Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/11/16

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive November 16th, 2018
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Photo taken by a family member, and released for any and all uses per Wikipedia's policy." is not good enough. The photographer has to release her/his work. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:37, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your reply. I actually had the image removed before, although I accepted all terms and such. Can you point me in the right direction as to where I release it? Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by DanielTahar (talk • contribs) 00:40, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep After some digging: Uploader = photographer. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:16, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:17, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Elpichacorter.pdf

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded this by mistake; duplicate of other image. Prburley (talk) 19:34, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 21:04, 16 November 2018 UTC: I uploaded this by mistake; duplicate of previously uploaded image. --Krdbot 02:03, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hi all - I am opening this request because this file has been nominated for speedy deletion. I believe this file is actually okay to upload to Wikipedia because I got permission from the copyright holder (the magazine publisher) to place it in creative commons. Sarahmirk (talk) 23:36, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 15:07, 17 November 2018 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1): Magazine cover --Krdbot 20:01, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate to Frýdlant, železniční stanice, staniční budova.jpg. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jan Polák (talk • contribs) 2018-11-16T08:44:18‎ (UTC)


Deleted: by User:Túrelio. --JuTa 00:02, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Wvdp (talk) 15:32, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploaded by vandal sock. Ed (Edgar181) 00:31, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Wvdp (talk) 15:32, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploaded by vandal sock. Ed (Edgar181) 00:31, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Wvdp (talk) 15:32, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploaded by vandal sock. Ed (Edgar181) 00:31, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, superseded by SVG. – Illegitimate Barrister (talkcontribs), 02:41, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:01, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:06, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

delete page 최광모 (talk) 01:43, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: make free for page from meta. --Achim (talk) 22:28, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:58, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:00, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:59, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:00, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:00, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:01, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal poetry; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:00, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:01, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please reload picture JopkeB (talk) 05:26, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, corrupted file. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:02, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused selfie of no educational value Voice of Clam (formerly Optimist on the run) (talk) 08:19, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:02, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused selfie of no educational value Voice of Clam (formerly Optimist on the run) (talk) 08:43, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:02, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope (not to be used in any context of the Wikimedia projects) j.budissin+/- 08:52, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:03, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ذبشظثمه (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 08:52, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:03, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal picture of not-relevant person (Commons as hosting) - useless for educational purposes L736E (talk) 10:33, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:06, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image. E4024 (talk) 15:30, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:06, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Handsome youngster. Has invented himself a career as actor and director. Maybe he will succeed that in the future, but today he is out of our scope. E4024 (talk) 15:33, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:07, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Wvdp (talk) 15:33, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:08, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shigeo Ami (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused audio file of questionable notability. Likely to be advertisement.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:09, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside our scope - purely promotional Mifter (talk) 18:33, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:11, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like spam. E4024 (talk) 19:09, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:11, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like spam. E4024 (talk) 19:11, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:11, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like spam. E4024 (talk) 19:12, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:11, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused out of COM:SCOPE personal images.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:28, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Maria Steve 72 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused out of COM:SCOPE personal images.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:48, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Maria Steve 72 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused out of COM:SCOPE personal images.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:49, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Personality rights Although this work is freely licensed or in the public domain, the person(s) shown may have rights that legally restrict certain re-uses unless those depicted consent to such uses. In these cases, a model release or other evidence of consent could protect you from infringement claims. Though not obliged to do so, the uploader may be able to help you to obtain such evidence. See our general disclaimer for more information.

I will add required information. You have to instruct and support how to solve, not try to find reason to delete. I also comment on your page. Why you not try to instruct and support how to use Wiki? Why always find reasons to delete?

You are not restore my comment? THe new comer ideas are not any value for you? Why you delete my tags and restore only your tags? Maria Steve 72 (talk) 22:59, 16 November 2018 (UTC).[reply]

You have to explain in the deletion discussion why do you think that Tran Nguyen Ngoc Trang is within COM:SCOPE. Besides there is a problem with the attribution of the authors : some are selfies so works of Ms. Trang some others are not so you must credit the actual photographer. Please note you are not allowed to remove deletion templates on the file description page hence these reverts. Yours, --Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:08, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Patrick Rogel,

I see you use Wiki not friendly. I shared with you photos not only for personal works. You do not see them can provide you how to live, how to study, how to build friendship? That is also a project influenced to better people.

