User talk:Marc Mongenet

Flags discussion moved to Commons:Deletion_requests#Flag_images_by_user:Marc_Mongenet

Flags from Wikipedia

May I ask how you were able to link the flags from the Commons to Wikipedia (as what you have possibly done with the Yemen, Zambia and Zimbabwe flags)? Zscout370 20:34, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I am sorry, I do not understand what you are writing about. I only uploaded flags to the Commons and did nothing special with Yemen, Zambia and Zimbabwe flags. Marc Mongenet 09:53, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Maybe you mean the interlanguage-links that show on the left, beneath the toolbox? If so, you can create them like you do in normal articles: For example, to link from Image:Zambia flag 300.png to the german description page in the de-wiki, place [[de:Image:Zambia flag 300.png]] on the image description page. HTH -- Duesentrieb 12:47, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Thanks to you both, but I solved my own question (Located the file from the Commons, link it to a Wikipedia article. Once I do that, I get a link saying that the files are located here. Sorry to bother you there Marc). Though, Marc, I wish to ask you what program do you use to compress the PNG files. I use Ultimate Paint, but I think that there could be many programs that can compress the files better. Zscout370 03:03, 2005 Apr 30 (UTC)

I use pngcrush. I also modified ppmquant (from the netpbm software) for colors reduction of flags. Marc Mongenet 23:12, 10 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a bunch. Zscout370 (sound off) 01:45, 2005 May 11 (UTC)

informationbox for flags

I just thought about it, and i think, we need more information on flag description pages. the infobox (e.g. Image:Flag of the Netherlands.png and Image:Europe flag 300.png) has to contain the codes for the colors, the ratio, the name (new) and the date of the first adoption. what do you think? Schaengel89 @me 18:05, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, good idea. But only RGB values is not usefull (and anyway it can be measured by any bitmap editor). We need to give the original reference and the conversion we used. For instance for the Netherlands, en:Image:Netherlands flag large.png tells (my emphasis on the information that should appear in a table):

The colours of the flag are calculated from the official Dutch government standards document which describes textile colours called Normblad NEN 3055:

De kleur rood moet zijn helder vermiljoen met de trichromatische coördinaten X=17,2; Y=9,0 en Z=2,6.

De kleur blauw moet zijn kobaltblauw met de trichromatische coördinaten X=7,8; Y=6,8 en Z=26,7.

These are the colour values defined in the CIE's chromaticity diagram. To convert these values to RGB, a daylight value of D65 was used.

Marc Mongenet 14:49, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Unified flag series

Hi Marc. I've been trying to figure out the purpose of your 300-pixel unified-height flag series. I've noticed some of these flags listed in Category:Redundant, but I don't want to mess with them until I understand the purpose. As far as I can tell, MediaWiki can automatically take, say, a 600-pixel flag and reduce it to 300 or whatever height. Is there something I'm missing? Is there somewhere this flag series is already explained? Thanks, Dbenbenn 17:53, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)

How do you tell MediaWiki to resize a flag to a given height ? As far as I know, it is only possible to give the width.

For the other purposes, I uploaded this serie to have a complete serie of national flags with the same naming scheme, the same height and the same border (no border). They are also very well compressed, but that's just a bonus. Marc Mongenet 20:25, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I also choosed a height that allows the flags to be resized to many dimensions with a pixel perfect ratio, unlike the 800 pixels height: for instance image:France_flag_300.png 300×450 -> /2 150×225, /3 100×150, /5 60×90, /6 50×75, /10 30×45, /15 20×30, /25 12×18, /30 10×15, /50 6×4, /75 4×6, /100 2×3. Marc Mongenet 20:45, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)

2400 pixels high would be even better: all the factors of 300, and they would be large enough to print, too!

You can't (yet?) tell MediaWiki to resize to a given height. But as far as I can tell, there's no page that uses the full 300 pixel heights. So for a page to display the flags all the same height, you have to calculate the appropriate width from the flag ratio anyway.

