Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/09/22
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
|
|
Promotional picture, out of scope Arthur Crbz (talk) 07:36, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: speedily: Spam & screenshot, user page deleted as well, user warned. --Achim (talk) 08:39, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Cropped from https://500px.com/photo/69504847/prac%CC%A7a-da-igreja-do-carmo-diamantina-minas-gerais-brazil-by-eduardo-dias-gontijo Py4nf (talk) 02:58, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb at 10:51, 22 September 2018 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) - --Krdbot 13:18, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
uploaded by accident, violates copyright (my mistake) Daderot (talk) 13:59, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 15:40, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
uploaded by accident, violates copyright (my mistake) Daderot (talk) 14:00, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 15:40, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
File:The military parade in honor of the 70-th anniversary of the end of the Second world war 05.jpg
[edit]与其他文件和页面完全重复 File:Parade in Honour of the Victory in the War of Resistance against Japan 03.jpg Tyg728 (talk) 14:09, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Kept: COM:INUSE, feel free to nominate the other (uploaded later) file as duplicate. --Sealle (talk) 15:30, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:15, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Shohel jas (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused out of COM:SCOPE personal images.
- File:Shohel-jas.jpg
- File:Shohel jas.jpg
- File:Shoheljas13.jpg
- File:Shoheljas14.jpg
- File:Shoheljas12.png
- File:Shoheljas9.jpg
- File:Shoheljas10.jpg
- File:Shoheljas11.png
- File:Shoheljas8.jpg
- File:Shoheljas7.jpg
- File:Shoheljas6.jpg
- File:Shoheljas4.jpg
- File:Shoheljas3.jpg
- File:Shoheljas5.jpg
- File:Shoheljas2.jpg
- File:Shoheljas1.jpg
- File:Shoheljas.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:18, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy deleted. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:31, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
personal photo in WLM Mmrsafy (talk) 09:48, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per contest's rules. -- ~ Nahid Talk 06:47, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
Flickr-washing. This image was posted online (with another from the same shoot) here on 9 August 2016. The white mark in the upper right corner (see https://imgbox.com/nksbX8uS) suggests that it was taken from a magazine. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:33, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 06:27, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
I still do not understand the purpose of this page. I was asked to create it. I tried to upload a photo I took but that was deleted. I don't need this page. It serves no purpose. 24.117.194.97 13:25, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Kept: log in and use {{Speedy}} then. --JuTa 07:49, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
This map is incomplete and incorrect. The map of India does not show the state of Jammu and Kashmir as an integral part of Republic of India. Hence it is misleading. 182.59.73.70 18:48, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Speedy keep Nonsensical nomination. —Gazoth (talk) 20:23, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Kept: its a user page, not a map. --JuTa 07:52, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
Copyright violation. None license of use was presented by the uploader. Leon saudanha (talk) 16:10, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: No license since 2018-09-17. For more information read the introduction of COM:L, about essential information and about Internet images. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 16:11, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
Low res duplicate of File:Gensan.jpg. File:Gensan.jpg's watermark can be removed digitally (cropping or digital photoshop) without the need of a duplicate, inferior-quality file like this. JWilz12345 (talk) 03:28, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected as duplicate. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:14, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
A batch of unused promotional photos. Depicted are people of questionable notability. Probably out of project scope. Licensing template with OTRS permission created by non-OTRS member.
- File:Жбанов игорь викторович 2004 сентябрь 101.jpg
- File:Жбанов игорь викторович 2004 сентябрь 092.jpg
- File:Жбанов игорь викторович 2004 сентябрь 091.jpg
- File:Жбанов игорь викторович 2004 сентябрь 195.jpg
- File:Щербаков пётр леонидович 2002 май 02.jpg
- File:Щербаков пётр леонидович 2002 май 01.jpg
- File:Шнигер николай ульянович 2002 июль 02.jpg
- File:Чжао алексей владимирович 2002 март 04.jpg
- File:Чжао алексей владимирович 2002 март 02.jpg
- File:Чжао алексей владимирович 2002 март 01.jpg
- File:Чжао алексей владимирович 2004 апрель 02.jpg
- File:Чжао алексей владимирович 2004 апрель 01.jpg
- File:Долбин анатолий григорьевич 2002 март 02.jpg
- File:Долбин анатолий григорьевич 2002 март 01.jpg
- File:Дёмина татьяна леонидовна 2002 июль 02.jpg
- File:Дёмина татьяна леонидовна 2002 июль 01.jpg
- File:Баранов константин николаевич 2002 май 01.jpg
- File:Баранов константин николаевич 2002 май 06.jpg
- File:Баранов константин николаевич 2002 май 05.jpg
- File:Баранов константин николаевич 2002 май 04.jpg
- File:Баранов константин николаевич 2002 май 03.jpg
- File:Баранов константин николаевич 2002 май 02.jpg
- File:Вайсман марк азриельевич 2002 июль 02.jpg
- File:Вайсман марк азриельевич 2002 июль 01.jpg
- File:Яковлев сергей владимирович 2002 февраль 02.jpg
- File:Яковлев сергей владимирович 2002 февраль 01.jpg
- File:Яковлев владимир петрович 2002 февраль 02.jpg
- File:Яковлев владимир петрович 2002 февраль 01.jpg
- File:Тарасюк сергей викторович 2002 январь 03.jpg
- File:Тарасюк сергей викторович 2002 январь 02.jpg
- File:Тарасюк сергей викторович 2002 январь 01.jpg
- File:Мищенко владимир семёнович 2002 январь 03.jpg
- File:Мищенко владимир семёнович 2002 январь 02.jpg
- File:Мищенко владимир семёнович 2002 январь 01.jpg
- File:Космодемьянский леонид владимирович 2002 январь.jpg
- File:Ивашкин владимир трофимович 2001 декабрь 04.jpg
- File:Ивашкин владимир трофимович 2001 декабрь 03.jpg
- File:Ивашкин владимир трофимович 2001 декабрь 02.jpg
- File:Ивашкин владимир трофимович 2001 декабрь 01.jpg
- File:Маевская марина викторовна 2001 декабрь.jpg
- File:Лапина татьяна львовна 2001 декабрь 02.jpg
- File:Лапина татьяна львовна 2001 декабрь 01.jpg
- File:Изотова галина николаевна 2002 февраль 02.jpg
- File:Изотова галина николаевна 2002 февраль 01.jpg
- File:Яненко элана константиновна 2001 ноябрь 01.jpg
- File:Мартов алексей георгиевич 2001 ноябрь 03.jpg
- File:Мартов алексей георгиевич 2001 ноябрь 02.jpg
- File:Мартов алексей георгиевич 2001 ноябрь 01.jpg
- File:Камалов армаис альбертович 2001 ноябрь 01.jpg
- File:Виноградов юрий алексеевич 2001 сентябрь.jpg
- File:Бронштейн александр маркович 2001 сентябрь 03.jpg
- File:Бронштейн александр маркович 2001 сентябрь 02.jpg
- File:Бронштейн александр маркович 2001 сентябрь 01.jpg
- File:Александров владимир борисович 2001 сентябрь 01.jpg
- File:Александров владимир борисович 2001 сентябрь 02.jpg
- File:Александров владимир борисович 2001 сентябрь 03.jpg
- File:Передкова елена владимировна 2001 июль 04.jpg
- File:Передкова елена владимировна 2001 июль 03.jpg
- File:Передкова елена владимировна 2001 июль 02.jpg
- File:Передкова елена владимировна 2001 июль 01.jpg
- File:Прощалыкин анатолий иванович 2001 июль 02.jpg
- File:Прощалыкин анатолий иванович 2001 июль 01.jpg
- File:Горячкина людмила александровна 2001 июль 06.jpg
- File:Погребниченко игорь викторович 2004 апрель 140.jpg
- File:Погребниченко игорь викторович 2004 апрель 139.jpg
- File:Горячкина людмила александровна 2001 июль 05.jpg
- File:Горячкина людмила александровна 2001 июль 04.jpg
- File:Горячкина людмила александровна 2001 июль 03.jpg
- File:Горячкина людмила александровна 2001 июль 02.jpg
- File:Горячкина людмила александровна 2001 июль 01.jpg
- File:Липова елена валериевна 2000 октябрь 02.jpg
- File:Липова елена валериевна 2000 октябрь 01.jpg
- File:Скрипникова ирина анатольевна 2001 март 02.jpg
- File:Скрипникова ирина анатольевна 2001 март 01.jpg
- File:Тамразова ольга борисовна 2000 октябрь.jpg
- File:Лепарский евгений анатольевич 2001 март 03.jpg
- File:Лепарский евгений анатольевич 2001 март 02.jpg
- File:Лепарский евгений анатольевич 2001 март 01.jpg
- File:Арзуманов виктор сергеевич 2004 апрель 025.jpg
- File:Стулин игорь дмитриевич 2004 апрель 092.jpg
- File:Стулин игорь дмитриевич 2004 апрель 091.jpg
- File:Семченко сергей борисович 2004 апрель 060.jpg
- File:Семченко сергей борисович 2004 апрель 058.jpg
- File:Тищенко павел дмитриевич 2004 апрель 173.jpg
- File:Резник олег николаевич 2004 апрель 064.jpg
- File:Больница-1996-07.pdf
- File:Охотский владимир павлович 2001 март 06.jpg
- File:Охотский владимир павлович 2001 март 05.jpg
- File:Охотский владимир павлович 2001 март 04.jpg
- File:Охотский владимир павлович 2001 март 03.jpg
- File:Охотский владимир павлович 2001 март 02.jpg
- File:Охотский владимир павлович 2001 март 01.jpg
- File:Томилина наталья аркадьевна 2004 апрель 179.jpg
- File:Тищенко павел дмитриевич 2004 апрель 199.jpg
- File:Больница-1996-08.pdf
- File:Рабинович юлиан яковлевич 2006 сентябрь 210.jpg
- File:Рабинович юлиан яковлевич 2006 сентябрь 202.jpg
- File:Матушевская валентина никитична 2004 февраль 134.jpg
- File:Матушевская валентина никитична 2004 февраль 128.jpg
- File:Матушевская валентина никитична 2004 февраль 126.jpg
- File:Матушевская валентина никитична 2004 февраль 125.jpg
- File:Матушевская валентина никитична 2004 февраль 123.jpg
- File:Матушевская валентина никитична 2004 февраль 121.jpg
- File:Буравихина татьяна амаяковна 2006 сентябрь 90.jpg
- File:Буравихина татьяна амаяковна 2006 сентябрь 85.jpg
- File:Буравихина татьяна амаяковна 2006 сентябрь 83.jpg
- File:Данилычева инна владимировна 2000 июнь 01.jpg
- File:Левин яков иосифович 2000 август 04.jpg
- File:Левин яков иосифович 2000 август 03.jpg
- File:Левин яков иосифович 2000 август 02.jpg
- File:Левин яков иосифович 2000 август 01.jpg
- File:Данилычева инна владимировна 2000 июнь 02.jpg
- File:Феденко елена сергеевна 2000 июнь 02.jpg
- File:Феденко елена сергеевна 2000 июнь 01.jpg
- File:Нии фтизиопульмонологии 2003 май 02.jpg
- File:Соколова галина борисовна 2003 май 03.jpg
- File:Соколова галина борисовна 2003 май 02.jpg
- File:Соколова галина борисовна 2003 май 01.jpg
- File:Люсов виктор алексеевич 2000 май 05.jpg
- File:Люсов виктор алексеевич 2000 май 04.jpg
- File:Люсов виктор алексеевич 2000 май 03.jpg
- File:Люсов виктор алексеевич 2000 май 02.jpg
- File:Люсов виктор алексеевич 2000 май 01.jpg
- File:Тардов михаил владимирович 2000 лицо.jpg
- File:Станулис анатолий иванович 2003 февраль 01.jpg
- File:Станулис анатолий иванович 2003 февраль 02.jpg
- File:Станулис анатолий иванович 2003 февраль 03.jpg
- File:Пашинян гурген амаякович 2003 февраль 06.jpg
- File:Пашинян гурген амаякович 2003 февраль 05.jpg
- File:Пашинян гурген амаякович 2003 февраль 04.jpg
- File:Пашинян гурген амаякович 2003 февраль 03.jpg
- File:Пашинян гурген амаякович 2003 февраль 02.jpg
- File:Каабак михаил михайлович 2001 апрель 01.jpg
- File:Евсиков евгений михайлович 2000 май 04.jpg
- File:Евсиков евгений михайлович 2000 май 03.jpg
- File:Евсиков евгений михайлович 2000 май 02.jpg
- File:Евсиков евгений михайлович 2000 май 01.jpg
- File:Сандриков валерий александрович 2004 сентябрь 066.jpg
- File:Сандриков валерий александрович 2004 сентябрь 065.jpg
- File:Борисов сергей евгеньевич 2003 май 03.jpg
- File:Борисов сергей евгеньевич 2003 май 02.jpg
- File:Борисов сергей евгеньевич 2003 май 01.jpg
- File:Валов алексей леонидович 2001 апрель 03.jpg
- File:Валов алексей леонидович 2001 апрель 01.jpg
- File:Валов алексей леонидович 2001 апрель 02.jpg
- File:Шварков сергей борисович 2000 август 03.jpg
- File:Шварков сергей борисович 2000 август 02.jpg
- File:Шварков сергей борисович 2000 август 01.jpg
- File:Клименко василий сергеевич 2006 сентябрь 193.jpg
- File:Бунятян армен артаваздович 2005 сентябрь 093.jpg
