Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/01/09

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive January 9th, 2018
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lower resolution of this file. ~Cybularny Speak? 07:34, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 16:15, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Delete. Frank vic (talk) 20:21, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Speedy-deleted per nomination, as uploader nominated it on day of upload. --Túrelio (talk) 20:44, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Delete. Frank vic (talk) 20:21, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Speedy-deleted per nomination, as uploader nominated it on day of upload. --Túrelio (talk) 20:44, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:02, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Rudolphous at 21:02, 9 Januar 2018 UTC: ' --Krdbot 01:39, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Overprocessed/overcompressed photo/"personal art". Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. LX (talk, contribs) 11:43, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --matanya talk 06:43, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Suspect to be a copyright violation: http://www.concerte-azi.ro/bug-mafia-lansat-un-nou-single-%E2%80%9Cpe-coasta%E2%80%9D ....HMS (talk) 15:50, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 08:41, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Playgirl model (talk) 06:13, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Mardetanha talk 19:31, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

devrait etre nommer Islander29 (talk) 21:16, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Devrait etre nommé Thamnoseris lacerata au lieu de Thamnoseris Lacerata erreur lors de la mise en ligne Islander29 (talk) 21:18, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Devrait etre nommé Thamnoseris lacerata au lieu de Thamnoseris Lacerata erreur lors de la mise en ligne Islander29 (talk) 21:20, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Il suffi de demander de renommer le fichier (chose faîte désormais) Ruthven (msg) 17:55, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar to https://www.gettyimages.fr/license/875012686 Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:45, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 20:15, 10 Januar 2018 UTC: Copyright violation: https://www.gettyimages.com/license/874795240 --Krdbot 01:38, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mélomène (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:DW copyvios. Existing images cropped onto different bodies, and altered in various ways (e.g., colourisation, horizontal flip, slight rotation, etc.). For example, File:Roger Heim.jpg is the head from here; File:Jacques Fabriès.jpg is the head from here; etc. Playing around in Photoshop does not remove the original author's copyright.

Эlcobbola talk 16:19, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyviol ? Against who ? All images from which Mélomèn created this one, are anonymous. --Amélie Pataud (talk) 14:30, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Just because you don't know the name of the authors doesn't mean they don't exist. They do and they still have rights (as clearly stated in the article L113-6 of the Code de la propriété intellectuelle). Cdlt VIGNERON (talk) 17:35, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --VIGNERON (talk) 17:31, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of image here (direct) Эlcobbola talk 16:58, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --VIGNERON (talk) 17:27, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work by uploader. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:16, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:12, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not Myriam Fares : out of project scope. Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:40, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Admins, can we salt the title? --E4024 (talk) 06:57, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

fake, deleted before, etc. Rafic.Mufid (talk) 01:27, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Being discussed for deletion. E4024 (talk) 11:44, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 18:23, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Playgirl model (talk) 05:56, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:08, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Playgirl model (talk) 05:57, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:08, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Playgirl model (talk) 05:58, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:08, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Playgirl model (talk) 05:59, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:07, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Playgirl model (talk) 06:00, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:07, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Playgirl model (talk) 06:00, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:06, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Playgirl model (talk) 06:01, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:06, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Playgirl model (talk) 06:02, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:05, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Playgirl model (talk) 06:03, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:05, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Playgirl model (talk) 06:04, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:05, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Playgirl model (talk) 06:04, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:04, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Playgirl model (talk) 06:05, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:04, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Playgirl model (talk) 06:06, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:04, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Playgirl model (talk) 06:07, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:04, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Playgirl model (talk) 06:08, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:04, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Playgirl model (talk) 06:09, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:04, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Playgirl model (talk) 06:10, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:01, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Playgirl model (talk) 06:12, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:01, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Playgirl model (talk) 05:40, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:15, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Playgirl model (talk) 05:41, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:15, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Playgirl model (talk) 05:42, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:15, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Playgirl model (talk) 05:42, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:14, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Playgirl model (talk) 05:44, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination+DW issues. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:14, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Playgirl model (talk) 05:44, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:11, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Playgirl model (talk) 05:45, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:10, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Playgirl model (talk) 05:46, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:11, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Playgirl model (talk) 05:47, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:10, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Playgirl model (talk) 05:48, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:10, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Playgirl model (talk) 05:50, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination+no permission. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:09, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Playgirl model (talk) 05:51, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:09, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Playgirl model (talk) 05:51, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:09, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Playgirl model (talk) 05:52, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:09, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Playgirl model (talk) 05:54, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:09, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Playgirl model (talk) 05:55, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:09, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image without any use for Wikipedia projects. Neither Commons is a place to host selfies, except for Wikipedists who want to show their face on their user pages. SuZumiya (talk) 07:58, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 10:17, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect edited version uploaded; User error. Brett osteen (talk) 07:38, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by JuTa at 01:19, 14 Januar 2018 UTC: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file --Krdbot 07:32, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside project scope, non-notable fan art Ytoyoda (talk) 14:25, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Dyolf77 at 19:48, 14 Januar 2018 UTC: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work - --Krdbot 01:31, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused and advert. Sixflashphoto (talk) 18:30, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, source – Fqacebook. Taivo (talk) 15:47, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"FBMD" in metadata, OTRS permission from the copyright holder is needed. Y.haruo (talk) 05:40, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Krd at 14:07, 15 Januar 2018 UTC: OTRS: Unaccepted or insufficient permission for use on Commons --Krdbot 19:29, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

blurry uneccesary image SecretName101 (talk) 00:04, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:16, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image out of COM:SCOPE El Funcionario (talk) 01:31, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:16, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image out of COM:SCOPE El Funcionario (talk) 01:33, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:17, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:55, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:18, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copy from http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7077/6871285946_a565ff3831.jpg Outlookxp (talk) 07:01, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Mys_721tx (talk) 05:02, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copy from http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7279/7017393335_6abba58739.jpg Outlookxp (talk) 07:02, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Mys_721tx (talk) 05:02, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copy from http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7203/7017393569_50cdaa5141.jpg Outlookxp (talk) 07:02, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Mys_721tx (talk) 05:02, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copy from http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7204/7017393451_d18ae1e316.jpg Outlookxp (talk) 07:03, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Mys_721tx (talk) 05:02, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copy from http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7268/6871286596_cf5cc517a6.jpg Outlookxp (talk) 07:04, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Mys_721tx (talk) 05:03, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copy from http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7200/7017393699_57e208f0ae.jpg Outlookxp (talk) 07:04, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: \. --Mys_721tx (talk) 05:03, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copy from https://pic.pimg.tw/iambruno/60677b5d4663a047a9488893bc925b87_n.jpg Outlookxp (talk) 07:07, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Mys_721tx (talk) 05:03, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"FBMD" in metadata, OTRS permission from the copyright holder is needed. Y.haruo (talk) 10:17, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:20, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:21, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Joschi71 (talk) 10:31, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:21, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Masalli qasimli (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo images and songs. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Masalli qasimli (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 17:04, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:27, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Masalli qasimli (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private photos of the user to show them in the gallery in the personal space. Wiki is not a hosting.

