Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/03/30
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_underway_at_sea_in_1955.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
trava todos os aplicativos 177.129.44.253 13:06, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
Speedy kept: Vandalism. --Amitie 10g (talk) 06:44, 8 August 2016 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)
bo tak nie działa, chcę przeistalować tą wtyczkę 89.68.159.116 16:37, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
Speedy Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 17:17, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
It pops upconstantly interfering with games, etc 24.186.53.142 00:52, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 01:12, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
old picture Seyonr (talk) 00:58, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:54, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Logo possible over COM:TOO Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 08:29, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Delete Uploader here, please delete, thanks. -FastilyClone (talk) 08:52, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Author requested deletion of page. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 08:57, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
this file was an unimpotant. Ddst40 (talk) 10:36, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:43, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Panam2014 as Speedy (speedy delete) and the most recent rationale was: reason=https://longshot.photo/blog/2016-03-09-samsung-galaxy-s7-review-sort-of Yann (talk) 11:53, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:53, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Seyonr as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: old image Yann (talk) 11:54, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:55, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
unused, uncat, doesn't seem to be in a scope (new image with this title) Pibwl (talk) 22:42, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:21, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Hyju as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.facebook.com/depthhate/photos/a.931400623596022.1073741833.402138576522232/931400780262673/?type=3&theater Yann (talk) 11:57, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:57, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Blurred, bad quality image of a many-times photographed hellicopter Felis domestica (talk) 10:31, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 13:12, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
O arquivo enviado não segue as regras de licença do Commons: Clique aqui or Click here Leonardo Gabriel Vieira Torres (talk) 05:56, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:55, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/TimedText:Fr-Ceci-n-est-pas-une-pipe.ogg.sk.srt
The source file, File:Slavic languages (no legend).png, has been deleted, because it had no source. Jcb (talk) 15:43, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- @Jcb: Why do you create separate request for each DW? They have one source and similar reasons for deletion, so may be listed in one request.--Anatoliy (talk) 19:09, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: merged into one request. --Anatoliy (talk) 19:17, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
The source file, File:Slavic languages (no legend).png, has been deleted, because it had no source. Jcb (talk) 15:43, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: merged into one request. --Anatoliy (talk) 19:17, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
The source file, File:Slavic languages (no legend).png, has been deleted, because it had no source. Jcb (talk) 15:43, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: merged into one request. --Anatoliy (talk) 19:17, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
The source file, File:Slavic languages (no legend).png, has been deleted, because it had no source. Jcb (talk) 15:43, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: merged into one request. --Anatoliy (talk) 19:17, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
The source file, File:Slavic languages (no legend).png, has been deleted, because it had no source. Jcb (talk) 15:44, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: merged into one request. --Anatoliy (talk) 19:17, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
The source file, File:Slavic languages (no legend).png, has been deleted, because it had no source. Jcb (talk) 15:44, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: merged into one request. --Anatoliy (talk) 19:17, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Delete this image is cropped from a Flickr image of a poster whose copyright status is unknown. PCP applies. Ww2censor (talk) 10:42, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Copyright violation. --Sreejith K (talk) 21:27, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No FOP in France (tags and album on Flickr source place this image in Lyon, France) Elisfkc (talk) 16:13, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sreejith K (talk) 21:30, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 21:39, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Jcb:
Done, thanks. (File was transferred from it.wikisource as discussed). --Holapaco77 (talk) 22:01, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: resolved. --Jcb (talk) 22:10, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Song. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:08, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Wikipedia Zero abuse, obvious copyvio. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:43, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused advertisement of questionable notability. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:10, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Wikipedia Zero abuse, obvious copyvio. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:41, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Personal Image and without EXIF meta data - Indrajit Das (Talk - Contribs) 18:46, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- The image is my property, and I want to use it for my user page. Is there anything to stop it?--Philip J Fry (talk) 19:45, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Keep: In use, and the user made thousand of contributions to the English Wikipedia, therefore in scope. --Amitie 10g (talk) 21:51, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: User page image in use. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 01:21, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
I do not want this picture anymore. Philip J Fry (talk) 20:21, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . – Kwj2772 (talk) 10:38, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:30, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 08:14, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unusable blurry failed photo, better alternative available (File:Monument des anciens combattants - panoramio - Mario Hains (1).jpg). P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:35, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 08:14, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by TU-nor as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: This is the same collage as File:Athens Montage 2.jpg that is nominated for deletion for copyvio reasons, except for one picture. The copyvio image from that older collage has been replaced by File:Aerial view of Olympic complex in Athens 2004.jpg, but that file has now been deleted as copyvio.,|source= - I agree with the nomination, but regular DR seems more appropriate. Jcb (talk) 16:48, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- The picture has been repaired, copyvio picture completely removed and replaced, both from the collage itself, as well as from its description page (attribution). I am not sure if this is enough, hope it helps. --SilentResident (talk) 00:57, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- This one is fine now. I have hidden the contents of the first version. Jcb (talk) 08:36, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: resolved. --Jcb (talk) 08:37, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: The Uploader is not the photographer. Insufficient evidence presented to speedy this image. No link to where it was found online, etc. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:10, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Ellin Beltz: See User:ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2/The Uploader is not the photographer --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 15:12, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- Just saying the same thing over and over is not proof. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:33, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- Permission from the photographer is required --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 15:38, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Comment At present there is no indication that the uploader is not the photographer, and COM:AGF. You can say the same things over and over, but you have not provided any indication that this image was not created by the uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:51, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- Obviously it is not selfie.So, what I said is true.Thank you --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 16:06, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. He is the copyright owner unless proven otherwise. --Tarawneh (talk) 15:36, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
I understand a file with this title was kept before, but I doubt this is it. It is clearly an out of scope personal file. E4024 (talk) 13:10, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 03:22, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Heartar2020 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Screenshots from a computer game. Unlikely to be own work.
jdx Re: 19:53, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.gmail.smashtrumpistk.SmashTrumpistk&hl=en - no license, no evidence that the uploader is the author. - Reventtalk 02:16, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:45, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Scale down duplicate of File:Kalpana Chawla, NASA photo portrait in orange suit.jpg. Yann (talk) 21:52, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:45, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Same image as non free version on en-wiki. en:File:Joan Clarke (cryptanalyst).jpg. With a date of 1940s, likely the copyright has not run out. Ronhjones (Talk) 23:58, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:44, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Ciba Spices (talk · contribs)
[edit]Com:packaging possibility of copyvios
- File:Tea Masala.png
- File:White Pepper Powder.png
- File:Sambar Masala.png
- File:Mix Achar.png
- File:Rajma Masala.png
- File:Raita Masala.png
- File:Pav Bhaji Masala.png
- File:Pani Puri Masala.png
- File:Paneer Masala.png
- File:Nimbu Achar Masala.png
- File:Kitchen King.png
- File:Kashmiri Mirch Powder.png
- File:Garam Masala.png
- File:Jal Jeera Masala.png
- File:Fish Masala.png
- File:Dry Mango Powder.png
- File:Dry Ginger Powder.png
- File:Chana Masala.png
- File:Dal Makhani Masala.png
- File:Chicken Masala.png
- File:Chatkari Chaat Masala.png
- File:Black Pepper Powder.png
- File:Achari Masala.png
- File:Biryani Masala.png
✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 17:01, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ciba Spices (talk · contribs)
[edit]Office promotion pictures. Out of scope Commons is not a social media site
- File:National Ved Meet.jpg
- File:Conference 1996.jpg
- File:Yoga Divas.jpg
- File:Health Baby Show.jpg
- File:Dealers Meet 2010.jpg
- File:Icons of Matsyachal.jpg
- File:Clean India Movement.jpg
- File:Boiled Egg Masala.jpg
- File:Ciba Group Head Office.jpg
- File:Ciba Dealers Meet.jpg
- File:Mr Babu Jhalani felicitating Pankaj Udas Ciba Spices kit.jpg
- File:Ciba Group Family.jpg
- File:Recognized for Quality at NNS Spices & Herbs Seminar.jpg
- File:Ciba Group Chairman & Directors.jpg
- File:YOUNG ENTREPRENEUR AWARD BY TIMES OF INDIA.jpg
✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 17:03, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: packages are obviously not own work. "Social media pictures" from variety of sources, not own work. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:49, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
No evidence for creative commons license Roseohioresident (talk) 18:08, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- This map appears on the corporate website here. Bottom of page says "Ohi-Rail Corporation © ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. " No evidence of commons licensing. Roseohioresident (talk) 18:11, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Housekeeping: 31 March 2017 Jcb (talk | contribs | block) deleted page File:Marketing Map.pdf (Missing permission as of 24 March 2017. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:47, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted as shown in details and without EXIF meta data - Indrajit Das (Talk - Contribs) 19:10, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:46, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope; not a selfie repository and unused personal image. -- Bagas Chrisara (talk) 20:33, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:59, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
personal photo with personal identificable data/individuals, i.e. seriously personality rights isusses and/or 'family album' content, doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? btw:file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 17:40, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:03, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
personal photo with personal identificable data/individuals, i.e. seriously personality rights isusses and/or 'family album' content, doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? btw:file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 17:41, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:03, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
personal photo with personal identificable data/individuals, i.e. seriously personality rights isusses and/or 'family album' content, doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? btw:file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 17:41, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:03, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
personal photo with personal identificable data/individuals, i.e. seriously personality rights isusses and/or 'family album' content, doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? btw:file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 17:41, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:03, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
personal photo with personal identificable data/individuals, i.e. seriously personality rights isusses and/or 'family album' content, doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? btw:file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 17:42, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:02, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
personal photo with personal identificable data/individuals, i.e. seriously personality rights isusses and/or 'family album' content, doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? btw:file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 17:42, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:02, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
personal photo with personal identificable data/individuals, i.e. seriously personality rights isusses and/or 'family album' content, doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? btw:file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 17:42, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:02, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
personal photo with personal identificable data/individuals, i.e. seriously personality rights isusses and/or 'family album' content, doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? btw:file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 17:42, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:02, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
personal photo with personal identificable data/individuals, i.e. seriously personality rights isusses and/or 'family album' content, doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? btw:file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 17:42, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:02, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
personal photo showing an indentificable human being, i.e. seriously personality rights isusses and/or 'family album' content, doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? btw:file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 17:46, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:02, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
DR started to verify claimed 'own work': potentially personality rights isusses, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin, hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 18:05, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:02, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
your opinions are asked : advertisements, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? btw, affected File:Aaryan Gala Logo.jpg, File:Aaryan-Gala.jpg et al, Roland zh (talk) 18:08, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:02, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
your opinions are asked : advertisements, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? btw, affected File:Aaryan Gala Logo.jpg, File:Aaryan-Gala.jpg et al, Roland zh (talk) 18:09, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete all. XXN, 12:27, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:01, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:09, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:01, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Personal Image and source not has been clarified - Indrajit Das (Talk - Contribs) 18:36, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:01, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Out of project scope KDS4444 (talk) 18:53, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:00, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope Commons is not a social media site ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 16:42, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:52, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sstevensats (talk · contribs)
[edit]Non free book cover possibility of copyvios
✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 16:43, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:52, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Image has watermark. Looks like an advertisement of the photographer ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 16:56, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: In use, and the watermark is not a valid reason for deletion if it belongs to the uploader. --Amitie 10g (talk) 21:53, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, deleted watermarked versions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:17, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation; should be re-uploaded on enwiki if it qualifies for fair use. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me 07:11, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:14, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyright violation Pugilist (talk) 07:34, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:14, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation Pugilist (talk) 07:35, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:14, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Copyright © 2017 Mid-Day Infomedia Ltd. All rights reserved. 2003:45:5C47:D201:EC9B:DFD:EF5D:59B3 08:40, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:14, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Dubious "own"work (28 KB) 2003:45:5C47:D201:EC9B:DFD:EF5D:59B3 08:44, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:16, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
no permission 2003:45:5C47:D201:EC9B:DFD:EF5D:59B3 09:22, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:17, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Dubious"own" work (4 KB) 2003:45:5C47:D201:EC9B:DFD:EF5D:59B3 09:41, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:18, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Adee koesoemah (talk · contribs)
[edit]Looks like derivative works
2003:45:5C47:D201:EC9B:DFD:EF5D:59B3 09:47, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:18, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by RainBowz100 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Facebook is not a good source. OTRS tickets required
- File:Yenxsantos On Facebook.jpg.png
- File:YenxSantos On Her Facebook.png
- File:YenSantos On Her Facebook.png
2003:45:5C47:D201:EC9B:DFD:EF5D:59B3 10:12, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:18, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Looks like a TV screenshot 2003:45:5C47:D201:EC9B:DFD:EF5D:59B3 10:29, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:18, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
The album cover are under copyright. Bagas Chrisara (talk) 11:06, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:20, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Werley Metal (talk · contribs)
[edit]Small images without EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.
