Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/03/24
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
|
|
Low quality image, and I can't imagine a use for it. Jmabel ! talk 04:47, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 12:17, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
No evidence of copyright status The Bounder (talk) 14:42, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation: external source, no license, no permission, probably intended as fair use. Green Giant (talk) 15:57, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
copyright violation (google) j.budissin+/- 00:43, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Ellin Beltz: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing
The youtuber Seng12900 .beautypageant is not the creator of the original footage or the copyright holder, the license is void. Martin H. (talk) 19:29, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, work at youtube was not author's to release. — billinghurst sDrewth 00:22, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Album Cover, accidentally uploaded to commons instead of Wikipedia itself. Tronvillain (talk) 21:42, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: fair use. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:43, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
It has been 7 days, time to delete PokestarFan (talk) 22:29, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb: Missing permission as of 17 March 2017 - Using VisualFileChange.
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. The UK has the PMA+70 rule. No indication that the author would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 15:59, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- https://www.granger.com/results.asp?image=0053852 gives an actual date of 1896. No help with authorship, however. - Reventtalk 07:32, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
- Ok, then it's (just) old enough for {{PD-old-assumed}}. Jcb (talk) 11:04, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: resolved. --Jcb (talk) 11:05, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by LAPIERRE Christophe
This is an Android screen recording of installing an app, not needed PokestarFan (talk) 18:59, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Commons:Derivative works from software screenshots. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:44, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Comes from http://www.zenit-kazan.com/media/photo/?year=2016&id_players=191, no evidence for provided license Ytoyoda (talk) 14:51, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:59, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Taken from http://www.skra.pl/en/team/players/item/4349-bartosz-kurek Ytoyoda (talk) 14:52, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:59, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
from http://www.fivb.org/Vis2009/Images/GetImage.asmx?type=press&no=59854 Ytoyoda (talk) 14:54, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:00, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
The youtuber Seng12900 .beautypageant is not the creator of the original footage or the copyright holder, the license is void. Martin H. (talk) 19:29, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Per nomination. --Discasto talk 23:44, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:43, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mukeshchaupal (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:02, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:29, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:02, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and no license. --Yann (talk) 22:29, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and no license. --Yann (talk) 22:27, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Cláudio Privilégio (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:03, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:37, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:35, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Commons is not a social media site. Out of scope
✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 09:28, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 03:34, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Altantuya battulga (talk · contribs)
[edit]Screenshot of copyrighted computer program
- File:Windows-7-install-1010.jpg
- File:Windows-7-install-8888.jpg
- File:Windows-7-install-6666.jpg
- File:Windows-7-install-5555.jpg
- File:Windows-7-install-3333.jpg
- File:Windows-7-install-2222.jpg
- File:Windows-7-install-181.jpg
- File:Windows-7-install-211.jpg
- File:Windows-7-install-171.jpg
- File:Windows-7-install-20.jpg
- File:Windows-7-install-11.jpg
- File:Windows-7-install-10 1.jpg
- File:Windows-7-install-9.jpg
- File:7zurag.png
- File:21zurag.png
- File:20zurag.png
- File:19zurag.png
- File:18zurag.png
- File:17zurag.png
- File:16zurag.png
- File:15zurag.png
- File:12zurag.png
- File:14zurag.png
- File:13zurag.png
- File:11zurag.png
- File:10zurag.png
- File:9zurag.png
- File:8zurag.png
- File:5zurag.png
- File:6zurag.png
- File:3zurag.png
- File:4zurag.png
- File:2zurag.png
✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 09:34, 24 March 2017 (UTC) Delete It's Windows. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:18, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:12, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Dubious claim of "Own work'. Derivative of non-free work, album cover. Wikicology (talk) 10:16, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:10, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Dubious claim of "Own work'. Derivative of non-free work, album cover. Wikicology (talk) 10:17, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:10, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Dubious claim of "Own work'. Derivative of non-free work, album cover. Wikicology (talk) 10:18, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:10, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Dubious claim of "Own work'. Derivative of non-free work, album cover. Wikicology (talk) 10:18, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:10, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Dubious claim of "Own work'. Derivative of non-free work, album cover. Wikicology (talk) 10:19, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:10, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Dubious claim of "Own work'. Derivative of non-free work, album cover. Wikicology (talk) 10:19, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:10, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Dubious claim of "Own work'. Derivative of non-free work, album cover. Wikicology (talk) 10:19, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:10, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Not licensed Sdarak09 (talk) 10:20, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:10, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Dubious claim of "Own work'. Derivative of non-free work, album cover. Wikicology (talk) 10:20, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:10, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted picture. 95.156.133.166 17:27, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
[1] "©2000-2015, 2016 Buzzle.com®. All rights reserved."--95.156.133.166 17:29, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: Just text and a color pattern, very bellow the Threshold of originality. --Amitie 10g (talk) 05:55, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: In use. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:08, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
This image is not accurate and the source it is from is not reliable. As such it is not educational content. Eye color is not recessive / dominant but polymorphic.[2] It is also not used on any project. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 10:57, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
- Support The link Doc James provided doesn't work for me, but this states that epistasis affects eye colour (so the alleles don't work additively as the image implies), and this says there are about 16 genes affecting eye colour (not three as the image implies). The source can't possibly be reliable as it blatantly contradicts itself, as the first paragraph under "Vital information" is completely inconsistent with the reference chart. In case there's any doubt that Buzzle is not a reliable source, one need only read Advantages and disadvantages of homeopathy. Adrian J. Hunter (talk) 12:19, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
- Delete It's just a colored table with numbers which don't reflect reality. Has no educational use. Ajpolino (talk) 20:06, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
- Delete, out of scope: inaccurate and not usable. CFCF (talk) 21:16, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. Needs to be based on a better source. Also, use of "dark brown-black" can lead people to believe that black eyes exists. Dark brown eyes can appear black, but they are not actually black. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 20:23, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
- delete per nominators rationale--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 21:09, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
- Delete in agreement with the nominator. The chart has no reliable citation and is incorrect. Incidentally copying and pasting Doc James' link works fine for me and the evidence there is clear. Mramoeba (talk) 09:18, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Contrary to the claim in the metadata, the authorship should be attributed to Ishani Chatterjee Shukla. While it is incorrect, it is certainly original in its incorrectness, so yes, it is a clear copyvio. LeadSongDog (talk) 19:37, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 23:42, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted picture 95.156.133.166 17:33, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
[3] © Climate-Data.org.--95.156.133.166 17:33, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:08, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted picture 95.156.133.166 17:36, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
[4]: © Climate-Data.org.--95.156.133.166 17:36, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:08, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
I accidentally uploaded a blurry image. MarioFinale (talk) 18:38, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:08, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
photograph is copied from a book Theroadislong (talk) 18:53, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:08, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
photograph is copied from a book Theroadislong (talk) 18:53, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:08, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
photograph is copied from a book Theroadislong (talk) 18:54, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:08, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
photograph is copied from a book Theroadislong (talk) 18:54, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:08, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
photograph is copied from a book Theroadislong (talk) 18:55, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:08, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ONUA ADDISON (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE, personal, unused, self-promotion.