Perhaps soon we'll be able to use SVG, which will solve the problem definitively. Dbenbenn 21:17, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Of course, the bigger the better, but the CIA flags were 302 pixels high. :-) For the height, I had in fact to reduce the flags on my own PC to have a ¼ height of 75 px, then to upload them for the fr:Galerie des drapeaux des pays du monde. Marc Mongenet 03:46, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I just found out you can specify the image height. For example, the flag to the right is exactly 85 pixels high, and I didn't have to know the flag ratio. (Actually, it's 84 pixels high, because of a tiny MediaWiki bug.) dbenbenn | talk 29 June 2005 15:32 (UTC)

And since we can have specified height of the image, that should almost removes the need for having flag images sized at a specific height. Zscout370 (sound off) 2005 June 30 05:28 (UTC)

Ugly hack with ugly result (see the bottom line of stars), but interesting, thanks. Marc Mongenet 3 July 2005 18:19 (UTC)

Hi Marc! just to let you know, that I'm supporting you to have images of flags in unified sizes. And this 300px serie is great work you are doing.

It is good to have flags in series of few different sizes as for different purposes suits different sizes. It's someway suprising to see this intolerance here to have smaller size flags as well, which are suiting way better to use on web pages than 1000px+ versions

(same tendency appears also in others similar type pics: location maps, COA) --TarmoK 12:51, 14 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Drapeau de l’Afghanistan

Bonjour,

Je voudrais vous signaler que le drapeau de l’Afghanistan a changé (une fois de plus) en 2004.

Il est passé à une proportion 2/3.

http://www.flags.net/country.php?country=AFGH&section=CURR&category=NATL

Cordialement.

Fabien Antoine.

Drapeau

Salut, je suis Anakin de la wiki française, j'ai vu que tu as utilisé le site http://www.vexilla-mundi.com/ pour créer les drapeaux. Mais je pense que tout ne doit pas être bon et qu'il faut à mon avis l'utiliser en vérifiant ailleurs si c'est correcte. Exemple, pour la Bolivie : le drapeau du Pando est dessiné de cette manière : trois bandes horizontale, (blanche, bleue, blanche) or le drapeau du pando ne contient que deux bandes de même hauteur, une blanche au dessus et une blanche en dessous. Autre drapeau de la Bolivie, les "flèches" du drapeau de Chuquisaca ne sont pas dans le bon sens pour celles qui descendent de droite à gauche, en fait elles montent. Et pour le Beni, il manque les étoiles jaunes. Voilà, je dit ça juste pour ne pas risquer de mettre de fausse informations ailleurs. Mais bon comme tu n'as pas utilisé ces drapeaux, il n'y a aucun problème ;) voilà voilà @+ 23:46, 30 September 2005 (UTC)

Image:Congo democratic flag 300.png

Image deletion warning

Image:Congo democratic flag 300.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion on its entry.
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

moyogo 10:55, 1 June 2006 (UTC) .[reply]

Image:Cape verde flag 300.png

Image:Cape verde flag 300.png a été listé dans les demandes de suppression pour que la communauté puisse discuter afin d'établir si ce fichier peut être conservé ou non. Nous aimerions que vous participiez à cette discussion, qui se déroule dans le paragraphe consacré à cette question.

Si vous êtes la personne qui a créé ce fichier, prenez bien note que le fait qu'il soit soumis à cette procédure ne signifie pas nécessairement que nous n'accordons pas de valeur à votre travail. Cela veut simplement dire qu'une personne croit qu'un problème précis se pose au sujet de ce fichier, comme par exemple un problème de copyright. Si le fichier est listé ainsi en raison de la mise en ligne d'une meilleure version disponible, considérez que bien que le fichier puisse être supprimé, votre travail (que nous apprécions à sa juste valeur) continue d'exister au travers de la nouvelle version.

Dans tous les cas, ne prenez pas cette procédure comme une attaque personnelle. Merci ! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Ultratomio 06:44, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Eritrea flag 300.png

Image deletion warning

Image:Eritrea flag 300.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Béka 00:24, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Ballens.jpeg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Ballens.jpeg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. --Fil nik 20:24, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Norway_flag_300.png

Image deletion warning

Image:Norway_flag_300.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

88.246.204.123 04:42, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Norway_flag_300.png

Image deletion warning

Image:Norway_flag_300.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

88.246.204.123 04:46, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Norway_flag_300.png

Image deletion warning

Image:Norway_flag_300.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

88.246.204.123 04:48, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Swiss-Highway-network.png

