Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/12/10

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive December 10th, 2018
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nudity, fake image used to defame a public figure Stblender (talk) 16:55, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, speedied as obvious attack-image. --Túrelio (talk) 19:33, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nudity, fake image used to defame a public figure Stblender (talk) 16:56, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, speedied as obvious attack-image. --Túrelio (talk) 19:33, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

sudah lama Agung Purnoatmojo (talk) 06:40, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, own user space. --Achim (talk) 20:27, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files by Marco Verch, used as an extorsion scam.

Yann (talk) 12:53, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 01:50, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As per previous nomination : Files by Marco Verch, used as an extorsion scam.

Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:14, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep for both lists (and undelete those already deleted on this basis). There is no problem with these files' licenses. They are under perfectly free licenses. The licenses are apparently being very strictly enforced, but going down any route of "we only host files whose copyright holders are not too strict about enforcing their copyright" would be a very fundamental redefinition of what Commons does and does not host. We regularly (and rightly) keep hosting files whose copyright holder is no longer distributing them under a free license (e.g. changing the license on Flickr to "all rights reserved"). It is likely that many such copyright holders, since they no longer want their files to be reused, will also very strictly enforce their licenses. It's the whole point of accepting only irrevocable licenses that we don't care about how nice the copyright holder might (now or at a future point) want to be about enforcement. So either we should delete all of these files if we worry about copyright holders not being nice about enforcement, or we should keep these files too. Tokfo (talk) 20:21, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I understand your reasoning, but this is in no way a typical case, because it appears that the uploader explicitly uploaded the images here in order to encourage misuse of them by innocent parties, in order to extort money from them using their own website http://www.plaghunter.com/en/. The way that after being blocked, the user has seemingly paid editors to add photos to high-trafficked WP articles e.g. [1] [2] makes this especially clear. How can we stand by and let them use the project in this way? Smartse (talk) 21:16, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 01:51, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same reason as the above RfD's + Commons:Deletion requests/Remaining files uploaded by Wuestenigel + Commons:Deletion requests/undefinedMarco Verch: indefblocked user, many copyvios, lots of out-of-scope stuff, and heavy misuse of Free licensing. This are the remaining search results for "Marco Verch" and (hopefully) the last portion of his uploads on Commons.

A.Savin 18:21, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:09, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same reason as in the previous deletion requests for this Flickr account: indefblocked Commons user, notorious licence laundering and prone to copyright extortion. Flickr account is blacklisted at Commons:Questionable Flickr images.

De728631 (talk) 15:54, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I consider this a form of recreation of content previously deleted per community consensus as the community decided about all content from this author. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 17:30, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Speedy deleted per Alexis Jazz. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:33, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

New Flickr account: https://www.flickr.com/people/160866001@N07.

Can also be speedied. I made a DR because it's a new account.

- Alexis Jazz ping plz 04:02, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination -- Banned user. --A.Savin 16:01, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only nominating so they can be deleted as "Per (link to this DR)". Speedy please. A.Savin?

- Alexis Jazz ping plz 19:37, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 20:44, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

But isn't there actually a possibility to prevent Marcho Verch's transfers in general for the future? Abuse filter or sth.? @Steinsplitter: Maybe you can help? --A.Savin 20:46, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@A.Savin: one of these was uploaded before the bad-author list was updated with his new Flickr account, the other was uploaded using UploadWizard with self-review which doesn't check the bad-author list. (another reason UploadWizard should insert {{Flickrreview}}) - Alexis Jazz ping plz 22:12, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@A.Savin: @Alexis Jazz: @Abzeronow: I don't upload images to WP (/Commons) often, but i don't get it. The images came with the proper license as far as i could tell. What did i do wrong? What does "link to this DR" mean? PizzaMan (talk) 22:24, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@PizzaMan: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive 68#Out of process deletion of files by User:Hystrix
Long story short, if you as much as misspell Marco Verch's name in the attribution, he'll threaten you with a lawsuit. Link to this DR (Deletion Request) is a link to the page you are reading right now. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 22:38, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
But isn't the whole deal of CC licenses to be redistributed in a manner specified by the author? For all legal purposes these images are all irrevocably released under free licenses so why delete them? I don't want any re-users to ever be harmed by anything they wish to use from Wikimedia Commons, but can Marco actually win any lawsuit? You can't claim that the images you legally stated are free are suddenly unfree, is there any evidence that it was in fact the person of Marco Verch and not an impersonator making all these threats? I can see someone claiming to be a photographer and demanding money and then banning the photographer would ban an additional victim. I'm not advocating undeletion, but I don't see the benefit of deleting free educational content. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 22:48, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for explaining, @Alexis Jazz: . Still sounds a bit odd to me that Flickr does allow his images to stay online, with open license, but a good faith usage of such a picture on this site would be met with legal action. I wonder: who would he sue? Me? Wikimedia? Did he ever actually sue someone? Under what law does he think he would stand a chance? Would he really risk having to pay the legal fees of Wikimedia as a defending party? Please understand that people put quite some effort into finding an acceptable picture and uploading it with all details filled in properly, which is cumbersome enough, and that it's quite disappointing to suddenly see it deleted even when you've done everything right. I feel WP/wikimedia editors should be protected from such disappointment. Me, I'll think twice before trying to cheer up a marginal WP entry with a picture again.PizzaMan (talk) 23:07, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Donald Trung: I don't really feel like going over all these discussions, much of which is in German.. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 23:17, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@PizzaMan: if you had used Flickr2Commons you would have been warned. Marco Verch is really an exception. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 23:17, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@PizzaMan: I just read these discussions and apparently in Germany and Austria you could threaten someone out of court with a kind of "cease and desist" scheme where a person has to pay around 400 (four-hundred) Euro's or be taken to court, German and Austrian copyright laws are crazy stupid and breed copyright trolls, this is really sad for the re-users, too many that we lost over 10.000 (ten-thousand) useful educational images simply because someone likes to abuse the law, maybe one day when the physical person behind Marco Verch dies ☠ we could see an undeletion request for those images but as long as this person keeps misusing the German legal system I don't see much chance at that. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 07:24, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Well if that's the German law and discussions on the German site led to the conclusion that nothing can be done about it, i guess we'll have to accept this situation. At least now it's clear what's going on for anyone who lands on this page. I didn't use the flickr tool, because i didn't know of it's existence. Again i don't have experience. Next time, I'll just try to make a picture myself and hope that process goes smoother. And may i be struck with a horrible disease if i threat legal action against anyone who wants to reuse a picture i upload here, for something as trivial as a typo.PizzaMan (talk) 07:50, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Another two.

- Alexis Jazz ping plz 11:11, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@A.Savin: can be speedied. This was the easiest way to explain the problem to the uploaders. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 11:12, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 14:20, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files by Marco Verch, used as an extortion scam. Pinging @A.Savin.

