Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/11/03

Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Year	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec
2004	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2005	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2006	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2007	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2008	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2009	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2010	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2011	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2012	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2013	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12

Year	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec
2014	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2015	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2016	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2017	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2018	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2019	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2020	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2021	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2022	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2023	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2024	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12

Archive November 3^rd, 2016

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:На улице 60лет Октября д.-4 - panoramio.jpg

likely a family photo, unknown but identifiable people, out of scope. Holger1959 (talk) 04:44, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:26, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Счастье Бабушки - panoramio.jpg

likely a family photo, unknown but identifiable people, out of scope. Holger1959 (talk) 05:05, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:26, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:На улице Льва Толстого д.-26 - panoramio.jpg

likely a family photo, unknown but identifiable people, out of scope. Holger1959 (talk) 05:06, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:26, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:На реке Кокшага - panoramio.jpg

likely a family album photo, unknown but identifiable people, out of scope. Holger1959 (talk) 05:07, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:26, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:В доме мего деда - panoramio.jpg

likely a family album photo, unknown but identifiable people, out of scope. Holger1959 (talk) 05:07, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:26, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Untitled - panoramio - William “Patrick” Ma… (3).jpg

Out of COM:SCOPE due to unusable low image quality and likely non-notable person. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:31, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:31, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hikmet eraslan.jpg

all over the web Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 11:01, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: oops, meant to do a speedy. --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 11:01, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ampallang dans la nature.png

low quality image of com:PENIS, and for the particularity, see the other uploading of the uploader..., do you really think we need so many images of it? Pippobuono (talk) 07:58, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Hedwig in Washington: Out of project scope - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sinterklaas Zwarte Piet.jpg

Professonal picture without any metadata of unknown origin, uncertainty about copyright status due to lack of data. ErikvanB (talk) 10:48, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have updated the description.Hausofmakeup (talk) 13:12, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See here this is OK in Dutch. I withdraw nomination MoiraMoira (talk) 20:21, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

How? — I withdraw my nomination. ErikvanB (talk) 18:55, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per above. --INeverCry 00:19, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sinterklaas Zwarte Piet.jpg

The actor on this picture does not give permission to use this picture. He wants this to be removed. Zwartmaker (talk) 18:37, 24 October 2016 (UTC)Pleas remove this picture Zwartmaker (talk) 14:47, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: please ask the actor to contact OTRS, so that we can determine whether there is a real problem. --Jcb (talk) 13:32, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sinterklaas Zwarte Piet.jpg

No copyright. No permission. Zwartmaker (talk) 11:13, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 18:45, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sinterklaas Zwarte Piet.jpg

I'm one of the actors on the picture and did not give permission to Haus of Make-up to publish it. Haus of Make-up is not even the owner of the photo and my lawyer sent a letter to them to remove the picture from internet. Smokey62 (talk) 08:56, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as said above: contact OTRS. --Jcb (talk) 16:12, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sinterklaas Zwarte Piet.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Thibaut120094 as no permission (No permission since) Jcb (talk) 16:48, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Reviewed by trusted user, see here - Jcb (talk) 16:48, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - See also Ticket:2016110410014418 1 - Haus of Make-up is not the owner of the Photo. 2 - I (one of the actors) never gave permission to publish it for free use. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smokey62 (talk • contribs) 10:20, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Gezien de actoren allemaal Nederlands spreken is het misschien handiger wanneer ik deze verwijdering in het Nederlands motiveer. Een college heeft de op IRC gevraagd of ik hier naar wil kijken omdat het ticket in het Nederlands is geschreven. Of er echt sprake is van een schending van het portretrecht is lastig ter bepalen. Temeer omdat de acteur niet herkenbaar in beeld is. Aan de andere kan is er het maatschappelijk debat wat wel voor een redelijk belang tegen het publiceren van deze foto kan zorgen. Het ticket biedt in ieder geval onvoldoende juridische argumenten om over te gaan tot verwijdering. Maar eigenlijk vind ik dit voor nu helemaal niet relevant.

De vraag is of een verwijdering bij wijze van gunst (courtesy deletion) redelijk is en gezien de maatschappelijke discussie rondom Zwarte Piet en de discussie op de Nederlandse Wikipedia over deze foto vind ik dat alleszins redelijk. Deze verwijdering had veel eerder plaats kunnen vinden indien Zwartmaker zicht niet oneervol had gedragen. Ik zal via OTRS nog het een en ander uitleggen.

TLDR in English: given the current debate about zwarte piet and some turmoil at the Dutch Wikipedia regarding the works uploaded by zwartmaker it seems reasonable to do a courtesy deletion. Natuur12 (talk) 13:25, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Schönheide im Erzgebirge – Alte Auerbacher Straße 13 (1).jpg

Diese Datei ist ein Duplikat von: Alte Auerbacher Straße 13 (1).jpg . Ich bin der Ersteller dieser Datei und wünsche, dass sie gelöscht wird. Wewalther (talk) 12:50, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, redir. --Wdwd (talk) 16:28, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:പാങ്ങോട് ഭൂപടം .jpg

ഇത് ഞാന്‍ http://lsgkerala.in/pangodepanchayat/photo-gallery/map/ എന്ന വെബ്‌സൈറ്റില്‍ നിന്നും download ചെയ്തതാണ്. എന്റെ സൃഷ്ടി അല്ല. ബന്ധപ്പെട്ട അധികാരികളില്‍ നിന്നും ശരിയായ മാര്‍ഗ്ഗത്തില്‍ വാങ്ങാന്‍ ശ്രമിക്കുന്നു. Afsalpangode (talk) 14:09, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:പാങ്ങോട് ഭൂപടം .jpg

i am downloaded this from "http://lsgkerala.in/pangodepanchayat/photo-gallery/map/" this website. it is not my own. please remove Afsalpangode (talk) 14:18, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: uploader request via e-mail. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:43, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Atradius logo.jpg

This image is the old logo of Atradius that is no longer in use. The logo has been changed in 2014. The new logo has also been uploaded to Commons and can be found at this URL https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3AAtradius_new_logo.jpg Also the official website of Atradius uses the new logo which can be verified here: https://group.atradius.com/ Clau clau19 (talk) 16:24, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept, Commons hosts old and outdated logos to show history. This is simple logo. Taivo (talk) 17:12, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Logo roell vilduero 2014 big.png

The user's only contribution. They uploaded a logo, then replaced it with gibberish. It seems to be a personal image with no potential educational value to anyone, including the uploader. Just delete. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 00:20, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. (t) Josve05a (c) 18:05, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Carte postal 120ème régiment du train.jpg

not own work: postcard BrightRaven (talk) 14:09, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by BrightRaven: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Carte postal 120ème régiment du train.jpg: not own work: postcard

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Quartier des Héronnières à Fontainebleau.jpg

http://monique-fournier.blogspot.be/2014_12_01_archive.html BrightRaven (talk) 14:10, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by BrightRaven: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Quartier des Héronnières à Fontainebleau.jpg: http://monique-fournier.blogspot.be/2014_12_01_archive.html

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Timelapse Koper to Maribor - 2h in a little more than 2 min.webm

possibly copyvio - no source for the music used in this video INeverCry (talk) 02:41, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@INeverCry: This is why I uploaded it without audio. --Sporti (talk) 15:17, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry (talk) 22:45, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sangre familia.jpg

bad name I made a mistake Goodmusic666 (talk) 15:30, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Goodmusic666: Until you withdraw this request, I cannot rename the file, like you suggested. Also, since this is a copyright violation (image is from https://www.facebook.com/bananemetalik/photos/a.441908353861.237508.31944243861/10153875212268862/?type=3&theater), it will be deleted anyways. Elisfkc (talk) 21:01, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, by Ymblanter for being a copyright violation. Elisfkc (talk) 21:22, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:মেজর জেনারেল.jpg

Blank image, upload error UAwiki (talk) 23:12, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: empty image. --Platonides (talk) 23:16, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:RUHSAT ETÜT ÇALIŞMALARINDA MERMERCİ ÖZGÜR - panoramio.jpg

Out of COM:SCOPE, unused image of probably encyclopedically non-notable person. -- Túrelio (talk) 16:08, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Shizhao: Out of project scope - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Justin Bieber MSG.jpg

Getty image, from file EXIF: "Author Larry Busacca Copyright holder 2010 Getty Images". MKFI (talk) 13:35, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. (t) Josve05a (c) 05:50, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Iaun Morgan.jpg

dupe File:Morgan,Henry.jpg Baddu676 (talk) 14:16, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: duplicate file, redirection to File:Morgan,Henry.jpg. --Wdwd (talk) 12:28, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Notre-Dame vu de la Seine (Paris).jpg

No FOP in France Elisfkc (talk) 21:19, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Coyau (talk) 10:45, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Speyer, Dom, Eingang zur Krypta - panoramio.jpg

Depiction of identifiable people in Germany requires their permission (Commons:Photographs_of_identifiable_people#Country_specific). -- Túrelio (talk) 21:39, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Shizhao: Out of project scope - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Category:Kayano Nagatomo

creator ask Sgsg (talk) 10:53, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Empty, deletion requested by author. --Achim (talk) 20:38, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Một chai mật ong hoa rừng Cát Bà.jpg

The bottle shown in the image is not own work of uploader, please read COM:L and COM:DW before making more uploads. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:41, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This photo taken by me. I also save original image. I found that, recently pressed my community! Goodmorninghpvn (talk) 02:49, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mật ong hoa rừng Cát Bà.jpg

This is the original image

Goodmorninghpvn, "This photo taken by me" is not enough if the subject depicted has copyright. See Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter. It seems some of your art works are derived from other artworks. Here the product packaging may have an issue. J e e 05:24, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. A derivative work of a non-free material is also non-free. Please see COM:DW. --★ Poké⁹⁵ 07:45, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, duplicate already deleted. --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 12:05, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Asuransipendidikan (talk · contribs)

Out of scope - advertisements.

--ghouston (talk) 00:20, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Asuransipendidikan (talk · contribs)

Out of scope - advertisements.

