Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/05/28
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
Third party logo, non trival, equiavlaent at English Wikipedia w:File:Toqger logo.jpg under non-free fair use. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:44, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, speedy deleted. Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:00, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
All files with unknown author, just copied from the web, yet uploaded as CC-0. Only the copyright owner can release a file under CC-0. Note that some of the files may already be in the public domain, for different reasons.
- File:Curtiss CR3 1923.jpg
- File:Curtiss CR3 du Lt. Irvine.jpg
- File:Supermarine S.5 et Gloster-Napier IV.jpg
- File:Gloster IVА N222.jpg
- File:Gloster-Napier IV vue de face.jpg
- File:Détails construction Gloster IV B.jpg
- File:Deux vues du Gloster-Napier IV.jpg
- File:Gloster IV B plan.jpg
- File:GREAT BRITAIN GOING STRONG IN THE 1927 SCHNEIDER CONTEST -- Flight-Lieut Worsley on the Supermarine-Napier (direct drive) S.5 No. 6 being overtaken by Flight-Lieut. Kinkead on the Gloster-Napier IVb.jpg
- File:Schneider Team 1927.jpg
- File:Supermarine S.5 Replica.jpg
- File:Supermarine S.4 démarrage a Bay Shore Park.jpg
- File:Supermarine-Napier S.4 a quai.jpg
- File:Supermarine S.4 vue de face.jpg
- File:Supermarine S.4 démarrage.jpg
- File:Supermarine S.4 Side.jpg
- File:Supermarine S.4 photo officielle.jpg
- File:Supermarine S.4 Bay Shore Park.jpg
- File:Supermarine S.4 & Gloster-Napier III, Bay Shore Park.jpg
- File:Supermarine S.4 left.jpg
- File:Kirkham-Williams Racer 3.jpg
- File:Kirkham-Williams Racer 2.jpg
- File:Kirkham-Williams Racer Engine.jpg
- File:Kirkham-Williams Racer.jpg
- File:Lorraine 12Rcr.jpg
- File:Bernard HV-220 plans.jpg
- File:Bernard H.V 40 Plan.jpg
- File:Bernard H.V 40.jpg
- File:Gloster II plan.jpg
- File:Gloster II.jpg
Ariadacapo (talk) 05:29, 28 May 2017 (UTC) All public domain!!--Petebutt (talk) 13:34, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:59, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
In spite of the previous deletion request, here we are again with a bunch of racing airplane images with fanciful sources and licenses. Some US Army, some UK army, some French Air Force (????), with no evidence or source besides random websites, and many fit with a custom-fit CC-0 dedication. Just because the image depicts a 1920s airplane doesn’t mean it’s in the public domain, and some half-serious check work for sources would be welcome.
- File:Bernard HV-120 02 plan.jpg
- File:Bernard HV-120 02 b.jpg
- File:Bernard HV-120 02 a.jpg
- File:Cams 38.jpg
- File:Bernard HV-220 SR3.jpg
- File:Bernard HV-220 SR1.jpg
- File:Bernard HV-220 SR2.jpg
- File:Bernard HV-220 plans copie.jpg
- File:NiD.650 B.jpg
- File:NID.450 A.jpg
- File:NID.650.jpg
- File:NID.450 B.jpg
- File:Dewoitine HD-412.jpg
- File:Dewoitine HD-411 AvG.jpg
- File:Dewoitine HD-411 Lat.jpg
- File:Dewoitine HD-41.jpg
- File:Short Crusader back.jpg
- File:Gloster II 1924.jpg
- File:Short Crusader face.jpg
- File:Short Crusader arr.jpg
- File:Short Crusader float.jpg
- File:Supermarine S.4 de face.jpg
- File:Navy Wright NW-2 ile de Wight 2.jpg
- File:Navy Wright NW-2 île de Wight.jpg
- File:Curtiss CR3 1923 B.jpg
- File:Curtiss CR3 1923 A.jpg
- File:Curtiss R3C-1.png
- File:Le lieutenant Cyrus Bettis avec le Curtiss R3C-1 du Pulitzer Trophy Race.jpg
- File:Le Curtiss R3C-1 traverse la ligne d'arrivée du Pulitzer Trophy Race de 1925.jpg
- File:Lieutenant Cyrus Bettis devant le racer Curtiss R3C-1.jpg
- File:Lt. Cyrus Bettis et Lt. James H. Doolittle avec son Curtiss R3C-2.jpg
- File:Short Crusader static.jpg
Ariadacapo (talk) 15:24, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:13, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
lo subi por error Gustavo.Coraza (talk) 04:54, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:02, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Tegel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Uploader is not the author according to the uploader on it's sv.wp talk page. Uploader not informed. Yann (talk) 16:30, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
- I have discussed the image with the uploader on the users talk page on the Swedish Wikipedia. The user understand that the image is a non-free image that don't comply with the license. -- Tegel (talk) 16:50, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:07, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by DAJF as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Posted to source as All Rights Reserved. Only free files are allowed on Commons. Yann (talk) 16:45, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:45, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Modern Sciences as Speedy (speedy deletion) and the most recent rationale was: no free Yann (talk) 18:40, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:40, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Badly photoshopped copy of en:File:Jeremy_Corbyn_in_2015.jpg which isn't a free file Nonsenseferret (talk) 20:26, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
- I dispute this because I am the copyright holder for this work. The nominator appears to be disputing if or not the image is very similar to another image - As Wikipedia is full of such content (Coat of Arms and Such) I am sure that we are no stranger to this. The fact is it is so dissimilar to the other image that it would not be covered by the other images copyright in addition it is my responsibility to handle copyright affairs with my creation and not the nominator. Olowe2011 (talk) 20:24, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
- If you're actually the copyright holder, please send permission to OTRS for the both files. Copyvio is the only valid reason for deletion. --Amitie 10g (talk) 20:50, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
- Comment - I believe that it is not for the nominator to play lawyer but if he does I do not believe that it does or should have an impact on my work that I post on Wikipedia. The fact is this image has several key differences which define it from the other found here. I would urge Nonsenseferret to look at this image here and make the same argument for deletion based on the same merits here. Olowe2011 (talk) 20:37, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. This is clearly a 'shop, so even if the original was CC-BY-SA (which it's not) there is no attribution. Taking a stock photo and adding a background does not constitute "own work." Primefac (talk) 21:47, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deleted: Obvious copyvio. Clear derivative of unfree image (only background has been changed). WJBscribe (talk) 11:30, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
obvious copyvio, http://jeremycorbyn.org.uk/about/ Jcc (talk) 21:40, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:45, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
poor quality Joschi71 (talk) 19:05, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 13:02, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
ibiblio.org is not a federal US government website. Unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 14:04, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
- This page[1] appears to indicate that it is from "national security agency central security service" United States of America. So looks like US government. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 07:46, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
- I agree, thanks! Jcb (talk) 15:44, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
- This page[1] appears to indicate that it is from "national security agency central security service" United States of America. So looks like US government. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 07:46, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
Kept: resolved. --Jcb (talk) 15:44, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by محمد علي العريقي (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work. Small sizes without EXIFs, the uploader already uploaded copyright violations.
- File:اضاحي العيد3.jpg
- File:اضاحي العيد2.jpg
- File:1اضاحي العيد.jpg
- File:5كيلو خير.jpg
- File:4كيلو خير.jpg
- File:3كيلو خير.jpg
- File:2كيلو خير.jpg
- File:كيلو خير.jpg
- File:1كيلو خير.jpg
- File:لن يقتلهم البرد.jpg
Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:05, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:54, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hack huygaa (talk · contribs)
[edit]Images are claimed as own work, but the first group appear to be software screenshots, The relevant software is not necessarily under a free licence. Second group appear to be diagrams, possibly from documentation from the software shown in the screenshots?
