Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/07/10
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_CV_01.jpg){kind=link}
.PNG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.PNG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Author has requested content be removed CHOKRA LOVES YOU 22:48, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Media related to notable artist en:Chokra. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 10:55, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Author has requested content be removed, Image copyright CHOKRA. CHOKRA 14:58, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Keep, see rationale from previous DR. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 21:54, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: deletion after author request will normally be done if this request is within a few days, not after several years. --Jcb (talk) 16:30, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Author has request this content be removed as it does not constitute as creative commons. The image is not being used as media for the notable artist CHORKA CHOKRA 02:48, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 08:03, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Author has requested content be removed CHOKRA LOVES YOU 22:49, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Media related to notable artist en:Chokra. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 10:55, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Author has requested content be removed. CHOKRA 14:57, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- Keep, see rationale from previous DR. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 21:53, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
- Do we know whether the uploader is actually the author and thus whether this file is validly released? Basvb (talk) 21:05, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: deletion after author request will normally be done if this request is within a few days, not after several years - to uploader: don't nominate the file for deletion again if you can't provide a valid rationale - to colleagues: feel free to tag as {no permission} if you feel there is a permission problem. --Jcb (talk) 16:32, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Author has requested removal of their work as they have not authorized permission for their artwork to appear under creative commons. The request appears after few years, since image has not been use in the article for notable artist en:Chokra since 2012 CHOKRA 02:54, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 08:02, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
File:Minnesota Governor Mark Dayton speaking outside his residence in St Paul (28053070712).jpg
[edit].jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
lkmköjkjön1lökök2014çök1kjöm jm möç1kçö 176.232.94.20 15:38, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Speedy kept: Vandalism. --Amitie 10g (talk) 15:52, 10 July 2016 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)
Errodeenvio. Silvabs16 (talk) 20:36, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request. --INeverCry 00:45, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
File:Cathédrale Saint-Étienne de Toulouse - Saint Paul ressuscitant Eutyque par Jean-Jacques Courtin PM31001406.jpg
[edit]
Error during loading Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:27, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jarekt (talk) 12:33, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Abbasizaibi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Dubious "own works" (small resolutions, no EXIF)
2003:45:5C6F:A801:7048:ED14:594E:C40B 13:23, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 05:33, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
Dubious "own work" (small resolution, no EXIF) 2003:45:5C6F:A801:7048:ED14:594E:C40B 13:30, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: from the newspapre Israel Hayom. -- Geagea (talk) 01:45, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work Biplab Anand (Talk) 03:59, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by INeverCry: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing
Incorrect Flickr licensing
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
The copyright status of "File:Jeremy Thorpe cropped.jpg" was questioned in a discussion of a non-free file at en:Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 July 2#File:1965 Jeremy Thorpe.jpg on English Wikipedia. Since the file originates from "File:Whitehall (15420756838).jpg", additonal clarification was sought at COM:VP/C#File:Whitehall (15420756838).jpg. Althought the Flickr licensing was verified as OK by a bot in November 2015, it was determined through the VP discussion that this was not a photo taken by the Flickr account holder, but rather a scan of a postcard. A link for the postcard for sale on ebay was found here which pretty much verified that the Flickr account holder was not the original copyright holder of the image. They may have purchased or received a copy of the postcard, but they almost surely didn't create it so the probably did not have the right to license it as CC 2.0. This makes the licensing of "File:Jeremy Thorpe.jpg" and "File:Jeremy Thorpe cropped.jpg" also likely incorrect since they were cropped versions of the original files. The suggestion at the VP was that these photos were clear copyright violations which could be speddily deleted, but I decided to nominate them here just on the off chance the VP discussion has missed something and so that there is a record of this DR. Additional files from the same Flickr account found in Category:Photographs by Leonard Bentley (Flickr) also appear to be cases of perhaps unintentional COM:LL, so the entirely category probably needs to be examined as well in perhaps another DR. --Marchjuly (talk) 22:20, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Delete These are obviously scans, and the quality of the image makes me think that the pictures are scans of a postcard, a magazine or some other kind of publication. Unlikely to be own work by the uploader. --Stefan2 (talk) 09:10, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per Stefan. --INeverCry 00:37, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
The credit line on this page, which contains a higher-resolution version, indicates that the image is actually the property of Keystone/Getty Images. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 16:20, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:45, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
The following image is taken from this article, specifically this image, and has been copyrighted by eNews Channel Africa (All Rights Reserved). This image violates Wikimedia Commons' policy on copyright infringement.
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:44, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Kiki Vandeweghe
[edit]
Managed to upload the same file three times. Request that the two duplicates are deleted. --TastyPoutine (talk) 06:39, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:42, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
both images:
Copyright violation: original author: Oregon State University Google image search --Alchemist-hp (talk) 22:42, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:42, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation Quark Logo (talk) 17:41, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, note that images were letterboxed screencaps of tiny size. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:39, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation Quark Logo (talk) 17:41, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, note that images were letterboxed screencaps of tiny size. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:39, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation Quark Logo (talk) 17:42, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, note that images were letterboxed screencaps of tiny size. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:39, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation Quark Logo (talk) 17:42, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, note that images were letterboxed screencaps of tiny size. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:39, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation Quark Logo (talk) 17:43, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, note that images were letterboxed screencaps of tiny size. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:39, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation Quark Logo (talk) 17:43, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, note that images were letterboxed screencaps of tiny size. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:39, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation Quark Logo (talk) 17:44, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, note that images were letterboxed screencaps of tiny size. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:39, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation Quark Logo (talk) 17:44, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, note that images were letterboxed screencaps of tiny size. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:39, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation Quark Logo (talk) 17:44, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, note that images were letterboxed screencaps of tiny size. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:39, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation Quark Logo (talk) 17:45, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, note that images were letterboxed screencaps of tiny size. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:39, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation Quark Logo (talk) 17:45, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, note that images were letterboxed screencaps of tiny size. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:39, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation Quark Logo (talk) 17:46, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, note that images were letterboxed screencaps of tiny size. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:39, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation Quark Logo (talk) 17:47, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, note that images were letterboxed screencaps of tiny size. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:39, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation Quark Logo (talk) 17:47, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, note that images were letterboxed screencaps of tiny size. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:38, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation Quark Logo (talk) 17:47, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, note that images were letterboxed screencaps of tiny size. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:38, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation Quark Logo (talk) 17:48, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, note that images were letterboxed screencaps of tiny size. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:38, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation Quark Logo (talk) 17:48, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, note that images were letterboxed screencaps of tiny size. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:38, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation Quark Logo (talk) 17:48, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, note that images were letterboxed screencaps of tiny size. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:38, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation Quark Logo (talk) 17:49, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, note that images were letterboxed screencaps of tiny size. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:38, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation Quark Logo (talk) 17:49, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, note that images were letterboxed screencaps of tiny size. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:38, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation Quark Logo (talk) 17:49, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, note that images were letterboxed screencaps of tiny size. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:38, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation Quark Logo (talk) 17:49, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, note that images were letterboxed screencaps of tiny size. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:38, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
no permission 2003:45:5C6F:A801:CDEA:6238:CD3B:484E 21:19, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:35, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
no permission 2003:45:5C6F:A801:CDEA:6238:CD3B:484E 21:20, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:35, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Copied from http://travel.cna.com.tw/travelnews/20160327S017.aspx @assanges (talk | cont | uploads) 23:24, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:35, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
False "own work", published previously e.g. at http://fishki.net/1209453-zhesty-kotorye-ne-stoit-pokazyvat-v-zarubezhnyh-stranah.html Tatewaki (talk) 00:40, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:59, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
source: http://66.media.tumblr.com/4859a1d5c3adc50abf2b21958ac173a4/tumblr_ns4eqvIscu1rivhdfo4_540.jpg August 2015 AlleinStein (talk) 00:52, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:59, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Source: http://www.vnpti.vn/41/he-thong-truyen-dan-quoc-te-va-trong-nuoc . Copyright: CÔNG TY VIỄN THÔNG QUỐC TẾ AlleinStein (talk) 01:05, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:59, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Pic already appears here: http://www.legacy.com/obituaries/orlandosentinel/obituary.aspx?n=michael-anthony-cox&pid=19929722 EricEnfermero (talk) 03:46, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:58, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
It is copyrighted by someone other than the contributor. WaSu-Bio (talk) 04:32, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:58, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Copyright ©1994 - 2016 FIFA. All rights reserved 2003:45:5C6F:A801:7048:ED14:594E:C40B 13:27, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:50, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://sites.google.com/site/dma0910/_/rsrc/1250125707134/donna-haraway/haraway1.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:49, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Cover artwork, no permission given. Seems to be a copyright violation. Don-kun (talk) 14:55, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Housekeeping: 16 July 2016 EugeneZelenko (talk | contribs | block) deleted page File:ヒヤパカ.png (Commons:Licensing: anime/manga/comics - Using VisualFileChange.). --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:48, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
No source (photo or scan from unknown magazine without permission), not user's own work as claimed, user is not author (magazine is unknown), no proper License MaryroseB54 (talk) 15:52, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, http://humansarefree.com/2010/12/biggest-pyramid-in-world-found-in.html sourced to Knight-Ridder newspapers. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:47, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Self nomination, low quality image extraction file. No longer required as now replaced by File:2004 Holden Berlina (VZ) sedan (2016-01-04) 01.jpg. OSX (talk • contributions) 04:40, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
_sedan_(2016-01-04)_01.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 21:12, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Self nomination of low quality file replaced by the equivalent and higher quality File:2006 Holden Calais (VZ MY06) sedan (2016-01-04) 02.jpg (and other files within Category:Holden Calais (VZ)). The deletion of this image would be in accordance with COM:Redundant. OSX (talk • contributions) 05:01, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
_sedan_(2016-01-04)_02.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 21:12, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Self nomination of low quality file replaced by the equivalent and higher quality File:2006 Holden Calais (VZ MY06) sedan (2016-01-04) 02.jpg (and other files within Category:Holden Calais (VZ)). The deletion of this image would be in accordance with COM:Redundant. OSX (talk • contributions) 05:01, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 21:12, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Blombos Cave (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:PRP: The images in this gallery were created by at least four different people but are all listed as own work as follows:
- File:Blombos_Cave_shellfish.jpg - Own work - Magnus M. Haaland
- File:Blombos Cave exterior 10.12.11.jpg - Own work - Magnus M. Haaland
- File:Blombos Cave interior, 2010.jpg - Own work - Magnus M. Haaland
- File:Blombos Cave stratigraphy.jpg - Own work - Magnus M. Haaland
- File:Blombos Cave site map.jpg - Own work - Magnus M. Haaland
- File:Blombos Cave Map.jpg - Own work - Magnus M. Haaland
- File:Blombos Cave bifacial points.jpg - Photo taken by author - Magnus Haaland
- File:Blombos Cave marine shell beads.jpg - Own work - Marian Vanhaeren & Christopher S. Henshilwood
- File:Blombos Cave engraved bone.jpg - Own work - Marian Vanhaeren & Christopher S. Henshilwood
- File:Blombos Cave bone tools.jpg - Own work - Christoper S. Henshilwood
- File:Blombos Cave processing kit.jpg - Own work - Christoper S. Henshilwood
- File:Blombos Cave engrave ochre.jpg - Own work -Chris. S. Henshilwood
Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:40, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. I already deleted File:BBC-artefacts.jpg after I contact to Prof. Chris. S. Henshilwood through ticket:2016061510025888. Did not figured out that there are more files of him (the original uploader was User:Chenshilwood from en.wiki.-- Geagea (talk) 02:13, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Anupamkaler (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal images uploaded to go with a declining/declined submission, out of COM:SCOPE.
- File:Anupam during his Jaisalmer Visit.jpg
- File:Anupan Choudhary at Laungewala Battlefield, Jaisalmer.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:44, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Juaquin Builes (talk · contribs)
[edit]No indication of user's own work on these various images which all appear to be culled from the web.
- File:Foto de la iglesia.jpg
- File:Cc-srooge-horses-hearse-web.jpg
- File:Daniel camargo barbosa.jpg
- File:MTE5NTU2MzE2NDgyOTk1NzIz.jpg
- File:Jamas-confies-en-un-extrano-camargo.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:45, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Image was previously published in a power point presentation, same size, looks nearly identical, but here claimed as own work. Here's a direct link to the pdf https://alvaroalonsodocencia.wikispaces.com/file/view/Mets+de+muestreo+de+organismos+acu%C3%A1ticos.pdf Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:48, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Maximiliano2016 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Highly unlikely that this user took the young pictures of the notable people in this gallery, nor is it likely that the bumper sticker is not copyright.
