Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/09/08

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive September 8th, 2018
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Insufficent license detail, Equivalent image at English Wikipedia was non-free ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:44, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 15:03, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is clearly an album cover art. I'm not aware of record labels releasing album art under Creative Commons. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:53, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 15:03, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Donetsk72 and VPC discussion MBH (talk) 15:43, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Administrative close. Failure to notify uploader is not acceptable. Request redone. See Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with deepcat:"Stamps of Donetsk People's Republic by year" hastemplate:PD-UA-exempt. --Majora (talk) 00:33, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Orgainzational logo, insufficent sourcing - Non-free per English Wikipedia ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:45, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 14:09, 8 September 2018 UTC: Commons:Licensing: non-trivial logo - --Krdbot 01:14, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Organisational logo, claimed as own work, but design is likely to be owned by a third party? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:46, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 14:09, 8 September 2018 UTC: Commons:Licensing: non-trivial logo - --Krdbot 01:14, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Insufficent sourcing, Logo is NOT simple, so I fail to see how this can be CC0 as claimed. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:54, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 14:09, 8 September 2018 UTC: Commons:Licensing: non-trivial logo - --Krdbot 01:14, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i want to delete.... DJSHIVAMOFFICIAL (talk) 09:40, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

delete it foe my request..... DJSHIVAMOFFICIAL (talk) 09:41, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@DJSHIVAMOFFICIAL: Why delete?   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 09:57, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

wrongly uploaded DJSHIVAMOFFICIAL (talk) 07:47, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

mistaken uploaded DJSHIVAMOFFICIAL (talk) 07:48, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

wrongly uploaded... please delete it soon.... DJSHIVAMOFFICIAL (talk) 07:50, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

delete it mistaken uploaded... DJSHIVAMOFFICIAL (talk) 07:52, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --JuTa 11:15, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doesn't qualify for WLM M.hekmat (talk) 23:38, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 08:55, 9 September 2018 UTC: Copyright violation: Has been published before. If you are the copyright holder please send permission via OTRS.
عکس پیش از این منتشر شده. اگر خالق عکس شما هستید از راه OTRS اقدام کنید. می‌توانید برای من پیغام بگذارید تا راهنمایی‌تان کنم.
--Krdbot 13:14, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising, the uploader's only contribution, the file is not in use. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 00:33, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Taivo at 11:35, 9 September 2018 UTC: Content created as advertisement; see COM:ADVERT (G10) --Krdbot 07:11, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It seems that Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic (CC BY-NC-SA 2.0) is no longer accepted here Veritycheck (talk) 20:06, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Magog the Ogre at 22:28, 9 September 2018 UTC: Failed license review; non-free license (F4) --Krdbot 07:13, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrond info Bhaskarfree (talk) 17:02, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Moheen at 03:42, 11 September 2018 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 07:09, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:DW. Yasu (talk) 15:05, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedied as obvious copyvio.  JGHowes  talk 13:29, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yanickghanty (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:23, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Agustin Prades (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Viele gute Fotos, einige 2016 hochgeladen, mit Wasserzeichen, ohne Metadaten. Die 2018 hochgeladenen Fotos stammen von verschiedenen Kameras oder EXIF fehlen. Genehmigung wäre notwendig. Sie werden nur auf der Benutzerseite in der es-WP genutzt. Die Gestaltung seiner BS sind dort die einzigen Beiträge.

Hystrix (talk) 04:05, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:40, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JohnalexPrado (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:56, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Info: Their 2nd account is obviously User:Johnalexpradooo. --Achim (talk) 18:10, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:19, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Arp lugo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:57, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:17, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LaManchaSpain (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Modern art. I think artist/heir(s) identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:58, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


thanks for your caution. i'll prepare confirmation via Commons:OTRS.  LaManchaSpain (talk) 19:59, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:23, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vmmmohan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Advertising and derivative works.

- Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:22, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Túrelio: this might as well be closed speedy, I just wanted to leave a reason for the nomination. With speedy that's either not possible or the reason may disappear along with the file, so I made a DR. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 10:42, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:23, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of File:Boeing 737-7BC BBJ AN1651097.jpg Marc Lacoste (talk) 08:24, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I deleted and redirected the other file per Fæ. Taivo (talk) 20:20, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JimMcG89 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:59, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I corrected the tags for these:

So why were they deleted? These were all pictures which were out of old (100 yrs old or older), out of print books and journals. I'd like an explanation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JimMcG89 (talk • contribs) 20:56, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Restored: as per [1]. Yann (talk) 08:51, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aayalat (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused screenshots of questionable notability

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:59, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Julio sutil (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely authorship claims based on the extremely low resolutions, missing metadata, the appearance of the images (music video screenshots?), and the uploader's history.