Yann (talk) 11:59, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:20, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Small images without EXIF data, user blocked for copyvios, unlikely to be own works.
Yann (talk) 12:12, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:21, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
This user has twice been blocked for uploading copyright violations. They clearly cannot distinguish between possession and intellectual property. Therefore, all their remaining uploads are suspect.
- File:Maslacak-Vlasic.jpg
- File:Grafika.png
- File:Cvijet-Canis.jpg
- File:Buk-a.jpg
- File:Iloomska-Petljaga.jpg
- File:Oblici vlasista (2).jpg
- File:Koricani1.jpg
- File:Angler.tif
- File:Salmo-trutta.jpg
- File:Vlasic.jpg
- File:Donji Korićani.jpg
- File:Gornji Korićani.jpg
- File:Ilomska-fishing.jpg
- File:Ilomska-pasture.jpg
- File:Tokilomske.jpg
- File:Buk-3.jpg
- File:BUK-1.jpg
- File:Ilo-tovarnica.jpg
- File:Lisina-1.jpg
- File:Iom-koricani.jpg
- File:Vitovlje2.jpg
- File:Mlinija (2).jpg
- File:Divlja ruza.jpg
- File:Korićanske (2).jpg
- File:Korićanske.jpg
- File:Ovčja brv (2).jpg
- File:Mlinovi.jpg
- File:Ugric.jpg
- File:Kruševica (2).jpg
- File:Kruševica-2 (2).jpg
- File:Prema Ugru.jpg
- File:Ovce-ilomska.jpg
- File:Vrbanja-siprage2.jpg
- File:Turbe-Travnik.jpg
- File:Kanjon Ilomske.jpg
- File:Ranča (4).jpg
- File:M.Ilomska.jpg
- File:Pougarje.jpg
- File:Petrovo polje.jpg
- File:Sinjac-Ilomska.jpg
- File:Omar-Lisina.jpg
- File:Podnozje.Lisine.jpg
- File:Stogovi-DKoricani.jpg
- File:Donji-Gornji-Koricani.jpg
- File:Vitovlje - slika.jpg
- File:Gornji Koricani.jpg
- File:Crkvenica.png
- File:Vrbanja.siprage.jpg
- File:Bosna oko 1412.jpg
- File:Logo-Ingeb.jpg
- File:Salmo trutta - Ilomska.jpg
- File:Munika - Prenj 1.jpg
- File:Frejnov karanfil - Prenj.jpg
- File:Ostaci rimske naseobine u Sipragama.jpg
- File:Acceleration2.jpg
- File:Acceleration1.jpg
- File:Ilomska.jpg
- File:Ilomska1.jpg
- File:Siprage.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
— Jeff G. ツ 04:06, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: most per nomination, kept some PD-ineligible files. --Jcb (talk) 16:14, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nalideo Nalideo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial flags of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:Bandera de Maskoyana.png
- File:Flag of Nagrenaledo.png
- File:Bandera de Nagreyupokno.png
- File:Brecozeismo.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:21, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:19, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nalideo Nalideo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Apparently, an "art" project by uploader: creation of a fictional country including flags, language, flora and fauna. See also https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Reino_de_%C3%91anday who is probably the same person.
- File:Emokarenday imagen satelital.png
- File:Pantalonreda.png
- File:Emokarendaya.png
- File:Alfabeto Nagrenalo.png
- File:Bandera del idioma Nagrenalo.png
- File:Muro de argentina.jpg
- File:Habitat de la especie.gif
- File:Alfabeto Nagrenalono.png
- File:Mapa de Maskoyana.png
- File:Chonidus Chonidus.jpg
- File:Veronicella Nagrenalensis.jpg
- File:Drymaeus Nagrenalensis.jpg
- File:Araña Domestica de Nagrenaledo.jpg
- File:Nagurmanuyus domesticus Nagrenalensis.png
- File:Chilomalidus Palidenreknsis.jpg
Takeaway (talk) 12:50, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:22, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Prince Abubakar (talk · contribs)
[edit]Images taken from the internet but uploaded as "own work". Probable copyright violations.
Takeaway (talk) 12:54, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:23, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Crop of headshot here: http://www.rbcasting.com/rb/web/tezetaabraham Ytoyoda (talk) 14:46, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:24, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Probable copyright violation. Google image search shows multiple hits and the information provided on the file is rather sparse. Image looks like a professional image, so I feel stronger proof or a free license is needed here. Ravensfire (talk) 14:49, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- Also File:Shakiranabillboard.jpg uploaded by the same user with similar problems. Ravensfire (talk) 14:51, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:25, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
suspected not own work, name of uploader isn't same as who drew the comic. TherasTaneel (talk) 15:31, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Housekeeping: 1 April 2017 EugeneZelenko (talk | contribs | block) deleted page File:Superman+og+Fredsbomben.jpg (Commons:Licensing: anime/manga/comics. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:25, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
EXIF says "© Alexandr Kotsoban, All Rights Reserved" Ytoyoda (talk) 16:46, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:28, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
EXIF says "© Alexandr Kotsoban, All Rights Reserved" Ytoyoda (talk) 16:47, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:28, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely that this is the uploader's work. There's a small copyright claim notice in the corner, previously published https://twitter.com/wonunim/status/700191670067802112?lang=en Ytoyoda (talk) 16:55, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:28, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Banner of the Qulla Suyu.svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:40, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:29, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Banner of the Qulla Suyu.svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:41, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:29, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Banner of the Qulla Suyu.svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:41, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:29, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Image uploaded to a copyrighted page in June, 2015: http://engenhariae.com.br/foto-aerea-de-santa-rita-do-sapucai/ Py4nf (talk) 18:40, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:30, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted and no information about the source ! Also without EXIF Meta data - Indrajit Das (Talk - Contribs) 18:58, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:30, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Copyright holder : Bouchaib HABBOULI, 2001 ©. See : http://anasbouanani.com/index.html Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:27, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:31, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Not "simple shape" - complex shading on central part of logo Ronhjones (Talk) 00:02, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:33, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal images
- File:Atoolred.jpg
- File:ATOOLRED ART.jpg
- File:ATOOLRED THINKYS BEAUTY INFINITY.jpg
- File:ATOOLRED.jpg
- File:Atoolred e8.jpg
--ghouston (talk) 00:04, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:33, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - adverts / promotional.
- File:Nordsee und Hund, Grüße aus dem Nordseebad Carolinensiel.jpg
- File:Die Königsberger Straße im Nordseebad Carolinensiel.jpg
- File:Einparken 2.jpg
- File:Das Wattenmeer vor Harlesiel.jpg
- File:MUTTER.jpg
- File:Was nicht passt.jpg
- File:Scheissleben czischolade.jpg
- File:Scheiss Leben.jpg
- File:Nochn Scheiss Leben.jpg
- File:Dackelkacke.jpg
- File:CZISCHOSTAD2.jpg
- File:Czischolade zum Mitnehmen NEW.jpg
- File:Czischolade XXL mit Toilette.jpg
- File:Czischolade Toilette schwarz.jpg
- File:Czischolade Schrauben nuss.jpg
- File:Czischolade Sanol.jpg
- File:CZISCHOLADE KALORIENREDUZIERT.jpg
- File:Czischolade Installateur.jpg
- File:Czischolade Bikinifigur.jpg
- File:Czischo Sanol Medizin für Heizungsmonteure.jpg
- File:Czischolade 2 NEW.jpg
- File:Czisch Umwälzpumpe.jpg
- File:Czisch Lochfrass.jpg
- File:Czisch Manometer.jpg
- File:Czisch Entlüfterschlüssel.jpg
- File:Czisch Badarmatur seitlich.jpg
- File:WC ist verstopft.jpg
- File:Czischolade leerer Magen.jpg
- File:Rohrbruch in meiner Küche.jpg
- File:Heizungsbau Czisch, Zwischenmahlzeit.jpg
- File:Heizungsbau Czisch, Was nicht passt.jpg
- File:Heizungsbau Czisch, Hanfteller.jpg
- File:Heizungsbau Czisch Der Tatort Rohrbruch.jpg
- File:In Carolinensiel zu erwerben.jpg
- File:Wo ist nur.jpg
- File:Carolinensiel, Ferienhaus Dumont (9).jpg
- File:Die Segelschule in Carolinensiel-Harlesiel.jpg
- File:Zeit für neue Spuren im Sand.jpg
- File:Eine der vielen "Carolade"-Sorten, einfach nur zum Schmunzieln.jpg
- File:Eine der vielen "Carolade"-Sorten, einfach nur zum Schmunzeln.jpg
- File:Der Nordsee-Retriever.jpg
- File:Caro Sanol.jpg
- File:Bevor Ihr fragt.jpg
- File:Birne oder Ei2.jpg
- File:Das Wattenmeer vor Carolinensiel-Harlesiel.jpg
- File:Schnecke quer.jpg
- File:Was nicht passt, wird passend gemacht.jpg
- File:Leute duckt Euch in sw.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
--ghouston (talk) 00:32, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- Comment (probably delete) - Some are out of scope. A few could have their watermarks/captions cropped out and be in-scope, but several of the ones I've looked at so far have also already been published elsewhere with an incompatible or unclear license. File:Die Königsberger Straße im Nordseebad Carolinensiel.jpg is here, File:Was nicht passt.jpg (and some others) are here, etc. It's entirely plausible (even likely) that these were uploaded by the same person, but the other publications pre-date their upload here. — Rhododendrites talk | 13:18, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:33, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gandoler (Gandola) (talk · contribs)
[edit]There are several situations here: 1) drawings by non-notable artist; 2) screenshots from copyrighted video game "Grand Theft Auto; 3) Images of trucks from all over the place, with either no camera data, or variable data... soem have overprinting showing true source. Items 2 and 3 are COM:COPYVIOs, items in group 1) are out of COM:SCOPE.
