Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/09/10
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
Out of COM:SCOPE, unused and rather useless image; description w promotional link.- -- Túrelio (talk) 07:38, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:53, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Looks like a copyvio Lyon-St-Clair (talk) 09:59, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Comment : @Grifine07: Why are you signing Nicolas Pauzié since this image is by Michel Peres ? --Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:27, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Delete per nom, needs permission from author "Michel Peres" via OTRS per EXIF metadata. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 10:27, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:42, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Personal photo. Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 12:15, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 14:25, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mashhashem77 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Clearly not the author's own work. Likely copy right violations.
- File:Ilam university of medical sciences logo.png
- File:Lums logo.jpg
- File:Semnan ums logo.jpg
- File:Goums logo.png
- File:Babol university of medical sciences logo.png
- File:Zums logo.png
- File:Ardebil ums logo.png
- File:Muk logo.jpg
- File:Kermanshah university of medical sciences logo.png
- File:Pezeshki shahid sodoghi yazd.jpg
- File:Kmu logo.jpg
- File:Birjand university of medical sciences logo.png
- File:Alborz university of medical sciences logo.png
- File:Zahedan university of medical sciences.jpg
- File:Hormozgan university of medical sciences.png
- File:Ghom university of medical sciences.jpg
- File:Jondishapoor university of medical sciences.jpg
- Cameron11598(talk) 21:18, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - all copyright violations and speedily deleted. --Nick (talk) 21:34, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
не правильний формат Lizabenet777 (talk) 09:16, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 12:54, 10 September 2018 UTC: не вірний формат --Krdbot 01:05, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
не правильний формат Lizabenet777 (talk) 09:16, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 12:54, 10 September 2018 UTC: не вірний формат --Krdbot 01:05, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
не вірний формат Lizabenet777 (talk) 12:33, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 12:52, 10 September 2018 UTC: не вірний формат --Krdbot 01:11, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
I created this file by mistake while my attempt to change the profile picture of Mr. Rajiv Anchal. Already there is a picture in his wiki page which is outdated. If you could add this photo there it would likely be a great help.
Thanks. Deepak Sunil KE (talk) 13:25, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 18:29, 10 September 2018 UTC: I created this file by mistake while my attempt to change the profile picture of Mr. Rajiv Anchal. Already there is a picture in his wiki page which is outdated. If you could add this photo there it would likely be a great help. Thanks. --Krdbot 01:11, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
copyvio from https://www.pexels.com/de/foto/abenteuer-dammerung-draussen-dune-206724/ Reda benkhadra (talk) 16:35, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 18:37, 10 September 2018 UTC: Copyright violation: https://www.pexels.com/de/foto/abenteuer-dammerung-draussen-dune-206724/ --Krdbot 01:12, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
This is a "pre-upload" (copyright expires in 2085), ready for current deletion and pre-listed for later undeletion. As uploader I request deletion ASAP. PlanespotterA320 (talk) 19:09, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 19:13, 10 September 2018 UTC: This is a "pre-upload" (copyright expires in 2085), ready for current deletion and pre-listed for later undeletion. As uploader I request deletion ASAP. --Krdbot 01:12, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
Getty Images photo: https://media.gettyimages.com/photos/noureddine-amrabat-of-morocco-throws-away-his-skull-cap-during-the-picture-id979373182?s=612x612 Ytoyoda (talk) 18:24, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Magog the Ogre at 03:34, 11 September 2018 UTC: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nourdine amrabat.jpg: Getty Images photo: https://media.gettyimages.com/photos/noureddine-amrabat-of-morocco-throws-away-his-skull-cap-during-the-picture-id979373182?s=612x612 --Krdbot 07:13, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope. No educational value in this file. - Cameron11598(talk) 21:23, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
Probably not own work. No permission. Jcb (talk) 14:52, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination. Also the uploader attempted to mark as fair use. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:55, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
не правильний формат Lizabenet777 (talk) 09:16, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:55, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Juan Pablo Urtaza (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promotional.
- File:LOOKBOOK4.jpg
- File:LOOKBOOK2.jpg
- File:LOOKBOOK3.jpg
- File:LOOKBOOK.png
- File:Ulän México.png
- File:Ulän boots.jpg
- File:Ulän Kids.jpg
Edslov (talk) 17:53, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:21, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
Description error Wayaum (talk) 17:31, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 03:16, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:Instant noodles in India
[edit]COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in these photos is the packaging; the details are neither minimal nor incidental, and are therefore unacceptable derivative works.
ℯxplicit 07:08, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 10:49, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Imho the unused corrupt file cannot even be "saved" by cropping. In this condition it is not suitable to illustrate the depicted object or the topic. It thus falls out of common's scope. Jotzet (talk) 07:08, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 10:50, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Useless image Satdeep Gill (talk) 07:29, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: personal picture, not used. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 10:50, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
useless selfie Satdeep Gill (talk) 07:38, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Used on a personal page. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 10:51, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
not own work, see watermark downright Pippobuono (talk) 10:18, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 10:51, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Blank photo SecretName101 (talk) 13:04, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 10:51, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Blurry photo SecretName101 (talk) 13:04, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy-deleted as nomination was on day of upload. --Túrelio (talk) 13:31, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Blurry picture SecretName101 (talk) 15:45, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 10:51, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Blurry picture SecretName101 (talk) 13:05, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 10:52, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Blurry picture SecretName101 (talk) 13:06, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 10:52, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Blurry picture SecretName101 (talk) 13:06, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 10:52, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Blurry photo SecretName101 (talk) 13:07, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 10:52, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
unlikely to be own works, and lacks of permissions. Are included various derivative works of book covers or page; a graph of questionable notability, small size files without EXIFs, a file grabbed from facebook "FBMD"....
- File:The Book of 10 Years Step of Today of MESO.jpg
- File:Mission, Vision and Objective of MESO.jpg
- File:Rāmañña Nikāya.jpg
- File:EiDhasira.jpg
- File:အဓိပတိတြေံကျာ်ဇၞော်အ္စနန္ဒ ဃောဂွံဝှ်(၅၀)၊ ဘာမည်ဇိုၚ်ကျာ်၊ ဍုၚ်လ္ဂုၚ်.jpg
- File:Hita Gawai SI.jpg
- File:Chart of ANF.jpg
- File:ကၞပ်လိက်ဝၚ်စၟတ်သမ္တီသဘၚ်ရတုသြန်၊ရာမညဓမ္မာစရိယ.jpg
- File:တိုန်စိုပ်ပေဲါသဳကၠဳ ဂကောံကွးဘာတက္ကသိုလ်သၚ်မန်.jpg
- File:ဒါယကာခမဳ ကေုာံ ဒါယကာထပ်သီ (မိကဵုမတအ်).jpg
- File:Aue Nai.jpg
Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:12, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:31, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 00:53, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:40, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
External copyrighted source, no permission, no CC-BY-SA visible there. Druschba 4 (talk) 10:00, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:48, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
External source and author, no permission. Druschba 4 (talk) 10:02, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:48, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
External copyrighted source and author, no permission. Druschba 4 (talk) 10:04, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:49, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
External copyrighted source and author, no permission. Druschba 4 (talk) 10:05, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:49, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Image previously deleted at [1], uploaded by sock ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 11:02, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 07:10, 17 September 2018 UTC: No permission since 8 September 2018 --Krdbot 13:10, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Low-res (even though large size) JPG. Have File:Cisatracurium besilate.svg as high-quality equivalent image and also File:Cisatracurium Besylate.png as higher-quality raster (with color-coded elements). DMacks (talk) 04:13, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 16:36, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal file; self promotion; no educational value. Regards, — TBhagat (contribs | talk) 06:14, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:31, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal file; self promotion; no educational value. Regards, — TBhagat (contribs | talk) 06:15, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:31, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal file; self promotion; no educational value. Regards, — TBhagat (contribs | talk) 06:15, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:31, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal file; self promotion; no educational value. Regards, — TBhagat (contribs | talk) 06:20, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:31, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal file; self promotion; no educational value. Regards, — TBhagat (contribs | talk) 06:23, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:31, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal file; self promotion; no educational value. Regards, — TBhagat (contribs | talk) 06:25, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:31, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal file; self promotion; no educational value. Regards, — TBhagat (contribs | talk) 06:26, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:31, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Felipe De Vicente (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope: unused artworks without obvious educational use. Artist: Felipe De Vicente [2].
- File:ART 131.jpg
- File:ART 134.jpg
- File:ART 174.jpg
- File:ART 173.jpg
- File:ART 172.jpg
- File:ART 155.jpg
- File:ART 154.jpg
- File:ART 153.jpg
- File:ART 146.jpg
- File:ART 136.jpg
4nn1l2 (talk) 07:49, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:31, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jonathan Montemayor (talk · contribs)
[edit]Social media pics.
- File:Osvaldo de Leon.jpg
- File:Claudia Martin foto.jpg
- File:Claudia Martin 2018.jpg
- File:David Zepeda en 2016.jpg
- File:David Zepeda Foto.jpg
- Alexis Jazz ping plz 08:25, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:32, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Afri Hidayat (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused gallery of art from unknown artist
- File:Lukisan Subhanallah.JPG
- File:Bismillah E.jpg
- File:Bersyukur I E.jpg
- File:Alfathikah E.jpg
- File:Bersyukur II E.jpg
Pippobuono (talk) 10:22, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:34, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: personal image/selfie, only contribution and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 15:31, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Magog the Ogre at 04:30, 30 Dezember 2017 UTC: Page is out of project scope --Krdbot 07:35, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:01, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:36, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:35, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:35, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yandiyansyahsh (talk · contribs)
[edit]Official symbol and document. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:35, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:34, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alejandro Sal y Rosas (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Alejandro Sal y Rosas.jpg
- File:Alejandro de la Sal y Rosas.jpg
- File:Inma J. Ferrero.jpg
- File:IREZMO.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:34, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rsjejonathanortiz (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo photos and copyrighted characters. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Fnafhs personajes temp 2.jpg
- File:Imagen oficial Fnafhs.jpg
- File:Edd00chan & MrDsater.jpg
- File:Fnafhs temp 1.jpg
- File:POSTER FNAFHS 480x480 264c1534-5eb4-463e-9671-4869bfa776e2 480x480.jpg
- File:Edd00chan Fnafhs.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:34, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
According to exif data (C) Anti Wendel. Skivsamlare (talk) 10:08, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 22:03, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Enrique Rojas Morales (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 22:03, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
out of scope of the project Wvdp (talk) 16:57, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Kept: in use on a personal user page, per COM:INUSE. --Sealle (talk) 22:09, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
vandalism and out of the scope of the project Wvdp (talk) 17:01, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 22:10, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE Lacrymocéphale (talk) 17:28, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 22:14, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE Lacrymocéphale (talk) 17:28, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 22:13, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. Small size, no metadata.
- File:Vasif Səmədov.jpg
- File:Bəbir Hüseynov .jpg
- File:Niyazov Xalid .jpg
- File:Leyla Axundzadə.jpg
- File:Salt-lake-city-2002.png
- File:Gucci store in Baku.jpg
- File:Гарамарьям.jpg
- File:Musa bey Rafiev.jpg
- File:Hacınski.jpg
- File:NYC - New York County.jpg
- File:Müştəba Əliyev .jpg
- File:Tonqal45.jpg
- File:Tonqal.jpg
Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 21:50, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Photographers should confirm licenses by following the instructions on OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 10:35, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
Questionable authorship claims based on the low/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent metadata, and the uploader's history.
- File:Aylin Fazelian.jpg – metadata indicates that this file was grabbed from social media; also published at https://www.bizimyol.info/az/news/99251.html
- File:Tanrıverdi Mustafayev 1.jpg – previously published at news.milli.az
- File:Tanriverdi Mustafayev.jpg
- File:Modern az logo .jpg
- File:CUHA .png
- File:Kərimov Elnur 7.png – odd choice of file format for a photo; squished image; screenshot?