I clearly do not know your explanation. But I don't have time to augue with you. You do not respect other contributions. Delete other works. My comment: Don't give reasons to offence female though Ms. or Mrs., they are respected. What you mean selfies so works of Ms. Trang? Do you think it is also art and hobbies or ambitions? What do you know clearly about her as well as her life? Do you think she will be died somedays? That is the reason I keep her photos here, I think you have ever thought life has been so short, do the best what can do when living. A lot things to do, save what you have. I think a lot people did like me. Maria Steve 72 (talk) 23:21, 16 November 2018 (UTC)![reply]

I see I added required information already Own work. Why you said not yet? Don't try to conflict personally. Maria Steve 72 (talk) 23:53, 16 November 2018 (UTC)![reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Please read COM:SCOPE. For personal images You can use Instagram or Facebook. Very friendly --George Chernilevsky talk 06:14, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Maria Steve 72 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused out odf COM:SCOPE personal images (again).

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:15, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

not understand! You have to show me which is wrong information? Or wrong descriptions? How to solve? and what is fair use? These pictures are evidences Maria Steve 72 (talk) 22:29, 27 November 2018 (UTC)![reply]

 Delete: The subject of these images had their enwiki autobiography deleted several times in 2011 w:TRAN NGUYEN NGOC TRANG and some of the same images previously had OTRS tickets sent that were unverifiable. Now this uploader is uploading the same, and more, images, and sending several OTRS tickets for them again. The subject is still not notable enough for an article and we cannot just keep personal images that have no educational value. Neither this uploader nor the subject appear to understand even the basics of the scope of the project or the notability of articles. Also see scope and deletions on this webpage: User talk:NGOC TRANG TRAN NGUYEN. Ww2censor (talk) 10:41, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Just don't have the skill to write on Wiki and wrong in given informations or wrong or not enough descriptions of evidences. But If you have to ask the contracts/decisions about the jobs at that time or right now, All have. But I see in never asked before. I can ask her to show you (All in Vietnamese versions and Engsligh versions). And you will not so fast to delete. But the current truth right now is she is an author of a visible book and more than 13 years of works. All people cannot be always online, on computers Maria Steve 72 (talk) 12:33, 28 November 2018 (UTC)![reply]
If @Maria Steve 72: were to be blocked for reuploading out of scope files after warning please consider User:Bích Liên 1571 and User:Steve1571 too. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:13, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Probably unknowingly at least 4 sockpuppets. Ww2censor (talk) 13:51, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: advertising/spam. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:09, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. No educational value. Not used. Headlock0225 (talk) 17:12, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:26, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mahdi Mousavi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Doesn't seem to be own work. Subject (=user) isn't the author of the photographs.

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:47, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hedwig I knew Mahdi for past couple of month, he has been proven to be law abiding wikizen and he has my full trust, I see no reason to doubt him and I Think he is the author Mardetanha talk 15:37, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - it's rather obvious that the depicted person is not the author of these pictures. --Jcb (talk) 17:04, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Restored per UDR - Jcb (talk) 18:14, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kokyawzayya (talk · contribs)

[edit]

low resolution and low file size from other sources, claiming as own works.

NinjaStrikers «» 13:55, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Kokyawzayya (talk · contribs)

[edit]

small and low resolution files taken from various sources.

NinjaStrikers «» 14:26, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Kokyawzayya (talk · contribs)

[edit]

low resolution and low file size from other sources, claiming as own works.

NinjaStrikers «» 04:36, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:08, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kokyawzayya (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Photos taken from Google Map and claimed as own works

NinjaStrikers «» 07:44, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:40, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by user:Civitas13

[edit]