- File:ADDISON OKOKROKO.jpg
- File:ADDISON AND TINA.jpg
- File:ADDISON.jpg
- File:ADDISON IKE.jpg
- File:ONUA ADDISON.jpg
- User:ONUA ADDISON
--Steinsplitter (talk) 19:33, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; With additional copyright concerns due to small size, no metadata and derivative works. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:07, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Not clear why it is in scope. Jonund (talk) 19:34, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Pictures of classrooms are in scope. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 09:52, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep. Considering we have only 27 photos in category:Classrooms in Canada, I tend to say the photo is in scope. Taivo (talk) 09:01, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:06, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Delete apparently Flickr user is blacklisted. Ww2censor (talk) 21:45, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator. --Leoboudv (talk) 00:29, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:05, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope Themightyquill (talk) 22:04, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:05, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope Themightyquill (talk) 22:05, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:05, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be today's own work, see [5]. BethNaught (talk) 22:08, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:05, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Screenshot PokestarFan (talk) 22:21, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per nom; this is a screenshot of non-free software, hence this screenshot is a copyvio. --★ Poké95 23:25, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Housekeeping: 25 March 2017 Magog the Ogre (talk | contribs | block) deleted page File:انترنت فابور.jpg. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:04, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Copyvio. — Sincerely Issimo 15 23:08, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:04, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
I'm cleaning up old designs. Julius Cæsar (talk) 23:51, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:04, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
I'm cleaning up old designs. Julius Cæsar (talk) 23:52, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:03, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
I'm cleaning up old designs. Julius Cæsar (talk) 23:53, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:03, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
I'm cleaning up old designs. Julius Cæsar (talk) 23:54, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:03, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
I'm cleaning up old designs. Julius Cæsar (talk) 23:55, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:03, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
I'm cleaning up old designs. Julius Cæsar (talk) 23:59, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:03, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
I'm cleaning up old designs. Julius Cæsar (talk) 23:59, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:03, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
not own work, probable copyvio Pippobuono (talk) 09:28, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:17, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Thakur Pankaj Saklani (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope Commons is not a social media
- File:Saklani Sahab.jpg
- File:Pankaj ji.jpg
- File:Pankaj.jpg
- File:Thakur Pankaj Saklani.jpg
- File:Pankaj Saklani.jpg
✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 09:29, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:17, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
as you cas see with the reflect, this is a derivative work from a poster with a glass... not own work and probalby not free Pippobuono (talk) 09:30, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:18, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by OS-J.SA13D034 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Screenshot of Copyrighted computer program
- File:Windows-xp-taskbar.gif
- File:Xp n 03.jpg
- File:RoyaleXP2.png
- File:Windows-xp-bliss-start-screen-100259803-orig.jpg
- File:Install-Windows-XP-Step-25-Version-3.jpg
- File:Windows XP task grouping (Luna).png
✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 09:31, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:18, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:18, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from diplomas.
- File:王静地球九极乞力马扎罗峰登顶证书.jpg
- File:王静地球九极南极点到达证书.jpg
- File:王静地球九极科修斯科登顶证书.jpg
- File:王静地球九极北极到达证书.jpg
- File:王静地球九极珠峰登顶证书.jpg
- File:王静地球九极文森峰登顶证书.pdf
- File:王静地球九极查亚峰登顶证书.jpg
- File:王静地球九极厄尔布鲁士峰登顶证书.pdf
- File:王静地球九极阿空加瓜峰登顶证书.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:18, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:10, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:18, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by RENATO CENTONZE (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos and document. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
- File:APRES MATCH AVANT GARDE TUNIS 1931.pdf
- File:Avant garde (1924).jpg
- File:Avantgarde 1929-30.pdf
- File:Innocenzo Centonze.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- You might want to consider File:AVANT GARDE TUNIS FOOTBALL 1931.pdf as well. Moumou82 (talk) 18:22, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:19, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Files of User:Sidinei Britto
[edit]- File:Britto - Pintor de arte abstrata.jpg
- File:Britto - assinatura.png
- File:Britto Pintor de arte abstrata.jpg
- File:Britto Gallery Art.jpg
Personal images and logos not in use, self-promotion; out of Project scope. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 14:09, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:19, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:19, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Saadtakigov (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:19, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Song. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:20, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:20, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:20, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.techeninja.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Forget-fitness-bands-just-wear-the-Oura-ring.jpg.
- File:Ringly Ring 01.png
- File:Oura Ring 01.png
- File:Payment Ring Olympics 01.png
- File:Payment Ring Superbowl 01.png
- File:Smart Ring.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
I own the copyrights, thank you for checking. shidosuru (talk) 15:26, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - if you are indeed the copyright holder, please contact OTRS. --Jcb (talk) 15:21, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 14:31, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:21, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Aypara1996 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos, documents and newspaper. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:22, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
File:Miniatura Roberto Ferres 01.JPG 189.108.61.194 14:34, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion specified. --Jcb (talk) 15:22, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
No confidence uploader created any of these images, no metadata, very small... all same subject, etc. Probable internet culls and thus COM:COPYVIOs.
- File:Christian-tna.jpg
- File:Christian-cage-tna.jpg
- File:Christian-ecw-champion.jpg
- File:Christian-2003.jpg
- File:Christian2011.jpg
- File:ChristianChampion.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:40, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Files removed 5 October 2015 Materialscientist Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:08, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.wwe.com/f/styles/wwe_large/public/article/image/2013/04/foley_wwe_title_win_article.jpg.
- File:RosemaryTna.jpg
- File:UniversalGoldberg.jpg
- File:GoldbergRaw.jpg
- File:WWEUniversal.jpg
- File:Foley.jpg
- File:Rhino.png
- File:Christian-cage-2011.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:23, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Komoro no kaze (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:小諸高校玄関前に建つ金色の乙女象「静思」.jpg
- File:小諸高校玄関前に建つ金色の乙女象「静思」銘板.jpg
- File:小諸高校玄関前に建つ金色の乙女象「静思」説明板.jpg
- File:椰子の実詩碑.jpg
- File:小諸市立千曲小学校.jpg
- File:高峯財産区高峯土地改良区記念碑.jpg
- File:蛇石.jpg
- File:笠石.jpg
- File:小諸高校.jpg
- File:こもろプラザ.jpg
- File:浅間登山標柱 02.jpg
- File:浅間登山標柱 01.jpg
- File:小諸市古文書調査室.jpg
- File:小林貞吾記念館.jpg
- File:菱野簡易水道菱野配水池.jpg
- File:水明楼.jpg
- File:小諸市立水明小学校校歌碑.jpg
- File:小諸市立水明小学校校歌碑と小諸高原美術館.jpg
- File:小諸市立水明小学校田んぼリンク.jpg
- File:高遠町閉町記念碑.jpg
- File:高遠町閉町記念碑側面.jpg
- File:小諸市庁舎.jpg
- File:二十五菩薩来迎会.jpg
- File:だんご石.jpg
- File:ハナミズキの紅葉.jpg
- File:小諸眺望百選7 浅間サンライン菱野西久保交差点付近.jpg
- File:小諸市動物園のヤギ.jpg
- File:小諸市菱野区入村の道祖神.jpg
- File:小諸市菱野区下村の道祖神.jpg
- File:小諸高校跡碑.jpg
- File:史跡寺ノ浦旧石器時代住居跡.jpg
- File:東山道清水駅.JPG
- File:小諸城址懐古園三之門.jpg
- File:クリーンヒルこもろ.jpg
- File:Dondoyaki.JPG
- File:Komoro-koukouatochihi.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:24, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Komoro no kaze (talk · contribs)
[edit]下記4ファイルに関して初版から2023年11月29日 (水) 12:20 (UTC) の版までの版指定削除を依頼します。外部の個人ウェブサイト「全国の歴史上の人物の御墓」の文章の転載を確認。出典ページ最下部に「文章や画像のコピーは禁止」とあり、著作権侵害のおそれ。
- File:初代小諸城主仙石秀久公墓所.jpg
- File:岩村田 五代藩主 内藤正国公 墓所 01.jpg
- File:岩村田 五代藩主 内藤正国公 墓所 02.jpg
- File:岩村田 五代藩主 内藤正国公 墓所 03.jpg
Qurren (talk) 09:54, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:17, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Karlos Moore (talk · contribs)
[edit]Art by living artist "Judith Barry" (see file names and templates), uploaded by "Karlos Moore". Needs COM:OTRS permission from the artist to retain, with the additional issue of is any of this in COM:SCOPE or not. Images were apparently uploaded for https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judith_Barry, which reads like a promo page.