- File:Бунятян армен артаваздович 2005 сентябрь 102.jpg
- File:Бунятян армен артаваздович 2005 сентябрь 098.jpg
- File:Бунятян армен артаваздович 2005 сентябрь 094.jpg
- File:Клименко василий сергеевич 2006 сентябрь 185.jpg
- File:Клименко василий сергеевич 2006 сентябрь 184.jpg
- File:Осауленко анатолий васильевич 2003 май 02.jpg
- File:Осауленко анатолий васильевич 2003 май 01.jpg
- File:Дедов иван иванович 2003 декабрь 07.jpg
- File:Дедов иван иванович 2003 декабрь 06.jpg
- File:Дедов иван иванович 2003 декабрь 05.jpg
- File:Дедов иван иванович 2003 декабрь 03.jpg
- File:Миланов николай олегович 2004 сентябрь 18.jpg
- File:Миланов николай олегович 2004 сентябрь 17.jpg
- File:Миланов николай олегович 2004 сентябрь 15.jpg
- File:Миланов николай олегович 2004 сентябрь 09.jpg
- File:Миланов николай олегович 2004 сентябрь 01.jpg
- File:Миланов николай олегович 2006 сентябрь 05.jpg
- File:Миланов николай олегович 2006 сентябрь 04.jpg
- File:Константинов борис алексеевич 2005 88.jpg
- File:Константинов борис алексеевич 2005 87.jpg
- File:Константинов борис алексеевич 2005 86.jpg
- File:Константинов борис алексеевич 2005 84.jpg
- File:Шумаков валерий иванович 2004 апрель 40.jpg
- File:Яворовский андрей георгиевич 2004 сентябрь 134.jpg
- File:Яворовский андрей георгиевич 2006 сентябрь 30.jpg
- File:Яворовский андрей георгиевич 2006 сентябрь 28.jpg
- File:Яворовский андрей георгиевич 2006 сентябрь 24.jpg
- File:Шабалкин борис владимирович 2006 сентябрь 119.jpg
- File:Шабалкин борис владимирович 2006 сентябрь 114.jpg
- File:Шабалкин борис владимирович 2006 сентябрь 112.jpg
- File:Шабалкин борис владимирович 2006 сентябрь 105.jpg
- File:Шабалкин борис владимирович 2006 сентябрь 103.jpg
- File:Трекова нина александровна 2005 20.jpg
- File:Трекова нина александровна 2005 09.jpg
- File:Трекова нина александровна 2005 08.jpg
- File:Больница-1996-10.pdf
- File:Больница-1996-11.pdf
- File:Больница-1996-06.pdf
- File:Больница-1996-05.pdf
- File:Больница-1996-09.pdf
- File:Больница-1996-12.pdf
- File:Ерёменко александр анатольевич 2006 сентябрь 150.jpg
- File:Ерёменко александр анатольевич 2006 сентябрь 147.jpg
- File:Данилов андрей борисович 2000 август 04.jpg
- File:Данилов андрей борисович 2000 август 03.jpg
- File:Данилов андрей борисович 2000 август 02.jpg
- File:Данилов андрей борисович 2000 август 01.jpg
- File:Вейн александр моисеевич 2000 август 03.jpg
- File:Вейн александр моисеевич 2000 август 02.jpg
- File:Вейн александр моисеевич 2000 август 01.jpg
- File:Вознесенская татьяна грациевна 2000 август 04.jpg
- File:Вознесенская татьяна грациевна 2000 август 03.jpg
- File:Вознесенская татьяна грациевна 2000 август 02.jpg
- File:Вознесенская татьяна грациевна 2000 август 01.jpg
- File:Бунятян армен артаваздович 2006 сентябрь 15.jpg
- File:Бунятян армен артаваздович 2006 сентябрь 13.jpg
- File:Бунятян армен артаваздович 2006 сентябрь 11.jpg
- File:Бунятян армен артаваздович 2006 сентябрь 09.jpg
- File:Григорьян ольга николаевна 2004 45.jpg
- File:Стенин алексей николаевич 2004 февраль 149.jpg
- File:Стенин алексей николаевич 2004 февраль 146.jpg
- File:Стенин алексей николаевич 2004 февраль 143.jpg
- File:Стенин алексей николаевич 2004 февраль 140.jpg
- File:Соколов владислав иванович 2005 127.jpg
- File:Ерёменко александр анатольевич 2006 сентябрь 153.jpg
- File:Ерёменко александр анатольевич 2006 сентябрь 140.jpg
- File:Бунятян карина арменовна 2005 сентябрь 123.jpg
- File:Чеботникова татьяна викторовна 2003 декабрь 03.jpg
- File:Чеботникова татьяна викторовна 2003 декабрь 02.jpg
- File:Чеботникова татьяна викторовна 2003 декабрь 01.jpg
- File:Гавриленко александр васильевич 2006 сентябрь 168.jpg
- File:Гавриленко александр васильевич 2006 сентябрь 167.jpg
- File:Гавриленко александр васильевич 2006 сентябрь 165.jpg
- File:Клюжев вячеслав михайлович 2001 май 05.jpg
- File:Клюжев вячеслав михайлович 2001 май 04.jpg
- File:Клюжев вячеслав михайлович 2001 май 03.jpg
- File:Клюжев вячеслав михайлович 2001 май 02.jpg
- File:Клюжев вячеслав михайлович 2001 май 01.jpg
- File:Ардашев вячеслав николаевич 2001 май 03.jpg
- File:Ардашев вячеслав николаевич 2001 май 02.jpg
- File:Ардашев вячеслав николаевич 2001 май 01.jpg
- File:Яворовский андрей георгиевич 2006 сентябрь 31.jpg
- File:Яворовский андрей георгиевич 2004 сентябрь 138.jpg
- File:Яворовский андрей георгиевич 2005 сентябрь 072.jpg
- File:Яворовский андрей георгиевич 2005 сентябрь 073.jpg
- File:Сандриков валерий александрович 2004 сентябрь 064.jpg
- File:Сандриков валерий александрович 2004 сентябрь 061.jpg
- File:Выжигина маргарита александровна 2005 112.jpg
- File:Выжигина маргарита александровна 2005 111.jpg
- File:Выжигина маргарита александровна 2005 109.jpg
- File:Анищук ольга ефимовна 2003 апрель 4037.jpg
- File:Анищук ольга ефимовна 2003 апрель 4034.jpg
- File:Анищук ольга ефимовна 2003 апрель 4019.jpg
- File:Аронов давид меерович 2003 апрель 4001.jpg
- File:Аронов давид меерович 2003 апрель 3999.jpg
- File:Аронов давид меерович 2003 апрель 3994.jpg
- File:Власов геннадий павлович 1998 ноябрь 02.jpg
- File:Власов геннадий павлович 1998 ноябрь 01.jpg
- File:Власов геннадий павлович 1998 ноябрь коллеги.jpg
- File:Оганов рафаэль гегамович 1997 октябрь 02.jpg
- File:Ерёменко александр анатольевич 2004 215.jpg
- File:Оганов рафаэль гегамович 2003 апрель 01.jpg
- File:Миланов николай олегович 2005 137.jpg
- File:Миланов николай олегович 2005 133.jpg
- File:Миланов николай олегович 2005 131.jpg
- File:Трекова нина александровна 2005 01.jpg
- File:Сандриков валерий александрович 2006 30.jpg
- File:Сандриков валерий александрович 2006 29.jpg
- File:Сандриков валерий александрович 2006 21.jpg
- File:Сандриков валерий александрович 2006 19.jpg
- File:Сандриков валерий александрович 2006 15.jpg
- File:Сандриков валерий александрович 2006 10.jpg
- File:Сандриков валерий александрович 2006 01.jpg
- File:Константинов борис алексеевич 2005 79.jpg
- File:Константинов борис алексеевич 2005 77.jpg
- File:Миланов николай олегович 2006 сентябрь 02.jpg
- File:Миланов николай олегович 2006 сентябрь 01.jpg
- File:Константинов борис алексеевич 2004 сентябрь 69.jpg
- File:Перельман михаил израилевич 2003 май 06.jpg
- File:Перельман михаил израилевич 2003 май 05.jpg
- File:Перельман михаил израилевич 2003 май 02.jpg
- File:Перельман михаил израилевич 2003 май 01.jpg
- File:Константинов борис алексеевич 2004 сентябрь 68.jpg
- File:Готье сергей владимирович 2004 апрель 110.jpg
- File:Готье сергей владимирович 2004 апрель 108.jpg
- File:Готье сергей владимирович 2004 апрель 187.jpg
- File:Готье сергей владимирович 2004 апрель 162.jpg
- File:Готье сергей владимирович 2001 апрель 03.jpg
- File:Готье сергей владимирович 2001 апрель 02.jpg
- File:Готье сергей владимирович 2001 апрель 01.jpg
- File:Мельниченко галина афанасьевна 2003 декабрь 04.jpg
- File:Мельниченко галина афанасьевна 2003 декабрь 03.jpg
- File:Мельниченко галина афанасьевна 2003 декабрь 01.jpg
- File:Шумаков валерий иванович 2004 апрель 02.jpg
- File:Шумаков валерий иванович 2001 апрель 02.jpg
- File:Шумаков валерий иванович 2001 апрель 01.jpg
- File:Скрипкин юрий константинович 1999 май 02.jpg
- File:Беленков юрий никитич 1999 июль 02.jpg
- File:Баранов александр александрович 1999 октябрь 01.jpg
- File:Больница-1997-11-12.pdf
- File:Больница-1997-10.pdf
- File:Больница-1997-08.pdf
- File:Больница-1997-07.pdf
- File:Больница-1997-05-06.pdf
- File:Больница-1997-04.pdf
- File:Больница-1997-03.pdf
- File:Больница-1997-02.pdf
- File:Больница-1999-09-10.pdf
- File:Перельман михаил израилевич 1998 декабрь 02.jpg
- File:Перельман михаил израилевич 1998 декабрь 01.jpg
- File:Больница-2005-09.pdf
- File:Больница-2006-09.pdf
- File:Шапаренко михаил васильевич 2000 октябрь.jpg
- File:Клюжев вячеслав ардашев вячеслав 2001 май.jpg
- File:Готье сергей владимирович 2002 март 01.jpg
- File:Константинов борис алексеевич 1998 февраль 02.jpg
- File:Константинов борис алексеевич 2004 сентябрь 01.jpg
- File:Больница-2004-09.pdf
- File:Больница-2004-03-04.pdf
- File:Больница-2004-01-02.pdf
- File:Больница-2003-12.pdf
- File:Больница-2003-08.pdf
- File:Больница-2003-06-07.pdf
- File:Больница-2003-05.pdf
- File:Больница-2003-04.pdf
- File:Больница-2003-03.pdf
- File:Больница-2003-02.pdf
- File:Больница-2003-01.pdf
- File:Больница-2002-10-11.pdf
- File:Больница-2002-02.pdf
- File:Больница-2002-12.pdf
- File:Больница-2002-08-09.pdf
- File:Больница-2002-06-07.pdf
- File:Больница-2002-04-05.pdf
- File:Больница-2002-03.pdf
- File:Больница-2002-01.pdf
- File:Больница-1998-12.pdf
- File:Больница-1998-11.pdf
- File:Больница-1998-10.pdf
- File:Больница-1998-08.pdf
- File:Больница-1998-07.pdf
- File:Больница-1998-06.pdf
- File:Больница-1998-05.pdf
- File:Больница-1998-04.pdf
- File:Больница-1998-03.pdf
- File:Больница-1998-02.pdf
- File:Больница-1998-01.pdf
- File:Больница-2001-12.pdf
- File:Больница-2001-10-11.pdf
- File:Больница-2001-06-07.pdf
- File:Больница-2001-08-09.pdf
- File:Больница-1999-01-02.pdf
- File:Больница-1999-12.pdf
- File:Больница-1999-11.pdf
- File:Больница-1999-08.pdf
- File:Больница-1999-06-07.pdf
- File:Больница-1999-05.pdf
- File:Больница-1999-04.pdf
- File:Больница-1999-03.pdf
- File:Больница-2001-05.pdf
- File:Больница-2001-04.pdf
- File:Больница-2001-02-03.pdf
- File:Больница-2001-01.pdf
- File:Больница-2000-11-12.pdf
- File:Больница-2000-09-10.pdf
- File:Больница-2000-07-08.pdf
- File:Больница-2000-06.pdf
- File:Больница-2000-04-05.pdf
- File:Больница-2000-03.pdf
- File:Больница-2000-02.pdf
Sealle (talk) 08:05, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- As a quick reaction. I confirm Ticket:2018050410007345 and template {{Газета-больница-лицензия}} are valid. The creation of the template was approved by the OTRS agent (not me). --sasha (krassotkin) 18:54, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Данная газета существовала в 1993—2006 годах, находится в архиве редактора данной газеты, что и было подтверждено мною в OTRS, Ticket:2018050410007345. О рекламе нет и речи. Все фотографии и текст были созданы сотрудниками газеты по заданию и являющиеся служебными произведениями. Некоторые фото используются в статьях русской Википедии, некоторые материалы согласились использовать проекты Викиновостях и Викитека. Шаблон OTRS создан один из агентов OTRS. Просьба, данные материалы Keep. С уважением, --Dogad75 (talk) 09:47, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
- After detailed investigation:
- There is one of the leading Russian clinical hospital newspaper (Газета «Больница» - Newspaper "Hospital") in pdf-files. See w:ru:Городская клиническая больница имени С. П. Боткина (Botkin Hospital). Many years ago this newspaper ceased to exist but its publisher kindly gave us archive of issues under a free license. This is stated in the ticket Ticket:2018050410007345. See also news in Russian n:ru:Врачам и пациентам: газета «Больница» передала Викискладу уникальные номера и фотографии (To doctors and patients: the newspaper "Hospital" has transferred unique issues and photos to Wikimedia Commons).
- The Wikinews community decided after the discussion to publish all the issues of this newspaper on the project following the example: n:ru:Газета «Больница», 2000 год, номер 1 (The newspaper "Hospital", 2000, 1).
- The Wikisource community also found it appropriate to post these issues on Wikisource pages in its own format.
- In addition the publisher handed us originals of photos of people who were interviewed. There are academicians and correspondence members of Russian Academy of Sciences, doctors of sciences, heads of leading clinics and institutes, others leading medical specialists - all those whom the newspaper considered important, in order to write about them.
- All uploaded photos are described in detail in Russian. For example from the list above: File:Ивашкин владимир трофимович 2001 декабрь 01.jpg (2, 3, 4). From the Russian description: "Vladimir Ivashkin is a Doctor of Medicine; Professor; Major General of Medical Service; Head of the Department of Propaedeutics of Internal Medicine of First Moscow State Medical University; Director of the Clinic for Propaedeutics of Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology, Hepatology of First Moscow State Medical University; Academician of Russian Academy of Medical Sciences; Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Chief Gastroenterologist Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation; Honored Scientist of the Russian Federation". See Wikipedia article about him: w:ru:Ивашкин, Владимир Трофимович. "Questionable notability"? Hmm...