- File:Axl Rose 1974.png
- File:Izzy Stradlin Niño.jpg
- File:Guns N' Roses Logo.jpg
- File:Pablo Macaya en Cooperativa.jpg
- File:Francisco Perez-Bannen.png
- File:Axl Rose Live 2016.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:49, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Maximiliano2016 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://ultimateclassicrock.com/files/2012/07/Axl2002.jpg.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:40, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
derivative work Biplab Anand (Talk) 04:01, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
No indication of user's own work on this image Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:25, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Advertising or promotional material plus the view of the phone is most likely from the internet. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:25, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal image, Commons isn't Facebook, see categories. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:28, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image --ghouston (talk) 04:28, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Unused crop from cited image, but as it's unused, it's out of COM:SCOPE. Also no categories. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:30, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
This is an unused crop from another Commons image. It doesn't seem necessary to keep both. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:31, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Artworks by and photographs of an artist without COM:OTRS to show that uploader has the rights to license the images. The photos are not selfies, so the subject cannot also be the creator. Looks promotional. Two of the images are identical.
- File:!nternet.jpg
- File:Internet Love.jpg
- File:Michael Borras Aka Systaime.jpg
- File:Michael Borras AKA Systaime.jpg
- File:Michael Borras A.K.A Systaime.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:54, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
- To whom it may concern: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Michaël Borras alias Systaime 2015.jpg: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Michaël Borras alias Systaime 2015.jpg Grand-Duc (talk) 08:14, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:17, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
This image is of very poor quality for it's size, and it appears to be derived from http://schooldesigns.com/Portals/0/SD_Images/Projects/811asu064a.jpg. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:56, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:19, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
No confidence that these photos were created by uploader, variable sizes, three cameras and four pictures, no apparent connection in white balance, composition etc. User's other uploads had metadata crediting another name as well as one picture "sent by". Please read COM:L befor emaking more uploads.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:00, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:19, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Falls outside COM:EDUSE Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:02, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:19, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Routine request for more information for a very small photo with no metadata. Is there a larger version of this image? Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:05, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:19, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
No indication of user's own work on this small image with no metadata. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:05, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:19, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
While the one I found on reverse google search is much smaller (https://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.skyscrapercity.com/customavatars/avatar934909_14.gif&imgrefurl=http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=1486201&h=57&w=85&tbnid=rt1UZAABe5KAKM&tbnh=55&tbnw=83&usg=__CYO1FoqrR9PiClchWhpSh8GdbcE=&docid=bfXY_yuW3FNDzM) it's also older and the Icon of a skyscraper city user. It would appear that both are derived from some earlier work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:07, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:19, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
This is a routine request for a tiny size image with no metadata. Is it possible to upload a larger version of this image? Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:09, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:19, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Harisson Souza (talk · contribs)
[edit]No confidence that any of these small size, poor quality images was created by uploader after searching remainder of this user's gallery, I gave up ... The find rate was 100%. I suspect these are all COM:COPYVIOs. as well.
- File:Juazeiro - BA.jpg
- File:Country Club em Juazeiro.jpg
- File:Cajueiro em Juazeiro.jpg
- File:Agrovale.jpg
- File:Santuário de Nossa Senhora das Grotas .jpg
- File:Vista Parcial de Juazeiro.jpg
- File:Rodeadouro.jpg
- File:Ponte em Juazeiro .jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:11, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:20, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Obvious copyvio, cut and paste to make a meme. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:13, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:20, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
While the image may be PD, it was used to make a political/humour statement which is outside of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:14, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:20, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kedileraskina (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
--ghouston (talk) 05:17, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:20, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry speedy deleted. Gunnex (talk) 05:18, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:20, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
COM:COPYVIO. While the naked man in these images may be the uploader, he's not also the photographer. Read user page.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:18, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete I always trust in Ellin. Apart from this, the quality is bad, I can't see any educational value, the pictures are out of the scope of Commons, and therefore, I cast a DELETE vote for all the three files named above. Away with them! GeoTrinity (talk) 12:39, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
- User:GeoTrinity, you say you trust Ellin (which is very sensible of you) but Ellin nominated these out of COM:COPYVIO concerns, while you seem to be bothered by their content. I suggest that you nominate for deletion all photos whose content bother you the same way those three above do, and then see how Ellin votes. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 00:50, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete, per nom. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 00:50, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:20, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
smaller copy of File:Baby Llama 2008.jpg by same uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:24, 10 July 2016 (UTC): Is this the place to type my reply? Ellinm you directed me to click on "at its entry," but that led to a page with no place to type. After exploring, I then clicked on "edit," which brought me here. I hope this is right. OK, yes, I don;t mind if one of the baby llama pix is deleted. I wasn't aware (or didn't remember) that two were uploaded. And yes, I shot this picture with my Canon camera. KFFOWLER (talk)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:21, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
: I don't remember how I got here. But here I am again (what did I just do?) facing a bunch of deletion warnings or advisories. I typed a couple of explanations elsewhere, hoping to save the period drawings of Lord Byron and Ada Lovelace as OBVIOUSLY public domain, but I guess I typed my response in the wrong place (i.e., not at the "at its entry" position). There is a problem with that instruction. Once I (or anybody, I suppose) click on it, I can't just start typing!
I am just a lowly retired teacher, a professor emeritus, so cannot spend hours learning--and remembering!--the wiki systems. I fear I have just lost patience, and wiki loses another contribution. KFFOWLER (talk) 21:28, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ladislav kopůnec Univerzon (talk · contribs)
[edit]A series of bright colored abstract images and some over colorized/over processed photographs. There is no indication of notability for any of these images which would be better uploaded to an art site like deviantart, than Commons. Commons isn't a social media or promotional site.
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 12.58.22. Colours.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 08.00.19. Photo original. Colours.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 13.41.54 Colours. Model. Photo original.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 14.55.12 Model. Colours. Photo original.png
- File:Sun Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 23.43.43 Model. Photo original. Colours imaginary.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 15.36.51 Colours. Photo original.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 15.20.40 Model. Photo orignal. Colours.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 15.53.24 Colours Photo original.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 17.58.30 Colours. Creative. Model. Photo original.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 17.41.12 Colours. Photo original.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon Colours Photo original 17.04.02 Creative.png
- File:Sun Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon Combined information. Kombinované informace. Photo original. Colours imaginary. 21.23.12 Imaginární barevné odstíny.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 12.59.47 Photo original Colours imaginary.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 13.06.08 Colours.png
- File:Natura Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 15.47.48 Art Nature. Photo original.png
- File:Sun Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 16.28.46 Art. Foto original. Colours imaginary.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 22.23.31 Colours. Barevné odstíny.png
- File:Sun. Natura. Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 17.22.37 Art. Colours imaginary. Photo original. Mysterious sun.png
- File:Natura Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 550016 Art. Nature. Photo oriiginal.jpg
- File:Natura Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon Art Nature Colours. 270580.jpg
- File:Natura Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon Nature 15.40.56 Art. Příroda.png
- File:Sun Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 15.22.02 Cosmos Art Shades asymmetry. Photo original. Kombince. Combination.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon Color imaginary. Asymmetri. 13.29.10 Model of color.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 870200 Natura. Příroda. Nature. Colours. Photo original.jpg
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 16.34.46 Colours. Barevné odstíny.png
- File:Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 09.59.03 Colours. Art.png
Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:27, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ladislav kopůnec Univerzon (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused files, artworks without obvious educational use
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon Colours Artworks Barevné odstíny 278641.png
- File:Art, Ladislav Kopůnec, Univerzon Artworks. English grammar - Ladislav Kopunec. Model 247834.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon Artworks Colours Barevné odstíny.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Sun Photo original Slunce 16592250 Colours imaginary.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 164528717 Colours.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 21744526 Colours Artwworks.png
- File:Art ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 1322719 Natura Colours Nature.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon Sun Photo original 16751450 Colours imaginary Slunce Imaginární barevné odstíny.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon Photo original 1232528 Artworks.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon Photo original Natura Artworks Nature P9090799.jpg
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon Barevné odstíny 19.10.32 Colours Artworks.png
- File:Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 20320457 Colours Barevné odstíny Artworks.png
- File:Sun Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon Photo original Colours imaginary 1842040 Artworks Slunce s upravenými barevnými odstíny.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 2325725 Colours Artworks.jpg
- File:Foto Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon Situace Situation Photo original Art 13432705.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 18421852 Slunce Photo original Colours imaginary Sun Art works.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 18732454 Art works Colours.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 21654432 Colours Barevné odstíny Original Art works.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 22151234 Barevné odstíny Colours Art works.png
- File:Sun Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon Art works Photo original Colours imaginary Slunce 20552733 Imaginární brevné odstíny.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 12418726 Colours Barevné odstíny Art works.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 06127157 Colours Barevné odstíny Art works.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 11354726 Colours Art works Barevné odstíny.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 09217406 Art works Sun Photo original Colours imaginary Natura Slunce.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 09726859 Colours Barevné odstíny Art works.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 23139607 Colours Barevné odstíny.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 07801353 Colours Barevné odstíny Artworks.png
- File:Sun Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 21446316 Photo original Art works by artist.png
- File:Sun Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 22759732 Photo original Colours imaginary Slunce Imaginární barevné odstíny.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 21640704 Colours Barevné odstíny Artworks Original.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 11545438 Colours Barevné odstíny Artworks Original.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 2345811 Colours Barevné odstíny Artworks.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 217503 Colours Barevné odstíny Artworks.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 2340223 Colours Barevné odstíny Artworks.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 2121044 Colours Barevné odstíny Artworks.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 23743540 Colours Barevné odstíny Artworks.png
- File:Sun Astronomy Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 01211410 Photo oriiginal Colours imaginary Art.png
- File:Sun Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon Original foto Shades. Cosmos. Astronomy. Colors.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 0717823 Colors Barevné odstíny.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 0934833 Colours Barevné odstíny.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 8452317 Model Barevné odstíny Original Colours.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon Colours 153916 Barevné odstíny.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon Colours 1310637.png
- File:Sun Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon Photo original 1359401 Colours imaginary.png
- File:Rámy obrázků - 2016.07.22 21.59.35 - (Clipboard).png
- File:Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon Barevné odstíny 224938 Creative Colours Model Original.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 160344 Barevné odstíny Colours Original.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 220246 Creative.jpg
- File:Moon. Měsíc. Original photo. CZ. B. July 21, 2016, 5 20 16 th. Original photo. Měsíc. 434618.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 224957 Barevné odstíny Creative Original Colours.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon Creative P3278347 Colours Barevné odstíny Original.jpg
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 221700 Creative Barevné odstíny Colours Original.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 200233 Barevné odstíny Colours Original.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon Model original Creative 723842.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univeron Model original Creative 150304 Colours.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 15.23.24 Creative.png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
BrightRaven (talk) 11:39, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ladislav kopůnec Univerzon (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused files, artworks without obvious educational use
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon Sun. Colours imaginary. Photo original. 14.50.10.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 18.46.56 Colours.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon Barevné odstíny. Colours. Creative. 17.53.27.png
- File:Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 2016.06.23 Sun. Photo original. 23.10.32. Colours imaginary. Art.png
- File:Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon Sun Astronomy Cosmos Photo original Colours imaginary 23.06.2016 Creative Astronomie. Slunce. 19.56.23.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 23.22.42 Model Original Colours.png
- File:Mysterious sun Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon Tajemství slunce. Creative. Photo original. Colours imaginary. 22.08.17.png
- File:At Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 23.05.59 Model Original Colours.png
- File:Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 18.03.28 Art Original Colours Model.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 12.54.14 Original Creative Colours.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 19.20.15 Colours Original.png
- File:Asymetrical shades. Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon Asymetrické barevné odstíny. 12.53.57 Art Colours Original.png
- File:Mysterious. Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 22.46.01 Photo original. Art. Colours imaginary.png
- File:Sun Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 15 21.16.06 Mysterious. Real photo of the sun. Colours imaginary. Art. Cosmos.png
- File:Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon Model Color Art 11.58.22.png
- File:Sun Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 20.28.44 Photo original Colours imaginary. Slunce.png
- File:Colours Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 14.08.53 Barevné odstíny Creative.png
- File:Architecture. Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon. 04.01.07.31. Creative. Model. Colors. Architektura.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 21.25.57 Model Colours Barevné odstíny Tvořivost.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 13.57.32 Creative Colours Barevné odstíny.png
- File:Colours Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 17.57.46.CZ Barevné odstíny.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 00.24.36 Sun Colours imaginary Photo oriiginal Cosmos Creative Barevné odstíny.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 15.47.29 Colours Barevné odstíny Creative Original.png
- File:Art Sun Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 18.20.33 Photo original Colours imaginary Cosmos.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 16.02.11 Colours Creative Original Barevné odstíny.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 22.31.12 Creative Colours Barevné odstíny Sun Cosmos Natura Proto original Colours imaginary.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 15.38.38 Creative Barevné odstíny Colours Original.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 16.00.22 Creative Colours Barevné odstíny Original.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 18.42.55 Colours Barevné odstíny Creative Original.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 18.46.50 Colours Barevné odstíny Creative Original.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 16.08.16 Colours Creative Original.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 13.53.55 Creative Colours.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon Barevné odstíny Art Colours Shades 15.51.13 Crerative.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 13.28.16 Colours Barevné odstíny Model Creative Architecture.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 14.36.19 Colours Barevné odstíny Model Creative.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 14.49.10 Colours Barevné odstíny Model Original.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 16.31.55 Colours Barevné odstíny Original Creative.png
- File:Art Model Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 01.52.37 Original Creative Barevné odstíny Colours.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon Colours Barevné odstíny 16.45.12 Creative.png
- File:Art Sun Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 13.13.17 Colours imaginary. Photo original. Barevné odstíny. Slunce. Cosmos.png
- File:Art Sun Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon Photo original Colours imaginary 15.44.54 Cosmos.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 10.26.50 Creative Barevné odstíny Colours.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 08.02.56 Colours Barevné odstíny Creative.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon Colours Barevné odstíny 10.22.47 Creative.png
- File:Art Model Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon Photo original Colours imaginary Shades 23.38.21.png
- File:Art Sun Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon Creative Photo original Colours imaginary Cosmos 00.03.50.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon 16.07.34 Model Ooriginal Colours Barevné odstíny Creative Tvořivost.png
- File:Model Original Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon Colors Barevné odstíny Creative 19.19.48.png
- File:Art Sun Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon Photo original. Colours imaginary. Cosmos. Creative. Barevné odstíny. 07.11.44.png
- File:Sun Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon Photo original Colours imaginary Art 13.13.37.png
- File:Colours Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon Model Art 19.32.57.png
- File:Art Ladislav Kopůnec Univerzon Artworks 2559714.png
BrightRaven (talk) 08:52, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
Comment The vast majority of this user's uploads are out-of-scope and should be deleted for that reason, regardless of their merits or otherwise. However, a few of the higher resolution and relatively unprocessed photographs might be worth keeping. (Those ones don't seem to have been nominated for deletion anyway).- Also, in fairness, the user should more clearly (and directly) have been notified about Commons' scope (i.e. via {{Scope}}) back when they first uploaded in June. I've done this now. Ubcule (talk) 21:51, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:13, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
_CV_01.jpg){kind=link}
_CV_01.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Low quality. OSX (talk • contributions) 03:11, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
_CV_01.jpg){kind=link}
Kept, not so bad. Taivo (talk) 18:17, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
_CV_01.jpg){kind=link}
_CV_01.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Self nomination of low quality file replaced by the equivalent and higher quality File:2006 Toyota RAV4 (ACA33R) CV wagon (2016-01-04).jpg (and other files within Category:Toyota RAV4 (XA30, 2005)). The deletion of this image would be in accordance with COM:Redundant. OSX (talk • contributions) 05:34, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
_CV_wagon_(2016-01-04).jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 21:12, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Outside of project scope, not realistically useful for education. Liance (talk) 14:05, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
- Keep it is in use = in scope. MGA73 (talk) 09:17, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:01, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
Ambiguous redirect. Anarchyte (work | talk) 06:09, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:24, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
copyvio, not CC Ragimiri 07:49, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:16, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
Not educationally useful Sclozza (talk) 06:34, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:24, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sudhirpasbird (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyvios. This user has been globally blocked for spamming: m:Special:CentralAuth/Sudhirpasbird.