LX (talk, contribs) 15:56, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:59, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Esitor do Acre (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely copyright violations. Low-resolution photos with dubious authorship claims (except the last file in the list), missing or inconsistent metadata identifying multiple authors, and previous publications found elsewhere.

LX (talk, contribs) 16:08, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:00, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 123hamda (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely copyright violations. Also outside of Commons' project scope.

LX (talk, contribs) 17:00, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:01, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shah asif222 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Obviously false authorship claims. If any of these files are in the public domain, please provide truthful source, authorship and copyright information.

LX (talk, contribs) 17:07, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:01, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Brijesh Deoria (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos of no encyclopedic value. These are the only files this user has uploaded.

Kalbbes (talk) 22:40, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 08:38, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Brijesh Deoria (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, out of scope. Commons is not a web host

Ronhjones  (Talk) 17:15, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This user has reuploaded files that were previously deleted (see request above) along with the many others today.

Kalbbes (talk) 23:21, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:03, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Haji Tea (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely authorship claims based on the low resolutions, missing metadata (except for File:Tanaman Tomat.jpg and File:Dsc 0438566u.jpg, which were taken with different cameras), watermarks identifying multiple different web sites, the nature of several of the images, and the uploader's history.

LX (talk, contribs) 17:50, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:05, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader is not author, the source document does not contain the claimed CC license. BethNaught (talk) 18:03, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:09, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These files do not match the specification document and are superseded by files in Category:Diagrams of route signs of Mexico. Many are PNG or GIF and are lower quality, and some have serious problems (wrong font size, non-transparent background). None of these are used in mainspace on any wiki. Also see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Sonora state highway shields for a similar nomination.

Rschen7754 18:27, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:09, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 19:16, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:10, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, unidentified logo. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. LX (talk, contribs) 19:17, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:10, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality Germaine Cornet (talk) 19:24, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: 'poor quality' of a gallery page?!?. --Jcb (talk) 00:11, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by File:MN-1.svg and similarly named files. These versions use the wrong colors according to the specification. These are unused in mainspace. Also see precedents at COM:HWY/P.

Rschen7754 19:40, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:15, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image from Facebook. No proof that this is under an acceptable license and the uploader has previous copyvios in their history. Majora (talk) 21:39, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio, no permission. --Wdwd (talk) 15:06, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

book cover, not free Sergkarman (talk) 22:01, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 15:00, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Orthographiefehler im Namen (Sgraffiti statt Sgrafitti!) Im Fokus (talk) 23:39, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: deleted redirection. --Wdwd (talk) 14:42, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Irrelevant Usman ashiq (talk) 09:22, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 21:32, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Depicted person died in 1974. Own work is under doubt, probably copyright violation. Uploader is banned from Wikipedia. Taivo (talk) 09:25, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 21:32, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Sankoswal (talk) 10:24, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Such a watermark may be a reason to crop, not to delete.--Pere prlpz (talk) 22:40, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 21:33, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Sankoswal (talk) 10:24, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 21:33, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Sankoswal (talk) 10:25, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 21:34, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Sankoswal (talk) 10:25, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 21:34, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Sankoswal (talk) 10:25, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 21:34, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Sankoswal (talk) 10:25, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 21:34, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot from site as source. No CC license. Father of Lies (talk) 11:10, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 21:38, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://www.tineye.com/search/2c7f771339757b42974cd390b95e92e4e4e7e7d0/ Polarlys (talk) 11:44, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 21:40, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 21:42, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this file is a copyright. Haseebahmad1087 (talk) 19:35, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can you provide the original location this image has been copied from?--Pere prlpz (talk) 22:27, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:48, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this file is a copyright. Haseebahmad1087 (talk) 19:35, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:48, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this file is a copyright. Haseebahmad1087 (talk) 19:36, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:31, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - private foto Schlurcher (talk) 05:27, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:31, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - private foto Schlurcher (talk) 05:28, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:31, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope - private picture Schlurcher (talk) 05:29, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:31, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - private picture Schlurcher (talk) 05:30, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:31, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - private picture Schlurcher (talk) 05:30, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:31, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - private picture Schlurcher (talk) 05:31, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:31, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - private picture Schlurcher (talk) 05:31, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:31, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 05:33, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

include

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:31, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused sample signature, maybe out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 07:18, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:33, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded PNG files (by File:Nova Scotia Route 201.svg and similar files) and unused in mainspace. The PNG files do not match examples in Category:Roads in Nova Scotia while the SVG shields do. Also see COM:HWY/P for precedent.

