Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/11/01
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
![3 File:2017 Präsentation Plakatsujets "Holen Sie sich, was Ihnen zusteht" (35556819683).jpg](#File:2017_Präsentation_Plakatsujets_"Holen_Sie_sich,_was_Ihnen_zusteht"_(35556819683).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_em_Recife,_PE_Brasil.jpg){kind=link}
![14 Commons:Deletion requests/File:Portada "La Ciudad Creyente".jpg](#Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Portada_"La_Ciudad_Creyente".jpg){kind=link}
_(2).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![53 File:"Aquarel" train, the 3d, "green" car №0575 (Метропоезд "Акварель", 3ий, "зелёный" вагон №0575) (5936861402).jpg](#File:"Aquarel"_train,_the_3d,_"green"_car_№0575_(Метропоезд_"Акварель",_3ий,_"зелёный"_вагон_№0575)_(5936861402).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
![132 File:"Have you forgotten?".jpg](#File:"Have_you_forgotten?".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-1176709955.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![318 File:Portada "La Ciudad Creyente".jpg](#File:Portada_"La_Ciudad_Creyente".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
The National Anthem of Bosnia and Herzegovina is a modern composition by the still living composer Dušan Šestić. Per Article 4 of Decision imposing the Law on the National Anthem of BiH, Office of the High Representative, 25 June 1999 the copyright to the Anthem is now the property of Bosnia and Herzegovina. The copyright will not expire until 70 years after the death of Dušan Šestić. Deleted twice previously at DR 1 and DR 2. If the uploader is making the argument that the Bosnian copyright law of 2010 extinquished the Dušan Šestić copyright owned by Bosnia and Herzegovina by virue of official texts in the domain of legislation, administration and judiciary being PD, this seems specious, as musical scores are not text (copyright law has traditionally considered musical scores and sound recording separate from literary works like text). —RP88 (talk) 05:11, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Delete: Yeah, my mistake. I realized soon after uploading it that it was copyrighted. Delete it please. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk) 05:12, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader also agrees to delete. Taivo (talk) 08:06, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Bzhamdndnnasitssltxjd 41.224.64.136 08:12, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept, vandalism. Taivo (talk) 10:11, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Primary subject of the photo is copyrighted. acagastya 16:17, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
- The copyright holder (SPÖ) of the photograph as well of the election poster has published this image under a "cc-by-sa-2.0"-compatible license, which has been confirmed by FlickreviewR ([1]). The photo is one of about 3.600 images in Category:Files from SPÖ Presse und Kommunikation stream (resp. one of 60 in Category:SPÖ Posters) from the same source (SPÖ press and communication stream on flickr). --M2k~dewiki (talk) 17:27, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
- the poster photo is copyrighted. Photo of photo does not eliminate copyright.
acagastya 08:06, 17 October 2017 (UTC)- Yes, but the copyright holder of the poster is the same as the copyright holder of the photo (SPÖ), they published their photo respectively their photo of their poster under a "cc-by-sa-2.0"-compatible license. --M2k~dewiki (talk) 10:16, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
- and how do you claim the photo in the poster was released in a similar license?
acagastya 18:44, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
- and how do you claim the photo in the poster was released in a similar license?
- Yes, but the copyright holder of the poster is the same as the copyright holder of the photo (SPÖ), they published their photo respectively their photo of their poster under a "cc-by-sa-2.0"-compatible license. --M2k~dewiki (talk) 10:16, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
- the poster photo is copyrighted. Photo of photo does not eliminate copyright.
![[1]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File%3A2017_Pr%C3%A4sentation_Plakatsujets_%22Holen_Sie_sich%2C_was_Ihnen_zusteht%22_%2835556819683%29.jpg&type=revision&diff=257574742&oldid=257574430){kind=link}
Kept: . --Didym (talk) 12:46, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
The previous reason to keep was not explained properly; and it was not proved the subject of this photo, the poster's photo is released under CC license. Besides, Austria's FoP is okay only if it remaines in public space permanently. Have a look at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Emmanuel Macron campaign poster in Paris 2.jpg acagastya 10:46, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
- I dont see who published the deleted Macron campaign poster under which licencse, but a difference might be, that this photo here has been published by the copyright holder (SPÖ) of the photograph as well of the election poster under a "cc-by-sa-2.0"-compatible license, like 60 other posters in Category:SPÖ Posters. --M2k~dewiki (talk) 10:59, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
- Okay, it is getting difficult to explain you, so let me take this analogy. Consider a painting. That painting is copyrighted. If that painting is kept in front of a gallery for some days/weeks, and you take a photo of that painting, release it in a CC license, it is not okay, even if you are the artist since the content of that painting is copyrighted. In this case, do we have the proof that the photo of those four people in the poster is under CC license? It does not matter how many photos are there in that category, if they are photos of copyrighted photos, it can not be there. (How about voice from @Yann: who closed the discussion Commons:Deletion requests/File:Affiches élection présidentielle 2017 Villars Dombes 4.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Affiches élection présidentielle 2017 Villars Dombes 5.jpg. I hope these are those poster photos)
acagastya 17:31, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
- Okay, it is getting difficult to explain you, so let me take this analogy. Consider a painting. That painting is copyrighted. If that painting is kept in front of a gallery for some days/weeks, and you take a photo of that painting, release it in a CC license, it is not okay, even if you are the artist since the content of that painting is copyrighted. In this case, do we have the proof that the photo of those four people in the poster is under CC license? It does not matter how many photos are there in that category, if they are photos of copyrighted photos, it can not be there. (How about voice from @Yann: who closed the discussion Commons:Deletion requests/File:Affiches élection présidentielle 2017 Villars Dombes 4.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Affiches élection présidentielle 2017 Villars Dombes 5.jpg. I hope these are those poster photos)
- Keep The image was published under a free license by the author of the poster, so it should be OK. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:49, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
- That does not eliminate the copyright status of that photo -- and it is possible the uploader did not remember to release the original photo under CC license. There are two different photos, and even for the work by same author, both of them should be released under compatible licenses. I hope you are aware of the confusions caused by dual licensing.
acagastya 17:03, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
- That does not eliminate the copyright status of that photo -- and it is possible the uploader did not remember to release the original photo under CC license. There are two different photos, and even for the work by same author, both of them should be released under compatible licenses. I hope you are aware of the confusions caused by dual licensing.
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - The Flickr account belongs to the SPO which owns the copyright for the poster. Therefore, unlike most Flickr images, we can be sure that both the photo and the underlying copyrighted work are covered by the CC license. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:52, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
no user with name Tiia Monto (broken user link) Zache (talk) 09:27, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:14, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
no user name with name Tuomas Vitikainen (broken user link) Zache (talk) 09:28, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:15, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
no user name with name Sampo Kiviniemi (broken userlink) Zache (talk) 09:28, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:13, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by CAMELEON Comptoirs Privés (talk · contribs)
[edit]
Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:28, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:29, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by ADAMBITA
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
redundant. This is a failed upload. A complete upload of this image has already been uploaded. SecretName101 (talk) 05:05, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete per nominator. --Leoboudv (talk) 05:21, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 16:49, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
appears promotional, no perceivable educational use, and unused. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 16:56, 1 November 2017 (UTC) Sixflashphoto (talk) 16:56, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: speedied by Guanaco. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:25, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
_em_Recife,_PE_Brasil.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_em_Recife,_PE_Brasil.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyrights: Flickr license 179.179.101.175 15:19, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
_em_Recife,_PE_Brasil.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted by Jcb at 16:10, 1 November 2017 UTC: Non-free Flickr license disallowing commercial use and/or derivative works --Krdbot 19:32, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
_em_Recife,_PE_Brasil.jpg){kind=link}
Image is from company's official Twitter profile, and uploader is unlikely to be copyright holder Uncle Milty (talk) 04:16, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:47, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
Picture is from Forbes - user clearly does not have permission to use photo. El cid, el campeador (talk) 15:40, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: clear copyright violation. --JuTa 13:16, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
ciudad creyente Mpgarcia10 (talk) 01:54, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
![01:54, 1 November 2017 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2017/11/01#c-Mpgarcia10-2017-11-01T01:54:00.000Z-Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Portada_"La_Ciudad_Creyente".jpg){kind=link}
Kept: A DR for a DR?. --JuTa 18:05, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
![18:05, 2 November 2017 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2017/11/01#c-JuTa-2017-11-02T18:05:00.000Z-Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Portada_"La_Ciudad_Creyente".jpg){kind=link}
This is a copyrighted image. See http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0243952/mediaviewer/rm2356329472 and note the copyright notice (for WireImage.com) near the bottom of the screen. NewYorkActuary (talk) 20:58, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
NOTE ALSO that the uploader (User:Cesarromero) has uploaded three other versions of the same image, as File:Mark 3.jpg, File:Publicity.png and File:Publicity 2.jpg (as seen here). NewYorkActuary (talk) 21:05, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Sorry for any problem. I am new and trying to figure this all out. Have done a lot of reading to try not to make mistakes. Those images are all over the internet without any copyright attached? Could you please help me so I can do this correctly? Do I need to reference the image if I get it from a public website? The separate files were uploaded because I was trying to figure out how to center/frame them properly. Can I (or do I need to) delete the excess files? And, if so, I can't seem to figure out how/where to do that? Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cesarromero (talk • contribs) 21:36, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- The fact that an image is all over the Internet doesn't mean that it's free. Lots of people are less careful about copyright law than Commons. You definitely need to indicate where you got the picture from (by using the "This file is not my own work" option in the Upload Wizard). You also need to indicate why you think it's free (for instance if the source has marked it with a Creative Commons licence). You can't delete files yourself, but you can ask for a file that you've uploaded recently to be deleted by choosing "Edit" on its page and adding "{{SD|G7}}" at the start of the description. --bjh21 (talk) 01:22, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:NETCOPYVIO. --Hystrix (talk) 17:47, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
_(2).jpg){kind=link}
_(2).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
failed upload. Complete upload already exists. Therefore redundant SecretName101 (talk) 04:53, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
_(2).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: and redirected. Exact or scaled-down duplicate: File:P1200853 (2263818229).jpg. --Y.haruo (talk) 18:21, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
_(2).jpg){kind=link}
Third party logo design, Non free on English Wikipedia w:File:North Korea FA.png ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:41, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 22:26, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Not own work necessacrily, Screencap or promo photo by third party, Non-free at English Wikipedia w:File:Characters of Misfits on E4.jpg ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:45, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 22:26, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
I will upload another one Mona Abo-Abda (talk) 15:05, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as a matter of courtesy. --Y.haruo (talk) 00:09, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. If this is your own work, why did you not upload the full version of the photograph such as on Sky News (https://e3.365dm.com/17/10/992x558/skynews-new-york-manhattan_4143837.jpg?20171031233905) or The Guardian (https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/gallery/2017/nov/01/nypd-responds-to-act-of-terror-in-pictures#img-5)? Vincent Mia Edie Verheyen (talk) 03:24, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Obvious copyright violation. This should be speedy deleted. Nick-D (talk) 09:03, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- SPEEDY Delete - Obvious copyvio. -- Veggies (talk) 14:19, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Very much doubt this is the uploader's own work. Funcrunch (talk) 15:23, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:52, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Chen101689N187 (talk) 22:14, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
The picture is of no use, it can be deleted sek2016(talk) 7:08, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader agrees to delete (nominated the image for speedy deletion). Taivo (talk) 10:03, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Chen101689N187 (talk) 22:15, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
The picture is of no use, it can be deleted sek2016(talk) 7:10, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader agrees to delete (nominated the image for speedy deletion). Taivo (talk) 10:05, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:53, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Moheen Reeyad at 09:44, 3 November 2017 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 13:30, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by AKirch-Bonn as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: datei doppelt Axel Kirch 09:22, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:13, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused screenshot of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:02, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:49, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:French-car-brands-Alpine-logotype.png
- File:RML Group logo.jpg
- File:Logo Epsilon Euskadi.png
- File:Mugen Power Logo.png
- File:Prema logo 001.jpg
- File:Brabus logo 2.svg.png
- File:Carlin Motorsport Logo.png
- File:Imbituba AC.png
- File:Escudo independente.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:36, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rawan.Barakat (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:50, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Bogus claim of own work, license is also unlikely to be correct: it's clearly a screenshot from the "Universe Sandbox" software, home page is http://universesandbox.com/ Redrose64 (talk; at English Wikipedia) 21:27, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb at 23:55, 5 November 2017 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - --Krdbot 01:27, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Copyrights 179.179.101.175 15:12, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Hedwig in Washington at 00:31, 7 November 2017 UTC: Media without a source as of 30 October 2017 - --Krdbot 07:23, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Mister No Brain (talk) 01:26, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:54, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Mister No Brain (talk) 01:28, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:55, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Mister No Brain (talk) 01:29, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:55, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Mister No Brain (talk) 01:29, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:55, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Mister No Brain (talk) 01:30, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:55, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Mister No Brain (talk) 01:31, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:56, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
no COM:EDUSE Mister No Brain (talk) 01:32, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:56, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Mister No Brain (talk) 01:33, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:56, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:48, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:56, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
blurred, unimportant SecretName101 (talk) 04:18, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:57, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
blurred image, unimportant, higher-quality alternatives are readily available SecretName101 (talk) 04:18, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:57, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
unimportant and blurry image SecretName101 (talk) 04:28, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:57, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
unused personal image out of COM:SCOPE Eurodyne (talk) 04:41, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:58, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
unimportant image SecretName101 (talk) 04:41, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:58, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
unused personal image out of COM:SCOPE Eurodyne (talk) 04:42, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:58, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
unlikely to be the uploader's own work as claimed. This is clearly a police booking photo, and it is available on several websites, http://amwfans.com/thread/55?page=14 for example Meters (talk) 22:01, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Agreed, seems unlikely to be own work. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:18, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Looks unlikely the photo here is actually the work of the FBI, more likely something they just used. -mattbuck (Talk) 06:57, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - Indeed. According to the FBI's website: "None. Commercial use is strictly prohibited. Descriptions and pictures of the “Ten Most Wanted Fugitives” are provided for the sole purpose of eliciting public assistance in tracking fugitives." (therefore incompatible with Commons requirements). — Rhododendrites talk | 02:50, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:59, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
one of the people in the photo wants it deleted BrightNamanya (talk) 08:57, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
i nolonger want this picture on wiki commons. Please help me make this picture unavailable BrightNamanya (talk) 12:01, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: user request shortly after upload. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:59, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution (all others were deleted as copyright violations). Probably not own work, but copyvio as well. Taivo (talk) 09:18, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:00, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
bad quality Ralph Hammann (talk) 09:26, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: unused crop of File:StMaurice 174.jpg. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:01, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
tv show logo, not user's own work fringio · α†Ω 18:55, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Jon Kolbert at 18:52, 7 November 2017 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 01:22, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative of a (presumably) non-free photo. Not de minimis. Retired electrician (talk) 00:36, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete --Drabdullayev17 (talk) 19:00, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:42, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
File:"Aquarel" train, the 3d, "green" car №0575 (Метропоезд "Акварель", 3ий, "зелёный" вагон №0575) (5936861402).jpg
[edit]_(5936861402).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(5936861402).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Display of 20th century paingings (with artists' years of birth and death provided, all failing PD test), no freedom of panorama. Retired electrician (talk) 00:44, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete --Drabdullayev17 (talk) 19:02, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:43, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Mehrere Fotos mit geringer Auflösung und ohne EXIF-Daten, einige sind schon länger als vor dem Hochladen auf Commons im Web vorhanden. Drei Bilder mit EXIF, drei verschiedene Kameras. Bei den Karten fehlt der Hinweis auf die Quellkarte.