Bilderling (talk) 11:33, 9 January 2018 (UTC) Şəkildə göründüyü kimi, şəkillər mənə məxsusdur. Sadiq Fəyyazov isə mənim qardaşımdır. Как вы видети на картинке, фотографии принадлежат мне. Садиг Фаязов - мой брат. --Masalli qasimli (talk) 12:28, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Depicted Sadiq Fayyazov is uploader's Masalli qasimli's brother. Taivo (talk) 11:34, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: commons is not a webhost. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 15:57, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Masalli qasimli (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Passport scans of a granddaddy - sensitive data

Bilderling (talk) 08:40, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bu fayllar mənə və mənim ailəmə məxsusdur. Sadəcə faylları mənə qardaşım göndərib. Эти файлы принадлежат мне и моей семье. Просто эти файлы отправил мне мой брат. --Masalli qasimli (talk) 09:21, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. This is passport of Soviet Union. Soviet Union does not exist since 1991. All those data are public and do not consist any secret, also during more than 25 years from issuing some data in the passport aren't correct anymore. Being more specific, the passport belongs to person, who was born in 1921 and died in 1998, so his privacy does not need to be protected very much. The files are used in az.wiki in article nameroom, so they are in scope too. Taivo (talk) 12:38, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:22, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Masalli qasimli (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal images, out of project scope, fan art, some derivative works, videos with non free sounds/music and in some pictures the author seems to be the subject of the photograph.

D Y O L F 77[Talk] 18:23, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bu fayllar mənə məxsusdur. Eyni zamanda meta məlumatlar da qeyd olunub. Silinməyə heç bir səbəb yoxdur. --Masalli qasimli (talk) 20:12, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

These files belong to me. At the same time, meta data, and records were. Delete there is no reason. --Masalli qasimli (talk) 20:12, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Personally, I think private pictures in user pages should be kept in the minimum. Having said that general opinion (that we can delete "excess" personal files although used in user space) we must check if some of these files are used here and there, in pages not belonging to users. (For example the last file...) --E4024 (talk) 08:11, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm no english language. Yes Azerbaijani, Turkish and Russian language. --Masalli qasimli (talk) 20:12, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Could you please do not delete these photos as this photos was done by me and genuine.

--Masalli qasimli (talk) 09:17, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • E4024, teşekkür ediyorum. Ama ben özel hayatımı kimsenin önüne sermiyorum. Yuxarıda olan dosyaları sile bilirsiniz ama, bu

dosyalar az vikide makaleler için çok önemli. Lütfen o dosyaları silmeyin. Hürmetle: --Masalli qasimli (talk) 09:30, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep File:Fərəcov Fəyyaz Qasım oğlunun imzası.png ({{PD-trivial}}, in use in az.wikipedia), File:Images.PO.jpg (plausibly an own photo / похоже на собственную фотографию).
 Delete 13 files above as deception / обман / kandırma. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 10:15, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Вот именно Images.PO.jpg только и является собственной работой. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 11:09, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Incnis Mrsi: what do you mean with «deception»? -- Tuválkin 09:58, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Tuvalkin: I mean forgery of authorship records. A ≈ 14-years-old youth claiming authorship of photographs made decades ago. Are you happy with all this rampage of deceptive forgers (like this) on Commons?! Incnis Mrsi (talk) 10:14, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Incnis Mrsi: thanks for explaining your apparently random accusation; it’d be good to be clear the first time around. And of course I’m not happy with uploaders being deceptive, why should I? -- Tuválkin 10:22, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Incnis Mrsi, Так они все является собственной работай. В том числе: File:Fəyyazov Mehdi (uşaqlıq şəklim).jpg --Masalli qasimli (talk) 11:20, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fəyyazov Mehdi (uşaqlıq şəklim).jpg является сканом старой фотографии, а старая фотография не могла быть сделана юношей, позирующим с надписью «Азербайджан». Incnis Mrsi (talk) 12:00, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Incnis Mrsi, I did not cheat. When i was a kid shot this picture. Poor english language.

Tuvalkin, I thank colleagues. --Masalli qasimli (talk) 14:00, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Incnis Mrsi, Mən heç kimi aldatmıram. Mən uşaq olanda çəkilib o şəkil. İngilis dilini zəif bilirəm.

Tuvalkin, Təşəkkür edirəm həmkar. --Masalli qasimli (talk) 14:03, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. The 2 keep "votes" were for DW that were claimed as own work but had no proper source and author. P 1 9 9   19:12, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong upload Shobhitbhatnagar18 (talk) 12:03, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:22, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 18:32, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:23, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hard to see how this photo of magazine covers, most of them with copyrighted photos, wouldn't be a copyvio. Jmabel ! talk 05:14, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 06:00, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I believe that at least the English translation here is still copyrighted (and probably the Spanish original is, too), so this would be a copyvio. Jmabel ! talk 05:11, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: It is. The copyright term in Argentina is 70 years, the author died in 1986. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 06:10, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright on buttons SecretName101 (talk) 00:53, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: miniscule images, DM. P 1 9 9   14:55, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright on button SecretName101 (talk) 01:04, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:55, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dubious personal work El Funcionario (talk) 01:06, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:56, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo with low resolution and extremely low quality Siyuwj (talk) 01:25, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion. P 1 9 9   14:57, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright of images on several displayed buttons SecretName101 (talk) 01:40, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: miniscule images, DM. P 1 9 9   14:57, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uses templates from www.free-power-point-templates.com whose website has copyright claim. Rahul Bott (talk) 02:52, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:00, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bdmitos (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Per COM:SCOPE: private images which are unlikely to be used in a project

Takeaway (talk) 03:35, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:01, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:46, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:01, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright 2017, Forbesindia.com Fitindia (talk) 05:36, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:02, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:54, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:03, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:55, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:03, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:56, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:03, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clarinet reed image files of User:さいとうくん

[edit]

These images are poor quality so they aren't useful for articles. There is the very useful clarinet reed image already uploaded in commons by the other user. See also ja:Wikipedia:削除依頼/ファイル:ClarinetReed.JPG. --新幹線 (talk) 06:24, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The suggested replacement shows the reeds from the inner (flat) side, while these pictures show the reeds from the outer (curved) side. We should  Keep File:リード.jpg on that basis, and frankly given the paucity of pictures in Category:Single reeds (most of which are saxophone reeds anyway) I'd be inclined to  Keep them all. --bjh21 (talk) 13:56, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:bjh21, at least until higher quality images are uploaded. P 1 9 9   15:05, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Buggy SVG, replaced by File:Ölsäure mit Endgruppe 2.svg. Leyo 15:35, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 14:09, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work. Small size, no metadata. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 06:52, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:14, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, mainly promotional upload , see watermarks. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:04, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:26, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal artwork, has no educational value or potential uses. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 09:50, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:27, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be the own work of a new user. No exif Gbawden (talk) 10:03, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reason for deleting? There exist video footage of the mockup in flight in the archve. --Blockhaj (talk) 15:27, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You posted this as own work. If it was taken by someone else it's not own work. You can't upload it if you don't have permission Gbawden (talk) 11:56, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, certainly not own work. P 1 9 9   15:29, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Collages need source and license for every used image. Taivo (talk) 10:13, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, DW. P 1 9 9   15:30, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope due to small size and bad quality. Taivo (talk) 10:32, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:30, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Who is he? Looks like a personal file. In scope? E4024 (talk) 13:14, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:32, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We have two of this file, with same name. E4024 (talk) 13:58, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused personal image, out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:33, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like an OoS personal file, doesn't it? E4024 (talk) 15:18, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:50, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like an OoS personal file, doesn't it? E4024 (talk) 15:19, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:50, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope HerrAdams (talk) 17:24, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:47, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal photo/selfie and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 18:19, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:46, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal photo/selfie and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 18:20, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:46, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 18:23, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:46, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 18:26, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:45, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 18:27, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:45, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:30, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:45, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 18:35, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:43, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 18:36, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:43, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 18:37, 9 January 2018 (UTC) Sixflashphoto (talk) 18:37, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:43, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: personal photo/selfie. Sixflashphoto (talk) 18:39, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:42, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by KhizerHayat (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused personal photo/selfie and unlikely to be used in a project.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 18:42, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:40, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lord de Velville (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused personal photo. Subject is of questionable notability and unlikely to be used in a project.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 18:44, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:40, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal photo/selfie and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 18:45, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:40, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal images, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   19:25, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:40, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:45, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:38, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kapapmendnsn (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 20:20, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:37, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sandpsandp23 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 20:21, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:36, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:06, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:35, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:39, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Liar!!! This is NOT YOUR PHOTO!