- File:Buyvuyr.jpg
- File:Hsd chg.jpg
- File:Dskhvkur.jpg
- File:Yureerb.jpg
- File:Avbbna.jpg
- File:Tatvar.jpg
- File:Ytfvytfvty.jpg
- File:Hygtc.jpg
- File:Fbfbddn.jpg
- File:Dkjb kjfb.jpg
- File:Jhhjk.png
- File:Cvzvcvczvzv.png
- File:Awfawfwafaw.png
- File:Afwf.png
- File:Jjvij.jpg
ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:18, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:54, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:License review needed
[edit]Possible violation of COM:FOP#Iraq.
- File:The New Zarih of Al-Askari Shrine 01 (cropped).jpg
- File:The New Zarih of Al-Askari Shrine 01.jpg
- File:The New Zarih of Al-Askari Shrine 02 (cropped).jpg
- File:The New Zarih of Al-Askari Shrine 02.jpg
- File:The New Zarih of Al-Askari Shrine 03 (cropped).jpg
- File:The New Zarih of Al-Askari Shrine 03.jpg
- File:The New Zarih of Al-Askari Shrine 04 (cropped).jpg
- File:The New Zarih of Al-Askari Shrine 04.jpg
- File:The New Zarih of Al-Askari Shrine 05 (cropped).jpg
- File:The New Zarih of Al-Askari Shrine 05.jpg
- File:The New Zarih of Al-Askari Shrine 06 (cropped).jpg
- File:The New Zarih of Al-Askari Shrine 06.jpg
- File:The New Zarih of Al-Askari Shrine 07 (cropped).jpg
- File:The New Zarih of Al-Askari Shrine 07.jpg
- File:The New Zarih of Al-Askari Shrine 08 (cropped).jpg
- File:The New Zarih of Al-Askari Shrine 08.jpg
- File:The New Zarih of Al-Askari Shrine 09 (cropped).jpg
- File:The New Zarih of Al-Askari Shrine 09.jpg
- File:The New Zarih of Al-Askari Shrine 10 (cropped).jpg
- File:The New Zarih of Al-Askari Shrine 10.jpg
- File:The New Zarih of Al-Askari Shrine 11 (cropped).jpg
- File:The New Zarih of Al-Askari Shrine 11.jpg
- File:The New Zarih of Al-Askari Shrine 12 (cropped).jpg
- File:The New Zarih of Al-Askari Shrine 12.jpg
- File:The New Zarih of Al-Askari Shrine 13 (cropped).jpg
- File:The New Zarih of Al-Askari Shrine 13.jpg
- File:The New Zarih of Al-Askari Shrine 14 (cropped).jpg
- File:The New Zarih of Al-Askari Shrine 14.jpg
- File:The New Zarih of Al-Askari Shrine 15 (cropped).jpg
- File:The New Zarih of Al-Askari Shrine 15.jpg
- File:The New Zarih of Al-Askari Shrine 16 (cropped).jpg
- File:The New Zarih of Al-Askari Shrine 16.jpg
- File:The New Zarih of Al-Askari Shrine 17 (cropped).jpg
- File:The New Zarih of Al-Askari Shrine 17.jpg
- File:The New Zarih of Al-Askari Shrine 18 (cropped).jpg
- File:The New Zarih of Al-Askari Shrine 18.jpg
- File:The New Zarih of Al-Askari Shrine 19 (cropped).jpg
- File:The New Zarih of Al-Askari Shrine 19.jpg
- File:The New Zarih of Al-Askari Shrine 20 (cropped).jpg
- File:The New Zarih of Al-Askari Shrine 20.jpg
- File:The New Zarih of Al-Askari Shrine 21 (cropped).jpg
- File:The New Zarih of Al-Askari Shrine 21.jpg
- File:The New Zarih of Al-Askari Shrine 22 (cropped).jpg
- File:The New Zarih of Al-Askari Shrine 22.jpg
MCMLXXXIX 15:37, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
- @1989: If you see the Permission part in the these pages, you will find an Explanation about the permission of the Tasnim News Agency which states in its footer, and Per this Discussion "All Content by Tasnim News Agency is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License" and these cases have nothing to do with COM:FOP#Iraq.Thanks.--Mbazri (talk) 12:58, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: I find it very hard to believe that Tasmin News Agency would be the artist of the depicted artwork. --Jcb (talk) 14:57, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Nuevo mapa turístico accesible de Madrid
[edit]These files include maps, printed works, and software which was made available by the City of Madrid, but was likely produced by a third party with unknown copyright status.
- File:Nuevo mapa turístico accesible de Madrid para personas con discapacidad visual (01).jpg
- File:Nuevo mapa turístico accesible de Madrid para personas con discapacidad visual (02).jpg
- File:Nuevo mapa turístico accesible de Madrid para personas con discapacidad visual (03).jpg
Guanaco (talk) 03:31, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
Keep No, the material was provided by the City of Madrid (...el Ayuntamiento, a través del Área de Turismo de Madrid Destino), so that the license is, in this case, perfectly valid. --Discasto talk 20:41, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: I follow here Discasto. The depicted material was apparently created by the tourist office of Madrid as claimed. Per COM:PRP we need significant doubt which has not been substantiated. --AFBorchert (talk) 07:05, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
Mercamadrid
[edit]The City of Madrid is a major shareholder of Mercamadrid, but they are not the same entity, and it's unlikely that the city can simply license Mercamadrid materials without specific permission.
- File:Se incrementa la tasa de valorización de residuos en un 45% en Mercamadrid (01).png
- File:Se incrementa la tasa de valorización de residuos en un 45% en Mercamadrid (02).jpg
- File:Se incrementa la tasa de valorización de residuos en un 45% en Mercamadrid (03).jpg
- File:Se incrementa la tasa de valorización de residuos en un 45% en Mercamadrid (04).jpg
- File:Se incrementa la tasa de valorización de residuos en un 45% en Mercamadrid (05).jpg
- File:Se incrementa la tasa de valorización de residuos en un 45% en Mercamadrid (06).jpg
Guanaco (talk) 08:19, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Delete As uploader. --Discasto talk 20:41, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination. --AFBorchert (talk) 07:12, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:License review needed
[edit]No evidence of permission. Original blog post has since been removed, but I couldn't seem to find any evidence of a free license in the archived version.
- File:Namdaemun Fire-4.PNG
- File:Namdaemun Fire-5.PNG
- File:Namdaemun Fire-1.PNG
- File:Namdaemun Fire-2.PNG
- File:Namdaemun Fire-6.PNG
- File:Namdaemun Fire-7.PNG
- File:Namdaemun Fire-9.PNG
- File:Namdaemun Fire-10.PNG
- File:Namdaemun Fire-11.PNG
- File:Namdaemun Fire-12.PNG
- File:Namdaemun Fire-13.PNG
- File:Namdaemun-After001.PNG
- File:Namdaemun-After-002.PNG
- File:Namdaemun-After-003.PNG
- File:Namdaemun-After-IMBv.PNG
- File:Namdaemun-After-people.PNG
- File:Namdaemun-After-PP.PNG
- File:Namdaemun-Fire-14.PNG
- File:Namdaemun-Fire-15.PNG
- File:Namdaemun-Fire-17.jpg
- File:Namdaemun-Lee Myung-bak.PNG
- File:Namdaemun-Fire-After-flower.PNG
- File:Namdaemun Fire-18.PNG
- File:Sungnyemun Building Fence.png
Yeeno (talk) 22:52, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 17:09, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Small images without EXIF data, user with bad history, unlikely to be own works.
