This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
@Atbannett: Ah yes, so you did, and Ruthven declined the request and then nominated the file for deletion. In that case I think your best course of action is to explain why the picture falls within the scope of Wikimedia Commons, specifically what educational use it's likely to have. If the file is kept you can then request renaming under criterion 1 (uploader request). If you wait for the file to be deleted and then re-upload it under a new name then the new copy is liable to be speedily deleted. --bjh21 (talk) 11:55, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This is a TV snapshot (as you see Haberturk TV logo) and copyrights may obtained by this TV channel. It have a Wrong licensed and copyrighted photo. - chanseyMesajYaz 15:21, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
Delete As reason. chanseyMesajYaz 15:25, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted, by Túrelio with reason "Sorry; I should have speedied this in the first place, as a privacy violation". Educational value wasn't so big anyway. Taivo (talk) 11:06, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Kept, the file has OTRS-permission, so here's no copyright problem, and it's used in multiple projects, so here's no scope problem. Taivo (talk) 11:12, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
License information here is not based on any available information from source I can find (and the uploader hasn't provided evidence), and it's far more likely this is just copyrighted, not CC-BY-SA. (I considered adding a speedy deletion template but I wasn't sure it was "obvious".) Purplewowies (talk) 00:53, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Natalie (the page where this image was found; I'm pretty sure they're just a disseminator, not an author) doesn't seem to have any evidence of a free license. The image is most likely copyrighted by Amuse (the creator/agency of the group) and isn't released under a free license at all. Purplewowies (talk) 05:48, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
There's no proof the uploader is indeed an employee of Doors4Home, so proof uploader has the right to release the image under a free license. And logo is out of scope, not used anywhere. Mbch331 (talk) 08:11, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Image is the logo of Doors4Home's website. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.84.96.214 (talk • contribs) 24 jan 2018 15:55 (UTC)
That still doesn't proof the upload has the rights to release the image under a free license and still isn't used anywhere on a Wikimedia project. Mbch331 (talk) 15:02, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted, the logo is too simple for copyright protection, so it is not a copyright violation. But I'll delete it nevertheless as out of project scope: Doors4home is not mentioned in en.wiki, uploader is indefinitely blocked there due to advertising. Taivo (talk) 15:58, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted, I'll delete them all as copyright violations. 23 Facebook files, 8 unsourced screenshots and 2 complex logos, remaining 14 files are mostly small photos without metadata. Taivo (talk) 17:12, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Not own work. No idea if it was taken by the US Govt so no idea if it's PD but there are enough free images of him here already Gbawden (talk) 10:09, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This looks very much like a professional photo. If User:Metropolia.milan, the uploader is the photographer, we need to have OTRS. No? OTOH, is the uploader same person with with User:Tiberiu.Ilinca? They seem to be uploaders of very similar images. E4024 (talk) 11:09, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted, the same user under different accounts. I'll delete most of his/her uploads as copyright violations. Mostly small photos without metadata. Some Facebook files. 10 photos are credited to another person. One complex logo – looks old, but belongs to organization, which was founded in 1991. Some photos have camera data – 4 different cameras. I'll keep photos taken with KODAK EASYSHARE C713 ZOOM as likely own work. Taivo (talk) 20:17, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
According to SteinsplitterBot, the second one is a re-upload of File:بووم.jpg, which was previously deleted as "Spam" by -revi. I tend to agree with that. The other one, at least in its current state without useful description or categories, appears to be out of scope as well.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
network watermark in lower right corner makes image appear to be a screen-grab, not an original image of the uploader. I suspect that this was uploaded under a false-claim of authorship. SecretName101 (talk) 15:08, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
I would really like to have this photo of me removed. I have no idea why this is here but there is no reason for it to be here. I did not authorize a photo of me to be on Wikipedia 209.160.138.15818:06, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
DR started to verify claimed 'own work': small-sized format, potentially personality right isusses, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Comment: files not in use at Wikimedia projects,
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
I am Sandra Lázaro, author of photography and as indicated by it accreditation it has Copyright, not a CC license. The eldiario.es licence said : http://www.eldiario.es/licencia/ "Estas condiciones tienen las siguientes excepciones: - No se aplica a los contenidos (textos, gráficos, informaciones, imágenes...) publicados por eldiario.es procedentes de terceros que vayan firmados o sean atribuibles a agencias de información (EFE, Europa Press...) o a cualquier otra empresa diferente de Diario de Prensa Digital, S.L. Todos los derechos sobre estos contenidos quedan estrictamente reservados a su titular (la agencia) y, por tanto, no podrán ser reproducidos, distribuidos, transformados o comunicados públicamente sin el consentimiento expreso de su titular. - Los dibujos de los viñetistas también son Creative Commons, aunque no podrán ser reproducidos con fines comerciales (cc-by-nc). " Therefore the works of third parties do not share their license. I request your erase quickly 95.125.169.321:29, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
SpeedyKeep, the only reason cross-wiki troll and globally banned user INeverCry is evading their ban is because people are appeasing his deletionist agenda, this is a user that doesn't create content and only deletes other people's work. As an admin INeverCry / Daphne Lantier never cared about following policy and after being globally banned all he does is nominate stuff for deletion while still trolling people with comments like these. The moment people will stand up against this troll and keep any image they nominate for deletion they will give up. When users who are banned evade their ban to upload useful educational images these get deleted en masse but for some reason these deletion requests are accepted. If Russavia uploads a copyright-free image of an æroplane that is missing on Wikipedia today it will be immediately deleted, so why the double standard for these deletion requests? Sent 📩 from my Microsoft Lumia 950 XL with Microsoft Windows 10 Mobile 📱. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) ("The Chinese Coin Troll" 👿) (Articles 📚) 10:48, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
SpeedyKeep, the only reason cross-wiki troll and globally banned user INeverCry is evading their ban is because people are appeasing his deletionist agenda, this is a user that doesn't create content and only deletes other people's work. As an admin INeverCry / Daphne Lantier never cared about following policy and after being globally banned all he does is nominate stuff for deletion while still trolling people with comments like these. The moment people will stand up against this troll and keep any image they nominate for deletion they will give up. When users who are banned evade their ban to upload useful educational images these get deleted en masse but for some reason these deletion requests are accepted. If Russavia uploads a copyright-free image of an æroplane that is missing on Wikipedia today it will be immediately deleted, so why the double standard for these deletion requests? Sent 📩 from my Microsoft Lumia 950 XL with Microsoft Windows 10 Mobile 📱. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) ("The Chinese Coin Troll" 👿) (Articles 📚) 10:49, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
I am Sandra Lázaro, author of photography and as indicated by it accreditation it has Copyright, not a CC license. The eldiario.es licence said : http://www.eldiario.es/licencia/ "Estas condiciones tienen las siguientes excepciones: - No se aplica a los contenidos (textos, gráficos, informaciones, imágenes...) publicados por eldiario.es procedentes de terceros que vayan firmados o sean atribuibles a agencias de información (EFE, Europa Press...) o a cualquier otra empresa diferente de Diario de Prensa Digital, S.L. Todos los derechos sobre estos contenidos quedan estrictamente reservados a su titular (la agencia) y, por tanto, no podrán ser reproducidos, distribuidos, transformados o comunicados públicamente sin el consentimiento expreso de su titular. - Los dibujos de los viñetistas también son Creative Commons, aunque no podrán ser reproducidos con fines comerciales (cc-by-nc). " Therefore the works of third parties do not share their license. I request y 95.125.169.320:35, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Are you a third-party? Can you justify it? Can you provide a proof-of-identity and any additional argumentation to COM:OTRS? Thanks --Discastotalk21:12, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
