen because of the above you and others mentioned (however, this is not fine with me because the English Wikipedia is 10 times as viewed as the respective mentioned projects in other languages). So, as a last word: it doesn't appeal to me to have my charts exploited at Wikipedia, and I lack the means and even the time to police their use.
- Then with regards to being paid (thanks for bringing this up as I don't know much about it, yet I'm not sure how others view my position in this sense): I don't even know if you refer to the chance that someone paid me to make these charts, or that I may be looking to sell them in the future. It just isn't what my Wiki work has been about. So in short: no, I don't get paid for these uploads (let alone for my WP edits) in any way whatsoever (just as, I guess, 99% of Wikimedia and Wikipedia users). Yes I'm an idiot maybe: I did it for free. 2A00:23C4:7116:D500:2DE5:1A53:9D47:EC76 23:59, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
- I wasn't suggesting you're being paid, it was just an example of how Commons policies differ from those on other projects. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 02:31, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- Ok. Also, when I say that I have no means nor time to police them, I actually mean that I had to make time and try my best throughout 2018 to police them (indeed I think I made 90% of the 2018 edits at those specific Wikipedia articles, under different IPs) against the mentioned administrative arbitrariness I still faced in January 2019, and that I can't nor I have any will left to do so anymore. And this is, substantially, the main reason to request the deletion of my own uploads which I know must be uncommon.
- I'm sure that a single user editing 90% or more of any article is not very "wiki-like" (but sensible and sad topics are obviously non-interesting to contribute to, thus why I was pretty much on my own). It surely must be contradicting and singular since I'm banned too, but is that an excuse to revert at will and keep plainly wrong content (table data is simple to cross-examine and correct)? I believe it's not: looks instead as a case of supervising burocracy (administration) arbitrarily subverting and damaging the process of content addition and revision (abuse of power): you must already know that even a good and reliable page (made of text and images) that took major efforts to put together is easily turned into a not-so-good and not-so-reliable page with only minor efforts (that's why books are reprinted, and that's what I'm pointing at). So at the very least I'm trying to point out the problem (or what I fully believe the problem is). 86.191.183.166 18:29, 10 February 2019 (UTC) Later added: I just made an edit request at the Talk Page of the mentioned article (with my mobile phone internet though, because its IPs are not blocked at the moment). 2A00:23C4:7116:D500:616D:5DA8:B98A:9BD 20:25, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- Update: my edit request found no support in six hours and then got deleted. This is why I seek to have my uploads removed. This is why I seek to have nothing to do with this Wiki platform anymore. The interests in "suicide and the media" are terribly leveraged. Good luck! 2A00:23C4:7116:D500:D034:FF5:F20C:A00B 07:30, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
- Update (2nd): tried again after a week (yesterday, 18 February 2019) and was reverted again. I think it's useless to contribute against admin's personal interests (as said above, the topic of "suicide and the media" is insanely managed (namely, the impact of publicity on suicide) since many years, as can be read on the news). Thus please if you would, delete all the above files if possible. SuperSucker (talk) 16:19, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
- @SuperSucker: please stop this. Commons is not Wikipedia. The non-English Wikipedias didn't block you. No other project has blocked you. You can start your own wiki and use the images on Commons there! - Alexis Jazz ping plz 21:48, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
- Then keep them, what more could I do than I already did to explain myself? 2A00:23C4:7116:D500:DD39:CA15:3323:8C5 08:37, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Alexis Jazz: And if that's all, why won't you unrevert then? Uncomfortable with contributing to such a scandalous, degenerate, non desiderable topic? Fear of the Ninja user? This is why I trust this Wiki-platform not: you are not contributing, you rather waste your time while claiming others shall be respectful for that. Start my own wiki? In another language you mean? I'm not pushing my views here in your Wiki-world you see, instead I try contribute if possible but since it's not, I do object, challenge, dispute, resist, do not simply look to change project. See my point? Nevertheless I don't speak a language better than I do speak English at the moment (although I was a polyglot for a time in my life, difficult task to achieve yet). So what are you advising? I just realised Ninja, the user reverting me at Wikipedia, is at Wikimedia as well, so I'm actually going to ping you both. @NinjaRobotPirate: the fact "suicide and the media" is a popularly scandalous topic grants no right to actually play with it as you're doing reverting my revisions. So is there a lack of consensus on that one table I'm trying to fix (it doesn't seem the case but I could understand, as I added it on my own months ago, and there just was no editor other than me to tell "there was a consensus")? Well, then remove it, but why keep it the way it is with mistakes? And there're other small corrections to be made or at least discussed as can be seen here (from 6 January 2019). I just don't understand and you don't seem to reason with anything but "you're blocked". SuperSucker (talk) 05:45, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