YOU SIR ARE RUDE AND DEAD WRONG! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shallemb (talk • contribs) 21:53, 9 January 2018‎ (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:34, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:44, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:33, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Carlosbakoliver (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - Not educationally useful; unused personal images of uploader.

Hiàn (talk) 23:45, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:32, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - Not educationally useful; unused personal image of uploader. Hiàn (talk) 23:46, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:31, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - Not educationally useful; unused personal image of uploader(?); file uploaded solely for the purpose of promotion. Hiàn (talk) 23:48, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:31, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright problem, also no clear author Afifa Afrin (talk) 02:43, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:46, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertissement / Publicité Laszlo (talk) 08:47, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It seems this picture has been uploaded by a user that contributed only one time, for uploading this picture. The clear reference of a commercial company/website (in the picture and in its description!) make me think this person is an employee of it. Moreover, there's a licence icon (c) in the picture and I'm really not sure things can be uploaded like that.
Additionnality, picture's description includes advertisment for the website and an overall consideration about these cups : "You can read more on this website http://menstrualcup.co to see why menstrual cups are better for you, the planet and your wallet" : I think it's not compatible with wikicommon rules.
In my point, we have to remove this picture.
Laszlo (talk) 09:04, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: no evidence of permission, promotional description could've been edited out but with the unclear copyright status we cannot keep it on the project at this time. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:50, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 09:20, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:49, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No mention of license at source, we should default to 'All Rights Reserved' Gikü (talk) 11:51, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:50, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

cpyvio image. Störm (talk) 19:50, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 03:37, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy of https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BMjA0OWQ5MzUtMTcxMS00N2U2LTkwZWEtMjc3ZjQ3YzU0NmFlXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyMjQwMDg0Ng@@._V1_.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:36, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 14:47, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy of https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BMmMxMzM1ODgtMjRjOS00MWE5LWE4YzItYjgzYmJkZDdkMDU5XkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyMjQwMDg0Ng@@._V1_.jpg. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:38, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 14:46, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar to https://img.uefa.com/imgml/TP/players/14/2018/324x324/250111131.jpg, DW, dubious own work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:49, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, single file upload, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 14:45, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality, unauthorized by the National Gallery in Prague, duplicit file NoJin (talk) 21:01, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Author of the original painting died more than 100yrs ago -> PD, no authorization needed. No reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 14:43, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality, unauthorized by the National Gallery in Prague, duplicit file NoJin (talk) 21:17, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Author of the original painting died more than 100yrs ago -> PD, no authorization needed. No reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 14:42, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:38, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like a tourist shot. Maybe not notable persons. Superseded by similar view of terracotta objects without these people: File:2010 CHINE (4566869003).jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:17, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom.: personal image, not in use (out of scope). --Wdwd (talk) 14:36, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparently, this poster is part of a series of information panels found near a cemetery in Medina, Saudi Arabia. The poster itself is definitely not the uploader's own work, while there is no COM:FOP in Saudi Arabia. HyperGaruda (talk) 22:51, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:34, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar to http://www.sofoot.com/IMG/joueurs/riza-durmisi-177853.jpg. Dubious own work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:21, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 14:33, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - Not educationally useful; personal image of uploader - uploader has no significant contributions to Wikimedia projects, only use is on user page of promotional nature. Hiàn (talk) 23:50, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:32, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful as own work, found elsewhere on the web. Hiàn (talk) 23:53, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 14:30, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, personal image. Дима Г (talk) 23:56, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:30, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation NiTenIchiRyu (talk) 10:57, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 15:12, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Suspect to be a copyright violation: https://twitter.com/keerthyfanz/status/824589778867802112 ....HMS (talk) 15:44, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 15:20, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Suspect to be a Copyright violation, published on 13th December 2017 on http://radionabinsansar.com/blog/tag/literature/ ....HMS (talk) 15:57, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 15:18, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

corrupt file. -- Geagea (talk) 15:58, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 15:17, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Exists elsewhere on the web, no metadata, not proven to be own work. ~Cybularny Speak? 16:12, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 15:12, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. https://jeffathletics.com/2017/03/08/jeffersonville-red-devil-golf/ John from Idegon (talk) 16:39, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 15:11, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please delete my photo George Mel (talk) 16:47, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, no recent upload, in use. --Wdwd (talk) 15:11, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

please delete my photo George Mel (talk) 16:47, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, no recent upload, in use. --Wdwd (talk) 15:10, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Θα ήθελα την διαγραφή της φωτογραφίας George Mel (talk) 13:56, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 06:04, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

please delete my photo George Mel (talk) 16:48, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, no recent upload, in use. --Wdwd (talk) 15:10, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Paul Wolf (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - no educational value

Cethos 17:10, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 15:01, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant. Almost identical image exists: File:Portugal 20170511 143337(0) (34374146620).jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:18, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, redirection. --Wdwd (talk) 15:00, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

THIS IS MY FAMILIES CAR ACCIDENT Super20178 (talk) 18:58, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Super20178: That's not itself a reason for deletion. Can you explain why Commons should delete this picture? --bjh21 (talk) 21:28, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 14:54, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non free photo for living person --Alaa :)..! 20:15, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 14:53, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Wdwd: he uploaded it again! --Alaa :)..! 17:09, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 04:48, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 20:24, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:51, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

예전 사진이라서 최신 사진으로 올리려고 합니다. Eleni P29 (talk) 03:06, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Not a valid reason to delete, as per Google Translate, the DR requester says that "I am going to upload my latest photo because it is an old one.". Tm (talk) 06:24, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Photo being outdated cannot be a valid deletion reason. If you want to upload a new one, just do it (tm). — regards, Revi 08:50, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion, no valid reason. --Wdwd (talk) 16:01, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Stephenloveslife (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Uploaded as "own work", these images seem to have been copied from the internet.