I am Sandra Lázaro, author of photography and as indicated by it accreditation it has Copyright, not a CC license. The eldiario.es licence said : http://www.eldiario.es/licencia/ "Estas condiciones tienen las siguientes excepciones: - No se aplica a los contenidos (textos, gráficos, informaciones, imágenes...) publicados por eldiario.es procedentes de terceros que vayan firmados o sean atribuibles a agencias de información (EFE, Europa Press...) o a cualquier otra empresa diferente de Diario de Prensa Digital, S.L. Todos los derechos sobre estos contenidos quedan estrictamente reservados a su titular (la agencia) y, por tanto, no podrán ser reproducidos, distribuidos, transformados o comunicados públicamente sin el consentimiento expreso de su titular. - Los dibujos de los viñetistas también son Creative Commons, aunque no podrán ser reproducidos con fines comerciales (cc-by-nc). " Therefore the works of third parties do not share their license. I request your erase quickly 95.125.169.320:40, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I am Sandra Lázaro, author of photography and as indicated by it accreditation it has Copyright, not a CC license. The eldiario.es licence said : http://www.eldiario.es/licencia/ "Estas condiciones tienen las siguientes excepciones: - No se aplica a los contenidos (textos, gráficos, informaciones, imágenes...) publicados por eldiario.es procedentes de terceros que vayan firmados o sean atribuibles a agencias de información (EFE, Europa Press...) o a cualquier otra empresa diferente de Diario de Prensa Digital, S.L. Todos los derechos sobre estos contenidos quedan estrictamente reservados a su titular (la agencia) y, por tanto, no podrán ser reproducidos, distribuidos, transformados o comunicados públicamente sin el consentimiento expreso de su titular. - Los dibujos de los viñetistas también son Creative Commons, aunque no podrán ser reproducidos con fines comerciales (cc-by-nc). " Therefore the works of third parties do not share their license. I'am a third partie. I request your erase quickly Sandlazaro (talk) 07:50, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
SpeedyKeep, the only reason cross-wiki troll and globally banned user INeverCry is evading their ban is because people are appeasing his deletionist agenda, this is a user that doesn't create content and only deletes other people's work. As an admin INeverCry / Daphne Lantier never cared about following policy and after being globally banned all he does is nominate stuff for deletion while still trolling people with comments like these. The moment people will stand up against this troll and keep any image they nominate for deletion they will give up. When users who are banned evade their ban to upload useful educational images these get deleted en masse but for some reason these deletion requests are accepted. If Russavia uploads a copyright-free image of an æroplane that is missing on Wikipedia today it will be immediately deleted, so why the double standard for these deletion requests? Sent 📩 from my Microsoft Lumia 950 XL with Microsoft Windows 10 Mobile 📱. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) ("The Chinese Coin Troll" 👿) (Articles 📚) 10:49, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
SpeedyKeep, the only reason cross-wiki troll and globally banned user INeverCry is evading their ban is because people are appeasing his deletionist agenda, this is a user that doesn't create content and only deletes other people's work. As an admin INeverCry / Daphne Lantier never cared about following policy and after being globally banned all he does is nominate stuff for deletion while still trolling people with comments like these. The moment people will stand up against this troll and keep any image they nominate for deletion they will give up. When users who are banned evade their ban to upload useful educational images these get deleted en masse but for some reason these deletion requests are accepted. If Russavia uploads a copyright-free image of an æroplane that is missing on Wikipedia today it will be immediately deleted, so why the double standard for these deletion requests? Sent 📩 from my Microsoft Lumia 950 XL with Microsoft Windows 10 Mobile 📱. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) ("The Chinese Coin Troll" 👿) (Articles 📚) 10:49, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
SpeedyKeep, the only reason cross-wiki troll and globally banned user INeverCry is evading their ban is because people are appeasing his deletionist agenda, this is a user that doesn't create content and only deletes other people's work. As an admin INeverCry / Daphne Lantier never cared about following policy and after being globally banned all he does is nominate stuff for deletion while still trolling people with comments like these. The moment people will stand up against this troll and keep any image they nominate for deletion they will give up. When users who are banned evade their ban to upload useful educational images these get deleted en masse but for some reason these deletion requests are accepted. If Russavia uploads a copyright-free image of an æroplane that is missing on Wikipedia today it will be immediately deleted, so why the double standard for these deletion requests? Sent 📩 from my Microsoft Lumia 950 XL with Microsoft Windows 10 Mobile 📱. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) ("The Chinese Coin Troll" 👿) (Articles 📚) 10:50, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
SpeedyKeep, the only reason cross-wiki troll and globally banned user INeverCry is evading their ban is because people are appeasing his deletionist agenda, this is a user that doesn't create content and only deletes other people's work. As an admin INeverCry / Daphne Lantier never cared about following policy and after being globally banned all he does is nominate stuff for deletion while still trolling people with comments like these. The moment people will stand up against this troll and keep any image they nominate for deletion they will give up. When users who are banned evade their ban to upload useful educational images these get deleted en masse but for some reason these deletion requests are accepted. If Russavia uploads a copyright-free image of an æroplane that is missing on Wikipedia today it will be immediately deleted, so why the double standard for these deletion requests? Sent 📩 from my Microsoft Lumia 950 XL with Microsoft Windows 10 Mobile 📱. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) ("The Chinese Coin Troll" 👿) (Articles 📚) 10:51, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
I am Sandra Lázaro, author of photography and as indicated by it accreditation it has Copyright, not a CC license. The eldiario.es licence said : http://www.eldiario.es/licencia/ "Estas condiciones tienen las siguientes excepciones: - No se aplica a los contenidos (textos, gráficos, informaciones, imágenes...) publicados por eldiario.es procedentes de terceros que vayan firmados o sean atribuibles a agencias de información (EFE, Europa Press...) o a cualquier otra empresa diferente de Diario de Prensa Digital, S.L. Todos los derechos sobre estos contenidos quedan estrictamente reservados a su titular (la agencia) y, por tanto, no podrán ser reproducidos, distribuidos, transformados o comunicados públicamente sin el consentimiento expreso de su titular. - Los dibujos de los viñetistas también son Creative Commons, aunque no podrán ser reproducidos con fines comerciales (cc-by-nc). " Therefore the works of third parties do not share their license. I request your erase quickly 95.125.169.321:08, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
I am Sandra Lázaro, author of photography and as indicated by it accreditation it has Copyright, not a CC license. The eldiario.es licence said : http://www.eldiario.es/licencia/ "Estas condiciones tienen las siguientes excepciones: - No se aplica a los contenidos (textos, gráficos, informaciones, imágenes...) publicados por eldiario.es procedentes de terceros que vayan firmados o sean atribuibles a agencias de información (EFE, Europa Press...) o a cualquier otra empresa diferente de Diario de Prensa Digital, S.L. Todos los derechos sobre estos contenidos quedan estrictamente reservados a su titular (la agencia) y, por tanto, no podrán ser reproducidos, distribuidos, transformados o comunicados públicamente sin el consentimiento expreso de su titular. - Los dibujos de los viñetistas también son Creative Commons, aunque no podrán ser reproducidos con fines comerciales (cc-by-nc). " Therefore the works of third parties do not share their license. I request your erase quickly 95.125.169.321:10, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
SpeedyKeep, the only reason cross-wiki troll and globally banned user INeverCry is evading their ban is because people are appeasing his deletionist agenda, this is a user that doesn't create content and only deletes other people's work. As an admin INeverCry / Daphne Lantier never cared about following policy and after being globally banned all he does is nominate stuff for deletion while still trolling people with comments like these. The moment people will stand up against this troll and keep any image they nominate for deletion they will give up. When users who are banned evade their ban to upload useful educational images these get deleted en masse but for some reason these deletion requests are accepted. If Russavia uploads a copyright-free image of an æroplane that is missing on Wikipedia today it will be immediately deleted, so why the double standard for these deletion requests? Sent 📩 from my Microsoft Lumia 950 XL with Microsoft Windows 10 Mobile 📱. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) ("The Chinese Coin Troll" 👿) (Articles 📚) 10:51, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
SpeedyKeep, the only reason cross-wiki troll and globally banned user INeverCry is evading their ban is because people are appeasing his deletionist agenda, this is a user that doesn't create content and only deletes other people's work. As an admin INeverCry / Daphne Lantier never cared about following policy and after being globally banned all he does is nominate stuff for deletion while still trolling people with comments like these. The moment people will stand up against this troll and keep any image they nominate for deletion they will give up. When users who are banned evade their ban to upload useful educational images these get deleted en masse but for some reason these deletion requests are accepted. If Russavia uploads a copyright-free image of an æroplane that is missing on Wikipedia today it will be immediately deleted, so why the double standard for these deletion requests? Sent 📩 from my Microsoft Lumia 950 XL with Microsoft Windows 10 Mobile 📱. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) ("The Chinese Coin Troll" 👿) (Articles 📚) 10:52, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