- Alexis Jazz ping plz 11:55, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Can we please blacklist the name to prevent future uploads?--Roy17 (talk) 12:56, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Roy17: these files were uploaded manually. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 14:09, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
AbuseFilter. Source code includes [Mm]arco [Vv]erch? Blocked.--Roy17 (talk) 14:22, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Roy17: AF won't be deployed for at most a couple of files a month. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 14:46, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 17:33, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Boo

- Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:09, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about my upload, I did not know about it. Bencemac (talk) 15:29, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not quite understand this particular case. At the source page the author states:

The image Velogorod bikes in Russia by Marco Verch can under Creative Commons license be used.

The image itself is rather important for the w:ru:Система совместного использования велосипедов as it's the only free image found so far of the Velogorod bike sharing system in Saint-Petersburg, Russia.--Vаdiм (talk) 20:14, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Vadim, our problem is not with this special image, but with the Flickr-user in general. So, per former community-decision it cannot stay on Commons. Feel free to upload it locally, if your project allows that. But, if you do, mark it clearly with "do not move to Commons". Otherwise, might File:Sezamki Halo.JPG be a suitable replacement? --Túrelio (talk) 07:41, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Túrelio: Probably not, because that shows a cracker instead of a bike. Neither were deleted. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 07:55, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and based on former community-decision. --Túrelio (talk) 07:47, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MarcoMarcoMarcoMarcoMarco

- Alexis Jazz ping plz 07:59, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Speedied, as there are enough replacements: Category:Wilson American football balls. --Túrelio (talk) 08:08, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missed one I guess. Thanks BevinKacon for alerting me. Pinging @Srittau.

- Alexis Jazz ping plz 17:07, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:53, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Adding these newly uploaded images to the list - from a blacklisted Flickr account. Please see Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with marco verch.

Ytoyoda (talk) 16:10, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the uploads, I didn't know about this situation. Should've paid attention to the blacklisted users list. Q-Wert-273 (talk) 16:55, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Pitke 2020-06-26 --Achim (talk) 20:49, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files from a blacklisted Flickr user accused of copyright trolling. See other examples above.

Ytoyoda (talk) 14:05, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete. I would support even speedy deletion for such cases. --Off-shell (talk) 16:30, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Speedy delete Community have decided to ban Marco Verch per this DR: Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with marco verch. --MGA73 (talk) 14:33, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per previous DRs. I have placed Category:Images by Marco Verch as a subcategory for speedy deletion requests, hopefully there will be no need for further DRs on this matter. --Pitke (talk) 09:42, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Close again, page not archiving properly. --Minoraxtalk 07:50, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded by mistake Tdmrv (talk) 21:02, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

{{Speedy|mistake}}


Deleted: per nomination. --Achim (talk) 21:40, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 23:02, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright Issues. CraigG01 (talk) 17:33, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 19:00, 10 Dezember 2018 UTC: Copyright violation: Just another non-free Google search result. See Commons:Image casebook#Internet images. --Krdbot 02:15, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright Issues CraigG01 (talk) 17:33, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 19:00, 10 Dezember 2018 UTC: Copyright violation: Just another non-free image from the Internet. See Commons:Image casebook#Internet images. --Krdbot 02:15, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Higher Resolution file availabe under different name: file:Daily Express 40409.jpg Gillfoto 01:46, 10 December 2018 (UTC)


 Deleted, uploader's request. Taivo (talk) 09:42, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Highere resolution file available here - file:Kent House 40366.jpg Gillfoto 01:50, 10 December 2018 (UTC)


 Deleted, uploader's request. Taivo (talk) 09:48, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Higher Resolution file available here - file:Mervyn Africa 10.jpg Gillfoto 01:53, 10 December 2018 (UTC)


 Deleted, uploader's request. Taivo (talk) 09:50, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old and already exists a better version in the Commons — Preceding unsigned comment added by Allice Hunter (talk • contribs) 2018-05-25T01:55:03‎ (UTC)


Kept: in use. Ruthven (msg) 18:33, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I creator of this work request the deletion of the file. It was replaced by a other high quality version. Allice Hunter (talk) 01:56, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, superseded by file:Can Provinces by HDI (2015).svg. Taivo (talk) 09:55, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged inmage Afifa Afrin (talk) 03:41, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:16, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image used only by long-abandoned draft about high school band that was deleted off enwiki, and also is of dubious copyright, DS (talk) 06:11, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also applies to user's other uploads: file:Bscphoto.jpg, File:BSCredconcert.JPG, File:BSCheadingphoto.JPG, and File:BSCny.JPG. DS (talk) 06:13, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, out of project scope due to bad quality, depicted persons are unidentified and apparently non-notable. One album cover is considered copyright violation and it's maybe non-notable as well. Taivo (talk) 10:24, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image used only by spam page deleted off enwiki DS (talk) 06:16, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, advertising. Taivo (talk) 10:27, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I wanna delete the redirection. 社会我佩奇 (talk) 06:33, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 10:28, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Press photo, not the work of the uploader http://coupenut.blogspot.com/2017/06/press-release-photos-reprise.html. Toasted Meter (talk) 07:40, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:30, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A SVG-Version exists (File:2018 European Championships Glasgow Logo.svg) and this file is not used. Malo95 (talk) 08:09, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:31, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

deletion rationale Injae JEON (talk) 08:44, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 10:44, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Album coverart , I fail to see how this can be under the license shown when it's non-free at English Wikipedia File:Something New Album Cover.jpg. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:50, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:47, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad scan. File available here: File:Portrait of John Leake. Wellcome M0011186.jpg -- Deadstar (msg) 11:28, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please use Category:Uploads by Fæ needing speedy deletion for any other non-controversial cases. Thanks -- (talk) 22:32, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, really bad scan. Taivo (talk) 11:03, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Partial upload: unusable in a project Takeaway (talk) 12:24, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:28, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self-nomination: same PD issue as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Canadian 5th Field Ambulance at Camp Fremo, Norway (4867004).jpg // sikander { talk } 12:59, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 11:40, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status B dash (talk) 15:05, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Appears to be uploader's own work. --Sealle (talk) 01:54, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata. Most probably the uploader is not the author. No Permission. Микола Василечко (talk) 21:00, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 13:39, 11 Dezember 2018 UTC: Copyright violation: See metadata: autor - JOHN AREVALO B --Krdbot 20:14, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

