Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/04/05

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive April 5th, 2018
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

source=http://nprillinois.org/post/illinois-gridlock-and-rise-trump-third-party-candidate-sees-opportunity-2018#stream/0 Mpen320 (talk) 01:22, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'll delete the user's last remaining uploads as copyright violation as well. Taivo (talk) 07:03, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is owned by Cook County. There is nothing that says you can distribute it just because it's the government. https://www.cookcountyil.gov/person/bridget-gainer-0 Mpen320 (talk) 01:24, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Licensereview failed. Taivo (talk) 06:52, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a headshot from a Fox News report which is likely owned by a professional photographer or Fox Mpen320 (talk) 01:33, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 06:55, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is credited to Stacey Wescott by the Chicago Tribune http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/chicagoinc/ct-met-wrestler-gov-1015-chicago-inc-20171013-story.html Mpen320 (talk) 01:34, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Although the image did not originate from me, I did screenshot it and downloaded the screenshot. It is not my intention to use copyrighted material. This has happened multiple times.


 Deleted, small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 07:00, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://www.pantagraph.com/blm-loc-kashjackson/image_4a1260e1-776c-5da1-a950-dd0f6f4ac88b.html Mpen320 (talk) 01:37, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Licensereview failed. Taivo (talk) 06:58, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This appears to be a headshot circulated amongst newspapers. It is highly doubtful that this individual both has the copyright and is freely distributing it. Mpen320 (talk) 01:40, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 06:56, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photographs of the Illinois General Assembly are copyrighted to the Illinois General Assembly Mpen320 (talk) 01:42, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 06:54, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Google Image Search demonstrates not their own work}} Mpen320 (talk) 01:46, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 06:50, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is his photo from http://www.cassidyandfishman.com/speakers/garry-mccarthy/ Mpen320 (talk) 01:50, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Licensereview failed. Taivo (talk) 06:48, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://www.gfoa.org/paul-vallas Mpen320 (talk) 01:51, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Licensereview failed. Taivo (talk) 06:49, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

grabbed from Facebook (see exif-data: FBMD01...), Personal image. Migebert (talk) 07:55, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:13, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader is a paid editor. This is very unlikely to be their own work as is claimed Smartse (talk) 12:45, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:03, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Out of project scope‎. ~Moheen (keep talking) 19:42, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Image taken by the Sustainable Sanitation Alliance. The image shows a women working in Bangladesh and, per flickr album description, it shows that "In April-May 2009, GTZ Bangladesh carried out a feasibility study on single use disposable toilet bags in Mymensingh Pourashava. Three poor urban communities were selected, from which 100 participants were chosen to test the bags. Per this, mage is not an personal photo, and not being in use is not a reason to delete. Or would the DR requester Moheen Reeyad care to delete the images, File:Road crossing (16486890923).jpg, File:Bakarkhani (14026687428).jpg, File:Domestic water use (14026712649).jpg, File:Woman of Nepal (13060777254).jpgand File:Goose (9357976179).jpg, with the same subject, uploaded by him? Tm (talk) 22:27, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination --~Moheen (keep talking) 05:27, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

same copyvio as last upload by same editor: http://www.mumbaimetronews.com/2018/01/16/director-shyamal-k-mishra-exclusive-interview-by-publish-media/ The Mighty Glen (talk) 16:38, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ronhjones at 00:37, 6 April 2018 UTC: Previously deleted file File:Shyamal K Mishra.jpg --Krdbot 06:37, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

grab from Facebook, another image of the same subject was deleted earlier as it was a news image that was falsely claimed as own work by the same uploader, same case applies here too. —SpacemanSpiff 13:29, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image first upload Wikimedia. Then Mr.Shyamal K mishra upload on facebook his image for fun and personal use .Mr.Shyamal K Mishra have not capture this image .This is captured by Rishi Kumar Maurya for use in Articles don't try to delet it. Rishi Kumar Maurya,12 April 2018 (UTC)


 Deleted, source – Facebook. Taivo (talk) 19:10, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, the user's only uploaded photo. Probably not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:19, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 04:24, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong upload of original file from Biblioteca del Congreso Nacional (correct file is uploaded under a JPG file, not a PNG, on https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Camila_Ruzlay_Rojas_Valderrama.jpg ) Sfs90 (talk) 19:55, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ronhjones at 00:34, 6 April 2018 UTC: Previously deleted file File:Camila rojas diputada.png --Krdbot 06:37, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image, a logo of an Israeli nature reserve (actually, as part of an ad), cannot be considered too simple not to be copyrighted. As such, it has no place in the Commons without a specific OTRS release note from the owner. Ldorfman (talk) 00:22, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'll delete file:Neot color heb.jpg due to same reason. These are the uploader's only contributions. Taivo (talk) 11:33, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Martoeg (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope logos.

Дима Г (talk) 00:45, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, by Túrelio with reason "Допусната грешка". Taivo (talk) 11:40, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, non notable person. Дима Г (talk) 01:57, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:45, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, not sure if own work either. Дима Г (talk) 02:02, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, own work is unlikely and the person isn't mentioned in uk.wiki. Taivo (talk) 11:50, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, personal image. Дима Г (talk) 02:08, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Depicted person isn't mentioned in ru.wiki. Taivo (talk) 11:53, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