- File:Federico Llano.jpg
- File:Leklein.jpg
- File:Rosa López Eurovisión.jpg
- File:Manel Navarro.jpg
- File:Xavi Martínez.jpg
- File:Clase de Bachillerato.jpg
- File:Clase de Secundaria.jpg
- File:IES La Rábida.jpg
- File:Manuel Siurot Huelva.jpg
- File:Juan-Carlos-de-Laraok.jpg
- File:JavierLopezMadrid.jpg
- File:Obras de la estación están al 50%.jpg
- File:Obras de la plataforma ferroviaria.jpg
- File:Obras de la Nueva Estación de Huelva.jpg
- File:Obras Estación Huelva Las Metas.jpg
- File:Fiesta de la Espuma.jpg
- File:Centro de Salud de El Portil y Nuevo Portil.jpg
- File:Autobuses de Damas.jpg
- File:The New Coffee.jpg
- File:Feria de El Portil y Nuevo Portil.jpg
- File:Restaurante Las Dunas.png
- File:Complejo Marlin Blue.jpg
Yann (talk) 17:56, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Excuse me, user with bad history? Bad history must be yours, but not me. I have improved a lot of Wikipedia articles and created some of them as well. What statement do you have for saying that? --MrSquid (talk) 19:01, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
- I mean bad history on Commons, of course. We are not concerned with you edits on Wikipedia. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:28, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:58, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Not notable person, out of scope here. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:58, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:01, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
not notable person, out of scope (spam) Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:58, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:01, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Two photographs taken with Nikon, the rest w/o any metadata. Probably grabbed from different photographers by family member(?)
- File:Emunah La-Paz Promotional Photo Chocolate Burnout.jpg
- File:Author Emunah La-Paz With Author Kim Corder, At The Changing Hands Book Signing.jpg
- File:Author Emunah La-Paz At Changing Hands Speaking Engagement, For Memoir Of A Jaded Woman.jpg
- File:Photo Promotion Author Emunah La-Paz.jpg
- File:Author Emunah La-Paz Promotional Picture Photo Shoot.jpg
- File:Author Emunah La-Paz Promotional Picture.jpg
- File:Emunah La-Paz Promotional Picture for Novel Memoir of a Jaded Woman.jpg
- File:Author Emunah La-Paz Promotional Picture For Novel.jpg
- File:Author Emunah La-Paz.jpg
Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 20:02, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:00, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. Ronhjones (Talk) 23:31, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:00, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:52, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:00, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:54, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:00, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:55, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:00, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:55, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:00, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:55, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:00, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:57, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:00, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Unencyclopedic Image Yohannvt (talk) 14:08, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:25, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Unencyclopedic Media Yohannvt (talk) 14:08, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:25, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Unused unencyclopedic personal image outside our scope Yohannvt (talk) 14:10, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:25, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:24, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:24, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:24, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:24, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:24, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Small images without EXIF data, please upload the original files, or send a permission via COM:OTRS.
Yann (talk) 16:27, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:23, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Marshal AB (talk · contribs)
[edit]Images without EXIF data, user with bad history, please upload the original files, or send a permission via COM:OTRS.
- File:قصبة تاوريرت بمدينة ورززات.png
- File:فطور مغربي تقليدي.png
- File:ساحة جامع الفنا.png
- File:بائع الزيتون بالسوق البلدي بمراكش.png
- File:الرعي التقليدي.png
- File:بائع البهارات بمراكش.png
Yann (talk) 16:39, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:22, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Copied from Facebook, please upload the original files, or send a permission via COM:OTRS.
Yann (talk) 17:01, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:27, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Closed discussions from Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Cloud Gate
|
|---|
|
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
No COM:FOP in the US for sculptures.
russavia (talk) 09:52, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Without OTRS permission after 9 days Alan (talk) 11:25, 11 June 2013 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
No COM:FOP in the US for sculptures.
russavia (talk) 16:25, 19 March 2014 (UTC) Deleted -FASTILY 07:40, 26 March 2014 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
As per this decision.
-- Tuválkin ✉ 09:09, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted some, kept some. For File:The Bean and McCormick Tribune Plaza.jpg, since it's being used to illustrate the plaza, it would be a better to crop out The Bean rather than deleting the whole thing. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:11, 22 August 2014 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Obviously, it's time for another Cloud Gate DR. I've tried to be as generous as I felt was reasonable about only including the images that violate the copyright in this sculpture. For context, en:Cloud Gate is a public sculpture erected in 2006 in McCormick Park in Chicago. It is not only copyrighted (with no FOP for sculpture in the US), but the City of Chicago has licensed it from the artist, and requires permission for any commercial use of photographs (which is incompatible with Commons). I've tried to weed out the ones where either the Bean is a de minimis aspect of an image of the park itself, or where it's shape is not visible and it's only 'a mirrored object'. Most of these are simply not okay.
Reventtalk 12:21, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:57, 22 December 2016 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Regular cleaning of this category of new uploads of images that depict too much of this copyrighted work of art. - Reventtalk 22:04, 28 May 2017 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:22, 3 June 2017 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
No COM:FOP for sculpture in the US, as per Commons:Deletion requests/Category:Cloud Gate and the above.
— Jeff G. ツ 04:07, 2 November 2017 (UTC) In File:The Bean and McCormick Tribune Plaza.jpg, the bean is de minimis, image hardly even has the bean in the photo. The sculpture is not even visible in File:Tented cloud gate.jpg. File:Cloud gate construction.jpg is simply a photo of a construction site, the sculpture had yet to be erected. It is inarguably de minimis in File:2005-10-13 2880x1920 chicago above millennium park.jpg. It is also minimus in File:Millennium park,chicago.JPG. It is hardly even visible in File:Millenium Park (7391867314).jpg. Seems to be de minimus in File:Bean from Kemper Tower (14958184744).jpg. Also, hardly the primary focal point of the image File:Chicago Bean.jpg. Not at all included in the image File:Cloud gate, Chicago skyline.jpg, as far as I can tell (not sure why it is in this category). Certainly not included in the image File:2008TIBE Day5 Hall1 ThemeSquare On the Road with Cloud Gate.jpg (should not be in this category at all). Not the primary focal point of the image File:The Bean - Millennium Park - panoramio.jpg. Some of these certainly should be spared, and the category itself should not be deleted. SecretName101 (talk) 04:13, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
The deletion of File:2005-10-13 2880x1920 chicago above millennium park.jpg would be particularly catastrophic, and utterly unnecessary. This is a valuable (and widely-used) image, in which the sculpture inarguably is de minimus. SecretName101 (talk) 04:28, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: most per nom. 'kept some due to de minimis or similar. --JuTa 09:47, 13 December 2017 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
still copyrighted, noting here so that it may be undeleted someday Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:54, 25 January 2019 (UTC) Deleted: speedily deleted as copyvios. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:54, 25 January 2019 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Copyrighted work, no freedom of panorama for public art in the US.
— Rhododendrites talk | 16:43, 26 March 2020 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:25, 14 May 2020 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
No FOP for sculpture in the US, and per Commons:Deletion requests/Category:Cloud Gate and the above.
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:35, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
Some of them can be cropped or have the work of art blurred out of them, and still be useful. I deleted the obvious cases, though.-- Darwin Ahoy! 16:39, 3 April 2021 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Another set of derivative work copyvios: of a sculpture protected by copyright by its living artist w:Anish Kapoor. Previously these were categorized under Category:Millennium Park so they got undetected. See [6] and [7] for the basis of nomination for these perhaps last non-trivial images of the copyrighted sculpture. There is no freedom of panorama for all copyrighted artworks in the United States, see COM:FOP US. US de minimis is sharper (COM:DM United States), as it uses "triviality" concept instead of "incidental".
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:43, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Still another set of derivative work copyright violations. No FOP of any sort for copyrighted public works in the U.S. except architecture, and sculptor Anish Kapoor does not allow free culture (commercial) reuses of visual appearances of "his" artwork! See also above nominations. American de minimis uses triviality concept instead of incidental/accessory concept like those in Europe or much of Asia.
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:53, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Cleaned up the nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:24, 5 October 2021 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
There is no freedom of panorama for copyrighted public art in the United States, and none of the nominated images show the sculpture in a trivial manner (U.S. de minimis is too narrower than European ones). This sculpture has been the subject of a copyright lawsuit by its living sculptor, Anish Kapoor, against a commercial user, NRA. See also the following resources regarding Kapoor's lawsuit against NRA: Artnet, The Guardian, and BBC.
