User talk:NoJin

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Vyšebrodský cyklus - Zvěstování (detail).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:49, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Magog the Ogre. High resolution professional photographs, including this one, were provided by the institution, who owns the paintings - the National gallery in Prague. According to mutual agreeement with the National Gallery I have used resized photographs of artworks and cut details for Wikimedia Commons. I am not aware that I had omitted any relevant information on the source and author.--NoJin (talk) 10:45, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Endre-Nemes,-Encounter-with-the-Baroque,-1968-79,-oil,-acrylic-and-tempera-on-canvas,-220-cm-x-180-cm.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Lokal_Profil 19:12, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Endre-Nemes,-Cardiogram,-1971,-litograph.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Lokal_Profil 19:14, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Marcus Cyron (talk) 18:46, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Michelská madona, Národní galerie v Praze.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

AndreasPraefcke (talk) 19:54, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Madona ze Zahražan, Národní galerie v Praze.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

AndreasPraefcke (talk) 19:55, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Sv. Petr ze Slivice, Národní galerie v Praze.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

AndreasPraefcke (talk) 19:55, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jiří Mrázek works

[edit]

Hi NoJin, you seem to have uploaded quite a few works of Jiří Mrázek. The works are not in the public domain yet. Did you get permission from the heirs of this artist? Multichill (talk) 15:11, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Valid permission has been sent to OTRS on 10th Aug., 2016 ( the time of upload), but not processed yet. It is a vacation time. Everything is OK.--NoJin (talk) 15:59, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Multichill: Permission is already in the system and approved. Regards --Mates (talk) 10:36, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jiří Pehe (2016).jpg

[edit]

Prosím, jak je to s portrétem Jiřího Pehe File:Jiří Pehe (2016).jpg? V popisu je uveden jako vlastní dílo. Ale v údajích EXIF se uvádí jako autor a držitel práv JAKUB JOACHIM. --Bazi (talk) 18:22, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Popravdě řečeno, je to pro mne naprostá záhada. Disponuji originální fotkou, kterou jsem převedl do černobílé, protože mi nevyhovovaly barvy originálu. Ten mohu doložit, spolu se souborem ostatních portrétů pořízených tamtéž. Máte Vy nějaké vysvětlení pro změnu exif dat? Nemohl někdo snímek přefotit a znovu uložit? --NoJin (talk) 23:51, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Omlouvám se. Měl jsem v té době svůj Nikon v záruční opravě a firma mi půjčila náhradní Nikon D600. Všechny fotky mají stejná exif data, zřejmě původního majitele. Nevím zda se s tím dá něco dělat.--NoJin (talk) 00:55, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Právě jsem namátkou prošel pár dalších portrétů, dost se EXIF údaje liší, ale totéž jméno se vyskytlo ještě třeba u těchto tří: File:Daniel Stach (2016).jpg, File:Filip Horký, 2016.jpg, File:Jiří Hanák (2016).jpg. Časově všechny zapadají přibližně do stejného období a jsou pořízené stejným modelem foťáku, což by mohlo nasvědčovat tomu, že to bude opravdu z toho zapůjčeného přístroje. Jen je to trochu matoucí. Jak to napravit, moc nevím. Snad přeuložit v nějakém programu, který by pročistil EXIF, ale jestli to stojí za to otravování, nevím. A ani nevím, jestli se při nahrání nové verze obrázku metadata aktualizují, nebo se udržují od první nahrané verze. --Bazi (talk) 03:39, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Ano to odpovídá. Další portrét je např. Libor Dvořák. Fotil jsem předávání novinářských cen pro Nadaci Český literární fond v Havlíčkově Brodě (26.5.2016).--NoJin (talk) 10:08, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:048 Václav Bláha, portrét, foto Magdalena Bláhová.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Arthur Crbz (talk) 15:27, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Permissions by both, Václav Bláha and his photographer (and wife) Magdalena Bláhová, will be delivered without delay, as soon as upload of all artworks is finished. --NoJin (talk) 15:36, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Velíškovo dílo

[edit]