--ghouston (talk) 00:21, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: speedy deleted. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 19:22, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Play 1.jpg

Just took a look at the copyright. It states "All copyrights belong to Sonos, Inc., which reserves the right to revoke permission to use the materials at any time." The URL to this is "http://press-us.sonos.com/presskit/216167" Sheldon.andre (talk) 18:26, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by AzaToth: Copyright violation: Invalid public domain reasoning. Press release images are copyrighted

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Humberto Vargas - panoramio - Humberto Vargas (7).jpg

Obviously a derivative of a likely not own background-photo[1] and out of COM:SCOPE anyway. -- Túrelio (talk) 16:28, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 05:23, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Port of Piran, Slovenia.webm

no details about the copyright status of the music used in the video INeverCry (talk) 01:38, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded only video, without audio. --Sporti (talk) 15:21, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn. --lNeverCry 10:17, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Slovenska vojska (in vojaška policija) predstavljata svoja vozila v Pivki 18. 9. 2016.webm

there's what sounds like some sort of anthem playing - is this music free? Who's singing it? INeverCry (talk) 02:33, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded only video, without audio. --Sporti (talk) 15:20, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn. --lNeverCry 10:44, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Soča White Water 2016.webm

the music here is stated to be "Whats Up by American Weirdos" - looks to be copyrighted INeverCry (talk) 02:35, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded only video, without audio. --Sporti (talk) 15:19, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn. --lNeverCry 10:46, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Category:Sun Yat-sen's calligraphy

no file Sgsg (talk) 15:11, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: empty category. --Ju Ta 10:26, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Photomine.jpg

Who or what is this. ¿Quién o qué es esto? Jos1950 (talk) 13:31, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: unused selfie. --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 17:13, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Logo lxy.jpg

Logo uploaded only for advertising. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 00:12, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination withdrawn – they are using the file on their user page. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 00:16, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Withdrawn. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:44, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hockey Ducilo.jpg

Copyright violation. Original image found at http://www.bafilm.com.ar/locacion/berazategui/232-ex-club-ducilo. It even has the original watermark FedericoMP (talk) 02:37, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:45, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Pileta ducilo.jpg

Copyright violation. Taken from http://www.laguiadeberazategui.com.ar/id/466-club-ducilo FedericoMP (talk) 02:40, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:45, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tren bera.jpg

Copyright violation. Found earlier in http://www.lanacion.com.ar/1908535-mauricio-macri-inauguro-una-extension-del-tren-electrico-de-la-linea-roca where it says that the source is "Prensa Transporte" FedericoMP (talk) 02:52, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:46, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Norman Jay, MBE.jpg

Not own work. File EXIF shows "Copyright holder Debbie Bragg". MKFI (talk) 13:58, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:43, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jenny-O.gif

copyright violation, uploader states it is own work but source seems to be web, copyrighted by Net News LTD. http://thenet.ng/2015/03/hip-tv-presenter-jenny-o-stuns-in-new-photos/ Ronaz (talk) 14:02, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:43, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Eve wears CHI CHI VON TANG's Warrior Bomber on Stage.png

Screenshot containing a photograph; no evidence that the uploader has permission to distribute and license the photograph. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 00:04, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:00, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:1953 Article.jpg

Copy of a possibly copyrighted newspaper article. --ghouston (talk) 00:26, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:00, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Louis Blaylock.jpg

No source or copyright details for the original photo. --ghouston (talk) 00:28, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:00, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Tuqay Ploshchad metro station mosaics

Photo of copyrighted mosaics by Baqi Urmançe who died in 1990. Unfortunately, there is no Freedom of Panorama in Russia for non-architectural artwork.

A.Savin 00:28, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I do not agree. After the photos are not commercial profit is extracted. Hence there is no violation Колчин Дмитрий (talk) 20:49, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

All photos will be transferred to Russian Wikipedia, so there is not much to discuss here, but I would still like to mention that the majority of these mosaics are authored by Rushan Samsutdinov who is also the uploader. --Alexander (talk) 18:06, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I see from ru:Площадь Габдуллы Тукая (станция метро), Shamsutdinov is indeed author of some of these mosaics (not sure if really of most of them) and Habibullin is "only" the one who assembled the paintings into the mosaics, but not the painter. From my understanding, we have the following status: to keep the mosaics by Shamsutdinov, we need at least an OTRS confirmation that the account is by himself (I doubt, for example, that he is really the photographer of this one). But at least a part of the mosaics is definitely DW of paintings by Urmançe, who died in 1990. --A.Savin 15:55, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:01, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Durgesh066 (talk · contribs)

Out of scope - unused personal images

--ghouston (talk) 00:34, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:02, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Durgesh066 (talk · contribs)

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:23, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:01, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Léo língua.jpg

Unused selfie. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 01:01, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:02, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mcwatchesfashion.png

Advertising. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 01:05, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:02, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ivan-a-4-year-old-lion-Mihai-VASILE.jpg

COM:COPYVIO artwork by Mihai Vasile uploaded by someone else. COM:OTRS permission of the artist would be required to keep it. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:40, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:02, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mihai-Vasile-Publicatie.png

COM:COPYVIO: I know I removed another copy of this exact same book cover earlier today or yesterday. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:41, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Message left on discussion page: "Hello, Thank you for your message. Several images, including this picture, posted on https://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mihai_Vasile page were deleted, despite the fact that I indicated the source and the author. May I know what is wrong and how I need to proceed in order to publish these pictures, please? I confirm that I can use all these pictures and I assume the entire responsability. Thank you in advance for your feedback. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cris2017 (talk • contribs) 07:21, 03 November 2016 (UTC) Cris2017 (talk) 07:54, 3 November 2016 (UTC)"[reply]

For images not created by yourself, COM:OTRS permission is needed from the other photographers to retain the images on Commons. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:44, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:02, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Elevation johannes cornelius kreiger.png

If this was created by Kay Fisker, it is non-free in its home country and the US. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:52, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:03, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Pbro. Joseph B. Stegemier S.pdf

Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:59, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:03, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:LA GASTRITIS.pdf

Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 06:02, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:03, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:17. July - Sep 16.pdf

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 06:02, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:03, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anne Maria Udsen (talk · contribs)

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 06:04, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Anne Maria Udsen (talk · contribs)

Modern art. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:03, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:MISS MARGARET ADJEI GYEKYE.pdf

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 06:04, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:03, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hakobal in de media 01.pdf

Newspaper scan, copyright violation. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 06:05, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:03, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:사진 자른거.jpg

Out of scope — regards, Revi 06:09, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:04, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:KakaoTalk 20160920 171311109.jpg

Out of scope — regards, Revi 06:10, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:04, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Farcry.PNG

The details on the letters reach the COM:TOO, making this a {{Logo}}-copyvio. (t) Josve05a (c) 06:11, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

looks like OK--EEIM (talk) 14:22, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:04, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Team leader AB Center.jpg

self-promotion, no use on any project C3r4 (talk) 06:20, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:04, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mydia's Life.jpg

unused, family member? Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 06:26, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

support to delete per nomination. Kayser Ahmad (talk) 02:25, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:04, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Har Meron as seen from Akbara Hiking trail near safed - panoramio.jpg

Low quality, unusable, alternatives exist Poliocretes (talk) 06:33, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:04, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Taylornarita.png

All Content we make available through our Website are “Rights Managed Content”, meaning “Content licensed for a fee on a per usage basis”. Unauthorized use of Content constitutes infringement of copyright and other applicable rights and the use of our Content without our prior approval or knowledge and shall entitle StartraksPhoto.com to exercise all rights and remedies under applicable copyright and other laws, including monetary damages against all users and beneficiaries of the use of such Content.

There is no indication that this has ever been in the public domain. AFBorchert (talk) 06:35, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:04, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Annavoce (talk · contribs)

Probably not one own work in this collection. Some metadata indicates other authors.

Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 06:37, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:05, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:LLS.jpg

Watermark indicates uploader isn't photographer Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 07:33, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:06, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Pic 1 (copy).JPG

Completely a non relevant redirect. Regards, KCVelaga _{☚╣✉╠☛} 08:04, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:06, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Океания 3.jpg

Derivative work of screenshot with unknown copyright status. Taivo (talk) 08:19, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:06, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Логотип школы 814.jpg

School logos are not own work. OTRS-permission from school representative is needed. Taivo (talk) 08:20, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:06, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader convinced me on his talkpage, that the file is published under free license. I reviewed the license and restored the file. Taivo (talk) 09:57, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Plocha school.jpg

no Com:FOP in Bulgaria :( Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 08:23, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:06, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Palacio del duque de úceda (plaza de colón)-1960.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Discasto as no permission (No permission since)

Delete Work published in 1960, still non-free and copyrighted. ★ Poké⁹⁵ 08:42, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:06, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Mall of Asia Arena

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Philippines.

Wikicology (talk) 09:03, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree with this. The Freedom of Entry covering the Philippines clearly shows that it is still a grey area, hence the status quo should be maintained since there is no proof either way yet as of now. (RoyKabanlit talk) 21:46, 03 November 2016 (GMT+8)

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:07, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Mall of Asia Arena

There's no freedom of panorama in the Philippines, and these are not applicable for de minimis. A free license from the architect is needed.

