Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/02/10

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive February 10th, 2017
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Double of File:Leeds RC Cathedral (7741959060).jpg Mef.ellingen (talk) 00:15, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: revoked by nominator. --Jcb (talk) 00:18, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free logo by GitHub, Inc. See FAQ. Qzekrom (talk) 16:52, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. −ebrahimtalk 17:26, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Donetsk Peolpe's Republic" award isn't an Ukrainian state award. MaxBioHazard (talk) 09:39, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ellin Beltz: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

taken from the internet as the rest of this user's uploads http://www.extremadura7dias.com/noticia/nueva-visita-guiada-por-los-monumentos-mas-emblematicos-de-badajoz_ Strakhov (talk) 17:29, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ellin Beltz: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copiright violation Anup Sadi (talk) 18:23, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - http://en.banglapedia.org/index.php?title=Bochaganj_Upazila. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:08, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The link is false, the image is not on enwiki. Out of scope. Lacrymocéphale (talk) 11:10, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Billinghurst: content was: "#REDIRECT ", and the only contributor was "Billinghurst" (talk)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Coollchintamani (talk · contribs)

[edit]

A bunch of selfies not used in any project. Out of scope. Wikimedia Commons is not a webhost for personal images.

Takeaway (talk) 19:29, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:42, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Takeaway as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Image seems copied from the internet but uploaded as "own work". Sreejith K (talk) 20:05, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Low res, no exif, many other instances found on the internet prior to upload but uploaded by user as "own work". Obvious copyright violation. - Takeaway (talk) 20:16, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Obvious copyright violation. Found copies uploaded much earlier. Ex: http://www.southreport.com/facts-charminar/. --Sreejith K (talk) 05:08, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ian.thomson as Copyvio (db-copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Per https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ian.thomson&diff=prev&oldid=764715196 , photo was just grabbed off of Google images by a user who thought that the copyright symbol means it's free to use. Yann (talk) 17:57, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

See [1]. Yann (talk) 17:59, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as above. --Yann (talk) 09:38, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ian.thomson as Copyvio (db-copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Per https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ian.thomson&diff=prev&oldid=764715196 , photo was just grabbed off of Google images by a user who thought that the copyright symbol means it's free to use. Yann (talk) 17:57, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

See [2]. Yann (talk) 18:00, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as above. --Yann (talk) 09:37, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Soupforone as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://bbs.tiexue.net/post_5224102_1.html#43 Yann (talk) 15:50, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb: Copyright violation: Not the uploader's own work. Colorized derivative of b/w and inscribed file published earlier in 2007 by Eritrea Daily, with a Sewrana.com copyright indication: [3]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jasonanaggie (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#Product_packaging (the packaging is not a government work)

4ing (talk) 21:50, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:22, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jasonanaggie (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Uploaded in error -- please delete

Jasonanaggie (talk) 21:31, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What exactly was the error? Example, File:Succulents in Terracotta (29061285351).jpg looks fine. For fresh uploads a speedy G7 uploader request would be better. With a formal deletion request the closing admin is supposed to check COM:INUSE for each file. –2A03:2267:0:0:3863:3F5D:4456:1D5D 06:38, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: uploader requested. --Sealle (talk) 15:12, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jasonanaggie (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Uploaded in error -- please delete

Jasonanaggie (talk) 21:34, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto, see above, CSD G7 uploader request would be faster. Maybe related, on your talk page are various "please limit the damage per hour to something that could be fixed in less time" notes. I'm still hoping for a reply near US Courts (Pacer). Speedy delete:tongue:2A03:2267:0:0:3863:3F5D:4456:1D5D 06:53, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: uploader requested. --Sealle (talk) 15:12, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jasonanaggie (talk · contribs)

[edit]

UPLOADED IN ERROR

Jasonanaggie (talk) 21:44, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto, see above, but File:Rain, rain, come again, Utah county needs you friend (8289523460).jpg is actually nice. Of course there can be reasons to avoid speedy deletions. –193.96.224.16 07:05, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: uploader requested. --Sealle (talk) 15:12, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jasonanaggie (talk · contribs)

[edit]

UPLOADED IN ERROR

Jasonanaggie (talk) 03:55, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:23, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jasonanaggie (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unwanted by another editor that has taken personal ownership of a transcription project. So, let's trash the work I put into it.

Jasonanaggie (talk) 10:04, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • I'm puzzled why these are nominated. They may be useful. The Anchor of Hope motif in particular is an interesting printer's mark. The work these are derived from is in the public domain. Jonathunder (talk) 12:29, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • I assume this refers to the copyright discussion at Wikisource. Essentially, the illustrator of these decorations isn't identified, and they may have been first (or jointly) published in the UK, and some users have expressed uncertainty that they satisfy {{PD-UK-unknown}}. Beleg Tâl (talk) 13:31, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: we have the established practice to delete files on uploader request shortly after upload (just a few hours in this case). --Jcb (talk) 15:32, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Jcb: Please undelete these images the contributor is not the author, they are just user's extractions from a work in which they will be used and should not have been deleted. They will now just be recreated for the completion of the work. There is no absolute right to remove any user's contributions, and you know that it is a courtesy only where we consider this. Please identify where in Commons:Deletion policy where there is an express deletion requirement? There was no consensus for deletion, so please undelete.  — billinghurst sDrewth 01:11, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    These files have been undeleted. They were only extracts from a book, not the work of the contributor. They are needed for the reproduction of the work, and no particular point in someone else spending time making the derivatives.  — billinghurst sDrewth 06:18, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abuhurayrah54 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused documents of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Speedy, Bangladesh Facebook case. -- ~ Nahid Talk 20:59, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image. Not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:46, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Matanya: Out of project scope: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Flickr - brewbooks - Te Puia (5).jpg: Private image. Not used.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image. Not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:46, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Matanya: Out of project scope: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Flickr - brewbooks - Te Puia (4).jpg: Private image. Not used.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Safiel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Cover of a copyrighted magazine, obtained at this link: http://cen.acs.org/magazine/92/09232.html# Natuur12 (talk) 22:08, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as a copy violation. I don't see how the given tag is applicable. Safiel (talk) 22:24, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
     Keep This image is ineligible for copyright, because it is composed of text and simple geometric shapes. --Leyo 22:40, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as containing several graphical elements that seem more than "simple geometric shapes" (it seems like the claimed license would be {{PD-textlogo}}?). The ACS logo in the lower-left is clearly not simple (en:File:American Chemical Society logo.svg is nonfree), and its presence seems like one of the key aspects of this image (identifying it as an ACS journal) even if one wanted to argue de minimis. And I don't think the X-ray diffraction pattern does not seem "simple" eitehr (I don't have that issue handy to know if the "about the cover" says it's an actual example, in which case one could argue "PD as a fact of nature", vs artist's rendering). DMacks (talk) 04:47, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Created using the following simple input to GeoGebra:
Folge[x² + (y - 10^(t / 5))² = 10^(2t / 5), t, 1, 5]
Folge[x² + (y + 10^(t / 5))² = 10^(2t / 5), t, 1, 5]
Folge[(x - 10^(t / 5))² + y² = 10^(2t / 5), t, 1, 5]
Folge[(x + 10^(t / 5))² + y² = 10^(2t / 5), t, 1, 5]
The logo may be old enough to be in the public domain. The ACS was founded in 1876, but I am not sure if they had the logo at that time. I only found a proof for 1951 so far. If the logo is not PD yet and de minimis is not applicable, it might simply be removed from the cover.
The X-ray diffraction pattern is not eligible for copyright since it is a simple geometric shape composed of two lines and regular circles, like many others (see e.g. Overlapping circles grid). --Leyo 07:10, 10 August 2016 (UTC) PS. Another C&EN cover that seems to be ineligible for copyright.[reply]

