Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/06/04
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
_(Branded)_Wallpaper_4.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
den moaresis Mamengeorgos (talk) 16:38, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion "I do not like you". --Rodhullandemu (talk) 16:43, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Θέλει ξανα δουλεμα Varriemai (talk) 09:40, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. "he wants to work again" --Rodhullandemu (talk) 09:43, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
ghthtyj gdfh Georgios Gianno (talk) 15:26, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Vandalism. --Achim (talk) 15:45, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal image of exceptionally low quality Rodhullandemu (talk) 16:48, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
den maresis Mamengeorgos (talk) 16:48, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 16:48, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
2black.jpg Mamengeorgos (talk) 16:48, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 16:49, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
found same one Kemistit (talk) 10:33, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Taivo at 11:35, 4 Juni 2018 UTC: Author requested deletion of page: author's request on creation day --Krdbot 18:42, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
copyright violation Photography by Nima Elm Theroadislong (talk) 16:29, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Christian Ferrer at 17:11, 4 Juni 2018 UTC: recreation after prior deletion --Krdbot 18:43, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
(wrong name) --Daniel Ventura (talk) 03:38, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Typo. --Achim (talk) 18:50, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Files of User:AJROCK123456
[edit]_%E0%A4%85%E0%A4%9C%E0%A4%AF_%E0%A4%B0%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%95.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
The files are promotional material of a trivial Youtuber (only 11 subscribers), which is considered a out of project scope and a violation of COM:ADVERT.--廣九直通車 (talk) 13:09, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 21:52, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
https://mymodernmet.com/serge-marshennikov-woman-paintings/ World's Lamest Critic (talk) 02:47, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Ronhjones at 18:11, 4 Juni 2018 UTC: Copyright violation: https://mymodernmet.com/serge-marshennikov-woman-paintings/ --Krdbot 00:42, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
No source for the logo at the right side, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 21:57, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete and nom for speedy. Wpgbrown (talk) 22:09, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader also agrees to delete (nominated the file for speedy deletion). Taivo (talk) 08:48, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
G7- Author Request Kanbei85 (talk) 18:11, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 07:08, 5 Juni 2018 UTC: CSD G7 (author or uploader request deletion) --Krdbot 12:43, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Grave doubts that this is own work. The subject died in 1963 but, worse, the face on the left appears to be pasted into the image Sitush (talk) 23:22, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 07:43, 5 Juni 2018 UTC: Copyright violation: https://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DdIszCQXkAA-QJk.jpg&imgrefurl=https://twitter.com/pspkfan2you/status/995909182195879936?lang=en&h=960&w=684&tbnid=Vejln5xHcPRdxM&tbnh=266&tbnw=189&usg=__fT5xSeR_YtgoHpF4AAxX0YD1Tts=&docid=gFoLD-HiEXF6xM and then face faked --Krdbot 12:43, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Testmaskara (talk · contribs)
[edit]They looking all fairly out of scope to me.
- File:Belandūr Tank 14.jpg
- File:Belandūr Tank 13.jpg
- File:Belandūr Tank 12.jpg
- File:Belandūr Tank 11.jpg
- File:St.John's National Academy of Health Sciences 7.jpg
- File:Belandūr Tank 10.jpg
- File:St.John's National Academy of Health Sciences 6.jpg
- File:St.John's National Academy of Health Sciences 5.jpg
- File:Belandūr Tank 9.jpg
- File:CV Raman Nagar.jpg
- File:St.John's National Academy of Health Sciences 4.jpg
- File:St.John's National Academy of Health Sciences 3.jpg
- File:Belandūr Tank 7.jpg
- File:Belandūr Tank 6.jpg
- File:Belandūr Tank 5.jpg
- File:Belandūr Tank 4.jpg
- File:Belandūr Tank 3.jpg
- File:St.John's National Academy of Health Sciences.jpg
- File:Belandūr Tank.jpg
- File:Belandūr Tank 2.jpg
Files uploaded by Testmaskara (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of project scope
Jon Kolbert (talk) 15:31, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy deleted as recreation of already-deleted material. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 15:33, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Testmaskara (talk · contribs)
[edit]All these images are either out of scope or displaying copyrighted product packaging.
- File:Test 8.jpg
- File:St.John's National Academy of Health Sciences 2.jpg
- File:QSt.John's National Academy of Health Sciences.jpg
- File:Sondekoppa 2.jpg
- File:Belandūr Tank 2.jpg
- File:Sondekoppa.jpg
- File:Sri Chamrājendra Reservoir 2.jpg
- File:Sri Chamrājendra Reservoir.jpg
- File:St.John's National Academy of Health Sciences.jpg
- File:Belandūr Tank.jpg
JuTa 13:02, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 21:02, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Testmaskara (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low quality nonsense / test uploads. Not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
- File:National Public School, Indiranagar.jpg
- File:Indian Airlines Flight 605.jpg
- File:Wikidata edit test upload.jpg
- File:Test blurred image.jpg
- File:St.John's National Academy of Health Sciences 2.jpg
- File:Hello world 2.jpg
- File:Hello world.jpg
- File:Test 11.jpg
- File:Multiple uploads 2.jpg
- File:Multiple uploads.jpg
- File:Iterm terminal.jpg
Ies (talk) 13:04, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:17, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Testmaskara (talk · contribs)
[edit]Test uploads, out of scope. The uploader has a long list of such uploads (misleading titles and descriptions, testing, out of scope), some of which they nominated for deletion themselves, others were later recreated. What is it that they keep testing I don't know.
- File:Harrison Middleton University 5.jpg
- File:Harrison Middleton University 4.jpg
- File:Harrison Middleton University 3.jpg
- File:Harrison Middleton University.png
- File:Test 8.jpg
- File:Test image .jpg
TFerenczy (talk) 11:29, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:30, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Testmaskara (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope.
- File:Test 11.jpg
- File:Test 10.jpg
- File:The New School for the Arts and Academics 2.jpg
- File:The New School for the Arts and Academics.jpg
- File:Vivi.jpeg
- File:University Theatre.png
Minoraxtalk 12:18, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:24, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by D CASH BUSINESS (talk · contribs)
[edit]small photo without metadata previously published on the internet
- File:Imagesss.jpg
- File:Yellow-millets-fish-meal.jpg 220x220xz.jpg
- File:Images (1) dddd.jpg
- File:High-protein-fish-meal-for-poultry.jpg 250x250xz.jpg
- File:HIGH-QUALITY-FISH-MEAL-ANIMAL-FEED.jpg 220x220xz.jpg
- File:Fish-meal-fishmeal-65-protein.jpg 220x220xz.jpg
- File:FISH-MEAL-FEED-GRADE-HAIHANG-BRAND-.jpg 220x220xz.jpg
- File:Fish-Meal-65-Protein-Made-From-Pure.jpg 220x220xz (1).jpg
- File:Fish-Meal-65-Protein-Made-From-Pure.jpg 220x220xz.jpg
- File:Fish-meal-65-for-animal-feed.jpg 250x250xz.jpg
- File:Fish-meal.jpg 250x250xz (1).jpg
- File:Fish-meal.jpg 250x250xz.jpg
- File:Export-frozen-parrot-fish-meal.png 220x220.png
- File:Dried-High-Protein-62-Fish-Meal-for.jpg 220x220xz.jpg
- File:Best-Defatted-Mealworm-Powder-Replacement-Fish-Meal.jpg 220x220xz.jpg
- File:Animal-feed-fish-meal-60-powder-for.jpg 220x220xz.jpg
- File:Animal-Feed-For-Protein-Meal-Fish-Meal.jpg 220x220xz.jpg
- File:Anchovy-fish-meal-for-sale.jpg 250x250xz.jpg
- File:Dqddy.jpg
- File:DERFC.jpg
- File:Busines.jpg
- File:GFTRB.jpg
- File:HYUJ.jpg
- File:II zenya.jpg
- File:Sdsdsd.jpg
- File:Hhhjuy.jpg
- File:HJJ.jpg
- File:GHYT.jpg
- File:The boy on tup.jpg
- File:Iikol.jpg
- File:Hhyukk.jpg
- File:Hhhji.jpg
- File:Harris the papa.jpg
- File:Hytg.jpg
- File:FG.jpg
- File:FDRRE.jpg
- File:Hhhhhu.jpg
- File:GTYUIO.jpg
- File:GTH.jpg
- File:FTGYH.jpg
- File:Fr.jpg
- File:FGTRYH.jpg
- File:Fgthhh.jpg
- File:Fffgt.jpg
- File:EDDR.jpg
- File:DFRTGYH.jpg
- File:DFRTG.jpg
- File:DERF.jpg
- File:HHHHvvb.png
- File:AASWW.png
- File:DDDDDaaa.png
- File:Yiiiiihi.jpg
_dddd.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Mitte27 (talk) 00:03, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Per nominator. — Racconish 💬 07:04, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by D CASH BUSINESS (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely claim of authorship and doubtful educational value.