- File:Kərimov Elnur 6.png – odd choice of file format for a photo; squished image; screenshot?
- File:Kərimov Elnur 5.png – odd choice of file format for a photo; screenshot?
- File:Kərimov Elnur 4.png – odd choice of file format for a photo; screenshot?
- File:Kərimov Elnur 3.jpg – taken with a Canon EOS 650D on 2016-05-21
- File:Kərimov Elnur 2.jpg – metadata indicates that this file was grabbed from social media
- File:Kərimov Elnur .jpg – metadata indicates that this file was grabbed from social media
- File:Nazir Əsədov.jpg
- File:Natiq Məmmədli1.jpg – taken with a Nikon D850 on 2018-07-07
- File:Natiq Məmmədli.jpg – previously published (albeit in lower resolution) at teatro.az
- File:Garanfil.jpg – https://www.jurnalistika.info/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/garanfil.jpg, grabbed from https://www.jurnalistika.info/arasdirma/insanlarin-qorxdugu-s%c9%99s/
—LX (talk, contribs) 17:49, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 22:15, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
No meta, small file sizes, apparently not taken by same person, unlikely own work.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:07, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:08, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Mirzə Mirzəyev şair.jpg
- File:Mirzə Mirzəyev - teatr xadimi.jpg
- File:Əliramiz Axundov.jpg
- File:Vəli Nəbiyev.jpg
- File:Səlim Rəfiq Rəfioğlu Hemid Arasli, Selim Refiq Refioğlu ve Abbas Zamanov.jpg
- File:Selim Refioglu.jpg
- File:Zaman Qarayev.jpg
- File:Əlabbas Bağırov 5.jpg
- File:Əlabbas Bağırov 4.jpg
- File:Əlabbas Bağırov.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:54, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/incosnsistent resolutions, missing EXIF/different cameras.
- File:Semra Eren-Nijhar1.jpg
- File:Elçin İbrahimov (alim).jpg
- File:Sevil Mikayılova.jpg
- File:Səkinə Babayeva.jpg
- File:İslam Manafov.jpg
- File:Sabrin Azim.jpg
- File:Saleh Oxumuş.png
- File:Rza Talıbov.jpg
- File:Ülvi Mehdiyev.jpg
- File:Rəhman Əzizzadə.jpg
- File:Nərman Süleymanov.jpg
- File:Qəzənfər Aloyev.jpg
- File:Fərhad Xubanlı.jpg
- File:İlqar İlkin.jpg
- File:Əlabbas Bağırov 3.jpg
- File:Əlabbas Bağırov 2.jpg
- File:Elnarə Akimova.jpg
- File:ƏLİ HƏSƏNLİ.jpg
- File:Nailə Rəhimbəyli.jpg
- File:Rəşid Məmmədov.jpg
- File:Vüsal Qasımlı.jpg
- File:Ülkər Piriyev.jpg
- File:Oktay Mehtiyev.jpg
- File:Cəlal Qurbanov.jpg
- File:Cavanşir Qurbanov.jpg
- File:Nigar Vəliyeva.2 - azərbaycanlı professor.jpg
- File:Nigar Vəliyeva.3 - azərbaycanlı professor.jpg
- File:Nigar Vəliyeva professor.jpg
- File:Nigar Vəliyeva.jpg
- File:Nigar Valiyeva.jpg
- File:Fərid Məmmədov.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
- One of these files is a re-upload after rather recent deletion (in case not a different image with same file name of course). The user has a "last warning" on their TP. If we do not give them an extra rest day at weekend, these "warnings" will not mean anything. (Indeed I do not use those warning templates for this reason.) E4024 (talk) 15:01, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:13, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Files claimed as own work but without any compelling appearance thereof: small sizes, low resolutions, a collage, historical figures, blurry historical figures, modern hip hop artist, etc. Unlikely that anyone but a professional photographer would have this kind of access and produce such low quality images.
- File:Lupe-fiasco-zoom-79c417bd-386c-40a9-8b11-22b88bc5ce34.jpg
- File:Jim-Sykes-tells-KTNA-stories.jpg
- File:Pappy cruz.jpg
- File:Snip3.png
- File:Capturedirksen.png
- File:Capturenh4.png
- File:Nh2.jpg
- File:Motz.jpg
- File:Davidsen.jpg
- File:Jonathan Motzfeldt.jpg
- File:Capturerml.png
Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:31, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:53, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
maps of fictional elections, not used. Out of project scope
- File:Electionmap48.png
- File:Map55.png
- File:Untitledlupe.png
- File:Genusmap6.png
- File:Espn14.png
- File:Electionmap5.png
- File:1964map.png
- File:ElectoralMap.png
- File:Electoral Map.png
- File:Canadda.svg
- File:Look.svg
- File:Social Credit is the only credit.svg
- File:Maine`1.png
- File:Scranton.png
- File:Captureca.png
- File:Mappy.png
- File:Capturesw.png
- File:Electoral map2.png
- File:Mappy map map.svg
- File:Capturest.png
- File:Capturehimap.png
- File:ElectoralCollege1992.svg.png
- File:2020eletionmapwithcnp.png
- File:1964 elextion map.png
- File:1952map.png
- File:USETHIS11.png
- File:1952ec.png
- File:1964 map.png
Robot Monk (talk) 09:29, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:46, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
Probable copyvios, given the uploader's history and prior DRs above.
- File:Untitledrkh.png
- File:Default123.jpg
- File:MNAndersen.jpg
- File:Capturekeef.png
- File:Cohn2.jpg
- File:Captureva.png
- File:Untitledbooo.png
- File:Patmcgee.jpg
- File:George-putnam-08.jpg
- File:Genusmap68.png
- File:Capturearizona.png
- File:Samuel pearson goddard jr.jpg
- File:Chiang-Kai-shek-heads-for-exile.jpg
- File:Flag-designer appspot.png
- File:Map2020.png
- File:Vermont2.jpg
- File:Genusmap (1).png
- File:Larry-McDonald.gif
- File:Untitledt&t.png
- File:Judd2.jpg
- File:Keef.jpg
- File:Jacques-stephen-alexis.jpg
- File:Lapalme-g.jpg
- File:Walter judd.jpg
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 18:57, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:07, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Almost every upload by this user is copyvio, and it's hard to take any of the self-made claim seriously. Fortunately, none of these images are used on Wikipedia.
- File:Genusmap (1).png
- File:Mufi.jpg
- File:Genusmap (2) (1).png
- File:Lyndon-B-Johnson-11.jpg
- File:Captureusn2.png
- File:Hawaii23.jpg
Ytoyoda (talk) 17:52, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, and please consider another block. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 07:31, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
Please include these in the discussion above. Lack of sourcing, description or categories make these images useless for Wikipedia.
- File:Capture60c.png
- File:Flag-designer appspotf.svg
- File:Flag-designer appspot.svg
- File:Capture93ok.png
Ytoyoda (talk) 11:31, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, and please consider another block. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 23:39, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
Unused maps.
- File:Genusmap (11).png
- File:Genusmap (9).png
- File:Genusmap (100).png
- File:Genusmap (8).png
- File:Genusmap (7).png
- File:Genusmap (6).png
- File:Genusmap (5).png
- File:Genusmap (4).png
- File:Genusmap (3).png
- File:Genusmap (1)9.png
- File:Genusmap (1).png
Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:00, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, and please consider another block. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 23:40, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
Probable copyvios, given the uploader's history and prior DRs above.
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 07:22, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 22:17, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ademoroti Emmanuel Adedeji (talk · contribs)
[edit]Self-promotion. Out of scope
- File:Ademoroti Emmanuel poems 10.jpg
- File:Ademoroti Emmanuel poems 09.jpg
- File:Ademoroti Emmanuel poems 07.jpg
- File:Ademoroti Emmanuel poems 08.jpg
- File:Ademoroti Emmanuel poems 06.jpg
- File:Ademoroti Emmanuel poems 05.jpg
- File:Ademoroti Emmanuel poems 04.jpg
- File:Ademoroti Emmanuel poems 01.jpg
- File:Ademoroti Emmanuel poems 02.jpg
- File:Ademoroti Emmanuel poems 03.jpg
- File:Webdeji in S.B.A uniform.jpg
- File:Ademoroti Emmanuel 06.jpg
- File:Ademoroti Emmanuel.jpg
- File:Ademoroti Emmanuel 03.jpg
- File:Ademoroti Emmanuel 02.jpg
- File:Ademoroti Emmanuel 01.jpg
Ronhjones (Talk) 15:16, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
- Delete most, for sure, but
keep File:Ademoroti Emmanuel poems 06.jpgfile:Ademoroti Emmanuel 06.jpg: It’s a fantastic thing — shirt colors and design matching building?! Fabulous! -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 17:39, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Tuvalkin: , you probably mean file:Ademoroti Emmanuel 06.jpg. This is really strange iomage. The rest must be deleted. Taivo (talk) 09:03, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, I meant that one, sorry! -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 16:26, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Tuvalkin: , you probably mean file:Ademoroti Emmanuel 06.jpg. This is really strange iomage. The rest must be
Self-promotion. Out of scope
- File:Ademoroti Emmanuel webdeji 05.jpg
- File:Ademoroti Emmanuel webdeji 06.jpg
- File:Ademoroti Emmanuel webdeji 04.jpg
- File:Ademoroti Emmanuel webdeji 02.jpg
- File:Ademoroti Emmanuel webdeji 03.jpg
- File:Ademoroti Emmanuel webdeji 01.jpg
- File:Ademoroti Emmanuel A.. 05.jpg
- File:Ademoroti Emmanuel A.. 04.jpg
- File:Ademoroti Emmanuel A.. 03.jpg
- File:Ademoroti Emmanuel A.. 02.jpg
- File:Ademoroti Emmanuel A.. 01.jpg
- File:Ademoroti Emmanuel poems 10.jpg
Ronhjones (Talk) 21:58, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope – not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader).
- File:Ademoroti Emmanuel webdeji.jpg
- File:Ademoroti Emmanuel webdeji recently during a birthday celebration.jpg
- File:Ademoroti Emmanuel webdeji. Ff.jpg
Hiàn (talk) 02:14, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
- Comment file:Ademoroti Emmanuel webdeji recently during a birthday celebration.jpg has maybe some value in category:Four matching outfits. The rest must be deleted. Taivo (talk) 09:03, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: except two per above. --Sealle (talk) 22:24, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ademoroti Emmanuel Adedeji (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE personal images.