- File:Christian Cueva anotando el Tercer Gol, en la victoria historia del Perú ante Paraguay (1-4).jpg
- File:Embassy of Hungary in Lima, Peru.png
- File:Embassy of Argelia in Lima, Peru.jpg
- File:Embassy of Italy in Lima, Peru.jpg
- File:Embassy of Canda in Lima, Peru.jpg
- File:Embassy of Austria in Lima, Peru.jpg
- File:Boeing 777-200 Aterrizando en el Aeropuerto de Lima, Peru.png
- File:Paises Operadores del Asanave V-1.png
- File:Intumi-20, Hospital de campaña movil en 2016.jpg
- File:ASANAVE- V1, en Exhibición, en el desfile de Tacna (2012).jpg
- File:Paises Operadores del ASANAVE V3.png
- File:ASANAVE V3, en camino ha la parada militar.jpg
- File:Paises Operadores del ASANAVE V4.png
- File:Prototipo Asanave con Misiles AT Malyutka.jpg
- File:Asanave V4 en exhibicionismo (Enero 2009).jpg
- File:Operadores del VATT LOBO.png
- File:Pozo lleno de Craneos en las catacumbas.jpg
- File:Exteriores de las catacumbas de Lima.jpg
- File:LOGO OTAKU.gif
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Hystrix (talk) 00:47, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- I think some of them can be deleted, but not all of them. --Drabdullayev17 (talk) 19:04, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:41, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. Probably Google Street View screenshots, at least one file taken from Facebook.
- File:Paraguayan Embassy in Lima, Peru.jpg
- File:Embassies of Finlad and Sweden in Lima, Peru.jpg
- File:Embajada de Cuba en Lima, Perú.jpg
- File:Embassy of Azerbaijan in Lima, Peru.jpg
- File:Embajada de Costa Rica en Lima, Perú.jpg
- File:Thai Embassy in Lima, Peru.jpg
- File:Embassy of Dominican Republic en Lima, Peru.jpg
- File:Embassy of El Salvador in Lima, Peru.jpg
- File:Embassy of Hungary in Lima, Peru.jpg
- File:ペルーのリマにある韓国大使館.jpg
- File:Embassy of Ukraine in Lima, Peru.jpg
- File:Embassy of Ecuador in Lima, Peru.jpg
- File:Embajada de Malasia en Lima, Perú.jpg
- File:日本の東京12か国の外交本部.jpg
- File:Embassy of Romania in Lima, Peru.jpg
- File:Embassy of Netherland en Lima, Peru.jpg
- File:Embassy of Uruguay in Lima, Peru.jpg
- File:Independencian.png
- File:Mapa de los países en donde se juega mayor cantidad de WolfTeam.png
- File:Pasarela Cosplay que representa escenas de un anime..jpg
Didym (talk) 16:46, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 20:33, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope - promotional - unused text logo of non-notable company 1989 15:30, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination 1989 22:20, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion Krd 07:12, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
- File:9th Asian Universiade Games logo.PNG
- File:10th Asian Universiade Games logo.PNG
- File:Asian Olympic Games logo.PNG
Only used on the English Wikipedia, where the subject's article was speedily deleted in June 2014 as a hoax. Out of project scope. ℯxplicit 07:08, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - out of scope. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:45, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Implausible author and date information, different camera models per exif data, unlikely all own work, and most also out of scope.
- File:Ausruestung (1).jpg
- File:Ausruestung (2).jpg
- File:Ausruestung (3).jpg
- File:Ausruestung (4).jpg
- File:Ausruestung (5).jpg
- File:Ausruestung (9).jpg
- File:FF Breitenbuch Geschichte (1).JPG
- File:FF Breitenbuch Geschichte (10).jpg
- File:FF Breitenbuch Geschichte (11).jpg
- File:FF Breitenbuch Geschichte (12).jpg
- File:FF Breitenbuch Geschichte (13).jpg
- File:FF Breitenbuch Geschichte (14).jpg
- File:FF Breitenbuch Geschichte (15).jpg
- File:FF Breitenbuch Geschichte (2).jpg
- File:FF Breitenbuch Geschichte (3).JPG
- File:FF Breitenbuch Geschichte (4).JPG
- File:FF Breitenbuch Geschichte (5).jpg
- File:FF Breitenbuch Geschichte (6).JPG
- File:FF Breitenbuch Geschichte (7).jpg
- File:FF Breitenbuch Geschichte (8).jpg
- File:FF Breitenbuch Geschichte (9).JPG
- File:FF Breitenbuch Geschichte.jpg
- File:Geschichte11.jpg
- File:Geschichte211.jpg
- File:Geschichte213.jpg
- File:Geschichte217.jpg
- File:Geschichte218.jpg
- File:Geschichte219.jpg
- File:Geschichte23.jpg
- File:Geschichte26.jpg
- File:Geschichte27.jpg
- File:Geschichte28.jpg
- File:Geschichte7.jpg
- File:HUBER Franz.png
- File:MAIER Bernhard.png
- File:PAIER Thomas.png
- File:Ruesthaus aktuell.jpg
- File:Ruesthaus alt.jpg
- File:Ruesthaus mittel.jpg
- File:Rüsthaus Breitenbuch.jpg
- File:STEINKLEIBL Alois.png
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Krd 09:17, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- +1, it looks like, there are copies from a anniversary publication from this fire brigade. --K@rl (talk) 10:29, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Delete all per nomination. De728631 (talk) 22:08, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:49, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Kwai Chung Methodist College
[edit]Derivative works of likely non-free publication/artwork. The copyrights should belong to the creators of the posters.
- File:慶祝開埠177年嘅葵循民主牆.jpg
- File:葵循4D班嘅一個壁布（2016年1月10號）.jpg
- File:葵循最近物理室嘅壁布2月中更新版.jpg
- File:葵循最近物理室嘅壁布2月頭更新版.jpg
- File:葵涌循道中學嘅一個課室嘅壁布.jpg
B dash (talk) 10:24, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:51, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Poster for a short film. The uploader declares to be the owner of copyright, but there is no evidence of permission. Horcrux92 (talk) 10:24, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:51, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Spam and adv. Bilderling (talk) 10:47, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination+wrong pdf format+copyrighted logo/banner. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:55, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
OTRS-permission from copyright holder Reliving the Moment is needed. Taivo (talk) 10:49, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:56, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Personal photo. Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 10:50, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:54, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
out of com:EDUSE, cf com:PENIS
- File:Close.up.jpg
- File:Penis. .jpg
- File:Mast. .jpg
- File:Human.penis.jpg
- File:Erect. .jpg
- File:Circumcised.penis.jpg
Pippobuono (talk) 11:02, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope
- File:Close.up.jpg
- File:Pre.cum. .jpg
- File:Pre.cum.jpg
- File:Penis. .jpg
- File:Meat. .jpg
- File:Pub. .jpg
- File:Mast. .jpg
- File:Human.penis.jpg
- File:Scrotum. .jpg
- File:Erect. .jpg
- File:Circumcised.penis.jpg
- File:Corona. .jpg
- File:Perianal.jpg
- File:Glans. .jpg
- File:..Meatus.jpg
- File:Circ.fren.jpg
- File:Pre.Cum.jpg
- File:Male.Pubic.Hair.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 14:33, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:54, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:59, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:18, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:01, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:20, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:00, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:52, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:01, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Fake license. Logo can't be own/free Bilderling (talk) 12:10, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:01, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 19:16, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
- Keep PD-textlogo. Fry1989 eh? 01:29, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
Kept: as per Fry1989. Yann (talk) 09:17, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
Unused logo. Out of scope. Uploader is blocked. Castillo blanco (talk) 12:14, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:18, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rebcenter-moscow (talk · contribs)
[edit]All depicted scenes have been staged by one person and are fictive, which has been confirmed by the uploader. This lets me doubt about educational usefulness.
- File:The guy in the hood with the poster "Stop" Free stock photo.jpg
- File:A young man with a poster "Help" Free stock photo.jpg
- File:Drug-dependent guy asks for help. Free stock photo.jpg
- File:A man with a poster "Stop drugs" Free stock photo.jpg
- File:Emotional photo A look of a man with a poster "Stop".jpg
- File:A man asks for help and closes his face with his hand Free stock photo.jpg
- File:A man with a poster "Help" Free stock photo.jpg
- File:The guy with the poster "Help" Free stock photo.jpg
- File:Man is sitting on the rails with a placard "Help" Free stock photo.jpg
- File:Drug addicted men with poster "Stop drugs" Free stock photo.jpg
- File:Man on the background of a moving train with a poster STOP Free stock photo.jpg
- File:Alcohol addiction destroys the family.jpg
- File:Young alcoholic drinks beer.jpg
- File:Hangover condition in women Free Stock Photo.jpg
- File:Female alcoholism Free Stock Photo.jpg
- File:Drunk girl suffering from alcoholism.jpg
- File:Girl and young man against drugs 01.jpg
- File:An alcohol-dependent girl with a bottle of beer and her young man. Conflict due to alcohol.jpg
- File:A young man embraces a girl who drinks beer and suffers alcoholism.jpg
- File:Alcoholic in Moscow.jpg
- File:A man in desperation drinks alcohol on the road of Moscow.jpg
- File:Alcoholik sits on the road and drinks beer.jpg
- File:Drunkard in Moscow.jpg
- File:Sad man under the bridge.jpg
- File:A men with beer goes under the bridge in Moscow.jpg
- File:A lonely man stands against the background of graffiti.jpg
- File:Alcohol with beer goes under the bridge in Moscow.jpg
- File:A homeless drunkard on a Moscow street.jpg
- File:A drug-dependent man uses heroin.jpg
- File:Drug addict on the street uses drugs.jpg
- File:A young alcoholic drinks alcohol. Free Stock Photo.jpg
- File:A homeless male alcoholic is sitting on the grass. Free Stock Photo.jpg
- File:A sad man looks at the road. Free Stock Photo.jpg
- File:The man is an alcoholic sitting on the road. Free Stock Photo.jpg
- File:Treatment of alcoholism is a battle with addiction. Free Stock Photo.jpg
- File:Reflections on suicide, alcoholic on the bridge. Free Stock Photo.jpg
- File:Uncertainty is the cause of addiction. Free Stock Photo.jpg
- File:Suffering from alcoholism is the way to lose yourself. Free Stock Photo.jpg
- File:The guy squatting drinks beer - the first stage of alcoholism. Free Stock Photo.jpg
- File:Alcoholic. Free Stock Photo.jpg
- File:A person without a face-less is the result of alcoholism. Free Stock Photo.jpg
- File:Attempted suicide on the bridge. Free Stock Photo.jpg
- File:The offender behind bars is the consequences of drug addiction. Free Stock Photo.jpg
A.Savin 12:43, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Comment Real people who suffer from drug addiction or alcoholism are photographed in the photo. This is their real life. I just spent time with them and photographed them --Rebcenter-moscow (talk) 17:26, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- No matter who the guy on the photos actually is — the scenes are obviously played and on this picture, just to name one example, he is standing on the bridge just to take this photo, hopefully not because he is really willing to jump (=>misleading description). Such pictures may be useful for a specific volunteering project, but Commons has a different project scope. It needs authentical illustrations, not fictive ones. --A.Savin 17:16, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- NOT All the scenes depicted were staged by one person! This is a real family of addicts. Here on these shots I asked them what to do or picture:
- No matter who the guy on the photos actually is — the scenes are obviously played and on this picture, just to name one example, he is standing on the bridge just to take this photo, hopefully not because he is really willing to jump (=>misleading description). Such pictures may be useful for a specific volunteering project, but Commons has a different project scope. It needs authentical illustrations, not fictive ones. --A.Savin 17:16, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- File:Attempted suicide on the bridge. Free Stock Photo.jpg
- File:Treatment of alcoholism is a battle with addiction. Free Stock Photo.jpg
- File:Girl and young man against drugs 01.jpg
- File:A lonely man stands against the background of graffiti.jpg
- File:The man is an alcoholic sitting on the road. Free Stock Photo.jpg
- File:The guy in the hood with the poster "Stop" Free stock photo.jpg
- File:A young man with a poster "Help" Free stock photo.jpg
- File:Drug-dependent guy asks for help. Free stock photo.jpg
- File:A man with a poster "Stop drugs" Free stock photo.jpg
- File:Emotional photo A look of a man with a poster "Stop".jpg
- File:A man asks for help and closes his face with his hand Free stock photo.jpg
- File:A man with a poster "Help" Free stock photo.jpg
- File:The guy with the poster "Help" Free stock photo.jpg
- File:Man is sitting on the rails with a placard "Help" Free stock photo.jpg
- File:Drug addicted men with poster "Stop drugs" Free stock photo.jpg
- File:Man on the background of a moving train with a poster STOP Free stock photo.jpg
On the other photos are real events, not staged !!! --Rebcenter-moscow 11:03, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - it seems out of scope - none of the photos look spontaneous, but scenes prepared (the faces are judiciously hidden). --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:16, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rebcenter-moscow (talk · contribs)
[edit]Advertising, no permission (© 2017 - 2018 Реабилитационный центр - «Парус» для наркозависимых и алкоголиков в Москва).