- File:Ddddht.jpg
- File:Wepp cocao.jpg
- File:Ujlo.jpg
- File:Tyhguinm.jpg
- File:Tyhguijl.jpg
- File:Cocaooooo.jpg
- File:Cocaooo.jpg
- File:Tilllllllllllllllll.jpg
- File:Th.jpg
- File:Sthr.jpg
- File:Cocao the best raw mat.jpg
- File:Rttttttttttttttttt.jpg
- File:Rtgfyth.jpg
- File:Production o cocoa.jpg
- File:Cocao production.jpg
- File:Qwase.jpg
- File:Rituyjh.jpg
- File:Gamers in production.jpg
- File:Harrrtr.jpg
- File:Iukyhj.jpg
- File:Hujiklo.jpg
- File:Hjyuti.jpg
- File:Iugtytyhjdr.jpg
- File:Gznnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn.jpg
- File:Gthyru.jpg
- File:Daddy pz.jpg
- File:Gthyr.jpg
- File:Gfpkdtz.jpg
- File:GndZgz.jpg
- File:Gfffffffffffffffffffff.jpg
- File:Fvcvbng.jpg
- File:Frtki.jpg
- File:Eqqqqqqqqqq.jpg
- File:The don.jpg
- File:Frtgem.jpg
- File:Eeeer.jpg
- File:Dferwqa.jpg
- File:Dadsd.jpg
- File:STORE orvall.jpg
- File:Thgygg.jpg
- File:SECURITIES.jpg
- File:You the bad.jpg
- File:PARK.jpg
- File:Ncjjjjjjjjjftuju.jpg
- File:MONEY W.jpg
- File:NANA.jpg
- File:MARGARET.jpg
- File:LABddddddddddddd.jpg
- File:MAN bghyt.jpg
- File:Jjjjjjjjjflloyio.jpg
- File:Imagesbbbb.jpg
- File:Camerr.jpg
- File:Harris aaaa.jpg
- File:FVGTHY.jpg
- File:GOOD.jpg
- File:GUN BOY.jpg
- File:FGTFH.jpg
- File:Dsgajfhj.jpg
- File:Drug devolopment.jpg
- File:Drug centle.jpg
- File:COOK.jpg
- File:CORRECT.jpg
- File:CASH.jpg
- File:CAME.jpg
- File:BAGAN.jpg
— Racconish 💬 06:57, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:54, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki Graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:46, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:12, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
Should have been Category:Salt Rock State Campground Magnolia677 (talk) 11:02, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, author's request. --Achim (talk) 20:22, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
Violating copyright; conflict of interest. ŚÆŊMØŠĀ 11:40, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 02:02, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Photographie non libre (© Jef Briguet) Bounè rodzo (talk) 09:37, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb at 15:48, 9 Juni 2018 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - --Krdbot 18:36, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
_(Branded)_Wallpaper_4.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(Branded)_Wallpaper_4.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
delete it pls Apriljeanettep (talk) 16:42, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
_(Branded)_Wallpaper_4.jpg){kind=link}
delete it pls 2804:431:9724:3A7F:D1E2:5C22:C71B:339A 15:36, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
_(Branded)_Wallpaper_4.jpg){kind=link}
- Support Falsified photo being used for vandalism. Her face is taken from this image and plastered on. Not sure where the original image is taken from. Prefall (talk) 03:21, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Uploader request, not used, and if falsified... --E4024 (talk) 15:43, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Achim (talk) 18:47, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
_(Branded)_Wallpaper_4.jpg){kind=link}
This photo is showing nothing usefull for Commons: a piece of sky with no particular feature. Pierre cb (talk) 02:42, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
- It's art work I just share it for who want use it for any work. Meshari Alawfi (talk) 03:15, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
not need it anymore and as i see some see it not benefit to be here {{Delete}} Meshari Alawfi (talk) 14:57, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: HR, reasonable quality. --Yann (talk) 10:15, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
This photo is showing nothing usefull for Commons: a piece of sky with no particular feature. Pierre cb (talk) 02:41, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
- It's art work I just share it for who want use it for any work. Meshari Alawfi (talk) 03:16, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
not need it anymore and as i see some see it not benefit to be here {{Delete}} Meshari Alawfi (talk) 14:58, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: HR, reasonable quality. --Yann (talk) 10:14, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
This photo is showing nothing usefull for Commons: a piece of sky with no particular feature. Pierre cb (talk) 02:40, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
- It's art work I just share it for who want use it for any work. Meshari Alawfi (talk) 03:15, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Meshari Alawfi: Commons is not a web host. If it is not intended for use on a Wikimedia project, then it falls out of project scope. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 11:24, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
@–LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) Who told you i need web host ? I publish some of my works under Creative Commons and i guess that is right place for that --Meshari Alawfi (talk) 11:55, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
not need it anymore and as i see some see it not benefit to be here {{Delete}} Meshari Alawfi (talk) 14:59, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: HR, reasonable quality. --Yann (talk) 10:14, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
Highly unlikely to be own work Limojoe (talk) 01:31, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:39, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Highly unlikely to be own work Limojoe (talk) 01:31, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:39, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Highly unlikely to be own work Limojoe (talk) 01:32, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:39, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b0/Shujuku.png Qicheng2008 (talk) 01:37, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: unused/uncategorized - uploader request. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:41, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
I had a hunch that this was a NYRB drawing and lo: http://www.nybooks.com/articles/1970/05/21/notes-on-anarchism/
Unless the uploader is David Levine, this upload is unlikely both to be "own work" and to have been done at the date specified ("circa 1870"). Or if due diligence wasn't done here, we'll need to look at this uploader's other uploads czar 01:40, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:42, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be "own work". There is no info about the camera and the license status is not clear. Py4nf (talk) 01:57, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:43, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MichaelZeiler (talk · contribs)
[edit]Derivative works based on eclipse maps. They are using the license CC-BY-NC-ND 3.0, which is not allowed in Commons
- File:Transit of Venus, 2125 December 8.jpg
- File:Transit of Venus, 2012 June 5-6.jpg
- File:Transit of Venus, 2117 December 10-11.jpg
- File:Transit of Venus, 2004 June 8.jpg
- File:Transit of Venus, 1882 December 6.jpg
- File:Transit of Venus, 1769 June 3-4.jpg
- File:Transit of Venus, 1874 December 9.jpg
- File:Transit of Venus, 1761 June 6.jpg
- File:Transit of Venus, 1631 December 7.jpg
- File:Transit of Venus, 1639 December 4.jpg
B dash (talk) 02:04, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:44, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Unknown location ; Personal image ; No notability ; No use ; this photo is the only upload of the user. Civa (talk) 11:43, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination+no permission anyway. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:49, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Advertising poster. BrightRaven (talk) 11:46, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:47, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Royal Plaza (talk · contribs)
[edit]- File:Lord William Tea Lounge at Royal Plaza Hotel.jpg
- File:Grills and More at Royal Plaza Hotel.jpg
- File:Royal Plaza Hotel, Cocktail of the Day.jpg
- File:Cocktail, Beer Fruit Mojito at Royal Plaza Hotel in Delhi.jpg
- File:Royal Plaza Upcoming Event, Lord William Tea Lounge.jpg
BrightRaven (talk) 11:48, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Also, since the user has continued uploading instead of participating in this discussion:
- —LX (talk, contribs) 18:45, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:46, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lebensmittelunvertraeglichkeiten (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved to relevant project as wiki-text if useful.
- File:Histamin-Tabelle.pdf
- File:Gluten-Tabelle.pdf
- File:Fructose-Tabelle.pdf
- File:Laktose-Tabelle.pdf
- File:Symptom- und Ernährungstagebuch.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:50, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Starclinic (talk · contribs)
[edit]File uploaded for advertisement purpose only, out of project scope.
- File:星和診所桃園.jpg
- File:星和診所高雄.jpg
- File:星和診所竹北.jpg
- File:星和診所台南.jpg
- File:星和診所台北.jpg
- File:星和診所台中.jpg
- File:星和診所仁愛.jpg
- File:星采古亭皮膚專科診所.jpg
- File:星采整形外科診所.jpg
Stang 09:16, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:30, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE and image of a minor (possibly personality-rights violated). -- Túrelio (talk) 10:25, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:30, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Snapchot from phone. This photo is the only upload of the user. Civa (talk) 11:19, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:31, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Looks out of scope to me. Is it? E4024 (talk) 12:23, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:32, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved to relevant project as wiki-text if useful EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:56, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:33, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:32, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo-album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:33, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:33, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ruslan.resmi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo-album. Not used.
- File:Signature of Ruslan Hüseynli.png
- File:Ruslan huseynli.jpg
- File:Ruslan Elsevər oğlu Hüseynov.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:34, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
personal files, out of project scope
- File:The most beautiful of the world.jpg
- File:The most beautiful of.jpg
- File:The most beautiful boy of the world.jpg
Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:24, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:19, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo-album. Not used.
- File:Le plus beau africain.jpg
- File:Le plus beau du monde.jpg
- File:Tamba cheick (le plus beau du monde).jpg
- File:Tamba Cheick (le plus beau du monde).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:35, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
unused logo, uploaded for article en:Thermodyne Engineering Systems, deleted in 2017. Te750iv (talk) 17:44, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:36, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
out of scope Ronhjones (Talk) 21:00, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:38, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Unused personal photo + Sockpuppet of User:Divyanka Babu. Vanjagenije (talk) 21:09, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:38, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
This is an advertisement Alqhaderi AliffianikoTalk 23:34, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:39, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FOP in Ukraine for monuments per: FOP#Ukraine Sixflashphoto (talk) 14:11, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:57, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- File:WindUp.jpg
- File:FFyCC1.jpg
- File:FFyCC2.jpg
- File:Clase de FeedForward Control.jpg
- File:CircuitoRLC 2.png
- File:CircuitoRL.png
- File:CircuitoRLC.png
Poorly drawn digrams. The first four are virtually illegible. The rest are of better quality, but they are clumsily hand-drawn. Most of the images are unused and can be replaced by better images. Note that not all diagrams uploaded by this user are of poor quality. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 07:13, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:45, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
This has no copyright. I will upload again this. Sanju Darshana (talk) 08:05, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
I uploaded high resoloution image Sanju Darshana (talk) 09:37, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Copyright issue Sanju Darshana (talk) 07:06, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: by colleague. --Jcb (talk) 17:44, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
no permission.-- DCKH (talk) 08:22, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:45, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
no permission.-- DCKH (talk) 08:23, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:45, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 11:26, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Keep in scope. --Ralf Roleček 07:09, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
- Please explain why. This is original research. Castillo blanco (talk) 07:35, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
- You have not given a reason why this should be out of scope. Good quality, usable, no deletation reason available. --Ralf Roleček 08:54, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
- No, it's not usable, as per en:Wikipedia:No original research. Castillo blanco (talk) 11:21, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
- You have not given a reason why this should be out of scope. Good quality, usable, no deletation reason available. --Ralf Roleček 08:54, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
- Please explain why. This is original research. Castillo blanco (talk) 07:35, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:44, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 11:27, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- Keep in scope. --Ralf Roleček 07:09, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
- Please explain why. This should be wikitext if really of any value. Castillo blanco (talk) 07:35, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
- You have not given a reason why this should be out of scope. Good quality, usable, no deletation reason available. --Ralf Roleček 08:54, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
- Please explain why. This should be wikitext if really of any value. Castillo blanco (talk) 07:35, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:44, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Not an active user; nor has ever been so, if the Global Contributions are correctly recorded. E4024 (talk) 11:33, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:44, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Only used on the English Wikipedia, where the subject's page was speedily deleted in May 2018 as spam. The contributor was subsequently blocked for promotion. Out of project scope. ℯxplicit 04:03, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:47, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
It doesn't belong here Seanmiller222 (talk) 04:19, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- I agree. Delete per OoS. --E4024 (talk) 08:18, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:47, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Only being used for vandalism on the English Wikipedia by uploader ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 04:26, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:48, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Only being used for vandalism on the English Wikipedia by uploader ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 04:26, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:48, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
The Youtube license here is "Standard YouTube Licence" which means this video clip is fully copyrighted. Leoboudv (talk) 08:53, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete @Leoboudv: various videos from the MTV international channel which Philip J Fry takes pictures of are Creative Commons.. but this one isn't. Just a simple mixup. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 10:29, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete It was a confusion, I did not notice which license has video.--Philip J Fry (talk) 11:29, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:49, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
- File:Logo cnx.jpg]
- File:Chiang rai title.jpg
- File:Logo dmk.jpg
- File:Hatyai title.jpg
- File:Logo bkk.jpg
- File:Phuket title.jpg
Can't be own work, since they are derivative of the logo. Questionable if PD-simple applies. Paul_012 (talk) 12:15, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:19, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Standard YouTube Licence Philip J Fry (talk) 13:38, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete unfree license and uploader request. --Leoboudv (talk) 00:13, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:19, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
EXIF data says "FBMD", meaning it was downloaded from Facebook, not an original work Ytoyoda (talk) 13:42, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:19, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Abongsristy (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:20, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Historical photos. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:20, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by JoseCasanova123 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Collection of scientific images from Internet.