- File:Gandoler (Plasticine Vehicle).jpg
- File:Gandoler (GHJJHG).jpg
- File:Gandoler Drawing (VMD).jpg
- File:Gandola Volvo.jpg
- File:Gandola Iveco.jpg
- File:Gandola (G868895).jpg obvious copyvio (metadata and [1])
- File:Gandola (5678767).png copyvio [2]
- File:Gandola (5t6y788).jpg copyvio [3]
- File:Gandoler (Red of 1971).jpg
- File:Gandola (5678765).jpg
- File:Gandoler (t600).jpg copyvio [4]
- File:Gandola cabaver.jpg copyvio [5]
- File:Gandola (de granado).jpg watermarked Clasipar.com
- File:Gandoler (de1967).jpg
- File:Gandola 567.jpg
- File:Gandoler (GR).jpg
- File:Gandola Mack Granite.jpg metadata assigns this to Picasa
- File:GTA San Andreas Emmet .png
- File:GTA San Andreas The Aztecas.jpg
- File:GTA San Andreas Vagos.jpg
- File:GTA San Andreas Ballas.jpg
- File:GTA San Andreas Families.jpg
- File:GTA San Andreas Ralph Pendelbury.png
- File:GTA San Andreas Mensajero MCB.png
- File:GTA San Andreas Guppy MCB.png
- File:GTA San Andreas Ran Fa Li.png
- File:GTA San Andreas Jose VLA.png
- File:GTA San Andreas Helena Wankstein.png
- File:GTA San Andreas Michelle Cannes.png
- File:GTA San Andreas Katie Zhan.jpg
- File:GTA San Andreas Dwayne.png
- File:GTA San Andreas Jethro.png
- File:GTA San Andreas Millie Perkins.png
- File:GTA San Andreas Denise Robinson.png
- File:GTA San Andreas T-Bone Méndez.png
- File:GTA San Andreas Jizzy B.png
- File:GTA San Andreas Su Xi Mu.jpg
- File:GTA San Andreas TheTruth.jpg
- File:GTA San Andreas Johnny Sindacco.png
- File:GTA San Andreas Salvatore Leone .jpg
- File:GTA San Andreas Ken Rosenberg.jpg
- File:GTA San Andreas Kent Paul.jpg
- File:GTA San Andreas B Dup.png
- File:GTA San Andreas Big Bear.png
- File:GTA San Andreas Big Smoke.png
- File:GTA San Andreas Cesar Vialpando.jpg
- File:GTA San Andreas Ryber.png
- File:GTA San Andreas Woozie.jpg
- File:GTA San Andreas Eddie Pulaski.png
- File:GTA San Andreas Zero.jpg
- File:GTA San Andreas OG Loc.jpg
- File:GTA San Andreas Sweet.jpg
- File:GTA San Andreas Jimmy Hernandez.jpg
- File:GTA San Andreas Frank Tenpenny.png
- File:GTA San Andreas Mike Toreno.png
- File:GTA San Andreas Maccer.jpg
- File:GTA San Andreas Catalina.png
- File:GTA San Andreas Kendl Johnson.png
- File:Gta san andreas madd dogg.jpg
- File:GTA San Andreas Loco Syndicate.png
- File:GTA San Andreas CJ and Families.jpg
- File:GTA San Andreas CJ. Sweet. Ryder. Big Smoke.jpg
- File:GTA San Andreas Gameplay.jpg
- File:GTA San Andreas BETA.jpg
- File:GTA San Andreas Carl Johnson.jpg
- File:1984 Mack Gandola GTA San Andreas.jpg
- File:1986 Mack Gandola GTA San Andreas.jpg
- File:Peterbilt 359 Gandola GTA SA.jpg
- File:1972 Peterbilt Gandola GTA San Andreas.jpg
- File:1974 GMC Gandola GTA San Andreas.jpg
- File:Gandola Linerunner-GTALCS-front.jpg
- File:Gandola Linerunner GTA 3.jpg
- File:Gandola 462.jpg
- File:Gta Gandola Roadtrain SA.jpg
- File:Gandola Roadtrain GTA SA PS2.jpg
- File:Gandola 359 GTA.png
- File:Gandola GTA 3.jpg
- File:Gandola GTA VCS.jpg
- File:Gandola Tanker GTA SA PS2.jpg
- File:Gandola Linerunner GTA PS2.jpg
- File:Gta Gandola Linerunner.jpg
- File:Gta Gandola Tanker.jpg
- File:GTA San Andreas and Gandola.jpg
- File:GTA San Andreas Gandola.png
- File:Gandola de GTA San Andreas.jpg
- File:Juguete de Gandola.jpg derivative work of a copyrighted model
- File:Gandola Trident 34567.jpg
- File:Gandola Trident.jpg copyvio [6]
- File:Categorás de Gandola.jpg
- File:Gandola Sanford 5678.jpg
- File:Gandola Sanford 189.jpg derivative work/video frame [7]
- File:Gandola Sanford.jpg
- File:Gandola Amarilla.jpg
- File:Gandola 389.jpg
- File:Gandola 379.jpg
- File:Gandola Ironore.jpg
- File:Gandola VBT.jpg
- File:Gandola Azul.jpg
- File:Gandola de transporte.jpg
- File:Gandola Roja.jpg
- File:Gandola más Larga.jpg
- File:Gandolas de Estados Unidos.jpg
- File:Gandolas Estadounidenses.jpg
- File:Gandola R600.jpg
- File:Gandola de la Larga.jpg
- File:Gandola de Pdvsa.jpg
- File:Gandola de Venezuela.jpg copyvio [8]
- File:Gandola de Garga.jpg
- File:Gandola Verde.jpg watermarked Clasipar.com
- File:Gandola de carreteras.jpg copyvio [9]
- File:Scania 113 Gandola.jpg
- File:Tipo de Gandola.jpg
- File:Gandola de Ve.jpg
- File:Gandolas tractoras.jpg
- File:Gandola Mack.jpg copyvio [10]
- File:Gandola Plataforma.jpg
- File:Gandola Argentina.jpg
- File:1974 Peterbilt Gandola of Clay.jpg
- File:Gandola de Carga.jpg
- File:Gandola más Grande.jpg
- File:Bahciomula.jpg
- File:Gandola Venezolana.jpg
- File:Martha Hunt official drawing.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
![[5]](https://i3.ytimg.com/vi/CiifDtIIabw/0.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
![[6]](https://www.thetruckersreport.com/images/TruckSide.jpg){kind=link}
Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:54, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
More images added below for discussion. De728631 (talk) 00:13, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
- File:Gandoler (QMIKHJ).jpg
- File:Gandoler EDMKTI.jpg
- File:Gandoler (MLHJHY).jpg
- File:Gandoler KIGHHG.jpg
- File:Gandoler MNGFGH.jpg
- File:Gandoler HNMVJV.jpg
- File:Gandoler FGHFDFG.jpg
- File:Gandoler (098y66kjhgnh).jpg
- File:Gandola 382 n (1).jpg
- File:Gandola Frmku.jpg
- File:Gandola C8NA.jpg
- File:Gandoler in Green.jpg
- File:Gandoler de Roms.jpg
- File:Gandola de Rojo.jpg
- File:Gandola White.jpg
- File:Gandoler hnfgjh955678.jpg
- File:Gandoler (LLKOJUG).jpg
- File:Gandoler (hjnm0998797).jpg
- File:Gandoler C7fghjhgfg.jpg
- File:Gandoler ihgfghjkjh.jpg
- File:Gandoler 0979585456.jpg
- File:Gandoler Gojuhyjk.jpg
- File:Gandoler OOgfghjhgvghj.jpg
- File:Gandoler rgtyuytrtyu.jpg
- File:Gandoler of tyuiuytgyui.jpg
- File:Gandoler Touyyhuiuyh.jpg
- File:Gandoler (Rmbjhgh845678).jpg
- File:Gandoler (nfcdfgh78987).jpg
- File:Gandoler (blackred0096575).jpg
- File:Gandoler (0000767545654).jpg
- File:Gandoler (1976).jpg
- File:Gandoler (GIKM8068).jpg
- File:Gandoler PG56776.jpg
- File:Gandoler (YTKW9575).jpg
- File:Gandoler (9600096677).jpg
- File:Gandoler 359.jpg
- File:Gandoler Neo.jpg
- File:Gandoler (6785677400).jpg
- File:Gandoler (6785677400).jpg
- File:Gandoler (0567654345).jpg
- File:Gandoler (GR6774567645).jpg
- File:Gandoler (GR00567886).jpg
- File:Gandoler (GR8586).jpg
- File:Gandoler (Vehiculo de los años 1950, 1960, 1970 ).jpg looks like a scan from a magazine
- File:Nu Girls.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Delete all. I have marked some obvious copyvios and the rest is either out of scope or highly questionable as Ellin has already noted. E.g. this upload by the same user had been extracted from a book cover. De728631 (talk) 21:19, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- I have blocked Gandoler (Gandola) (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information) for one week after he uploaded this and other new obvious copyright infringements. Other new uploads have been listed above for discussion. De728631 (talk) 00:13, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:37, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Annamaria2004 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Dubious"own" works (small resolutions)
- File:Тимур Еремеев.jpg
- File:Рина Гришина.png
- File:АЛЕКСАНДРА КУЗЕНКИНА (2).jpg
- File:Александра Кузенкина.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
2003:45:5C47:D201:EC9B:DFD:EF5D:59B3 10:31, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 22:25, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
probable copyvio, see signature of painter down right Pippobuono (talk) 10:35, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 22:24, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Pardon, Bild ist nicht sichtbar (auch bei 2 Versuchen...), wird auf keiner Seite verwendet, Quelle und Beschreibung deshalb nicht erfasst. Vorab ein Dankeschön für die Bemühungen! Petrus3743 (talk) 00:05, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:38, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Previously published at http://www.aysor.am/am/news/2017/02/20/%D5%96%D5%A5%D5%AC%D5%AB%D6%84%D5%BD-%D5%91%D5%B8%D5%AC%D5%A1%D5%AF%D5%B5%D5%A1%D5%B6/1215489, no evidence that uploader is the copyright holder. --ghouston (talk) 00:13, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - A reverse image search shows it has been published in several other locations, as well, prior to its upload. — Rhododendrites talk | 12:23, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:38, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Tiger logo is copyrighted; unlikely that the uploader is the actual author. Corkythehornetfan (ping me) 00:25, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:38, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted 3-d artwork Wcam (talk) 03:33, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:39, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Replaced by wikitext. Nothingserious (talk) 05:04, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:39, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
The copyright of this image belongs to Lithuanian embassy (Lithuanian "ambasada") in Germany (see for example http://www.delfi.lt/news/daily/lithuania/berlyne-rastas-vasario-16-osios-akto-originalas-lietuviu-kalba.d?id=74205398) Powermelon (talk) 05:25, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:39, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
file was renamed so this redirect page needs to be removed Saschaporsche (talk) 05:31, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:39, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
logo from not notable company; no permission either, previously also deleted MoiraMoira (talk) 05:45, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:39, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Replaceable by File:2C-D-Chemdraw.png, which is larger/higher-res and has clear bg DMacks (talk) 05:49, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:44, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Small/low-res and with non-standard typography for the primes. Category:Tertiary amino group has several better equivalents DMacks (talk) 05:56, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:44, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Image was previously published on external websites, although of lower resolution. Per standard practice, OTRS permission is needed from the copyright holder of this image. ★ Poké95 05:57, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:44, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Dubious "own" works. They belong to a deleted article, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:S I Nw KRPC.jpg
- File:TRAD.jpg
- File:Simon traditional.jpg
- File:"Simon I Nwakacha KRPC".jpg
- File:Simon I Nwakacha KRPC.jpg
- File:"Simon Nwakacha KRPC".jpg
- File:Nwakacha family.jpg
- File:Simon Nwakacha KRPC.jpg
- File:Simon KRPC.jpg
2003:45:5C47:D201:EC9B:DFD:EF5D:59B3 06:24, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:44, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
no permission by the photographer 2003:45:5C47:D201:EC9B:DFD:EF5D:59B3 06:35, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:44, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Same problem as in Commons:Deletion requests/File:At Sony Renaults Guilds Award.jpg. Username same as the subject in the photograph but claim of own work. All other uploads by the user have been deleted previously. There is a possible issue of socking too. Rahul Bott (talk) 06:44, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:45, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
out of scope, low-res, unkown child Xgeorg (talk) 07:58, 30 March 2017 (UTC) image was uploaded in order to coincide with article Curr Granger
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:45, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hisilva ,.,..,, (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused personal files
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
2003:45:5C47:D201:EC9B:DFD:EF5D:59B3 08:36, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:45, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
An OTRS ticket and a description would be fine
2003:45:5C47:D201:EC9B:DFD:EF5D:59B3 08:48, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:45, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
unused personal file 2003:45:5C47:D201:EC9B:DFD:EF5D:59B3 08:51, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:45, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Mapa incorrecto; mezcla Atenas con Tarento. Dodecaedro (talk) 09:05, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: as per COM:INUSE -- used in 3 pages. --Daphne Lantier 00:47, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal file 2003:45:5C47:D201:EC9B:DFD:EF5D:59B3 09:23, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:47, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kpnchowdharys (talk · contribs)
[edit]no permissions
- File:Adhintrs.jpg
- File:Allarintr.jpg
- File:Naantr.jpg
- File:Nagimg.jpg
- File:Sumhadrt.jpg
- File:Andhantr.jpg
2003:45:5C47:D201:EC9B:DFD:EF5D:59B3 09:38, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. --Daphne Lantier 00:46, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AdrishIndab (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused personal files
2003:45:5C47:D201:EC9B:DFD:EF5D:59B3 09:40, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:47, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope.
