User talk:Gżdacz
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- 21:32, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 12:54, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
- Image:BraessParadox2.svg was uncategorized on 20 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:54, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
- Image:BraessParadox1.svg was uncategorized on 20 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:54, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Sztufada wołowa.JPG was uncategorized on 17 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:58, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Sztufada wołowa 2.JPG was uncategorized on 17 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:58, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!Dear Gżdacz, Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012. Kind regards, |
- Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 07:10, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
zatoka Pucka, NAC
[edit]Moje zdolności edytorskie co do map ograniczają się do "kopiuj-wklej", więc nie przekraczają poziomu niedoświadczonego amatora. Nie podejmę się dodawania innych rezerwatów, doradzałbym poszukania w polskiej Wiki kogoś, kto umie i kto lubi rysować mapy (nasuwa mi się tu np. wikipedysta Malarz).
Co do NAC: nie jestem prawnikiem, nie mam pojęcia co ustawodawca miał na myśli pisząc o "wyraźnym zastrzeżeniu". Doradzam posługiwanie się zdrowym rozsądkiem przy publikowaniu fotografii: w Wikipedii (a szczególnie w Commons) sporo jest oszołomów, którzy przyczepić się mogą do każdej fotografii, ale nikt cię nie wsadzi do więzienia, jeśli popełnisz jakiś błąd. Najbezpieczniej jest zamieszczać skany z konkretnych publikacji, jeśli upłynęło już te ustawowe 70 lat, bo obróbka zdjęć (usuwanie logo) NAC ze zdjęć - nawet jeśli są identyczne z tymi, które zostały kiedyś wydrukowane - może być przez kogoś potraktowane jako wykorzystanie innego źródła niż to drukowane.
Sam musisz rozwiązać te dylematy, nie oczekuj, że zapalę Ci zielone światło i powiem: rób tak, albo rób inaczej. Muszę Ci powiedzieć, że - szczególnie w Commons - można spotkać się z takimi idiotyzmami, że nie sposób przewidzieć, jaki będzie los przesłanego obrazka. No ale z drugiej strony na razie przynajmniej nie ma lepszej metody, więc musimy się z tymi "specami" od polskiego prawa męczyć (choćby oni byli w rzeczywistości australijskimi gimnazjalistami albo amerykańskimi farmerami).
Julo (talk) 07:24, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
NAC
[edit]Przepraszam, że dopiero teraz odpowiadam. Ilustracje ładowane na Commons przycinam i tak uzyskuję efekt końcowy. Pozdrawiam Tomasz Wachowski (talk) 06:01, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Praga 1867.png
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Praga 1867.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 15:43, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
Löschtroll
[edit]Mach mal lieber was vernünftiges, als die Arbeit anderer Benutzer zu nichte und nur Löschanträge zu stellen. Typisch Polnisch. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2.201.2.188 (talk) 06:32, 29 June 2016 (UTC) Das Problem ist, dass es sich hier um keine "Arbeit anderer Benutzer" handelte, sondern um die Arbeit der echten Autoren, die mittels falscher Angaben gestohlen wurde. Gżdacz (talk) 07:11, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
File:Orzeł NAC.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Dd1495 (talk) 08:22, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Szczekociny 01 AB.png
[edit]Dzięki za uwagę! :) Przy okazji dodałem W24. Pozdrawiam! --Chepry (talk) 22:27, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
Logo ANRB VAKB
[edit]Dear User, You proposed the logo NRAB VAKB for deletion and this has been done. The reason you gave was 'copyvio'. Can you explain this to me? A logo can be nothing else, I suppose, than copyvio. I can no longer see who added the logo to Wikimedia Commons. I think I can ask the owner of the logo to add the logo again. Can you help me in this? Best regards, Andries Van den Abeele (talk) 09:34, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Andries Van den Abeele: Dear Andries, Some logos exist here because they are assumed not to be complex enough (text and simple geometric shapes) to pass the threshold of originality required to be protected by copyrights, or are old enough for their copyright to have expired. Neither of the two is the case for the logo of NRAB VAKB. Of course you can ask the owner for permission, but this would effectively mean that their logo is published under Creative Commons license, so that anyone can use it for any purpose, modified or unmodified. I strongly doubt if they will agree. Gżdacz (talk) 10:01, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
Zgłoszenie usunięcia pliku: Skan mapki z książki "Wojna polska 1918 - 1921"
[edit]Zgłosił Pan do usunięcia przesłany przeze mnie plik [1], który jest skanem mapki z książki Adam Przybylski (1896 - 1945), Wojna Polska 1918 ― 1921. Warszawa: Wojskowy Instytut Naukowo - Wydawniczy, 1930.
Skan pochodził z wersji online tej książki z zasobów Wielkopolskiej Biblioteki Cyfrowej, później został zastąpiony przez nieco lepszy z zasobów biblioteki cyfrowej Polona.pl. Biblioteka Polona.pl sama opatruje książkę oznaczeniem przynależności do Domeny Publicznej. Argument za usunięciem pliku był taki, że zastosowana licencja (PD-Polish) ma zastosowanie tylko do fotografii, a nie do rysunków. Zastąpiłam ją przez (PD-scan|PD-old-70|deathyear=1945). Czy tak będzie dobrze? Z uszanowaniem, Elżbieta Kossecka (talk) 22:29, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
Czy może bardziej odpowiednia byłaby licencja (PD-Art|PD-old-70|deathyear=1945)? Należy mieć na uwadze, że autor książki Adam Przybylski niekoniecznie sam wykonywał rysunki mapek do niej w wersji przeznaczonej do druku; raczej wydawnictwo zlecało to anonimowemu kreślarzowi. Ale koncepcja tych rysunków - jako że był autorem książki - należała z pewnością do niego, więc też Jego podaję jako ich autora. Elżbieta Kossecka (talk) 22:51, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
- Witaj przyjacielu. Jaki jest kłopot z tym plikiem? Wydano przed 1930, udostępniono na wolnej licencji? --Gruzin (talk) 10:46, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
Chyba coś ci się pomyliło. Ten plik ma zezwolenie na wykorzystywanie do celów niekomercyjnych i link do strony, na której jest pozwolenie do jego wykorzystania znajduje się w opisie pliku (Korzystanie z serwisu Geoportalu. Na Coomons jest około tysiąca plików wykorzystanych z tego serwisu. Jeśli coś jest nie tak z licencją - to popraw licencję a nie zgłaszaj do usunięcia legalnie wstawionego pliku. Selso (talk) 08:18, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!
[edit]Dear Wikimedian,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2023 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 1 will end on UTC.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2022 Picture of the Year contest.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:05, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!
[edit]Read this message in your language
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2023.
Round 2 will end at UTC.
If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 16 October 2024 (UTC)