por que no megusta esta foto Filiberto del angel rivera (talk) 02:54, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 11:57, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Irrelevant logo. Out of Project scope.
*I couldn't find any information on the web about this business. A Google image search ([1]) revealed that the logo is derived from a tire on fire clipart. I was unable to find out the original source, author and license information. --Zaccarias (talk) 03:41, 5 April 2018 (UTC) Zaccarias (talk) 03:41, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, complex logo, MotorsoM is not mentioned in en.wiki. Taivo (talk) 12:04, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong license, it would pass the threshold for originality anyways. Ionutzmovie (talk) 04:08, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, spam. I'll delete the promotional userpage too. Taivo (talk) 13:29, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Template:PD-FLGov explicitly doesn't apply to the state lottery Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:51, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Corrected the license to the proper one. – Illegitimate Barrister (talkcontribs), 04:52, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DELETED|superseded by file:Logo of the Florida Lottery (1988–2012).png. Taivo (talk) 13:33, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I closed the request speedily, but re-opened it, because Magog the Ogre asked me to do that. Probably he wants to add the newer version for deletion as well. Taivo (talk) 16:33, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: deleted by Taivo. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:50, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Interface symbols may be protected. Also likely out of project scope. Schlurcher (talk) 05:38, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 13:50, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Valokuvassa oleva teos on tekijän oikeuksien alainen Leokeke (talk) 06:11, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Also no freedom of panorama in Finland for sculptures. Taivo (talk) 13:55, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope personal pic kept in a sandbox. E4024 (talk) 06:37, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I nominated the sandbox for deletion in en.wiki. Taivo (talk) 14:06, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope personal image. I found this in Category:Biographies. Colleagues with time for some clean up, other than that category, the cats like "Images", "Profile pictures", "Singer", "Actresses" etc are waiting your attention. Thank you. E4024 (talk) 06:41, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 14:09, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:36, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata. I'll delete file:Akshay1798.jpg due to same reason. These are the uploader's only contributions. Depicted Akshay Prakash is not mentioned in en.wiki. Taivo (talk) 14:12, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:40, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, out of scope. Source – Facebook. Taivo (talk) 14:14, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:42, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, out of scope. Source – Facebook. Taivo (talk) 14:16, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope. Currently used on a promotional user page Gbawden (talk) 07:43, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, spammy userpage is deleted. Taivo (talk) 14:18, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DawoodQuraishi3 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal type photos, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 07:47, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 14:20, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:47, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 14:22, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused duplicate/work in progress version of File:Nosislav.svg TFerenczy (talk) 07:51, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 14:26, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The rendering of the SVG-file was wrong Roderich Kahn (talk) 08:54, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 15:00, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Détenteur du droit d'auteur © Nicholas Harvey 2011 All Rights Reserved, autorisation de l'auteur nécessaire, voir Commons:OTRS/fr Shev123 (talk) 16:20, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  1.  Support Violation des droits d'auteurs. --KAPour les intimes 09:58, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:37, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Scope Perumalism Chat 09:02, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'll delete all contributions of the uploader as copyvios from Facebook. Taivo (talk) 13:47, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Scope Perumalism Chat 09:14, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'll delete most of his other uploads due to same reason. They are all used in hi.wiki userpage, but this does not count, because Krishnaveni. 172 (talk · contribs) has no edits there outside userspace. Taivo (talk) 14:02, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate image Contribuidor da Wikipédia (talk) 10:28, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, the image cannot be deleted due to that reason, because it is used in multiple projects. Taivo (talk) 14:08, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deriviative work. ~Cybularny Speak? 10:41, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Rolling Stone special edition cover. Taivo (talk) 14:35, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution, Facebook metadata. ~Cybularny Speak? 11:00, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 15:28, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

above the threshold of originality SecretName101 (talk) 11:01, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, source – Facebook. Taivo (talk) 15:31, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

above the threshold of originality SecretName101 (talk) 11:01, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, source – Facebook. Taivo (talk) 15:32, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

picture collection from 4 pictures, out of project scope Motopark (talk) 12:01, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:15, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Out of project scope‎. ~Moheen (keep talking) 11:03, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 15:34, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TanvirH (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copied from Facebook, Metadata has "FBMD" mark. Please upload the original files, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. And the others are unused personal photos. Out of project scope‎.

~Moheen (keep talking) 11:09, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, two first files as copyvios from Facebook and two last files as out of scope: unused personal files. Taivo (talk) 15:38, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from Facebook, Metadata has "FBMD" mark. Please upload the original files, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. ~Moheen (keep talking) 11:05, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:07, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong file uploaded SecretName101 (talk) 11:26, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 16:09, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

アップロードミスにより Kitakyusyunohito (talk) 12:26, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom. Corrupt file. --E4024 (talk) 12:28, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 17:13, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. File is nothing but raw text. Appears to be fanfiction or an original story or something, possibly written by the uploader. IagoQnsi (talk) 17:13, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:59, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Mys_721tx (talk) 01:45, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Out of project scope‎. ~Moheen (keep talking) 18:09, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:03, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work Tomas62 (talk) 18:29, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:03, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Out of project scope‎. ~Moheen (keep talking) 18:29, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:02, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Out of project scope‎. ~Moheen (keep talking) 18:30, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:02, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Out of project scope‎. ~Moheen (keep talking) 18:30, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:01, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Out of project scope‎. ~Moheen (keep talking) 18:30, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:01, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Out of project scope‎. ~Moheen (keep talking) 18:37, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:01, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Out of project scope‎. ~Moheen (keep talking) 18:38, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:01, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Out of project scope‎. ~Moheen (keep talking) 18:38, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:01, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Out of project scope‎. ~Moheen (keep talking) 18:41, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:00, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low graphical quality (especially resolution) and oddly tilted. Category:Amino sugars has several high-quality replacements for this chemical, including File:Alpha-D-Galactosamin.svg that is in the same style. DMacks (talk) 19:06, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:59, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very low-resolution file. Seems not own work. ~Moheen (keep talking) 19:11, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:59, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution, no metadata, exists [2]. According to username, uploader was connected with that company. It's unlikely that Commons was the first place where they published their photo and that uploader is an actual copyright holder. ~Cybularny Speak? 19:25, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:57, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ifagun (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photo. Out of project scope‎.

~Moheen (keep talking) 19:34, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:57, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Out of project scope‎. ~Moheen (keep talking) 19:34, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:56, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Riyadmahmud480 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photo. Out of project scope‎.

~Moheen (keep talking) 20:02, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:56, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Commons95 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All photos coming from social networks profiles. I've found some o'them on Facebook, but others have a watermark, etc. Most probably everything is copyvio.

Ruthven (msg) 20:37, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:52, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably a copyright infringement NearEMPTiness (talk) 21:19, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:56, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission from the photographer. Picture is not old enough for PD-old. Jcb (talk) 21:21, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:56, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Monir Crazy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope – not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader).

hiàn 21:28, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:54, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

source is unclear Kokkarani (talk) 23:37, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:53, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, personal image, Дима Г (talk) 00:34, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:59, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gajananhubele (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope, personal images.

Дима Г (talk) 00:36, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:59, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope logo. Дима Г (talk) 00:42, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 08:00, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope logo. Дима Г (talk) 00:50, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 08:00, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mary3033 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope.

Дима Г (talk) 01:53, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 08:00, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong license, it would pass the threshold for originality anyways. Ionutzmovie (talk) 04:07, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. This is not a simple logo. Taivo (talk) 13:26, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 08:01, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, personal image, Дима Г (talk) 06:19, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Depicted person isn't mentioned neither in en.wiki, ru.wiki nor in uk.wiki. Taivo (talk) 14:01, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 08:02, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Swedishminara

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Swedishminara (talk · contribs):

Small photos and mostly without metadata. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 06:26, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 08:02, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Has been DR'ed before by problematic user names and reverted per DENY. Uploaded by a one time user, it looks quite out of scope and not used. Got no idea why the description says "Allahu akbar". We will not lose anything for deleting this. E4024 (talk) 06:31, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 08:03, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Somedream

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Somedream (talk · contribs):

Unused photos with unclear notability, maybe out of project scope. Mostly small photos, metadata is always missing, copyright violation is possible too. Taivo (talk) 07:50, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 08:04, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Dickie Marx

[edit]

Here are both contributions of Dickie Marx (talk · contribs):

Dickie Marx isn't mentioned in en.wiki and article project about him was rejected there. The photos about him are out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 08:34, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 08:05, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Tuliovieira

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Tuliovieira (talk · contribs):

Small photos without metadata. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:39, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 08:05, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Wallace-it-up

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Wallace-it-up (talk · contribs):

Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 08:46, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 08:05, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Saratgt12

[edit]

Here are both uploads of Saratgt12 (talk · contribs):

Unused personal photos, out of project scope. Depicted person is unidentified. Taivo (talk) 08:59, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete - I remember having already voted to delete these OoS personal promotion images. --E4024 (talk) 09:04, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 08:06, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Out of scope. ~Cybularny Speak? 10:31, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 08:06, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope logo. ~Cybularny Speak? 10:36, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 08:06, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work. Cover? ~Cybularny Speak? 10:38, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 08:06, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nitish Kumar Mehta (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 13:12, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 08:12, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nicholas Gemini (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low quality penis photo.