Rschen7754 07:31, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:33, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shivam2068 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE personal Facebook images.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:47, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:33, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by WILDER FLOREZ (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:10, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:34, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of the file already on Wikimedia Crook1 (talk) 21:36, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 01:07, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rodrigo Roa Duterte (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Philippine banknote and coin designs are not appropriate for Commons per Commons:Currency#Philippines.

4nn1l2 (talk) 13:02, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:59, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

nf ummei rjh 61.69.174.154 04:03, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no comprehensible reason for deletion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:29, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality photo of person for which a higher quality photo is available at File:Zach Terrell attempts pass in 2017 Cotton Bowl Classic.jpg. Arbor to SJ (talk) 05:59, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:31, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Maybe I'm wrong here, but the license on the YouTube video doesn't appear to specify whether commercial reuse is permitted, or for that matter, specify any individual CC license at all, but only that it is under some CC license. I don't think that is usable for our purposes. GMGtalk 14:00, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No, this video is released with the license Creative Commons CC BY It can be imported to Wikimedia Commons. Tan Khaerr (talk) 14:13, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Ooh. Sorry. I looked at this page, and didn't follow the link to here where it does specify a specific license.  I withdraw my nomination GMGtalk 15:21, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Patrick Rogel: may be interested. Jcb (talk) 15:39, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Video uploaded to Youtube by the copyright holder (I assume) France 3 Grand Est under a CC-BY license. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:33, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of an unknown person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 17:17, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:34, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in the US, at the convention where this photo of sculptures was taken. (The photo itself might have a free Creative Commons license, but lacks rights to the subjects depicted.) czar 23:45, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:35, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo is not own work as claimed, Design most likley owned by EA ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:51, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 21:34, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo element top is not simple as claimed. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:52, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 21:44, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo is not simple as claimed. Non-free per English Wikipedia en:File:UC Browser Logo.png ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:56, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@ShakespeareFan00: I put this logo on because I thought it was allowed. An example is this file: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Google_Chrome_icon_(September_2014).svg Piolodiusz (talk) 12:42, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 21:48, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious licensing information: source is listed as "Private collection" with no indication that the uploader is the copyright owner. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:41, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The uploader of the picture seems to be the copyright owner, as this is an own work. I worked on the German and the English Karl Freiherr Michel von Tüßling articles, and from my research I know, that the picture is taken from a frame of some film material of the Tag der deutschen Kunst i.e. the Große Deutsche Kunstausstellung in Munich, 1939. The film material is copyright free (CC-BY) and can be found on youtube, for example: here (24:21), or here. It is released with the license Creative Commons CC-BY therefore it can be imported to Wikimedia Commons (see: here).
This picture of Bouhler, Ley, and Michel von Tüßling is used in numerous wp articles, and as far as I know, the only colour picture available. Only two pictures are known, that show Karl Freiherr Michel von Tüßling, both taken from the same scene in Munich, in July 1939, with only this one showing his face properly, as he was very wary of not being photographed. He acted as a desk criminal on behalf of Brack, Bouhler, and Himmler, and without those two pictures, we would not be able to put a face to that name. The wp also has no other pictures of Inga Ley, so please do not delete – it would be a real loss. --Zawhie (talk) 16:12, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Zawhie + very probably {{PD-GermanGov}}. Ruthven (msg) 07:01, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly dubious copyright status: uploaded by User:OberRanks currently site-banned from en.wiki for copyright infringement and fabricating sources, so "own work" is questionable. In any case, a higher-quality, properly-licensed image of the subject is already available on Commons here:

K.e.coffman (talk) 20:22, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 07:02, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Also File:PRINCIPE.jpg, File:ESCUDO DE ARMAS.jpg and File:Príncipe Víctor Hugo García.jpg. Out of project scope. Uploaded by the user to illustrate his now-deleted autobiography on eswiki. LlamaAl (talk) 04:55, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nom and comment. Strakhov (talk) 18:08, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cover of copyright works. John123521 (talk) 13:41, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nom. This one should have been nominated to speedy deletion. Strakhov (talk) 18:14, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality-no subject Jumpy01 (talk) 23:14, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I must agree with that. Taivo (talk) 19:10, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

間違った人物をあっぷろーと Yamatonadesiko1942 (talk) 15:05, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

