User talk:Bgag

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File:Shinsegae Department Store in Daejeon.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 15:37, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ongii Monastery 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:49, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ongii Monastery 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:49, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ongii Monastery 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rangan Datta Wiki 03:03, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ongii Monastery 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:42, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ongii Monastery 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Needs a more precise description. --Tagooty 02:42, 28 October 2024 (UTC)  Comment Sorry but there was no description on the site.--Bgag 15:25, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 15:48, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gondal, India.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:09, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Naulakha Palace 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:40, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Naulakha Palace 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:55, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Archaeological Museum of Lothal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:54, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lothal - warehouse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:40, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Otranto 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:10, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Otranto 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support That piping in the lower right corner isn't very nice, you could try cropping or retouching the picture, but IMO it's also acceptable as it is. --Plozessor 05:05, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Otranto 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:23, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Balcony in Otranto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:05, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:05, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Otranto Cathedral 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:11, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ongii Monastery 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:18, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ongii Monastery 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:42, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ongii Monastery 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:29, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ongii Monastery 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:29, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ongii Monastery 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:42, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torre Campaniara (Otranto) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 03:23, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lizard in Otranto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 03:24, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Maria de finibus terrae 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:44, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue of Santa Maria di Leuca 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 04:10, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lothal - water well.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:50, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rani Rupavati's Mosque 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:39, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lothal - lower town.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 03:23, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Utelia Palace 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:50, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Utelia, India 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:54, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ongii Monastery 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 03:46, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ongii Monastery 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 03:46, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ongii Monastery 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:29, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Maria de finibus terrae 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:19, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue of Santa Maria di Leuca 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:38, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fingerpost in Leuca.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:19, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Faro di Santa Maria di Leuca 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:38, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hera Temple, Metapontum 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:38, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Water well in Mongolia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:16, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Khavtsgait Petroglyphs 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:16, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hotel Camp Secret of Ongii 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:16, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vegetable market, Ahmedabad.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:49, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wood carving in Ahmedabad.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:56, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tricycle in Ahmedabad.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Buidhe 05:46, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chabutra in Ahmedabad 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:49, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Houses in Ahmedabad.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:49, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Maria de finibus terrae 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:44, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue of Santa Maria di Leuca 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:48, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Faro di Santa Maria di Leuca 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:44, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hera Temple, Metapontum 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:44, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sasso Barisano (Matera) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:48, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bayanzag 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:05, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bayanzag 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:10, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hotel Camp Secret of Ongii 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:37, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue at Bayanzag Museum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:37, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sun Temple, Modhera 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:05, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jama Masjid, Ahmedabad 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:20, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sidi Saiyyed Mosque, Ahmedabad.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:07, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chabutra in Ahmedabad 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:13, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palazzo di città, Taranto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:58, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bayanzag 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:14, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Khavtsgait Petroglyphs 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:09, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Khavtsgait Petroglyphs 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:10, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castello Aragonese (Taranto) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:49, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sasso Barisano (Matera) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:04, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hera Temple, Metapontum 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:59, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Surya Kund 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:14, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sun Temple, Modhera - Sabha Mandap 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:49, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sun Temple, Modhera 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:09, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sun Temple, Modhera - Guda Mandap 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:52, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ponte Girevole (Taranto) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Very slightly leaning out on the left side, otherwise good. --Plozessor 05:04, 10 November 2024 (UTC) ✓ Done You're right. --Bgag 14:48, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:40, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Via Porto Salvo, Cefalù 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:51, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piazza del Duomo (Cefalù).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:51, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Door knocker in Cefalù 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:55, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Door knocker in Cefalù 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:59, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sasso Barisano (Matera) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:58, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Temple of Poseidon (Taranto).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 04:42, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Door knocker in Taranto 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 04:35, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sasso Barisano (Matera) 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 04:34, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sasso Barisano (Matera) 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 04:34, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Khavtsgait Petroglyphs 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:05, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Khavtsgait Petroglyphs 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:06, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bayanzag 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:06, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bayanzag 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:16, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Camels in Gobi Desert 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:07, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rani ki vav 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 04:15, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rani ki vav 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 04:15, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rani ki vav 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 04:14, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chiesa di San Pasquale (Taranto).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:00, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ovoo in Gobi Desert.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:21, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Khongoryn Els 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:21, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rani ki vav 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:29, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rani ki vav 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:39, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sasso Caveoso (Matera) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:29, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sasso Caveoso (Matera) 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:29, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sasso Caveoso (Matera) 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 04:34, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Khavtsgait Petroglyphs 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 07:03, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Khavtsgait Petroglyphs 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:17, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bayanzag 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 06:02, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Khavtsgait Petroglyphs 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 07:51, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sasso Caveoso (Matera) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:14, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedral (Matera) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:22, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Khavtsgait Petroglyphs 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Khavtsgait Petroglyphs 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Khavtsgait Petroglyphs 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:12, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bayanzag 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:12, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Camels in Gobi Desert 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 04:19, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tibet Museum (Dharamsala).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:09, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Library of Tibetan Works and Archives.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:09, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parliament of the Central Tibetan Administration 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:12, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Deden Tsuglakhang 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:12, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! House in Naddi 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:14, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]