- File:"Speedflesh" diagram by Judith Barry.jpg
- File:"They Agape" installation by Judith Barry.jpg
- File:"Echo" still frame by Judith Barry.jpg
- File:"Voice Off" installation by Judith Barry.jpg
- File:"Voice Off" still frame by Judith Barry.jpg
- File:"Casual Shopper" installation shot by Judith Barry.jpg
- File:"Speedflesh" close up by Judith Barry.jpg
- File:"Study for the Mirror and Garden" by Judith Barry.jpg
- File:"From Receiver to Remote... Channeling Spain" by Judith Barry.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:05, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:24, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope — Racconish ☎ 15:22, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:27, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope — Racconish ☎ 15:22, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:27, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 16:30, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:27, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work on this 3-d object. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:05, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:28, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Who is the photographer? The author field states: "Scanned by Fanghong". Jcb (talk) 17:28, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- The pic was taken by myself,but used film has to scan, renewd state.--Fanghong (talk) 00:40, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks! I will tag the whole series as own work. Jcb (talk) 14:28, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- I see you already fixed it yourself. Thanks. Jcb (talk) 14:50, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks! I will tag the whole series as own work. Jcb (talk) 14:28, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- The pic was taken by myself,but used film has to scan, renewd state.--Fanghong (talk) 00:40, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: resolved. --Jcb (talk) 14:28, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Placeholder called "no photograph". Achim (talk) 17:29, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:28, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rishikesh001 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.
Yann (talk) 17:59, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:28, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Missing permission M. Krafft (talk) 18:19, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:29, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
The photo incorporates copyright artwork. We need permission from the artist before this photo and the others listed below can be accepted on the Commons. Some of the photos have the artist posing in front of his paintings, but the amount of the painting incorporated into each photo is not trivial, and permission would still be required in the form of an OTRS ticket.
- File:Chaki with mi makir.jpg
- File:Four Seasons 1208 (A,B,C,D) copy.jpg
- File:Four Seasons 1208.jpg
- File:Chaki in front of his large landscape 2016.jpg
- File:Paysage 6001.jpg
- File:City of David Poster.jpg
- File:Oasis 1001.jpg.
Diannaa (talk) 20:05, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:26, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- Restored per ticket:2017032710018939
Ningbo panoramio 2017-03-24
[edit]Panoramio-bot uploaded, including:
- File:在水一方(2013) - panoramio.jpg
- File:南溪家园附近未名小水塘 - panoramio.jpg
- File:故乡的山野(2009) - panoramio.jpg
- File:王鹤农庄 - panoramio.jpg
Not educationally useful, out of scope. Siyuwj (talk) 01:13, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:49, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted object. G I Chandor (talk) 01:14, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:49, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vocaladies (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons is not a place to advertise and out of project scope.
ℯxplicit 01:19, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:49, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
USA does not have freedom of panorama for artworks; hence, any statue erected after 1923 is not in the public domain. This statue was erected in 2006, see this. PumpkinSky talk 01:32, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:50, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Ezaki Glico advertisements
[edit]Copyrighted objects.
G I Chandor (talk) 01:38, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:50, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Watermarking indicates this is not the uploader's work Ytoyoda (talk) 03:39, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:51, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work MB298 (talk) 04:45, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:51, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
maybe, not own work G I Chandor (talk) 05:07, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:51, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
maybe, not own work G I Chandor (talk) 05:08, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:51, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
derivative work, not own work... probable copyvio, see watermark Pippobuono (talk) 09:31, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:53, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
derivative work... wrong licence Pippobuono (talk) 09:32, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:53, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
derivative work, wrong licence Pippobuono (talk) 09:33, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:53, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
derivative work, wrong licence Pippobuono (talk) 09:33, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:53, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Studio photo, only upload by user, no EXIF, relatively low res Vera (talk) 09:51, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:53, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:09, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:55, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
unused and unreadable (hence useless) family tree; a high-resolution version of that image could yet be useful Jochen Burghardt (talk) 10:10, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:55, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Files of User:Titosunkist
[edit]Personal artwork uploaded by a single-purpose account for advertising purposes. They were used in an article that was deleted for being advertising. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 10:12, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:52, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Personal photo not to be used in public Sdarak09 (talk) 10:20, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:59, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Personal photo not to be used Sdarak09 (talk) 10:21, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:59, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Taken from Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/p/BRZljLcDw44/ Ytoyoda (talk) 03:34, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:24, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
No FOP in Japan. G I Chandor (talk) 04:59, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:25, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama for sculpture in the U.S., and thish is mainly a picture of a group of pieces by Dale Chihuly. Jmabel ! talk 05:03, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:25, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted artwork. G I Chandor (talk) 05:11, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:25, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Minamoto no Yoshitsune
[edit]Copyrighted statues.
G I Chandor (talk) 05:14, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:25, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Gojō Ōhashi
[edit]No FOP in Japan. The statues were created by 岡本庄三 (Shozo Okamoto) [6]. His death year is 1994 [7].
G I Chandor (talk) 05:23, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:25, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted object. G I Chandor (talk) 05:31, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:26, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted characters. G I Chandor (talk) 05:32, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:26, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
The photo contains a copyrighted artwork. G I Chandor (talk) 05:43, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:27, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
The photo contains a copyrighted artwork. G I Chandor (talk) 05:43, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:27, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Original photographer needs to send permission to our support team. Delete per our precautionary principle. Wikicology (talk) 10:37, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Hi Wikicology a permission mail was sent to the OTRS support team. If the OTRS support team so requires or can't find it, I was in copy of that mail they may request for me to forward it to them. --Flixtey (talk) 10:44, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Please, contact OTRS if you want to know what happens to your previous email. As far as I can see prior to nominating this file for deletion, there is no evidence that permission was received or sent to our support team. With kind regards. Wikicology (talk) 10:59, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: I found the ticket, ticket:2017021410014727, but it's not yet sufficient. Closing this DR for now. We grant 30 days to complete the verification process. --Jcb (talk) 16:09, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Original photographer needs to send permission to our support team. Delete per our precautionary principle. Wikicology (talk) 10:40, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Hi Wikicology a permission mail was sent to the OTRS support team. If the OTRS support team so requires or can't find it, I was in copy of that mail they may request for me to forward it to them.--Flixtey (talk) 10:46, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Please, contact OTRS if you want to know what happens to your previous email. As far as I can see prior to nominating this file for deletion, there is no evidence that permission was received or sent to our support team. With kind regards. Wikicology (talk) 10:54, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: I found the ticket, ticket:2017021410014727, but it's not yet sufficient. Closing this DR for now. We grant 30 days to complete the verification process. --Jcb (talk) 16:09, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Original photographer needs to send permission to our support team. Delete per our precautionary principle. Wikicology (talk) 10:41, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Hi Wikicology a permission mail was sent to the OTRS support team. If the OTRS support team so requires or can't find it, I was in copy of that mail they may request for me to forward it to them.--Flixtey (talk) 10:46, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Please, contact OTRS if you want to know what happens to your previous email. As far as I can see prior to nominating this file for deletion, there is no evidence that permission was received or sent to our support team. With kind regards. Wikicology (talk) 10:58, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: I found the ticket, ticket:2017021410014727, but it's not yet sufficient. Closing this DR for now. We grant 30 days to complete the verification process. --Jcb (talk) 16:09, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Original photographer needs to send permission to our support team. Delete per our precautionary principle. Wikicology (talk) 10:41, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Hi Wikicology a permission mail was sent to the OTRS support team. If the OTRS support team so requires or can't find it, I was in copy of that mail they may request for me to forward it to them.