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:41, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted all but one per DM. — Racconish 💬 15:04, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Several new files have been added that populate this category. I'm also tagging several older files that haven't been discussed before to gather consensus on whether they should be kept on de minimis grounds. At issue is that these files depict Cloud Gate, a copyrighted sculpture permanently installed in the US where there is no freedom of panorama for public art. Quoting an earlier successful deletion request, "this sculpture has been the subject of a copyright lawsuit by its living sculptor, Anish Kapoor, against a commercial user, NRA. See also the following resources regarding Kapoor's lawsuit against NRA: Artnet, The Guardian, and BBC." IMO the litigousness of the copyright holder should not affect our consistent application of standards around copyright law but it's been brought up before so I suppose it's worth bringing up again. First, there is one photo that is entirely of Cloud Gate for which a de minimis rationale would not apply: Second, there are several photos in which Cloud Gate appears at a distince within the larger context of the setting. A de minimis arguement could be made for these, and we have kept two files in the past (File:2005-10-13 2880x1920 chicago above millennium park.jpg and File:Millennium park,chicago.JPG) on these grounds. However, in both of those cases Cloud Gate is a significantly smaller and less focal portion of the image.
Third, several photos depict a portion of Cloud Gate up close, often with the inclusion of other elements in the foreground or background. Do these files qualify as de minimis inclusion of the copyrighted work? Consider this file which had most of Cloud Gate coropped out to focus on the background elements instead.
Finally, one photo is simply a selfie taken by way of the mirrored surface of Cloud Gate. This might be argued to be entirely a photo of the sculpture, or to be a completely de minimis usage. In either case, I'm nominating it here for consensus: Any of these files that aren't deleted (or that are partially cropped and saved) can be added to Category:Incidental views of the Cloud Gate. Thanks! Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 17:37, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - kept one. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:58, 7 June 2024 (UTC) |
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_panoramio.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_S.5_No._6_being_overtaken_by_Flight-Lieut._Kinkead_on_the_Gloster-Napier_IVb.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(4131954934).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(4865734246).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_at_night_2.jpg){kind=link}
_at_night.jpg){kind=link}
,_downtown_Chicago.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(302020237).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_at_night_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_at_night.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_downtown_Chicago.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(302020237).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Millennium_Park,_Chicago,_Illinois_(9179489717).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Millennium_Park,_Chicago,_Illinois_(9179490139).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Millennium_Park,_Chicago,_Illinois_(9179492567).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Millennium_Park,_Chicago,_Illinois_(9179493853).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Millennium_Park,_Chicago,_Illinois_(9179495047).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Millennium_Park,_Chicago,_Illinois_(9179495495).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Millennium_Park,_Chicago,_Illinois_(9181703314).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Millennium_Park,_Chicago,_Illinois_(9181706070).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Millennium_Park,_Chicago,_Illinois_(11004162135).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Millennium_Park,_Chicago,_Illinois_(11004164355).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Millennium_Park,_Chicago,_Illinois_(11004257826).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Millennium_Park,_Chicago,_Illinois_(11004321464).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Millennium_Park,_Chicago,_Illinois_(11004322814).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Millennium_Park,_Chicago,_Illinois_(11004323314).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Millennium_Park,_Chicago,_Illinois_(11004382903).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Chicago_1_26_18_(26388865178).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Chicago_1_26_18_(39343630775).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Chicago,_IL.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Flickr_-_jmcmichael.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_panoramio_(1).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_panoramio_(4).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_panoramio_(5).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_panoramio.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(222198161).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(222198196).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(222198236).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Millenium_Park_(35549620631).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Millenium_Park_(35549628831).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Millenium_Park_(35549635591).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Millenium_Park_(35640530046).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Millenium_Park_(35679751185).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(222198259).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(222198289).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Millenium_Park_(34839034874).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Millenium_Park_(34839040474).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Millenium_Park_(35549651301).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Flickr_-_vanz.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(222198126).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(222198144).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(801715).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Files in Category:Cloud Gate 14
[edit]- File:Miniature Bean (28865844563)~3.jpg
- File:The Bean, Millennium Park, Chicago, Illinois (28865844563)~4.jpg
~3.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
~4.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama for sculpture in the US, and per Commons:Deletion requests/Category:Cloud Gate and the above. Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 03:39, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, many similar earlier listings. COM:DW. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:46, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Third party logo, non trival, Equivalent at English Wikipedia w:File:Snort ids logo.png under non-free fair use. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:15, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:24, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Logo of a third party, which is non-trivial, Equivalent at English Wikipedia is under non-free fair use w:File:Sport ancash.png ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:24, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:24, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Logo of a third party, non-trivial, Equivalent at English Wikipedia under non-free fair use w:File:Sprout Social Logo.png ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:25, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:24, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Logo of a third party, non trivial, equivalent at English Wikipedia under non-free fair use w:File:StarWalk logo.png ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:27, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:24, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Third party logo, non-trivial, equivalent at English Wikipedia w:File:SurveyMonkey Logo.png under non-free fair use. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:29, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:23, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Third party logo, non trivial , Equivalent at English Wikipedia w:File:Sydney FC logo.svg under non-free fair use. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:30, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:23, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Unclear that this logo actually fails to pass the threshold of originality. Pitpisit (talk) 11:36, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:25, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Unclear that this logo actually fails to pass the threshold of originality. Pitpisit (talk) 11:38, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
- It seems that I was false to write the right summary. I've been fix it. But, if there any other mistake, tell me. Tiktomoro (talk) 12:33, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:24, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Unclear that this logo actually fails to pass the threshold of originality. Pitpisit (talk) 11:38, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:24, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Unclear that this logo actually fails to pass the threshold of originality. Pitpisit (talk) 11:38, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:24, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Unclear that this logo actually fails to pass the threshold of originality. Pitpisit (talk) 11:39, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:24, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Unclear that this logo actually fails to pass the threshold of originality. Pitpisit (talk) 11:39, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:24, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
no COM:EDUSE Daphne Lantier 18:17, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:26, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Daniele Acciai (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope — unused personal image & artworks
- File:Acciai Daniele 2012.jpg
- File:Daniele Acciai, piazza del paese nativo.jpg
- File:Acciai Daniele, disegni dell'infanzia.jpg
- File:Daniele Acciai-Urban Emotions Warsaw-2013.jpg
Daphne Lantier 18:23, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:25, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
File is not educationally useful, and only exists for the subject's continued failed attempts at self-promotion on Wikipedia. MikeWazowski (talk) 00:08, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 21:35, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Already deleted once per above. Vanjagenije (talk) 12:50, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:06, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
no license Nickel nitride (talk) 14:11, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:07, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
This file violates Universal Music Group's Website General Term of Use: https://www.umusic.co.uk/terms.html. The term of use link is accessible and linked via Island Records' website. Misterpither (talk) 01:49, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:34, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No pertinence and encyclopedic nature —usernamekiran(talk) 02:01, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:34, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
I have a better Picture of Armando. Sc30002001 (talk) 05:48, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:35, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
personal rights not respected. --Mef.ellingen (Diskussion) 23:03, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:35, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
there is no picture --Mef.ellingen (Diskussion) 21:51, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
- false, there ist a picture in a high resolution, but there ist noch previev of it. So the deletion reason is not right. The picture looks good. --Soenke Rahn (talk) 10:20, 28 May 2017 (UTC) So I erase the deletion request to it. --Soenke Rahn (talk) 10:20, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
I fixit with new Version of the File --Fabian Horst (talk) 10:22, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Kept: fixed. Daphne Lantier 20:35, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Not clear source; image replaced by really free image Edgars2007 (talk) 06:50, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:35, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
not free lisecnse. Upload for Offical Twitter. not ownwork. アルトクール (talk) 06:51, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:35, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
copyright violation — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pe1agia (talk • contribs) 2017-05-21T12:57:50 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:35, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Bishop Onisim (Pylayev) was canonized on 17 July 2001. Icon must be created afterwards. ~ Чръный человек (talk) 14:04, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:36, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The source given is correct. But the image is not free. More specifically, it is not licensed under CC-BY-SA 4.0. Codename Lisa (talk) 07:20, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:36, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Hello, This picture is violating author's rights. Sources, Author's name, publication dates have been counterfeit. Please find originial document here: https://photos.google.com/share/AF1QipMWvmaT-jlym7QPqVCEj9q6nDrQOeq45ZiEYF5M1TeBUWJ5PbLMoZVIyKOfLl7m5g?key=a0N2UHdNRzA5andHblFveWRQUENUdjFrUl9sdEF3 Also the linked website is commercial which is another violation as it has been publicated under non-commercial use only lincence. Thanks in advance. Kind regards, Christian CHUINARD christian@chuinard.fr — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.24.159.142 (talk • contribs) 2017-05-21T15:59:21 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:36, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