★ Poké⁹⁵ 02:09, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand why these set of pictures were deleted, and I don't accept it. When I do a search now of Wikimedia Commons of "Mall of Asia Arena", I still see MANY pictures of it there. How come those were not deleted but the ones I uploaded were? RoyKabanlit (talk) 06:09, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: some and kept some. For some of the files COM:DM does apply. --Jcb (talk) 02:08, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Mall of Asia Arena

Same reason as the first nomination at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Mall of Asia Arena.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:51, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 06:23, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Malabry cle0dcc8e.jpg

violation des droits d'auteur AntonyB (talk) 09:37, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:07, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:4781531 6 7e23 cedre-bleu-pleureur-de-l-atlas-de e6d6b994d14b893c3ec7f17eacc694db.jpg

violation des droits d'auteur AntonyB (talk) 09:37, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:07, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tramway T10.jpg

violation des droits d'auteur AntonyB (talk) 09:37, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:07, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Maison-chateaubriand.jpg

violation des droits d'auteur AntonyB (talk) 09:37, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:07, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Maisondechateaubriand.jpg

violation des droits d'auteur AntonyB (talk) 09:37, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:07, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:معلومات النشر لبحث اختصار الحديث وأثره في الاشكال جامعة الشارقة.png

fair use (book cover) --Alaa Najjar :)..! 09:38, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:07, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:إفادة نشر دار العلوم جامعة القاهرة.jpg

non free image - fair use --Alaa Najjar :)..! 09:39, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:07, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:إفادة نشر بحث موهم الاختلاف مجلة المدونة الهند.png

non free image - fair use --Alaa Najjar :)..! 09:39, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:07, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Pholiota microspora-3.jpg

This was incompletely nominated by the uploader shortly after upload giving no rationale. This appears to have been an attempt at requesting a courtesy deletion. As the deletion request was malformed, I think this should have a DR. Storkk (talk) 09:51, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ː(Literal translation by a robot.) not Pholiota microspora. it's Pholiota adiposa.　--Togabi (talk) 00:05, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:07, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Thelab2010.jpg

Small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. I suspect copyright violation. Smaller version exists in http://www.hispasonic.com/foros/afinar-piano/63586/pagina2 since 2007. Taivo (talk) 10:18, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:07, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sarah Hasted Portrait.jpg

Looks like a crop http://www.sarahhasted.com/about/ Thoughts? Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 10:23, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Found here as well (bottom) http://www.edelmanarts.com/news/2016/6/13/john-margolies --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 10:24, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:08, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Graphzweischwimmer.svg

One of the most bizarrely constructed graphs I have seen. Literally made up of millions of circles. Once >2,000,000 white circles have been removed, the remaining ~100K circles do somehow form an SVG version of File:Graphzweischwimmer.png (uploaded by the same user) that Inkscape can read... but the SVG file is useless. This was an incomplete nomination by Bocardodarapti with the rationale "does not work, we use png-version" - but was not transcluded and the uploader was not informed. Storkk (talk) 10:29, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

thanks and sorry for the incomplete deletion request, something went wrong from png to svg.--Bocardodarapti (talk) 11:01, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:08, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Alix Bénézech 1.jpg

no permission for this image. The flickr permission is for old file overwritten by this one Dacoucou (talk) 10:44, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: overwrite version deleted. --lNeverCry 00:10, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Alix Bénézech 1.jpg

Request from the subject - DR by courtesy. OTRS ticket:2017041710011079 AntonierCH ^(d) 00:41, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Aucune raison de supprimer cette image qui est très bien. --Shev123 (talk) 07:22, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep actrice, personnage public, dans l'exercice de sa fonction sur un événement public, festival de cinéma. En plus, la photo est très bien. Dacoucou (talk) 17:03, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per above. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 17:42, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Cette photo ne contrevient pas au droit à l'image. Hadrianus (talk) 18:00, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Cette photo est manifestement une pose qui implique donc consentement de la personne. De plus, la photo a été prise dans un lieu public et la personne est publique. Malosse (talk) 18:02, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Ajouter {{Personality rights}} pourrait être opportun. Cordialement, — Racconish^☎ 19:52, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Idem que ci-dessus. Jean-Jacques Georges (talk) 07:44, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: same. Nomen ad hoc (talk) 10:52, 19 April 2017 (UTC).[reply]

Keep per above. Goodshort (talk) 13:31, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep same -Titou (talk) 14:11, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per consensus. --Jcb (talk) 15:45, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy giving Law Day Address.jpg

Delete While this images comes from the LOC's New York World-Telegram & Sun Newspaper Photograph Collection, there is a possible restriction per the collection's "Rights and Restrictions Information" page at http://www.loc.gov/rr/print/res/076_nyw.html The image is too small to read the attached text to see if the image was in fact a staff image or just one of the other wire service images collected by NTWT&S. If it is the latter it is probably not old enough to be in the public domain, unless it was a US government work photo. Sorry but I can't find a better quality image or other author information online to verify it's copyright status. Ww2censor (talk) 10:56, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The LoC attributes it to UPI. So, misuse of the NYWT&S template. -- Asclepias (talk) 23:01, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:10, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Giovanni Battista Re.PNG

also crop file:Cardinale Re.png
Uploader's name is Luca Giarelli, but here author is Andrea Richini. Evidence for CC-license is needed, for example OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 11:21, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:11, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hatsune Miku V3.png

The license for this character is a CC-by-nc, not be able to accept in the Commons. kahusi (會話) 11:54, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:11, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rin & Len Kagamine - Sega.jpg

The license for this character is a CC-by-nc, not be able to accept in the Commons. kahusi (會話) 11:57, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:11, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rin&Len Kagamine - Good Smile Company.jpg

The license for this character is a CC-by-nc, not be able to accept in the Commons. kahusi (會話) 11:57, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:11, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cambrian Student.jpg

OTRS-permission from author Noble is needed. Small unused photo, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:58, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:11, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Alan santhosh kodikunnil.jpg

private snap of non-notable individual; out of project scope DCB (talk) 12:06, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:11, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:BanajeetSharma.jpg

Small personal photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. The photo is used in teahouse archive, which in my opinion does not count as using. Taivo (talk) 12:08, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:11, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Carlos bujosa,en estreno bamby c4.jpg

Private image or probably copyvio from paparazi magazine. GeorgHH • talk 12:34, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:11, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:District govt chakwal png.png

also file:Provincial assembly of punjab logo .png
The logos are not own work. Maybe they are somehow in public domain, but real source and better license is needed. Taivo (talk) 12:37, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:11, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Stemma del Comune di Castel San Lorenzo.jpg

Official coat of arms, not free (see http://www.comune.castelsanlorenzo.sa.it/, Commons:Deletion requests/Italian CoA) GJo (talk) 13:14, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:11, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Niemand - Tragödie in sieben Bildern

No permission, see: de:Wikipedia:Bildrechte#Theaterauff.C3.BChrungen

Brackenheim (talk) 13:35, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:12, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Adam Cooley self portrait 224.jpg

Most of these images were previously uploaded to en.wiki on September 30 by User:KevinJardine and were subsequently deleted as lacking evidence of permission. The same group of images were uploaded here at the Commons a couple days later by user:Japanarteye. Some of the images were previously published at the artist's website. Images of artwork require express permission of the copyright holder via an OTRS ticket. Diannaa (talk) 13:39, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Adam Cooley self portrait 224.jpg: previously published at http://iamadamcooley.com/About
File:Black and white self portrait 1 of Adam Cooley.jpg: previously published at http://iamadamcooley.com/performance-artist-bio

These ones incorporate artwork by Adam Cooley. We have no evidence of permission for these derivative works:

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:12, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Vedhika kumar.jpg

Copyright violation; no evidence that this is the uploader's own picture. Kailash29792 (talk) 13:42, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:12, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abaz22 (talk · contribs)

Professional-level images and logo of single event taken with various cameras. Single-purpose article on en:wikipedia. Unlikely own work.

Ariadacapo (talk) 16:53, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:26, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abaz22 (talk · contribs)

Copyright violations. File:Toronto 2016 1.jpg is from https://swatchmajorseries.com/en/60/about-swatch-major-series and credited to Bernhard Horst. Most of the others are from https://www.swatchmajorseries.com/en/media/picturesBestOf.

MKFI (talk) 13:45, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per MKFI Ariadacapo (talk) 07:46, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:12, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:The Forgery 1998.jpg

Suspected copyright violation, unlikely to be own work, inconsistent date given (2010 vs. 1998 play). MKFI (talk) 13:55, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:13, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Emsa Clip & Close Frischhaltedose in der Produktion.jpg

Press photograph. File EXIF shows "Author matthias sandmann", OTRS permission needed. MKFI (talk) 13:56, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Author" Matthias Sandmann assigned his claims and rights on the press photograph File:Emsa Clip & Close Frischhaltedose in der Produktion.jpg to Emsa.

--EMSA Pressestelle (Diskussion) 15:55, 09. Nov. 2016 (CEST)

@EMSA Pressestelle: please send OTRS permission so that Commons has a confirmation of the above. MKFI (talk) 12:44, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:13, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Christine Hoeft (talk · contribs)

Uploader is the subject. File EXIF shows "Author www.olivernestola.com Copyright holder Oliver Nestola". OTRS permission from Oliver Nestola needed.

MKFI (talk) 14:02, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:13, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:DIG13943 062 (29877044260).jpg

Commons:Derivative works from non-free photo. Should be cropped/blanked to keep. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:03, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:13, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:DIG13943 076 (29877043010).jpg

Commons:Derivative works from non-free photo. Should be cropped/blanked to keep. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:03, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:13, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Andrew Whiston.jpg

The permission of the author, Julio Larramendi, should be sent through OTRS. BrightRaven (talk) 14:05, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:13, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Media without a license as of 3 November 2016

Out of Commons:Project scope: Sorry, but not every photo published by government has educational purpose.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:13, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:DIG13937 053 (29659000832).jpg

Commons:Derivative works from photos. Should cropped/blanked to keep. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:14, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:DIG13937 040 (29735378316).jpg

Commons:Derivative works from photos. Should cropped/blanked to keep. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:14, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Dominique Mouillot 2016.png

The permission of Studio Harcourt should be sent through OTRS. BrightRaven (talk) 14:08, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:14, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Dominique Mouillot - Séché Energies.jpg

The permission of Studio Harcourt should be sent through OTRS. BrightRaven (talk) 14:09, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:14, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Joba-Arriba---La-parada.jpg

Own work or advertising for the website Jos1950 (talk) 14:15, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:14, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vaultoromedia (talk · contribs)

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:14, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rito Egizio Tradizionale Sovrano Gran Santuario di Heliopolis sedente in Napoli.pdf

Historical drawing. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:14, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ExBSicon exHST saffron.svg

Because I accidentally created it with the filename beginning with "ex", ren1dering it useless, what's more, I'm blocked from uploading a correctly named icon because the replacement has identical content. My error, apologies DavidAHull (talk) 14:23, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:14, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tierratribal.2016.jpg

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://s3.amazonaws.com/bit-photos/thumb/6267867.jpeg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:14, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bill Hillmann.jpg

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://thcreadingseries.files.wordpress.com/2016/01/hillman.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is my photo and should be kept. It is also the author's bio photo.