Takeaway (talk) 03:59, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 15:58, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"FBMD" in metadata, OTRS permission from the copyright holder is needed. Y.haruo (talk) 05:40, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 15:56, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"FBMD" in metadata, OTRS permission from the copyright holder is needed. Y.haruo (talk) 05:44, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 15:57, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Es deutet nichts auf "Eigenes Werk" von HairmanDo, Freigabe durch den Urheber fehlt Jbergner (talk) 07:03, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 15:54, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation - MHIRM talk 08:24, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, no permission. --Wdwd (talk) 15:53, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation. - MHIRM talk 08:26, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, no permission. --Wdwd (talk) 15:53, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation. - MHIRM talk 08:26, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, no permission. --Wdwd (talk) 15:53, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation. - MHIRM talk 08:26, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, no permission. --Wdwd (talk) 15:53, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not a nymphaea caerulea. It's a commercial hybrid called nymphaea "Islamorada". I can send them a right photo of this species. Here you can see the same hybrid. https://www.victoria-adventure.org/waterlilies/day_bloomer_galleries/islamorada.html 46.26.208.35 15:14, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: You can update the information on the image page by choosing "Edit". There's no need to delete the picture for that. --bjh21 (talk) 15:35, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep: Obviously, as per bjh21. --Mathieu MD (talk) 16:25, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Wdwd (talk) 15:34, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ladiesofbohane (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Some of these are labelled "BY SHANE MC CARTHY", some "BY MISCHA SCHERRER", and one "BY JEN ROSENSTEIN". All are labelled "own work" by Ladiesofbohane, though. It's possible that Ladiesofbohane goes by all three of those names. More likely, the free licence is incorrect and these are copyright violations.

bjh21 (talk) 15:30, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 15:21, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Acho que eu coloquei as atribuições todas erradas. Peço desculpas Jmunhoz (talk) 22:20, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. --Érico (talk) 16:29, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of presumably copyrighted photos and display boards: no FOP in the UK for two-dimensional artworks. —Odysseus1479 (talk) 03:15, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 03:57, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo (colour version on enWP is under FUR); no FOP for two-dimensional artwork in the UK, as well as a fairly low TOO.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 03:24, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 04:00, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

States in the description this has a Noncommercial CC license, which is not compatible with Commons. This is confirmed by the Policies of the website where it came from. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 05:07, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 04:07, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of permission, or that User:Countmustard is DontKnowWhatToDraw IJReid (talk) 05:28, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 04:11, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Despite having uploaded this file I ask that you delete it, because before I thought it was just simple geometric figures, but I realized that it has originality. SuZumiya (talk) 07:47, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 04:15, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Fantcany as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G7
Converted by me to DR, as it does not qualify for speedy-deletion, as it is currently in use on a project. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:51, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: It isn't in use now and the user doesn't have any contributions. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 04:23, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The painting is not the uploader's work (it's a work by Jan Verkolje in the public domain), so the photograph probably isn't the uploader's work either, and there is no truthful source information to determine if that is indeed published under the stated license. LX (talk, contribs) 08:41, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thhe file can be found on several sites through Google. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 04:35, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality, blurry Hiddenhauser (talk) 11:08, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:41, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As depicted person died in 1915, the photo is not own work. But the photo is not enough old to assume public domain without evidence. Who is the photographer and when (s)he died? When and where the photo was first published? Taivo (talk) 11:28, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-1923. Ruthven (msg) 08:43, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture of non-notable person. All edits are of self promotion. Hindust@niक्या करें? बातें! 12:29, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:44, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture is not a official picture of Maria Doyle Kennedy and the user who uploaded it does not have the rights to the picture Ladiesofbohane (talk) 13:31, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: The upload history is a bit tangled, but the earliest is the first version of File:Orphan black 0001.jpg, by Tristan Loper. Other files derived from the same original are:
Another version of the same picture appears on Flickr with a (different) free licence, along with many other pictures from the same event taken with the same camera. I think this will need rather more evidence from Ladiesofbohane that Tristan Loper was not the author. --bjh21 (talk) 14:24, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The image was tagged for speedy deletion today by 176.61.23.124 with the rationale “Please use other picture this is unauthorised and is not a correct representation of artist”. Since that is not one of the criteria for speedy deletion, I have removed the tag and am mentioning it here instead. --bjh21 (talk) 11:21, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: There is no doubt that the image was taken by Tristan Loper, so he has the rights to this image. If the artist depicted does not want this image to be used, she is invited to submit a better free image.--17:11, 10 January 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by CennoxX (talk • contribs) 17:11, 10 January 2018‎ (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. Ruthven (msg) 08:45, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader claims to be the person in the picture, but also the creator of the image. I don't thinks so. Marcus Cyron (talk) 14:41, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Fanghong. Ruthven (msg) 08:57, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no freedom of panorama in italy 151.42.243.44 14:56, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 08:57, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no freedom of panorama in italy 151.42.243.44 14:56, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The building is not registered at the Ministry for protection; thus, copyright claims are not enforceable. Ruthven (msg) 08:58, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Luna Hal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Contemporary art by Luba Hal uploaded by an account with the same name. Needs com:otrs verification to stay on Commons.

Vera (talk) 16:02, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination + ADVERT. Ruthven (msg) 09:00, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1/3 of the picture is a copyrighted picture. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 18:22, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 09:01, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The title and category show that the main subject is the poster (and a big part of the photo is another copyrighted poster). TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 18:23, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 09:01, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

interior of a museum, no permission visible for this work Alabasterstein (talk) 20:34, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • I'm sorry but you're failing in providing an actual policy and evidence for your statement. As far as I know there is freedom of panorama in Switzerland and the interior of a building is not mentioned as exeption by the law. --Phyrexian ɸ 08:18, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Sorry, but you're definitly wrong. FoP is defined as a provision in the copyright laws of various jurisdictions that permits taking photographs and video footage and creating other images (such as paintings) of buildings and sometimes sculptures and other art works which are permanently located in a public place. The interior of a building is never a public place, quite not in a museum where you have to pay for enty. This principle is in all country the same where FoP is to apply. --Alabasterstein (talk) 07:34, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • FoP is defined in a different way by each jurisdiction. The incipit of an article of en.wikipedia is not a legal definition anywhere, and your personal interpretation of it is definitely not a policy here. I repeat myself: as far as I know FoP is permitted in Switzerland at federal level, and there are no mentions of interior of buildings in that law. I still ask you to prove me wrong or to provide a policy of Wikimedia Commons that impose the deletion of this file. --Phyrexian ɸ 02:39, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also in Switzerland the basic definition of FoP is like in all other countries. Art. 27/1 URG says: Ein Werk, das sich bleibend an oder auf allgemein zugänglichem Grund befindet, darf abgebildet werden; die Abbildung darf angeboten, veräussert, gesendet oder sonst wie verbreitet werden. Logical translation in english: A oeuvre is allowed to be reproduced and published if it is permanently and on public place. I reapeat: ON PUBLIC PLACE. The interior of a museum which you have to pay entrance fee is never a public place. --Alabasterstein (talk) 06:52, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion: wrong interpretation of what Freedom of panorama is. Ruthven (msg) 09:04, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