Je voulais te demander si je peux emprunter ton image sur les autoroutes suisses ? J'en aurais besoin pour une encyclopédie sur les routes (WikiSara) qui s'occupait des autoroutes françaises et maintenant des autoroutes belges, luxembourgeoises et suisse à ma demande. J'aurais besoin de la modifier aussi puisque l'encyclopédie est en français. Me permets tu ? ODLG 18:18, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Tu sais, je n'ai fait qu'ajouter quelques traits. C'est Marcel.c qui a téléchargé l'image. Mais il l'a reprise de Wikipedia en allemand ! Cependant, tu peux copier l'image sans même demander l'autorisation. :-) Mais, il faut respecter la licence : Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License... En pratique, sur le site où l'image est copieé, indique qu'elle est sous la licence GFDL et qu'elle vient de http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Swiss-Highway-network.png (théoriquement il faudrait donner la liste des auteurs plutôt que cet URL, mais bon). Bon travail, j'aime bien WikiSara. Connais-tu OpenStreetMap ? Tu pourrais y trouver des plans de bonne qualité. Marc Mongenet (talk) 19:01, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Je te remercie. Je ne connaissais pas OpenStreetMap. Mais, dans ma ville, on ne peut pas voir toutes les rues et c'est dommage. Malgré tout, le tracé du plan de ville est plus récent puisque certaines routes ont été rajoutées et ne le sont pas dans d'autres sites. Merci encore ! ODLG 08:54, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

La carte d'OpenStreetMap n'est effectivement pas finie. C'est comme Wikipédia, il faut la compléter soi-même. :-) Marc Mongenet (talk) 11:21, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Singapore_flag_300.png

Image deletion warning

Image:Singapore_flag_300.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

— Cheers, JackLee ^–talk– 05:06, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Singapore_flag_300.png

Image deletion warning

File:Singapore_flag_300.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

— Cheers, JackLee ^–talk– 14:58, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Singapore_flag_300.png

File deletion warning

File:Singapore_flag_300.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

— Cheers, JackLee ^–talk– 16:41, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Marc Mongenet!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT (talk) 06:09, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Emil-Edwin REINERT.jpg is uncategorized since 3 January 2009. BotMultichillT (talk) 06:09, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Iraq_flag_300.png

File:Iraq_flag_300.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Antemister (talk) 15:03, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Iraq_flag_300.png

File:Iraq_flag_300.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Antemister (talk) 08:44, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Laos flag 300.png

File:Laos flag 300.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Antemister (talk) 17:00, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Vatican flag 300.png

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Vatican flag 300.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ju Ta 17:59, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tajikistan flag 300.png

File:Tajikistan flag 300.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Ricordi samoa 17:08, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. INeverCry 23:57, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Panneau entrée dans Chatenay.JPG

Salut,
Je te vois passer en ce moment dans ma liste de suivi.
Comme tu as déjà fait le département de l'Ain et que j'ai fait cette photo (de panneau) seulement aujourd'hui...
Merci, --Aga (d) 21:26, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merci, panneau catégorisé. Marc Mongenet (talk) 11:47, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merci à toi. --Aga (d) 22:13, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Madagascar flag 300.png

File:Madagascar flag 300.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Antemister (talk) 20:23, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Niger flag 300.png

File:Niger flag 300.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Antemister (talk) 12:42, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Malawi flag 300.png

File:Malawi flag 300.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Antemister (talk) 19:38, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zambia flag 300.png

File:Zambia flag 300.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Antemister (talk) 19:43, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.^{[survey 1]} The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.^{[survey 2]} The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

↑ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
↑ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

File:Netherlands antilles flag 300.png

File:Netherlands antilles flag 300.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Metrónomo's truth of the day: "That was also done by the president" not an excuse. 13:07, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:14-06-30-colmar-by-RalfR-134-panneau-B54.jpg

File:14-06-30-colmar-by-RalfR-134-panneau-B54.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Gzen92 ^[discuter] 20:21, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Signalisation de danger

Bonjour, puis-je vous proposer deux de mes images pour aider à compléter Illustration de l'Instruction interministérielle sur la signalisation routière, 2e partie, Signalisation de danger (précisément A6 et A7) ? KiwiNeko14 (talk) 19:24, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@KiwiNeko14: Merci beaucoup. Je suppose qu'un jour ces pages pourront servir de galerie dans Commons. Une question à propos du feu sur le panneau A6, s'agit-il d'un feu clignotant rouge R24 ? Marc Mongenet (talk) 20:20, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Avec plaisir.

