Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/02/14
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.svg){kind=link}
_(14589944197).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
Miserable quality alkab (talk) 00:10, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Delete, the nominator is fully right, no educational use possible (not even in some kind of explanation about how photography should not be done, as the file is lacking useful EXIF). Grand-Duc (talk) 04:53, 14 February 2016 (UTC)- Delete, only bad. --Hydro (talk) 08:52, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Julo (talk) 10:05, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 08:19, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Julo (talk) 10:10, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 09:33, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Julo (talk) 10:08, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Julo (talk) 10:09, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
unused, out of pedagogical scope Pippobuono (talk) 09:42, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Julo (talk) 10:07, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
I created category, but it has POV issues, changed to "Supreme Court of the United States caricatures" Callinus (talk) 07:36, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: empty category. --JuTa 14:44, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Piauíartigos (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Piauíartigos (serial copyright violator/file cropper/watermark remover) = 7 uploads on 16.11.2015 = 5x copyvio.
- File:Foliões do BOCADJEGUE.JPG
- File:ACS e coordenadora do Bloco Bocadjegue faz entrega dos presentes para crianças no natal São Joãonense.jpeg
Gunnex (talk) 12:25, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:08, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Screen from TV, Copyright violation Ciacho5 (talk) 11:17, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Christian Ferrer: Copyright violation: TV screencap
Derivative work of the icons? Or threshold of originality / low resolution of the icons? –Totie (talk) 22:21, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 19:35, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Infringes copyright Carlitoscarlos (talk) 20:56, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- @Krd: The user re-uploaded the image.–Totie (talk) 22:22, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:15, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
infringes copyright Carlitoscarlos (talk) 22:47, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: by Ellin Beltz; DR closed by Josve05a (talk) 09:55, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Нет Авторский права Абдырашит Сатылганов (talk) 14:56, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation. --Cambalachero (talk) 14:22, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Visit url. Out of commons scope. Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 13:35, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Non-trivial logo. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Defective SVG that transcludes raster images; orphaned and not up-to-date anyway. Leyo 16:40, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Kannst Du ruhig löschen! Uraltversion mit Bugs - wir haben das deutlich aktuellere PNG. --Elop (talk) 17:26, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and by uploader. --Emha (talk) 15:34, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
This screenshot is probably copyvio from a game Otourly (talk) 07:28, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko: Screenshot of non-free content: Game
No permission provided. My NPD template was reverted, that's why I start the regular deletion request. Masur (talk) 19:58, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Weak keep: File uploaded in 2009, and the only source currently available is Commons. Can we assume (and AGF) that this file was available at Flickr under the given license? --Amitie 10g (talk) 20:05, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: CV from [1]. --Masur (talk) 06:35, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
Given that all the other uploads of the user are copyright violation and there is no indication that this map is based on a freely licensed one, this is IMHO, a copyright violation. C messier (talk) 09:35, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:49, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
Given that all the other uploads of the user are copyright violation and there is no indication that this map is based on a freely licensed one, this is IMHO, a copyright violation. C messier (talk) 09:36, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:50, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
Unencyclopedic photo montage Mike Rosoft (talk) 18:08, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- I've restored this page to its original state as there was too much noise, and very little discernible argument in relation to the image. Please keep arguments short and to the point. Rodhullandemu (talk) 21:26, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per nom - worth noting that there are at least two other uploads that are or appear virtually identical and I'm not seeing anything actually relevant to Commons purpose here. --Herby talk thyme 17:31, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- As with Rodhullandemu's comment above, I've removed the ongoing and off topic comments from the uploader. They would simply seem to emphasise their lack of understanding of this project sadly. Equally - to me - the result of this DR will be applicable to the other very similar uploads by this user. --Herby talk thyme 07:52, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Motopark (talk) 23:05, 16 February 2016 (UTC),,,yes delete and sensorer the best to shut of My mouth,how to explain à Death hare Picture ,Joseph Beuys 😛(((King muh)))H
Deleted: per nomination - uploader appaers to agree too. --Herby talk thyme 13:24, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
Drawings by Tim Gooding/Lasse Kaukomaa; Image of drawings created by Tim Gooding; May, 1970: Sydney, Australia. Images scanned to files by Tim Gooding; January 2016; Sydney, Australia. Permission to reproduce granted.
Files uploaded by Errol chekhov (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical drawings. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
- File:City Magazine Inner Cover.pdf
- File:City Magazine CookaRoo Cover.pdf
- File:Dedication of The CookaRoo Monument.jpg
- File:Vertical Section of The CookaRoo Monument Showing Inner Workings.jpg
- File:Lower Body Detail of The CookaRoo Monument.JPG
- File:Upper Body Detail of The CookaRoo Monument.JPG
- File:Legend of The CookaRoo Monument.JPG
- File:Artist's Impression of The CookaRoo Pawtal and Location Map of Monument.jpg
- File:Artist's Impression of Two Features of The CookaRoo.jpg
- File:The CookaRoo and Vertical Section.jpg
- File:The CookaRoo with Legend.JPG
- File:The CookaRoo.JPG
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 14 February 2016
(UTC Drawings by Tim Gooding/Lasse Kaukomaa; Image of drawings created by Tim Gooding; May, 1970: Sydney, Australia. Images scanned to files by Tim Gooding; January 2016; Sydney, Australia.
Kept: OTRS ticket received. -- Darwin Ahoy! 02:07, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in The United States. w:Partners (statue) appears to be from 1993.
- File:Cinderella Castle and Partners statue at Magic Kingdom.jpg
- File:Magic Kingdom (21909594313).jpg
- File:Magic Kingdom (22342841320).jpg
- File:Partners (3470009703) (2).jpg
- File:Partners (5310828267).jpg
- File:Partners statue at Magic Kingdom.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Stefan2 (talk) 23:22, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete FOP exception doesn't exist in the US. epicgenius (talk) 03:38, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:09, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
No FoP in USA. The statue is not DM and is part of the whole composition in each images.
- File:Cinderella Castle and Walt and Mickey Statue Magic Kingdom Panorama 2009 (3985545934).jpg
- File:Cinderella Castle with Partners.jpg
- File:MKPlazaRehab04 (20602554168).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:34, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 17:36, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
DR started as imho commercial advertisements, and tagges as "www.facebook...", Roland zh (talk) 23:30, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:09, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
While this picture may be acceptable in some Wikipedia versions under a "fair use" policy, I can't see how it is available under a free license. PanchoS (talk) 23:33, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:08, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work' as p.e. missing exif, and media not in use within Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 23:43, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:08, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Not too simple logo, there are complex figures in the fist and rose logo, specially with the curves of the rose drawing. Sfs90 (talk) 23:58, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:07, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Not too simple logo, there are complex figures in the fist and rose logo, specially with the curves of the rose drawing. Sfs90 (talk) 23:59, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:07, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata. Seems, that uploader and author are different. OTRS-permission from real photographer is needed. Taivo (talk) 09:32, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:07, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
i don't need this file Kangaroogears (talk) 09:33, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:05, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
i don't need this image Kangaroogears (talk) 09:39, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:05, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Claimed source is a major newspaper (The Hindu), no credible indication of free use. See also photo in http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-features/tp-fridayreview/a-star-fades-away/article3231270.ece Dl2000 (talk) 16:53, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 10:58, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Files in Category:Barbara Dimanski
[edit]German stamps review. The author of these stamps is still alive.
