Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/08/29
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
"(c) Sakura photograph", with no good evidence of Commons-compatible licensing being issued by the copyright holder Categorizing (talk) 08:36, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, correctly licensed, but I'll delete it due to bad quality. Taivo (talk) 08:40, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:26, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Unambiguous cases may use {{Copyvio}}. --Эlcobbola talk 14:31, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Ukraine Ronhjones (Talk) 18:49, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - gone. -- Darwin Ahoy! 19:06, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:26, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 01:59, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
Self promotional Photo and no metadata present - IndrajitDas 17:37, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 18:50, 29 August 2018 UTC: Copyright violation: https://www.google.com/search?newwindow=1&q=kostas+martakis+anakapo+kapote&tbm=isch&tbs=simg:CAQSmgEJb7qERugDFAMajgELEKjU2AQaCAg9CEIIFQgIDAsQsIynCBphCl8IAxInthDbHKcFe90clBu1ELsRlRuZG6U6hSToLqY63zrsOrMtsS2yMLMwGjBaQZiY8Sk7S1H-OQCBIM8cgeieQRQA0WnRqUVmWaymjubELsvcCpPF-x7gyzVZLWAgBAwLEI6u_1ggaCgoICAESBK-_1u8EM&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi3_f2N85LdAhWM16QKHT-iB9AQ2A4IJygB&biw=1279&bih=946#imgrc=TPI2K-sLUYbBVM: --Krdbot 01:13, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
Made by Mistake דוג'רית (talk) 22:18, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Should have been a gallery. --Achim (talk) 17:41, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope. Tweets can cited if needed, the screenshot is not useful. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:41, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete without the image(s), it is now out of COM:SCOPE - "..following are not considered media files, and may not be hosted here: Files which are representative merely of raw text". w:Template:Tweet exists for this purpose.--BevinKacon (talk) 19:52, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination I eat bananas 101 (talk) 21:30, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Comment @BevinKacon: , again, Commons caters more than just Wikipedia. Showing a tweet in a way that allows it to be easily visually identified as a tweet is useful. On Wikipedia the template would probably be preferred, although even there I can imagine reasons to use a screenshot instead. If you wanted to use this using mw:InstantCommons or on your own website or blog, these screenshots would be useful. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 22:33, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted Additionally false assertion of "own work" and copyright ownership by the uploader. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:24, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal photo B dash (talk) 04:29, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:18, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
No FoP in Bulgaria Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Bulgaria, need sculptor details (name, death date) to see if PD. Ronhjones (Talk) 18:27, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:19, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
No FOP in Ukraine. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:19, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:20, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
No FOP in Ukraine. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:21, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:21, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope; not useful. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:27, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:08, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal photo B dash (talk) 04:13, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:05, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
out of scope+already published elsewhere Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:14, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:05, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
out of scope personal images of a non-active user
Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:16, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:05, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jesustgs22 (talk · contribs)
[edit]The only purpose they serve on commons is advertising - out of scope
- File:Claustro Gómez Universitas-15.jpg
- File:Claustro Gómez Consulting Group-16.jpg
- File:Claustro Gómez Consulting Group-15.jpg
- File:Claustro Gómez Universitas-14.jpg
- File:Claustro Gómez Universitas-13.jpg
- File:Claustro Gómez Consulting Group-14.jpg
- File:Claustro Gómez Consulting Group-13.jpg
- File:Claustro Gómez Universitas-12.jpg
- File:Claustro Gómez Consulting Group-12.jpg
- File:Claustro Gómez Universitas-11.jpg
- File:Claustro Gómez Consulting Group-11.jpg
- File:Claustro Gómez Universitas-10.jpg
- File:Claustro Gómez Consulting Group-10.jpg
- File:Claustro Gómez Universitas-9.jpg
- File:Claustro Gómez Consulting Group-9.jpg
- File:Claustro Gómez Universitas-8.jpg
- File:Claustro Gómez Consulting Group-8.jpg
- File:Claustro Gómez Universitas-7.jpg
- File:Claustro Gómez Consulting Group-7.jpg
- File:Claustro Gómez Universitas-6.jpg
- File:Claustro Gómez Universitas-5.jpg
- File:Claustro Gómez Consulting Group-6.jpg
- File:Claustro Gómez Consulting Group-5.jpg
- File:Claustro Gómez Universitas-4.jpg
- File:Claustro Gómez Consulting Group-4.jpg
- File:Claustro Gómez Universitas-3.jpg
- File:Claustro Gómez Consulting Group-3.jpg
- File:Claustro Gómez Universitas-2.jpg
- File:Claustro Gómez Consulting Group-2.jpg
- File:Claustro Gómez Universitas-1.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 06:38, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:06, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:33, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:07, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
project scope: promotional content Personal album.
- File:Arbaj Ali photo new.jpg
- File:Arbaj ali new photo.jpg
- File:Arbaj Ali new pose.jpg
- File:Arbaj Ali new shoot.jpg
- File:Arbaj ali new pic.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:47, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:07, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Personal photos, out of scope
- File:Arbaj Ali indian model.jpg
- File:Arbaj ali.jpg
- File:Arbaj ali with umang.jpg
- File:Arbaj ali with friend.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 08:26, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:39, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by مصطفی صالحی ونجانی (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:OOS: Personal essay
- File:نقش فرهنگ وهنر ملل در توسعه گردشگری پایدارچکیده 2.pdf
- File:تاثیر شهرنشینی و تکنولوژی بر فرهنگ وهنر ملل چکیده 1.pdf
4nn1l2 (talk) 13:57, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 16:20, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 14:01, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 16:20, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo-album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:11, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved to relevant project as wiki-text if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 16:19, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Image previously published at https://nwt.se/asikter/insandare/2018/02/05/varfor-tycker-vuxna-det-ar-fel-att and credited to Fredrik Sandberg Ytoyoda (talk) 14:53, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 16:19, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 16:19, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved to relevant project as wiki-text if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 16:19, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved to relevant project as wiki-text if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 16:19, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 16:19, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, could be found with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 16:19, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo-album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 16:18, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused test image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 16:19, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 16:19, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Unused. Out of project scope, kinda... "fantasy rosters"?
strakhov (talk) 16:33, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 16:18, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Definitely not own work of uploader and too complex to be considered in the public domain. Hiàn (talk) 16:40, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 16:18, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:06, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 16:18, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Shambu Tilavalli (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photos.
- File:Amogh Shambu 05.jpg
- File:Amogh Shambu 06.jpg
- File:Amogh Shambu 04.jpg
- File:Amogh Shambu 02.jpg
- File:Amogh Shambu 01.jpg
- File:Amogh Shambu 03.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:53, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 16:17, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Really poor resolution/quality, not used in any article. Leyo 13:37, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 18:09, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Really poor resolution/quality, not used in any article. Leyo 13:39, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 18:09, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Really poor resolution/quality, not used in any article. Leyo 13:40, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 18:09, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Non-free image MiguelAlanCS (talk) 00:17, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 19:55, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Richard Mahn ist erst 1951 gestorben - URV. Xocolatl (talk) 00:25, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 19:56, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Shows explicit copyrighted material ProtoplasmaKid (talk) 00:37, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 19:56, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:13, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 19:57, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:13, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 19:57, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Suspicious EXIF, resolution and file name; not likely self-created. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:17, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 19:58, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:17, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 19:58, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
want to chage Compcare K. Bhuvaneswari (talk) 01:41, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: unused personal image. --Ciell (talk) 19:59, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Selfie photo. Maybe no permission shizhao (talk) 01:55, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 20:00, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: PDF file with user created raw text (best fits in Wikisource, but only if sourced). No source: copyright violation. - Aleator (talk) 02:01, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 20:01, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
No sense of using this having this one https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pirelli_F1_W_Azul.svg MiniPictures (talk) 02:16, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 20:03, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
No sense of using this having this one https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pirelli_F1_Vac%C3%ADo.svg MiniPictures (talk) 02:18, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
No sense of using this having this one https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pirelli_F1_Vac%C3%ADo.svg MiniPictures (talk) 04:14, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 20:03, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 20:03, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
No sense of using this having this one https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pirelli_F1_US_Violeta.svg MiniPictures (talk) 02:18, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 20:03, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
No sense of using this having this one https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pirelli_F1_T_Gris.svg MiniPictures (talk) 02:19, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 20:03, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
No sense of using this having this one https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pirelli_F1_SS_Rojo.svg MiniPictures (talk) 02:19, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 20:03, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
No sense of using this having this one https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pirelli_F1_HS_Naranja.svg MiniPictures (talk) 02:20, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 20:03, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
No sense of using this having this one https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pirelli_F1_S_Amarillo.svg MiniPictures (talk) 02:20, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 20:03, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
No sense of using this having this one https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pirelli_F1_M_Blanco.svg MiniPictures (talk) 02:21, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 20:03, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
No sense of using this having this one https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pirelli_F1_I_Verde.svg MiniPictures (talk) 02:21, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 20:03, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
No sense of using this having this one https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pirelli_F1_HS_Rosado.svg MiniPictures (talk) 02:22, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 20:03, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
No sense of using this having this one https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pirelli_F1_H_Celeste.svg MiniPictures (talk) 02:22, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 20:03, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
This video clip has no license and a copyright claim by "UMG (on behalf of MMB); Ultra Publishing, SOLAR Music Rights Management, and 7 Music Rights Societies". Leoboudv (talk) 03:19, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 20:04, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
No sense of using this having this one https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Neum%C3%A1tico_F1_Pirelli_Rosado.png MiniPictures (talk) 03:25, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 20:08, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
No sense of using this having this one https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Neum%C3%A1tico_F1_Pirelli_Violeta.svg MiniPictures (talk) 03:26, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 20:08, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
No sense of using this having this one https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Neum%C3%A1tico_F1_Pirelli_Rojo.svg MiniPictures (talk) 03:27, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 20:08, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
No sense of using this having this one https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Neum%C3%A1tico_F1_Pirelli_Amarillo.svg MiniPictures (talk) 03:27, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
No sense of using this having this one https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Neum%C3%A1tico_F1_Pirelli_Amarillo.svg MiniPictures (talk) 05:20, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 20:09, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 20:09, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
No sense of using this having this one https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Neum%C3%A1tico_F1_Pirelli_Blanco.svg MiniPictures (talk) 03:28, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
No sense of using this having this one https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Neum%C3%A1tico_F1_Pirelli_Blanco.svg MiniPictures (talk) 05:23, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 20:08, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 20:09, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
No sense of using this having this one https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Neum%C3%A1tico_F1_Pirelli_Celeste.svg MiniPictures (talk) 03:29, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 20:10, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
No sense of using this having this one https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Neum%C3%A1tico_F1_Pirelli_Naranja.svg MiniPictures (talk) 03:30, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 20:10, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
No sense of using this having this one https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Neum%C3%A1tico_F1_Pirelli_Verde.svg MiniPictures (talk) 03:30, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 20:10, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
No sense of using this having this one https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Neum%C3%A1tico_F1_Pirelli_Azul.svg MiniPictures (talk) 03:30, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
No sense of using this having this one https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Neum%C3%A1tico_F1_Pirelli_Azul.svg MiniPictures (talk) 05:22, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 20:09, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 20:10, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
No sense of using this having this one https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Neum%C3%A1tico_F1_Pirelli_Gris.svg MiniPictures (talk) 03:31, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 20:09, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
No sense of using this having this one https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Neum%C3%A1tico_F1_Pirelli_Liso.svg MiniPictures (talk) 04:12, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 20:09, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
No sense of using this having this one https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Neum%C3%A1tico_F1_Pirelli_Liso.svg MiniPictures (talk) 04:13, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 20:09, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work : small size wihout EXIFs Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:11, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 20:11, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
{{FakeSVG}}, unused, broken Cwbm (commons) (talk) 05:49, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Was initially used to create File:Principe_cbir.png. Seems broken, indeed, but I don't know why. Xiawi (talk) 20:09, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Keep I withdraw the request. --Cwbm (commons) (talk) 05:43, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Ciell (talk) 20:12, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
broken svg, not fixed for 12 years;
The 2018 deletion discussion confirmed broken-ness, but kept the image nevertheless, without justification. Jochen Burghardt (talk) 11:51, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
A png version (File:Principe cbir.png) exists and can be used as replacement. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 11:53, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:23, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bakingjames (talk · contribs)
[edit]Screencaps from the Great British Bake Off, copyright belongs to the broadcaster and/or the production company.