MKFI (talk) 07:22, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:24, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
All uploads by this user are suspected copyright violations: http://pmyx.blog.163.com/blog/static/2061972102013111893048821/, http://www.qiuzhi5.com/10/2015/1211/183021.html, http://rc.usst.edu.cn/index.php?school_id=31.
- File:USST K.jpg
- File:USST J.jpg
- File:USST I.jpg
- File:USST H.png
- File:USST G.png
- File:USST F.png
- File:USST E.png
- File:USST D.png
- File:USST C.png
- File:USST B.jpg
- File:USST A.jpg
- File:USST a.jpg
- File:上理工大门.jpg
- File:Shangli 5.jpg
- File:Shangli 3.jpg
- File:Shangli 2.jpg
- File:Shangli 1.jpg
- File:USST Library.jpg
- File:USST Main Gate.jpg
MKFI (talk) 07:24, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:24, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Флаг не является в действительности флагом Казахского Ханства. Об этом написано в описании. Но при использовании файла, не предупреждают об этом — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oscuro (talk • contribs) 2016-07-09T21:00:21 (UTC)
- I have no idea about whether the flag is accurate: I just traced it for the Graphic Lab, so if it needs to be deleted because it's misleading, I don't mind. --Slashme (talk) 14:45, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Kept: widely used. --INeverCry 00:25, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
jest kilka zdjęć z tej pozycji — Preceding unsigned comment added by ETR (talk • contribs) 2016-07-03T18:18:56 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:28, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
jest kilka zdjęć z tej pozycji — Preceding unsigned comment added by ETR (talk • contribs) 2016-07-03T18:19:40 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:28, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
to zdjęcie dodałem przypadkiem dwa razy.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ETR (talk • contribs) 2016-07-03T18:16:20 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:28, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
All files (uploads) are copies (or groundless slightly changed) of Commons SVG.
- File:Kaon-diagram.png
- File:Kaon-box-diagram-with-bar.gif
- File:Electrolyse of water.JPG
- File:Electrolyse1.png
- File:Ergosphere of a rotating black hole.PNG
By now the first two files are indeed obsolete, because the original author of the file has made the necessary changes. Both files corresponding to Electrolyse may be deleted as well. The last file is currently under discussion. --B wik (talk) 17:42, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:26, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
The same file is available as File:Mekici and jam.JPG. The other name is more correct, as it shows Bulgarian mekitsi (similar to Hungarian langos). The other image is uploaded by the author himself (Biser Todorov (Biso)) who also uploaded it to Flickr. The other version has also higher resolution than this one. Off-shell (talk) 08:40, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:26, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
.PNG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.PNG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Hello, please, delete this file. I gave some information about my request on the image's page. Thank you. --Sergii-rachmonov (talk) 20:36, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
.PNG){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:26, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
.PNG){kind=link}
Image was from Google and I have violated the Copyright violation — Preceding unsigned comment added by BugMenn (talk • contribs) 2016-07-06T01:13:46 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:26, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Oppose Bad quality and also is penson's face.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marrovi (talk • contribs) 2016-07-06T00:56:16 (UTC)
- Keep: In use, so courtesy deletion is hardly applicable. --Amitie 10g (talk) 15:56, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --INeverCry 00:27, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
File:Earth in the GameCube version of the Hylian alphabet from "The Legend of Zelda Twilight Princess".pdf
[edit]This is an "old" work of mine, i.e. the Latin grammar has a few lacks, so I would like it to be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jin Zan (talk • contribs) 2016-07-08T14:41:27 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:28, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Fines autopromocionales dentro de Wikipedia en español — Preceding unsigned comment added by Luisalvaz (talk • contribs) 2016-07-10T03:57:56 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:28, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Fines autopromocionales dentro de Wikipedia en español — Preceding unsigned comment added by Luisalvaz (talk • contribs) 2016-07-10T03:58:36 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:28, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Fines autopromocionales dentro de Wikipedia en español — Preceding unsigned comment added by Luisalvaz (talk • contribs) 2016-07-10T03:59:32 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:28, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
I want to change the name of the file Muhammadkashifrizwan (talk) 10:21, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Not a reason for deletion. Instead, propose a different file name. --Stefan2 (talk) 12:44, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
Kept: use {{Rename}}. --INeverCry 00:28, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Violates COM:FOP#Korea (South). Bloody-libu (talk) 10:40, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
No FoP in France. Bloody-libu (talk) 10:41, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP in France, architect is Jean Prouvé, died in 1984. Bloody-libu (talk) 10:43, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This is not a public domais image. Its rights are from SBT Brazil. 179.198.217.12 10:55, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
No FoP in France, architect is Olivier Chaslin (alive). Bloody-libu (talk) 10:56, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
No FoP in France, architects are Alain Bourbonnais (1925-1988) et François Carpentier (1910-1976). Bloody-libu (talk) 10:57, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Not useful: really bad quality due to strong blur, small image. Grand-Duc (talk) 10:58, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
This is not a public domais image. It's from SBT and the have the rights. 88marcus (talk) 10:59, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
No FoP in France, architect is Eugène Leseney (1931-2014). Bloody-libu (talk) 11:02, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Not a public domain image. 88marcus (talk) 11:04, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
No FoP in France, architect is Jean Merlet (1910-1976). Bloody-libu (talk) 11:05, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Not a public domain image. 88marcus (talk) 11:05, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Not a public domain image. The actress and SBT have the rights. 88marcus (talk) 11:06, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Not a public domais image. Its rights are from the SBT. 88marcus (talk) 11:07, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Not a public domain image. SBT have the rights. 88marcus (talk) 11:10, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
No metadata and this file can be found with other pictures of the same series : http://www.brainparking.com/view/topic.cfm?key_or=879640&lenta_type=4 TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 11:32, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
- All User:Aassddww uploads are very problematic; deletion nominations should have been grouped together... AnonMoos (talk) 10:19, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
No metadata. Dubious file. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 11:34, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete This is NOT Facebook, personal pictures must not be uploaded here. Delete the crap. GeoTrinity (talk) 00:38, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
- It's not really a "personal file", but almost certainly something User:Aassddww stole from a CMNF sub-site... AnonMoos (talk) 02:32, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
No metadata and that file can be found with other pictures of the same series : http://www.brainparking.com/view/topic.cfm?key_or=887307&lenta_type=4 TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 11:35, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
- All User:Aassddww uploads are very problematic; deletion nominations should have been grouped together... AnonMoos (talk) 05:36, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
- I have to admit I've launched a first DR and then realized that his other uploads were problematic too... and I've been lazy to launch a massive DR (it's so quick to launch individual DRs !) --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 06:57, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
No metadata and that file can be found with other pictures of the same series : http://www.brainparking.com/view/topic.cfm?key_or=873197&lenta_type=4 TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 11:35, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
No metadata and that file can be found with other pictures of the same series : http://www.brainparking.com/view/topic.cfm?key_or=931006&lenta_type=4 TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 11:36, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
- All User:Aassddww uploads are very problematic; deletion nominations should have been grouped together... AnonMoos (talk) 06:30, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
- P.S. Not entirely sure what you mean by "series" in this context. AnonMoos (talk) 11:21, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
- Yes I made a mistake : for this one, the link I provide don't show a series. Actually that's also why I prefered separate DRs : the cases are sometimes different.
