User talk:Fagairolles 34
Le tutoriel des premiers pas et la FAQ peuvent énormément vous aider. Ils expliquent comment personnaliser votre interface (pour la langue par exemple), comment importer des fichiers, sans oublier les licences. Des compétences techniques ne sont pas indispensables. Soyez clair et présumez des bonnes intentions des autres. C'est un wiki - rien de très compliqué. Plus d'informations sont disponibles sur le portail communautaire. Vous pouvez posez des questions sur le service d'aide, le Bistro, ou encore sur IRC, au canal #wikimedia-commons. Vous pouvez également contacter un administrateur sur sa page de discussion. |
| |
(P.S. Vous pouvez émettre une critique ou un commentaire sur ce message de bienvenue) |
le Korrigan →bla 13:31, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 08:11, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 19:52, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 09:59, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Hola, me gustan muchísimo tus fotos, especialmente las de paisajes de montes, valles y pueblos, a las que que soy muy aficionado. Saludos, --Cornava 11:58, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Serignan salanquiers.JPG
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Serignan salanquiers.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 13:36, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
Pay attention to copyright | Image:Montpellier Donut.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.
|
"Hommage à Confucius" de Alain Jacquet (1939-2005), No freedom of Panorama in France, Image not before 2080 - Zil (d) 10:53, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
Please use sub-categories
[edit]
When categorising files, please avoid placing them into several categories that are directly linked within the same tree (e.g. a parent category and a child category - like Category:France and Category:Paris), to prevent over-categorization of files and over-population of categories. Usually, only the most specific category should be used. See Commons:Categories for more details. Thank you.
Ce message est lié à tes modifications sur les images de Proumeyssac: la Category:Proumeyssac est déjà incluse dans Category:Caves of France donc il est inutile de rajouter cette catégorie à chaque image contenue dans la catégorie Proumeyssac. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 17:05, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
- Disons que j'avais ajouté la catégorie "geology" pour celles qui montraient une particularité géologique. C'est discutable mais ça me paraissait pertinent, notamment pour Image:Triangles-Proumeyssac.JPG. Et cette volonté de rajouter cette catégorie image par image était guidée par l'existence d'une photo de la même catégorie qui ne montrait rien de géologique (Image:Proumeyssac-pottery.JPG)
- En tout cas, content d'avoir fait une leçon de logique à un prof de maths! ;-) Ca doit être mes vieilles envies de faire ce métier qui ressortent... --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 08:39, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
Bonjour! J'apprécie beaucoup le travail que vous effectuez chez Wikipedia, essentiellement vos superbes photos, dont nombre d'entre elles illustrent des pages créées ou visitées souvent par mes soins, en toute modestie bénévole. Franchement, bravo pour vos photos, notamment celle du département où j'habite, l'Hérault. ( à Puisserguier) Par ailleurs, et c'est le pourquoi de mon intervention sur votre page d'accueil, j'ai "piqué" une photo du poulain de Pézenas pour le mettre sur la page animaux totémiques de l'Hérault. Mais ce qui serait génial, c'est que peut-être possédez-vous des clichés sur d'autres animaux totems, à publier sur cette page. Encore bravo et merci pour votre boulot. Kzo
File tagging Image:Riquet Paul.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading Image:Riquet Paul.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:Image:Riquet Paul.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Jodo (talk) 11:05, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 05:48, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Bassan eglise 2.JPG is uncategorized since 19 April 2009.
Please help replace this outdated license
[edit]Hello!
Thank you for donating images to the Wikimedia Commons. You have uploaded some images in the past with the license {{PD}}. While this was a license acceptable in the early days of Wikimedia, since January 2006, this license has been deprecated and since October 2008 no new uploads with this license was allowed.
The license on older images should be replaced with a better and more specific license/permissions and you can help by checking the images and adding {{PD-self}} if you are the author or one of the other templates that you can see in the template on the image page.
Thank you for your help. If you need help feel free to ask at Commons talk:Licensing or contact User:Zscout370.