I am Sandra Lázaro, author of photography and as indicated by it accreditation it has Copyright, not a CC license. The eldiario.es licence said : http://www.eldiario.es/licencia/ "Estas condiciones tienen las siguientes excepciones: - No se aplica a los contenidos (textos, gráficos, informaciones, imágenes...) publicados por eldiario.es procedentes de terceros que vayan firmados o sean atribuibles a agencias de información (EFE, Europa Press...) o a cualquier otra empresa diferente de Diario de Prensa Digital, S.L. Todos los derechos sobre estos contenidos quedan estrictamente reservados a su titular (la agencia) y, por tanto, no podrán ser reproducidos, distribuidos, transformados o comunicados públicamente sin el consentimiento expreso de su titular. - Los dibujos de los viñetistas también son Creative Commons, aunque no podrán ser reproducidos con fines comerciales (cc-by-nc). " Therefore the works of third parties do not share their license. I request your erase quickly 95.125.169.321:13, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
SpeedyKeep, the only reason cross-wiki troll and globally banned user INeverCry is evading their ban is because people are appeasing his deletionist agenda, this is a user that doesn't create content and only deletes other people's work. As an admin INeverCry / Daphne Lantier never cared about following policy and after being globally banned all he does is nominate stuff for deletion while still trolling people with comments like these. The moment people will stand up against this troll and keep any image they nominate for deletion they will give up. When users who are banned evade their ban to upload useful educational images these get deleted en masse but for some reason these deletion requests are accepted. If Russavia uploads a copyright-free image of an æroplane that is missing on Wikipedia today it will be immediately deleted, so why the double standard for these deletion requests? Sent 📩 from my Microsoft Lumia 950 XL with Microsoft Windows 10 Mobile 📱. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) ("The Chinese Coin Troll" 👿) (Articles 📚) 10:52, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
SpeedyKeep, the only reason cross-wiki troll and globally banned user INeverCry is evading their ban is because people are appeasing his deletionist agenda, this is a user that doesn't create content and only deletes other people's work. As an admin INeverCry / Daphne Lantier never cared about following policy and after being globally banned all he does is nominate stuff for deletion while still trolling people with comments like these. The moment people will stand up against this troll and keep any image they nominate for deletion they will give up. When users who are banned evade their ban to upload useful educational images these get deleted en masse but for some reason these deletion requests are accepted. If Russavia uploads a copyright-free image of an æroplane that is missing on Wikipedia today it will be immediately deleted, so why the double standard for these deletion requests? Sent 📩 from my Microsoft Lumia 950 XL with Microsoft Windows 10 Mobile 📱. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) ("The Chinese Coin Troll" 👿) (Articles 📚) 10:52, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
SpeedyKeep, the only reason cross-wiki troll and globally banned user INeverCry is evading their ban is because people are appeasing his deletionist agenda, this is a user that doesn't create content and only deletes other people's work. As an admin INeverCry / Daphne Lantier never cared about following policy and after being globally banned all he does is nominate stuff for deletion while still trolling people with comments like these. The moment people will stand up against this troll and keep any image they nominate for deletion they will give up. When users who are banned evade their ban to upload useful educational images these get deleted en masse but for some reason these deletion requests are accepted. If Russavia uploads a copyright-free image of an æroplane that is missing on Wikipedia today it will be immediately deleted, so why the double standard for these deletion requests? Sent 📩 from my Microsoft Lumia 950 XL with Microsoft Windows 10 Mobile 📱. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) ("The Chinese Coin Troll" 👿) (Articles 📚) 10:53, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
SpeedyKeep, the only reason cross-wiki troll and globally banned user INeverCry is evading their ban is because people are appeasing his deletionist agenda, this is a user that doesn't create content and only deletes other people's work. As an admin INeverCry / Daphne Lantier never cared about following policy and after being globally banned all he does is nominate stuff for deletion while still trolling people with comments like these. The moment people will stand up against this troll and keep any image they nominate for deletion they will give up. When users who are banned evade their ban to upload useful educational images these get deleted en masse but for some reason these deletion requests are accepted. If Russavia uploads a copyright-free image of an æroplane that is missing on Wikipedia today it will be immediately deleted, so why the double standard for these deletion requests? Sent 📩 from my Microsoft Lumia 950 XL with Microsoft Windows 10 Mobile 📱. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) ("The Chinese Coin Troll" 👿) (Articles 📚) 10:53, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Looks like a copyright violation (copvio). The file comes from the website of a newspaper, and I see no sign that the newspaper or the photographer, Sandra Lázaro, has allowed the use of this image for Commons. The EXIF data say “All rights reserved” (Spanish: “Todos los derechos reservados a Sandra Lázaro www.sandralazaro.com”). So I am sorry but I fear that we must delete this file. What do other people think? Aristeas (talk) 13:43, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
I am Sandra Lázaro, author of photography and as indicated by it accreditation it has Copyright, not a CC license. The eldiario.es licence said : http://www.eldiario.es/licencia/ "Estas condiciones tienen las siguientes excepciones: - No se aplica a los contenidos (textos, gráficos, informaciones, imágenes...) publicados por eldiario.es procedentes de terceros que vayan firmados o sean atribuibles a agencias de información (EFE, Europa Press...) o a cualquier otra empresa diferente de Diario de Prensa Digital, S.L. Todos los derechos sobre estos contenidos quedan estrictamente reservados a su titular (la agencia) y, por tanto, no podrán ser reproducidos, distribuidos, transformados o comunicados públicamente sin el consentimiento expreso de su titular. - Los dibujos de los viñetistas también son Creative Commons, aunque no podrán ser reproducidos con fines comerciales (cc-by-nc). " Therefore the works of third parties do not share their license. I request your erase quickly 95.125.169.321:19, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
I am Sandra Lázaro, author of photography and as indicated by it accreditation it has Copyright, not a CC license. The eldiario.es licence said : http://www.eldiario.es/licencia/ "Estas condiciones tienen las siguientes excepciones: - No se aplica a los contenidos (textos, gráficos, informaciones, imágenes...) publicados por eldiario.es procedentes de terceros que vayan firmados o sean atribuibles a agencias de información (EFE, Europa Press...) o a cualquier otra empresa diferente de Diario de Prensa Digital, S.L. Todos los derechos sobre estos contenidos quedan estrictamente reservados a su titular (la agencia) y, por tanto, no podrán ser reproducidos, distribuidos, transformados o comunicados públicamente sin el consentimiento expreso de su titular. - Los dibujos de los viñetistas también son Creative Commons, aunque no podrán ser reproducidos con fines comerciales (cc-by-nc). " Therefore the works of third parties do not share their license. I request your erase quickly 95.125.169.321:21, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
I am Sandra Lázaro, author of photography and as indicated by it accreditation it has Copyright, not a CC license. The eldiario.es licence said : http://www.eldiario.es/licencia/ "Estas condiciones tienen las siguientes excepciones: - No se aplica a los contenidos (textos, gráficos, informaciones, imágenes...) publicados por eldiario.es procedentes de terceros que vayan firmados o sean atribuibles a agencias de información (EFE, Europa Press...) o a cualquier otra empresa diferente de Diario de Prensa Digital, S.L. Todos los derechos sobre estos contenidos quedan estrictamente reservados a su titular (la agencia) y, por tanto, no podrán ser reproducidos, distribuidos, transformados o comunicados públicamente sin el consentimiento expreso de su titular. - Los dibujos de los viñetistas también son Creative Commons, aunque no podrán ser reproducidos con fines comerciales (cc-by-nc). " Therefore the works of third parties do not share their license. I request your erase quickly 95.125.169.321:24, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
SpeedyKeep, the only reason cross-wiki troll and globally banned user INeverCry is evading their ban is because people are appeasing his deletionist agenda, this is a user that doesn't create content and only deletes other people's work. As an admin INeverCry / Daphne Lantier never cared about following policy and after being globally banned all he does is nominate stuff for deletion while still trolling people with comments like these. The moment people will stand up against this troll and keep any image they nominate for deletion they will give up. When users who are banned evade their ban to upload useful educational images these get deleted en masse but for some reason these deletion requests are accepted. If Russavia uploads a copyright-free image of an æroplane that is missing on Wikipedia today it will be immediately deleted, so why the double standard for these deletion requests? Sent 📩 from my Microsoft Lumia 950 XL with Microsoft Windows 10 Mobile 📱. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) ("The Chinese Coin Troll" 👿) (Articles 📚) 10:53, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
SpeedyKeep, the only reason cross-wiki troll and globally banned user INeverCry is evading their ban is because people are appeasing his deletionist agenda, this is a user that doesn't create content and only deletes other people's work. As an admin INeverCry / Daphne Lantier never cared about following policy and after being globally banned all he does is nominate stuff for deletion while still trolling people with comments like these. The moment people will stand up against this troll and keep any image they nominate for deletion they will give up. When users who are banned evade their ban to upload useful educational images these get deleted en masse but for some reason these deletion requests are accepted. If Russavia uploads a copyright-free image of an æroplane that is missing on Wikipedia today it will be immediately deleted, so why the double standard for these deletion requests? Sent 📩 from my Microsoft Lumia 950 XL with Microsoft Windows 10 Mobile 📱. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) ("The Chinese Coin Troll" 👿) (Articles 📚) 10:54, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