- In fact this is definitely part of a series : http://pokazuha.ru/view/topic.cfm?key_or=786927&lenta_type=1&type=49 --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 12:26, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
- I'm sure the User:Aassddww files would be deleted even if uou didn't trace a source, since they're just too fishy... AnonMoos (talk) 04:04, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
- Of course. You're right. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 16:33, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
- I'm sure the User:Aassddww files would be deleted even if uou didn't trace a source, since they're just too fishy... AnonMoos (talk) 04:04, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete This is NOT Facebook, personal pictures must not be uploaded here. Delete the crap. GeoTrinity (talk) 00:39, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
- This is not particularly a "personal picture", as explained above (though it certainly should be deleted)... AnonMoos (talk) 02:44, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
That file can be found with better resolution and with other pictures of the same series : http://www.brainparking.com/view/topic.cfm?key_or=1132263&lenta_type=4 TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 11:37, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Dubious file, considering other uploads by the same user. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 11:37, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete This is NOT Facebook, personal pictures must not be uploaded here. Delete the crap. GeoTrinity (talk) 00:41, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
- It's not really a "personal file", but almost certainly something User:Aassddww stole from a CMNF sub-site... AnonMoos (talk) 02:35, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
The current naming format is wrong; it should be "Longdong (Taiwan)" or "Longdong, Taiwan". I made a new one with the right title here: Category:Longdong (Taiwan).--Liji (talk) 12:13, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:26, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 00:27, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
unused promotional file, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:27, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 00:27, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:28, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 00:27, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:30, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 00:27, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Out of Scope. No encyclopaedic use. Dandelo (talk) 10:36, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Out of Scope. No encyclopaedic use. Dandelo (talk) 10:36, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Against deleting! Fits to the Category:Blow molding! Encycopaedic use. FFA P-16 (talk) 23:56, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
Delete Too blurry and small to be useful. There are better files of the subject in the same category. --Dandelo (talk) 17:38, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Out of Scope. No encyclopaedic use. Dandelo (talk) 10:37, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Against deleting!Fit to the Category:Blow molding =encyclopaedic use. FFA P-16 (talk) 23:54, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
Delete Too blurry and small to be useful. There are better files of the subject in the same category. --Dandelo (talk) 18:00, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Out of Scope. No encyclopaedic use. Dandelo (talk) 10:37, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
useless, nothing to see Hiddenhauser (talk) 10:40, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- support deletion as uploader. This was an error, i tried to upload the video. --Atlasowa (talk) 12:22, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
unused logo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 13:12, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:31, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Selfie gallery - very very low encyclopedic value
- File:Ávila y recreación.jpg
- File:Kezul.jpg
- File:Kerby y Mami.jpg
- File:Kerby y Gerardinne.jpg
- File:Acercado.jpg
- File:Perfilamiento.jpg
- File:Mal día.jpg
- File:Ángulo.jpg
- File:Hermético.jpg
- File:Eschuando.jpg
- File:Dormitando.jpg
- File:Angular.jpg
- File:Lujuria.jpg
- File:Portada flash.jpg
- File:Común.jpg
- File:Velado.jpg
- File:Responso.jpg
- File:Cerrados.jpg
- File:Acertijo.jpg
- File:A cara.jpg
- File:Después de cinco años.jpg
- File:Siendo símismo.jpg
- File:Herby no-Facético.png
- File:Ultimos tiempos en Miranda.jpg
- File:Kerby Hernández.png
- File:Kerby Hernández vistiendo su primer blazer.jpg
2003:45:5C6F:A801:7048:ED14:594E:C40B 13:14, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:32, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
No proof that "Joseph Alex Russell" is the same person as "SophieCooke93", the source "My own computer" adds even more doubt. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 13:29, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
- Please also note the DW File:Frances cropped.jpg. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 13:31, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:32, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hansziller (talk · contribs)
[edit]Dubious "own works" (different cameras, different copyright holders)
- File:Bonfire-Michael Bormann 2016.jpg
- File:Hans Ziller-Fireworks-Tour.jpg
- File:Bonfire-Bravo-Formel1 1988.jpg
- File:Bonfire-Frank-Ronnie-Hans.jpg
- File:30th Anniversary Tour 2016.jpg
- File:Hans-Ziller-Bonfire.jpg
- File:Bonfire Band 2016-3.jpg
- File:Bonfire-2016-Pearls-album.jpg
- File:Bonfire-Pearls 2016.jpg
- File:Hans FB.jpg
- File:Bonfire Logo Flames.jpg
- File:Bonfire Band Shoot Glörious.jpg
- File:Bonfire Bandfoto mit Logo.jpg
- File:Bonfire-couch3b.jpg
- File:Bonfire-live-band.jpg
- File:Bonfire-Frank & Hans.jpg
- File:David Hans 4 DK big 300dpi.jpg
- File:Bonfire-David Reece.jpg
- File:Bonfire Band-2c.jpg
- File:Bonfire Band-3a.jpg
- File:Bonfire Band-3.jpg
- File:Bonfire-Tree.jpg
- File:Bonfire-run 1.jpg
2003:45:5C6F:A801:7048:ED14:594E:C40B 13:37, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hansziller (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo materials. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Bonfire 2020.jpg
- File:Bonfire Fistful Of Fire Tour.jpg
- File:Bonfireloc.jpg
- File:Bonfire-Guitar-Army.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:34, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unreliable uploader. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:26, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ellaellaaaa (talk · contribs)
[edit]Dubiuos "own works" without OTRS tickets
- File:Affiche2016.jpg
- File:CEFF2014-Affiche-Champs-Elysées-Film-Fesival-Juin-2014.jpg
- File:Champs Elysees Film Festival affiche.jpg
- File:Festival-champs-elysees-2012.jpg
- File:Logo champs élysée film festival.png
- File:LogoCEFF2016-blanc-RVB.jpg
2003:45:5C6F:A801:7048:ED14:594E:C40B 13:47, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Trulymadlygaby (talk · contribs)
[edit]Uploads without OTRS tickets
- File:Emblems.jpg
- File:Ybarro-Aquil.jpg
- File:Ynang Reyna and Raquim.jpg
- File:Cassiopeia-Agane.jpg
- File:Muyak-Apitong.jpg
- File:Gurna-Hitano-Muros.jpg
- File:Sanggre.jpg
- File:Encamap.jpg
- File:Enca2016.jpg
- File:Danaya2016.jpg
- File:Pirena2016.jpg
- File:Alena2016.jpg
- File:Amihan2016.jpg
2003:45:5C6F:A801:7048:ED14:594E:C40B 13:52, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:08, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.
- File:Faith@Role of GOD.JPG
- File:Faith @ Role of GOD.JPG
- File:Parda and Islam.pdf
- File:Taharat rules in islam.JPG
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:10, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
- I agree that something must happen. Gamingforfun365 (talk) 00:14, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
unused screenshot, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 14:17, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
- include
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://static.panoramio.com/photos/large/12241250.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Modern art. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.
- File:Christian-skjødt-columns-01.jpg
- File:Christian-skjødt-adumbrare-02.jpg
- File:Christian-skjødt-vibrant-disturbance3-02.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Magazine pages. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Neural magazine nr. 52 - page 12.pdf
- File:The wire magazine nov 2014.pdf
- File:Neural 52 - page 12.jpeg.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Leonardo Lugo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Since we don't know who the author of the photo is, we can't say for certain that they have been dead for 70 years. It's impossible to say in these circumstances what the copyright status of the photo is. Diannaa (talk) 14:28, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Seems to be promo photo. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private drawing album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://celebritywc.com/images/rialda-kadric-12.jpg.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://img.youm7.com/images/NewsPics/gallery/pics/102015231628471921%D8%A7%D9%83%D8%AA%D9%85-%D8%A3%D9%86%D9%81%D8%A7%D8%B3%D9%83%D8%8C-%D8%AA%D8%B9%D8%B1%D9%81%D8%8C-%D8%A3%D8%AE%D8%B7%D8%B1-5-%D8%B1%D9%8A%D8%A7%D8%B6%D8%A7%D8%AA%D8%8C-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B9%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85-(4).jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://static1.squarespace.com/static/51f8265be4b07a5ac2960069/55c4e806e4b06d2ca7fb0af3/55c4e9c9e4b06d2ca7fb4956/1438968265788/IMG_1198.jpg.
- File:JC Gonzalez-JCG344.jpg
- File:JCgonzalez-2007-Menudo.png
- File:JC Gonzalez-076.jpg
- File:JC gonzalez-street.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lomapegado (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_fgJ6Ty0wVCM/SjTyZ3HxGCI/AAAAAAAABD8/1nrsbmVGWk4/s200/Ayto-Sab.Gde.JPG.
- File:Alcarde de la comunidad sabana grande.jpg
- File:Parque Sabana Grande.jpg
- File:Ayuntamineto de Sabana Hostos.jpg
- File:Clinica Sabana Grande.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jmajor2013 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos and drawing. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
- File:Old newport hill2.jpg
- File:Memorial Stadium 1959.jpg
- File:Svhs.png
- File:Memorial Stadium 1924.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jmajor2013 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.stadiumsusa.com/images/thumbs/3ef3a853b0a58155622ac557b0c3f2258188efc2.jpg-590x1000.png.
- File:Newport Hill present.png
- File:Newport starting line.jpg
- File:Coal Fountain Immigrant Plaza.jpg
- File:Immigrant plaza statute.jpg
- File:Four Seasons Fountain clinton IN.jpg
- File:Gate to little italy 9th St Clinton IN.jpg
- File:Four Season's Fountain Clinton, IN.jpg
- File:The Walk Wabash.jpg
- File:The Walk ISU.jpg
- File:Michael Simmons Center Starting Line.jpg
- File:Entrance Memorial Stadium Terre Haute.jpg
- File:ISU Memorial Stadium Terre Haute.png
- File:Memorial Stadium Indiana State.jpg
- File:Old Clinton HS.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
This file has been replaced by the file Ringsignal2.png Göran Holbeck (talk) 14:47, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
no educational use, out of scope. Don-kun (talk) 14:56, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
This is not Wikipedia Yanguas (talk) 15:12, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
No source (photo or scan from unknown book), not user's own work as claimed, user is not author (book author is unknown), no proper License MaryroseB54 (talk) 15:46, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:40, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
No source (photo or scan from unknown book), not user's own work as claimed, user is not author (book author is unknown), no proper License MaryroseB54 (talk) 15:46, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:40, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
No source (photo or scan from unknown book), not user's own work as claimed, user is not author (book author is unknown), no proper License MaryroseB54 (talk) 15:46, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:40, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
No source (photo or scan from unknown book), not user's own work as claimed, user is not author (book author is unknown), no proper License MaryroseB54 (talk) 15:46, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:40, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
No source (photo or scan from unknown book), not user's own work as claimed, user is not author (book author is unknown), no proper License MaryroseB54 (talk) 15:46, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:40, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
No source (photo from archeological find on a towel, is this even legal?), not user's own work as claimed, user is not author (maybe he is photographer), no proper License MaryroseB54 (talk) 15:53, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:40, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Previously deleted by another admin Alan (talk) 23:14, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
Non-free image Stryn (talk) 16:00, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
No confidence that these images were created by uploader, no useful metadata. User's other uploads were copied from a marathon running race site, and a school site, as well as book covers, posters and so on. I think perhaps uploader should read COM:L before making more uploads.
- File:SMKBA Field 2008.jpg
- File:SMKBA 2015 Pendaftaran.jpg
- File:SMK Bakar Arang1.jpg
- File:SMK Bakar Arang.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:06, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
- @Ellin Beltz: FYI: User:NgYShung has posted a statement regarding these images here (permanent link). --El Grafo (talk) 14:43, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
- Comment I am pasting the relevant portion here:
- 'Notification about possible deletion:
- I 100% swear this was taken by me, please don't delete it.
- I was about nominate this for deletion, well just delete it. signed NgYShung
- Thanks NgYShung for the clarification and please leave me a message on my talk page if you need help!
- I'd like to
I withdraw my nomination on the two "own works" as stated above, leaving the deletion request in place for the two lower images, File:SMK Bakar Arang.jpg & File:SMK Bakar Arang1.jpg. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:45, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per above. --INeverCry 00:41, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
file is broken; use cropped version File:Gisela C. Schulze Oldenburg.jpg instead Jochen Burghardt (talk) 16:06, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
- I agree, use cropped version File:Gisela C. Schulze Oldenburg.jpg instead. Best regards, --Jue (talk) 16:10, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:42, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Delete National sides of Euro coins are copyrighted to the country of origin. Only a few countries within the EU have licenses on their national sides compatible with Commons licensing requirements. Germany is not one of them. See also Commons:Currency#Germany. Hammersoft (talk) 16:19, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Delete Agree, a clear case. GeoTrinity (talk) 21:27, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:42, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Particularly obvious flickrwashing by an account on the bad flickr accounts list; there's no evidence that Calatrava's firm released the rendering under any CC license. Vcohen, who transferred the image to Commons, is a prolific and trusted user so this appears to have just been an innocent mistake by him. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 16:40, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete, no doubt. Where can I see the bad flickr accounts list? It would be useful for my future uploads. Vcohen (talk) 17:55, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
- The list is at Commons:Questionable Flickr images. It's a mix of accounts that upload entirely bad images, and some that have a mix of good and bad images. It's not entirely clear which this account is at this point. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:01, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks. Vcohen (talk) 18:12, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
- The list is at Commons:Questionable Flickr images. It's a mix of accounts that upload entirely bad images, and some that have a mix of good and bad images. It's not entirely clear which this account is at this point. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:01, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:42, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
good morning friends.