Pour le A6, au-dessus, il s'agit d'un feu clignotant rouge en tout cas.

Pour ce qui est du panneau A7, je l'ai pris dans le village de Saint-Romain-de-Benet ; je ne sais pas si ça compte en tant qu'agglomération, mais le panneau de sortie EB20 était situé au-delà du passage à niveau (à moins qu'il ne s'agisse d'une question de distance 150m/50m ?). KiwiNeko14 (talk) 20:49, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@KiwiNeko14: En fait, c'est la présence du panneau J10 (road sign, France) qui m'a fait noter hors agglomération, car l'article 35-1 Passages à niveau situés en agglomération de la 2^e partie de l'instruction interministérielle indique un simple panneau A7 en agglomération. Marc Mongenet (talk) 22:43, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bonsoir ! Si besoin d'une meilleure photo, j'ai téléversé un G1a (panneau de signalisation de position pour les passages à niveau sans barrière sur les lignes de chemin de fer à plusieurs voies). KiwiNeko14 (talk) 21:12, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

suppression de catégorie

Bonjour,

Pourquoi avez-vous retiré la catégorie Level crossings in France de cette photo [1] alors qu'elle montre clairement un passage à niveau en France ?

Lionel Allorge (talk) 05:50, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Lionel Allorge: Bonjour, car la photo est dans Category:G2 (road sign, France) qui est dans Category:Level crossings in France. Marc Mongenet (talk) 18:06, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

C'est noté. Je ne suis pas sûr qu'il soit logique que l'une soit une sous catégorie de l'autre alors qu'elles désignent des choses différentes, mais je comprend votre modification. Lionel Allorge (talk) 19:38, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Lionel Allorge: Le code G2 n'est certes pas explicite, mais il s'agit selon l'instruction interministérielle d'un passage à niveau muni d'une signalisation automatique, avec demi-barrière automatique. Il s'agit donc forcément d'un passage à niveau en France. Marc Mongenet (talk) 17:13, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

B6a2 et B6a3

Bonsoir, si intéressé, il y a désormais des photos de modèles actuels de panneaux B6a2 et B6a3 dans Commons. KiwiNeko14 (talk) 20:17, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@KiwiNeko14: Merci bien, j'ai mis à jour la page. Marc Mongenet (talk) 01:13, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bonsoir, si il faut, j'ai trouvé à Cabariot un CE6a modèle actuel. KiwiNeko14 (talk) 17:33, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merci. Marc Mongenet (talk) 05:57, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour ! Si besoin : Category:K2 (road sign, France). KiwiNeko14 (talk) 06:45, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merci ! Marc Mongenet (talk) 09:49, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bonsoir, j'ai ramené du K1 et du B50a dans mes filets de pêche aujourd'hui. KiwiNeko14 (talk) 19:52, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bonsoir, le B50a est très réussi, merci bien. Marc Mongenet (talk) 21:30, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:French polynesia flag 300.png

File:French polynesia flag 300.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Jcb (talk) 20:52, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mail

Bonjour. Je t'ai envoyé un mail par le formulaire de Commons, mais n'ayant pas eu de retour de ta part, je me dis que tu ne l'as peut-être pas vu. Je me permets donc de te laisser un petit message ici. Bonne journée, cordialement, Sebleouf (talk) 07:42, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, j'ai répondu par email le 19 août, je suis étonné que tu n'as rien reçu. Peut-être dans le spam? Marc Mongenet (talk) 09:20, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Schweiz Frühmia Adel.svg

File:Schweiz Frühmia Adel.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

sidonius (talk) 08:41, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Chapeau !