- As a summary. These are not promotional files because this newspaper has not existed for a long time. The archive of the newspaper obtained as a result of our propaganda of free content and Wikimedia Commons. All these files are directly planned to be used in Wikimedia projects. All the people shown in the photos are notable because the profile newspaper decided to write about their merits or interviewed them. We need to keep these files: Keep. --sasha (krassotkin) 12:22, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
- Keep, used: w:ru:Баранов, Александр Александрович (педиатр), w:ru:Беленков, Юрий Никитич, w:ru:Скрипкин, Юрий Константинович, w:ru:Шумаков, Валерий Иванович, w:ru:Мельниченко, Галина Афанасьевна, w:ru:Готье, Сергей Владимирович, w:ru:Константинов, Борис Алексеевич etc--Леонид Макаров (talk) 20:51, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
- Keep, nothing "promotional", these are licensially correct archives that have historical and encyclopedic value. Was discussed previously at Wikisource and Wikinews. The terms like "promotional" are constantly hardly abused at Russian Wikipedia and may not be furtherly used for such purposes. --ssr (talk) 22:09, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
- "Notability" at Commons?? --ssr (talk) 04:34, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
- Оставить, тут и думать нечего, номинация не основана на правилах. Nomination is not based on rules of project. Фред-Продавец звёзд (talk) 07:39, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
- Keep, of course, and nomination looks quite strange for an experienced administrator: most of the persons are notable and photos of them have nothing promotional; moreover, as is said above, other Wikiproject have plans to use this pictures. Wikisaurus (talk) 11:47, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
- Keep, и присоединюсь к вопросу: «Вот какая польза от такой деятельности Sealle?» (Wikisaurus) -- S, AV 17:10, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn as per a disinterested admin's suggestion. --Sealle (talk) 21:28, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
Can't see the word clearly, not a good one B dash (talk) 08:15, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- @B dash: why is white text on a transparent background bad? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 09:02, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- My computer display is like this. --B dash (talk) 09:10, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- @B dash: that's just what Commons does on file pages, adding a white and grey checkered background. As you see on the right, the image is fine. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 20:26, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Kept, I withdraw my nomination. --B dash (talk) 03:06, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
No indication that the author has been dead for 70 years Aymatth2 (talk) 19:41, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Note that it comes from a compilation of photographs that the BnF presumably considers to be a en:collective work (France) in the public domain since it was published more than 70 years ago. But can the photograph be extracted from the collective work and published in a different context? If it was created around 1880, when Vinson was in his mid-30s, the photographer could have been alive 70 years ago. E.g. if the photographer was 20 and lived to 90, he would have died in 1880+70 = 1950. Aymatth2 (talk) 19:44, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- 1883 is old enough to be PD-old-assumed. But if closing admin thinks COM:PCP should have us assume an 1950 death date, then be sure to include it with the Undelete in 2021 category. My opinion would be a soft keep but I don't have strong feelings on it one way or the other. Abzeronow (talk) 20:10, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- That's a bad assumption. Pierre Jacques Smit published illustrations starting ca. 1883 and died in 1960. —innotata 17:48, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
- 1883 is old enough to be PD-old-assumed. But if closing admin thinks COM:PCP should have us assume an 1950 death date, then be sure to include it with the Undelete in 2021 category. My opinion would be a soft keep but I don't have strong feelings on it one way or the other. Abzeronow (talk) 20:10, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Obviously. --Yann (talk) 15:53, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Yann: The photographer could have taken the picture as a 18-year-old apprentice in 1883, then lived past age 82. Or as a 22-year-old, lived past age 86, etc. Unlikely, perhaps, but not wildly implausible. There is significant doubt about whether the image if free. Aymatth2 (talk) 16:52, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
- No. @Aymatth2: There is no significant doubt. Please do not create such senseless claim. Thanks, Yann (talk) 16:59, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Yann: My grandparents were all born in the 19th century. They had relatively comfortable lives, and three of them lived into their eighties. My maternal grandmother was born in 1883 and died in 1973, aged eighty nine. Any photographs or other creative works by any of them would still be covered by copyright. In the case of my grandmother, who painted and wrote poetry, copyright would last until 2043. Aymatth2 (talk) 18:55, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
- Sure, but that beside the point. Regards, Yann (talk) 03:11, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
- If my grandmother had been born twenty years earlier, took the picture when she was twenty, and lived as long as she did live, it would be covered by copyright until 2023. This is a plausible scenario. There is significant doubt about whether the image if free. Aymatth2 (talk) 12:43, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
- No. You don't understand what "significant doubt" means. It is not about a particular case, but about the probability that the file would still not be in the public domain. And that probability is very low. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:59, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
- Delete In the EU (etc.) you need to know who the creator of a work was or know that the creator is unknown to assume it is public domain. Unless such documentation is provided, we shouldn't be saying it's public domain in its source country and this can't be safely reused unconditionally by people in the EU. Aymatth2 is right. —innotata 17:48, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: ridiculous request. The image comes from the National Library of France, which asserts that it is in the public domain. If you want to contest the copyright status, write to them. --Yann (talk) 05:37, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by أحمد سمير محمد طه طلبة (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused out of COM:SCOPE personal images.
- File:الجامعة العربية.jpg
- File:بعد ختام الاحتفال.jpg
- File:بداية الاحتفال.jpg
- File:يوم السلام بجامعة الدول العربية.jpg
- File:بهو الجامعة العربية.jpg
- File:أثناء التحضير.jpg
- File:من داخل القاعة الكبرى بجامعة الدول العربية.jpg
- File:صورة تجمعني بالدكتور خالد العتر.jpg
- File:صورة تجمعني بنجمة الإعلام العربي حنان الشبينى.jpg
- File:صورة تجمعني بنجم الخليج داوود حسين.jpg
- File:صورة تجمعني بالفنانة عبير.jpg
- File:يوم السلام العالمي بجامعة الدول العربية.jpg
- File:صورة تجمعني مع الإعلاميين.jpg
- File:صورة تجمعني بالفنان شريف خيرالله.jpg
- File:صورة تجمعني بالفنانة سمية الخشاب.jpg
- File:صورة تجمعني بالسفير شريف الجمل.jpg
- File:الاحتفال بيوم السلام العالمي.jpg
- File:صورة تجمعني مع الإعلامية حنان الشبينى.jpg
- File:في أول زيارة رسمية لجامعة الدول العربية.jpg
- File:صورة تجمعني مع الفنانة سمية الخشاب.jpg
- File:مدير تحرير قناة صوت النيل الفضائية أحمد سمير.jpg
- File:صورة تجمعني مع الإعلامية التونسية كريمة موليهي.jpg
- File:اجتماع قمة الوزراء العرب.jpg
- File:الصحفي والإعلامي- أحمد سمير محمد.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:17, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~MOHEEN (keep talking) 10:27, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by أحمد سمير محمد طه طلبة (talk · contribs)
[edit]Various documents and one logo, not own works. Uncertain copyright, and dubiously in scope.
- File:ملف الأكاديمية لندن الدولية للإعلام والفنون.pdf
- File:ASM ملف أكاديمية لندن الدولية للإعلام والفنون.pdf
- File:صاحب الإمتيار ورئيس مجلس الإدارة الإعلامي-أحمد سمير محمد.jpg
- File:MASR ELARABIA New.jpg
- File:MASR ELARABIA NEW.jpg
- File:جريدة مصر العربية نيو.jpg
- File:ASM LONDON INTERNATIONAL MEDIA AND ARTS.png
- File:ASM LONDON INTERNATIONAL MEDIA AND ARTS ACADEMY.png
- File:ASM LONDON INTERNATIONAL.png
- File:Companies House.png
- File:The Hague Convention.png
- File:ASM LONDON INTERNATIONAL MEDIA AND ARTS ACADEMY LIMITED.png
Yann (talk) 19:44, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:35, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vvvvvvvidal (talk · contribs)
[edit]All the images uploaded by this user are poorly sourced. One cites Wikipedia as a source while the others are just images found on the Internet.
—Cpt.a.haddock (talk) (please ping when replying) 13:22, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~MOHEEN (keep talking) 10:27, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:Rajdeep grewal.jpg
- File:દહદનસમમટદિષનષન.jpg
- File:Rajdeep Grewal.jpg
- File:Scientist Rajdeep Singh Grewal.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~MOHEEN (keep talking) 10:28, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
Files of User:Naharfashionistas
[edit]- File:Bazaar magazine.jpg
- File:Alostoura Magazine.jpg
- File:Saudi Gazzette.tif
- File:Nahar for alostoura magazine 1.jpg
Magazine clippings and photos, copyrighted unless there is evidence otherwise. The uploader claims to be the person in the last photo and says it is a photoshoot for a magazine, so unlikely own work, need permission from the photographer. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 14:49, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~MOHEEN (keep talking) 10:28, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kawilmagaza (talk · contribs)
[edit]small resolutions. do not look like own works.
- File:Mitr Evseviy.jpg
- File:Mitr Evsevy.jpg
- File:1995-fil intr.JPG
- File:Patr Fil.jpg
- File:Патріарх Мстислав.jpg
Anatoliy (talk) 20:09, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~MOHEEN (keep talking) 11:21, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by SabaFatima123456789 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused out of COM:SCOPE personal images.
- File:Saba at Marina Beach.jpg
- File:Monument outside Marina Beach.jpg
- File:Saba at temple.jpg
- File:Qutub shahi tombs Hyderabad..Saba enjoying.jpg
- File:Qutub shahi tombs Hyderabad 03.jpg
- File:Qutub shahi tombs Hyderabad WID saba.jpg
- File:Gate of CHOWMAHALLA PALACE.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:43, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~MOHEEN (keep talking) 11:20, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
File:The book of Ser Marco Polo - the Venetian concerning the kingdoms and marvels of the East (1903) (14766372571).jpg
[edit]Poorly cropped (by a bot) version of File:The book of Ser Marco Polo - the Venetian concerning the kingdoms and marvels of the East (1903) (14582831830).jpg. Uninteresting to anyone for any reason. The better version should be cropped if necessary. Broichmore (talk) 11:46, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- The cropping was by an Internet Archive project rather than a Commons projects. Refer to Category:Files from Internet Archive Book Images Flickr stream which promotes using Category:Internet Archive (uncrop needed). Try that before raising a DR on in-scope scans of old illustrative images from books thanks. Keep --Fæ (talk) 11:58, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- This file was uploaded incorrectly twice by people not arsed to check what they upload in the first place. On top of that I already uploaded the uncropped version elsewhere. So why apply for uncropping it again. It will now be the same file on the system, twice. Broichmore (talk) 12:08, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected as duplicate. --JuTa 17:11, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
Outside of project scope - this has no conceivable encyclopedic use B (talk) 04:36, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:42, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
Personal picture, out of scope. Arthur Crbz (talk) 07:33, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:42, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
Unused, poor quality, small size. Arthur Crbz (talk) 07:41, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:42, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Seedsofmary (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not free images. One was made by Mickael Tirat (according to fr wiki), one by Didier Rivet and the others are CD cover. Autorizations needed, see Commons:OTRS/fr
- File:Seeds Of Mary EP.jpg
- File:The Blackbird & The Dying Sun.jpg
- File:Choose Your Lie.jpg
- File:The Sun Sessions.jpg
- File:Seedsofmary2018.jpg
- File:Seedsofmary2016.jpg
Shev123 (talk) 06:56, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:31, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Solomon203 (talk) 06:37, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:37, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kotofey2016 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Derivatives of non-free 3D objects.
Sealle (talk) 07:51, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:37, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
Artist Herb Greene is alive and his works are protected by the copyright law. His express written permission is needed to release his works under a free license. The evidence of permission can be provided using COM:OTRS. Please also see [1] and [2] which show no indication of a free license.
4nn1l2 (talk) 09:26, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
No indication of a free license. http://www.getty.edu/research/library/using/reproductions_permissions/index.html states "Images not in the public domain may be downloaded for personal study, noncommercial use, or for fair use as defined in the United States copyright law." Works uploaded to Wikimedia Commons should be allowed for commercial use. Furthermore, fair use is not allowed. Therefore, permission of rights holder should be obtained to release these works under a free license so that anybody can use them for any purpose in anytime. Evidence of permission can be provided using COM:OTRS.
- File:Herb Greene Cunningham House 1964 photo by Julius Shulman © J. Paul Getty Trust. Getty Research Institute, Los Angeles (2004.R.10).jpg
- File:Prairie House (west facing) by Herb Greene, 1961. Photo Julius Shulman.jpg
- File:Prairie House by Herb Greene, 1961. Photo Julius Shulman.jpg
- File:Joyce House by Herb Greene,Snyder, OK. Photograph by Julius Shulman 1961.© J. Paul Getty Trust. Getty Research Institute, Los Angeles (2004.R.10).jpg
- File:Joyce House by Herb Greene. Photograph by Julius Shulman, 1961, Snyder OK.jpg
4nn1l2 (talk) 11:00, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:38, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
unidentified and unusable Amada44 talk to me 12:14, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:39, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope. Photo was only used on Wikidata and the item there got deleted due to lack of notability. Probably used for self-promo based on the username that created the item on Wikidata. Mbch331 (talk) 09:14, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:14, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
My parents can't find out I was in Iraq Katringlosauer (talk) 10:08, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as a courtesy. Officially you are two weeks too late, we normally delete on upload request within 7 days after upload. --Jcb (talk) 21:17, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
My parents can't find out I was in Iraq Katringlosauer (talk) 10:09, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as a courtesy. Officially you are two weeks too late, we normally delete on upload request within 7 days after upload. --Jcb (talk) 21:17, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
My parents can't find out I was in Iraq Katringlosauer (talk) 10:09, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as a courtesy. Officially you are two weeks too late, we normally delete on upload request within 7 days after upload. --Jcb (talk) 21:17, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
My parents can't find out I was in Iraq Katringlosauer (talk) 10:09, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as a courtesy. Officially you are two weeks too late, we normally delete on upload request within 7 days after upload. --Jcb (talk) 21:17, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
My parents can't find out I was in Iraq Katringlosauer (talk) 10:10, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as a courtesy. Officially you are two weeks too late, we normally delete on upload request within 7 days after upload. --Jcb (talk) 21:17, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
My parents can't find out I was in Iraq Katringlosauer (talk) 10:10, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as a courtesy. Officially you are two weeks too late, we normally delete on upload request within 7 days after upload. --Jcb (talk) 21:17, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
My parents can't find out I was in Iraq Katringlosauer (talk) 10:10, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as a courtesy. Officially you are two weeks too late, we normally delete on upload request within 7 days after upload. --Jcb (talk) 21:17, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
My parents can't find out I was in Iraq Katringlosauer (talk) 10:10, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as a courtesy. Officially you are two weeks too late, we normally delete on upload request within 7 days after upload. --Jcb (talk) 21:17, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
My parents can't find out I was in Iraq Katringlosauer (talk) 10:11, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as a courtesy. Officially you are two weeks too late, we normally delete on upload request within 7 days after upload. --Jcb (talk) 21:17, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
Personal image that I no longer use. Please delete. Thayts (talk) 13:37, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:18, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Delete This image has been uploaded to me completely, if not mine, please delete — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lakhan Bhatiya (talk • contribs) 09:31, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:18, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sheikhinam (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:18, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:18, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:18, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:19, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:19, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:19, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
Above COM:TOO. Copyrighted logo. Arthur Crbz (talk) 15:49, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:19, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
I think this image does meet threshold of orginality to meric copyright. Jarekt (talk) 19:37, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
This logo image consists only of simple geometric shapes or text. It does not meet the threshold of originality . Simple text logo, text SpongeBob with points.
Per the United States Copyright Office:
familiar symbols or designs; mere variations of typographic ornamentation, lettering, or coloring ... typeface as typefaced are not subject to copyright.
--EEIM (talk) 20:50, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
- As one can see, this image is from here, cut and vectorized. It is not redrawn with a different font, it has up to 100% coincidence of graphic elements other than text. And such a complex font itself is subject to copyright.
- File:SpongeBob SquarePants logo.svg
- when it’s large, it’s better to see, right?·Carn 17:01, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
Everything there, including the points, is part of the font. Fonts have no copyright in the USA. There are only two words here. SpongeBob SQUAREPANTS. The owner is Nickelodeon. The licensing is This logo image consists only of simple geometric shapes or text. It does not meet the threshold of originality. This work includes material that may be protected as a trademark in some jurisdictions. from this web , we can change the source.--EEIM (talk) 09:27, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
- If you use this argument then we could import any image in Commons (including ALL corporate logos): just transform them first to SVG (this can be automated), and build a FONT with it (assign some random letters for monochromatic glyphs, map colors)! Font designs are obviously copyrightable including in the US, if the glyphs are not "mere variations" of "familiar" letters or basic ornementations. However the placement of dots, relative glyph sizes for variation of letters, the choice of color palette, and everything that makes it really unique and clearly identifiable as a reserved trademark, brand or logo means that this image (independantly of the technic used to reproduce it) is effectively subject to copyright.
