Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/03/24

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive March 24th, 2017
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality image, and I can't imagine a use for it. Jmabel ! talk 04:47, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 12:17, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of copyright status The Bounder (talk) 14:42, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violation: external source, no license, no permission, probably intended as fair use. Green Giant (talk) 15:57, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation (google) j.budissin+/- 00:43, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ellin Beltz: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The youtuber Seng12900 .beautypageant is not the creator of the original footage or the copyright holder, the license is void. Martin H. (talk) 19:29, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, work at youtube was not author's to release.  — billinghurst sDrewth 00:22, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Album Cover, accidentally uploaded to commons instead of Wikipedia itself. Tronvillain (talk) 21:42, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: fair use. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:43, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It has been 7 days, time to delete PokestarFan (talk) 22:29, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb: Missing permission as of 17 March 2017 - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. The UK has the PMA+70 rule. No indication that the author would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 15:59, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.granger.com/results.asp?image=0053852 gives an actual date of 1896. No help with authorship, however. - Reventtalk 07:32, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, then it's (just) old enough for {{PD-old-assumed}}. Jcb (talk) 11:04, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: resolved. --Jcb (talk) 11:05, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by LAPIERRE Christophe

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is an Android screen recording of installing an app, not needed PokestarFan (talk) 18:59, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Commons:Derivative works from software screenshots. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:44, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Comes from http://www.zenit-kazan.com/media/photo/?year=2016&id_players=191, no evidence for provided license Ytoyoda (talk) 14:51, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:59, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from http://www.skra.pl/en/team/players/item/4349-bartosz-kurek Ytoyoda (talk) 14:52, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:59, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

from http://www.fivb.org/Vis2009/Images/GetImage.asmx?type=press&no=59854 Ytoyoda (talk) 14:54, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:00, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The youtuber Seng12900 .beautypageant is not the creator of the original footage or the copyright holder, the license is void. Martin H. (talk) 19:29, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per nomination. --Discasto talk 23:44, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:43, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mukeshchaupal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:02, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:29, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:02, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and no license. --Yann (talk) 22:29, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and no license. --Yann (talk) 22:27, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cláudio Privilégio (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:03, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:37, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:35, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by VVXOXO (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons is not a social media site. Out of scope

✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 09:28, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 03:34, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of "Own work'. Derivative of non-free work, album cover. Wikicology (talk) 10:16, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:10, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of "Own work'. Derivative of non-free work, album cover. Wikicology (talk) 10:17, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:10, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of "Own work'. Derivative of non-free work, album cover. Wikicology (talk) 10:18, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:10, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of "Own work'. Derivative of non-free work, album cover. Wikicology (talk) 10:18, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:10, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of "Own work'. Derivative of non-free work, album cover. Wikicology (talk) 10:19, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:10, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of "Own work'. Derivative of non-free work, album cover. Wikicology (talk) 10:19, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:10, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of "Own work'. Derivative of non-free work, album cover. Wikicology (talk) 10:19, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:10, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not licensed Sdarak09 (talk) 10:20, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:10, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of "Own work'. Derivative of non-free work, album cover. Wikicology (talk) 10:20, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:10, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted picture. 95.156.133.166 17:27, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[1] "©2000-2015, 2016 Buzzle.com®. All rights reserved."--95.156.133.166 17:29, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:08, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is not accurate and the source it is from is not reliable. As such it is not educational content. Eye color is not recessive / dominant but polymorphic.[2] It is also not used on any project. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 10:57, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 23:42, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted picture 95.156.133.166 17:33, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[3] © Climate-Data.org.--95.156.133.166 17:33, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:08, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted picture 95.156.133.166 17:36, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[4]: © Climate-Data.org.--95.156.133.166 17:36, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:08, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I accidentally uploaded a blurry image. MarioFinale (talk) 18:38, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:08, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photograph is copied from a book Theroadislong (talk) 18:53, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:08, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photograph is copied from a book Theroadislong (talk) 18:53, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:08, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photograph is copied from a book Theroadislong (talk) 18:54, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:08, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photograph is copied from a book Theroadislong (talk) 18:54, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:08, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photograph is copied from a book Theroadislong (talk) 18:55, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:08, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ONUA ADDISON (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE, personal, unused, self-promotion.

--Steinsplitter (talk) 19:33, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; With additional copyright concerns due to small size, no metadata and derivative works. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:07, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not clear why it is in scope. Jonund (talk) 19:34, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:06, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete apparently Flickr user is blacklisted. Ww2censor (talk) 21:45, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:05, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Themightyquill (talk) 22:04, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:05, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Themightyquill (talk) 22:05, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:05, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be today's own work, see [5]. BethNaught (talk) 22:08, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:05, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot PokestarFan (talk) 22:21, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Housekeeping: 25 March 2017 Magog the Ogre (talk | contribs | block) deleted page File:انترنت فابور.jpg. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:04, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. — Sincerely Issimo 15 23:08, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:04, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm cleaning up old designs. Julius Cæsar (talk) 23:51, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:04, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm cleaning up old designs. Julius Cæsar (talk) 23:52, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:03, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm cleaning up old designs. Julius Cæsar (talk) 23:53, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:03, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm cleaning up old designs. Julius Cæsar (talk) 23:54, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:03, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm cleaning up old designs. Julius Cæsar (talk) 23:55, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:03, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm cleaning up old designs. Julius Cæsar (talk) 23:59, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:03, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm cleaning up old designs. Julius Cæsar (talk) 23:59, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:03, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work, probable copyvio Pippobuono (talk) 09:28, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:17, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Thakur Pankaj Saklani (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope Commons is not a social media

✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 09:29, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:17, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

as you cas see with the reflect, this is a derivative work from a poster with a glass... not own work and probalby not free Pippobuono (talk) 09:30, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:18, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by OS-J.SA13D034 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Screenshot of Copyrighted computer program

✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 09:31, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:18, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:18, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:10, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:18, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RENATO CENTONZE (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos and document. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You might want to consider File:AVANT GARDE TUNIS FOOTBALL 1931.pdf as well. Moumou82 (talk) 18:22, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:19, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Sidinei Britto

[edit]

Personal images and logos not in use, self-promotion; out of Project scope. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 14:09, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:19, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:19, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Saadtakigov (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:19, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Song. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:20, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:20, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:20, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shidosuru (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.techeninja.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Forget-fitness-bands-just-wear-the-Oura-ring.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I own the copyrights, thank you for checking. shidosuru (talk) 15:26, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - if you are indeed the copyright holder, please contact OTRS. --Jcb (talk) 15:21, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 14:31, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:21, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aypara1996 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos, documents and newspaper. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:22, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Miniatura Roberto Ferres 01.JPG 189.108.61.194 14:34, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion specified. --Jcb (talk) 15:22, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by POLVORA C (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No confidence uploader created any of these images, no metadata, very small... all same subject, etc. Probable internet culls and thus COM:COPYVIOs.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:40, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Files removed 5 October 2015 Materialscientist Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:08, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by POLVORA C (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.wwe.com/f/styles/wwe_large/public/article/image/2013/04/foley_wwe_title_win_article.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:23, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Komoro no kaze (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:24, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Komoro no kaze (talk · contribs)

[edit]

下記4ファイルに関して初版から2023年11月29日 (水) 12:20 (UTC) の版までの版指定削除を依頼します。外部の個人ウェブサイト「全国の歴史上の人物の御墓」の文章の転載を確認。出典ページ最下部に「文章や画像のコピーは禁止」とあり、著作権侵害のおそれ。

Qurren (talk) 09:54, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:17, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Karlos Moore (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Art by living artist "Judith Barry" (see file names and templates), uploaded by "Karlos Moore". Needs COM:OTRS permission from the artist to retain, with the additional issue of is any of this in COM:SCOPE or not. Images were apparently uploaded for https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judith_Barry, which reads like a promo page.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:05, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:24, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope — Racconish ☎ 15:22, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:27, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope — Racconish ☎ 15:22, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:27, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 16:30, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:27, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of own work on this 3-d object. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:05, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:28, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Who is the photographer? The author field states: "Scanned by Fanghong". Jcb (talk) 17:28, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The pic was taken by myself,but used film has to scan, renewd state.--Fanghong (talk) 00:40, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! I will tag the whole series as own work. Jcb (talk) 14:28, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I see you already fixed it yourself. Thanks. Jcb (talk) 14:50, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: resolved. --Jcb (talk) 14:28, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Placeholder called "no photograph". Achim (talk) 17:29, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:28, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rishikesh001 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 17:59, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:28, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing permission M. Krafft (talk) 18:19, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:29, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo incorporates copyright artwork. We need permission from the artist before this photo and the others listed below can be accepted on the Commons. Some of the photos have the artist posing in front of his paintings, but the amount of the painting incorporated into each photo is not trivial, and permission would still be required in the form of an OTRS ticket.

Diannaa (talk) 20:05, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:26, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Restored per ticket:2017032710018939
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ningbo panoramio 2017-03-24

[edit]

Panoramio-bot uploaded, including:

Not educationally useful, out of scope. Siyuwj (talk) 01:13, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:49, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted object. G I Chandor (talk) 01:14, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:49, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vocaladies (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons is not a place to advertise and out of project scope.

xplicit 01:19, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:49, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

USA does not have freedom of panorama for artworks; hence, any statue erected after 1923 is not in the public domain. This statue was erected in 2006, see this. PumpkinSky talk 01:32, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:50, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted objects.