Bonjour Marc.
Il y a bien longtemps que je voie vos ajouts de catégories relatives aux panneaux de signalisation dans mes photos de routes ou d'autoroutes. Vous avez là une belle passion et une belle persévérance pour arriver à examiner toutes les photos montrant des voies de circulation routières et y détecter des panneaux et les catégoriser. Dans ma jeunesse, au début des années 70 (c’est-à-dire il y a très longtemps, bien avant d'avoir obtenu le permis de conduire), j'apprenais par cœur les panneaux qui se trouvaient à la fin du Code Rousseau. Depuis, le Code de la route a changé, de nombreux panneaux sont apparus (il m'arrive même d'en découvrir de nouveaux en France, sans compter ceux que je découvre à l'étranger)...
Bref, bravo pour ce travail de catégorisation Il m'arrive de parcourir certaines des catégories que vous ajoutez sur mes photos, et j'avoue que je découvre des choses après plus de 43 de permis de conduire.
Voilà, c'était juste un petit message d’épatement de ma part.
N'hésitez surtout pas à signaler la mauvaise qualité de certaines de mes anciennes photos (comme vous l'avez fait aujourd'hui) (parfois, c'est ma chère épouse qui prend les photos pendant que je conduis, les réglages de l'APN et le cadrage pour des panneaux de signalisation ne sont pas des choses qui l'emballent vraiment... Alors qu'une belle maison ou un beau paysage sur le côté de la route l'intéressera beaucoup plus).
Cordialement, --Poudou99 (talk) 19:36, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Poudou99: Bonsoir et merci pour votre soutien. Il est vrai qu'il existe un nombre considérable de panneaux différents en France. Au début je mettais beaucoup de temps à les identifier, mais à présent ça roule. De mon côté, c'est ma femme qui conduit quand je veux prendre des panneaux. Marc Mongenet (talk) 22:49, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Marc.

Je dois faire en urgence lundi un trajet Paris-Voiron (près de Grenoble) : A6, A46, A432, A48, ex N75 et ex N85. Y aurait-il des panneaux, des signalisations ou des lieux routiers qui vous manqueraient dans votre collection que je pourrais prendre en photo sur mon parcours ? --Poudou99 (talk) 01:01, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Poudou99: merci beaucoup pour la proposition. Sur autoroute et voies rapides, il me manque notamment :

SE2c symbole de sortie à gauche

D48b Prochaines aires de service avant et après bifurcation

D48c Aires de service après bifurcation

Da41d Sortie numérotée à flèche coudée

D51d Sorties rapprochées [2]

D52b Bifurcation de routes à chaussées séparées

Da51br Sortie et aire de service

D62d Confirmation de filante avec flèches coudées sur autoroute

D69b Fin d'itinéraire Bis

D79a Itinéraire S

D79b Itinéraire Bis

H12 Message graphique

En résumé, se sont les panneaux avec flèches coudées et les variantes de panneaux qui annoncent des sorties et des aires. Marc Mongenet (talk) 12:50, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Je me suis préparé une petite feuille de "route" avec des photos des panneaux trouvés sur le web. Je vais imprimer la feuille et bien mémoriser le tout. --Poudou99 (talk) 16:26, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Marc.
Non, je ne t'avais pas oublié. Mais j'avais mille choses à faire en même temps dans Commons (par exemple : verser de vieilles photos de villes étrangères prises dans les années 1985 à 2010 ; et surtout retrouver les lieux exacts pour les catégoriser convenablement et cela m'a pris beaucoup de temps).

Donc, maintenant je reviens aux autoroutes.
Tout d'abord, lors de mon voyage de septembre, je crois avoir aperçu très peu de panneaux avec flèches coudées (à croire que les sociétés APRR et AREA ne les aiment pas) mais beaucoup de panneaux H12. Et, sur les routes, j'ai pu prendre quelques panneaux D79a-b.

Une autre chose m'a pris du temps avant de verser mes photos de septembre : classer et parfois retoucher le millier de photos d'autoroutes que j'avais prises en 2018 et 2019 et que je n'avais toujours pas encore versées dans Commons. Bon, maintenant je suis prêt...
Mais avant de lancer les versements, j'ai entrepris de faire quelques sous-catégorisations dans quelques catégories d'autoroutes (celles que j'ai empruntées) en séparant les péages, les aires de repos, les bifurcations (avec annonces de bifurcations),... du reste des autres photos.

Concernant les photos de panneaux H12 (qui montrent des dessins "touristiques"), je me pose la question de savoir si l'on peut tous les verser dans Commons car certains sont de quelconques dessins qui n'atteignent pas le seuil d'originalité, mais d'autres sont de vrais dessins et la règle du NoFop en France pourrait s'appliquer (même si en général ces panneaux sont au minimum présents 2 fois sur une autoroute - un dans chaque sens). Qu'en penses-tu ?