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:42, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
.PNG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.PNG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Oppose Municipal flag of Guadalajara is diferent.--Marrovi (talk) 14:18, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
.PNG){kind=link}
- Keep This is just a different drawing. It is still the same flag. Fry1989 eh? 23:46, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per Fry1989. --INeverCry 00:43, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
.PNG){kind=link}
.PNG&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
No flag of Guadalajara — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marrovi (talk • contribs) 2017-03-26T19:00:40 (UTC)
Deleted: superseded by File:Flag of Guadalajara (México).svg. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:39, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Delete this image for bad quality without use in articles.--Marrovi (talk) 21:18, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Incompatible license, not needed (see File:Homicide and Suicide Rate by Country.svg). Delphi234 (talk) 21:29, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Two reasons : File:Boiler Feed Injector Diagram.svg is a multilanguage SVG file which replaces this file. Moreover, there are bugs in the actual French file. Borvan53 (talk) 09:22, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Private image/Photographs of identifiable people/Request of the person in the picture 최광모 (talk) 21:52, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Private image/Photographs of identifiable people/Request of the person in the picture 최광모 (talk) 21:52, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:44, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Low quality (and unattributed) copy of File:Filmaspectratios svg.svg, with unintelligible text Crh23 (talk) 12:55, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
- {{speedydelete|Request withdrawn in favour of speedy delete}} — Preceding unsigned comment added by Crh23 (talk • contribs) 13:59, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Photo is being used for advertisement and not just an addition to wikipedia page "Art Car". Image has been used to spam several places including but not limited to Google Maps / Local Guide. Contains advertising watermark "Free images should not be watermarked, distorted, have any credits or titles in the image itself or anything else that would hamper their free use, unless, of course, the image is intended to demonstrate watermarking, distortion, titles, etc. and is used in the related article." - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Image_use_policy#Watermarks.2C_credits.2C_titles.2C_and_distortions
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:44, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Este material ha sido difundido a través de una cuenta de twitter para justificar una filiación partidista que había sido cuestionada por diversos conflictos de interés. El personaje aludido cuenta con un artículo en Wikipedia en español que ha estado siendo objeto de ediciones sospechosas que remiten a una 'edición bajo propósito'. Es por eso que considero que este material no tiene ninguna relevancia enciclopédica, pues tiene fines autopromocionales. --Luisalvaz (talk) 03:51, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:44, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
I don't understand how this photo has become free and uploader has not explained it. --sasha (krassotkin) 16:55, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
- Hi. See the legal advice from the website. http://web.gencat.cat/en/menu-ajuda/ajuda/avis_legal/index.html --Kippelboy (talk) 12:01, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
- @Kippelboy: Did you mean section "Modalitats de reutilització de la informació a gencat.cat"? Before I've read that. Firstly, there is not a license that you specified in description (not CC BY 4.0) but own. Secondly, this license is not complete (for example, they say nothing about the commercial usage) and it's not free (for example: "State the date of the latest update of the information", "It is necessary to contact the author or the copyright holder"). --sasha (krassotkin) 07:15, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:44, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Probably not own work. As described in section Metadata the copyright holder of this photo is Museu Nacional d'Art de Catalunya. But there is only CC BY-NC-SA 3.0.0 most freely license on its site. --sasha (krassotkin) 17:11, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:44, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Derivative works, some of them look unfree. File names are needed. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 17:34, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:44, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
- File:Касмачоў, Канстанцін Міхайлавіч, 1965 -1970.jpg
- File:Касмачоў, Канстанцін Міхайлавіч, пачатак 1930-х гадоў.jpg
- File:Касмачоў, Канстанцін Міхайлавіч, 1970-1975 гг.jpg
- File:Касмачоў, Канстанцін Міхайлавіч, 1960-1970 гг.jpg
- File:Василий и Изабелла Яновские 03.jpg
- File:Василий Яновский 04.jpg
- File:Василий Яновский 02.jpg
- File:Василий Яновский 01.jpg
Photographs of 1930-1990 without authors. --sasha (krassotkin) 17:43, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:44, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Dubious PD rationale. I see no reason to believe that this photo was created by an officer or employee of the US Federal Government. —LX (talk, contribs) 18:38, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:44, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Dubious PD rationale. I see no reason to believe that this photo was created by an officer or employee of the US Federal Government. —LX (talk, contribs) 18:39, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:44, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Questionable authorship claims. Looks like a screenshot of a presumably non-free broadcast rather than the uploader's own photograph. —LX (talk, contribs) 18:40, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:44, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
File from new user, but not contain EXIF. Also it's older than the similar photo from this cite in Russian - http://tvzvezda.ru/news/vstrane_i_mire/content/201607091510-u7pf.htm (all times are MSK - UTC+3) Brateevsky {talk} 18:48, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:44, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
See Use policy (Copyright) of Emilio Segrè Visual Archives. --sasha (krassotkin) 18:49, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:44, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Appears to be scanned from a printed source, virtually certain to still be under copyright (depicted cards were not yet created 70 years ago), and no license given for that. Flickr user scans many postcards among original photographs. Carl Lindberg (talk) 18:58, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Appears to be taken from https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/gallery/2013/dec/17/vintage-photographs-of-christmas-in-london-by-henry-grant-in-pictures . Author is Henry Grant, died 2004, so not PD until 2075 (2058 in the U.S.). Carl Lindberg (talk) 19:09, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Low resolution Patogonza (talk) 20:04, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:46, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Files in Category:Photographs taken on 2008-08-23
[edit]photographs of a family meeting, unknown people, low encyclopedic value
- File:A Lara, é dona da casinha por enquanto - panoramio.jpg
- File:Amigos da família - panoramio.jpg
- File:Anfitriões - panoramio.jpg
- File:Dezoito graus na escala termométrica - panoramio.jpg
- File:Distinto casal - panoramio.jpg
- File:Edu Dudu - panoramio.jpg
- File:Ei Augusta^ Olhando nesta câmera, dê um sorriso. - panoramio.jpg
- File:Enquanto isso - panoramio.jpg
- File:Festa - panoramio - Claudio Oliveira Lim….jpg
- File:Parabéns p... - panoramio.jpg
- File:Querida bisa Palmira - panoramio.jpg
- File:Vic Vickers 2008 08 23.JPG
- File:Visitação - panoramio.jpg
- File:À Prole - panoramio.jpg
2003:45:5C6F:A801:CDEA:6238:CD3B:484E 19:56, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:46, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Likely unfree, unencyclopedic, used in a promotional version of the article en:Alexia Thomas. (Calling a living person a "mother of saints", seriously?) Mike Rosoft (talk) 20:10, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:46, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
this 2002 Afghan stamp appears not to comply with the requirements of the attached licence where the image is copyright for 50 years pma Ww2censor (talk) 20:21, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Hmm, I was under impression that Afghan government works are not protected, but I can't find that in the copyright text. Materialscientist (talk) 23:48, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:46, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Dubious "own works" plus uploads without permissions / OTRS tickets
- File:Miftar Ramadan Fana, 75 vjet me dorë në tasto e kufje në vesh, libër me autor Dr. Zihni Haskaj.jpg
- File:Ali Rakip Manaj - vullneti që lartëson njeriun, libër me autorë Dr. Zihni Haskaj - historian, Bektash Zite - publicist.jpg
- File:Bektash Zite - 40 vjet gazetar me penë në dorë. Libër me autor Dr. Zihni Haskaj.jpg
- File:Fjala e parë - Atdhetarizmi, Bektash Zite për Tepelenën e tepelenasit (2000-2006). Libër me autor Dr. Zihni Haskaj.jpg
- File:Kadri Mahmud Shametaj treçerek shekulli në këmbë, libër nga Dr. Zihni Haskaj dhe Bektash Zite.jpg
- File:Kalo Brahim Xhaferaj në kujtimet e dy brezave, libër nga Dr.Zihni Haskaj dhe Bektash Zite.jpg
- File:Kalo Brahim Xhaferaj një jetë në këmbë për mëmëdhenë - libër me Autorë Zihni Haskaj dhe Bektash Zite.jpg
- File:Kur kujtojmë Eshref Gjonçën, libër me Autor Dr. Zihni Haskaj.jpg
- File:Misioni ynë - një detyrim atdhetar (Nga përshëndetja e kryetarit të Shoqatës, Dr. Zihni Haskaj) Tepelena jonë Nr.1 Janar 2003.jpg
- File:Zihni Haskaj - Historiani dhe publicisti i shquar tepelenas. Gazeta “Trebeshina” Nr 25, tetor 2011. f 7.jpg
- File:Autobusi i kombëtares shqiptare në Francë, Euro 2016.jpg
- File:Gazeta “Mirdita”.jpg
- File:Tiranë “Muzeu i Kullës së Sahatit”.jpg
- File:Muzeu i Kullës së Sahatit në Tiranë.jpg
- File:Thënie nga Enver Hoxha.jpg
- File:Gazeta “Bulqiza”.jpg
- File:Kadare në gjuhët e botës, në dyzet e pesë gjuhë.jpg
- File:Mbledhja e përbashkët e dy qeverive të Kosovës dhe Shqipërisë. (3 qershor 2016 Prishtinë).jpg
- File:Ish ndërtesa “Instituti i Sigurimeve” (INSIG) në Tiranë.jpg
- File:Gazeta “Dukagjini”.jpg
- File:Skulpturë e artistit shqiptar Vasillaq Kolevica në Korçë.jpg
- File:Monument në Tiranë “700 Petale”.jpg
- File:Gazeta “Devolli”.jpg
- File:Çika e Tërbaçit.jpg
- File:Zihni Haskaj , Tiranë 10 shtator 1998.jpg
- File:Gazeta “Sheperi”.jpg
- File:Pikturë e bukur murale në Korçë (Shqipëri) nga piktorit shqiptar Toni Sulo.jpg
- File:Afishe e filmit “Kapedani”.jpg
- File:Dita ndërkombëtare e vallëzimit.jpg
- File:Lunxhëria (gazetë).jpg
- File:Shoqata “Bulqiza”.png
- File:Gazeta e Korçës, e shtunë 27 shkurt 1926.jpg
- File:LLiari (gazetë).jpg
- File:Orientimi në Muzeun e Bankës së Shqipërisë.jpg
- File:Shtatorja e Migjenit me “Lulin e Vocërr”.jpg
- File:Dita ndërkombëtare e monumenteve - Shqipëri 2016.jpg
- File:Prezantim projekti “Durrësi Antik vs Durrësi Modern”.jpg
- File:Muzeu i Bankës së Shqipërisë.jpg
- File:Komisariati i policisë Fier.jpg
- File:Drejtoria e policisë së qarkut Gjirokastër.jpg
- File:Federata sportive Shqiptare.jpg
- File:Afishe e filmit “Kryengritje në pallat”.jpg
- File:Afishe e filmit “Dollia e dasmës sime”.jpg
- File:Këtu punohet.jpg
- File:Inspektorati shtetëror teknik dhe industrial.jpg
- File:Fototeka Kombëtare Marubi.jpg
- File:Inspektoriatit Qendror Teknik.jpg
- File:Shoqata kulturore artistike ”Jehona Shqiptare”.jpg
- File:Gazeta e Korçës 28 nëntor 1932.jpg
- File:Kartë e shëndeti.jpg
- File:Zyra postelegrafike, Kolonjë, 1914.jpg
- File:Fanella e Shqipërisë (2016).jpg
- File:Bashkia Kukës.png
._Lib%C3%ABr_me_autor_Dr._Zihni_Haskaj.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Tepelena_jon%C3%AB_Nr.1_Janar_2003.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_n%C3%AB_Tiran%C3%AB.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_nga_piktorit_shqiptar_Toni_Sulo.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
2003:45:5C6F:A801:CDEA:6238:CD3B:484E 20:18, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:47, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Historical newspapers, tickets, publications. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Gazeta “Bulevard”.jpg
- File:Biletë shërbimi urban 60 qindarka.jpg
- File:Biletë shërbim urban.jpg
- File:Tepelena jonë - Nr. 1, janar 2003. Drejtor Zihni Haskaj.jpg
- File:Tepelena jonë - Nr. 19, shkurt 2009. Drejtor Zihni Haskaj.jpg
- File:Tepelena jonë - Nr. 18, korrik 2008.jpg
- File:Tepelena jonë - Nr. 17, dhjetor 2007.jpg
- File:Tepelena jonë - Nr. 16, maj 2007.jpg
- File:Tepelena jonë - Nr. 15, dhjetor 2006. Drejtor Zihni Haskaj.jpg
- File:Tepelena jonë - Nr. 14, tetor 2006. Drejtor Zihni Haskaj.jpg
- File:Tepelena jonë - Nr. 13, korrik 2006. Drejtor Zihni Haskaj.jpg
- File:Tepelena jonë - Nr. 12, dhjetor 2005. Drejtor Zihni Haskaj.jpg
- File:Tepelena jonë - Nr. 11, tetor 2005. Drejtor Zihni Haskaj.jpg
- File:Gazeta “Tepelena jonë” - Nr. 10, maj 2005. Drejtor Zihni Haskaj.jpg
- File:Gazeta “Tepelena jonë” - Nr. 9, mars 2005. Drejtor Zihni Haskaj.jpg
- File:Tepelena jonë - Nr. 8, korrik 2004. Drejtor Zihni Haskaj.jpg
- File:Tepelena jonë - Nr. 7, prill 2004. Drejtor Zihni Haskaj.jpg
- File:Tepelena jonë - Nr. 6, shkurt 2004. Drejtor Zihni Haskaj.jpg
- File:Gazeta-Shkumbini-viti-9-mars-1975.pdf
- File:Tepelena jonë - Nr. 5, dhjetor 2003.jpg
- File:Tepelena jonë - Nr. 4, gusht 2003.jpg
- File:Tepelena jonë - Nr. 3, qershor 2003.jpg
- File:Biletë hyrje - Manastiri i Mesopotamit në Shqipëri.jpg
- File:Tepelena jonë - Nr.2, Mars 2003.jpg
- File:Histori shqiptare nga Alma Çupi.jpg
- File:Poezi për Nalo Haskaj nga Çerçiz Myftari.jpg
- File:Zihni Haskaj - Wien, 22 shtator 1976.jpg
- File:Shqipëri - Biletë hyrje në Kalanë e Beratit, tetor 2019.jpg
- File:Shqipëri - Biletë hyrje në Muzeun Kombëtar Gjergj Kastrioti Skënderbeu në Krujë, tetor 2019.jpg
- File:Shqipëri - Biletë hyrje në Muzeun Kombëtar të Fotografisë Marubi në Shkodër, tetor 2019.jpg
- File:Shqipëri - Biletë hyrje në Muzeun Kombëtar Ikonografik Onufri në Berat, tetor 2019.jpg
- File:Shqipëri - Biletë hyrje në Kalanë e Shkodrës, tetor 2019.jpg
- File:Shqipëri - Biletë hyrje në Parkun Kombëtar Arkeologjik në Apoloni të Fierit, tetor 2019.jpg
- File:Shqipëri - Biletë hyrje në Muzeun Arkeologjik në Tiranë, tetor 2019.jpg
- File:Shqipëri - Biletë hyrje në Muzeun Kombëtar të Pavarësisë në Vlorë, tetor 2019.jpg
- File:Korça tek ju.jpg
- File:Tepelena jonë, Maj 2010.jpg
- File:Biletë urbani Tiranë 2019.jpg
- File:Biletë urbani Vlorë 2019.jpg
- File:Kuvendi i Dukagjinit 15 shkurt 1602.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 14:06, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
The title of the file itself shows that there is no educational but just an ordinary exibitionist claim behind this picture. Plus, it is certainly not necessary to show one's face in combination with a nude picture. At last, we already have enough nude penis pictures in stock. Therefore, I cast a deletion vote for it. GeoTrinity (talk) 20:32, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:47, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