- File:Ademoroti Emmanuel.jpg
- File:Ademoroti's.jpg
- File:Ademoroti Emmanuel Adedeji.jpg
- File:Ademoroti.jpg
- File:Ademoroti Emmanuel webdeji recently during a birthday celebration.jpg
- File:Ademoroti Emmanuel 06.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:01, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:46, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
Das Bild ist eine Fälschung. Feirefis (talk) 23:55, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 22:30, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
External copyrighted source website not online, see here and author, no permission. Druschba 4 (talk) 10:07, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Sealle at 22:01, 17 September 2018 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) - --Krdbot 01:07, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
External copyrighted source (website not online, see here) and author, no permission. Druschba 4 (talk) 10:08, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Sealle at 22:01, 17 September 2018 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) - --Krdbot 01:07, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
External copyrighted source (website not online, see here) and author, no permission. Druschba 4 (talk) 10:08, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Sealle at 22:01, 17 September 2018 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) - --Krdbot 01:07, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
External copyrighted source (website not online, see here) and author, no permission. Druschba 4 (talk) 10:09, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Sealle at 22:01, 17 September 2018 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) - --Krdbot 01:07, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
External copyrighted source and author, no permission. Druschba 4 (talk) 10:09, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Sealle at 22:01, 17 September 2018 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) - --Krdbot 01:07, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
External copyrighted source and author, no permission. Druschba 4 (talk) 10:10, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Sealle at 22:01, 17 September 2018 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) - --Krdbot 01:07, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Summerguy1983 (talk · contribs)
[edit]unlikely to be own works, some nominated files are already tagged for speedy deletion as "obvious copyvios"
- File:GBTA 5314.jpg
- File:NorwalkT 177.jpg
- File:GBT 4712.jpg
- File:GBT 3701.jpg
- File:MilfordT 117.jpg
- File:GBT Access 2710.jpg
- File:GBT 5335.jpg
- File:GBT 4313.jpg
- File:MilfordT 2909.jpg
Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:06, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:00, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
unlikely to be own works but grabbed from the web
Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:20, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:00, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Also Commons:Derivative works. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:57, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 08:58, 18 September 2018 UTC: No license since 10 September 2018 --Krdbot 13:07, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
no description, no educational use, out of scope Krd 18:45, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Jdx at 09:47, 18 September 2018 UTC: Mass deletion of pages added by Mc msjon --Krdbot 13:08, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
no description, no educational use, copyvio or out of scope Krd 18:47, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Jdx at 09:47, 18 September 2018 UTC: Mass deletion of pages added by Mc msjon --Krdbot 13:08, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope, use wikipedia as social media. Godric ki Kothritalk to me 03:54, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:37, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
Small and unused image, out of scope B dash (talk) 04:46, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
- Delete If it isn't being used on the article it was meant for, then it's fine by me to be deleted. Philroc (talk) 11:56, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: by colleague. --Jcb (talk) 16:37, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:P1240362 (42121630115).jpg SecretName101 (talk) 15:40, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 17:42, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
Somewha blury. Plenty better alternatives exist SecretName101 (talk) 15:48, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 17:54, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
Face obscured SecretName101 (talk) 15:48, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: too poor quality. --JuTa 17:41, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
Blurry. Better alternatives exist SecretName101 (talk) 15:49, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 17:49, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
Blurry. Better alternatives exist SecretName101 (talk) 15:50, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 17:49, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
very small without EXIFs : unlikely to be own work Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:48, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:44, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Divinnaboutique (talk · contribs)
[edit]"test" files, not educationally useful, or seemingly commercial purposes (see also user name Divinna*boutique)
Henxter (talk) 11:08, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:44, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
Facebook download, missing link/OTRS Ytoyoda (talk) 11:18, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:44, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
out of scope of the project Wvdp (talk) 17:06, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:45, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Brownieeeboy (talk · contribs)
[edit]- File:"Бог ме помоли да избавя хората от безграмотието".png
- File:"Намерих чай в шкафа".png
- File:Елица Маймарева.jpg
—SpanishSnake (talk | contribs) ping me plz 21:40, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:45, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
Blurry image SecretName101 (talk) 15:51, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 01:23, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
Blurry image SecretName101 (talk) 15:51, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 01:24, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
Blurry image SecretName101 (talk) 15:51, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 01:25, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
Blurry image SecretName101 (talk) 16:21, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 01:49, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
Das Foto ist ein Schnappschuss und nicht seriös im Kontext von Wikipedia 84.46.59.162 08:07, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Ich, Viola Roggenkamp, möchte kein Foto von mir auf der Wikipediaseite veröffentlicht sehen. Dieses Foto ist unseriös im Kontext der Wikipediaseite, es ist ein Schnappschuss. Ich wünsche keine Fotoveröffentlichung. 84.46.59.162 08:09, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
- Sehr geehrte Frau Roggenkamp, bitte melden Sie sich mit ihrem verifizierten Wikipedia-Account an. Die Administratoren können sonst nicht wissen, dass Sie es sind, die den Löschantrag stellt.--Fiona (talk) 11:45, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Als Person der Zeitgeschichte besteht kein Anspruch auf Löschung (§ 23 KUG). Somit existiert kein Löschgrund. --Ralf Roleček
12:05, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Selbstverständlich kann auch eine Schriftstellerin das Recht am eigenen Bild geltend machen. Derjenige, der ein Bildnis ohne Zustimmung veröffentlicht und verbreitet ist in der Pflicht zu beweisen, warum hier eine Ausnahme von dem Persönlichkeitsrecht gemacht werden soll. Wikipedia sollte es nicht darauf ankommen lassen, die Veröffentlichung erzwingen zu wollen.--Fiona (talk) 17:54, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
- Besser wäre es, mit der Dame einen Termin zu machen, um Fotos anzufertigen, die ihr gefallen und die sie auch selbst benutzen kann. Zur Klarstellung: Wir dürfen die Bilder laut Gesetz verwenden. Ob wir es sollten, steht auf einem ganz anderen Blatt. Ich sehe es auch so, daß man Wünsche der Abgebildeten respektieren sollte, wenn man irgendwelchen Ersatz hat. Haben wir dummerweise nicht. --Ralf Roleček 18:29, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
- Noch besser wäre es, das unerwünschte und entbehrliche Bild rauszulassen und abzuwarten, ob ein neues zustandekommt. --JosFritz (talk) 18:49, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
- Korrekt lizenzierte Bilder werden nur gelöscht, wenn Alternativen existieren. --Ralf Roleček 20:19, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
- Meinst Du mit gelöscht "aus dem Artikel entfernt" oder "aus Commons entfernt"? Ich denke doch ersteres, oder? Allerdings kann ich da nicht uneingeschränkt zustimmen, es gibt auch tatsächlich für Artikel unbrauchbare Bilder, dies ist allerdings keins davon. Grüße vom Sänger ♫ (talk) 05:26, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
- Korrekt lizenzierte Bilder werden nur gelöscht, wenn Alternativen existieren. --Ralf Roleček
- Noch besser wäre es, das unerwünschte und entbehrliche Bild rauszulassen und abzuwarten, ob ein neues zustandekommt. --JosFritz (talk) 18:49, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
- Und das maßt Du dir an zu beurteilen, während die Bitte der dargestellten Person nicht zählt? Weil du es in deiner Anonymtät kannst? Es kann nicht sein, dass Wikipedia und ihre anonymen User Persönlichkeiten zwingen entweder mit einem als unwürdig empfundenen Schnappschuss, für den sie keine Erlaubnis erteilt haben, abgebildet zu werden oder einen Fotografen zu beauftragen (vielleicht einen Wikipedianer, der damit Geld verdient?) Wie weit geht die Verfügungsgewalt Anonymer über öffentliche Personen? Wikipedia will eine seriöse Enzyklopädie sein und kein buntes Boulevardblatt. Dazu gehört auch die Verantwortung der Bearbeiter, angemessene Porträts von Personen abzubilden oder keine.--Fiona (talk) 06:41, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
- Du vergreifst dich im Ton, wie man es von dir kennt. Du hast es nötig, von Anonymität zu schwafeln. Und deine Behauptung, irgendjemand würde gegen Bezahlung fotografieren, ist eine Frechheit und Lüge. EOD --Ralf Roleček 09:14, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
- Du vergreifst dich im Ton, wie man es von dir kennt. Du hast es nötig, von Anonymität zu schwafeln. Und deine Behauptung, irgendjemand würde gegen Bezahlung fotografieren, ist eine Frechheit und Lüge. EOD --Ralf Roleček
- Und das maßt Du dir an zu beurteilen, während die Bitte der dargestellten Person nicht zählt? Weil du es in deiner Anonymtät kannst? Es kann nicht sein, dass Wikipedia und ihre anonymen User Persönlichkeiten zwingen entweder mit einem als unwürdig empfundenen Schnappschuss, für den sie keine Erlaubnis erteilt haben, abgebildet zu werden oder einen Fotografen zu beauftragen (vielleicht einen Wikipedianer, der damit Geld verdient?) Wie weit geht die Verfügungsgewalt Anonymer über öffentliche Personen? Wikipedia will eine seriöse Enzyklopädie sein und kein buntes Boulevardblatt. Dazu gehört auch die Verantwortung der Bearbeiter, angemessene Porträts von Personen abzubilden oder keine.--Fiona (talk) 06:41, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Very unfavourable expression, such a "portrait" does not do the lady any justice whatsoever. Even if this is the only freely licensed picture of this person, Commons does not need it. Really not. And even much less when the depicted person requests its deletion herself. I for myself often photograph people for Wikipedia, and sometimes there are unfavourable snapshots in the series too, but I select one or two best photo and do never upload such snapshots. (Even if the lady was Angela Merkel in person, I would not support uploading such a photo, though in this case it would be juridically and even ethically OK, I guess.) --A.Savin 09:44, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
- Keep But I think it would be a good idea to transfer the other photos of her from the Flickr album (https://www.flickr.com/photos/das-blaue-sofa/albums/72157628008750491) and use one of the others (https://www.flickr.com/photos/das-blaue-sofa/6347612610/in/album-72157628008750491/) für her article. --Magnus (talk) 10:20, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Tsungam: RfD is not a poll. Since you provided no argumentation for keeping it, I hope the closing sysop will ignore your "vote". --A.Savin 10:24, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for nothing. --Magnus (talk) 11:03, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
- This is not a free foto. In the description field there is a copyright holder mentioned and that it may be used for non-commercial purposes. It is also unfavorable. BUT: Why should anyone think the IP is Viola Roggenkamp or a person who acts in her interest? The foto is a promo foto published by a public broadcaster and meant to promote a public appearence of Roggenkamp in a TV series (Das blaue Sofa). Why should Roggenkamp oppose a foto, she has agreed to, to be used for promotion? Still, it has to be deleted for being not-commercial. --C.Suthorn (talk) 11:08, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Tsungam: RfD is not a poll. Since you provided no argumentation for keeping it, I hope the closing sysop will ignore your "vote". --A.Savin 10:24, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
- I confirm that the applicant is Viola Roggenkamp. She is not used to how to act in Wikipedia.--Fiona (talk) 11:25, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
- After looking into de:Viola Roggenkamp The users who participate in this DR have also been involved in a edit conflict in the german wikipedia article (and do not mention it here). --C.Suthorn (talk) 11:41, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
- Correct. The edit conflict, however, had nothing to do with this photo but mainly deals with the article itself. Most of the users involved in editing ref. the photo actually don't partipate in this discussion. Btw: Viola Roggenkamp recently created an account, but does sometimes forget to login - hence, it is not unlikely that she wrote here herself. -AnnaS. (talk) 13:38, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
- After looking into de:Viola Roggenkamp The users who participate in this DR have also been involved in a edit conflict in the german wikipedia article (and do not mention it here). --C.Suthorn (talk) 11:41, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
- I confirm that the applicant is Viola Roggenkamp. She is not used to how to act in Wikipedia.--Fiona (talk) 11:25, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
- Comment The photo should be deleted not because it's possibly unfree, but because of its low quality and usability due to unfavorable facial expression, as explained above. If it's deleted because of wrong license, maybe in some days an OTRS permission is received and the picture is restored as if nothing happened. But it should be deleted without a possibility to restore it (apart from the technical possibility). --A.Savin 13:43, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Many people would love to rewrite the Wikipedia article about themselves -and unfortunately, some do. Apart from the correction of factual mistakes, that's not a very wise thing to do. As a picture tells a thousand words, it's only logical that many people would also love to have a "better" picture posted in "their" Wikipedia article. Hence the success of Wikiportret. Though it's wise to listen to diverging opinions, in the end the contributors to Wikipedia decide about the text and the images -not by vote, but by trying to reach consensus. Looking at this disputed picture, it is clear that it is an expressive picture. I like it, but I can imagine someone would love a more neutral one. As the same source had a technically better picture in store, I uploaded that one to Wikimedia Commons and included it in the German version of the Wikipedia article. But, I repeat, it's the choice of the Wiki community. If a more recent or more telling picture would pop up, the "new" 2005 picture could easily be replaced. Just a note: this photograph has been in Wikimedia Commons (and in the Wikipedia article) since December 2012, so I guess it has been a late wake-up call. Regarding the license: this photograph passed the Flickr license review on 3 December 2012 (CC-BY-2.0), and the only restriction from the source is "editorial use only, please credit" -in line with CC-BY. Vysotsky (talk) 15:26, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
- Keep No valid reason for deletion is stated here. I) Correct license. II) The portrayed person can't demand a deletion. III) The quality of the image isn't nowhere nearly bad enough for a deletion. --Mirer (talk) 02:08, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
- "The portrayed person can't demand a deletion" -> obviously wrong, of course it's possible to demand it. One of my photos was deleted exactly for this reason (and it was nowhere nearly as bad as this one). --A.Savin 05:28, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
I agree with Magnus. We should keep another pichture from https://www.flickr.com/photos/das-blaue-sofa/albums/72157628008750491 as new version. There are no reason to delete this picture. --Verum (talk) 13:22, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per Commons:Photographs of identifiable people#Moral issues. I agree (and this is very unusual) with A.Savin. --Stepro (talk) 23:30, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
(edit conflict) Comment Meanwhile another picture from the same set has been uploaded. In my opinion there is no licence issue here: It’s not our fault when the Flickr user sets all the images under cc-by-sa-2.0. The limitation in the text is in my eyes irrelevant. Notwithstanding I am for
- Delete for personal reasons, see also Commons:Photographs of identifiable people. The photo can be considered as unfllattering (right word?). — Speravir – 23:38, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
- Delete for personal reasons, see also Commons:Photographs of identifiable people. By the way - she stated at the beginning of this thread as IP, that this photo was not authorized by her and that she do not want a picture of her in Wikipedia.--KarlV (talk) 08:47, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
Comment Das blaue Sofa (2005) showed Viola Roggenkamp in a public appearance, in which she was even holding a microphone in one of the photographs. This means that Roggenkamp, as a well known author, went to that ZDF broadcast as a public figure. Consequently Section 23 of the KUG (German Copyright Act) applies, so the given license is appropriate and correct. Vysotsky (talk) 11:26, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
- Part (2) of this law clearly excludes cases where the publication is contrary to a legitimate interest of the depicted person. --A.Savin 13:47, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
- That's correct. But that clause ("durch die ein berechtigtes Interesse des Abgebildeten [...] verletzt wird" / "which violates a legitimate interest of the person depicted") is meant to protect people who are pictured in a degrading or defamatory way -not to forbid expressive or peculiar photographs. Mind you: I uploaded the new (less expressive) photograph of Roggenkamp myself, so I understand her feelings, but to my understanding the disputed photograph is in line with the rules of Wikimedia Commons and German copyright law. Vysotsky (talk) 15:10, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Courtesy deletion, as depicted person clearly objected against this image, it's unused now and as alternative image is on Commons.