Je te ferai signe quand j'aurai fini mes téléchargemennts (tu pourras retrouver les nouvelles photos dans ma page de photos en attente de classement personnel ici : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Poudou99/gallery ). Cela pourra t'aider à mieux catégoriser les types de panneaux.

Cordialement, --Poudou99 (talk) 23:51, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour @Poudou99: , je me réjouis de voir les nouvelles photos. J'ai en liste de suivi les catégories de panneau, donc je vois ces catégorisations. Il faudrait peut-être que j'ajoute les autoroutes en liste de suivi, quoique si c'est dans des sous-catégories. Pour les panneau H12, je pense effectivement que la règle du NoFop s'applique généralement, et il faudrait que je prenne contact avec l'auteur pour certaines de mes photos. Marc Mongenet (talk) 10:29, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Marc

Je viens de terminer le versement de toutes les photos d'autoroutes françaises A4xx (Rhone-Alpes) que j'avais sous le coude (photos prises en 2018 et 2019).

Tu trouveras tout ça ici : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Poudou99/gallery ; Tu peux donc déjà t'attaquer à la catégorisation des panneaux de ces photos d'autoroutes si tu le souhaites.

Je vais terminer cette zone avec les photos de routes départementales de l'Isère (notamment les ex-nationales N75 et N85) entre Rives et Voreppe.

Comme tu as dû le remarquer, j'ai fait des sous-catégories pour les aires de repos, les gares de péage, les jonctions ou raccordement d'autoroutes... J'ai fait au mieux, si tu as des remarques n'hésite pas à me les dire.

Un peu plus tard, je vais verser des photos des autoroutes A4, A5, A6, A7,... et autres photos d'autoroutes (prises en 2018 et 2019). J'attendrai que tu aies fini la catégorisation des photos A4xx et départementales de l'Isère (que je déplacerai ensuite de ma galerie générale vers mes catégories thématiques).

PS /info perso/ : ayant habité Annecy durant près de 10 ans entre 1967 et 1976, puis Grenoble entre 1976 et 1985 (et je reviens souvent dans ces régions depuis), j'avais assisté à la construction de toutes des autoroutes alpines. Vraiment dommage qu'à ces périodes-là il ne me venait pas l'idée de faire des photos de ce genre de choses !

Et dire aussi que j'ai indirectement participé à la construction (dans les aspects de la gestion informatique et des automatismes des signalisations et autres systèmes de sécurité) des tunnels et viaducs de l'A40 entre 1987 et 1990. De cela, je ne garde que des médailles et des livres de l'inauguration de l'autoroute des Titans mais aucune photo. Quel c.. étais-je... Shame on me!

Cordialement, --Poudou99 (talk) 03:03, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Marc

Je ne sais pas si tu comptes te servir de ma galerie de photos en attente de classement vers mes galeries personnelles thématiques, mais pour me permettre de continer mes versements j'ai déplacé toutes les photos versées jusqu'au 26/12 dans une autre galerie d'attente : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Poudou99/gallery2 ; c'est là que se trouvent maintenant les photos d'autoroutes françaises A4xx (Rhone-Alpes) et routes de l'Isère que j'avais sous le coude (photos prises en 2018 et 2019).--Poudou99 (talk) 18:44, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Poudou99: Bonsoir et merci pour les liens. Je suis en train de tout catégoriser, mais il y en a pour un moment... Marc Mongenet (talk) 19:34, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bonsoir Marc.