The subject Bill Hillmann who owns the copy right has given permission to use the photo. --usigned comment 09:38, 7 November 2016‎ DanHamilton1998

Then please contact WP:OTRS and follow the proper procedure of proving that you have, indeed, the permission. Also, why upload such a crappy low res picture? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 08:44, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:14, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AlternateWars (talk · contribs)

Historical documents. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:15, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Joni Gelp Letra De SU.png

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:15, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Magnetic-Coupling-Principle.png

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:15, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rmarrio10 (talk · contribs)

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:15, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:DanC.jpg

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:15, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wiki ocean 33 (talk · contribs)

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://i.ytimg.com/vi/3GvOv_T3gpE/maxresdefault.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:15, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Leomimi (talk · contribs)

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:15, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rberezin (talk · contribs)

Advertisement. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:15, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cajetan392 (talk · contribs)

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio. P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:23, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cajetan392 (talk · contribs)

Historical photos and map. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:15, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dr.Oetker Arabia (talk · contribs)

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:15, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Esgbattery (talk · contribs)

Out of Commons:Project scope: advertisement. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:16, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Logo microsoft.png

I don't find this logo on internet : so tis is a copyvio of a logo, or a wrong logo. Olivier LPB (talk) 14:52, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:16, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Genrikh Saulovich Altshuller commemorative plaque in Petrozavodsk.JPG

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Russia for artworks. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:16, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sarajevo - Avaz twist tower - panoramio.jpg

Per Commons:Deletion requests/Avaz Twist Tower Smooth_O (talk) 15:28, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:16, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bertrand Escaich.jpg

Badly rotated duplicate of File:Bertrand BeKa.jpg. Lacrymocéphale (talk) 15:47, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:16, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ROC Public Construction Commission Logo.png

It's an orphaned and scaled-down duplicate. There is an svg format, File:ROC Public Construction Commission Seal.svg, in Commons now. Akira123 (talk) 16:01, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:16, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ROC Atomic Energy Council Logo.png

It's an orphaned and scaled-down duplicate. There is an svg format, File:ROC Atomic Energy Council Seal.svg, in Commons now. Akira123 (talk) 16:02, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:16, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Toys-r-us-logo.jpg

above COM:TOO, the version before was fair use Kopiersperre (talk) 16:07, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:16, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Toysruslogo 2007.jpg

above COM:TOO, the version before was fair use Kopiersperre (talk) 16:07, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:16, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [2]. Yann (talk) 11:48, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Eva Lindström 2014-11-21 001.jpg

While this is a 'version' of the same photo as licensed at the stated source (mynewsdesk) it's not the 'same work'... it is a very different crop, at far higher resolution, and appears to be from here. I think the difference is sufficient to create a serious doubt about if this version of the image is licensed. Revent^talk 16:18, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:16, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Pierre Joubert.jpg

This appears to a reproduction of a copy of the original photograph. The wider version originally uploaded has a signature, apparently of "R. Manson". This page indicates that Robert Manson was a studio photographer in Paris, who took images of scouts, and was alive until 2001. This would make the image clearly still copyrighted (until 2072), and indicates that Pascal Poumailloux only owns a physical copy. Revent^talk 16:40, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See also Commons:Help desk#Copyright help regarding File:Pierre Joubert.jpg. -- Asclepias (talk) 17:08, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Asclepias: Amusingly, I had not actually read your response there, I had just looked at the 'question' and the image itself. But, yes, you did rather make the same argument. Revent^talk 03:30, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, given the circumstases, I cannot do anything but waiting for the deletion. I apologize for the problem created by my inexperience, but I have not yet figured out how to work with Commons and licenses. Being unable to ask for permission, at this point I hope that the image is erased. So I approve the deletion request. Yaniv 01 (talk) 13:10, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:16, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:AV Logo.jpg

Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 16:51, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:17, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Baby duck pond (7411800246).jpg

Unused image without any context to give it educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:54, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:17, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Logo joel.png

only advertising, nothing special. Jos1950 (talk) 16:59, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:17, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:BADHAN.jpg

Unused personal group photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:06, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:17, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Logo DogFinance.jpg

Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 17:24, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:17, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Health Goes Female logo.png

Health goes female is not mentioned in en.wiki, so the logo is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 18:21, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:17, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ward3590.jpg

OTRS-permission from author Jason Corriher is needed. Taivo (talk) 18:32, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:17, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Joe Ferrone.jpg

Out of Scope: personal image Florn (talk) 18:37, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:17, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tobias i sitt vanlige miljø.png

Out of scope: personal image Florn (talk) 18:38, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:17, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:NATOMAP.jpg

No evidence showing the author let this work under a free license. Kumkum (talk) 19:18, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:17, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Super radio brasil.jpg

Copyright violation. João Justiceiro (talk) 19:56, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:17, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ptacekmarek.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Rosenfeld~cswiki as Speedy (speedy delete) and the most recent rationale was: out of scope: private photo Wdwd (talk) 20:04, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:18, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Topmanager.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Rosenfeld~cswiki as Speedy (speedy delete) and the most recent rationale was: out of scope: private photo Wdwd (talk) 20:06, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:18, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Svatý Milan - Milanovci.png

This file was initially tagged by Rosenfeld~cswiki as Speedy (speedy delete) and the most recent rationale was: out of scope: private photo Wdwd (talk) 20:06, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:17, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Humberto Vargas - panoramio - Humberto Vargas (10).jpg

Out of COM:SCOPE, unused portrait-shot of probably non-notable person. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:29, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Same problem with:

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:18, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Andrea Pagano (talk · contribs)

Unlikely own works by uploader, this is a gallery about one person but with widely different sizes, styles, colors, dates, and so on showing it's more likely a collection of images than user's own work.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:49, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:18, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by María Presso (talk · contribs)

These images are all sourced to various stock photo sites, but, not directly. So they lead to the top level URL of the site where they may or may not be found. Thus they do not have any indication of the actual page from which they came, with the actual creator's name and the ability to determine if the licenses are compatible with Commons.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:56, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.publicdomainpictures.net/view-image.php?image=33041&picture=path-in-the-woods María Presso (talk) 21:57, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've kept this one, added the source, and reviewed it. lNeverCry 00:21, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:21, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Петрозаводск, Памятник П.Ф. Анохину.jpg

Unfortuately, there is no freedom of panorama for modern monuments in Russia. The file is being transferred to the Russian Wikivoyage where it is in use. Ymblanter (talk) 21:18, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:22, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Transport in The Liberties.jpg

One of the files has a watermark, thus I doubt whether all of the files used are own work or only the collage of the images is. Basvb (talk) 21:47, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:22, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MikeBarry1989 (talk · contribs)

I have my doubt that all of the images in these collages are own work. The transport in the liberties bottom file has a watermark for example. This user also has 6 non-collage uploads. Although these uploads are of high res and contain metadata they show to be taken with 4 different kinds of camera's.

Basvb (talk) 21:51, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:22, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Lorenz Isaac L. Raquiz.jpg

Has been filed as selfpublished work, it is unused, and I have found no corresponding article. Iazyges (talk) 21:58, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:22, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wyszy3.jpg

The sourcing and authorship is not own work in this case, meaning the license PD-self is invalid. The file is signed however I can't read the exact year (1937, 1837) which matters a lot. We need to determine whether this is PD-old or not. Basvb (talk) 22:00, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:22, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:A6M5 TAIC.jpg

Insufficient information to determine copyright situation. No source to support the license. Jcb (talk) 22:45, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:22, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:A6N2-N Rufe.jpg

No source. Insufficient information to determine copyright situation. Contradicting statements: would be a US navy work, under a Japanese PD rationale. Jcb (talk) 22:48, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:22, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:In Hancesti (1986). (15878699194).jpg

Private photo; non-notable people. Out of scope. XXN, 23:15, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:23, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Helsinki. Sibelius-monumentti. Valokuva Victor Belousov. - panoramio.jpg

Derivative work of the Sibelius Monument (wikidata:Q2584017), a 1967 sculpture by Eila Hiltunen (1922–2003; wikidata:Q460402), not in Public Domain yet. FOP in Finland for buildings only. Apalsola ^{t • c} 23:22, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Previous cases:

––Apalsola ^{t • c} 23:24, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:23, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:5.21.11JimCheungByLuigiNovi.jpg

The subject requested it due to his discomfort over his appearance in the pic. As the photographer who took the pic, it is important to me that subjects are are not made to feel this way, and since I have uploaded suitable replacements for it, I have no objection to its deletion. Nightscream (talk) 23:28, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:23, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Soccer star Abby Wambach arrested for DUI in Portland.jpg

No evidence that booking photos in Oregon are in public domain Ytoyoda (talk) 23:41, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:23, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gonzalez Dominando el Balon en un entrenamiento en 2014.jpg

Only used on the Spanish Wikipedia, where the subject's article was speedily deleted as a non-notable individual in June. Out of project scope. — ξ ^xplicit 23:48, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:23, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Drink&Draw 059.jpg

Per this older nomination. It's a derivative of a protective work. Affected:

Should be addressed:

File:Drink&Draw 052.jpg
File:Drink&Draw 020.jpg (probably Commons:De minimis)
File:Drink&Draw 048.jpg
File:Drink&Draw 010.jpg (the tato matters here)
File:Drink&Draw 007.jpg

Mhhossein ^talk 05:07, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Kept one, DM. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:22, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Degard1 (talk · contribs)

Modern artworks : (if they are in scope) it lacks the permission of the author (see OTRS), though it will be not sufficient for the artworks that include derivative work of photo(s), in these cases an autorisation from the photographer is also needed (or an evidence the photos are free)

e.g. File:Degard 2014 Marilyn AP.jpg is a derivative of [3]

Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 06:06, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Message made by the uploader, Degard1, copied from my talk page:

"Dear Christian

i received your message this morning about the imagery for degard1.