Uploader request (criterion 7). I upload less that 7 days ago this file from a Flickr account that publish these image with a free license. I think that the Flickr user is also the author of the photo (the photos have metadata and also other factors). However how you can see all this image, despite having a free license (that I think is not fake) have also a watermark saying "copyright". A user on German Wikipedia (see here) make me note that the watermark can contrants with the Flickr license. Personally I think that the Flickr author want to relase them with a free licenze but only puts also the watermark for attribution (using the copyright watermark); since I want to be sure at 100% that the image is really free and I dont'want to make a copyright violation and I don't know how the watermark can affect the free license I politely ask to delete all the image I uploaded. I know that they are a lot of image a should I have thought better before the uploading but I will approciate a lot if my request will be accepted. Note that about all the images are not used (except 2 o 3 for Wikidata and German wikipedia). Note that I uploaded also other picture from the same accounte but they don't have a copyright watermark (and they have a free license of course !) and so I don't see any problem with that. NOTE: I didn't use the speedy delete tag because there a lot of picture. Greeting --Civitas13 (talk) 21:02, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I changed my mind and I tagged all the files (if I didn't forgotten anyone) with the speedy deletion tag about criterion 7, considering that all the requirement are met (less than 7 days, not used); I think that will shorten the process of deletion (considering that the criteria are met). I have delete my edit regarding this images on German Wikipeida and on Wikidata (where I use one image of that) and so there are no more image used. I think that when all the iamge will be deleted this discussion could be closed form who has the right to do this. Greeting and apologise for my big upload error, --Civitas13 (talk) 14:56, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by colleagues. --Jcb (talk) 17:06, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted meme, see https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/ew-i-stepped-in-shitSpanishSnake (talk | contribs) ping me plz 00:24, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 10:55, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Эта фотография некачественная (очень искажены цвета), Тимошенко на этом фото не похожа на себя, это фото используют как карикатуру.
This photo is of poor quality (very distorted colors), Tymoshenko in this photo does not look like herself, this photo is used as a caricature. Vles1 (talk) 00:46, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Vles1: how about now - Alexis Jazz ping plz 03:28, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Alexis Jazz: Yesterday's photo (14.11.2018) — https://www.tymoshenko.ua/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/APX3335.jpg --Vles1 (talk) 03:40, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Vles1: Where's the license for that photo? Commons does not allow fair use, see COM:FAIRUSE. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 03:43, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Vles1: I see you've also given it a try. You think that's an improvement? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 06:10, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish💬 11:05, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photograph of a presumably copyrighted work. —innotata 01:51, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: derivative work. — Racconish💬 11:07, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in this photo is the packaging; the details are neither minimal nor incidental, and is therefore unacceptable derivative work. xplicit 02:36, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 11:08, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in these photos is the packaging; the details are neither minimal nor incidental, and are therefore unacceptable derivative works.

xplicit 02:50, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 11:08, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:PACKAGING Wcam (talk) 04:14, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 11:11, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Borna62

[edit]

Stock photos of tea products used in their advertisements, such as here and here, copyright violations. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 09:21, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 11:12, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

seems to be a copyrighted image "Tous droits réservés". No evidence the uploader holds copyright. ELEKHHT 09:40, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Architect's authorization is limited to two other uploaders. — Racconish💬 11:14, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no evidence uploader hoolds copyright; source states "Tous droits réservés" ELEKHHT 09:43, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Architect's authorization is limited to two other uploaders. — Racconish💬 11:19, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mompati Dikunwane (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope, unused private photos

George Chernilevsky talk 16:57, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


deleted. INeverCry 01:13, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mompati Dikunwane (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, commons is not a photo album

Gbawden (talk) 10:10, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I see some of them are use in a user gallery - but all that is is a photo album, so being in use shouldn't be a reason to keep them Gbawden (talk) 06:29, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I agree and hesitated this time because some of the pictures show relevant people like Katherine Maher and so it could be wrong to mass delete them. It may be better to have a look on each of the pictures. --Indeedous (talk) 19:21, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Deleted only selfies. — Racconish💬 11:26, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mompati Dikunwane (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No EXIF data or other information provided that allow verification of the uploader's "own work" claim or the en:provenance of these photos. Possibly "own work", though not sure that can just be automatically assumed given all the notifications found on the uploader's user talk page. Since the uploader hasn't edited Commons since March 2021 or English Wikipedia since September 2022, tagging the file's with {{Npd}} probably would be equivalent to deleting them by default; so, after asking about them at User talk:King of Hearts#Query about some photos, I figured it's better to bring them up for discussion at DR.