The images we would like you to check are:
BotMultichillT 20:29, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
Bonjour ! Le sculpteur de cette œuvre, Jean-Louis Delorme, est encore en vie. Son œuvre est donc protégée et, en France, le fait qu'elle soit exposée sur la voie publique ne change rien (voir commons:Liberté de panorama). Est-ce que tu penses qu'il est possible d'obtenir une permission de l'artiste ? À défaut, il faudrait supprimer l'image. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 13:12, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
- J'ai vu qu'il était Frontignanais, c'est pour ça que je te demande au lieu de sortir le flingue tout de suite ;-) Le problème est qu'on n'accepte pas les licences « Wikipédia-only ». Si un éditeur par exemple reprend ta photo pour des cartes postales, est-ce qu'il serait tout aussi d'accord ? Il faudrait vraiment avoir un mail disant : « j'autorise la publication de cette photo sous la double licence GFDL/CC-BY-SA ». Jastrow (Λέγετε) 13:34, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
- Cool ! La procédure est décrite sur Commons:OTRS/fr, l'adresse où envoyer le mail est permissions-commons-fr @ wikimedia.org. Il faut que le mail soit très explicite, sinon les volontaires OTRS vont le rejeter (j'en ai fait l'expérience). Jastrow (Λέγετε) 11:02, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
File:Rodez_cardinal_Bourret.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Teofilo (talk) 22:15, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
Please use the correct date format
[edit]Hi Fagairolles 34,
Thank you for your contributions to Commons. I noticed you mentioned a date on File:Frontignan cloche Julie.JPG. Please know that in order for dates to be automatically detected and translated into other languages it needs to be in the YYYY-MM-DD
format (ie. 2024-01 for January 2024 or 2024-11-21 for 21 November 2024). Also, for other (less specific) dates use {{Other date}} for centuries, ranges, 'circa' etc. like this: {{other date|between|1899|1903}}
for "between 1899 and 1903
". This way the dates will be translated internally into the user's language preference. I've fixed it for you here. See for example the result in French: here. Thanks again. –Krinkletalk 20:24, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
Re: Template:Date, en occitan
[edit]File:Lodeve monument morts.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
86.217.15.144 20:21, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
File:Clermont-l'Hérault monument morts DARDE.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
86.217.15.144 20:24, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
File:Saint-Maurice-Navacelles monument aux morts.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
86.217.15.144 20:26, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
File:Frontignan jouteur.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
86.217.15.144 20:40, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
Les églises sont implantées dans des communes, correspondant à des départements
[edit]Bonjour Fagairolles 34. Tu catégorises actuellement des églises par saint patron, ce qui est une bonne chose. Par contre, leur retirer la catégorie du département où elles sont implantées me parait complètement improductif pour tous ceux qui cherchent ces églises par commune d'implantation. Qui aura l'idée pour trouver l'église de X d'aller passer en revue la totalité des églises dont le saint patron s'appelle Y, Z ou T ? Aurais-tu l'amabilité de remettre ces catégories en place ? À la limite, tu peux créer une sous-catégorie par lieu, par département (Category:Churches in X by location). Père Igor (talk) 14:07, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
- Bonjour Ta remarque est correcte. Il semble qu'il n'y ait pas de politique très définie sur le sujet. Je travaille surtout sur l'Hérault, où les églises ont déjà été classées par cantons (Category:Churches in Hérault by canton) (et aussi pour certaines d'entre elles par communes (Churches in Hérault by municipality)), ce qui me semble un bon compromis pour le classement géographique. Cette habitude ne semble pas généralisée aux autres départements. J'attends tes réactions avant de répondre à ta demande ? Fagairolles 34 (talk) 14:41, 6 December 2012 (UTC).
- Je me suis aperçu de ton travail car tu as œuvré sur des communes de la Haute-Garonne que j'ai en suivi. Sur mon département, la Dordogne, les églises sont catégorisées soit par commune (exemple : category:Churches in Périgueux, soit par canton (exemple : category:Churches in the canton of Verteillac), ce qui n'est pas non plus au mieux, pour des recherches à l'intérieur des cantons. Je ne sais plus quel participant a introduit les cantons pour faire maigrir la category:Churches in Dordogne. Les catégories « by municipality » sont une bonne idée et les catégories par cantons ne sont pas du tout recommandées pour toutes les communes importantes multi-cantonales (Amiens = 8 cantons, Marseille = 25 cantons, et Périgueux qui n'a que 30000 habitants a quand même 3 cantons). Par ailleurs, la réforme des collectivités territoriales nous obligera peut-être à revoir un grand nombre de catégories cantonales. Je pense que cette discussion pourrait être élargie au Bistro de Commons, pour avoir plus d'avis. Père Igor (talk) 16:49, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
File:Murasson Panorama.jpg
[edit]Bonjour, en parcourant Wikipédia, j'ai vu trois de vos photos qui pouvaient être assemblées. Voici le panorama en résultant. Cordialement François de Dijon (talk) 12:55, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
- A votre service. Pour être franc le logiciel a tout fait, je n'ai utilisé que le mode automatique. Il a juste fallu recadrer à la fin. J'utilise un logiciel du commerce : Kolor Autopano Giga 3.0, il me semble qu'il fonctionne sous Windows, Mac et linux.(Il existe en version d'essai, mais j'arrête là la pub...) J'en avais essayé d'autres mais c'est celui que j'ai conservé. Il arrive bien à assembler des photos prises à main levées, à condition de bien anticiper sur les zones de recouvrement. Si vous avez des photos à assembler, ce sera avec plaisir que je le ferai en attendant que vous vous équipiez. François de Dijon (d) 14:12, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
- Bonjour, voici un autre exemple réalisé avec le logiciel, assemblage de 29 photos. François de Dijon (talk) 16:00, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
- A votre service. Pour être franc le logiciel a tout fait, je n'ai utilisé que le mode automatique. Il a juste fallu recadrer à la fin. J'utilise un logiciel du commerce : Kolor Autopano Giga 3.0, il me semble qu'il fonctionne sous Windows, Mac et linux.(Il existe en version d'essai, mais j'arrête là la pub...) J'en avais essayé d'autres mais c'est celui que j'ai conservé. Il arrive bien à assembler des photos prises à main levées, à condition de bien anticiper sur les zones de recouvrement. Si vous avez des photos à assembler, ce sera avec plaisir que je le ferai en attendant que vous vous équipiez. François de Dijon (d) 14:12, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
File:Thézan-les-Béziers maison 1.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Aga (d) 07:37, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
File:Thézan-les-Béziers maison 2.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Aga (d) 07:37, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]The Photographer's Barnstar | |
Pour la belle photo d'Alès et le Gardon! Aarp65 (talk) 13:29, 27 July 2014 (UTC) |
File source is not properly indicated: File:Riccardo Zandonai.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Riccardo Zandonai.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Riccardo Zandonai.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Stefan4 (talk) 22:19, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
Welcome, Dear Filemover!