G I Chandor (talk) 01:38, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:50, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermarking indicates this is not the uploader's work Ytoyoda (talk) 03:39, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:51, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work MB298 (talk) 04:45, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:51, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

maybe, not own work G I Chandor (talk) 05:07, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:51, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

maybe, not own work G I Chandor (talk) 05:08, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:51, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

derivative work, not own work... probable copyvio, see watermark Pippobuono (talk) 09:31, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:53, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

derivative work... wrong licence Pippobuono (talk) 09:32, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:53, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

derivative work, wrong licence Pippobuono (talk) 09:33, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:53, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

derivative work, wrong licence Pippobuono (talk) 09:33, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:53, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Studio photo, only upload by user, no EXIF, relatively low res Vera (talk) 09:51, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:53, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:09, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:55, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused and unreadable (hence useless) family tree; a high-resolution version of that image could yet be useful Jochen Burghardt (talk) 10:10, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:55, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Titosunkist

[edit]

Personal artwork uploaded by a single-purpose account for advertising purposes. They were used in an article that was deleted for being advertising. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 10:12, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:52, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo not to be used in public Sdarak09 (talk) 10:20, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:59, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo not to be used Sdarak09 (talk) 10:21, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:59, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/p/BRZljLcDw44/ Ytoyoda (talk) 03:34, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:24, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Japan. G I Chandor (talk) 04:59, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:25, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama for sculpture in the U.S., and thish is mainly a picture of a group of pieces by Dale Chihuly. Jmabel ! talk 05:03, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:25, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted artwork. G I Chandor (talk) 05:11, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:25, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted statues.

G I Chandor (talk) 05:14, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:25, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Japan. The statues were created by 岡本庄三 (Shozo Okamoto) [6]. His death year is 1994 [7].

G I Chandor (talk) 05:23, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:25, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted object. G I Chandor (talk) 05:31, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:26, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted characters. G I Chandor (talk) 05:32, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:26, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo contains a copyrighted artwork. G I Chandor (talk) 05:43, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:27, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo contains a copyrighted artwork. G I Chandor (talk) 05:43, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:27, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Original photographer needs to send permission to our support team. Delete per our precautionary principle. Wikicology (talk) 10:37, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wikicology a permission mail was sent to the OTRS support team. If the OTRS support team so requires or can't find it, I was in copy of that mail they may request for me to forward it to them. --Flixtey (talk) 10:44, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Please, contact OTRS if you want to know what happens to your previous email. As far as I can see prior to nominating this file for deletion, there is no evidence that permission was received or sent to our support team. With kind regards. Wikicology (talk) 10:59, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: I found the ticket, ticket:2017021410014727, but it's not yet sufficient. Closing this DR for now. We grant 30 days to complete the verification process. --Jcb (talk) 16:09, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Original photographer needs to send permission to our support team. Delete per our precautionary principle. Wikicology (talk) 10:40, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wikicology a permission mail was sent to the OTRS support team. If the OTRS support team so requires or can't find it, I was in copy of that mail they may request for me to forward it to them.--Flixtey (talk) 10:46, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Please, contact OTRS if you want to know what happens to your previous email. As far as I can see prior to nominating this file for deletion, there is no evidence that permission was received or sent to our support team. With kind regards. Wikicology (talk) 10:54, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: I found the ticket, ticket:2017021410014727, but it's not yet sufficient. Closing this DR for now. We grant 30 days to complete the verification process. --Jcb (talk) 16:09, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Original photographer needs to send permission to our support team. Delete per our precautionary principle. Wikicology (talk) 10:41, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wikicology a permission mail was sent to the OTRS support team. If the OTRS support team so requires or can't find it, I was in copy of that mail they may request for me to forward it to them.--Flixtey (talk) 10:46, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Please, contact OTRS if you want to know what happens to your previous email. As far as I can see prior to nominating this file for deletion, there is no evidence that permission was received or sent to our support team. With kind regards. Wikicology (talk) 10:58, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: I found the ticket, ticket:2017021410014727, but it's not yet sufficient. Closing this DR for now. We grant 30 days to complete the verification process. --Jcb (talk) 16:09, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Original photographer needs to send permission to our support team. Delete per our precautionary principle. Wikicology (talk) 10:41, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wikicology a permission mail was sent to the OTRS support team. If the OTRS support team so requires or can't find it, I was in copy of that mail they may request for me to forward it to them.--Flixtey (talk) 10:47, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Please, contact OTRS if you want to know what happens to your previous email. As far as I can see prior to nominating this file for deletion, there is no evidence that permission was received or sent to our support team. With kind regards. Wikicology (talk) 10:58, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: I found the ticket, ticket:2017021410014727, but it's not yet sufficient. Closing this DR for now. We grant 30 days to complete the verification process. --Jcb (talk) 16:09, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Original photographer needs to send permission to our support team. Delete per our precautionary principle. Wikicology (talk) 10:42, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wikicology a permission mail was sent to the OTRS support team. If the OTRS support team so requires or can't find it, I was in copy of that mail they may request for me to forward it to them.--Flixtey (talk) 10:48, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Please, contact OTRS if you want to know what happens to your previous email. As far as I can see prior to nominating this file for deletion, there is no evidence that permission was received or sent to our support team. With kind regards. Wikicology (talk) 10:57, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: I found the ticket, ticket:2017021410014727, but it's not yet sufficient. Closing this DR for now. We grant 30 days to complete the verification process. --Jcb (talk) 16:09, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Original photographer needs to send permission to our support team. Delete per our precautionary principle. Wikicology (talk) 10:42, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wikicology a permission mail was sent to the OTRS support team. If the OTRS support team so requires or can't find it, I was in copy of that mail they may request for me to forward it to them.--Flixtey (talk) 10:48, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Please, contact OTRS if you want to know what happens to your previous email. As far as I can see prior to nominating this file for deletion, there is no evidence that permission was received or sent to our support team. With kind regards. Wikicology (talk) 10:57, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: I found the ticket, ticket:2017021410014727, but it's not yet sufficient. Closing this DR for now. We grant 30 days to complete the verification process. --Jcb (talk) 16:09, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Original photographer needs to send permission to our support team. Delete per our precautionary principle. Wikicology (talk) 10:43, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wikicology a permission mail was sent to the OTRS support team. If the OTRS support team so requires or can't find it, I was in copy of that mail they may request for me to forward it to them.--Flixtey (talk) 10:49, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Please, contact OTRS if you want to know what happens to your previous email. As far as I can see prior to nominating this file for deletion, there is no evidence that permission was received or sent to our support team. With kind regards. Wikicology (talk) 10:56, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: I found the ticket, ticket:2017021410014727, but it's not yet sufficient. Closing this DR for now. We grant 30 days to complete the verification process. --Jcb (talk) 16:09, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Original photographer needs to send permission to our support team. Delete per our precautionary principle. Wikicology (talk) 10:43, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wikicology a permission mail was sent to the OTRS support team. If the OTRS support team so requires or can't find it, I was in copy of that mail they may request for me to forward it to them.--Flixtey (talk) 10:49, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Please, contact OTRS if you want to know what happens to your previous email. As far as I can see prior to nominating this file for deletion, there is no evidence that permission was received or sent to our support team. With kind regards. Wikicology (talk) 10:56, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: I found the ticket, ticket:2017021410014727, but it's not yet sufficient. Closing this DR for now. We grant 30 days to complete the verification process. --Jcb (talk) 16:09, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Original photographer needs to send permission to our support team. Delete per our precautionary principle. Wikicology (talk) 10:44, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wikicology a permission mail was sent to the OTRS support team. If the OTRS support team so requires or can't find it, I was in copy of that mail they may request for me to forward it to them.--Flixtey (talk) 10:50, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Please, contact OTRS if you want to know what happens to your previous email. As far as I can see prior to nominating this file for deletion, there is no evidence that permission was received or sent to our support team. With kind regards. Wikicology (talk) 10:55, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: I found the ticket, ticket:2017021410014727, but it's not yet sufficient. Closing this DR for now. We grant 30 days to complete the verification process. --Jcb (talk) 16:09, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope selfie photograph. Wikimedia is not a personal photo-album. Acabashi (talk) 11:28, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:27, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