source: web. All other Uploads by this user were copyvios Migebert (talk) 20:09, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:57, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A whole bunch of what Wikipedia would describe as "Original research". This is way outside Commons' intended scope. Andy Dingley (talk) 23:39, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • A whole bunch of what Wikipedia would describe as "Original research". This is way outside Commons' intended scope.
  • @Andy Dingley: To mention "Wikipedia" as an example of what is not allowed here at WikiMedia Commons is an action which is out of scope to Commons' intended scope. "Original research" is out of scope to Commons' intended scope. These criticisms must be ignored for being pseudo-scientific (aka, not accurate) -- as in: nonsensical mumbo-jumbo.Vinyasi (talk) 05:24, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I thought its isolation was sufficient to satisfy the policy here of allowance plus isolation. Am I mistaken that this is not adequately isolated? I thought original research only applies to articles on Wikipedia since it is indexed by search engines while WikiMedia is not indexable by any search engine. Thus, isolation is satisfied, yes? What am I overlooking? Please advise.Vinyasi (talk) 00:31, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I see no place here for a page like this, or most of the material on it. I would be interested to hear @Constant314: 's views on this. Andy Dingley (talk) 01:35, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Is WikiMedia Commons adequate isolation for original research?Vinyasi (talk) 02:16, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with deletion. It is not Wikimedia or Wikipedia material.Constant314 (talk) 04:28, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I've already answered to this claim.Vinyasi (talk) 15:19, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I disagree with both of you. Deletion is not appropriate. Thanks for that link, Andy. But I find nothing there to authenticate your point of view. In fact, I see only support for my postings, for instance: Commons:Project scope/Neutral point of view and Commons:Verifiability both support my postings here on Wikimedia. And Commons:Deletion policy#Not educationally useful fails to categorize my work as useless; especially bullet point #3: Files that add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject, especially if they are of poor or mediocre quality. due to the first two policies overriding any opinion you or anyone else may hold against the content of these postings. In answer to Constant314, yes, this is not Wikipedia, but I see nothing here in these citations to confuse my postings with Wikipedia. Bringing up Wikipedia is not relevant unless there is some other citation, other than that provided by Andy, to shed some light.Vinyasi (talk) 00:06, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Andy, I don't understand what is the purpose of this discussion if, instead of responding, you go ahead and nominate for deletion all of my postings? Why don't I nominate all of these discussions for their complete removal as being of trivial non-importance since you obviously don't take my responses very seriously enough to participate in making a response? Fair enough? I'm not kidding. What were you thinking, Andy, by jumping the gun so-to-speak? Is that your method of discussion? To respond with action instead of counter-logic and ignore my questions? It lends the impression that holding a discussion, here, was vastly trivial and merely a token gesture to show everyone that you were acting in good faith.Vinyasi (talk) 20:03, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Andy Dingley: So... My position remains without a counter-rationale offered by yourself. All we have, is not a discussion anymore, but a disagreement along with a flurry of activity. Where's the discussion? Or, when were you planning on having it? Did it die?Vinyasi (talk) 20:03, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 05:03, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Marked as {{Copyvio}} by Krdbot. Likely is PD-Art. Abzeronow (talk) 15:12, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this drawing is from ± 1793, then this picture is in the public spaceː it is flat (two dimensional) and much more than 70 years older than the death of anyone who have lived at that time. So I plea for keeping the file. JopkeB (talk) 18:19, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is probably pre-1848. Source listed doesn't give any author info or anything useful though. Abzeronow (talk) 20:22, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per above. License fixed. --Yann (talk) 05:28, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Diamante royc (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self-promotional personal photographs, out of scope.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:47, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:02, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Seyedsaman20 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal images, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 08:25, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:03, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Seyedsaman20 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope/likely not own works

Юрий Д.К 11:08, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:33, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kosar257

[edit]
  • All files uploaded by user Kosar257 (total 160 images)

This all image came from website 해외안전여행 of Ministry of Foreign Affairs in South Korea. According to Ministry of Foreign Affairs #1, we cannot be licensed under CCL. Thanks. --Garam talk 08:30, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:12, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Cesar Rodriguez Chavez

[edit]

Cesar Rodriguez Chavez (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:

Mostly small photos without metadata. If camera data exist, then always different. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Some files come from Facebook. I did not nominate files taken with Samsung SM-G531H, which are likely own work. Taivo (talk) 08:17, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:04, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Circeminnie

[edit]

Circeminnie (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

There is no freedom of panorama in Italy and the photos violate sculptors' copyright. Taivo (talk) 08:42, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:12, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Ko Ko Chit Chit

[edit]

Ko Ko Chit Chit (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

Mostly small photos without camera data. I suspect copyright violation. I did not nominate photos taken with Xiaomi HM NOTE 1S, which are likely own works. Taivo (talk) 08:48, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:12, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Kokkenmodding

[edit]

Kokkenmodding (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:

Out of project scope due to bad quality. Taivo (talk) 08:55, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:18, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Ish.xmeii

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Ish.xmeii (talk · contribs):

There is no freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates and the photos violates architect's copyright. Taivo (talk) 09:04, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:18, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of TNSE arunbharathi DGL

[edit]

TNSE arunbharathi DGL (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

Small photos. If camera data exist, then always different. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:12, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:18, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Ivaibhavjain

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Ivaibhavjain (talk · contribs):

Mostly small photos without metadata. If camera data exist, then always different. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:30, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:21, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This 优酷全娱乐 YouTube Channel is very likely fake and not affiliated with 优酷全娱乐.

Full list of files

User:Wcam (talk) 15:19, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Wcam: Did you try to contact "优酷全娱乐" to confirm the youtube account is really an official youtube account of 优酷全娱乐? If it's true, the cc-by license on the videos is true. Accoring to your user page, you introduced yourself that your mother language is Chinese on there... Puramyun31 (talk) 01:20, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I did not try to contact them because based on my experience corporations like 优酷 are very unlikely to respond to requests like this. The reasons I believe this YouTube channel is fake are the following:
  1. The link to this channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCY7OamiZ5T7teoqpcGp9GOw/ does not match the one on the banner image, and when I try to open the link on the banner image it says that channel is closed due to violation of the term of service. My theory is that this channel in question is the second account created by the same impersonator after their first account was blocked by YouTube.
  2. In the descriptions of almost all the videos on this channel, it says "如果您喜歡我的我的視頻, 請盡可能分享給朋友, 真心謝謝大家的支持" (if you like my videos, please share them with your friends and I sincerely appreciate everyone's support). There are two things that are abnormal about this: a) corporations like 优酷 usually do not use languages as such in their contents, and b) this sentence is written in Traditional Chinese, whereas Youku is based in mainland China where Simplified Chinese is used.
  3. It is also very unlikely for corporations like 优酷 to license their video contents under a free license. On YouTube there is another 优酷 channel which I assume is official (since I have no way of verifying its authenticity), and I have not seen any video in this channel is released under CC license.
--Wcam (talk) 03:25, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Wcam: Corporations can license their content under free license if they want (cc-licensor does not necessarily have to be an indivisual such as an amateur), so "unlikely for corporations like 优酷 to license their video contents under a free license" as you said can't sorely be a reason of the doubt. Also "corporations like 优酷 are very unlikely to respond to requests like this" seems to be a hasty conclusions and give up even before trying. Regardless whether kept/delete of the files, It's best to try to contact them directly if you doubt. Puramyun31 (talk) 03:55, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

if the youtube account is really fake as you said, please be aware that I didn't intentionally upload the files under the knowledge of +