- File:IQOS - heated tobacco products.jpg
- File:Girl with tobacco smoking device IQOS.jpg
- File:Girl smoking tobacco device IQOS.jpg
- File:Electronic scale.jpg
- File:Laboratory dispenser.jpg
- File:5975 series Agilent mass - selective detector.jpg
- File:Analyzer T & D innovationen IK 200609.jpg
- File:Orbital shaker HY-5.jpg
- File:Liquid chromatograph Agilent 1200.jpg
- File:Analytical balance scales.jpg
- File:Analytical scales A&D GR-300.jpg
- File:Chromatographic irradiator.jpg
- File:Tripod for solid phase extraction.jpg
- File:Laboratory centrifuge.jpg
- File:Electrolyte analyzer AEC-01.jpg
- File:Social rehabilitation of alcohol and drug addicts.jpg
- File:Gambling - dependence on gambling.jpg
- File:Occupational therapy for drugs addicted in Rehabilitation Hospital Parus.jpg
- File:Rehabilitation center for drug addicts Parus.jpg
- File:Sandplay therapy. For dependence treatment.jpg
- File:Therapeutic group in the Rehabilitation Center for alcohol and drug addicts.jpg
- File:A nicotine-dependent man suffers from depression.jpg
- File:Depression - a lonely alcoholic in fear covers his face with his hands.jpg
- File:A drug addict is going to commit suicide.jpg
- File:Виды медицинских инъекций.png
- File:Виды медицинских инъекций.jpg
- File:Syringe disposable "Luer" circuit device.jpg
- File:Insulin syringe foto.jpg
- File:Insulin syringe in disassembled form.jpg
- File:Диаграмма. Число наркоманов состоящих на медицинском учёте в России.png
Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:45, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Patrick Rogel, The problem is solved, please check website. Is it ok now? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rebcenter-moscow (talk • contribs) 11:54, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
- Please explain what kind of violation in question?
- Many photos were used on various wiki projects, which means they turned out to be useful. For example:
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Social_rehabilitation_of_alcohol_and_drug_addicts.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Gambling_-_dependence_on_gambling.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Occupational_therapy_for_drugs_addicted_in_Rehabilitation_Hospital_Parus.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Rehabilitation_center_for_drug_addicts_Parus.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Therapeutic_group_in_the_Rehabilitation_Center_for_alcohol_and_drug_addicts.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Depression_-_a_lonely_alcoholic_in_fear_covers_his_face_with_his_hands.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Syringe_disposable_Luer_circuit_device.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Insulin_syringe_in_disassembled_form.jpg
Regarding copyright, please explain exactly where the violation is. We are happy to fix it.--Rebcenter-moscow (talk) 13:06, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Ticket:2018121410008526 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 23:00, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
- Да, разрешение в OTRS пришло, Ticket:2018121410008526, разрешение оформлено, в файлы загружено. С уважением, --Dogad75 (talk) 15:10, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Ticket:2018121410008526,. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:36, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
unused logo of questionable notability : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:45, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:19, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Looks like pic of a pic, but I may of course be wrong. E4024 (talk) 12:54, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:17, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
unused logo of questionable notability : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:25, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:20, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
unused personal image : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:29, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:21, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vikash rout (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:VIKASH ROUT belpahar MBA.jpg
- File:Vikash rout cfa.jpg
- File:VIKASH ROUT.jpg
- File:VIKASH ROUT (3).jpg
- File:Vikash rout (2).jpg
- File:Vikash rout 1.jpg
- File:Vikash rout.jpg
- File:300660backup.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:20, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AkshayyHindustani (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos, out of scope
Gbawden (talk) 14:34, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:21, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:22, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by CARLOS ALBERTO CACHAY FLORES (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused documents of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.
- File:-ANA CECILIA MARIN ARANA.pdf
- File:ANA CECILIA MARIN ARANA--.pdf
- File:ANA CECILIA MARIN ARANA.pdf
- File:CARLOS ALBERTO CACHAY FLORES-.pdf
- File:BOSQUEJO-REALIDAD-FINAL.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:21, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:22, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:22, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Otoniel Pereira Xavier (talk · contribs)
[edit]Official symbol. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:23, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Logo design, not necessarily own work ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:38, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination+unused logo of questionable notability : likely out of scope. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:24, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Book covers are not own work, third party designs ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:39, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:24, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Album cover : copyrighted. Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:40, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:24, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Album cover : copyrighted. Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:40, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:25, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Album cover : copyrighted. Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:41, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:25, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Album cover : copyrighted. Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:41, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:25, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:49, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:22, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:50, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:22, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:50, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:22, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:50, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:22, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
unused logo of questionable notability : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:05, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:44, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
I think it is above the threshold of originality Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:37, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:45, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
UPF and OoS. E4024 (talk) 14:00, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:45, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:08, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:45, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
UPF and OoS. E4024 (talk) 14:12, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:46, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Low res, not used, out of scope Nv8200p (talk) 01:56, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: unused personal photo, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 14:08, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:46, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Siddiqui1040 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:46, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Unaware of Disney relasing anything under the given license, so nominationg for Deletion on the basis of no permission ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:33, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Speedy delete: An image is the non-libre/non-free upcoming movie poster due to fair use, and should not hosted here. HarvettFox 96 06:36, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as copyright violation. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:47, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:47, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Appears to be a photograph of a screen or a screen capture
Ytoyoda (talk) 14:58, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:47, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Files by Paklogitics (talk · contribs)
[edit]- File:Our Services.jpg
- File:4 Square.jpg
- File:Our International Offices.jpg
- File:Our Domestics Affiliations.jpg
- File:Message From Chairman.jpg
- File:PaK Group Of Companies.jpg
All are images used promotionally in the now-deleted enwiki userpage. Clearly out of scope. –theinstantmatrix (talk) 15:14, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:48, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
UPF and OoS. E4024 (talk) 15:32, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:48, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Own work? Which one? Scope? E4024 (talk) 15:33, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:48, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Minor religious scholar or leader. E4024 (talk) 15:34, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:48, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
spam, out of scope, del on DE Nolispanmo 15:39, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:49, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Professional photo all over internet, including larger resolution at https://i.pinimg.com/736x/86/0b/c9/860bc9d299a07bd21f65a52a0b21a387--celebs-celebrities.jpg GRuban (talk) 00:58, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 11:00, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Personal photo, no educational value, out of Commons:Project scope GRuban (talk) 15:42, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: could be in scope, but no metadata or evidence of permission. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:49, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
At higher resolution at http://www.wallpaperist.com/wallpapers/Various/Places/Detroit-River.html GRuban (talk) 15:47, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Agree with the deletion; seems that the original uploader is not the author. --XXN, 18:12, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:50, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dipndots27 (talk · contribs)
[edit]
Hystrix (talk) 17:05, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom, no evidence of permission as well. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:50, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope Commons is not a social media site ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 17:09, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:50, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Assessoriajr (talk · contribs)
[edit]- File:Jhonatha Riller.jpg
- File:Jhonatha Riller 1.jpg
- File:Jhonatha Riller 2.jpg
- File:Jhonatha Riller 3.jpg
Out of COM:SCOPE: unused personal photos. --109.238.80.47 18:17, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:51, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE: unused personal photo. -- 109.238.80.47 18:48, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:52, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE: unused personal image. -- 109.238.80.47 19:01, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:52, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo Apocheir (talk) 19:06, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:52, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE: unused personal photo without metadata. -- 109.238.80.47 19:06, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:52, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE: unused personal photo. -- 109.238.80.47 19:10, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:52, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE: unused personal photos. -- 109.238.80.47 19:11, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:53, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE: unused personal photo. -- 109.238.80.47 19:14, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:53, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Unused promotional image Apocheir (talk) 19:29, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:53, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hortensja Bukietowa (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:PACKAGING Derivative works of the image on the chocolates depicted.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:49, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:53, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo Apocheir (talk) 19:52, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:54, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE: unused personal photo without metadata. -- 109.238.80.47 20:12, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:54, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE: unused personal photo. -- 109.238.80.47 20:14, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:55, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE: unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. -- 109.238.80.47 20:17, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:55, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE: unused personal photo without metadata. -- 109.238.80.47 20:19, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:55, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE: unused personal photo without metadata. -- 109.238.80.47 20:20, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:55, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Derivative of unknown artwork (poster), no author/permission available A.Savin 20:20, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
![20:20, 1 November 2017 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2017/11/01#c-A.Savin-2017-11-01T20:20:00.000Z-File:"Have_you_forgotten?".jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:55, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
![06:55, 8 November 2017 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2017/11/01#c-Jon_Kolbert-2017-11-08T06:55:00.000Z-File:"Have_you_forgotten?".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of COM:SCOPE: unused personal photo. -- 109.238.80.47 20:24, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:56, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of COM:SCOPE: unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. -- 109.238.80.47 20:26, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:56, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE: unused personal photo, the uploader's only contribution. -- 109.238.80.47 20:27, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:56, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE: unused personal photo without metadata. -- 109.238.80.47 20:28, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:56, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE: unused personal photo. -- 109.238.80.47 20:29, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:56, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE: unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. -- 109.238.80.47 20:30, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:57, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE: unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. -- 109.238.80.47 20:30, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:57, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE: unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. -- 109.238.80.47 20:31, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:57, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE: unused personal photo. -- 109.238.80.47 20:33, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:57, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE: unused personal photo without metadata. -- 109.238.80.47 20:33, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:57, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE: unused personal photo. -- 109.238.80.47 20:37, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep As noted, it's an example of "generous" use of tanning lotion. Andy Dingley (talk) 00:57, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep And it's in use. // Liftarn (talk) 07:29, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- Just for the record, the photo began to be used after the nomination. But if the Community believes that subject is in COM:EDUSE, then so be it. --109.238.80.47 21:40, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: seems to be in use now. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:58, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE: unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. -- 109.238.80.47 20:38, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:59, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE: unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. -- 109.238.80.47 20:38, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:59, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE: unused personal photo, the uploader's only contribution. -- 109.238.80.47 20:42, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:59, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photos
Apocheir (talk) 20:52, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:59, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jayant Uppal (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photos
- File:Specatcles in mall.jpg
- File:My book launch.jpg
- File:Intensity in mountains.jpg
- File:An image next to the bookshelf.jpg
- File:Happy New Year 2017.jpg
Apocheir (talk) 20:53, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:00, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo Apocheir (talk) 20:54, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:00, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photos / amateur musician spam
Apocheir (talk) 20:56, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:00, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo Apocheir (talk) 20:57, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:00, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Unused selfies
Apocheir (talk) 20:58, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:01, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by FAYZULLO KURBANOV (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photos
Apocheir (talk) 20:59, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:01, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Unused selfie Apocheir (talk) 21:00, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:01, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Chen101689N187 (talk) 21:40, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:01, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Chen101689N187 (talk) 21:42, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:02, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Chen101689N187 (talk) 21:49, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:02, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE: unused personal photo. -- 109.238.80.47 21:49, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:02, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Chen101689N187 (talk) 21:51, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:02, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ibrahim Al-Haidos (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal files, likely we have permission from the subject of the photo, not the photographer.