- File:1999-kindermarke.JPG
- File:Briefmarke Berliner Dom.jpg
- File:DPAG 2007 2617 75 Jahre Saaletalsperre Bleiloch.jpg
- File:DPAG 2008 50 Jahre Lebenshilfe.jpg
- File:DPAG 2010 45 Deutsche Einheit.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 1998 MiNr2011 Franckesche Stiftungen.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 1999 MiNr2065 Dominikus-Ringeisen-Werk.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 1999 MiNr2072 Kindermarke.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 2003 Block61 Knabenchöre.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 2003 MiNr2318 Regensburger Domspatzen.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 2003 MiNr2319 Dresdner Kreuzchor.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 2003 MiNr2319 Thomanerchor Leipzig.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 2004 Block65 Klassisches Theater.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 2004 MiNr2391 Wilhelm Tell.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 2004 MiNr2392 Faust II.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 2004 MiNr2407 Nationalparke Wattenmeer.jpg
Liliana-60 (talk) 00:46, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:33, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
published in 2011 here and in 2012 here, no compatible license stated in the website ☣Banjo tell me 00:51, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:34, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope and unused personal photo. Commons is not a private photo album. ★ Poké95 01:58, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Support Has no educational use. Riley Huntley (talk) 04:32, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:34, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Scope? Looks like an unused selfie Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:17, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Out of project scope - was used in four-times-deleted en:Rachael Ieszenberg. JohnCD (talk) 11:05, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:34, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope, used for hoax article on a fictional country on enwiki Acroterion (talk) 04:34, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:35, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
scope? own work?
Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:42, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:35, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry speedy deleted. Gunnex (talk) 07:29, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:35, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Miguel Lofresi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used.
Gunnex (talk) 07:40, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:35, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Abdella Ame Mussa (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope -- we do not keep images of text. Text must be set in wiki-markup where needed.
- File:The name of Allah Al-Ghafur .png
- File:The name of Allah Al-Azim.jpg
- File:The name of Allah Al-Haleem.jpg
File:Abdella Ame Mussa.pngthere is a separate DR for this image and it is not a text --Jarekt (talk) 14:17, 16 February 2016 (UTC)- File:The name of Allah Al-khabir.png
- File:The name of Allah Al-Latif.jpg
- File:The name of Allah Al-Adl .jpg
- File:The name of Allah Al-Hakam .jpg
- File:The name of Allah Al-Basir.jpg
- File:The name of Allah Al-Sami.jpg
- File:The name of Allah Al-Muzill.gif
- File:The name of Allah Al-Mu'izz.jpg
- File:The name of Allah Ar-Rafi.gif
- File:The name of Allah Al-khafiz.jpg
- File:The name of Allah Al-Basit.gif
- File:The name of Allah Al-Qabid.jpg
- File:The name of Allah Al-Fattah.jpg
- File:The name of Allah Al-Razzaq .png
- File:The name of Allah Al wahab.png
- File:The name of Allah Al-Qahhar.png
- File:The name of Allah Al-Musawwir.gif
- File:The name of Allah Al-Bari .gif
- File:The name of Allah Al-Khaliq.gif
- File:The name of Allah Al Mutakabbir.jpg
- File:The name of Allah Al-Jabbar.png
- File:The name of allah al muheymin.gif
- File:The name of allah as-salam.jpg
- File:The name of Allah Al-Alim.png
- File:The name of Allah As-Salam.gif
- File:The name of Allah Ar-Rahman .png
. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:22, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- File:The name of Allah Al-Hafiz.png
- File:The name of Allah Al-Kabir.jpg
- File:The name of Allah Al-Aliyyu.jpg
- File:The name of Allah Ash-Shakur.jpg
Add--Infinite0694 (talk) 14:30, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Here is the gallery of the images:
--Jarekt (talk) 14:09, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. Images of text would be OK if they fall withing the scope of Category:Arabic calligraphy, but this seems to be generic font. --Jarekt (talk) 14:17, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:37, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope. Test answer key. Likely copyrighted. Uncle Milty (talk) 21:52, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:26, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope. Test answer key. Likely copyrighted. Uncle Milty (talk) 21:52, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:26, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolution, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:M2f0 = 4 uploads since 13.02.2016 = 3x copyvio Gunnex (talk) 22:13, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:24, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Unused (jpg) logo. No clear scope. Josve05a (talk) 22:16, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:24, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Unused (jpg) logo. No clear scope. Josve05a (talk) 22:21, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:23, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
The picture, that seems to be a professional one, appears in several websites and no OTRS release approval has been sent. It cannot stay in the Commons in this situation. Ldorfman (talk) 22:27, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:23, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
I can't find the original source for this image, but it contains a watermark. Additionally, this image has existed elswhere for over a year, like on this Tumblr post at a higher resolution (480×720 pixels), indicating that this is not the work of the uploader and may very well be a copyright violation. — ξxplicit 22:29, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:22, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as p.e. thumbnail format and missing exif, Roland zh (talk) 22:35, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:22, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as p.e. thumbnail format and missing exif, Roland zh (talk) 22:36, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:21, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as p.e. EXIF missing and rather small format, see also File:Jeethu (cropped).jpg, Roland zh (talk) 23:13, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:20, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Not own work, small size indicates taken from internet, a quick google search throws multiple results for the image ☣Banjo tell me 01:07, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:16, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
taken from a news website, publised there in 2014 ☣Banjo tell me 01:27, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:16, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Clearly not own work; see a different crop of the image in the video at http://www.ryot.org/meet-americas-most-influential-immigrants/945571 GRuban (talk) 02:14, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:17, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
out of project scope Didym (talk) 02:49, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:18, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:50, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:21, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Poor quality; replaced by File:MPH-RRA.png by the same uploader. Leyo 00:34, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 04:12, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
(c) packaging Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:11, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:59, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry speedy deleted. Gunnex (talk) 08:16, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:59, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
see watermark in first version Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:31, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 21:17, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Unfortunately, the original image is copyrighted by the Guardian, so the clear derivative at DeviantArt can't be released without the Guardian's permission. GRuban (talk) 04:41, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:19, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unencyclopedic fantasy flag without any basis in fact. It's symbolism includes all components of the United Kingdom, not just SCotland. It is not realistically useful for educational purpose and is out of project scope. Secondarywaltz (talk) 04:56, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:19, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
unused personal files
2003:45:5C21:3401:49B1:1933:24D3:F90D 05:21, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:19, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely own work. Photoshopped collage of 12 (cartoon) characters related somehow to American writer en:Lauren Kate's "Fallen Series" (young adult fiction). Uploaded on 14.11.2015 from and for ptwiki. Gunnex (talk) 07:58, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:20, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope. Self portrait used on self-promotional user pages Uncle Milty (talk) 08:01, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:20, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry 3x speedy deleted. If IN scope needs permission via https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10201675856137383&set=a.1259957198242.30435.1809031420&type=3&theater (2014) Gunnex (talk) 08:03, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:20, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rohit07singh (talk · contribs)
[edit]"All rights reserved. Any usage of the photo without permission are prohibited."
2003:45:5C21:3401:49B1:1933:24D3:F90D 09:01, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:22, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Questionable claims of the uploader being the copyright holder based on the low/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent metadata, and the uploader's history. As noted in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Brevard Childs.jpg, looking at en:Special:Log/Pavani and comparing it to other files that have not yet been transferred, it looks like the user uploaded a bunch of files with the file description "Rights with the author. / I, the copyright holder..." even for files where she is clearly not the author, which suggests that she either does not understand or does not care what the words "copyright holder" actually mean.