- May be the font used may not be copyrighted (if glyphs have reusable designs and are not intended for a single use), but after all the ASCII alphabet is also not copyrightable, but the assembly of these Latin letters makes texts that ARE copyrightable. This clearly applies here ! This is for the same reason that databases can also be copyrighted even if all their individual components are not (e.g. a geographic database, or the database containing this wiki and this talk page, even if most individual talks like "+1" are free). verdy_p (talk) 17:03, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- Conclusion: Delete as this obviously violates copyright and this image (even if it's built by using some free elements) is a unique assembly clearly identifiable as a copyrighted logo. The technics used to reproduce the logo (any other numeric image format, including innovative ones) does NOT matter at all. Only the criteria of originality and identifiability matters (and here this is a high fidelity reproduction of a copyrighted design, recreated and published without permission, so here this is clearly not original to get a new authorship and new licencing term; the claimed PD is an obstinated lie)!
- And to the author of this image, @EEIM: , NEVER retry using similar concealing technics, in order to bypass the copyright law: this is a strong failure notice. If you ever retry you'll be subject to sanctions here, for repeated attempts to violate copyrights with repeated false claims that this is only a basic set of letters and simple shapes. So the (worldwide) PD licence is a pure LIE and MUST be removed immediately and adminsitratively (the second licence claim is possible but only for some juridictions, but in fact very few not in Americas and Europe, most parts of Asia and Oceania, except possibly very few countries without working juridictions or not enforcing international copyright law, like Iran, Northern Cyprus, North Korea, Somalia, Yemen, Sudan, South Sudan, or possibly Brunei, Cuba and Venezuela). verdy_p (talk) 17:12, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- Companies usually have a simple variant of the main logo. see main logo and simple variant logo Sony Pictures 2004–present, main logo is cc , but the variant logo is simple.
for example the use of a variant: simple, real poster .
See Logos of television programmes of US .--EEIM (talk) 07:32, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 22:39, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
http://www.bacciguitars.com/portfolio-posts/riccardo-onori/. Besides photographer can't be the person pictured. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:13, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Il file è di proprietà del soggetto che lo aveva ceduto al sito citato. Ora il proprietario lo ha inserito su Flickr dove ha specificato il copyright. Quindi non c'è nessuna violazione. --Nuvolele (talk) 16:56, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. The fact that the subject of the photo has uploaded it to his Flickr account does not say anything about what the photographer allows others to do with this photo. Thuresson (talk) 20:05, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. The subject is the owner of the photo. What else? --Nuvolele (talk) 08:16, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Photographer needs to send permission to COM:OTRS. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 09:43, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: by colleague. --Jcb (talk) 21:19, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alvinavidornab (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photo. Out of project scope.
~MOHEEN (keep talking) 17:37, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:20, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope. Permission has to be sent to COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 17:43, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:20, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:02, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:39, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:02, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:39, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:02, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:39, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:02, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Mein Argument für das Hochladen der Datei, die ich als IMG mit dem Ticket 201809211000 noch einmal zur Verfügung gestellt habe war, dass es derzeit noch keine aktuelle Biografie der Künstlerin Eva Bur am Orde gibt. Die anfangs eingestellte Biografie ist unvollständig und - aus meiner Sicht - enthält sie, obwohl sie im Fließtext abgefasst ist stilistische Mängel. Das ist eine Meinung, wie ich einräume (veralteter Stil welcher, welche, welches und ebenda). Da Frau Bur am Orde diese Biografie autorisiert, signiert und zum Einstellen freigegeben hat, sehe ich darin eine Bereicherung für den Artikel Eva Bur am Orde. Dorthin würde ich ihn gerne verschieben. Eine Kategorisierung Eva Bur am Orde wäre wohl richtig.--Nina Eger (talk) 20:47, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:39, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:03, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:38, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:03, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:38, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:03, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:38, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hamza Ben Jelloun (talk · contribs)
[edit]Vanity photo by banned non-contributing user; see COM:SELFIE.
- File:Abdellah Taïa and Soulaimane Abidy au Salon 2017.jpg
- File:Soulaimane Abidy - Cinéma.jpg
- File:Lamia Berrada-Berca- Ali Benmakhlouf- Soulaimane Abidy.jpg
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:19, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:38, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
Vanity photo by banned non-contributing user; see COM:SELFIE. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:22, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - Out of scope - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 11:29, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:38, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
False date, out of COM:SCOPE (fr:Charlotte Huré). Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:38, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:37, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Surallah South Cotabato 1.jpg. Although it might seem this file has a higher resolution, the file history of File:Surallah South Cotabato 1.jpg indicates that the latter was cropped and the original high res version is still intact in the file history. In other words, this file is up for deletion. JWilz12345 (talk) 03:20, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
@P199: : For additional insight.JWilz12345 (talk) 03:21, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Delete as duplicate. File:Surallah South Cotabato 1.jpg was cropped to remove the big black spot and make it usable for WP. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:55, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:31, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
Obviously a derivative work of the copyrighted photos B (talk) 04:38, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:32, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
Derivative work of a number of copyrighted logos B (talk) 04:39, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:32, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
Derivative work of the copyrighted map B (talk) 04:54, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:32, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:SPIEGEL-Bestseller vom 15. September 2018.JPG, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
- Looks like a Commons:De_minimis#Germany case Mutter Erde (talk) 15:58, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - I think this is over the line of COM:DM. --Jcb (talk) 11:33, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
Kircheninnenraum, keine Panoramafreiheit, weniger als 70 Jahre Ginkgo2g (talk) 07:27, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:34, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
Kircheninnenraum, keine Panoramafreiheit, weniger als 70 Jahre Ginkgo2g (talk) 07:28, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:34, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
Kircheninnenraum, keine Panoramafreiheit, weniger als 70 Jahre Ginkgo2g (talk) 07:28, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:34, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
Kircheninnenraum, keine Panoramafreiheit, weniger als 70 Jahre Ginkgo2g (talk) 07:29, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:34, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
Kircheninnenraum, keine Panoramafreiheit, weniger als 70 Jahre Ginkgo2g (talk) 07:29, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:34, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
Kircheninnenraum, keine Panoramafreiheit, weniger als 70 Jahre Ginkgo2g (talk) 07:30, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:34, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
Kircheninnenraum, keine Panoramafreiheit, weniger als 70 Jahre Ginkgo2g (talk) 07:30, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:34, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
Kircheninnenraum, keine Panoramafreiheit, weniger als 70 Jahre Ginkgo2g (talk) 07:31, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:34, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by HombreDHojalata as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: copyright Juan Cancelo 1892-1988
Converted by me to DR to allow for discussion, as other user claims on talkpage "En España, as simples fotografías son de dominio público transcorridos 25 anos da realización da fotografía." -- Túrelio (talk) 07:56, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - I don't know of such a law in Spain. --Jcb (talk) 11:35, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by HombreDHojalata as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyright Luís Casado
Converted by me to DR to allow for discussion, as other user claimed "En España, as simples fotografías son de dominio público transcorridos 25 anos da realización da fotografía." -- Túrelio (talk) 07:57, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - I don't know of such a law in Spain. --Jcb (talk) 11:36, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
Uploader's vita, copied from https://people.bayt.com/profile-profile-51352679/, out of project scope. Achim (talk) 08:30, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:37, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
Personal picture, not used Arthur Crbz (talk) 08:30, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
dear sir, can you please tell why it is put in deletion requests --Pranavs17 (talk) 08:34, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Pranavs17: You should read the following page: COM:SELFIE. Personal pictures can't be uploaded on Wikimedia Commons, unless it's used on a Wikimedia Project...
- Plus, you are unlikely to be the author of this picture. We need permission fromthe photographer to release this file under a free license. See COM:OTRS. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 10:01, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
I'm extremely sorry sir, i apologize for this mistake. henceforth i will see through it that i wont repeat this kind of blunders. please excuse me for this. its better to delete this file --Pranavs17 (talk) 10:05, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per uploader request. @Pranavs17: No problem :) Don't hesitate to contact me if you have any question about Wikimedia Commons. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 10:18, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
the image is only fair use - loaded in error Victuallers (talk) 10:35, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:38, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
Official document. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:38, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:38, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:38, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
Unclear source. this page tends to show that it's not really an extract from a Méliès film, but a photograph that may be copyrighted. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 15:19, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:39, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
This does not look like an "own work". Looks like it's been found on the Internet where 100s of similar Tyagaraja portraits can be found. —Cpt.a.haddock (talk) (please ping when replying) 15:23, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:39, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
Incorrect use of the user page, deleted content from Spanish Wikipedia was added here because it is promotional. ProtoplasmaKid (talk) 15:44, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:39, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
copyrighted elsewhere, uploaded by mistake of owner PopularOutcast talk2me! 15:47, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:40, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
Possibly above COM:TOO. Arthur Crbz (talk) 15:47, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:40, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
Copytight violation of Monitorapp, Inc Yanjipy (talk) 16:30, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Maybe PD-textlogo, but apparently out of scope. --Jcb (talk) 11:41, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
Look pretty much out of scope to me. Pleae dont forget the redirect File:Nena dhe vajza e saj.jpg JuTa 17:51, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:41, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
A part of image derived from File:Batong2.jpeg and deleted due to copyright problem. Suggest to be replaced by File:Wikipedia_Patroller4.svg. Xiplus (talk) 07:12, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and redirected as suggested. --Sealle (talk) 17:19, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
Is the same as File:Straatbeelden, buurten, armoedig, bevolking, Bestanddeelnr 252-9283.jpg; but the other one is sharper JopkeB (talk) 07:10, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Kept: marked as duplicate. --Sealle (talk) 17:29, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted artwork by Alicia Carletti (d. 2017), missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:09, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 17:32, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
По запросу автора Dockawai (talk) 17:55, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Keep and close this trolling DR: States author’s request but nominator is not the author. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 21:48, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
I've taken this photo and Dockawai isn't me --Butko (talk) 13:42, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 17:34, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
По запросу автора Dockawai (talk) 17:58, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested. --Sealle (talk) 17:39, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
Personal image with no encyclopedic value. Also its just 121 KB, may not an original work. KCVelaga (talk · mail) 18:09, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 17:38, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
This monument has been created by Antoine Sartorio (1885-1988), an artist who died less than 70 years ago. As there is no freedom of panorama in France, these images can't be freely shared and they have to be removed from commons.
- File:Monument aux morts de l'Armée d'Orient et des terres lointaines (2).jpg
- File:Monument aux morts de l'Armée d'Orient et des terres lointaines. 1.jpg
- File:Monument aux morts de l'Armée d'Orient et des terres lointaines.jpg
- File:Porte d'Orient à Marseille.jpg
Pymouss Let’s talk - 21:43, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
- Delete, see previous requests : Commons:Deletion requests/File:Marseille - Monument aux Morts de l'Armée d'Orient.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Monument aux morts dOrient Crépuscule.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Monument aux morts de l'Armée d'Orient et des terres lointaines.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:IMonument aux morts d'Orient-1.JPG. Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 10:00, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
- File:Marseille, Monument aux morts d'Orient 01.JPG
- File:Marseille, Monument aux morts d'Orient 02.JPG
- File:Marseille, Monument aux morts d'Orient 03.JPG
- File:Marseille, Monument aux morts d'Orient 04.JPG
- File:Marseļa, Francija - panoramio (2).jpg
- File:Monument - panoramio (13).jpg
- File:Monument-Aux-Morts-D-Orient.jpg
- File:Monuments aux morts de l'armée d'Orient et des terres lointaines.jpg
- File:The Porte d'Orient (Unsplash).jpg
VIGNERON (talk) 15:37, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 19:58, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
No FoP in France. Artist Gaston Castel died in 1971
- File:20211113.Monument aux morts d'Orient (Marseille).-011.jpg
- File:20211113.Monument aux morts d'Orient (Marseille).-012.jpg
- File:20211113.Monument aux morts d'Orient (Marseille).-013.jpg
- File:Marseille 115DSC 0481 (49241785112).jpg
- File:Marseille 115DSC 0482 (49241095168).jpg
- File:Marseille 115DSC 0483 (49241569036).jpg
- File:Marseille 115DSC 0484 (49241095163).jpg
- File:Marseille 115DSC 0485 (49241785017).jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 03:18, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:03, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Non-encyclopedic, no apparent value. Till (talk) 20:12, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 20:06, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
Looks the same as File:Mandenmakerij, Bestanddeelnr 256-1540.jpg. JopkeB (talk) 06:38, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 20:45, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
File:The book of Ser Marco Polo - the Venetian concerning the kingdoms and marvels of the East (1903) (14789451233).jpg
[edit]Tis is a partial of file:The book of Ser Marco Polo - the Venetian concerning the kingdoms and marvels of the East (1903) (14767223334).jpg. Its an error in bot uploading and and should be deleted. Its redundant Broichmore (talk) 11:15, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Keep We have the folded and unfolded page. Seeing exactly how the map folds up is interesting and is in scope. If you want to fully uncrop an image, remember that Faebot is set up to make it easy. --Fæ (talk) 11:38, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- We have the book and it has the "folded" image in it. What's the category here? "Folded maps". I'm waiting for the idiot to pop up here to claim, they'll be using it in a forthcoming article of "How to fold maps in books". And by the way, we did not have the full version since the three years this was uploaded till I put it there, today. Broichmore (talk) 11:54, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, pre Broichmore. Taivo (talk) 20:53, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
Source (YouTube) does not provide any suitable license. Unless a proper source with suitable license is provided, there's no reason to believe these videos may remain in commons
- File:11. Beobide Garmendia, Jose (Zigoitia, 1920).webm
- File:9. Biteri Mendieta, Gregorio (Legutio, 1922).webm
- File:12. Arana Barinaga, Agustin (Eibar, 1913).webm
Discasto talk 22:12, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Other videos (such as this and this) have been already deleted. As the uploader is complaining, possibly not in a proper way (@Hedwig in Washington: ), it would be nice to have a second opinion and clarify the status of these videos. --Discasto talk 22:17, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- A complete waste of time, it is very well specified here [3], there is no reason why we should believe that the youtube channel with the same name as the page should be the source and have a restrictive license. Nonsense. All the information is there, so please restore it. I added additional info on Hedwig in Washington's talk. Iñaki LL (talk) 22:46, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Sure, but it's a waste of time created by you. Provide a proper source (not one without licensing information), do it in the file description and not in random admins' talk pages, include {{LicenseReview}} and, voilà, no more waste of time. It's a pity you keep on making the rest of the community waste their time. --Discasto talk 23:24, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- A complete waste of time, it is very well specified here [3], there is no reason why we should believe that the youtube channel with the same name as the page should be the source and have a restrictive license. Nonsense. All the information is there, so please restore it. I added additional info on Hedwig in Washington's talk. Iñaki LL (talk) 22:46, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Sources have been provided and license reviewed. See here. --Discasto talk 18:26, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
Kept per nom. Strakhov (talk) 22:18, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from song and/or non-trivial background.