-- Marchjuly (talk) 00:58, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:10, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mompati Dikunwane (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Modern buildings from Botswana, where there is no freedom of panorama. Commercial license permissions from architects of the nominated buildings or their heirs are required.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:33, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:42, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrectly drawn functional group: attachment points cannot be drawn like normal bonds (such drawings are considered 'not acceptable' by IUPAC recommendations). Two alternative versions are available: File:Methanylylidene group.svg with IUPAC-preferred style for substituents and File:Methine.svg (drawn as a Markush structure, so not exactly a functional group, but a class of compounds). Wostr (talk) 23:29, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 12:16, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Since these are waveforms representative of a copyrighted song, they are effectively the copyrighted song itself. It's non-free. Chess (talk) 02:15, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


What sort of logic is this? A picture of a waveform does not let you hear the copyrighted song. Kosmosi (talk) 11:53, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Not possible to recreate the song from this waveform. --Amada44  talk to me 17:24, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong position, I will upload a new one. Mo5ul (talk) 12:36, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Image has been rotated. --Amada44  talk to me 19:01, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Request by uploader / person in photograph magairlín 12:59, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: user request. --Amada44  talk to me 19:04, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File from Facebook NinjaStrikers «» 13:40, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44  talk to me 21:19, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad image quality Derbrauni (talk) 16:34, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44  talk to me 21:23, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:mmrsafy

[edit]

These photos are the same presentation of photo * File:Jhinuk pitha 01.jpg. So keep the first one and delete the rest. --ferdous Alap 20:54, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: deleted three of the six. --Amada44  talk to me 21:35, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality version of File:Plan Ouvrage A2 de Fermont..jpg Borvan53 (talk) 21:42, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44  talk to me 21:40, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality version of File:Plan Ouvrage A2 de Fermont..jpg Borvan53 (talk) 21:43, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44  talk to me 21:41, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lower quality version of File:Plan Ouvrage A12 du Bois-Karré.jpg Borvan53 (talk) 21:45, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44  talk to me 21:41, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality version of File:Ouvrage du Chesnois.jpg Borvan53 (talk) 21:48, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44  talk to me 21:42, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is a nonsense Matankic (talk) 22:21, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44  talk to me 21:44, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by JC7V7DC5768 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: <improbable that its author's own work> Indeed, but this requires a regular DR. Didym (talk) 23:44, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


I don't understand what evidence I'm supposed to provide to say that it is my own work. Normally, people don't prepare receipts and licenses as and when they take photos. How can I possibly provide an evidence for this? My consent apparently isn't enough, so, do let me know what else I need to do to help retain the file on Wikimedia Commons. --Aakansha Trivedi (talk) 15:31, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Last time around this user's image was deleted for not providing the correct rationale for use. So it seems to get around that they said it was 'their own work' which is a very common tactic for users to get around the image copyright rules on this site.JC7V7DC5768 (talk) 16:45, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Image is from here: https://scontent-ort2-2.cdninstagram.com/vp/29155fbf02b700d3a3aa82700419e825/5CAAE639/t51.2885-15/e35/43681778_513344632472821_4738008137263490957_n.jpg. --Amada44  talk to me 21:50, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://guariglia.com/exhibitions/19/overview/ Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:48, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44  talk to me 21:45, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнение в авторстве и лицензии: малый размер файла, отсутствие метаданных, фото похоже на студийное Dogad75 (talk) 01:23, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 21:53, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнение в авторстве и лицензии: малый размер файла, отсутствие метаданных, фото похоже на студийное Dogad75 (talk) 17:03, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 16:28, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:Дэ.svg