[edit]
Hi Fagairolles 34, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:
- Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
- Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
- Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.
--Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:21, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
Montpellier buste J-B. Fabre b.jpg
[edit]Bonjour Jeune Homme Fagairolles 34. Étant, actuellement, en train de géolocaliser les photos de Montpellier, je me suis permis de modifier les coordonnées de cette photo et d'y rajouter des fonctions que nous offre Commons. Il arrive parfois que certains appareils soient parasités pour donner la géolocalisation ou alors que certains logiciels donnent quelques erreurs de conversions. Personnellement, j'utilise GeoLocator qui propose différentes vues et cartes pour géolocaliser une photo et qui a été développé par la communauté. Cordialement ! -- DePlusJean (talk) 06:31, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
[edit]Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.[survey 1] The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.[survey 2] The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.
You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.
Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
- ↑ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
- ↑ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.
Bonjour, j'ai vu dans ma liste de suivie que tu avais complété la description, merci! Du coup cela attiré mon attention sur cette photo j'ai téléchargé une meilleure version avec un nouveau travail d'édition plus réussi. Donc 2 fois merci. :) Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:11, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
- Bonsoir J'ai essayé par curiosité de localiser l'endroit où a été tirée la photo avec geoportail et google earth, mais je patine un peu... St-Thibéry est pourtant le village de mon père....Le domaine est bien Nadaillan et on voit le clocher sur la gauche du domaine, ce qui invalide les coordonnées GPS proposées (route D18 de Montblanc). Te rappellerais-tu l'endroit de manière plus précise ? merci d'avance cordialement Fagairolles 34 (talk) 21:51, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
- ça y est merci, j'ai rectifié ainsi que sur l'autre image, prise au meme moment. J'avais fais ça de mémoire, je roule parfois en voiture un peu au hazard pour prendre des photo, et je me rappelai avoir pris ces photos sur une départementale après avoir traversé St. Thibéry. Ce coup-ci c'est bon, merci encore. Christian Ferrer (talk) 23:08, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
- OK merci. C'est à peu près ce que j'avais trouvé avec Google Earth. Fagairolles 34 (talk) 09:52, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
- ça y est merci, j'ai rectifié ainsi que sur l'autre image, prise au meme moment. J'avais fais ça de mémoire, je roule parfois en voiture un peu au hazard pour prendre des photo, et je me rappelai avoir pris ces photos sur une départementale après avoir traversé St. Thibéry. Ce coup-ci c'est bon, merci encore. Christian Ferrer (talk) 23:08, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey
[edit](Sorry to write in Engilsh)
Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.
If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.
About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
File:Mireval monument morts.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Culex (talk) 12:43, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, 90.2.29.143 12:55, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
File:Sète jouteur 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Culex (talk) 15:31, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
File:Balaruc-les-Bains monument morts.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Culex (talk) 09:41, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
File:Stanislao Gastaldon circa 1900.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jcb (talk) 21:16, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
File:Primo Riccitelli.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:51, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
Les mois...
[edit]Bonjour, j'ai notifié que tu avais créé Category:July 2018 in Tarn. Pour les mois qui concernent les années après 2016, il faut utiliser {{Month by year in Tarn}} et non {{Month by year in TarnMP}}, pareil pour les autre départements de la région, j'ai déjà corrigé. Cordialement, Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:27, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
File:Cébazan maison décorée.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Túrelio (talk) 09:34, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
File:Olargues pont Eiffel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
84.98.196.11 08:34, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
File:Pezenas Monument aux morts.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
86.249.126.51 22:56, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
Important message for file movers
[edit]A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect
user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.
Possible acceptable uses of this ability:
- To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
- To perform file name swaps.
- When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)
Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.
The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect
user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Al-Cartero (chuquete).jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Al-Cartero (chuquete).jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Al-Cartero (chuquete).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 15:06, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
Pay attention to licensing
|
Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content: images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose.
File:Paladilhe Emile signature 1881.jpg seems to be free (or it would be proposed for deletion), but it was identified as having a wrong license. Usually, it is because a public domain image is tagged with a free license, or because the stated source or other information is not sufficient to prove the selected tag is correct. Please verify that you applied the correct license tag for this file. If you believe this file has the correct license, please explain why on the file discussion page.
|
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 12:11, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
File:Emma Carelli in Lorenza.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 12:13, 21 December 2021 (UTC)