- File:Gari - Josu Zabala - E txo!.webm
- File:Gari - Josu Zabala - Si vis pacem.webm
- File:Gari - Josu - Hertzainak Euskaldunan (09).jpg
- File:Gari - Josu - Hertzainak Euskaldunan.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:47, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 08:33, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
дубль File:35 - Гора Пихтовая.jpg Alexandronikos (talk) 11:37, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:32, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
дубль File:21 - Гора Пихтовая 548,0 м.jpg Alexandronikos (talk) 11:38, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:37, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
дубль File:11 - Гора Пихтовая 548,0 м.jpg Alexandronikos (talk) 11:39, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:38, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: фото 1975 года, оцифрована в наше время, маленький размер файла, необходимо подтверждение в OTRS от автора Dogad75 (talk) 13:28, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:40, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: фото 1975 года, оцифрована в наше время, маленький размер файла, необходимо подтверждение в OTRS от автора Dogad75 (talk) 13:28, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:40, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: фото 1975 года, оцифрована в наше время, маленький размер файла, необходимо подтверждение в OTRS от автора Dogad75 (talk) 13:29, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:40, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: фото в молодые годы, дата указана в наше время, автор фота и лицо на снимке-одно и тоже лицо, необходимо подтверждение в OTRS от автора Dogad75 (talk) 13:32, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:40, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Нарушение авторских прав от автора книги, неизвестен автор обложки, производная от автора обложки. Необходимо подтверждение в OTRS от автора обложки Dogad75 (talk) 18:22, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:41, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: на фото персоне не 85 лет, фото сделано в давних временах и оцифровано в наше время, фотограф снимка, скорее всего, неизвестно. необходимо подтверждение в OTRS Dogad75 (talk) 18:41, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:41, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: фото в 1985 году, автор, скорее всего неизвестен, оцифрована в наше время. Необходимо подтверждение в OTRS Dogad75 (talk) 19:26, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:42, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Сомнение в авторстве и лицензии: фото встречается в Интернете до загрузки до Викисклада <http://berkovich-zametki.com/2008/Zametki/Nomer11/Dumesh1.php>. Необходимо подтверждение в OTRS от автора фото. Dogad75 (talk) 19:28, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:42, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: фото в 2000 году, автор, скорее всего неизвестен, оцифрована в наше время. Необходимо подтверждение в OTRS Dogad75 (talk) 19:44, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:43, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: фото в 2003 году, автор, малого размера файла, нет метаданных, скорее всего неизвестен, оцифрована в наше время. Необходимо подтверждение в OTRS Dogad75 (talk) 19:55, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:43, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Сомнения и в лицензии: фото встречается в Интернете до загрузки до Википедии <http://e-wiki.org/ru/images/Московский_физико-технический_институт_мфти#images-8>. Необходимо подтверждение от фотографа в OTRS Dogad75 (talk) 19:58, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:43, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Неизвестны автор, дата создания и дата правомерно обнародованного фото. Dogad75 (talk) 22:15, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:44, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Создание даты фото неизвестна, автор неизвестен, дата обнародования неизвестна. Удалить. Dogad75 (talk) 22:22, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:44, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: not exact duplicate. Ruthven (msg) 16:09, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/2017031210011731
[edit]ticket:2017031210011731 is invalid. It does e.g. not contain a specific license. It's not really clear to which files the ticket is supposed to apply, but it is stated that they are the author of only a part of the pictures. @Pallerti:
- File:Karácsony János.jpg
- File:Művelődésügyi Minisztérium 2. sz. Fiúnevelő Intézetének folyosója. Urbán Tamás fotókiállításának megnyitója. Fortepan 89571.jpg
- File:Hungary Fortepan 89883.jpg
- File:100 Folk Celsius zenekar fortepan 124243.jpg
- File:Horváth István fortepan 125619.jpg
- File:Szent Gellért tér fortepan 5823.jpg
- File:Szomjas György fortepan 125560.jpg
- File:A Polgár lányok fortepan 40708.jpg
- File:Kesjár Csaba fortepan 40704.jpg
- File:Budai Ifjúsági Park fortepan 15869.jpg
- File:Deim Pál (1970).jpg
- File:Egerszegi Krisztina fortepan 40687.jpg
- File:Kovács Kati fortepan 88728.jpg
- File:Hoynos Nelly.jpg
- File:Aczél György (1978).jpg
- File:Kopaszkutya 05 (Fortepan).jpg
- File:Imre Makovecz.jpg
- File:Keleti Éva fortepan 89572.jpg
- File:Csehák Judit fortepan 124979.jpg
- File:Koltai Róbert fortepan 88012.jpg
- File:Szentágothai János fortepan 124984.jpg
- File:Puskás Ferenc fortepan 23991.jpg
- File:Április 4 fortepan 88386.jpg
- File:Esztergom, Bajcsy-Zsilinszky út, szemben a Szent Tamás-hegy. Fortepan 87935.jpg
- File:Ligeti Erika fortepan 87236.jpg
- File:Menyhárt János fortepan 126037.jpg
- File:LGT fortepan 88741.jpg
- File:Szalay Edit fortepan 88009.jpg
- File:Laux József.jpg
- File:István, a király fortepan 125568.jpg
- File:Kopaszkutya 08 (Fortepan).jpg
- File:Kopaszkutya 11 (Fortepan).jpg
- File:Katona Klári (1978).jpg
- File:Barta Tamás.jpg
- File:Budapest I., a Várhegy déli lejtője, Kék Csillag Együttes a - Fortepan 89274.jpg
- File:Maserati 8CM.jpg
- File:Szakács Zsuzsa fortepan 88999.jpg
- File:Állami Artistaképző Intézet, manökenjelöltek felvételi vizsgája. Fortepan 31943 cropped.jpg
- File:Kozák András fortepan 87277.jpg
- File:Jubileumi Rockfesztivál - P. mobil 01.jpg
- File:P. Mobil csoportkép 1986-ból.jpg
- File:Lajos Illés.jpg
- File:Ildikó Piros.jpg
- File:Koncz Zsuzsa fortepan 88590.jpg
- File:Aczél György kultúrpolitikus.jpg
- File:Magyar Zoltán fortepan 47121.jpg
- File:Kovács Lajos.jpg
- File:Waszlavik László (1980).jpg
- File:Kocsis Zoltán (1972).jpg
- File:Würtz Ádám fortepan 87927.jpg
- File:Bontovics Kati fortepan 88222.jpg
- File:Esztergom, Szent Tamás-hegy. Fortepan 9554.jpg
- File:Edda Művek 1983 fortepan 47143.jpg
- File:Kádár János fortepan 47119.jpg
- File:Czeizel Endre 1988.jpg
- File:Karthago együttes (1984).jpg
- File:Fonográf együttes fortepan 125391.jpg
- File:Kopaszkutya 09 (Fortepan).jpg
- File:Omega együttes fortepan 88424.jpg
- File:Miklós Borsos.jpg
- File:Pataky Attila Koltay Gábor fortepan 47144.jpg
- File:Bródy-Szörényi-Kovács Kati fortepan 89425.jpg
- File:Magyar beatzenészek fortepan 40721.jpg
- File:Berlini fal fortepan 44787.jpg
- File:PPS-41 fortepan 87601.jpg
- File:Szűcs Antal Gábor fortepan 124225.jpg
- File:Fodor István fortepan 124985.jpg
- File:Bubik István 1978 FP 89106.jpg
- File:1977 Fortepan 89056.jpg
- File:Magyar Rádió stúdiója, E. Fehér Pál újságíró és Hajdú János szerkesztő. Fortepan 89148.jpg
- File:1979 Fortepan 89446.jpg
- File:Kopaszkutya 02 (Fortepan).jpg
- File:Budapest V., Ferenciek tere.jpg
- File:Németh Gábor fortepan 124220.jpg
- File:Ef Zámbó István fortepan 126119.jpg
- File:Locomotiv GT.jpg
- File:Kodály Zoltán 1964.jpg
- File:SKÁLA fortepan 88701.jpg
- File:Lerch István fortepan 126037.jpg
- File:Pelsőczy László fortepan 125570.jpg
- File:Deák Bill Gyula fortepan 125571.jpg
- File:Bergendy István 02.jpg
- File:Zalatnay Sarolta énekesnő. Fortepan 89422.jpg
- File:Tarján Györgyi fortepan 89090.jpg
- File:Víg Mihály (1981).jpg
- File:1977 Fortepan 89052-Takács Éva.jpg
- File:1977 Fortepan 89056 cropped.jpg
- File:Benkő László Fortepan 89105.jpg
- File:Pataky Attila fortepan 124598.jpg
- File:Németh Miklós Fortepan 124978.jpg
- File:István, a király fortepan 125572.jpg
- File:Pozsgay Imre fortepan 124978.jpg
- File:Karthago együttes (1984-3).jpg
- File:Waszlavik Gazember László.jpg
- File:József Attila lakótelep, Pest-Buda mozi. Fortepan 88343.jpg
- File:1977 Fortepan 89059.jpg
- File:Kék Csillag együttes. Fortepan 89275.jpg
- File:Csapó György Edda fortepan 89456.jpg
- File:Kovács Gyula fortepan 87245.jpg
- File:Kopaszkutya 04 (Fortepan).jpg
- File:Sütő Enikő fortepan 89058.jpg
- File:Fortepan Gyárfás Tamás (cropped) 47032.jpg
- File:Középen Földes László (Hobó), balra Novotny Zoltán, jobbra Gyárfás Tamás riporter. Fortepan 31863.jpg
- File:Vasfüggönybontó fortepan 40703.jpg
- File:Péter Máté.jpg
- File:Somló Tamás fortepan 40679.jpg
- File:Demjén Ferenc fortepan 89424.jpg
- File:István, a király fortepan 125565.jpg
- File:Karthago együttes (1984-2).jpg
- File:Kopaszkutya 01 (Fortepan).jpg
- File:Beatzenészek központi szervezésű találkozója állami vezetőkkel.jpg
- File:1977 Fortepan 89052.jpg
- File:Kopaszkutya 10 (Fortepan).jpg
- File:Tátrai Tibor fortepan 88137.jpg
- File:István, a király fortepan 125567.jpg
- File:Melocco Miklós (1970).jpg
- File:Kerényi Imre fortepan 87341.jpg
- File:Omega együttes fortepan 87127.jpg
- File:Frenreisz Károly fortepan 89145.jpg
- File:Szűcs Judith fortepan 89352.jpg
- File:Markó Iván fortepan 46975.jpg
- File:Budapest Sportcsarnok fortepan 125167.jpg
- File:Kancsal Tamás.jpg
- File:Tunyogi Péter.jpg
- File:Művelődésügyi Minisztérium 2. sz. Fiúnevelő Intézetének folyosója. Urbán Tamás fotókiállítása. Fortepan 89574.jpg
- File:(ekkor Druzsba), tengerpart. Fortepan 89663.jpg
- File:(ekkor Druzsba), tengerpart. Fortepan 89665.jpg
- File:Erzsébet híd pesti hídfő, villamosmegálló a Váci utcánál. Fortepan 87833.jpg
- File:Niki Lauda (1969, Budapest).jpg
- File:Blaha Lujza tér, jobboldalon Urbán Tamás fotóriporter. Fortepan 87400.jpg
- File:Kassák Klub, a Sebő-együttes táncháza, Sebő Ferenc. Fortepan 88688.jpg
- File:Palatinus Strandfürdő. Fortepan 88561.jpg
- File:Szyksznian Wanda grafikusművész. Fortepan 20445.jpg
- File:Rolls Frakció (Fortepan).jpg
- File:Kopaszkutya 07 (Fortepan).jpg
- File:Király Tamás divattervező. Fortepan 26962.jpg
- File:Delhusa Gjon fortepan 88135.jpg
- File:Csengeri Szilvia fortepan 89053.jpg
- File:Hegedűs Csaba fortepan 88454.jpg
- File:Kern András fortepan 88409.jpg
- File:Vikidál Gyula fortepan 89149.jpg
- File:Slamovits fortepan 89456.jpg
- File:István a király fortepan 125575.jpg
- File:Baross Imre igazgató.jpg
- File:1977 Fortepan 89052 András Judit.jpg
- File:László Polgár in 1989.jpg
- File:István, a király fortepan 125566.jpg
- File:István, a király fortepan 125564.jpg
- File:Horváth István fortepan 125613.jpg
- File:M7 együttes fortepan 125537.jpg
- File:Pálos Zsuzsa fortepan 87341.jpg
- File:Lois Viktor fortepan 124346.jpg
- File:Balázs Fecó fortepan 125621.jpg
- File:Fortepan 87565 Szilágyi Mari.jpg
- File:Adamis Ann fortepan 89290.jpg
- File:Dinnyés József fortepan 88497.jpg
- File:Antal Imre fortepan 89825.jpg
- File:DVTK stadion, Rockfesztivál. Török Ádám és Papp Gyula (Mini együttes). Fortepan 31868.jpg
- File:1977 Fortepan 89058.jpg
- File:(ekkor Druzsba), tengerpart. Fortepan 89664.jpg
- File:Művelődésügyi Minisztérium 2. sz. Fiúnevelő Intézetének folyosója. Urbán Tamás fotókiállítása. Fortepan 89575.jpg
- File:Radics Béla.jpg
- File:Pirk János fortepan 87192.jpg
- File:MihályTamás.jpg
- File:Bródy János fortepan 89235.jpg
- File:Elsőáldozó fortepan 40689.jpg
- File:Erzsébet (Lenin) körút, Vörös Csillag mozi. Fortepan 10905.jpg
- File:Zoltán Magyar.jpg
- File:Herpai Sándor fortepan 126037.jpg
- File:Schultheisz Emil fortepan 125875.jpg
- File:A pécsi Ciszterci Rend Nagy Lajos Gimnáziuma és Kollégiumának Orff-zenekara fortepan 125307.jpg
- File:Király Zoltán fortepan 124977.jpg
- File:Jobba Gabi.jpg
- File:Makovecz Imre fortepan 124744.jpg
- File:István, a király fortepan 125574.jpg
- File:Márk Iván fortepan 89790.jpg
- File:Máté Péter cropped.jpg
- File:Victor Máté fortepan 125563.jpg
- File:Győrffy Miklós fortepan 125955.jpg
- File:Kopaszkutya 06 (Fortepan).jpg
- File:Jeszenszky Endre Sütő Enikővel.jpg
- File:Asszonyi Tamás (1970).jpg
- File:Nagy Attila (1976).jpg
- File:Kulka János fortepan 89218.jpg
- File:Jubileumi Rockfesztivál - P. mobil 02.jpg
- File:Kocsis Imre festőművész.jpg
- File:Déry Tibor és Presser Gábor fortepan 88008.jpg
- File:Omega együttes fortepan 88423.jpg
- File:Frenreisz Károly fortepan 47129.jpg
- File:Kozák András színművész a Thália Színház Paulay Ede utcai épületében. Fortepan 87276.jpg
- File:DVTK-stadion, Rockfesztivál. Závodi János beatzenész. Fortepan 88118.jpg
- File:Imre Antal.jpg
- File:Gábor Harsányi.jpg
- File:Wartburg a határon fortepan 46955.jpg
- File:Dolly fortepan 125312.jpg
- File:Békesi László fortepan 124986.jpg
- File:Szigeti Ferenc fortepan 125606.jpg
- File:Budapest Sportcsarnok fortepan 125170.jpg
- File:Dömsödi Gábor fortepan 125769.jpg
- File:Szerednyey Béla fortepan 125915.jpg
- File:Kopaszkutya 03 (Fortepan).jpg
- File:Budai Vár, a Ferdinánd Kapuhoz vezető lépcső. Kék Csillag együttes. Fortepan 15594.jpg
- File:Október huszonharmadika (Schönherz Zoltán) utca, Skála Budapest Szövetkezeti Nagyáruház, a felvétel a megnyitáskor készült. Parkoló a Bercsényi utcánál. Fortepan 88704.jpg
- File:Művelődésügyi Minisztérium 2. sz. Fiúnevelő Intézetének folyosója. Urbán Tamás fotókiállításának megnyitója. Fortepan 89573.jpg
- File:Nyers Rezső 1970.jpg
- File:Győri balett.jpg
- File:Aczél György fortepan 89108.jpg
- File:Feledy Péter fortepan 88384.jpg
- File:Művelődésügyi Minisztérium 2. sz. Fiúnevelő Intézetének folyosója. Urbán Tamás fotókiállításának megnyitója. Fortepan 89576.jpg
- File:Művelődésügyi Minisztérium 2. sz. Fiúnevelő Intézetének folyosója. Urbán Tamás fotókiállításának megnyitója. Fortepan 89572.jpg
- File:Horváth Gyula (1971).jpg
- File:József Attila Színház, a Svejk a hátországban című darab próbája (1971).jpg
- File:Vígszínház, a Képzelt riport egy amerikai popfesztiválról című musical előadása, Egri Márta, mellette Szegedi Erika. Fortepan 88005.jpg
Jcb (talk) 06:46, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Keep and try again. When this photo is included in a DR bagged under the pretense that «they are the author of only a part of the pictures» (refering to Urbán Tamás), we know that the DR is simply not serious. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 22:00, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Keep, valid ticket. Tamás Urbán gave permission to Wikimedia to upload and use his images that were uploaded himself in Fortepan, a Hungarian photo collection. --Norden1990 (talk) 22:09, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- You have no access to OTRS, how can you tell that the permission would be valid? Jcb (talk) 22:29, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Because, before I uploaded images last year, I took assistance in Hungarian Wikipedia from OTRS users. So, I know the content of Urbán's e-mail, and not "with Google translate" (...). The photographer (Urbán) clearly states that he made himself the uploaded photos, which appear on the surface of the Fortepan collection - except his photos from WW1 obviously. The e-mail confirms that Urbán himself permitted CC BY-SA 3.0 licence to Fortepan. --Norden1990 (talk) 08:16, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
- We have clear guidelines on what kind of permissions are valid and what kind or permissions are not. A permission without a specific license is invalid, that's a clear rule. @Krd: or another OTRS admin may wish to have a look why this OTRS agent did not handle the ticket in accordance with our established standards. Jcb (talk) 11:01, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
- Tamás Urbán clearly states that he permitted his photos to upload under CC BY-SA 3.0 licence. --Norden1990 (talk) 11:18, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
- Not in the ticket! Jcb (talk) 11:24, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
- There is. You should request a certified translation instead of self-serving unreliable Google translate. --Norden1990 (talk) 12:31, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
- Not in the ticket! Jcb (talk) 11:24, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
- Tamás Urbán clearly states that he permitted his photos to upload under CC BY-SA 3.0 licence. --Norden1990 (talk) 11:18, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
- We have clear guidelines on what kind of permissions are valid and what kind or permissions are not. A permission without a specific license is invalid, that's a clear rule. @Krd: or another OTRS admin may wish to have a look why this OTRS agent did not handle the ticket in accordance with our established standards. Jcb (talk) 11:01, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
- Because, before I uploaded images last year, I took assistance in Hungarian Wikipedia from OTRS users. So, I know the content of Urbán's e-mail, and not "with Google translate" (...). The photographer (Urbán) clearly states that he made himself the uploaded photos, which appear on the surface of the Fortepan collection - except his photos from WW1 obviously. The e-mail confirms that Urbán himself permitted CC BY-SA 3.0 licence to Fortepan. --Norden1990 (talk) 08:16, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
- You have no access to OTRS, how can you tell that the permission would be valid? Jcb (talk) 22:29, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- You have access to that absurdly secret outfit — you tell us why do you think Urbán Tamás’ pants are on fire. And after that we’ll see who’s to be trusted: You, with your tattered reputation, or a renown Hungarian photographer. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 00:36, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