interior of a museum, no permission visible for this work Alabasterstein (talk) 20:35, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Permission was granted during the visit. Just requested a confirmation from the museum in writing. Until then, please postpone the deletion request. --Vardai (talk) 10:15, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Permission was granted by the legal head of Fondation Beyeler. Where should I upload it? --212.31.90.40 11:50, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And what about personality rights in this pictures? Did you ask each person to be in a picture, that will later on publicated here? --Alabasterstein (talk) 06:42, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. If personality rights are your concert, pleaase add the relative template. Ruthven (msg) 09:04, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

interior of a museum, no permittion visible for this work Alabasterstein (talk) 20:35, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Permission was granted during the visit. Just requested a confirmation from the museum in writing. Until then, please postpone the deletion request. --Vardai (talk) 10:15, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Permission was granted by the legal head of Fondation Beyeler. Where should I upload it? --212.31.90.40 11:50, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And what about personality rights in this pictures? Did you ask each person to be in a picture, that will later on publicated here? --Alabasterstein (talk) 06:43, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. If personality rights are your concert, pleaase add the relative template. Ruthven (msg) 09:04, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

interior of a museum, no permission visible for this work Alabasterstein (talk) 20:36, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 09:03, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

interior of a museum, no permission visible for this work Alabasterstein (talk) 20:36, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 09:03, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

interior of a museum, no permission visible for this work Alabasterstein (talk) 20:36, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 09:03, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

interior of a museum, no permission visible for this work Alabasterstein (talk) 20:36, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 09:03, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

interior of a museum, no permittion visible for this work Alabasterstein (talk) 20:36, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 09:03, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) Angela Marklew. Identity of Amedayusnews should be verified via OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:37, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 09:03, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

location info stored inside Max4564 (talk) 21:51, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request. Ruthven (msg) 09:06, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claimed as a free user-created work, yet the website of this organization is copyrighted. Outside fo project scope anyway. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:59, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 09:06, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

None of the licensing conditions provided suggest any kind of compatible license Discasto talk 18:23, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: Attribution requested. Ruthven (msg) 07:01, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Trying again. Apparently, the person who closed the DR didn't even read the licensing conditions. They're in here and here and do not support at all any of the licensing claims in the image description. Neither 'attribution' nor 'public domain' Discasto talk 14:19, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Discasto, amigo, la puerta de la Asociación Española de Nosequé no vale perder tanto tiempo. Si yo fuera admin, habría cerrado este pedido de borrado en seguida. Hay muchos otros archivos que esperan la atención de admins y de nosotros los otros usuarios. No insista pf. --E4024 (talk) 14:26, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
E4024, amigo, no entiendo nada de lo que has dicho. Las condiciones de licencia de la fuente no son las que se dicen aquí que son y todavía me estoy preguntando en qué estaba pensando Ruthven cuando cerró el DR. Si, como parece, no tienes mucha idea de licencias, estaría bien que no nos hicieras perder tanto tiempo. Un cordial saludo --Discasto talk 19:03, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment We clarified the issue with Discasto. The nota legal (the link provided above doesn't work) does not license their contents, so we should consider "© Agencia Estatal de Seguridad Ferroviaria", all rights reserved. --Ruthven (msg) 10:40, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I swear it worked . It's here but you can see it says nothing about lincensing condition. --Discasto talk 11:28, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: It is "All rights reserved" as can be seen at the foot of the page. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 03:41, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A picture in a web is NOT a legal or regulatory provision. Neither a judgement of jurisdictional bodies Discasto talk 14:28, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Images are copyrighted. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 03:29, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Orphaned personal picture (used to be in de:Benutzer:Shagrath). Leyo 15:25, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 22:07, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jussim (talk · contribs)

[edit]

I think this is an attempt at self-promotion, and although the logo doesn't pass the threshold of originality, we have much better images of equilateral triangles available, e.g. File:Element Feuer.png.

Apocheir (talk) 20:48, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 22:24, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant. Superseded by similar view, which is a bit sharper: File:Phi Phi Island Tour (4296478039).jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:09, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 22:26, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

too small resolution and quality to be any useful. Jcornelius (talk) 22:52, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 22:25, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like an OoS personal file, doesn't it? I see no educational value here. E4024 (talk) 15:19, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:18, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata: All Right Reserved Kareem Studio 2016, therefore suspect to be a copyright violation. ....HMS (talk) 16:13, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:17, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing permission from photographer. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:43, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:17, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) Angela Marklew. Identity of Amedayusnews should be verified via OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:34, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:15, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright Boeing, see https://www.challenges.fr/salon-du-bourget/ces-avions-au-destin-brise_207236/slide_2 Marc Lacoste (talk) 14:55, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:19, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS-permission from photographer Hugo Glendinning is needed. Taivo (talk) 11:33, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:44, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar to http://www.wanacorp.fr/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Kasi-Mlungu-2_-360x450@2x.jpg or https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/830103476428496896/WfYt1o5h.jpg. Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:57, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:43, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same series as http://www.pictame.com/media/1258583123520934772_261679371 or https://scontent-cdt1-1.cdninstagram.com/t51.2885-15/e35/14718188_596825870489587_5724637865887924224_n.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:19, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:43, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recent file by one-time uploader. male in bikini bottom. Exhibitionism - amateur porn. I find it OoS. E4024 (talk) 12:29, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:42, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recent upload. Personal file. See other files of the uploader, exhibitionism or amateur porn. I consider all of them OoS. E4024 (talk) 13:49, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:41, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant and a bit blurred. Superseded by clearer image with larger field of view: File:Bangalore to Pune 19 (Friar's Balsam Flickr).jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:53, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I would go for a delete for the other one too since it looks unlikely to be of project use. Rahul Bott (talk) 01:35, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:41, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

소방공무원 전세중입니다. 얼굴이 보기 싫으니 상반신 사진 삭제해 주세요. 부탁드립니다. 121.167.245.33 01:54, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Google Translate: “Firefighting officers are chartered. I do not want to see your face. Please.” An actual Korean speaker might want to double-check, but I don’t think this is a valid reason for deletion. LaundryPizza03 (talk) 02:46, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion: we have OTRS. Ruthven (msg) 23:01, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ersetzt durch: François Gérard Alexandrine-Sophie de Bawr 1810 détail.jpg Petermichaelgenner (talk) 07:27, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: not exact duplicate. Ruthven (msg) 23:01, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Iran. 4nn1l2 (talk) 10:56, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 23:07, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Iran. 4nn1l2 (talk) 10:57, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 23:07, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Iran. 4nn1l2 (talk) 11:02, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 23:08, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files from all-idol.com

[edit]

Discrepancy in the license: at the end of the articles in the source there are both a CC-BY-2.0-KR icon and a non-free license icon. Some photos from Korean websites with the same problem were already deleted for the Precautionary principle (see here and here), so I propose the deletion of the abovementioned photos for the same reason. --Chiyako92 (talk) 15:52, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. For what I know, is automatically placed by tistory; however, the owner of all-idol.com added its own license icon, which is , a non-free one. Seeing two conflicting licenses, one shouldn't upload. --EliOrni (talk) 14:49, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 04:10, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.