- @SuperSucker: please stop this. Commons is not Wikipedia. The non-English Wikipedias didn't block you. No other project has blocked you. You can start your own wiki and use the images on Commons there! - Alexis Jazz ping plz 21:48, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
- I wasn't suggesting you're being paid, it was just an example of how Commons policies differ from those on other projects. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 02:31, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- It's okay. As I said, Commons is not Wikipedia. English Wikipedia blocked you. I don't know why and Commons doesn't care. Your charts are also used on Spanish, French, Polish, Portuguese, Hungarian and Chinese Wikipedia. Those Wikipedias didn't block you. And they all have their own policies for various things, as does Commons. No project is the same. What is considered notable on Spanish Wikipedia may not be considered notable on English Wikipedia. And if you happened to be paid (not saying you are, just an example of another difference), Commons and a few other projects don't require you to disclose that while most projects do. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 22:40, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
- It's clear. I apologize deeply. 2A00:23C4:7116:D500:2DE5:1A53:9D47:EC76 20:55, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
- At your what? I threatened you, but you're now defaming me. I don't know who this user is (or think he/she is), and surely I do not know the home (or work?.. thinking about it..) address. Let's move on please, I know you're not serious and just teasing, but if you wish, we can meet and fight: I live in England at the moment. 2A00:23C4:7116:D500:2DE5:1A53:9D47:EC76 20:26, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
- I don't care what SuperSucker does here (apparently, Commons is OK with death threats), but he's indefinitely blocked on English Wikipedia. He doesn't seem to understand that means that he is forbidden from editing English Wikipedia, and he has repeatedly engaged in block evasion. I would advise him not to canvass editors to make edits on his behalf on Commons. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 10:38, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Alexis Jazz, Clpo13, and NinjaRobotPirate: See also Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Blocks and protections/Archive 25#2A00:23C4:7116:D500:C141:D195:C629:A9C5. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:17, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
- That's the point, Commons at Wikipedia (being it a highly visited website along with giants in the order of Amazon Facebook and Google and Youtube).
- My confrontation is an argument that shifted from editing to censorship, because Wikipedia's administration can't deal responsibly with complex issues such as "suicide and the media" (or deals with them worse than titled media outlets) where the Commons Creative intellectual rights happen to meet human rights: admins get creative with their tools while editors are to be creative with their writing skills, and unfortunately the result turns out to be about scarce if you overlook admins' oppressive interest, a difficult environment to contribute in. Moreover, in recent several months the EU's been actively seeking more rewarding practices on intellectual property thus Wikipedia/media are all but a disinterested environment for contributors: every now and then at Wikipedia indeed, I read disclaimers about the EU laws being discussed and Wikipedia inviting to take action into what it regards as the "struggle to protect the web and the freedom of opinion" (it is recent news that at the end of 2017 the EU adopted indeed some guidelines discussed during the previous months).
- I am no admin. I want to be an editor alone as it is the content done that matters and want nothing to do with the administrative facet of doing content. Instead it appears admins can't help taking me in while taking for granted the content is rather a contribution to the website they're administrating than to the readers: and this is abusive conduct. SuperSucker (talk) 03:08, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --JuTa 03:34, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
Radio station logo files uploaded by Many Radiator (talk · contribs)
[edit]Radio station logos; unlikely to be "own work" as claimed or licensed under the given Creative Commons licenses. At least some of these are probably under the threshold of originality, but not all of them.