--Flixtey (talk) 10:47, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Please, contact OTRS if you want to know what happens to your previous email. As far as I can see prior to nominating this file for deletion, there is no evidence that permission was received or sent to our support team. With kind regards. Wikicology (talk) 10:58, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: I found the ticket, ticket:2017021410014727, but it's not yet sufficient. Closing this DR for now. We grant 30 days to complete the verification process. --Jcb (talk) 16:09, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Original photographer needs to send permission to our support team. Delete per our precautionary principle. Wikicology (talk) 10:42, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Hi Wikicology a permission mail was sent to the OTRS support team. If the OTRS support team so requires or can't find it, I was in copy of that mail they may request for me to forward it to them.--Flixtey (talk) 10:48, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Please, contact OTRS if you want to know what happens to your previous email. As far as I can see prior to nominating this file for deletion, there is no evidence that permission was received or sent to our support team. With kind regards. Wikicology (talk) 10:57, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: I found the ticket, ticket:2017021410014727, but it's not yet sufficient. Closing this DR for now. We grant 30 days to complete the verification process. --Jcb (talk) 16:09, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Original photographer needs to send permission to our support team. Delete per our precautionary principle. Wikicology (talk) 10:42, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Hi Wikicology a permission mail was sent to the OTRS support team. If the OTRS support team so requires or can't find it, I was in copy of that mail they may request for me to forward it to them.--Flixtey (talk) 10:48, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Please, contact OTRS if you want to know what happens to your previous email. As far as I can see prior to nominating this file for deletion, there is no evidence that permission was received or sent to our support team. With kind regards. Wikicology (talk) 10:57, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: I found the ticket, ticket:2017021410014727, but it's not yet sufficient. Closing this DR for now. We grant 30 days to complete the verification process. --Jcb (talk) 16:09, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Original photographer needs to send permission to our support team. Delete per our precautionary principle. Wikicology (talk) 10:43, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Hi Wikicology a permission mail was sent to the OTRS support team. If the OTRS support team so requires or can't find it, I was in copy of that mail they may request for me to forward it to them.--Flixtey (talk) 10:49, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Please, contact OTRS if you want to know what happens to your previous email. As far as I can see prior to nominating this file for deletion, there is no evidence that permission was received or sent to our support team. With kind regards. Wikicology (talk) 10:56, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: I found the ticket, ticket:2017021410014727, but it's not yet sufficient. Closing this DR for now. We grant 30 days to complete the verification process. --Jcb (talk) 16:09, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Original photographer needs to send permission to our support team. Delete per our precautionary principle. Wikicology (talk) 10:43, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Hi Wikicology a permission mail was sent to the OTRS support team. If the OTRS support team so requires or can't find it, I was in copy of that mail they may request for me to forward it to them.--Flixtey (talk) 10:49, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Please, contact OTRS if you want to know what happens to your previous email. As far as I can see prior to nominating this file for deletion, there is no evidence that permission was received or sent to our support team. With kind regards. Wikicology (talk) 10:56, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: I found the ticket, ticket:2017021410014727, but it's not yet sufficient. Closing this DR for now. We grant 30 days to complete the verification process. --Jcb (talk) 16:09, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Original photographer needs to send permission to our support team. Delete per our precautionary principle. Wikicology (talk) 10:44, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Hi Wikicology a permission mail was sent to the OTRS support team. If the OTRS support team so requires or can't find it, I was in copy of that mail they may request for me to forward it to them.--Flixtey (talk) 10:50, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Please, contact OTRS if you want to know what happens to your previous email. As far as I can see prior to nominating this file for deletion, there is no evidence that permission was received or sent to our support team. With kind regards. Wikicology (talk) 10:55, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: I found the ticket, ticket:2017021410014727, but it's not yet sufficient. Closing this DR for now. We grant 30 days to complete the verification process. --Jcb (talk) 16:09, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope selfie photograph. Wikimedia is not a personal photo-album. Acabashi (talk) 11:28, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:27, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
promotional content, no notability Do not follow (talk) 12:18, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:27, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Nice :) But against privacy protection and no educational use Derbrauni (talk) 12:22, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:28, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
No educational purpose Derbrauni (talk) 12:25, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:29, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
No educational purpose Derbrauni (talk) 12:25, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:29, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
No educational purpose Derbrauni (talk) 13:54, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:29, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:01, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:29, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
I am unaware that "Enciklopedija Jugoslavije" is out of copyright. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:13, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:29, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Text is under copyright to someone - most likely not the uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:14, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:29, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted characters. G I Chandor (talk) 05:44, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:41, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted characters. G I Chandor (talk) 05:51, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:40, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGING. G I Chandor (talk) 05:52, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope. -Quark Logo (talk) 07:25, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:40, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Maybe, not own work. It seems these are scenes from movies or TV programs.
G I Chandor (talk) 06:00, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:40, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted object. G I Chandor (talk) 06:05, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:44, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
widely used in internet (tumblr for example) propably copyright violation Berthold Werner (talk) 06:49, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
This photo with complete information taken by me. Improbably copyright violation. -- 松粉 (talk) 07:21, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: by colleague. --Jcb (talk) 16:42, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
FoP doesn't include posters in Austria. Derivative work of copyrighted material. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 06:49, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:41, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
This photograph apparently shows a non-notable family. Robert Weemeyer (talk) 07:14, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:42, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
This photograph apparently shows a group of non-notable people. Robert Weemeyer (talk) 07:15, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:42, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
This photograph apparently shows a non-notable family. Robert Weemeyer (talk) 07:15, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:42, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation (no data) Supporterhéninois (talk) 07:28, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:42, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Seems to be a screenshot instead of a free work. Antigng (talk) 15:56, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, can be found in the web, speedy deleted. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:15, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted material. Recreation after speedy deletion. Antigng (talk) 07:48, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:43, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Delete as company property Sdarak09 (talk) 10:21, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:43, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
I think we've deleted this image before, in any case we're likely to do so again as this is obviously not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:13, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:30, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Cropped from https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Renato_Curi.JPG without attribution or proper license. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:24, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:32, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
https://plus.google.com/112422463544632699529, and no way is this a selfie. So if the Race Car Driver is uploading this image, it's not "own work permission from actual photographer is required via COM:OTRS. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:27, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator. — Racconish ☎ 07:29, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:31, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work. If uploader is racecar driver, this is not possibly a selfie. This looks like an unattributed professional photograph due to clarity, size, and location from which it was taken. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:28, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator. — Racconish ☎ 07:32, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:31, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Source is another wiki with no additional source information whatsoever to prove that this is free use. Majora (talk) 22:11, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:32, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Source is another wiki with no additional source information whatsoever to prove that these images are free use.
- File:FN SCAR L (Standard) and FN SCAR H (Standard).jpg
- File:FN SCAR H (Standard).jpg
- File:FN SCAR L (Standard).jpg
Majora (talk) 22:12, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:33, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by YatesMcLamb&Weyher (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope
PokestarFan (talk) 22:20, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:35, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by WesleyCV87 (talk · contribs)
[edit]These are clearly not made by the uploader.