@Wcam: Corporations can license their content under free license if they want (cc-licensor does not necessarily have to be an indivisual such as an amateur), so "unlikely for corporations like 优酷 to license their video contents under a free license" as you said can't sorely be a reason of the doubt. Also "corporations like 优酷 are very unlikely to respond to requests like this" seems to be a hasty conclusions and give up even before trying. Regardless whether kept/delete of the files, It's best to try to contact them directly if you doubt. and I think the license of 优酷 account and 优酷全娱乐 account should be treated indivisually. Puramyun31 (talk) 03:55, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I don't disagree with the idea that someone should try to contact Youku about this account, but regardless, in my opinion there is significant doubt that these files are free. --Wcam (talk) 04:07, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Wcam: If you don't want to help me to contact 优酷全娱乐, can we ask another chinese user help to contact them? also if the youtube account is really fake as you said, please be aware that I didn't intentionally upload the files under the knowledge of "fake account", so I don't wish this case will be a blanket distrust against me... Puramyun31 (talk) 04:23, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
No, I do not blame you personally, nor do I have anything against you. It's just that given the rules here on Commons, these files should not be allowed. --Wcam (talk) 04:34, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I asked question about this issue on Youku site Puramyun31 (talk) 05:55, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete Wow, the owner of this YouTube channel pulled this off incredibly well, especially considering its Youku page and 1.2 million followers. I fell for it and reviewed a majority of these. However, the evidence provided by Wcam is pretty damning. Taking into consideration Youku's Anti-Piracy statement of its content, there is considerable doubt over this channel to delete these videos under COM:PCP. xplicit 02:25, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:52, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same reason as the previous time -- these images are from an impersonator (fake) Youtube account.

Wcam (talk) 21:10, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:22, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mammademimn (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Modern art and promo photo. I think artist permission via Commons:OTRS is needed.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 21:35, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Mathiascorvinuscollegium

[edit]

Here are all contributions of Mathiascorvinuscollegium (talk · contribs):

The photos are credited to different persons, multiple are previously published in Facebook. Files taken with NIKON D300S are credited to author and copyright holder Attila Orbán. In such circumstances OTRS-permission from copyright holders is needed. Taivo (talk) 10:50, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:19, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sannisaha (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused images of non-notable person: out of project scope; COM:HOST

Rrburke (talk) 15:10, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:20, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sannisaha (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 06:48, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - re-uploads. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 01:39, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sannisaha (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All images out of COM:SCOPE, periodically re-uploaded after deletion.

Ariadacapo (talk) 17:37, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; G4 as well. --Gbawden (talk) 08:10, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jose.lagarda (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Per COM:Currency, Polish money is copyrighted

Abzeronow (talk) 21:27, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Jose.lagarda (talk · contribs)

[edit]

as Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Poland#Currency. Note that the few notes that have a Specimen mark - but this is way too small to comply with 6c of http://www.nbp.pl/homen.aspx?f=/en/banknoty/wykorzystanie_wizerunkow_en.html = on the front and back side of the image there shall be an opaque inscription “WZÓR” or “SPECIMEN” or an inscription “REPRODUKCJA” written in Arial font or a similar font to Arial in a contrasting colour, placed diagonally, with a length no shorter than 75% of the length of the reproduction and a height no shorter than 15% of the height of the reproduction.

Ronhjones  (Talk) 19:46, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:18, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vanecha.Roudbaraki (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images sous droits d'auteurs, autorisation de l'artiste nécessaire pour les œuvres et des photographes pour les deux portraits, voir Commons:OTRS/fr

Shev123 (talk) 21:41, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:52, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from Facebook (see EXIF), unlikely to be own work. Sealle (talk) 22:56, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 15:22, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:01, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 15:22, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:01, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 15:22, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:04, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 15:21, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of photo, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:05, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 15:19, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplication of File:דני עברי.png in lower quality. Not needed. Ldorfman (talk) 23:22, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, add redirection. --Wdwd (talk) 15:18, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
: Not educationally useful. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:26, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 15:14, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It has duplicated file which will be original with "инж. Валентин Ковачганев" which I will be using. InfoVector (talk) 23:38, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content (G7). --Wdwd (talk) 15:16, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermarked image. 110.150.22.47 23:59, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, no obvious copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 15:13, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Self Portrait", out of scope. Conde Edmond Dantès (talk) 23:43, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:24, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Connected to an independent record label, apparently with no notoriety whose article was created as spam on pt.wiki Conde Edmond Dantès (talk) 23:45, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:25, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Connected to an independent record label, apparently with no notoriety whose article was created as spam on pt.wiki Conde Edmond Dantès (talk) 23:46, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:25, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo of independent record label, apparently with no notoriety whose article was created as spam on pt.wiki Conde Edmond Dantès (talk) 23:47, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:25, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

University logo that apparently does not exist. Conde Edmond Dantès (talk) 23:49, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:26, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image exclusively used for fuerdai vandalism, no potential use in any regular Wikimedia pages. -★- PlyrStar93 Message me. 01:16, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality is so bad, that I suggest to  Delete. Taivo (talk) 09:40, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:28, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad photo. shizhao (talk) 02:14, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:29, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mchpv (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Violation of the rule Commons:Freedom of panorama#Russia

Maxinvestigator (talk) 03:30, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Все фотографии сделаны лично мной. Почему они предложены для удаления? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mchpv (talk • contribs) 21:21, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Это потому что в России нет свободы панорамы и эти фотографии нарушают авторские права скульпторов. Taivo (talk) 10:05, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Понятно. Если нельзя, я не против удаления, но другие фотографии памятников на Новодевичьем кладбище есть на страницах людей, похороненых на Новодевичьем кладбище. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mchpv (talk • contribs) 10:25, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:30, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not "own work" - this is a photograph of a photograph Dmoore5556 (talk) 08:16, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:33, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of VGrossack

[edit]

Here are both contributions of VGrossack (talk · contribs):

Small photos without metadata, permission field says "no". Probably not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:25, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:35, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:Currency, Polish money is copyrighted. Looks fairly new so not PD. Abzeronow (talk) 21:22, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb at 17:18, 18 Dezember 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Jose.lagarda --Krdbot 20:10, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photos, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 11:09, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 12:14, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
redundant, same files and comments are in the DRs below