- File:PARTÍCULAS+ELEMENTALES+PARTÍCULAS+PORTADORAS+DE+FUERZA.jpg
- File:Daa85-galaxy.jpg
- File:Stephen hawking.jpg
- File:Wallpaper-String-Theory-Digital-Colorfull-Abstraction.jpg
- File:2652universe.jpg
- File:Bosones y fermiones.jpg
- File:Las-4-fuerzas-fundamentales-de-la-fisica-actual-4.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:20, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Any metadata, low-re image, unlikely to be own work. Most probably the uploader is not the author. And also:
- File:Городецький А.О.jpg
- File:Петриченко М.І.jpg
- File:Поліщук Іван Карпович.jpg
- File:Рибак К.С.jpg
- File:Рибак Г.І.jpg
- File:Гуральчук М.І.jpg
- File:Жебрівський І.П.jpg
- File:Сірий В.Й-1.jpg
- File:Дубик П.Б.jpg
- File:Яців Є.В.jpg
- File:Ярощук І.І.jpg
- File:Ярощук Б.І.jpg
- File:Юхимець О.В.jpg
- File:Савченко Р.В.jpg
- File:Савченко Віктор.jpg
- File:Савченко В.Б.jpg
- File:Репетій В.О.jpg
- File:Ременюк І.А.jpg
- File:Ременюк О.М.jpg
- File:Пилипончик О.М.jpg
- File:Мишко Ю.О.jpg
- File:Мишко М.О.jpg
- File:Куделін В.В.jpg
- File:Ковтун А.В.jpg
- File:Кобічук О.М.jpg
- File:Іллюк Р.О.jpg
- File:Жебрівський П.І.jpg
- File:Дроботюк О.В.jpg
- File:Гуральчук О.О.jpg
- File:Григорович Т.О.jpg
- File:Голюк С.О.jpg
- File:Годлевський В.А.jpg
- File:Герасимчук В.В.jpg
- File:Вітюк О.Л.jpg
- File:Бенца С.І.jpg
- File:Анікальчук С.А.jpg
- File:Мовчан В.А.jpg
Микола Василечко (talk) 16:50, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:23, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Book covers and watermarked photos. IF this is the author, then OTRS is the only route.
- File:Edward Warrior - Nzombie - O Morto Vivo.jpg
- File:Edward Warrior - Mar Profundo.jpg
- File:Edward Warrior - ILIASH Vol. 1 - O Berbere Capa.jpg
- File:Edward Warrior - ILIASH Vol. 2 - de Arminandar.jpg
- File:Edward Warrior - A Pedra do Tempo Vol. 1.jpg
- File:Edward Warrior - Arcadamius Vol. 3 - Retaliação.jpg
- File:Edward Warrior - Arcadamius Vol. 2 - Reconquista.jpg
- File:Nzombie - The Living Dead.jpg
- File:Edward Warrior - World Eye - The Benagil Ocean.jpg
- File:Edward Warrior - World Eye - The Benagil Cliff.jpg
- File:Edward Warrior - Vindimas de Coruche 2017.jpg
- File:Edward Warrior - ILIASH Vol. 2 - of Arminandar.jpg
- File:Edward Warrior - ILIASH - The Time Stone Vol. 1.jpg
- File:Edward Warrior - ILIASH Vol. 1 -The Berber.jpg
- File:Edward Warrior - Deep Sea.jpg
- File:Edward Warrior - Arcadamius Vol. 3 - Arcadamius Retaliation.jpg
- File:Edward Warrior - Arcadamius Vol. 2 - Reconquest.jpg
- File:Edward Warrior - 36 To Be Wild.jpg
- File:Edward Warrior - Volúpia.jpg
- File:Edward Warrior - Arcadamius Vol. 1 - Actuna of Toris.jpg
- File:Edward Warrior - I Genius!.jpg
- File:Edward Warrior Captain Old P&B.jpg
- File:Edward Warrior Tree P&B.jpg
- File:Edward Warrior Street.jpg
- File:Edward Warrior Seat P&B.jpg
- File:Edward Warrior Explorador Color.jpg
- File:Edward Warrior Explorer.jpg
- File:Edward Warrior Explorer P&B.jpg
- File:Edward Warrior Cave P&B.jpg
- File:Edward Warrior Writer.jpg
- File:Edward Warrior P&B.jpg
- File:Edward Warrior Explorador Wall P&B.jpg
- File:Edward Warrior .jpg
Ronhjones (Talk) 21:43, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no permission. --Wdwd (talk) 09:37, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
This not-in-use picture seems to be copied as it appears in several places on the web. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 22:45, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- That's what the uploader was told by Jeff G. and Storkk a couple of weeks before their last batch of uploads. I guess they didn't like that answer. —LX (talk, contribs) 05:48, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
- It's not the same photo, but does also need OTRS verification in the same way. Storkk (talk) 07:03, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
- Weak delete per nom. OOS, needs permission. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 07:21, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 09:32, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
This not-in-use picture seems to be copied as it appears in several places on the web. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 22:46, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- Weak delete per nom. OOS, needs permission. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 07:23, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 09:32, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
Outdated photo showing pollution coming from Eurocan Pulp and Paper, an industry which closed its doors in Kitimat in 2010. This photo does not put Kitimat in a good light and does not reflect what exists here today. DistrictOfKitimat (talk) 23:01, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- That the picture might be outdated or showing something that has changed since then can never be a reason to delete a file. It would just be a question of where to use it. Has to be kept. --Jonesey (talk) 20:40, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 09:06, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
Ist ein Duplikat von Datei "Dr.-Ing. Theo Bosch" Fabo71 (talk) 19:21, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 01:38, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
Derivative work from nasiriphoto.com.Though image is courtesy of GoDaddy.com, image from Go Daddy.com is "All rights reserved" B dash (talk) 02:25, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: The first version was from Mansour Nasiri, so I suppose he agrees to publish his images under a free license. --Yann (talk) 20:48, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
The image clearly infringes upon the copyright of Micah McGonigal, the developer of "Baldi's Basics In Education and Learning", from which this picture originates. Javert2113 (talk) 04:30, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:50, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Duplicate of the non-cropped picture Braveheart (talk) 06:51, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: Colors were changed. --Yann (talk) 20:52, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope. Being just a "member" of a political party does not make one in scope, even if the country were as small as San Marino, which is not the case here. If she is elected at least mayor of a town or some similar post then we can consider having her images here. Please read Commons:Categories for discussion/2018/05/Category:Michaela Krausová. Thanks for your time. E4024 (talk) 07:01, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- Look at File:Eva Markvartová.jpg. She is also a member of the same party, and wears symbols of the party. Therefore this latter pic is acceptable for Commons, IMHO. (I hope now ordinary members of that party, who may be subject to deletion of images, do not buy clothing with party emblems and take new pics. I'm especially worried of seeing nude people with only a party beret or something, even if only to protest my DR. :) Please let us be more logical than always, if we added pictures of the members of political parties in Turkey here, that would make millions. Let us keep this "junior politician" issue to people who have been "elected" to some post, even if a small town mayor or provincial party chair(men/women). Thanks. --E4024 (talk) 14:48, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Quite good quality, EXIF data, could be useful somewhere. --Yann (talk) 20:53, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
unused logo Ankry (talk) 10:39, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. The company Reolink has gotten a decent amount of news coverage in reliable sources ([1], [2], [3], [4]). The company probably wouldn't survive a deletion discussion on Wikipedia, but they're noteworthy enough to pass COM:EDUSE. I'll go ahead and add some categories, and request a move to a more descriptive title. –IagoQnsi (talk) 17:12, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
- If kept, this image and File:Logo - 副本.png need to be renamed to something more meaningful than "Logo color" or "Logo copy". -Mys_721tx (talk) 00:11, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: as per above. --Yann (talk) 20:54, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
copyvio diseño no oficial copiado del concello de ferrol Nemigo galiza 10:58, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Oppose Apreciación absolutamente incorrecta del usuario Nemigo (talk · contribs). Es el modelo utilizado de forma oficial en el ayuntamiento de Ferrol. Véase el enlace y, por tanto, que no es copyvio. --Echando una mano (talk) 13:23, 4 June 2018 (UTC)- OpposeCoat of arms based on the heraldic definition of coat of arms of city of Ferrol. Bye, --Elisardojm (talk) 22:14, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- The heraldic definition could be checked at es:Escudo de Ferrol. Bye, --Elisardojm (talk) 15:48, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Elisardojm Poco2 19:06, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose no es copyvio. --Jcfidy (talk) 09:15, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 20:55, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
"Description: As the two state solution becomes more and more unlikely to be agreed on, other concepts like a federal or one-state solution are discussed. Therefore I would like to propose a new flag for a possible future Federal Republic of Israel-Palestine. It has the following characteristics: 1: Both the Israeli and Palestine flag are integrated in a circle as a symbol of unity. 2: Unlike other proposals for a binational flag the two national flags are not disrupted, compromised or blended with each other into a new mixed-up-flag, but they remain in their original and recognizable design, so both people can identify with their respective part. 3: As the two national flags within the circle come from a controversial and heavily burdened past, the yellow background of the federal binational flag is of a new color not included in either of the national flags. Thus yellow stands for a new future oriented paradigm, and as the color of the sun for the hope of a bright and prosperous future for a new binational state of Israel-Palestine." Do we have a function or right to "propose" flags for states that do not exist? How come this could enter the page "National symbols of Palestine"? Is it also a "national symbol of Israel"? Out of scope. E4024 (talk) 12:17, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete: Commons is not the place to propose flags: out of scope. --bjh21 (talk) 19:38, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- Actually, as has been discussed before, Commons has many hundreds of "Special or fictional flag" image files, and they aren't usually deleted just for being special or fictional, unless there's some additional aggravating factor... AnonMoos (talk) 11:58, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
This DR should also cover the equivalent JPEG:
--bjh21 (talk) 19:41, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete both. Thanks for the addition. --E4024 (talk) 12:00, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:56, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE Lacrymocéphale (talk) 13:21, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:57, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
Delete it. Thanks. --Okstartnow (talk) 13:54, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- Keep: File is in use on zh:健達奇趣蛋 and no reason given for deletion. --bjh21 (talk) 19:32, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 20:57, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
Delete it. Thanks. --Okstartnow (talk) 13:54, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:58, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
Delete it. Thanks. --Okstartnow (talk) 13:54, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 20:59, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
Delete it. Thanks. --Okstartnow (talk) 13:54, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 20:59, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
Delete it. Thanks. --Okstartnow (talk) 13:54, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:59, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
Delete it. Thanks. --Okstartnow (talk) 13:55, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:59, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
Delete it. Thanks. --Okstartnow (talk) 13:55, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 21:00, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
This file is not own work. TV program capture. Uplode user is ja:LTA:M.K.. アルトクール (talk) 14:29, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:01, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
In my opinion this is not a simple logo. If I remember correctly, then we have even deleted such things in the past. Taivo (talk) 14:39, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo. --Yann (talk) 21:01, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
replaced by jpg (Neuwerk Herrengarten 360.jpg) Aeroid (talk) 14:40, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:02, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
Credited author does not appear to be author of image, purported license does not appear accurate SecretName101 (talk) 14:40, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:03, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
Too complex for PD-ineligible, and no evidence that the uploader has permission to grant a licence for this file. RexxS (talk) 15:47, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
我更换了一个版权标示，该项目为公有领域简单图形及文字。I change a licence Kmule mg (talk) 06:26, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:03, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
Эlcobbola talk 16:07, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:03, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
Same as File:Man penis.jpg above, but with background removed. COM:PENIS