- File:PB-estreladomar pb.jpg
- File:Estrela do Mar Esporte Clube.png
- File:Associação Desportiva Niterói.jpg
- File:Olímpico-AMBR(5).png
- File:Rio Branco de Andradas Futebol Clube.jpg
- File:Lagarto Esporte Clube.png
- File:Estudantes Sport Club.jpg
- File:Gremio Atletico Coariense-AM.gif
- File:Ponta Grossa Esporte Clube.jpg
- File:Atlético Clube Três Corações.jpg
- File:Associação Caçadorense de Desportos.jpg
- File:Joaçaba EC.jpg
- File:Ca Lajes.png
- File:Paulistano-PE.gif
- File:Mancheterecife.gif
PokestarFan (talk) 22:26, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Speedy delete all except File:Lagarto Esporte Clube.png, File:Atlético Clube Três Corações.jpg and File:Paulistano-PE.gif per nom; they are above COM:TOO. Keep File:Lagarto Esporte Clube.png and File:Paulistano-PE.gif as they are below COM:TOO, and Neutral on File:Atlético Clube Três Corações.jpg which is possibly below COM:TOO. --★ Poké95 23:40, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: most, kept three per discussion, I agree those three are below TOO. --Jcb (talk) 16:37, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Bad quality, no enzyclopädic information and no use with sense possible. Codc (talk) 22:36, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:39, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Bad quality, no enzyclopädic information and no use with sense possible. Codc (talk) 22:44, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:39, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
mass-upload of panoramio streams of poor quality, and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 00:30, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:04, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
No FOP in Japan. G I Chandor (talk) 00:46, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:05, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
The description board is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 00:48, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:05, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted object. G I Chandor (talk) 00:51, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:05, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted object. G I Chandor (talk) 00:51, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:05, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted poster. G I Chandor (talk) 00:53, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:05, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
The photo contains copyrighted images. G I Chandor (talk) 00:55, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:05, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
No FOP in Japan. G I Chandor (talk) 00:55, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:06, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
The description board is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 00:56, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:06, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted object. G I Chandor (talk) 00:57, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:06, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
The description board is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 00:59, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:06, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
The description board is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 01:00, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:06, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
The description board is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 01:00, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:06, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
No FOP in Japan. G I Chandor (talk) 01:01, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:07, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
The guide map is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 01:02, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:07, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
The description board is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 01:03, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:07, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
The description board is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 01:03, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:07, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted posters. G I Chandor (talk) 01:06, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:07, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
No FOP in Japan. G I Chandor (talk) 01:08, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:07, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Matsumoto City Museum of Art
[edit]G I Chandor (talk) 01:09, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:07, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
No FOP in Japan. G I Chandor (talk) 01:10, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:11, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
No FOP in Japan. G I Chandor (talk) 01:11, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:11, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
No FOP in Japan. G I Chandor (talk) 01:11, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:11, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Copyright holder is Wales News Service Ltd, not the Welsh government. No evidence for the provided license Ytoyoda (talk) 03:14, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:13, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:St David Awards Finalists
[edit]Almost all these photographs are marked copyrighted and credited to Wales News Service, not the Welsh government. There's no indication that Wales News Service or other rights holders have released these images.
- File:21 Plus; Gwobrau Dewi Sant Welsh Govenment St David Awards 2017 01.jpg
- File:Alison a David Lea-Wilson; Gwobrau Dewi Sant Welsh Govenment St David Awards 2017 05.jpg
- File:Anne Ellis; Gwobrau Dewi Sant Welsh Govenment St David Awards 2017 10.jpg
- File:Anthony Evans Gwobrau Dewi Sant Welsh Govenment St David Awards 2017 02.jpg
- File:Brittany Davies; Gwobrau Dewi Sant Welsh Govenment St David Awards 2017 12.jpg
- File:Cairn Newton-Evans, Gwobrau Dewi Sant Welsh Govenment St David Awards 2017 03.jpg
- File:Carl Jones Gwobrau Dewi Sant Welsh Govenment St David Awards 2017 09.jpg
- File:Cory Band WNS 160217 St David Awards Finalists 89.jpg
- File:Dr David Nott; Gwobrau Dewi Sant Welsh Govenment St David Awards 2017 07.jpg
- File:Elan Môn Gilford; Gwobrau Dewi Sant Welsh Govenment St David Awards 2017 14.jpg
- File:Elfed Roberts WNS 160217 St David Awards Finalists 62.jpg
- File:Innovation genesis biosciences - 01 Genesis Biosciences.jpg
- File:Innovation genesis biosciences - 02.jpg
- File:Innovation genesis biosciences - 03.jpg
- File:Llaeth y Llan; Gwobrau Dewi Sant Welsh Govenment St David Awards 2017 06.jpg
- File:Nizar Dahan ; Gwobrau Dewi Sant Welsh Govenment St David Awards 2017 08.jpg
- File:PC Christopher Buck and PC Rhys Evans WNS 160217 St David Awards Finalists 84.jpg
- File:Pontardawe Fire Crew WNS 160217 St David Awards Finalists 59.jpg
- File:Professor Jen Wilson WNS 160217 St David Awards Finalists 86.jpg
- File:Savannah Lloyd; Gwobrau Dewi Sant Welsh Govenment St David Awards 2017 13.jpg
- File:WNS 160217 St David Awards Finalists 95.jpg
Also listing:
Ytoyoda (talk) 03:25, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Yes there is! Link was given to their images here on the Government's website; click on the 'Copyright' link - bottom left. Read. The photographs' copyright would have been cleared internally by the Government, otherwise they could not use them on an OGL licence; we must accept that that is the case, and assume good faith. Llywelyn2000 (talk) 07:52, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Here are the relevant texts in the copyright statement that you referred to:
- Most of the material featured on this site is subject to Crown copyright protection.
- (The implication here is that some material on the website are under Crown copyright, some are not)
- The permission to reproduce Crown copyright material does not extend to any material on this site which is identified as being the copyright of a third party. Authorisation to reproduce such material would need to be obtained from the copyright holders concerned.
- This is the key point. While governments often allow the content they produce to be distributed freely (for example, press releases and other text), they also re-publish content created by third parties, like video and photographs. In this case, most of the photographs are explicitly credited to a third party that claims its own copyright. And that copyright doesn't simply disappear simply because the work is featured on a government website. Ytoyoda (talk) 11:49, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Here are the relevant texts in the copyright statement that you referred to:
- Thanks. The high-res images I uploaded were sent directly to my email address from the Welsh Gov, at my request. I've just sent them a link to this discussion and will come back as soon as I hear from them. Then, I suppose I'll ORTS their email. Llywelyn2000 (talk) 12:13, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - may be restored if a valid permission arrives at OTRS. --Jcb (talk) 21:13, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
No FOP in Japan. The statue was erected in 1978. [8] G I Chandor (talk) 06:07, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:14, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Dubious claim of "own work" followed by "from private collection". Needs permission of actual creator. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:12, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:15, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Contains Derivative Images of the flowers without attribution to source. This is the same as a collage, each image needs a source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:15, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:16, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Small size, incomplete EXIF data, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 18:46, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:17, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Unused textlogo of non-notable network, probably out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 21:56, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:18, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Unclear ownership. Listed as "own work" but very low resolution and no exif data. Also states "Permission for the use of this images granted by Mickey Munday" but no OTRS. Themightyquill (talk) 21:59, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:17, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
As the photo is previously published, own work is considered doubtful and OTRS-permission from copyright holder is needed. Taivo (talk) 22:03, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:18, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work': rather small-sized format, one-file-upload, potentially copyright isusses, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin, hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 23:07, 24 March 2017 (UTC) Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 19:59, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:18, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
These photos contain copyrighted advertisements.