promotional content, no notability Do not follow (talk) 12:18, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:27, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nice :) But against privacy protection and no educational use Derbrauni (talk) 12:22, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:28, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No educational purpose Derbrauni (talk) 12:25, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:29, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No educational purpose Derbrauni (talk) 12:25, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:29, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No educational purpose Derbrauni (talk) 13:54, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:29, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:01, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:29, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am unaware that "Enciklopedija Jugoslavije" is out of copyright. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:13, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:29, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text is under copyright to someone - most likely not the uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:14, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:29, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted characters. G I Chandor (talk) 05:44, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:41, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted characters. G I Chandor (talk) 05:51, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:40, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING. G I Chandor (talk) 05:52, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:40, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DOGBEE4 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Maybe, not own work. It seems these are scenes from movies or TV programs.

G I Chandor (talk) 06:00, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:40, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted object. G I Chandor (talk) 06:05, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:44, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

widely used in internet (tumblr for example) propably copyright violation Berthold Werner (talk) 06:49, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This photo with complete information taken by me. Improbably copyright violation. -- 松粉 (talk) 07:21, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by colleague. --Jcb (talk) 16:42, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FoP doesn't include posters in Austria. Derivative work of copyrighted material. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 06:49, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:41, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photograph apparently shows a non-notable family. Robert Weemeyer (talk) 07:14, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:42, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photograph apparently shows a group of non-notable people. Robert Weemeyer (talk) 07:15, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:42, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photograph apparently shows a non-notable family. Robert Weemeyer (talk) 07:15, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:42, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation (no data) Supporterhéninois (talk) 07:28, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:42, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be a screenshot instead of a free work. Antigng (talk) 15:56, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, can be found in the web, speedy deleted. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:15, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted material. Recreation after speedy deletion. Antigng (talk) 07:48, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:43, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Delete as company property Sdarak09 (talk) 10:21, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:43, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think we've deleted this image before, in any case we're likely to do so again as this is obviously not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:13, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:30, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cropped from https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Renato_Curi.JPG without attribution or proper license. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:24, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:32, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://plus.google.com/112422463544632699529, and no way is this a selfie. So if the Race Car Driver is uploading this image, it's not "own work permission from actual photographer is required via COM:OTRS. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:27, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:31, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of own work. If uploader is racecar driver, this is not possibly a selfie. This looks like an unattributed professional photograph due to clarity, size, and location from which it was taken. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:28, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:31, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source is another wiki with no additional source information whatsoever to prove that this is free use. Majora (talk) 22:11, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:32, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gun Lover (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Source is another wiki with no additional source information whatsoever to prove that these images are free use.