Permission from Ruslans Matrozis needed. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:52, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Yann at 05:28, 21 September 2018 UTC: No license since 14 September 2018 - --Krdbot 19:07, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
Created with wrong page name Uoaei1 (talk) 11:17, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: accidental creation. --JuTa 06:40, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by JuTa as no license (No license since). Uploaded in 2012; there may be a license at fawiki, possibly at a deleted file description page. I'd like someone to look into this possibility before we delete this. Guanaco (talk) 13:22, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: still no license. --Jcb (talk) 13:48, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
A book cover, unlikely to be own work Ymblanter (talk) 07:09, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Intended to uploaded it as a book cover without properly considering how to do so. Its a mistake on my part and should be deleted. --Eamonsmf (talk) 14:14, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 18:48, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
Since there are many better photographs depicting the same in Category:San Brizio Chapel - Sermon and Deeds of the Antichrist this redundant unused low-quality file should be obsolete. Jotzet (talk) 07:31, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 18:48, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
Google translates file description as "A siam fighter or betta fish in captivity in Paraguana". I cannot see any fish here, maybe the image is out of project scope due to missing educational value. Taivo (talk) 09:48, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Kept: @Taivo: I clearly see the fish. I think it's a Betta splendens, see for example File:Kampffisch betta splendenscele4.jpg. It's an Asian fish, not native to Venezuela, so I think the categories are wrong - that particular fish bowl might be located in Paraguaná, but that doesn't make it a fish of Paraguaná. Kept, I'm going to correct the categorization. --Gestumblindi (talk) 19:42, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
Useless image SecretName101 (talk) 13:34, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (blurry, unclear subject). --Gestumblindi (talk) 19:48, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
Useless image SecretName101 (talk) 13:34, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (blurry, unclear subject). --Gestumblindi (talk) 19:48, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
Better images existx rather blurry SecretName101 (talk) 13:39, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 19:48, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
Blurry, better images exist as alternatives SecretName101 (talk) 13:40, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 19:49, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
Blurry image SecretName101 (talk) 13:41, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 19:49, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
Blurry imahe SecretName101 (talk) 13:41, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 19:49, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
Blurry image SecretName101 (talk) 13:42, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 19:49, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
Blurry image SecretName101 (talk) 13:42, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 19:50, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
Blurry image SecretName101 (talk) 13:42, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 19:50, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
Blurry image. Better alternatives exist SecretName101 (talk) 13:43, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 19:50, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
Permission from Robert Alexander Anderson needed. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:26, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:15, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
Useless imahe SecretName101 (talk) 13:33, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Moheen at 10:10, 27 September 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Kylie Minogue at Bowery Ballroom (June 25, 2018) --Krdbot 12:58, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
Blurry image SecretName101 (talk) 15:32, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Moheen at 10:10, 27 September 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Kylie Minogue at Bowery Ballroom (June 25, 2018) --Krdbot 12:58, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
Blurry photo SecretName101 (talk) 15:32, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Moheen at 10:10, 27 September 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Kylie Minogue at Bowery Ballroom (June 25, 2018) --Krdbot 12:58, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
Blurry image SecretName101 (talk) 15:32, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Moheen at 10:10, 27 September 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Kylie Minogue at Bowery Ballroom (June 25, 2018) --Krdbot 12:58, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
Blurry image SecretName101 (talk) 15:33, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Moheen at 10:10, 27 September 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Kylie Minogue at Bowery Ballroom (June 25, 2018) --Krdbot 12:58, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
Placed by the uploader to 2018 fire at the Museu Nacional, Rio de Janeiro. The image initially appearing like a fire damage photo reveals to be an edited version of File:Museu Nacional 2.jpg by the same uploader. This latter, after examination, is found to originate from November, 2017, and obviously doesn’t show any kind of fire damage. IMHO this user, Antoni_Vieira (talk · contribs), deserves some kind of negative attention due to this forgery. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 06:07, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Revision of User_talk:Antoni_Vieira
Deleted per nom. Out-of-scope forgery. Strakhov (talk) 02:37, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Uploader request. I created this some time ago and realized now it's factually inaccurate. Related to deletion requests File:Di silv.svg and File:Tri copp.svg. Officer781 (talk) 06:37, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
- Sorry, this one is factually correct. I wish to not delete this image.--Officer781 (talk) 15:00, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: withdraw by the nominator. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:06, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Uploader request. I know I withdrew my nomination before, but this time I wish to delete it for good. It is an oversimplified picture which does not capture the full extent of bonding for the molecule. Officer781 (talk) 03:05, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, it's not in use in any case. Ruthven (msg) 08:52, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Files of User:Rocklandrose
[edit]- File:Jeffrey Rose, CMH.jpg
- File:NYC Hypnotist Jeffrey Rose, CMH - A Leading Manhattan Hypnotherapist.jpg
- File:Jeffrey Rose, CMH - NYC Hypnotist.jpg
The metadata states "Author: www.RickHelman.com, Copyright holder: www.RickHelman.com". This does not appear to be the uploader (who may be the subject of the photos considering the user name and advertising bent); would need permission from the copyright holder to license his photos. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 03:38, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:51, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Not a work of the federal government, {{PD-USGov}} does not apply. Mys_721tx (talk) 05:03, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; Photo courtesy of the Northbrook Public Library. Ruthven (msg) 08:52, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Not a work of the federal government, {{PD-USGov}} does not apply. Mys_721tx (talk) 05:03, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:52, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Die Darstellerin Frau Weisgerber hat der Veröffentlichung NICHT zugestimmt und möchte, dass das Foto entsprechend gelöscht wird! 217.91.112.246 09:55, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Als Person der Zeitgeschichte ist gem. § 23 KUG keine Zustimmung erforderlich. § 201a StGB ist nicht betroffen. Somit besteht kein Löschgrund. --Ralf Roleček 11:16, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 08:53, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Irrtum, echte Pflaumen Mehlauge (talk) 12:39, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
falsches Lemma, nicht identifizierte Zwetschgensorte, keine Lizenz Mehlauge (talk) 16:21, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: by Wvk. Ruthven (msg) 08:53, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Blurry image SecretName101 (talk) 12:51, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:54, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Blank image SecretName101 (talk) 12:52, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:54, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Blurry crowd shot SecretName101 (talk) 12:52, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:54, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Blurry crowd shot SecretName101 (talk) 12:53, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:54, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Blurry crowd shot SecretName101 (talk) 12:53, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:54, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Blurry photo SecretName101 (talk) 13:03, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:54, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Blurry photo SecretName101 (talk) 13:03, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:54, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Copyvio from: http://beaus.net/ Father of Lies (talk) 13:33, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Support speed deletion because copyrights violation for the website.--Chiba ryo (talk) 19:23, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:54, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
è di mia proprietà e non desidero più condividerlo. Cristiano.piva (talk) 13:33, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
è di mia proprietà e non desidero più condividerlo. 37.160.102.145 12:09, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: NETCOPYVIO in any case. Ruthven (msg) 08:55, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
- This file was uploaded accidentally when trying to upload a different version of the image. It should be deleted. Weegaweek (talk) 15:21, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:55, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
unidentified logo of questionable notability, should be SVG if useful. Jon Kolbert (talk) 14:15, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:55, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:56, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
non-notable individual, also a web-quality image that was possibly lifted from elsewhere Jon Kolbert (talk) 14:17, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:56, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama in USA for statues. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:56, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 09:07, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 09:07, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 09:07, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 09:07, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama in USA for statues.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 09:07, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Seoexpertinbd (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 09:08, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kevshoyankee (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (images already present in different websites). Ruthven (msg) 09:10, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
No date, wrong use of template. Fæ (talk) 15:01, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Fæ: there was a date in the description. The photo has been taken more than 180 years ago. Why can't I use this license? Bigbossfarin (talk) 20:02, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
- The only original date at the time this DR was created was 1838, the date of building reconstruction. However this appears to be a photograph of a model of the building. The dates given of the 1960s for the photograph of the model, mean that the photograph itself needs a release, or a credible rationale of why the photograph is public domain. --Fæ (talk) 09:01, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
- Ok, I agree it's no public domain. Do you think I could use this photo of a Ducat instead? Bigbossfarin (talk) 19:09, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
- No longer needed thanks. Delete Bigbossfarin (talk) 18:10, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
- No longer needed thanks.