I understand your concern but there is no reason for concern.

i own all the copyrights to all these paintings. These are original paintings.

Further i also own the copyrights to the photographs since i have purchased them in advance of doing the paintings.

i purchase the images from getty, image collect, alamy and some of the images are free.

thank you very much. Dee" Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 17:03, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The issue is always the same, if those artworks are in our project scope, so an OTRS permission by you is always needed. And evidences the photos are free (for each photos used) must be provided (links to the free sources (web sites)), or again OTRS permissions from the copyright owners of the photos (for each photos) that don't have a free source must be send. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 17:08, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

hi - sorry i am working my way around this system - it isnt that easy (like a reply tab!!) - i hope we have provided evidence now - please do confirm very best Dee

Deleted: First, a license from Getty images would usually not give the right to further license the work freely -- the license would have to be sent to OTRS. But, more important, these are out of scope as personal art from an artist who is not notable. That is usually measured by an article on WP or other evidence -- here we just have an anonymouse username. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:26, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Methodist Church of St John Halifax 1880.jpg

The photograph is listed as dating from the 1930s. A life + 70 tag cannot be relied upon under these circumstances, and no UK tag has been given. No valid US tag has been given either. Hchc2009 (talk) 06:39, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks you for the heads up on this one. The details were added in error by me, after a long day of uploading various images - I guess we all make mistakes sometimes. I have replaced the source link with another one which confirms the date as 1888. The image has to date before 1914 anyway, as the painting on the east wall was removed before then. Storye book (talk) 07:43, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: 1888 is old enough to assume the photographer has been dead for 70 years. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:31, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Front face of a Turkish work permit.jpg

(c) Turkey , not own work Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 07:49, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also:

File:Back Face of a Turkish Work Permit.jpg --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 07:50, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

By Ata Kurumsal : This photo is my photo taken yesterday, so it is not a copyright infringement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ata Kurumsal (talk • contribs)

Owned by Turkish Gov. Can't be freely relicensed. --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 08:11, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

By Ata Kurumsal : This is a photo aiming to show what a turkish work permit look like. I claim the photo, also this permit card is mine. So even if the card is made by the turkish government it has been given to me, so it belong to me, right ?

False. You didn't create the permit. You didn't take the photograph. You can't (rightfully) claim what's not yours. --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 08:22, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

By Ata Kurumsal : I took THE photograph of MY card. And the has been given to me. It is like saying someone give you candies and you can't eat it. seriously ? i am not saying i own all the card, i say i own THİS card. and also the PHONE with which i took the photo. So yes i didn't created the card, as well as you didn't created the phone or computer you are using right now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:|]] ([[User talk:|talk]] • contribs) Ata Kurumsal (UTC)

You don't own the design. By Turkish law you can't relicense a derivative of the card. Correction about the photograph: I mean the photograph of the person on the card. You have a physical copy of the card. That doesn't mean you can copy the card. Example: You can buy a book, but you can't go and say now it's mine and I do what I want with it. --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 08:32, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

By Ata Kurumsal : I don't own the design correct. But i never said i owned the design i said i own the card itself. The person on the photo is me, it is my photo. And i don't copy the card i am putting an example of it. I blurred delibrately some information since it is personal. And as for the book if i own the book i can show it to anyone as long as i don't copy the information of it or distribute it. This is the same thing here, i am not distributing the informations. It is like taking a photo of a car to put on a page to show what it looks like. If you want i can put in the description that the design of the card is owned by the Turkish government, will it make it ok ? Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:|]] ([[User talk:|talk]] • contribs) Ata Kurumsal (UTC)

Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.

No, it is not like a car. And yes, exactly like you said about the book: As long as you don't copy it. And by uploading here you copy the card. It doesn't matter what we put into the description, the Turkish laws don't allow you relicense their work. --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 09:07, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

By Ata Kurumsal : I understand your point of view but i don't agree with you. From your point of view everything is a copyright infringement as long at it show something made from somebody else. I should add that since i blurred some information some design point of the card has changed. Also i can check on the Turkish laws if they authorise the representation of their card on internet.Ata Kurumsal (talk) 09:26, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Be my guest, here's a link to the law: http://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/details.jsp?id=3843

By Ata Kurumsal : I read it, and i am still maintening what i am saying, i am not copying this card, i am uploadin a card to represent it. Also the copy isn't totally true as it has been modified willingly. So it is not a copy it is a representation. Lastly i own THİS card and THİS photo without owning the design of it. This what i have to say. I am sure i am not infringing any copyright law or restriction. I can even confirm my claim by calling the Turkish government to ask them if they allow me this, or to know if it is a copyright infringement.Ata Kurumsal (talk) 09:48, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

By Ata Kurumsal : Also I read your link it doesn't stipulate anything about the representation of the Turkish government documents. It is only talking about the copyright infringement.Ata Kurumsal (talk) 09:48, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

By Ata Kurumsal : And when i looked again about the copyright it state : . Freedom of Performance 33. The free performance of a published work at public places exclusively for training and education purposes or without any aim of benefit is allowed. The same rule applies to the performances, the net revenue of which are completely allocated to felicities. Yet, it is obligatory to regularly mention the name of the owner of the work and the work. And Since Wikipedia is a public place to educate freely. It can be used. Thank You Ata Kurumsal (talk) 09:58, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

By taking a picture you are creating a derivative work. There's no wiggling out of that. Did you follow the link to [4] and read the whole thing? Turkish copyright law states that laws, rules, regulations, notifications, circular letters and juridical decisions which are officially promulgated or announced are not protected by copyright. This infers that everything else issued by the government is protected. Anyway, this is not Wikipedia! Commons is a totally different project. We have respect the intellectual property laws of every single country. --10:31, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

By Ata Kurumsal : I agree like you that copyright must be protected. As you stated notification are not protected by copyrights, and since this kind of work permit card represent a notification it can be published. And of course laws of every country must be respected. You can say whatever you want but i still maintain my point of this not being a copyright infringement. Because the aim of it isn't reproduction or copy. It has a purpose of education. And education only. I am not wishing to sell this information neither to copy and distribute it. I am pretty sure the laws includes the card distributed by the government. Ata Kurumsal (talk) 10:47, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:33, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Basic income.jpg

Can't see any educational use. Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 08:03, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

How did you find the image so quickly, 15 mins after I uploaded it, are you are bot, are you for some reason monitoring my uploads, did you actually look at the image? Words are inherently educational, and the two words "BASIC INCOME" have high educational value similar to the word "THINK" or the words "QUESTION AUTHORITY." An image is not a thesis, images are not lengthy tomes, but simple images can be very educational in all senses of the word. SRHSP (talk) 08:15, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No, I am not monitoring you. Didn't even know you exist. Here my rebuttal: High educational value? Nonsense. Scribble on paper by not noteworthy person = out of project scope. No offense. --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 08:20, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your response, a mere 15 mins, after my upload implies bot-usage, which in addition to your other mass deletion request/s implies a lack of attention, a lack of consideration for the image/s, the facts, in question. Bots can be helpful but in this case I fear you have rushed into a mistaken bot-based decison. I think the previous successful "keep" regarding a deletion request in 2011 should apply to this case, because the previous 2011 keep-case was also regarding a mere two word image, namely self-aware.

In the previous deletion request, which resulted in a keep, the argument for keeping was "it says what it is" according to mattbuck. I think that same argument remains valid.

I think the discussion regarding your other mass deletion requests for my images could also have relevance to this case. SRHSP (talk) 09:59, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I fully understand the out of scope concept

My point about the previous "keep," regarding a similar two word image (SELF AWARE), is very relevant to this case, thus it is worth reiterating this point. I understand the out of scope concept, which I was aware of regarding the previous delete request; furthermore it is not unreasonable to conclude the reasons for keeping in 2011, regarding the "self aware" image, are reasons that apply to this "basic income" image. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SRHSP (talk • contribs)

Delete: per nomination and: uploaded just for to annoy some involved admins. --Achim (talk) 17:09, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Has great EV. See en:Right to work, en:National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, 2005, etc. It has strong EV especially nowadays. (This DR is started first; so no merits in Achim's arguments.) J e e 04:57, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Smearing something onto a piece of paper doesn't make it eduse. Next thing someone writes US-constitution inside a coke can. I retract from saying garbage since it's paper it's recyclable out of scope nonsense. Nothing that can not be replicated using the computer KEYBOARD if needed.

--Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 08:04, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

So what about this? Just 12 lines and a, b, c.. :) J e e 08:27, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:33, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SRHSP (talk · contribs)

Bunch of self promo.

Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 08:06, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am the uploader. As a public figure, or former public figure, with easy access to the mainstream media (if I desire but I always turn-down media appearances these days), I have no need to promote myself, nor any desire to promote myself now that I am currently retired from public life. The images in question were uploaded in 2010, and the reason you noticed them in 2016 was almost certainly via some type of bot algorithm regarding my upload on 3 Nov 2016, which you also requested to be deleted. It took you six years to notice the images in question, during which time someone used one of my images in the Wikipedia page The Freedom To Be Yourself. The usage of the image on the aforementioned Wikipedia page shows someone at least thinks one of the images has educational value (the self aware placard is also COM:INUSE). I wonder what your motives are, are you monitoring me specifically, or what other reason could exist for your bot flagging my recent upload? Maybe you are just watching my profile? Your usage of the request for deletion seems to be an abuse of process.