FDMS 4 10:37, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:50, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
unused personal files
2003:45:5C47:D201:EC9B:DFD:EF5D:59B3 09:43, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:48, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:48, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:48, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Akash Khokhariya (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused personal files
- File:Akash Khokhariya.jpg
- File:Akash Khokhariya 2.jpg
- File:Akash Khokhariya 1.jpg
- File:Safe image (1).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
2003:45:5C47:D201:EC9B:DFD:EF5D:59B3 09:52, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:48, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
unused personal file 2003:45:5C47:D201:EC9B:DFD:EF5D:59B3 09:56, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:48, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Probably uploaded without permission, by a new user Kürschner (talk) 09:58, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. --Daphne Lantier 00:48, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rajeshkannan yadav (talk · contribs)
[edit]very low educational value
2003:45:5C47:D201:EC9B:DFD:EF5D:59B3 10:21, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:48, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
unused personal file 2003:45:5C47:D201:EC9B:DFD:EF5D:59B3 10:25, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:48, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Raudalkhudri (talk · contribs)
[edit]It is unclear if the files were allowed to be uploaded under their present license by their copyright holders: missing COM:PERMISSION. To uploader: Please follow procedure laid out in Commons:OTRS. - Takeaway (talk) 11:10, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- File:Peta Menuju Sawarna.png
- File:Surfing Sawarna.jpg
- File:Sunset Sawarna.jpg
- File:Peta Kawasan Sawarna.jpg
- File:Karang Taraje Beach.jpg
- File:Visit Pesona Sawarna Logo.png
- File:Curug Cihear.jpg
- File:Masjid Agung Al-A'raf.jpg
- File:Tanjung Layar Beach.jpg
- File:Icon of Tanjung Layar Beach.jpg
- File:Sawarna Beach.jpg
- File:Lambang Kabupaten Lebak.png
- File:Hasbi Jayabaya.png
- File:Mulyadi Jayabaya.jpg
- File:Achmad Dimyati Natakusumah.jpg
- File:Notable Bantenese.jpg
- File:Syafruddin Prawiranegara.jpg
- File:KH Tubagus Falak.jpg
- File:Ma'ruf Amin.jpg
- File:KH Tubagus Ahmad Bakri.jpg
- File:Slamet Rahardjo.jpg
- File:Syekh Asnawi.jpg
- File:Taufiequrachman Ruki.jpg
- File:Armand Maulana.jpg
- File:Trio Wijaya.jpg
- File:Abuya Muhtadi Dimyathi.jpg
- File:Sunan Gunungjati.png
- File:Tokoh Banten.jpg
- File:K.H. Tubagus Ahmad Bakri as-Sampuri.jpg
- File:Abuya Dimyathi.jpg
- File:Syekh Nawawi al-Bantani.jpg
- File:Sketsa Ageng Tirtayasa dari Banten.jpg
- File:Sketsa Maulana Hasanuddin dari Banten.jpg
- File:Bantenese people.png
- File:Raud al-Khudri official portrait.jpg
- File:Banten Sultanate Emblem.png
- File:Sultan Banten terima mandat.jpg
- File:Penyematan-sultan2.jpg
- File:Sultan Syarif Muhammad ash-Shafiuddin.png
Takeaway (talk) 10:35, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Takeaway I had permission from relevant parties to upload a file that I uploaded on Wikimedia Commons. so I beg Takeaway to reconsider the abolition of the files I upload (do not delete them), because these files to complete the article which I edited. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Raudalkhudri (talk • contribs) 11:03, 30 March 2017 (UTC) (UTC)
- Raudalkhudri, to ensure that the copyright holders have given their consent, please follow the procedure as set out in COM:OTRS. Wikimedia Commons can not rely on the uploader's say-so concerning copyright issues. - Takeaway (talk) 11:10, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- Takeaway, I have sent an email in accordance with the existing procedures at COM:OTRS. Furthermore, what should I do? even from some of the files to be deleted is my own work previously unpublished except I uploaded on Wikimedia Commons. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Raudalkhudri (talk • contribs) 06:43, 31 March 2017 (UTC) (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Let OTRS undelete them if permissions are legit. Even after being blocked for "Uploading unfree files after warnings", this uploader has continued to do so. Since 06:43, 31 March 2017 (UTC), all this uploader has done is remove delete tags, remove additional files listed in the idw notice, remove most of the files listed in this DR, and remove this DR's transclusion from Commons:Deletion requests/2017/03/30. None of those actions are acceptable, and all of them appear to be in bad faith. I have reversed all of them, tagged all the files with {{OTRS pending}}, and warned the user in the strongest possible terms. @Magog the Ogre: , as the previous blocking admin, I thought you should know about these actions. — Jeff G. ツ 14:35, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks, Jeff. I have no special advice; I noticed copyright violations so I blocked. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:37, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:50, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Raudalkhudri (talk · contribs) 2
[edit]Falsely attributed to the General Elections Commission of the Republic of Indonesia though images are owned by different political parties.
- File:Sayid Fadhal Alhamid, 2014.jpg
- File:Sayed Mustafa Usab Al Idroes.jpg
- File:Sayed Mustafa Usab Al-Idroes, SE, M.Si.jpg
- File:Tb Dedy Mi'ing Gumelar.jpg
- File:Abdul Hakim Bafagih.jpg
- File:Dr. Tb. H. Ace Hasan Syadzily, M.Si.jpg
- File:Sayed Junaidi Rizaldi.jpg
- File:Husin Shahab.jpg
- File:Muannas Alaidid.jpg
- File:Tsamara Amany.jpg
- File:Habib Aboe Bakar Alhabsyi, S.E.jpg
- File:Rahma Sarita Al Jufri, S.H.jpg
- File:Najwa Shihab.jpg
- File:Irman Gusman.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:12, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
- Hi, Patrick Rogel. Previously I thanked you for monitoring my activities and contributions in the Commons. I honestly object with the delete tag that you attached to some photos that I uploaded in the Commons, while the photo license is the public domain because it was published by the Government of the Republic of Indonesia (with the domain .go.id, I use the template PD-IDGov) through the official website of the Republic of Indonesia General Election Commission (http://www.kpu.go.id). If you see similar photos also published by other websites such as http://pemilu.asia/, https://pintarmemilih.id/, https://jariungu.com/, or https://kbr.id/, because they took their sources (including official photos of legislative candidates) from the official website of kpu.go.id, and their licenses remain with the Government of the Republic of Indonesia. Actually, I and other users from Indonesia not the first time upload some photos to Commons with sources from the official website published by the Government of the Republic of Indonesia such as kpu.go.id, dpr.go.id, dpd.go.id, indonesia.go.id, or other sites. Even most of the photos of the Governor or former governor in Indonesia uploaded to the Commons are publications from the official sites of their respective provincial governments. Photographs of DPR and DPD members are also the results of publications from the official website dpr.go.id and dpd.go.id. All of them use the PD-IDGov template and so far it is fine. With all due respect, I hope you can delete the delete tags that you added to some of the photos that I uploaded according to the reasons I mentioned above. :) Raudalkhudri (talk) 17:45, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Raudalkhudri: I think it's exactly the contrary: for example the General Elections Commission is using KDR party images (which have been deleted already by an Administrator) as well of images of other parties. Nevertheless an Administrator will find out which files have been published first and who has copied who. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:53, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete all per nom and the previous DR above. File:Abdul Hakim Bafagih.jpg is already gone. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 23:11, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; user blocked for copyvio's. --Gbawden (talk) 08:06, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Zeeshan Rajpoot (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused personal files
- File:Zeshan Amjad.jpg
- File:Ali Babral.jpg
- File:Ali babral.jpg
- File:Zeshan Babral.gpg.jpg
- File:Zeshan Babral.jpg
2003:45:5C47:D201:EC9B:DFD:EF5D:59B3 10:34, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:50, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
некорректное изображение герба Alexandronikos (talk) 10:46, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:51, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Dubious "own" work 2003:45:5C47:D201:EC9B:DFD:EF5D:59B3 11:03, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Delete Older in use at http://www.forum.tak-site.com/thread14376.html. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:20, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:51, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
As requested at the talk page Info-farmer (talk) 11:02, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:52, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
unused personal file 2003:45:5C47:D201:EC9B:DFD:EF5D:59B3 11:06, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:52, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
The image have been uploaded without having obtained the permission of the owners. Bagas Chrisara (talk) 11:07, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:52, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
unused personal file 2003:45:5C47:D201:EC9B:DFD:EF5D:59B3 11:10, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:52, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Promotional image. Blythwood (talk) 11:11, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- This image was used only in vanity pages, now deleted, about the uploader, on English Wikipedia. The editor is now indefinitely blocked on English Wikipedia, and the image has no conceivable use within scope for Commons, so it should be deleted. JamesBWatson (talk) 16:48, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:52, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
unused personal file 2003:45:5C47:D201:EC9B:DFD:EF5D:59B3 11:11, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:52, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Promotional image. Blythwood (talk) 11:11, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:52, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Photomontage. A free source for each images must be given. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:14, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:52, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Protégé par le droit d'auteur. Thesupermat (talk) 11:20, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:52, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Protégé par le droit d'auteur. Thesupermat (talk) 11:20, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:52, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Protégé par le droit d'auteur. Thesupermat (talk) 11:20, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:52, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
License not clear. Loader (Isanova) and author (Jesús María del Rincón) seem different people. Macucal (talk) 11:24, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:53, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Spam and the article deleted ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 12:09, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:53, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
titre modifié, plus précis Fagairolles 34 (talk) 12:31, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:54, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
renommé, correction orthographe Fagairolles 34 (talk) 12:40, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:54, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Does not comply with the Wikipedia rules - not licensed under CC Vmario97 (talk) 13:08, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:54, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
copyright infringement Pugilist (talk) 13:49, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:54, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyright infringement Pugilist (talk) 13:50, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:54, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
См. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Images_reliant_on_OTRS_ticket_2011101010016175 Dogad75 (talk) 13:57, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:55, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
См. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Images_reliant_on_OTRS_ticket_2011101010016175 Dogad75 (talk) 13:58, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:55, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
См. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Images_reliant_on_OTRS_ticket_2011101010016175 Dogad75 (talk) 13:58, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:55, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
СМ. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Images_reliant_on_OTRS_ticket_2011101010016175 Dogad75 (talk) 13:59, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:55, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hassan19ful (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:55, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://flockler.com/thumbs/5536/_dsc6782--hunof5ew8r_s1800x0_q80_noupscale.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:56, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:56, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Erldenmile (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos and drawing. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
- File:Billy Weston's Billiards Saloon, Coolgardie circa 1896.pdf
- File:William (Billy) Weston, billiard champion - circa 1920.pdf
- File:1948 aerial view US Navy 7NAD, Springhill.png
- File:1948 Aerial view RAAF No 6 Replenishment Centre, Muresk.png
- File:1941 aerial view of 7BSD - Spencers Brook.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:56, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by JUAN JAVIER ARROYO CARVACHE (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:56, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Historical book. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:56, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:57, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Brodonswhite (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused advertisement of questionable notability. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Characteristics and Uses of Optical Termination Box from Greentelftth.pdf
- File:Greentelftthcom.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:57, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:57, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:57, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Copyright not expired; CC0 does not apply, see Commons:Deletion requests/Images from muis.ee. 62.65.58.38 14:29, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:57, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Publicity of "Büyüleyici güzel Ela" internet pages (LGBT dating) E4024 (talk) 14:30, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:57, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused map of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:57, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:57, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:57, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://x3.wykop.pl/cdn/c3201142/comment_GLA5x8Ru7XYjSO0okeh3gbT71axYu1Q0.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:58, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Promo photos and logo. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Jad.jpg
- File:Jovenesad.jpg
- File:Logojadejido.jpg.jpg
- File:Juventudad.jpg.jpg
- File:Jadejidosesiondiajuventud.jpg.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:58, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jonsturmcom (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos and document. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
- File:General Herman Sturm 1831-1906.png
- File:General Herman Sturm and Anna Lubbe Sturm 50th Wedding Anniversary Commemorative Plaque.jpg
- File:Anna Lubbe Sturm 1835-1903.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:58, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Maher Mzowak - Dubai film Fes.jpg
- File:Maher Mzowak.jpg
- File:جيسي المر.jpg
- File:Sadeq Jarrar.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:58, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Umjetnostbalkana (talk · contribs)
[edit]Modern art. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.