-mattbuck (Talk) 08:43, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Commons is not an amateur porn site PierreSelim (talk) 08:38, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Nicholas Gemini (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivative works of products/packaging/promotions/posters/similar

Эlcobbola talk 19:21, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per discussion. --Krd 08:05, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nicholas Gemini (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No COM:FOP in Italy, artists' permissions needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:00, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 16:07, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Character4Sale (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:42, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 08:21, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is clearly not the uploader's "own work", and so the uploader was in no position to grant a license. Perhaps this is public-domain material for some other reason, but no such other reason has been presented. NewYorkActuary (talk) 03:54, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 12:04, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is clearly not the uploader's "own work", and so the uploader was in no position to grant a license. Perhaps this is public-domain material for some other reason, but no such other reason has been presented. NewYorkActuary (talk) 03:57, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 12:04, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:47, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 08:21, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lilian89 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons:Derivative works from anime/manga/comics.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:55, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 08:21, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lilian89 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused Wikipedia screenshots.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:33, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Magog the Ogre: hola, lo siento, pero no entiendo la razón de borrarlas, quiero decir, son capturas de pantalla que había pensado usar para ilustrar mi paso por wikipedia. pero en fin, si cometí algún error, pues nada me disculpo, de todo se aprende y no volverá a pasar. solo una pregunta por qué dice que fueron subidos por otro usuario (36swagga)? las he subido yo desde mi cuenta, es solo curiosidad. gracias Lilian89 (talk) 15:46, 22 July 2018 (UTC)pd: lo siento si este no es el lugar para responder, no soy muy diestra por estos lares. saludos.[reply]
@Lilian89: Pedí que fueran borrados por que no estás usándolos.
No puse 36swagga; fue un error cometido por la herramienta que uso. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:23, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Magog the Ogre ya entiendo, es bueno saber y lección aprendida, supongo que corresponde borrarlas entonces, no pasa nada igual ahora que lo pienso no era muy correcto usarlas. es que pensé que había faltado alguna de las normas de commons, que tengas lindo día entones. saludos Lilian89 (talk) 16:33, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Lilian89: no violaste una norma de por sí. Es que normalmente borramos las imágenes que solamente sirven para utilizarse en la página de usuario, y que no se usan ahora. Si quieres usarlas, no es un problema mantenerlas. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:34, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 20:14, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. E4024 (talk) 16:01, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 08:22, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Draft:Siedd has been declined in EN:WP. Out of scope. E4024 (talk) 16:11, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 08:22, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Till (talk) 19:17, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 08:23, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is clearly not the uploader's "own work", and so the uploader was in no position to grant a license. Perhaps this is public-domain material for some other reason, but no such other reason has been presented. NewYorkActuary (talk) 03:56, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 12:10, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As noted by the uploader themselves, this is not the uploader's "own work" and so the uploader was in no position to grant a license. Perhaps this is public-domain material for some other reason, but no such other reason has been presented. NewYorkActuary (talk) 03:59, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 12:06, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As noted by the uploader themselves, this is not the uploader's "own work" and so the uploader was in no position to grant a license. Perhaps this is public-domain material for some other reason, but no such other reason has been presented. NewYorkActuary (talk) 03:59, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 12:07, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image can be found on numerous other sites, such as https://www.facebook.com/khrystyna.soloviy/videos/1945123589033904/. Needs evidence that license is valid. --ghouston (talk) 03:19, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 14:14, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Не несёт энциклопедической ценности Eg0rk0t323 (talk) 05:21, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I agree, especially because "прибамбас" is not mentioned in ru.wiki. Taivo (talk) 13:47, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 14:15, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too sophisticated logo for PD. ~Cybularny Speak? 10:55, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 14:16, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work made 8 years after his death. E4024 (talk) 13:49, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 14:18, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Own work" after death. One of two suspicious uploads by one user who did not upload anything else. E4024 (talk) 13:51, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 14:18, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 14:18, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Elowis3 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, out of scope. Although these photos are in use this is a result of vandalism on the Spanish Wikipedia. trying to get someone to help with that

Gbawden (talk) 10:06, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete all of them. Just for vandalism. It's just about somebody who thinks he's funny. --Ravave (talk) 15:29, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Elowis3 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 13:14, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 15:41, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Saprissa18

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Saprissa18 (talk · contribs):

Small photos without metadata. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 07:13, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 17:29, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Smok Bazyli

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Smok Bazyli (talk · contribs):

First group. Small photos and mostly without metadata. If camera data exist, then mostly different. One historical photo, one is credited to another person. I suspect not own work, but different photographers' copyright violation. I did not nominate photos takein with Nikon 90 and Nikon 5000, which are likely own work.

Second group. Source site has license "At copying of materials of a site the active hyperlink on a source is obligatory." How to use it in printed materials? Taivo (talk) 07:18, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 17:30, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Sakincalimimar

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Sakincalimimar (talk · contribs):

Mostly small photos without metadata. Uploader has been blocked for uploading copyvios. I suspect copyright violation again. Taivo (talk) 07:28, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 17:33, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Shoaib74444

[edit]

Here are last remaining photos uploaded by Shoaib74444 (talk · contribs):

Mostly small photos, metadata is always missing, one comes from Facebook. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 07:38, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 17:34, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Sujit Tomar

[edit]

Sujit Tomar (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

First group. Small photos and mostly without camera data. I suspect not own work, but different photographers' copyright violation.