out of project scope: unused personal logo George Chernilevsky talk 16:19, 16 November 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adiga75578 (talk • contribs) 18:43, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Удалите это изображение Ikabar4765 (talk) 09:42, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 01:17, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This seems to be a poor scan of a professional/publicity photo. It seems unlikely that the real copyright owner, with access to the full quality original, would either scan it so badly or release it into the public domain. If they did then that would very likely indicate promotional intent. DanielRigal (talk) 00:51, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:51, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image appears to be a promo pic of the band. Highly unlikely one-time user who uploaded this created the image itself. Appears all over the internet etc. Andrzejbanas (talk) 02:55, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:50, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, photographer needs to release the photograph. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:00, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:50, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work, needs OTRS Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:13, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:49, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, out of project scope. Willy1018(talk) 09:11, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:48, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no evidence uploader holds copyright - source page states "Tous droits réservés" ELEKHHT 09:42, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The uploader is not claiming to own the copyright on the photo. The uploader dutifully credits the copyright of the photo to its copyright owner. The website copyright notice is the generic copyright notice of the website. It does not disallow the possibility for the copyright owner of the photo to specifically issue a free license. What is missing is evidence of the free license from the copyright owner of the photo. The uploader is probably someone from the architecture firm, so they may be able to obtain it if they are notified of this request. (N.b.: Wikimedia already owns confirmation from this architect that he allows his architectuaral works to be freely photographed and used in free-licensed photos. So, this aspect is not an issue.) -- Asclepias (talk) 12:34, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, the uploader doesn't appear to be the photographer, hence it is a problem that there is no evidence that the photographer would have published this image under the stated license. --ELEKHHT 12:02, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:47, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no evidence uploader hoolds copyright; source states "Tous droits réservés" ELEKHHT 09:43, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:46, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no evidence uploader hoolds copyright; source states "Tous droits réservés" ELEKHHT 09:44, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:46, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Professional photo. Probably derived from the same photo that was featured on the "FREE LIVE!" album cover per https://theamazingkornyfonelabel.files.wordpress.com/2015/01/free-reminiscence-tan.jpg   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 13:33, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:45, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file by a single-aim participant. If this is an own work it is clearly not bona fide, as clearly understood from the edits of the uploader. If it is someone else's work then it requires OTRS. E4024 (talk) 18:02, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:43, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is this image free and/or in scope? E4024 (talk) 18:07, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:43, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Quite a derivative work. E4024 (talk) 18:17, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Did you see that the frame is animated? Its not a photograph of a picture. Amada44  talk to me 21:32, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
No I did not. Who is this person BTW? --E4024 (talk) 14:43, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
No idea but that shouldn’t be a scale for notability. My guess would be that nobody would be sad if we delete this image. Amada44  talk to me 16:58, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:43, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No EXIF data and looks like a screenshot from something and thus a derivative work of whatever that is? The image description claims it's from 1970, but I don't think there were too many smart phones in use in 1970 (she has one sititng on the table next to her) B (talk) 18:27, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:41, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING Ronhjones  (Talk) 21:00, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:38, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RAntonio (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivative work

Discasto talk 22:55, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:37, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image, presented as a logo, cannot be considered too simple not to be copyrighted. As such, it has no place in the Commons without a specific OTRS release note from the owner. Ldorfman (talk) 23:17, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:36, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source "historisches Foto vom Flohmarkt", translated "historical photo from flea market", that's not enough to simply assume {{Anonymous-EU}}. That a particular copy of a photograph bought at a flea market doesn't mention the photographer is not proof that the author never claimed authorship and is generally unknown. Apart from the fact that Anonymous-EU possibly is not even applicable for Germany, see the template's note in small print. Gestumblindi (talk) 23:53, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:36, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image appears corrupted: a black rectangle is shown at the tip of each arrow - the file should be fixed, or deleted Jochen Burghardt (talk) 14:51, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:29, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:11, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: ok. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:28, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tr9ABf3KamX (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos and document. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:28, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

as of https://cuentos-cuanticos.com/2015/02/ license is CC-BY-NC-SA/3.0 > no commercial use allowed Migebert (talk) 18:40, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:27, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a derivative work of the copyrighted en:Enterprise (NX-01) B (talk) 18:44, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:26, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative works of the copyrighted Enterprises depicted, no freedom of panorama in the US. B (talk) 18:46, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:26, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Silar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

{{PD-Poland}}-fails. NOT Polish works. Sourced with (as indicated) "ONB" = ÖNB = Österreichische Nationalbibliothek (Austrian National Library) = (as example for File:01944 Szpitalna-Straße. Die Häuser in dieser Straße gehören zu den wenigen Gebäuden, die bis heute erhalten geblieben sind..jpg) http://www.bildarchivaustria.at/Pages/ImageDetail.aspx?p_iBildID=1566382 and authored with "Heydecker, Joe J." = de:Joe Heydecker (1916—1997), a German photographer. Copyrighted till the end of 2067. Obs.: Use http://www.bildarchivaustria.at/Pages/Search/ProfiSearch.aspx for finding all photos of Heydecker filling field "Person" with "Heydecker, Joe J." or try http://www.bildarchivaustria.at/Pages/Search/QuickSearch.aspx with parts of the file title, e.g. "Szpitalna".