SpeedyKeep, the only reason cross-wiki troll and globally banned user INeverCry is evading their ban is because people are appeasing his deletionist agenda, this is a user that doesn't create content and only deletes other people's work. As an admin INeverCry / Daphne Lantier never cared about following policy and after being globally banned all he does is nominate stuff for deletion while still trolling people with comments like these. The moment people will stand up against this troll and keep any image they nominate for deletion they will give up. When users who are banned evade their ban to upload useful educational images these get deleted en masse but for some reason these deletion requests are accepted. If Russavia uploads a copyright-free image of an æroplane that is missing on Wikipedia today it will be immediately deleted, so why the double standard for these deletion requests? Sent 📩 from my Microsoft Lumia 950 XL with Microsoft Windows 10 Mobile 📱. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) ("The Chinese Coin Troll" 👿) (Articles 📚) 10:54, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
SpeedyKeep, the only reason cross-wiki troll and globally banned user INeverCry is evading their ban is because people are appeasing his deletionist agenda, this is a user that doesn't create content and only deletes other people's work. As an admin INeverCry / Daphne Lantier never cared about following policy and after being globally banned all he does is nominate stuff for deletion while still trolling people with comments like these. The moment people will stand up against this troll and keep any image they nominate for deletion they will give up. When users who are banned evade their ban to upload useful educational images these get deleted en masse but for some reason these deletion requests are accepted. If Russavia uploads a copyright-free image of an æroplane that is missing on Wikipedia today it will be immediately deleted, so why the double standard for these deletion requests? Sent 📩 from my Microsoft Lumia 950 XL with Microsoft Windows 10 Mobile 📱. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) ("The Chinese Coin Troll" 👿) (Articles 📚) 10:54, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
SpeedyKeep, the only reason cross-wiki troll and globally banned user INeverCry is evading their ban is because people are appeasing his deletionist agenda, this is a user that doesn't create content and only deletes other people's work. As an admin INeverCry / Daphne Lantier never cared about following policy and after being globally banned all he does is nominate stuff for deletion while still trolling people with comments like these. The moment people will stand up against this troll and keep any image they nominate for deletion they will give up. When users who are banned evade their ban to upload useful educational images these get deleted en masse but for some reason these deletion requests are accepted. If Russavia uploads a copyright-free image of an æroplane that is missing on Wikipedia today it will be immediately deleted, so why the double standard for these deletion requests? Sent 📩 from my Microsoft Lumia 950 XL with Microsoft Windows 10 Mobile 📱. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) ("The Chinese Coin Troll" 👿) (Articles 📚) 10:57, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
SpeedyKeep, the only reason cross-wiki troll and globally banned user INeverCry is evading their ban is because people are appeasing his deletionist agenda, this is a user that doesn't create content and only deletes other people's work. As an admin INeverCry / Daphne Lantier never cared about following policy and after being globally banned all he does is nominate stuff for deletion while still trolling people with comments like these. The moment people will stand up against this troll and keep any image they nominate for deletion they will give up. When users who are banned evade their ban to upload useful educational images these get deleted en masse but for some reason these deletion requests are accepted. If Russavia uploads a copyright-free image of an æroplane that is missing on Wikipedia today it will be immediately deleted, so why the double standard for these deletion requests? Sent 📩 from my Microsoft Lumia 950 XL with Microsoft Windows 10 Mobile 📱. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) ("The Chinese Coin Troll" 👿) (Articles 📚) 10:58, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
SpeedyKeep, the only reason cross-wiki troll and globally banned user INeverCry is evading their ban is because people are appeasing his deletionist agenda, this is a user that doesn't create content and only deletes other people's work. As an admin INeverCry / Daphne Lantier never cared about following policy and after being globally banned all he does is nominate stuff for deletion while still trolling people with comments like these. The moment people will stand up against this troll and keep any image they nominate for deletion they will give up. When users who are banned evade their ban to upload useful educational images these get deleted en masse but for some reason these deletion requests are accepted. If Russavia uploads a copyright-free image of an æroplane that is missing on Wikipedia today it will be immediately deleted, so why the double standard for these deletion requests? Sent 📩 from my Microsoft Lumia 950 XL with Microsoft Windows 10 Mobile 📱. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) ("The Chinese Coin Troll" 👿) (Articles 📚) 10:58, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
SpeedyKeep, the only reason cross-wiki troll and globally banned user INeverCry is evading their ban is because people are appeasing his deletionist agenda, this is a user that doesn't create content and only deletes other people's work. As an admin INeverCry / Daphne Lantier never cared about following policy and after being globally banned all he does is nominate stuff for deletion while still trolling people with comments like these. The moment people will stand up against this troll and keep any image they nominate for deletion they will give up. When users who are banned evade their ban to upload useful educational images these get deleted en masse but for some reason these deletion requests are accepted. If Russavia uploads a copyright-free image of an æroplane that is missing on Wikipedia today it will be immediately deleted, so why the double standard for these deletion requests? Sent 📩 from my Microsoft Lumia 950 XL with Microsoft Windows 10 Mobile 📱. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) ("The Chinese Coin Troll" 👿) (Articles 📚) 10:58, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
SpeedyKeep, the only reason cross-wiki troll and globally banned user INeverCry is evading their ban is because people are appeasing his deletionist agenda, this is a user that doesn't create content and only deletes other people's work. As an admin INeverCry / Daphne Lantier never cared about following policy and after being globally banned all he does is nominate stuff for deletion while still trolling people with comments like these. The moment people will stand up against this troll and keep any image they nominate for deletion they will give up. When users who are banned evade their ban to upload useful educational images these get deleted en masse but for some reason these deletion requests are accepted. If Russavia uploads a copyright-free image of an æroplane that is missing on Wikipedia today it will be immediately deleted, so why the double standard for these deletion requests? Sent 📩 from my Microsoft Lumia 950 XL with Microsoft Windows 10 Mobile 📱. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) ("The Chinese Coin Troll" 👿) (Articles 📚) 10:59, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
SpeedyKeep, the only reason cross-wiki troll and globally banned user INeverCry is evading their ban is because people are appeasing his deletionist agenda, this is a user that doesn't create content and only deletes other people's work. As an admin INeverCry / Daphne Lantier never cared about following policy and after being globally banned all he does is nominate stuff for deletion while still trolling people with comments like these. The moment people will stand up against this troll and keep any image they nominate for deletion they will give up. When users who are banned evade their ban to upload useful educational images these get deleted en masse but for some reason these deletion requests are accepted. If Russavia uploads a copyright-free image of an æroplane that is missing on Wikipedia today it will be immediately deleted, so why the double standard for these deletion requests? Sent 📩 from my Microsoft Lumia 950 XL with Microsoft Windows 10 Mobile 📱. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) ("The Chinese Coin Troll" 👿) (Articles 📚) 10:59, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
SpeedyKeep, the only reason cross-wiki troll and globally banned user INeverCry is evading their ban is because people are appeasing his deletionist agenda, this is a user that doesn't create content and only deletes other people's work. As an admin INeverCry / Daphne Lantier never cared about following policy and after being globally banned all he does is nominate stuff for deletion while still trolling people with comments like these. The moment people will stand up against this troll and keep any image they nominate for deletion they will give up. When users who are banned evade their ban to upload useful educational images these get deleted en masse but for some reason these deletion requests are accepted. If Russavia uploads a copyright-free image of an æroplane that is missing on Wikipedia today it will be immediately deleted, so why the double standard for these deletion requests? Sent 📩 from my Microsoft Lumia 950 XL with Microsoft Windows 10 Mobile 📱. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) ("The Chinese Coin Troll" 👿) (Articles 📚) 10:59, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