The self, identity, is integral to my previous campaigning; so there will unavoidably be attention focused on the "self" (my self) regarding a campaign (previously reported by the international mainstream media) about the self (all selves). This focus on the self, myself regarding my campaigning about myself, should not be mistaken as empty self-promotion. Such a mistake could be construed as trolling, which means it is not actually a mistake it is a malicious abuse of process. SRHSP (talk) 08:44, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What I do and how I stumble upon things is none of your business. Period. My motives are pretty clear: Commons is not a garbage can. Furthermore: You aren't important enough for me to stalk your measly uploads. I hope that clears your head. Take your whining somewhere else, this deletion request is not the appropriate venue. --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 08:38, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It is my business when I think there has been an abuse of process. Forgive me if you thought I was "whining," I suspect your "garbage can" hostility shows, via the uncivil nature of it, prejudgement, prejudice; perhaps you have body image insecurities? I repeat I am not "whining," I make a reasoned counter-argument to your deletion request. SRHSP (talk) 08:44, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Be careful with your accusations, it will only end in you being blocked on Commons. Fact: These uploads are out of scope per project policy. Nothing more to it. You suspect abuse by me? -> Com:AN/U. Good luck. --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 08:50, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please feel free to make a case for blocking me if you so desire, but you are wrong regarding your "facts." Your so-called "fact" regarding "out of scope" shows the prejudgement I previously referred to. I think it is not unreasonable to allege hostility and bias on your part, which I think the evidence of you actions and comments shows, but this and the suitability of the images is not for you or I to judge. I don't know how exactly the adjudication processes works but I suspect there will be a degree of impartiality, fairness in judging beyond your view verses mine. I seem to remember when this type of thing previously happened, in 2011, regarding a self-aware placard the adjudication process to "keep" was fair. I am not sure but maybe the images in question were previously flagged for deletion but the judgement was to keep. I will double check to see if there have been previous deletion requests, regarding the images in question, and if there has been a previous successful "keep" then your case should be rejected immediately. SRHSP (talk) 09:16, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(Edit conflict)

I won't allow you to waste more of my precious time. So here it goes the last time: WE, as a community, have rules about what we want to have here and what's out of scope. There's no bias in calling out of scope garbage exactly that: out of scope garbage. Those pictures belong on imgur or Facebook. Not here. Period. --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 09:19, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Other people have precious time too, the world does not revolve around you and your "precious" time. Now that you have brought it up I must say I am most annoyed by your seemingly frivolous case, which wastes my very precious time and energy; time and energy I deem infinitely more precious than yours. Your tone, with your "precious time," indicates to my mind you are having an emotional reaction to my uploads rather than a logical reaction, which I submit is corroborated be the "garbage" pejorative. If an item is out of scope (a concept I fully understand from a former deletion request) merely say so rather than adding the superfluous and personal descriptor of "garbage." That former 2011 deletion request makes me wonder why all my images were not flagged for deletion then, perhaps we can infer they were deemed to be fully within scope?

I have just noted the summary for one of your edits is "last reply, Mr. I M Important," which clearly seems to be mockery? If that is mockery this is proof of the uncivil attitude and potential bias I accuse you of. SRHSP (talk) 09:41, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Violates COM:ADVERT. This person does not have an article on any WP, so we probably should not give him space here. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:59, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

LOL I don't have an article on Wikipedida because many years ago I requested them to remove it, which Wikipedia complied with; perhaps you will know how check this? It's not an advert, it is a very reasonable expression of my identity for when media companies STILL insist upon focusing attention on me (thankfully it doesn't happen too often these days). What do you think I am advertising? It actually prevents people creating a Wikpedia entry, it ensures the previous removal of my Wikpedia page remains intact. SRHSP (talk) 11:17, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On the issue of self-promotion (advert) I think with famous people, even minor and former fame such as myself, regarding an public issue fundamentally about the self (my campaigning was about self-awareness), the issue of self promotion does not apply. Seriously if I wanted to promote myself or advertise myself I would not do this via the utterly minor backwater of Wikicommons. I am sure there are desperate people out there who need to misuse Wikimedia in this way, but I assure you I am absolutely not doing this for self-promotion/advertisement. I think it is fair game for a famous person to post self-portraits, especially when the fame is regarding the issue of identity, without those self-portraits being deemed empty self-promotion adverts. Ironically the last thing I want to do is promote myself, I suffer severely from stress thus I don't want any attention, which is what the portraits are about, it is about inviolable identity, which ties in to my campaigning regarding freedom of identity. Alas some things never change, it is similar to how "people" often insisted the nakedness was merely attention seeking, which they could not be more wrong about. The last thing I want is attention from despicable humans but I am trapped in this world thus I suffer from the perceptions of "people," hence I must comment or post images regarding my fame.SRHSP (talk) 11:39, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep File:Vincent Bethell Self Aware Placard.png as a free-standing image it has illustrative value and is in-scope. Delete the others as out of scope. With regard to comments about notability of the individual, these are English Wikipedia viewpoints, they are irrelevant to whether an image is in scope on Commons. Commons has no policy with respect to notability, only likely educational value. --Fæ (talk) 11:05, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Fæ, you misunderstand, the self aware placard is NOT flagged for deletion, it was flagged in 2011, FIVE YEARS ago but kept! Or maybe it has today been re-flagged (is this allowable to continually flag an image despite a keep verdict?). I mention the placard because the same should hold true (keep). Hey I am not really bothered, I will just delete the whole lot if you desire, I really don't like this place, and if I ever do decide to enter the public area again (not that notability matters in Commons) I will have very stern and very prominent words to express regarding the whole Wiki thing. "Education" is a very debatable-subjective thing, Pink Floyd educatively might say, for example: we don't need no education, no thought control. Education? Huh, in North Korea or Iran, yes it seems regarding your interpretation. SRHSP (talk) 11:17, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The fact that an image has previously been put up for deletion request does not stop others from later raising new deletion requests. However the earlier keep should be a factor for any closing admin and when this deletion request was created, that previous one should have been reviewed by the nominator (it may well have been).

A more useful way of seeing the Scope policy is that realistic educational value can be demonstrated by cases. I suggest you focus on providing pragmatic demonstrations of educational value, such as being in use on Wikipedia, or used in publications by the media, rather than getting distracted by what you read as unhelpful comments by others. Those issues are tangents to whether the images should be hosted on Commons. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 15:40, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well Fæ the fact that two images are in scope via COM:INUSE should at least ensure those two are not deleted, especially because one of those two was a previous keep in 2011, and that image has not changed since 2011. I would argue that if two are in scope via being in use, then all could easily be in scope, but people have merely not found a use for them at this point in time. The fact that some images are not currently being used does not mean they don't have educational value. SRHSP (talk) 16:43, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2011 Missing Permission Resolved

Three of the images in question, above, were threatened with deletion/removal in 2011 due to missing permission, permission which I had to email to prevent deletion. Surely if the images were unsuitable in 2011, when the "missing permission" issue arose, they would have been also flagged for out of scope deletion in 2011, instead of merely being flagged regarding a request for missing copyright permission? Only one of these 2010 images was flagged for actual out of scope deletion in 2011, so maybe we can infer because these 2010 images were not suitable for being fagged for deletion in 2011 they are not suitable for being flagged for deletion now? The only one of my 2010 images flagged for deletion (actual deletion not merely a request for copyright permission) in 2011 ("what's that" - out of scope?) was eventually kept, the ruling was "keep," which should hopefully occur again now in 2016. SRHSP (talk) 10:54, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep File:Vincent Bethell Self Aware Identity Portrait who I am Embellished.png and File:Vincent Bethell Self Aware Placard.png as COM:INUSE. (t) Josve05a (c) 11:49, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ah thanks for that COM:INUSE point Josve05a, which states: "A media file that is in use on one of the other projects of the Wikimedia Foundation is considered automatically to be useful for an educational purpose, as is a file in use for some operational reason such as within a template or the like. Such a file is not liable to deletion simply because it may be of poor quality: if it is in use, that is enough." So the educational point seems clear, and I would state if TWO images can be educationally useful so can the others even if not being used at present.SRHSP (talk) 11:56, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As Fæ said: Keep File:Vincent Bethell Self Aware Placard.png as a free-standing image it has illustrative value and is in-scope. Delete the others as out of scope. Rationale: Images that illustrate the TFTBY/SRHSP campain is one thing, images that present/portray/promote Vincent Bethell a different one. --Achim (talk) 16:53, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Achim one of the images representing myself is in use, thus via being COM:INUSE it is in scope. You see being the founder of TFTBY my identity is very much part of TFTBY, hence I am personally mentioned on TFTBY Wikipedia page, and an image representing myself (one of the images flagged for deletion) is being used. It is also pertinent to note there was a personal Wiki page for myself but I asked for it to be deleted and my wishes were complied with, but I am nevertheless personally mentioned on TFTBY page hence the need for a personal image of my identity. Here is a quote from the in use page, which seems clear for keeping File:Vincent Bethell Self Aware Identity Portrait who I am Embellished.png:

"A media file that is in use on one of the other projects of the Wikimedia Foundation is considered automatically to be useful for an educational purpose, as is a file in use for some operational reason such as within a template or the like. Such a file is not liable to deletion simply because it may be of poor quality: if it is in use, that is enough."

Info In 2011 File:Vincent Bethell Self Aware Identity Portrait who I am Embellished.png had been supeseded by File:Vincent Bethell Identity Self Aware Portrait.png which isn't covered by this DR. --Achim (talk) 17:15, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree Achim because the rules regarding in use do not stipulate about later images superseding an earlier image. Being in use is sufficient, read COM:INUSE, which states "...if it is in use, that is enough." So based on the in use rules, File:Vincent Bethell Self Aware Identity Portrait who I am Embellished.png must be kept. SRHSP (talk) 17:22, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vincent, don't treat en:The Freedom to be Yourself as your private property. As soon as someone removes the image from that page your COM:INUSE goes downstairs. --Achim (talk) 17:29, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes but in use is relevant now, thus we should judge the situation as it actually is now, in fact, not how it might be at some other time. SRHSP (talk) 17:35, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And I don't think it is my private property, I didn't edit that Wiki page regarding the image in question. SRHSP (talk) 17:36, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hypothetically assuming all my images are kept, what rights do I have to remove all my images, to totally remove my input and presence from Wikimedia. I deeply resent this dynamic where you, Wikimedia, feel you are giving me something via allowing my images here, whereas I feel I am generously giving you something supremely great via giving you the privilege I hosting my exceptionally educational images, thus considering the insulting dynamic of this relationship where I am not respected, I am wondering how I can totally remove my entire input from Wikimedia? Can I do this? SRHSP (talk) 17

37, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

To answer my own question it seems I need to mail the support team at: info-commons@wikimedia.org and request courtesy deletion. I need to explain my reasons according to the contact page. SRHSP (talk) 17:51, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the two used images;

Delete others per courtesy. Ankry (talk) 18:35, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep all. The author is very notable at that time and no need to re-review them now. J e e 05:00, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Jkadavoor: No, one small article when there's nothing else to report doesn't justify notability. Geeez, there it is: I want what I want or else I go away. Don't let the door hit you on the way out. --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 06:05, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK I won't let the door hit me on the way out User:Hedwig in Washington. Thanks for your concern. Regards, Ivan. SRHSP (talk) 17:00, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that

are both said to be created by Vincent Bethell. We have no proof at all that the uploader, SRHSP, is Vincent Bethell, so they both require {{Copyvio}} speedy deletions, notwithstanding the fact that they are in use.