Эlcobbola talk 22:14, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:05, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The logo indicates that it belongs to the en:Nickelodeon brand Leon saudanha (talk) 16:13, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:04, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:18, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Appears to be a previously published photo: https://topsport.bg/tennis/dimitar-kuzmanov-ne-sam-igral-s-zhoao-sousa-no-imam-golemi-shansove-za-pobeda.html Ytoyoda (talk) 16:45, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:04, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
I do not see any evidence this file s licensed under CC-BY-SA Ymblanter (talk) 17:04, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:05, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
Image is from Vogue Magazine - no evidence Flickr user has any relationship to Vogue or otherwise authorized to license its IP. This appears to be Flickr washing and requires COM:OTRS permission. Эlcobbola talk 17:54, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:07, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
no consent; photograph poses a safety risk and endangerment risk for family (including minors) Jomama39 (talk) 18:00, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Nonsense rationale. clpo13(talk) 18:15, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Rubbish. She clearly was aware of the photographer's presence and obviously took no action to prevent this image being taken. Rodhullandemu (talk) 18:24, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- Keep, from what I could tell this person doesn't seem to have any issue with the photographer and I don't see how this image "poses a safety risk and endangerment risk for family (including minors)", claims like that should be supported by evidence, otherwise it's simply paranoia. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 22:27, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- comment i normally support subject request deletions, that are not in use. personality rights tag is not enough. waiting to hear if this is the author. Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 23:41, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete subject request confirmed. Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 00:41, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete As this photo isn’t being used, I’ll support deletion per Slowking4 and as a courtesy to the subject. clpo13(talk) 02:51, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Comment Parallel discussion in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Dorothy Bendel 4080054.jpg. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 05:08, 5 June 2018 (UTC)- Delete @Slowking4: what is it with you and Dorothys?
- Alexis Jazz ping plz 05:08, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
- i like to lurk in the back and capture writer souls, every once and a while they object. Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 16:59, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and uploader's request. --Yann (talk) 21:07, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
there is a watermark on the wolf. Probable copyvio 90.91.41.63 17:24, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:08, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
non-free image, taken from http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/content/player/543922.html Lugnuts (talk) 17:40, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:08, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
no consent; photograph poses a safety risk and endangerment risk for family (including minors) Jomama39 (talk) 18:00, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Nonsense rationale. clpo13(talk) 18:16, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Rubbish. She clearly was aware of the photographer's presence and obviously took no action to prevent this image being taken. Rodhullandemu (talk) 18:25, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- Keep, from what I could tell this person doesn't seem to have any issue with the photographer and I don't see how this image "poses a safety risk and endangerment risk for family (including minors)", claims like that should be supported by evidence, otherwise it's simply paranoia. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 22:26, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- comment i tend to honor deletion requests of subject not in use. personality rights tag is not enough. waiting for confirmation. you might well think that a flashy camera is notorious, but readers have tunnel vision, and acquiescence is not consent.
- Delete subject request confirmed. Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 00:05, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete As this photo isn’t being used, I’ll support deletion per Slowking4 and as a courtesy to the subject. clpo13(talk) 02:53, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Parallel discussion in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Dorothy Bendel 4080049.jpg. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 05:07, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete @Slowking4: what is it with you and Dorothys? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 05:07, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and uploader's request. --Yann (talk) 21:08, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Wecouldbelongtogether (talk · contribs)
[edit]Appear to be COM:NETCOPYVIO - File:Mayimbialikcaptain-hat.jpg is a poorly photoshopped version of this; File:Mayim-bialik-b495f1d0c9810be88da00c28988c67d0.jpg and File:Mayim-bialik-b495f1d0c9810be88da00c28988c67d1.jpg appear to be from a Getty set, etc. All lacking camera EXIF and lower resolution - DUCK copyvios.
- File:Mayimbialikcaptain-hat.jpg
- File:Mayim-bialik-b495f1d0c9810be88da00c28988c67d0.jpg
- File:Mayim-bialik-b495f1d0c9810be88da00c28988c67d1.jpg
- File:Mayim Bialik at Emmys 2015.jpg
- File:Mayim-bialik-b495f1d0c9810be88da00c28988c67d0 (cropped).jpg - extracted from File:Mayim-bialik-b495f1d0c9810be88da00c28988c67d0.jpg.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Эlcobbola talk 18:19, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:09, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
advertisment? small size, not usable Avron (talk) 19:05, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:11, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
From subject's Facebook page, https://www.facebook.com/204356823482680/photos/a.204357493482613.1073741827.204356823482680/204362286815467/?type=3&theater GRuban (talk) 19:24, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:11, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
Document en pdf sur plusieurs pages. Une autre gravure en png a été uploadée. Bel Bonjour, Ambre Troizat (talk) 19:33, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:11, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
Original, primarily textual documents. Out of scope, being "representative merely of raw text".
bjh21 (talk) 19:52, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:12, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ricky Partel (talk · contribs)
[edit]No description, poor categorization, no coordinates, no encyclopedic value.
- File:2taudaha0180210 145031.jpg
- File:2taudaha0180210 145022.jpg
- File:2taudaha0180210 145021.jpg
- File:Taudaha20180210 145014.jpg
- File:Taudaha20180210 145010.jpg
- File:Taudaha20180210 144932.jpg
- File:Taudaha20180210 144928.jpg
- File:Taudaha20180210 143136.jpg
- File:Taudaha20180210 144456.jpg
- File:Taudaha20180210 144813.jpg
- File:2taudaha0180210 143134.jpg
- File:2taudaha0180210 143133.jpg
- File:Taudaha20180210 143117.jpg
- File:Taudaha20180210 142656.jpg
- File:Taudaha20180210 142654.jpg
- File:2taudaha0180210 142649.jpg
- File:Taudaha20180210 142651.jpg
- File:Taudaha20180210 142644.jpg
- File:Taudaha20180210 142643.jpg
- File:Taudaha20180210 142637.jpg
- File:Taudaha20180210 142631.jpg
Till (talk) 19:54, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:12, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
Copyrighted images via USDA
[edit]- File:170823 Paiute BenDitto©-131 (36644600363).jpg
- File:170823 Paiute BenDitto©-051 (36644392633).jpg
- File:170823 Paiute BenDitto©-121 (36644391723).jpg
- File:170823 Paiute BenDitto©-152 (36644600163).jpg
- File:170823 Paiute BenDitto©-204 (37456985655).jpg
- File:170823 Paiute BenDitto©-070 (36644392403).jpg
- File:170823 Paiute BenDitto©-325 (37515289214).jpg
- File:170823 Paiute BenDitto©-265 (37456985565).jpg
- File:170823 Paiute BenDitto©-103 (36644391963).jpg
- File:170823 Paiute BenDitto©-066 (36644392493).jpg
- File:170823 Paiute BenDitto©-120 (36644391763).jpg
- File:170823 Paiute BenDitto©-152 (37515289414).jpg
- File:170823 Paiute BenDitto©-318 (36604637674).jpg
- File:170823 Paiute BenDitto©-325 (36644391553).jpg
- File:170823 Paiute BenDitto©-088 (36644392163).jpg
- File:170823 Paiute BenDitto©-130 (36644600393).jpg
- File:170823 Paiute BenDitto©-237 (37456985605).jpg
- File:170823 Paiute BenDitto©-280 (37456985495).jpg
- File:170823 Paiute BenDitto©-286 (37456985445).jpg
- File:170823 Paiute BenDitto©-237 (26449837289).jpg
- File:170823 Paiute BenDitto©-177 (37456985715).jpg
- File:170823 Paiute BenDitto©-085 (36644392263).jpg
- File:170823 Paiute BenDitto©-136 (36644600273).jpg
- File:170823 Paiute BenDitto©-093 (36644392043).jpg
- File:170823 Paiute BenDitto©-277 (37456985535).jpg
- File:170823 Paiute BenDitto©-161 (37456985735).jpg
- File:170823 Paiute BenDitto©-108 (36644391873).jpg
- File:170823 Paiute BenDitto©-143 (36644600223).jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Bot dump from Flickr, where they have a usable license from the United States Dept. of Agriculture. However, they are copyrighted by the photographer as indicated by the metadata and even the file names. The photographer is not a USDA or other US Govt employee. We don't have permission to keep these copyrighted photos here. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 19:53, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- Keep COM:NOTCOPYVIO, these can assumed as work for hire which has been discussed before: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Chairman McWatters Official Headshot.jpg. @Clindberg: any comment on this particular case? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 20:56, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- The CC-BY license is perfectly compatible with the EXIF statements; presumably they had permission to license the photos that way. The author should mention Mr. Ditto though. Whether the PD-USGov license is valid is cloudier; if the photographer was simply paid to take the photos in lieu of a government employee doing it, that may count as PD-USGov. May be hard to be sure, but if the photos were meant for the USDA website, may be OK to assume that, though I could also see removing that license and using just the CC-BY license as well. There is a web page here, which has a couple of photos marked "Courtesy photo by Ben Ditto", though there are also photos from a USFWS employee marked "courtesy" as well. They are making sure to credit the photographer, but I think it's reasonable to assume they had permission to at least put CC-BY on the photos, and maybe the PD-USGov as well. Carl Lindberg (talk) 03:19, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
- Ok, if it sounds reasonable to others that we keep these I'm fine with that, but can I get your opinion. I'm going through thousands of files that have been bulk-uploaded to Flickr by the government agencies and some have claims like this (e.g. "this is copyrighted by such-and-such photographer but we're giving it a CC license"). Are there any cases where I should nominate these for deletion? Or should I just let all these fly with the assumption that the government agency had permission? At this point I'm pretty foggy on what's correct. Thanks very much Ruff tuff cream puff (talk)
- "work for hire" can be a hard concept for contractual situations -- the legislative notes says: it can be assumed that, where a Government agency commissions a work for its own use merely as an alternative to having one of its own employees prepare the work, the right to secure a private copyright would be withheld. For a work commissioned by an external artist because of some special skill, we can't make that assumption. For pre-existing works the government is just using, not sure I would assume anything at all. This one is on the PD-USGov borderline, as it seems as though the photographer was documenting a governmental agency action, and the photos appear to have been first published on the government site, which would seem to indicate they had full permission to do so (and may have just been volunteering). Whether that qualifies as PD-USGov is a bit borderline to me, but sure seems like the photographer would have been aware of the liberal license at least. I could understand limiting the license to just the CC-BY. If someone wants to contact the author to get clarification, that would always help as well. Carl Lindberg (talk) 06:07, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: as per Alexis and Carl. --Yann (talk) 21:14, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
copyvio Tortenecke (talk) 20:36, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:17, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
Just a reupload of File:Draper-Ulysses and Sirens.jpg (of which we also already have multiple variants) with bogus authorship claim/license Эlcobbola talk 21:01, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:18, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
COM:NOTHOST - unused images of non-notable person(s). Note three are used for en.wiki vanity article, but that is this user's sole "contribution" to the project (i.e., does not legitimately meet requirement "that user is or was an active participant on that project" (COM:INUSE); uploader is merely self-promoting, not genuinely participating). Also, to the extent "Litonfca" = "Mohammad Liton Farazy," uploader is mere subject; copyright would be held by the photographer (OTRS permission would be needed.)