Personal photos. Out of scope

Ronhjones  (Talk) 02:03, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

* Keep: File:محمد ناظم رداد السلامي 13.jpg (I've cropped), File:محمد ناظم رداد السلامي 7.jpg, File:Mohammed Nazem Raddad Al - Salami محمد.jpg, File:Mohammed Nazem Raddad Al - Salami محمد ناظم رداد السلامي 05.jpg and File:Mohammed Nazem Raddad Al - Salami محمد ناظم رداد السلامي 06.jpgas these are cars,

Delete the rest as they're all selfies. –Davey2010Talk 02:28, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion is now below. –Davey2010Talk 03:10, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Mohammed Nazem Raddad Al - Salami (talk · contribs), Kia Pregio van photos

[edit]

Unused out of COM:SCOPE personal images.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:27, 9 December 2018 (UTC) *Keep as these are all van images. [reply]

Delete the rest as those are all selfies.
And last but not least a huge trout to the nom for not bothering to look at the actual images before nominating them!. –Davey2010Talk 17:12, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: DRs were restructured, "the rest" refers to the DR below. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 10:45, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I've added some photos to that gallery that I improved. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 10:45, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hi Jeff G., Could you kindly explain how the vehicles here (in my !vote) are out of scope ?, I admit a few in my selection include the guy which I'm going to crop out but as far as I'm aware vans don't fall in the remit of "out of scope"..... –Davey2010Talk 20:17, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Davey2010: The uploader seems to be all about decorating his userspace on arwiki with photos of himself and his van (sometimes together). The van photos are small and are destructively watermarked by his camera. I doubt their educational usefulness. Commons is not his personal webhost or photo album per COM:NOT. I don't think he is adding value to any WMF project.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 20:43, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I completely agree with that statement he has only come here to decorate his userpage but in my eyes the images he's uploaded well the vans atleast are IMHO in scope here and can be used internally and externally, Looking at the vehicles category there are no yellow versions photographed so imho that's enough to keep, They're not great images compared to others in that cat but they're certainly not the worst either. –Davey2010Talk 20:50, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeff G.: the "Candy" watermark can be removed easily. Most of the photos are full HD, how is that small? Not everyone has an 8K monitor you know. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 10:50, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Alexis Jazz - Sorry to ping you again - I was at some point going to photoshop the candy thing out but if you wanted to I have no problems with that (To be fair I feel you've done enough what with these images and even previous images on other DRs so I'd be more than happy to do these but just throwing it out there), Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 12:24, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Mohammed Nazem Raddad Al - Salami (talk · contribs), selfies and the like

[edit]

Unused out of COM:SCOPE personal images.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:27, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as these are selfies (a few include the van but I feel we have enough crops/angles of the van). –Davey2010Talk 14:01, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Just to add whilst File:محمد ناظم رداد السلامي 99.jpg is a van it unfortunately includes a child standing infront of it and it's impossible to crop him out so unfortunately that has to go too). –Davey2010Talk 14:01, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
And why not one picture with a child to make a change? --Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:59, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Davey2010: May you tell us what authority you have in Commons to ask user to upload even more pictures of his Kia Pregio van (you have already flooded the category with about 40 pictures of this yellow vehicle after saying "Looking at the vehicles category there are no yellow versions photographed") since the discussion is not over? Please consider too that DR are not vote and avoid modifying the layout of this page. Thanks a lot, --Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:31, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Because there is nothing wrong with the van images he's uploaded, I simply asked him to stop uploading selfie images, Had you bothered to ask him this the first time round we may not of needed to be here for Round 2,
I haven't flooded any category - I have simply categorised all of the van images something you could've done yourself,
avoid modifying the layout of this page - I simply added a number 3 to your DR as well as removed the "!votes" header - Something which I myself added and down the line realised it more confusing than of help hence its removal,
Maybe just maybe had you done due diligence inregards to the mass nomination of all his images maybe just maybe I wouldn't be here. –Davey2010Talk 16:03, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Davey2010: You still don't reply to my question. IMHO you should have waited an Administrator closes this discussion BEFORE giving user an unauthorized go-ahead (upload even more yellow Kia Pregio van pictures). May you precise when you will be satisfied and end voting Keep: when 50 similar pictures are uploaded? 100? When someone will ask for the block of the user for having uploaded useless and COM:NOTUSED pictures (yes, you categorised them all but you failed to find a destination for a single picture)? --Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:59, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Patrick Rogel - No I shouldn't because their van images aren't the problem, Their selfies are the only problem here (and that has been proven by Alexis and علاء (Alaa) above me),
This user does not need mine or your permission to upload, I simply left that message so that they would stop the selfie uploads - Leaving this until the DR ends would mean they could upload more between now and whenever this DR is closed - Does this make sense ? ... I left the message to stop the selfie uploads but like I said they're more than welcome to upload van images,
I will keep an eye on this editor and if they carry on then yes I will seek to have them blocked,
Also as an addendum I've also asked the user to not upload pictures of people infront of the vans either.
Davey2010Talk 18:21, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Patrick Rogel: Davey2010 didn't flood the category, I did. So you're shouting at the wrong person. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 23:06, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi [[Alexis Jazz, I did move images from Arabic cats to English ones as well as moving them to "Yellow vans" ... so I think I'm to blame unless I've missed something lol –Davey2010Talk 23:31, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I had categorized 32 files (a few incorrectly, too much selfie, you removed those from the cat again). - Alexis Jazz ping plz 00:06, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Ah so you did sorry, I had no idea you categorised these but those you did categorise aren't above (hence why they were de-categorised), If you want them kept I'd be happy to add them to the list and recat them, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 02:17, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Mohammed Nazem Raddad Al - Salami (talk · contribs), old photos

[edit]

Unused out of COM:SCOPE personal images.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:27, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 11:52, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope files

Originally nominated for deletion by Mjrmtg (talk) but then in a single deletion request per file. Instead I collected all of them here.Jonteemil (talk) 18:28, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:43, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

pas droit d'image Pierrick-21 (talk) 13:38, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 14:07, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Arcul de Triumf by Britchi Mirela

[edit]

Britchi Mirela (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

There is no freedom of panorama in Romania. The architect en:Petre Antonescu died in 1965 and the arc of triumphe is protected with copyright until 2036 (70+1 years from death). Taivo (talk) 10:18, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:48, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Masterfridge

[edit]

Here are both contributions of Masterfridge (talk · contribs):

Small photos without metadata, made in different ends of world (Lebanon and Venezuela). I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:32, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:47, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of MrtRémy

[edit]

MrtRémy (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

Historical postcards. Who are the photographers and when they died? If you claim anonymous work – are you sure, that photographer's name isn't printed on backside? Taivo (talk) 10:35, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:47, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of MyraLeeVzla

[edit]