Zdravím, vypadá to, že u Velíškova díla chybí povolení k užití od autora. Vy to budete dodávat? Správně byste to měl dodat už při uploadu. V tomhle stavu to tu zůstat nemůže. Díky za vysvětlení. --Palu (talk) 18:31, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fotky byly načteny až poté, co jsem obdržel svolení autora odeslané zároveň na moji adresu i na adresu OTRS. Nemohu bohužel ovlivnit jak rychle to správci ošetří. Obraťte se na ně.--NoJin (talk) 18:37, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Dobrý den, díky za vysvětlení. Pro takovéto případy je lepší použít šablonu OTRS pending, protože jinak vám každý může olepit takové soubory Copyviem. S pozdravem, --Palu (talk) 21:43, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Načítám vždy fotky teprve když mi dojde kopie prohlášení o autorských právech. Když fotky nenačtu hned, zase dostávám dotazy OTRS, kde ty fotky jsou. Zdraví--NoJin (talk) 21:48, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No jak říkám, nejlepší je fotky načíst s šablonou OTRS pending, poslat povolení a počkat na ověření. Takhle nikdo nebude mít podezření na Copyvio. --Palu (talk) 21:50, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Až na výjimky vždy načítám fotky, kde jsem autorem já sám, pro můj vlastní Art Library Project na Commons. Copyvio tedy nehrozí a souhlas autora díla si vždy opatřím předem.--NoJin (talk) 21:59, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Mluvíte o něčem jiném než já. Já mluvím o tom, aby v každém okamžiku vaše přebíraná fotka měla OK právní status. Tedy i v mezičase od uploadu než přijde povolení. K tomu je určená výše zmíněná šablona OTRS pending. --Palu (talk) 21:24, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Michal Ožibko, iDeath I, olej na plátně 220 x 170 cm, 2010.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Secondarywaltz (talk) 22:33, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

{{OTRS pending |year= 2017|month= 12|day= 3}}

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Michal Ožibko, Girl with… (portrét Frederike Höppner), olej na plátně 230 x 140 cm, 2007.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Secondarywaltz (talk) 22:33, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

{{OTRS pending |year= 2017|month= 12|day= 3}}

Deletion requests

[edit]