Ytoyoda (talk) 08:57, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:50, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:57, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:50, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:58, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:50, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Estudio Segui (talk · contribs)
[edit]not own work, promotional user account
Triplecaña (talk) 12:38, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:13, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Orochicreative-commons (talk · contribs)
[edit]not own work
- File:Rehabilitación Teatro Cervante de Málaga.jpg
- File:Cubertería Acero Inoxidable diseñado por José Seguí.jpg
- File:Estadio de Futbol de la Rosaleda.jpg
- File:Ciudad de la Justicia de Málaga.jpg
- File:José Seguí Foto Personal.jpg
Triplecaña (talk) 12:40, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Estas imagenes son propias de los proyectos cedida completamente en derechos para su dufisión de manera libre. ¿Qué precisan para que les corrobere este hecho y no eliminen este contenido?
--Orochicreative-commons (talk) 12:46, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
- El fotógrafo puede comunicarse con OTRS. Jcb (talk) 21:13, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:13, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Martsoutade (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical document and photo. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected.
- File:Photo de Sainte Héléna.jpg
- File:Acte de naissance de Sainte Héléna Soutadé.pdf
- File:Acte de décès de Sainte Héléna Soutadé.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:14, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, could be found with Google Images.
- File:Día del deporte 2018 Osos del Pardo Rugby.jpg
- File:Jugador sub 12 Osos del Pardo Rugby Club.jpg
- File:Jugadores "Osos del Pardo Rugby".jpg
- File:Jugadores sub 8 "Osos del Pardo Rugby".jpg
- File:Senior "Osos del Pardo Rugby".jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:14, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved to relevant project as wiki-text if useful.
- File:Om Namah Shivaya in Sri Rudram in English.png
- File:Om Namah Shivaya in Sri Rudram in English and Sanskrit.png
- File:Om Namah Shivaya in Sri Rudram in Sanskrit.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
- The texts I have uploaded although unused are correct. I don't see any possible use of them in near future. So I myself vote for *Yes*. I would have gotten rid of them in first places but I do not know how to delete uploads. शिव साहिल (talk) 15:42, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:14, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Wikijoenas (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:14, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Andreroias (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found with Google Images.
- File:Estragos Furacão Nadine.jpg
- File:Coroa do Divino do Espírito Santo dos Aflitos.jpg
- File:Império do Divino do Espírito Santo dos Aflitos.jpg
- File:Coroa do Divino Espírito Santo dos Aflitos.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:15, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jornalistamineiro (talk · contribs)
[edit]Official symbols. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Guerreiro do Vale replaced the made-up {{cc-by-sa-4.0}} claim with {{PD-BrazilGov}}, but careful mathematical analysis will reveal that 1995 is not before 1983. —LX (talk, contribs) 09:37, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:15, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alkqn360br (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Membersbrazil.jpg
- File:Stbrasil.jpg
- File:Memberlatino.jpg
- File:Brazilrs.jpg
- File:Membrosdanacao.jpg
- File:Reiamorousemamor.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:15, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Official symbol. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:15, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dechurintzio (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF.
- File:La Noria Plaza.png
- File:Churintzio.jpg
- File:Santuario de Ntra. Sra, de Guadalupe en Churintzio.png
- File:Autopista México-Guadalajara.jpg
- File:Yácata de Churintzio.jpg
- File:Plaza Principal de Churintzio.jpg
- File:Casa del Diezmo.png
- File:Bosque de pino-encino.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:15, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
not actually word pronunciation files, but full phrases. Uploaded by mistake.
~★ nmaia d 16:08, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:16, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by TodorBelomorski (talk · contribs)
[edit]No FoP in Bulgaria Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Bulgaria. Needs the details (name, death date) of the sculptor to see if the object is PD
- File:Monument to soviet army - "Glory to Ukraine", Sofia, Bulgaria, Памeтник на съветската армия - "Слава на Украйна", София, България 2.JPG
- File:Monument to soviet army - "Glory to Ukraine", Sofia, Bulgaria, Памeтник на съветската армия - "Слава на Украйна", София, България.JPG
- File:Bust Monument to Georgi Rakovski in Kotel, Бюст паметник на Георги Раковски в Котел 2008.JPG
- File:Monument to Petar Beron, Kotel, Паметник на Петър Берон в Котел 2008.JPG
- File:Sculpture of Prosek brothers, Sofia, Скулптура на братя Прошекови, София.jpg
- File:Sculpture of Prosek brothers, Sofia, Склуптура на братя Прошекови, София.jpg
- File:Sclupture of Prosek brothers, Sofia, Склуптура на братя Прошекови, София 3.jpg
- File:Sclupture of Prosek brothers, Sofia, Склуптура на братя Прошекови, София 2.jpg
- File:Sclupture of Prosek brothers, Sofia, Склуптура на братя Прошекови, София.jpg
- File:Bust monument to Rayko Daskalov, Sofia, Бюст паметник на Райко Даскалов, София 3.jpg
- File:Bust monument to Rayko Daskalov, Sofia, Бюст паметник на Райко Даскалов, София 2.jpg
- File:Bust monument to Rayko Daskalov, Sofia, Бюст паметник на Райко Даскалов, София.jpg
- File:Monument to Grigor Vachkov, Sofia, Паметник на Григор Вачков, София 3.jpg
- File:Monument to Aleksandar Fol, Паметник на Александър Фол.jpg
- File:Monument to Nikola Vaptsarov, Sofia, Паметник на Никола Вапцаров, София .jpg
- File:Monument to Dimitar Ivanov -Litso, Haskovo, Паметник на Димитър Иванов - Лицо, Хасково 2.jpg
- File:Monument to Dimitar Ivanov -Litso, Haskovo, Паметник на Димитър Иванов - Лицо, Хасково.jpg
- File:Thracian dolmen in the center of Haskovo, Tракийски долмен в центъра на Хасково.jpg
- File:Sclupture Haskovo watermelon, Haskovo, склуптура Хасковски каунь, Хасково.jpg
- File:Monument to captain Georgi Georgiev, Kardzhali, Паметник на капитан Георги Георгиев, Кърджали.jpg
- File:Monument to Grigor Vachkov, Sofia, Паметник на Григор Вачков, София 2.jpg
- File:Gotse Delchev, Borisova gradina, Sofia, Гоце Делчев, Борисова градина, София.jpg
- File:Worker sclupture in Museum of Socialist Art, Sofia, Статуя на работник в Музей на социалистическото изкуство, София.jpg
- File:Che Guevara Bust in Museum of Socialist Art, Sofia, Бюст на Че Гевара в Музей на социалистическото изкуство, София.jpg
- File:Georgi Markov Monument, Паметник на Георги Марков.jpg
- File:Monument to Georgi Kaloyanchev, Паметник на Георги Калоянчев.jpg
- File:Monument to Apostol Karamitev, Паметник на Апостол Карамитев.jpg
- File:Monument to Petko Voyvoda, Kardzhali, Паметник на Капитан Петко войвода, Кърдажали.jpg
- File:Паметна плоча на загиналите във войните - село Мандра.jpg
- File:Чешма в центъра на село Долно Големанци.jpg
- File:Dimitar Madzharov monument, паметник на Димитър Маджаров, Кърджали.jpg
- File:Monument to Taras Shevchenko, Sofia, Bulgaria.jpg
- File:Asparuh Leshnikov monument, Haskovo, Bulgaria.jpg
- File:Monument to the Unknown Soldier, Haskovo, Bulgaria.jpg
- File:Паметник от признателните арменци - Бургас.jpg
Ronhjones (Talk) 18:24, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:17, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Paintings - need artist name and death date to confirm PD
- File:Zenia Luchasan Bialystok (ok. 1935).jpg
- File:Stara kobieta w chuscie(1930).jpg
- File:Roze na czarnym tle (1982) pastel.jpg
- File:Poleszuk (ok. 1929).jpg
- File:Poleszuczka (ok.1929).jpg
- File:Piwonie olej na plotnie.jpg
- File:Park w Bialymstoku (ok.1934-35).jpg
- File:Pando Papachristo Szapkarew (1970) olej.jpg
- File:Ostrozki (1981) pastel.jpg
- File:Mjr Stefan Orlowski olej na desce.jpg
- File:Milonga (1937) pastel.jpg
- File:Marychna Kraszewska w Romanowie.jpg
- File:Krystyna Ewa(1955).jpg
- File:Krystyna Ewa (1957) sangwina.jpg
- File:Krystyna Ewa (1938) pastel.jpg
- File:Krystyna Ewa (1939) olej naplotnie.jpg
- File:Krystyna Ewa (1930).jpg
- File:Krystyna Ewa (1935) pastel.jpg
- File:Krystyna Ewa (1935)-pastel.jpg
- File:Krajobraz Wigry (1934).jpg
- File:Krajobraz Wigry -1934.jpg
- File:Jerzy Anders (1931) olej na plotnie.jpg
- File:Irysy (1979) pastel.jpg
- File:Gozdziki (1979) pastel.jpg
- File:Glowa NN (1960) sangwina.jpg
- File:Autoportret Maria Wedrowska Orlowska(1925).jpg
- File:Astry (1989) pastel.jpg
- File:Autoportret Maria Wedrowska Orlowska(1928) sangwina.jpg
- File:Anna Teresa z pieskiem.jpg
- File:Anna Teresa z Gromem(1954).jpg
- File:Anna Teresa (1947).jpg
- File:Anna Teresa.jpg
Ronhjones (Talk) 18:45, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:31, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Clearly publicity shots/COM:NETCOPYVIO; obviously from the same series as images here; and uploaded among copyvios of same subject. Quack.