stitching errors everywhere — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kiril Simeonovski (talk • contribs) 2017-05-22T07:51:21 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:36, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 08:33, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:36, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
This is a third party logo, Equivalent at English Wikipedia w:File:REFUNITE LOGO.png under non-free fair use. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:33, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:36, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF data, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 08:34, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:36, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Not own work but logo of third party, equivalent at English Wikipedia w:File:Reduxio Logo.png under non-free fair use, but looks to be too simple. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:35, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:36, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF data, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 08:36, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:36, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Logo design left is non-trival, so not necessarily trival as claimed ( We need an FFD for commons, as opposed to DR) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:37, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:36, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Logo design is not trival as claimed. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:37, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:36, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Logo design left is non-trival , equivalent at English Wikipedia w:File:Ripple company logo 2015.png under non-free fair use. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:39, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:36, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Mostly simple text, but I am wondering if the split S tips this above the threhsold of originality. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:42, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:36, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
The stylised Split S and W which are not necessarily standard typefaces, tips this over threshold of originality for me. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:44, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:36, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Not convinced that the logo element (left) is simple, equivalent at English Wikipedia w:File:Saluc logo.svg under non-free fair use ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:46, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:37, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Not own work, logo of third party which is non-trivial ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:49, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:37, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
This is a logo of a third party, which is non-trival. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:11, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:37, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Not so sure this is simple, stylised D with strokes (middle) tips this over threshold of originality for me , equivalent at English Wikipedia w:File:SkyDomeLogo.png under non-free fair use ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:13, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:37, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Not own work, this is a Windows UI element. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:31, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Another non free file from en-wiki en:File:Syskey screenshot on Windows XP.jpg Ronhjones (Talk) 18:27, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:37, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation : https://www.wetzelford.com/new-vehicles/police-vehicles/ Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 09:31, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:37, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Logo of a third party, non trivial, equivalent at English Wikipedia w:File:UNAM Pumas.png under non-free fair use. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:34, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:37, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Not convinced as to this being simple (logo element left), equivalent at English Wikipedia w:File:Tintri, Inc. Logo.jpg under non-free fair use. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:42, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:37, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
website is copyright. Pitpisit (talk) 10:38, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:37, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
requestd by the uploader (me) Coekon (talk) 10:44, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:37, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This is a film still and I doubt if the uploader owns this particular work. Skr15081997 (talk) 11:31, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:37, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Invented flag which does not exist in the real world. Its use harms the prestige of WM Commons. E4024 (talk) 15:21, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: In use. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:05, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Google Image Search yields no similar image. User is probably abusing Wikipedia and Commons, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Yenicubuk.png. Why does tr:Gemerek, which deals with the district and the town, not contain a flag? Wikiwerner (talk) 11:42, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:38, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
This is the flag of Rotterdam, The Netherlands. User is probably abusing Wikipedia and Commons, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Yenicubuk.png. He created all the flags at nl:Gemerek (district). Wikiwerner (talk) 11:46, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:38, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 11:46, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:38, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Small files without EXIF data, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS.
- File:Site of Natural Resource Management programme of Rajiv Gandhi Foundation in Rajasthan.jpg
- File:Wonderoom RGF.JPG
Yann (talk) 11:48, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:38, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
теперь не нужно Леонид Макаров (talk) 11:54, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:38, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
теперь не нужно Леонид Макаров (talk) 11:55, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:38, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
теперь не нужно Леонид Макаров (talk) 11:55, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:38, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
_-_panoramio.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_panoramio.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Blurry/unsharp : out of scope. + Packaging/derivative work issue Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:28, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
_-_panoramio.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:38, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
_-_panoramio.jpg){kind=link}
my own work; never used Maiō T. (talk) 12:46, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:38, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
my own work; never used Maiō T. (talk) 12:46, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:38, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Own work is unlikely, probably copyright violation. Real source and real license are needed. Taivo (talk) 12:49, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:39, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Derivative work Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:52, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:39, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Nom sans signification, corrigé Père Igor (talk) 13:11, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:39, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
false filename, see: File:Newes from Perin in Cornwall of a most Bloody and vn-exampled Murther, Cover.jpg Gerd Leibrock (talk) 13:12, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:39, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
A 2D copyrighted image, not subject to Freedom of Panorama in the Netherlands Hchc2009 (talk) 13:37, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:39, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
And also:
Unclear copyright status / out of scope. FDMS 4 13:45, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:39, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status / out of scope. FDMS 4 07:44, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:06, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status (no EXIF, compression artefacts, uploader's copyvio history).
FDMS 4 13:55, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:39, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 14:02, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:39, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:39, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:39, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:39, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:39, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo. Vanjagenije (talk) 14:23, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:39, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Song. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:39, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, the uploader's only contribution. Out of project scope. Maybe it would be in scope, if we would know the country. Taivo (talk) 14:35, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:39, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:40, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
File:X67777423 Brazil27s-Federal-Supreme-Court-STF-President-Carmen-Lucia-attends-a-session-in-Brasilia.jpg.pagespeed.ic. C8ROCO7Lq.jpg
[edit]
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://217.218.67.233//photo/20170519/ed7199b4-ac08-4894-9c84-252c05fe9b41.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:40, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
File:Futebol de weslley jklj jlkjlkjlkj oiujbhjhbjçklçlkj oij oihuinlkçjçlkijpo ijhoiuhuoihoij poj i jklhkljhnlkjlkjoíuhjo ih.jpg
[edit]
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.clmais.com.br/public/noticias/0100576_crop.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:40, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
this image was emailed to me from the owner robert l harris to be used for this entry. I personally edited the image by cropping and changing the file type. Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://oaacc.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/robertharris-thegem-person.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:40, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyright violation --- Screeshot; copyright is not at the uploader 92.75.45.236 14:52, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:40, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://fabriqueducinema.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/marta.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:40, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Horrible crop. In category:Oscar van Dillen we have far better quility photographs. No need for this. Natuur12 (talk) 15:10, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:40, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
The copyright in this image belongs to Richard Avedon and his heirs and the license in this file has been misattributed to a Creative Commons license. 24.228.88.174 15:30, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:40, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work, no source, no author, no date, no permission. Yann (talk) 16:21, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:41, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work, copy here. Yann (talk) 16:25, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:41, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work, no source, no author, no date, no permission. Yann (talk) 16:26, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:41, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
De pagina bevat geen bestand. (+ er bestaat al een gelijkaardige pagina met wél een bestand op, nl. hetgeen ik zelf geuplaod heb omtrent tramlijn 1) Squizie3 (talk) 16:27, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:41, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 16:30, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:41, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
poor quality Joschi71 (talk) 16:31, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:41, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lespaulrock (talk · contribs)
[edit]Small images without EXIF data, please upload the original files, or send a permission via COM:OTRS.