Zdravím. Všiml jsem si, že jste označil ke smazaní fotografie některých obrazů z NG. Obávám se, že unauthorized by the National Gallery in Prague je nedostatečný důvod pro smazání, pokud tedy autorská práva na dané dílo již vypršela. Pokud jde o méně kvalitní duplikát k jinému, existujícímu souboru vyšší kvality, tak to už důvod ke smazání je, ale chtělo by to na onen soubor odkázat, aby správce vyhodnocující DoS nemusel pracně existenci duplikátu ověřovat. Čili například toto (odůvodněno pouze jako "neautorizováno NG") či toto (chybí odkaz na duplikát) rozhodně nejsou dobře založené diskuse o smazání. S pozdravem --Vachovec1 (talk) 13:06, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dobrý den. Mám pověření Národní galerie nechat smazat veškeré soubory nahrané značkou NGCZ [1] Všechny jsou mimořádně nekvalitní, nahrané patrně nějakým botem, bez schválení Národní galerií. Nevíte jak požádat o smazání všech najednou, abych je nemusel označovat jednotlivě? Je jich asi 600.--NoJin (talk) 13:30, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Pokud dobře vidím, tak těch souborů není šest set set, ale spíše šest tisíc (btw. fixnul jsem Váš odkaz na seznam oněch uploadů). Ano, zřejmě byly nahrány nějakým botem/automatizovaným skriptem a nejsou to buhvíjak kvalitní reprodukce. Ovšem to, že nejsou "autorizované" Národní galerií, obávám se není dostatečný důvod pro smazání. Všechno to je PD Art, příslušná díla jsou již volná. Domnívám se tedy, že NG tudíž nemá na základě čeho požadovat smazání, respektive uplatňovat autorská práva. Pokud by NG hromadně chtěla nahradit tyto nekvalitní reprodukce vlastními kvalitnějšími reprodukcemi, šlo by požadovat smazání na základě existence kvalitnějších duplikátů. Ani nelze uplatňovat "tvůrčí přídavek" u tvorby reprodukcí jako u onoho případu v Německu, kdy sem na Commons byly přeneseny velmi kvalitní digitální reprodukce vytvořené přímo jistým muzeem/galerií bez svolení onoho muzea/galerie. Jinak hromadná žádost o smazání se zakládá vytvořením podstránky s výčtem souborů navrhovaných ke smazání, jako třeba zde; odkaz na příslušnou podstránku pak přidáte na konec aktuálního seznamu Dosů, naní by to bylo sem --Vachovec1 (talk) 14:10, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Ten případ je záhadný. Fotky musel nahrát někdo s přístupem k fotodokumentaci sbírek Národní galerie v lednu 2016, ale nikdo ze zaměstnanců k tomu nedostal pověření a nepodařilo se zjistit kdo to mohl být. Značka NGCZ vypadá, jako by fotky vložila na Commons NG sama. Nejde o autorská práva, jsou to skutečně volná díla, ale řediteli NG vadí, že jde o fotografický šmejd a u všech souborů je navíc uveden odkaz na Národní galerii. Nahrávám postupně nové kvalitní fotky, které Národní galerie poskytla jako volná díla a tyto duplicitní a nekvalitní soubory zároveň označuji ke smazání. Díky za radu, pokusím se navrhnout hromadné mazání. Zcela obecně se domnívám, že nízká kvalita je dostatečný důvod k odstranění. Chystám se označit tak i některé své staré portréty osob, které se mi mezitím podařilo vyfotil lépe.--NoJin (talk) 14:49, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Ředitele NG celkem chápu. Jak jsem zmiňoval, nízká kvalita sama o sobě jako důvod ke smazání stačit zřejmě nebude – vždy je lepší alespoň méně kvalitní snímek, než snímek vůbec žádný. Ale můžete provádět postupné nahrazování kvalitnějšími duplikáty. Bude-li u snímku k dispozici kvalitnější duplikát, smazání by mělo být možné (nezapomeňte vždy uvést odkaz na příslušný duplikát). Ovšem vzhledem ke zmiňovanému množství snímků to bude běh na dlouhou trať. --Vachovec1 (talk) 15:07, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Nejde jen o nízkou fotografickou kvalitu. Některé soubory vypadají např. takto: [2], [3], [4]. Podle mne by je měli správci mazat automaticky.--NoJin (talk) 15:15, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your deletion requests

[edit]

Hi, Please do not request deletion of paintings with rationales such as "low quality" and "unauthorized by the National Gallery in Prague" when the author died more than 70 years ago. These are not valid reason for deletion (see {{PD-Art}} and Commons:When to use the PD-Art tag). If these are duplicate, please provide a link. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:21, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:04. Stanislav Podhrázský, Dívka u stolu (1956), olej, AJG Hluboká.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Túrelio (talk) 20:43, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi NoJin, when did Stanislav Podhrázský die? His works are likely still in copyright (70 years pma). --Túrelio (talk) 20:43, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, do not worry, as always, permission of the copyright owner has been sent to OTRS this morning.--NoJin (talk) 20:53, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, great. However, you should then add to each image-page {{OTRS pending}} . --Túrelio (talk) 21:02, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Odstraňování kategorií People of Czechia in…

[edit]

Dobrý den, nevím, jestli je to záměr, nebo omyl. Kategorie jsou v pořádku a bude potřeba je tam zase vrátit. Defaultsort se obvykle používá v kategoriích, pokud chcete řazení použít jen v kategorii svých portrétů, dejte řadicí klíč jen do této kategorie. V kategorii osoby je to nesmyslné řazení, tam by bylo lepší např. podle roku. A v řazení je lepší nepoužívat diakritiku, zde se řadí podle anglické abecedy. Děkuji za pochopení. Gumruch (talk) 18:56, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS pending

[edit]