 Keep No doubt this is really PD-ineligible. --Itu (talk) 08:18, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ACS logo in a stamp from 1951

There is some additional information concerning the logo found in Kaliapparat:

A stylized symbol of a kaliapparat is used in the American Chemical Society logo, originally designed in the early 20th century by Tiffany's Jewelers.
(ref: Everts, Sarah (7 September 2015). "A Most Important Artifact". Chemical & Engineering News 93 (35): 46–47.)

Hence, the logo is probably old enough to be in the PD. --Leyo 08:32, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Easily
  • First, the central image. This is W.L. Bragg's stereographic diagram of the x-ray crystallography of rock salt, from 1913, as attributed on the TOC page, and as published, among many other places, in his 1915 text. It would not be copyrightable anyhow, as diagramming a fact of nature (a diffraction pattern) and embodying no human creativity, but it would be long expired anyhow.
  • Second, the ACS logo. Checking the trademark registration shows that it was initially 'used in commerce' in December of 1909. So, also long expired.
(edit) this is a better link. Leyo pointed out the previous one broke at the Ref Desk. Reventtalk 22:13, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Third, the 'arrangement' of the elements on the cover. This is a generic magazine cover layout, used by magazine and journals as varied as Nature and Popular Mechanics (to use ones I found in a couple of minutes), and is nothing original. Such a layout has long since become 'common property', because it's simply obvious and widely used.
I don't even think the wording of the article titles, here, reaches a level of copyrightable originality... they are short phrases, and titles are commonly indexed without any claims of copyright infringement. Reventtalk 09:41, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reson for deletion. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:05, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Graphic design too sophisticated for the stated licence. Philafrenzy (talk) 10:50, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep No new arguments compared to the above. Haven't you read the discussion above? --Leyo 12:55, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Been there, done that. We discussed this in depth and the conclusion was kept. --Natuur12 (talk) 23:42, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

importé par erreur - upload by mistake


Deleted: uploaders request shortly after upload. --JuTa 06:42, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 21:32, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 03:54, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no longer valid since no state formation proposal Vinayakavm (talk) 05:07, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

no longer valid since no new states will be formed in this region Vinayakavm (talk) 11:45, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:14, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It represents separate states out of Karnataka Vinayakavm (talk) 16:18, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per self-nomination, courtesy deletion. P 1 9 9   17:09, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 책읽는달팽 (User talk) 02:25, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 02:54, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chococatlove (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low resolution photographs, no exif, probably all of them taken from the internet. This user has not uploaded a single pic of his own. There are watermarks, drawings, aerial photos,... all of them in Google images.

Strakhov (talk) 17:39, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Not own work and likely copyvios. I removed five as noted above. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:47, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:43, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor writing, non important people, self promotion and private information, non relevant for wikimedia projects The Photographer (talk) 00:12, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:21, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:06, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:34, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Niunamenos (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unidentified author; unclear notability. Likely out of scope.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:10, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:34, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:16, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:34, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spam, out of scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:17, 10 February 2017 (UTC) РЕСПУБЛИКАНСКАЯ ПРЕМИЯ ИМЕНИ БУЛАТА СУЛТАНГАРЕЕВА -ежегодный творческий конкурс среди учащийся молодежи, проводимый Республиканской молодежной газетой «Йэшлек» Республики Башкортостан.Конкурс является Лауреатом Союза журналистов России. Цель конкурса. Воспитание молодежи в духе патриотизма, преданности Родине, всестороннего развития личности, а также выявление и поддержка творческой молодежи, активных в творчестве, лучших в учебе и общественной жизни. Конкурс, который получил общественный резонанс среди учащейся молодежи проводится с 2014 года, ежегодно в ней принимают участие более сотни учащихся. Конкурсанты поражают своими интересными мыслями, свежими благородными идеями по различным проблемам. Интересен и тот факт, что все участники конкурса - выпускники школ, поступают в вузы по избранным профессиям и продолжают активную жизненную деятельность, но уже среди студенческой молодежи. Конкурсный цикл и вручения премий широко освещается в СМИ. Предполагаем, что баннер будет использован при создании Вики Страницы конкурса.[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:35, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:20, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:35, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:38, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:05, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 16:28, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


deleted. INeverCry 01:59, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:26, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:47, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, unused personal picture Kayser Ahmad (talk) 16:14, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:29, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 17:30, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:30, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Grumpy cat, as delightfully depicted on this poster, is the work of someone not the photographer. It's unfortunate, but it's a derivative work, see COM:DW Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:01, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:30, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cormag100 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

User has been uploading copyvios for some time, I have already tagged 9 uploads for speedy deletion today. None of these look likely to be own work, most appear to be screen shots (one is an admitted screen shot of an unnamed artwork).

January (talk) 18:53, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvios. INeverCry 19:28, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cormag100 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Apparently thís user regularly uploaded copyvios, I've deleted a few. Among the files he claimed as "own work" is the 2013 portrait of a Russian singer who died in 2001 - go figure. The files nominated are likely copyvios as well and don't appear to be old or simple enough to be exempt from copyright. So they should be deleted per the precautionary principle.

Rosenzweig τ 19:50, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:33, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Naloes (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 22:22, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:33, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Samy Lourdjane (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 22:27, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:33, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gregório e Amigos (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images/artworks

lNeverCry 22:50, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:34, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Elihwin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal artworks