- File:Stevan Aleksic Autoportret Sa Seljankama 1919.jpg
- File:Uros Toskovic Monstrum 1982.jpg
- File:Uros Toskovic Nude 1953.jpg
- File:Uros Toskovic Ribar 1972.jpg
- File:Boza Ilic Akt Devojke.jpg
- File:Djordje Andrejevic Kun No Passaran.jpg
- File:Uros Toskovic Akt.jpg
- File:Zora Petrovic Akt Zene.jpg
- File:Uros Toskovic Glava.jpg
- File:Borivoje Bora Stevanovic Autoportret.jpg
- File:Djordje Andrejevic Kun Studija devojke sa lutkom 1949.jpg
- File:Petar Lubarda Fantasticna Zver 1953.jpg
- File:Vasa Pomorisac Kartasi 1924.jpg
- File:Petar Lubarda Crnogorski Krs 1966.png
- File:Petar Lubarda Konj u trku 1965.jpg
- File:Petar Lubarda Bik 1971.jpg
- File:Petar Lubarda Konji.jpg
- File:Petar Lubarda Selo Cekanje.jpg
- File:Petar Lubarda Guslar.jpg
- File:Sinisa Vukovic Plavi Enterijer oko 1955.jpg
- File:Sinisa Vukovic Dve Gracije 1994.jpg
- File:Sinisa Vukovic Nadrealisticni Predeo 1992.jpg
- File:Bogoljub Boba Jovanovic Autoportret 1950.jpg
- File:Atanasije Popovic Rudari II decenija XX veka.jpg
- File:Borivoje Bora Stevanovic Savinacka Crkva.jpg
- File:Vasa Pomorisac Portret Kr. C. Pomorisac 1943.jpg
- File:Leposava Bela Pavlovic Bolestan Sam 1949.jpg
- File:Zivko Grozdanic Gera 2015-2016.jpg
- File:Leposava Bela Pavlovic Akt Devojke 1932.jpg
- File:Slavoljub Slava Bogojevic 1965 Enformel.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:58, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
- File:Вывоз леса Кирьяново.jpg
- File:Кирьяново детский дом.jpg
- File:Записки краеведа.jpg
- File:Бахматов АА.jpg
- File:Трукшин АП.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:58, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Image appears to be part of a series found at http://www.mining-technology.com/projects/sangdong-tungsten-molybdenum-project/sangdong-tungsten-molybdenum-project3.html, notice uniforms, Korean lettering on helmets, type of rock, type of equipment, etc. No indication of this user's own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:01, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:58, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Younghyun.ju (talk · contribs)
[edit]This group of files is all about Tungsten & Molybdenum mining: it includes mineral photos, core photos, diagrams, 3d diagrams, and pictures of equipment. The sizes are widely variable. Of all the uploader's images, only 3 had metadata - to 3 different cameras. The diagrams are blurry, and all indications point to this being a group of photos from somewhere else, by many someone else's all uploaded and claimed as own work.
- File:GSM 6.jpg
- File:GSM 10.jpg
- File:GSM 7.jpg
- File:GSM 4.jpg
- File:SDH 1.jpg
- File:GSM 9.jpg
- File:GSM 8.jpg
- File:GSM 5.jpg
- File:F-8.10.jpg
- File:Underground drilling operator.jpg
- File:Woulfe Adit.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:05, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:59, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
это террористическая организация. Вики не пропагандирует терроризм 213.154.218.111 09:44, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- очередной галушкистанский бред. обсуждать тут нечего, я так полагаю. --Nicolay Sidorov (talk) 10:05, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- This is a non-starter appeal for deleting the flag. See NOTCENCORED. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 21:05, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: The named source has an explicit copyright notice at the bottom. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:33, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by MaxBioHazard as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: This isn't PD-UA-exempt, because DPR isn't an Ukrainian administrative unit. File is widely in use, this argument is not cut-and-dried. Changing from speedy to Another Deletion Request on this same file. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:09, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- Strongly oppose the file is based on free files which are the previous flag of DNR and the COA. --Panam2014 (talk) 16:58, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
@Nicolay Sidorov, Iryna Harpy, MrPenguin20, Elevatorrailfan, and Ян Веретенников: --Panam2014 (talk) 16:59, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- Strongly oppose - This image, including copyright vio, has been discussed at length twice (here and here). Please take note of the scope of the discussion. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 20:07, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: as per Iryna Harpy. --Daphne Lantier 01:02, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
No indication of user's own work on this logo, very small and blurry. Needs source other than "own work" to verify license. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:14, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:03, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FOP in Italy Elisfkc (talk) 15:25, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:03, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:31, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:03, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo with personal identifyable info, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:34, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:03, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Bild eines noch nicht 70 Jahre verstorben Künstlers, Rechte des hochladers nicht ersichtlich Lutheraner (talk) 15:35, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:03, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Bild eines noch nicht 70 Jahre verstorben Künstlers, Rechte des Hochladers nicht ersichtlich Lutheraner (talk) 15:36, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:34, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
COM:COPYVIO This was formerly sent to speedy, but the tag was removed and it was tossed back in the pile. What was missed by the tag remover, was the "FBMD" in metadata, the file size and that this image has obviously been in and out of Facebook before coming here. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:38, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- Comment: I removed the tag because:
- The uploader has not been warned for that, so, a deletion could been uoyt of process.
- Yes, I noticed tha FBMD in the Exif, but I'm not the kind of person who thinks everyones commits copyvio without providing proof.
- I'll not vote here. Let the uploader answering the DR. --Amitie 10g (talk) 22:05, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:46, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
This was previously sent to speedy but the tag was removed and the image tossed back in the pile. It's from a 2016 publication, no indication the book was licensed as this image is here. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:40, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:46, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
This image was formerly sent to speedy, but then the tag was removed and image tossed back in the pile without note. Please see that this image has the word "Landinux" in it, same as "source" and same as "author" which is doubtful, if you look at the logo in lower right corner. Similar image http://landinux.org/data/diapos/liberez_vos_ordinateurs/img/image-logo-landinux.png Their legal statements are at https://www.landes.fr/mentions-legales, I see "Toute reproduction totale ou partielle de ces marques ou de ces logos, effectuée à partir des éléments du site sans l'autorisation expresse du Département des Landes est donc prohibée, au sens de l'article L.713-2 du Code de la propriété intellectuelle." which would suggest this image can't be hosted on Commons and is indeed a copyright, despite having its copyvio tag removed. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:43, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:46, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
This is likely not a work made by a US government employee at the NIH. The source page credits it to Judith Stoffer and has a CC-by-NC-sa licence which would be incompatible with Commons. The NIH frequently uses third-party works and credits the authors, and this seems to be one of them. De728631 (talk) 16:02, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete I'm the original person that raised a question about this image, and I'm new to wikipedia, so I don't even know if I'm supposed to comment on this. However, I looked at some other deletion requests discussions and there are keep or delete comments, so I'll add my opinion. Not only is this image of questionable compatibility for the commons, but it also isn't very good. I'm working on improving the article that it was on, and wouldn't bother to include it in the revised version of the article. It isn't worth keeping, even if compatible, IMHO. JeanOhm (talk) 14:21, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:47, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
License fail: would be owned by whoever you asked to take the picture. And part of a pattern of license-vio and spam for this editor's company (admins can see his deleted history) DMacks (talk) 16:05, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- ...and by other COI evidence, is actually likely as part of uploader's job, so the license would be owned by the company. DMacks (talk) 19:43, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:48, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
possibility of COM:PACKAGING ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 16:37, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:48, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Pictures of a journalist without permission possibility of copyvios.
- File:LuisCostaBonino 3.jpg
- File:LuisCostaBonino.jpg
- File:LuisCostaBonino2.jpg
- File:Blanca-Rodriguez UY.jpg
- File:Blanca - Rodriguez2 UY.jpg
- File:Líber Seregni BR.jpg
- File:Blanca Rodriguez 3.jpg
- File:Ministras BR.jpg
- File:Blanca-rodriguez1.jpg
- File:BlancaRod.jpg
✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 16:58, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:48, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Salisapants (talk · contribs)
[edit]I have concerns that these may not be legally uploaded. The uploader describes them as their own work, but I do see these images reproduced on a number of websites and Etsy selling sites, suggesting that these are commercial images put out by a wholesaler. For example, if you look at this web shop, there are images clearly showing the same garments in different poses and views. I cannot make any clear link between the uploader's name "Salisapants" and these images, apart from their uploads. If you look at the file descriptions, these were clearly uploaded as advertising for the uploader's shop (here, but it has not been updated since 2015). These images are usually taken from a central inventory for the use of wholesalers/cheap clothing vendors, which is why alternative views appear on other seller pages and sites. We should probably err on the side of caution here and delete them, as they are highly unlikely to be the uploader's own photographs, and have all the hallmarks of being commercial photographs, even though they are not the best quality ones. The fact that there are so many alternative views floating around unconnected vendor websites is a strong indicator that they were uploaded by an advertiser.