SpeedyKeep, the only reason cross-wiki troll and globally banned user INeverCry is evading their ban is because people are appeasing his deletionist agenda, this is a user that doesn't create content and only deletes other people's work. As an admin INeverCry / Daphne Lantier never cared about following policy and after being globally banned all he does is nominate stuff for deletion while still trolling people with comments like these. The moment people will stand up against this troll and keep any image they nominate for deletion they will give up. When users who are banned evade their ban to upload useful educational images these get deleted en masse but for some reason these deletion requests are accepted. If Russavia uploads a copyright-free image of an æroplane that is missing on Wikipedia today it will be immediately deleted, so why the double standard for these deletion requests? Sent 📩 from my Microsoft Lumia 950 XL with Microsoft Windows 10 Mobile 📱. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) ("The Chinese Coin Troll" 👿) (Articles 📚) 11:00, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
SpeedyKeep, the only reason cross-wiki troll and globally banned user INeverCry is evading their ban is because people are appeasing his deletionist agenda, this is a user that doesn't create content and only deletes other people's work. As an admin INeverCry / Daphne Lantier never cared about following policy and after being globally banned all he does is nominate stuff for deletion while still trolling people with comments like these. The moment people will stand up against this troll and keep any image they nominate for deletion they will give up. When users who are banned evade their ban to upload useful educational images these get deleted en masse but for some reason these deletion requests are accepted. If Russavia uploads a copyright-free image of an æroplane that is missing on Wikipedia today it will be immediately deleted, so why the double standard for these deletion requests? Sent 📩 from my Microsoft Lumia 950 XL with Microsoft Windows 10 Mobile 📱. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) ("The Chinese Coin Troll" 👿) (Articles 📚) 11:00, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
SpeedyKeep, the only reason cross-wiki troll and globally banned user INeverCry is evading their ban is because people are appeasing his deletionist agenda, this is a user that doesn't create content and only deletes other people's work. As an admin INeverCry / Daphne Lantier never cared about following policy and after being globally banned all he does is nominate stuff for deletion while still trolling people with comments like these. The moment people will stand up against this troll and keep any image they nominate for deletion they will give up. When users who are banned evade their ban to upload useful educational images these get deleted en masse but for some reason these deletion requests are accepted. If Russavia uploads a copyright-free image of an æroplane that is missing on Wikipedia today it will be immediately deleted, so why the double standard for these deletion requests? Sent 📩 from my Microsoft Lumia 950 XL with Microsoft Windows 10 Mobile 📱. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) ("The Chinese Coin Troll" 👿) (Articles 📚) 11:00, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
SpeedyKeep, the only reason cross-wiki troll and globally banned user INeverCry is evading their ban is because people are appeasing his deletionist agenda, this is a user that doesn't create content and only deletes other people's work. As an admin INeverCry / Daphne Lantier never cared about following policy and after being globally banned all he does is nominate stuff for deletion while still trolling people with comments like these. The moment people will stand up against this troll and keep any image they nominate for deletion they will give up. When users who are banned evade their ban to upload useful educational images these get deleted en masse but for some reason these deletion requests are accepted. If Russavia uploads a copyright-free image of an æroplane that is missing on Wikipedia today it will be immediately deleted, so why the double standard for these deletion requests? Sent 📩 from my Microsoft Lumia 950 XL with Microsoft Windows 10 Mobile 📱. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) ("The Chinese Coin Troll" 👿) (Articles 📚) 11:01, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
SpeedyKeep, the only reason cross-wiki troll and globally banned user INeverCry is evading their ban is because people are appeasing his deletionist agenda, this is a user that doesn't create content and only deletes other people's work. As an admin INeverCry / Daphne Lantier never cared about following policy and after being globally banned all he does is nominate stuff for deletion while still trolling people with comments like these. The moment people will stand up against this troll and keep any image they nominate for deletion they will give up. When users who are banned evade their ban to upload useful educational images these get deleted en masse but for some reason these deletion requests are accepted. If Russavia uploads a copyright-free image of an æroplane that is missing on Wikipedia today it will be immediately deleted, so why the double standard for these deletion requests? Sent 📩 from my Microsoft Lumia 950 XL with Microsoft Windows 10 Mobile 📱. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) ("The Chinese Coin Troll" 👿) (Articles 📚) 11:01, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
SpeedyKeep, the only reason cross-wiki troll and globally banned user INeverCry is evading their ban is because people are appeasing his deletionist agenda, this is a user that doesn't create content and only deletes other people's work. As an admin INeverCry / Daphne Lantier never cared about following policy and after being globally banned all he does is nominate stuff for deletion while still trolling people with comments like these. The moment people will stand up against this troll and keep any image they nominate for deletion they will give up. When users who are banned evade their ban to upload useful educational images these get deleted en masse but for some reason these deletion requests are accepted. If Russavia uploads a copyright-free image of an æroplane that is missing on Wikipedia today it will be immediately deleted, so why the double standard for these deletion requests? Sent 📩 from my Microsoft Lumia 950 XL with Microsoft Windows 10 Mobile 📱. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) ("The Chinese Coin Troll" 👿) (Articles 📚) 11:01, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
SpeedyKeep, the only reason cross-wiki troll and globally banned user INeverCry is evading their ban is because people are appeasing his deletionist agenda, this is a user that doesn't create content and only deletes other people's work. As an admin INeverCry / Daphne Lantier never cared about following policy and after being globally banned all he does is nominate stuff for deletion while still trolling people with comments like these. The moment people will stand up against this troll and keep any image they nominate for deletion they will give up. When users who are banned evade their ban to upload useful educational images these get deleted en masse but for some reason these deletion requests are accepted. If Russavia uploads a copyright-free image of an æroplane that is missing on Wikipedia today it will be immediately deleted, so why the double standard for these deletion requests? Sent 📩 from my Microsoft Lumia 950 XL with Microsoft Windows 10 Mobile 📱. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) ("The Chinese Coin Troll" 👿) (Articles 📚) 11:02, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
SpeedyKeep, the only reason cross-wiki troll and globally banned user INeverCry is evading their ban is because people are appeasing his deletionist agenda, this is a user that doesn't create content and only deletes other people's work. As an admin INeverCry / Daphne Lantier never cared about following policy and after being globally banned all he does is nominate stuff for deletion while still trolling people with comments like these. The moment people will stand up against this troll and keep any image they nominate for deletion they will give up. When users who are banned evade their ban to upload useful educational images these get deleted en masse but for some reason these deletion requests are accepted. If Russavia uploads a copyright-free image of an æroplane that is missing on Wikipedia today it will be immediately deleted, so why the double standard for these deletion requests? Sent 📩 from my Microsoft Lumia 950 XL with Microsoft Windows 10 Mobile 📱. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) ("The Chinese Coin Troll" 👿) (Articles 📚) 11:02, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
SpeedyKeep, the only reason cross-wiki troll and globally banned user INeverCry is evading their ban is because people are appeasing his deletionist agenda, this is a user that doesn't create content and only deletes other people's work. As an admin INeverCry / Daphne Lantier never cared about following policy and after being globally banned all he does is nominate stuff for deletion while still trolling people with comments like these. The moment people will stand up against this troll and keep any image they nominate for deletion they will give up. When users who are banned evade their ban to upload useful educational images these get deleted en masse but for some reason these deletion requests are accepted. If Russavia uploads a copyright-free image of an æroplane that is missing on Wikipedia today it will be immediately deleted, so why the double standard for these deletion requests? Sent 📩 from my Microsoft Lumia 950 XL with Microsoft Windows 10 Mobile 📱. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) ("The Chinese Coin Troll" 👿) (Articles 📚) 10:57, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
If this board is installed somewhere in the U.S., the image may violate copyright, as such works are not covered by freedom-of-panorama exception of the USA. -- Túrelio (talk) 21:44, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
A series of images which do not appear to be created by uploader due to image size, image quality, location from which image was taken, various white balance issues and compositional differences, and other indications (including "paint" in metadata).