lNeverCry 22:52, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:34, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photos Pippobuono (talk) 20:55, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:16, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE - small and extremely blurry image - plenty of higer-quality images of this event are available lNeverCry 20:58, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:16, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Breo360 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 21:36, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:16, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work Fixertool (talk) 21:42, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:16, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted book cover. Vanjagenije (talk) 21:47, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:16, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 21:59, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:17, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 22:03, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:17, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 22:03, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:17, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 22:04, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:17, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 22:06, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:17, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bhattarung (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 22:30, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:17, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recreation of a speedied image. Credited to Jiro Schneider, no explanation for license given: http://people.com/celebrity/redone-star-studded-dont-you-need-somebody-video-michael-jackson/ Ytoyoda (talk) 00:32, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Platonides (talk) 00:31, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per ticket:2017021010017017. Yann (talk) 14:12, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyviol dalle pubblicazioni dell'epoca Arbalete (talk) 01:33, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Platonides (talk) 00:29, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France for architectural works. The sphere is the primary subject of the image. 68.193.210.74 01:33, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Platonides (talk) 00:29, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France for architectural works. The sphere is clearly the main subject. 68.193.210.74 01:34, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Platonides (talk) 00:29, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 책읽는달팽 (User talk) 02:17, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Platonides (talk) 00:28, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 책읽는달팽 (User talk) 02:17, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Platonides (talk) 00:28, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 책읽는달팽 (User talk) 02:18, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Platonides (talk) 00:28, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 책읽는달팽 (User talk) 02:18, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Platonides (talk) 00:28, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 책읽는달팽 (User talk) 02:19, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Platonides (talk) 00:28, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 책읽는달팽 (User talk) 02:20, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Platonides (talk) 00:27, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 책읽는달팽 (User talk) 02:20, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Platonides (talk) 00:27, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 책읽는달팽 (User talk) 02:20, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Platonides (talk) 00:27, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 책읽는달팽 (User talk) 02:20, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Platonides (talk) 00:27, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 책읽는달팽 (User talk) 02:20, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Platonides (talk) 00:27, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 책읽는달팽 (User talk) 02:20, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Platonides (talk) 00:27, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 책읽는달팽 (User talk) 02:21, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Platonides (talk) 00:27, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 책읽는달팽 (User talk) 02:21, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Platonides (talk) 00:27, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 책읽는달팽 (User talk) 02:21, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Platonides (talk) 00:27, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 책읽는달팽 (User talk) 02:21, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Platonides (talk) 00:27, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 책읽는달팽 (User talk) 02:21, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Platonides (talk) 00:27, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 책읽는달팽 (User talk) 02:21, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Platonides (talk) 00:27, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 책읽는달팽 (User talk) 02:24, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Platonides (talk) 00:27, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 책읽는달팽 (User talk) 02:24, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Platonides (talk) 00:27, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 책읽는달팽 (User talk) 02:24, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Platonides (talk) 00:27, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 책읽는달팽 (User talk) 02:24, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Platonides (talk) 00:27, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 책읽는달팽 (User talk) 02:27, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Platonides (talk) 00:27, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 책읽는달팽 (User talk) 02:27, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Platonides (talk) 00:27, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 책읽는달팽 (User talk) 02:27, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Platonides (talk) 00:27, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 책읽는달팽 (User talk) 02:27, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Platonides (talk) 00:27, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image. Possible out of scope. Senapa (talk) 02:50, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Platonides (talk) 00:39, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

erreur de fichier Chatte xx (talk) 03:08, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Platonides (talk) 00:35, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

erreur de fichier Chatte xx (talk) 03:11, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Platonides (talk) 00:35, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing legal info Fixertool (talk) 03:47, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Fiction


Deleted: per nomination. --Platonides (talk) 00:32, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low res social media image available elsewhere on the web: http://www.taringa.net/post/musica/19596912/Rap-Argento-Kodigo-MC.html Ytoyoda (talk) 03:51, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Platonides (talk) 00:32, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See OTRS#2017020710023285 ... permission might come, will be reuploaded then Edoderoo (talk) 06:53, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: OTRS agent indicated that a valid permission was received. --Platonides (talk) 00:40, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See OTRS#2017020710023285 ... permission might come, will be reuploaded then Edoderoo (talk) 06:53, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: OTRS agent indicated that a valid permission was received. --Platonides (talk) 00:41, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See OTRS#2017020710023285 ... permission might come, will be reuploaded then Edoderoo (talk) 06:53, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: OTRS agent indicated that a valid permission was received. --Platonides (talk) 00:41, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See OTRS#2017020710023285 ... permission might come, will be reuploaded then Edoderoo (talk) 06:53, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: OTRS agent indicated that a valid permission was received. --Platonides (talk) 00:41, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See OTRS#2017020710023285 ... permission might come, will be reuploaded then Edoderoo (talk) 06:53, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: OTRS agent indicated that a valid permission was received. --Platonides (talk) 00:41, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See OTRS#2017020710023285 ... permission might come, will be reuploaded then Edoderoo (talk) 06:53, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: OTRS agent indicated that a valid permission was received. --Platonides (talk) 00:41, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The picture is twice. So should this picture deleted ? (Have ask at discussion page) First picture:https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Autobiography-of-a-Yogi.jpg Richard Reinhardt (talk) 08:33, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Scaled down duplicate of File:Autobiography-of-a-Yogi.jpg. --Platonides (talk) 00:44, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Subject unsharp Mhohner (talk) 09:06, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Not a valid reason for deletion. The image is not sharp but not bad enough to be useless. --Sreejith K (talk) 15:55, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
+1  Keep I mean the quality is not good but ok, if there is no comparable photo here, there is no valid reason for deletion. -- User: Perhelion 22:30, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per above. Too bad we don't have the exact species, though. --Platonides (talk) 00:44, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not the author's own work, particular purpose account uploading political images. Edjoerv (talk) 05:00, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, mobile uploads of dubious provenance - I've checked some, and they appear to have been published elsewhere first. --99of9 (talk) 00:53, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not the author's own work Edjoerv (talk) 05:02, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, mobile uploads of dubious provenance - I've checked some, and they appear to have been published elsewhere first. --99of9 (talk) 00:51, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not the author's own work, and the woman in the picture is Elsa Bucaram actually. Edjoerv (talk) 05:03, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, mobile uploads of dubious provenance - I've checked some, and they appear to have been published elsewhere first. --99of9 (talk) 00:52, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:41, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Platonides (talk) 00:51, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:42, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Platonides (talk) 00:51, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:45, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Platonides (talk) 00:51, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:48, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, plus low-res and not clear own work. --Platonides (talk) 00:52, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't see any use for this image of an aircraft compass crudely installed in a car. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:39, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, based on the vantage point over water and viewing the bridge from above, I believe this was taken from an aircraft and not a car. Perhaps it should be renamed instead of deleted? Waz8 (talk) 02:50, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Waz8. --Platonides (talk) 00:53, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small unused personal photo without metadata. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 12:54, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. --Platonides (talk) 00:54, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Just a test during workshop Beetlebeard (talk) 13:42, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per author request. --Platonides (talk) 00:55, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probable copyvio, see anywhere on the web, Pippobuono (talk) 13:52, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Platonides (talk) 00:56, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of com:EDUSE Pippobuono (talk) 13:54, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Platonides (talk) 00:57, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of com:EDUSE Pippobuono (talk) 13:55, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Platonides (talk) 00:57, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source says "COPYRIGHT ©ONHYM. 2015 Tous droits réservés." but it may be under COM:TOO. Lacrymocéphale (talk) 15:00, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: © violation. --Platonides (talk) 01:00, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Platonides (talk) 01:01, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Modern stamp still under copyright. Philafrenzy (talk) 10:46, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --99of9 (talk) 01:10, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Modern stamp still under copyright. Philafrenzy (talk) 10:47, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --99of9 (talk) 01:06, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Modern stamp still under copyright. Philafrenzy (talk) 10:47, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --99of9 (talk) 01:10, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Modern stamps shown are still under copyright. Philafrenzy (talk) 10:47, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --99of9 (talk) 01:11, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:47, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --99of9 (talk) 01:12, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no exif information, probably not to be own work. Momocalbee (talk) 17:28, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and unused, too. --Platonides (talk) 01:09, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information. Probably not own work, small resolution, no EXIF. Jcb (talk) 17:41, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Platonides (talk) 01:02, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright to Martijn de Rijk Gyrostat (talk) 18:55, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Platonides (talk) 01:10, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started as bit confused by the tag "Michael Dusche", which may occur copyright issues as the pix was uploaded by another user, hence, claimed 'own work' may be disputed - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 19:09, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: it is not clear that it is indeed the work of Bhutawalas. --Platonides (talk) 01:11, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE lNeverCry 22:19, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Platonides (talk) 01:14, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 22:37, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Platonides (talk) 01:15, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ataurttc (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 23:10, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:09, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Skmanchal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 23:17, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:09, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 23:18, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:09, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 23:20, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:09, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fadhila21 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 23:24, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:09, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 23:27, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:09, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 23:29, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:09, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jonasselander (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 23:31, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:09, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 23:36, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:09, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 23:41, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:09, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Azeemtelecome (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 23:45, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:08, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 책읽는달팽 (User talk) 02:18, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Platonides (talk) 00:22, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo, therefore shouldn't be in Commons. Edjoerv (talk) 05:09, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: source info didn't have the license specified. --99of9 (talk) 01:05, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:07, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:45, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 22:09, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:45, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 22:14, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:44, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:14, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:44, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no FoP in the USA - modern sculpture in Florida lNeverCry 22:18, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:42, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:19, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:42, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo. Not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:21, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:41, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE - small blurred image with severe sun flare lNeverCry 22:22, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:40, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recent and original building in Paris. But there is No Fop in France Tangopaso (talk) 22:35, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:33, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 22:35, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:31, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Product Packaging Jasonanaggie (talk) 22:36, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:30, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by EFE ASAGBA (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 22:36, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:30, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sir.argupta (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 22:40, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:30, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ashutoshmaheshwari (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 22:41, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:30, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 22:42, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:28, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 22:43, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:25, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 22:44, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:25, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aspirezone (talk · contribs)