- File:Pancake pants.jpg
- File:Brown Pants.jpg
- File:Green Skirt.jpg
- File:Bangkok pants.jpg
- File:Hippie pants.jpg
- File:Elephant pants.jpg
- File:Boho pants.jpg
- File:Harem pants.jpg
Mabalu (talk) 17:04, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:49, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
This is not used on any file page and looks like a test case rather than like a true licence. Creative Commons has no corresponding type of national licence and there is no external source given that could be used for attribution. De728631 (talk) 17:15, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete this is not a valid license that's why you get the pirate flag (see {{Cc-country-flags}}). Multichill (talk) 17:40, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete as unused and unlikely to be used license template, since CC does not have bd version of Cc-by-sa-3.0. --Jarekt (talk) 19:14, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:49, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work': potentially personality rights isusses, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 18:11, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:49, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work': thumbnail format, potentially personality rights isusses, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin, hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 18:17, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:50, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Image contain no EXIF Meta Data and has no proper information about the source - Indrajit Das (Talk - Contribs) 18:25, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:50, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify notability as imho rather 'profiling', but also potentially personality rights isusses, hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? btw: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 18:26, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:50, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Copyright Image without information regarding source and without EXIF meta data - Indrajit Das (Talk - Contribs) 18:29, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:50, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work': rather small-sized format as the other related uploads, potentially personality rights isusses, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin, hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 18:30, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:50, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work': potentially personality rights isusses, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 18:38, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:50, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work': one-file-upload, potentially personality rights isusses, hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 18:46, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:50, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Not credibly own work, file has no associated OTRS ticket and no metadata, likely copyright violation, delete per precautionary principle KDS4444 (talk) 18:49, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:50, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted and no EXIF Meta data also blurry Image - Indrajit Das (Talk - Contribs) 18:59, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:50, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work': rather small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 19:02, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:51, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work': one-file-upload, potentially personality rights isusses, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 19:12, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:51, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
No information has been provided reagarding source, Low resolution image and also EXIF Meta Data missing - Indrajit Das (Talk - Contribs) 19:15, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:52, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by GabrielaLolota (talk · contribs)
[edit]- File:LoloTaBellapink.jpg – [11]
- File:LoloTaBella.jpg – [12]
- File:LoloTaBellabalcony.jpg – [13]
- File:LoloTaBellastory.jpg – [14]
Files of the Czech Bimbo Barbie found elsewhere on the web (Instagram account and other sites). Unlikely to be own work. Missing OTRS → copyright violation. --Kacir (talk) 20:16, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:52, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
The Flickr account owner does not seem to have the rights of this card, issued by Uribe Kostako Irakurzaleen Txokoa Discasto talk 20:47, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:52, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope. Also unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 23:28, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:53, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 23:29, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:53, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FOP in France Elisfkc (talk) 23:32, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:53, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files in Category:Photographs taken on 2012-09-19
[edit]No FOP in France
- File:Disney - panoramio (10).jpg
- File:Disney - panoramio (11).jpg
- File:Disney - panoramio (12).jpg
- File:Disney - panoramio (13).jpg
- File:Disney - panoramio (6).jpg
- File:Disney - panoramio (7).jpg
- File:Disney - panoramio (8).jpg
- File:Disney - panoramio (9).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Elisfkc (talk) 23:33, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:54, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
O arquivo foi editado e não tem nenhuma licença livre para esta imagem vou deixar os links para você ver: https://www.flickr.com/photos/marcogomes/6931371130 - http://www.ebc.com.br/noticias/brasil/2013/10/tenente-suspeito-de-envolvimento-com-pcc-e-preso-pela-corregedoria-da-pm - http://outracidade.uol.com.br/arquivo-como-e-o-sistema-de-funcionamento-do-pcc-nas-cadeias/ Leonardo Gabriel Vieira Torres (talk) 23:44, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:54, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
logo, fair bit of complex shading, probably greater than TOO Ronhjones (Talk) 23:46, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:54, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
License doesn't provide anything viable to confirm authenticity of signature, and overall image quality is subpar to begin with when the words are somewhat small at typical image size while blurry when expanded. SNUGGUMS (talk) 23:56, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:54, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the photographer would have died before 1942. Jcb (talk) 23:58, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:54, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Complex logo - not text and simple shapes Ronhjones (Talk) 00:43, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete, but transfer first to the French Wikipedia, where it is used. --Amitie 10g (talk) 01:16, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:02, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
No evidence that this user is the copyright holder; more likely a non-free use logo David Biddulph (talk) 01:46, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Change license to {{PD-textlogo}} Ronhjones (Talk) 19:01, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: simple textlogo. --Daphne Lantier 02:05, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ronhjones as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: logo. Bellow the TOO in the UK? Amitie 10g (talk) 04:27, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as per COM:PCP. --Daphne Lantier 02:06, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
no educational purpose Joschi71 (talk) 08:59, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: Why? This is a beautiful and good quality shoot of a path, and properly categorised. No valid reason for deletion. --Amitie 10g (talk) 22:19, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Daphne Lantier 02:07, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ronhjones as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: logo. Bellow the TOO in the EU? Amitie 10g (talk) 04:29, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo. --Yann (talk) 09:14, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
The copyright of this image belongs to Lithuanian embassy (Lithuanian "ambasada") in Germany (see for example http://www.delfi.lt/news/daily/lithuania/berlyne-rastas-vasario-16-osios-akto-originalas-lietuviu-kalba.d?id=74205398) Powermelon (talk) 05:24, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- Still, I think it can be licensed as not replaceable historical image as it is the first photo taken of this act and the act currently is not available for public as it is protected by Federal Foreign Office Political Archive of Germany. Furthermore, this photo belongs not to the Lithuanian embassy, but more likely to Liudas Mažylis who discovered this act. This article has photos of him showing this photo to others (possibly Lithuanian embassy personnel): http://www.delfi.lt/news/daily/lithuania/vokietija-patvirtina-kad-rastas-vasario-16-osios-aktas-sveikina-lietuva.d?id=74215860. -- Pofka (talk) 11:53, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Nonsense. Keep. No editio princeps (25 years protection in the EC) because the work is published long ago. No protection according German Lichtbildschutz because made with a scanner. --Historiograf (talk) 14:57, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep. This is the scan of a 2D-document (manuscript), the content is known and has been published. No "schöpfungshöhe". --Felistoria (talk) 15:34, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep No editio princeps. 2D-Repro. --Ralf Roleček 21:47, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: PD-scan. --Yann (talk) 09:16, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Files ubloaded by Lactalis Halawa (talk · contribs)
[edit]- All her images are private
- The Uploader is not the photographer --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 07:36, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Wrongly formatted. See Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Lactalis Halawa. --Yann (talk) 09:22, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 155.91.64.15 as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission, no OTRS. Yann (talk) 12:15, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- Agree Copyright infringement as stated by MacMillan ed. --Bestiasonica (talk) 11:33, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:25, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
This image was formerly sent to speedy, but the tag was removed and the image tossed back in the pile. The author is unknown. The date is not known very well either, but somehow that's ok for the license? Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:36, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: Did you seen the {{PD-Israel}} tag? The description clearly mention the source, the context and possible dates. Leraning some History does not hurt. --Amitie 10g (talk) 18:44, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep I can't somehow access the source, and the data in the date field is contradicting with the source, but {{PD-Israel}} says that photographs taken in 2008 or earlier are in the public domain after the 51st year of creation, so either we assume that the date the photograph taken was before the 1930s or 1948, this image is in the public domain. --★ Poké95 01:50, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Kept, the photo entered into public domain in 1986, before URAA date. Taivo (talk) 06:56, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Image had been sent to speedy, tag removed and put back in general pile without fixing the problem. No source... Image can be found http://www.sonofthesouth.net/leefoundation/Confederate_Generals.htm, page marked (C). Yes the image might be old enough, etc. - but there's nothing to show that on the file template, no source, no real date and no author. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:46, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep person depicted died 1877, public domain by now because it's clearly made and published in the USA before 1923. Multichill (talk) 17:19, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: PD-1923. --Yann (talk) 09:26, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Image had been sent to speedy, tag removed and put back in general pile without fixing the problem.
The link to "source" spins without connecting. No source... Image can be found http://www.sonofthesouth.net/leefoundation/Confederate_Generals.htm, page marked (C). Yes the image might be old enough, etc. - but there's nothing to show that on the file template, no source, no real date and no author. I agree that the age may be enough to make it "obvious" but files still need sources, templates and proper information before being tossed back on the pile. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:47, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep person depicted died 1877, public domain by now because it's clearly made and published in the USA before 1923. Nominating an image for deletion when you know it's a free image just because you want more metadata borders vandalism. Multichill (talk) 17:20, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: PD-1923. --Yann (talk) 09:27, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely claim of own work on this historical picture, which was formerly sent to speedy, had its tag removed and put back in the pile. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:47, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep you see to have found the other versions: Thank you for your suggestion! When you feel a media or gallery needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. Wikimedia Commons is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any media and gallery by simply following the Edit link at the top. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to). Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes — they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome. Multichill (talk) 17:24, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: XIX century picture! Is very unlikely it has not been published before 1923, but, is very unlikely the author (if known) died after 1947 (unless the life expectancy in the United States is 150 or more years in the XIX century) . --Amitie 10g (talk) 18:38, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- Comment Larger version here http://thedcgazette.com/2016/ku-klux-klan/, still with no source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:28, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Kept: PD-1923. --Yann (talk) 09:34, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Bei der vorliegenden Grafik handelt es sich nicht um das Wappen des Bezirksverbandes Pfalz. Das Wappen des Bezirksverbandes ist aus dem Jahre 1986 und wird durchweg wie folgt dargestellt: File:Wappen bvpfalz.jpg vgl. zwei Darstellungen auf Liselotte - Das Magazin für die ganze Pfalz bzw. jenes Buchcover.
Der in der vorliegenden Grafik verwendete Löwe stammt konkret aus dieser Grafik. Die übereinstimmenden Fehler sind doch mehr als auffallend. Von einem "eigenen Werk", wie es der Uploader beschreibt, kann da schon keine Rede sein.
Der Pfälzer Löwe sieht auch nur in dem konkreten Fall des rheinl.-pfälzischen Landeswappens so "verstümmelt" aus, weil es aufgrund der vorhandenen Blasonierung auch schwerlich anders darzustellen wäre.
Das Wappen des Landes Rheinland-Pfalz stammt aus dem Jahre 1948 (ist somit 38 Jahre älter als jenes des Bezirksverbandes) und ist in der Anlage (Muster 1: Landeswappen) zum WappG RP in der Fassung vom 7. August 1972 konkret dargestellt in der Zeichnung des Heraldikers Joseph Decku.
Zur Erinnerung: Der Uploader schreibt von einem "eigenen" Werk. Es darf bezweifelt werden, dass es sich beim Uploader um Joseph Decku handelt. Dies, und die Zeichnung des Wappens des Bezirksverbandes durch Joseph Decku ist auszuschließen. Der Herr ist - so man dieser Seite Glauben schenkt - im Jahre 1974 verstorben.
Die völlig falsche Lizensierung der vorliegenden Datei unter Creative Commons ist bei allem bisher vorgetragenem fast schon eine Randnotiz.
Mir bleibt also nur eins: Diese völlig falsche und rechtlich bedenkliche Datei zur Löschung vorzuschlagen. Fränsmer (talk) 02:29, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: You are right that the depicted lion is not typical for a lion rampant. Instead we find a mutilated one which was especially designed for a tierced shield. I am deleting it as it is currently unused and unlikely to be used, hence out of COM:SCOPE. --AFBorchert (talk) 13:01, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
no permission 2003:45:5C47:D201:EC9B:DFD:EF5D:59B3 06:35, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Model and the uploader are the same person, İsmail Özboyacı. --E4024 (talk) 07:33, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: This needs to be processed by our support team. --AFBorchert (talk) 13:02, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
_underway_at_sea_in_1955.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_underway_at_sea_in_1955.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was originally tagged as no license but this was due to a typo for {{PD-USGov-Military-Navy}} which is usually an acceptable license. However, on closer inspection it seems the source does not clarify the copyright status, simply giving "Bob Daly/PC-1181" as contributor and/or copyright holder. I note that other photos in that section of the source page state clearly "Official US Navy photo" but not this one. There is also one that has a "©", but not this one. I'm not familiar with US military nomenclature but it does sound like PC-1181 might be an aircraft number that Bob was flying. It quite probably is the case that Bob was in the navy and this was his job, in which case the PD license is fine. If he took this photo and he wasn't employed by the US armed forces, then it might be a different issue, but I'm hoping a military enthusiast might shed some light on the matter. In all honesty I couldn't just fix the typo and sweep the doubts under a metaphor carpet, hence the Discussion Request. Green Giant (talk) 08:59, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
_underway_at_sea_in_1955.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Bob Daly is named in the Contributed By And/Or Copyright column. Consequently, the PD license appears doubtful. --AFBorchert (talk) 13:38, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
_underway_at_sea_in_1955.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Mary1234~ruwiki as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: it is old picture Yann (talk) 11:52, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: No valid reason for deletion was given. --AFBorchert (talk) 13:39, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Maradexcove as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: delete Yann (talk) 11:52, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: I am deleting it as this was requested by the uploader and more importantly no proper source was given. --AFBorchert (talk) 13:44, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 155.91.64.15 as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission, no OTRS. Yann (talk) 12:15, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: It is marked since 2011 as “OTRS pending”. It is time to delete it. --AFBorchert (talk) 13:46, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 155.91.64.15 as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission, no OTRS Yann (talk) 13:02, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; cannot find any OTRS ticket. Ruthven (msg) 16:25, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Funny but useless Arthur Crbz (talk) 22:22, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 16:26, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Bild wurde ohne einverständnis, vom Privatgrund aus gemacht.Außerdem zeigt es Zwei Privatgrundstücke die ohne erlaubnis gemacht wurden, rechtliche Schritte behalte ich mir vor. 91.38.155.199 12:15, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Das Foto ist eine Ausschnittsvergrößerung und wurde vom Standort Vetschauer Straße, d. h. öffentlicher Grund und Boden, im Rahmen der Panoramafreiheit aufgenommen. Das Tor zum Grundstück war an diesem Tag (Wochenende) verschlossen. Privaten Grund und Boden habe ich meiner Meinung nach nicht betreten.