- File:Litu in car.jpg
- File:Surprisedd.jpg
- File:Sss (2).jpg
- File:India gate near.jpg
- File:University campus 2.jpg
- File:University campus 1.jpg
- File:University campus.jpg
- File:India gates.jpg
- File:India delhi.jpg
- File:Dia-bari.jpg
- File:Dia bari.jpg
- File:Dia bari 1.jpg
- File:Punjabia.jpg
- File:Airports.jpg
- File:Presentation Day.jpg
- File:Rajshhi.jpg
- File:Litonfarazy.jpg
- File:Liton.jpg
- File:Mohammad Liton Faraz.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Эlcobbola talk 21:21, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- Note: strike above because vanity article has since been deleted as misuse of wiki as webhost. All images now unused. Эlcobbola talk 16:59, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
COM:NOTHOST - unused images of non-notable person. Same issue, including possible uploader as mere subject, as noted above.
- File:With guiter.jpg
- File:Dhanmondi.jpg
- File:Uibt-09.06.18-.jpg
- File:HFC Resturant.jpg
- File:Heritage park.jpg
Эlcobbola talk 16:53, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:20, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:22, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 21:53, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- Good evening Jcb
,
To understand the situation, I allowed myself to analyze the profile of the user Syryatsu and the origin of the file.
The file is dated July 6, 2007 at 19:04, the contributions of the french user (Global information, Wikiscan) indicate during this period (link), that he contributed to the Project: WikiProject Heraldry and vexillology (Blazons in french).
His contribution history shows the origin of the current (File:Blason dpt fr Herault.png) file as of April 6, 2007 at 16:32. The license is: Public domain self.
For indication: In France, for political reasons, the regions have just merged and the historical symbols are also experiencing problems that are linked to this development. In the present case, the symbol belongs to the Occitan cross (Wikipedia:Occitan cross) dating from the XII century (link source of dictionary histophile.com [sorry in french]).
I think it's the same topic for the Blason département fr Gers.svg file.
cordially, DePlusJean (talk) 22:15, 6 June 2018 (UTC)- The problem is that most of the files of this uploader seem to be derivative work rather than fully own work and that they forgot to mention the sources for the heraldry elements. In some cases the source elements have been identified by other users and determined to be free, so some have been saved. If the source remains unknown, we cannot determine the copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 22:38, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you for your reply Jcb,
You are absolutely right about your indications. Should we take all the contributions of this user to make a re-evaluation of this work?
It imported 648 files including 557 between 2007 and 2008. DePlusJean (talk) 00:44, 7 June 2018 (UTC)- That may be wise I think. Jcb (talk) 14:37, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you for your reply Jcb,
- The problem is that most of the files of this uploader seem to be derivative work rather than fully own work and that they forgot to mention the sources for the heraldry elements. In some cases the source elements have been identified by other users and determined to be free, so some have been saved. If the source remains unknown, we cannot determine the copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 22:38, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 21:21, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
Complex logos cannot be in Commons without OTRS. E4024 (talk) 09:30, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 00:38, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
ライセンスを間違えたので削除させていただきます Rebirth10 (talk) 09:57, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: in use; CC licenses are not revocable. --Yasu (talk) 15:16, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deletion Renominating for copyright violation
[edit]
- Delete Copyright of the image is held by Niigata Kotsu Co., Ltd. [5] Darklanlan (talk) 04:20, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted per nomination. Not a simple logo. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:42, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
there is another copy אלחנן וינוגרד (talk) 20:07, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. -- Geagea (talk) 21:44, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Very low technical quality and out of COM:SCOPE. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:03, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:27, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
out of scope (self-promotion) Rojelio (talk) 09:42, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:27, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
- also file:Premios LaconNetwork 2017.png
I cannot find the company neither in ca.wiki, en.wiki nor in es.wiki. Probably the company is non-notable and the logos are out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:16, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:27, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
I see that this user has quite few global contributions. Alright, let's keep the pic, you can say, but his user page is also like a WP article. It gives me the impression that this user has made themselves an encyclopedia entry on their userpage. I believe this is personal promotion and should be prevented. Am I wrong? Sorry. E4024 (talk) 13:00, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. This user has only edited own userpage, no meaningful contributions. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:32, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
Most likely it will not be used Lsh0709 (talk) 13:23, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: unusable low quality. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:29, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
unused derivate of existing file:M1-MKD.svg Puclik1 (talk) 13:37, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:30, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
Delete it. Thanks. --Okstartnow (talk) 13:55, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused file, little educational value anyway. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:30, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:31, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
No description, poor categorization, no coordinates, no encyclopedic value.
- File:Taudaha20180210 135221.jpg
- File:Taudaha20180210 135233.jpg
- File:Taudaha20180210 135250 001.jpg
- File:Taudaha20180210 135251.jpg
- File:Taudaha20180210 135252 001.jpg
- File:Taudaha20180210 135252 002.jpg
- File:Taudaha20180210 135252 003.jpg
- File:Taudaha20180210 135252 004.jpg
- File:Taudaha20180210 135252 005.jpg
- File:Taudaha20180210 135252 006.jpg
- File:Taudaha20180210 135252 007.jpg
- File:Taudaha20180210 135255 001.jpg
- File:Taudaha20180210 135255 002.jpg
- File:Taudaha20180210 135255 003.jpg
- File:Taudaha20180210 135256.jpg
- File:Taudaha20180210 135258.jpg
- File:Taudaha20180210 135300.jpg
- File:Taudaha20180210 135301.jpg
- File:Taudaha20180210 135305.jpg
- File:Taudaha20180210 135306.jpg
- File:Taudaha20180210 135307.jpg
- File:Taudaha20180210 135308.jpg
- File:Taudaha20180210 135344.jpg
- File:Taudaha20180210 135347.jpg
- File:Taudaha20180210 135350 001.jpg
- File:Taudaha20180210 135350 004.jpg
- File:Taudaha20180210 135350 005.jpg
- File:Taudaha20180210 135350 006.jpg
- File:Taudaha20180210 135350 007.jpg
- File:Taudaha20180210 135350 008.jpg
- File:Taudaha20180210 135350 010.jpg
- File:Taudaha20180210 135350 011.jpg
- File:Taudaha20180210 135350 012.jpg
- File:Taudaha20180210 135350 013.jpg
- File:Taudaha20180210 135350 014.jpg
- File:Taudaha20180210 135352 001.jpg
- File:Taudaha20180210 135352 002.jpg
- File:Taudaha20180210 135352 003.jpg
- File:Taudaha20180210 135352 004.jpg
- File:Taudaha20180210 135352 005.jpg
- File:Taudaha20180210 135352 006.jpg
- File:Taudaha20180210 135352 007.jpg
- File:Taudaha20180210 135352 008.jpg
- File:Taudaha20180210 135352 009.jpg
- File:Taudaha20180210 135352 010.jpg
- File:Taudaha20180210 135352 011.jpg
- File:Taudaha20180210 135352 012.jpg
- File:Taudaha20180210 135354 001.jpg
- File:Taudaha20180210 135354 002.jpg
- File:Taudaha20180210 135354 003.jpg
- File:Taudaha20180210 135354 004.jpg
- File:Taudaha20180210 135354 005.jpg
- File:Taudaha20180210 135354 006.jpg
- File:Taudaha20180210 135354 008.jpg
- File:Taudaha20180210 135354 009.jpg
- File:Taudaha20180210 135357(0).jpg
- File:Taudaha20180210 135357.jpg
- File:Taudaha20180210 135358(0).jpg
- File:Taudaha20180210 135358(1).jpg
- File:Taudaha20180210 135358.jpg
- File:Taudaha20180210 135400.jpg
- File:Taudaha20180210 135442 001.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Till (talk) 20:10, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:36, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
non-free image, looks professionally done, no fair-use rationale supplied Lugnuts (talk) 13:06, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 14:12, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by ZI Jony as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: screenshot I strongly doubt this image is own work given the lack of EXIF, the professionnal quality, the subject and the copyvio record of the uploader. BrightRaven (talk) 08:48, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --BrightRaven (talk) 07:15, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
nothing to suggest the user owns the rights to any of the images used in creating this Ivar the Boneful (talk) 08:16, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:41, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
Kept. Nominator withdrew nomination. This closure is based on their response to SilkTork's comment. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 22:49, 4 July 2018 (UTC) (non-admin closure)
It is unlikely the Flickr uploader has rights to release this photo under a CC license. The photo was taken in 1973. It was uploaded to Flickr by someone who claims it was taken in 2008 and this is obviously untrue. Laser brain (talk) 21:17, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- The photograph was taken and uploaded to Flickr by Dina Regine who is a known photographer of Seventies rock acts including Kiss and Led Zeppelin. Interview with her. her website. I assume the 2008 date is the upload date. SilkTork (talk) 23:47, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks–this seems to be fine in that case. --Laser brain (talk) 19:03, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept. Nominator withdrew nomination. This closure is based on their response to SilkTork's comment. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 22:52, 4 July 2018 (UTC) (non-admin closure)
It is unlikely the Flickr uploader has rights to release this photo under a CC license. The photo was taken in 1973. It was uploaded to Flickr by someone who claims it was taken in 2009 and this is obviously untrue. Laser brain (talk) 21:18, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- The photograph was taken and uploaded to Flickr by Dina Regine who is a known photographer of Seventies rock acts including Kiss and Led Zeppelin. On the Flickr page she is asked the date of the tour, and she says 1973. Interview with her. her website. I assume the 2009 date is the upload date. SilkTork (talk) 23:44, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for the additional information. It seems this should be fine, then. --Laser brain (talk) 19:03, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
There is already File:Parliament of Turkey 1995.svg ZYjacklin (talk) 06:49, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Strong oppose same situation. --Mehman 97 22:07, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, not identically. -- User: Perhelion 10:20, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gil Karpas (talk · contribs)
[edit]I doubt these images are own work given the lack of EXIF, the size, the professionnal quality, and the subject.