Looking at the log for File:Gerhard von Rad.jpg and the similarities between en:Special:Log/Grbpradeep, en:Special:Log/Preethi Evangeline and en:Special:Log/Pavani (all containing this odd "Rights with the author" sentence fragment), I'm inclined to suspect that there's either sockpuppetry or meatpuppetry going on. Thus, Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Grbpradeep and Commons:Deletion requests/File:K.david1.jpg may be seen as related.
Files transferred to Commons as of this writing:
- File:Gnana Robinson in Dehradun with other Indian Theologians.jpg
- File:Premasagar10.jpg (I'm not sure what's going on with the file description for this one. It seems to be for a completely different file. The log at the English Wikipedia is here.)
- File:Premasagar11.jpg
- File:Premasagar4.jpg
- File:Premasagar5.jpg
- File:Premasagar6.jpg
- File:Premasagar8.jpg
- File:Premasagar9.jpg
- File:Surya Prakash 1.jpg
- File:Surya Prakash 2.jpg
- File:Utc bengaluru.jpg
—LX (talk, contribs) 10:27, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:23, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Grbpradeep (talk · contribs)
[edit]Questionable claims of the uploader being the copyright holder based on the low/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent metadata, and the uploader's history. Looking at en:Special:Log/Grbpradeep and comparing it to other files that have not yet been transferred, it looks like the user uploaded a bunch of files with the file description "Rights with the author. / I, the copyright holder..." even for files where he is clearly not the author, which suggests that he either does not understand or does not care what the words "copyright holder" actually mean.
The uploader is indefinitely blocked at the English Wikipedia since 2012-03-26 for repeatedly uploading copyright violations.
Looking at the log for File:Gerhard von Rad.jpg and the similarities between en:Special:Log/Grbpradeep, en:Special:Log/Preethi Evangeline and en:Special:Log/Pavani (all containing this odd "Rights with the author" sentence fragment), I'm inclined to suspect that there's either sockpuppetry or meatpuppetry going on. Thus, Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Pavani at English Wikipedia and Commons:Deletion requests/File:K.david1.jpg may be seen as related.
Files uploaded directly to Commons or transferred here as of this writing:
- File:Abhiruchi.jpg
- File:Ac college one.JPG
- File:Ac college three.jpg
- File:Ac college two.JPG
- File:Co-Canada.jpg
- File:E. C. John.jpg
- File:Hooghly.JPG
- File:H. Sumitra.jpg
- File:Juhanon Mar Thoma.jpg
- File:Kolleru Lake at dusk.jpg
- File:Man on Indian beach.jpg
- File:Navnirmaan meal.jpg
- File:Navnirmaan people.jpg
- File:Prakasam district salt panners.jpg
- File:Punarnirmaan politicians 1.jpg
- File:Punarnirmaan politicians 2.jpg
- File:Ravulapalem children.jpg
- File:R. R. Sundara Rao.jpg
- File:Sugandhar.gif
- File:W. D. Coleman.jpg
- File:Wuppertal III.jpg
—LX (talk, contribs) 10:27, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete There seem to be too many camera models for "own work" to be credible. Also, a few pictures, such as File:Juhanon Mar Thoma.jpg and File:W. D. Coleman.jpg, look like scans of newspapers or other publications. Also note that a bunch of files were listed at w:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2016 February 14#Files uploaded by Grbpradeep. --Stefan2 (talk) 16:19, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:23, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Likely copyright violation, not own work. According to this use of the image, it's from the January 2015 edition of a magazine. No indication that it's freely licensed, though the uploader claimed via IRC that it is. Huon (talk) 10:36, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as having questionable copyright provenance. Should probably just be tagged with
{{subst:npd}}. The uploader will need to go through OTRS anyway given it's got prior publishing history. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 21:24, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:24, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
one source picture missing Picture collection must collect from local picture from Commons, please upload first every picture to Commons and then collect it from those. Please take a look at File:Collage Rome.jpg as an example how to do it. See Commons:Collages for details. Motopark (talk) 18:42, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:25, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
This is outdated photos. Modern photo's should be uploaded Shafikochi123 (talk) 10:45, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion -- file is widely used. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:25, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Files of User:NachosyQueso
[edit]- File:David and his parents.jpg
- File:Ron&David.jpg
- File:David 5.jpg
- File:David 6.jpg
- File:David 7.jpg
- File:David 4.jpg
- File:David 3.jpg
- File:David Brandhosrt.jpg
- File:David 1.jpg
- File:Brandhorst- Gamboa family.jpg
- File:Daniel and David.jpg
- File:Juliana, 2001.jpg
- File:Juliana and his dad David.jpg
- File:Juliana 5.jpg
- File:Juliana and her mother Ruth.jpg
- File:Juliana 4.jpg
- File:Juliana 1.jpg
- File:Juliana 3.jpg
- File:Juliana 2.jpg
- File:Falkenberg family in Disney.jpg
- File:Falkenberg family.jpg
- File:Dana and Zoe.jpg
- File:Dana, Zoe and their dad.jpg
- File:Dana Falkenberg.jpg
- File:Dana 2.jpg
- File:Zoe 2.jpg
- File:Dana and Zoe 2.jpg
- File:Rodney 1.jpg
- File:Bernand.jpg
- File:Asia 4.jpg
- File:Asia 5.jpg
- File:Asia 3.jpg
- File:Asia 2.jpg
- File:Asia 1.jpg
- File:Christine and her parents.jpg
- File:Christine's family.jpg
- File:Christine and her mom Sue.png
- File:Christine 8.jpg
- File:Christine 2.jpg
- File:Christine 6.jpg
- File:Christine 7.jpg
- File:Christine 3.jpg
- File:Christine 5.jpg
- File:Christine Lee Hanson.jpg
- File:Christine Hanson.jpg
Commons isn't Flickr. --Sismarinho (talk) 10:46, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. As private image collections, these are out of scope. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:23, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:30, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Recent architecture (with reference to contemporary artiste Viallat). No FoP in France. Authorization needed. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 13:42, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:30, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Misleading graph presenting "something" and that's the most precise description. Misleading title: media - in fact it's a mix of webportals, randomly chosen TV programs and TV stations. Source of data: "Facebook" is as precise description as "source: internet", or "source: library". What is the datasource? Y axis shows thousands of... views? Likes? followers? Nobody knows. In what time period? Since times immemorial? Pseudo-information is worse than no information, and therefore I nominate the file for deletion. Felis domestica (talk) 13:42, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: Image is used on the Polish Wikipedia about an article about some kind of TV station (I presume). I don't understand Polish, but apparently the image is related to the article text. JIP (talk) 15:22, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Used to be used ;) presumably to boost the notability of the said article, but it did not help, as the article was, after discussion deleted and partially integrated with another one (about its creator, pl:Mariusz Max Kolonko)--Felis domestica (talk) 11:08, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- I don't understand a single word of the discussion, not even to know what the actual outcome was, but it looks like the image isn't used there any more. JIP (talk) 21:33, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Used to be used ;) presumably to boost the notability of the said article, but it did not help, as the article was, after discussion deleted and partially integrated with another one (about its creator, pl:Mariusz Max Kolonko)--Felis domestica (talk) 11:08, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:30, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Non-encyclopedic - only use was on user's en.wikipedia page which was deleted for U5 Bad Weather 2014 My work | What's wrong? 13:43, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:30, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mdaliansari452 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Collection of unused private images, out of COM:SCOPE.