Эlcobbola talk 20:54, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:31, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Anoutiabed (talk · contribs)
[edit]copyrighted files
- File:Vision and visuality, poster.png
- File:Journalism in time of war.png
- File:The Long Egyptian Film.jpg
- File:The State’s intellectuals.jpg
- File:The Photographer2.png
- File:Analog museum project. aug 2018.png
Triplecaña (talk) 12:51, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 06:11, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo-album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:36, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Shauryashekhar18 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Screenshots of copyrighted jokes, the wording itself is above COM:TOO, and being only raw text, it is out of COM:SCOPE - "..following are not considered media files, and may not be hosted here: Files which are representative merely of raw text". w:Template:Tweet exists for this purpose. @Alexis Jazz: as updater of images.
BevinKacon (talk) 19:55, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
- Comment a joke can't be copyrighted. For copyright, the joke must be original and the wording above TOO. These four jokes come from 3 different Twitter accounts, so it doesn't appear to be a collection from a single author either. I find it questionable whether the wording is above TOO, so I'm neutral on this. I wouldn't have nominated them myself. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 22:05, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
- Deleted copyright/license fraud by [User:Shauryashekhar18]] falsely claiming to be author and copyright holder of works by multiple different authors. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:15, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
date of the pic unknown Tamiledition (talk) 23:11, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 02:09, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
Delete Self promotional of the user's self-published book on music (see also [1]). Whatever the Greek readers want to know on scales in music is already available in the article w:el:Κλίμακα (μουσική). ——Chalk19 (talk) 09:21, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 06:45, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
Fake date, source and author (whose claimed book was written in 1990s), as well as such licence which cannot be public domain. Miki Filigranski (talk) 14:36, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:57, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
No acceptable filename, no acceptable description, no categories. Depicted person and depicted event are unidentified, both are maybe non-notable. That way the photo is out of project scope. Probably uploaded with promotional intent. Taivo (talk) 11:12, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:28, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
Everything from the uploader is a copyvio, I just haven't been able to find the specific source for this although there's no reason to think that this isn't like the others —SpacemanSpiff 11:29, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:27, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo, downloaded from club's website 99kerob (talk) 12:25, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:25, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
Missing exif, not the author's own work. Edjoerv (talk) 12:59, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Also, it's unused. --CiaPan (talk) 11:26, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:25, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
Description says "Picture owned by MP Veera Ruoho", yet it is claimed to be the uploader's own work and licensed CC-BY-SA 4.0. The same user has previously uploaded a non-free photo of the same MP twice, and both have been deleted. Lentokonefani (talk) 13:28, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:24, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 13:36, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:23, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
advertising/promotion CiaPan (talk) 14:09, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:23, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
Unambiguous copyright violation ScrapIronIV (talk) 14:18, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:22, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small size, no usable EXIF, user upload history 4nn1l2 (talk) 14:23, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:22, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
Derivative work. Needs permission from بابک اطمینانی Hanooz 14:43, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:16, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
private shot. unused Hiddenhauser (talk) 16:55, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:15, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
Probably uploaded with promotional intent. Kirilloparma (talk) 17:41, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:14, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by GANGTALKcoc (talk · contribs)
[edit]Probably uploaded with promotional intent. COM:ADVERT Kirilloparma (talk) 17:32, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:13, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
Missing picture's data, not the author's own work. Edjoerv (talk) 18:27, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:13, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
The picture's data claims "All Rights Reserved" to Ivan Escobar, as which the user is named "Joao Macias". Edjoerv (talk) 18:29, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:12, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
Probably a copyvio. This image was uploaded for a hoax article en:Breek Morgan and its true provenance is unknown. B (talk) 18:35, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:12, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
false claim "own work"; clearly produced by Guiness World Records Ltd Bri (talk) 19:38, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete as per nominator. Joseph2302 (talk) 06:33, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:10, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
false claim "own work"; corp logo Bri (talk) 19:41, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:09, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
false claim "own work"; corp logo Bri (talk) 19:41, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:09, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:OSX
[edit]- all of them
The car designs are copyrighted, making this a derivative work. --I eat bananas 101 (talk) 21:26, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
- Keep @I eat bananas 101: Malformed deletion request. Also Commons:Derivative works#Isn't every product copyrighted by someone? What about cars? Or kitchen chairs? My computer case? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 03:43, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: . --Didym (talk) 16:08, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
Image of ... something? Out of scope. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:34, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
- I probably misclicked, so could be deleted.
- But you should improve the text of your request, without irony, as we are in a community... -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 16:51, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
- I am sorry that you feel that way, but the mass uploads of low-to-medium quality photos from Flickr with questionable educational purpose can only be countered with fatalism. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:19, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Srittau, I'm not massive uploading from Flickr, and I'm selecting files to upload here from the extinct repository of CC photos from 500px. I just misclicked, if you had read at list the summary before nominate to deletion, you may know how the workflow works...
- I'll not enter on this not based in reality insults to my work. As a sysop you should have an away better posture. You must guarantee a health community, and keep Wikimedia Commons a space to people feel motivate to contribute; not what you are doing here.
- -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 21:42, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:07, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
A person of no notability. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 23:55, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:06, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:06, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:31, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Belarus. The pediatric hospital in Kizhevatov street in Brest (Belarus) was built in 2014. Jarash (talk) 12:33, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
- However, the main part of the photo is the front door. And it looks like a historic building built into a new building. [2]. --Insider (talk) 13:40, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, the new building is protected with copyright. Taivo (talk) 18:50, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
i don't like Fototsm (talk) 14:43, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: nice and usefull image. --JuTa 20:25, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
Quidousse died in 1998. Sonty (talk) 14:32, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:14, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
Falsch beschriftet (Ravensburg), ersetzt durch File:2018_07_30_Fürstenberg_KZ-Ravensbrück_final_2.PNG Anselm Rapp (talk) 10:56, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Bad name of location, replaced by File:2018 07 30 Fürstenberg KZ-Ravensbrück final 2.PNG by the same uploader. --Achim (talk) 17:35, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D artwork in USA B dash (talk) 06:26, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination, {{Non-free graffiti}}--B dash (talk) 14:52, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
This is actually a painting by John Stobart, a living painter, called Maiden Lane, New York in 1800. See: https://www.scrimshawgallery.com/product/maiden-lane-new-york-in-1800/ Hence protected by copyright. Creuzbourg (talk) 21:09, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted per nom. Vague copyright information provided by uploader. Apparently not in the public domain yet. Strakhov (talk) 21:52, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:10, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
- Speedily delete, it's a personal attack, see the description (in Spanish). --CiaPan (talk) 13:06, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: by Túrelio. --Didym (talk) 18:29, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
No exif on this photo uploaded by a young wikimedian (by numbers of edits). Probably a copyvio from Dodgers baseball website. Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 07:11, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:29, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 09:11, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Dear Taivo this is an other purely promotional uploading by the user, who is a music teacher. It is the logo of his privately run business (a school for teaching music) called "Music Road", located in Kallithea, Greece [3]. Maybe it can be speedily deleted as G10. ——Chalk19 (talk) 09:28, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
- PS. Cf. this and that. ——Chalk19 (talk) 23:16, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:26, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Crop from corrupt upload. In my opinion the image is still worthless. There exists file:Slavnostní odhalení pomníku Ludvíku Očenáškovi.jpg. Taivo (talk) 09:52, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
- Shouldn't deletion of affected files wait until the upload bug is identified and resolved? --ŠJů (talk) 11:43, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:26, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Personal photoshopped Twitter image - out of scope. GermanJoe (talk) 08:05, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Agree. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 12:42, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:01, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Looks like a photoshopped image. Claims to be of an actress and thus used on her draft pages but this is clearly a man so a case of vandalism Gbawden (talk) 09:59, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:25, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
- also file:Shah Imran Hasan.jpg
Unused photos about non-notable person (not mentioned in en.wiki), out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:46, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:25, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Unused photo about non-notable person (not mentioned neither in en.wiki nor in es.wiki), out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:49, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:24, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
sheriff deen mohammed Deen Sheriff Mohammed (talk) 14:04, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Didym (talk) 18:23, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Artist: Mirka Mora (18 March 1928 – 27 August 2018): protected until 2089. Permission of her heirs is required. 4nn1l2 (talk) 15:28, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
- User:4nn1l2 has put file Mirka1963.jpg on [[4]] up for deletion. While I appreciate their vigilance as a WP editor, I do not understand the reasons. I have now removed the image from the article pending the result of this request, but I have not deleted the file as I don't know how.