BrightRaven (talk) 11:09, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
These are the pictures given to me by the band manager, and original and current member of the band who is also the owner of the copyright. They gave these to me to update and create an accurate description of the band. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gil Karpas (talk • contribs) 18:44, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
- Hello. So you are not the author of the photographs. In this case, you have to follow this procedure: COM:OTRS. Thank you. BrightRaven (talk) 07:13, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nominaton. -- User: Perhelion 10:04, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
Not a free image - was fair use as described. Deryck Chan (talk) 13:29, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- The source video is itself under 'Creative Commons Attribution licence (reuse allowed)', which Youtube says is CC Attribution 3.0 Unported, so I took this screencap and put up the license using {{YouTube CC-BY}}. I am confused now if this is in accordance with copyright law.--Roy17 (talk) 14:07, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- If the image is legal, then I have another question. Is it necessary to keep the logo in the image (as a form of attribution), or if the logo could be cropped as well?--Roy17 (talk) 14:07, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- Roy17: I think you're right. I didn't see the CC-By tag on the YouTube video. It is permitted to crop the image and use the image description page for attribution. Withdrawing deletion request. Deryck Chan (talk) 14:44, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- If the image is legal, then I have another question. Is it necessary to keep the logo in the image (as a form of attribution), or if the logo could be cropped as well?--Roy17 (talk) 14:07, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: valid license. -- User: Perhelion 10:52, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Este archivo es para una línea del metro de medellín con un nombre diferente (T-A), adicionalmente ya existe un archivo SVG de esta Jdapenao (talk) 04:01, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination (out of scope). --BrightRaven (talk) 07:11, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Photomagpie (talk · contribs)
[edit]All low res images, likely in use across the web, no exif except Windows photo editor data on one. I'm not nominating the one image that has camera data and is the original resolution of the photo. Unless provenance is evident, these should be deleted.
- File:Jagmati Sangwan 2.jpg
- File:Varsha Dongre.jpg
- File:Kaushal Panwar.jpg
- File:Radhika Vemula.jpg
- File:Aruna Sanghapali.jpg
—SpacemanSpiff 06:18, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- The file I did not include is a copy of [6] —SpacemanSpiff 08:02, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
![[6]](https://amnesty.org.in/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Copy-of-Pavitri-Manji.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination (unclear authorship). --BrightRaven (talk) 07:19, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:Tower City station
[edit]Photos of maps copyrighted by the RTA.
Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:40, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. (No FOP for maps in the US.) --BrightRaven (talk) 07:21, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This is a scan of a copyrighted recent publication Gżdacz (talk) 06:46, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination (1989 publication). --BrightRaven (talk) 07:24, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Looks like an official headshot or a screencap from a media appearance. No explanation of when/where in the description. GreyGoose (talk) 07:41, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (unclear authorship). --BrightRaven (talk) 07:25, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
looks like found on the internet, no Exif, small size Migebert (talk) 08:08, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (unclear authorship). --BrightRaven (talk) 07:55, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Likely not own work by uploader, as he changed the author-entry shortly after the upload[7]. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:02, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
![[7]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Bollon_marcado.jpg&diff=256762166&oldid=256761421){kind=link}
Same problem with File:Bollo marcado.jpg, see [8]. --Túrelio (talk) 09:04, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
![[8]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Bollo_marcado.jpg&diff=256762734&oldid=256761420){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination (unclear authorship). --BrightRaven (talk) 08:00, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Small filesize and lacking metadata: dubious claim of {{Own work}}. Likely press photo. Photographer should confirm license by following the instructions on OTRS. Storkk (talk) 09:05, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (uclear authorship). --BrightRaven (talk) 08:00, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
copy from https://www.ly.gov.tw/Images/Legislators/ly1000_6_00105_12f.jpg Outlookxp (talk) 09:48, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (copyvio). --BrightRaven (talk) 08:00, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Image issue de ce lien sous licence non compatible (NC) Shev123 (talk) 11:53, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (copyvio). --BrightRaven (talk) 08:15, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Na prośbę Zdzisława Otella Horodeckiego, którego wizerunek znajduje sie na zdjęciu. Marwo21 (talk) 11:59, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- Dostałem e-mail'a na prywatną pocztę z prośbą o usunięcię zdjęcia na prośbę autora. Proszę w imieniu autora o usunięcie zdjęcia. Fafik Napisz coś® 22:25, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
- Jest to mój wizerunek z błędami obiektywu i mam prawo zgodnie z prawem o ochronie wizerunku do ingerencji w jego byt .Zdzisław Otello Horodecki — Preceding unsigned comment added by Flawiuszott1 (talk • contribs) 04:45, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Licences are not revocable. --BrightRaven (talk) 08:13, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Proszę ponownie o usuniecie mego wizerunku takie mam prawo
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Zdzis%C5%82aw_Otello_Horodecki_2008.jpg Dotyczy odmowy usunięcia foto w Commons na ktorym jest moja twarz. Foto zostało zrobione w pracowni 2004 roku z bardzo bliska obiektywem szerokokątnym co spowodowało deformacje.Zostało użyte jako pierwsze w wiki gdyż w chwili.zakladania strony nie miałem innego. Bylo to w 2008 r.Od początku bylo złe.Postanowiłem z userem Marwo21, w związku z ponagleniem Wiki zostawić je. W Commons są inne moje fotosy bez błędów technicznych. To spełniało swoją rolę prawie przez 8 lat.Dopiero gdy powstały inne portrety to naturalnie zeszło. To foto grało w info radia ale na moją prośbę radio przeszło.na firmowe z Commons.Proszę Państwa o pomoc.Po oczekiwaniu i dzisiejszym moim monicie odrzucono moją i nie tylko moją prośbę.Ponowilem dzisiaj prośbę o usunięcie.Twarz jest własnością szczególnie chronioną i jeśli istota tego żąda zgodnie z prawem na całym świecie ujęcie jest usuwane.Bardzo proszę Panie,Panów o decyzyjną pomoc Zdzisław otello Horodecki.Flawiuszott1
Flawiuszott1 (talk) 17:33, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- Comment. There are many other pictures of the subject in Category:Zdzisław Otello Horodecki, so maybe it is actually not necessary to keep this one. Maybe it would be easier to give a positive answer to this request if you explained why this picture is so problematic for you. BrightRaven (talk) 09:06, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Po raz enty proszę Wielmożnych Panow o podjecie decyzji o usunieciu.Powód jest podany Zgodnie z prawem mam prawo do decydowaniu o wizerunku.Proszę albo w lewo albo w prawo.Z zewnatrz wyglada to na nieporadnosc. Wisi to i wisi.Pytania zewnętrzne nie są komplementami. Flawiuszott1 (talk) 05:15, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. File uploaded in 2010. Ruthven (msg) 16:12, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Previous version needs deleted, COM:TOY, uploader request GMGtalk 12:16, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Commons:Courtesy deletions. (No legal reason for deletion: the toy is de minimis.). --BrightRaven (talk) 08:20, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (unclear authorship). --BrightRaven (talk) 08:21, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (unclear authorship). --BrightRaven (talk) 08:55, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (unclear authorship). --BrightRaven (talk) 08:56, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
COM:DW of toy - see COM:TOYS. Source website license applies only to the photo, not the toy. Эlcobbola talk 18:24, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --BrightRaven (talk) 09:28, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Maltese currency - Commons:Currency#Malta Ronhjones (Talk) 20:58, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --BrightRaven (talk) 09:26, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Oeuvre de l'architecte Albert-Paul Müller décécé en 1965 (voir https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert-Paul_M%C3%BCller). NoFop In France Poudou99 (talk) 22:31, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (No FOP in France.). --BrightRaven (talk) 09:24, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/insource:"flickr4jazz" insource:"candid"
[edit]Photos that were likely taken without consent. I already filtered files without people in them. (see here)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Alexis Jazz ping plz 20:39, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Revdel for the following after I blurred them:
- File:New York City - 26 July 2008 (2706827322).jpg
Done blurred - File:New York City - 26 July 2008 (2706050753).jpg Done blurred
- File:New York City - 26 July 2008 (2706832754).jpg Done blurred
- File:New York, New York. Manhattan, to be exact. (3838952815).jpg Done blurred
- File:New York City - 26 July 2008 (2706008159).jpg Done blurred
- File:New York City - 26 July 2008 Jazz in Washington Square (2706040587).jpg Done cropped to what is in scope, revdel optional
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
One I'm not sure about:
Files found with Special:Search/insource:"flickr4jazz" insource:"candid"
[edit]- File:New York City - 26 July 2008 (2706043419).jpg is DW
- File:New York City - 26 July 2008 (2706831454).jpg is DW, maybe PD
- File:New York City - 26 July 2008 (2706025285).jpg is DW, maybe PD-USGov
- File:New York City - 26 July 2008 (2706041021).jpg is DW, maybe PD-USGov
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Alexis Jazz ping plz 20:46, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- Hmm, those of these that are definitely no-permission candids of a single person or a small number of people should absolutely be deleted. Some, like File:New York City - 26 July 2008 Jazz in Washington Square (2706038915).jpg, are crowd shots with less personality issues, though I question whether they are in scope. Others, like File:New York City - 26 July 2008 Jazz in Washington Square (2706036947).jpg, fall in a grey area - photos of individual performers that may have less expectations of privacy, and more potential use as photos, than shots of random people. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pi.1415926535 (talk • contribs) 00:29, 6 June 2018 (UTC) (UTC)
- @Pi.1415926535: You accidentally signed with ~~~~~. I also noticed a few shots of performers when going through them. Those that I noticed were showing minors and I don't think the girl in the photo you linked is an adult either. That tips the scale to delete for me. Candid camera plus minor equals creepy. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 00:47, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
- Whoops, good catch on that. And yeah, them probably being minors makes a good case to delete. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:53, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
- File:New York City - 26 July 2008 (2706050753).jpg as well as some others looks like a scenery shot with some people in them more than anything else. I've certainly had my share of those. Hell, even the Historic American Building Survey and National Archives and Records Administration have taken pictures of people. when they intended to get pics of places. -----DanTD (talk) 03:43, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
- @DanTD: I bet they didn't use a candid camera though. But that one was on my list to be blurred, which I'll do this week. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 05:53, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