[edit]

no FoP in the UAE

lNeverCry 22:48, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no FoP in Qatar. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:27, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 22:54, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:24, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gechisss (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Screenshots of various websites, without apparent educational purpose and likely copyrighted (and all in completely unrelated categories).

Gauss (talk) 20:09, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:18, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:15, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in scope, it's a known people https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Michel. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:15, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image. Not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:28, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Ralf, visually a good image, category added. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:08, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant. Superseded by a bit less blurred image. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:31, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:05, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo. Not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:52, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:02, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo. Not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:52, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:02, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Glowchurchnorthsydney (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Descriptions suggest these are uploaded primarily to promote a church

Ytoyoda (talk) 14:29, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination+useless anyway. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:21, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://i1.sndcdn.com/avatars-000273781767-908b0k-t500x500.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:24, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:25, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:25, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF says "All Copyrights Tony Foster" Ytoyoda (talk) 15:33, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, then Tony Foster have to send a permission. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:25, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:26, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

identical at : File:Colmar_-_panoramio_(124).jpg Gzen92 [discuter] 15:43, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:43, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

identical at : File:Colmar_-_panoramio_(120).jpg Gzen92 [discuter] 15:44, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:50, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

identical at : File:Colmar_alsace_france_tunliweb.jpg Gzen92 [discuter] 15:48, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:51, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo from Twitter (possibly copyrighted) uploaded without any consent from original author. Subhashish Panigrahi (talk) 20:10, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:20, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS-permission from author villa-Sannois.fr is needed. Taivo (talk) 20:10, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:19, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image appears to be a professional studio portrait photograph, with whom copyright would reside. I've found no evidence Roninryu (talk · contribs) represents such interests. — fourthords | =Λ= | 02:38, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - also, if the IP user actually is both User:Roninryu and the subject of the image, as claimed, then he is in serious violation of WP:EN's policy on conflict of interest. He should read and obey that policy at once. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:04, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May be a copyright issue if any of the original photographers/families did not fully release all rights to the National Park Service (as public domain and without attribution) for use in this sign. Two other versions of the same sign are also on Commons, both of which are nearly the same resolution but wider angles. One of the other copies has an OTRS ticket though it's not known who OK'd it. Brian W. Schaller (talk) 02:55, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Is File:A435,_Flight_93_National_Memorial,_Stonycreek_Township,_Pennsylvania,_USA,_memorial_sign,_passengers_and_crew.jpg a crop of File:A tour of the Flight 93 National Memorial - 03.jpg ? It may be covered by Freedom of Panorama. Platonides (talk) 00:38, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No, it's an original image (of the same sign). Main concern is: are portraits taken by others, even though posted in a public place (by a U.S. government agency in this case), possibly protected by copyright of the original photographers of each of the included images, even though no photo credits or copyright symbols appear anywhere on the composite sign? Is it also possible that the OTRS-ticketed image was not properly approved? Brian W. Schaller (talk) 02:40, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Possibly, indeed. Platonides (talk) 02:48, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
BTW, I posted (10 days ago) on the OTRS noticeboard with no definite response yet as ticket is in German. Due to potential copyright issues, I decided to request deletion (of this copy, which is mine) rather than wait up to 2 months for an OTRS examination of the issue. Thanks, Brian W. Schaller (talk) 03:22, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The OTRS ticket is from the photographer and has nothing to do with the copyrights for all of the images shown here. I think the government posted these as fair use -- I can't believe that they actually got licenses from the 40 photographers whose work is shown here. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:22, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No clear educational use. JesseW (talk) 05:30, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:26, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's not a own work by the uploader. He's depicted on the image. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 05:55, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:27, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Own work" claim is implausible. JesseW (talk) 05:55, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sigh. Looking into it further, it does appear to have been uploaded by the creator of the app, which makes it more plausible that he does have copyright ownership of it. Request withdrawn. JesseW (talk) 05:57, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Small size, no EXIF, JesseW may see a reason to believe that the uploader is the creator, but we have no way of knowing that. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:28, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Date is unknown. Given the subject was born in 1942, it's highly unlikely that this is PD India. Vensatry (Ping me) 06:19, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:29, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo has free license, but is derivative of a 3D animatronic work, for which we don't have a free license. czar 06:21, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:29, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be from http://colegiokolbe.com/descubre-el-kolbe/instalaciones/ Ytoyoda (talk) 16:19, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 12:21, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused signature of unknown person, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 18:59, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 12:21, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused signature of unknown person. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 19:01, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 12:21, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