Yann (talk) 16:35, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:41, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Last remaining file, no EXIF data, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 16:44, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:41, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
poor quality Joschi71 (talk) 17:07, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:41, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Book cover ([9]), no evidence for permission HaeB (talk) 17:08, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:41, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
File:Rugeley Trent Valley Station - London Midland 350 255 - Entertainment's in our nature - Amazing free TV shows now on board (34559994745).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Davey2010 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: author request Yann (talk) 17:14, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - My error these shouldn't of been CSD'd so apologies for that - The image on the train as well as the text was probably taken off of the website - The text for sure would've been done on a Neon text website and I believe these are only for personal use only but not entirely sure on that, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 19:01, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:42, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
File:Rugeley Trent Valley Station - sign - Cannock Chase Heritage Trail - Welcome to Rugeley (34165691970).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Davey2010 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: author request COM:DW? Yann (talk) 17:15, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - My error these shouldn't of been CSD'd so apologies for that - I uploaded the image from Flickr and in short I sort through and delete those that aren't of good quality or those that I personally believe won't ever be used here, I realise we all judge things differently however I only like to upload images that I believe will be used (and if another editor believes these are useful they're more than welcome to reupload), As I upload over 200 images for one album at times it's impossible to sort through on Flickr2Commons especially when after a certain limit the previews don't work, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 19:09, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:42, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Knotted Dragon Pendant MET DT5073.jpg Liridon (talk) 17:17, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:43, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Unused JPEG logo, out of scope. Yann (talk) 17:27, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:43, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
No COM:FOP in Iran. 4nn1l2 (talk) 17:37, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:43, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
No COM:FOP in Iran. 4nn1l2 (talk) 17:39, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:43, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
No COM:FOP in Iran 4nn1l2 (talk) 17:41, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:43, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
No COM:FOP in Iran. 4nn1l2 (talk) 17:42, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:43, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
No COM:FOP in Iran. 4nn1l2 (talk) 17:43, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:43, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
No COM:FOP in Iran 4nn1l2 (talk) 17:48, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:42, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 17:53, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:42, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
No COM:FOP in Iran 4nn1l2 (talk) 18:07, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:42, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
No COM:FOP in Iran 4nn1l2 (talk) 18:08, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:42, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Wappen Möllensen.png Aeroid (talk) 18:09, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:42, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
No COM:FOP in Iran 4nn1l2 (talk) 18:11, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:42, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I originally CSD'd the image however It was declined (Although I'm not the author I did still upload here from Flickr only last week so therefore Speedy should apply?)
Anyway that aside in short I've always held the belief we should host good quality images that are useful and or are educationally helpful to people around the world - I realise we all judge things differently however in this case I don't believe this image will ever be used by anyone nor is it educationally useful to anyone but ofcourse if anyone disagrees they're more than welcome to reupload the image,
Many editors in the past have been blocked etc for uploading bad images hence my "standards",
Anyway thanks, –Davey2010Talk 18:41, 28 May 2017 (UTC) (Reworded 19:56, 28 May 2017 (UTC))
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:43, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unused private image, out of scope, in addition montage (head of the left person). Achim (talk) 18:43, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:43, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I originally CSD'd the image however It was declined (Although I'm not the author I did still upload here from Flickr only last week so therefore Speedy should apply?)
Anyway that aside in short I've always held the belief we should host good quality images that are useful and or are educationally helpful to people around the world - I realise we all judge things differently however in this case I don't believe this image will ever be used by anyone nor is it educationally useful to anyone but ofcourse if anyone disagrees they're more than welcome to reupload the image,
Many editors in the past have been blocked etc for uploading bad images hence my "standards",
Anyway thanks, –Davey2010Talk 18:41, 28 May 2017 (UTC) (Reworded 19:59, 28 May 2017 (UTC))
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:43, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I originally CSD'd the image however It was declined (Although I'm not the author I did still upload here from Flickr only last week so therefore Speedy should apply?)
Anyway that aside in short I've always held the belief we should host good quality images that are useful and or are educationally helpful to people around the world - I realise we all judge things differently however in this case I don't believe this image will ever be used by anyone nor is it educationally useful to anyone but ofcourse if anyone disagrees they're more than welcome to reupload the image,
Many editors in the past have been blocked etc for uploading bad images hence my "standards",
Anyway thanks, –Davey2010Talk 18:41, 28 May 2017 (UTC) (Reworded 20:01, 28 May 2017 (UTC))
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:43, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I originally CSD'd the image however It was declined (Although I'm not the author I did still upload here from Flickr only last week so therefore Speedy should apply?)
Anyway that aside in short I've always held the belief we should host good quality images that are useful and or are educationally helpful to people around the world - I realise we all judge things differently however in this case I don't believe this image will ever be used by anyone nor is it educationally useful to anyone but ofcourse if anyone disagrees they're more than welcome to reupload the image,
Many editors in the past have been blocked etc for uploading bad images hence my "standards",
Anyway thanks, –Davey2010Talk 18:41, 28 May 2017 (UTC) (Reworded 20:02, 28 May 2017 (UTC))
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:43, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
We already have much better images of this train at Category:Rugeley_Trent_Valley_railway_station as well as at Category:British Rail Class 350s in London Midland livery, Thanks –Davey2010Talk 18:53, 28 May 2017 (UTC) (Updated 20:04, 28 May 2017 (UTC))
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:43, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Uploder is obviously not the Photographer (see Metadata). Drahreg01 (talk) 18:55, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:43, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
We already have much better images of this train at Category:Rugeley_Trent_Valley_railway_station as well as at Category:British Rail Class 350s in London Midland livery, Thanks –Davey2010Talk 18:56, 28 May 2017 (UTC) (Reworded 20:07, 28 May 2017 (UTC))
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:43, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
We already have much better images of this train at Category:Rugeley_Trent_Valley_railway_station as well as at Category:British Rail Class 350s in London Midland livery, Thanks –Davey2010Talk 18:57, 28 May 2017 (UTC)(Reworded 20:09, 28 May 2017 (UTC))
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:43, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
poor quality, no educational purpose Joschi71 (talk) 18:57, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:45, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
poor quality Joschi71 (talk) 18:58, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:45, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The image on the train was probably taken off of a website - The text for sure would've been done on a Neon text website and I believe these are only for personal use only but not entirely sure on that, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 19:11, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:45, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
We already have much better images of this platform at Category:Rugeley_Trent_Valley_railway_station, Thanks –Davey2010Talk 19:13, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:45, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
We already have much better images of this power station at Category:Rugeley_Power_Station, Thanks –Davey2010Talk 19:17, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:45, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Blurry image of a railway sign, We have a much clearer one at Category:Rugeley_Trent_Valley_railway_station, Thanks –Davey2010Talk 19:17, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:45, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Blurry image - We have much clearer images at Category:Rugeley_Trent_Valley_railway_station, Thanks –Davey2010Talk 19:20, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:45, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal images out of scope. Commons is not a personal media storage like Facebook, or Instagram. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 19:42, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:45, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Repeated unnecesary file from one already cropped, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Nia_Jax_WrestleMania_32_Axxess.jpg TheBellaTwins1445 (talk) 19:53, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:45, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
File:Inspirational Women And Some Future Speakers With Emunah La-Paz Changing Hands Bookstore.jpg
[edit]
Video screenshot? Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:55, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:45, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
unknown location, IF in US, no FOP for 3D works. subject is form US-AZ, so probably US. Com:PCP Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:58, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:45, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Photo sous droit d'auteur (d'après la source indiquée) Litlok (talk) 20:06, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:45, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
« Service du Patrimoine de la ville de Bourges », pas de mention du photographe. De plus, le bâtiment est récent et original. Litlok (talk) 20:07, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:45, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
« Service du Patrimoine de la ville de Bourges », pas de mention du photographe. De plus, le bâtiment est récent et original. Litlok (talk) 20:08, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
"Bâtiment récent et original" : cette chapelle fait partie du patrimoine de la ville de Bourges. Le patrimoine ne se limite pas aux bâtiments anciens.