- Sometimes I wonder how far we have to go with this. This couple making out on a subway train I can understand the need to delete, but these musicians in Washington Square, those people in costumes drenched in fake blood (which looks like it might've been for some kind of parade), that little kid in a cow costume (which I'm still trying to find), and people in parades in general look too much like the grey area that Pi was referring to. This guy, on the other hand, actually wanted to be in my shot of the bridge between the BMT Jamaica and IND Fulton sections of Broadway Junction (New York City Subway) ----DanTD (talk) 13:28, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
- One other candid picture I came across was this one which claimed to be on the "Fulton Street Subway," even though the sign behind the window clearly says "Chambers Street." It's also part of another group of candid photos claiming to be on the "Fulton Street Subway" in Manhattan. If that one picture is incorrect, it seems like an indication of some less than accurate reliability for the descriptions. ----DanTD (talk) 19:41, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
- @DanTD: let me know if you find the kid in the cow costume. I think I know what you mean but I can't find it either. It's probably not in this DR. The issue with "these musicians in Washington Square" is (for me) that I doubt the girl is an adult. If you view this DR as a gallery it becomes obvious many photos are photos of women so that's just a bit too sketchy. File:New York City - 26 July 2008 Jazz in Washington Square (2706040587).jpg on the other hand does not feature any possible minors/scantily clad girls so I don't have any problem with that. The main reason for cropping that was actually that the audience just isn't in scope, it was needed to make the picture usable. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:49, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
- She could be in her 20's for all either of us know. Maybe she just looks young to you. I once met a young woman who hit on me in my late-20's who I later found out was still in high school, and I used our age differences to make her give up on me. On the other hand, I knew somebody who was trying to buy a house, and the previous owner was an old lady living with her granddaughter who I thought was 14, but instead turned out to be 28! And as a kid, I had neighbors who's boys grew peach fuzzes in their pre-teens. I suppose the best reason to let a picture or more of her stay is that she's performing in the park with her boyfriend, or somebody I assume to be her boyfriend. Regardless of how she's dressed, she's not performing some kind of porn sketch. She and the guy are just playing music. As for the kid in the cow costume, I'll keep trying to look for him or her, but I still wonder about the candid pictures of people in parades, or street musicians like the ones you're having such a problem with. Then, there's the issue of pics of barmaids, waiters and other random people. I'm still on the fence about some of those, but on others, I kind of agree with you. ----DanTD (talk) 16:15, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
- She could be 13 or she could be 30, but since we have no clue we should be cautious. Although she is performing in the park, the moment somebody visibly pulls out a camera or phone she could say "no pictures please" or walk away. For me it's the combination of a candid camera and a girl in hotpants who may or may not be an adult. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 16:31, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
- A Nikon D80 is not what I'd call a candid camera. It would be obvious that he's taking pictures or at least intends to. clpo13(talk) 17:32, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
- File:Sights and People of NYC (2482199734).jpg and File:Sights and People of NYC (2482185922).jpg were also taken with a D80, yet those people really don't seem to be aware of the presence of a camera. I don't know if/how he's hiding the camera, maybe in a bag or something. The description on File:A Great Day in New York, New York (3619913835).jpg says "Candid subway photo of young couple in love. They couldn't hear the shutter due to the noise of the train.", that photo was taken with a Nikon D700, almost twice the weight of the D80. File:A Walk in Manhattan, New York (3757365971).jpg says "Guy with a Nikon camera. Candid street photography. Watch out! I might catch you next!". - Alexis Jazz ping plz 18:07, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
- Question; Why does this photo of a woman on the alleged "Fulton Street Subway" contain two deletion tags? Shouldn't one be enough? ----DanTD (talk) 20:59, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
- @DanTD: that one was originally nominated by Pi.1415926535 (Commons:Deletion requests/File:Fulton Street Subway, Manhattan, New York (3879205933).jpg) which is also what triggered me to create this DR. That file should be in this DR to prevent having two discussions about the same thing. That original DR isn't really needed anymore as we now have this. So the answer to your question is "technical reasons". - Alexis Jazz ping plz 21:07, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
- UPDATE - I just found the little kid in the cow costume, and I now realize it's not a cow costume. ----DanTD (talk) 19:07, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
- @DanTD: hey, that's not the picture I remember. The one I remember was darker (really dark, possibly night), I think the kid was further away from the camera, possibly a bit more to the left and there were other people in the picture. (I think 3-5 others) - Alexis Jazz ping plz 03:35, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Alexis Jazz: Well, if I stumble upon that, I'll let you know too. ----DanTD (talk) 05:16, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
- @DanTD: I do very much appreciate you actually coming back for this! I should have said that. Most people forget such things or think "oh, bother". But it seems we were thinking of different pictures. I don't rule out it may have been the same kid and costume but just another photo, but my memory of it is too fuzzy to say for sure. (I already checked the photostream around the kid, but nothing seems to be there) And there is always the option that I simply don't remember it correctly. Thanks again for the effort. The kid in the costume (what is it anyway?) is not up for deletion. I'm not sure we should keep such photos. Let's put it this way: if there were a photo of you at that age on Commons, in that costume, and that photo would possibly be used on, for example, w:Halloween costume for the world to see. Would you be happy? I doubt I would be.. Others may not mind. But how could we possibly know if the kid would mind? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 05:32, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
- @DanTD: I do very much appreciate you actually coming back for this!
- @Alexis Jazz: Well, if I stumble upon that, I'll let you know too. ----DanTD (talk) 05:16, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
- @DanTD: hey, that's not the picture I remember. The one I remember was darker (really dark, possibly night), I think the kid was further away from the camera, possibly a bit more to the left and there were other people in the picture. (I think 3-5 others) - Alexis Jazz ping plz 03:35, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
- UPDATE - I just found the little kid in the cow costume, and I now realize it's not a cow costume. ----DanTD (talk) 19:07, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
- @DanTD: that one was originally nominated by Pi.1415926535 (Commons:Deletion requests/File:Fulton Street Subway, Manhattan, New York (3879205933).jpg) which is also what triggered me to create this DR. That file should be in this DR to prevent having two discussions about the same thing. That original DR isn't really needed anymore as we now have this. So the answer to your question is "technical reasons". - Alexis Jazz ping plz 21:07, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
- Question; Why does this photo of a woman on the alleged "Fulton Street Subway" contain two deletion tags? Shouldn't one be enough? ----DanTD (talk) 20:59, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
- File:Sights and People of NYC (2482199734).jpg and File:Sights and People of NYC (2482185922).jpg were also taken with a D80, yet those people really don't seem to be aware of the presence of a camera. I don't know if/how he's hiding the camera, maybe in a bag or something. The description on File:A Great Day in New York, New York (3619913835).jpg says "Candid subway photo of young couple in love. They couldn't hear the shutter due to the noise of the train.", that photo was taken with a Nikon D700, almost twice the weight of the D80. File:A Walk in Manhattan, New York (3757365971).jpg says "Guy with a Nikon camera. Candid street photography. Watch out! I might catch you next!". - Alexis Jazz ping plz 18:07, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
- A Nikon D80 is not what I'd call a candid camera. It would be obvious that he's taking pictures or at least intends to. clpo13(talk) 17:32, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
- She could be 13 or she could be 30, but since we have no clue we should be cautious. Although she is performing in the park, the moment somebody visibly pulls out a camera or phone she could say "no pictures please" or walk away. For me it's the combination of a candid camera and a girl in hotpants who may or may not be an adult. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 16:31, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
- She could be in her 20's for all either of us know. Maybe she just looks young to you. I once met a young woman who hit on me in my late-20's who I later found out was still in high school, and I used our age differences to make her give up on me. On the other hand, I knew somebody who was trying to buy a house, and the previous owner was an old lady living with her granddaughter who I thought was 14, but instead turned out to be 28! And as a kid, I had neighbors who's boys grew peach fuzzes in their pre-teens. I suppose the best reason to let a picture or more of her stay is that she's performing in the park with her boyfriend, or somebody I assume to be her boyfriend. Regardless of how she's dressed, she's not performing some kind of porn sketch. She and the guy are just playing music. As for the kid in the cow costume, I'll keep trying to look for him or her, but I still wonder about the candid pictures of people in parades, or street musicians like the ones you're having such a problem with. Then, there's the issue of pics of barmaids, waiters and other random people. I'm still on the fence about some of those, but on others, I kind of agree with you. ----DanTD (talk) 16:15, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
- @DanTD: let me know if you find the kid in the cow costume. I think I know what you mean but I can't find it either. It's probably not in this DR. The issue with "these musicians in Washington Square" is (for me) that I doubt the girl is an adult. If you view this DR as a gallery it becomes obvious many photos are photos of women so that's just a bit too sketchy. File:New York City - 26 July 2008 Jazz in Washington Square (2706040587).jpg on the other hand does not feature any possible minors/scantily clad girls so I don't have any problem with that. The main reason for cropping that was actually that the audience just isn't in scope, it was needed to make the picture usable. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:49, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
- One other candid picture I came across was this one which claimed to be on the "Fulton Street Subway," even though the sign behind the window clearly says "Chambers Street." It's also part of another group of candid photos claiming to be on the "Fulton Street Subway" in Manhattan. If that one picture is incorrect, it seems like an indication of some less than accurate reliability for the descriptions. ----DanTD (talk) 19:41, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
- Sometimes I wonder how far we have to go with this. This couple making out on a subway train I can understand the need to delete, but these musicians in Washington Square, those people in costumes drenched in fake blood (which looks like it might've been for some kind of parade), that little kid in a cow costume (which I'm still trying to find), and people in parades in general look too much like the grey area that Pi was referring to. This guy, on the other hand, actually wanted to be in my shot of the bridge between the BMT Jamaica and IND Fulton sections of Broadway Junction (New York City Subway) ----DanTD (talk) 13:28, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
- @DanTD: I bet they didn't use a candid camera though. But that one was on my list to be blurred, which I'll do this week. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 05:53, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