Guanaco (talk) 21:52, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:03, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
no COM:EDUSE Chen101689N187 (talk) 21:52, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:03, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE: unused personal photo without metadata. -- 109.238.80.47 21:53, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:03, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of COM:SCOPE: unused personal photo. -- 109.238.80.47 21:54, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:03, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of COM:SCOPE: unused personal photo, the uploader's only contribution. -- 109.238.80.47 21:55, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:03, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
no COM:EDUSE at this tiny 4kb size Chen101689N187 (talk) 21:56, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:03, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE: unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. -- 109.238.80.47 21:56, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:04, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE: unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. -- 109.238.80.47 21:56, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:04, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE: unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. -- 109.238.80.47 21:57, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:04, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
per COM:ADVERT Chen101689N187 (talk) 21:57, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:05, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Serial Number 54129 as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: -spam Yann (talk) 23:18, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 23:19, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
per COM:ADVERT Chen101689N187 (talk) 21:58, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:05, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
File:Machines - computers think what we let them think-----Manipulate thoughts as variables in algorithms--So to have a thought based on experience--Experience is random variable input--Random variable input is al 2014-04-26 20-08.jpeg
[edit]
Out of COM:SCOPE: unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. -- 109.238.80.47 21:58, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:05, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Chen101689N187 (talk) 21:59, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:06, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE: unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. -- 109.238.80.47 22:00, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:06, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Chen101689N187 (talk) 22:00, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:06, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Chen101689N187 (talk) 22:01, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:06, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE: unused personal photo without metadata. -- 109.238.80.47 22:04, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:06, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE: unused personal photo without metadata. -- 109.238.80.47 22:06, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:06, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE: unused personal photo without metadata. -- 109.238.80.47 22:07, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:06, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Chen101689N187 (talk) 22:08, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:07, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Chen101689N187 (talk) 22:12, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:07, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal images
Chen101689N187 (talk) 22:13, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:07, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal images
Chen101689N187 (talk) 22:16, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:07, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Chen101689N187 (talk) 22:16, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:07, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
This is an old picture of myself for a wiki user page which I have deleted. KidCrime (talk) 14:10, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Per user request. Feel free to {{Speedy}} such images next time. Regards, ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 14:51, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
No evidence uploader is the owner of the copyright of this work. Philafrenzy (talk) 14:05, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:35, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Chen101689N187 (talk) 22:22, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:08, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Anand.prakash81 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images/artworks
Chen101689N187 (talk) 22:23, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:08, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Astronautahco (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
- File:Ensaio fotográfico.jpg
- File:Selfie em Salinas.jpg
- File:Visita a Rede Minas.jpg
- File:Jaguaribe.jpg
- File:Agenciado pela Five.jpg
- File:No Pico do Urubu.jpg
- File:Festa de 15 anos.jpg
Chen101689N187 (talk) 22:24, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:09, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Chen101689N187 (talk) 22:24, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:09, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
private pic Chen101689N187 (talk) 22:24, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:09, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope - unused personal images
- File:Selfie in Mirror.jpg
- File:Beharry,LyndonMartinW.-TTN.jpg
- File:BeharryLyndonMartinW Minerals.jpg
- File:BeharryLyndonMartinW PresentingMineralsPrices.jpg
- File:BeharryLyndonMartinW HeadShot.jpg
- File:LyndonBeharry HeadShot.jpg
Chen101689N187 (talk) 22:25, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:09, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kishoregaru (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
- File:World Trade Park in Jaipur water fountain.jpg
- File:Selfie taking from the Bhangarh Fort.jpg
- File:Bhangarh fort Rajasthan.jpg
Chen101689N187 (talk) 22:26, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:10, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Chen101689N187 (talk) 22:27, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:10, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Selim Akarsu (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
Chen101689N187 (talk) 22:29, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:11, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
File:Selim Akhter - Lecturer Of Shahid Abdur Rab Serniabat Textile Engineering College, Barisal.jpg
[edit]
Out of scope - unused personal image Chen101689N187 (talk) 22:29, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:12, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Chen101689N187 (talk) 22:31, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:13, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Chen101689N187 (talk) 22:31, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:13, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Chen101689N187 (talk) 22:32, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:13, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Chen101689N187 (talk) 22:34, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:13, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Manas Jyoti Urang (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
- File:Tezpur KF 03.jpg
- File:Tezpur KF 02.jpg
- File:Tezpur KF 01.jpg
- File:My besties.jpg
- File:Manas.jpg
Chen101689N187 (talk) 22:35, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:13, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Андрей Ходоренко (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
- File:My brother you.jpg
- File:I love you i.jpg
- File:My family i.jpg
- File:Good i.jpg
- File:A good friend and companion.jpg
Chen101689N187 (talk) 22:35, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:14, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Chen101689N187 (talk) 22:37, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:14, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Chen101689N187 (talk) 22:37, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:14, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ujjalpodder (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
Chen101689N187 (talk) 22:38, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:15, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal images
Chen101689N187 (talk) 22:38, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:15, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope - unused personal image Chen101689N187 (talk) 22:40, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:15, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope - unused personal image Chen101689N187 (talk) 22:41, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:15, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Danni Wamafma (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
Chen101689N187 (talk) 22:42, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:16, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Album cover : copyrighted. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:44, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:16, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Chen101689N187 (talk) 22:44, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:16, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rohith kashi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
- File:Beautiful twins.jpg
- File:Good brothers.jpg
- File:Brothers rohith.jpg
- File:My photo and my bro.jpg
Chen101689N187 (talk) 22:45, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:16, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
some inknown person, not used Motopark (talk) 04:10, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:36, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Chen101689N187 (talk) 22:46, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:17, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
private pic Chen101689N187 (talk) 22:47, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:17, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope - unused personal image Chen101689N187 (talk) 22:47, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:17, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope - unused personal image Chen101689N187 (talk) 22:48, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:17, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
no COM:EDUSE Chen101689N187 (talk) 22:48, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep usable. --Ralf Roleček 23:19, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:17, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Moujib scellot 6 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images of blocked user
Chen101689N187 (talk) 22:49, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:18, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Chen101689N187 (talk) 22:50, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:18, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Chen101689N187 (talk) 22:51, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:18, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
_-1176709955.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-1176709955.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:35, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
_-1176709955.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:19, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
_-1176709955.jpg){kind=link}
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:36, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:18, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:38, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:19, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:38, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:19, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:38, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:19, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope.
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:41, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:20, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:42, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:20, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:42, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:20, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:42, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:20, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:43, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:20, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Derivative works
Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:47, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:44, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Angelamarti (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope. The only contribution of this user is their own sandbox, in 2013.
- File:Garden-Path Model.png
- File:Serial vs. Distributed Processing.png
- File:Sample Figure for WikiAssignment.png
Castillo blanco (talk) 12:12, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:44, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Wrong colour rendering during upload. Uploaded a png version instead (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fields_Of_Action_WMDE_2018.png) Christof Pins (WMDE) (talk) 12:40, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
-2017-11-01T12:40:00.000Z-File:Fields_of_Action_WMDE_2018.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:43, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Low-quality file. Superseded by [2]. Magnolia677 (talk) 12:56, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
![[2]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Stuart.Florida.riverwalk.before.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:42, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete PDF announcing business partnership between two companies. Copy of the file found at [3] in press releases page [4]. Copyrighted and out of scope. --朝彦 | asahiko (talk) 10:24, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:42, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:41, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Not own work, third party logo design ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:42, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:41, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 16:10, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:41, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
No educational purpose – COM:EDUSE Hasenläufer 16:19, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:41, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo + unused. Vanjagenije (talk) 16:30, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:41, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Used previously for Wikipedia advertising. User blocked now. Vanjagenije (talk) 16:34, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:40, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Used previously for Wikipedia advertising. User blocked now. Vanjagenije (talk) 16:35, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:40, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE: unused personal photo. -- 109.238.80.47 17:57, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:39, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Flag of Spain.svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:58, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:39, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Low-quality file. Superseded by [5]. Ebyabe (talk) 18:48, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:39, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Personal photo. Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 09:53, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:51, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work': thumbnail format, personality right isusses, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 19:53, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete and block. Another {{copyvio}} from this copyvio only uploader. Grabbed from https://www.m3db.com/artists/68860. —LX (talk, contribs) 22:15, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:48, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work': thumbnail format, personality right isusses, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 19:54, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:49, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work': thumbnail format, personality right isusses, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 19:54, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete and block the uploader. The uploader claims to have created it on the day it was uploaded here, but it was published at http://cinetrooth.in/2016/03/12/chanchal-hari-actress-profile-and-biography/ 19 months earlier. They've had plenty of warnings to stop uploading copyright violations. —LX (talk, contribs) 22:10, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:48, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
My picture 82.1.136.246 11:46, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
- I cannot know if it is your pic or not, but considering that it's not in use, I suggest to believe the IP and delete the pic, as a concerned party wishes so and the image is not something that would be sine qua non. --E4024 (talk) 11:55, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep As image is in scope as it shows "Players of Somalia national bandy team at reception in Borlänge after World Championships 2014". Also how do we know that who is this random and anonymous IP or better yet should we believe this random and anonymous british IP? And if so for what? That he is in this picture? Or that this image is his property, against the fact that the uploader\photographer has dozens of images of sports taken with the same camera. Tm (talk) 05:58, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
- Comment The claim of the anonymous person is as Tm points out somewhat unclear. If the meaning is regarding who is the photographer, I guess you could either trust my upload history of sports events and pictures from the region – or this unrevealed person. More likely, as Tm was into, is that the person is one of the portrayed players. I don't have knowledge of their names, however, two players who played in a world cup in bandy (not a very big sport internationally, but still) are worth preserving in our database, and could probably be named if someone more into the sport looks at the picture. Vivo (talk) 09:31, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:50, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
UPF and OoS. E4024 (talk) 12:40, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Before opining or deletion please have a look at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Benard Odoh.jpg, who seems to be the same person. Let's not make a mistake. (If I made one, we have a week to correct, at least.) --E4024 (talk) 12:48, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 22:21, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
"Secretary to Ebonyi State Government" could be an important position, or not. I have no idea. I am bringing this to here because it is not used anywhere and is the only upload of a sporadic user. If I made a mistake I'm sure colleagues will help correct it. E4024 (talk) 12:43, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 22:21, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 13:06, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: unused personal photos are out of project scope. This is the user's only upload. Taivo (talk) 20:03, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
UPF and OoS. Could have been deleted before. E4024 (talk) 12:50, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:17, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
I guess it's a previously deleted (very common file name) unused personal file. E4024 (talk) 11:35, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 05:07, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
Another OoS "my photo". E4024 (talk) 21:10, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 04:59, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
UPF and OoS. E4024 (talk) 16:45, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:14, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
I have a feeling like files titled "my photo" are generally out of scope selfies. This one also. E4024 (talk) 16:32, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 07:32, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
This is not MY PHOTO. 181.203.64.67 22:41, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 18:45, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
photomontage : a free source for each images should be provided + maybe out of scope too Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:30, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 22:22, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
No educational purpose – COM:EDUSE Hasenläufer 16:18, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 22:23, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
No apparent educational utility on this large size, but small quality image of something in what looks to be a banana plantation. But unclear, and unused. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:54, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 22:24, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Helenhunter (talk · contribs)
[edit]Fake licenses - a lot of logos as "own". PR activities.
- File:Logo Verny Capital.jpg
- File:FAU Logo.png
- File:Pivdenkombank Logo.jpg
- File:Ukraine Trophy Logo.jpg
- File:Team Ukraine racing with Ferrari.jpg
- File:Altyntau logo.jpg
- File:Verny Kapital.jpg
Bilderling (talk) 08:52, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - No indication these have been released with a free license. — Rhododendrites talk | 03:00, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:38, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rshmukherjee (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope Commons is not a social media site
- File:Swagata & Usha Utthup16.jpg
- File:Swagata Mulherjee 15.jpg
- File:Indrani & Rishi14.jpg
- File:RISHI MUKHERJEE Actor 13.jpg
- File:Rishi MUKHERJEE12.jpg
- File:OBHINOY OBHINOY 11.jpg
- File:Swagata - RISHI 10.jpg
- File:Drama The Dancing Girl GOHORJAN 09.jpg
- File:Swagata Mukherjee.jpg
- File:Function Rishi & Swagata.jpg
- File:Rishi Mukherjee & Swagata.jpg
- File:FM studio Rishi with Swagata.jpg
- File:Swagata and Rishi Mukherjee.jpg
- File:Kobita RISHI MUKHERJEE 02.jpg
✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 12:46, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: I do not agree with the reason given by nominator. Rishi Mukherjee is an actor and Swagata Mukherjee is a singer, both mostly performing in Bengali regional media and maybe aren't that notable. They both have IMDB entries and I found passing mention in this English newspaper. Maybe they are covered locally in Bengali media (I don't understand Bengali). But I support deletion as non of the images have Metadata and few have "FBMD" in EXIF data indicating copied from facebook. Possible copyvios. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:15, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:39, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Modern art and promo photo. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.
- File:O033.jpg
- File:O028.jpg
- File:O032.jpg
- File:50LWF0250 (2)moji gattaiab.jpg
- File:~LWF0307ao思い出 a.jpg
- File:~LWF0386aa.jpg
moji_gattaiab.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:39, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Failed upload, replaced by File:Jesus es el Rey Ministerio.jpg. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:00, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete- No reason to retain 'broken' upload if high quality alternative exists. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:26, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:52, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be user's own work based on other copyvio uploads
Jon Kolbert (talk) 15:28, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:52, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Angelinagurova95 (talk · contribs)
[edit]These pages seem to have been scanned from textbooks but uploaded as "own work".