- Please stop polluting DRs with your usual nonsensical comments and personal attacks. Jcb (talk) 11:01, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
- Sure, I’ll stop — when you stop attempting to delete, based on licensing pretexts, files that are properly licensed. Insult me all you like — keeping these photos in Commons is more important to me than trying to avoid you is. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 07:16, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
- Keep @Jcb: Would you have nominate to deletion these pictures if OTRS template had not been there? Source page contains the licence. Tamás Urbán sent e-mail to OTRS only because to confirmed this licence. If you think the ticket is not valid, delete the ticket not these pictures. --Regasterios (talk) 12:25, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
- Comment OTRS ticket is invalid and should not be used for any file permission. --Krd 14:15, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
- Keep A jegy érvényes. Urbán Tamás neve alatt rengeteg fotó van a Fortepanon. Mivel a Fortepananon több olyan kép is szabad licenc alatt van, amely nem jogosan lett szabad licenc alá helyezve, Urbán Tamás -- érdeklődésünkre -- elmondta, hogy igen, azok az ő képei, kivéve az első világháborúsokat, mert azokat csak gyűjtötte. A beküldött engedély annak alátámasztása, hogy valóban ő engedélyezte (adta) a képeit szabad licenc alatt a Fortepannak. Érdekes momentum, hogy Jcb csak azokat jelölte törlésre, amiken már kint van, hogy a szerzőjük alátámasztotta, hogy igen, az övéi, és igen, ő adta a Fortepannak szabad licenc alatt, de azokat nem jelölte törlésre, amelyek ugyanúgy a Fortepanról származnak, de nincs rajtuk OTRS-sablon. Ha azok a képek törlendőek, amelyeknél a szerző biztosított minket arról, hogy azok az ő képei, valóban ő adta szabad licenc alatt a Fortepannak, ahonnan mindenféle kontroll nélkül kerültek át a képek, akkor legyen minden, Fortepanról származó kép (kivéve ahol a szerző a szükséges időn túl halt meg) is törölve, hiszen azoknál még biztosíték sincs arra, hogy valóban ők engedélyezték a képeik megjelenését szabad licenc alatt. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 14:22, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Hungarikusz Firkász: Would you in that case please change your
{{comment}}
to{{vk}}
? -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 07:16, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
- Thx Tuválkin for telling me. I added. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 07:50, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Hungarikusz Firkász: Would you in that case please change your
- See you here: User:Grin/fortepan.hu#External comments. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 14:41, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
- While this is an interesting exposé, it doesn’t affect the matter of this DR: The licensing made by Urbán Tamás is clear and correct; Fortepan was just the vessel to get these photos online at a given moment: The release was made not for Fortepan, but (as preconized by its own standard text) to the worldwide general public. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 07:16, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
- It touches on the fact that it supports some of the need for the letter's request and submission. (machine translated answer). Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 09:11, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
- Keep The permission is certainly valid, the DR is unsubstantiated. Fortepan is well know for its unreliability: even though the photos are published under free, CCBYSA licence, it has been found in several cases that they in fact do not have permission from the authors, therefore uploading photos from Fortepan without permission is not recommended. Fortepan refused to discuss clarification of the situation, therefore, in many cases, editors of Wikipedia asked permission in writing from the authors of the photos, like from Tamás Urbán. Tamás Urbán has confirmed in writing that he had authorized publishing of the photos under free licence. This permission is recorded under ticket number 2017031210011731. The correspondance went in Hungarian, so I have doubts if user JCB is in command of Hungarian language, and they may not understand the precize contents of the correspondance rendered by Google translate. --Pallerti (talk) 10:18, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
- Concerning Jcb’s command of the Hungarian language: None, according to the Babel List on his own talk page. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 11:18, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
- Note to closing admin - only close this after coordination with the investigation from OTRS site, see here - Jcb (talk) 10:39, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Fortepan is a popular website in Hungary, which collects old, archive photos of the country. If somebody upload a photo there, accept the terms and conditions of the website, including 1) they have the right to publish the photo, 2) they publish it under CC-BY-SA 3.0. The situation is the same as it is on Flickr or other image collecting or media hosting sites, and common practice of Wikimedia Commons, that if the external site indicate a free licence for a file, than (if there is no doubt) Commons accepts this permission after a review process, which only checks if the claimed permission is the same on the external site as well. Therefore if we accepted images from Fortepan without any extra efforts, it would be in line with the rules and common practice. Compared to this, in this case Hungarikusz Firkász wrote an email directly to the author, because he is a well-know photographer. His photos are publicly available and it would have been possible that somebody else collected his photos and uploaded to Fortepan without the consent of the author. The answer we received from the author in ticket 2017031210011731 confirms the followings: 1) he is the author of the photos, 2) he uploaded (sent) the photos to Fortepan, 3) he agrees and accepts the free license of Fortepan (which is CC-BY-SA 3.0 for all images). This statement, together with the legal terms of Fortepan is enough to be sure, that these images have a real and valid permission (on Fortepan), and we (or anybody) can legally use the images under the indicated CC-BY-SA 3.0 license. Regards, Samat (talk) 13:13, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per Samat and Krd + discussion. Ruthven (msg) 16:00, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
non-free image, taken from the ESPN Cricinfo site (per the link for source!) Lugnuts (talk) 08:14, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:10, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Duplicate. Ketil3 (talk) 10:07, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Kept: duplicate of what? @Ketil3: please use {{Duplicate}} if you want to propose it again for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 16:11, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Duplicate of a crop. Just delete it. Ketil3 (talk) 10:11, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Don't feed the troll! This request was obviously taken with the intention of provoking. Look at the discussion page of the user, that explains everything. MagentaGreen (talk) 12:01, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: duplicate of what? @Ketil3: please use {{Duplicate}} if you want to propose it again for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 16:12, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Duplicate. Ketil3 (talk) 10:12, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Don't feed the troll! This request was obviously taken with the intention of provoking. Look at the discussion page of the user, that explains everything. MagentaGreen (talk) 12:02, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 16:12, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
photo resulation is not good Apuranta (talk) 13:32, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Kept: 4 128 × 2 322 pixel seems good enough to me!. Ruthven (msg) 16:13, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:14, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
fabricated depiction, misleading. Jaydayal (talk) 14:36, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. @Jaydayal: use {{Fictitious flag}} instead. Ruthven (msg) 16:15, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Copyvio(https://m.facebook.com/AmethiaRajput/photos/a.372893083237682/373345026525821/?type=3&source=54&ref=page_internal) Heba Aisha (talk) 01:59, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: by Taivo. ---akko (talk) 02:33, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
This map is incorrect. It does not show the Indian state of Jammu and Kashmir which is an integral part of India. 182.59.73.70 18:46, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Speedy keep Nomination is incompatible with Commons:Deletion policy. —Gazoth (talk) 20:20, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Speedy keep --62.24.138.23 16:03, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
- Speedy keep The file depicts the intended topic correctly. Renzut (talk) 10:45, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. Ruthven (msg) 16:31, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Incorrect map of a historical kingdom and the existing sources don't support the boundary depicted here. Areas which were parts of other kingdoms (like Pala empire) during this time have been depicted as part of Kamrup kingdom in this map. There is a link given (which doesn't look reliable at all) even doesn't support the map.) Za-ari-masen (talk) 10:46, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
- Speedy keep: This is the traditional boundary of Kamarupa as produced from an authoritative text, and reproduced in a PhD thesis. The map has been geo-referenced. The claim that the existing sources do not support this map is false. The boundaries have fluctuated considerably during the historical period and the claim of the Pala Empire is not relevant here. Chaipau (talk) 22:34, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: This file is in use on Wikipedia articles from as:অসমৰ ইতিহাস to ta:அசாம் வரலாறு, and on Kamarupa (Q1194765). Under COM:NPOV, used files are not eligible for deletion just because they're inaccurate. If this file is accurate enough for twelve Wikipedias, it's accurate enough for Commons. --bjh21 (talk) 11:07, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
'Kept per above and previous; in use in multiple projects. (Uploading of better alternative free licensed maps is welcome.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:19, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
Vanity photo by banned non-contributing user; see COM:SELFIE. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:23, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:31, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Correct vector image is created. --Kwasura (talk) 11:51, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Better svg file exists (File:Finnish air force roundel 1934-1945 border.svg). The swastika has also a wrong shade of blue in this one. According to Finnish book about the warpaint of the FAF (Keskinen, Kalevi; Stenman, Kari: Sotamaalaus, Suomen ilmavoimien historia 23. ISBN 951-98751-6-6), the shade of blue should be Federal Standard 595 FS15123 which is used on the Finnish air force roundel 1934-1945 border.svg. --Msaynevirta (talk) 19:36, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
Kept: In use, cannot be deleted for these reasons. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:41, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
Not in use no more. --Kwasura (talk) 13:33, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
- So what? Per COM:Redundant, we do not delete files like this. --Stefan2 (talk) 15:13, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
- Not only this. Incorrect colours too. Look and File:Finland roundel WW2 border.png This difference matters. See the conversation on my talk page. --Kwasura (talk) 20:04, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
Kept: again. --JuTa 23:20, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Inferior duplicate of the File:Finnish air force roundel 1934-1945 border.svg Kwasura (talk) 17:32, 14 September 2018 (UTC) Kwasura (talk) 19:40, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:32, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Out of project scope: personal document, unused, promotional 4nn1l2 (talk) 19:43, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:32, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted menu and photo. Everything that isn't copyrighted is outside project scope - the back of someone's head has no encyclopedic use B (talk) 12:24, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 15:52, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
Загружен по ошибке. Быстрое удаление. Раиса Морозова (talk) 12:58, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 12:11, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
This file will not be in the public domain in its home country until January 1, 2039 Coldcreation (talk) 21:26, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Agree Uploader should locally host it on English Wikipedia since it is public domain in the US, but won't be PD in France until 2039. Abzeronow (talk) 15:50, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 20:25, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
Derivative work of Paramount's content. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:25, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- What are you basing this claim on ? Can you provide a link to the original photo at Paramount's website? WikiJunkie (talk) 06:40, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
- I'm basing it on the fact that it clearly says Paramount on the image. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:46, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Those 1940s Superman cartoons are PD-US-not renewed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abzeronow (talk • contribs) 15:59, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
- Proof? Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:46, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
- Gizmodo article mentions they are public domain https://io9.gizmodo.com/5963049/you-can-now-watch-the-1940s-fleischer-studios-superman-cartoons-online . Also the English Wikipedia page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superman_(1940s_cartoons) Abzeronow (talk) 19:58, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
- Yet oddly the Youtube videos in that article have been DMCA'd. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:15, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
- Cartoon Brew was source for that Gizmodo article. Said that Warner Brothers had uploaded those videos (they have rights to original negatives) https://www.cartoonbrew.com/classic/warners-posts-1940s-fleischer-superman-cartoons-online-73590.html#disqus_thread. Could be that WB took down their own videos. En.wikipedia cites a book when they say it's public domain. I'm open to the possibility that internet and Wikipedia have the wrong info (in which case, it would only become free in 2039 since cartoon could be one of the 1943 ones), but haven't seen evidence that the cartoons themselves are still in copyright either Abzeronow (talk) 17:22, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
- Yet oddly the Youtube videos in that article have been DMCA'd. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:15, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
- Gizmodo article mentions they are public domain https://io9.gizmodo.com/5963049/you-can-now-watch-the-1940s-fleischer-studios-superman-cartoons-online . Also the English Wikipedia page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superman_(1940s_cartoons) Abzeronow (talk) 19:58, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
- Proof? Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:46, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion (public domain cartoons), also the title card itself might not be eligible for copyright (PD-Text, I'd say, even if the "Paramount" and "Superman" letterings/logos might be trademarked, but that's a different issue). --Gestumblindi (talk) 20:29, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Uploader is himself depicted person. I suspect not own work, but photographer's copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 11:06, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:16, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
Image has text "Political ad paid by commitee to elect Caroline Fayard". In my opinion the commitee is copyright holder and the uploader cannot publish it under any license. OTRS-permission is needed. Taivo (talk) 11:15, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:15, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata, uploader has very few contributions. Maybe uploader isn't photographer, but violates his copyright. OTRS-permission is needed. Taivo (talk) 11:18, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:15, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
Suspected copyright violation: professional looking work but low resolution and minimal EXIF. Only contribution by uploader. MKFI (talk) 12:54, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:14, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
No real sourcing is provided. Pic is quite likely a copyright violation and should be deleted ASAP. SNUGGUMS (talk) 21:35, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:12, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Iamhasanansari (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused personal selfies.