- File:Md alia ansari.jpg
- File:Mona parveen.jpg
- File:MD ALI ANSARI B.jpg
- File:MD ALI ANSARI C.jpg
- File:MD ALI ANSARI A.jpg
- File:Md ali ansari-wikipedia.png
Achim (talk) 14:07, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:31, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
COM:DW // COM:PACKAGING Josve05a (talk) 14:35, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:32, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Depicted person was born in 1946, so this is not 2005 photo, but much older. Own work is in doubt. Who is the photographer and does (s)he allow free publishing of the photo? Taivo (talk) 14:49, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:32, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
File is empty, has 0x0 pixels. Same is true for all 6 files loaded up by this user. ProfessorX (talk) 15:21, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. An empty image is useless by default. JIP (talk) 15:25, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
And these too, please:
- File:Fangruida 2009.jpg
- File:Fangruida photo 2012.jpg
- File:Fangruida image.jpg
- File:Fangruida.jpg
- File:Prof.fangruida.jpg
--ProfessorX (talk) 17:53, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:33, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Empty file, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 15:37, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:48, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ideas Abstractas (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal images : out of scope
- File:Víctor Andrés Gámez (Ideas Abstractas) 4.png
- File:Víctor Andrés Gámez (Ideas Abstractas) 3.jpg
- File:Víctor Andrés Gámez (Ideas Abstractas) 8.JPG
- File:Víctor Andrés Gámez (Ideas Abstractas) 5.png
- File:Víctor Andrés Gámez (Ideas Abstractas) 6.png
- File:Víctor Andrés Gámez (Ideas Abstractas) 7.JPG
- File:Dibujo de Víctor Andrés Gámez (Ideas Abstractas) 1.jpg
- File:Víctor Andrés Gámez (Ideas Abstractas) 2.jpg
- File:Víctor Andrés Gámez (Ideas Abstractas).jpg
- File:Víctor Andrés Gámez.jpg
_4.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_3.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_8.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_5.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_6.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_7.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:40, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:33, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Víctor Reyes Molina (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal images : out of scope
Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:41, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:33, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Абдырашит Сатылганов (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Carrot cupcake.jpg
- File:Life hacking cupcake KG.jpg
- File:Classic cupcake 2.jpg
- File:Classic cupcake 3.jpg
- File:Classic Cupcake 1.jpg
- File:Kaira Abazbekova.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:33, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Абдырашит Сатылганов (talk · contribs)
[edit]is it below TOO?
Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:14, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:55, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
As discussed here, it seems that this file may have still been copyrighted in Norway at the URAA date and thus was recopyrighted in the US until 2059. While this file may be PD in Norway since 2014 and it's licensed as CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0, that license is not free enough to satisfy our policy requirements for US copyrights. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 17:01, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete No evidence that this is in the public domain in the United States. The copyright seems to have expired in Norway in 2014, which was after 1996. The copyright term therefore runs for 95 years from publication in the United States. --Stefan2 (talk) 17:29, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:34, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mark Gil B. Alcover (talk · contribs)
[edit]Images of very limited- if any- educational use, and not currently in use for personal purposes.
- File:Food time.jpg
- File:Golf course Iligan City.jpg - Generic-looking section of golf course, non-golfing person in way renders even less useful
- File:Al pardan EAting ttime.jpg
- File:The Wedding.jpg - Might be a case for keeping this one as a representative of a "wedding" or something. Probably not.
- File:Iligan Capitol College.jpg
- File:Qatar whitehouse garden.jpg
- File:Qatar ventage car show Al wakra.jpg
Ubcule (talk) 18:20, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:34, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by A claudytta a (talk · contribs)
[edit]All this user's uploads appear to be by the Chilean painter "David Amaltes" (except the photograph *of* Amaltes), but there is no clear evidence of any connection between him/her and Amaltes, nor is there evidence that permission was given to upload them under a free license.
Google translation into Spanish: "Todos los archivos del usuario parecen ser por el pintor chileno "David Amaltes" (excepto la fotografía * de * Amaltes), pero hay hay una clara evidencia de cualquier conexión entre él / ella y Amaltes, ni hay pruebas de que se le dio permiso para subirlos bajo una licencia libre."
- File:La Furia del Mar por el Pintor Amaltés..jpeg
- File:Estación Mapocho por el Pintor Amaltés..jpg
- File:Carnaval de Venecia. Amaltés..jpg
- File:Paseo Bulnes..jpg
- File:Amaltes en su taller.JPG
- File:Paraque Forestal por Amáltes.JPG
- File:Alameda con 18 de septiembre por Amaltés.JPG
Ubcule (talk) 18:41, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:35, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Spam promoting barcode label maker. (Google translation: "هرزنامه ترویج برچسب بارکد ساز.")
- File:نرم افزارهای تخصصی چاپ.jpg
- File:شماره زن.jpg
- File:بارکد.jpg
- File:Smart barcode maker fasoftco.png
Ubcule (talk) 20:04, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:35, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
_(14589944197).jpg){kind=link}
_(14589944197).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
bad quality, black and white, better files see Category:02. Joachim among the Shepherds Oursana (talk) 23:00, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
_(14589944197).jpg){kind=link}
- It's a good scan of the original B&W print in the book. I have reduced the moiré effect and reuploaded. Amongst other things, it is interesting to compare modern photographs with how the artwork would have been studied back then, and, as it happens, none of the images in the category referenced are high resolution, certainly they are lower than the resolution of this scan. --Fæ (talk) 23:29, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Fæ's reasons are more than sufficient. - Jmabel ! talk 02:03, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:37, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
_(14589944197).jpg){kind=link}
Incorrect structure: hydrogen bound to the nitrogen missing. Replaced by File:Chromen-2-one (SNDRI).png. Leyo 00:31, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Delete Replacement is obviously better fileformat, but both are ambiguous (and actually geometrically incorrect) about the orientation of the oxygen coming off the tropane carbon. DMacks (talk) 19:27, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- {{Disputed chem}} should be added to the PNG version, then. --Leyo 14:47, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
- Done. DMacks (talk) 07:30, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 00:37, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal image. Policy allows one or two personal images for user pages of active contributors, but "active" and "contributor" must come first. Commons is not Facebook. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:26, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: no license at all. --JuTa 03:35, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- File:Mullah Mustafa Barzani in Kurdistan, Iraq in 1965.jpg
- File:Mullah Mustafa Barzani, Northern Iraq, 1965 by William Carter.jpg
Copyvio. The author of this photograph William Carter is still alive. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mustafa barzani.jpg. Takabeg (talk) 11:12, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:55, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Selfie used in deleted autobio en:Uday bhan singh. JohnCD (talk) 21:31, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 20:25, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
On English Wikipedia, it says Previously published: https://www.facebook.com/Matakana-War-Memorial-703648379697232/timeline/. I can't find any apparent connection with the Facebook page and the uploader, but I can't find the image on that page either. Stefan2 (talk) 00:13, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination https://www.facebook.com/703648379697232/photos/pb.703648379697232.-2207520000.1456811798./725764794152257/?type=3&theater. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:57, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Likely taken from http://sport.rs/17998-sjaj-i-beda-srpskog-fudbala-47-povratak-lake-konjice/ Ytoyoda (talk) 05:16, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, or from http://fkbskbatajnica.weebly.com/. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:55, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
unused personal file 2003:45:5C21:3401:49B1:1933:24D3:F90D 05:19, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. No educational value. Someone has mistaken Commons for a social network site. JIP (talk) 15:17, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:52, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Screenshot of non-free software ViperSnake151 (talk) 05:23, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:58, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Deepak1993 (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused personal files
- File:Deepakdeepak kumar azaad kapurthala.jpg
- File:Deepak azaad kpt.JPG
- File:Deepak kumar azaad kapurthala.jpg
2003:45:5C21:3401:49B1:1933:24D3:F90D 05:39, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:59, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
unused personal file 2003:45:5C21:3401:49B1:1933:24D3:F90D 05:42, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Commons is not a social network site. Image file name is too generic. JIP (talk) 15:18, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:59, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
OTRS ticket required 2003:45:5C21:3401:49B1:1933:24D3:F90D 05:45, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, also maybe out of scope as it seems to be self promotion, also it is a photomontage with lacks of source. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:01, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