- This is the background. In 1963 Mirka made the charcoal drawing as a gift to my father, J. Brian McArdle, whose portrait of Mirka I also uploaded into the article, via Wikimedia Commons, where it is available to anyone to use (as had already happened - it's a lovely portrait). The drawing, of which I made the copy for the article, has been in the family since Brian's death in 1969. We, the McArdle family, own the image.Regards, Jamesmcardle (talk) 22:41, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
- Jamesmcardle, your family merely owns the physical copy of the drawing. Copyright and all neighbouring rights still belong to Mirka (or her heirs) for 70 years after her death. (See Commons:Copyright rules by territory#Australia for more details.) Please have the copyright holder send a permission statement to permissions-commons
wikimedia.org. The full instructions are given at COM:OTRS. 4nn1l2 (talk) 05:15, 30 August 2018 (UTC) - Only administrators and above can delete pages and files, by the way. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 15:42, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, 4nn1l2 I think, being sensitive to the fact that Mirka's death is recent, that I would prefer, if I have no rights over the image as you say, that the file be deleted, by an administrator as BRAINULATOR9 emphasises. I won't go pestering family for permissions at this time. Maybe later. I have learned another WP lesson about copyright in the process. Thank youJamesmcardle (talk) 12:24, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
- Jamesmcardle, your family merely owns the physical copy of the drawing. Copyright and all neighbouring rights still belong to Mirka (or her heirs) for 70 years after her death. (See Commons:Copyright rules by territory#Australia for more details.) Please have the copyright holder send a permission statement to permissions-commons
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:21, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 16:44, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:19, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Suspicious uploads, all claimed as own work, likely all stolen. None have meta data of cameras. File:Vlcsnap-2016-03-20-22h46m20s950.png screenshot of TV channel you can see logo and from file name, they then removed the logo and uploaded it as File:Ноносабасут.png. Meta data of File:3 Майяими.jpg shows it's been lifted from a stock site.
- File:Russian-Bustle.jpg
- File:Ноносабасут.png
- File:Vlcsnap-2016-03-20-22h46m20s950.png
- File:3 Майяими.jpg
- File:Матусовский А. А..png
BevinKacon (talk) 19:02, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:18, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Yann as Dw no source since (dw no source since). Not necessarily clear that this is derived from anything, although it probably is. It is not wanted on Commons regardless, because we do not accept such encyclopedic PDFs. See Commons:Project_scope#PDF_and_DjVu_formats. Guanaco (talk) 19:09, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete as OOS and probable copyvio (see the unexplained footnote marks). — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 00:11, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete No source given and appears to be a sub-standard English translation, in which case it is likely a copyright violation of the source text that is impermissible by Commons licensing policy. On the other hand, if it's the now-blocked uploader's own work, it's OOS as original research. JGHowes talk 10:40, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:18, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Contains copyrighted text not under a free license Belegfreund (talk) 19:11, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, but it is in my view the text is ineligible for copyright. Habitator terrae (talk) 20:51, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete There is enough of "creative" content and phrases, that this above TOS und so in my opinion it is copyrighted. --Quedel (talk) 21:16, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Quedel,du meintest sicher TOO. TOS = term of service. --Túrelio (talk) 09:19, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
- The content is in my view not creative enough, because this opinion isn't from him, the phrases could be. Habitator terrae (talk) 05:08, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
See also: de:WP:UF#AfD Tweet Now it is in the archive --Habitator terrae 
12:40, 16 October 2018 (UTC) -- Habitator terrae (talk) 05:08, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
- As far as the legal situation in Germany is concerned, this is of course always an individual case decision. Tweets are generally not protected by copyright, since with 140 characters an adequate level of creation can only be assumed in exceptional cases, because short sentences generally lack the necessary level of design. It requires a particularly original/inventive intellectual content in order to reach the level of creation. I can't see that kind of content here. As in life, length is not decisive here, especially since 140 characters are not even long. --78.50.245.152 12:34, 30 August 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.62.111.40 (talk) 14:52, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
- It is a public statement of MdB Markus Frohnmaier. Is is not a violation of copyright to cite him. -- 84.62.111.40 14:52, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
- The Tweet contains 222 characters. Twitter changed its policy and you can tweet longer. --Emha (talk) 15:24, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete this is defenitly not a citation. It is a visual representation of this tweet. If you want to cite, you can reference with a link. --Wuselig (talk) 15:23, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
- It's right if it's only a citation we should delet it, but I thing this language is not over the treeshold of origanility, because if the content of this sentences would be facts (I don't thing so), this sentence only show this facts very easy, and the content wasn't his idea. Habitator terrae (talk) 17:38, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
- This might be for sentences 2 and 4. But sentence 3 is very creative and the choice of words isn't what generally someone would use. Even the neologism Messermigration ("knifemigration") is specially enough, especially in combination with todbringende: If the idea behind this tweet weren't so bad, it could be defined as literary. And yeah, I meat COM:TOO ;) --Quedel (talk) 19:32, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
- It's right if it's only a citation we should delet it, but I thing this language is not over the treeshold of origanility, because if the content of this sentences would be facts (I don't thing so), this sentence only show this facts very easy, and the content wasn't his idea. Habitator terrae (talk) 17:38, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
Ok here I accept, it is over the TOO, Delete --Habitator terrae 🌍 16:32, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
- Icons of the Tweet
- You discuss about the text. But the picture contains even more than just the text. What is about all the icons and co? --Riepichiep (talk) 17:02, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
- That is realy sure under the TOO and if it is realy copyright it falls under De minimis. Habitator terrae (talk) 17:30, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:17, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Larger version at https://www.filmstarhub.com/hollywood-actress-natalie-zea-biography/ so unlikely this is original. User's only upload. User name implies they're a public relations agency, if so, and if they do own the rights to the image they should contact COM:OTRS. GRuban (talk) 19:26, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:14, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
not really sure if it's public domain. Nipponeselover (talk) 21:14, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete {{PD-art}} isn't even right, this is not a reproduction. Ad Council is an American organization (no government) and this doesn't look too old either. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 21:22, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Definitely post-1989 and not public domain. Abzeronow (talk) 03:39, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:14, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
C'est gênant pour regarder mes pages internet 83.152.160.5 14:32, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- Bonjour, j’avoue ne pas comprendre la raison de cette demande de suppression d’une page utilisateur. Je clos la demande. Jean-Fred (talk) 16:14, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Kept: No rationale for deletion Jean-Fred (talk) 16:13, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
The toys are copyrighted, making this a derivative work. See COM:TOYS. I eat bananas 101 (talk) 21:21, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
- But these are electronic devices (gaming consoles and computers), rather than toys. Electronic devices are “useful articles”, and “there are special provisions in the US copyright law to exempt utility articles to a wide degree from copyright protection”. There’s a whole chapter about such cases: “Isn't every product copyrighted by someone? What about cars? Or kitchen chairs? My computer case?”. The page also says that: “On the other hand, ordinary alarm clocks, dinner plates, gaming consoles— as well as actual, full-scale planes— are not generally copyrightable...” I agree that, theoretically, a few simple handhelds (e.g. Game & Watch and Microvision) could be considered as toys, but the most devices listed in the gallery surely aren’t “toys”. Therefore, there’s no need to delete the whole gallery. Mr r0ckers (talk) 07:53, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
- Agreed. These are electronic devices with utility, essentially special-use computers. Even fixed-software hardware like a Game & Watch has the utility of enabling use of its software, similar to a DVD player or television. They aren't aesthetic objects, with value derived from form, like paintings, sculptures, or toy figurines. I imagine these devices would generally be protected by a combination of patent and trademark, not copyright. For what it's worth, Nintendo corporate's own website does not list hardware among the categories covered by their copyrights: https://www.nintendo.com/corp/legal.jsp#copyrights 173.239.228.25 08:18, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Sock nomination. Denied. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 08:27, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Sock nomination of a user page. If there is a concern about particular uploads, a legitimate user is free to nominate the relevant images. --Эlcobbola talk 19:26, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
No Freedom of panorama in Azerbaïdjan, permission of artist needed. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:34, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 20:41, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
- I understand the nom and Jeff's support; but that "Love" thingy with hearts does not look like a work of art to me and if I had the buttons to do it, I would keep this pic. Best. --E4024 (talk) 13:10, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 19:27, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Looks like an excerpt from a copyrighted encyclopedia. A possible derivative work. I eat bananas 101 (talk) 21:59, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
- Keep @I eat bananas 101: image is photoshopped, File:Blue morpho butterfly.jpg was inserted. The text is not readable in this form or relevant. It could be replaced with any placeholder text, this image is just used to illustrate "Request for images". - Alexis Jazz ping plz 23:11, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Эlcobbola talk 19:29, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
COM:TOYS Ronhjones (Talk) 23:48, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
- They are not isolated, not a copyright infringement.