Second group. Unused photos about uploader himself, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 08:52, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 17:36, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Poresh

[edit]

Poresh (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

Mostly small photos and always without camera data. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:23, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:42, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Gervaisjc

[edit]

Gervaisjc (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

Historical photos, not own work and not enough old to assume public domain without evidence. If some of these photos are anonymous – how do you know, that they are anonymous? Taivo (talk) 08:29, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:46, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Ostry45

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Ostry45 (talk · contribs):

If camera data exist, then always different, one file comes from Facebook. I suspect not own work, but different photographer's copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:51, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:46, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Zakin13

[edit]

Zakin13 (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

Camera data is different and often missing. Some posters and complex logos (threshold of originality is low in Australia). Taivo (talk) 09:05, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:46, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Yombangue

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Yombangue (talk · contribs):

Mostly small photos without camera data, some files come from Facebook. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:15, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:47, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Nantanan Qst

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Nantanan Qst (talk · contribs):

Mostly small photos without metadata. Probably not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:31, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:48, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Valery of Buenos Aires

[edit]

Images of a photoshoot - commons is not a photoalbum. On another note the author on flickr has changed the copyright status to all rights reserved

Gbawden (talk) 12:54, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete them all. No useful contribution. Someone must tell these young women that the road to fame does not pass through Commons. --E4024 (talk) 13:58, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Jeff, I added Category:Female models to her cat (and a COM:PACKAGING item to my uploads gallery :)... --E4024 (talk) 14:07, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
FYI, her cat is Category:Valery of Buenos Aires. Enjoy your upside down Şehriye.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 17:26, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Non-notable mode, out of scope. Jeff, please stop uploading random flickr models to Commons. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:02, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by CJGC (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own work. At least one is from the internet - http://blog.toyota.co.uk/toyota-mirai-greentomatocars

Gbawden (talk) 13:11, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:03, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong license, it would pass the threshold for originality anyways. Ionutzmovie (talk) 04:06, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 18:58, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of LOGGING TRUCKS CHECKING IN AT THE OXFORD PAPER MILL AT RUMFORD ON THE ANDROSCOGGIN RIVER - NARA - 550707.jpg, but with slightly different supporting info; several similar cases are in https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:NARA_images_of_the_Androscoggin_River and https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Rumford_Mill JiriMatejicek (talk) 06:32, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ugh? what? What kind of request is this? any reason? Artix Kreiger (talk) 13:15, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The reason was clearly stated: it is a duplicate of another image. JiriMatejicek (talk) 10:35, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: I've redirected all the duplicate files to the original. Jiri, in the future you can use {{Duplicate}} rather than filing a DR. Artix, try not to be rude when you upload a duplicate and someone notices. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:58, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo is previously published at http://www.bollywoodgallery.xyz/suchhi-kumar-the-international-model-actor-rocking-journey-toward-fame/ and multiple other places online. An OTRS ticket is required. Diannaa (talk) 12:29, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:58, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User:RobertsHollywood is the copyright owner Robert Strom? How do we know? E4024 (talk) 13:37, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'll delete file:VirginiaOBrien-500x500.jpg due to same reason. If Robert Ström will send OTRS-permission, then the files can be restored. Taivo (talk) 19:50, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Davidjose365 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:41, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'll delete his other contributions due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 19:53, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Own work" from the 40s of the past century. Dubious. E4024 (talk) 13:41, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 19:48, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Maximum023 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos and video. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:48, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:59, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Raef farouuk ahmed hafez (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:50, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:58, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:59, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PNG conversion of File:Nokia Lumia 520 Black.jpg. Inferior and redundant to the JPEG original, not as useful on Wikipedia. Ytoyoda (talk) 19:14, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:01, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicates LaGuardia Airport - panoramio (8).jpg epicgenius (talk) 22:13, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Next time, just use {{Duplicate}} rather than filing a DR. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:00, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicates LaGuardia Airport - panoramio (11).jpg epicgenius (talk) 22:13, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:00, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicates LaGuardia Airport - panoramio (4).jpg epicgenius (talk) 22:14, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:00, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicates LaGuardia Airport - panoramio (6).jpg epicgenius (talk) 22:15, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:00, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of LaGuardia Airport - panoramio (5).jpg epicgenius (talk) 22:15, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:00, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of LaGuardia Airport - panoramio (3).jpg epicgenius (talk) 22:16, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:00, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of LaGuardia Airport - panoramio (2).jpg epicgenius (talk) 22:16, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:00, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of LaGuardia Airport - panoramio (1).jpg epicgenius (talk) 22:16, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:00, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of LaGuardia Airport - panoramio (10).jpg epicgenius (talk) 22:17, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:00, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Djm1973

[edit]

Djm1973 (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

Small photos and (with one exception) without camera data. Some files come from Facebook. Probably different photographers' copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:03, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Most of these photos are ones I've taken but uploaded to Facebook and deleted the original. I am the senior pastor of First Baptist Church of Sutton, and the admin of the Facebook page as for First Church in Charlestown. Contact Pastor Erik Maloy erik@fccharlestown.com and he will tell you that I have permission to those pictures and was given permission to create their wiki page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Djm1973 (talk • contribs)

This permission should be sent to our permissions department. Please open COM:OTRS page and look, what kind of e-mail should be sent into permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Permission must come from copyright holder (usually the photographer or his/her heir), so apparently multiple permission e-mails is needed, because different people are here copyright holders of different photos. Taivo (talk) 14:57, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:31, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 2islands Inc. (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Official photos, used on adverts and announcements eg. on Facebook.

~Cybularny Speak? 10:50, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:31, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Re-upload. E4024 (talk) 12:05, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:32, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is this the same file that was recently deleted? E4024 (talk) 07:09, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 15:58, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Re-upload. E4024 (talk) 12:07, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:32, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of LaGuardia Airport - panoramio (9).jpg epicgenius (talk) 22:19, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Pi.1415926535 at 20:00, 12 April 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:New York LaGuardia Airport (8273041674).jpg --Krdbot 00:29, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Monument created by Vyacheslav Klokov (Вячеслав Клоков), sculptor, who died in 2007 and by Anatoly Ignashchenko (Анатолий Игнащенко), architect, who died in 2011. Undelete in 2082. Дима Г (talk) 04:16, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:45, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical books. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:46, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:48, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Tatiana Matlina (talk · contribs)

Bogus licenses; whatever the copyright status of the coins, the photographs of the coins also have a copyright per Commons:When_to_use_the_PD-Art_tag#Photograph_of_an_old_coin_found_on_the_Internet. The websites from which these images were taken are all "© All rights reserved"

Эlcobbola talk 20:42, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Tatiana Matlina (talk · contribs)

Per {{PD-Cuba}}, government works have perpetual copyright. These are also contemporary coins (1997 and 2001 minting dates)

Эlcobbola talk 16:06, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Tatiana Matlina (talk · contribs)

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Belarus. Created in 1990s.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


There is no FOP in Belarus -FASTILY 01:23, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Tatiana Matlina (talk · contribs)

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Belarus. Painter(s) information is necessary to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    • Правила гласят про ограниченную форму свободы обзора: изображения защищенных авторским правом архитектурных работ, фотосъемок или работ изобразительного искусства (который включает скульптуры и статуи), которые постоянно расположены в публично доступных местах, могут быть изданы, только если изображенная защищенная авторским правом основная работа не основной предмет изображения, и изображение в некоммерческих целях.