Dobrý den, chtěl bych jenom poprosit, pokud nahráváte fotky, ke kterým autoři odesílají povolení na OTRS, vkládejte k nim prosím šablonu {{OTRS pending}}. Zpracovat povolení nám někdy může trvat trochu déle a právě šablona OTRS pending je informace pro patrolu (či jak tomu tady říkají), aby fotku neoznačila ke smazání. Díky, --Michal Lenc (talk) 15:59, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Karel Balcar, USB (2017), olej na plátně 60 x 55 cm.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:04, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Karel Balcar, Sufficit unum (2016), olej na plátně 132 x 107 cm.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:04, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Karel Balcar, bunny (2017), olej na plátně 93 x 72 cm.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:04, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Karel Balcar, Self-tied II (2016), olej na plátně 70 x 55 cm.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:05, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Karel Balcar, Recuerdos de la Alhambra (2015), olej na plátně 132 x 128 cm.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:05, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

[edit]
WMF Surveys, 18:22, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey

[edit]
WMF Surveys, 01:20, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

[edit]
WMF Surveys, 00:30, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

[edit]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 20:32, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stefan Milkov, Adam, 2018.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:66. Michal Cihlář, Manual book japan kinbaku, 2018.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Secondarywaltz (talk) 00:20, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jiří Hanák (2016).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

194.79.55.130 11:21, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jsem si toho problému vědom. Fotka je moje, ale měl jsem svůj Nikon v záruční opravě a firma mi půjčila náhradní. Nevšiml jsem si, že v exif datech je zaznamenán jiný majitel. Nevím jak to řešit. Fotografie byla pořízena při fotografování novinářských cen pro Nadaci Český literární fond, která může potvrdit, že fotografem jsem byl já. Předchozího majitele náhradního foťáku neznám a nevím jak ho kontaktovat.--NoJin (talk) 12:58, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Dobrý den, kolego. Doporučil bych autora v metadatech změnit a soubory přehrát (pokud to neumíte ve Vašem fotoeditoru, tak existují i nějaké editory EXIF, viz třeba w:ExifTool nebo se zkuste zeptat třeba zde). Pokud dobře chápu použití, tak by mohlo stačit soubory označit šablonou {{wrong exif|former camera user}}. Gumruch (talk) 20:21, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
File:Martin Velíšek, Renata, 2016.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

GMGtalk 10:50, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:24, 31 October 2019 (UTC) {{OTRS pending}} --NoJin (talk) 23:49, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear NoJin, I assume you did not upload the file without permission of the author, unfortunately it is not clear whether the autor agreed to publish the photo using given licence. You have already added the photo to a page on Czech Wikipedia, however the edit summary on Commons does indicate whether any OTRS e-mail has been sent. JanSuchy (talk) 21:13, 31 January 2020 (UTC) {{OTRS pending}}--NoJin (talk) 23:38, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Přihlaste své fotky do Czech Wiki Photo 2020!

[edit]
Czech Wiki Photo
Czech Wiki Photo

Milí fotografové a editoři projektů Wikimedia,

každý rok společně nahrajete na Commons tisíce svobodných fotografií. Chceme vám všem poděkovat a také vás ocenit. Vyberte ty nejlepší z vašich fotek a přihlaste je do 30. 10. 2020 do soutěže Czech Wiki Photo 2020! Soutěž je otevřená i úplným nováčkům. Autoři tří nejlepších fotek si odnesou vouchery do Foto Škoda a speciální wiki-odznaky. Přihlášené fotky bude hodnotit i Honza Rybář, držitel Czech Press Photo.

Baví vás focení pro Commons i mimo soutěže? Staňte se fotografem Wikimedie, půjčujeme fototechniku a proplácíme cesty - více na Fotíme Česko.

Těšíme se na vaše snímky!
Za spolek Wikimedia Česká republika
Jakub Holzer
jakub.holzer@wikimedia.cz -- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:06, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Zdenek Rykr

[edit]

proč to neděláte sám, když jste přesvečen o falsu, já ne--Martin wolf (talk) 11:04, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

proč bych to měl dělat já, když chyba je vaše? Vy rozeznáte pravý obraz a podpis Zdenka Rykra (respektive pravé podpisy umělců, které nahráváte na Commons)? Upozornil mne na to ředitel GVU Cheb Marcel Fišer. Jestli jste tak přesvědčen o své pravdě, vyřiďte si to s ním. Já figuruji jen jako pošťák, v díle Z. Rykra se nevyznám.--NoJin (talk) 19:18, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello NoJin; I just discovered your discussion with Martin wolf. The picture of the signature is currently nominated for deletion, since it was flagged as a copyright violation. Could you explain the issue on the related nomination page? Cheers, --Andel (talk) 17:20, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Josef Moucha (2019).jpg