I also note that in bold above, SRHSP has requested deletion of all his contributions to Commons. I see no reason why we should not comply. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:45, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment@Jameslwoodward: claims that "We have no proof at all that the uploader, SRHSP, is Vincent Bethell", yet File:Vincent Bethell Identity Self Aware Portrait.png, which he links, is the proof that SRHSP, is Vincent Bethell clearly marked by otrs in Template:OTRS ticket. Tm (talk) 15:10, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that it is very likely that SRHSP is Vincent Bethell, but "very likely" is not our standard of proof, "beyond a significant doubt" is. There are two problems with the conclusion you draw from the OTRS ticket -- first, it is from a Yahoo account, so it could be from anyone. Second, it purports to be (and very likely is) from Vincent Bethell, but it does not say that he is User:SRHSP, only that he holds the copyright to the image. I see so much of the bad side of Commons users that I take very little at face value, particularly with users who are difficult. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:22, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Well there is the OTRS ticket that cleared "he holds the copyright to the image" and that SRHSP is Vincent Bethell or anyone with enough permissions to upload and license files on his name. Or are you doubting your OTRS companions that cleared the OTRS ticket? Tm (talk) 15:35, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On reflection I have decided to confess that I am NOT Vincent Bethell, thus all my uploaded images should be deleted for various reasons, which I will now list. 1: I do not actually own the copyright for any of the images I uploaded. 2: All the uploaded images are fraudulent impersonations of Vincent Bethell. 3: All the images I uploaded are blatant attempts at advertising and self promotion regarding a mass market viral video game that will soon be launched, the images are nothing more than adverts regarding a false Vincent Bethell (Naked Aware The Video Game), which means the images are merely a commercial enterprise (it is a viral meme for generating page hits and to improve SEO ranking) with obviously zero educational value. Hope that clears up everything, sorry for the trouble. Regards, Ivan Westermaker. SRHSP (talk) 16:41, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

=== Delete all. I am not Vincent Bethell. I am Ivan Westermaker. I don't own the copyright for any of the images I have uploaded. The images are fraudulent representations Vincent, they are adverts and self-promotion for a video game. Free Special Offer coming soon for anyone using the images, 25% off, one time offer! Use coupon code VBOFF. Sorry for all my uploaded images being fraudulent representations of Vincent, and sorry for the zero educational aspect of all the images, they are merely self promotion adverts. === SRHSP (talk) 16:56, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Info SRHSP blocked 3 days for disruptive editing. --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 17:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: I don't know where the truth lies here, but it is clear that the uploader has said two mutually contradicotry things, and has demanded deletion of these files. Since their value to Commons is questionable at best, I see no reason not to comply with the request. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:37, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Original Arzobishop Palace of Alcalá de Henares before the fire.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Discasto as no source (No source since)

I converted the "no source" tag to a DR because there is a source present. "No source" should not be used when a user doubts that the existing source is appropriate. ★ Poké⁹⁵ 08:27, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Rodolfo García Pablos died 2001. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:40, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Palacio de xifré interior 2.JPG

This file was initially tagged by Discasto as no source (No source since)

I converted the "no source" tag to a DR because there is a source present. "No source" should not be used when a user doubts that the existing source is appropriate. ★ Poké⁹⁵ 08:27, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion: there is a source and license is not disputed. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:09, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Palacio de Xifré (10).jpg

This file was initially tagged by Discasto as no source (No source since)

I converted the "no source" tag to a DR because there is a source present. "No source" should not be used when a user doubts that the existing source is appropriate. ★ Poké⁹⁵ 08:28, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion: there is a source and license is not disputed. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:09, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Palacio-de-Xifré-5.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Discasto as no source (No source since)

I converted the "no source" tag to a DR because there is a source present. "No source" should not be used when a user doubts that the existing source is appropriate. ★ Poké⁹⁵ 08:28, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion: there is a source and license is not disputed. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:09, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Claustro del convento de santo tomás-1875.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Discasto as no source (No source since)

I converted the "no source" tag to a DR because there is a source present. "No source" should not be used when a user doubts that the existing source is appropriate. ★ Poké⁹⁵ 08:29, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion: there is a source and license is not disputed. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:09, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Frontón Fiesta Alegre.png

This file was initially tagged by Discasto as no source (No source since)

I converted the "no source" tag to a DR because there is a source present. "No source" should not be used when a user doubts that the existing source is appropriate. ★ Poké⁹⁵ 08:29, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion: there is a source and license is not disputed. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:09, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Frontón Beti Jai (Madrid).jpg

This file was initially tagged by Discasto as no source (No source since)

I converted the "no source" tag to a DR because there is a source present. "No source" should not be used when a user doubts that the existing source is appropriate. ★ Poké⁹⁵ 08:30, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion: there is a source and license is not disputed. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:09, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2013헌다1 통합진보당 해산심사 결정문.pdf

수정된 최종결정문이 헌법재판소 홈페이지 등에 게재된 상태라 해당 초고결정문은 삭제하고 최종결정문으로 교체해야 할 것 같습니다. Ksh2140 (talk) 08:30, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

일반적으로 삭제보다는 새 버전을 올린 후 해당 버전을 사용하도록 안내한 후 두 버전을 모두 보존하고 있습니다. — regards, Revi 09:22, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No need to delete, requester can upload a new file. — regards, Revi 15:36, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Casa trinxet.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Discasto as no source (No source since)

I converted the "no source" tag to a DR because there is a source present. "No source" should not be used when a user doubts that the existing source is appropriate. ★ Poké⁹⁵ 08:31, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion: there is a source and license is not disputed. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:12, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Second Palace of the Marquis of Casa Riera.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Discasto as no source (No source since)

I converted the "no source" tag to a DR because there is a source present. "No source" should not be used when a user doubts that the existing source is appropriate. ★ Poké⁹⁵ 08:31, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion: there is a source and license is not disputed. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:12, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Palacio de Xifré Exterior.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Discasto as no source (No source since)

I converted the "no source" tag to a DR because there is a source present. "No source" should not be used when a user doubts that the existing source is appropriate. ★ Poké⁹⁵ 08:32, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion: there is a source and license is not disputed. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:12, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Casa Trinxet 1.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Discasto as no source (No source since)

I converted the "no source" tag to a DR because there is a source present. "No source" should not be used when a user doubts that the existing source is appropriate. ★ Poké⁹⁵ 08:34, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion: there is a source and license is not disputed. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:12, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Casa trinxet 4.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Discasto as no source (No source since)

I converted the "no source" tag to a DR because there is a source present. "No source" should not be used when a user doubts that the existing source is appropriate. ★ Poké⁹⁵ 08:34, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion: there is a source and license is not disputed. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:11, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Caa trinxet 3.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Discasto as no source (No source since)

I converted the "no source" tag to a DR because there is a source present. "No source" should not be used when a user doubts that the existing source is appropriate. ★ Poké⁹⁵ 08:35, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:11, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Antigua fachada del palacio de la moncloa.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Discasto as no source (No source since)

I converted the "no source" tag to a DR because there is a source present. "No source" should not be used when a user doubts that the existing source is appropriate. ★ Poké⁹⁵ 08:36, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion: there is a source and license is not disputed. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:11, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Dining room of former Palacio de La Moncloa.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Discasto as no source (No source since)

I converted the "no source" tag to a DR because there is a source present. "No source" should not be used when a user doubts that the existing source is appropriate. ★ Poké⁹⁵ 08:36, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion: there is a source and license is not disputed. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:11, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Main staircase of former Palacio de La Moncloa.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Discasto as no source (No source since)

I converted the "no source" tag to a DR because there is a source present. "No source" should not be used when a user doubts that the existing source is appropriate. ★ Poké⁹⁵ 08:37, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion: there is a source and license is not disputed. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:11, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bedchamber of the Duchess of former Palacio de La Moncloa.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Discasto as no source (No source since)

I converted the "no source" tag to a DR because there is a source present. "No source" should not be used when a user doubts that the existing source is appropriate. ★ Poké⁹⁵ 08:38, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion: there is a source and license is not disputed. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:11, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Former Palacio de La Moncloa damaged during Spanish Civil War.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Discasto as no source (No source since)

I converted the "no source" tag to a DR because there is a source present. "No source" should not be used when a user doubts that the existing source is appropriate. ★ Poké⁹⁵ 08:44, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion: there is a source and license is not disputed. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:11, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cabinet of Charles IV.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Discasto as no source (No source since)

I converted the "no source" tag to a DR because there is a source present. "No source" should not be used when a user doubts that the existing source is appropriate. ★ Poké⁹⁵ 08:45, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion: there is a source and license is not disputed. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:11, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Front bedroom of the Duchess of former Palacio de La Moncloa.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Discasto as no source (No source since)

I converted the "no source" tag to a DR because there is a source present. "No source" should not be used when a user doubts that the existing source is appropriate. ★ Poké⁹⁵ 08:45, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion: there is a source and license is not disputed. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:11, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Courtyard Palacio de Sánchez Dalp.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Discasto as no source (No source since)

I converted the "no source" tag to a DR because there is a source present. "No source" should not be used when a user doubts that the existing source is appropriate. ★ Poké⁹⁵ 08:48, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion: there is a source and license is not disputed. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:11, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fachada Palacio de Sánchez-Dalp.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Discasto as no source (No source since)