Я считаю, что в файле File:Paintings in Church of Saints Simon and Helena 04.JPG витражи не являются основным предметом изображения. Цвет стёкол в окне-"розе" мало различим вообще, а два цветных окна в правом углу - также не основной предмет. Живописная картина запечатлена в совершенно нерезком качестве и не составляет даже 1/6 от площади фотографии.

Также, качество изображения витражей и живописи в файлах File:Paintings in Church of Saints Simon and Helena 05.JPG и File:Stained-glass windows in Church of Saints Simon and Helena 02.jpg также является весьма посредственным и нерезким, что никак не может содействовать коммерческому использованию этих фото.

Также, помещение этих фотографии на Викисклад не преследует никакой коммерческой цели. Поэтому, моё мнение, что указанные мною три фото не нарушают закон об ограничении панорамы в Республике Беларусь, в отличие от фотографий с деревянной резьбой из Красного Костёла или витражей из Пушкинской библиотеки.

Хотя, я бы поспорила насчёт файла File:Stained-glass windows in Library of Pushkin in Minsk 01.JPG, где витражи - не основной предмет изображения, а сфотографирован просто вестибюль библиотеки. Tatiana Matlina (talk) 19:13, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


There is no FOP in Belarus -FASTILY 01:23, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.


Files uploaded by Tatiana Matlina (talk · contribs)

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Russia for 2D works. Artists are know, see w:ru:Киевская (станция метро, Арбатско-Покровская линия).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:14, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Tatiana Matlina (talk · contribs)

No FOP in Belarus

— Racconish💬 10:26, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:16, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Tatiana Matlina (talk · contribs)

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Belarus.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:04, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 09:47, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tatiana Matlina (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious own works: too many (15) different cameras used or no original metadata at all.

Komarof (talk) 17:22, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Комаров, какого лешего ты стал считать мои фотокамеры и лезть в мои фотографии? Тебе больше заняться нечем? Своей жизни нету? Или денег на фотокамеры и телефоны нету??? Ты, идиот, позанимайся столько лет, сколько я, современным искусством, пофотографируй столько художественных выставок, сколько я пофотографировала, а потом лезь модерировать мои работы, бездарь! Лишишь целый культурный пласт их личных фотографий — твою фамилию всё равно никто не запомнит в этой жизни. Как был никем, так и останешься. Еле сдерживаюсь, чтобы матом тут не писать! Герострат хренов! Tatiana Markina 22:38, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
  •  Keep  Neutral Notwithstanding the incivility above, the uploader doesn't really have a track record of lying about "own work". (Some of their photos have been deleted due to FoP, and some of their uploads not claimed to be own work have been deleted for incorrect copyright status, but I can't find any examples of photos which were falsely claimed to be self-photographed.) So unless additional evidence is provided in favor of deletion (such as links to prior publication on an external website), I will default to COM:AGF when they repeat their claims here that the photos are own work. -- King of ♥ 10:48, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete per nom. --A.Savin 20:26, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Всем фантазёрам, которые тут активничают от того, что нет своих личных дел, предлагаю заглянуть в мою личную фотогалерею, которую больше нигде в интернете разместить, кроме Flikr, и сравнить тех, кто на моих фото, с теми фотографиями, которые вы тут собираетесь удалять. Удаляйте свои фото, свой вклад в википедию, а к моему не прикасайтесь! Я потратила годы жизни на то, чтобы найти в реале всех этих людей и сфотографировать. А вы пытаетесь обесценить мою жизнь и стереть. Стирайте свою! https://www.flickr.com/photos/199607278@N04?fbclid=IwAR0AfGRSTISsgQSSY4i0AH5K6ZFtnSHmumPfrQSIg8Hc4j5rAOxno3HTj8A — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tatiana Matlina (talk • contribs)
    Только не надо тут изображать жертву абьюза! Жертва здесь я! Я 10 лет молча терпела, когда вы здесь удаляли мои фото с разрешениями OTPS, добытыми моей кровью, удаляли фото работ художников, которые уже давно находятся в общественном достоянии. Но теперь я молчать не буду! Давайте, удалите меня отсюда! Tatiana Markina 06:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination - too many different cameras -- too many on the Web with copyright notices. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:22, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wikipedia editor User:Wehwalt has suggested here that "most grave markers are not barred, but Krushchev's was custom designed for his grave by an artist in the mid 1970s and has not passed into the public domain." So it is a "derivative artwork" and it seems all the images in this Category should be deleted. Martinevans123 (talk) 17:14, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Russia also has no FoP:

File:Khrushchev's Grave.jpg
File:Krushchev's Grave - panoramio.jpg
File:Russia 3492 - Nikita Khrushchev (4155041489).jpg
File:Могила Хрущева Никиты Сергеевича.jpg
File:Памятник Никите Хрущёву на Новодевичьем кладбище.jpg
File:Хрущев Н.С. могила.JPG
File:Хрущев Никита (2).JPG
File:Хрущев.jpg

Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:19, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

UAE has no FoP ..

Saqib (talk) 17:52, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I do not understand the proposed deletions or how to respond Clémence Jacqueri (talk) 19:58, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
These deletion requests come from the fact that "In almost all countries, art, architecture, and other works are protected by copyright for a specified period." See Commons:Freedom of panorama and Commons:Derivative works. Sadly there is no much that you can do. Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:27, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
What about all other photos in Category:Burj Al Arab an so on? Must they also be deleted? I don't think so. --ProfessorX (talk) 06:22, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as per my comment above. Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:23, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in the UAE

Saqib (talk) 15:49, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Christian Ferrer: can you please delete the first part this DR as well.. --Saqib (talk) 13:03, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:20, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as per my comment above. Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:23, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in the UAE

Saqib (talk) 14:42, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:36, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in the UAE... some of the images can be kept under De Minimis but I am not sure which ones.

Saqib (talk) 08:43, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted most per nomination, kept some as DM - Jcb (talk) 13:54, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in the UAE. some of the photos can be kept under De minimis.