no permission 2003:45:5C21:3401:49B1:1933:24D3:F90D 05:45, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination [2]. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:02, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
unused personal file 2003:45:5C21:3401:49B1:1933:24D3:F90D 05:47, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Image is of no use in Commons and has no education value. Image file name is misleading as image doesn't show actual defecation. JIP (talk) 15:18, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:03, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
no permission 2003:45:5C21:3401:49B1:1933:24D3:F90D 05:48, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination or also maybe out of scope self promotion/ personal artwork. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:08, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:53, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete -per nominator (COM:PS). Anupmehra -Let's talk! 03:19, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:09, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
unused selfie Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:59, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:09, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
own work? I don't think so. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:45, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:12, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:CJSC_Chernigov_Oil_Refinery.jpg&action=edit Tknft (talk) 08:16, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: , no author, no license, also it seems to be a complex logo. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:14, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
no permission 2003:45:5C21:3401:49B1:1933:24D3:F90D 08:41, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, derivative wotk. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:15, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Probably copyvio: low-resolution version of an image, larger versions of which are available on many Russian websites, e.g. at http://static.kulinarika.ru/media/cache/popup_image/u/image/product/31.jpg Off-shell (talk) 08:42, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination : older and bigger versions on the web. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:16, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
derivative work? 2003:45:5C21:3401:D0C:EDFE:D152:8792 14:17, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, photo of photo. Taivo (talk) 11:14, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Only the attribution, attribution-sharealike and public domain dedication creative commons licenses are acceptable to Commons. The other flickr licenses are not including public domain-mark since it can be revoked by the copyright holder. Leoboudv (talk) 09:21, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 19:22, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Es wird das Firmenzeichen der Firma ALDI verwendet. Ich weiß nicht, ob das in dieser Form auf einem Faschingswagen zulässig ist. A. Köppl (talk) 13:54, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request and no license. --JuTa 20:02, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Can't find any recognized copyright information Suchichi02 (talk) 05:44, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete: This edit by the uploader would seem to imply that they are not actually the photographer or copyright owner, so evidence of permission for reuse on Commons will be required. --DAJF (talk) 08:36, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- 我的本名就是「陳建弘」，這張圖像是我親自拍攝上傳。--Chen Jian Hong Sega (talk) 17:17, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- @Chen Jian Hong Sega: A wider version of the image was posted on Twitter before it was uploaded here. [3] Because of this, we need verification that you are indeed the owner of the image, and did not just take it from there (people do so constantly, unfortunately). Probably the easiest way to do so would be to simply tweet a confirmation, and then link it here. Revent (talk) 18:47, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- 我的本名就是「陳建弘」，這張圖像是我親自拍攝上傳。--Chen Jian Hong Sega (talk) 17:17, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Comment Note to closing admin: See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mai Fuchigami.JPG, and my statement there. Revent (talk) 00:05, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, please send OTRS-permission and the file will be restored. Taivo (talk) 07:57, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Can't find any recognized copyright information Suchichi02 (talk) 05:44, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete: Missing permission. This edit by the uploader on another image uploaded at the same time would seem to imply that they are not actually the photographer or copyright owner, so evidence of permission for reuse on Commons will be required. --DAJF (talk) 08:36, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- 我的本名就是「陳建弘」，這張圖像是我親自拍攝上傳。--Chen Jian Hong Sega (talk) 17:16, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Comment Note to closing administrator: See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ai Kayano.JPG. The uploader seems to not understand English, but has (apparently, by translation) claimed to be the author. The uploader has edit warred to remove the DR notices from both images, and continued to do so after being warned (with the template, which is translated), although not after given a second (final) warning. In the case of the 'other' image, a request to provide verification due to a prior publication of a wider image was not responded to, but the uploader edited (reverted the DR notices) after being pinged, and so presumably saw the request. Revent (talk) 00:03, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, please send OTRS-permission and the file will be restored. Taivo (talk) 07:54, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
According to the file description, this is an image of the mascot "Tenpī" of the japanese "Shimane Prefectural Sanbe Natur Hall". So it is definitively a derivative of some kind of official work. Thus, the "Own-Work"-licensing is wrong, and we need clarification about the ability to be hosted on Commons. Is this creation older than 50 years, assuming that it was made on behalf of a local administrative agency? Grand-Duc (talk) 04:34, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Probably not own work. --BrightRaven (talk) 15:50, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Duplicates of images can be found here : 
Thatonewikiguy (talk) 06:00, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: The other image is not an exact duplicate: it is cropped. --BrightRaven (talk) 15:52, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
The program is not from 2016, only the photo of it, and the uploader can not be the copright owner Yger (talk) 06:35, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: The photographs are covered by {{PD-Sweden-photo}}. The rest of the poster is ineligible for copyright, so I think we can keep it. --BrightRaven (talk) 16:11, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Selfie (COM:SELFIE). Sismarinho (talk) 10:21, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: out of scope. --BrightRaven (talk) 16:18, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of project scope. Selfie used in deleted en:Manish kumar. JohnCD (talk) 10:56, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --BrightRaven (talk) 16:19, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
File name with double extension jpg Tangopaso (talk) 10:57, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: useless redirect. --BrightRaven (talk) 16:20, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Own work is unlikely. The photo is in en.wiki only as fair use. Terms of use of source site http://www.esa.int/Services/Terms_and_conditions license all contents on site under non-commercial, no derivatives clause. Taivo (talk) 12:11, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --BrightRaven (talk) 16:22, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Recent architecture. No FoP in France. Authorization needed. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 12:34, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --BrightRaven (talk) 16:23, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
- also file:CREED HIMALAYA.jpg
Copyrighted packaging? Taivo (talk) 12:46, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted and kept: Channel n° 5 packaging is ineligible for copyright. The bottle itself is a utilitarian object. The label is simple text. --BrightRaven (talk) 16:26, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely authorship claims based on the low resolution, missing metadata, and the nature of the image. —LX (talk, contribs) 09:41, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 10:34, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Scanned page from a paper of an Israeli organization. No OTRS release approval has been sent for it. Wikimedia Commons is not a repository for just anything. It has no place in the Commons. Ldorfman (talk) 11:49, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Copyright and scope issues. --Storkk (talk) 10:35, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Private travel picture Zenwort (talk) 09:02, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Commons is not a personal travel blog. Image is far too small to be of any use. JIP (talk) 15:19, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: in all cases asmall duplicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Biondi.Leshan.grande.jpg. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:39, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
© Jonas Rosquist http://www.pbase.com/grefven/image/112183098 Alexandronikos (talk) 09:05, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:42, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Work of an artist which is still alive Shev123 (talk) 09:09, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, FoP not ok in Belgium. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:50, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Private travel picture Zenwort (talk) 09:02, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Commons is not a personal travel blog. JIP (talk) 15:20, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep notable people, in use, image with EXIF. Despite not a very big resolution, I see no reason to delete. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:41, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: as per C. Ferrer. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:52, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Duplicate of : 
Thatonewikiguy (talk) 10:52, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:53, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Weliton Leite (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Both related ptwiki entries [speedy] deleted.