- Ok, I agree it's no public domain. Do you think I could use this photo of a Ducat instead? Bigbossfarin (talk) 19:09, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
- The only original date at the time this DR was created was 1838, the date of building reconstruction. However this appears to be a photograph of a model of the building. The dates given of the 1960s for the photograph of the model, mean that the photograph itself needs a release, or a credible rationale of why the photograph is public domain. --Fæ (talk) 09:01, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 09:10, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 09:10, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Persönlichkeitsrechte sind nicht gewahrt 9EkieraM1 (talk) 15:19, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: added {{personality rights}} {{consent|public}}. @9EkieraM1: can you be more specific?. Ruthven (msg) 09:12, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Texte de Colette, mort en 1954, il y a moins de 70 ans , pas encore libre de droit Havang(nl) (talk) 15:24, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
- Il me semble, en effet, que pour rester cohérents, il faut supprimer ce fichier, dont l'auteur, d'une part, est mort il y a moins de 70 ans, comme l'écrit Havang(nl), et d'autre part, illustre des éléments dits 'inédits' qu'il y aurait lieu de supprimer dans l'article sur Catherine Fauln (au cas où, bien sûr, il serait accepté). Merci donc de veiller à ce qu'il soit supprimé également si Wikimedia, de même que tous les fichiers qui sont sous droit d'auteur, comme la gouache de Pierre Caille. --Ada5516 (talk) 15:49, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 09:13, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Failed upload Joanbanjo (talk) 15:27, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 09:14, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Blank image SecretName101 (talk) 15:33, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 09:14, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Blank imagr SecretName101 (talk) 15:34, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 09:14, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
This is a "pre-upload" (copyright expires in 2072), ready for current deletion and pre-categorized for later undeletion. As uploader I request deletion ASAP. PlanespotterA320 (talk) 18:12, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: by Túrelio. Ruthven (msg) 09:14, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
copyvio MiguelAlanCS (talk) 20:49, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Obviously copyvio. --Taichi (talk) 16:37, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: from https://www.instagram.com/p/BCCFOu2rF-E/?utm_source=ig_embed&utm_medium=loading. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 03:41, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
Questionable authorship claims based on the moderate resolution, missing metadata (except metadata indicating that it was grabbed from social media), and the uploader's history. Same resolution, subject and photographic style as https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=120584435367160. —LX (talk, contribs) 18:29, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:24, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
Internet image, watermarked Ytoyoda (talk) 18:42, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:18, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
Seemingly meaningless diagram that does not seem to relate to anything real that I can find in Google search. Presumably it is the invention of the uploader. Unlikely to be of any use to the project. Has been spuriosuly inserted into a few articles on English Wikipedia but the meaning is no clearer for that. DanielRigal (talk) 19:10, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:17, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
Unused and seemingly useless image. The Commons is not free file storage for random images. DanielRigal (talk) 19:12, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:17, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
This is a professionally taken photograph by Rick Rhodes (see Exif data). The uploader, however, seems to be a COI editor focused on creating en:Draft:Storm Eye Institute who is highly unlikely to be Rick Rhodes himself. As such, the copyright release is called into question, and we would need an OTRS release to keep it. Waggie (talk) 19:12, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:17, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
Unused and seemingly useless image. Description and file name are at complete odds. No indication that this is a real flag of anything. Seems to be using the Commons as a free file host for random images. DanielRigal (talk) 19:19, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:16, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
This is a "pre-upload" (copyright expires in 2071), ready for current deletion and pre-listed for later undeletion. As uploader I request deletion ASAP. PlanespotterA320 (talk) 19:23, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: by Túrelio. --Didym (talk) 20:16, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
Facebook download, possibly video screenshot? Ytoyoda (talk) 19:23, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:15, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
Copyright violation: http://phatfossils.com/collecting%20trip.php?tripid=032117 Super Dromaeosaurus (talk) 20:11, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:15, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
Copyvio : http://www.luxtram.lu/fr/documentation/dossier-eie/ "3.2.6 Vues 3D Vues 3D" Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 20:51, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:14, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
Leon Kennedy is a character from Resident Evil from Konami : Copyright issues CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:52, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:13, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
Copyright violation:https://www.deviantart.com/teratophoneus/art/Choconsaurus-baileywillisi-720049596 Super Dromaeosaurus (talk) 20:52, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:13, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
Copyvio : http://www.luxtram.lu/fr/documentation/dossier-eie/ "3.2.6 Vues 3D Vues 3D" Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 20:54, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:13, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
von http://i1.wp.com/medscoop.anem.pt/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/goiana.jpg?w=250 Verum (talk) 21:04, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:12, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
Not-own work modified to be a trolling attack image: The legend reads Santa Maria do Cu (= Saint Mary of the Arse). Not used. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 21:57, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:12, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
upload error LigaDue (talk) 22:10, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:11, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
upload error LigaDue (talk) 22:10, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:11, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
Low-resolution rendering claimed as “own work”, while the organization’s site credits the artwork to “Barrie”. If the uploader is indeed the same person, the identity should be verified through OTRS. —Odysseus1479 (talk) 22:15, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:11, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
Unvalid date : copyright protection in Latvia lasts 50 or 70 years, it depends on when the picture has been shot. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:55, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:10, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
COM:DW of https://egyptwindow.net/Egypt_News/10035/Default.aspx Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:59, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:10, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
I have upload a new more complete Version of the file. Yomomo (talk) 23:01, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:10, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
Permission from Brett Groehler needed. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:02, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:09, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
Logo; No Fairuse on Commons Father of Lies (talk) 18:22, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
- Out of scope, non-free image logo that meets the threshold of originality. - Cameron11598(talk) 21:26, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:46, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
Initially published at https://ellesmusikblogg.se/2016/06/jamie-meyer-pa-smaka-pa-stockholm-festivalen-2016/ Ytoyoda (talk) 18:26, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:46, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
Previously published at https://webb-tv.nu/carl-stanley-arligt-talat-svt-play/ Ytoyoda (talk) 18:28, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:30, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
Si trova nella sezione sbagliata, cioè Cimitero Maggiore invece che Castello Visconteo. Lordraffy (talk) 12:01, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:39, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
Si trova nella sezione sbagliata, cioè Cimitero Maggiore invece che Castello Visconteo. Lordraffy (talk) 12:01, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:39, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
Not the good new logo ArnaudDl (talk) 09:36, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Not the good new logo ArnaudDl (talk) 11:00, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: advertising, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:28, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
title error Wayaum (talk) 17:46, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:18, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Uploader states this photo was taken from a brochure. Would need information about the copyright status of the brochure or permission from the copyright holder. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 03:42, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:19, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
bad in optical Henry Rolling (talk) 05:12, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:20, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
i make mistake title write Kyaw Myo Hlaing (Tanai) (talk) 06:04, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:20, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
I uploaded this photo a few months ago without the permission of my friend. Now he request to delete this photo from wiki as this photo include confidential information about the project Khyeungae (talk) 08:56, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:21, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
out of scope - no detail provided, image is unusable Cabayi (talk) 10:21, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:21, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
personal photo; out of scope (uploaded in batch Flickr upload) Mindmatrix 14:29, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:21, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Unused insignia of a single rank of a city police department. The rest of the set does not appear to have been uploaded, and this file has no use in isolation. Additionally, the shading probably pushes this over the threshold of originality, making the PD claim invalid. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:11, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:35, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
Photoshopped professional PR photo from Assetwork products. Unlikely to be "own work" as claimed. A similar upload by User:Thefleetbeat (File:AssetWorks Electronic Logging Device.png) is a clear copyvio. Delete per COM:PCP (also out of scope as advertisement). GermanJoe (talk) 14:23, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:35, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
If all we know is 19th century, then there can be no reliable statement that the image is public domain. Fæ (talk) 15:10, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Kept: f all we know is 19th century, then it is 98% likely older than 120 years. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:39, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
If country of creation was not the US, and date may be as late as 1900, then the PD license cannot be supported. Fæ (talk) 15:11, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
@Fæ: If you nominate this for deletion, you should nominate this for deletion, too. I only cropped the file. Habitator terrae (talk) 15:18, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks, consider it included. A valid PD statement may be possible if the country of creation can be verified.
- Now checking the source record at https://www.brooklynmuseum.org/opencollection/objects/76398, this gives location of creation as India. As this was at the end of the 19th C. copyright is calculated as life + 60 years. However, if we can presume that the work is unattributed, possibly mass produced for the export market, then we can presume that {{PD-India}} may correctly apply.
- I'm going to take a view of Keep on this basis and change the license accordingly.
--Fæ (talk) 15:28, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
-small.png){kind=link}
![190 File:Carl stanley under turnén "Ärligt talat", 2017.jpg](#File:Carl_stanley_under_turnén_"Ärligt_talat",_2017.jpg){kind=link}
![198 File:"Saungtaigyi Watet Fall".jpg](#File:"Saungtaigyi_Watet_Fall".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![209 File:Kirche "St. Vitus" in Schweiburg (Jade).jpg](#File:Kirche_"St._Vitus"_in_Schweiburg_(Jade).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
-13.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
%E1%81%8A_%E1%80%98%E1%80%AC%E1%80%99%E1%80%8A%E1%80%BA%E1%80%87%E1%80%AD%E1%80%AF%E1%81%9A%E1%80%BA%E1%80%80%E1%80%BB%E1%80%AC%E1%80%BA%E1%81%8A_%E1%80%8D%E1%80%AF%E1%81%9A%E1%80%BA%E1%80%9C%E1%80%B9%E1%80%82%E1%80%AF%E1%81%9A%E1%80%BA.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
![[1]](https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Chris_Jarvis_photography.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(1).png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
9.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
-small.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-small.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
-small.png){kind=link}
-small.png){kind=link}
![18:28, 10 September 2018 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2018/09/10#c-Ytoyoda-2018-09-10T18:28:00.000Z-File:Carl_stanley_under_turnén_"Ärligt_talat",_2017.jpg){kind=link}
![20:30, 25 October 2018 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2018/09/10#c-Didym-2018-10-25T20:30:00.000Z-File:Carl_stanley_under_turnén_"Ärligt_talat",_2017.jpg){kind=link}
-2018-09-10T06:04:00.000Z-File:"Saungtaigyi_Watet_Fall".jpg){kind=link}
![03:20, 12 November 2018 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2018/09/10#c-P199-2018-11-12T03:20:00.000Z-File:"Saungtaigyi_Watet_Fall".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Keep Habitator terrae (talk) 17:54, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: PD-India. --4nn1l2 (talk) 10:25, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
suspected fake. The Author "Wilhelm von Schrankenbogens" can not be found anywhere, the image shows an old book but does not support the claims of the description. There are connections to a deleted article "reason for deletion: nonsense" at dewiki from the same author with a referents to a "Herbert von Schrankenbogens". --Pentachlorphenol (Diskussion) 08:31, 10 September 2018 (UTC) Pentachlorphenol (talk) 08:33, 10 September 2018 (UTC)}}
Weak keep Name of the supposed author would be "Schrankenbogen", not "Schrankenbogens" (that's genitive in "Wilhelm von Schrankenbogens Werk"), but no authors with this name can be found anywhere in library catalogues or authority databases (GND, VIAF...). So it is a fake and the related article was deleted as a fake in German-language Wikipedia. But the image is of good quality and likely the uploader's own work (supported by resolution and EXIF), so it could be kept as depicting the subject "old, worn book", there aren't too many files in Category:Worn-out books. Would only need a rename of the file to something like "Unidentified old book" and changing the description... Gestumblindi (talk) 19:02, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
- It is definitely a hoax, discussed at de:Wikipedia:Löschkandidaten/10. September 2018#Homo Perditus (SLA). Page de:Homo Perditus has been deleted, its creator was User:Vivviz (blocked indef on de:wp) who also has uploaded this image. The spine of the book reads (printed in Fraktur) de Coster Ulenspiegel, see Charles De Coster for more info. That makes it a really good hoax because of the connotation of Till Eulenspiegel. I'll rename that file. --Achim (talk) 19:00, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per above, file renamed to File:Ulenspiegel by Charles De Coster.jpg. --Achim (talk) 19:24, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
Not own work. Corporate author is claimed, but no real source and this makes it impossible to verify the licence. Andy Dingley (talk) 17:49, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
- Also File:Accumulator05.jpg Andy Dingley (talk) 17:50, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
I have just accepted permission for “File:Accumulator04.jpg” under ticket:2018112710002652. --whym (talk) 01:49, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: permission confirmed. --whym (talk) 01:50, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
Copyrighted glas-window, as it is from 1942, it may be copyrighted today. As there is no FOP within buildings in switzerland, permission will be needed for this window. Quedel (talk) 16:10, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
- I will try to find the author of the artwork to check if we can keep the image. --1-Byte (talk) 18:44, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
- Gemäss Template:FoP-Switzerland gibt es keine Angabe, wie alt oder jung das Werk sein darf oder muss. Gruss --Schofför (talk) 22:04, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: No freedom of panorama inside buildings in Switzerland (Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Switzerland). --Rosenzweig τ 21:15, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Failed upload Joanbanjo (talk) 17:47, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
![17:47, 10 September 2018 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2018/09/10#c-Joanbanjo-2018-09-10T17:47:00.000Z-File:Kirche_"St._Vitus"_in_Schweiburg_(Jade).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 21:16, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
![21:16, 12 January 2019 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2018/09/10#c-Rosenzweig-2019-01-12T21:16:00.000Z-File:Kirche_"St._Vitus"_in_Schweiburg_(Jade).jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by FenixFeather as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: F1 Apparent copyright violation. A quick Google reverse image search shows that this image is not, in fact, the uploader's own work. Eg: [3]
Converted by me to DR, as the presented external hit is not convincing. The image was uploaded to Commons early in June 2018, whereas the external article is from 07/23/2018. -- Túrelio (talk) 19:06, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Same for File:Taylor Swift Reputation Tour2 (cropped).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Delete The metadata shows that this photo was taken by a professional camera. Professional cameras aren't allowed into her concerts, which means this was taken by an officially approved press photographer. Looking at the contract for 1989 [4] [5] it's clear the guidelines aren't compatible with release under a CC license. I can't find the contract for Reputation, but I assume it's similar. FenixFeather (talk) 17:14, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 21:17, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
Copyright © 2017. All Rights Reserved. (https://web.archive.org/web/20180910202727/http://www.fljud13.org/JudicialDirectory/AshleyBMoody.aspx). The executive arm being distinct to the judiciary arm, I'm not sure it's a work of the State of Florida. To be discussed. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:20, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
- As the statute (§119.011(12)), which is quoted in the FLGov license tag, makes clear, "public record" includes works "made or received in connection with the official business of any public body, officer, or employee of the state, or persons acting on their behalf, [which includes the work of] the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of government and each agency or department created thereunder."