Saqib (talk) 12:52, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: most per nomination and per COM:TOYS, kept some as COM:DM or no derivate work shown. --Wdwd (talk) 11:24, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old picture of me (Luca Aless), uploaded on Commons years ago. The content of the file is not suitable with the purposes of Commons and has no research value. This is why I would like to ask if it could be removed Luca Aless (talk) 16:22, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination (unused personal photo). --Gestumblindi (talk) 23:20, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old picture of me (Luca Aless), uploaded on Commons years ago. The content of the file is not suitable with the purposes of Commons and has no research value. This is why I would like to ask if it could be removed Luca Aless (talk) 16:23, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination (unused personal photo). --Gestumblindi (talk) 23:20, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image taken from National Portrait Gallery website and recently uploaded by a user blocked for sockpuppetry is copyrighted by the URAA, which restored many non-US works in 1996. In this case, it was still copyrighted in 1996 in the UK. Presumably, it was not published in the US within 30 days after first availability in the UK, which to me is unknown. I can say that 1974 would be the first availability year, the same year when the image was given to NPG. Regardless, URAA-restored works recently uploaded cannot be hosted on Commons. -George Ho (talk) 01:53, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, besides the file isn't still PD-old in UK. Ruthven (msg) 02:13, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In this form unusable (no context, better as a table, no file description). Thus, out of project scope. Schlurcher (talk) 05:36, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 02:17, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mario Rosati is born in 1949. No freedom of panorama in Italy. 82.216.33.207 07:53, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 02:16, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mario Rosati is born in 1949. No freedom of panorama in Italy. 82.216.33.207 07:55, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 02:16, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious "own work" without metadata. Unused. E4024 (talk) 07:58, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination + OoS. Ruthven (msg) 02:17, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© Centro Studi Pier Paolo Pasolini di Casarsa della Delizia. 82.216.33.207 08:01, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-Italy. Ruthven (msg) 02:15, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Auteur CHARLOTTE SCHOUSBOE, autorisation de l'auteur nécessaire, voir Commons:OTRS/fr Shev123 (talk) 10:34, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 02:17, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Exists elsewhere on the web. ~Cybularny Speak? 10:42, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 02:18, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously published at https://twitter.com/caf_online/status/972054073020223488?s=21 Ytoyoda (talk) 11:30, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 02:18, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Crop of a previously published photo: https://i.pinimg.com/736x/9a/e0/2b/9ae02b10e93970f6c97172568b863f19.jpg Ytoyoda (talk) 11:34, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 02:18, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Détenteur du droit d'auteur ARTFACT FOTOLAB'Z, autorisation de l'auteur nécesaire, voir Commons:OTRS/fr Shev123 (talk) 11:44, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 02:18, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Erkki.lyly (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos tagged as own work. Without providing correct author and source it's impossible to clarify copyright status.

~Cybularny Speak? 11:50, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A correct author is now provided on all photos. The photos are from our Family album and taken by our fathers camera. We are first time making an article for the Wikipedia and made a mistake. Hopefully things are good now. Ilkka and Erkki Lyly

As the photos have been taken before 1968, they are eligible for {{PD-Finland50}}. No need to delete. --Lentokonefani (talk) 06:37, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per -Lentokonefani. Ruthven (msg) 02:22, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image was previously published at https://mikokings.wordpress.com/ and elsewhere online. An OTRS ticket is required. Diannaa (talk) 12:47, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: OTRS authorisation needed from the author. Ruthven (msg) 02:23, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

N'est plus a jour avec une demande d'oublie stargatewar (talk) 13:45, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. Ruthven (msg) 02:25, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 02:27, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize I’m new to adding media on wiki. I thought they accepted free-copy work as well, I will delete it. How do is delete the file? If you know how to please feel free to do so.


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 02:27, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shaparak2014 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 02:27, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://www.binance.com/ Petrov Victor (talk) 17:10, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Simple logo. Ruthven (msg) 02:29, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

UAE has no FoP but I'm not sure if this one is okay or not. Saqib (talk) 17:37, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: it's fine, it's a general view. Ruthven (msg) 02:30, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

UAE has no FoP Saqib (talk) 17:37, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: the sea is not copyrightable. Ruthven (msg) 02:32, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

UAE has no FoP Saqib (talk) 17:37, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 02:33, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Kevin Chomat : out of COM:SCOPE Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:28, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Can be used to illustrate filmmaking, or the model of camera, etc. Ruthven (msg) 02:35, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1967 film, 70 years have not passed. Bultro (talk) 21:34, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 02:36, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Any reason to be PD. Besides, not found at URL nor https://www.delcampe.net/fr/collections/search?search_mode=all&excluded_terms=&term=Bab+Diwan&show_type=all&display_ongoing=&started_days=&started_hours=&ended_hours=&display_only=&min_price=&max_price=&currency=&seller_localisation=&view=&order=sale_start_datetime Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:39, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Finaly, perhaps PD-Tunisia : i've added the template. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:46, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawal. Ruthven (msg) 02:35, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Danidamiobi as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: <Image is blur and may not find a use on a Wiki project>

That's not a valid speedy reason. But I do think this image is poor. Best I can tell it is from en:University of Ilorin, but it is blurry enough that it's a poor representation of that school and likewise poor of...whatever plant or other objects are here. DMacks (talk) 05:06, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: failed photo, unusable. P 1 9 9   18:01, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

与其他图片完全重复,有一个类似的但不完全相同的页面 File:Hard sleeper compartment on YW25G 674792 (20150625163119).JPG Tyg728 (talk) 13:52, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: not a duplicate, and this image is better than the suggested alternative. P 1 9 9   18:05, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

good photo, but COM:DW sadly. Krd 14:16, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep:ich glaube nicht, dass das Fotografieren eines bei einem öffentlichen Konzertes hochgehaltenen Smartphones, das sich im Video-Aufnahmemodus befindet, bereits eine Urheberrechtsverletzung darstellt. I doubt that taking a photo of a smartphone, held up in the air at a public concert and actually working in video recording mode is already a violation of copyright. rs-foto (talk) 15:56, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete:the definition of derivative work is clear and sound and even something as simple as holding up a smartphone at a specific point in time is covered there MarkusFelix (talk) 06:52, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep:Wieso löschen? Auf dem Bild wird jemand gezeigt, der mit seinem Smartphone etwas aufnimmt: Man sieht das komplette Smartphone und dessen Hände, die es bedienen. Damit wird alles Wesentliche erfasst. Da von der Person nur die Hände zu sehen sind, ist noch nicht einmal eine Verletzung von Persönlichkeitsrechten dabei. Das Foto ist selbst erstellt und keine Kopie eines anderen Fotos. Einfach unter "Aufnahme eines Konzertvideos mit Smartphone" taggen und fertig. --Stefan Bollmann (talk) 07:35, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Die Frage ist, ob das Foto die Urheberrechte der Person verletzt, deren Handy zu sehen ist. Liegt vielleicht eine Einwilligung dieser Person vor? This depends on whether this image violates the copyright of the person holding the smartphone. Do we maybe have this person's permission? --Gnom (talk) 10:30, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep:There is no reason for deletion, the main act is the phone, no personality, no urv. keep. --Jörgens.Mi Talk 10:32, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Neutral ja, die Regel zu COM:DW trifft irgenwie zu. Aber ich denke, das sind Spitzfindigkeiten, die in der Praxis nicht angewendet werden. Sonst müssen wir solche Fotos wie File:Coronas blacksheep 2016 6412.jpg auch löschen, denn COM:DW trifft auch hier zu. Die Erlaubnis von denjenigen der das Smartphone gehalten hatte liegt auch nicht vor. Wo sind die Grenzen? Ich würde nicht so viel Wirbel um so ein Bild machen, in der Praxis landet das Video vom Smartphone auf Youtube und Facebook. Natürlich macht es das Unrechtsbewußtsein des einen nicht besser. Gibt es schon Verfahren und Urteile, das solche Bilder als Urheberrechtsverstöße bewertet wurden? --Atamari (talk) 10:40, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    Die Grenzen werden gezogen durch COM:DM. Bei dem hier besprochenen Bild klar überschritten, bei dem von Dir genannten eher nicht. --Krd 15:45, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Neutral schließe der Meinung von Atamari an. --Huhu Uet 11:04, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: DW is a stretch, as per User:Stefan Bollmann. Not really a photo of another photo. P 1 9 9   18:16, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader has yet to prove that he will be a contributing user, to be able to keep a personal pic in his user page. One week is not a very short time to show that will. E4024 (talk) 14:27, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Five global edits in two weeks, two of them being this upload and adding it to user page. Indeed normally I would add a "delete" vote here but I have seen objections in the past. I want to make a clarification on the occasion: Firstly, I proposed deletion with a view to see if the uploader would make an effort to become a real user or not in a week, therefore it is more than legitimate for me to vote, after 13 days now. Secondly, I (and I know several other people also) "open to discussion" a file; proposing it for deletion is not our final view. Last but not the least, IMHO deletion discussions are not -and should not be converted into- a "democracy". This is not about raising hands, it is about arguments. Thanks for the patience, closing admin, I know you're the only one who lost time in reading me. --E4024 (talk) 12:40, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, not a meaningful contributor. His only edits at en.wp were vandalism. P 1 9 9   18:19, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