West Virginia is not (AFAIK) one of the US states that has a law releasing it's works to the Public Domain. (see en:Copyright status of work by U.S. subnational governments. Leoboudv (talk) 06:24, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:32, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image is blurred and out of focus. Schlosser67 (talk) 08:49, 10 February 2017 (UTC) Delete -Kafuffle (talk) 13:57, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:33, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

identical at : File:Colmar - panoramio (77).jpg Gzen92 [discuter] 09:03, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:35, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, uploaded by problematic user. I blocked him/her for a week and I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:06, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:36, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of com:EDUSE Pippobuono (talk) 09:26, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:36, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Donetsk People's Republic" award isn't an Ukrainian state award MaxBioHazard (talk) 09:44, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:43, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Donetsk People's Republic" award isn't an Ukrainian state award MaxBioHazard (talk) 09:44, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:43, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Donetsk People's Republic" award isn't an Ukrainian state award MaxBioHazard (talk) 09:44, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:43, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Donetsk People's Republic" award isn't an Ukrainian state award MaxBioHazard (talk) 09:45, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:43, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Donetsk People's Republic" award isn't an Ukrainian state award MaxBioHazard (talk) 09:45, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:43, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Donetsk People's Republic" award isn't an Ukrainian state award MaxBioHazard (talk) 09:45, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:43, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Donetsk People's Republic" award isn't an Ukrainian state award MaxBioHazard (talk) 09:46, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:43, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Donetsk People's Republic" award isn't an Ukrainian state award MaxBioHazard (talk) 09:47, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:43, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Donetsk People's Republic" award isn't an Ukrainian state award MaxBioHazard (talk) 09:47, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:43, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Donetsk People's Republic" award isn't an Ukrainian state award MaxBioHazard (talk) 09:47, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:43, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Donetsk People's Republic" award isn't an Ukrainian state award MaxBioHazard (talk) 09:48, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:43, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Donetsk People's Republic" award isn't an Ukrainian state award MaxBioHazard (talk) 09:48, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:43, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Donetsk People's Republic" award isn't an Ukrainian state award MaxBioHazard (talk) 09:48, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:43, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Donetsk People's Republic" award isn't an Ukrainian state award MaxBioHazard (talk) 09:51, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:43, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Donetsk People's Republic" award isn't an Ukrainian state award MaxBioHazard (talk) 09:51, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:43, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Donetsk People's Republic" award isn't an Ukrainian state award MaxBioHazard (talk) 09:51, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:44, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Donetsk People's Republic" award isn't an Ukrainian state award MaxBioHazard (talk) 09:52, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:44, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Donetsk People's Republic" award isn't an Ukrainian state award MaxBioHazard (talk) 09:52, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:44, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Donetsk People's Republic" award isn't an Ukrainian state award MaxBioHazard (talk) 09:54, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:44, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Donetsk People's Republic" award isn't an Ukrainian state award MaxBioHazard (talk) 09:54, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:44, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Donetsk People's Republic" award isn't an Ukrainian state award MaxBioHazard (talk) 09:55, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:44, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Donetsk People's Republic" award isn't an Ukrainian state award MaxBioHazard (talk) 09:55, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:44, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Donetsk People's Republic" award isn't an Ukrainian state award MaxBioHazard (talk) 09:55, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:44, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Donetsk People's Republic" award isn't an Ukrainian state award MaxBioHazard (talk) 09:56, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:44, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Donetsk People's Republic" award isn't an Ukrainian state award MaxBioHazard (talk) 09:57, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:44, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Donetsk People's Republic" award isn't an Ukrainian state award MaxBioHazard (talk) 09:57, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:44, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Modern stamp still under copyright. Philafrenzy (talk) 10:47, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep You didn't even have a look at the information provided. Three of the four photographs used are PD, the fourth was taken by me! The creators of the stamp violated my copyright, not the other way round. --Leyo 12:48, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, but the page doesn't explain it as clearly as you just have. I am happy to withdraw my nomination. Philafrenzy (talk) 23:53, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
User:Leyo, could you clarify the Description on the image-page? It says that there is a copyright/license violation, but it isn't clear that the problem is as you described here. As written, it sounds like the violation is the commons file vs the stamp's license, rather than the stamp vs the underlying photograph's license. It needs to be clear that the country is not allowed to place a restrictive license on their derivative work of your share-alike-licensed image. DMacks (talk) 03:44, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The German version of the description is very clear about that IMHO. I'm not sure how to phrase it in English in order to prevent that misunderstanding. Could one of you give a try? --Leyo 12:23, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
User:Jameslwoodward did a bunch of work on it, I tweaked it a bit more. I think we're all done with this DR now? DMacks (talk) 13:32, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:52, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Graphic design too sophisticated for the stated licence. Philafrenzy (talk) 10:49, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Unspezifische Behauptung ohne irgendwelche Belege. --Leyo 12:54, 10 February 2017 (UTC) PS. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Chemical & Engineering News cover.jpg.[reply]

Deleted: I see no reason to start keeping copyrighted magazine covers. There are several sentences of text, the layout, and the graphics here. I see no doubt that there is a valid copyright. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:56, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Company Ahmed applications are not mentioned in en.wiki, probably out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:21, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:56, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Venus Theory is not mentioned in en.wiki and the textlogo is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:32, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination -- this is not the first deletion of this logo. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:57, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source, no author, can be easily found throughout the Web before 2006: e. g. [4]. Sealle (talk) 11:38, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Taken from a book. But was it PD-old? Platonides (talk) 00:50, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Itr could well be old, but someone will have to prove that. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:58, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promotion Cabayi (talk) 11:46, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:59, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:46, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:59, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Datei ist kaputt, Vorschaufenster zeigt nur schwarz SWR Kommunikation (talk) 12:19, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:00, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Carl Ha (talk) 12:29, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Artist died 1953. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:00, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Already too many images of this one dog. The image of the dog is underexposed and the surrounding landscape is nondescript. Takeaway (talk) 12:35, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:01, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Already too many images of this one dog. Takeaway (talk) 12:36, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:01, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photos Pippobuono (talk) 14:10, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:02, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photos Pippobuono (talk) 14:10, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:02, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author died less that 80 years ago. The sculpture is not exhibited in a place according to Spanish FoP laws Discasto talk 14:13, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:03, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mistakenly uploaded Hemant banswal (talk) 14:52, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:03, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical drawing. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:03, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no Freedom of Panorama in Kazakhstan. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 16:03, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:04, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF credits " PB, Pelle Börjesson / Idrottsfoto" Ytoyoda (talk) 16:33, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:04, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seemingly not of Giffard: see here and here Eagleash (talk) 17:01, 10 February 2017 (UTC) :Keep: As per the source, it is Giffard; the eyepatch was not permanent, but only due to temporary injuries. The source, which is the Australian War Memorial, is reliable in this regard. If one looks closely, and ignores the eyepatch, one recognizes that this image and this image show the same man, Giffard, though the latter is probably from when he was younger (and still had dark hair). Furthermore, Giffard served in Palestine at the time the photo was taken, and no other General George Giffard was in Palestine at the time, so the image must show Giffard. Applodion (talk) 19:22, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Applodion, I have a new image ready to upload but don't know how to do it. I can't see any "Upload a new version of this file" button on the image's page. Can you help please? Arabella Birdperson (talk) 11:54, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