Gunnex (talk) 12:14, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:53, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 12:28, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:54, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Visit url. Out of commons scope. Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 13:30, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Questionable own work claim. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Nahsik01. --Stefan2 (talk) 16:20, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:54, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Non-encyclopedic - only use was on user's en.wikipedia page which was deleted for U5. Bad Weather 2014 My work | What's wrong? 13:41, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:55, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Extremely low quality photo taken from a computer screen of an image of unknown copyright status. Takeaway (talk) 13:56, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:55, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
unused with no real description image, out of scope Pippobuono (talk) 14:27, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:56, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
author request — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.6.159.85 (talk • contribs) 2016-02-12T15:00:04 (UTC)
Deleted: unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:57, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Unused logo. No clear scope. Josve05a (talk) 15:03, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:57, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Image is used solely for self-promotion. The original image description (since removed) consists of a resumé, which indicates the uploader is using Commons solely for promoting himself. Image has no educational value. It is hopelessly miscategorised. JIP (talk) 15:05, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. As the nom says, this is being used for self-promotion. Even though the resume was removed, we're still left with an unencyclopedic image. As far as I'm aware, there's no current shortage of selfies. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:01, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:58, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
out of scope 2003:45:5C21:3401:D0C:EDFE:D152:8792 15:06, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:59, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:00, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
unused personal image : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:45, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:00, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nacho54321 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:01, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:01, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:01, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:02, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:02, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.wired.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/LaFerrari007.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:03, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.las2orillas.co/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/vestido_de_bano_choco.png. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:03, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:02, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Screenshot from TV series. ("Muhteşem Yüzyıl Kösem") Dr. Coal (talk) 16:40, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:03, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope. Ubcule (talk) 17:00, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:04, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Personal-use image on misused userpages belonging to non-contributing user at English and Indonesian Wikipedias, removed from use there. (COM:NOTHOST and en:WP:NOTHOST) Ubcule (talk) 17:22, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:04, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
unnecessary redirect Kopiersperre (talk) 17:35, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:05, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Out of scope. Slogan translates as "doctor dentist"; assumed to be uploader or person of no obvious notability, not used for personal purposes. Ubcule (talk) 18:04, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:05, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal-use image of uploader. Ubcule (talk) 18:06, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:06, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
A person of no notability. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 18:25, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:06, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Andrewshenn (talk · contribs)
[edit]No clear indication of why this person is notable, evidence suggests that it is the uploader himself (possibly using a different name) since File:Alaa Zoheiry.jpg was formerly pasted onto NOTHOST userpage at en.wikipedia from non-contributing user. (Image with title using Arabic text appears to be same name as others (allowing for variations in transliteration) so assumed all to be same person)
Ubcule (talk) 18:33, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:07, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Out-of-scope (and unused for personal purposes) selfie of uploader who has not otherwise contributed to the project. Commons is not your personal webhost. Ubcule (talk) 18:35, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:07, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Image of apparently non-notable people, not used for personal purposes. (Description translated states: "She is [redacted], I've known since I was four years playing outside the house of my uncle [redacted], until one day we meet again in our school that even today we")
Google translation: (Imagen de la gente aparentemente no notables, no se utiliza para fines personales.)
Ubcule (talk) 18:44, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:08, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Not relevant with the project Atudu (talk) 18:47, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:08, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Not relevant with the project Atudu (talk) 18:48, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:08, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Blurred image Atudu (talk) 18:51, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unusable. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:09, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Lowest quality nonsense image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 12:41, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:08, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
"A carton seen under a microscope". But it's still out of focus and not very useful, unfortunately. ("Pero sigue siendo fuera de foco y no muy útil, por desgracia.") Ubcule (talk) 18:59, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unusable. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:10, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
person of unknown notability (personal photo?), sole upload Pibwl (talk) 19:04, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:10, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal image of uploader. Ubcule (talk) 19:16, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:10, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Squall0968 (talk · contribs)
[edit]User uploads appear to be possibly associated with anti-fouling campaign (Google's questionable translation of the given texts are variants of "dog is not shit"), but all appear to be copies or derivatives of (presumably copyrighted) works.
(Google Chinese translation of above: "用户上传似乎与防污运动来可能有关（谷歌的疑问的给定文本的翻译是“狗不拉屎”变种），但都似乎是副本或（可能受版权保护）的作品衍生物。")
Ubcule (talk) 17:26, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Mys_721tx (talk) 12:48, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
This is a duplicate of File:University of Wisconsin Waving W.svg. No reason to have two (2) of the same file. Corkythehornetfan 01:42, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Info: This file is older and is in use (in one file, unlike tyhe other tgat is used in several more). --Amitie 10g (talk) 03:42, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Amitie 10g, can replace it with the other file? That'd be much easier... Corkythehornetfan 06:15, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected, per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:46, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
This is a joint work, and another user will claim the right. So, I want it deleted from my account, please. Caballero//Historiador ☊ 05:32, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recently uploaded file. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:48, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Questionable authorship claims based on the low resolution, missing metadata, and the uploader's history. Looking at en:Special:Log/Preethi Evangeline and comparing it to other files that have not yet been transferred, it looks like the user uploaded a bunch of files with the file description "Rights with the author. / I, the copyright holder..." even for files where she is clearly not the author, which suggests that she either does not understand or does not care what the words "copyright holder" actually mean. Looking at the log for File:Gerhard von Rad.jpg and the similarities between en:Special:Log/Grbpradeep, en:Special:Log/Preethi Evangeline and en:Special:Log/Pavani (all containing this odd "Rights with the author" sentence fragment), I'm inclined to suspect that there's either sockpuppetry or meatpuppetry going on. Thus, Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Grbpradeep and Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Pavani at English Wikipedia may be seen as related. —LX (talk, contribs) 10:29, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:59, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Duplicate of image : File:ENERGON energy gum.JPG. --Thatonewikiguy (talk) 10:48, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:59, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gilmar Oliveira12 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF. Uploaded in a row on 13.02.2016 for pt:Primeira Igreja Batista do Brasil. Considering also File:Pibb132anos-1031.jpg = grabbed from http://com12.com/aniversario-de-132-anos-da-pibb/ (Copyright 2012 COM12. Todos os Direitos Reservados.) = http://com12.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/pibb132anos-1031.jpg (last modified: 2014) and File:Lmlkn.PNG, grabbed from (example) https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=896792050439865&set=a.342263982559344.79093.100003272340780&type=1&theater (04.02.2016)
- File:Casa de oração mundial.PNG
- File:Lmlkn.PNG
- File:Pibb132anos-1031.jpg
- File:Primeira igreja batista do brasil.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 10:55, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:01, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
File:Cucking stool.png is a best file Hervé Tigier (talk) 12:19, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: actually, File:Old woman draught at Ratcliffe Highway.png is the best version. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:08, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
File:Cucking stool.png is a best file et not used. Hervé Tigier (talk) 12:26, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:02, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
duplicated file https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Barrio_Par%C3%ADs-Londres,_en_Santiago_de_Chile.jpg Willemarcel (talk) 13:36, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected, per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:19, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
très mauvaise qualité (trop flou) / very bad quality (too blury) Bzh-99 (talk) 13:48, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Comment This one is sharp enough to be usefull, at 300px. --C messier (talk) 22:02, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: kept per C. Messier. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:22, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
très mauvaise qualité (trop flou) / very bad quality (too blury) Bzh-99 (talk) 13:48, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: unusable. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:23, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Files of User:PHOTOMAN
[edit]- File:Gijón 2012 593.JPG
- File:Gijón 2012 592.JPG
- File:Gijón 2012 591.JPG
- File:Gijón 2012 590.JPG
- File:Gijón 2012 589.JPG
- File:Gijón 2012 588.JPG
- File:Gijón 2012 587.JPG
- File:Gijón 2012 586.JPG
- File:Gijón 2012 585.JPG
- File:Gijón 2012 584.JPG
Out of project scope (commons don't host your holiday's photos). --Sismarinho (talk) 13:56, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep The pictures show landscapes, cyclists... I don´t understand what is wrong with them. The same for this and this one. --Rodelar (talk) 14:09, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep The same commentary of Rodelar. Adolfobrigido (talk) 21:08, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per above. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:26, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Elisfkc as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Logo owned by Microsoft
- Keep {{PD-textlogo}}, Josve05a (talk) 14:52, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Image was not created by uploader, who is claiming right for it. In addition, uploader is known for uploading files without regard for copyright. Elisfkc (talk) 00:00, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep PD-textlogo. Fry1989 eh? 18:11, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Or delete every logo in the whole Commonswiki. --RomanLier (talk) 17:51, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Kept: per above. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:25, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
smaller duplicate of File:SMiguelBUE.PNG Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:43, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:29, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
bad quality, low resolution, better files (3) see Category:Bocca di Leone in the Doge's Palace (Venice) Oursana (talk) 19:14, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Supported the deletion. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:30, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The source site says "all rights reserved". Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 08:50, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- I added an OTRS permission Hanay (talk) 11:09, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ronhjones (Talk) 17:42, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The source site says "all rights reserved". Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 08:50, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- I added an OTRS permission Hanay (talk) 11:08, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ronhjones (Talk) 17:42, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation, used here. All other uploads by User:Krishnaghji were more obvious copyright violations; this one might indeed be his own work, but we'd need evidence. Huon (talk) 09:10, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - https://www.nationstates.net/nation=ezaekia is earlier date. --Ronhjones (Talk) 17:44, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Duplicates of images found at here: File:Elektrody3.png Thatonewikiguy (talk) 09:10, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 17:42, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Duplicates of images found at here: File:Elektrody3.png Thatonewikiguy (talk) 09:10, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 17:43, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Commercial spam.