- File:Assassin's Creed IV Black Flag by Ryo FUKAsawa.jpg
- File:Chaos;Head by Ryo FUKAsawa (2).jpg
- File:D.C. Dream X'mas by Ryo FUKAsawa (1).jpg
- File:D.C. Dream X'mas by Ryo FUKAsawa (3).jpg
- File:Don Quixote x AKB48.jpg
- File:Gamers Akiba - Rewrite, Nana Mizuki Live Games x Academy Blu-ray & DVD.jpg
- File:Gamers Akiba during closed with Rewrite posters.jpg
- File:Ikusa Megami VERITA by Ryo FUKAsawa.jpg
- File:Imouto no Okage de Motesugite Yabai. by Ryo FUKAsawa (1).jpg
- File:Kotori Love Ex P by Ryo FUKAsawa (1).jpg
- File:Kud Wafter by Ryo FUKAsawa (2).jpg
- File:Kud Wafter by Ryo FUKAsawa (7).jpg
- File:LOVELY QUEST by Ryo FUKAsawa (2).jpg
- File:Nanairo Kouro by Ryo FUKAsawa (1).jpg
- File:Nanairo Kouro by Ryo FUKAsawa (2).jpg
- File:Otome Riron to Sono Shuuhen -Ecole de Paris- by Ryo FUKAsawa (2).jpg
- File:Otome Riron to Sono Shuuhen -Ecole de Paris- by Ryo FUKAsawa (3).jpg
- File:Otome Riron to Sono Shuuhen -Ecole de Paris- by Ryo FUKAsawa (4).jpg
- File:Otome Riron to Sono Shuuhen -Ecole de Paris- by Ryo FUKAsawa (6).jpg
- File:Rewrite decoration on Sofmap Akihabara.jpg
- File:Rewrite Harvest festa! on sales in Gamers Akiba.jpg
- File:Rewrite on Animate Nihonbashi shop.jpg
- File:とらのあな 秋葉原店B タイトーステーション側ショーウィンドウ magnet -favorites plus- を撮るカップル (4466428873).jpg
- File:とらのあな 秋葉原店B タイトーステーション側ショーウィンドウ magnet -favorites plus- を撮る女の子 (4404171044).jpg
- File:とらのあな 秋葉原店B タイトーステーション側ショーウィンドウ magnet -favorites plus- を撮る女の子たち (4450073354).jpg
G I Chandor (talk) 00:22, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:09, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
your opinions are asked : rather 'family album' or 'posing', but also potentially personality rights isusses, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? btw: file not in use at Wikimedia projects for use at a user page, Roland zh (talk) 00:25, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:09, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
personal photo with personal identifiable data, i.e. seriously personality rights isusses and/or 'family album' content, as well as claimed 'own work' but missing EXIF data etc to verify, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 00:40, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:09, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
No indication that the author would have died before 1947, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 01:25, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:09, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
This photograph is from the campground's National Register nomination. As such it is the work of another person and it is therefore a copyright violation. Farragutful (talk) 02:32, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:09, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Super Sentai
[edit]Copyrighted characters.
G I Chandor (talk) 05:48, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:10, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted object.
- File:INGRAM AV-98 for THE NEXT GENERATION -PATLABOR- exhibited at Chiba Marine Stadium 01.jpg
- File:INGRAM AV-98 for THE NEXT GENERATION -PATLABOR- exhibited at Chiba Marine Stadium 02.jpg
- File:INGRAM AV-98 for THE NEXT GENERATION -PATLABOR- exhibited at Chiba Marine Stadium 03.jpg
- File:INGRAM AV-98 for THE NEXT GENERATION -PATLABOR- exhibited at Chiba Marine Stadium 04.jpg
- File:INGRAM AV-98 for THE NEXT GENERATION -PATLABOR- exhibited at Chiba Marine Stadium 05.jpg
- File:INGRAM AV-98 for THE NEXT GENERATION -PATLABOR- exhibited at Chiba Marine Stadium 06.jpg
- File:INGRAM AV-98 for THE NEXT GENERATION -PATLABOR- exhibited at Osaka Nanko ATC (1).JPG
- File:INGRAM AV-98 for THE NEXT GENERATION -PATLABOR- exhibited at Osaka Nanko ATC (10).JPG
- File:INGRAM AV-98 for THE NEXT GENERATION -PATLABOR- exhibited at Osaka Nanko ATC (2).JPG
- File:INGRAM AV-98 for THE NEXT GENERATION -PATLABOR- exhibited at Osaka Nanko ATC (3).JPG
- File:INGRAM AV-98 for THE NEXT GENERATION -PATLABOR- exhibited at Osaka Nanko ATC (4).JPG
- File:INGRAM AV-98 for THE NEXT GENERATION -PATLABOR- exhibited at Osaka Nanko ATC (5).JPG
- File:INGRAM AV-98 for THE NEXT GENERATION -PATLABOR- exhibited at Osaka Nanko ATC (6).JPG
- File:INGRAM AV-98 for THE NEXT GENERATION -PATLABOR- exhibited at Osaka Nanko ATC (7).JPG
- File:INGRAM AV-98 for THE NEXT GENERATION -PATLABOR- exhibited at Osaka Nanko ATC (9).JPG
- File:INGRAM AV-98 for THE NEXT GENERATION -PATLABOR- exhibited at Osaka Nanko ATC.JPG
- File:Mercedes-Benz ACTROS loading AV-98 INGRAM 20140810-02.JPG
- File:The Next Generation Patlabor AV-98 INGRAM Back connector 20140810.JPG
- File:The Next Generation Patlabor AV-98 INGRAM Back View 20140810.JPG
- File:The Next Generation Patlabor AV-98 INGRAM Cockpit 20140810.JPG
- File:The Next Generation Patlabor AV-98 INGRAM Front View 20140810.JPG
- File:The Next Generation Patlabor AV-98 INGRAM Head 20140810-01.JPG
- File:The Next Generation Patlabor AV-98 INGRAM Head 20140810-02.JPG
- File:The Next Generation Patlabor AV-98 INGRAM Head 20140810-03.JPG
- File:The Next Generation Patlabor AV-98 INGRAM in Osaka ATC 20140810.JPG
- File:The Next Generation Patlabor AV-98 INGRAM Right Arm 20140810.JPG
- File:The Next Generation Patlabor AV-98 INGRAM Right Leg 20140810.JPG
- File:The Next Generation Patlabor AV-98 INGRAM winch 20140810.JPG
G I Chandor (talk) 06:17, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:11, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- also file:1. Storåsen speidergruppe Bergen.jpg
Artist en:Dik Browne died in 1989 and the logos can be restored in 2060, when the copyright has expired. Taivo (talk) 10:16, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:13, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 10:29, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:13, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
No indication that the author would have died before 1947, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 10:34, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:13, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. France has the PMA+70 rule. No indication that the author would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 10:36, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:13, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Ghana. Wikicology (talk) 11:03, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:13, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Sadly, no FoP in Ghana. Wikicology (talk) 11:10, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:13, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Ghana. Wikicology (talk) 11:11, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:14, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Ghana. Wikicology (talk) 11:13, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:14, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Copyright infringement - THe mermaid is still protected Pugilist (talk) 11:16, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:14, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
I wonder whether this is own work. On this page is mentioned that the photographer is Rob Rich. It is the only contribution of the user and there are no metadata. Wouter (talk) 12:07, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:14, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
No source for the base map. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 14:00, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:14, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Photo of a mural painting. -- Asclepias (talk) 14:02, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Canada has Freedom of panorama for 3D works, so the key question is: do we consider this a 2D or a 3D work? May be borderline. Jcb (talk) 15:32, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- There is no exception for paintings. This is a painting. -- Asclepias (talk) 15:49, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:15, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1947 and no indication that this would be an anonymous work. Jcb (talk) 14:34, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:15, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 14:38, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:15, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1947, or that the picture of this German ship would somehow be UK crown copyright. Jcb (talk) 14:42, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:15, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- Restored -- has source. Daphne Lantier 19:42, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 14:45, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:15, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 14:46, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:15, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
File:Bandera de Castil de Campos (Córdoba).svg is a new and improved version. File:Bandera de E.L.A. de Castil de Campos (Córdoba).svg it's a duplicate and unnecessary. Erlenmeyer (talk) 14:49, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:15, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
File:Escudo de Castil de Campos (Córdoba).svg is a new and improved version. File:Escudo de E.L.A. de Castil de Campos (Córdoba).svg it's a duplicate and unnecessary. Erlenmeyer (talk) 14:50, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:15, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Not a work of the US federal government. Copyrighted by Henry De Wolf Smyth. Jcb (talk) 15:06, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:15, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
This image is so small and of such poor quality that it's doubtful that it is the own work of uploader. If I'm wrong, please upload a larger version, without being overlaid on a clear background, etc. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:09, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:16, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