useless photo for wiki Bestalex (talk) 17:31, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The sign on the building to the right seems to suggest some kind of travel agency or travel insurance office (a train and aeroplane logo, letters say "Kassa", I think? A pay office? I don't speak Russian, have only limited knowledge of Cyrillic letters...) - anyway, it might not be completely uninteresting with a better description? We have to keep in mind that photos on Commons don't necessarily have to be usable "for wiki" (=Wikipedia?) but "realistically useful for an educational purpose" per COM:SCOPE. That also includes potential uses outside our projects. Gestumblindi (talk) 23:27, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It's ticket-office/ticket-shop. --Insider (talk) 07:04, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Well, then... a ticket-office in Nizhny Novgorod, Russia - in scope, I'd say? It's not a beautiful picture, but has a clear subject. Gestumblindi (talk) 20:54, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: in scope as per User:Gestumblindi. P 1 9 9   18:21, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This appears to be a photograph of a vehicle sales brochure, which is likely copyright by Geely. Mindmatrix 17:35, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:22, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

من تمایل ندارم این فایل دیگر در این وبسایت باشد. نیما فریدونی (talk) 19:14, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:23, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image of an event at Concordia University, unfortunately of too-poor quality due to blurring Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:47, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:59, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in France. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:57, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello EugeneZelenko. This is a commemorative plaque of Bernard Dimey (1931-1981), a French poet, that I photographed in front of his house in Paris. It is an amateur carving, offered by a fellow neighbour at the time of his death, and isn't protected by any copyright whatsoever. It's just a moving testament of friendship from a nearby friend. All the best : Tatvam (talk) 16:08, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Even if it was created by amateur, it complicated enough to be copyrighted. However, you could try to get sculptor permission via Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your answer. The amateur sculptor is dead, so what to do? I send you a photograph of the environment in which the file has been taken: http://020952.free.fr/DOWNLOADS/IMAGES/Dimey2.JPG. Do you think this image could be uploaded instead of the other one (I used it on a web site about Montmartre, the Paris neighbourbood in which Bernard Dimey was living). The caption would be about the house, not the carving. Tatvam (talk) 16:25, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Does sculptor have heirs? If so, they could give permission. Yes, photo with bigger surroundings could be used instead, but that particular one too focused on plate. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 19:33, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, if the OTRS-permission will arrive, then the photo can be restored. Taivo (talk) 20:42, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Caio Santanna (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Official symbols. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:08, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, if you have evidence, that the symbols were created before 1983, then they can be restored. Taivo (talk) 20:45, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Avg W (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 20:47, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Falsche Vorlage genutzt / wrong picture used Reinhard Dietrich (talk) 14:31, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 20:49, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files sourced to en-wiki user Crosskimo

[edit]

These are files originally uploaded to en-wiki by en:User:Crosskimo. I've already tagged File:Hossam Ashour.jpg and File:Walid Soliman.jpg for deletion, and also found other problematic images on en-Wiki, including en:File:Ultas Ahlawy 2017.jpg from Getty Images photo and en:File:Ahmed Hamoudi.jpg from Twitter. The user is unreliable at best, and we should avoid transferring files from this user to Commons.

Ytoyoda (talk) 15:04, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 20:51, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It has a watermark on it. Can it still be CR'ed in France? (Less than 120 years, 1904.) E4024 (talk) 15:46, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, if somebody has information about the photographer, then the photo can be restored. Taivo (talk) 20:59, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in this case. This building was designed by Mikhail Parusnikov (Russian: Парусников, Михаил Павлович, 1893—1968). The law of copyright of Belarus requires that the images of architecture become of public domain 50 years after author's death which in this case is 2019. Jarash (talk) 18:17, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 21:04, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo is not by Lt. Jorgensen. His photo was taken at a different angle and can be found here: https://catalog.archives.gov/id/520697 (file:Kissing the War Goodbye.jpg).

This image was taken by Alfred Eisenstaedt for LIFE magazine and is protected by copyright. It should not be listed as public domain. 50.204.127.128 18:45, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, will be undeleted in 2066 (70+1 years from death). Taivo (talk) 21:09, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

нарушение авторских прав Barbarian (talk) 20:34, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Вот еще вам фото: (Pavel Krylov + foto Toyota Prado 150)File:Локомобиль-Тойота-Прадо-150-на-рельсах-001.jpg File:Локомобиль-Тойота-Прадо-150-на-рельсах-001.jpg