Here are all contributions of MyraLeeVzla (talk · contribs):

Small photos without metadata, probably not own works, but copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 10:39, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:47, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE selfie. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:54, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:48, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Samjoy19 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:49, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused presentation of questionable notability. Should be moved to relevant project as wiki-text if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:49, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MFSinger (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Even if they were {{PD-US-no notice}}, these photographs shouldn't be in .pdf format. Abzeronow (talk) 15:21, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:49, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Klus97 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: What is still missing in existing collection of explicit materials? Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:49, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved to relevant project as wiki-text if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:49, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved to relevant project as wiki-text if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:49, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This isn't the official logo. 109.152.56.184 15:09, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no permission. --Jcb (talk) 18:50, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused trivial flag of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:11, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:50, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flag of nonnotable micronation. There also seem to be issues with the file quality. Clarinetguy097 (talk) 17:17, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 08:27, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused low quality photo of demesticated dog. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:50, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:17, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:50, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abdulazizalsaad102 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album/files storage. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:50, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Camilo Blanes (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:51, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by EMOEMO7 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:51, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Jayasurya2000

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Jayasurya2000 (talk · contribs):

Unused selfies and other personal files of banned user, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:49, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:57, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Movimiento Socialista De Venezuela

[edit]

Movimiento Socialista De Venezuela (talk · contribs) uploaded these images:

Small photos without metadata. I suspect not own photo, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:43, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:56, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Uploader is herself depicted. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:48, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:57, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Gilfiley88 (talk · contribs) is indefinitely blocked in Commons for abusing multiple accounts. He has done nothing in Wikipedia, except article about himself in en.wiki (3 times speedily deleted), userpage and talkpage and uploading a photo about himself, which is used only on the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 13:36, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Magog. Ruthven (msg) 13:31, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo of indefinitely blocked user, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:02, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:56, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:55, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:55, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:54, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:54, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:54, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:53, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vanahail (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:53, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Elylavozdmiel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:51, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:51, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:51, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Enricomanfio (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:51, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:00, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:51, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Erickbay (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:01, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:51, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hwhelloworld (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused logos for companies with no apparent notability. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. If deemed within scope for some reason, the ones that are above the threshold of originality required for copyright protection (which is all of them, according to the uploader) will require verified permission.

LX (talk, contribs) 18:56, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:52, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Фото обнародовано неправомерно в 2009 году родственницей Таней Савичевой, в РФ правомерно обнародованием имеет право либо фотограф снимка или его наследники, либо персона, изображенная на снимке. Фото пролежало у родственницей около 70 лет <https://www.kp.ru/online/news/604290/> Dogad75 (talk) 15:51, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • As far as I can tell it was taken around 1940 and it now appears to have been released to the public domain by the heir of the photographer. Mramoeba (talk) 17:04, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • ...Мария Путиловская - близкая родственница Тани и принесла бережно завернутую фотографию... — сказано, что фото предоставлено родственницей изображённой на фотографии, указания, что она наследник фотографа, не сказано. Фотограф, скорее всего, неизвестен, и, самое главное, фото до 2009 года обнародовано не было. С уважением, --Dogad75 (talk) 19:40, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:35, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Used only for vandalism at enwiki by now-blocked user and associated sockpuppets. Zero encyclopedic value. Kinu (talk) 20:39, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, by Túrelio with reason "Content intended for vandalism, threat or attack". Taivo (talk) 22:06, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Cumulus7

[edit]

Cumulus7~commonswiki (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:

Per {{FoP-Germany}}, German freedom of panorama does not apply indoors. OTRS-permission from artist de:Dietrich Klinge (still living) is needed. Taivo (talk) 09:44, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44  talk to me 21:27, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I made this image too small. I've replaced it with a properly sized one. Blodcyning (talk) 13:27, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44  talk to me 21:32, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I made this image too small. I've replaced it with a properly sized one. Blodcyning (talk) 13:27, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44  talk to me 21:32, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photograph of copyrighted 2D work Mindmatrix 13:29, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44  talk to me 21:34, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted work by Carl Oscar Kylberg (d. 1952), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:35, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep In this photo, the artwork is small enough to be covered by Commons:De minimis. If necessary, I can upload a new version with the painting blurred. /ℇsquilo 13:37, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Amada44  talk to me 21:39, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unusable montage of private photos. Smooth O (talk) 14:15, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44  talk to me 21:54, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This file was uploaded as a test for mobile device uploads, didn't realise I wouldn't be able to delete it afterward, thank you for the deletion request. ManuRoquette 15:00, 10 December 2018 — Preceding unsigned comment added by ManuRoquette (talk • contribs) 15:01, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44  talk to me 21:54, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative work from postcards. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44  talk to me 21:55, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44  talk to me 21:55, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Cruising Horny Corners": Looks like a book cover. Is it PD? E4024 (talk) 15:31, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44  talk to me 21:56, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44  talk to me 21:57, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

incomplete upload JopkeB (talk) 17:10, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44  talk to me 22:00, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incomplete upload JopkeB (talk) 17:11, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44  talk to me 22:00, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incomplete upload JopkeB (talk) 18:11, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44  talk to me 22:01, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution version of a professional image. This appears to be the default product shot provided by the manufacturer for online sale [3] [4] [5]. Would need a permission from the copyright holder, w.g. via COM:OTRS. El Grafo (talk) 13:53, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44  talk to me 22:14, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

By own decision. Awalerk (talk) 19:22, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request. --Amada44  talk to me 22:01, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

By own decision. Awalerk (talk) 19:23, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

By own decision. Awalerk (talk) 19:38, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request. --Amada44  talk to me 22:03, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

By own decision Awalerk (talk) 19:32, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

By own decision. Awalerk (talk) 19:37, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request. --Amada44  talk to me 22:03, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

By own decision Awalerk (talk) 19:33, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request. --Amada44  talk to me 22:04, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

By own decision. Awalerk (talk) 19:34, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request. --Amada44  talk to me 22:08, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

By own decision. Awalerk (talk) 19:34, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request. --Amada44  talk to me 22:07, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

By own decision. Awalerk (talk) 19:35, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request. --Amada44  talk to me 22:07, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