January 8 uploads

[edit]

As noted above, images from all-idol.com/all-idol.tistory.com were previously deleted because of the contradicting Creative Commons licenses. The no derivatives/noncommercial footer banner license which contracted the post license has disappeared, but it is unlikely that the terms of the photographer have changed. The blog was last updated in May 2016, but the banner was presented as recently as June of last year [1]. It is unclear what resulted in the ND/NC license (The blog owner? A tweak on Tistory's side which disabled it?). Ultimately, we don't really know, so the precautionary principle still needs to be applied here. xplicit 10:14, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tistory UI revamp in September 2017 removed that CCL banner, as explained at User:-revi/Tistory (it has been, for some time). Only valid CCL measurement method after then is the CCL icon in the bottom right. Anyway,  Delete. — regards, Revi 00:33, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination & discussion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:01, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

November 2020

[edit]

As above, all-idol does not actually release their content under a free license.

ƏXPLICIT 11:40, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Explicit: I clicked on the source in the file for the 2NE1 GD concert image, and there is a CC by 4.0 license icon? I see the threads above mentioning a second icon that is non-free but I don't see it, is this located somewhere else on the page? (I was looking at this user's images earlier today trying to find an image for an article which is why I ask) Alexanderlee (talk) 14:34, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
As -revi noted above, Tistory removed the second method to license content from their blogs in 2017; it can viewed in this archived link, for example: "이 저작물은 크리에이티브 커먼즈 코리아 저작자표시-비영리-변경금지 2.0 대한민국 라이선스에 따라 이용하실 수 있습니다." This was a single notice displayed throughout the entire blog, as opposed to the only option it offers now, which is licensing through each and every blog post. ƏXPLICIT 00:18, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh.. I thought that it would be ok as this file File:Kim Ji-soo at Incheon Airport, heading to Amsterdam on May 16th, 2019 21.png was used on the Jisoo article, and when I clicked on the source website a CC 4.0 icon was there but the website bottom states (C) Copyright, All Rights Reserved. My apologies! I don't want to infringe any copyright laws


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 18:08, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation of this blog, the uploader not is the author of file. Leon saudanha (talk) 14:42, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:56, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Include screenshot from non-free software. TechyanTalk15:21, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 01:08, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:56, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bollywood Hungama images of non-Indian events are not free. The IIFA Awards 2017 took place at New Jersey. Also delete the image's cropped version. Kailash29792 (talk) 15:47, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

My bad. Numerounovedant (talk) 18:03, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:55, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Azerbaijan. MasoodHA (talk) 19:47, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:54, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

artist died in 1992, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 20:15, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:54, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

artist died in 1992, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 20:15, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:54, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

artist died in 1992, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 20:16, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:54, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

artist died in 1992, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 20:16, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:54, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

artist died in 1992, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 20:16, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:54, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

artist died in 1992, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 20:16, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:54, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

artist died in 1992, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 20:17, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:54, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

artist died in 195, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 20:18, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination (note: 1965, like the others). --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:53, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

artist died in 1965, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 20:20, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Das Bild zeigt architektonische Stilelemente, wie die symmetrischen Bogenansätze des Kreuzgewölbes. Der Bogenansatz sitzt auf einem einfach profilierten Kämpfergesims. Es zeigt u. a. die Beschaffung der Fensternische. Ich bitte darum die Fotodatei zu belassen. Das Werk des Künstlers ist sekundär zu betrachten. The image should be preserved in favor of Wikipedia and Commons.--Colling-architektur (talk) 08:36, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Sorry, the stained glass copyright is not secondary to architectural features. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:52, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

artist died in 1965, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 20:20, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Das Bild zeigt architektonische Stilelemente, wie die symmetrischen Bogenansätze des Kreuzgewölbes. Der Bogenansatz sitzt auf einem einfach profilierten Kämpfergesims. Es zeigt u. a. die Beschaffung der Fensternische. Ich bitte darum, die Fotodatei zu belassen. Das Werk des Künstlers ist sekundär zu betrachten. The image should be preserved in favor of Wikipedia and Commons--Colling-architektur (talk) 08:25, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Sorry, the stained glass copyright is not secondary to architectural features. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:52, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

artist died in 1965, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 20:20, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:51, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

artist died in 1965, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 20:21, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:51, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

artist died in 1965, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 20:21, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

bin der Meinung das das Bild der Panoramafreiheit unterliegt, da es an einem öffentlich zugänglichen Ort aufgenommen wurde und nicht ausschließlich das Werk der 1965 verstorbenen Künstlerin zeigt. --Frinck (talk) 08:03, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Öffentlicher Gebetsraum einer der Bevölkerung zugängigen Klosterkirche, in dem die Werke (Tabernakel und Holzrelief) zweier Künstler (Eulenbruch und Wendling) neben anderem Details (Altartisch, etc.) zu sehen sind, deshalb behalten, --ArthurMcGill (talk) 18:26, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Bitte siehe pto. Öffentlichkeitscharakter [2]. Gruß, --Martin Sg. (talk) 19:06, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:51, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

artist died in 1965, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 20:22, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

bin der Meinung das das Bild der Panoramafreiheit unterliegt, da es an einem öffentlich zugänglichen Ort aufgenommen wurde und nicht ausschließlich das Werk der 1965 verstorbenen Künstlerin zeigt. --Frinck (talk) 08:01, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Kirchen gelten nach dt. Rechtssprechung nicht als öffentlich zugänglich im Sinne der Panoramafreiheit. Und dass noch andere Werke abgebildet sind, schmälert die Urheberrechte am einen Werk mitnichten. --Martin Sg. (talk) 18:20, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:51, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

artist died in 1965, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 20:24, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:50, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

artist died in 1965, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 20:25, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:50, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

artist died in 1965, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 20:25, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:50, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

artist died in 1965, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 20:25, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:50, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

artist died in 1965, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 20:25, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:50, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

artist died in 1965, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 20:26, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:50, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

artist died in 1965, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 20:26, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:50, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

artist died in 1965, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 20:26, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:50, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

artist died in 1965, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 20:27, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:50, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

artist died in 1965, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 20:28, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:50, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

artist died in 1965, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 20:28, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:50, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

artist died in 1965, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 20:28, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:50, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

artist died in 1965, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 20:28, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:50, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality image - effectively the same as File:MasterSGTpin.jpg Gbawden (talk) 11:02, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your input, however the image is not as poor quality as it looks, and is only a little ragged on the edges due to background removal, which was done so that the black table background on the Richland County Sheriff's Department page on Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richland_County_Sheriff's_Department) (the sole page on which it is used), would show through, making it look like the RCSD's rank slip-ons and/or collar pins.