I converted the "no source" tag to a DR because there is a source present. "No source" should not be used when a user doubts that the existing source is appropriate. ★ Poké⁹⁵ 08:48, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion: there is a source and license is not disputed. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:11, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Despacho palacio sanchez dalp.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Discasto as no source (No source since)

I converted the "no source" tag to a DR because there is a source present. "No source" should not be used when a user doubts that the existing source is appropriate. ★ Poké⁹⁵ 08:52, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion: there is a source and license is not disputed. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:11, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Courtyard Palacio Sánchez Dalp.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Discasto as no source (No source since)

I converted the "no source" tag to a DR because there is a source present. "No source" should not be used when a user doubts that the existing source is appropriate. ★ Poké⁹⁵ 08:54, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion: there is a source and license is not disputed. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:11, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fountain of the Palacio de Sánchez Dalp.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Discasto as no source (No source since)

I converted the "no source" tag to a DR because there is a source present. "No source" should not be used when a user doubts that the existing source is appropriate. ★ Poké⁹⁵ 08:55, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion: there is a source and license is not disputed. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:11, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Interior palacio del marques de portugalete.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Discasto as no source (No source since)

I converted the "no source" tag to a DR because there is a source present. "No source" should not be used when a user doubts that the existing source is appropriate. ★ Poké⁹⁵ 08:58, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion: there is a source and license is not disputed. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:11, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Interior palacio del marques de portugalete.jpg

original source (better resolution and clarity), in File:Madrid. — Salón de baile en el Palacio de los Excmos. Sres. Duques de Bailén.jpg Triplecaña (talk) 11:37, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Taivo (talk) 13:30, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Palacio de portugalete facade.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Discasto as no source (No source since)

I converted the "no source" tag to a DR because there is a source present. "No source" should not be used when a user doubts that the existing source is appropriate. ★ Poké⁹⁵ 08:59, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion: there is a source and license is not disputed. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:11, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:הסופר דייוויד קולמן.jpg

Attila Demeter (talk) 11:03, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:23, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:US Playing Card Co bridge cards from 1906 featuring jumbo indexes.jpg

Image not found on Flickr Elisfkc (talk) 22:03, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Irrespectively of its current Flickr availability it's been uploaded by the original author, please see the user name in Wiki (i.e. in the original upload log) against the Flickr one - the same person. Certainly to be kept. --MartyRus (talk) 22:08, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per discussion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:27, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Karte Gemeinde Puplinge.png

Unknown copyright situation. Inadequat source information. Where does this map come from? Jcb (talk) 22:51, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: The source says "Artist: Tschubby" and uploaded in 2005, therefore, is very unlikely that the author is other than Tschubby. Google Image Search by date didn't returned results prior of uploading, so no proof of copyvio. Also, there are more discussion about the files from Tschubby. --Amitie 10g (talk) 18:31, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Maps are usually derivative work rather than own work. Keeping those maps is risky, unless we have a clear indication that this is really own work. It's true there are more discussions about the uploads of this user. I see hundreds of deleted contributions in file namespace. Jcb (talk) 20:52, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Then, provide proof. Meanwhile, the best indication that Tschubby is the author of these maps is Assume Good Faith. See also Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Karte_Gemeinde_Sorens.png. --Amitie 10g (talk) 21:41, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per discussion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:29, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Lazare carnot.jpg

File's source information is redundant (refers back to this same image), author is missing entirely. I conducted an Internet search for this image and could find no viable source information. The image appears old, but there seems to be nothing available anywhere to verify its age or origin. This effectively means it has no source; together with no author, I don't see how we can host it. KDS4444 (talk) 13:21, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This old engraving seems inspired by the file. It's a strong indication but not completely conclusive... --Guise (talk) 20:50, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: I think it is clear that the image cited by Guise and this are closely related. That was published in 1903. Also, Carnot died in 1823, and while this is not a photograph and could have been made at any time, it seems unlikely to be recent. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:34, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Paulhugel (talk · contribs)

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rebuttal for deletion of images added category,

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Photographs_by_Paulhugel

updated use page, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Paulhugel

including further detail description on images including temperature photo of author wearing down jacket gives visual cue to viewers of ambient temperature

the protective clothing worn including sunglasses, desert white give viewers perception that this scene has intense solar radiation.

the blue foam sleeping pad helps viewers with understanding scale of scene

The Virtual IO HMD photograph with author helps to show the size of the unit since many different HMD units have been produced this photo shows an early 3-D HMD in in use with relative size to users head. hope the format is acceptable people photographed in public places

"What is allowed on Commons You may upload works that you created entirely yourself. This includes photos and videos of:natural landscapes, animals, plants public figures and people photographed in public places (only with consent in some cases, depending on local laws)useful or non-artistic objects"

"by custom the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal Commons user page is allowed."

attempting to use this page as a guide https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Hike395

Paulhugel (talk) 21:33, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The quoted custom is correct, but the custom is that we expect users to be active contributors before they upload multiple photos of themselves. When three out of the only four uploads are closeup head shots of the user, that expectation is violated -- Commons is not Facebook. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:34, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Abbaye Saint-Laurent.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Michaelversatile as no source (No source since)

This image is at risk of deletion, I fail to understand why as the artwork is easily dated to be over 200 years old. Fæ (talk) 18:39, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Rules are rules, but this is so clearly an old work (18th c, probably) that I see no reason to delete it. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:43, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Dominique Mouillot.jpg

Appears to attempt to credit Studio Harcourt, who have released some images in the past under free licenses, but there is no evidence that this one has been. Storkk (talk) 10:57, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a Studio Harcourt images but ok for deletion — Preceding unsigned comment added by Groupeonet (talk • contribs) 13:41, 4 November 2016‎ (UTC)[reply]

You're correct - that was later vandalism, and I'm sorry I didn't check the file history. However, it still looks like a studio portrait... were you the photographer? If so, please follow the instructions on OTRS. We'd love to keep the photo! Storkk (talk) 13:54, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 13:07, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Adam Curry 2016.jpg

Was requested as speedy deletion - contesting Lantrix //Talk//Contrib// 11:23, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This image was tagged as COM:SPEEDY due to possibly flickrwashing, professional image, unverified flickr account so I'm contesting this and converting to a regular delete request as per Commons:Deletion_policy#Speedy_deletion. I've updated the file talk page.

The image is an allowed image licence from Flickr as per COM:FLICKR specifically a CC-BY-SA Licence; it is also on the Flickr account owned by the subject in the photo and he has licensed it as CC-BY-SA specifically to allow it to be used on commons. Additionally the tagger of the COM:CSD said unverified flickr account. One, flickr doesn't verify accounts like twitter, etc.; Two this account is > 10 years old and is well established as the account of the owner of the image, Adam Curry. I've even spoken to the owner/copyright holder of the photo to confirm it's licensed as CC-BY-SA for this use. I also followed the appropriate guidelines in uploading this photo. So why the COM:CSD ?? In fact why delete at all? Lantrix //Talk//Contrib// 11:23, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I only verify the license is CC BY SA with no NC or ND restrictions. Nothing more. --Leoboudv (talk) 01:58, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 13:08, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Light fountain of the Exposicion Regional Valenciana.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Discasto as no source (No source since)

Before this gets deleted, I would like a meaningful explanation of why on record. Fæ (talk) 18:43, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't wanna put myself in Discasto's shoes, but I guess because it belongs to a collection of crappy uploads, and because of not having any source stating why this image is in public domain (not source, not author, not anything), but a PD-70 claim (not enough for Spanish works, by the way) made by an uninformed user. At least with this one, Vvve does not attribute the image himself, as it happened with many others. Said that, since it shows 1909 Exposición Regional Valenciana and «Thomas» is readable in a corner, that signature could belong though to es:Casa Thomas (a business run by es:Josep Thomas i Bigas, dead in 1910, and known because of its pretty postcards), so this particular photo could be acceptable (wild guess) if we suppose 1) it was published before 1923 2) it was first published in Spain and 3) it's an anonymous/collective work (by "Casa Thomas") or it's a work by the man running that business at that particular time (dead before 1935 -> ok with 80 p.m.a. in Spain). Strakhov (talk) 19:22, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Original source is probably this one. The actual source where Vvven took this image... I bet that it was kind of carefree-I'll-upload-what-I-find-whatever-copyright-status-it-has Google Images search. Strakhov (talk) 19:38, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Given Strakhov's research, I think we can safely keep this. It's a post card, so it was obviously published and since it is a postcard of a short lived event, was almost certainly published in 1909. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:51, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jacob Frank Coonley.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Hedwig in Washington as no source (No source since)

Raising this to a DR as it still has no source. However I have no idea what the rationale would be if an admin were to delete this 1865 public domain image, so it would be useful to have that laid out on record. Fæ (talk) 19:02, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Found a source of a better version of this image, which I uploaded. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:06, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Eversti Pertti Laatikainen.png

Derivative work of a contemporary painting (still under copyright) of Pertti Laatikainen. No author or source information available. Apalsola ^{t • c} 22:40, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The painting probably is painted by Juhani Toukonen and it may also be covered by the same OTRS permission as the other files in Category:Paintings by Juhani Toukonen (ticket #2016102810010816). (That is the reason I did not nominate the file for speedy deletion.) However, the author, source and possible OTRS permission information need to be verified and to the description page. ––Apalsola ^{t • c} 22:45, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The painter and the owner of the exclusive rights has sent the permission for his works with the ticketnumber #2016102810010816 as Apasola has written. During the loading the painting the loading page were very simple without any possibility to load any other information from the picture that name, form and licence number. This picture belongs to his permissions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1Eetu5 (talk • contribs) 2016-11-05T10:22:20‎ (UTC)

Comment The cited OTRS ticket covers 11 specific files. This is not one of them. I also note that the cited ticket speaks only to the photographs and not to the art works shown in the photographs, so it is not actually valid for any of them. That may simply be an error on the part of the sender, but it needs to be corrected. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:11, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: After uploading a file, it is almost always necessary to go to the file page and make any necessary additions. That would not have helped in this case, since, as I noted above, we do not actually have a license. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:21, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]