--Radler59 (talk) 16:26, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Ich glaube das ich mich an sie erinnern kann, ihnen habe ich eigentlich gesagt das sie das Bild bitte löschen, welches sie auch zugesichert haben. 91.38.155.199 17:39, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Ich weiß, dass ich mit niemanden sprechen konnte, denn leider war die Mühle am Wochenende geschlossen. Gern hätte ich Sie gefragt, ob ich mir die historischen Anlage angesehen kann. Das Foto, wurde dadurch mehr oder weniger nur im Vorbeifahren aufgenommen.
--Radler59 (talk) 19:46, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Hallo, ich gebe ihnen hiermit 7 Tage Zeit um dieses Bild zu löschen, wenn dieses nicht passiert werden Rechtliche Schritte eingeleitet. 91.38.129.96 07:28, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Die sachlichen Argumente zur Bildaufnahme habe ich vorgetragen. Von der Mühle ist ja auf Grund der geschilderten Gegebenheiten leider nicht viel zu sehen. Mehr ist dazu nicht zu sagen. Ich überlasse es den sachverständigen Entscheidern der Wikimedia-Gemeinschaft ob das Bild gelöscht wird oder nicht. --Radler59 (talk) 12:24, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Kept: The statement by Radler59 appears to be trustworthy and matches the position recorded in the EXIF data. @91.38.129.96 please note that legal threats are not permitted on-wiki. --AFBorchert (talk) 08:37, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 155.91.64.15 as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission, no OTRS. Yann (talk) 12:15, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: It is marked as OTRS pending since 2011. It is now time to delete it. --AFBorchert (talk) 08:41, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 155.91.64.15 as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission, no OTRS. Yann (talk) 12:16, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: It is marked as OTRS pending since 2011. Time to delete it. --AFBorchert (talk) 08:43, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 155.91.64.15 as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission, no OTRS. Yann (talk) 12:16, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: The file was marked as OTRS pending since 2011. It is about time to delete it. --AFBorchert (talk) 08:44, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Image contain no EXIF Meta Data and Source of the image has not been provided - Indrajit Das (Talk - Contribs) 18:19, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
source is mine, I own the rights, also listed here:http://www.prsgroup.com/about-us/from-the-ceo
Deleted: This needs to be confirmed through our support team. The file will be restored as soon as the written permission has been processed. --AFBorchert (talk) 08:49, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Out of date, unrelevant photograph 2A02:C7F:DC32:CC00:25BF:CC3E:4F9E:6512 20:41, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, we keep outdated stuff too. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:52, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
unused illustrated explanation, written in bad English (to say the least; e.g. 'solving' a 'radius' is nonsensical); if the explanation can be fixed to make sense, it should better be added to an appropriate wikipedia article; in this case, a cropped version of the picture is needed Jochen Burghardt (talk) 19:24, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and excluded educational content. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:44, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
substituído por: Brasão de Vitória do Mearim2.png Pedrobneto (talk) 19:33, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:33, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
некорректное изображение герба Alexandronikos (talk) 12:41, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Keep. Во-первых, сама номинация "некорректна" (потому что никак не аргументирована). Во-вторых, если номинатора, например, смутило количество зубцов в короне, то это вполне объяснимо: File:Coat of Arms of Karpinsk (Sverdlovsk oblast).png и File:Герб ГО Карпинск.jpg - это гербы города и городского округа, поэтому они и отличаются друг от друга формой короны, венчающей щит (подробнее см.: здесь). -- Александр Танчугин (talk) 14:03, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 16:37, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Unlikely to have a free license; the source website is copirighted DmitTrix (talk) 22:32, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- I have personal permission of the author to publish this photo on wikipedia Niculesco 08:32, 31 March 2017 (GMT+2)
- Please see COM:OTRS for the steps the author (or you) need to take to confirm the permission. Please note that the permission should come from the author of the photo, and not the person pictured. Thanks, DmitTrix (talk) 07:04, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
- Actually, I see that you have uploaded a much better-quality image here: File:Postulachi Ghenadie.jpg. So maybe the image under discussion should be deleted anyway as a very low-resolution one. DmitTrix (talk) 07:06, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: follow OTRS procedure. --Sealle (talk) 16:44, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Logo, not free Lluis tgn (talk) 20:41, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: Just text, bellow the COM:TOO in Spain? --Amitie 10g (talk) 21:47, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: not just text, but a silhouette. --Sealle (talk) 16:51, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Quelle eigenes Werk und Urheber zweifelhaft Ralf Roleček 21:50, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: derivative, no author's permission. --Sealle (talk) 16:48, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
está fora de padrão da Lei municipal 07-A/1990 que o instituiu os símbolos do município de Vitória do Mearim-ma. Já foi baixado no wikicommons o brasão correto: Brasão de Vitória do Mearim.png Pedrobneto (talk) 18:59, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. The duplicate file referred to has already been deleted by Commons:Deletion requests/File:Brasão de Vitória do Mearim.png. Green Giant (talk) 04:50, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
There is no evidence that this is a "work created in execution of duties of employment". Neither do I find information on the lifespan of the author to tell if the copyright has expired. So, unless this information is given as an evidence, or unless permission from author's descendent is received via COM:OTRS, then this file should be deleted per COM:PRP. 90.191.109.9 11:55, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
"This Estonian work is in the public domain because it was published more than 70 years ago and it is either: 1. a work created in execution of duties of employment, or 2. a collective work (works of reference, collections of scientific works, newspapers, journals and other periodicals or serials, etc.)."
It was published 70+ years ago and covers the first point, I understood thats when you can use it. No? --LeeMarx (talk) 10:05, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
- If this was the case, then, at least, we should be able to tell where was the author employed and what were these specific duties that might be relevant to this law clause regarding this work. 90.191.109.9 17:26, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: editor is clearly indicated at the source page. Ruthven (msg) 16:22, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Post-mortem discussion:
Ruthven, it's indicated indeed, we know author's name, but we don't know one's lifespan which would allow us to tell whether copyright has expired or not. Which is the actual problem here as per COM:PRP. 90.191.109.9 17:52, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, but the plan was printed and distributed by the editor (and there is the name of the printer as well), so it's safe to consider that it was a work for hire, and it has been published more than 70 years ago. --Ruthven (msg) 18:03, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
- You mean that every work which is not self-published is a work for hire? I don't think it's safe to say that without knowing that the author actually was hired by the publisher. Otherwise we could consider pretty much like all works, including books, that date to pre the era of user generated content, as works of hire, excluding those a few authors that had their own printing houses. 90.191.109.9 18:57, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Some months have passed, I'd like to seek for third (or fourth) opinion now. I still don't see any reason to consider this as a work of hire (which by the way isn't necessarily the same as "a work created in execution of duties of employment" given in law). 62.65.58.38 16:39, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 17:37, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
Current license tag does not apply also because author isn't anonymous nor pseudonymous. So 70 pma term applies instead and this term is not known to have been passed. See also Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2017/05#A work created in execution of duties of employment. 62.65.58.38 06:05, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, as previously. --Yann (talk) 14:02, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
- For future reference and since it's unknown in what way are the above reasons for deletion invalid, the reason why this file was kept is: even though author's birth and death date is currently unknown and work was created in 1930, per Yann there is no significant doubt that 70 years has passed since author's death and copyright for this work has hence expired. I'll adjust file's license information accordingly. 62.65.58.38 11:23, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
The source file, File:Slavic languages (no legend).png, has been deleted, because it had no source.