@Fhsig13: I urge you to look here for suitable images Category:Military rank insignia of the United States - there are far better quality images for you to use than the one you uploaded Gbawden (talk) 09:50, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: This discussion was closed by Fhsig13, but I have reopened it because it seems entirely inappropriate for one of the participants, in a DR to unilaterally decide to close the discussion and interpret what (if any) consensus has been established; such a thing should be left to an uninvolved administrator to determine. I’m hoping this is just a good-faith mistake which will not be repeated; otherwise, further discussion at COM:ANU may be warranted. — Marchjuly (talk) 03:33, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 03:40, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ersetzt durch: François Gérard Alexandrine-Sophie de Bawr 1810 détail.jpg Petermichaelgenner (talk) 07:28, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: duplicate. --Yann (talk) 04:23, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The link is dead but the image comes from the USC website; images from the university are copyrighted unless there is evidence otherwise. The author is listed as "authers of University of Southern California", which is not specific and doesn't give a clue to the copyright status. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 10:18, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 04:25, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Smooth O as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.olx.pl/oferta/dostepne-od-zaraz-narozne-biurko-maksym-sonoma-CID628-IDoDp64.html
Converted by me to DR, as the image has been posted on the cited external site 5 months after it was uploaded to Commons. However, the uploader him/herself had added a source-credit to paczkameble.pl , which suggests that it is not really own work, except the uploader owns this source-site. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:38, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Here is original source: https://www.paczkameble.pl/biurka/445-narozne-biurko-maksym.html --Smooth O (talk) 11:46, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion: AGF, our copy is bigger and has EXIF. --Yann (talk) 04:27, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1968 pic. Probably not free. E4024 (talk) 13:23, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 04:29, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant, a bit dark. Supreseded by similar photo with more light: File:Brenham AMNH 2.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 14:02, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep to establish provenance of File:Brenham AMNH 2.jpg. --bjh21 (talk) 14:29, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep I agree. However I could eventually reupload File:Brenham AMNH 2.jpg as a new version of File:Brenham AMNH.jpg and then delete File:Brenham AMNH 2.jpg as duplicate. This would save the provenance history. -- Basilicofresco (msg) 13:49, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion: as above. --Yann (talk) 04:31, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Vice-president of some local student assoc. I believe no chances to be used anywhere. In other words no EV. What, am I wrong? Keep it then. E4024 (talk) 14:22, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 04:32, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

画像に誤りがある為。 トレインファン (talk) 14:29, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uncertain copyright, and should be SVG anyway. --Yann (talk) 04:33, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Codexinfotech (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promotion pictures. Also copyright violation.

Hindust@niक्या करें? बातें! 15:15, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I'll delete speedily two extremely promotional files. But one file should be kept, because it's simple and in use. Taivo (talk) 12:43, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, except one, as per above. --Yann (talk) 04:44, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vets (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Erroneous geometry (sides should all be the same length, and circles aren't circular) and unusably small images. We have much better geometry illustrations available.

Apocheir (talk) 20:44, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t see how the last two images fit in this request; they are grossly mislabeled nature photos. As for the other four, they are too ornate for educational purposes. At eswiki he is building a draft about circles (which already exists at Círculo); it should be tagged as {{destruir|U3}}, the equivalent of {{db-u5}} on enwiki. I can’t, since I’m not autoconfirmed at eswiki. LaundryPizza03 (talk) 04:28, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I should have been more clear: the last two are the unusably small images. I think they might be intended to show circles in nature, but they're so small and low-quality that it's anyone's guess. -Apocheir (talk) 02:12, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 04:47, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality, unauthorized by the National Gallery in Prague, duplicit file NoJin (talk) 20:50, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: PD-Art. --Yann (talk) 04:47, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Having searched around the site, I was unable to find these images (either separated or merged) on the species' page. There are no archived copies that feature these images either. If this image is found and verified to be owned by this site, it would be usable. Until then, this should be deleted. Anarchyte (work | talk) 10:06, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: Commons:Grandfathered old files. --Yann (talk) 04:24, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is an appeal for the closure of the previous deletion request. The closing admin has been asked to reevaluate but responded in a tongue in cheek fashion, so I am requesting community reevaluation. Additionally, the reasoning for the closure is wrong given there was a rationale for deletion: that the image's licensing is not obvious and thus Commons cannot assume the rights.

As per the previous nomination, there is no evidence that this image, uploaded on May 23, 2006 (after the introduction of OTRS), was released under a license that allows for unequivocal free use. There is no entry with either this image compilation or the two images separated on the species' entry page on entomart.be. It should also be noted there are no archived versions of this page that include these images, either, including a snapshot from November 9, 2007.

The grandfather clause cannot be used as a reasoning for keep here, either. The image's licensing does not give any mention to private email licensing. This discussion does not give any impression that we should allow an image to be kept simply because of it's upload date being prior to January 1, 2007. Anarchyte (work | talk) 06:49, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The user uploaded several files from his old website (e.g. File:Eulithis pyraliata01.jpg), all with attribution license, as stated on the website itself. There is no reason to suppose that this one is an exception to the rule. Ruthven (msg) 16:49, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted skeletal was used as the primary basis ( https://www.deviantart.com/art/Monolophosaurus-548749807 ) as well as Original Research maximum size estimate IJReid (talk) 04:14, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:08, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does not look like a real image but some sort of CGI image, probably taken from some game Denniss (talk) 19:18, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Adobe Photoshop, Adobe Illustrator. Original image quarter half of weapon not visible obstructed by plane window, needs full-length image of weapon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Виктор Вихарев Марков (talk • contribs)