Gunnex (talk) 17:47, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:42, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Silar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:FOP in Poland is only for works which are permanently exhibited. To be discussed.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:48, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:21, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Silar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:FOP in poland only for works are permanently exhibited.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:44, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - predominant, not De minimis IMO. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:09, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Silar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 01:58, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:59, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Silar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:FOP in Poland only for works that are permanently exhibited.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:23, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 15:26, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Silar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:FOP in Poland only for works that are permanently exhibited. (again).

Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:56, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep

1. FOPː #Permanent_vs_temporary - "Even quickly decaying works can thus be "permanent" and therefore be subject to freedom of panorama. Street paintings, ice, sand, or snow sculptures rarely last more than a few days or weeks. If they're left in public space for their natural lifetime, they are considered "permanent" all the same." - the election posters are definitely designed to last till the election day (noone plans to keep these masterpieces in museum or art-gallery afterwards) thus they can be considered as placed there till the end of their life cycle - ie. permanently.

2. Election posters (seeː https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Election_posters) are of Utility objects nature and ephemeric ːEphemera thus not copyrighted

3. Anyway, they are usually too simple to be copyrightedː do not meet Threshold_of_originality
the same concerns previous badge of election posters that IMO should be restoredː https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#File:02019_1015_(2)_Nationalisten_abgeklebte_SLD-Wahlplakat.jpg_File:02019_1014_(2)_Konfederacja,_Graffitti.jpg_File:DSC_1012_(2)_Polling_place_in_Z%C5%82ote_%C5%81any.jpg --Oo91 (talk) 21:30, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:45, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found at higher resolution at https://www.afriqueconnection.com/article/12-08-2014/c%C3%B4te-divoire-affi-nguessan-fait-du-lobbying-chez-b%C3%A9di%C3%A9?qt-populaire_mois_semaine=1 Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:55, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Patrick Rogel: I'm the owner of this image. The full picture will be uploaded soon on Commons.--Zenman (talk) 18:43, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Patrick Rogel: Done here.--Zenman (talk) 15:44, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: full resolution with EXIFs, no prior publications oft he big version, own work is credible. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:07, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Affi1.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:56, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Affi1.jpg. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:07, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://www.lescahiersdelislam.fr/Audios-Hallaj-par-Louis-Massignon-m-1962_a1200.html Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:15, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quel est exactement votre argument pour justifier cette demande de suppression ? Cette photographie m'a été transmise par la famille de Louis Massignon et je l'ai publiée à leur demande. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ThomasC12 (talk • contribs) 10:09, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@ThomasC12: Cette photo semble être non pas de 1948 mais de 1962 et est donc soumise au droit d'auteur en France. Par ailleurs les régles de Commons veulent que, pour tout travail publié précédemment sous license non-libre, une autorisation du photographe doit être transmise via COM:OTRS/fr. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:20, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:02, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Louis Massignon, 1948.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:16, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:02, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems it was taken from here: File:Wappen Elze.png. This one should be deleted and redirected to the latter. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:55, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 23:35, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a fake WebGPU logo, created based on the WebGL logo (which is a Khronos trademark). The W3C GPU for the Web group has not yet adopted any logo. Kainino (talk) 00:22, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An alternative would be to just replace this logo with regular black plaintext. Though that would be better suited as an SVG. Kainino (talk) 00:24, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 23:36, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Thje logo is above ToO and I find nothing in the official page http://www.ancestris.org/index_fr.html saying that a free license is applicable to the logo, but a "© Association Ancestris" at the bottom of the page. Furthermore a logo is not a software. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:55, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 00:20, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

its a photograph taken illegaly. The sign says photographs are not allowed!! 223.30.12.166 07:35, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That a sign says that a photograph is not to be taken, that doesn't make it illegal, nor does it mean it is a copyright violation. Information about the work itself is needed. Closing as invalid without making any determination on the underlying component as insufficient information.  — billinghurst sDrewth 00:22, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion.  — billinghurst sDrewth 00:23, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 11:55, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 00:29, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. The site of origin do not assign what license your content is on, and the uploader did not prove to be allowed to upload the image under the license presented Leon saudanha (talk) 15:50, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 00:32, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a Potez 29 and the photo already exists in that category Stuffy Carrot (talk) 17:16, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; see File:Potez 33 Ambulance L'Aéronautique June,1928.jpg.  — billinghurst sDrewth 00:34, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mein eigenes Foto, es gibt schon mehrere Ansichten davon, ist überflüssig. Nadi2018 (talk) 20:35, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 00:47, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Other files affected:

I think this image violates the licensing rules of Commons PePeEfe (talk) 08:55, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

oui ça semble le cas, il faudrait télécharger ce logo sur Wikipédia, --Pierrette13 (talk) 11:40, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@PePeEfe: Could you elaborate? The source of the file has been uploaded by the WWF themselves. Amada44  talk to me 19:09, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Amada44: WWF Deutschland uploaded the source file to Commons, not the World Wildlife Fund or WWF International. I doubt they have authorization to upload the global logo of the organization, which also includes the symbols (C) and (R). Thanks for your interest. --PePeEfe (talk) 21:35, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
"Trademarks. The panda logo, the WORLD WILDLIFE FUND ,the WWF initials, and any other product or service name or slogan contained in the Site are trademarks of WWF, the WWF network, its corporate partners, licensors, or other respective owners, and may not be copied, imitated or used, in whole or in part, without the prior written permission of WWF or the applicable trademark holder." Text in World Wildlife Fund ("WWF") Web Site Terms and Conditions. --PePeEfe (talk) 21:44, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Also including

I think this image violates the licensing rules of Commons PePeEfe (talk) 08:53, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment, Hi all, I received a response today by WWF member, reply copy pasted below for others to see. It is clear that they consider it copyright violation so these images should be deleted in my opinion. --DBigXray 20:12, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dec 27, 2:10 PM EST

Dear Friend,

Thank you for your email to World Wildlife Fund-US.

Our policy does not allow outside use or distribution of WWF photos, logo, or graphics. These images are the property of photographers and designers, and therefore, we cannot give permission to use any images that appear on our site.

I suggest sending your inquiry to WWF- Germany. Please visit the attched link. http://wwf.panda.org/wwf_offices/germany/

If you have additional questions or concerns please call 800-960-0993. Thank you for your commitment to global conservation. Together we can make a world of difference.

Best regards,

[NAME WITHELD]

World Wildlife Fund


Deleted: WWF logo is copyrighted uploads by WWF Germany where not authorised. --Amada44  talk to me 21:04, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality, unauthorized by the National Gallery in Prague, duplicit file NoJin (talk) 23:17, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-Art. --Yann (talk) 17:10, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