Ubcule (talk) 19:29, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:31, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
More out-of-scope / unused personal uploads by non-contributing user. Commons is not your personal webhost. Ubcule (talk) 19:38, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:32, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
More out-of-scope / unused personal uploads by non-contributing user. Commons is not your personal webhost Ubcule (talk) 19:39, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:32, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
No lo quiero Ciclon 03 (talk) 19:55, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:33, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Logo of a band whose article en:Forces Of Sodomy was deleted as likely hoax, anyway non-notable. (It said their record "became a massive hit although only sold 100 copies"). JohnCD (talk) 20:12, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:37, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Selfie used in deleted NN autobio en:Sukh singh JohnCD (talk) 20:15, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:37, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho potentially non-free content, Roland zh (talk) 20:28, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: strongly suspect copyvio, COM:PRP. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:38, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
This is a derivative work that does not identify the sources for the included images. I found this conversation in the comments of a blog post asking to use the top image for a collage on Wikipedia. Permission does not specify a free license and could be interpreted as "Wikipedia-use only" which is not permitted. Unable to verify copyright/permission status of all included images. Nick (talk) 20:29, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:39, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Elisfkc as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Logo owned by Disney-ABC Group Bellow the COM:TOO in the US? Amitie 10g (talk) 22:01, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Image above Originality threshold, more than simple geometry. Also, license currently being claimed says that the logo was created by the uploader. Elisfkc (talk) 23:38, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep PD-textlogo. It is a circle and letters. Gradients are not copyrightable in the United States. Fry1989 eh? 18:12, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: far, far below COM:TOO, just see the examples there. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:42, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Elisfkc as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Logo owned by Disney-ABC Group Bellow the COM:TOO in the US? Amitie 10g (talk) 22:07, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Image above Originality threshold, more than simple geometry. Also, license currently being claimed says that the logo was created by the uploader. Elisfkc (talk) 23:38, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Looks trivial to me; text, circle, a gradient. If there is no concrete precent for this, I would consider this a {{PD-textlogo}}.–Totie (talk) 01:53, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep PD-textlogo. It is a circle and letters. Gradients are not copyrightable in the United States. Fry1989 eh? 18:14, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: far, far below COM:TOO, just see the examples there. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:42, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
This building is too recent. No FoP in France. Authorization needed TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 13:37, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 18:09, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Recent architecture. No FoP in France. Authorization needed. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 13:37, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 18:09, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Not sure how to handle this; the current file actually shows a different LGA per this and that particular LGA has already a map at File:LGATasmania CentralCoast.png. This file should probably be deleted and File:LGATasmania Burnie (1).png moved to its title to correct the offcommons files, which all refer to Burnie.. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 19:57, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- This can easily be fixed by overwriting the file with a new version. Give me a few days to do that. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:36, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: fixed image, and will redirect the duplicate one here. P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:16, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
very bad quality! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Донор (talk • contribs) 2016-02-09T14:29:27 (UTC)
- Comment: Apparently the image has educational value as it's used on a how-to article on Wikiversity. But I agree, the quality of the image is horrible. JIP (talk) 15:24, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Educational value; regardless of quality. --Riley Huntley (talk) 03:13, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
this is not boy george 2A01:E35:8B32:B510:DC9D:A2B2:9D1C:B65A 09:39, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Not convinced. Hand tattoos match other images on web Ronhjones (Talk) 18:06, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
- Keep As Ronhjones said, the hand tattoos are consistent with other photos on the web (e.g. [4]) and the facial hair, t-shirt and pendant match this official video from 2014. Regards, HaeB (talk) 07:50, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Seems perfectly legit celeb + photographer combo, See [5](since 2000),[6] Unfitlouie (talk) 12:50, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:42, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Visit url. Out of commons scope. Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 13:34, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Comment Your link shows some notability, may be in scope,see [7]. Unfitlouie (talk) 16:06, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: No indication that uploader had the right to upload the image. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:44, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 13:57, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Postei uma versão maior da foto. Leeteuk Kim (talk) 18:58, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
- It's from here, this pic --Knochen ﱢﻝﱢ 05:16, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Delete Credited to Mreya Aciento. COPYVIO Unfitlouie (talk) 12:55, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination.. Getty Images. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:44, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Not "own work", its a screenshot from copyrighted mobile game "Talking Angela" Cap1000 (talk) 15:18, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:45, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Not "own work", its a screenshot from copyrighted mobile game "Talking Angela" Cap1000 (talk) 15:19, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:45, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
potential copyright violation from http://arnaud-lapierre.com/about Arcyon37 (talk) 16:16, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Bonjour.
- Cette image est libre de droit, donné par LudivineNakedCat pour utilisation publique et présentation.
- Cordialement.
- Merci de cette précision. Il faut alors que LuduvineNakedCat confirme elle-même en envoyant un courriel à Wikimedia. Toutes les infos ici. Cordialement, --Arcyon37 (d) 15:28, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no reply to request for OTRS. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:46, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Error fixed version of this file was uploaded in othername(file:OSAKA-KUWARI-PLAN-20140723.png). Route163 (talk) 16:53, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:47, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
There are hundreds of copies of this image with various colorings and black-and-white all over the web. No evidence this uploader actually owns the original. DMacks (talk) 16:54, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Delete as a colorised derivative with resulting complex copyright issues. Unfitlouie (talk) 16:09, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:47, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Questionable authorship claims based on the low resolutions, missing metadata, publications found elsewhere, and the uploader's history.