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:10, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source clearly says that the "video provided to VOA Persian by local resident" so is not exclusively produced by VOA. Mhhossein talk 19:26, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment The 'Copyright notice' on VOA website clearly says that "All text, audio and video material produced exclusively by the Voice of America is in the public domain." The nominated file produced by local residents, not VOA. --Mhhossein talk 19:29, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep this is a file ... produced exclusively by the Voice of America..., no matter who and where produced, first published by VOA and VOA is copyright holder of this file, when the "local resident" sent it to VOA, he or she agreed about VOA copyright. --Rafic.Mufid (talk) 20:16, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Certainly this file and similar files are not produced by VOA, so they are not in PD.--Mbazri (talk) 12:10, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Speedy delete @Rafic.Mufid: , unless you can show that it's standard procedure for VOA to make people who give a photo/video/anything to VOA sign some sort of waiver they agreed to nothing. All they could expect is for VOA to use it. VOA is not the copyright holder and it is irrelevant whether the clip was first published on VOA. Also, how do you even know the video wasn't published on FB/YT/Twitter before the local resident gave it to VOA? (don't bother searching for it, there will always be places you didn't look including the YT/FB/etc virtual trashcan) W3ird N3rd (talk) 18:00, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Submitting material to VOA would typically give them a license to use it, but copyright would likely remain with the original submitter. See for example https://blogs.voanews.com/photos/send-us-your-best-shot-tos/ . For Iran, it would not be copyrighted in the rest of the world (since Iran is not party to any copyright treaties), but we would still respect Iran's copyright. We would need more evidence than simply appearing on VOA -- we would need to see evidence of a free license, or a statement that the videos were placed in the public domain, or the agreement mandated that, etc. Carl Lindberg (talk) 16:30, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Clindberg: Somewhat (but not entirely) offtopic, but this got me thinking. The video was made by a "local resident", but we don't know for sure it's actually an Iranian. If this local resident would happen to be a US citizen (or German, Japanese, etc), for example a foreign photographer who decided to rent an apartment locally for a year or two so they can take a lot of photos. Or (if it makes any difference) a foreigner who is just "passing by". (vacation, Doctors Without Borders, etc) Do they get the copyright from the country they come from, or from the country where the photo is taken (Iran)? In case of the former, we don't even know for sure we are dealing with Iranian copyright. In case of the latter, any photo/video from, say, the North Pole is in the public domain? W3ird N3rd (talk) 18:03, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
In general, copyright infringement would be dictated by the laws of the country in which the claimed infringement takes place. So you "get" a copyright per each country's rules -- it's just that copyright conventions normalize the rights mostly, and the treaties mean you get protection in a country even as a foreigner. Since Iran has no such treaties, works by their citizens will generally not get protection in other countries. Now, for the Berne Convention... "country of origin" is the country of first publication. So if an Iranian arranges for a work to be published in a Berne country, they will get protection throughout Berne countries in general. And yes, if a work is done by a foreign national and published there, they will at least get protection in their home country (and similarly the EU will protect the works of any EU national regardless of where published). If simultaneously published in Iran and another Berne country, the "country of origin" will be that other country. Carl Lindberg (talk) 20:10, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:10, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jeff G. as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No FoP in Ukraine.
Converted by me to DR for procedural reasons. However, I think the depicted building is above COM:TOO and thereby likely copyrighted. As there is no FoP in Ukraine, we need a permission from the artist or the image needs to be deleted. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:36, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. I had seen them as a unit. --Túrelio (talk) 08:46, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm, well, then an OTRS agent needs to add the ticket to the image. --Túrelio (talk) 11:55, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Btw, should the OTRS agent add the ticket to several images in the Category:Dnipro Metro Station and Category:Statue of Peace, Metro Bridge? (Probably all of them are missing the ticket.) --Kulmalukko (talk) 12:41, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I have asked the colleague, who had put the ticket onto the category, to add it to all images covered. --Túrelio (talk) 13:28, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Túrelio and Kulmalukko: The "permission" was forwarded, did not specify a license, should not have been accepted, and did not mention the statue. Therefore, it does not apply.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:37, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oh. That's sad, as it will mean deletion for several images of that building/statue. --Túrelio (talk) 16:30, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeff G.: What problem with permission? It has attached file where given permission to use architectural works (metro stations, railway station buildings) of Stanislav Krushinskyi under CC-BY-SA 3.0.--Anatoliy (talk) 19:57, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Anatoliy: Sorry, now I have seen the attached permission, but it is only for architectural works. This statue does not qualify.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 01:58, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The files in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Statue of Peace, Metro Bridge was kept due to the OTRS permission with the same ticket:2017070410029892. Should also those photos have been deleted? --Kulmalukko (talk) 17:24, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Kulmalukko: Yes, I'm afraid so. None of the uses there are DM.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:02, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Then probably over than 20 pics of the man holding Sputnik in Category:Dnipro Metro Station should be deleted. --Kulmalukko (talk) 14:19, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Statues are part of metro station architectural complex, aren't them?--Anatoliy (talk) 19:53, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Ahonc: Who designed this statue / sculpture, when? If they died, when was that?   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 23:48, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Both the :uk and the :ru article mention 5 names as sculptors of the 2 statues; all of them are deceeased already, between 1984 and 1999. --Túrelio (talk) 07:41, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Túrelio: Thank you, undelete in 1999+70+1=2070 per {{PD-Ukraine}}.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:10, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Statue of Peace, Metro Bridge.--Anatoliy (talk) 19:57, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Ahonc: I have filed a new DR there.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:18, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The OTRS agent that handled the ticket (or another one) should ask for re-sending the permission directly from the author's address (or write him directly, given that the e-mail address is given). The ticket looks acceptable/genuine. --Ruthven (msg) 23:05, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: updating; with my limited Russian skills (but with the enormous skills of Google Translate) I can assure you that we've the permission to publish the photos from this artwork (and of other artworks, like the stations of the Kiev underground "Arsenal", "Khreshchatyk", "Dnipro", and some others of the railways in Odessa) under CC BY-SA 3.0; so that the architect Krushinsky Stanislav Yosypovych shall be credited as author. The sculpture is part of his project for the station. Ruthven (msg) 18:15, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Iran. 4nn1l2 (talk) 10:56, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 18:19, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Near-duplicate of File:Biometric passports.png. This one should be deleted (and uploaded over the previous one) for attribution/copyright. 84.250.17.211 14:45, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: not exact duplicate. Ruthven (msg) 18:18, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A similar communication from EN:WP was deleted the other day for OoS. The users in question here have had a similar correspondence. Out of scope for Commons. E4024 (talk) 11:39, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Obvious  Keep. Used. --Discasto talk 19:10, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, still used. Taivo (talk) 12:51, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work published in 1928? Dubious. E4024 (talk) 13:21, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright term in Armenia is life+70y; if the author is unknown, we cannot determine public domain. LaundryPizza03 (talk) 03:43, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment May be {{Anonymous-EU}}. What's the source? Yann (talk) 04:30, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
According to the uploader, the source is "own work". Of course that's not very realistic for a 1928 pic. What's the real source? Aucune idée. Where was the pic taken? Aucune idée. (Maybe the sculptures behind may give a hint.) If the place of first publication is an EU country, you could be right. If it is the States 1928 is beyond the pre-1923 line. Could be somewhere else? Who knows? --E4024 (talk) 07:07, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, anonymous work does not mean "I do not know, who the author is". We have no acceptable source here and no enough information to decide, that the photo is really anonymous. If somebody can give real photographer and publication data, then the photo can be restored. Taivo (talk) 12:56, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All these jewels are very probably copyrighted to the artists that created them. We need an authorisation by Swarovski to publish them.

Ruthven (msg) 11:43, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Materialscientist: We can also consider those as "utilitarian objects", so that they are not covered by copyright, but I doubt this is acceptable for jewels of this kind. I opened the DR also to have comments, like yours, because these cases can happen relatively often. --Ruthven (msg) 14:11, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, freedom of panorama does not apply here, because the objects are not permanently displayed. It was suggested, that Swarowski swan does not surpass threshold of originality – I do not agree, this is very original swan. But I  Keep one photo about utilitarian object. One file has OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 15:30, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The actual picture, of a 3D object, is not in the public domain. At most, the insignia design Discasto talk 15:00, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:50, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The licensing conditions provided does not state any kind of compatible licensing conditions. On the other hand, it's not part of a legal or ruling disposition Discasto talk 18:25, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: it's Attribution. Ruthven (msg) 07:00, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Trying again. Apparently, the person who closed the DR didn't even read the licensing conditions. They're in here and do not support at all any of the licensing claims in the image description. Neither 'attribution' nor 'public domain' Discasto talk 14:10, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The terms say: "Se prohíbe la reproducción total o parcial de los contenidos del Portal sin citar su origen o solicitar autorización" (It is forbidden to replicate the contents of the Portal without citing the source or asking for permission). Even if haven't the permission, we fullfil the request "cite the origen", as per the attribution template. The "or" is disjunctive, so I interpret it as "filling either one condition or the other". --Ruthven (msg) 08:51, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment "Reproduction" does not involve "derivative works". It's been usually a consideration in all "compliant" licenses. I see that it's no longer an issue. Best regards --Discasto talk 10:18, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete. As per Commons:Licensing#Acceptable licenses: ...Publication of derivative work must be allowed; Commercial use of the work must be allowed; The license must be perpetual (non-expiring) and non-revocable. I see none of these obligations fulfilled. Sealle (talk) 20:06, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per Sealle. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:43, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]