間違った人物をアップロード Yamatonadesiko1942 (talk) 15:06, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

wrong person Yamatonadesiko1942 (talk) 15:58, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader requested deletion on the day of upload. --Yasu (talk) 15:55, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In 1953, the Canadian TOO would have been the same as the UK - therefore this is way over COM:TOO. Probably copyright until 2024 Ronhjones  (Talk) 15:06, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 14:08, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, out of WLM 2018 context Sankoswal (talk) 11:59, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:12, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of context Sankoswal (talk) 12:01, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:12, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of WLE context, personal image Sankoswal (talk) 12:43, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:12, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING. 4nn1l2 (talk) 12:56, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:12, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Half of a greeting card should be Out of Scope Mjrmtg (talk) 13:00, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:11, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work as claimed. No supporting metadata TripWire (talk) 13:07, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:11, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non free image. [2] John123521 (talk) 13:48, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:10, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:57, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:10, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image on Vacheron Constantin website list as own work John123521 (talk) 13:58, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:09, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:08, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alinor xalhaye (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:08, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:08, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from pin. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:07, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:07, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Official symbol. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:07, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial flag of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:07, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: what new could be added to existing collection of explicit materials? EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:06, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:06, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:06, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nhom1ketoank10 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely false authorship claims based on the extremely low resolutions, missing metadata, previous publications found elsewhere, and the uploader's history.

LX (talk, contribs) 15:40, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:05, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aquino lopes (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely false authorship claims based on the extremely low resolutions, missing metadata, and previous publications found elsewhere. The only other file uploaded by the user was a copyright violation.

LX (talk, contribs) 16:02, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:05, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small size, low resolution, missing EXIF, user has a history of uploading copyvios. 4nn1l2 (talk) 16:11, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:03, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image, lack of EXIF data B dash (talk) 16:19, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:03, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Crisijuan0 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely false authorship claims based on the low resolutions, missing/inconsistent metadata, watermarks, and previous publications found elsewhere.

LX (talk, contribs) 16:43, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:03, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely authorship claims given the nature of the image and the uploader's history. LX (talk, contribs) 16:54, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:02, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Unitechsurveysolution1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely copyright violations. Also outside of Commons' project scope.

LX (talk, contribs) 17:15, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:01, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-permanent installation, freedom of panorama does not apply Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:35, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:01, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely false authorship claims. Previously published in much higher resolution at climatetracker.org. The filename there suggests the image may have been previously published here on Wikimedia Commons, but I have not been able to locate it. LX (talk, contribs) 17:40, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:00, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contains a watermark; previously deleted. Larry Hockett (talk) 07:04, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:17, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Abysmal quality, subject barely visible. One of over 200 in batch upload, many far better. MPF (talk) 19:58, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:59, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Abysmal quality, subject barely visible. One of over 200 in batch upload, many far better. MPF (talk) 19:59, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:59, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Abysmal quality, subject barely visible. One of over 200 in batch upload, many far better. MPF (talk) 19:59, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:59, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is an promotion image, that doesn't make it own work. commons:licensing Father of Lies (talk) 20:25, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:58, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SCOPE; organisation logos generally aren't useful unless a page in a WMF site covers the subject, which I expect to be unlikely, as this is a local museum in a small rural community. I'm slightly concerned about the copyright status, as the uploader, Curator-RCVMuseum, claims it as an own work; this isn't unlikely for someone with such a username, and given the own-work claim, {{Npd}} is unwarranted (we accept own-work without OTRS), but it's the kind of thing that tends to get questioned here. Nyttend (talk) 20:29, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:58, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work Ymblanter (talk) 20:30, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:57, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work Ymblanter (talk) 20:31, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:57, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SCOPE. The uploader unambiguously claims to be the creator (Source="I was payed to make a flyer for this festival"), which is quite plausible for a small-town event like this, but non-historic flyers generally aren't in scope, as there's no real use for them except for the original purposes of the entity that produced them. Nyttend (talk) 20:31, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:57, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A scan, unlikely to be own work Ymblanter (talk) 20:32, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:56, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image was uploaded on november 16 of 2016. But appears on social media since may of the same year. The user doesn't seem to have the proper license or permission to reuse it. Luisalvaz (talk) 23:53, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:55, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality image that appears to be a scan (lots of extra white space) with no EXIF data. Unlikely to be own work. Majora (talk) 23:55, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:55, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality photo with no educational purpose OhanaUnitedTalk page 02:34, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:48, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unusable in this way Schlurcher (talk) 05:25, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:34, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 07:34, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:33, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