nízká kvalita, duplicitní soubor NoJin (talk) 11:58, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:10, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No reason to use this over the identical (except for less whitespace) and superior SVG version: File:Juventus FC 2017 logo.svg IagoQnsi (talk) 21:21, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep That there is no reason for you to use it, does not make it out of scope. That someone may wish to use it makes it reasonable to keep, and to utilise templates and {{Other version}} to direct. We are simply not limited to a single image at Commons.  — billinghurst sDrewth 01:23, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete - Basically the same as File:Juventus FC 2017 logo.svg. No reason to keep. --Ratherous (talk) 03:06, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per billinghurst. We keep obsolete versions. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:06, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No reason to use this over the identical and superior SVG version: File:Juventus FC 2017 logo.svg IagoQnsi (talk) 21:22, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep That there is no reason for you to use it, does not make it out of scope. That someone may wish to use it makes it reasonable to keep, and to utilise templates and {{Other version}} to direct. We are simply not limited to a single image at Commons.  — billinghurst sDrewth 01:23, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete - Basically the same as File:Juventus FC 2017 logo.svg. No reason to keep. --Ratherous (talk) 03:05, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per billinghurst. We keep obsolete versions. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:06, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No reason to use low-res JPEG over identical superior SVG File:Juventus TV - Logo 2017.svg IagoQnsi (talk) 21:48, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Danyele. We keep obsolete versions. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:05, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No reason to use over identical SVGs File:Juventus FC 2017 icon (white on black).svg and File:Juventus FC 2017 icon (white).svg. Creates a confusing abundance of options in Logos of Juventus FC IagoQnsi (talk) 21:49, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per billinghurst. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:05, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Insufficient permission, OTRS validation required. 2A02:2168:869B:E900:8D67:557A:BFF3:21E1 00:50, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Pvladko: The nominator is correct, this image needs to follow the process at Commons:OTRS  — billinghurst sDrewth 23:40, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, no permission. --Martin H. (talk) 23:10, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Extracted from File:李正信.jpg, but this is cropped to focus on a monitor displayed at the concert. It is an inappropriate derivative work. xplicit 01:35, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Martin H. (talk) 23:09, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All other cartoons by Shlomo Cohen have OTRS permissions, why not this one? Is this a privilege of User:Pivox? E4024 (talk) 17:27, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image was uploaded in 2017, though for 2010 image and the OTRS permission is dated 2015, so it may not specifically cover this image by name or link. One would need to check via Com:OTRS/Noticeboard on the scope of the permission given, though one often finds that a permission is limited to identified images, rather than being open to all work. At this stage it looks as the image should be deleted. User:Pivox?  — billinghurst sDrewth 00:59, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Missing evidence of permission. --Martin H. (talk) 23:02, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from some blog. Is he someone in scope? E4024 (talk) 18:14, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Let's see... tossing the source page through Google Translate and it seems that the subject is Gong Myung wgo is on EN. So he's notable. Offhand I'd say keep - source site has a suitable license and Tineye doesn't find it elsewhere. Tabercil (talk) 18:05, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Martin H. (talk) 22:59, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OoS person I saw at the Category:Unidentified men. E4024 (talk) 02:14, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Sorry, I missed the fact that it had been kept in a previous DR, also opened by me! (Getting old. :) As the file cannot find itself a use still it may be considered OoS. I leave it to the admins that follow me; close it if you wish. --E4024 (talk) 05:13, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: this is not Gong Myung. P 1 9 9   14:32, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per number of contributions does not look like a real user. E4024 (talk) 18:19, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: FIle is in use on a userpage. --Martin H. (talk) 22:58, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Delete own work 75.63.168.9 03:57, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unused personal image, no discussion since November. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:28, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader didn't actually take the picture, but used an image apparently given with permission to use on Wikipedia by Rachel Kadish. Unfortunately, the image appeared temporarily on her Instagram. I have no reason to doubt that version of events, but we don't have formal confirmation via OTRS Jimfbleak (talk) 09:11, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, no OTRS. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:28, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing Exif data, author is possible other person than the uploader. Previous copyvios by the uploader. In case this is deleted, it should be restored in 2031, when the picture enters the public domain. Jamez42 (talk) 12:04, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Veronidae: comment?  — billinghurst sDrewth 00:30, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Billinghurst: Veronidae seems to have been inactive for three years now in Commons. --Jamez42 (talk) 09:54, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, and without specifically pinging them there is no ability to get comment. At least we get to say we have tried.  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:24, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 10:15, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bamas100 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused maps of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki Graph or SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion. — Racconish💬 10:17, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Georgia Dogad75 (talk) 16:54, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 10:13, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Restored. Copyright was expired.--Anatoliy 🇺🇦 (talk) 11:44, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Juventus FC 2017 logo negative files

[edit]

No reason to use these over File:Juventus FC 2017 logo (white on black).svg or file:Juventus FC 2017 logo (white).svg. Having them creates a confusing abundance of options in the Juventus FC logos category.

IagoQnsi (talk) 21:51, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've just created File:Juventus FC 2017 flag (black).svg, another SVG which is a much closer match for the shape of the latter 2 files. –IagoQnsi (talk) 22:08, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Danyele: The problem is that someone coming to Category:Juventus FC logos (2017–) may be overwhelmed with choices and not know which version to use, especially if they're not familiar with the differences between vector and raster graphics. The flag image I created is nearly identical to the second image in this nomination and is very similar to the third one. I can create a square version to replace the first file if it's really necessary. There is no reason anyone would choose to use these images over the superior SVG images unless they weren't paying attention or didn't know much about image file formats. –IagoQnsi (talk) 21:48, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Any user should be entitled to use whichever they wish to, and any article is able to have its images altered. The images are in scope and we can host multiples. At what point do you think that your choice is better than others. If we use your logic, and approve this as an approach, where does such an approach stop?  — billinghurst sDrewth 00:42, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept - per billinghurst. We keep obsolete versions. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:09, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]