- File:Таблица показателей Инвентаря модели стилей межкультурных конфликтов 2.png
- File:Таблица показателей Инвентаря модели стилей межкультурных конфликтов 1.png
- File:Таблица показателей Инвентаря модели стилей межкультурных конфликтов 3.png
Takeaway (talk) 16:05, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:52, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
copyright violation https://affxtionid.wordpress.com/2012/07/11/sbs-for-you-in-full-blossom-script-reading-2p/ 86.158.55.108 17:18, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:55, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
ND license Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:21, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
- License has been change to CC BY SA so we are good now. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 23:38, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
Older duplicate of my artwork uploaded on 31. Okt 2017, difference is missing CC BY SA icons. Guido4 (talk) 13:29, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: CC BY SA. Ruthven (msg) 08:53, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Duplicate of "07 Hegasy Cardiac Cycle Wiki EN CCBYSA.png " Guido4 (talk) 12:32, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:52, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
Clearly a video game cover art, not necessarily own work, Equivalent at English Wikipedia is non-free ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:40, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - @ShakespeareFan00: For obvious copyright violations, it's usually better to just use {{copyvio|1=Reason}} to speedy delete it. Up to you if you want to close this and do so. — Rhododendrites talk | 02:54, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- If it's obvious then it's speedy, and will tag accordingly. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:20, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy deleted by Jon Kolbert. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 14:59, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
(c) Cyril Bontemps/ Le Studio de Louison. Missing permission, no metadata. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:36, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:03, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
(c) Ferrari X. Identity of Le Fur Damien should be veryfied thru OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:37, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: no permission received. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:03, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
(c) Grégory Cogotti. Identity of Le Fur Damien should be veryfied thru OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:38, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: no permission received. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:03, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Proctor1234 (talk · contribs)
[edit]small resolution; missing EXIF data
Hystrix (talk) 18:43, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:09, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Unused graph, unusably small Apocheir (talk) 17:40, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- This is a scaled duplicate of File:VKontakte Number of Registered users 120224.png, so can be speedied. I've edited the description accordingly. -Apocheir (talk) 14:07, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination/discussion. Replaced by File:VKontakte Number of Registered users 120224.png. --Wdwd (talk) 15:00, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Unused files: This one and File:Bernard Lallement.png. I have no idea if the person has any notability for Commons but the pics are not used anywhere. E4024 (talk) 12:21, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:46, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Low-re image, missing permission, extract from a video file (http://www.notele.be/list38-vivre-ici-media47521-exclusif---le-rachat-du-rfc-tournai-tombe-a-l-eau.html) Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:24, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:46, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Appears to be the subject's social media avatar: https://vk.vkfaces.com/628717/v628717552/60ba/Zr9y69i6Hks.jpg Ytoyoda (talk) 13:52, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:46, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
File:ALRA South - The Royal Victoria Patriotic Building - John Archer Way - London, Greater London - SW18 3SX.jpg
[edit]
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://alra.co.uk/images/facilities/alra-south.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & watermarked. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:45, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
I think we've got a problem here. Book covers, collage without licences etc. E4024 (talk) 14:09, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:45, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Do we need this text? Why? E4024 (talk) 15:35, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:44, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Kashmir is not a disupted territory,it's an integral part of India. 43.251.92.214 17:33, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep File in heavy use. Also, from en:Kashmir, "Kashmir is the northernmost geographical region of the Indian subcontinent. Until the mid-19th century, the term "Kashmir" denoted only the Kashmir Valley between the Great Himalayas and the Pir Panjal Range. Today, it denotes a larger area that includes the Indian-administered territory of Jammu and Kashmir (subdivided into Jammu, Kashmir, and Ladakh divisions), the Pakistani-administered territories of Azad Kashmir and Gilgit-Baltistan, and Chinese-administered territories of Aksai Chin and the Trans-Karakoram Tract." So it is divided between China, India and Pakistan and so it is not an integral part of India, besides the territorial disputes between the three countries. Tm (talk) 18:10, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: COM:INUSE. Since the file is in use, Commons will not delete it for inaccuracy. See COM:NPOV for details. --bjh21 (talk) 18:11, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:44, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Supertroop6 (talk · contribs)
[edit]- File:Percy Herold Hello Mr. Saturday Night = It's "Fire In Da Hole" time.png
- File:Percy Herold's Hooter's Baby's Mamma - Fire In Da Hole!!!!.png
- File:Percy Da SuperTroop Herold 2016.png
- File:Percy Herold hangingout at Sheffield Beer and Wine Garden.png
- File:Percy Herold Fire In Da Hole.png
- File:Percy Herold Hooter's Number One Fan.png
- File:Percy Herold Hanging With Friends In Austin Texas.jpg
- File:Percy Herold grilling at ribfest Chicago 2014.png
Out of COM:SCOPE: unused personal photos. --109.238.80.47 13:07, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
- Comment. It seems that I have not added the DR page in daily log October 17. All files were marked, Uploader notified. Sorry. --109.238.80.47 17:44, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:44, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Book covers are protected by copyright Vera (talk) 17:45, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- I think a composite of many covers are not. Just like there are photo's of exteriors of McDonalds and Burger King restaurants on Commons, the logo's are copyrighted but in context of a compisite picture with the surroundings they are allowed. Someone Not Awful (talk) 16:17, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- Fair use is not allowed on Wikimedia Commons. Vera (talk) 16:56, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:43, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted graphic work MichaelMaggs (talk) 18:09, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:43, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Largely text-only and out of scope. Some have clipart and stock images of unclear origin/copyright status.
Apocheir (talk) 19:03, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:43, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Copyrights: Search in Internet Leonardo.G G (talk) 19:49, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:42, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
This seems to be outside the project scope. The text appears to be PD-USGov, but it belongs on other wikis as text, not a jpeg image. Guanaco (talk) 20:01, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:41, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Copyright holder of this image is the Canadian Governor General's Office, not the U.S. Department of State – Maliepa (talk) 20:44, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:41, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
The pic seems to come from a personal website (www.rossanacasale.it) which shows a copyright symbol (© 2017 Rossana Casale). No OTRS ticket, no evidence that the uploader is the copyright owner. Carnby (talk) 21:25, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:41, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Copy of https://i.pinimg.com/236x/69/7a/2d/697a2d5d9276f266cf99bfd26fc50b45--tour-pinterest.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:44, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:40, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Patteismus (talk · contribs)
[edit]Works from artist Patrick Timm (born in 1979). OTRS authorisation needed from the author.
- File:Kringel.tif
- File:Wärmebilder.png
- File:Explosio Patrick Timm.png
- File:Heilschlamm.png
- File:Bad Gastein Thermalsee Utopie Wanderkarte.png
Ruthven (msg) 22:29, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:40, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Photograph probably not own work, no exif and small resolution. Jcb (talk) 22:41, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:39, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Not "Own work". Film poster is owned by the the production company and not freely licensed. Secondarywaltz (talk) 23:30, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:39, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
As the source line says, the photo is ©Michael Heizer, so we'd need an explicit release. GRuban (talk) 23:47, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:39, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Low quality image, all of them has an alternate version to replace.
- File:Hurricane Matthew Suomi NPP - VIIR satellite view 01-October-2016.png
- File:Hurricane Matthew Terra-Modis satellite view 02-October-2016.png
- File:Hurricane Matthew Terra-Modis satellite view 04-October-2016.png
B dash (talk) 09:03, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:50, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
wrong author, wrong date (before 1946) Goesseln (talk) 09:50, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- i don't understand anything in the moment. this picture of the exhibition was taken on this day.--Donna Gedenk (talk) 09:53, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. While the image may have been taken on a particular day, it showed another photograph. There was no permission from the creator of the "derivative work" thus the image itself became a copyright violation, even though the uploader took it on a particular day. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:49, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
wrong author, wrong date (before 1946) Goesseln (talk) 09:51, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
thus: wrong licence. -jkb- (talk) 10:52, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:48, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
I see no evidence that this image has been suitably licensed. At en:Talk:Adam Tan (article now deleted as a copyvio) the uploader said "the picture does not infringement, has authorized me to edit use", which sounds like the common "They've told me I can use it" but without proper release. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:05, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:48, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Low-definition image with over-exposed sky. Wikimedia Commons has numerous better images of this cemetery. Motacilla (talk) 10:13, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Comment Depends on what is shown by this photograph. If any of the graves visible are of a notable person, it should be kept. I'd only delete if I was confident that doesn't apply.--Nilfanion (talk) 11:13, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: This is usable as a picture of the cemetery, but we have far better ones. It's not usable as a photo of any individual grave, since once you've cropped to a single gravestone it's too fuzzy even as a Wikipedia-sized thumbnail. --bjh21 (talk) 11:24, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- However if a specific grave was important, it would be a keep, in the absence of a better photo of that grave. Sure it would be a bad image but a bad image is better than nothing.--Nilfanion (talk) 12:16, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:48, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
PR photo upload by a user Sohochina (or pretent to reprsent the company), which the person worked for. It is copyrighted unless formal OTRS by the company to release to the public Matthew hk (talk) 10:25, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:48, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
PR photo upload by a user Sohochina (or pretent to reprsent the company), which the person worked for. It is copyrighted unless formal OTRS by the company to release to the public Matthew hk (talk) 10:26, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:48, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
PR photo upload by a user Sohochina (or pretent to reprsent the company), which the person worked for. It is copyrighted unless formal OTRS by the company to release to the public Matthew hk (talk) 10:27, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:48, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Spam and adv. Bilderling (talk) 10:47, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:47, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 11:14, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:47, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
The file has two problems. At first, en:Jewel Bramson was deleted as hoax, she is likely non-notable. At second, this is small photo without metadata and the uploader's only contribution, probably not own work as claimed, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 11:29, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:47, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
OTRS-permission from author Arte Warren is needed, because I am not convinced, that uploader Equaliserrr is the same person. Taivo (talk) 11:40, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:46, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Frédéric Lejeune, missing permission. Copy of https://static.wixstatic.com/media/14d3f2_0f146e0f76224abdb10e03834201c925~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_676,h_380,al_c,q_80,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01/14d3f2_0f146e0f76224abdb10e03834201c925~mv2.webp%7Csubpage Identity of Nahoj lorim should be veryfied via OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:06, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:46, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Kolforn (talk · contribs) nominated the file for speedy deletion with reason "Unused personal photo of subject with no apparent notability. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope". I'm not sure, we can discuss it for a week. It is in category "Woman at work in Tunisia", maybe usable as stock photo. Taivo (talk) 08:13, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep part of the Wiki Loves Africa contest about Africans at work. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:44, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Weak Delete - Uploaded in good faith, but unclear if it's in project scope. With no description and no information about who this is, what sort of work is being done, etc. it seems unlikely it has an educational purpose (according to GTranslate, it is someone working at Etisalat, a telecom company, but since there's nothing in the image about Etisalat that doesn't seem to help much?). The users's other uploads looks to be good, though (at a glance). — Rhododendrites talk | 02:56, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Rhododendrites: FYI Etisalat means here, literally, 'telecommunications', not referring to the company. Cordially — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 21:30, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Nothing here to prove that its a "Woman at work in Tunisia". Would have helped if there was some categorization other than Woman at work in Tunisia. It is more like a personal photo of subject and has no apparent notability. Not useful for educational purposes. Demax (talk) 17:02, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 21:17, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Mass nom: also
- File:Moscow river & Kremlin. Moscow, Russia - panoramio.jpg
- File:Moscow river & Kremlin. Moscow, Russia - panoramio - Oleg Yu.Novikov.jpg
- File:Moscow river & Kremlin. Moscow, Russia - panoramio - Oleg Yu.Novikov (1).jpg
- File:Moscow river & Kremlin. Moscow, Russia - panoramio - Oleg Yu.Novikov (2).jpg
- File:Moscow river & Kremlin. Moscow, Russia - panoramio - Oleg Yu.Novikov (3).jpg
- File:Moscow river & Kremlin. Moscow, Russia - panoramio - Oleg Yu.Novikov (4).jpg
- File:Moscow river & Kremlin. Moscow, Russia - panoramio - Oleg Yu.Novikov (7).jpg
- File:Moscow river & Kremlin. Moscow, Russia - panoramio - Oleg Yu.Novikov (9).jpg
- File:Moscow river & Kremlin. Moscow, Russia - panoramio - Oleg Yu.Novikov (10).jpg
- File:Moscow river & Kremlin. Moscow, Russia - panoramio - Oleg Yu.Novikov (11).jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Image quality: overblown colours, compression noise, low res... many many alternatives on hand. Some other uploads from the same panoramio account, like File:Moscow river & Kremlin. Moscow, Russia - panoramio - Oleg Yu.Novikov (6).jpg, imo, are ... passable. Retired electrician (talk) 00:24, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Some photos are the only photos of the ships on the Wikimedia Commons (Category:Sukhinichi (ship, 1994), Category:Moskva-21 (ship, 1974), Category:Moskva-63 (ship, 1978) etc). Some photos are of historical significance (Mercedes-Benz advertisement (was demolished), Rossiya Hotel (was demolished) etc). I think not so bad photos to delete them. --Insider (talk) 13:33, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Images in scope, also per Insider. Tm (talk) 14:06, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep --Drabdullayev17 (talk) 18:59, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Images are in project scope, no reason to delete. Some of them have de minimis elements in them, which should be noted on the page of each such image.--Дима Г (talk) 07:23, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per TM et al. Ruthven (msg) 10:55, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
In com:PS?