By own decision. Awalerk (talk) 19:35, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request. --Amada44  talk to me 22:08, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Invalid Source 148.240.153.254 19:40, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Amada44  talk to me 22:06, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Invalid Source 148.240.153.254 19:41, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Amada44  talk to me 22:06, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Invalid Source 148.240.153.254 19:41, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Amada44  talk to me 22:06, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Invalid Source 148.240.153.254 19:42, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Amada44  talk to me 22:06, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image, out of scope Migebert (talk) 20:39, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44  talk to me 22:10, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:01, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No source. -mattbuck (Talk) 15:23, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Vanity selfie. No educational/encyclopaedic value whatsoever. The user has already been banned on enwiki for self promotion, and disruptive editing. —usernamekiran(talk) 00:38, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 09:25, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader is assumedly depicted, so this recreated image is likely not "own work" (not a self-shot photo). Missing original author and permission. The arguments in the previous deletion discussion also still apply imo, but it's a likely copyvio anyway. GermanJoe (talk) 11:21, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader is now blocked as a sock (disruptive edits, self-promotion) on en-Wiki. GermanJoe (talk) 20:34, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused personal photo, the user's last remaining upload. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 23:34, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pas de liberté de panorama en France, batiment sous droits d'auteurs Shev123 (talk) 11:23, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, in addition, small photo without metadata and the uploader's only contribution. Own work is unlikely, probably copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 23:37, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible not own work, no metadata AlvarezGomez (talk) 11:36, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 23:40, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/690943270856298496/m_HxkIC-_400x400.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:26, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Partrick. you requested my picture to be deleted and added a link to tt profile picture (the same picture) as a proof. Therefore I would like to inform you that both tt profile picture and picture on wiki commons is the same person, with the same name and... it is me. That is why I would like to ask you to cancel this request and confirm a picture on wiki. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wlodarczyk (talk • contribs) 23:17, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Wlodarczyk: . You must ask Beata Jarzębska. to send a permission via COM:OTRS or modify this page and add a valid Creative Commons license. Yours, --Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:36, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, copyright violation. Copyright belongs to photographer, not to depicted person. Taivo (talk) 23:50, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

failed upload Hiddenhauser (talk) 13:38, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An upload affected by the known MediaWiki bug should be not discussed separately but through a special process for affected files. The uploader should be requested for reupload and warned about the software bug, occurrence of affected files should be monitored and tracked. --ŠJů (talk) 07:40, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:32, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

failed upload Hiddenhauser (talk) 13:38, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An upload affected by the known MediaWiki bug should be not discussed separately but through a special process for affected files. The uploader should be requested for reupload and warned about the software bug, occurrence of affected files should be monitored and tracked. --ŠJů (talk) 07:40, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:42, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

failed upload Hiddenhauser (talk) 13:38, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An upload affected by the known MediaWiki bug should be not discussed separately but through a special process for affected files. The uploader should be requested for reupload and warned about the software bug, occurrence of affected files should be monitored and tracked. --ŠJů (talk) 07:40, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, and redirected. Taivo (talk) 09:52, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work in Japan. Batholith (talk) 13:47, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:52, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of permission from the artist, Chiharu Shiota, who is living. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 14:01, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:54, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Single upload photo with copyright watermark. Same photo uploaded by another user here: File:Akshara indoor.jpg. Smooth O (talk) 14:11, 10 December 2018 (UTC) this picture has been uploaded by me on the page of the man who owns and built this very theatre and who is also my grandfather. The picture was taken by an employee of the theatre and all rights belong to us. The theatre still belongs to us. I do not see a reason to delete a picture I own and I published .[reply]


 Deleted, almost-duplicate. Taivo (talk) 09:57, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Suphysis (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Modern music, art and poster. I think artist permission via Commons:OTRS is needed.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Suphysis (talk) 22:45, 10 December 2018 (UTC)Hi, I am the author of the music and art. Please do not delete! I have proceeded to verify via OTRS[reply]


 Deleted, the files will be restored after getting OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 09:58, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A person of no notability. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 15:31, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, at moment there exists uk:Ступак Іван Іванович молодший. After deleting the article due to non-notability you can re-nominate the photo for deletion. Taivo (talk) 10:05, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This "Reproduction of a painting that is in the public domain because of its age" looks a lot like a reproduction of a three-dimensional sculpture. LX (talk, contribs) 15:34, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, no permission from photographer. Taivo (talk) 10:11, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, also this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:23, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

عکس به طور کامل آپلود نشده است. Waalden (talk) 15:58, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 10:25, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nawlins43 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, after processing OTRS-ticket the files can be restored. But remember: copyright does not belong to depicted person, but to photographer, so I suspect, that the permission will be rejected. Taivo (talk) 10:32, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 24.46.2.52 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: privacy concerns, signature
Converted by me to DR, as this needs discussion. -- Túrelio (talk) 16:38, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can you expand on what the privacy concerns might be? It's a museum display, though I have no idea how they acquired the item. But note we also have an image of his signature at File:Michael Dell signature.png. Looks the same ;-) So I think we should keep this one, too. Pete Tillman (talk) 16:11, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, no reason to delete. Taivo (talk) 10:35, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

How does GTVM92 know that the copyright of this work has expired if they don't know anything about who created it or when it was created or published? The supposed "source" is an infinity-scrolling haystack of images, most of which appear to be copyright violations, where finding this particular needle is left as an exercise for the reader, so it is of no use in verifying the PD rationale. LX (talk, contribs) 16:56, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:38, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MRRaja001 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low-re pictures oif celebrity, unlikely to be own work.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:57, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, this one is OK. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:24, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, and  kept. Taivo (talk) 10:40, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

nicht mehr aktuell U971331 (talk) 17:41, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, the file is still used. Taivo (talk) 10:56, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Falsch Hochgeladen U971331 (talk) 17:41, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 11:00, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Falsch Hochgeladen U971331 (talk) 17:42, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 11:01, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

State venture is not state agency. Its symbols are not state symbols. Alex Spade (talk) 18:48, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:04, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per EXIF data, a Facebook download, needs OTRS ticket since this has been published elsewhere previously. Ytoyoda (talk) 18:50, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:05, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook download, previously published elsewhere so needs OTRS ticket Ytoyoda (talk) 18:52, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:06, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio MiguelAlanCS (talk) 19:12, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:07, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

перенаправление с ошибкой Панн (talk) 19:25, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, not a plausible redirect. Taivo (talk) 11:13, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope. 83.102.245.190 19:34, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:15, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

By own decision. Awalerk (talk) 19:36, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, derivative work of unknown painting, maybe painter's copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 11:23, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

By own decision. Awalerk (talk) 19:36, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Author is (per EXIF) Henilios LLC, not sure, that uploader is the same person. Taivo (talk) 11:28, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

small size without EXIFs, unlikely to be own work Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:52, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:31, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright problem: the website in the source says Copyright © DIARIO ABC, S.L. No evidence of a free license Civitas13 (talk) 19:56, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, license review failed. Taivo (talk) 11:32, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Activistas del Perú (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Well it looks like all their other uploads are taken from online. Given these are of the same subject also with no meta data, I'm skeptical that these are own work.