The title of the file itself shows that there is no educational but just an ordinary exibitionist claim behind this picture. Plus, it is certainly not necessary to show one's face in combination with a nude picture. At last, we already have enough nude penis pictures in stock. Therefore, I cast a deletion vote for it. GeoTrinity (talk) 20:33, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:47, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
The title of the file itself shows that there is no educational but just an ordinary exibitionist claim behind this picture. Plus, it is certainly not necessary to show one's face in combination with a nude picture. At last, we already have enough nude penis pictures in stock. Therefore, I cast a deletion vote for it. GeoTrinity (talk) 20:34, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:48, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete The title of the file itself shows that there is no educational but just an ordinary exibitionist claim behind this picture. Plus, it is certainly not necessary to show one's face in combination with a nude picture. At last, we already have enough nude penis pictures in stock. Therefore, I cast a deletion vote for it. GeoTrinity (talk) 20:34, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:48, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Dubious "own work" (small resolution, no EXIF) 2003:45:5C6F:A801:CDEA:6238:CD3B:484E 20:34, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:48, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
The title of the file itself shows that there is no educational but just an ordinary exibitionist claim behind this picture. Plus, it is certainly not necessary to show one's face in combination with a nude picture. At last, we already have enough nude penis pictures in stock. Therefore, I cast a deletion vote for it. GeoTrinity (talk) 20:35, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:48, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
The title of the file itself shows that there is no educational but just an ordinary exibitionist claim behind this picture. Plus, it is certainly not necessary to show one's face in combination with a nude picture. At last, we already have enough nude penis pictures in stock. Therefore, I cast a deletion vote for it. GeoTrinity (talk) 20:35, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:48, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
The title of the file itself shows that there is no educational but just an ordinary exibitionist claim behind this picture. Plus, it is certainly not necessary to show one's face in combination with a nude picture. At last, we already have enough nude penis pictures in stock. Therefore, I cast a deletion vote for it. GeoTrinity (talk) 20:36, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:48, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
No educational purpose, plus we have other pictures like that in stock. Personality rights might also count. I cast a deletion vote. GeoTrinity (talk) 20:39, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:48, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MetaBankCC (talk · contribs)
[edit]No EXIF; OTRS tickets required
- File:Stanley H. Haahr.tif
- File:Original Storm Lake Savings and Loan Association building.tif
- File:Meta Payment Systems headquaters in Sioux Falls.jpg
- File:J. Tyler Haahr.jpg
- File:Brad Hanson.png
2003:45:5C6F:A801:CDEA:6238:CD3B:484E 20:44, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:49, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MetaBankCC (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused logos of questionable notability : out of scope
_division_logo.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:04, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:49, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alirezakariminejad (talk · contribs)
[edit]no permissions
- File:Cold-Breath-Film-2016-Poster.jpg
- File:Bita badran image.jpg
- File:Bita badran.jpg
- File:Cold Breath-poster.jpg
- File:Abbasraziji.jpg
- File:Dame sard image.jpg
2003:45:5C6F:A801:CDEA:6238:CD3B:484E 20:52, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:49, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Own work?? 2003:45:5C6F:A801:CDEA:6238:CD3B:484E 20:55, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:49, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope: pt:Skiller'z Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:58, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:49, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Personal essay; see Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:58, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Commons is not a personal website. GeoTrinity (talk) 21:25, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:49, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope: simple:User:Mansoor Saddiq Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:00, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:49, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Inferior duplicate File:Прапор Сил спеціальних операцій.png PsichoPuzo (talk) 21:01, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:49, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Missing evidence of age claim. Stefan2 (talk) 21:04, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:49, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
COM:DW / COM:PACKAGING Josve05a (talk) 21:04, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:49, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Eurovision69 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Dubious "own works"
- File:Боб Мартин.jpg
- File:Мишель Арно.jpg
- File:Лиз Ассиа.jpg
- File:Kaliopi 2012.jpg
- File:Калиопи на 61-м конкурсе песни Евровидение.jpg
- File:Coctail Chic.jpg
- File:Eurovision Song Contest 1968 - Isabelle Aubret.jpg
- File:Semihayanki101 v-zweispaltig.jpg
2003:45:5C6F:A801:CDEA:6238:CD3B:484E 21:10, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:50, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
This is a copy from page 280 of Andrew Mollo's "Armed Forces of World War II" Crown Publisher, Inc., NY 1981. All rights reserved. Luke (talk) 21:16, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:50, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
The copyright tag {{PD-US-no notice}} requires evidence of publication, which we do not currently have. Stefan2 (talk) 21:53, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
- The original image was marked
{{Copy to Wikimedia Commons|bot=Svenbot|priority=true}}. That´s all.--Gampe (talk) 03:53, 11 July 2016 (UTC)- And that means that the file has been tagged by a bot, so you need to carefully check that the bot hasn't tagged files which are unsuitable for Commons. --Stefan2 (talk) 09:00, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:50, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
the Flickr image page states that "Chris" took the photos and also states that he apologises for the "All right reserved" on the images, though his flickrstream has a free licence. To keep this image we really need an OTRS verification from the copyright holder. Ww2censor (talk) 22:11, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Okay, actually just delete it. There are other photos that I can use that are freely licensed on Flickr. Nothing Is Illuminated (talk) 22:55, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator. --Leoboudv (talk) 23:59, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:50, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:24, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:51, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:25, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:51, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:26, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:51, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Patikayolu (talk · contribs)
[edit]- File:X88888.jpg
- File:X77777.jpg
- File:X55555.jpg
- File:X9999.jpg
- File:X3333.jpg
- File:X1000.jpg
- File:X11.jpg
- File:X222.jpg
- File:X444.jpg
- File:Devrimci Parti 3.jpg
- File:Devrimci Parti 4.jpg
- File:Devrimci Parti 1.jpg
- File:Devrimci Parti 0.jpg
- File:Devrimci Parti 2.jpg
- File:Birlesik Devrimci Parti Logo.png
- File:Birleşik Devrimci parti logosu.png
- File:Birleşik Devrimci Parti.png
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:32, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:51, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Private image. Not educationally useful. Uncategorised, unused. DavidIvar (talk) 23:00, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Hej! This is NOT Facebook, personal pictures must not be uploaded here. Delete the crap. GeoTrinity (talk) 00:40, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:51, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope, used only for autopromotion.
kvardek du (la plej bela nombro) 23:16, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:51, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
This is a lower resolution version of File:Clara Kimball Young - May 1920 Photoplay.jpg. The title and description is also incorrect, claiming it is a portrait of Gail Kane. It is a portrait of Clara Kimball Young, as can be read on the right of the cover. Batfan1966 (talk) 23:27, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:51, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
obvious copyvio Ringerfan23 (talk) 23:43, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:51, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
no signs of permission to use the photo with CC-0 license C messier (talk) 07:16, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:51, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope C messier (talk) 07:23, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:51, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kristamack (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of COM:SCOPE and per COM:ADVERT
- File:Powered By Love Biography.pdf
- File:Powered By Love news release.pdf
- File:Powered By Love, Movie.jpg
- File:Krista Mack Biography.pdf
- File:Krista Mack.jpg
INeverCry 20:58, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. -- Geagea (talk) 20:07, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
No indication of user's own work on this gallery of images, two logos, all claimed as own work, but likely not. Variable sizes, no camera data, etc.
- File:Haal (2).jpg
- File:Ustad amir khan.jpg
- File:Shyam-Lal-Chaturvedi (writers of chhattisgarh).jpg
- File:Radhey shyam kori.jpg
- File:Panchanan maheshwari.jpg
- File:National book award.jpg
- File:IATA.jpg
- File:Aaja nachle.jpg
- File:Taaj.PNG
- File:Navneet SIngh.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:49, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete all except File:IATA.jpg and File:National book award.jpg per nom and COM:PRP (COM:SCOPE for File:Taaj.PNG and File:Navneet SIngh.jpg), while Keep File:IATA.jpg and File:National book award.jpg as {{PD-ineligible}}. --★ Poké95 07:18, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
- Comment We have a better File:Iata official logo.png. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:39, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete: The usual problem, people confuse Commons either with Facebook (or similar) or they upload pictures that are out of the scope of Commons. I therefore cast a vote to DELETE this file. It's so annoying ... Poor admins. GeoTrinity (talk) 13:48, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 21:02, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
If subject is uploader, permission from the actual photographs of each of the two images are needed to retain the images. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:23, 10 July 2016 (UTC) : The photos were taken by an attendant at Machu Picchu, using my Canon EOS camera, in exchange for a tip. To be precise, the attendant and a colleague had just helped my aging body climb the last steep steps to this peak, for which service I tipped him (rather generously), and he then offered (through gestures and baby Spanish) to take the photos of my wife and me. Based on this transaction, I claim ownership of the photos even though I appear in them. KFFOWLER (talk)
Deleted: unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:47, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
why Germany inherits West Germany's results, Russia inherits USSR's results, Czech Republic and Slovakia inherits Czechoslovakia's results, Serbia inherits Yugoslavia's results? Glovacki (talk) 10:11, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
- Because FIFA and UEFA recognise Germany, Russia, Czech Republic and Serbia as the successor teams of West Germany, the Soviet Union, Czechoslovakia and Yugoslavia respectively. There is no reason for this file to be deleted. GarethTJennings (talk) 11:12, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
- Where is proof that FIFA and UEFA recognise them as the successor teams? I can somehow understand the case of West Germany and the Soviet Union, but for Czechoslovakia and Yugoslavia there is no reason for such a succession. --Glovacki (talk) 21:00, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
- In all pages of wiki, you can see the reference of Czech Republic and Serbia has the successor teams of Czechoslovakia and Yugoslavia respectively, Since Slovakia to independence from Czech Republic, Czech Republic wins as the successor to Czechoslovakia, like Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, Macedonia and Kosovo become independent of Serbia, Serbia wins be the successor to Yugoslavia: https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disoluci%C3%B3n_de_Yugoslavia, https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serbia#Transici.C3.B3n_pol.C3.ADtica, https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disoluci%C3%B3n_de_Checoslovaquia, https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rep%C3%BAblica_Checa, https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eurocopa#cite_note-CZE-15. --LuisAngel01 (talk) 00:40, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
- Where is proof that FIFA and UEFA recognise them as the successor teams? I can somehow understand the case of West Germany and the Soviet Union, but for Czechoslovakia and Yugoslavia there is no reason for such a succession. --Glovacki (talk) 21:00, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
- Because FIFA and UEFA recognise Germany, Russia, Czech Republic and Serbia as the successor teams of West Germany, the Soviet Union, Czechoslovakia and Yugoslavia respectively. There is no reason for this file to be deleted. GarethTJennings (talk) 11:12, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
- It's commonly and fair known that they are referred as the sucessor teams. This is not new. Don't know why now shows up this discussion. I've seen it aroun other places in Wikipedia. Here are some links:
- FIFA affiliation of Czech Republic (prior Czechoslovakia) - considered successor
- FIFA affiliation of Slovakia (prior Czechoslovakia) - not considered successor
- FIFA affiliation of Russia (prior USSR and CEI) - considered successor
- FIFA affiliation of Serbia (prior Yugoslavia) - not considered successor
- FIFA affiliation of Ukraine (prior USSR) - not considered successor
- Obviously both organisms talk about their "special" aspect in their history, but in the end is a matter of how you name them. One under USSR denomination (today Russia), and the other under Czechoslovakia name, today Czech Republic. Like other countries have today different names. Same situation as Germany, successor of Federal Germany, and not Oriental Germany.