Attention, je suis en train de télécharger d'autres photos de l'A6 et de ses bifurcations (A77, A19, A38, A31, A40, A46, A466, A89,...). Je n'ai pas fini. Je vois que tu en traites aujourd'hui, tu risques d'en louper quelques-unes et devoir revenir sur ces catégories. A moins que tu aies une méthode pour voir les nouveaux versements. --Poudou99 (talk) 18:38, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Poudou99: Les liens déjà visités ne sont pas de la même couleur que les autres, je le vois ainsi. Marc Mongenet (talk) 18:40, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bonsoir Marc.
Voilà, j'ai terminé le plus gros:

le versement de mes photos des autoroutes A6, A4, A344 et A26, qui sont là: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Poudou99/gallery
et les photos des autoroutes A4xx (Rhone-Alpes), versées la semaine dernière, qui sont là: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Poudou99/gallery2

J'ai encore quelques photos des autoroutes A7, A5a, de la N104 (Francilienne) et de la N7, mais je vais faire une longue pose dans les versements de photos dans Commons relatives aux autoroutes. Je dois me remettre à classer (et re-traiter éventuellement) des photos de villes françaises et autres sujet ferroviaires - cela va me prendre du temps.
Bonne fin d'année... --Poudou99 (talk) 22:01, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Poudou99: Merci, et bonne année ! Je ne serai pas sur Commons les premiers jours de l'année. Marc Mongenet (talk) 22:04, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Marc.
Je vois que je vous ai donné beaucoup de boulot avec la catégorisation de mes photos de panneaux. Quel travail de titan vous faites !
Dommage que je n'ai pu attraper que le D79b parmi ceux qui vous manquaient. J'essaierai de faire mieux ;)
Cordialement, --Poudou99 (talk) 19:43, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour @Poudou99: , il n'y a pas que le D79b, j'ai placé dans mes galeries de panneaux quelques autres photos que vous avez prises [3], [4], [5]. Bonne journée. Marc Mongenet (talk) 10:26, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Poudou99: , voilà, je crois que j'ai fait le tour des photos avec des panneaux catégorisables. Merci pour les photos. Marc Mongenet (talk) 23:03, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Marc,

Encore une fois chapeau bas pour ce travail

J'ai encore un très gros paquet de photos de routes et de villages à verser dans Commons. Je ne sais pas quand je m'y remettre. Mais comme pour les autoroutes, je maintiendrai une galerie perso temporaire dans laquelle vous pourrez jeter un œil pour voir s'il y a des panneaux qui vous intéresseraient.

Depuis quelques années, je prends soin de créer une catégorie "Street signs in..." dans les catégories de communes dans lesquelles j'ai versée des photos. Mais il se peut que de très anciens versements n'aient pas été catégorisés ainsi. Il faut que je refasse une passe sur tous mes versements de photos de communes françaises [6]. Cordialement, --Poudou99 (talk) 14:47, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Ligne aérienne TPG

Bonjour. Je suis aussi admiratif pour ce travail de catégorisation. Cependant, dans le cas de la catégorie Category:Ligne aérienne TPG, il me semble préférable de limiter son emploi aux images sur lesquelles ces lignes sont bien visibles. L'ajout de File:Genève panneau 2.19 4 m (1).jpg et de File:Genève panneau 2.19 4 m (2).jpg ne me semble pas judicieux. De manière générale, il faut aussi éviter la sur-catégorisation. --MHM (talk) 06:44, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour @MHM55: ce sont les petits panneaux jaunes visibles sur File:Genève panneau 2.19 4 m (2).jpg qui m'ont fait catégoriser, mais il est vrai que les photos ne sont pas centrées sur cela et qu'il vaut peut-être mieux retirer la catégorie. Marc Mongenet (talk) 08:10, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oui, ces panneaux indicateurs de croisements ou d'aiguilles sont bien visibles sur d'autres images. Je "décatégorise" donc. --MHM (talk) 10:29, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AK3b

Bonsoir ! J'ai vu que vous aviez mis la photo du panneau AK3b dans votre page, donc si vous voulez j'ai aussi téléversé un AK3a il y a un certain temps. KiwiNeko14 (talk) 16:52, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merci, je l'avais oublié. Je pense effectivement compléter l'intégration des panneaux anciennement officiels. Marc Mongenet (talk) 16:59, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Petite question au sujet d'un numéro d'un panneau de signalisation.