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Own work doubtful, probably COM:DW. Uploader has been blocked for uploading aviation-related copyvios. See also the previous DRs at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by LoveyDovey. We would need permission from copyright holder Jan Severijns jseverijns@gmail.com via COM:OTRS.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Mostly small photos, metadata is always missing. Some historical photos. Collages need source and license for every used image. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:05, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Could be an MD but uploaded by a one-time visitor, not used, not categorised, no info etc; difficult to make a realistic educational use of this file. E4024 (talk) 10:26, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Historical photos, not own work, but not enough old to assume public domain without evidence. Who are the photographers and when they died? When and where the photos were first published? Taivo (talk) 10:33, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deutsch: @Benutzerfürvojnov: bitte den Anweisungen unter Commons:OTRS/de folgen um eine Einverständniserklärung des Künstlers an permissions-dewikimedia.org zu senden, andernfalls müssen die fraglichen Dateien leider (erneut) gelöscht werden. Bei Fragen zum Prozedere bitte ebenfalls an die genannte e-mail adresse wenden.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Metadata is usually missing. If camera data exist, then always different. One unsourced collage, one file comes from Facebook. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:40, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This Flickr guy is probably sponsored by rivals of Apple Inc. – otherwise I would see no merit showing this iPhone dung to the public. But Commons may not subscribe to brawls between electronics brands, Delete. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 15:13, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Cette photo de Fabrice Blind prise par Lionel Arnaud est là pour être ajoutée au Wikipedia de Fabrice Blind Que la photo soit déjà sur le site de son agent distri-art ne veut pas dire qu’elle appartient à l’agent ... Cireneparis (talk) 23:09, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Unclear on copyright status of Cambodian money. What we do know is that the uploader cannot claim creative commons license as the copyright (if any) belongs to the designer and/or the government.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Unclear copyright status: Uploaded since 2013 (the last one on 05.11.2015 via cross-wiki upload from pt.wikipedia.org) for pt:Agassiz Almeida (1935—, Brazilian politician and writer), portraying the political career of Agassiz Almeida in photos from 1964, 1984 and 1987 (some of them photos of photos and/or mysteriously watermarked & cropped). Can't taken by himself and can't also taken by his son "Agassiz Almeida Filho" (who might be the uploader and ptwiki editor). Further details and/or permissions needed.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Kept, author is correct, Dick Thomas Johnson is really the photographer. He has created many similar promotional photos and some of them are published under free license. Original picture is free, license is reviewed. Taivo (talk) 16:31, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted, apparently created before 1926, but this is not enough old to assume PD-old without evidence. No author, no publication data, no even source country! Taivo (talk) 17:05, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Has been deleted before, unlikely to be the uploader's own work, looks like a scan from a textbook. And indeed, the drawing appears in context here. The first few lines from that page:
Воздушно-реактивные двигатели
Гильзин Карл Александрович
Глава третья
Турбореактивный двигатель
translated via Google:
Air-Jet Engines
Gilzin Karl Alexandrovich
Chapter Three
Turbojet engine
@FeelUs: Well, that's what I was asking above. Properly documenting that would have been your duty as the uploader, now is your chance to rectify that. However, the latest year I can find in the text is 1955, so it must have been published in or after that year. Given that, I don't see how any of the Public Domain tags listed at Commons:Copyright_tags#Russia_and_former_Soviet_Union could apply. --El Grafo (talk) 12:31, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
I am the person featured in this photo, and I would like to delete this page. I never consented to this image being posted on Wikimedia Commons and ask that this page be removed. 128.12.253.522:40, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I am the uploader of the photo. The photo was taken in a public location in the US. Even so, I am sorry to hear that the depicted person is dissatisfied with the photo, and on those grounds, I would be all right with the photo being deleted from Commons.
Kept, Commons rarely takes photos down due to depicted person's request, and almost never, when the request comes from IP. We cannot be sure, that the request really comes from depicted person. Such requests must come through COM:OTRS, so that we can be sure, that you are really who you claim to be. Taivo (talk) 20:03, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
The photo subjects are copyrighted. And the photo was taken from a place which is not publicly accessible -- one has to pay to [enter in order to] view. acagastya03:46, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This image, taken by an American photographer, contains a stencil work on a concrete by a French anonymous artist. Per COM:TOO#France, it may be original enough for copyright in France; the copyright doesn't belong to the photographer. George Ho (talk) 11:18, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Strongly oppose. The design of the work itself seems to fall beneath the threshold of originality. Additionally, it is graffiti.
The condition of originality requires that the work bears the imprint of the " personality " of its author. Originality is a concept distinct from that of " novelty " used in patent law
Yes Graffiti is copyrightable. My point in mentioning that it is graffiti is that there is less of a peril for intellectual ownership/authorship litigation with graffiti, as proclaiming authorship is essentially confessing to a crime. Thus, there is perhaps less need to fret if you are on the fence about whether or not a work is beneath the threshold of originality.SecretName101 (talk) 05:02, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Keep. Acceptable quality, educational value exists. Uploader's request is valid reason only during first week after upload. Here 1½ years have passed. And I am not sure in uploader's request, because the nominator is anonymous. Taivo (talk) 12:56, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Pepe del Valle isn't mentioned neither in en.wiki nor in es.wiki. In my opinion all photos depicting him are out of project scope. In addition, the photos are mostly small and without metadata, if camera data exist, then always different. They are not selfies as claimed, probably different photographers' copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:12, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Sounds like an accidental upload. We can certainly extend her a courtesy deletion. This is not a critically important image by any stretch of the imagination, so there should be no problem doing that.SecretName101 (talk) 11:16, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Agree. Though, the claim "uploaded without her permission" sounds a bit bogus, when it is her own Flickr-account to which it was uploaded first. However, as the face of the person in the middle is censored now on Flickr, the request seems to be in earnest. --Túrelio (talk) 11:34, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Seconding Jeff's suggestion to Delete or (blur and remove middle person's name to follow changes at Flickr) per nom. Again, I have no problem with granting a courtesy deletion. Either entirely deleting this imahe or replacing the image with a blurred version and deleting the current version and "scrubbing" it from the history (not sure if I am using correct terminoligy there) SecretName101 (talk) 21:29, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose blurring the middle person, because this makes the photo ugly. We can keep the image or delete totally. Both mentioned persons Neeta Lind and Leslie Salzillo are mentioned in en.wiki, but no article exists. Taivo (talk) 20:46, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Copyright violation. The image represents the logo of a company, to which certainly belongs its copyright, here falsely attributed by the uploader as being their. I did not find evidence that the image has a license compatible with commons, or that the uploader has a connection with the company that holds the rights abount her. Leon saudanha (talk) 13:51, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
@Adeninasn: If you want to upload a new version, you can either do so under a new name or by using the “Upload a new version of this file” (“Muatkan versi yang lebih baru dari berkas ini”) link at the bottom of the image page. There's no need for the existing file to be deleted. --bjh21 (talk) 11:40, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Bjh21: Okay, maybe I have written the wrong reason for deletion request. Actually I do not make the new version yet, and I am thinking that I do not need to use these kind of pictures, because I do not use it in any Wikipedia articles I wrote as I planned before. So, would you do my request, please! --Adeninasn (talk) 13:22, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Adeninasn: I'm not an administrator, so I can't delete it myself. If someone else wanted to write an article on the same topic, would they not find your pictures useful? --bjh21 (talk) 23:41, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: per nomination. 1) it's not permanently displayed, 2) Article 40bis further states the above law "may not be so interpreted that they could be applied in a manner capable of unreasonably prejudicing the legitimate interests of the author or adversely affecting the normal exploitation of the works to which they refer.". Ruthven(msg)13:43, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
1) It is a 2D artwork, so it does not matter who took the photo. 2) Your link [7] indeed refers to a temporary exhibition in Girona, but the original is from another collection, in Barcelona. Materialscientist (talk) 02:29, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Keep unless there is evidence the source plays fast & loose with copyright; the first thing I see on visiting the page is a pop-up that says it’s under a CC BY-SA-3.0 licence.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 10:33, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Keep: All the pictures were taken around 1986–87 around Plymouth Sound and of similar subjects. They were taken on film (based on the visible grain), so it's not surprising they have no Exif data. I think it's entirely plausible that they are the work of a single photographer with a 35mm camera living around Plymouth in 1987. --bjh21 (talk) 11:29, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:Cachacabrazil.jpg Desculpe, mas não sou colaborador experiente, porém sou o autor desta e outras fotos que estão prpostas para eliminação. Ela pode ser colocada em dominio publico, pois sou eu mesmo o autor. Agradeço se experientes puderem ajudar (inclusive foram deletadas outras sem que eu soubesse evitar . Grato - Schermann
File:Garrafa Cachaça Sapucaia de 1933.jpgDesculpe, mas não sou colaborador experiente, porém sou o autor desta e outras fotos que estão propostas para eliminação. Ela pode ser colocada em dominio publico, pois sou eu mesmo o autor. Agradeço se experientes puderem ajudar (inclusive foram deletadas outras sem que eu soubesse evitar . Grato - Schermann
File:Marzadro-18lune.jpg <-- Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 license has been accepted by the Marzadro distillery representative. User talk:E_A_S
The image is correctly described on Creative commons, listing its author as Luca Marzadro, a representative of the Marzadro distillery with the power to accept the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license. I have an e-mail to testify that such use has been granted. If there are problems regarding the quality of the image (only 240 × 240) I can try to request a better image.