One further comment - General Sir George married in 1915 and wore a wedding ring, which he never removed, for the rest of his life. He did not possess a signet ring. The man in this photo isn't wearing a wedding ring, but is wearing a signet ring on his little finger. Arabella Birdperson (talk) 11:59, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or merge: A better image has been uploaded: here So lets remove this one, which was apparently mistakenly labeled by the AMW. Applodion (talk) 15:37, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Aside from the bad ID, the image is by the LIFE photographer George Silk, who died in 2004. There is no reason to believe that an image taken in Palestine by a LIFE photographer was first published in Australia. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:16, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising, the uploader's only contribution, the file is not in use. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 17:21, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:16, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 17:29, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:17, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of the cat drawing on the sign, photographer didn't create it. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:02, 10 February 2017 (UTC) - Disagree - photo of protest poster at the March. It's significance is that it's historical to the Marches around the world. --ZeWrestler (talk) 07:59, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: User:ZeWrestler, that is certainly true, but the image infinges on the copyright for the sign, so we cannot keep it, no matter how important it is. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:19, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artwork not created by photographer is COM:DW "derivative work". Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:02, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:21, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Uploader does not look old enough to be the photographer back in 1978. Jcb (talk) 18:09, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep File uploaded in 2005. It seems likely that the uploaded did held the rights to upload it under GFDL + CC-BY-SA 3.0. Platonides (talk) 01:08, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
There is no statement about who the author was and there is no claim about a permission. It's not own work. The sole fact that it was uploaded in 2005 does not make the uploader the copyright holder. Jcb (talk) 10:31, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: I agree with Johan that he does not look old enough to have taken this photo 39 years ago. However, that is not the whole problem -- the author and source are not given and this 1978 photo certainly has a copyright in both Israel and the USA. Also there is the question of whether the text on the sign has its own copyright -- that's a close call, but the uncertainties over the copyright for the photo make it moot. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:28, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:29, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Original image might be public domain, but this composite image is taken without consent of the copyright holder @ http://www.catholicgentleman.net/2014/04/blessed-beans-how-the-pope-baptized-coffee/. Takeaway (talk) 18:45, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I will ask Catholic Gentleman for permission, and I am sure I riceive it. Sorry I do not find his e-mail. Let you help me and send letter to

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:30, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small unused selfie without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 18:45, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:30, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's scan, non own work ShinePhantom (talk) 19:15, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Probably not PD-old, but we need more information. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:31, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work, scan of old photo ShinePhantom (talk) 19:17, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:31, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work, scan of old photo Dogad75 (talk) 20:59, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Arthur Crbz. --ƏXPLICIT 01:23, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"own" photo on non free photo ShinePhantom (talk) 19:19, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:31, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:23, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:31, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fictional flag. Self-created artwork without obvious educational use Иван Дулин (talk) 19:24, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no useful filename, description, or cat. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:32, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Maybe private image. Not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:25, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Badly overexposed, unknown person. Flickr site is now ARR and while the license was reviewed and is irrevocable, why keep this?. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:33, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fictional flag. Self-created artwork without obvious educational use Иван Дулин (talk) 19:26, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:34, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Maybe private image. Not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:27, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:34, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fictional flag. Self-created artwork without obvious educational use Иван Дулин (talk) 19:27, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:34, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fictional flag. Self-created artwork without obvious educational use Иван Дулин (talk) 19:28, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:34, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fictional flag. Self-created artwork without obvious educational use Иван Дулин (talk) 19:28, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:34, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image. Not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:28, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:34, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fictional flag. Self-created artwork without obvious educational use Иван Дулин (talk) 19:29, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:34, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fictional flag. Self-created artwork without obvious educational use Иван Дулин (talk) 19:29, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:34, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-created artwork without obvious educational use Иван Дулин (talk) 19:30, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:35, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-created artwork without obvious educational use Иван Дулин (talk) 19:30, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:35, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo. Not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:36, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:36, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fictional flag. Self-created artwork without obvious educational use. Иван Дулин (talk) 19:37, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:36, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-created artwork without obvious educational use. Иван Дулин (talk) 19:37, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:36, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image. Not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:37, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:37, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-created artwork without obvious educational use. Иван Дулин (talk) 19:38, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:37, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-created artwork without obvious educational use. Иван Дулин (talk) 19:38, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:37, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fictional flag. Self-created artwork without obvious educational use. Иван Дулин (talk) 19:39, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:37, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-created artwork without obvious educational use. Иван Дулин (talk) 19:42, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:37, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fictional flag. Self-created artwork without obvious educational use. Иван Дулин (talk) 19:43, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:37, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry image of a dog (there are already numerous images of this exact same dog on Wikimedia Commons) blocking out the view of a nondescript landscape. Out of scope. Takeaway (talk) 19:45, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:37, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fictional coat of arm. Self-created artwork without obvious educational use. Иван Дулин (talk) 19:45, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:37, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fictional flag. Self-created artwork without obvious educational use. Иван Дулин (talk) 19:46, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:37, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image, spam/advertizing Denniss (talk) 19:57, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:37, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's not public domain. It made no earlier than 1943 ShinePhantom (talk) 19:58, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:38, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is the file in project scope? Taivo (talk) 20:08, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:38, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

died in 1988. Really own work? ShinePhantom (talk) 20:09, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:39, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Really own photo? With 480 × 476 quality? ShinePhantom (talk) 20:13, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:39, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-created artwork. Out of scope per COM:SCOPE. Takeaway (talk) 20:49, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:39, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo. Not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:14, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:39, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo. Not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:21, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:39, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

70 years have not passed since the photograph was made, so it's still not in PD. Author's permission is needed. Dragoljub Badrljica is certainly not the author of this photo, as he was not born in 1948. Vanjagenije (talk) 21:51, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nowhere was it stated that Dragoljub Badrljica is the photographer, but he as a museum curator may have obtained rights other way. Especially since this photo of Nadlački, to present a late citizen of Mokrin, is displayed in an open institution - in the museum there. Newertheless, if according to your knowledge the source is copyrighted, you are welcome to delete it. I have no time to further research.–Jozefsu (talk) 01:50, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:40, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a photo of a page from a Serbian scientific journal named "Attendite" (ISSN 1820-3485). Vanjagenije (talk) 21:56, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If the source is copyrighted, please delete it. I will use this as a written source anyway, not as a picture. I made this photograph during visit to the exhibition in Mokrin, where Nadlački personally lived, and it was presented there, as an open page on a table – as a museum exhibit. I thought it may only serve educational purposes.–Jozefsu (talk) 01:50, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:40, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not yet out of copyright. None of the reasons for PD-Australia applies. I couldn't find when Hugh W. Groser died, but he was still active in 1957, see here, so even if he died that same year, the work will not be out of copyright until 2028. Jcb (talk) 22:28, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:41, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No information, out of scope. Jcb (talk) 22:49, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:41, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I could be missing something, but I don't see how it's appropriate for other users to claim others' signatures as their own work. This was uploaded one week after the subject died, so uploader obviously wasn't Jackson himself. SNUGGUMS (talk) 22:55, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:42, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation https://www.instateangels.com/university-of-idaho-moscow-tuition-overview/ John from Idegon (talk) 08:34, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:30, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:31, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing EXIF, not own work. kovox90      13:13, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:31, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

oeuvre de Sam Samore, permission écrite nécessaire voir Commons:OTRS/fr Shev123 (talk) 13:47, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:32, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 17:29, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:32, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Orxan Əzimov (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except self-promotional userpage in az.wiki and uploading a photo about himself, which is used only on the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. The photo is probably not a selfie, but copyright violation too. Taivo (talk) 18:42, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:26, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant. Superseded by similar image with colors. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:33, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: this one, deleted the other -- the heavy magenta cast on that image makes it totally unusable. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:28, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Carte présente sur le site de l'entreprise Shev123 (talk) 12:57, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb: Missing permission as of 10 February 2017 - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Yudhacahyo