- File:20130421131537!Slavic languages.png
- File:Distribution langues slaves.jpg
- File:Jezyki slowianskie.png
- File:Langues slaves.png
- File:Lenguas eslavas.png
- File:Limbi slave.png
- File:Linguas eslavas.png
- File:Linguas slave Interlingua.png
- File:Lingue slave carta.png
- File:Llengues eslaves.png
- File:Püks slavik.png
- File:Slaavi keeled.png
- File:Slava lingvaro.png
- File:Slavaj lingvoj mapo cs.svg
- File:Slavaj lingvoj mapo eo.png
- File:Slavenski jazici.png
- File:Slavic languages 2000s.png
- File:Slavic languages 2008.PNG
- File:Slavic languages chinese.png
- File:Slavic languages hr.png
- File:Slavic languages korean.png
- File:Slavic languages map en.svg
- File:Slavic languages map pl.svg
- File:Slavic languages-BLANK.png
- File:Slavic languages-HE.png
- File:Slavic languages-ka.png
- File:Slavic languages.png
- File:Slavic-languages-jp.png
- File:Slavikes glosses.png
- File:Slavische talen.png
- File:Slaviska språk.jpg
- File:Slaviske sprog.png
- File:Slavjanski ezici.png
- File:Slavjanskie jazyki.png
- File:Slavjanskie jeyki.jpg
- File:Slavu kalbos.png
- File:Slavu valodas.png
- File:Slawische sprachen.png
- File:Slovanske jazyky cz.png
- File:Slovanské jazyky.jpg
- File:Slovanské jazyky.png
- File:Slovenski jezici.png
- File:Slovjans'ki movi.png
- File:Slowjanske rece.png
- File:Slowjanske recy dsb.PNG
- File:Slowjanske recy.png
- File:Szlav nyelvek.png
- File:Verspreiding Slavische talen.png
- File:Славяньскы языкы.png
- File:Слов'янські мови.png
- File:Slavaj lingvoj mapo eo.svg
Anatoliy (talk) 19:14, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Files were originally nominated by Jcb in separate requests.--Anatoliy (talk) 19:15, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
@Jcb and Daphne Lantier: Well, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Slavic languages (no legend).png is strange nomination. File was deleted as DW of no-sourced file. But original file was not deleted or nominated. Why? We should discuss deletion of original and then delete or not delete DW.--Anatoliy (talk) 19:23, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Keep I also do not understand Commons:Deletion requests/File:Slavic languages (no legend).png. The file was tagged with {{PD-self}} by user:Happenstance, I do not see any evidence to question that that user created that map. The reason for deletion was listed as "No source for the base map", so the worry is that the latitude and longitude of the country boundaries is copyrighted? Because the base map only shows boundaries which are not copyrighted. --Jarekt (talk) 20:08, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, maps are typically copyrighted. We speedy delete e.g. screenshots from Google maps. Although data itself is not copyrighted, there are many different ways to depict them in a map and a lot of choices to be made by the author of the map. This is mainly caused by the fact that the earth is spherical and our computer screens are not (yet) spherical. Jcb (talk) 20:40, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- Umm, this is definitely not taken from any Google map. Based on your premise, the majority of map images at Commons are up for deletion (uploaders do tell lies about pinching base maps and claiming them as their own work). Are you prepared to delete reams of files based on this rationale? --Iryna Harpy (talk) 20:54, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- Unfortunately it's indeed true that many maps get deleted because they have unknown copyright situation. There are free maps (e.g. Open Street Maps), so it is possible to have maps at Commons. Jcb (talk) 20:59, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- Understood, but I think it's taking it too far with old maps that have been used in good faith. Eliminating all of these files would require exhaustive replication for the purposes of the maps being used on numerous wiki projects. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 21:13, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- Unfortunately it's indeed true that many maps get deleted because they have unknown copyright situation. There are free maps (e.g. Open Street Maps), so it is possible to have maps at Commons. Jcb (talk) 20:59, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- Umm, this is definitely not taken from any Google map. Based on your premise, the majority of map images at Commons are up for deletion (uploaders do tell lies about pinching base maps and claiming them as their own work). Are you prepared to delete reams of files based on this rationale? --Iryna Harpy (talk) 20:54, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, maps are typically copyrighted. We speedy delete e.g. screenshots from Google maps. Although data itself is not copyrighted, there are many different ways to depict them in a map and a lot of choices to be made by the author of the map. This is mainly caused by the fact that the earth is spherical and our computer screens are not (yet) spherical. Jcb (talk) 20:40, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep per Jarekt. The only context in which the use of any of these files would be contentious would be for use within Wikipedia article space. Sources are not a Commons issue, and there's no issue of copyvio here. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 20:31, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - no source for the base map. @Ahonc: This does not seem to be a DW of the JPG file, because that one has a different underlying base map. The JPG is missing source for the base map as well unfortunately. Jcb (talk) 20:36, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep - I understand importance of sources, but "There's no source" does not prove infringement of copyright.--Ma▀▄Ga 15:25, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- Actually it works the other way round, see e.g. COM:PCP. We need evidence of a valid copyright situation to keep them. Jcb (talk) 15:38, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- But the base map is just country boundaries on a flat map. I can generate it if I do a Scatter plot of public domain latitudes and longitudes, you can create it with dozens of tools of programing languages. I see no evidence that user:Happenstance who claimed {{PD-self}}, used any copyrighted base map. --Jarekt (talk) 15:59, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Why are some files on the list above deleted, and the rest of them not?--Ma▀▄Ga 14:54, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
- Because some files were already listed individually in older DRs, which all have been closed as delete in the meantime, but this DR has not yet been closed. Jcb (talk) 16:07, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, but it's the same problem for all files, and they should be deleted together, of course, if they will be deleted.--Ma▀▄Ga 16:41, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
- I agree the other files are in the same situation as the ones already deleted. The other DRs were closes by two different admins, who both closed all of them as delete. So the most likely outcome of this DR is also deletion. Jcb (talk) 16:56, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
- Other DR were closed without any discussion. Unless someone actually look at the merit of the arguments and starts discussion, closing admin is likely to just go with nomination. --Jarekt (talk) 03:39, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Are you suggesting that both Daphne Lantier and Ellin Beltz were careless on closing these DRs? Seems improbable to me, I know them both as careful admins. Please be aware that closure is not necessarily based on the presence or absence of 'keep' votes. A DR is not a vote. Closing admin has to take a decision per policy, based on the presented information. Till now, none of the 'keep' voters have demonstrated that the underlying base map is free, or comes from a free source. Maps are typically copyrighted. Due to the fact that the earth is not flat but more or less spherical, there are many different ways to depict a map and several choices to be made. A map is not just PD-ineligible information. Jcb (talk) 10:52, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Maps are typically copyrighted. Tipically means that some maps are not copyrighted. No one has prove infringement of copyright, also.--Ma▀▄Ga 15:00, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Are you suggesting that both Daphne Lantier and Ellin Beltz were careless on closing these DRs? Seems improbable to me, I know them both as careful admins. Please be aware that closure is not necessarily based on the presence or absence of 'keep' votes. A DR is not a vote. Closing admin has to take a decision per policy, based on the presented information. Till now, none of the 'keep' voters have demonstrated that the underlying base map is free, or comes from a free source. Maps are typically copyrighted. Due to the fact that the earth is not flat but more or less spherical, there are many different ways to depict a map and several choices to be made. A map is not just PD-ineligible information. Jcb (talk) 10:52, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Other DR were closed without any discussion. Unless someone actually look at the merit of the arguments and starts discussion, closing admin is likely to just go with nomination. --Jarekt (talk) 03:39, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Well, they should be restored until closing this DR.--Ma▀▄Ga 17:04, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
- I suggest using COM:UNDEL if you do not accept my closes. Based on our policies, they were closed as delete. Ellin Beltz (talk) 13:59, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- As I mentioned above: all files from list above have the same problem (if they have the problem). Each one should be treated equally. Individually deleting is just not OK. Why should someone ask to undelete something that shouldn't be deleted, regarding to the rest of files?--Ma▀▄Ga 15:00, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- If result of this nomination will be 'Keep', deleted files will be restored.--Anatoliy (talk) 11:38, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
- As I mentioned above: all files from list above have the same problem (if they have the problem). Each one should be treated equally. Individually deleting is just not OK. Why should someone ask to undelete something that shouldn't be deleted, regarding to the rest of files?--Ma▀▄Ga 15:00, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- I suggest using COM:UNDEL if you do not accept my closes. Based on our policies, they were closed as delete. Ellin Beltz (talk) 13:59, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- I agree the other files are in the same situation as the ones already deleted. The other DRs were closes by two different admins, who both closed all of them as delete. So the most likely outcome of this DR is also deletion. Jcb (talk) 16:56, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, but it's the same problem for all files, and they should be deleted together, of course, if they will be deleted.--Ma▀▄Ga 16:41, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
- Keep - Jcb apparently decided to make a Great Purge but his claims aren't substantiated. The assertion "base maps have no source" (therefore they are examples of copyvio) doesn't comply with the rule COM:PCP which states "where there is significant doubt about the freedom of a particular file, it should be deleted." --Iaroslavvs (talk) 02:21, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Take a look on this file. It is transferred from english wikipedia (according to original upload log) in 2008, and deleted on english wikipedia two years later. Should you ask admins on en.wiki to take a look on source on en.wiki?--Ma▀▄Ga 15:00, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Looking at the original upload summary of the deleted File:Slavic languages (no legend).png, Happenstance cites File:Slavic languages.jpg which was uploaded here in 2005 from English Wikipedia. I'm not sure the original is still available because the EN-WP log only goes back to August 2006. If I'm not wrong, deleted files before 2006 really were deleted and unrecoverable. Green Giant (talk) 05:14, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
- So, this DR (and related DR's of already deleted files) should prove the infringement of copyright. I can't see any evidence of that. Without any evidence the DR's are very disputable.--Ma▀▄Ga 08:45, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
- So, what about deletion log. We need source of file. It may be stated in 2006 version.--Anatoliy (talk) 11:38, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
- What if the source was cited in originally uploaded file on en.wp? You claim it isn't?--Ma▀▄Ga 13:33, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
- I've asked the deleting admin (Quadell) for help, so hopefully we will have an answer (although they haven't edited there in a couple of months). Green Giant (talk) 18:50, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
- @MaGa: for what it's worth I think the ultimate source map was quite probably created by User:Robin_Hood~enwiki and so all of these deleted files should be restored but obviously it depends on the deleted contents of the file on Eng-Wiki. I can only suggest patience but even if the files are deleted they can be restored quite easily when we have the requisite proof. Green Giant (talk) 18:57, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
- I hope for the best.--Ma▀▄Ga 16:40, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
- The source file, File:Slavic languages (no legend).png, has been deleted, because it had no source. But if a map have one, it must be deleted because it's a copyviol. That's stupid. We must just follow the WP rules with discernment. The uploader of the source file, have created his map since all the linguistic map available, and registered as PD. --86.241.164.212 20:43, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
- I hope for the best.--Ma▀▄Ga 16:40, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
- What if the source was cited in originally uploaded file on en.wp? You claim it isn't?--Ma▀▄Ga 13:33, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
- So, what about deletion log. We need source of file. It may be stated in 2006 version.--Anatoliy (talk) 11:38, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
- So, this DR (and related DR's of already deleted files) should prove the infringement of copyright. I can't see any evidence of that. Without any evidence the DR's are very disputable.--Ma▀▄Ga 08:45, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
Can someone restore already deleted files and merge DR's with this DR (like here), please?--Ma▀▄Ga 09:39, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
- @Ahonc: , @Ellin Beltz: , @Jcb: , @Daphne Lantier: , anyone, please?--Ma▀▄Ga 15:09, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
- This DR may remain open for a while, because it's obvious that the DR should result in deletion if closing admin follows the rules, but that's an impopular decision with all the keep votes on the page. Jcb (talk) 15:13, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
- @MaGa: You can open an undeletion request after the result of this one, I think. --Rezonansowy (talk) 15:16, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
- I have already said my opinion above. We should wait for result here. If it will be 'Keep' we should restore photos. If we'll restore then now and result will be 'Delete', we should delete them again. That's why I do not think that we should restore now, before we have reuslt of discussion.--Anatoliy (talk) 19:35, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
- @Ahonc: OK, why is this file kept?--Ma▀▄Ga 15:24, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
- I said above about already deleted file. This file was not deleted, so I kept it to avoid to DRs for one file. But I did nkt search for all such requests. Only ones that was found quickly.--Anatoliy (talk) 15:29, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
- Well, deleted files should be restored until closing this DR. This DR can last forever.--Ma▀▄Ga 15:45, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
- I said above about already deleted file. This file was not deleted, so I kept it to avoid to DRs for one file. But I did nkt search for all such requests. Only ones that was found quickly.--Anatoliy (talk) 15:29, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
- @Ahonc: OK, why is this file kept?--Ma▀▄Ga 15:24, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
- I have already said my opinion above. We should wait for result here. If it will be 'Keep' we should restore photos. If we'll restore then now and result will be 'Delete', we should delete them again. That's why I do not think that we should restore now, before we have reuslt of discussion.--Anatoliy (talk) 19:35, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
- Keep and Comment Per above. We need to fix and correct these files on Commons:Graphic Lab/Map workshop or en:Wikipedia:Graphics Lab/Map workshop. --Rezonansowy (talk) 15:16, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
- Keep, any author is allowed to draw his own map combining various primary informations.
- Nevertheless, some of these maps need lesser corrections. Example: In Austria, the Croatian minority in Burgenland has been marked, but the Slovenian minority in Carinthia (which has been the majority, there, for many centuries) has been forgotten.--Ulamm (talk) 23:11, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
Can any admin resolve this, please?--Ma▀▄Ga 18:02, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
- Keep per Iaroslavvs, no significant doubt about the source of the base map. — Jeff G. ツ 01:40, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
- If the source is not given (as is the case here), what is the point of stating that you have no significant doubt about that (not given) source? How can you judge the credibility of a source that is not stated? Jcb (talk) 08:59, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
- @Jcb: It's probably {{Own work}}. I we don't have any proof that it was created by someone else, then we can assume it's own work and add it to the file's description. --Rezonansowy (talk) 10:33, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
- The color marking may be or may not be own work, but it's very unlikely that the base map would be own work as well. So DW at best. Jcb (talk) 10:35, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
- @Jcb: It's probably {{Own work}}. I we don't have any proof that it was created by someone else, then we can assume it's own work and add it to the file's description. --Rezonansowy (talk) 10:33, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
- If the source is not given (as is the case here), what is the point of stating that you have no significant doubt about that (not given) source? How can you judge the credibility of a source that is not stated? Jcb (talk) 08:59, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Quite a number of people think that there is no issue here. See also [15]. --Yann (talk) 11:37, 5 May 2017 (UTC)