sensor dust from mirrorless. uploaded new version. Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 07:58, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:33, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, out of context Sankoswal (talk) 09:35, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:32, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looking at white space right of image, this is not own work, but own scan. Maybe this is copyright violation, at least real author and better license are needed. Taivo (talk) 10:21, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:32, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image, out of context Sankoswal (talk) 10:26, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:31, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image, out of context Sankoswal (talk) 10:26, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:31, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Scope Perumalism (talk) 10:35, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:30, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Collages need source and license for every used image. The man in front is the user's another uploaded file, other parts of the nominated image are unsourced. Taivo (talk) 10:38, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:19, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploading new one Sivarajanlunnala (talk) 11:13, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:18, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of context to the WLE 2017 competition Sankoswal (talk) 11:41, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:17, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of context to WLM 2018 Contest Sankoswal (talk) 11:45, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:16, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo design most likely held by club, No evidence presented to explain uploader connection to said club. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:47, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:16, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of context Sankoswal (talk) 11:54, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:16, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Diegodiez03 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logo's claimed as self, but clearly 'third-party' designs. Logo deisgns are not simple enought to be ineligible.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:55, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by EugeneZelenko. --Didym (talk) 18:15, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image, out of WLM context Sankoswal (talk) 11:57, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:14, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no sound; going to reupload it in ogg format ~nmaia d 11:57, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:13, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, out of WLM context Sankoswal (talk) 11:58, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:13, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal picture, out of WLM context Sankoswal (talk) 11:58, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:13, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mistake, wanted to overwrite Marc Lacoste (talk) 08:32, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:09, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
English: Church built in 1942. The architects André Boyer (1882-1953) and André Salvan (d. 1969) died less than 70 years ago, therefore the building is not yet in public domain (and no Freedom of Panorama in France).
Français : Église construite en 1942. Les architectes André Boyer (1882-1953) et André Salvan (mort en 1969) sont morts il y a moins de 70 ans, le bâtiment n'est donc pas encore dans le domaine public (et pas de liberté de panorama en France).

VIGNERON (talk) 13:58, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pymouss Let’s talk - 21:16, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
English: See supra previous rationale for deletion.
Français : Voir ci-dessus pour la raison de suppression.

VIGNERON (talk) 12:29, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: still no OTRS confirmation. --JuTa 05:07, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
English: Church built in 1942. The architects André Boyer (1882-1953) and André Salvan (d. 1969) died less than 70 years ago, therefore the building is not yet in public domain (and no Freedom of Panorama in France).
Français : Église construite en 1942. Les architectes André Boyer (1882-1953) et André Salvan (mort en 1969) sont morts il y a moins de 70 ans, le bâtiment n'est donc pas encore dans le domaine public (et pas de liberté de panorama en France).

VIGNERON (talk) 13:58, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pymouss Let’s talk - 21:16, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
English: See supra previous rationale for deletion.
Français : Voir ci-dessus pour la raison de suppression.

VIGNERON (talk) 12:29, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: still no OTRS confirmation. --JuTa 05:07, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - private foto not used Schlurcher (talk) 05:26, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep A nice example of Category:Men looking at viewer handshakes.--Pere prlpz (talk) 22:30, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, plenty of alternatives in its category. P 1 9 9   04:47, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source is a published work without explicit license; we need OTRS or other evidence that it's free. Prosfilaes (talk) 06:57, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have asked the author to send through the declaration of consent, sorry for the trouble. Lindaharperjr (talk) 09:49, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   04:48, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We have a lot of better photos in Category:Arecaceae in Venezuela. Out of project scope due to quality. Taivo (talk) 07:48, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   04:48, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Sankoswal (talk) 11:36, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply] Sankoswal (talk) 11:37, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, numerous alternatives available. P 1 9 9   04:49, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Sankoswal (talk) 11:37, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, numerous alternatives available. P 1 9 9   04:50, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Sankoswal (talk) 11:37, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, numerous alternatives available. P 1 9 9   04:50, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of context Sankoswal (talk) 11:37, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   04:51, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Sankoswal (talk) 11:43, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, numerous alternatives available. P 1 9 9   04:51, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Sankoswal (talk) 11:43, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, numerous alternatives available. P 1 9 9   04:51, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Sankoswal (talk) 11:43, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, numerous alternatives available. P 1 9 9   04:52, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Sankoswal (talk) 11:43, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, numerous alternatives available. P 1 9 9   04:52, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Sankoswal (talk) 11:43, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, numerous alternatives available. P 1 9 9   04:52, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Sankoswal (talk) 11:43, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, numerous alternatives available. P 1 9 9   04:53, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Sankoswal (talk) 11:43, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, numerous alternatives available. P 1 9 9   04:53, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation of Lifestyle Nutrition. Did not source work, and didn't prove that this image was self made. Yanjipy (talk) 19:45, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   04:53, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very poor quality, subject barely visible. One of over 200 in batch upload, many far better. MPF (talk) 20:03, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   04:53, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Curso Aline Almeida 86 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image collection