[edit]

These images seem taken from the Internet without proper license. --Yogwi21 (talk) 03:25, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 04:05, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Double of File:Leeds RC Cathedral (7741959060).jpg Mef.ellingen (talk) 00:16, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; duplicate of File:Leeds RC Cathedral (7741959060).jpg. --miya (talk) 05:32, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Apple Chan. Unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 20:23, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 04:10, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader provided no sources or proper attribution to the photo of Craig Kilborn. I contacted the uploader who has not yet responded. I'm nominating this for deletion. George Ho (talk) 21:11, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 04:08, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This unused file has a name, but no description, no categories. Google does not show any hits and there is no WP article. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:53, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 08:32, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

film still, probable copyvio Pippobuono (talk) 13:57, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:43, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

film still, probable copyvio Pippobuono (talk) 13:57, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:43, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

film still, probable copyvio Pippobuono (talk) 13:57, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:43, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

film still, probable copyvio Pippobuono (talk) 13:58, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:43, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

film still, probable copyvio Pippobuono (talk) 13:58, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:43, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

film still, probable copyvio Pippobuono (talk) 13:58, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:43, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

film still, probable copyvio Pippobuono (talk) 13:58, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:43, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

film still, probable copyvio Pippobuono (talk) 13:58, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:43, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

film still, probable copyvio Pippobuono (talk) 13:59, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:43, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

film still, probable copyvio Pippobuono (talk) 13:59, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:43, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 17:29, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Below ToO. --Itu (talk) 17:46, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No, not below TOO. Jcb (talk) 18:38, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:44, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously deleted personal image, unused and out of scope (added to completely random categories, such as a mountain chain in the Alps, a brand of bicycles, a building in Central Germany and ... firefighting). Gauss (talk) 20:14, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:20, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, upload of rather poor quality, but also dominantely tagged, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:16, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:19, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, upload of rather poor quality, but also dominantely tagged, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:17, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:18, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, upload of rather poor quality, but also dominantely tagged, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:17, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:18, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, upload of bad quality, but also dominantely tagged, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:18, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:17, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, upload of very bad quality, but also dominantely tagged, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:19, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:17, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, upload of very poor quality, small-sized and obviously randomly taken from car/bus etc, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:23, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:17, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams of very poor quality (taken with Nokia C3), which seems to be randomly taken and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?
btw: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 20:27, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:10, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams of very poor quality (taken with Nokia C3), which seems to be randomly taken and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?
btw: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 20:28, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:10, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams of rather poor quality (taken with Nokia C3), which seems to be randomly taken and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?
btw: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 20:29, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:09, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams of rather poor quality (taken with Nokia C3), which seems to be randomly taken and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?
btw: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 20:31, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:09, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams of very poor quality (taken with Nokia C3), which seems to be randomly taken and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?
btw: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 20:32, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:08, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams of poor quality (taken with Nokia C3), which seems to be randomly taken and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?
btw: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 20:34, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:08, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams of rather poor quality (taken with Nokia C3), which seems to be randomly taken and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?
btw: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 20:38, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:06, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams of rather poor quality (taken with Nokia C3), which seems to be randomly taken and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?
btw: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 20:39, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:06, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams of rather poor quality (taken with Nokia 5800), which seems to be randomly taken and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?
btw: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 19:42, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:44, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams (taken with Nokia 5800), file not in use at Wikimedia projects, upload of rather poor quality, small-sized and obviously randomly taken from car/bus etc, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 19:43, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:43, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams of rather poor quality (taken with Nokia C3), which seems to be randomly taken and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?
btw: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 19:48, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:43, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho potentially non-free content: small-sized (HD) format and missing EXIF data to verify origin, also personality rights isusses - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 19:51, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:42, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho potentially non-free content: rather small format and missing EXIF data to verify origin, but also missing description, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?
btw: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 19:54, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:41, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

as per File:Temples karnataka.jpg DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho potentially non-free content: rather small format and missing EXIF data to verify origin - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 19:55, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:41, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams of rather poor quality, tagged and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?
btw: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 20:04, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:41, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams (taken with Nokia C3), file not in use at Wikimedia projects, upload of rather poor quality, small-sized and obviously randomly taken from car/bus etc, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:04, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:41, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, tagged upload of rather poor quality, small-sized and obviously randomly taken from car/bus etc, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:05, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:40, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, tagged upload of rather poor quality, small-sized and obviously randomly taken from car/bus etc, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:06, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:40, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams (taken with Nokia C3), file not in use at Wikimedia projects, upload of rather poor quality, small-sized and obviously randomly taken from car/bus etc, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:08, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:40, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams (taken with Nokia C3), file not in use at Wikimedia projects, very poor quality upload, also small-sized, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:09, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:39, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams (taken with Nokia C3), file not in use at Wikimedia projects, rather small-sized upload of poor quality, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:12, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:39, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, upload of rather poor quality, tagged, and also showing advertisements, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:13, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:39, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams (taken with Nokia C3), file not in use at Wikimedia projects, upload of rather poor quality, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? Roland zh (talk) 18:46, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:54, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams of rather poot quality (taken with Nokia C3), usually randomly taken and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?
btw: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 18:52, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:54, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams of rather poor quality (taken with Nokia C3), randomly taken and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?
btw: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 18:56, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:53, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams of rather poor quality (taken with Nokia C3), randomly taken and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?
btw: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 18:57, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:53, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams of rather poor quality (taken with Nokia C3), randomly taken and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?
btw: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 18:58, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:50, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams of poor quality (taken with Nokia C3), randomly taken and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?
btw: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 18:59, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:50, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

your opinions are asked : imho a rather 'fictional' map of Karnataka which is not representing the present or past political facts, hence, imho out of scope of Wikimedia commons ?? Roland zh (talk) 19:02, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:50, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams of poor quality (taken with Nokia C3), randomly taken and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?
btw: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 19:25, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:50, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams of poor quality (taken with Nokia C3), replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?
btw: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 19:26, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:50, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams of poor quality (taken with Nokia C3), replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?
btw: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 19:26, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:47, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams of poor quality (taken with Nokia C3), replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?
btw: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 19:27, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:49, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams of poor quality (taken with Nokia C3), replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?
btw: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 19:27, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:47, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams of rather poor quality (taken with Nokia C3), which seems to be randomly taken and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?
btw: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 19:31, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:47, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams of rather poor quality (taken with Nokia C3), which seems to be randomly taken and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?
btw: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 19:37, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:46, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I guess this file was tagged as requiring permission due to the note “Photo taken by Bryan S. Bush and given to me to place on Wikipedia under a free license” in the description. As it has been uploaded past the COM:GOF date of 1 January 2007, we need indeed a permission from the photographer through our support team. However, as this file has been transferred from en:wp to Commons and as the original uploader has not been notified, we should process this through a regular deletion request that gives the opportunity to rectify this problem. AFBorchert (talk) 07:28, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The original uploader has told that he has no time for this and that we shall proceed with deleting this file (and the other photos by Bryan S. Bush which were uploaded by him and also filed for deletion). --AFBorchert (talk) 15:10, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, if the original uploader ever change their mind, they can send OTRS email and ask for undeletion. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:10, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 17:30, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, description says "hypothetical map". §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:07, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 17:30, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, description says "hypothetical map". §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:07, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams (taken with Nokia C3) of rather poor quality, replaceable by any file at the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons, file not in use at Wikimedia projects - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 18:40, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:04, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams (taken with Nokia C3), upload of rather poor quality, replacable by any file at the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? br>btw: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 18:43, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:04, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams (taken with Nokia C3), file not in use at Wikimedia projects, upload of rather poor quality, replacable by any file at the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 18:45, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:04, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams of rather poor quality (taken with Nokia C3), which seems to be randomly taken and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?
btw: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 21:21, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:14, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There are no evidences that this image (logo of one of the DPR departments) is really created by this user. MaxBioHazard (talk) 10:06, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 16:16, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope MaxBioHazard (talk) 10:07, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 16:16, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope MaxBioHazard (talk) 10:09, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 16:16, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope MaxBioHazard (talk) 10:09, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 16:17, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