GMGtalk 20:10, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photos without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contributions. Taivo (talk) 11:43, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This map is wrong. Slovenia signed the agreement. 91.177.170.58 20:29, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:16, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This ribbon was given to our organization and has been submitted to copyright and was used commercially first. The IP design was created by Bridge the Gap SYNGAP Education and Research Foundation 2600:1700:21F0:4770:6484:1BC:1CDD:9FFA 20:36, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this ribbon is not simple. It is copyrighted and can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Source link is dead, I cannot confirm license. Taivo (talk) 12:18, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File used solely for promotion (see ro:Utilizator:Tattoosabin). Gikü (talk) 20:44, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:21, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

too many changes Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 20:50, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 12:22, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because of watermark Tekstman (talk) 20:52, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 12:23, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low-resolution crop of File:Kadam Flower1.jpg with fraudulent authorship claims. If such a crop is needed, it should be created from the full resolution version and correctly attributed to Balaram Mahalder as required by law and the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike license. LX (talk, contribs) 20:59, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:24, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong image St.Cali (talk) 20:59, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 12:26, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Professional shot, low resolutionPhotoshop in EXIF - strong doubts that this is own work as claimed Ymblanter (talk) 21:17, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:28, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibel copyright problems. In the webpage used as a source it is written "Motoservices.com ® Tous droits réservés". No evidence of a free license Civitas13 (talk) 21:18, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:30, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SamDavid1021 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal type photos, out of scope. commons is not a photo album

Gbawden (talk) 08:57, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:57, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SamDavid1021 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely all copyright violations - nothing has EXIF data and they are a variety of resolutions. File:Mumbai Indians.jpg has an author mark in the upper right corner. File:Himan Sharna.jpg was tweeted at [6] two weeks before it was uploaded here. File:Captain Sharma.jpg was published at [7] last December.

B (talk) 21:24, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Taivo (talk) 12:34, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't think Greece has Freedom of Panorama for this newer building as the architect must be deceased at least 70 years before it is copyright free. Leoboudv (talk) 21:59, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:43, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't think Greece has Freedom of Panorama for this newer building as the architect must be deceased at least 70 years before it is copyright free. Leoboudv (talk) 21:59, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:45, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Albert Bouquillon died in 1997. No freedom of panorama in France. 83.204.227.235 22:57, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, will be undeleted in 2068 (70+1 years from death). Taivo (talk) 12:47, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission from ДНВП "Картографія". Sealle (talk) 23:24, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:48, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is claimed as own work, but looks like a scanned map from a third party source ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:55, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb at 18:11, 7 Januar 2019 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by 匿名001 --Krdbot 19:42, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Venezuelazhengjie

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Venezuelazhengjie (talk · contribs):

Small photos without metadata, taken on different ends of world (China and Venezuela). I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:21, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination-I found a no cropped version in the web. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:10, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Arcul de Triumf by Panoramio upload bot

[edit]

Panoramio upload bot (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

There is no freedom of panorama in Romania. The architect en:Petre Antonescu died in 1965 and the arc of triumphe is protected with copyright until 2036 (70+1 years from death). Taivo (talk) 10:02, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:08, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously not the uploader's own work. It's doubtful whether {{PD-textlogo}} applies; if it doesn't, this is a copyright violation. Huon (talk) 10:10, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I added another version for deletion. Taivo (talk) 10:57, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination+maybe out of scope. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:07, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work or public domain like the others files on this Flickr account. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:03, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:12, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Highere Resolution file exists under different file name: Island Dancer North Pass WC11.jpg Gillfoto 00:48, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

 Keep Colors are very different and I like more colors of this file. Taivo (talk) 09:34, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept per Taivo. Strakhov (talk) 20:14, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: no, its much longer. --JuTa 00:11, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: Admin above forgot to delete. --1989 (talk) 21:58, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Володимир Юрас

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Володимир Юрас (talk · contribs):

Small photos without metadata. Probably not own works, but copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 09:37, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: OTRS permission is required. --1989 (talk) 22:01, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Die Person auf dem Foto (Caecilie Norby) hat dem Hochladen dieses Bildes nicht zugestimmt. Es verletzt ihre Persönlichkeitsrechte und wir möchten, dass dieses Foto schnellstmöglich entfernt wird. 217.92.213.228 10:52, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The photo was made in public concert, where permission for photographing is not needed. So no privacy is violated. Taivo (talk) 11:01, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --1989 (talk) 22:03, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted work by Carl Oscar Kylberg (d. 1952), permission of his heirs neede via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:34, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete In this photo, the artwork is not small enough to be covered by Commons:De minimis. /ℇsquilo 13:38, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
imho it would be okay. Its clearly not the focus of the photograph and in addition to that its black and white. His paintings are going to be public domain in 4 years. Amada44  talk to me 21:43, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have undeleted the file und blured the images in question. The deleted revision can be undeleted in 4 years time. cheers, Amada44  talk to me 07:32, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 02:42, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The blog page of blogger NYPD who created original image, have button "CC BY-SA 2.0 KR". Nonetheless, it seems that this image is licensed under NonCommercial, because blogger NYPD said "단, 영리목적은 금지입니다!" (But, it cannot be used for any commercial purposes!) in same page. Thanks. --Garam talk 08:09, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 20:36, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Arcul de Triumf by Rsandu

[edit]

Rsandu (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

There is no freedom of panorama in Romania. The architect en:Petre Antonescu died in 1965 and the arc of triumphe is protected with copyright until 2036 (70+1 years from death). Taivo (talk) 10:07, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
We must to inform Mr. Taivo about our romanian laws as

This is a photo gallery of a historic monument in București, classified with number B-II-m-A-19670.

. --Julieta39 (talk) 12:31, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep The last three images, per {{PD-RO-exempt}} (criteria c).--Strainu (talk) 04:35, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 20:30, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work from NII map, which is copyrighted. B dash (talk) 15:36, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 20:32, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work from NII map, which is copyrighted B dash (talk) 15:40, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is no similarity between the two pictures. Apparently, the contours of Japanese islands do not belong to the "copyright work" .
朋友,醒醒。这俩图哪里一样了?日本列岛的轮廓线属于公知信息,因而不可能为某一特定机构的版权作品。--Jyxyl9 (talk) 15:51, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --JuTa 20:37, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low qulaity --> File:Jan Jansz. de Stomme - Kinderlijkje Groninger Museum.jpg Lotje (talk) 15:46, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Weird you were first concerned about the fire destroying everything, and now you want to "clean up" old images that may be the only record of such objects? I don't get it. Jane023 (talk) 16:31, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Lotje (talk) 17:10, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: good enough. --JuTa 20:35, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of File:Cartwright Pugh.jpg, apparently obtained from the same source (https://opc.mfo.de/detail?photo_id=3401), but artificially blown up to double width and height (file size 17-->45 kb) Jochen Burghardt (talk) 21:23, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: derivates are allowed. --JuTa 20:34, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]