- File:Hasan Ansari with Micah B. Phillips.jpg
- File:Hasan Ansari with Hon. State Senator Royce West.JPG
- File:Hasan Ansari with Roy Williams, Jr.JPG
- File:Hasan Ansari with Judge Roberto Canas.JPG
- File:Hasan Ansari with Judge Ken Molberg.jpg
- File:Hasan Ansari with Ernest White.JPG
- File:Hasan Ansari with David Espinosa.JPG
- File:Hasan Ansari with Gov Chris Christie.jpg
- File:Hasan Ansari with Scott Coleman.JPG
- File:Hasan Ansari with Hon. Congressman Joaquin Castro.jpg
- File:Hasan Ansari with Chief David O Brown.JPG
- File:Hasan Ansari with Judge Phyllis Brown.JPG
- File:Hasan Ansari with Chika Anyiam.JPG
- File:Hasan Ansari with Sheriff Lupe Valdez.JPG
Saqib (talk) 07:49, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Category:Lupe Valdez and w:David Brown (police officer) have an article Mutter Erde (talk) 09:04, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (by Jon Kolbert), two keept per Mutter Erde. -- User: Perhelion 12:12, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
I have read in de:Madame d’Ora that she lived between 1927-1946 in Paris, France, so this self portrait of 1929 is probably a copyright violation Mutter Erde (talk) 16:59, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Undelete in 2034. Abzeronow (talk) 20:02, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Delete per discussion. Strakhov (talk) 20:50, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
Geringe Auflösung. José A. Sánchez Penzo (talk) 14:48, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Slightly wider crop in much higher resolution available at File:Ratingen, Pfarrkirche, Peter und Paul, Teilansicht-Nordfassade.jpg, so deleting this version as uploader's request (as it was shortly after your upload, you could also have nominated it for speedy deletion with {{SD|G7}}). --Gestumblindi (talk) 17:12, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
Geringe Auflösung. José A. Sánchez Penzo (talk) 14:50, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Reason for deletion is "small resolution"; although the resolution isn't too small in my opinion and I don't see a version with higher resolution of that image here, I'll treat this as a case equivalent to a {{SD|G7}}), as uploader nominated the file for deletion the same day. --Gestumblindi (talk) 17:16, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 15:57, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Delete — Per nom. It appears to be a campaign photo from the 2002 gubernatorial election, which was featured on her website here. —Halvorsen brian (talk) 06:45, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 17:17, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
Derivative work of copyrighted advertisement. MKFI (talk) 12:50, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, PCP. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:24, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 15:36, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
Taken from https://richmondfirst.ca/board-of-education-trustees/elsa-wong-chinese-bio/, clearly not "own work" RoySmith (talk) 16:44, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
This photo is a self portrait obtained from Elsa Wong. She indicated that this was a photo she submitted to Richmond First Voters Society and was used on their website. Capba (talk) 22:12, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - no permission. — Racconish 💬 15:38, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 20:59, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 15:38, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
not covered by FoP in Brazil, see COM:FOP Brazil, as the artwork isn't allowed to deteach from its surrounding (as this is in this clipart). Therefore, while its not in PD yet, this ClipArt is a copyright violation in Brazil. Quedel (talk) 09:11, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 17:11, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
This presumably German photo (it shows a German politician) is said to be pre-1933 and claimed to be in the PD. The photographer is said to be "unknown". The source given is scan of a photo.
If we want to keep this file, we need more information. A ca. 1933 photo is not old enough to assume that the photograph must be in the PD anyway, since the photographer easily could have lived beyond 1947 - which by the usual 70 years pma formula would mean the photograph is still protected by copyright.
"I do not know the photographer" also does not mean that the photographer is actually "unknown". The claim that the photographer is "unknown" isn't applicable to German works anyway, since German law says that pre-1995 anonymous works are only really anonymous if the author (here: the photographer) was never publicly disclosed anywhere, not even in a lecture or similar. One cannot prove that, so pre-1995 "anonymous" works from Germany are not suitable for Commons (or de.wp).
This means that the file should be deleted per the precautionary principle, unless new information is presented that shows the photo is clearly in the PD or under a free license. Rosenzweig τ 10:01, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 17:11, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
No using, also false copyright template because the statement only for "documents", not image minhhuy (talk) 10:07, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 17:12, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Does Commons:Freedom of panorama in source country allow this? EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Question Well, what is the source country? The paper man is reading a Swedish newspaper, but that doesn't necessarily mean that the photo was taken in Sweden. Gestumblindi (talk) 17:04, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep likely Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Sweden but I see no violation here.--BevinKacon (talk) 21:35, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
- If the photo is from Sweden, I would vote Delete per COM:PRP in light of the uncertainty surrounding FoP in Sweden. Gestumblindi (talk) 22:42, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 17:13, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Who is Pallava Narayanan Kanhangad? Dated to 2 days before the upload? Is the uploader the artist? Also, bad AR. —Cpt.a.haddock (talk) (please ping when replying) 16:50, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Pallav narayanan Kanhangad is a painter. The painting was photographed and uploaded by me. if this is against the rules, then it may be deleted.
- Thanks. Vijayan Rajapuram(വിജയന് രാജപുരം) 17:03, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- I'm not fully clear about the licensing of a photograph taken by you of a recent work of art. You can also see bits of the frame as well as the garland. This might no longer be a 2D work of art. Let's see what the mods say. BTW, is that a weird crop or is it the angle that's wonky?—Cpt.a.haddock (talk) (please ping when replying) 18:09, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 17:14, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
This image is copyroghted by Arthur Cavalieri as seen in http://www.informepolicial.com/giro/YUhSMGNEb3ZMM1psYW1FdVlXSnlhV3d1WTI5dExtSnlMM0J2YkdsMGFXTmhMMlY0TFdkdmRtVnlibUZrYjNJdFpHOHRjbWx2TFdkaGNtOTBhVzVvYnkxbExYQnlaWE52TFhCbGJHRXRjR1l2 Paladinum2 (talk) 18:22, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
ola apenas usei a imagem para colocar na pagina do garotinho peço desculpas nao sou o autor da imagem — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nathan Josef (talk • contribs) 19:39, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 17:14, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
No information on the photographer of this 3D object, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 20:52, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- It is my own photo, I've made it and uploaded. MaxiMaxiMax (talk) 01:24, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Maximaximax: Please fill in the information template and add a license for the picture. Jcb (talk) 14:26, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Uploader hasn't updated the info nor added a license for the photograph. Delete Abzeronow (talk) 02:36, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
- Keep the meta data would suggest uploader is the photographer, and other uploads of same pattern.--BevinKacon (talk) 21:38, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
- Yes, I would agree with that, but the photo has no license and we are not mind readers. Would be open to an undeletion request if uploader made one. @Jcb: Abzeronow (talk) 03:31, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
- I agree. This file cannot be keep-closed before uploader adds a license, but @Maximaximax: can safe the file by adding it. Jcb (talk) 11:47, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 17:15, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
No source. No information on the photographer of this 3D object, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 20:54, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 17:15, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Bogus license. Jcb (talk) 20:58, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Refining information file. It is OK? --Jiří Nedas (talk) 13:00, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
- No, I don't think so. Are you really claiming that you took this picture back in 1949? Seems highly unlikely to me. Permission has to come from the (heirs of the) photographer, unless the photographer would have died before 1948, which is inpossible if they took a picture in 1949. Jcb (talk) 13:09, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
- František Jelínek is my grandfather. The photo comes from a family album. The direct heirs are my mother and aunt whose permission I received. If there is anything else to do, please let me know. Thank you.--Jiří Nedas (talk) 12:34, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
- If you don't know who the photographer was, I think there is nothing you can do. Jcb (talk) 14:41, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
- František Jelínek is my grandfather. The photo comes from a family album. The direct heirs are my mother and aunt whose permission I received. If there is anything else to do, please let me know. Thank you.--Jiří Nedas (talk) 12:34, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
- No, I don't think so. Are you really claiming that you took this picture back in 1949? Seems highly unlikely to me. Permission has to come from the (heirs of the) photographer, unless the photographer would have died before 1948, which is inpossible if they took a picture in 1949. Jcb (talk) 13:09, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 17:16, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Insufficient source information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 21:40, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 17:16, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Not a Czech bramboráček at all. Typical czech bramborák/bramboráček is flat round where potatoes are the main ingredients. Raw, not fried yet, bramboráček is so sparse, it can't hold its shape. Google images of "bramboráčky" from ".cz" (i.e. excluding this ones) Kmarty (talk) 12:49, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- The closest one with what is showed on pictures "Bramboráček ([1-7]).JPG" could be "bramborové šišky"("potato cones"), Mohnnudel or Gnocchi. But all of them are usually boiled, not fried. Kmarty (talk) 12:34, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Hi all of you, firstly I do not really understand why the image is proposed to be deleted. Even if the name of the picture would be consider as a misleading (which is not as I will show later), it is appropriate just rename it, not to delete it.
- About the name. In Czech is a quite common that several different thinks has the same name and it depends on the context. This type of bread is really called "bramboráček" because the dough from which it is made contains potatoes. However, this does not mean that it is the same thing as the "bramborák" which is mentioned above. The procedure of the preparation is different, but both thinks share the same name. Therefore the problem is that the category mix up together also the different type and that is wrongly linked to Wikipedia projects. Regards --Chmee2 (talk) 13:14, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- I have nothing about renaming. But, as a Czech, this is the first and only appearance of potato bread called "bramboráček" (I believe this is only some strictly local thing). On every place of Czechia if you say "bramboráček/bramboráčky"(singular/plural), everybody thinks about small form of "bramborák/bramboráky" which is definitely not this one. Placing this picture as a "typical czech bramboráček/bramboráčky" is really misleading. Kmarty (talk) 13:37, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
- BTW renaming/deleting proposal. I found only "deleting proposal" hence I select this one. So it doesn't mean I want these pictures has to be deleted, I'd only like to remove that mislead. And this one is quite big (local naming vs wide spread naming). Kmarty (talk) 13:48, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
- See also
All related deletion requests.
- Tento projekt nesplňuje požadavky pro smazání !!!!!!!!
- Nápověda
- Category:Smažené bramborové krokety sypané směsí
- Dobré obrázky
- Pokročilé...
- Z projektu Wikimedia Commons
- Skočit na navigaciSkočit na vyhledávání
- Smažené bramborové krokety sypané směsí. Místní specialita prodávaná na trhu nebo v rychlém občerstvení. Prodejní název je :Bramboráček. Oficiání podniková norma pro neznámou pekárnu. Česká stání norma má název Bramborák. Zdrobnělina pro státní :normu je nepřípustná. Jedná se tak vždy o podnikovou normu nebo místní název pro tento výrobek. Tento výrobek nemusí :splňovat ČSN pro Bramborák. Ani podle názvu nebo složení. Czech Republic.
- Název je oficiální. S pozdravem Pohled 111.Pohled 111 --Pohled 111 (talk) 16:15, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
--Pohled 111 (talk) 16:23, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: If there is a problem with the file names, don't propose deletion, but work together to move the files to fitting filenames and into a separate category if appropriate. --Rosenzweig τ 18:41, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
Not a Czech bramboráček at all. Typical czech bramborák/bramboráček is flat round where potatoes are the main ingredients. Raw, not fried yet, bramboráček is so sparse, it can't hold its shape. Google images of "bramboráčky" from ".cz" (i.e. excluding this ones) Kmarty (talk) 12:49, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- The closest one with what is showed on pictures "Bramboráček ([1-7]).JPG" could be "bramborové šišky"("potato cones"), Mohnnudel or Gnocchi. But all of them are usually boiled, not fried. Kmarty (talk) 12:34, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Hi all of you, firstly I do not really understand why the image is proposed to be deleted. Even if the name of the picture would be consider as a misleading (which is not as I will show later), it is appropriate just rename it, not to delete it.
- About the name. In Czech is a quite common that several different thinks has the same name and it depends on the context. This type of bread is really called "bramboráček" because the dough from which it is made contains potatoes. However, this does not mean that it is the same thing as the "bramborák" which is mentioned above. The procedure of the preparation is different, but both thinks share the same name. Therefore the problem is that the category mix up together also the different type and that is wrongly linked to Wikipedia projects. Regards --Chmee2 (talk) 13:14, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- I have nothing about renaming. But, as a Czech, this is the first and only appearance of potato bread called "bramboráček" (I believe this is only some strictly local thing). On every place of Czechia if you say "bramboráček/bramboráčky"(singular/plural), everybody thinks about small form of "bramborák/bramboráky" which is definitely not this one. Placing this picture as a "typical czech bramboráček/bramboráčky" is really misleading. Kmarty (talk) 13:38, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
- Tento projekt nesplňuje požadavky pro smazání !!!!!!!!
- Nápověda
- Category:Smažené bramborové krokety sypané směsí
- Dobré obrázky
- Pokročilé...
- Z projektu Wikimedia Commons
- Skočit na navigaciSkočit na vyhledávání
- Smažené bramborové krokety sypané směsí. Místní specialita prodávaná na trhu nebo v rychlém občerstvení. Prodejní název je :Bramboráček. Oficiání podniková norma pro neznámou pekárnu. Česká stání norma má název Bramborák. Zdrobnělina pro státní :normu je nepřípustná. Jedná se tak vždy o podnikovou normu nebo místní název pro tento výrobek. Tento výrobek nemusí :splňovat ČSN pro Bramborák. Ani podle názvu nebo složení. Czech Republic.
- Název je oficiální. S pozdravem Pohled 111.Pohled 111 --Pohled 111 (talk) 16:15, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
--Pohled 111 (talk) 16:19, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: If there is a problem with the file names, don't propose deletion, but work together to move the files to fitting filenames and into a separate category if appropriate. --Rosenzweig τ 18:41, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
Not a Czech bramboráček at all. Typical czech bramborák/bramboráček is flat round where potatoes are the main ingredients. Raw, not fried yet, bramboráček is so sparse, it can't hold its shape. Google images of "bramboráčky" from ".cz" (i.e. excluding this ones) Kmarty (talk) 12:49, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- The closest one with what is showed on pictures "Bramboráček ([1-7]).JPG" could be "bramborové šišky"("potato cones"), Mohnnudel or Gnocchi. But all of them are usually boiled, not fried. Kmarty (talk) 12:34, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Hi all of you, firstly I do not really understand why the image is proposed to be deleted. Even if the name of the picture would be consider as a misleading (which is not as I will show later), it is appropriate just rename it, not to delete it.