- File:Wsta 1340.png
- File:105 Jamz.png
- File:Oldies 94.5 FM.png
- File:WISA 1390 AM.png
- File:Rumba 98.3 FM.png
- File:Isle 95.png
- File:Da Vybe 107.9.png
- File:WVIE 107.3 FM.png
- File:Caribbean Country 93.5.png
- File:Radio Una 1340 AM.png
- File:La Buena 1330.png
- File:Radio Paraiso.png
- File:WLRP Radio Raices.png
- File:Wisa1390AM.png
- File:Borinquen 1160.png
- File:SuperK106FM.png
- File:WYEL600AM.png
- File:WBQN Borinquen 1160.png
- File:KodeshFM.png
- File:Caliente 101.png
- File:Nueva Vida 97.7.png
- File:Nueva Vida 977.png
- File:Radio Felicidad.png
- File:Radio Casa Pueblo.png
- File:FaroDeSantidad.png
- File:WVJP Radio 1110.png
- File:WFAB 890 AM.png
- File:Play 96.5.png
- File:WVJP1110AM.png
- File:AlfaRock.png
- File:PuraPalabra.png
- File:LA965.png
- File:LaXFM.png
- File:La96.5FM.png
- File:RadioCoamo.png
- File:WRTU logo.png
- File:SacraFM.png
- File:CatolicaRadio.png
- File:WIUJ1029FM.png
- File:WEVI.png
- File:AMG WWKS.png
- File:AMG WIVI.png
- File:AMG WVJZ.png
- File:AMG WVWI.png
- File:WTJX-FM.png
- File:WVSE 91.9 FM.png
- File:WSKX StCroix 907.png
- File:WODB LP.png
- File:WKAQ 580.png
- File:WYEL600.png
- File:Triunfo 96.9.png
- File:Top Radio 98.png
- File:WZCL98.png
- File:WALO 1240 logo.png
- File:SuperK106.png
- File:PuraPalabraMedia.png
- File:WAELFM96.png
- File:Fidelity PR.png
- File:Hot 102 PR.png
- File:Redentor logo 2016.png
- File:Vid90.png
- File:WVIS 106.1.png
- File:WRRH106.1.png
- File:WVPJ 107.9 FM.png
- File:WVJPRadioCaguas.png
- File:WEGA AM.png
- File:WPPC1570.png
- File:WCPR 1450.png
- File:WRSS1410.png
- File:WBSG.png
- File:WYKO.png
- File:WEXS X61.png
- File:WABA La Grande.png
- File:WXEW 840.png
- File:WKVM.png
- File:WORO-FM.png
- File:WIPR FM.png
- File:WIPR AM.png
- File:Nueva Vida FM.png
- File:Vida FM.png
- File:Onda Cultural del Sur.png
- File:WRSJ1520.png
- File:WIBS1540.png
- File:Oldies 94.5.png
- File:WOLA 1380.png
- File:WJIT 1250.png
- File:WJDZWNNV.png
- File:WYQE 92.9.png
- File:WSOL1090.png
- File:MaranathaRadioMinistries.png
- File:Dimension103.png
- File:WYAC930.png
- File:WIAC740.png
- File:Magic97.3-99.5FM Puerto Rico.png
- File:WVDJ1079FM.png
- File:Cima 103.7.png
- File:Clamor893.png
- File:WMDD 1480.png
- File:WDNO960.png
- File:WVQR.png
- File:WKJB 710.png
- File:WPRA 990.png
- File:Salsoul.png
- File:881Inspira.png
- File:WHOY.png
- File:WBQN1160.png
- File:WDEP 1490.png
- File:WKFE 1550.png
- File:WLEY 1080.png
- File:WLRP.png
- File:WNEL.png
- File:WGDL1200AM.png
- File:WYAS921FM.png
- File:WZOL.png
- File:Mix 107.7.png
- File:Fresh999.png
- File:WQBS870.png
- File:WLYM-LP.png
- File:Zeta93.png
- File:LaNueveCuatroFM.png
- File:WXRF.png
- File:WMIA.png
- File:WVOZ.png
- File:WTIL.png
- File:Estereotempo.png
- File:WISO.png
- File:11Q.png
- File:WXYX.png
- File:WKAQ580.png
- File:WAPA680.png
- File:WSKN 1320.png
WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 22:47, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
- I do not think there is a need to delete these logos; what really needs to be done is to change their licensing from “own work” (because the uploader did not create them) to something that would state that the logos are copyrighted by their respective owners while also providing a valid “fair use” rationale for using the logos in the pertaining articles. If for some reason the logos still need to be deleted, then allow me to save them so I can later re-upload them with proper “fair use” licensing like all other properly-licensed logos. ‑‑🌀SilSinnAL982100💬 22:52, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
- @SilSinn9821: Commons, unlike English Wikipedia, does not accept any en:fair use/en:fair dealing files per c:COM:FAIR. So, I'm not sure what you mean by adding a "fair use rationale". Perhaps you mean add a non-free use rationale? That can be done if one of the above files is uploaded locally to English Wikipedia as non-free content and the way you intended to use the file satisfies Wikipedia's non-free content use policy. So, if there's any you feel are acceptable as non-free content, you should save the links to their source pages somewhere and upload them after this DR has been closed to see which files end up being kept. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:54, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