- Par « récent et original », je fais référence à la liberté de panorama, qui n'existe pas en France. Concrètement et simplement, si l'architecte n'est pas mort depuis au moins 70 ans et si son œuvre est originale, une photographie de ce bâtiment ne peut pas être publiée sous licence libre. Litlok (talk) 11:31, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:45, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Source indiquée : Laissez vous conter l'habitat au Moulon, Bourges Nord II, par le Service du Patrimoine. L'uploader n'est pas le photographe. Litlok (talk) 20:09, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:45, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope and unused. Was used on English Wikipedia for advertising. Vanjagenije (talk) 20:10, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:45, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Source indiquée: Laissez vous conter l'habitat au Moulon, Bourges Nord II, auteur Alain Giraud, qui n'est pas l'uploader. Litlok (talk) 20:17, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:45, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Source indiquée : Laissez vous conter l'habitat au Moulon, Bourges Nord II, par le Service du Patrimoine. L'uploader n'est pas le photographe. Litlok (talk) 20:19, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:45, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
J'ai un doute sur le fait qu'un plan est protégé ou pas par le droit d'auteur. Les auteurs indiqués sont ici A. Giraud, C. Gratias, C. Jamet et A. Morin. L'uploader n'est pas l'auteur initial. Litlok (talk) 20:20, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:45, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
D'après le commentaire de diff sur wiki fr, l'image serait libre de droit, il faut une autorisation du détenteur des droits (en général le photographe, voir Commons:OTRS/fr) Shev123 (talk) 20:25, 28 May 2017 (UTC) Monsieur, J'en ai marre des administrateurs procéduriers tels que vous, sur Wikipédia ! Votre encyclopédie, je sens que vous allez la continuer sans moi !... À part proposer des suppressions, que savez-vous faire ??? La photographie que j'ai publiée est un document privé et familial qui m'a été fourni par Dorine Bourneton elle-même (qui est une connaissance de longue date), afin que je puisse illustrer sa page Wikipédia... Le photographe est son compagnon. Jusqu'à preuve du contraire, cette photo est donc libre de tous droits ! Vous ne risquez rien - ni moi ! - en la laissant en place !!! Si vous la supprimez, vous me supprimerez par la même occasion de vos contributeurs réguliers. À bon entendeur... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bernard DEJARDIN (talk • contribs)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:45, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
есть отдельный общий файл Леонид Макаров (talk) 20:25, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:45, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
out of scope : personal image Florn (talk) 20:37, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:45, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No COM:FOP in the USA. Leoboudv (talk) 20:44, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Comment: This was in Denver, Colorado. --Leoboudv (talk) 20:44, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:45, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
As already discussed in Commons:Deletion requests/Files from ''www.congreso.es'' Discasto talk 20:48, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:45, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
seems to be a webfind Personalgewinnungsoffizier (talk) 21:14, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:45, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
No FoP in Georgia Dogad75 (talk) 21:33, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:45, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
RASTREAMENTO E MONITORAMENTO VEICULAR ORB TRACKER Evertonfurlaneti (talk) 23:27, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 20:45, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by TONYchainsaw (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Seems to be texts generated recently. Will be good idea to find historical publications.
- File:The White People.pdf
- File:The Three Imposters.pdf
- File:The Hill of Dreams.pdf
- File:The Secret Glory.pdf
- File:The Red Hand.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Files were uploaded to serve as references for the Gothic Literature project Semana i Fall 2017 project. Students from Tecnológico de Monterrey will work on typing and having the texts available in Wikisource. Please, let me know if these can remain the way they are or original scans will have to be uploaded. TONYchainsaw (talk) 10:48, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
In addition, all files were taken from Internet Archive so no copyright is being infringed. TONYchainsaw (talk) 13:17, 2 Jun 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:15, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Duplicate file name on wikipedia Naruto 64 (talk) 16:00, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Kept: file on local wiki should be renamed. Daphne Lantier 20:41, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
This is clearly not own work, as it's a screenshot from Microsoft Windows, albiet running inside VMware, inlcudes the stylised IE logo. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 20:42, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:14, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
out of scope — unused personal image Daphne Lantier 18:35, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:13, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
out of scope — unused personal image Daphne Lantier 18:39, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:13, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
out of scope — unused personal images
Daphne Lantier 18:54, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:14, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission.
No speedy delete: Maybe some PD-tag can apply? Wdwd (talk) 10:41, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: still no license at al. --JuTa 01:54, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Per Special:Permalink/245802483#File:Azadi_tower_9.jpg and COM:FOP#Iran. —MarcoAurelio 13:46, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
- The Iranian copyright law (article 16) seems to say that works owned by a legal personality last for 30 years from publication. If that is the case here, the tower is PD in Iran. COM:FOP#Iran say that is where the rights are owned or even transferred to a legal personality. I'm not sure if Article 16 is about the ownership of the rights, or just the object in question, or both. The government certainly seems to own the building, so by that interpretation it would seem the tower is PD. And it seems fairly likely that the government at the time would have acquired the rights, as well. I would lean Keep here. Carl Lindberg (talk) 15:00, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
- Agreed with Carl. Keep
Please note that this monument is a historical landmark, and is established as part of the country's cultural heritage.
—Rye-96 (talk) 21:17, 28 May 2017 (UTC)- Being an historical landmark and part of the country's heritage does not seem to be relevant when it comes to the work's copyright status. You tried to make the same argument before in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Milad Tower in Tehran City.jpg and the opinion given to you then was that such things are irrelevant to copyright status.
- Regardless, Carl Lindberg makes an interesting point and if correct could possibly apply to a number of other images, some of which may have already been deleted. I think more discussion is needed on this because Items 6 and 7 of Article 2 of Iranian copyright law do apply to sculptures and architectural works respectively, so the question is whether Article 16 applies to this photo and if so how it applies. If nobody objects, I think it might be a good idea to add this file to Category:Possibly unfree TasnimNews images. There seems to have been quite a number of other discussions related to Tasnim images based upon Category:Tasnim News Agency related deletion requests and COM:VP/C#Images from Tasnim needing reviewing. I started the discussion of this particular file at COM:VP/C#File:Azadi_tower_9.jpg, but it might be a good idea to try and get as much input from the Commons community as possible if there's way to do that. Wikipedia has en:Template:Please see which can be used to notify others in a neutral manner to avoid any claims of canvassing, but I'm not sure how Commons handles such things. Getting this right here might help resolve issues with other similar files. It also could imapct Wikipedia indirectly because if Commons allows these types of files, then there would almost surely be no need for non-free ones to be uploaded locally to Wikipedia. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:50, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep the 30 year rule seems save to apply in this situation to me. --Hannolans (talk) 22:12, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
- Agreed with Carl.
- Keep The Iranian copyright for the building has expired (30 years) and because the US has no copyright relations with Iran, it is in the public domain in the US. AHeneen (talk) 01:45, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Kept: as above. --Yann (talk) 11:21, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: document of questionable notability. Used only on user page. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:22, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
poor quality Joschi71 (talk) 17:11, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep, No other illustrations for this object. --Insider (talk) 13:20, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 11:22, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Infothrone (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope — unused personal images
Daphne Lantier 18:53, 28 May 2017 (UTC) Commons These files are actually associated with a page we created.