- File:New York City - 26 July 2008 (2706050753).jpg as well as some others looks like a scenery shot with some people in them more than anything else. I've certainly had my share of those. Hell, even the Historic American Building Survey and National Archives and Records Administration have taken pictures of people. when they intended to get pics of places. -----DanTD (talk) 03:43, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
- Whoops, good catch on that. And yeah, them probably being minors makes a good case to delete. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:53, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Pi.1415926535: You accidentally signed with ~~~~~. I also noticed a few shots of performers when going through them. Those that I noticed were showing minors and I don't think the girl in the photo you linked is an adult either. That tips the scale to delete for me. Candid camera plus minor equals creepy. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 00:47, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
- Well cases like File:New York City - 26 July 2008 (2706043419).jpg are clearly derivative works. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 16:57, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: I have reviewed COM:IDENT and it seems that in the US, there is no requirement to get the consent of the people that appear in a photograph to publish it. In countries where consent is necessary, the use of a candid camera is a problem, because generally if the people look at camera, you can assume they give their consent to be photographed, which is not possible with a candid camera. In the US, however, the consent is not required (even for minors), so imho, the publication of photographs taken with candid cameras is not illegal. Nevertheless, I think most of these photographs should be deleted because they are out of scope: photographs of anonymous people doing usual activities are not realistically useful for an educational purpose, just like private party photos, photos of friends, collection of holiday snaps... So I have started deleting most of the files and just keeping some that seem to be in scope in my opinion (like the photographs of the jazz performers in Washington Square). Given the amount of files, it will still take some time to review everything. I admit some images are in the grey area... For those, one can still start a more specific DR (or UDR) if one thinks it is necessary. --BrightRaven (talk) 11:45, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
This photo is claimed to be released in the PD, but there is no confirmation. The source website is gone, the uploader contributed only this one file. Without some proof or a satisfactory explanation, I don't quite believe this photo is in the PD. It should be deleted per the precautionary principle. Rosenzweig τ 16:12, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. And redirected to keep article links. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:08, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Delete unfortunately the source url does not link to the image and neither a tineye nor google image search bring up the image. Ww2censor (talk) 18:35, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- Keep: I fixed the source link. --Achim (talk) 18:57, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- But it's from a blacklisted site, so how can we keep it. Ww2censor (talk) 21:47, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Ww2censor: m:Talk:Spam blacklist/Archives/2009-08#listenarabic.com, was probably blacklisted in 2009 because it was being spammed. (I assume, no reason is stated) Or do you have knowledge of it being blacklisted for license issues? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 04:53, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Achim and Alexis Jazz: Sorry I can't comment on anything else and I have no idea about the site's blacklisting. This image is not recent but from 2010, only a few months after the blacklisting. Ww2censor (talk) 09:17, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
- Was spammed, look here. --Achim (talk) 13:00, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
- Keep if there is no other reason for deletion. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 02:59, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
- Was spammed, look here. --Achim (talk) 13:00, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Achim and Alexis Jazz: Sorry I can't comment on anything else and I have no idea about the site's blacklisting. This image is not recent but from 2010, only a few months after the blacklisting. Ww2censor (talk) 09:17, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:19, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 22:01, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:35, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
How can a headshot of a person be the person's own work? Yoninah (talk) 23:23, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
They are campaign photos that he either owns or has permission to useSbinfo (talk) 01:10, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:36, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
How can a picture of a person be the person's own work? Yoninah (talk) 23:24, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
The photographer (Greg Stewart) has completed a release through the interactive release generator.Sbinfo (talk) 01:21, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
Keep: Creator release is now secured for this image. Poorlyglot (talk) 17:22, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:37, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
How can a picture of a person be the person's own work? Yoninah (talk) 23:25, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
The photographer (Greg Stewart) has completed a release through the interactive release generator.Sbinfo (talk) 01:24, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
Keep: Creator release is now secured for this image. Poorlyglot (talk) 17:21, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:37, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Link for licensing says that "There may be copyright, Creative Commons or other expectations placed on the data". It does not link to a specific creative commons license and the Scott Frost page does not state whether it is released under Creative Commons. Since the licensing page states it could be under copyright or Creative Commons, we should be treating it like it is copyrighted (under the precautionary principle), since it is not otherwise stated. Elisfkc (talk) 14:55, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: no clear evidence of free licensing. SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 17:47, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Corkythehornetfan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Link for licensing says that "There may be copyright, Creative Commons or other expectations placed on the data". It does not link to a specific creative commons license and the athletic pages do not state whether it is released under Creative Commons. Since the licensing page states it could be under copyright or Creative Commons, we should be treating these like they are copyrighted (under the precautionary principle), since it is not otherwise stated. (See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Scott Frost.jpg)
- File:Amy Williams official photo.jpg
- File:Dan Kendig.jpg
- File:John Cook official photo.jpg
- File:Bill Moos.jpg
Elisfkc (talk) 14:58, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- I am going solely based off of their website for the administration - see here and here. They tend to release their photos with the CC By-s.a 4.0. I will contact them and see if they respond. Corky 16:26, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: The cc-by-sa licence is expressely issued for the phtoographs of Vice-Chancellors and Deans of the university. No other pages have that licence, thus we cannot assume that other photographs are implicitly licenced as the same. SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 17:52, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Corkythehornetfan (talk · contribs)
[edit]No evidence that these photos were published on a OGL website. Now that another election was over and a new cabinet has been formed, can User:Corkythehornetfan finally provide the critical licensing info?
- File:Rt Hon Mark Lancaster TD MP.jpg
- File:Rt Hon Andrew Murrison MP.jpg
- File:Justin Tomlinson MP.jpg
- File:Andrew Stephenson, MP.jpg
- File:Thérèse Coffey MP.jpg
- File:Rt Hon Christopher Pincher MP.jpg
- File:George Eustice, MP.jpg
- File:Jesse Norman MP.jpg
- File:Rt Hon Nick Gibb MP.jpg
- File:Nigel Adams, MP.jpg
- File:Kit Malthouse MP.jpg
File:Rt Hon Priti Patel MP.jpgFile:Jacob Rees-Mogg MP.jpg- File:Rt Hon Theresa Villiers MP.jpg
File:Rt Hon Dominic Raab MP.jpg
Roy17 (talk) 14:08, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Unable to find these under an OGL license (except those struck through). Metadata states UK MOD Crown Copyright, 2019. This image is for current news purposes only. It may not be used, reproduced or transmitted for any purpose without first obtaining a copyright licence available from MOD, Crown Copyright Unit.. --Storkk (talk) 09:54, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
Complex logo without OTRS. E4024 (talk) 11:41, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- Please hold. Have just sent email to OTRS. --Fadesga (talk) 12:37, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- Don't worry; there is quite a backlog. :) --E4024 (talk) 12:51, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- Uploader has not replied to e-mail sent to them 13/06/2018 12:44 Ticket#2018060410006764 Ronhjones (Talk) 01:03, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
- Don't worry; there is quite a backlog. :) --E4024 (talk) 12:51, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:23, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
Image has been deleted before File:Ignacio 2018.jpg, where source was stated as "Carolina Sainz". This will need OTRS to validate this new account as the true owner. Note the image is already on the internet on other sites. Ronhjones (Talk) 17:04, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
This image has been authorised by its author, Carolina Sainz, before and now. There's an email sent to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org with the authorization. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2A01:C50E:3800:9700:51EA:F93F:A166:71D9 (talk) 20:50, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
- I've searched OTRS for "Carolina Sainz", "Ignacio Rodó", "Carolinasainzphotography", "Carolina Sainz Castillo". "Carolina Castillo". and not found a single ticket. The comment above is just intended to stall the deletion process. Ronhjones (Talk) 00:59, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:23, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
It is unlikely the Flickr uploader has rights to release this photo under a CC license. The photo was taken on May 4, 1965 by Christopher Kevin Delaney according to the Flickr page; however, it was uploaded by Flickr user Steve Denenberg. Laser brain (talk) 21:04, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- C. Kevin Delaney and Steve Denenberg were friends, and travelled together to see the band, and take photos. It seems unlikely that Denenberg would publish his friend's photos, giving details of both their names, etc, if Denenberg did not have permission - though it is possible. However, the only way to know for sure is to ask either one of them - Steve Denenberg gives his email address on his own website: thinhippo. SilkTork (talk) 23:30, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
- I'll contact Steve to clarify. --Laser brain (talk) 19:05, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
- Did you get a response Laser brain? --TheSandDoctor (talk) 22:47, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:23, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
It is unlikely the Flickr uploader has rights to release this photo under a CC license. The photo was taken on May 4, 1965 by Christopher Kevin Delaney according to the Flickr page; however, it was uploaded by Flickr user Steve Denenberg. Laser brain (talk) 21:14, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- C. Kevin Delaney and Steve Denenberg were friends, and travelled together to see the band, and take photos. It seems unlikely that Denenberg would publish his friend's photos, giving details of both their names, etc, if Denenberg did not have permission - though it is possible. However, the only way to know for sure is to ask either one of them - Steve Denenberg gives his email address on his own website: thinhippo. SilkTork (talk) 16:23, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:23, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