Majora (talk) 22:12, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:33, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by YatesMcLamb&Weyher (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope

PokestarFan (talk) 22:20, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:35, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad quality, no enzyclopädic information and no use with sense possible. Codc (talk) 22:36, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:39, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad quality, no enzyclopädic information and no use with sense possible. Codc (talk) 22:44, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:39, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams of poor quality, and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 00:30, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:04, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Japan. G I Chandor (talk) 00:46, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:05, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The description board is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 00:48, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:05, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted object. G I Chandor (talk) 00:51, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:05, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted object. G I Chandor (talk) 00:51, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:05, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted poster. G I Chandor (talk) 00:53, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:05, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo contains copyrighted images. G I Chandor (talk) 00:55, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:05, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Japan. G I Chandor (talk) 00:55, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:06, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The description board is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 00:56, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:06, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted object. G I Chandor (talk) 00:57, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:06, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The description board is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 00:59, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:06, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The description board is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 01:00, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:06, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The description board is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 01:00, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:06, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Japan. G I Chandor (talk) 01:01, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:07, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The guide map is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 01:02, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:07, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The description board is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 01:03, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:07, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The description board is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 01:03, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:07, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted posters. G I Chandor (talk) 01:06, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:07, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Japan. G I Chandor (talk) 01:08, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:07, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Japan.

G I Chandor (talk) 01:09, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:07, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Japan. G I Chandor (talk) 01:10, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:11, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Japan. G I Chandor (talk) 01:11, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:11, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Japan. G I Chandor (talk) 01:11, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:11, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright holder is Wales News Service Ltd, not the Welsh government. No evidence for the provided license Ytoyoda (talk) 03:14, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:13, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Almost all these photographs are marked copyrighted and credited to Wales News Service, not the Welsh government. There's no indication that Wales News Service or other rights holders have released these images.

Also listing:

Ytoyoda (talk) 03:25, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes there is! Link was given to their images here on the Government's website; click on the 'Copyright' link - bottom left. Read. The photographs' copyright would have been cleared internally by the Government, otherwise they could not use them on an OGL licence; we must accept that that is the case, and assume good faith. Llywelyn2000 (talk) 07:52, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Here are the relevant texts in the copyright statement that you referred to:
Most of the material featured on this site is subject to Crown copyright protection.
(The implication here is that some material on the website are under Crown copyright, some are not)
The permission to reproduce Crown copyright material does not extend to any material on this site which is identified as being the copyright of a third party. Authorisation to reproduce such material would need to be obtained from the copyright holders concerned.
This is the key point. While governments often allow the content they produce to be distributed freely (for example, press releases and other text), they also re-publish content created by third parties, like video and photographs. In this case, most of the photographs are explicitly credited to a third party that claims its own copyright. And that copyright doesn't simply disappear simply because the work is featured on a government website. Ytoyoda (talk) 11:49, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. The high-res images I uploaded were sent directly to my email address from the Welsh Gov, at my request. I've just sent them a link to this discussion and will come back as soon as I hear from them. Then, I suppose I'll ORTS their email. Llywelyn2000 (talk) 12:13, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - may be restored if a valid permission arrives at OTRS. --Jcb (talk) 21:13, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Japan. The statue was erected in 1978. [8] G I Chandor (talk) 06:07, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:14, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of "own work" followed by "from private collection". Needs permission of actual creator. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:12, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:15, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contains Derivative Images of the flowers without attribution to source. This is the same as a collage, each image needs a source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:15, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:16, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, incomplete EXIF data, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 18:46, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:17, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused textlogo of non-notable network, probably out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 21:56, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:18, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear ownership. Listed as "own work" but very low resolution and no exif data. Also states "Permission for the use of this images granted by Mickey Munday" but no OTRS. Themightyquill (talk) 21:59, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:17, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As the photo is previously published, own work is considered doubtful and OTRS-permission from copyright holder is needed. Taivo (talk) 22:03, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:18, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work': rather small-sized format, one-file-upload, potentially copyright isusses, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin, hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 23:07, 24 March 2017 (UTC)  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 19:59, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:18, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These photos contain copyrighted advertisements.

G I Chandor (talk) 00:22, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:09, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

your opinions are asked : rather 'family album' or 'posing', but also potentially personality rights isusses, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? btw: file not in use at Wikimedia projects for use at a user page, Roland zh (talk) 00:25, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:09, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo with personal identifiable data, i.e. seriously personality rights isusses and/or 'family album' content, as well as claimed 'own work' but missing EXIF data etc to verify, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 00:40, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:09, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication that the author would have died before 1947, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 01:25, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:09, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photograph is from the campground's National Register nomination. As such it is the work of another person and it is therefore a copyright violation. Farragutful (talk) 02:32, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:09, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted characters.

G I Chandor (talk) 05:48, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:10, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted object.