- File:Rap Muscian.jpg
- File:Teen Break.jpg
- File:Take Five.jpg
- File:A student reading from a laptop.jpg
- File:An Animator.jpg
- File:A Keyboard player.jpg
- File:Crying to God.jpg
- File:Bridal Photography.jpg
- File:Bridal Pose.jpg
- File:Preacher in Mombasa.jpg
- File:Running on the Beach.jpg
- File:Camels at the Kenyan Coast.jpg
- File:Crocodiles at the Kenya Coast.jpg
Hystrix (talk) 00:54, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Why nominate all of these? The crocodiles and camels, for example, seem clearly in project scope? A few of them have quality issues that make them questionable (e.g. File:Preacher in Mombasa.jpg and File:Bridal Pose.jpg) and a couple look to be personal social media-type photos, but I don't have cause to question them as a group. — Rhododendrites talk | 02:36, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: clearly in scope. Even the preacher. Ruthven (msg) 10:58, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
In com:PS?
- File:FILE0311 (2)metier de bois.jpg
- File:FILE0289femme en action.jpg
- File:Au chantier.jpg
- File:Une marche humanitaire.jpg
- File:La tournée du prefet.jpg
metier_de_bois.jpg){kind=link}
Hystrix (talk) 01:00, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: Either plausibly-usable pictures of work or what appears to be a significant public event. --bjh21 (talk) 17:43, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Good illustration of everyday's life in Africa. Ruthven (msg) 10:59, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
In com:PS?
- File:PlantingPotatoes.jpg
- File:FrankInspecting.jpg
- File:KidGettingInfo.jpg
- File:RagelCrosses.jpg
- File:CerifiedPotatoTubers.jpg
- File:Planting TPS.jpg
- File:HangingArround.jpg
- File:FransInspecting.jpg
- File:NoksInspecting.jpg
- File:RachelPollen.jpg
- File:InspectionInTheMist.jpg
- File:Potato picker in Limpopo.jpg
Hystrix (talk) 01:30, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep - images are mostly illustrations of stages in a potato breeding program. Not seeing any issue for project scope. — Rhododendrites talk | 02:39, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep, as useful pictures of agriculture and agricultural research. Only exception might be File:HangingArround.jpg, which doesn't explain the use of the balloon. --bjh21 (talk) 17:41, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 10:59, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Ciudad creyente Mpgarcia10 (talk) 01:53, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
![01:53, 1 November 2017 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2017/11/01#c-Mpgarcia10-2017-11-01T01:53:00.000Z-File:Portada_"La_Ciudad_Creyente".jpg){kind=link}
- Cual es la razón de su pedido? --E4024 (talk) 10:10, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Sergio Trujillo Magnenat ha muerto en 1999. Ruthven (msg) 11:04, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
![11:04, 21 November 2017 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2017/11/01#c-Ruthven-2017-11-21T11:04:00.000Z-File:Portada_"La_Ciudad_Creyente".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Considering the date of death of the artist is 1989, the work can not be in public domain and thus the public domain claim is false. Cold Season (talk) 03:24, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:06, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
If the stated author Jovan Šurdilović is sr:Јован Шурдиловић, this is almost certainly not public domain. He's alive as of this year Guanaco (talk) 14:23, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 06:04, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Reinoso.png
- File:Arlindo dos santos.png
- File:Zague.png
- File:Cecilio Dominguez.png
- File:Antonio Carlos Santos.png
- File:Diego Lainez.png
- File:Roberto Rodríguez Pérez.png
- File:Collage zamora.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:56, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Ich erhalte nur Fehlermeldungen von Flickr, habe dort allerdings auch kein Account.
Hystrix (talk) 17:14, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Comment The four images are licensed, don't delete them please. Maucg (talk) 18:09, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- I don't understand this nomination. I don't see a problem with the Flickr license on any of these images. Ytoyoda (talk) 04:13, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: all seems ok. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:23, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Codc as no license, with the reason: Invalid licenz because its a trade mark of a commercial company. See also (R) in the picture. JuTa 05:32, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:42, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
Fake license, logo can't be own Bilderling (talk) 10:46, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:32, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:51, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:31, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
Loading error Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, corrupted image. --Y.haruo (talk) 16:43, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Mewa767 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: bad, black-white copy of File:H Hondius dÄ - Ambrosius Blarer (RB23-07).jpg. Regular deletion request is created, because the file has been 11½ years in Commons. Taivo (talk) 07:59, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete No reason to keep this version. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 21:28, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per Dyolf77, Redundant/bad quality. I think that this file finished a role because there is the good image. --Y.haruo (talk) 16:52, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Since the original file was deleted since it was under NC terms, even this would be available only for non commercial purposes. acagastya 08:00, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 17:01, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Apparently taken from here regardless there is no link, uploader states author is "Instituto Andaluz de Patrimonio Histórico". Content stored in that webpage (including pics) is licensed with CC BY NC SA 3.0, not suitable for Wikimedia Commons Strakhov (talk) 15:37, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Non-free licenses. --Y.haruo (talk) 17:41, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
inappropriate 69.254.29.183 13:22, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:46, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
duplicate of File:Rutan Model 33 VariEze - GPN-2000-001910.jpg Marc Lacoste (talk) 14:03, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: duplicate. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:50, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
File:Icone, madre di dio della tenerezza, prima metà del XIII sec, dalla catt della trasfigurazione, belozersk.JPG
[edit]
We have a much better version: File:Unknow - The Mother of God of Tenderness of the White Lake - Google Art Project.jpg Carl Ha (talk) 15:42, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep not a duplicate, not bad quality- link files of same object - do not delete. see also COM:Redundant. Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 13:29, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, not a duplicate. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 18:05, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
copyrighted logo, sorry I thought i was uploading a new version to local wikipedia as a non-free Uhooep (talk) 16:39, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, this is only simple text. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 18:08, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Thor Bøgelund-Jensen died in 1959, so this poster is not in the PD yet (enters the PD in 2030). The poster is claimed to be under a CC-BY-SA-3.0 license; I'd like to see conclusive proof for that. The proof should also show that whoever granted that license is actually authorised to do that. Rosenzweig τ 14:33, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:55, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Despite the title here and on Flickr, the subject of the image is not Neil Pauffley (this is him), So we just have a misnamed image of an unidentified person. That's of no possible educational use and might be misleading. Huon (talk) 22:02, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Renamed the page and corrected description to Kyle Edmund. --Sporti (talk) 07:28, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Jcb (talk) 08:55, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
This photo is not from 1906, is from 2005. This link has the same photo in high quality (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Heinolds_First_and_Last_Chance_Bar.jpg) and you can clearly see in the large quality a TV that also appears in the low-resolution that passes as a photo from 1906. 107.2.82.97 04:17, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep they are not the same photo, please look closer at 100% resolution to compare them, there are numerous differences including lighting, items on the table, items in the cupboard window on the left. seb26 (talk) 12:33, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per seb26. Ruthven (msg) 15:47, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
Not the work of the uploader, and no evidence that the copyright holder has donated the copyright David Biddulph (talk) 05:43, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Admin Dyolf77 tagged this image as no permission on 27 November even though there was already a DR started. Dyolf, could you delete it and close the DR considering it has been almost a month and no permission was filed? My search of OTRS tickets revealed no pending tickets related to this image. Cheers, seb26 (talk) 12:36, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: by Steinsplitter. Ruthven (msg) 15:47, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
The user uploaded images downloaded from internet and claims of their own. This one is stolen from the subject's instagram profile the day after it is posted: https://www.instagram.com/p/CpMctWAJNvn/ Dead.rabbit (talk) 04:25, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Materialscientist. --Rosenzweig τ 11:01, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Irrelevant and unnecessary. There are better versions of other similar maps. LAi zhen kang (talk) 06:05, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- How is a map of a metro line irrelevant? This image was in use on a Wikipedia article for several years so it's definitely in scope. I haven't seen any other versions in Dutch. You seem to have nominated this image and a couple of other images for the wrong reason. A better reason would probably be that it's a low quality diagram that is not likely to be used anymore because it's replaced by a template. Multichill (talk) 19:05, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep, no valid reason for deletion. If the image has been superseded please provide a link at minimum. seb26 (talk) 12:38, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 15:47, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
Irrelevant and unnecessary. There are better versions of other similar maps. LAi zhen kang (talk) 06:05, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep, no valid reason for deletion. If the image has been superseded please provide a link at minimum. seb26 (talk) 12:38, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 15:47, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
Irrelevant and unnecessary. There are better versions of other similar maps. LAi zhen kang (talk) 06:06, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep, no valid reason for deletion. If the image has been superseded please provide a link at minimum. seb26 (talk) 12:38, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 15:47, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
Irrelevant and unnecessary. There are better versions of other similar maps. LAi zhen kang (talk) 06:06, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep, no valid reason for deletion. If the image has been superseded please provide a link at minimum. seb26 (talk) 12:39, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 15:47, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
Irrelevant and unnecessary. There are better other versions of such similar maps. LAi zhen kang (talk) 06:07, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep, no valid reason for deletion. If the image has been superseded please provide a link at minimum. seb26 (talk) 12:39, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 15:48, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Caricature by George Grosz (1893-1959). Please restore in 2030 Mutter Erde (talk) 09:26, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Comment Mutter Erde: I'm not so sure. The publication date of this is 1919 which makes it PD in the US for being before 1923. What is the reason this would be copyrighted in source country? Reviewing Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany reveals no clear answer to me. seb26 (talk) 12:49, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
- All files hosted on commons have to be free in the US and in the country of its origin. George Grosz is a German citizen and so his works are still protected in Europe. See https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:George_Grosz Regards Mutter Erde (talk) 06:57, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
- Mutter Erde: "All files hosted on commons have to be free in the US and in the country of its origin." thank you, I already understood this, but the clarification and the link about the artist was helpful. Cheers, seb26 (talk) 14:34, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
- All files hosted on commons have to be free in the US and in the country of its origin. George Grosz is a German citizen and so his works are still protected in Europe. See https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:George_Grosz Regards Mutter Erde (talk) 06:57, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 15:48, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
wrong author, wrong date (before 1945) Goesseln (talk) 09:48, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- ?--Donna Gedenk (talk) 09:52, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- this picture was taken in the exhibition of the museum. you can see it and the museum wrote the names of the children in the picture.--Donna Gedenk (talk) 10:16, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Goesseln: What do you think about the OTRS ticket attached to the file? If the license is ok, the date/info can just be corrected, no? — Rhododendrites talk | 03:11, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 15:51, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
The license is not correct. It is a picture of a living woman Yona B. (t) 10:22, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Hi there. Unless Google Translate misled me, the source page (on the local Wikipedia) said that someone took this picture, then uploaded it themselves and put it in the public domain. I just thought I'd put it on Commons since it was said that it was public domain at the photograph's request, so we could also use it for Wikidata and possible translations. Exilexi (talk) 14:10, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Maybe i got it wrong but a picture of living person that don't have authorization of the person itself (not only the photographer) it not PD. and the authorization need to be deliver in OTRS. Yona B. (t) 13:47, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- I got my answer in other place. not for delete. Yona B. (t) 13:57, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Maybe i got it wrong but a picture of living person that don't have authorization of the person itself (not only the photographer) it not PD. and the authorization need to be deliver in OTRS. Yona B. (t) 13:47, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 15:51, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
This map has no reference source, also it is misleading, notice that the German language covers most of Poland, Czech Rep, and Russian Kaliningrad. This is simply not true. Pls see other maps of the kind File:Germanic languages in Europe.png. E-960 (talk) 13:13, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: COM:INUSE. As long as the file is in use, it's not liable for deletion simply for being incorrect. See COM:NPOV for more discussion. --bjh21 (talk) 18:03, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per bjh21. Ruthven (msg) 15:52, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
Map has no reference source, also some of the claim it makes do no correlate to historical facts as, with the high concentration of the I1a in Poland on the Baltic cost (most of the Poles living there today were expelled form the east after WWII, in turn the German inhabitants were expelled further west into Germany by the Communists). E-960 (talk) 13:31, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: in use. Ruthven (msg) 15:52, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
Map claims own research — mixing various data, as stated "I created this map using information from genetic testing results form various companies". Also, this map makes some very questionable claims that do no correlate to historical facts as with the high concentration of the I1a in Poland on the Baltic cost (most of the Poles living there today were expelled form the east after WWII, in turn the German inhabitants were expelled further west into Germany by the Communists), yet the map shows the area with very high I1a concentration, as in places like Denmark or Sweden. E-960 (talk) 13:38, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: widely in use. Ruthven (msg) 15:52, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
Derivative of the I1a map used in Balanovsky et al, a copyright issue per COM:PRP and COM:DW. Being in use does not override copyright law. Fæ (talk) 17:50, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
- Keep The author of this image was based on Phylogeography of Y-Chromosome Haplogroup I Reveals Distinct Domains of Prehistoric Gene Flow in Europe (2004) and Balanovsky et al (2008), and then made an artistic interpretation. It seems perfectly valid.--Maulucioni (talk) 03:58, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
- If the map was based on Map C, Figure1, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1181996 (archive) as it appears to be, then it is a derived work and so a copyright violation. --Fæ (talk) 09:34, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Ruthven: as prior closer you may want to provide an opinion even if you leave it to someone else to close. In the last DR, the issue of being a derived work was not examined, so the nature of the nomination is new. --Fæ (talk) 11:37, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Fæ, this DR has very few in common with the previous one. Data used to create a map from scratch are not copyrightable (at least not in this context), but the drawing itself is. I am unable to open all the links you provided, but the map in fig. 1 of the article looks different from the one in the file. --Ruthven (msg) 12:18, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, but the map is not reproducible from any specific data. As it appears, based on its own description, to be artistically derived from Map C, Figure 1, rather than generated from a set of data, it should be considered to be a derived work of the copyrighted map. A user created artistic interpretation of a copyright work, does not bypass the original copyright. --Fæ (talk) 12:33, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Fæ, this DR has very few in common with the previous one. Data used to create a map from scratch are not copyrightable (at least not in this context), but the drawing itself is. I am unable to open all the links you provided, but the map in fig. 1 of the article looks different from the one in the file. --Ruthven (msg) 12:18, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Data is not copyrighted, but it is sourced. Thus it is not plagiarism and not even an original research (which, unlike Wikipedia, Commons accepts). It is a useful map for an educational purpose. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 21:26, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:25, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from music, advertisement and non-trivial logos. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- So what exactly does that mean? Is it worth me uploading anything else? It would seem harder to upload to wiki than reading Haskell. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bentaylor13413 (talk • contribs) 14:42, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep I've verified music is the same as on Free Music Archive under the Free Art License (given in the source). Concerning advertisement and logos: prior and after there are 10 seconds of vanity plates. 5 seconds of the featured glass blowers. 5 seconds for the music credits. Branding is visible on back of uniforms. I feel there's enough video (3 min 40 sec) that the video is in scope. —Dispenser (talk) 03:28, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep, at least as far as scope is concerned. The video may have the consequence of advertising its makers, but it's primarily informational (and actually very interesting). --bjh21 (talk) 18:22, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep : as said above. Anthere (talk) 21:53, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep, (but a little concern about the logo). — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:59, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per Dispenser et al. Ruthven (msg) 15:53, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
Incorrect names of molecules; SVG version is now correct. Slashme (talk) 14:34, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 15:53, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
Fake description. A portrait of a Chinese Ming mandarin, not vietnamese. Zhxy 519 (talk) 03:44, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Use {{Fact disputed}} or {{Rename}}. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:21, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
Wrong name redirection. Zhxy 519 17:41, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. See former DR. Ruthven (msg) 15:53, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
A wrong name redirection that has nothing to do with the portrait photo. Zhxy 519 01:54, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. See previous DRs. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 15:31, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Wrong name redirection. Zhxy 519 (talk) 21:56, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete COM:CSD#G2. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:30, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Zhxy 519 Please explain why you think it is "Wrong name redirection", otherwise that should be kept per previous DRs. SCP-2000 11:59, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
- 梁登 is a Vietnamese officer but the portrait is a Chinese one.--Zhxy 519 (talk) 01:57, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
- Any source can prove that? SCP-2000 01:46, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
- [6], and you should ask the uploader if he or she can prove the portrait is 梁登. --Zhxy 519 (talk) 19:29, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Zhxy 519: Your link takes me to Pinterest, which in turn takes me to a dead link, so I’m not sure what I’m supposed to be looking at. Is there a museum collection link or a scholarly article that explains the artwork’s provenance? If you are certain that the image subject is misidentified, you should be able to provide clear evidence and edit the file name/description instead of repeatedly listing for deletion. Ytoyoda (talk) 22:30, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- As you see, the last time I asked to delete it was 4 years ago. I don't remember the source I found then, nor can find something now. On the other hand, I made another request for Commons:Deletion requests/File:阮始中先生像圖.jpg for the same reason, which was accepted.--Zhxy 519 (talk) 15:39, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
- I would still need opinions from @P199, Ruthven, and Pi.1415926535: On why their keep rationales are invalid for your 4th DR. "As you see, the last time I asked to delete it was 4 years ago."