- Those are a few of thousand links.. As I've said, this is not new. Can0t understand this disscussion.. --Brgesto (talk) 08:37, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
This photo should be updated, not deleted. Portugal won Euro 2016.--172.56.2.23 21:44, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
- Got updated in the meantime. --mfb (talk) 23:43, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:49, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Not even half-finished file for 6 years MaryroseB54 (talk) 15:09, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Kept: File is used on wp. --Sanandros (talk) 19:37, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
The person in the photo is not Hammamizade Ismail Dede Efendi. He is possibly Suleyman Hayati Dede. The following link goes to a newspaper article addressing this confusion.
http://haber.star.com.tr/pazar/kravatli-dede-efendi-fotografinin-ardindaki-gercek/haber-715920 46.1.49.135 20:33, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Kept: This is not a case to discuss on DR pages, this should be discused on the talk page. --Sanandros (talk) 19:49, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jasonecohen6 (talk · contribs)
[edit]I suspect all images by this user are copyright violations of various wrestlers. File:Iron Empire.jpg is from http://nwasmokymountain.com/nwa-world-champions/.
- File:Matt Riviera 3.jpg
- File:Iron Empire.jpg
- File:Matt Riviera Western States Title.jpg
- File:Matt Riviera 1.jpg
- File:Josh Lewis and Eric Draven with Mortimer Blankenship III.jpg
- File:Josh Lewis and Eric Drave.jpg
- File:Josh Lewis US title.jpg
- File:Josh Lewis vs Rob Conway.jpg
- File:Josh Lewis Bodybuilding.jpg
- File:Josh Lewis vs Greg Anthony.jpg
- File:Josh Lewis Pic.jpg
- File:Josh Lewis.jpg
- File:NWA Supreme United States Championship.jpg
- File:NWA Mid America Tag Team Champions.jpg
- File:Eric Draven.jpg
- File:Johnny Justice.jpg
MKFI (talk) 07:32, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
I have the permission from these wrestlers to use these pictures for online media such as Wikipedia. Some of them I even took myself with my camera. Others, I have permission for if you need me to list their Facebook accounts so you can ask them yourself, that is no problem. I can even have written permission for these pictures signed by these various wrestlers.
Jasonecohen6 I have dates and written documentation that I took the pictures in question and will submit them if necessary Jasonecohen6
- Jasonecohen6, please send and OTRS ticket so we have a confirmation of the permission. Note that the wrestlers need to include an explicit free license such as CC-BY-SA. MKFI (talk) 06:45, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
I have submitted the OTRS ticket and have submitted the free licenses by email to Wikimedia Commons and are awaiting their decisions Jasonecohen6
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:42, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jasonecohen6 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.
- File:Josh Lewis and NWA President Bruce Tharpe.jpg
- File:NWA Mid America Champion Nic Noble.jpg
- File:Josh Lewis US Champion.jpg
- File:Josh Lewis as NWA Mid America Champion.jpg
- File:Josh lewis 3 titles.jpg
- File:Eric Draven as NWA Mid America Champion.jpg
- File:Eric Draven NWA Supreme Heavyweight Champion.jpg
- File:Eric Draven vs Rob Conway.jpg
- File:Josh Lewis U.S. Champ.jpg
- File:Josh Lewis Double Champ.jpg
- File:NWA Supreme U.S. Title.jpg
- File:Dual Champ Josh Lewis.jpg
- File:Mr. 5.5 Matt Riviera.jpg
- File:Matt Riviera as Champion.jpg
- File:Loverboy Matt Riviera.jpg
- File:Josh Lewis US Champ.jpg
- File:Lewis vs Anthony.jpg
- File:Power Trip.jpg
- File:Josh Lewis as Champ.jpg
- File:Lewis Bodybuilding.jpg
- File:Lewis vs Conway.jpg
- File:Iron Empire New.jpg
Yann (talk) 13:02, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
Jasonecohen6 I have been targeted once again for supposed copyright violations. This is ridiculous because all of the images I upload I have taken with my own cameras and either uploaded directly or edited and then uploaded. I do not know what I have to do to prove to you people that I own these copyrights. I upload these pictures for people I work with in wrestling as a favor to them, I receive no compensation for this and do not know why these pictures keep getting flagged for copyright violations. If someone were to claim to own them that would be one thing, but no one does because I own them! This is beyond ridiculous that someone can say I don't own the pictures because they think I don't. These people do now know me or the wrestlers in the pictures. Any of these wrestlers are easily reachable through our Facebook page at www.facebook.com/nwasupreme. They will all tell you I own the pictures and they have given me permission to post any picture I take.
Deleted: please contact OTRS to provide evidence of permission. --Jcb (talk) 22:20, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Isaac daniel~commonswiki
[edit]The following files has been initially tagged by Isaac daniel as Copyvio (copyvio) and provided links to Flickr, where the source files are currently licensed as All rights reserved:
- File:Casario_Santa_Luzia_MG.jpg (uploaded to Flickr at 22 May 2011 03:49:58 UTC; uploaded to Commons at 7 February 2012 - after)
- File:Hosp_SaoJoaodeDeus_SantaLuziaMG.jpg (uploaded to Flickr at 13 May 2012 03:49:58 UTC; uploaded to Commons at 14 March 2012 - before)
- File:Novo_Forum_de_Santa_Luzia_MG.jpg (uploaded to Flickr at 13 May 2012 03:49:58 UTC; uploaded to Commons at 21 July 2012 - after) (part of the collage)
- File:Rua_Direita_e_Matriz_de_Santa_Luzia_MG.jpg (uploaded to Flickr at 13 May 2012 03:49:58 UTC; uploaded to Commons at 21 July 2012 - after) (part of the collage)
- File:Montagem_cidade_Santa_Luzia_MG.jpg (collage uploaded to Commons at 21 July 2012; see bellow)
Also, the following files aren't tagged for speedy, but part of the above collage:
- File:Monumento_aos_Bravos.jpg (not found at Flickr's user uploads, nor Google Image Search, nor in SkyscraperCity)
- File:AvBrasilia_Santa_LuziaMG.jpg (uploaded to Flickr at 13 May 2012 03:49:58 UTC; uploaded to Commons at 14 March 2012 - before) (photo don't have the Date in the Exif, so, the Date of Taking is actually the Date of upload)
- File:Rua_Floriano_Peixoto_em_Santa_Luzia_MG.jpg (uploaded to Flickr at 22 April 2011 03:49:58 UTC; uploaded to Commons at 21 July 2012 - after)
But, according to the Exif, Isaac Daniel is the photographer (then the copyright holder), therefore, is User:Isaac daniel (the nominator) and User:Isaac daniel~commonswiki (the uploader, known as User:Isaac daniel before the username renaming process) the same person? To avoid copyfraud, please indicate if the uploader (the person behind User:Isaac daniel~commonswiki) is the actual copyright holder, and if the holder actually agree to release these photos under the CC-BY license (in both Flickr and Commons, as demonstrated in the files uploaded first to Commons). Unfortunately, no License Reviewer reviewed the files, but the files first uploaded to Commons shouldn't be questionated and speedy kept.
Also, consider the contributions from the both Isaac Daniel (the only contributions from the newer one was tagging these files for Speedy). Amitie 10g (talk) 02:14, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Info: Doing an in-deep research, I checked the Date of upload to Commons and compared with the Date of upload to Flickr (using the UNIX Timestamp found using the Flickr API). Also, the only relevant result found in Google Image Search is this post at SkyscraperCity, posted at 13 May 2012 06:25 UTC (more than 2 hours after uploading to Flickr), and Isaac Daniel indicated that these files comes from (and therefore first uploaded to) Flickr. Then, before apply COM:PCP, we should consider that, as CC license are irrevocable, but no License Reviewer reviewed the files, the only way is AGF and consider the source Own work as valid; or, know if the uploader is actually the copyright holder. --Amitie 10g (talk) 03:44, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Comment I'd suggest a Check User with pt:Usuário:Isaac daniel and User:Isaac daniel~commonswiki.--Sanandros (talk) 19:28, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
Comment The two profiles are mine, I do not know because it was created another. When I uploaded the pictures I thought it was putting another type of license. I asked to remove the images because I am suffering license violations.--Isaac daniel (talk) 13:56, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
- You can merge your accounts. I think here you can get more information. If not then contact user:derHexer who has sysop rights and can also merge accounts. We introduced on Commons and on WP global user accounts so your original commons account was shifted to User:Isaac daniel~commonswiki and then they created a new account connectet to your WP account which is now your User:Isaac daniel account on commons.
And now the files: Who is accusing you of license violation and what copyright they are claiming?--Sanandros (talk) 18:09, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
- No one is accusing me of violating licenses. Several sites are commercially using my pictures, and it is very difficult judicial proceedings in my locality. A simple license does not protect my intellectual property.--Isaac daniel (talk) 18:40, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
- Wrong, a CC license protects you and your rights as long as it protects. And you, as the copyright holder, you still can send a DMCA Takedown to people and websites that used your work without complying with the license. Also, CC licenses are irrevocable, so, the change of licensing are applicable only for ussages after the license change at Flickr (excluding the files first uploaded to Commons, that cannot be questionated). Finally, when uploading files to Commons, you agree and understand the CC-BY-SA license that you choosen (and I suppose that you used the same license at Flickr) and how the Free Licenses protect your rights in the different ways that them provides. Please go to the copyright violators, not to Commons. --Amitie 10g (talk) 20:51, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
- @Isaac daniel: I can merge both your accounts when they both confirm merging them, e.g. you can add both signatures here. But for doing that, I need to move your current 8 commonswiki edits made by Isaac daniel to placeholder name (like Isaac daniel (usurp)). Best, —DerHexer (Talk) 20:13, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
- Wrong, a CC license protects you and your rights as long as it protects. And you, as the copyright holder, you still can send a DMCA Takedown to people and websites that used your work without complying with the license. Also, CC licenses are irrevocable, so, the change of licensing are applicable only for ussages after the license change at Flickr (excluding the files first uploaded to Commons, that cannot be questionated). Finally, when uploading files to Commons, you agree and understand the CC-BY-SA license that you choosen (and I suppose that you used the same license at Flickr) and how the Free Licenses protect your rights in the different ways that them provides. Please go to the copyright violators, not to Commons. --Amitie 10g (talk) 20:51, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
Kept: files were apparently uploaded by copyright holder, license is irrevocable. --Jcb (talk) 11:48, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
Image was previously published, see halftoning around woman's face... Highly unlikely that this is own work of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:20, 10 July 2016 (UTC) :I shot this photo at a dress rehearsal of my production of THE THREEPENNY OPERA at the Virginia Museum in Richmond VA in fall 1972. The actors were professional (Actors Equity) artists whose contracts allowed their images to be used. (The contracts were to my company - The Revels Office, incorporated by me - as the Museum was prevented by state law from dealing with a labor union.) I have since copied and photoshopped the original multiple times, only to improve on its lighting and the visibility of the artists. I should add that I was the Producing Director of the theater, i.e., the producer of the company and also the director of this particular production. KFFOWLER (talk)
Deleted: please contact OTRS. --Jcb (talk) 23:39, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I suppose the top image could still be in copyright in the UK. It's credited to w:Aerofilms so e.g., if it was taken by w:Claude Grahame-White it would still be under copyright. It can also be found at [1], where it's for sale commercially, although I wouldn't necessarily expect this organisation to reveal if it was actually public domain. --ghouston (talk) 12:36, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep I think. There is no photographer listed -- that would typically be a different person than the pilot anyways. There is a bit of history on the company here; they note that pilots were hired as commissions came in. Claude Friese-Greene (died 1943) is pictured as a photographer there. On the other hand, it does say that Francis Lewis Wills (died 1980 and a co-founder) did develop the negatives -- so if he was the photographer as well, there could in theory still be a copyright for a long time. But given that there was no human credit on the published items by the looks of it, and the law required that the identity become public by 1992 or so (70 years after the 1922 publication), and it still seems to be unknown -- I think this qualifies for {{PD-UK-unknown}} (as currently listed). Doing research and identifying an author today would not matter; such identification needs to happen in the first 70 years after publication (or creation if never published). Carl Lindberg (talk) 18:34, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
- Interesting, I hadn't heard about this 70 year rule. Commons:Deletion requests/File:Fundament relict of Watkin's Tower - 1922.jpg is similar, and I'm sure there are a lot of other Aerofilms images that would be worth having. --ghouston (talk) 22:39, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
- Oh, it's the implication of the 70 years mentioned on Template:PD-UK-unknown. --ghouston (talk) 22:41, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
- Wouldn't that also require that somebody had tried to ascertain the author by "reasonable enquiry" within the first 70 years, and somehow made the result of the enquiry public? I suppose a reasonable enquiry in this case would be asking Aerofilms or their descendent rights-holders who the author is. --ghouston (talk) 22:44, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
- Oh, it's the implication of the 70 years mentioned on Template:PD-UK-unknown. --ghouston (talk) 22:41, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
- Interesting, I hadn't heard about this 70 year rule. Commons:Deletion requests/File:Fundament relict of Watkin's Tower - 1922.jpg is similar, and I'm sure there are a lot of other Aerofilms images that would be worth having. --ghouston (talk) 22:39, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
- I think the company would have had to made it public. I'm not sure there is any guidance on the term; generally anonymous authors must make themselves known, or have it come out -- I'm guessing the reasonable enquiry would be seeing if there was any information in the literature out there. This is largely theoretical; the photograph would have expired 50 years after creation (per the old UK rule) and the new 70 year term was imposed in 1996, per the EU directive -- but that had likely already passed so it probably was not restored at all. I think if the author's identity became known in the 70 years, the new 70pma term would apply. But learning the author's name now (if not from a public source) I don't think would make a difference. If an author can't be found via a reasonably diligent internet search now, it's likely the name was not known within 70 years, and I think it's OK to assume that term. (In fact, if the UK had properly implemented the EU directive, companies of works for hire needed to name the human authors on their initial publication to get the 70pma term; if not the7 get 70 years from publication regardless of later author disclosure -- but don't think the UK implemented that clause.) Carl Lindberg (talk) 23:08, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