G I Chandor (talk) 06:17, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:11, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:13, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 10:29, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:13, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication that the author would have died before 1947, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 10:34, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:13, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. France has the PMA+70 rule. No indication that the author would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 10:36, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:13, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Ghana. Wikicology (talk) 11:03, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:13, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sadly, no FoP in Ghana. Wikicology (talk) 11:10, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:13, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Ghana. Wikicology (talk) 11:11, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:14, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Ghana. Wikicology (talk) 11:13, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:14, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement - THe mermaid is still protected Pugilist (talk) 11:16, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:14, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I wonder whether this is own work. On this page is mentioned that the photographer is Rob Rich. It is the only contribution of the user and there are no metadata. Wouter (talk) 12:07, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:14, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source for the base map. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 14:00, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:14, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of a mural painting. -- Asclepias (talk) 14:02, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Canada has Freedom of panorama for 3D works, so the key question is: do we consider this a 2D or a 3D work? May be borderline. Jcb (talk) 15:32, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
There is no exception for paintings. This is a painting. -- Asclepias (talk) 15:49, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:15, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1947 and no indication that this would be an anonymous work. Jcb (talk) 14:34, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:15, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 14:38, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:15, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1947, or that the picture of this German ship would somehow be UK crown copyright. Jcb (talk) 14:42, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:15, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 14:45, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:15, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 14:46, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:15, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bandera de Castil de Campos (Córdoba).svg is a new and improved version. File:Bandera de E.L.A. de Castil de Campos (Córdoba).svg it's a duplicate and unnecessary. Erlenmeyer (talk) 14:49, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:15, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Escudo de Castil de Campos (Córdoba).svg is a new and improved version. File:Escudo de E.L.A. de Castil de Campos (Córdoba).svg it's a duplicate and unnecessary. Erlenmeyer (talk) 14:50, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:15, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a work of the US federal government. Copyrighted by Henry De Wolf Smyth. Jcb (talk) 15:06, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:15, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is so small and of such poor quality that it's doubtful that it is the own work of uploader. If I'm wrong, please upload a larger version, without being overlaid on a clear background, etc. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:09, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:16, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source for the base map. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 15:17, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:16, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 15:20, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:16, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image from 2010 "european press agency" as per (C) in lower left corner, and publication http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1250636/Olympic-luger-Nodar-Kumaritashvili-killed-smashing-concrete-pillar-95mph.html Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:22, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:16, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wikimedia Commons is not for trivia, especially if it is incorrect or unsourced. Lordtobi () 15:43, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:25, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wikimedia Commons is not for trivia. Lordtobi () 15:44, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:25, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wikimedia Commons is not for trivia. Lordtobi () 15:44, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:25, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wikimedia Commons is not for trivia or personal advertisment. Lordtobi () 15:45, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:25, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A priori, image non libre / Seems under copyright Shev123 (talk) 15:51, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Asdesas4 and Shev123: La photo a été vendue par le photographe Julien Panie au Lido et n'a pas été chargée par l'ayant droit ni validé par un ticket. Sans rapide mise en règle de la licence, une suppression est inévitable. La photo a été téléchargée par une nouvelle contributrice dans la cadre d'un WikiMOOC, il faut donc lui fournir les explications sur le principe des licences et des autorisations sur commons avant suppression. Snipre (talk) 16:32, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:25, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication that the author would have died before 1947, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 15:52, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:16, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A logo of a political party doesn't seem to fit into the mentioned license. Yann (talk) 18:18, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(d) State symbols of Ukraine, government awards; symbols and signs of government authorities, the Armed Forces of Ukraine and other military formations; symbols of territorial communities; symbols and signs of enterprises, institutions and organizations/ The All-Ukrainian Union "Svoboda" is a Ukrainian nationalist political party. --Andrew J.Kurbiko (talk) 18:23, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as per Yann -- this is a political party not part of the Ukrainian Government. --Daphne Lantier 00:25, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [9]. Yann (talk) 22:13, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free logo of a company in Taiwan where the COM:TOO is not clear Wcam (talk) 18:51, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:16, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think this is a copyvio, but the official website does not state any licenses PokestarFan (talk) 18:56, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is the official logo of the French research agency "ANRS". The license is theirs. Nopluss


Kept: simple text logo. --Daphne Lantier 00:22, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probabile licenza non valida: è una foto professionale Emmepici (talk) 19:13, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:22, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement. Painter Henry Heerup died in 1993 Pugilist (talk) 19:14, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:17, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Depicted person was born in 1926, so the photo is made in 1970s or 1980s. Own work is under doubt, maybe copyright violation. Who is photographer and does (s)he allow free publishing the photo? Taivo (talk) 20:17, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:17, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo was uploaded into Commons on 31st of May 2015, but was found at http://www.kar-online.com/node/9287 from 6th of May 2015. That case OTRS-permission from copyright holder is needed. Taivo (talk) 20:20, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:17, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It seems like a product package. Not used and potential copyright violation. Kuailong (talk) 20:26, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:17, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope. Blurry screenshot from a video that has no clear meaning. Kuailong (talk) 20:32, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:17, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