OhanaUnitedTalk page 02:38, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • A lot of these have no place on Commons, but some are acceptable. For instance, File:Correndo pelas escadas do museu 15.jpg provides a human scale to the building, and no one is identifiable, so it's useful. ~nmaia d 03:41, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment I think, they were uploaded because of this https://twitter.com/Wikipedia/status/1037066123869483008/photo/1 --Snek01 (talk) 10:58, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Absolutley against. 1: we will lose the trust of such new editors who are coming from social networks and trying to help. They will be disappointed and wont understand it. Because for god's sake, this is what we've asked them to do! The case is absolutely exceptional. And 2) since everything was lost these photos are actualy valuable. We don't have many of them with a free license, even when they are personal. So i believe we should skip the rules this time. And keep them. --Andrei (talk) 11:39, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • When a lot of the photos uploaded by this user are similar in quality to what you find on people's upload to Facebook, then it falls the "private image collection" criteria and does not justify exceptions. Many of the photos have a minor (child) in it and we must be careful about how it's being used, especially with licenses that allow commercial re-use. Plus, we don't really need 10+ photos of a child sitting or walking up the stone stairs (see photos with file names like Escadas do museu X.jpg, with X being a number). I highly doubt the large set of stone stairs located on the outside of the museum would somehow be burned to the point that it's gone forever. OhanaUnitedTalk page 06:37, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • suggest we put them in a subcategory for now and worry about the details later.Geni (talk) 00:24, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Campaign:MuseuNacional

Different from a Wiki Loves... that most of the people are motivate by the money, or other prizes. This campaign are trying to gather many photos as possible after the fire, and the only motivation is to save a bit of history. And as you can see, we are not successful... demotivate the donation is terribly bad for the campaign, especially for a situation like that. We just lost our biggest museum, and people want to help.

I sign all Andrei points, and we should have more people skills in this cases. Keep the files will have a small impact in our community, deleting could keep possible contributions away.

-- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 21:53, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Part of the campaign and we can crop them and get valuable images out of these.--Juandev (talk) 00:10, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep This is an exceptional situation and we have asked people to upload this type of photo from the burned down museum. Perhaps after the campaign is completed we can give all of the photos to the museum or another party, and at that point can cull those that don't fit our needs. But as long as the campaign is ongoing, we absolutely cannot delete these. Smallbones (talk) 01:08, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep These contributions are very important. They provide information on a collection that has just disappeared. We cannot make a decision just right now on what is valuable or not, as we are still through the process of curating what we have, what we need. I am very thankful for all this new editors who have heard our call and contribute with good faith. --Joalpe (talk) 02:46, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep All images from Museu Nacional are valuable. Ixocactus (talk) 02:53, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep - this would have been a more sensible DR if only those photos that show close ups of people had been nominated. Photos showing interior with people shoudl not be deleted. FunkMonk (talk) 04:49, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment A number of those photos are clearly useless (blurred closeups with people), but it would be much better if they would be nominated in smaller batches, so that we can be able to evaluate them in a case by case way.-- Darwin Ahoy! 13:09, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Those should be reviewed on a case by case basic. Some of them have indeed very little value as far as contributing to the museum collection, but they still can be used to illustrate topics about people visiting the museum, showing tourists, or just as sample encyclopedic examples of family photos, or Brazilian children and their fashion in early 21st century, etc. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 10:07, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: most per nomination. I have been very selective to only delete images were there is (nearly) nothing visible of the collection. Deleting these personal out-of-scope images is not detrimental to the campaign as such images are not the type we need. P 1 9 9   03:05, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo already existed as File:Sam Gerovich (1).jpg Howard61313 (talk) 16:49, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: 18:27, 9 September 2018, by Magog the Ogre. P 1 9 9   03:12, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dublette und nicht mehr hier benutzt und eingebunden Eilaender (talk) 16:59, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9   03:13, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The original source doesn't say that the image has this license. Copyvio. Rapsar (talk) 00:12, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:32, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contents of this website are copyrigh protected. Rapsar (talk) 00:45, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:32, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image is identical to the (modified) source File:Münster, Fürstbischöfliches Schloss -- 2018 -- 1930-31 (cropped).jpg. Thanks for deletion. XRay talk 01:08, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:33, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D artwork in Romania