- Same as:
Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 19:29, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Appears to be a modern monumant - no FoP in US. Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#United_States Ronhjones (Talk) 23:59, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 19:30, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D artwork in Russia B dash (talk) 05:14, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ℯxplicit 01:41, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
No FoP for graphic works in UK B dash (talk) 06:05, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ℯxplicit 01:41, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D artwork in USA B dash (talk) 06:24, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ℯxplicit 01:42, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D artwork in USA B dash (talk) 06:26, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ℯxplicit 01:43, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
FoP don't apply here as it is not permanently displayed, the photo is a derivative work of the spider-man image. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:21, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ℯxplicit 00:30, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
No source. Besides looks like a photoshoped picture. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:10, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ℯxplicit 00:28, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
copyright issues. Looservillewe (talk) 12:21, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ℯxplicit 00:27, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Pictures of set designs at Seebühne Bregenz
[edit]- File:Building the stage for the upcoming opera festival season. The access is open and for free for the audience to see the works. Lake stage of the opera house in Bregenz, Austria, (3448536132).jpg
- File:Die Oper Aida von Giuseppe Verdi auf der Seebühne in Bregenz - panoramio.jpg
- File:Seebühne Bregenz mit AIDA im Jahr 2009 - panoramio.jpg
- File:Andrea Chenier - 2012.jpg
- File:Andrea Chenier - Bregenz.jpg
- File:Andrea Chenier, Opera Festival - 2012.jpg
- File:André Chénier - Behind The Head (6042390262).jpg
- File:André Chénier - Candles (6041482739).jpg
- File:André Chénier - Enveloped (6056376016).jpg
- File:André Chénier - French Constitution (5603718535).jpg
- File:André Chénier - Head Inside (5512837726).jpg
- File:André Chénier - Head Structure (6042406380).jpg
- File:André Chénier - Horror (6042728652).jpg
- File:André Chénier - Mirror (6041496639).jpg
- File:André Chénier - Operation Head (5531863081).jpg
- File:André Chénier - Platform (6030166464).jpg
- File:André Chénier - Still Faceless (5532432922).jpg
- File:André Chénier - Still Headless (5489140597).jpg
- File:André Chénier - The Head (5512247367).jpg
- File:André Chénier, Bregenzer Seebühne - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:Bregenz - Lake Stage (5606382779).jpg
- File:Bregenz Seebühne 2011-2012 - panoramio.jpg
- File:Riesenskulptur - panoramio.jpg
- File:Seebühne 2011 - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:Seebühne 2011 - panoramio.jpg
- File:Seehotel Am Kaiserstrand von der Seebühne Bregenz aus gesehen - panoramio.jpg
- File:Stage Design - panoramio.jpg
- File:The Death of Marat (5552867269).jpg
- File:Bregenz, Seebühne, Bühnenbild Carmen, Rückseite (1).jpg
- File:Bregenz, Seebühne, Bühnenbild Carmen, Rückseite (4).jpg
- File:Bregenz, Seebühne, Bühnenbild Carmen, Rückseite (5).jpg
- File:Bregenz, Seebühne, Bühnenbild Carmen, Rückseite (6).jpg
- File:Bregenz, Seebühne, Bühnenbild Carmen, Rückseite (7).jpg
- File:Bregenz, Seebühne, Bühnenbild Carmen, Rückseite (8).jpg (• see discussion below •)
- File:Bregenz, Seebühne, Bühnenbild Carmen, Rückseite (9).jpg (• see discussion below •)
- File:Bregenz, Seebühne, Bühnenbild Carmen, Rückseite.jpg
- File:C-armen.jpg
- File:Car-men.jpg
- File:Carmen (Bizet), Seebühne Bregenz, 2017.jpg
- File:Carmen Festspiele Bregenz 2017 by Olaf Kosinsky-1.jpg
- File:Carmen Festspiele Bregenz 2017 by Olaf Kosinsky-10.jpg
- File:Carmen Festspiele Bregenz 2017 by Olaf Kosinsky-12.jpg
- File:Carmen Festspiele Bregenz 2017 by Olaf Kosinsky-13.jpg
- File:Carmen Festspiele Bregenz 2017 by Olaf Kosinsky-14.jpg
- File:Carmen Festspiele Bregenz 2017 by Olaf Kosinsky-15.jpg
- File:Carmen Festspiele Bregenz 2017 by Olaf Kosinsky-18.jpg
- File:Carmen Festspiele Bregenz 2017 by Olaf Kosinsky-2.jpg
- File:Carmen Festspiele Bregenz 2017 by Olaf Kosinsky-23.jpg
- File:Carmen Festspiele Bregenz 2017 by Olaf Kosinsky-3.jpg
- File:Carmen Festspiele Bregenz 2017 by Olaf Kosinsky-4.jpg
- File:Carmen Festspiele Bregenz 2017 by Olaf Kosinsky-5.jpg
- File:Carmen Festspiele Bregenz 2017 by Olaf Kosinsky-6.jpg
- File:Carmen Festspiele Bregenz 2017 by Olaf Kosinsky-9.jpg
- File:Carmen-Seebühne.jpg
- File:Seebühne der Bregenzer Festspiele 2017.jpg
- File:Austria Bregenz Seebuehne.jpg
- File:Bregenz - Lake Stage (8692448191).jpg
- File:Bregenz - The Magic Flute (8692446263).jpg
- File:Bregenz Seebühne Zauberflöte.jpg
- File:Der Vogelhändler - Seebühne - BREGENZ - 2014 - panoramio.jpg
- File:Festspiele - panoramio.jpg
- File:Kulisse - panoramio.jpg
- File:Kulissenaufbau - panoramio.jpg
- File:Märchenfigur - panoramio.jpg
- File:Seebuehne Bregenz.jpg
- File:Seebühne - panoramio.jpg
- File:The Magic Flute - Blue Dress (9364298288).jpg
- File:The Magic Flute - Coffin (9364296716).jpg
- File:The Magic Flute - Dragon (8634974964).jpg
- File:The Magic Flute - Fitting monster's head (8692449279).jpg
- File:The Magic Flute - Golden Dome (9361525667).jpg
- File:The Magic Flute - Golden Hands (9361523851).jpgthe
- File:The Magic Flute - Lake Stage (8633869423).jpg
- File:The Magic Flute - Prob (8870100126).jpg
- File:The Magic Flute - Prop (8634973984).jpg
- File:The Magic Flute - Props (9361534841).jpg
- File:The Magic Flute - Surprise Egg (9364309086).jpg
- File:Zauberflöte Bregenz - panoramio.jpg
- File:Zauberflöte Kulisse - panoramio.jpg
- File:Austurya bregenz by ismail soytekinoğlu - panoramio.jpg
- File:Bregenz - Turandot (16871454427).jpg
- File:Bregenz - Turandot (17077347332).jpg
- File:Bregenz - Turandot (17078824125).jpg
- File:Bregenz Seebühne Turandot 2015.JPG
- File:Bregenz, Seebühne, Bühnenbild Turandot 2016, 1.jpeg
- File:Bregenz, Seebühne, Bühnenbild Turandot 2016, 2.jpeg
- File:Bregenz, Seebühne, Tribüne und Bühnenbild zu Turandot, 1.jpeg (• see discussion below •)
- File:Bregenz, Seebühne, „Terrakottaarmee“ 2016, 1.jpeg
- File:Bregenz, Seebühne, „Terrakottakrieger“ 2016, 1.jpeg
- File:Bregenz-festspiele-seebühne-turandot.JPG
- File:Bregenzer Festspiele 2014 Seebühne DSC 7104.jpg
- File:Bühne - panoramio (3).jpg
- File:Chinesische Mauer Bregenz - panoramio.jpg
- File:Mauer - panoramio (3).jpg
- File:Puzzini - panoramio.jpg
- File:Seebühne - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:Seebühne - panoramio (2).jpg
- File:Seebühne in Bregenz.jpg
- File:Tribüne - panoramio (5).jpg
- File:Turandot - Behind the stage (18188708279).jpgthe
- File:Turandot - From behind (18376420391).jpg
- File:Turandot - panoramio.jpg
- File:Turandot - Terracotta Warriors (18186985638).jpg
- File:Alfred-Wopmann-Bregenz.jpg
- File:Austurya bregenz by ismail soytekinoğlu - panoramio - ismail soytekınoglu (1).jpg
- File:Blick auf die Seebühne in Bregenz, Die Zauberflöte - panoramio.jpg
- File:Porgy and Bess, Bregenzer Seebühne - panoramio.jpg
- File:Wopmann maskenball.jpg
All the above mentioned photographs show the stage design of the "Seebühne" of Bregenzer Festspiele. Unfortunately, Austrian Freedom of Panorama does explicitly not apply to such stage designs because they are not permanent, so publishing a photograph of such a stage design would require the explicit permission of the stage designer(s).
More details are described in the red box at the top of this page (in German). --Reinhard Müller (talk) 19:40, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
- + 1; Unfortunately Section 54, paragraph 1, item 5 of the Austrian Copyright Law (§ 54 Abs. 1 Z 5 UrhG), which stipulates a freedom of panorama in Austria, does only apply for works that are meant to appear in public permanent. This is not the case with the stage sets of the Bregenz Festival as these are demolished and completely new designed every two years. Therefor freedom of panorama does not apply to photographies of the stage sets. They have to be deleted. --Plani (talk) 09:34, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
- Even if they are the less interesting ones: Pure technical images like File:Bregenz, Seebühne, Bühnenbild Carmen, Rückseite (8).jpg or File:Bregenz, Seebühne, Bühnenbild Carmen, Rückseite (9).jpg should have no threshold of originality.--Karsten11 (talk) 11:08, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
- Für meine hochgeladenen Bilder würde ich sagen. Wenn die rechtliche Situation wirklich so ist, bitte löschen. Grüße--Wald-Burger8 (talk) 15:02, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
- I suggest that Bregenz, Seebühne, Tribüne und Bühnenbild zu Turandot, 1.jpeg might be a case of de minimis; the set design is only a small part of the picture and mainly in the shadow. The grandstand is the main object of the picture. To make that clearer the right 25% could be cropped. -- Renardo la vulpo (talk) 18:38, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
- As the discussion seems to converge on Delete I uploaded a new version of Bregenz, Seebühne, Tribüne und Bühnenbild zu Turandot, 1.jpeg, with the stage setting pixelated, blurred, and decolored. Maybe this way it can remain as a picture of the grandstand and the overall architecture. The image title is no longer really appropriate but we can take care of that later when it has been decided whether to delete the picture or not.
- I support Karsten11's opinion about pictures just showing part of the stage machinery. -- Renardo la vulpo (talk) 22:10, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
- As the discussion seems to converge on
- Even if they are the less interesting ones: Pure technical images like File:Bregenz, Seebühne, Bühnenbild Carmen, Rückseite (8).jpg or File:Bregenz, Seebühne, Bühnenbild Carmen, Rückseite (9).jpg should have no threshold of originality.--Karsten11 (talk) 11:08, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
- This really depends on the interpretation of the word "permanent". If a building is demolished, or destroyed by (say) fire, while in copyright, we would not regard it as not being permanent. How is the demolition of brick-built stage sets at the end of a season any different? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:25, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
- The difference is the intention. The exact wording in Austrian Copyright Law is "andere Werke der bildenden Künste nach Werkstücken, die dazu angefertigt wurden, sich bleibend an einem öffentlichen Ort zu befinden", meaning "other pieces of work of visual arts which were created (with the intention) to remain permanently at a public space". A sculptor creating a statue for a park does this with the plan that the scuplture will remain at the public place without any fixed end date. The set designer designs the set already with the knowledge that it will be destroyed again after 2 years. --Reinhard Müller (talk) 11:34, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
- In Austria a sculptur is seen as permanent, nearly the german rights. It's till the sculptur is destroyed „für die Dauer ihres Bestehens". --K@rl (talk) 20:54, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
- That's an interesting aspect. Can you give a quote on that? I cannot read it from the text of the law (§ 54) but maybe there is relevant jurisdiction.