Bonjour Marc

J'ai un petit problème pour catégoriser un panneau de signalisation. Il s'agit du panneau du milieu parmi ces trois panneaux posés sur le même poteau. Normalement, il s'agit d'un panneau "interdiction aux deux roues" comme celui-ci. Sur ma photo dans ma ville, le dessin du cyclomoteur est effacé, et celui de la motocyclette l'est en partie. Mais je n'ai pas réussi à trouver son n° Bxx. Avez-vous une idée. Cordialement, --Poudou99 (talk) 16:26, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour @Poudou99: à ma connaissance ces panneaux ne sont pas réglementaires. Dans ma commune, il y en a un qui interdit la circulation aux motos, vélomoteurs, et quads. J'en ai vu d'autres avec la silhouette d'un camping car. Mais en France, à ma connaissance, seuls category:B7a (road sign, France) et category:B7b (road sign, France) sont réglementaires. Marc Mongenet (talk) 16:34, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merci bien Marc. Provisoirement je l'avais mis en B9b, je vais le mettre en B7a. --Poudou99 (talk) 16:49, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Panneau C1a avec logo vélo

Bonjour Marc,
Existe-t-il une nomenclature spécifique pour ce panneau de parking avec logo vélo ? Ne l'ayant pas trouvée, j'ai a défaut catégorisé la photo dans les panneaux C1a (puisqu'il équivaut à la combinaison panneau C1a + panonceau M4d1).
TCY (talk) 11:18, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@TCY: Bonjour, il s'agit d'un panneau non réglementaire. À ma connaissance, un parking à vélos est réglementairement signalé par un panneau C1a et un panonceau M4d1, comme dans File:Parking à vélos avec panneau C1a et panonceau M4d1.jpg. Marc Mongenet (talk) 21:23, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Panneau type C… pour de l'autopartage ?

Bonsoir,

J'ai croisé un panneau de signalisation fraîchement implanté, qui reprend le motif de l'idéogramme ID37 « Autopartage », mais en blanc sur fond bleu comme un panneau de signalisation de type C.

Sait-on si un tel panneau correspondrait à quoi que ce soit de réglementaire (quelque chose de fraîchement intégré au code de la route) ?

Merci d'avance et bonne soirée,

KiwiNeko14 (talk) 20:07, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@KiwiNeko14: , bonjour, je suppose qu'il s'agit d'un panneau C9. Marc Mongenet (talk) 20:11, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Marc Mongenet: D'accord (et merci) ! Je fais le tri dans les photos que j'ai pris de ce panneau, et j'en téléverse une ou deux. KiwiNeko14 (talk) 20:14, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

G1c

Bonjour. Si besoin d'un G1c, il y en a un a Florange (si il n'a pas bougé depuis 2012). 49°19'34.3"N 6°09'16.9"E 92.175.23.141 08:50, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

J10 avec 1 barre à gauche

Bonsoir. J'ai repéré un lieu près de chez moi où il y avait des balises J10 d'approche de passage à niveau en version « côté gauche de la chaussée ». Y compris un exemplaire à 1 barre. Je peux tenter d'en prendre des photos dans les prochains jours. Amicalement 2A01:CB18:F02:EE00:59FD:FB4E:AB55:1EDD 22:39, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Très volontiers. Marc Mongenet (talk) 23:38, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bonsoir, c'est chose faite ! KiwiNeko14 (talk) 19:33, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Interdiction de skier et luger (CH)

For your image gallery: File:Berguen_Verbotsschilder.jpg (although wrongly mounted). --Filzstift (talk) 11:34, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category

When you want to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category, best practice is to mark it with {{SD|C2}} if it would be OK to re-create it in the future, given that appropriate content becomes available or {{SD|C1}} if it is an inappropriate category name that should not be reused. In particular, this is better practice than just blanking the category page, as you did at Category:M12a (road sign, France). ("C1" and "C2" come from Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion). Jmabel ! talk 04:53, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.

[2] Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

[survey 1]

[survey 2]

User talk:Marc Mongenet

Flags from Wikipedia

informationbox for flags

Unified flag series

Drapeau de l’Afghanistan

Drapeau

Image Tagging Image:Ballens.jpeg

Tip: Categorizing images

Copyright status: File:Vatican flag 300.png

Autopatrol given

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Signalisation de danger

suppression de catégorie

B6a2 et B6a3

Mail

Chapeau !

Category:Ligne aérienne TPG

AK3b

Petite question au sujet d'un numéro d'un panneau de signalisation.

Panneau C1a avec logo vélo

Panneau type C… pour de l'autopartage ?

G1c

J10 avec 1 barre à gauche

Interdiction de skier et luger (CH)

How to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category

Navigation menu

Search