No source for the base map. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 15:17, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:16, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 15:20, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:16, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Image from 2010 "european press agency" as per (C) in lower left corner, and publication http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1250636/Olympic-luger-Nodar-Kumaritashvili-killed-smashing-concrete-pillar-95mph.html Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:22, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:16, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
COM:COPYVIO Cropped from http://mcfcsupportersclub.co.uk/tag/marc-vivien-foe/ & https://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://mcfcsupportersclub.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Marc-Vivien%2BFoe.jpg&imgrefurl=http://mcfcsupportersclub.co.uk/tag/marc-vivien-foe/&h=322&w=639&tbnid=mj0g7Yk8FbYnWM&tbnh=159&tbnw=316&usg=__PgJPo1r39LGEyW9lQ1VLiKLIDWU=&docid=BMXEfwBIpeVkFM#h=322&imgrc=mj0g7Yk8FbYnWM:&tbnh=159&tbnw=316&w=639 Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:23, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:16, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Wikimedia Commons is not for trivia, especially if it is incorrect or unsourced. Lordtobi (✉) 15:43, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:25, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Wikimedia Commons is not for trivia. Lordtobi (✉) 15:44, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:25, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Wikimedia Commons is not for trivia. Lordtobi (✉) 15:44, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:25, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Wikimedia Commons is not for trivia or personal advertisment. Lordtobi (✉) 15:45, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:25, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
A priori, image non libre / Seems under copyright Shev123 (talk) 15:51, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Asdesas4 and Shev123: La photo a été vendue par le photographe Julien Panie au Lido et n'a pas été chargée par l'ayant droit ni validé par un ticket. Sans rapide mise en règle de la licence, une suppression est inévitable. La photo a été téléchargée par une nouvelle contributrice dans la cadre d'un WikiMOOC, il faut donc lui fournir les explications sur le principe des licences et des autorisations sur commons avant suppression. Snipre (talk) 16:32, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:25, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
No indication that the author would have died before 1947, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 15:52, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:16, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
A logo of a political party doesn't seem to fit into the mentioned license. Yann (talk) 18:18, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- (d) State symbols of Ukraine, government awards; symbols and signs of government authorities, the Armed Forces of Ukraine and other military formations; symbols of territorial communities; symbols and signs of enterprises, institutions and organizations/ The All-Ukrainian Union "Svoboda" is a Ukrainian nationalist political party. --Andrew J.Kurbiko (talk) 18:23, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as per Yann -- this is a political party not part of the Ukrainian Government. --Daphne Lantier 00:25, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- Restored: as per [9]. Yann (talk) 22:13, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
Non-free logo of a company in Taiwan where the COM:TOO is not clear Wcam (talk) 18:51, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:16, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
I think this is a copyvio, but the official website does not state any licenses PokestarFan (talk) 18:56, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep per simple/TOO. --Achim (talk) 20:21, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
This is the official logo of the French research agency "ANRS". The license is theirs. Nopluss
Kept: simple text logo. --Daphne Lantier 00:22, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
probabile licenza non valida: è una foto professionale Emmepici (talk) 19:13, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:22, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
File:Lousiana Art Museum, Humlebaek, DenmarkThe Louisiana Museum of Modern Art is an art museum located directly on the shore of the Øresund Sound in Humlebæk, 35 km (22 mi) north of Copenhagen, Denmark. It is t - panoramio (3).jpg
[edit]Copyright infringement. Painter Henry Heerup died in 1993 Pugilist (talk) 19:14, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:17, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Depicted person was born in 1926, so the photo is made in 1970s or 1980s. Own work is under doubt, maybe copyright violation. Who is photographer and does (s)he allow free publishing the photo? Taivo (talk) 20:17, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:17, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
The photo was uploaded into Commons on 31st of May 2015, but was found at http://www.kar-online.com/node/9287 from 6th of May 2015. That case OTRS-permission from copyright holder is needed. Taivo (talk) 20:20, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:17, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
It seems like a product package. Not used and potential copyright violation. Kuailong (talk) 20:26, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:17, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
out of scope. Blurry screenshot from a video that has no clear meaning. Kuailong (talk) 20:32, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:17, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
KennCreation (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except self-promotional userpages in Commons (now deleted), en.wiki and meta and uploading a selfie, which is used only on the userpages. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 20:37, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:17, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
a página ta mal feita A.daniele (talk) 20:46, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:21, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Aarushi.sh842 (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except userpage in hi.wiki and uploading a selfie, which is used only on the userpage. All her activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 21:00, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:17, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Unused bad user creation of File:Wappen_Mueckenloch.png, replaced by File:COA Mückenloch.svg -- User: Perhelion 21:05, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:17, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
OTRS-permission from author and copyright holder Walmir Piva is needed. Taivo (talk) 21:35, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- It's copyrighted here. In pt-wiki this uploader request the deletion (in Portuguese: "Peço por gentileza que eliminem todos os dados como a foto q inseri dessa garota" translated by google: "I beg you to delete all the data like a photo that I uploaded from this girl"); but in file, this user vandalized this request. (sorry my bad English). André Koehne TALK TO ME 07:41, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:21, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Too dark/low-quality to be of any educational use, especially with many other images of the same subject that have much higher quality. –Juliancolton | Talk 21:53, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:18, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Uploads by User:Detective psm
[edit]See User's upload log for list of files.
False own work claim. Images are photos taken from books. --Paul_012 (talk) 21:53, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:21, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata, the user's only upload. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 21:59, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:18, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
No indication on the source link provided for the image that this logo has been released under a "Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported" license as claimed by the uploader. It might be possible for this to be treated as PD if it's too simple for copyright protection, but a discussion about the file at COM:VP/C seems to think it's not. Unless it can be clearly shown to be PD for Lithuania, the file should be deleted per COM:PCP. Marchjuly (talk) 22:37, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:18, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Not used, file superseded by a better format – File:Symfony.svg. Rezonansowy (talk) 23:01, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:18, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
The photo contains copyrighted artworks. G I Chandor (talk) 05:36, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- The "oni" seen in this image is a traditional character like Santa. It isn't a company's character. Nesnad (talk) 08:56, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: The fact that it is a tradiational character, like Santa, is irrelevant. Individual representations of Santa have copyrights, too. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:54, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
no author nor permission mentionned, name of source is a apparently a twitter account Do not follow (talk) 07:57, 24 March 2017 (UTC).