Regarding File:Kronbrännvin Dunbodi.JPG: The image on the label is by an unknown artist, drafted around 1870. The medals on the label, which are scetchy and not really identifiable, must also be from the end of the 19th Century. So you could realistically assume that the artists have been dead at least 70 years by now. No reason for the image to be deleted. Boberger (talk) 16:08, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The president of the Hideous company sent me this photo and gave permission for its use for any purpose, otherwise I never would have uploaded it. Please check these things before nominating photos for deletion, and kindly contribute to the Wikimedia projects in a way that enriches, not depletes, our projects.
Ccyyrree, I am not trying to claim that you did not take the photo yourself, and that second one is in fact an excellent shot. The question is not the copyright of the photo, it is the copyright of the label on the bottle. Just because you take a photo of something doesn't mean you hold copyright over every element in it. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:08, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
File:Floresta cachaca flaska.JPG Wahts the legal issue in taking a photo of a product i bought and posses? Is there a legal problem fotographing my property if the label of the producer is visable? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eniklasc (talk • contribs)
Unfortunately yes. To put it simply, ownership of a picture does not mean you own the rights to that picture. If you buy a painting at a gallery, you may own the canvas but you do not have copyright of it, and so you could not make reproductions of it. The same applies here, but instead of a painting we have a label on a bottle, and instead of a gallery we have a liquor store. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:34, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, but you should read the wikipedia commons guidelines better, check the photo in the example, with the label in the exact same way. --Eniklasc (talk) 22:18, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The design of a useful article shall be considered a pictorial, graphic, or sculptural work only if, and only to the extent that, such design incorporates pictorial, graphic, or sculptural features that can be identified separately from, and are capable of existing independently of, the utilitarian aspects of the article.” The bottle is the utilitarian aspect, the label is not. The label on that bottle is not eligible for copyright as it fails to pass the threshold of originality. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:35, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Since you now read up on the rules for deritavie work, you should revise your list for deletion. It many of the ones that i checked that does not fall under : " pictorial, graphic, or sculptural features that can be identified separately from, and are capable of existing independently of, the utilitarian aspects of the article". It is kind of insulting to the contributors adding photos for deletion without reading upp on the facts. --Eniklasc (talk) 22:59, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — all photos. From the pattern of nominations for deletion, it appears user mattbuck is acting in bad faith. These are all pictures of alcoholic beverages. In many of them the labels on the bottles are blurred, illegible or partially obscured and cannot conceivably be used for copyright violation or replication. It's much easier to destroy the work of others than make meaningful contributions to the Wikipedia projects, isn't it, mattbuck? Please tell us what your real reason for a wholesale purge of photos of alcoholic beverage bottles is. — Quicksilver@23:49, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No, I have better things to do than act in bad faith, unlike you apparently. It seems you never read the whole AGF thing. Easier to destroy than make meaningful contributions? I have uploaded over 10,000 photos here, I have written about 10 good articles on en.wikipedia and contributed to many many more, I was a WLM Ukraine judge, I curate UK railway images, I am active at the Quality Image project... oh, and that's in addition to the general shit which goes with being a Commons admin. Part of that job of Commons admin is watching out for potential copyright violations. That is the most important thing we do here on Commons - we try to ensure that we follow the law with our images. I think that some if not all of the images I nominated here are potentially iffy from a copyright standpoint. Thus, as is the process for these things, I nominated them for deletion to ask for others' opinions. Perhaps some people know the rules regarding these things better than me, that's fine, they can comment here and the closing admin will take their views into account. I fully acknowledge I have made some mistakes with this DR, but I did act in good faith when I nominated them, and frankly I am fucking fed up of being attacked for it here. You uploaded images and they were nominated? I'm very sorry for it, but that's the way it goes. Copyright is labyrinthine, complex and against common sense. No one will know everything about it, and we don't expect them to. Perhaps you took a photo of a new building. That's great if you're in the UK, but if you're in France it will probably have to be deleted. You photographed a poster? In the US you're fine, but in New Zealand it's a problem. You have a photo which was taken in 1900 - in Europe it's probably still copyrighted, but in India it's probably public domain! We on Commons are not out to hurt the Wikimedia project by deleting all the photos you put in articles, we want to protect it by ensuring that the WMF doesn't get sued for using images they shouldn't have! But I'm sure that to you that doesn't count as making a meaningful contribution... -mattbuck (Talk) 00:34, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
KeepFile:Awamori in Moscow.JPG. Hi, dear colleagues! Frankly, I do not see any reason to delete this file – as well as most of other files. I’ve made the photo myself and it makes an excellent illustration for the related article (ru:Авамори) I wrote in Russian Wikipedia. I don't know Japanese and can't argue whether there is any company label on the bottle or not. Although I hardly imagine any bottle label without the producer's logo. Should we delete all alcohol photos except the ones of homemade moonshine?:) Today is December 31, not April 1:) Best New Year wishes, Bapak Alex (talk) 08:36, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
CC question
If the company/copy right holder would accept to release a picture of a bottle with a clearly visible label under creative commons license and prove that with OTRS etc. Would they then just release that specific depiction of the label under CC? Or would it mean they have released any depiction of the label, and thus the label itself, under cc-license?--LittleGun (talk) 23:08, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It is not the visible label that is a problem, reading the guidelines here on wikipedia commons, as i understand it, its only a problem if the label conatains some artistic or sculptural work, wich is not a part of the buisness label. "NOT a blobby unidentifiable medallion and such." --Eniklasc (talk) 23:19, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Nope, since it needs to be separately identifyable, and a generic apple cant be said to fall under that, so there should be absolute no reason for deletion on that. I Dont think mattbuck read up on the copyright rules before he started massposting requests for deletion. Im not sure with mine though anymore, the mountain seems to be apart of the businesslogo and not a copyrighted artistic object, but i cant find anything properly written about that. Maybe its up for deletion, maybe its not. Since mattbuck didnt read up on the rules in the first place, i dont think he is the one to answer our questions. --Eniklasc (talk) 00:02, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry LittleGun, i missread your earlier question you asked wich "SHOULD BE" deleted, and im not sure wich should be deleted. Maybe some with artistic or sculptural objects on them, maybe my mountain and a couple of more ones, but most of them should not be deleted. But i cant find anything written that explaines if there is some difference between company logo and artistic objects. Maybe there is, maybe there is not. --Eniklasc (talk) 00:13, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
KeepFile:CzechSpiritFlask.JPG 18th century so any artwork is well out of copyright. Also in this case I don't think the artwork is the subject of the picture, but the bottle as a whole: even so the artwork could be extracted from this image and used as it's public domain everywhere. --Simonxag (talk) 01:53, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Split up the request into logical and manageable parts. Some images the bottle is not the main item, some labels are just text, some are old enough to be out of copyright and some may be actual copyvios so please split up the request. // Liftarn (talk)
Then I would hope you understand why I requested deletion. We get hundreds of people each month who see pictures on Google, and, because it's on the internet, think they have the right to release it here. People by and large do not understand copyright (can't blame them for that), and so we get people uploading photos they took themselves and believing that theirs is the only copyright which is important. I started this DR because I was worried about the manufacturers' copyrights being violated. You say you're the producer of this product - that's great, we're really happy to have you here, and we thank you for releasing your image freely. However, you can understand, given the hundreds of people who steal promotional images and upload them as own work, that we need to be suspicious. Could you please send permission for this file to our OTRS team (from a corporate email account) so that it can be verified? We just want to make sure no one is ripping off your hard work. -mattbuck (Talk) 10:23, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