- Also, the "unknown" part implies it may be possible to use this tag even without knowing the provenance, rather than most "anonymous" laws which requires knowledge that a work was published anonymously. If we know the initial publications were anonymous, I'm not sure what else there would be to enquire about, other than the author becoming generally known later on. Carl Lindberg (talk) 23:13, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 19:29, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
If subject is uploader as would appear, this isn't a selfie. Permission from the photographer is needed. Notice Facebook size. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:21, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
- I was on vacation with my wife, Janice Byrd Fowler. She is not a member of this web site, but I'm pretty sure she grants me permission, just as I grant her permission automatically when I use her camera to photograph her. I have no doubt that you are being legalistic about this, but surely there is a point where this becomes rather oppressive. I hope your response, if any, will not require several extra steps to PROVE my ownership of the image taken by my wife with my camera. Or, is there perhaps a standard form we can submit that will cover ALL such spousal shots? Thank you. KFFOWLER (talk)
- It's really easy!! Please have Mrs. Fowler send in a version of the sample email at COM:OTRS! Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:12, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
- OK. But really?! I mean, we aren't trusted enough to be permitted to skip a step (that we don't quite understand; what exactly is COM:OTRS?)?? I can ask my wife to send an email, but I really think this is an imposition on her time and the very definition of officiousness. And anyway, how will you or anyone at wikimedia know that the sender is my wife? Do we need to file a scan of our marriage license too? I know you're trying to help, but C'mon, Guys! KFFOWLER (talk)
- My wife submitted the release form. I doubt we will be posting any more photos of this old actor from our visit to Elsinore. The red tape fuss puts me in mind of Dogberry trying to mind everyone's business. We wish there were more room for trust in ownership matters, especially with pictures that serve little purpose other than as tourist keepsakes. KFFOWLER (talk)
- @KFFOWLER: There exists a verdict in Germany where the action of spouses still doesn't act in the name of the member (BGH, Urteil vom 11. Mai 2011 – VIII ZR 289/09. So to avoid complicated legal situations it would be useful that your wife any way is sending a permission to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org.--Sanandros (talk) 23:18, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:20, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
"Unknown author" may be invalid, since it was apparently licensed by Simmons Aerofilms (according to w:Aerofilms it existed from 2001-2005) and perhaps they have records of who the photographer was. --ghouston (talk) 13:09, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
- perhaps, perhaps, perhaps. In the given source there isn't a photographer but Simmons Aerofilms as copyright holder. Independent from that this image was made available to the public more than 70 years ago, so we have public domain. Keep --Alabasterstein (talk) 14:37, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Admiralty Arch (14726933558).jpg is similar, and I'm sure there are a lot of other Aerofilms images that would be worth having. --ghouston (talk) 22:37, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- The publication date (and lack of credit) is a bit more obvious on that one, though this may still be OK. It sounds like we know of a source from a 2006 book, where no author credit was given. The question is if was this published earlier... if 2006 was the first publication, it would be OK in the UK (more than 70 years from creation without being published and without a named author). Although its U.S. copyright would last a while longer yet. If it was published in 1922, the lack of an author in the 2006 publication may not indicate that it was originally anonymous (though given that it probably came from the company, if they had no record of it, and were not in the habit of crediting the human photographers, it may be reasonable to assume that). The photo originally expired in the 1970s of course, since the old UK rule was 50 years from creation, so you'd have to see if copyright was restored in 1996. This one is a little less certain, but I'd lean Keep as it's probably PD in the UK, and (if published before 1989) probably OK in the US as well. Carl Lindberg (talk) 23:20, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
- The publication date (and lack of credit) is a bit more obvious on that one, though this may still be OK. It sounds like we know of a source from a 2006 book, where no author credit was given. The question is if was this published earlier... if 2006 was the first publication, it would be OK in the UK (more than 70 years from creation without being published and without a named author). Although its U.S. copyright would last a while longer yet. If it was published in 1922, the lack of an author in the 2006 publication may not indicate that it was originally anonymous (though given that it probably came from the company, if they had no record of it, and were not in the habit of crediting the human photographers, it may be reasonable to assume that). The photo originally expired in the 1970s of course, since the old UK rule was 50 years from creation, so you'd have to see if copyright was restored in 1996. This one is a little less certain, but I'd lean
- @Clindberg: "if 2006 was the first publication, it would be OK in the UK (more than 70 years from creation without being published and without a named author)" - no, I don't think it would be OK in the UK in that case, because the UK has implemented publication right, "a type of copyright granted to the publisher who first publishes a previously unpublished work after that work's original copyright has expired", see Wikipedia: "anyone who makes available to the public for the first time a previously-unpublished out-of-copyright work" is granted a "publication right" of 25 years. So, if an unpublished work that went into the public domain 70 years after creation is published for the first time in 2006, it's protected until 2031. Gestumblindi (talk) 21:30, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
- Yep, you're right, forgot about that in the above reply. Carl Lindberg (talk) 21:42, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 08:21, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
There's not enough reason to believe this photo was created by NASA. Damiens.rf 14:47, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
According to this interview with Margaret ([2]) it was taken by a Draper Lab photographer:
- Taken by the Draper Lab photographer in 1969 (during Apollo 11). Here, Margaret is shown standing beside listings of the software developed by the team she was in charge of, the LM and CM on-board flight software team
— M3TAinfo @ 17:40, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Also, at the time the photo was taken, Draper Labs was part of MIT. I think there's a reasonable fair use rationale for this image. — M3TAinfo @ 17:58, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
- We don't use fair use here. --Damiens.rf 16:50, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
Is there a standard for a presumed attribution? The problem raised here is equally true for many, many other historical photos. 50.1.50.209 23:53, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
- This credits it to NASA (scroll down). Bubba73 (talk) 02:02, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
The NASA credit in your link, and many other online copies of the image, presumably comes from Wikipedia, so is not useful for determining attribution. However the document I quoted above is an interview with Margaret Hamilton, where she is asked about this photograph. The question, and her response, are given (in full, this time) below. As you can see, it seems that the photograph was taken by Draper Lab staff, and used in an MIT Draper Lab document. Unfortunately, we have no further details as to the scope or purpose of the document, and I was unable to determine the original source.
- Was this picture taken during the Apollo project development? When was it taken and who took it?
- Here is a description of the photo excerpted from an MIT Draper Lab document:
- “Taken by the Draper Lab photographer in 1969 (during Apollo 11). Here, Margaret is shown standing beside listings of the software developed by the team she was in charge of, the LM and CM on-board flight software team”.
I still think there is a good fair-use case, as the photo is historically significant, although my understanding is that it would need to be moved from commons back to Wikipedia if that was determined to be the case. — M3TAinfo @ 05:58, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
- For God's sake we don't use fair use here! --Damiens.rf 16:50, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
- Sorry! I didn't realise this was in commons, not the main wikipedia. Good to see someone is looking into the Draper labs connecftion, though. — M3TAinfo @ 23:28, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
Actually, since MIT Draper Labs was acting as a NASA contractor when producing the Apollo software, a good case can be made that the rights belong to the US Government, and it can be treated as a NASA image, i.e. public domain? — M3TAinfo @ 06:01, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, absolutely. This is a PD case -- Draper was working on Apollo code on NASA money (most all of their work was government-funded work). -- Phoebe (talk) 13:44, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
- The photographer may have transferred the copyright to NASA. Also, if it was published before 1978 without a copyright notice, it is in the public domain. Bubba73 (talk) 16:10, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
- All those "maybe" are not enough reason to believe this photo was created by (or belongs to) NASA. --Damiens.rf 16:50, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
- @Damiens.rf: There is no need to be rude about it. People are trying to help. This is an important photo that has been widely used in Wikipedia (and on the news); you chose to try to make an example of it, when there are thousands and thousands of other totally clear-cut copyright violation cases on Commons to work on. -- Phoebe (talk) 13:49, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
- @Phoebe: , you're using the (English Wikipedia's) en:WP:OTHERCRAP argument. --Damiens.rf 12:24, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
- @Damiens.rf: There is no need to be rude about it. People are trying to help. This is an important photo that has been widely used in Wikipedia (and on the news); you chose to try to make an example of it, when there are thousands and thousands of other totally clear-cut copyright violation cases on Commons to work on. -- Phoebe (talk) 13:49, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
- All those "maybe" are not enough reason to believe this photo was created by (or belongs to) NASA. --Damiens.rf 16:50, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
I just messaged Draper Labs requesting for a Creative Commons license to be applied to the photo. I will let you know as soon as I hear back. Kees08 (talk) 07:06, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
- Make sure you follow the instructions in Commons:OTRS. Just telling us they gave you an 'ok' will not suffice. --Damiens.rf 19:48, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
- Of course. I'll give them a call tomorrow sometime if I do not hear anything back.Kees08 (talk) 06:54, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
- Just a note that this is still in progress -- I'm working on it too, am asking the Draper library. -- Phoebe (talk) 21:17, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
- And that is a good work! Keep us up to date. --Damiens.rf 12:24, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
- Just a note that this is still in progress -- I'm working on it too, am asking the Draper library. -- Phoebe (talk) 21:17, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
- Of course. I'll give them a call tomorrow sometime if I do not hear anything back.Kees08 (talk) 06:54, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:23, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
Copied from this page at hollandwest.com. Same applies to most of the other uploads by Mvwal, copied from other pages at hollandwest.com. No indication of CC license at hollandwest.com. If Mvwal is owner of hollandwest.com, needs an OTRS tag; if not, then delete as copyvio. MPF (talk) 15:25, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep - received an email from User:Mvwal indicating he is the owner of hollandwest.com; have responed with a request to head to OTRS - MPF (talk) 20:02, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
=== response from mvwal I am concerned about this process. I did a test upload of another picture and could not find a way to link it to my website even though it was uploaded from my computer. I also reviewed my uploads and could not find a way to add it after the fact. I do not know what a "CC license" is and how to add it to my website. hollandwest.com belongs to me (Mvwal) thus permission is implied. I will add what is needed to that site.
Deleted: this should go via OTRS. I am also very concerned by the "I do not know what a CC license is" comment. --Jcb (talk) 08:30, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
Fake. This is obviously a mirrored and badly edited copy of the copyrighted image ms:Fail:Babut.jpg, portraying a different species, Rheithrosciurus macrotis - the ms:Babut or en:Tufted ground squirrel. --KnightMove (talk) 15:23, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
- Addendum: As images of the Tufted Ground Squirrel (Rheithrosciurus macrotis) and the Cream-coloured giant squirrel (Ratufa affinis) easily prove, the claim in the original file is wrong (this is no way a Tufted Ground Squirrel), while the copy might be right in its claim. Still, the license and the procedure are not acceptable. --KnightMove (talk) 07:04, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:31, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Laberkiste as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: There is something strange with this video. When I try to open it in the YT video editor (wanted to download it to get the full video to Commons), I get: "Video is not usable due to a copyright claim."
I disagree, as there is absolutely no problem in downloading this video through an application (the JDownloader, in this case). No need for a speedy, here -
- Maybe I should have filed a "normal" deletion request. I merely tried to download the video via the "remix" option, where I got this message that I mentioned. I know how to rip videos, but I thought maybe I could download it there directly, since that might have been easier. I wonder why this copyright claim message comes up, since YouTube supports CC attribution and offers tools to do so correctly. Maybe it is preventive because the user got copyright strikes on other videos, but according to the YouTube CC FAQ your account needs to be in "good standing" to even upload CC videos. Also look at the users other uploads on YT, some of which are clearly not CC yet marked as such. --Laber□T 16:18, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
- Of course, a standard DR would have evidently been the correct course of action, as the channel is not obviously owned by a license launderer. I'll strike my keep, but let others discuss this! Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 17:23, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
- I didn't had any problem when I clicked on the download button.--Sanandros (talk) 19:46, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 08:36, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