isn't "own work" MaxBioHazard (talk) 10:12, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 16:16, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

isn't "own work" MaxBioHazard (talk) 10:13, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 16:16, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

isn't "own work" MaxBioHazard (talk) 10:13, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 16:16, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

isn't "own work" MaxBioHazard (talk) 10:13, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 16:16, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

isn't "own work" MaxBioHazard (talk) 10:14, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 16:16, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Worse version of File:Ausblick in das Donautal und auf die Stadt Melk - panoramio.jpg Braveheart (talk) 10:31, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 16:16, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 17:28, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 16:17, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 17:29, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 16:17, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 17:29, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 16:17, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful own work, other uploads were !p or speedy. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:44, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 16:17, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information. The seal may be old enough, but the photographer of this 3D object also has a copyright. May have been taken from here. No permission. Jcb (talk) 17:47, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. --Natuur12 (talk) 16:17, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Urheberrechtliche Gründe GnagfloW (talk) 08:04, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; metadata credited another. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:50, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 12:52, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:50, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

New version Updated Moajjem 13:13, 10 February 2017 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:50, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DW rather than own work. No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 17:31, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:51, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This unused B&W image is almost certainly not "own work" as claimed. There's a name, but no description, no categories, no google hits and no WP article so it is probably out of scope as well. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:56, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fritz Isfort wurde am 20.05.1882 in Horstmar (Westfalen) geboren. Er hat am Technikum in Frankenhausen studiert und war Erfinder und Inhaber zahlreicher Patente. Seine erste Erfindung war eine Reibungskupplung, die in Deutschland und 14 anderen Staaten patentiert wurde und unter dem Namen „Isfort-Kupplung“ Weltruf erlangte (siehe Patenturkunden). 1911 gründete Oberingenieur Fritz Isfort sein eigenes Ingenieurbüro in Bocholt (Westfalen) und passte seine Kupplung dem jeweiligen Verwendungszweck an und erwarb dadurch eine ganze Reihe weiterer Patente in Deutschland. Nach dem ersten Weltkrieg trug Oberingenieur Isfort aufgrund der guten Erfahrungen, die mit der „Isfort-Kupplung“ bei Schiffsantrieben gemacht worden waren, durch die Konstruktion eines neuartigen, von Hand gesteuerten Schiffswendegetriebes dazu bei, dass Deutschland auf diesem Gebiet vom Ausland völlig unabhängig wurde. Auch dieses Getriebe wurde in Deutschland und 12 andren Staaten patentiert und kam als „Isfort-Getriebe“ erfolgreich auf den Markt. Als Beratender Ingenieur bei der Firma Junkers in Dessau musste er im März 1945 in den letzten Kriegstagen des zweiten Weltkrieges nach Westdeutschland (Bergrothenfels Unterfranken) flüchten und verlor dabei fast sein gesamtes Hab und Gut. So musste er im Alter von 63 Jahren nahezu neu beginnen und schon zwei Jahre nach Kriegsende lag seine Neukonstruktion eines modernen handgesteuerten Schiffswendegetriebes vor und zahlreiche neue Patente wurden ihm zuerkannt. 1950 erhielt er, nach einigen Schwierigkeiten mit der sowjetischen Militär Administration in der DDR, als Abtretung seiner dortigen Patentrechte und als einmalige Lizenzgebühr einen Abfindungsbetrag. Damit verlor er notgedrungen alle weiteren Rechte an diesen Erfindungen, die noch jahrelang von Firmen in der DDR (BAMAG) lukrativ genutzt wurden. Immerhin war durch diese Abfindung ein gewünschter Umzug in die alte Heimat Westfalen (Münster) möglich geworden, wo er am seinen Lebensabend verbrachte und am 19.06.1962 verstorben ist. Eine nette Erinnerung erhielt Fritz Isfort von Graf Luckner, auf dessen Schiff die „Isfort-Kupplung“ eingebaut wurde und der ein Bild mit den handgeschriebenen Worten versah: „Isfort se hebben de Koppling in min Schipp ingebaut. Hoppentlik höllt se so, dat ik seggen kann, wenn ik wedder komm, Isfort de Koppling häw hollen.“ Und sie hat gehalten. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaeger-winni (talk • contribs) 11:32, 11 February 2017‎ (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Please do not remove the nominator's opening comment as you did here. The mini-biography above speaks well to the notability of the subject. I hope that User:Jaeger-winni takes it to start an article on the subject at WP:DE. If this is closed as Kept he should also fill in the information and categories for the file.

However, the mini-bio does not change the fact that we have an image here that was taken of a man born in 1882 who looks to be perhaps 40. His clothing looks later than that, perhaps 1935, which would make him 53. It is very unlikely that it is actually our uploader's own work and without a date or any information about the photo we must assume that it is still under copyright. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:23, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; obviously not own work. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:51, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams of rather poot quality (taken with Nokia C3), usually randomly taken and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?
btw: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 18:51, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I could not find any better quality image of this particular church although there are plenty images in Category:Churches in Kochi, Kerala of other churches. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:04, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:52, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams of rather poor quality (taken with Nokia C3), which seems to be randomly taken and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?
btw: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 20:35, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Seems of reasonable quality in the lot Category:Beypore Beach. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:08, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:52, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, upload of rather poor quality, but also dominantely tagged, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:17, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This seems to be not that bad in quality. Salvagable with crop to remove the email id at bottom. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:18, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Too dark, tops of plants missing, e-mail watermarl. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:13, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not PD-textlogo MaxBioHazard (talk) 10:01, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have changed the license to reflect the PNG that is replaces. Fry1989 eh? 22:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
strongly oppose free document. --Panam2014 (talk) 10:04, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per change of license by Fry. Green Giant (talk) 20:50, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear that this logo actually fails to pass the threshold of originality. Pitpisit (talk) 12:39, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Agree, as above. ~riley (talk) 03:12, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]