File:Luxembourg Vianden Nut-fair 09.jpg On these bottles are selfmade labels made by a local association of elderly people. The bottles contain selfmade liquor made of walnuts, a local speciality not available in shops. There is no copyright sign on the lable nor an address nor whatsoever might refer to a copyright holder. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PlayMistyForMe (talk • contribs)
Copyright does not need to be registered, it simply exists. Whoever drew the squirrel will, absent a transfer agreement or being dead 70 years, be the copyright holder, and their copyright will have been violated by that photo unless they were the uploader. -mattbuck (Talk) 10:23, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
KeepFile:Old Bottle.JPG - mostly text and simple lines and the little artwork present (the trademark) is probably pre 1923 US (see [8] which isn't authoritative but there don't seem to be many sources for info on this bourbon and the style of bottle is very old fashioned.) --Simonxag (talk) 12:45, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Für die ersten drei: Wir haben das in den Räumen der Firma mit ihrer Genehmigung fotografiert. Borco war Sponsor von Wiki loves Cocktails. --Ralf Roleček07:32, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Eigentlich bräuchten wir dann eine OTRS Freigabe von Bronco. Das Problem dabei ist, dass Bronco dann das Flaschendesign bzw alle grafischen Elemente der Flasche unter eine CC-BY-SA Lizenz stellen muss und das wird die Firma vermutlich ungern machen. Amada44talk to me19:32, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Sie müssen nicht das Design freigeben, nur die Fotos. Wir haben auch das Logo von Coca-Cola (ok, alt genug) oder anderer Firmen. Wenn ein konkretes Foto freigegeben ist, bedeutet das ja nicht, daß Markenrechte oder das Urheberrecht am Design betroffen sind. Die verbleiben bei der Firma und die müssen von Nachnutzern beachtet werden, wie Persönlichkeitsrechte bei Porträts. Die Firma wußte, wofür wir was haben wollten und sie haben dementsprechend auch ganz gezielt Flaschen rausgesucht, die wir fotografieren dürfen. Fotografiere ich im Rahmen der Panoramafreiheit ein geschütztes Kunstwerk, verliert ja der Künstler damit auch nicht sein Urheberrecht, er muß es nach nationalem Recht nur dulden, daß man das abbilden darf. Er bleibt Urheber mit allen Rechten. Und der Urheber des Flaschen- oder Etikettendesigns verliert nicht sein Urheberrecht daran, nur weil ein freies Foto existiert. --Ralf Roleček21:50, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Um das Problem zu demonstrieren, habe ich einen Auschnitt aus der Flasche hochgeladen. File:15-09-26-RalfR-WLC-0113-crop.jpg Wer ist der Author dieses Logos? Du? Wohl nicht oder? Ich habe mal Kwaifeh als Author eingertragen. Unter welcher Lizenz denkst du soll es veröfentlicht werden? Will Kwaifeh dass ihr Logo unter einer freien Lizenz veröffentlicht wird? Verstehst du das Problem? Amada44talk to me09:24, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Nach geltender Rechtssprechung ist das Logo Beiwerk, da sich bei einer Änderung des Logos der Gesamtcharakter des Bildes nicht ändern würde. --Ralf Roleček16:37, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Darum gehts doch gar nicht. Verstehst du, dass wenn du ein Bild unter einer freien Lizenz hochlädst, alle Teile dieses Bildes unter einer freien Lizenz stehen und somit in diesem Beispiel auch das Logo? Ist sich Kwaifeh bewusst, dass sie ihr Logo unter einer freien Lizenz veröffentlicht haben? OTRS brauchts so oder so und bis jetzt ist da kein otrs tag dran. Amada44talk to me19:51, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Doch, darum gehts. Wir brauchen hier File:Berlin, April 2016 - 22.jpg auch keine Freigabe von Saturn. Wenn alle Teile des Bildes frei sein müßten, müssen wir alle Fotos löschen, die irgendwas enthalten, was von Menschen geschaffen wurde. Man kann in jeder Stadt die Kamera blind irgendwo hinhalten, es ist immer irgendwas Geschütztes drauf. Das ist doch völlig an der Realität vorbei und auch nicht durch Rechtssprechung gedeckt, was du verlangst. --Ralf Roleček19:59, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
.png){kind=link}
![16 File:TAVtech Class of 2016 ("Aleph Class").jpg](#File:TAVtech_Class_of_2016_("Aleph_Class").jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Сергей_Кузьмин.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_'s_mirror_selfie.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_2.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
._Col·lecció_ABA_Gallery_(Nova_York)..jpg){kind=link}
![193 File:Nogizaka46 2nd Album "Sorezore no Isu" Promotional Event "Nogiten" at Shibuya Tsutaya, Nakamoto Himeka.jpg](#File:Nogizaka46_2nd_Album_"Sorezore_no_Isu"_Promotional_Event_"Nogiten"_at_Shibuya_Tsutaya,_Nakamoto_Himeka.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(14753549357).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Aristetolian.jpg){kind=link}
._Col·lecció_Artur_Ramon_(Barcelona).jpg){kind=link}
._Museu_Nacional_d'Art_de_Catalunya.jpg){kind=link}
._Háttérben_a_Pozsonyi_úti_református_templom_tornya_látszik._Fortepan_30965.jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Delete per nomination. Maybe it's about time we give them an indefinite block. Masum Reza📞 08:02, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
Kept, the file has OTRS-permission, so here's no copyright problem, and it's used in multiple projects, so here's no scope problem. Taivo (talk) 11:12, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
![02:51, 24 January 2018 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2018/01/24#c-Only-2018-01-24T02:51:00.000Z-File:TAVtech_Class_of_2016_("Aleph_Class").jpg){kind=link}
![12:23, 25 January 2018 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2018/01/24#c-Taivo-2018-01-25T12:23:00.000Z-File:TAVtech_Class_of_2016_("Aleph_Class").jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Comment: files not in use at Wikimedia projects,
![[1]](http://images.google.fr/imgres?imgurl=http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_UijZ31j6qsg/R5JcJCy_9PI/AAAAAAAAALM/SVB_auP3LBA/s400/franco%252Be%252Bsalazar.jpg&imgrefurl=http://oficinadegerencia.blogspot.com/2009_03_15_archive.html&usg=__i0qazz-O6qlBdvsKbWgmP06l6nE=&h=287&w=400&sz=25&hl=fr&start=13&um=1&tbnid=mlCKRBPqcTRzyM:&tbnh=89&tbnw=124&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dantonio%2Bsalazar%2Bet%2Bfranco%26as_st%3Dy%26hl%3Dfr%26safe%3Dimages%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:fr:official%26sa%3DX%26um%3D1){kind=link}
I withdraw my nomination See Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_KOKUYO#Files_uploaded_by_KOKUYO_.28talk_.C2.B7_contribs.29_4 --Discasto talk 19:42, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
%D0%A1%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B3%D0%B5%D0%B9_%D0%9A%D1%83%D0%B7%D1%8C%D0%BC%D0%B8%D0%BD.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
%D0%A1%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B3%D0%B5%D0%B9_%D0%9A%D1%83%D0%B7%D1%8C%D0%BC%D0%B8%D0%BD.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Сергей_Кузьмин.jpg){kind=link}
Сергей_Кузьмин.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%27s_mirror_selfie.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%27s_mirror_selfie.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_'s_mirror_selfie.jpg){kind=link}
_'s_mirror_selfie.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
wikimedia.org zu senden, andernfalls müssen die fraglichen Dateien leider (erneut) gelöscht werden. Bei Fragen zum Prozedere bitte ebenfalls an die genannte e-mail adresse wenden.
_-_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_-_2.jpg){kind=link}
_-_2.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
._Col%C2%B7lecci%C3%B3_ABA_Gallery_(Nova_York)..jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
._Col%C2%B7lecci%C3%B3_ABA_Gallery_(Nova_York)..jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
._Col·lecció_ABA_Gallery_(Nova_York)..jpg){kind=link}
._Col·lecció_ABA_Gallery_(Nova_York)..jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(14753549357).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14753549357).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_(14753549357).jpg){kind=link}
_(14753549357).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Oppose blurring the middle person, because this makes the photo ugly. We can keep the image or delete totally. Both mentioned persons Neeta Lind and Leslie Salzillo are mentioned in en.wiki, but no article exists. Taivo (talk) 20:46, 25 January 2018 (UTC).jpg){kind=link}
_-_8.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_9.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
--Adeninasn (talk) 13:22, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Aristetolian.jpg){kind=link}
_Aristetolian.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_Aristetolian.jpg){kind=link}
_Aristetolian.jpg){kind=link}
._Col%C2%B7lecci%C3%B3_Artur_Ramon_(Barcelona).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
._Col%C2%B7lecci%C3%B3_Artur_Ramon_(Barcelona).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
._Museu_Nacional_d%27Art_de_Catalunya.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
._Museu_Nacional_d%27Art_de_Catalunya.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
._Museu_Nacional_d'Art_de_Catalunya.jpg){kind=link}
._Museu_Nacional_d'Art_de_Catalunya.jpg){kind=link}
._H%C3%A1tt%C3%A9rben_a_Pozsonyi_%C3%BAti_reform%C3%A1tus_templom_tornya_l%C3%A1tszik._Fortepan_30965.jpg){kind=link}
._H%C3%A1tt%C3%A9rben_a_Pozsonyi_%C3%BAti_reform%C3%A1tus_templom_tornya_l%C3%A1tszik._Fortepan_30965.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
,_sailing_from_Devonport_Dockyard_to_begin_her_service_with_the_Indian_Navy.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_by_Klugschnacker_in_Wikipedia.JPG){kind=link}