KennCreation (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except self-promotional userpages in Commons (now deleted), en.wiki and meta and uploading a selfie, which is used only on the userpages. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 20:37, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:17, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

a página ta mal feita A.daniele (talk) 20:46, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:21, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Aarushi.sh842 (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except userpage in hi.wiki and uploading a selfie, which is used only on the userpage. All her activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 21:00, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:17, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused bad user creation of File:Wappen_Mueckenloch.png, replaced by File:COA Mückenloch.svg -- User: Perhelion 21:05, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:17, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS-permission from author and copyright holder Walmir Piva is needed. Taivo (talk) 21:35, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's copyrighted here. In pt-wiki this uploader request the deletion (in Portuguese: "Peço por gentileza que eliminem todos os dados como a foto q inseri dessa garota" translated by google: "I beg you to delete all the data like a photo that I uploaded from this girl"); but in file, this user vandalized this request. (sorry my bad English). André Koehne TALK TO ME 07:41, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:21, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too dark/low-quality to be of any educational use, especially with many other images of the same subject that have much higher quality. –Juliancolton | Talk 21:53, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:18, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploads by User:Detective psm

[edit]

See User's upload log for list of files.

False own work claim. Images are photos taken from books. --Paul_012 (talk) 21:53, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:21, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, the user's only upload. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 21:59, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:18, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication on the source link provided for the image that this logo has been released under a "Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported" license as claimed by the uploader. It might be possible for this to be treated as PD if it's too simple for copyright protection, but a discussion about the file at COM:VP/C seems to think it's not. Unless it can be clearly shown to be PD for Lithuania, the file should be deleted per COM:PCP. Marchjuly (talk) 22:37, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:18, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not used, file superseded by a better format – File:Symfony.svg. Rezonansowy (talk) 23:01, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:18, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo contains copyrighted artworks. G I Chandor (talk) 05:36, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The fact that it is a tradiational character, like Santa, is irrelevant. Individual representations of Santa have copyrights, too. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:54, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no author nor permission mentionned, name of source is a apparently a twitter account Do not follow (talk) 07:57, 24 March 2017 (UTC).[reply]

Plusieurs sources ainsi que Le Figaro qui est ici: www.lefigaro.fr/international/2016/10/18/01003-20161018ARTFIG00167-un-immense-concert-neonazi-choque-la-suisse.php
right, Le Figaro is a well-known french newspaper. --Do not follow (talk) 12:23, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Le Figraro has a copyright. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:54, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.


Company Henner is now mentioned in fr:Henner. DianeBri (talk) 12:12, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:55, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of "Own work". Uploader is the one appearing in the photo. Original photographer needs to send permission to support team. Wikicology (talk) 11:06, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the prompt Wikicology, It has been changed accordingly to the author and copyright holder Rberchie. He has also just forwarded a permission for upload immediately --Flixtey (talk) 13:06, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No wahala, bro. All the best.Wikicology (talk) 14:09, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Needs OTRS. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:56, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of "Own work". Uploader is the one appearing in the photo. Original photographer needs to send permission to support team. Wikicology (talk) 11:07, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the prompt Wikicology, It has been changed accordingly to the author and copyright holder Rberchie. He has also just forwarded a permission for upload immediately --Flixtey (talk) 13:07, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No wahala, bro. All the best.Wikicology (talk) 14:09, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:56, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of "Own work". Uploader is the one appearing in the photo. Original photographer needs to send permission to support team. Wikicology (talk) 11:08, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the prompt Wikicology, It has been changed accordingly to the author and copyright holder Rberchie. He has also just forwarded a permission for upload immediately --Flixtey (talk) 13:08, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No wahala, bro. All the best.Wikicology (talk) 14:08, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:56, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of "Own work". Uploader is the one appearing in the photo. Original photographer needs to send permission to support team. Wikicology (talk) 11:08, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the prompt Wikicology, It has been changed accordingly to the author and copyright holder Rberchie. He has also just forwarded a permission for upload immediately --Flixtey (talk) 13:10, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No wahala, bro. All the best.Wikicology (talk) 14:08, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:57, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of "Own work". Uploader is the one appearing in the photo. Original photographer needs to send permission to support team. Wikicology (talk) 11:15, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the prompt Wikicology, It has been changed accordingly to the author and copyright holder Rberchie. He has also just forwarded a permission for upload immediately --Flixtey (talk) 13:11, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No wahala, bro. All the best. Wikicology (talk) 14:06, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:57, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of "Own work". Uploader is the one appearing in the photo. Original photographer needs to send permission to support team. Wikicology (talk) 11:16, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for prompting me of this error Wikicology, It has been changed accordingly to the author and copyright holder User:Rberchie. He has also just forwarded a permission for upload immediately --Flixtey (talk) 13:04, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No wahala, bro. All the best.Wikicology (talk) 14:10, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:57, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This Image is not "Kadim Hamdani Mosque" of Bangladesh, ID-BD-C-63-79 - Image should be removed Please User:Ibrahim_Husain_Meraj cross check it - Indrajit Das (Talk - Contribs) 11:41, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:58, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This Image is not "Kadim Hamdani Mosque" of Bangladesh, ID-BD-C-63-79 - Image should be removed Please User:Ibrahim_Husain_Meraj cross check it.- Indrajit Das (Talk - Contribs) 11:43, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:58, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Vida Brodar's adaptatiom of Martin's scale"... no permision from Brodar or Martin. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:08, 24 March 2017 (UTC)  Keep - Actually this is a scientific scale of nature (physical anthropology). Nature itself (for example the eye colors, eye shapes) cannot be copyrighted. The Martin scale is just a scientific scale of nature like the Richter magnitude scale. So no copyright violation from this perspective. The only copyrighted thing I see here is the photgraph itself and there is a correct licence given. --Micha (talk) 15:31, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Many of these are 3-D objects (example: http://web.archive.org/web/20160802080400/http://antropologia-fizyczna.pl/images/antropometria/somatoskopia/martin-schulz.jpg) and I think this photograph is also of a 3d object, notice the hinges and the case. On en:Martin scale where it is in use, it says it's adapted by Vida Brodar, and appears to contain an illustration or photograph of each different colored eye making it a composite image and derivative work of the object. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:09, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Whether the individcual eyes are photographs or paintings, they each have copyrights, so the scale as a whole has a copyright. We need a license from Brodar. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:00, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Based of Commons:Threshold of originality, India's TOO is not clear so it may be appropriate not to host the file here. The same file is currently hosted on Wikipedia where it meets the USA's TOO. Also I do not believe the uploader is the author of the file. Salavat (talk) 11:18, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-textlogo. --Yann (talk) 20:40, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inferior dupe of File:Wappen_Aurich.png (the speedy dupe tag was removed by Billinghurst without anything). -- User: Perhelion 10:06, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that you will find that this has a transparent background, and the other does not.  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:09, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
In fact I really don't recognized your revert, because I don't expect that very uncommon behavior. The Commons rules tell us that are no need for dupe for (transparency/other) backgrounds. Also this file is unsused! In addition, you have reverted a 7 year old version (beside the reverted image had alpha-transparency and this only primitive gif-transparency also without color gradient