нарушение авторских прав PavelKrylov (talk) 06:37, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader confesses copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 21:12, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PHOTOGRAPHY BY JUSTIN HARTLEY 2016 AND LARRAH MELISSA 2017, https://static1.squarespace.com/static/57a562119de4bb16f436476b/57a81839d2b857268eac885a/5aafe67c82908515ad0a8af3/1521477268257/?format=500w Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:11, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 21:14, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{PD-German Empire stamps}} is no longer an accepted license. I could not detect another valid free license. No authorship information on the artwork, no indication that the author would have died before 1948. Jcb (talk) 22:57, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, the stamp is probably in public domain due to age, but without additional information (artist? publication year?) we cannot be sure. Taivo (talk) 21:17, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The medal is a stock design – you can still see a watermark. I have only found it behind a paywall: https://www.123rf.com/photo_12668816_illustration-of-gold-medal.html TFerenczy (talk) 11:10, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 16:06, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Template:PD-FLGov explicitly doesn't apply to universities Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:06, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Works by Florida universities are copyrighted. --Storkk (talk) 10:45, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Template:PD-FLGov explicitly doesn't apply to the Department of Transportation. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:14, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 10:46, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Exif data shows this was taken in 2008, a time when Fairchild was not a board member for the US government. Also shown in this Fall 2011 UVA Alumni Magazine article. Photo is not in the Public Domain. Corky 05:27, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Confirmation from photographer needed via OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 10:47, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems really just a copy of File:Electric potential.png saved in wrong (pdf) file format. Geek3 (talk) 13:40, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Ras67. --Y.haruo (talk) 16:27, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An orphan image, there is a video that has the entire lifespan of Katrina B dash (talk) 03:02, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment "Orphan image" isn't a reason for deletion (there are tons of currently unused images on Commons) and this picture wouldn't seem less relevant and in scope than the others in Category:Satellite pictures of Hurricane Katrina. The fact that there is also a video doesn't mean it's not potentially useful. However, as it seems to be a closer crop of the higher-resolution File:Hurricane Katrina Arrives (4922919159).jpg and there doesn't seem to be a particular reason for keeping that crop, I think we could delete the image. Gestumblindi (talk) 23:15, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:48, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong license, it would pass the threshold for originality anyways. Ionutzmovie (talk) 04:06, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Football is not simple. Should be deleted. Taivo (talk) 12:06, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
In my opinion this is more complex than buckminsterfullerene and so eligible for copyright. Taivo (talk) 10:03, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Should we nominate almost everything in Category:Association football ball drawings as a DW of this? (yes, that question is rhetorical) - Alexis Jazz 18:23, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Own work can stay. Taivo (talk) 20:38, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
So https://imgur.com/a/itFqpL3 would be acceptable (copyright-wise), but this nominated logo isn't. And File:Sozialistische Einheitspartei Deutschlands Logo.svg is also acceptable, because.. It was uploaded years ago I guess? - Alexis Jazz 21:23, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: below TOO in Germany. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:50, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Template:PD-FLGov explicitly doesn't apply to universities Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:51, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep - Fixed the license to the proper ojne. – Illegitimate Barrister (talkcontribs), 04:58, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:51, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Template:PD-FLGov explicitly doesn't apply to universities Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:52, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Corrected the license to the proper one. – Illegitimate Barrister (talkcontribs), 04:53, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
How do you know it was published before 1968? Your work is sloppy. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:55, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no reason to assume it was not published the year it was taken. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:52, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Template:PD-FLGov explicitly doesn't apply to universities Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:53, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: The license has been corrected to the proper one. – Illegitimate Barrister (talkcontribs), 04:55, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
There is no proof this was published before 1968. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:57, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Info This photograph ist hosted twice @ UFCD. The 2nd one is said to be published in 1947. I added both of the source links. --Achim (talk) 16:56, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:52, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Template:PD-FLGov explicitly doesn't apply to universities Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:53, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: The license has been corrected to the proper one. – Illegitimate Barrister (talkcontribs), 04:55, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Do we know this was published before 1968? Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:57, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This photo was published in the University of Florida yearbook while Tigert was UF's president, which was from 1928 to 1947. So, yes. Zeng8r (talk) 22:07, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:52, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Also:

Template:PD-CAGov explicitly doesn't apply to the educational system Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:53, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep - I've fixed the license to the proper one. – Illegitimate Barrister (talkcontribs), 05:28, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Any proof this was published before 1989 without following formalities? Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:00, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:53, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Template:PD-FLGov explicitly doesn't apply to universities Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:53, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep - Fixed the license. – Illegitimate Barrister (talkcontribs), 04:57, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Any proof this was published without formalities? Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:59, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete It says that this was published without a copyright notice and without subsequent copyright registration, but it doesn't say where it was published, so it is not possible to verify that claim. --Stefan2 (talk) 20:54, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no reason to assume it was not published. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:54, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per previous nomination. I don't think this was properly closed. Jcb (talk) 14:44, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The closure statement did not address the nomination by Magog the Ogre or the quite to the point comment of Stefan2. I asked Srittau at their user talk page to reconsider the closure, but they did not respond. I don't think that a mere assumption of publication (without any information on how it was published and without any means of verification) is not sufficient to use {{PD-US-1978-89}}. Maybe Jim has some insights here, as being one of our experts in US copyright? Jcb (talk) 14:50, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete In review, I agree. We have no original source, and it is not even obvious from the page linked in the year that this image is from 1978. Too many uncertainties. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:07, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete per admin Sebari, appreciating the noble attitude. --E4024 (talk) 15:13, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • I do not question the clam in the copyright tag that this was published: it looks like some kind of official photograph which was meant for publication, so it is fairly likely that it was published somewhere. The problem I see is that the copyright tag makes additional statements about the publication, namely that the photograph must have been published without a copyright notice. Americans were probably aware that a copyright notice was required and it was not difficult to include a copyright notice, so I don't think that we can accept a claim that it was published without notice without looking at the publication and for that purpose the publication needs to be identified. --Stefan2 (talk) 16:37, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. --Majora (talk) 02:24, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of 96stambul

[edit]

96stambul (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

First group. Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission.

Second group. Small photos and mostly without metadata. If camera data exist, then always different. I suspect not own work, but different photographers' copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:38, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:06, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Any metadata, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:55, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I havde permission from Sen. Duffy, who sent me the picture after I asked for it. If you would like to verify, here is the email sent to me. Feel free to contact Se. Duffy or his staffer. Mike Duffy <mdduffy@gmail.com>

Subject: How about this? 4630 Happy camper Date: March 20, 2018 at 1:17:52 PM ADT To: Mark Bourrie <mbourrie@yahoo.com>, Melanie Mercer <MELANIEVOS@rogers.com> Jaquestheripper (talk) 14:50, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Jaquestheripper: . When uploading a picture you should fill the File description in an manner that Commons has not to verify itself the accurency of the information enclosed. Besides Commons policy requires that the actual copyright holder (which is almost always the photographer and not the subject), must send a free license directly using COM:OTRS. So you could ask Sen. Duffy to contact his photographer, who shall send directly his/her authorization. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:57, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your help with this. It was my first picture acquistition and upload and, frankly, I found the situation confusing. Duffy apprently commissioned the picture for his web page. Do you think, since he hired the photographer, he might own the rights? Jaquestheripper (talk) 20:18, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Even commissioned the rights remain to the photographer and his/her heirs 70 years after his/her death. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:58, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It's only partially true: if it's a work for hire, the copyright belong to the individual that commissioned the work. @Jaquestheripper: we need a confirmation of the authorisation from the copyright holder via the OTRS service. --Ruthven (msg) 02:25, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: OTRS permission required. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:07, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted: per ticket:2018092810005447. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 15:09, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar to https://www.thebusinessyear.com/Content/interviewee/bb9af307-8139-4893-b71d-d8ee8f81b67e.jpg?anchor=topcenter&mode=crop&w=218&h=238 Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:16, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:08, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]