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:26, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Please delete this file. It had the wrong name, and I am using Miraheze that does not easily let me upgrade. The file I want to keep is already uploaded at "file:FileTotal solar eclipse NASA TSE2017-1 annotated.svg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Guy vandegrift (talk • contribs) 2017-05-22T03:16:58 (UTC)
- File:Total solar eclipse NASA TSE2017-1 annotated.svg is the replacement file, not the one listed above. And, yes, this should be deleted. I am confused about how to delete, primarily because I am accustomed to working on wikis (Wikiversity and Miraheze) where I can just delete files myself. And on Wikipedia, I just put up a delete template and somebody deletes it for me. I was trying to prepare a paper and Miraheze wasn't working at the time so I was using Wikiversity. And, unlike the wiki stuff I am accustomed to, images have a way of persisting wrong on my computer in spite of attempts to purge. --Guy vandegrift (talk) 03:02, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Guy, please note that it is a waste of computer and human resources to upload the file a second time. In the future, please use {{Rename}}. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:30, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
The subject has chosen to retract the consent to use these images — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikael Häggström (talk • contribs) 2017-05-24T16:56:48 (UTC)
Kept: Since the subject is not identified, that is irrelevant and the license is irrevocable. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:32, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
An "invented" flag that does not exist in real life. E4024 (talk) 06:56, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- The user has first invented another flag for the same place, which has been deleted; then he or she invented this one and cheated Dutch (not the first time), English and Vietnamite Wikipedias. I could say block the user, but they seem to have used a special user name for these "so-called" flags and then disappeared. They could be found, perhaps, in the relevant WP pages wherever these "invented" flags appear. --E4024 (talk) 07:01, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
- File is currently in use. I think Wikipedia is a better place to discuss this. --Amitie 10g (talk) 23:34, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: used on multiple wiki pages. --Daphne Lantier 00:13, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Google Image Search yields no similar image. User is probably abusing Wikipedia and Commons, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Yenicubuk.png. This user created all flags at nl:Gemerek (district). Wikiwerner (talk) 11:50, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Kept: I agree that this is probably a hoax, but since the image is in use in WP, we cannot delete it here except for copyvio. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:35, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
.png&action=edit§ion=T-3){kind=link}
Invented flag, bordering vandalism. DR'ed before but was in use in fooled WPs. Not any more. Therefore please delete it. E4024 (talk) 13:28, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
Speedy delete The fantasy flag by "sehzade design" isn't realistically useful for any educational purpose therefor the unused file very clearly falls outside of Commons’ project scope. Jotzet (talk) 12:44, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:53, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
Not convinced that the logo element (top) is simple. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:45, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
- -> http://blog.safecast.org/faq/licenses/: "The term “Safecast” and the safecast logo are Registered Trademarks of the Momoko Ito Foundation, a 501(c)3 Non-profit
- Usage must be approved by us.", earlier it was only "All contents of this website are published under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence": Just the moment i asked sean bonner, co-founder and global director of savecast on twitter for licensing. --Hungchaka (talk) 13:51, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
- Non-Commerical clause would be incompatible with Commons. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:56, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --PumpkinSky talk 00:47, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
All 25 files were transferred by User:Rcclh from Italian Wikipedia. Whether or not they are still under copyright in Italy, they are all still under copyright in the U. S., and so cannot remain on Commons. See also User talk:Rcclh#PD-Italy_files.
- File:Aldo maldera(1).png
- File:Anthony Stewart Woodcock - Inghilterra - Euro 1980.jpg
- File:Bruno Conti - AS Roma 1979-80.jpg
File:Claudio Sala(1).jpgkept --Ruthven (msg) 08:32, 3 June 2017 (UTC)- File:Coppa UEFA 1988-89 - Napoli vs Bordeaux - Diego Maradona e Zoran Vujovi% C4% 87(1).jpg
- File:Edinho.jpg
File:Eraldo Pecci(1).jpgkept --Ruthven (msg) 08:32, 3 June 2017 (UTC)- File:Euro % 2780% 2C Germania Ovest-Belgio 2-1% 2C Karlheinz F% C3% B6rster e Jan Ceulemans(1).jpg
- File:Euro 1980 - Belgio vs Spagna - Miguel Tendillo e Jan Ceulemans.jpg
- File:Franco Selvaggi% 2C Cagliari 1980-81.jpg
- File:Gianpiero Marini - FC Internazionale Milano 1981-82.jpg
- File:Italia vs Jugoslavia % 28Torino% 2C 1980% 29 - Dragan Panteli% C4% 87.jpg
- File:Italy v France (friendly match) - 1978 - Marius Trésor, Dino Zoff.jpg
- File:Italia-Jugoslavia 0-0% 2C Roma% 2C 8 maggio 1978% 2C Zoff e % C5% A0urjak.jpg
- File:Italy v Poland (friendly match) - 1980 - Dino Zoff, Wojciech Rudy.jpg
- File:Juan Barbas - US Lecce 1987-88.jpg
- File:Juventus FC v Hungary (friendly match) - 1977 - Giuseppe Furino, László Bálint.jpg
- File:Juventus FC v Hungary (friendly match) - 1977 - Sándor Gujdár, Roberto Bettega.jpg
- File:1985-86 Serie A - Juventus FC v SSC Napoli - Diego Maradona, Lionello Manfredonia.jpg
- File:Luther Blissett% 2C Milan 1983-84.jpg
File:Paolo Conti calciatore 1950(1).jpgkept --Ruthven (msg) 08:32, 3 June 2017 (UTC)- File:Paul Rideout.jpg
- File:Pietro Vierchowod% 2C Roma 1982-83.jpg
- File:Renato zaccarelli(1).jpg
- File:Stanislav Seman - Cecoslovacchia - Euro 1980(1).jpg
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_1978_-_Marius_Tr%C3%A9sor,_Dino_Zoff.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_1980_-_Dino_Zoff,_Wojciech_Rudy.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_1977_-_Giuseppe_Furino,_L%C3%A1szl%C3%B3_B%C3%A1lint.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_1977_-_S%C3%A1ndor_Gujd%C3%A1r,_Roberto_Bettega.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
— Jeff G. ツ 05:28, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
- People considering commenting here should look at my analysis of this at User talk:Jeff G.#Recent images from Italy. The only case in which photographs published in Italy after 1978 can be PD in the US if if they are from the period of 1978-1989, and did not have a copyright notice. "No notice" claims require evidence, and such works would have a potentially restored copyright due to the URAA (they would, in fact, almost certainly have a restored copyright, but we don't need to get into that without evidence of 'no notice'). - Reventtalk 06:49, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
- Kept the files pre-1976. The others seem to be taken either from Panini's albums or from the newspapers. Ideally we should move the best files back on it.wiki before deletion… --Ruthven (msg) 08:32, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
- Revent has it backwards. The burden of proof is on those who want to keep an image, so in the absence of proof that there was notice, we must assume that there was none. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:27, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
- @Jameslwoodward: I think you misunderstood me, and took it directly opposite. ... I'm saying that we need evidence that notice was given, and that absent such evidence we should delete the files per the PRP. The confusion might be that I attempted to discriminate between 'subsisting copyright' files (that are clearly deletable) and files that are potential URAA cases (where the deletion would be controversial).
- I have been attempting to segregate actual URAA cases from those where the URAA was mentioned, but where it clearly did not apply due to a subsisting copyright. - Reventtalk 05:13, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
- Specifically, I said at User_talk:Jeff_G./Archives/2017/May#Recent_images_from_Italy, "we would need an indication that the work was actually published without notice in that period.... the default assumption would be to delete due to a US copyright unrelated to the URAA, without proof of no-notice". - Reventtalk 05:32, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
- I agree with Revent's analysis. — Jeff G. ツ 05:55, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
- Sorry about that -- I guess I had it backwards. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:25, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
- Specifically, I said at User_talk:Jeff_G./Archives/2017/May#Recent_images_from_Italy, "we would need an indication that the work was actually published without notice in that period.... the default assumption would be to delete due to a US copyright unrelated to the URAA, without proof of no-notice". - Reventtalk 05:32, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
- Revent has it backwards. The burden of proof is on those who want to keep an image, so in the absence of proof that there was notice, we must assume that there was none. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:27, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
- Kept the files pre-1976. The others seem to be taken either from Panini's albums or from the newspapers. Ideally we should move the best files back on it.wiki before deletion… --Ruthven (msg) 08:32, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted no URAA files, which is safe as it appears that they weren't never deleted from it.wiki. Kept the others. Ruthven (msg) 11:59, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
- File Eraldo Pecci(1).jpg has been deleted as well, as the sponsors on the shirt indicate that the photo was taken during the 1988-1989 season, as pointed out by Danyele. --Ruthven (msg) 14:50, 6 June 2017 (UTC)