, which is clear recognizable). -- User: Perhelion 10:18, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: not exact duplicates. Ruthven (msg) 08:28, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Multiple issues:

  1. Icons on the sidebar are under various unmentioned licenses, which would need to be checked for license compatibility and sourced appropriately to establish copyright. In example, {{MPL2}} for the Firefox icon. Alternatively, these parts may be cropped off the image as they are not seemingly essential to the representation.
  2. The yellow car graphic (authored by Konstantin Rotkevich) is believed to be licensed under Free Art License ({{FAL}}), which is considered incompatible with the GPLv2+ (Inkscape's choice of license). See File talk:Inkscape0.45.png, Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2016/08#Non-free revisions of File:Inkscape0.45.png, Various Licenses and Comments about Them § Free Art License and GNU General Public License, version 2, section 4. Note this graphic is distributed with Inkscape 0.91 source code as an aggregate work at inkscape-0.91/share/examples/car.svgz.
  3. The author (User:Plommespiser) cannot license modified works derived from GPL-licensed works under a CC BY-SA 4.0 license due to license incompatibility. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:GIMP 2.9 Usage.png for a similar case and GNU General Public License, version 2, section 4 for the termination clause.

With the author's consent, it may be possible to license this derivative work under GPLv2+({{GPLv2+}}, {{GPLv2 only}}, {{GPLv3+}} or {{GPLv3 only}}), if the concern about license compatibility with the yellow car graphic and Free Art License is resolved prior.

 Question: Additionally, have the conditions set in GPLv2 section 3 been previously met as of starting this nomination for providing a complete corresponding source, and section 2 for possible prominent notices if modifications were made? 80.221.152.17 20:10, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Info: I've checked the metadata of car.svgz in Inkscape 0.91 source distribution, and it still carries an URI to http://artlibre.org/licence.php/lalgb.html (Free Art License) today. 80.221.152.17 20:13, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: Prior to this nomination, I didn't check the uploader's other uploads. It seems like many more of them (upload log for Plommespiser) are troubled with similar issues. I'm going to tag these with Template:Incompatible license, but it'd be helpful if someone with a mass-tool could nominate them for deletion and refer here. 80.221.152.17 20:41, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Close in procedural grounds: Screenshots of well-known free software must be licensed according to every element there, and separated licenses for the software and the document depicted has been accepted in Commons for years (this is specially true for Browser screenshots showing Wikipedia). The icons in the bar could be considered de minimis (since the main subject is the Inkscape screenshot), and a large list of licenses for every de-minimis elements does not makes sense.
The right place to discusse this license compatibility issue is the Village Pump rather than tagging a wide ammount of properly licensed files (specially if you're editing under an IP address). --Amitie 10g (talk) 05:47, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Amitie 10g: Thanks for mentioning de minimis for the icons. I'm upholding this nomination for this specific file, mainly due to the concern about Free Art License incompatibility and how it's impossible to convey this adapted/modified work, in addition to the CC BY-SA incompatibility. 80.221.152.17 21:32, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: All elements must be properly attributed and documented. This has not even been done for the yellow car which appears to be the main element. --AFBorchert (talk) 13:26, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]