- On the other hand, if the creators of the Bregenz stage sets do not want pictures of their works on WC, who cares? I am in favour of deleting them in this case, except for those showing mainly permanent buildings or purely technical installations. -- Renardo la vulpo (talk) 21:41, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
- See in de:Panoramafreiheit#Erfasste Werke und privilegierte Nutzungen ..Andere Werke der bildenden Künste. ...--K@rl (talk) 09:32, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
- But the article you cite says „Exemplare anderer Werke der bildenden Künste müssen außerdem dazu angefertigt worden sein, sich bleibend an einem öffentlichen Ort zu befinden“ (my faulty translation: moreover, copies of other works of the visual arts must have been created to be permanently at a public place; compare Reinhard Müller's translation above). That does not seem to be the case for a stage setting. -- Renardo la vulpo (talk) 22:09, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
- That menans, till there are destroyed and this is after the saison. --K@rl (talk) 07:28, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
- But the article you cite says „Exemplare anderer Werke der bildenden Künste müssen außerdem dazu angefertigt worden sein, sich bleibend an einem öffentlichen Ort zu befinden“ (my faulty translation: moreover, copies of other works of the visual arts must have been created to be permanently at a public place; compare Reinhard Müller's translation above). That does not seem to be the case for a stage setting. -- Renardo la vulpo (talk) 22:09, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
- See in de:Panoramafreiheit#Erfasste Werke und privilegierte Nutzungen ..Andere Werke der bildenden Künste. ...--K@rl (talk) 09:32, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
- In Austria a sculptur is seen as permanent, nearly the german rights. It's till the sculptur is destroyed „für die Dauer ihres Bestehens". --K@rl (talk) 20:54, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
- The difference is the intention. The exact wording in Austrian Copyright Law is "andere Werke der bildenden Künste nach Werkstücken, die dazu angefertigt wurden, sich bleibend an einem öffentlichen Ort zu befinden", meaning "other pieces of work of visual arts which were created (with the intention) to remain permanently at a public space". A sculptor creating a statue for a park does this with the plan that the scuplture will remain at the public place without any fixed end date. The set designer designs the set already with the knowledge that it will be destroyed again after 2 years. --Reinhard Müller (talk) 11:34, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
- Keep - most of them. There is even one with an OTRS on it! My pics show the crowd watching, at first place, how would I picture them without the background? And at night... Someone is confused (probably myself :) I guess. --E4024 (talk) 19:46, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion on 3 exceptions. — Racconish 💬 12:43, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Der Bischof mit der E-Gitarre (talk · contribs)
[edit]These are German photos taken in 1926. Such photos are protected by copyright in the United States for 95 years since publication. Commons files have to be free in both Germany and in the United States.
Stefan4 (talk) 00:27, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
- In that case: May I ask why we have the respective license (anonymous work, EU, published more than 70 years ago) at all? It's useless if Uncle Sam has the final word. --Der Bischof mit der E-Gitarre (talk) 00:40, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
- No, it's not useless. The rule at Commons is that files have to be free in the U.S. and in the source country. A work may be free in the EU as Anonymous-EU and at the same time in the U.S. for a different reason, so then more than one license template is needed to reflect this. Many files here are deleted because they are not free in the EU although they are free in the U.S. (e.g. EU works published prior to 1923 where the creator died less than 70 years ago - public domain in the U.S. but not in the EU). - With regard to this photo (duplicate files), it seems to me that Stefan4 is right, see Commons:Hirtle chart. The photo was published in 1926. This means that it became free in the EU 70 years after publication, on January 1, 1997. That's a year too late, as it was still protected in its source country (Germany) at the URAA date of January 1, 1996. And this "activates" the protection term of 95 years since publication in the U.S., I think. Gestumblindi (talk) 03:19, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
- Well, so we need an additional template: This file may not be used in Wikipedias under the following national jurisdictions... - just as in the German-language Wikipedia files with the US 1923-PD tag may not be used. As for me, I'll avoid the Commons from now on after uploading countless files here. I'm sick of it. --Der Bischof mit der E-Gitarre (talk) 13:48, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
- No, it's not useless. The rule at Commons is that files have to be free in the U.S. and in the source country. A work may be free in the EU as Anonymous-EU and at the same time in the U.S. for a different reason, so then more than one license template is needed to reflect this. Many files here are deleted because they are not free in the EU although they are free in the U.S. (e.g. EU works published prior to 1923 where the creator died less than 70 years ago - public domain in the U.S. but not in the EU). - With regard to this photo (duplicate files), it seems to me that Stefan4 is right, see Commons:Hirtle chart. The photo was published in 1926. This means that it became free in the EU 70 years after publication, on January 1, 1997. That's a year too late, as it was still protected in its source country (Germany) at the URAA date of January 1, 1996. And this "activates" the protection term of 95 years since publication in the U.S., I think. Gestumblindi (talk) 03:19, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Der Bischof mit der E-Gitarre (talk · contribs)
[edit]These 1934 presumably German photos (they show mostly German actors and were published in Germany) are claimed to be in the PD because the photographer is unknown and therefore "anonymous".
But that claim isn't applicable to German works, since German law says that pre-1995 anonymous works are only really anonymous if the author (here: the photographer) was never publicly disclosed anywhere, not even in a lecture or similar. One cannot prove that, so pre-1995 "anonymous" works from Germany are not suitable for Commons (or de.wp).
1934 is also not old enough to assume that the photographs must be in the PD anyway, since the photographer(s) easily could have lived beyond 1946.
This means that the files should be deleted per the precautionary principle.
- File:WP Hubert von Meyerinck 2.jpg
- File:WP Hubert von Meyerinck.jpg
- File:WP Käthe von Nagy.jpg
- File:WP Anny Ondra.jpg
- File:WP Renate Müller.jpg
- File:WP Brigitte Helm.jpg
- File:WP Luis Trenker.jpg
Rosenzweig τ 21:02, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:22, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Der Bischof mit der E-Gitarre (talk · contribs)
[edit]These 1935 presumably German photos (they show mostly German actors and were published in Germany) are claimed to be in the PD because the photographer is unknown and therefore "anonymous".
But that claim isn't applicable to German works, since German law says that pre-1995 anonymous works are only really anonymous if the author (here: the photographer) was never publicly disclosed anywhere, not even in a lecture or similar. One cannot prove that, so pre-1995 "anonymous" works from Germany are not suitable for Commons (or de.wp).
1935 is also not old enough to assume that the photographs must be in the PD anyway, since the photographer(s) easily could have lived beyond 1947.
This means that the files should be deleted per the precautionary principle.
- File:WP Hansi Knoteck.jpg
- File:WP Paula Wessely.jpg
- File:WP Gläsernes Filmatelier Babelsberg außen.jpg
- File:WP Erich Kaiser-Titz.jpg
- File:WP Albert Bassermann.jpg
- File:WP Thea von Harbou.jpg
Rosenzweig τ 18:45, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 13:03, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
This file said to be ca. 1926 and claimed to be in the PD, but no reason is given WHY it should be in the PD; no author or place is given. The person depicted worked in Germany in 1926 (filming Metropolis), so this is presumably a photo from Germany. The author of a ca. 1926 German photo could well have lived beyond 1947, which would mean that this photo is not in the PD. The file should therefore be deleted per the precautionary principle. Rosenzweig τ 18:56, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
- Still photographer of Metropolis was Horst von Harbou - and it's very likely he was the photographer of this picture. Harbou died in 1953. So the Image will be free in 2024. Marcus Cyron (talk) 19:19, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
- Is this more than just speculation? We don't even know for sure this image was made while filming Metropolis. --Rosenzweig τ 20:25, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:PCP. — Racconish 💬 13:04, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. It is clearly a still from a video. Felviper (talk) 19:20, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Keep clearly a still from a video??, this file is mine, I took photos using this camera, see Metadata and Autor, another files are: file:DCAM0029.JPG , file:DCAM0032.JPG , see Metadata.--EEIM (talk) 04:13, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish 💬 13:05, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
No sense of using this having this one https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pirelli_F1_Vac%C3%ADo.svg MiniPictures (talk) 04:15, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: This one is actually better, but both are in local use. — Racconish 💬 14:17, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Malarz pl as duplicate (duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: POL gmina Kobiele Wielkie flag.svg
Not a duplicate. One of these two may be incorrect? Guanaco (talk) 04:38, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
- Those flags are very similar. I do not know which one is correct. I do not even know if any of them is. Both of them are described as "gmina Kobiele Wielkie flag", but names are diffrent. One of them is correct, the second (POL Kobiele Wielkie flag.svg) shows, that is a flag of village Kobiele Wielkie. Offical web page of Kobiele Wielkie administrative district (http://www.kobielewielkie.pl/) has no information about any flag. In Poland most villages has no flag. Only cities, former cites and gminas have own flags. Malarz pl (talk) 20:00, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: not an exact duplicate. — Racconish 💬 14:20, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
No FoP in Bulgaria, unlikely to pass the 70 pma B dash (talk) 05:19, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 14:20, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
The file is unused and is well replaced with File:Diameter of a Set.svg by the same author. CiaPan (talk) 07:06, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
- I have no objections to deletion. Aetheling (talk) 18:09, 31 August 2018 (UTC) (original author)
Deleted: per consensus. — Racconish 💬 14:21, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Banknotes of Iraq
[edit]See Commons:Currency#Iraq and Commons:Deletion requests/Iraqi currency.