- Comment @Wcquidditch: A huge list of files like this is unwieldy and I've seem nominations similar to this declined on procedural reasons simply because of number of files being nominated at once takes too much time to assess properly. So, it would be quite helpful if you could break the list in your original OP up into sections indicting which ones you feel clearly are too complex to be PD and which ones you feel might be close enough to be {{PD-textlogo}}. If a file that has been claimed as "own work" has simply been mislicensed, its licensing can be easily fixed. For example, File:LA965.png, File:La96.5FM.png, File:SuperK106FM.png are just a few of the above which seem acceptable as "PD-textlogo" and these can probably be kept if there's no other reason for deleting them. On the other hand, certain files like File:Caribbean Country 93.5.png and File:WBQN Borinquen 1160.png seem to be obviously too complex to be "PD-textlogo" and probably would've been better off tagged for speedy deletion instead. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:09, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
- I will try to fix the sourcing on those three PD-textlogo examples. I already saved most of the other logos for later reupload to enWP. ‑‑🌀SilSinnAL982100💬 04:06, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
- Fixed them now. For File:SuperK106FM.png, I could not locate exact source but did find a slightly updated version on the station’s official home page, so I uploaded the refreshed version and put the link to the home page as the source. I invite you to examine it and see if the shading effects still allow it to pass as PD-textlogo. ‑‑🌀SilSinnAL982100💬 04:31, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose "At least some of these are probably under the threshold of originality..." Which ones? That's too vague. The nominator doesn't say, and doesn't also say why he thinks some of the files may not be. I don't believe we can comment with certainty if the submission itself doesn't know the facts. But, most importantly, the number of files submitted (seems over 100 and perhaps even closer to 200) is way too large for any reasonable editor to be expected to comment on them as a group and not risk judging some (potentially many) of the files in the list unfairly. Seems to me a reasonable number of files to nominate would had been perhaps in the 10s, not in the 100s. I oppose the nomination because it should be denied in favor that it be resubmitted in a lesser quantity of files and with less vague, more concrete, details. Mercy11 (talk) 00:46, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Marking this DS as deleted, and moved those still not deleted to a new section below, to facillite easier admin handling. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:01, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
Not deleted from DR above, moved to a new section
[edit]Copied from above, in order to make a new arbitrary break. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:00, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
- File:Oldies 94.5 FM.png
- File:SuperK106FM.png
- File:Nueva Vida 97.7.png
- File:Nueva Vida 977.png
- File:Play 96.5.png
- File:WVJP1110AM.png
- File:PuraPalabra.png
- File:LA965.png
- File:LaXFM.png
- File:La96.5FM.png
- File:RadioCoamo.png
- File:WRTU logo.png
- File:WIUJ1029FM.png
- File:AMG WWKS.png
- File:AMG WIVI.png
- File:AMG WVJZ.png
- File:AMG WVWI.png
- File:WSKX StCroix 907.png
- File:WKAQ 580.png
- File:WYEL600.png
- File:Triunfo 96.9.png
- File:WZCL98.png
- File:SuperK106.png
- File:PuraPalabraMedia.png
- File:WAELFM96.png
- File:Fidelity PR.png
- File:WVJPRadioCaguas.png
- File:WEXS X61.png
- File:WABA La Grande.png
- File:WXEW 840.png
- File:WORO-FM.png
- File:WIPR FM.png
- File:WIPR AM.png
- File:Vida FM.png
- File:Onda Cultural del Sur.png
- File:WRSJ1520.png
- File:WJIT 1250.png
- File:WYAC930.png
- File:WIAC740.png
- File:WMDD 1480.png
- File:WDNO960.png
- File:WPRA 990.png
- File:881Inspira.png
- File:WDEP 1490.png
- File:WKFE 1550.png
- File:WLEY 1080.png
- File:11Q.png
- File:WXYX.png
- File:WKAQ580.png
- File:WAPA680.png
- File:WSKN 1320.png
Deleted: most as unsourced, kept one with corrected source and license. --JuTa 03:20, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
Television station logo files uploaded by Many Radiator (talk · contribs)
[edit]Television station logos; unlikely to be "own work" as claimed or licensed under the given Creative Commons licenses. Like with the radio station logos, some are probably under the threshold of originality, but not all of them.