B dash (talk) 02:32, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, delete these ugliness. :) They no longer exist, the plaster has been removed. --Turbojet (talk) 08:33, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per COM:GRAFFITI. P 1 9 9   20:37, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don’t think CNSE Sports 1 owns this video. The video description includes mentions of “alzajeera” which is clearly trying to confuse people into thinking it’s affiliated with Al Jazeera, and one of the “exclusive” videos clearly comes from MSNBC. Ytoyoda (talk) 04:07, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, looks indeed like COM:LL. P 1 9 9   20:43, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio Rekishi-JAPAN (talk) 04:10, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:DW. P 1 9 9   20:43, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i uploadaed Baratiiman (talk) 09:38, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion, and out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:44, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical document. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:39, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The author, location and date of the document is in the document itself: it was created in June 1940 in the Portuguese consulate in Bordeaux. Most of the image is below TOO. The design of stamps may be PD or de minimis (or both).--Pere prlpz (talk) 22:45, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:Pere prlpz. P 1 9 9   20:46, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In my opinion this is corrupt map, should be deleted. Taivo (talk) 14:15, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Taivo: Let me see if I can fix it.--ZiaLater (talk) 15:47, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@ZiaLater: better, but still not totally fixed. Taivo (talk) 12:38, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: appears to be fixed now. P 1 9 9   20:51, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a own work Lyon-St-Clair (talk) 15:28, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:51, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These are both CC4 see https://maidsafe.net/assets.html

‘The following assets are available to download and use. All assets are available under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International license (CC). This means that you are free to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and/or adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) as you see fit.’

‘If you would like to write about us feel free to get in touch with Nick via press@maidsafe.net. This is obviously not a requirement, but we‘d be happy to answer any questions you might have.’

Thank you. Next time, please show such links in file infobox, when uploading the files. But I noticed another problem. Both files are unused and en:MaidSafe was deleted per en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MaidSafe. Maybe the organization is non-notable and the files are out of project scope? Taivo (talk) 23:00, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. Ruthven (msg) 17:56, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:53, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same case as File:Logo PSOE 1976-2001.svg: Unfree logo. License used is not correct, as the image does not consist just of "simple geometric shapes or text" (the fist and the rose meeting the threshold of originality) Sfs90 (talk) 23:11, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am opposing deletion on the same arguments I used here and here. --Fer1997 (talk) 23:19, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Trademarks mean absolutely nothing to us as they are a non-copyright restriction. What matters is copyright which is a completely different section of law. If the rose itself, which is the only part of that image that meets TOO, was in the public domain than this would be a derivative of something that is PD. Which would make it fine to be here. That is the entire point of the public domain. For things to be available to be redone and rethought into new creations. --Majora (talk) 21:14, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D artwork in USA

B dash (talk) 02:37, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Research was unable to determine the source of the graffiti, and when I spoke to the property owner he said he had known the name of the graffiti artist but could not remember it. He said that he left the graffiti alone because it improved the neighborhood. He said that he owned the garage but did not own the truck, and the truck had not moved since before the graffiti was applied. My thinking at the time was that these two photographs were similar to those of the side of a boxcar on a freight train where graffiti artists might paint a mural.Tamanoeconomico (talk) 17:47, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn, {{Non-free graffiti}}. --B dash (talk) 15:27, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States.

A1Cafel (talk) 03:34, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see how FoP applies here, unless you want public art on Wikipedia expunged. This RearMuralPublicArt was painted (live, as performance art, mind you) in conjunction with the Treefort Music Fest under the aegis the Boise City Department of Arts & History. There's a new mural annually. Furthermore it's an excellent example of two distinct styles of graffiti and the film's legacy. Kencf0618 (talk) 12:24, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment You seem to know something about this - sounds like authorized artwork (mural) rather than illicitly placed (graffiti) - if you can find out any info that these are for some reason free licensed, great; otherwise assumption would be that the artists retain copyright on their works. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:23, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:33, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is an movie poster. Commons doesnt accept fair-use Commons:Fairuse. Father of Lies (talk) 20:37, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded this poster to use it in the page created for the TV show for which the poster is made (https://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jutro_%C4%87e_promeniti_sve). I worked on that TV project as a crew member. I understand if it's not possible to keep it uploaded.