- About the name. In Czech is a quite common that several different thinks has the same name and it depends on the context. This type of bread is really called "bramboráček" because the dough from which it is made contains potatoes. However, this does not mean that it is the same thing as the "bramborák" which is mentioned above. The procedure of the preparation is different, but both thinks share the same name. Therefore the problem is that the category mix up together also the different type and that is wrongly linked to Wikipedia projects. Regards --Chmee2 (talk) 13:14, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- I have nothing about renaming. But, as a Czech, this is the first and only appearance of potato bread called "bramboráček" (I believe this is only some strictly local thing). On every place of Czechia if you say "bramboráček/bramboráčky"(singular/plural), everybody thinks about small form of "bramborák/bramboráky" which is definitely not this one. Placing this picture as a "typical czech bramboráček/bramboráčky" is really misleading. Kmarty (talk) 13:39, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
- Tento projekt nesplňuje požadavky pro smazání !!!!!!!!
- Nápověda
- Category:Smažené bramborové krokety sypané směsí
- Dobré obrázky
- Pokročilé...
- Z projektu Wikimedia Commons
- Skočit na navigaciSkočit na vyhledávání
- Smažené bramborové krokety sypané směsí. Místní specialita prodávaná na trhu nebo v rychlém občerstvení. Prodejní název je :Bramboráček. Oficiání podniková norma pro neznámou pekárnu. Česká stání norma má název Bramborák. Zdrobnělina pro státní :normu je nepřípustná. Jedná se tak vždy o podnikovou normu nebo místní název pro tento výrobek. Tento výrobek nemusí :splňovat ČSN pro Bramborák. Ani podle názvu nebo složení. Czech Republic.
- Název je oficiální. S pozdravem Pohled 111.Pohled 111 --Pohled 111 (talk) 16:15, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
--Pohled 111 (talk) 16:20, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: If there is a problem with the file names, don't propose deletion, but work together to move the files to fitting filenames and into a separate category if appropriate. --Rosenzweig τ 18:42, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
Not a Czech bramboráček at all. Typical czech bramborák/bramboráček is flat round where potatoes are the main ingredients. Raw, not fried yet, bramboráček is so sparse, it can't hold its shape. Google images of "bramboráčky" from ".cz" (i.e. excluding this ones) Kmarty (talk) 12:49, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- The closest one with what is showed on pictures "Bramboráček ([1-7]).JPG" could be "bramborové šišky"("potato cones"), Mohnnudel or Gnocchi. But all of them are usually boiled, not fried. Kmarty (talk) 12:34, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Hi all of you, firstly I do not really understand why the image is proposed to be deleted. Even if the name of the picture would be consider as a misleading (which is not as I will show later), it is appropriate just rename it, not to delete it.
- About the name. In Czech is a quite common that several different thinks has the same name and it depends on the context. This type of bread is really called "bramboráček" because the dough from which it is made contains potatoes. However, this does not mean that it is the same thing as the "bramborák" which is mentioned above. The procedure of the preparation is different, but both thinks share the same name. Therefore the problem is that the category mix up together also the different type and that is wrongly linked to Wikipedia projects. Regards --Chmee2 (talk) 13:14, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- I have nothing about renaming. But, as a Czech, this is the first and only appearance of potato bread called "bramboráček" (I believe this is only some strictly local thing). On every place of Czechia if you say "bramboráček/bramboráčky"(singular/plural), everybody thinks about small form of "bramborák/bramboráky" which is definitely not this one. Placing this picture as a "typical czech bramboráček/bramboráčky" is really misleading. Kmarty (talk) 13:39, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
- Tento projekt nesplňuje požadavky pro smazání !!!!!!!!
- Nápověda
- Category:Smažené bramborové krokety sypané směsí
- Dobré obrázky
- Pokročilé...
- Z projektu Wikimedia Commons
- Skočit na navigaciSkočit na vyhledávání
- Smažené bramborové krokety sypané směsí. Místní specialita prodávaná na trhu nebo v rychlém občerstvení. Prodejní název je :Bramboráček. Oficiání podniková norma pro neznámou pekárnu. Česká stání norma má název Bramborák. Zdrobnělina pro státní :normu je nepřípustná. Jedná se tak vždy o podnikovou normu nebo místní název pro tento výrobek. Tento výrobek nemusí :splňovat ČSN pro Bramborák. Ani podle názvu nebo složení. Czech Republic.
- Název je oficiální. S pozdravem Pohled 111.Pohled 111--Pohled 111 (talk) 16:15, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: If there is a problem with the file names, don't propose deletion, but work together to move the files to fitting filenames and into a separate category if appropriate. --Rosenzweig τ 18:42, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
Not a Czech bramboráček at all. Typical czech bramborák/bramboráček is flat round where potatoes are the main ingredients. Raw, not fried yet, bramboráček is so sparse, it can't hold its shape. Google images of "bramboráčky" from ".cz" (i.e. excluding this ones) Kmarty (talk) 12:49, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- The closest one with what is showed on pictures "Bramboráček ([1-7]).JPG" could be "bramborové šišky"("potato cones"), Mohnnudel or Gnocchi. But all of them are usually boiled, not fried. Kmarty (talk) 12:34, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Hi all of you, firstly I do not really understand why the image is proposed to be deleted. Even if the name of the picture would be consider as a misleading (which is not as I will show later), it is appropriate just rename it, not to delete it.
- About the name. In Czech is a quite common that several different thinks has the same name and it depends on the context. This type of bread is really called "bramboráček" because the dough from which it is made contains potatoes. However, this does not mean that it is the same thing as the "bramborák" which is mentioned above. The procedure of the preparation is different, but both thinks share the same name. Therefore the problem is that the category mix up together also the different type and that is wrongly linked to Wikipedia projects. Regards --Chmee2 (talk) 13:14, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- I have nothing about renaming. But, as a Czech, this is the first and only appearance of potato bread called "bramboráček" (I believe this is only some strictly local thing). On every place of Czechia if you say "bramboráček/bramboráčky"(singular/plural), everybody thinks about small form of "bramborák/bramboráky" which is definitely not this one. Placing this picture as a "typical czech bramboráček/bramboráčky" is really misleading. Kmarty (talk) 13:39, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
- Tento projekt nesplňuje požadavky pro smazání !!!!!!!!
- Nápověda
- Category:Smažené bramborové krokety sypané směsí
- Dobré obrázky
- Pokročilé...
- Z projektu Wikimedia Commons
- Skočit na navigaciSkočit na vyhledávání
- Smažené bramborové krokety sypané směsí. Místní specialita prodávaná na trhu nebo v rychlém občerstvení. Prodejní název je :Bramboráček. Oficiání podniková norma pro neznámou pekárnu. Česká stání norma má název Bramborák. Zdrobnělina pro státní :normu je nepřípustná. Jedná se tak vždy o podnikovou normu nebo místní název pro tento výrobek. Tento výrobek nemusí :splňovat ČSN pro Bramborák. Ani podle názvu nebo složení. Czech Republic.
- Název je oficiální. S pozdravem Pohled 111.Pohled 111--Pohled 111 (talk) 16:15, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
--Pohled 111 (talk) 16:21, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: If there is a problem with the file names, don't propose deletion, but work together to move the files to fitting filenames and into a separate category if appropriate. --Rosenzweig τ 18:42, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
Not a Czech bramboráček at all. Typical czech bramborák/bramboráček is flat round where potatoes are the main ingredients. Raw, not fried yet, bramboráček is so sparse, it can't hold its shape. Google images of "bramboráčky" from ".cz" (i.e. excluding this ones) Kmarty (talk) 12:49, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- The closest one with what is showed on pictures "Bramboráček ([1-7]).JPG" could be "bramborové šišky"("potato cones"), Mohnnudel or Gnocchi. But all of them are usually boiled, not fried. Kmarty (talk) 12:34, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Hi all of you, firstly I do not really understand why the image is proposed to be deleted. Even if the name of the picture would be consider as a misleading (which is not as I will show later), it is appropriate just rename it, not to delete it.
- About the name. In Czech is a quite common that several different thinks has the same name and it depends on the context. This type of bread is really called "bramboráček" because the dough from which it is made contains potatoes. However, this does not mean that it is the same thing as the "bramborák" which is mentioned above. The procedure of the preparation is different, but both thinks share the same name. Therefore the problem is that the category mix up together also the different type and that is wrongly linked to Wikipedia projects. Regards --Chmee2 (talk) 13:14, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- I have nothing about renaming. But, as a Czech, this is the first and only appearance of potato bread called "bramboráček" (I believe this is only some strictly local thing). On every place of Czechia if you say "bramboráček/bramboráčky"(singular/plural), everybody thinks about small form of "bramborák/bramboráky" which is definitely not this one. Placing this picture as a "typical czech bramboráček/bramboráčky" is really misleading. Kmarty (talk) 13:39, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
- Dobrý den
- Není nutné mazat tyto fotografie!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Stači je znovu popsat. Název není bramboráček. Jde o bramborové krokety :pečené. Kdosi je upravil na místní specialitu. Opekájí se na panvičce. Ale dají se smažit i ve fritéze.
- Na závěr jsou obaleny v hrubé soli a několika druhů semínek. Podobná norma 21009 v knize "Receptůry teplých pokrmů".
- Kam je uložit : Nápověda
- Category:Smažené bramborové krokety sypané směsí - Jako místní specialita. Specialita prodávaná na trhu nebo v rychlém :občerstvení.
- Název fotografií nemohu přepracovat. User:Chmee2 přepracuj prosím název podobný tomuto. Prosím nemažte a zachraňte místní :specialitu. Děkuji Vám za pomoc. S pozdravem pohled 111.Pohled 111--Pohled 111 (talk) 20:18, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: If there is a problem with the file names, don't propose deletion, but work together to move the files to fitting filenames and into a separate category if appropriate. --Rosenzweig τ 18:42, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
Not a Czech bramboráček at all. Typical czech bramborák/bramboráček is flat round where potatoes are the main ingredients. Raw, not fried yet, bramboráček is so sparse, it can't hold its shape. Google images of "bramboráčky" from ".cz" (i.e. excluding this ones) Kmarty (talk) 12:49, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- The closest one with what is showed on pictures "Bramboráček ([1-7]).JPG" could be "bramborové šišky"("potato cones"), Mohnnudel or Gnocchi. But all of them are usually boiled, not fried. Kmarty (talk) 12:34, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Hi all of you, firstly I do not really understand why the image is proposed to be deleted. Even if the name of the picture would be consider as a misleading (which is not as I will show later), it is appropriate just rename it, not to delete it.
- About the name. In Czech is a quite common that several different thinks has the same name and it depends on the context. This type of bread is really called "bramboráček" because the dough from which it is made contains potatoes. However, this does not mean that it is the same thing as the "bramborák" which is mentioned above. The procedure of the preparation is different, but both thinks share the same name. Therefore the problem is that the category mix up together also the different type and that is wrongly linked to Wikipedia projects. Regards --Chmee2 (talk) 13:13, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- I have nothing about renaming. But, as a Czech, this is the first and only appearance of potato bread called "bramboráček" (I believe this is only some strictly local thing). On every place of Czechia if you say "bramboráček/bramboráčky"(singular/plural), everybody thinks about small form of "bramborák/bramboráky" which is definitely not this one. Placing this picture as a "typical czech bramboráček/bramboráčky" is really misleading. Kmarty (talk) 13:39, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
- Tento projekt nesplňuje požadavky pro smazání !!!!!!!!
- Nápověda
- Category:Smažené bramborové krokety sypané směsí
- Dobré obrázky
- Pokročilé...
- Z projektu Wikimedia Commons
- Skočit na navigaciSkočit na vyhledávání
- Smažené bramborové krokety sypané směsí. Místní specialita prodávaná na trhu nebo v rychlém občerstvení. Prodejní název je :Bramboráček. Oficiání podniková norma pro neznámou pekárnu. Česká stání norma má název Bramborák. Zdrobnělina pro státní :normu je nepřípustná. Jedná se tak vždy o podnikovou normu nebo místní název pro tento výrobek. Tento výrobek nemusí :splňovat ČSN pro Bramborák. Ani podle názvu nebo složení. Czech Republic.
- Název je oficiální. S pozdravem Pohled 111.Pohled 111--Pohled 111 (talk) 16:15, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
--Pohled 111 (talk) 16:22, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: If there is a problem with the file names, don't propose deletion, but work together to move the files to fitting filenames and into a separate category if appropriate. --Rosenzweig τ 18:42, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: автором указан Петровский семейный архив, а не фотограф, нет разрешения автора или наследники на свободные лицензии. необходимо подтверждение в OTRS. Dogad75 (talk) 21:19, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 13:53, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Logo was downloaded from Twitter but without written permission for licensing by the authoring organization, Take Mirrenberg (talk) 11:29, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
Kept: with PD-textlogo. --Jcb (talk) 17:18, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
This meets the treshold to be copyrighted by Belgium law (with the added text) https://finniancolumba.be/en/copyright-2/frequent-questions-belgian-copyright/ Father of Lies (talk) 08:02, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Keep - I don't believe this passes the TOO in Belgium. Jcb (talk) 16:33, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
- With the text on the side it clearly meets: the author should make minimal creative choices; the creation should not be the product of mere technical requirements Father of Lies (talk) 18:21, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
Kept: dont agree. --JuTa 17:58, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- A collage of a circa 1914 photograph of Harold Harmsworth from a British governmental publication & a circa 1909 photograph of Alfred Harmsworth taken for an American magazine(The World's Work) by Gertrude Käsebier (1852-1934). Would appear to be public domain in both the UK & the US. Looks to also be public domain in uploader's country(Italy) Abzeronow (talk) 16:32, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Kept: fixed the license(s). --JuTa 17:46, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
http://www.bacciguitars.com/portfolio-posts/riccardo-onori/. Besides photographer can't be the subject. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:08, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Il file è di proprietà del soggetto raffigurato che lo ha caricato sul suo Flickr con precise indicazioni sul copyright. In precedenza la foto era stata postata su un altro sito, ma ciò non significa che il copyright appartenga a quel sito. Quindi la foto va tenuta. --Nuvolele (talk) 17:00, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Possiamo togliere la richiesta di cancellazione? --Nuvolele (talk) 12:10, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
- @-Nuvolele: Il file non è più presente su Flickr. Inoltre chi ci dice che Riccardo Onori sia realmente il detentore del copyright (in teoria, non dovrebbe appartenergli), senza contare che la licenza usata su Flickr non è valida (CC by-nc-sa). Delete per me. --Ruthven (msg) 16:17, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: flickr uploader likely not the author. --JuTa 17:53, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: фото 1958 года, малого размера файла, автор, скорее всего, неизвестно, оцифровано в наше время. Необходимо повреждение в OTRS от автора. Dogad75 (talk) 20:54, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
I earnestly ask not to delete this photo. This is an only photo of my father; it was made by unknown photo atelier in Leningrad (former USSR) in 1968. I have an original at my home and I was the person who made the digitization. The article "Осмоловский Григорий Евсеевич" in Wikipedia is an only use of this photo and the photo is necessary for this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Okolecitza (talk • contribs) 05:14, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyright violation. --JuTa 17:54, 15 February 2019 (UTC)