- Just because a state website includes a copyright symbol or rights language doesn't mean it's not a public record under Florida law. The Florida Senate, Department of State, Department of Veterans Affairs websites also have copyright symbols at the bottom of the page; the last one says "all rights reserved" too. Starrfruit (talk) 06:40, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per Starrfruit. --Rosenzweig τ 21:20, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
Diese Weiterleitung wird nicht benötigt Im Fokus (talk) 23:31, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 21:21, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
Ich will sie nicht weiter zur Verfügung stellen. Sascha Grosser (talk) 10:35, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Der Aufkleber ist urheberrechtlich geschützt. Dieses Foto kann demnach nicht weiter zur Verfügung stehen Sascha Grosser (talk) 07:37, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
- Keep No valid reason for a delition. The content of this image is covered by FoP-Germany. -- Ies (talk) 07:49, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader request. --PierreSelim (talk) 07:19, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader request. --PierreSelim (talk) 07:19, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
Ich möchte diese Datei nicht weiter zur Verfügung stellen. Sascha Grosser (talk) 10:41, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Der Aufkleber ist urheberrechtlich geschützt. Dieses Foto kann demnach nicht weiter zur Verfügung stehen. Sascha Grosser (talk) 07:37, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
- Keep No valid reason for a delition. The content of this image is covered by FoP-Germany. -- Ies (talk) 07:50, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader request. --PierreSelim (talk) 07:19, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader request. --PierreSelim (talk) 07:19, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
created by mistake Виктор Не Вацко (talk) 11:54, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: maybe, but it's used by several Wikipedias now. --Rosenzweig τ 23:24, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
There is no freedom of panorama in USA for sculptures. The sculpture can be somehow in public domain, but sculptor's name, erection year and correct license are needed. Taivo (talk) 12:08, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:45, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
René Iché died in 1954. Copyright violation. 83.204.247.233 12:42, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:45, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
Painting of a man, no information about artist, approximate time of production or country of first publication. Thuresson (talk) 00:26, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 20:38, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
clearly not the author's own work. see http://www.mtjuliet-tn.gov/site/copyright John from Idegon (talk) 01:25, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 20:38, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
he Subham Gangwar (talk) 03:02, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
- Delete and nuke all contributions too File:Etmadula 2.jpg. These two uploads and the bizarre deletion requests are the editor's only contributions. Given this, and the inappropriate categorizations, it's hard to see these as valid GF uploads, nor can the authorship, thus licensing, claims be trusted. We're better rid of both. Andy Dingley (talk) 12:02, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 20:39, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
I disagree that the logo is below ToO, I think we need a permisssion from the copyright holder Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:43, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Christian Ferrer: usually for anime or cartoons logos there never are copyright issues, that's so for basically most of them--Floppa01 (talk) 13:52, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
- Logos and trademarks are accepted in Wikimedia Commons only if
- they are in public domain (help) for a specific reason; or
- they are freely licensed by their owner, in such case please include a web link; or
- they are below the threshold of originality; or
- the copyright holder sends directly a permission to OTRS, where you can read how to do it. Note that even if it is you who are the copyright holder, you must send this permission.
- and, as for all other files and other content, they must fall within the Commons scope.
Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:12, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
@Christian Ferrer: as you mentioned, the logo can be used thanks the threshold of originality, on the page you can find lots of others similar examples so I think that's the same here — Preceding unsigned comment added by Floppa01 (talk • contribs) 21:20, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 20:39, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Wrong text: UBRIS instead of URBIS. There's a correct SVG version "Coat-of-arms-of-Dublin.svg" Mfortini (talk) 06:37, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
- Weak keep: This file is heavily used across Wikipedias, and is the source of File:Coat-of-arms-of-Dublin.svg. It might be a copyvio of https://vector-images.com/image.php?epsid=7578, but that may itself be derived from a free source. (See Commons:Deletion requests/Template:Vector-Images.com (2nd request) for discussion) --bjh21 (talk) 17:13, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
Kept: I fixed the spelling with PhotoShop. --Ronhjones (Talk) 20:50, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
wrong license, not own work, see anywhere on the web Pippobuono (talk) 08:59, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 20:56, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
It is copy of another file Walter Klosse (talk) 15:12, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
- Which file? Gestumblindi (talk) 22:46, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Can't find duplicate. No valid reason for deletion. Please use {{Duplicate}} next time and/or list the actual file this is a duplicate of. --Majora (talk) 21:49, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 122.53.31.197 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: This logo is still copyrighted by the IOC. I can't determine if the threshold of originality is reached or not... AlNo (discuter/talk/hablar/falar) 13:28, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
- It's clearly under threshold of originality for me, like File:1976 Summer Olympics logo.png Lyon-St-Clair (talk) 22:04, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
- Same as above: probably under threshold of originality. --Superbenjamin (talk) 13:14, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Speedy keep, simple red circle, a year, and a city name. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 12:42, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep - I thought we decided this was ok to use, right? I don't understand the argument against it... Nesnad (talk) 05:20, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: below TOO. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 05:48, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: фото 1975 года, фотограф, скорее всего, неизвестен, фото отсканирована в наше время. Необходимо подтверждение в OTRS от автора фотографии. Dogad75 (talk) 14:38, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
- Это фотография из семейной коллекции, передана мне Ларисой Михайловной для публикации в статье. Автор неизвестен, кто-то из членов семьи. Отсканирована мной. Что сделать чтобы у статьи была фотография? Sergey Moskalev (talk)
- Необходимо разрешение от фотографа или его наследников, см. ВП:ДОБРО. С уважением, --Dogad75 (talk) 20:43, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 05:48, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Torrma 2018 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 05:50, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
The picture was taken by a photographer during The ReAktion's performance in Knotfest 2015, I requested the picture personally to Mainia Recordings (management) to be used in public domains. Alternative Difusion (talk) 14:56, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 05:50, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Created 1995. No Permission from the sculptor.
And also File:Lviv+Podillia 695.jpg
Микола Василечко (talk) 19:38, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 05:51, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work, user already uploaded several copyvios. Smooth O (talk) 09:43, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 19:32, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
File has no valid license. Although it has already been marked accordingly before, this DR is made due to a special suggestion. ;) Jotzet (talk) 11:23, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Generałowie podczas Święta Wojska Polskiego 2007.jpg as precedent. Also license deprecated in 2013; this image uploaded 2018. --Эlcobbola talk 19:45, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
File has no valid license. Although it had already been marked accordingly before, this DR is made due to a special suggestion. ;) Jotzet (talk) 11:59, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - extract from file deleted per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Generałowie podczas Święta Wojska Polskiego 2007.jpg. --Эlcobbola talk 19:42, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Mhhossein as Copyvio (copyvio) because Dubious own work claim. Low resolution version without EXIF data and subsequently by @Túrelio: per EXIF data: copied from Facebook. Because uploader disagrees (see File talk and uploader's Talk page), this qualifies for a DR instead of SD. JGHowes talk 12:15, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:NOTHOST - unused, low quality image of non-notable person. --Эlcobbola talk 19:37, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Original poster with copyrightable design and photographs. This has obviously been published before it was uploaded here, so we need evidence of permission for the original work. In case this was photographed anywhere in the public: Freedom of panorama in Australia does not apply to 2-dimensional artwork or photos. De728631 (talk) 13:51, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - COM:DW. --Эlcobbola talk 19:37, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:03, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - here in 2008 - a decade before Commons upload. --Эlcobbola talk 19:39, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Photo of a non-free work. -- Asclepias (talk) 14:07, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
- Asclepias Vous avez un pourcentage à partir duquel une oeuvre non libre ne peut pas remplir la photo ? --Judicieux (talk) 22:16, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
- Bonjour, Malheureusement, ce n'est pas aussi facile que seulement une question de pourcentage. C'est plutôt de voir si l'oeuvre non libre (et pour laquelle on ne dispose pas par ailleurs d'une «liberté de panorama») est ou n'est pas un élément non négligeable inclus volontairement dans la photo. Si on estime parfois un pourcentage dans ce genre de discussion, c'est seulement un argument parmi d'autres pour tenter d'évaluer à quel point l'oeuvre non libre est un élément plus ou moins important de la photo. Par exemple, si on avait voulu photographier une vue générale du quartier et que la pancarte s'adonnait à être dans un coin, pas en évidence, ça pourrait être bon. (Au Canada, la loi dit que c'est ok si l'incorporation de l'oeuvre non libre est faite «de façon incidente et non délibérée». Autrement dit, si l'oeuvre n'est pas le sujet de la photo et se trouve incluse en quelque sorte sans qu'on l'ait cherché.) Sur Commons, comme guide général en cette matière, on peut se faire une bonne idée avec les exemples données dans la page Commons:De minimis. Les utilisateurs de Commons sont parfois plus laxistes que ce que dit cette politique et des cas limites sont conservés. Par contre, dans cette photo-ci, la question ne se pose pas, cette pancarte est clairement le sujet principal de la photo. (Tout ça est en effet bien dommage d'ailleurs. J'ai failli publier une photo de l'autobus de campagne du PLQ, mais il y avait une image de Couillard peinte dessus. Ça pourrait faire partie des cas limites acceptés, mais pour l'instant je n'ai pas pris de chance.) -- Asclepias (talk) 23:19, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
- Asclepias Merci de ces précisions claires, je comprends bien. --Judicieux (talk) 15:01, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
- Bonjour, Malheureusement, ce n'est pas aussi facile que seulement une question de pourcentage. C'est plutôt de voir si l'oeuvre non libre (et pour laquelle on ne dispose pas par ailleurs d'une «liberté de panorama») est ou n'est pas un élément non négligeable inclus volontairement dans la photo. Si on estime parfois un pourcentage dans ce genre de discussion, c'est seulement un argument parmi d'autres pour tenter d'évaluer à quel point l'oeuvre non libre est un élément plus ou moins important de la photo. Par exemple, si on avait voulu photographier une vue générale du quartier et que la pancarte s'adonnait à être dans un coin, pas en évidence, ça pourrait être bon. (Au Canada, la loi dit que c'est ok si l'incorporation de l'oeuvre non libre est faite «de façon incidente et non délibérée». Autrement dit, si l'oeuvre n'est pas le sujet de la photo et se trouve incluse en quelque sorte sans qu'on l'ait cherché.) Sur Commons, comme guide général en cette matière, on peut se faire une bonne idée avec les exemples données dans la page Commons:De minimis. Les utilisateurs de Commons sont parfois plus laxistes que ce que dit cette politique et des cas limites sont conservés. Par contre, dans cette photo-ci, la question ne se pose pas, cette pancarte est clairement le sujet principal de la photo. (Tout ça est en effet bien dommage d'ailleurs. J'ai failli publier une photo de l'autobus de campagne du PLQ, mais il y avait une image de Couillard peinte dessus. Ça pourrait faire partie des cas limites acceptés, mais pour l'instant je n'ai pas pris de chance.) -- Asclepias (talk) 23:19, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 19:46, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work, no EXIF data, same photo can be found here, published in 2010: http://curiosidadeseculturas.blogspot.com/2010/10/iriian-java-papua-ocidental-e-formada.html
Same goes for other photos uploaded by same user: File:Huttes yali.gif, File:Yali old man & women13.jpg and File:Papua Yali (2).JPG. Smooth O (talk) 14:30, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- I agree. I think the most damning piece of evidence is that these seem to have been uploaded during edits to the Yali page on fr wiki - but the apparent author of this post is Portuguese speaking. Likely the author of the blog post does not own copyright of any/all of the photos either, but could be asked.Mvolz (talk) 17:47, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 19:47, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
- Over on my en:wp talk page, someone thinks the article it's for is a vanity article - David Gerard (talk) 07:01, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
- ... and I just did a thorough reference check, and it appears it is: en:Susan Schneider. This image is really obviously a photo of a video screen, possibly a capture from the video documentary reference in the article (though the link is dead) - David Gerard (talk) 07:38, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 19:49, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Historical drawing. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 19:49, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
EXIF credits Richard Marsham - RMG Photography, uploader does not explain how they came to claim ownership.