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 21:04, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from poster. Should be blanked/cropped to keep. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:54, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept. Let's suppose that's Russia. Cropped. Strakhov (talk) 19:58, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work, probably taken from [3] [4] , where this has full metadata and a bigger size:

EXIF
Camera Model Name iPhone 7
Orientation Horizontal (normal)
Software Instagram
Modify Date 2018:06:25 18:54:36
Date/Time Original 2018:06:25 18:54:36
1 year, 3 months, 21 days, 8 hours, 19 minutes, 32 seconds ago
Create Date 2018:06:25 18:54:36
1 year, 3 months, 21 days, 8 hours, 19 minutes, 32 seconds ago
Components Configuration Y, Cb, Cr, -
Shutter Speed Value 1/113
Aperture Value 1.80
Brightness Value 6.231143552
Exif Image Size 1,200 × 1,500

VLu (talk) 10:23, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:16, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D artwork in USA

B dash (talk) 02:35, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 20:18, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D artwork in USA B dash (talk) 02:36, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 20:18, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D artwork in USA B dash (talk) 02:38, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image is a mural celebrating the history of a small town in the State of Maine. It is an expression of civic pride meant to be shared, and nobody is trying to make money on it. Sharing this image is sharing the history of a community, which was the intent of the mural and my photo of it. This request for deletion seems overzealous and culturally insensitive. It is common for small towns in the U.S. to share such expressions of civic pride in the form of roadside murals. They are not meant to be hidden away. I do not believe the town of Orrington, Maine is going to bring its massive resources to bear in an effort to prevent the viewing of this image. If we are going to delete this picture on these grounds then we had better go ahead and nominate the entire Category Murals in the United States for deletion too. I believe the town of Orrington would be as saddened by this deletion request as I am.Daniel P. Stewart (talk) 12:50, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 20:19, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not very accurate, as there should not be a stress on the last syllable. The file is replaceable by "File:En-us-baragouin.ogg". — SGconlaw (talk) 06:37, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 20:19, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Indoor painting without permission. Whether {{FoP-Austria}} covers indoor paintings? Regasterios (talk) 09:09, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You want to know whether FoP-Austria covers indoor in public by making a random deletion request instead of just asking in a discussion??? That makes me speechless. YES, IN AUSTRIA ALSO INDOOR IN PUBLIC IS COVERED BY FOP! --Thomas Ledl (talk) 12:57, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - only architectural works allowed indoors. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 20:23, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 20:23, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo is not entirly own work in design, However it's mostly text. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:48, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 20:24, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo is not own work, it's most likely (in terms of the design) owned by the brand it represents. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:49, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 20:23, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Template:Watermar Sankoswal (talk) 13:00, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 20:24, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The bust was set up in 1980 (the 55th year of the Showa era) [5]. Not in PD, and COM:FOP Japan doesn't allow such artworks. Yasu (talk) 15:04, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 20:24, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Belarus. The previous cases of the same subject Commons:Deletion requests/File:Monument of Prince Barys.gif and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Borisov-prince-monument-and-church.rev.jpg Jarash (talk) 15:20, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 20:24, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 20:25, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Yamatonadesiko1942 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: mistake. What mistake? File currently in use in Wikidata. Amitie 10g (talk) 16:30, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Amitie Alan (talk) 12:47, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mistake,wrong person Yamatonadesiko1942 (talk) 16:49, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 20:25, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redirect makes no sense. It doesn't describe its target at all.  — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  20:54, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 20:26, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This same image (not the same file as this is of slightly worse quality) is in the Finnish Wikipedia fi:Tiedosto:Perttisalolainen.JPG with OTRS permission and CC 3.0 license. I don't believe that this is "own work" of the uploader here. There's a 2017 DR regarding the same fi-wiki image here where it was deleted, as the admin didn't seem to think the OTRS permission was valid. kyykaarme (talk) 21:02, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 20:26, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Extremely useless redirect name that should be blacklisted.  — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  21:21, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 20:26, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Web-resolution image, previously published before stated creation date. Likely not uploader's own work. BethNaught (talk) 14:53, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 14:48, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader does not appear to be the creator of either the photograph or the object. Source link does not display the claimed CC license. BethNaught (talk) 18:00, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:06, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jikest (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logos claimed as own work, but are clearly third party in terms of the design.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:50, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Per above, except File:Fox Family Movies.png which is not expected to be {{PD-textlogo}}. --Эlcobbola talk 18:55, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]