- File:250IraqidinarOldbanknote(reverse) 01.JPG – incorrectly tagged as {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}}
- File:250IraqidinarOldbanknote(SaddamHussein) 02.JPG – incorrectly tagged as {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}}
- File:Al-Alim al-Arabiy al-Hasan bin al-Haytham (the Arab Scientist al-Hasan bin al-Haytham).jpg – incorrectly tagged as {{PD-Iraq}}. Since this banknote was published in 1980 according to the file description (i.e. not before January 1, 1980), that tag would only apply if this were a photo or an audiovisual work, which banknotes are not.
- File:Criterios de seguridad.jpg – incorrectly tagged as {{cc-by-sa-2.0}}. As noted in relation to File:25Kbill.jpg in Commons:Deletion requests/Iraqi currency, M&S Investment GmbH is not actually the author of this banknote, so the OTRS permission is invalid.
- File:Saddam 2 iraq Saddam Hussein.jpg – incorrectly tagged as {{cc-by-2.0}}
- File:Sinan Al-Shibibi with Don Evans.jpg – tagged as {{PD-USGov-Military-Navy}}. Some might argue that the bill is de minimis, but the description and categorization clearly show that the non-free work being displayed is a primary subject. We have one acceptable crop of the photo and could create one or two more in case this is deleted.
- File:USMC-17641.jpg – tagged as {{PD-USGov-Military}}. Arguably de minimis.
—LX (talk, contribs) 16:52, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:37, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Files in Category:Banknotes of Iraq
[edit]See Commons:Currency#Iraq, Commons:Deletion requests/Iraqi currency, Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Iraqi Dinar and the previous discussion above.
- False authorship and licensing claims
- File:1 2IQDback.jpg
- File:1 2IQDfront.jpg
- File:1 4IQDback.jpg
- File:1 4IQDfront.jpg
- File:10000IQD2002back.jpg
- File:10000IQD2002front.jpg
- File:10000IQDback.jpg
- File:10000IQDfront.jpg
- File:1000IQDback.jpg
- File:1000IQDfront.jpg
- File:100IQD1991back.jpg
- File:100IQD1991front.jpg
- File:100IQD1994back.jpg
- File:100IQD1994front.jpg
- File:100IQD2002back.jpg
- File:100IQD2002front.jpg
- File:10IQD1992back.jpg
- File:10IQD1992front.jpg
- File:10IQDback.jpg
- File:10IQDfront.jpg
- File:1IQD1992back.jpg
- File:1IQD1992front.jpg
- File:1IQDback.jpg
- File:1IQDfront.jpg
- File:1IQDkingback.jpg
- File:1IQDkingfront.jpg
- File:25000IQDback.jpg
- File:25000IQDfront.jpg
- File:250IQD1995back.jpg
- File:250IQD1995front.jpg
- File:250IQD2002back.jpg
- File:250IQD2002front.jpg
- File:250IQDback.jpg
- File:250IQDfront.jpg
- File:25IQD1986back.jpg
- File:25IQD1986front.jpg
- File:25IQD1990back.jpg
- File:25IQD1990front.jpg
- File:25IQD2001back.jpg
- File:25IQD2001front.jpg
- File:25IQDback.jpg
- File:25IQDfront.jpg
- File:50000IQDback.jpg
- File:50000IQDfront.jpg
- File:5000IQDback.jpg
- File:5000IQDfront.jpg
- File:500IQDback.jpg
- File:50IQD1991back.jpg
- File:50IQD1991front.jpg
- File:50IQD1994back.jpg
- File:50IQD1994front.jpg
- File:5IQD1992back.jpg
- File:5IQD1992front.jpg
- File:5IQDback.jpg
- File:5IQDfront.jpg
- File:Iraq Banknote (33979328161) (2).jpg
- File:Iraq Banknote (33979328161).jpg
- File:L'arxiu del corresponsal de Guera. Col·lecció Plàcid Garcia-Planas (20).JPG
- File:New10000IQDback.jpg
- File:New10000IQDfront.jpg
- File:New25000IQDback.jpg
- File:New25000IQDfront.jpg
- File:Series 1986 iraqi 25 dinar obverse.jpg
- File:Series 1986 iraqi 25 dinar reverse.jpg
- File:Ирак 0,5 динара 1993.jpg
- File:Ирак 250 динаров 2002 2.jpg
- File:Ирак 250 динаров 2002 47.jpg
- File:Ирак 250 динаров 2013 2.jpg
- File:Ирак 250 динаров 2013.jpg
- False authorship and licensing claims – possibly old enough to be in the public domain
- File:1 2IQD1931back.jpg
- File:1 2IQD1931front.jpg
- File:1 4IQD1931back.jpg
- File:1 4IQD1931front.jpg
- File:100IQD1931back.jpg
- File:100IQD1931front.jpg
- File:10IQD1931back.jpg
- File:10IQD1931front.jpg
- File:1IQD1931back.jpg
- File:1IQD1931front.jpg
- File:1IQDking1931back.jpg
- File:1IQDking1931front.jpg
- File:5IQD1931back.jpg
- File:5IQD1931front.jpg
- Other
- File:50 Dinars, 1 dinar, half dinar Central Bank of Iraq--Uncirculated - 1980.jpg – tagged with {{PD-Iraq}}, but 1980 is not more than 50 years ago
- File:Iraq anti-war art (26869433894).jpg – derivative (photo) of a derivative (artwork) of a non-free banknote and one other presumably non-free photo
—LX (talk, contribs) 07:26, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
- Commons:Copyright rules by territory#Iraq
- "Iraq's copyright law from 1971 protected most works for 25 years from the date of death; snapshot photos were protected for five years from publication and corporate/government works were copyrighted 30 years from publication."
- "In 2004, the CPA non-retroactively amended the law such that the economic rights of author is protected for lifetime of the author and for 50 years from the date of his death, with no exception for simple photographs; corporate/government works are now protected for 50 years from publication."
- So everything before 1974 is PD-Iraq. The uploader who used PD-Iraq for a 1980 banknote was probably referring to It is one of "collections of official documents, such as texts of international laws, regulations and agreements, judicial judgements and various official documents." I'm not sure money would be considered an "official document", but this depends on the country I think. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 12:21, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
- Interesting that {{PD-Iraq}} fails to mention anything about earlier limits which would still be relevant, but I don't think that changes any of the grouping above. The ones from 1931, as already noted, could probably be kept if the file descriptions are corrected. Everything else appears to be from 1979 or later.
- The "official documents" exception clearly refers to texts, so it would not apply here. —LX (talk, contribs) 18:41, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted those still in copyright per nomination. — Racconish 💬 14:38, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Banknotes of Iraq
[edit]Per COM:CUR Iraq, currencies of Iraq published after 1974 are copyrighted.
- File:1 динар.jpg
- File:10 Dinar-R.jpg
- File:10Dinar-F.jpg
- File:50.000IQD.jpg
- File:IQD-2003-1000-a.jpg
- File:IQD-2003-1000-b.jpg
- File:Irak 10 Dinar 1994 1.jpg
- File:Irak 10 Dinar 1994 2.jpg
- File:Irak 100 Dinar 1991 1.jpg
- File:Irak 12 Dinar 1993 1.jpg
- File:Irak 12 Dinar 1993 2.jpg
- File:Irak 50 Dinar 1994 1.jpg
- File:Irak 50 Dinar 1994 2.jpg
- File:Irak100dinar20021.jpg
- File:Irak100dinar20022.jpg
- File:Irak250dinar20022.jpg
- File:Irak250dinar20023.jpg
- File:Iraq 25000 Dinar observe.jpg
- File:Один динар. Ирак. 1984. ОС.jpg
- File:Один динар. Ирак. 1984..jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 15:46, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Geni (talk) 22:39, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
There is no evidence that the Syro-Malabar Catholic Church has a flag, and particularly that the illustrated flag is official. An anonymous editor (with varying ISP digits) is spamming this image on many pages of various-language Wikipedias. Theodoxa (talk) 07:28, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion as it is in use and it is not up to us to go against it. — Racconish 💬 14:40, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
identisch mit / identical to File:Chorthippus larva-pjt.jpg Pjt56 (talk) 08:14, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 14:41, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Does not meet Commons:De minimis. This building is copyrighted artwork. Nobody is allowed to distribute their own photos of the Atomium without the consent of the copyright holders. See also Freedom_of_panorama#Belgium. If this is considered to be de minimis then please clariify the Commons policy page. 84user (talk) 21:35, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Photo of the Tour de France, released by the Duch Nationaal Archief. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 21:42, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
- Sadly the image has de be deleted due to the dumb copyright regulation in Belgium. --Denniss (talk) 15:11, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
_censored.jpg)
_censored_blur2.jpg)
Update: I have uploaded these censored versions by erasing and blurring the Atomium from the original photograph from the Nationaal Archief's Commons Flickr stream. Maybe these can be used instead? -84user (talk) 01:47, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted, per nominator. Replaced with the "censored" images. Kameraad Pjotr 20:29, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
lowres, not in use and only slightly cropped version of Wielrenners passeren het Atomium, Bestanddeelnr 911-3743.jpg Vysotsky (talk) 08:27, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion now a redirect. — Racconish 💬 14:47, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Involuntary blurring Sammyday (talk) 09:03, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
- flou involontaire ? m'enfin ! il est très beau ce flou ! il ajoute du tragique aux personnages et au caractère romantique de la scène ! et puis c'est pas un motif de suppression : il n'y a aucun problème de licence ! ! ! fiche-lui la paix à mon adélaïde ! tout le monde était bien content de la voir quand j'ai rédigé l'article sur fr:Comminges et Adélaïde au couvent de la Trappe ! et puis je suis allée à lyon exprès ! non c'est pas vrai pas exprès mais l'expo était très belle ! maintenant rien ne t'interdit de la remplacer par la lumineuse photo prise par benoît si celle-ci n'est pas à ton goût ! mais celle-ci restera dans l'historique et sur commons ! nonméééh ! Mandariine (talk) 05:14, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
- Si l'intérêt de ce fichier est d'illustrer l'article sur le tableau, l'autre fichier a une meilleure résolution, n'est pas tronqué et n'est pas flou. Du coup je ne vois pas l'intérêt de garder deux images qui ont la même prétention, surtout si l'une est de mauvaise qualité. Sammyday (talk) 14:07, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
- t'as qu'à dire que c'est de la m*** ça ira plus vite ! d'abord elle est pas tronquée elle est parfaitement cadrée et mon flou est tout à fait artistique ! ensuite il y a des tapées de catégories avec des fichiers en double triple quadruple parce que les gens aiment bien mettre leurs photos sur commons lorsqu'ils vont dans les musées et ça gêne personne ! il y a aussi des tonnes de vrai caca sur commons ! mais c'est sur ce fichier que tu te focalises ! quelle chose étonnante ! un fichier qui a eu le mérite — on fait ce qu'on peut avec ses petits moyens — pendant des années d'illustrer l'article ! peut-être même t'a-t-il permis de découvrir la peinture de fleury richard pendant tout ce temps et j'espère que tu y as pris plaisir ! je comprends que tu le remplaces par la photo de benoît qui est techniquement bien plus efficace ! mais pour le reste fiche-lui la paix à ma photo : elle n'a aucun problème de licence et il n'y a aucune raison de la faire disparaître de l'historique de l'article comme si elle n'avait jamais eu aucun mérite ! quel mépris pour les gens qui se donnent du mal même s'ils ne sont pas très doués ! un peu comme si je masquais dans l'historique des articles de wp les interventions de personnes à l'orthographe hésitante comme on fait disparaître des copyvio : une vrai révolution ! si tu n'y vois aucun intérêt il te suffit de ne pas la regarder ! moi perso j'aime bien comparer les deux — les trois même
— et j'aime bien la retrouver dans l'historique de l'article parce que ça me rappelle que j'ai pu être utile ! allez rends-toi utile à ton tour va améliorer les articles et lâche les baskets à ma photo ! et encore une fois il n'y a aucun problème de licence donc aucun motif de suppression ici ! Mandariine (talk) 20:33, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