Ytoyoda (talk) 20:27, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
- Permission from copyright holder Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Combined Authority - I can show authorisation if required, and if you advise how. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CambsPage (talk • contribs) 10:48, September 11, 2018 (UTC)
- @CambsPage: You'll find detailed instructions at COM:OTRS—please have someone at Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Combined Authority (preferably using their email address) contact the OTRS board with verication that they own the photograph (as opposed to the photographer mentioned above), and they're releasing the image to a free license (i.e. allowing any use or modification, including commercial use). Thanks. Ytoyoda (talk) 16:11, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
Ok I'll make the request - should be fairly swift. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CambsPage (talk • contribs) 08:59, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - COM:OTRS permission from Richard Marsham - RMG Photography required. --Эlcobbola talk 21:03, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1948. Jcb (talk) 21:01, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 19:53, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Incorrect Description: leaving aside its other inaccuracies, this is obviously a screenshot from a video game (Il-2 Sturmovik, specifically), not a photo by a US Government photo lab 98.150.138.68 10:05, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 13:41, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Uploaded wrong file FICFA Marketing (talk) 15:24, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Kept: deleted and redirected by User:Niridya. --Y.haruo (talk) 13:50, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
-13.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-13.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Depicted Rowan Syed Tollan isn't mentioned in en.wiki and uploader en:user:Ffrfrfrdf is indefinitely blocked there. The photo is out of project scope. This is the user's only upload. Taivo (talk) 17:45, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
-13.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 13:57, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
-13.jpg){kind=link}
PNG duplication of File:Royal Standard of Prince Edward, Duke of Windsor.svg. Fry1989 eh? 18:00, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 14:08, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
File:How to record pronunciations of a long list of words using Lingua Libre (tutorial in Odia).webm
[edit]a longer version exists Psubhashish (talk) 18:17, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 14:03, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely authorship claims. Possibly old enough to be in the public domain, but truthful source, authorship and publication details are required to establish that. —LX (talk, contribs) 18:20, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 14:05, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
The same user has also uploaded this to w:File:WalkerEsperDean photo May 2018.jpg, where a different author is listed. Stefan2 (talk) 18:35, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 14:11, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Chirurgien22~commonswiki
[edit]
Those files uploaded by User:Chirurgien22~commonswiki are way too small to be usable on articles. And I'm not sure if those kind of book covers can be considered "free" of use. --Titlutin (talk) 16:01, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 01:19, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
This design is probably copyrighted in CH. I would guess that the Post owns the copyright, since they are at the origin of this form. AntonierCH (d) 07:42, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Keep I don't think that this very simple form is copyrightable in Switzerland. Switzerland applies a rather high threshold of originality. Other opinions? Gestumblindi (talk) 18:50, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
Neutral Not convinced by the copyright claim. But the picture quality is really poor, it would not be a big loss. Marc Mongenet (talk) 23:02, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
- Well, it seems that we have no better images of Swiss Einzahlungsscheine. File:Einzahlungsschein.jpg is another type (for transfers without reference number), also a very poor scan... Gestumblindi (talk) 20:09, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - below COM:TOO. — Racconish 💬 18:26, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Unknown date, unknown artist, no way of verifying anything about this painting. Consequently there can be no credible PD statement. Fæ (talk) 15:04, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
It is currently in the ownership of the Harding-Rolls family, if it helps I can get a statement from the current owner about its provenance? Due to the alterations that were made to the house, it is estimated to have been painted in the 1880s, making it over 120 years since its creation and arguably in the public domain. --Ithundir (talk) 15:21, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
- It would help to have something sent in to OTRS. The easier rationale for PD status would be to confirm that there is no signature or initials on the painting (or its reverse), and consequently no reasonable enquiry would ascertain who the artist was. This way, {{PD-UK-unknown}} can apply and is a much better license for re-users. --Fæ (talk) 15:34, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - a decent reason to undelete would be welcome. — Racconish 💬 18:28, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Persönlichkeitsrechte sind nicht gewahrt 9EkieraM1 (talk) 15:19, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish 💬 18:30, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Persönlichkeitsrechte sind nicht gewahrt, schlechte Bildqualität 9EkieraM1 (talk) 15:20, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish 💬 18:31, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Persönlichkeitsrechte sind nicht gewahrt, schlechte Bildqualität 9EkieraM1 (talk) 15:20, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
- Keep: Added {{Personality rights}}, insufficient rationale. --Achim (talk) 17:30, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish 💬 18:32, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
vector version available here File:Seri Setia DUN, Petaling Jaya.svg *angys* (talk) 18:24, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Kept: not an exact duplicate. — Racconish 💬 18:33, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
@Racconish: , I am the original uploader and this file was the previous file of latter file, and I would like to delete it from commons ats it had available vectorize version and removed the black line.````
Duplicate of File:Anarcho-primitivism.png (and I think that is of dubious authenticity too). This one is completely unused and seems completely redundant. DanielRigal (talk) 19:18, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 18:34, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Seems to be excessively similar to File:Green and Black flag.svg. Unlikely to have a distinct meaning. SVG is preferable to PNG. This is only used in one Wikipedia article, and that dubiously. DanielRigal (talk) 19:24, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Kept: not an exact duplicate. — Racconish 💬 18:34, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Usa imágenes de logos con protección de copyright CarlosArturoAcosta (talk) 20:15, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 18:35, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Philly boy92 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: This is a logo and is copyrighted. Arthur Crbz (talk) 21:19, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 18:35, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by SpanishSnake as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Map from copyrighted video game Arthur Crbz (talk) 21:20, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Arthur Crbz: This map is taken directly from Hearts of Iron III. Maps provided here are the essentially same, and were published a year before this image was on Commons. —SpanishSnake (talk | contribs) ping me plz 21:30, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:54, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
Wie die Beschreibung durch den Hochlader schon aussagt: "user variant, no offical emblem". Dennoch ist die Datei vielfach in mehreren Projekten vielfach im ANR eingebunden, insbesondere in Infoboxen in Fußballbereich. "Self-made only combining two coat of arms just present on Commons: Image:Coat of arms of Austria.svg and Image:Austria coat of arms simple.svg" erzeugt ein völlig falsches Bild aus einem mehr oder weniger korrekt gezeichneten Bundeswappen und einem "Bindenschild des alten Erzherzogtums Österreich". Eine Löschung der "user variant, no offical emblem" Datei erscheint zielführender, als sich durch alle Sprachprojekte durchzuwühlen um dort die Datei zu entfernen bzw. auszutauschen. Überdies ist damit die Gefahr nicht gebannt, dass diese Datei dennoch wieder in den ANR kommt. Elisabeth (talk) 21:53, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
- Nachtrag, von der File-Talk copy&paste:
- "-- Wrong badge --
- This is not the badge of shirt of Austria national football team. The correct badge is this [6] [7] [8] and does not exist in official website [9] of ÖFB. --IM-yb (talk) 22:58, 5 June 2014 (UTC)"
![[6]](https://brand.puma.com/system/team_logos/18/hub/PUMA-teams-thumb-Austria.jpg?1380295912){kind=link}
![[7]](http://images5.fanpop.com/image/photos/27500000/Euro-2012-Qualifier-Germany-vs-Austria-german-national-soccer-team-27589346-610-420.jpg){kind=link}
![[8]](http://cdn.c.photoshelter.com/img-get/I00005FqvjDtp5E4/s/750/750/motivioFUL9250311825.jpg){kind=link}
- Hat schon damals, Juni 2014, der ÖFB einen falschen Bindenschild für den Bundesadler verwendet (spitz unten zusammenlaufend) und damit auch keinen Zusammenhang mit dem in den div. Fußballartikeln quer über die Projekte verwendeten File:Austria mixed COA.svg, auf die nun der LA von mir gestellt wurde, so hat der ÖFB in aktueller Version ohnehin nurmehr den Bundesadler ohne Bindenschild in Verwendung; eine Einbindung von einer derartigen Datei - egal ob die in Löschfrage stehende oder eine andere dieser Art - in die Fußballartikel ist damit auch obsolet geworden und sollte bei korrektem Austausch in den betroffenen Artikel die gegenständliche Datei, soweit ich es überblicke, keine ANR-Einbindung mehr haben.
- --Elisabeth (talk) 22:33, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Elisabeth:
- die eine frage ist, ob dieses wappen "heraldisch" zulässig ist. dazu muss man klar sagen: ja. sowohl die proportionen der wappenfiguren (hier: der Bundsadler) zum grund (hier: rot-weiß-rot resp. rot-silber-rot, der Bindenschild), wie auch die form des schildes selbst (hier eine alterümliche spanisch-französische mischform) bleibt alleine dem heraldiker überlassen.