- File:ParaisoTV.png
- File:Canal36.png
- File:Paraiso TV 45.png
- File:WOST-DT 14.png
- File:Boricua TV.png
- File:BoricuaTV.png
- File:TCVMusicNetwork.png
- File:Z21 WZVI TV.png
- File:Somos El Valle.png
- File:CDMInternacionalTV.png
- File:JLTVPR.png
- File:WEFSTV.png
- File:Wscg34.png
- File:KMOHTV6.png
- File:TeleMar.png
- File:PuraPalabraTv.png
- File:WCLF CTN.png
- File:Telecinco WRFB-DT.png
- File:KEEN CTN.png
- File:WHNO CTN20.png
- File:WRFB Telecinco.png
- File:WapaDeportes.png
- File:Canal Trece.2.png
- File:EBNTV.png
- File:Liberty Junior College TV.png
- File:TCV Music Network.png
- File:WSJU-TV.png
- File:Teleadoracion Enlace.png
- File:WIPR Kids TV.png
- File:CTNI.png
- File:WSJP-Cozi.png
- File:WVXF-DT1.png
- File:MasTVPR.png
- File:NBC PR.png
- File:Punto2.png
- File:WTPMTV.png
- File:Canal38SanJuan.png
- File:CDM Internacional.png
- File:WRFB-DT.png
- File:WORA TV 5.png
- File:Buena TV.png
- File:WAPA Deportes.png
- File:WECN Unico TV.png
- File:Make TV PR.png
- File:Teleoro Canal 13.png
WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 22:54, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
- As I said above for radio logos, I do not think there is a need to delete these logos; what really needs to be done is to change their licensing from “own work” (because the uploader did not create them) to something that would state that the logos are copyrighted by their respective owners while also providing a valid “fair use” rationale for using the logos in the pertaining articles. If for some reason the logos still need to be deleted, then allow me to save them so I can later re-upload them with proper “fair use” licensing like all other properly-licensed logos. ‑‑🌀SilSinnAL982100💬 22:53, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
- I fixed the issues pertaining File:NBC PR.png, so please remove this file from this delete nomination as per this talk page. ‑‑🌀SilSinnAL982100💬 01:07, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
- Also did the same for File:Make TV PR.png. ‑‑🌀SilSinnAL982100💬 01:17, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
- I noticed that some of the images nominated here for deletion are lower-resolution duplicates of other images also nominated here. The uploader should have just uploaded one version over another, thus avoiding duplicity and redundancy in the process. ‑‑🌀SilSinnAL982100💬 01:26, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose (Again) Ditto from my comment regarding the radio stations nomination above: "At least some of these are probably under the threshold of originality..." Which ones? That's too vague. The nominator doesn't say, and doesn't also say why he thinks some of the files may not be. I don't believe we can comment with certainty if the submission itself doesn't know the facts. But, most importantly, the number of TV station files submitted (seems perhaps some 50 or so) is way too large for any reasonable editor to be expected to comment on all of them as a group and not risk judging some (potentially many) of the TV station files in the list unfairly. Seems to me a reasonable number of files to nominate would had been perhaps in the 10s, not in the 50s. I oppose the nomination because it should be denied in favor that it be resubmitted in a lesser quantity of files and with less vague, more concrete, details. Mercy11 (talk) 01:10, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: most as unsourced, kept two with corrected source and license. --JuTa 03:33, 8 June 2019 (UTC)