[edit]

Dobrý den pane Nosku, na přání pana Josefa Mouchy jsem nahrál upravený portrét, jehož jste autorem. --Gampe (talk) 15:17, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

works of Jenny Hladíková

[edit]

Hi NoJin, I don't want to bother you unnecessarily, but will a OTRS ticket/permission be added to the images in Category:Tapestry by Jenny Hladíková? As the artist is still alive, her works are in copyright, as you are surely aware. --Túrelio (talk) 20:45, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Túrelio, as always, I have permission from the author (Jenny ia a friend of mine). Everything depends on volunteets at permissions-cs@wikimedia.org.--NoJin (talk) 11:55, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Category discussion warning

Featured pictures from the Art Library Project has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Eureka Lott 20:22, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Posters by Badiucao, Prague Metro (1.2.2022) I.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PlanespotterA320 (talk) 01:04, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Posters by Badiucao, Prague Metro (1.2.2022) II.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PlanespotterA320 (talk) 01:04, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Posters by Badiucao, Prague (31.1.2022) XIII.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PlanespotterA320 (talk) 01:05, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Posters by Badiucao, Prague Metro (1.2.2022) VII.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PlanespotterA320 (talk) 01:05, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Posters by Badiucao, Prague Metro (1.2.2022) III.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PlanespotterA320 (talk) 01:06, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Posters by Badiucao, Prague Metro (1.2.2022) IV.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PlanespotterA320 (talk) 01:06, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Posters by Badiucao, Prague Metro (1.2.2022) V.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PlanespotterA320 (talk) 01:06, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Posters by Badiucao, Prague Metro (1.2.2022) VI.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PlanespotterA320 (talk) 01:07, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Posters by Badiucao, Prague (31.1.2022) XVI.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PlanespotterA320 (talk) 01:07, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Posters by Badiucao, Prague (31.1.2022) XV.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PlanespotterA320 (talk) 01:08, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Posters by Badiucao, Prague (31.1.2022) XIV.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PlanespotterA320 (talk) 01:08, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Posters by Badiucao, Prague (31.1.2022) XII.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PlanespotterA320 (talk) 01:08, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Posters by Badiucao, Prague (31.1.2022) XI.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PlanespotterA320 (talk) 01:09, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Posters by Badiucao, Prague (31.1.2022) X.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PlanespotterA320 (talk) 01:09, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Posters by Badiucao, Prague (31.1.2022) II.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PlanespotterA320 (talk) 01:09, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Posters by Badiucao, Prague (31.1.2022) I.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PlanespotterA320 (talk) 01:10, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Posters by Badiucao, Prague (31.1.2022) III.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PlanespotterA320 (talk) 01:10, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Posters by Badiucao, Prague (31.1.2022) IV.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PlanespotterA320 (talk) 01:10, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Posters by Badiucao, Prague (31.1.2022) IX.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PlanespotterA320 (talk) 01:11, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Posters by Badiucao, Prague (31.1.2022) V.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PlanespotterA320 (talk) 01:11, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Posters by Badiucao, Prague (31.1.2022) VI (2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PlanespotterA320 (talk) 01:11, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Posters by Badiucao, Prague (31.1.2022) VI.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PlanespotterA320 (talk) 01:12, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Posters by Badiucao, Prague (31.1.2022) VII.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PlanespotterA320 (talk) 01:12, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Luděk Sekyra (2017), foto Jaromír Zubák.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 11:55, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--19h00s (talk) 23:09, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Michaela Škultéty (2022).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

87.6.202.31 09:18, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the file https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Kristina_Haidingerov%C3%A1_(2022).jpg or ask Kristina Haidingerova for permission. Thank you! According to CZ law: "V občanském zákoníku (§12) je totiž uvedeno, že ... obrazové snímky a obrazové a zvukové záznamy týkající se fyzické osoby nebo jejích projevů osobní povahy smějí být pořízeny nebo použity jen s jejím svolením." Richard Denatierre (talk) 11:33, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]