Oppose 2021-2018=3, I don't see any reason you +1ed it. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 07:55, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
- I would still need opinions from @P199, Ruthven, and Pi.1415926535: On why their keep rationales are invalid for your 4th DR. "As you see, the last time I asked to delete it was 4 years ago."
- As you see, the last time I asked to delete it was 4 years ago. I don't remember the source I found then, nor can find something now. On the other hand, I made another request for Commons:Deletion requests/File:阮始中先生像圖.jpg for the same reason, which was accepted.--Zhxy 519 (talk) 15:39, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Zhxy 519: Your link takes me to Pinterest, which in turn takes me to a dead link, so I’m not sure what I’m supposed to be looking at. Is there a museum collection link or a scholarly article that explains the artwork’s provenance? If you are certain that the image subject is misidentified, you should be able to provide clear evidence and edit the file name/description instead of repeatedly listing for deletion. Ytoyoda (talk) 22:30, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- [6], and you should ask the uploader if he or she can prove the portrait is 梁登. --Zhxy 519 (talk) 19:29, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
- Any source can prove that? SCP-2000 01:46, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
- 梁登 is a Vietnamese officer but the portrait is a Chinese one.--Zhxy 519 (talk) 01:57, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. No objection to deletion of redirect (implausible search term). Since the file has been renamed, the original DR is no longer relevant. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:27, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Redirect deleted. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:06, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
Daniel Rondeau refuse l'utilisation de cette photo Facones3 (talk) 18:19, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Bonjour,
- Cette photographie est faite sur la voie publique à Malte le 22 septembre 2010 à 19:12 en marge d'une procession de l'ordre de Malte.
- Je ne comprends pas pourquoi Daniel Rondeau ne veut pas que cette photographie ne soit pas disponible sur le domaine public. Je possède au moins une autre photo faite en même temps. Il a vu que je prenais cette photo, je ne l'ai pas volé, c'est sur la voie publique, et c'est moi qui l'ai faite, j'en ai les droits et je les ai cédés à Wikimédia Commons. Donc ...
- Cordialement -- • Hamelin [ de Guettelet ] • 16:02, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: que Daniel Rondeau nous écrive à Template:Amail. Ruthven (msg) 15:59, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
Fake description. A portrait of a Chinese Ming mandarin, not vietnamese. Zhxy 519 (talk) 03:36, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Use {{Fact disputed}} or {{Rename}}. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:21, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
Wrong name redirection Zhxy 519 18:23, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: see former DR to rename the page. Ruthven (msg) 16:01, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
A wrong name redirection that has nothing to do with the portrait photo. Zhxy 519 01:54, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Themightyquill (talk) 12:27, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
This image from pixabay from an account with just 10 images may or may not be own work but there is no camera metadata. However, is it in COM:SCOPE? Leoboudv (talk) 19:21, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Comment: Image is in scope since it is in use. But is it own work considering that it has a high resolution but no metadata? That is a problem. --Leoboudv (talk) 20:25, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Weak keep: the real issue is potential license laundering. But in this case, I am hesitant to think so, because all 10 images of this Pixabay user are very similar, maybe part of a series. Missing EXIF data is not a deletion reason. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:42, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep I withdraw this nomination. --Leoboudv (talk) 21:48, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. Ruthven (msg) 16:01, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Pibewiki as Fair use (Google) .. no clue why a 1766 book would trigger this action, personally I Keep. But as I could be wrong, sending to Deletion Nominations for consensus. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:52, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- no clue why a 1766 book would trigger this action, personally I Keep. Please look inside the book.Pibewiki (talk) 21:22, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: the book is PD. Ruthven (msg) 16:02, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
kein inhalt 217.255.139.64 09:33, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- The image was lost when someone renamed the file some years ago. Very unfortunate, since I no longer have the original file. The file showed the lake as it was in the 1990s and 2000s, a view that has strongly changed since 2008 (I took the picture because the filling-up had started). I don't know if it's technically possible to retrieve the file? Does anybody know how to do so? --Wimpi (talk) 14:45, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Very disappointing. :/ Looks like archive.org doesn't have it (also checked the Wikipedia page it was used in). There is a Phabricator thread about it here, but it doesn't look to have been resolved. — Rhododendrites talk | 03:07, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- If any solution is unlikely, than obviously I agree it is best to delete the file. But then we have to be sure that all attempts to repair those files have been given up and that deleting the empty file won't block the way for a possible repair... Wimpi (talk) 22:01, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- Very disappointing. :/ Looks like archive.org doesn't have it (also checked the Wikipedia page it was used in). There is a Phabricator thread about it here, but it doesn't look to have been resolved. — Rhododendrites talk | 03:07, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Sadly, retrieval doesn't look likely. Deletion shouldn't impede recovery if that ever becomes possible. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 07:40, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
Eurostat's licensing states that "The following Eurostat data and documents may not be reused for commercial purposes [...] Publications or documents where the copyright belongs partly or wholly to other organisations." This map is partly Turkstat copyrighted: Law n°4982 on Right Of Information Acquirement (Bilgi Edinme Hakkı Kanunu, 9 oct 2003, §2, §3d and §29): any content from any state institution in Turkey is released under a non-commercial license. Then Turkstat's licensing does not arise under any special (free) regime. Kumkum (talk) 10:36, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Also affected:
- File:Fertility Rate Europe by NUTS 2 regions.png
- File:EU-regions GDP per capita PPP.png
- File:Gross domestic product (GDP) per inhabitant, in purchasing power standard (PPS), by NUTS 2 regions, 2010 (1) (% of the EU-27 average, EU-27 = 100).png
- File:Gross domestic product (GDP) per inhabitant, in purchasing power standard (PPS), by NUTS 2 regions, 2009 (% of the EU-27 average, EU-27=100).png
_per_inhabitant,_in_purchasing_power_standard_(PPS),_by_NUTS_2_regions,_2010_(1)_(%25_of_the_EU-27_average,_EU-27_%3D_100).png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_per_inhabitant,_in_purchasing_power_standard_(PPS),_by_NUTS_2_regions,_2009_(%25_of_the_EU-27_average,_EU-27%3D100).png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Possibly?:
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 07:42, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
WikiTravel doesn't use this page anymore, no valid reason for undeletion. B dash (talk) 10:43, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Potentially useful as an illustration of the system at that time, as with other maps in the category?. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 07:44, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
No source for the base map. Unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 22:33, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- User:Rauenstein created almost all (or even all?) of the locator maps of German municipalities in the beginning of the municipality project. Sörup in SL.PNG is just one derivative work of a Rauenstein base map in Category:Locator maps of municipalities in the Kreis Schleswig-Flensburg. Most of these files were uploaded by Begw but somehow the map of Sörup was missing and Ditschi took Kappeln in SL.PNG as a source [7]. NNW 17:58, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- But where is the source map? All files in the category seem to be derivatives and none of them mentions the source file. Jcb (talk) 18:38, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- I doubt that the source map was uploaded at Commons. I think that Rauenstein mailed the source map to Begw who usually wrote articles of Schleswig-Holstein (a source map for the files in Category:Locator maps of municipalities in the Kreis Nordfriesland is missing, too). Perhaps @ClausG can tell you more about the way these maps were produced. Rauenstein, Begw and others are inactive or almost inactive and I joined Wikipedia & Co. years later. I am not able to explain exactly what happened in 2005 but I am sure that there is no doubt that Rauenstein created a source map and others made the derivative files. NNW 18:52, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- Back in 2005, many users grabbed maps from the web and called them 'own work'. Or they made a DW of an existing map and called the result 'own work'. Maps are seldom created completely from scratch by our users, so the key question is: What is the copyright situation of the underlying base map? Unfortunately we don't have any information on that. Jcb (talk) 20:35, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- There are no maps available that look like Rauenstein's maps. It is cartographic standard to use other maps as long as the result is different from the source. NNW 08:36, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
- It may be 'cartographic standard', but that does not resolve the copyright issue. Maps may be DW of a free source (e.g. CIA maps), which would be fine, but may also be DW of a non-free source, in which case the result would also be non-free. Jcb (talk) 19:29, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
- That's what Wikimedians think. Cartography is different because it is impossible to show an area from a different angle, at a different time, at a different season &c. like an object on a photo. Earth's surface is determined and the only way to create different maps of the same area are cartographic rules and craft like projection, generalization, the usage of colours, styles &c. There is no copyright on the true shapes of municipality boundaries but there is a copyright on the way they are shown. Rauenstein’s way to show them is unique in generalization, colour, style. He created a map of its own and it is his right to claim it free. NNW 11:36, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
- Your argument could be correct, if the map was 3-dimension. But in fact the map is flat, while the earth isn't. From one single boundary, it's possible to have a wide rage of shapes for a flat map, based on several choices that are made by the map creator. Those choices are clearly above TOO. Jcb (talk) 11:51, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
- Well, it is correct. The true shapes of municipality boundaries are of course three-dimensional and a map is – also of course – two-dimensional. I mentioned the choice of a projection above. There are only very few sensible projections you would use to show a map like this. In this scale – and additionally in this level of generalization – you won't be able to say which projection was used. They look very, very similar and we just can guess. But projection is only one point to create a new map and it is more or less negligible when you are not able to name it. NNW 10:52, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- I disagree with such a simplification of map design. In fact it's much more complex. I know that because, as a pilot, I have done a fair amount of hand navigation. You can only make good use of a map for navigation purposes if you have a good understanding of what the map is exactly telling you. Jcb (talk) 14:27, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pilots definitely need more information about a map and especially a better map at all but this file here only shows where Sörup is in Kreis Schleswig-Flensburg. No one will navigate with it, its purpose is very limited. Btw: There is no need to tell me how complex map design is. I am a cartographer. :o) NNW 14:48, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- I disagree with such a simplification of map design. In fact it's much more complex. I know that because, as a pilot, I have done a fair amount of hand navigation. You can only make good use of a map for navigation purposes if you have a good understanding of what the map is exactly telling you. Jcb (talk) 14:27, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Well, it is correct. The true shapes of municipality boundaries are of course three-dimensional and a map is – also of course – two-dimensional. I mentioned the choice of a projection above. There are only very few sensible projections you would use to show a map like this. In this scale – and additionally in this level of generalization – you won't be able to say which projection was used. They look very, very similar and we just can guess. But projection is only one point to create a new map and it is more or less negligible when you are not able to name it. NNW 10:52, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Your argument could be correct, if the map was 3-dimension. But in fact the map is flat, while the earth isn't. From one single boundary, it's possible to have a wide rage of shapes for a flat map, based on several choices that are made by the map creator. Those choices are clearly above TOO. Jcb (talk) 11:51, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
- That's what Wikimedians think. Cartography is different because it is impossible to show an area from a different angle, at a different time, at a different season &c. like an object on a photo. Earth's surface is determined and the only way to create different maps of the same area are cartographic rules and craft like projection, generalization, the usage of colours, styles &c. There is no copyright on the true shapes of municipality boundaries but there is a copyright on the way they are shown. Rauenstein’s way to show them is unique in generalization, colour, style. He created a map of its own and it is his right to claim it free. NNW 11:36, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
- It may be 'cartographic standard', but that does not resolve the copyright issue. Maps may be DW of a free source (e.g. CIA maps), which would be fine, but may also be DW of a non-free source, in which case the result would also be non-free. Jcb (talk) 19:29, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