- ausschlaggebend ist die blasonierung, und die ist erfüllt. dass die republik österreich "offiziell" eine spezielle form vorgibt, ist keine heraldische, sondern eine politische frage.
- die frage, ob das ein "wappen", oder nur ein "emblem" sei, ist damit ebenfalls beantwortet: es ist ein heraldisch korrektes wappen.
- weiters ist die frage, ob und wie jemand berechtigt ist, das wappen der republik zu verwenden (Wappengesetz 1945), und inwieweit dann die "amtliche" form zu wählen sei, für die existenz dieser darstellung nicht bedeutend.
- die frage, ob das dass logo der fußballmannschaft sei, ist reine artikelarbeit: welches bild in welchen artikel kommt, ist sache der WP-autoren. betrifft diese bilddatei also nicht.
- und an und für sich bleibt es der intention des autors überlassen, für welchen didaktischen zweck er welche darstellungsform verwendet.
- und zuletzt ist die frage, ob ein bild in den artikeln verwendet wird, insgesamt irrelevant: commons ist nicht die bilddatenbank der WP, sondern ein unabhängiges projekt, das bilddateien unter einer freien lizenz zur verfügung stellt. ein bild muss nicht in artikeln verwendet werden. commonsbilder werden nicht "obsolet".
- daher gibt's definitiv keinen grund, diese datei zu löschen.
- übrigens ist deine intention, dass "nurmehr jeweils eine derartige Datei übrigbleibt" auch aus anderen gründen nicht durchführbar, dazu hab ich dir dort auf meiner benutzerseite noch geantwortet. mfg --W!B: (talk) 11:07, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
- Danke, für die Stellungnahme. In den meisten Punkten kann ich dir durchaus folgen. Dem Punkt 2. mit "offiziell" vs politisch wage ich zu widersprechen: Gesetz ist Gesetz und damit nicht mehr politisch. Ob hingegen unser österreichisches Wappengesetz - dein Punkt 4 - auf commons schlagend werdend könnte, vermag ich nicht zu beurteilen. Das ist aber ohnedies nicht wirklich das Thema meines LA.
- @Elisabeth:
- Zum IMHO wirklich wichtigen deiner Punkte, nämlich Punkt 7: Grundsätzlich hast du damit recht, gewiss. Jedoch zwei Einwände:
- 1. sehe ich tagtäglich, dass über commons gesteuert wird, was in die wp-projekte kommt oder nicht, indem oftmals Dateien gelöscht werden, wo man sich überdies manchmal fragt, ob das wirklich notwendig ist, wo z.B. auf Zuruf tatsächlicher oder vorgeblicher öffentlicher Personen unter Vorgabe ihrer Persönlichkeitsrechte oftmals gelöscht; vgl. auch die unsäglichen Löschwellen auf Dateien von Briefmarken etc. pp. Da fährt dann halt ein Putzbot durch die Projekte und die Artikeleditoren werden dann auf den Fehler (oder meinetwegen auch: auf den "Fehler") aufmerksam und werden sich nach einer passenderen Datei umsehen oder allenfalls bei Bebilderungen dann halt kein diesbezügliches Bild mehr im Artikel haben. In diese Richtung ging eben auch meine Überlegung mit dem LA.
- 2. Bei uns auf der deWP-Artikeldisk des Bundeswappens im Jahr 2009 hast du noch geklagt über "jedenfalls, das nervt mich schon länger, so ein schild kennen wir nicht (noch schlimmer das zweite) - die linkliste bei uns ist aber enorm (ca. 40 artikel) - besser haben wir derzeit nur was spanisches, auch unbefriedigend" in Bezug auf File:Austria coat of arms simple.svg (nunmehr seit heute verschoben auf File:Coat of arms of the archduchy of Austria.svg) und wo du als "das zweite" ganz offensichtlich die ggst. Datei meinst, die du mit "File:Austria mixed COA.svg|Mickimouse-heraldik" kommentiertest. Genauso sehe ich das auch. Eine "Mickimouse-heraldik" hat aber nun mE in keinem Artikelnamensraum etwas verloren und darin sehe ich eine legalen Löschgrund (leider finde ich gerade nicht mehr, trotzdem ich mich nun einige Zeit deppert gesucht habe, die Liste der Löschgründe, es war erinnerlich dort oder in dessen EN2 Punkt 7.). Um die Verwendung der "Mickimouse-heraldik" im Artikelnamensraum zu unterbinden, sehe ich nur die einzige Möglichkeit der Dateilöschung, deren Nichtmehrexistenz als "Mickimouse-heraldik" wohl auch zu verschmerzen wäre.
- Zum IMHO wirklich wichtigen deiner Punkte, nämlich Punkt 7: Grundsätzlich hast du damit recht, gewiss. Jedoch zwei Einwände:
- Als andere Möglichkeiten - ohne Dateilöschung - kann ich mir noch vorstellen, wenn der LA nicht erfolgreich ist,
- die Datei umbenennen zu lassen der Dateibeschreibung entsprechend auf z.B. "File:Coat of arms of Austria with shield - user variant, no offical emblem.svg", da putzt dann auch ein Bot durch die Projekte und benamst nachziehend in den Projektverwendungen um (siehe wie zuvor verlinkt auf unserer Artikeldisk zum Wappengesetz), worauf die dortigen Editoren darauf aufmerksam werden, die ja wohl in den allermeisten Fällen in Unkenntnis und in gutem Glauben die Datei in ihren Artikeln eingebunden haben, oftmals wohl auch durch Übernahmen von Sprachprojekt zu Sprachprojekt, und sich dann vielleicht auch um besseren Ersatz umsehen;
- oder an selbiger Stelle, also unter selbem Namen, eine neue Datei hochzuladen, die unserem korrekten Schild mit eingebunden korrektem Bundesadler entspricht. Damit erscheint dann automatisch beim Laden jeder Verwendung in den Projekten die richtige anstelle der "Mickimouse-heraldik"-Version.
- --Elisabeth (talk) 14:09, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Elisabeth: erwischt ;) .. aber damals war ich noch ein hitzköpfiger jungspund, heute seh ich das pragmatischer. ausserdem ging es explizit ums bundeswappen (mit "politisch" meinte ich übrigens "gesetz", nur in abgrenzung zu "heraldisch": die republik hat beschlossen, genau diese eine darstellung zu verwenden, und zwar sogar eine heraldisch etwas unkorrekte. nichtsdestotrotz darf der heraldiker das österr. wappen auch anders darstellen, wenn er will). und nicht um logos im allgemeinen: die sehen so aus, wie sich der träger dieser das wünscht (und logos unterliegen eben auch nicht irgendwelchen regeln der reinen heraldischen lehre).
- die andere frage ist die verwendung, wie ich sehe, geht es derzeit wirklich nurmehr ums logo der fußballmannschaft: wie sieht das also jetzt genau aus? eher würde ich dieses unter "Austrian national football team logo" (oder "Austrian national sports team logo", falls das andere sportarten auch verwenden, cf. en:Austria national beach soccer team) hochladen, und die paar einbindungen, die es noch gibt, manuell ersetzen. und das, wie gesagt, ist eine sache der de:sportabteilung (wenn die anderen sprachschwestern das nicht goutieren, weils sie genau dieses schild wollen, werden sie es eh revertieren). W!B: (talk) 08:52, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
- Als andere Möglichkeiten - ohne Dateilöschung - kann ich mir noch vorstellen, wenn der LA nicht erfolgreich ist,
Kept: the file is (heavily!) in use. It's not the task of Commons admins to decide whether individual Wikipedia projects are using a correct version of the CoA. --Jcb (talk) 14:53, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: unrecognizable Incnis Mrsi (talk) 09:25, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Neutral If we can allow something like that then this file should also be kept, if we cannot then this one should be deleted. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ ✍ ⏿) 14:01, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Gone Postal: how a file in Wikipedia whose description page has a thick warning against transferring it to Commons substantiates this bizarre swing? The dispute is obviously about whether the 23 × 15 PNG is eligible for copyright in principle, not about where was it derived from. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 18:40, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
- It is a derivative work, the question is this: Is it a derivative work of a public domain file or is it a derivative work of the copyrighted file. The thick warning is actually something that points towards a reason for deletion, since on many Wikipedias this file was deleted or marked as non-free. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ ✍ ⏿) 03:39, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
- Does anybody claim that the flag itself is in public domain? In such a case the user doing Revision of File:Flag_of_the_African_Union_(free).png would have to be blocked for disruption, with no creation any deletion request ensuing. Yet another time – Flag_of_the_African_Union_(free).png is declared as {{PD-ineligible}} and this is the point of contention. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 05:37, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
- I do not understand what your disagreement with me is. I have simply stated my position that we need to determine if the flag is PD, if it is not, then we need to delete the file, if it is, we can keep. I have no opinion on whether or not it is PD at this moment, and I need to think about it. What exactly is your argument? ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ ✍ ⏿) 07:37, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
- Произведение, не подлежащее защите а/п в принципе, считается находящимся в общественном достоянии. Независимо от того, откуда оно берётся. Непохоже, что «с двух раз не осилил» — проблема плохого английского, но попробовать по-другому приходится. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 18:02, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
- Совершенно верно. Вы пересказали мою позицию очень верно. Если произведение не подлежит защите а/п, то оно в авторском достоянии, и соответственно может остаться. Если подлежит, то не в авторском достоянии, и должно быть удалено. Ещё раз, в чём ваше несогласие со мной? ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ ✍ ⏿) 20:34, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
- Произведение, не подлежащее защите а/п в принципе, считается находящимся в общественном достоянии. Независимо от того, откуда оно берётся. Непохоже, что «с двух раз не осилил» — проблема плохого английского, но попробовать по-другому приходится. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 18:02, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
- I do not understand what your disagreement with me is. I have simply stated my position that we need to determine if the flag is PD, if it is not, then we need to delete the file, if it is, we can keep. I have no opinion on whether or not it is PD at this moment, and I need to think about it. What exactly is your argument? ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ ✍ ⏿) 07:37, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
- Does anybody claim that the flag itself is in public domain? In such a case the user doing Revision of File:Flag_of_the_African_Union_(free).png would have to be blocked for disruption, with no creation any deletion request ensuing. Yet another time – Flag_of_the_African_Union_(free).png is declared as {{PD-ineligible}} and this is the point of contention. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 05:37, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
- It is a derivative work, the question is this: Is it a derivative work of a public domain file or is it a derivative work of the copyrighted file. The thick warning is actually something that points towards a reason for deletion, since on many Wikipedias this file was deleted or marked as non-free. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ ✍ ⏿) 03:39, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Gone Postal: how a file in Wikipedia whose description page has a thick warning against transferring it to Commons substantiates this bizarre swing? The dispute is obviously about whether the 23 × 15 PNG is eligible for copyright in principle, not about where was it derived from. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 18:40, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
.png&diff=319541421&oldid=319540424){kind=link}
.png)
- If nobody nominates for deletion the photo at the right, then Keep the small image. It would be absurd to delete a 15-pixels-high downsample but retain a 230-pixels-high photograph of the same subject. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 11:42, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Keep @Incnis Mrsi, Gone Postal, and Patrick Rogel: was going to look at closing, then I realised I actually knew of another one File:Flag of the African Union.svg is already on commons, and heavily used. Country outlines are typically PD, and so are stars, I see no real reason to delete - except maybe the small one as we have the big one. Ronhjones (Talk) 21:16, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - too small, not useful. Jcb (talk) 14:58, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused and too small to be useful for an educational purpose: out of COM:SCOPE. I'll leave a note in the deletion log to look out for File:Flag_of_the_African_Union.svg, since a png->svg redirect probably doesn't make sense. --Storkk (talk) 11:53, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}