- Plusieurs sources ainsi que Le Figaro qui est ici: www.lefigaro.fr/international/2016/10/18/01003-20161018ARTFIG00167-un-immense-concert-neonazi-choque-la-suisse.php
- right, Le Figaro is a well-known french newspaper. --Do not follow (talk) 12:23, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Le Figraro has a copyright. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:54, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- also file:Logo-Henner-RVB-filet TM.jpg
Company Henner isn't mentioned neither in de:Henner, en:Henner, fr:Henner nor in ru:Хеннер. The logos are out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:39, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Company Henner is now mentioned in fr:Henner. DianeBri (talk) 12:12, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:55, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Dubious claim of "Own work". Uploader is the one appearing in the photo. Original photographer needs to send permission to support team. Wikicology (talk) 11:06, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for the prompt Wikicology, It has been changed accordingly to the author and copyright holder Rberchie. He has also just forwarded a permission for upload immediately --Flixtey (talk) 13:06, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- No wahala, bro. All the best.Wikicology (talk) 14:09, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Needs OTRS. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:56, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Dubious claim of "Own work". Uploader is the one appearing in the photo. Original photographer needs to send permission to support team. Wikicology (talk) 11:07, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Comment - Note that uploader has changed the author and source to User:Rberchie here.Wikicology (talk) 12:42, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for the prompt Wikicology, It has been changed accordingly to the author and copyright holder Rberchie. He has also just forwarded a permission for upload immediately --Flixtey (talk) 13:07, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- No wahala, bro. All the best.Wikicology (talk) 14:09, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for the prompt Wikicology, It has been changed accordingly to the author and copyright holder Rberchie. He has also just forwarded a permission for upload immediately --Flixtey (talk) 13:07, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:56, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Dubious claim of "Own work". Uploader is the one appearing in the photo. Original photographer needs to send permission to support team. Wikicology (talk) 11:08, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Comment - Note that uploader has changed the author and source to User:Rberchie here. Wikicology (talk) 12:45, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for the prompt Wikicology, It has been changed accordingly to the author and copyright holder Rberchie. He has also just forwarded a permission for upload immediately --Flixtey (talk) 13:08, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- No wahala, bro. All the best.Wikicology (talk) 14:08, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for the prompt Wikicology, It has been changed accordingly to the author and copyright holder Rberchie. He has also just forwarded a permission for upload immediately --Flixtey (talk) 13:08, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:56, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Dubious claim of "Own work". Uploader is the one appearing in the photo. Original photographer needs to send permission to support team. Wikicology (talk) 11:08, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Comment - Note that uploader has changed the author and source to User:Rberchie here.Wikicology (talk) 12:47, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for the prompt Wikicology, It has been changed accordingly to the author and copyright holder Rberchie. He has also just forwarded a permission for upload immediately --Flixtey (talk) 13:10, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- No wahala, bro. All the best.Wikicology (talk) 14:08, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for the prompt Wikicology, It has been changed accordingly to the author and copyright holder Rberchie. He has also just forwarded a permission for upload immediately --Flixtey (talk) 13:10, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:57, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Dubious claim of "Own work". Uploader is the one appearing in the photo. Original photographer needs to send permission to support team. Wikicology (talk) 11:15, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Comment - Note that uploader has changed the author and source to User:Rberchie here. Wikicology (talk) 12:39, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for the prompt Wikicology, It has been changed accordingly to the author and copyright holder Rberchie. He has also just forwarded a permission for upload immediately --Flixtey (talk) 13:11, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- No wahala, bro. All the best. Wikicology (talk) 14:06, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for the prompt Wikicology, It has been changed accordingly to the author and copyright holder Rberchie. He has also just forwarded a permission for upload immediately --Flixtey (talk) 13:11, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:57, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Dubious claim of "Own work". Uploader is the one appearing in the photo. Original photographer needs to send permission to support team. Wikicology (talk) 11:16, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Comment - Note that uploader has changed the author and source to User:Rberchie here. Wikicology (talk) 12:37, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for prompting me of this error Wikicology, It has been changed accordingly to the author and copyright holder User:Rberchie. He has also just forwarded a permission for upload immediately --Flixtey (talk) 13:04, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- No wahala, bro. All the best.Wikicology (talk) 14:10, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Info: I've labeled this file with Template:OTRS pending and Template:De minimis. 80.221.152.17 21:47, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:57, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
This Image is not "Kadim Hamdani Mosque" of Bangladesh, ID-BD-C-63-79 - Image should be removed Please User:Ibrahim_Husain_Meraj cross check it - Indrajit Das (Talk - Contribs) 11:41, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:58, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
This Image is not "Kadim Hamdani Mosque" of Bangladesh, ID-BD-C-63-79 - Image should be removed Please User:Ibrahim_Husain_Meraj cross check it.- Indrajit Das (Talk - Contribs) 11:43, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:58, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
"Vida Brodar's adaptatiom of Martin's scale"... no permision from Brodar or Martin. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:08, 24 March 2017 (UTC) Keep - Actually this is a scientific scale of nature (physical anthropology). Nature itself (for example the eye colors, eye shapes) cannot be copyrighted. The Martin scale is just a scientific scale of nature like the Richter magnitude scale. So no copyright violation from this perspective. The only copyrighted thing I see here is the photgraph itself and there is a correct licence given. --Micha (talk) 15:31, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Comment Many of these are 3-D objects (example: http://web.archive.org/web/20160802080400/http://antropologia-fizyczna.pl/images/antropometria/somatoskopia/martin-schulz.jpg) and I think this photograph is also of a 3d object, notice the hinges and the case. On en:Martin scale where it is in use, it says it's adapted by Vida Brodar, and appears to contain an illustration or photograph of each different colored eye making it a composite image and derivative work of the object. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:09, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Whether the individcual eyes are photographs or paintings, they each have copyrights, so the scale as a whole has a copyright. We need a license from Brodar. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:00, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Based of Commons:Threshold of originality, India's TOO is not clear so it may be appropriate not to host the file here. The same file is currently hosted on Wikipedia where it meets the USA's TOO. Also I do not believe the uploader is the author of the file. Salavat (talk) 11:18, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo. --Yann (talk) 20:40, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
Inferior dupe of File:Wappen_Aurich.png (the speedy dupe tag was removed by Billinghurst without anything). -- User: Perhelion 10:06, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- I believe that you will find that this has a transparent background, and the other does not. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:09, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- In fact I really don't recognized your revert, because I don't expect that very uncommon behavior. The Commons rules tell us that are no need for dupe for (transparency/other) backgrounds. Also this file is unsused! In addition, you have reverted a 7 year old version (beside the reverted image had alpha-transparency and this only primitive gif-transparency also without color gradient
, which is clear recognizable). -- User: Perhelion 10:18, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: not exact duplicates. Ruthven (msg) 08:28, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Multiple issues:
- Icons on the sidebar are under various unmentioned licenses, which would need to be checked for license compatibility and sourced appropriately to establish copyright. In example,
{{MPL2}}
for the Firefox icon. Alternatively, these parts may be cropped off the image as they are not seemingly essential to the representation. - The yellow car graphic (authored by Konstantin Rotkevich) is believed to be licensed under Free Art License (
{{FAL}}
), which is considered incompatible with the GPLv2+ (Inkscape's choice of license). See File talk:Inkscape0.45.png, Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2016/08#Non-free revisions of File:Inkscape0.45.png, Various Licenses and Comments about Them § Free Art License and GNU General Public License, version 2, section 4. Note this graphic is distributed with Inkscape 0.91 source code as an aggregate work atinkscape-0.91/share/examples/car.svgz
. - The author (User:Plommespiser) cannot license modified works derived from GPL-licensed works under a CC BY-SA 4.0 license due to license incompatibility. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:GIMP 2.9 Usage.png for a similar case and GNU General Public License, version 2, section 4 for the termination clause.
With the author's consent, it may be possible to license this derivative work under GPLv2+({{GPLv2+}}
, {{GPLv2 only}}
, {{GPLv3+}}
or {{GPLv3 only}}
), if the concern about license compatibility with the yellow car graphic and Free Art License is resolved prior.
Question: Additionally, have the conditions set in GPLv2 section 3 been previously met as of starting this nomination for providing a complete corresponding source, and section 2 for possible prominent notices if modifications were made? 80.221.152.17 20:10, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Info: I've checked the metadata of car.svgz
in Inkscape 0.91 source distribution, and it still carries an URI to http://artlibre.org/licence.php/lalgb.html
(Free Art License) today. 80.221.152.17 20:13, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Comment: Prior to this nomination, I didn't check the uploader's other uploads. It seems like many more of them (upload log for Plommespiser) are troubled with similar issues. I'm going to tag these with Template:Incompatible license, but it'd be helpful if someone with a mass-tool could nominate them for deletion and refer here. 80.221.152.17 20:41, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Close in procedural grounds: Screenshots of well-known free software must be licensed according to every element there, and separated licenses for the software and the document depicted has been accepted in Commons for years (this is specially true for Browser screenshots showing Wikipedia). The icons in the bar could be considered de minimis (since the main subject is the Inkscape screenshot), and a large list of licenses for every de-minimis elements does not makes sense.
- The right place to discusse this license compatibility issue is the Village Pump rather than tagging a wide ammount of properly licensed files (specially if you're editing under an IP address). --Amitie 10g (talk) 05:47, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
@Amitie 10g: Thanks for mentioning de minimis for the icons. I'm upholding this nomination for this specific file, mainly due to the concern about Free Art License incompatibility and how it's impossible to convey this adapted/modified work, in addition to the CC BY-SA incompatibility. 80.221.152.17 21:32, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: All elements must be properly attributed and documented. This has not even been done for the yellow car which appears to be the main element. --AFBorchert (talk) 13:26, 3 April 2017 (UTC)