- There are no maps available that look like Rauenstein's maps. It is cartographic standard to use other maps as long as the result is different from the source. NNW 08:36, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
- Back in 2005, many users grabbed maps from the web and called them 'own work'. Or they made a DW of an existing map and called the result 'own work'. Maps are seldom created completely from scratch by our users, so the key question is: What is the copyright situation of the underlying base map? Unfortunately we don't have any information on that. Jcb (talk) 20:35, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- I doubt that the source map was uploaded at Commons. I think that Rauenstein mailed the source map to Begw who usually wrote articles of Schleswig-Holstein (a source map for the files in Category:Locator maps of municipalities in the Kreis Nordfriesland is missing, too). Perhaps @ClausG can tell you more about the way these maps were produced. Rauenstein, Begw and others are inactive or almost inactive and I joined Wikipedia & Co. years later. I am not able to explain exactly what happened in 2005 but I am sure that there is no doubt that Rauenstein created a source map and others made the derivative files. NNW 18:52, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- But where is the source map? All files in the category seem to be derivatives and none of them mentions the source file. Jcb (talk) 18:38, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
![[7]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Sörup_in_SL.PNG&diff=next&oldid=4154476){kind=link}
Behalten. Es gibt keinen Nachweis, dass eine Urheberrecht sverletzung vorliegt. im Gegenteil, die Behauptung einer solchen Rechtsverletzung kann als Straftat gewertet werden. Liesel (talk) 20:32, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- The map is obviously part of a self made / collaboration made map series. No older maps are mentioned or found, that are older and could be the source of an copyright violation. <PA removed> Keep --Don-kun (talk) 21:06, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- It's the other way round. Uploader has to tell how the map was made. It's not that we need to find an older version, uploader has to show evidence that everything is in order. Jcb (talk) 21:10, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- He told you by labeling it as his own work. There is no reason to doubt that (at least you didn't name any). --j.budissin+/- 08:26, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- There neither is a copyright on administrative boundaries nor on cartographic projection (which is standardized mathematical calculation). What makes a map eligible for copyright is its overall style (selection and graphical representation of map elements) and maybe additional spatial data. Since the style of this particular map follows Wikim/pedia internal conventions, I can't see any copyright infringement. Keep -- Thoroe (talk) 09:32, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- There neither is a copyright on administrative boundaries nor on cartographic projection (which is standardized mathematical calculation). What makes a map eligible for copyright is its overall style (selection and graphical representation of map elements) and maybe additional spatial data. Since the style of this particular map follows Wikim/pedia internal conventions, I can't see any copyright infringement.
- He told you by labeling it as his own work. There is no reason to doubt that (at least you didn't name any). --j.budissin+/- 08:26, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- It's the other way round. Uploader has to tell how the map was made. It's not that we need to find an older version, uploader has to show evidence that everything is in order. Jcb (talk) 21:10, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
A note to whomsoever who is ending this DR: It is not only about Sörup in SL.PNG, you will have to delete everything in Category:Locator maps of municipalities in the Kreis Schleswig-Flensburg. But you cannot stop here because all municipality locator maps of Germany are made the same. All municipalities plus all former municipalities plus the low-level administrative units in the Länder, that will sum up to more than 12.000 files. And this is only Germany. You can go on with e.g. Category:Locator maps of municipalities of Limburg (Netherlands) or Category:Locator maps of communes of Pyrénées-Atlantiques or Category:Maps of municipalities of the province of Reggio Calabria or Category:Maps of municipalities of the province of Córdoba, Spain. I guess you will have to delete far more than 100.000 files and it will only be municipality locator maps. I know lots more cases where users uploaded maps as their own work. (Do you really believe that the CIA creates its maps completely on its own? Do they really have surveying teams all across the world? They better do because it is impossible to see e.g. small rivers – and even hugh rivers start small – in satellite images inside forests. You have to be there to find out where these small rivers run. Otherwise – uh oh – they took their information from other maps and I really doubt that all countries of the world have got open data portals. So even CIA maps which are claimed to be free might be copyvios.) I trust the uploaders and I know that what they created is clearly within the copyright laws for maps but if you think that in all these cases evidence has to be shown that everything is in order then be bold and consistent and delete them all. NNW 09:54, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- I'm going to close this as kept per Thoroe's statement above. Maps can be created from databases and the positions of boundaries and objects are almost the same (differences might be recognisable due to scale and projection). Our locator maps are that simple, they can be generated easily by an engine that "draws" lines fed by data input. A map depicting only the outer borders of Colorado might fall below TOO. In addition I'm assuming this "missing" map file having been created from File:Kappeln in SL.PNG, where per [8] the file desc had been forgotten to adjust. --Achim (talk) 22:28, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
- And yes, since my nav time at the German navy I know what maps and charts are... --Achim (talk) 22:28, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
![[8]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:S%C3%B6rup_in_SL.PNG&oldid=4154476){kind=link}
Kept: No evidence of copyvio/DW. --Achim (talk) 22:31, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
though the software is said "free" https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Veron_(Software), the license don't seems compatible with a publication here http://faisal65.yolasite.com/project.php Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:08, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: below TOO, {{PD-textlogo}}. P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:07, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
Нарушение авторских прав. Информационный ролик ФПК (РЖД). Размещено на youtube под CC неправомерно. Пользователь yuotube, разместивший ролик по URL, указанному как источник, сделал это неправомерно. 84.23.54.21 16:45, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
- Имеются ли прямые доказательства или по крайней мере серьёзные обоснования версии, что автор ролика на youtube не является создателем данного видео? Вполне возможен и другой вариант, что пользователь youtube является работником медиа-центра ФПК/РЖД/Talgo/и т.п. и вполне легально разместил ролик. Если это копивио, по крайней мере должен существовать опубликованный ранее оригинал в другом месте, в таком случае потрудитесь привести ссылку на источник-оригинал, иначе это лишь бездоказательное предположение. — Xenotron (talk) 19:43, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 01:27, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
This is a corporate (Russia Railroads) safety video, as shown on trains every day. Note professional voiceover, speaking in first person ("our train", "our service" etc.). This is not own work, no way. Retired electrician (talk) 00:54, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Why not? Even corporate videos created by people, and it's possible that the uploader of this video is worker of Russian Railways media centre and participated in video creation. This video doesn't look like a CamRip taken inside the train due to its high quality, and it was uploaded a month before the date of starting operations of the train with passengers (1 June 2015), so it's evident that it hasn't been refilmed with camera. The only potential public source of possible copyvio could be a website, so if you think that the uploader of this video is not its copyright owner, please provide another source of this video with the same or better quality that was published before this one on the official website / corporate youtube channel, otherwise this is just an unsubstantiated speculation without any proofs of copyvio. Xenotron (talk) 08:48, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Xenotron: I cannot tell from the above if you did not see or have reason to discount the YouTube link to a video that was uploaded before it was uploaded to Commons? — Rhododendrites talk | 02:30, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- I've meant that if we would found the same video via Internet that was uploaded without CC-BY license before the video at this link, we would have a proof that the YouTube user just could copy it from public source and potentially not created as own, and it would be a reason for deletion. However I haven't found any other copy of this video via Internet that was published before YouTube video at source link, so we haven't enough proofs of possible copyvio to delete video from Commons. Xenotron (talk) 10:01, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Xenotron: I cannot tell from the above if you did not see or have reason to discount the YouTube link to a video that was uploaded before it was uploaded to Commons? — Rhododendrites talk | 02:30, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Delete—Unclear - Even if the uploader is the creator of the video, and even if it is that individual and not the company who owns the video, and even if that person also owns the music, logos, etc. in the video, it was still uploaded after the YouTube video which it links to right in the description, and which does not have a compatible license. — Rhododendrites talk | 02:29, 2 November 2017 (UTC)- @Rhododendrites: What do you mean by saying that the source video on YouTube does not have a compatible license? It has the CC-BY license in license description which is absolutelly compatible with Commons. Xenotron (talk) 10:01, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
you're right. I must have a blind spot on my monitor. this is indeed less obvious than I thought it was and I've struck my vote. From the user's other videos, it appears to be a train enthusiast rather than an official account, but it's unclear. Will defer to users with more experience with this sort of case. — Rhododendrites talk | 14:04, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Rhododendrites: What do you mean by saying that the source video on YouTube does not have a compatible license? It has the CC-BY license in license description which is absolutelly compatible with Commons. Xenotron (talk) 10:01, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: a confirmation through OTRS would be needed. --JuTa 08:56, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
{{Dateiüberprüfung|Urheberrecht}}: Das Bild stammt nicht aus dem Gemeindearchiv Timmendorfer Strand. 2003:DF:B3E8:F400:B87A:7E27:1208:3644 09:47, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: PD-self and unknown author does not fit. --JuTa 08:39, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
Unverified source for checking license. acagastya 10:17, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Licensing is not game of guessing work. Without evidence, Commons can not keep it.
acagastya 14:58, 29 November 2017 (UTC)- acagastya: What kind of evidence are you expecting? Not all military works exist digitally on publicly available US military websites for example that could be cross checked. seb26 (talk) 00:19, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
- I took away my keep vote because a similar DR case came to mind about doubt over government authorship. However I'm still interested in the answer to the question about what form or format would evidence need to be in to suggest photos from 1940s belong to the military and not civilians or other parties that happen to be in the same location? seb26 (talk) 14:40, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
- Licensing is not game of guessing work. Without evidence, Commons can not keep it.
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 08:48, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
your opinions are asked : described by uploader, quotation: "...Both photographs are owned by PhotoReq, though less known history was allowed to take copies from the original or from any copy that PhotoReq originally held. Since, Wikipedia, by mistake, did not approve lessknownhistory's right to use the photograph, the right has been reverted and PhotoReq fully owns all rights pertaining to the photograph and its derivatives..." . although taken by phone and claimed 'own work', copyright and personality rights issues, hence, out of Wikimedia Commons ? Roland zh (talk) 19:05, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Comment: see also Commons:Deletion_requests/File:K._Kumar;_Travanvore_Kumar_;_Elanthoor_Gandhi_during_his_last_days_-4.jpg and related uploads, Roland zh (talk) 19:16, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: if the rights belong to 3rd party, its not the work of the uploader as claimed. --JuTa 08:42, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
as per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Elanthur K. Kumar ; Travancore Kumar.jpg and related uploads, claimed 'own work', but there are potentially copyright and personality rights issues, hence, out of Wikimedia Commons ? Roland zh (talk) 19:13, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Dear Rolland, In the light of the explanations offered by PhotoReq and lessknownhistory etc, kindly withdraw the deletion request.... The deletion request has been active for more than a month now. Thanks
- Dear PhotoReq, as mentioned at your talk (Commons:Deletion requests), this is a discussion, and in fact, finally, a Wikimedia Commons administrator will end every 'DR' due to the community's votes. kindly regards, Roland zh (talk) 17:56, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: if the rights belong to 3rd party, its not the work of the uploader as claimed. --JuTa 08:46, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
as per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Elanthur K. Kumar ; Travancore Kumar.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Elanthur K. Kumar ; Travancore Kumar.jpg and related uploads, claimed 'own work', but there are potentially copyright and personality rights issues, hence, out of Wikimedia Commons ? Roland zh (talk) 19:18, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: if the rights belong to 3rd party, its not the work of the uploader as claimed. --JuTa 08:44, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No evidence of when the photo was first published. It would need to be published before 1947 for this to be Public domain according to the license tag. Nigel Ish (talk) 21:37, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 08:50, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}