- t'as qu'à dire que c'est de la m*** ça ira plus vite ! d'abord elle est pas tronquée elle est parfaitement cadrée et mon flou est tout à fait artistique ! ensuite il y a des tapées de catégories avec des fichiers en double triple quadruple parce que les gens aiment bien mettre leurs photos sur commons lorsqu'ils vont dans les musées et ça gêne personne ! il y a aussi des tonnes de vrai caca sur commons ! mais c'est sur ce fichier que tu te focalises ! quelle chose étonnante ! un fichier qui a eu le mérite — on fait ce qu'on peut avec ses petits moyens — pendant des années d'illustrer l'article ! peut-être même t'a-t-il permis de découvrir la peinture de fleury richard pendant tout ce temps et j'espère que tu y as pris plaisir ! je comprends que tu le remplaces par la photo de benoît qui est techniquement bien plus efficace ! mais pour le reste fiche-lui la paix à ma photo : elle n'a aucun problème de licence et il n'y a aucune raison de la faire disparaître de l'historique de l'article comme si elle n'avait jamais eu aucun mérite ! quel mépris pour les gens qui se donnent du mal même s'ils ne sont pas très doués ! un peu comme si je masquais dans l'historique des articles de wp les interventions de personnes à l'orthographe hésitante comme on fait disparaître des copyvio : une vrai révolution ! si tu n'y vois aucun intérêt il te suffit de ne pas la regarder ! moi perso j'aime bien comparer les deux — les trois même
- Si l'intérêt de ce fichier est d'illustrer l'article sur le tableau, l'autre fichier a une meilleure résolution, n'est pas tronqué et n'est pas flou. Du coup je ne vois pas l'intérêt de garder deux images qui ont la même prétention, surtout si l'une est de mauvaise qualité. Sammyday (talk) 14:07, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_0229.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
_-_geograph.org.uk_-_520797.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_0229.jpg){kind=link}
_0229.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_0229.jpg){kind=link}
_0229.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_pastel.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_olej.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_pastel.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_pastel.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_sangwina.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_pastel.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_olej_naplotnie.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_pastel.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-pastel.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_olej_na_plotnie.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_pastel.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_pastel.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_sangwina.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_pastel.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_sangwina.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
_Maybe_next_year_(5304823816).jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
_-_geograph.org.uk_-_520797.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_geograph.org.uk_-_520797.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_-_geograph.org.uk_-_520797.jpg){kind=link}
_-_geograph.org.uk_-_520797.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_Seeb%C3%BChne_Bregenz,_2017.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_01.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_02.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
- Keep, it is used on the painting's page at English Wikipedia. Randy Kryn (talk) 11:15, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: in use (strangely). — Racconish 💬 14:49, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
- étrangement ? ben ouais ! c'est ballot hein ? et c'est même pas moi qui l'ai mise là ! merci racconish ! sympa ! chais franchement pas ce qu'elle vous a fait cette photo à tous les deux mais tout ça est bien étrange ! bon elle est conservée je vais arrêter de râler ! mais tout de même ! bon d'accord j'arrête ! pfff... Mandariine (talk) 04:36, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Image cropped to show copyrighted element. Derivative work of a copyrighted movie poster. Ytoyoda (talk) 09:05, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Comment: It’s extracted from File:Lisbonne - Electrico (22966669512).jpg, where it is not COM:DM, but okay due to COM:FoP Portugal. Or is it not? -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 09:31, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- I don’t think so. The Portuguese interpretation of FOP applies to permanent works like buildings and sculptures, not a film advertisement on a tram car. Ytoyoda (talk) 20:18, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 14:50, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Je n'ai pas le copyright BernardArras (talk) 10:08, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 14:51, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Probably not created by Moldiver. This is a logo of a local political party, see: http://www.lidingopartiet.se/ Stigfinnare (talk) 10:56, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
I am the copyright holder to this image. moldiver
Deleted: permisssion validation by OTRS needed. — Racconish 💬 14:52, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
This file is no longer in use and has been replaced by an image of superior quality: Jean Antoine Marbot.png Archivuswiki (talk) 11:04, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 14:54, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Copyrighted image, copied from Gazeta Wyborcza's website - [5] 99kerob (talk) 12:28, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 14:56, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Photo of photo, missing permission.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:50, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Hello. All these files have a specified permission of "The heirs of this work's copyright holder (usually the creator) have released it into the public domain. " Can you please let me know what permission is missing? I'm new to this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anyariv (talk • contribs) 14:36, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Patrick, I did send permission to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org, I released the jpeg images and the original work. I am the heir to this work and I own it. As for the photos, they were taken by my grandmother who is diseased and the photographs are now also owned by me. I will send permission for them as well. How do I identify on each file that I already sent this permission and that it's pending? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anyariv (talk • contribs) 14:54, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Permission sent to permissions-commons@wikipedia.ord. --Anyariv (talk) 20:23, 3 September 2018 (UTC)Ayariv
I have just accepted permission for “File:Boris_F_Borzin_painting.jpg” under ticket:2018082910001389. --Ijon (talk) 13:35, 7 December 2018 (UTC)- I have just accepted permission for “File:Boris_F._Borzin_in_uniform.jpg” under ticket:2018082910001389. --Ijon (talk) 13:39, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
- actually, it would seem to be PD-Russia, since it was taken more 70 years ago by an unknown author. Ijon (talk) 13:44, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
- However, there is no clarity on either date or authorship of File:Boris F. Borzin.jpg, so I cannot verify the permission sent to OTRS is good enough. Ijon (talk) 13:44, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept 2, deleted 1 per OTRS agent. — Racconish 💬 14:57, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Replaced by the video: Donald Trump Victory Speech.webm B dash (talk) 14:13, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - not an exact duplicate. — Racconish 💬 14:59, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Does Commons:Freedom of panorama in source country allow this? EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Unknown mural by unknown author (so we cannot assess notability or copyright status) in an unknown country (so we cannot assess FoP, as noted by nom). The Spanish Wikipedia lists 11 countries with places named "Independencia" (10 of which speak Spanish), and some of these countries have no FoP for 2D artwork. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 07:29, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Apparently taken in Peru (es:Usuario:Desahueving art productions/Taller), where freedom of panorama is granted. Strakhov (talk) 20:57, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per Strakhov. — Racconish 💬 15:00, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP in Georgia, need permission from the painter B dash (talk) 16:19, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 15:02, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No FoP in Georgia, need permission from the painter B dash (talk) 16:21, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
- Street art is an unsanctioned artwork in the public space. Hence, it cannot be a subject to copyright law.--Kober (talk) 17:15, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 15:02, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Фото не ілюструє певний об'єкт ПЗФ. Vian (talk) 17:02, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish 💬 15:03, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Фото не ілюструє певний об'єкт ПЗФ. Vian (talk) 17:02, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish 💬 15:03, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Фото не ілюструє певний об'єкт ПЗФ. Vian (talk) 17:03, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish 💬 15:03, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Files on User:BevinKacon/Badstock5
[edit]I tagged these as speedy deletion advert, the uploader is only promoting themselves as can be seen by description \ username. Admin @Taivo: declined speedy, so listing here as out of scope. All files unused.
BevinKacon (talk) 19:24, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
- Comment en:Angel Broking and en:MUZU.TV are clearly notable. Two other files are not very promotional, their belonging into scope is debatable. Taivo (talk) 19:53, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
- File:Muzuwikilogo.png may be kept for historical purpose, others seem redundant.--BevinKacon (talk) 20:10, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: all except last subject to permission. — Racconish 💬 15:09, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Files on User:BevinKacon/Badstock5
[edit]Screenshots copied from Google Street View of signs that uploader claims is just text that is too simple to be copyrighted. False license as signs are 3D objects themselves which can be seen from the angle of the photos, and the images are not cropped to just the text, but also include the crest design, surrounding environment, such as walls, shadows, edge of sign etc.
- File:Calle Doctor Creus.jpg
- File:Calle Ramón Nocedal en Elda.png
- File:Calle de José María Benito Serra.png
- File:Calle del Siglo Futuro en Madrid.png
- File:Carrer de Joan Maria Roma.jpg
- File:Manuel Senante placa nueva.png
BevinKacon (talk) 20:35, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:50, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
false claim "own work"; corp logo Bri (talk) 19:39, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 15:10, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
The sculptor is alive and the artwork was published in 2014. There is no FOP for art in Finland. We have another "fair use" image we use locally in fi-wiki. kyykaarme (talk) 20:50, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 15:10, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