- File:Modern Cancer Hospital Guangzhou Image.jpg – this file found on a Wikipedia mirror suggests that this file is the same one deleted from Vietnamese Wikipedia
- File:Modern Cancer Hospital Guangzhou.jpg – found in higher resolution here. The cloud background is grabbed from here.
—LX (talk, contribs) 16:56, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:47, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope (Commons:SELFIE). Sismarinho (talk) 18:51, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Comment In use on ms.wiki. INeverCry 01:50, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion -- In use. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:48, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
text pages in Romanian - out of scope, unclear copyright - same for the rest of user's uploads Pibwl (talk) 19:03, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:49, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lister Ogusuku Ribeiro (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unclear copyright status. Uploaded in a row on 15.11.2015 from and for ptwiki by Lister Ogusuku Ribeiro (talk · contributions · Statistics), all files (Facebook resolutions, no exif) were previously published on Facebook via https://www.facebook.com/SantuariodaVirgemMontesina/:
- File:Santuário da Virgem Montesina - 2015.jpeg --> https://www.facebook.com/SantuariodaVirgemMontesina/photos/pb.899918190024895.-2207520000.1455443179./1215409285142449/?type=3&theater (04.11.2015)
- File:Imagem de Nossa Senhora da Conceição Montesina (Nova Coroa - 2015).jpeg --> https://www.facebook.com/SantuariodaVirgemMontesina/photos/a.901839223166125.1073741828.899918190024895/1203277593022285/?type=3&theater (10.2015)
- File:Romaria dos Cavaleiros 2015.jpeg --> https://www.facebook.com/SantuariodaVirgemMontesina/photos/a.1204412802908764.1073741844.899918190024895/1204416382908406/?type=3&theater (10.2015), taken from the album https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.1204412802908764.1073741844.899918190024895&type=3 which is credited with "Fotos: Lister Ogusuku Ribeiro - Santuário da Virgem Montesina ©2015"
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Further details and/or permission(s) needed. Despite of having a similar username, the Facebook user is not necessarily the same person as the Commons user. A verifiable connection via COM:OTRS (or by other means) must be established.
- File:Romaria dos Cavaleiros 2015.jpeg
- File:Santuário da Virgem Montesina - 2015.jpeg
- File:Imagem de Nossa Senhora da Conceição Montesina (Nova Coroa - 2015).jpeg
Gunnex (talk) 09:53, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:49, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Putnik as no permission (No permission since) Anatoliy (talk) 12:39, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: OTRS-ticket. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:49, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
OTRS-permission from photographer Eduardo de Carvalho Leme is needed. (Note that the file has been more than 11 years in Commons.) Taivo (talk) 13:27, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- That would mean that Commons:Grandfathered old files applies. —LX (talk, contribs) 15:20, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- I believe that applies only where someone claimed in pre-OTRS days that an email or other explicit permission was sent. I see no such claim here, and the fact that the uploader is Jurema Oliveira and the claimed photographer is "Eduardo de Carvalho Leme" is indeed puzzling and in need at least of explanation. Storkk (talk) 10:38, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Per Storkk. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:50, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Pumuckl ist eine geschützte Figur. Ich weiß nicht, ob die Verwendung auf einem Faschingswagen in dieser Form erlaubt ist. A. Köppl (talk) 13:53, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader requested at the day of the upload. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:50, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Possible personality and author's rights violation. "Author" of photo clearly states, that true author is other person. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SubRE (talk • contribs) 2016-02-08T21:24:04 (UTC)
Kept: Meets com:IDENT imho. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:51, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Privacy rights violation. Author (photographer) is not an owner of persons image. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SubRE (talk • contribs) 2016-02-09T09:50:19 (UTC)
Kept: Meets com:IDENT imho. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:52, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
no permission 2003:45:5C21:3401:D0C:EDFE:D152:8792 15:08, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:52, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Wiki4joey10 (talk · contribs)
[edit]no permissions
2003:45:5C21:3401:D0C:EDFE:D152:8792 15:11, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:52, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
OTRS tickets required 2003:45:5C21:3401:D0C:EDFE:D152:8792 15:17, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:52, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
probably copyright violations
2003:45:5C21:3401:D0C:EDFE:D152:8792 15:20, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:52, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://ell.h-cdn.co/assets/cm/15/02/54ae9a0b4610d_-_adam-levine-jimmy-v-elv.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:52, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Given the lack of background information from the uploader and the fact that at least two of the three appear to have been taken from privileged positions at what look like official events, in the absence of further info, it's questionable that these are the uploader's work and that he/she has the right to upload them.
- File:A.Ibn El Melih et le Shah d'Iran.png
- File:Zaiter, Ibn El Melih, Balafrej.jpg
- File:Ahmed IBN EL MELIH.png
Ubcule (talk) 17:31, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:54, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alec Smithson (talk · contribs)
[edit]Licence à vérifier. Les objets photographiés ont plus de 100 ans, mais les photos sont récentes. Elles proviennent de http://www.persee.fr/doc/crai_0065-0536_2004_num_148_2_22753?_Prescripts_Search_tabs1=standard& (p937) et l'auteur est J.B de Vaivre (figure 12 et suivantes). Or Il est né en 1941 est probablement encore vivant : http://www.aibl.fr/membres/liste-des-correspondants-francais/article/vaivre-jean-bernard-de
- File:Sceau de Regnault de Nantouillet 1403.jpg
- File:Armes Robert de Nantouillet.jpg
- File:Armes de le chevalier Regnault (Robert) de Nantouillet.jpg
- File:Scenau Robert de Nantouillet.jpg
- File:Sceau de Oger de Nantouillet.jpg
- File:Sceau de Henri de Nantouillet.jpg
- File:Sceau de Regnault de Nantouillet.jpg
- File:Sceau de Jean de Nantouillet.jpg
_de_Nantouillet.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Habertix (talk) 18:45, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:52, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ALS MORRIS (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not entirely clear-cut, but possible copyright violations; all images seem to have some usage before they were uploaded to Commons and (with the exception of the woman with the children, which could easily be a personal image) look like officially-taken shots, especially as all the people in them are apparently notable.
- File:范瑋琪.jpg - Singer Christine Fan
- File:黑人 陳建州.jpg - Blackie Chen, basketball player and actor
- File:KID 林柏昇.jpg
- File:KID林柏昇.jpg
Ubcule (talk) 19:25, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:54, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
This is an older version of the logo which has been superseded by PNG and SVG versions; not in use. +mt 21:07, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:54, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Misnamed, unclear copyright status: The picture depicts the painter Jakob Nußbaum (d. 1936); the attribution to Friedrich Heimburg (d. 1882) at the source page is wrong. It is unclear if PD-old is applicable since the photographer is unknown. Jergen (talk) 21:20, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:54, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Why is it PD? Any evidence? Josve05a (talk) 21:27, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Why is it listed at Commons:Database reports/Getty Images/Whitelist? -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 22:59, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Because I was the one who asked for that database report to be made, and since this was not a clear cut case (or perhaps it was already maked with a dletion template?) I removed it from the database report-page, together with ~25 other files, to easier see when new files came. That page however does not prove any license permissions etc., just that it wasn't a clear cut case to detect a copyvio, which that page is there for. Josve05a (talk) 23:06, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Not enough evidence to assume that it is PD. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:55, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
This is the same version as seen at the institute's homepage [8]. If the National Institute of Medical Herbalists is the copyright holder of this graphical rendition of the arms, we would require a letter of consent through OTRS. Otherwise we need a permission from the original artist. De728631 (talk) 21:43, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:55, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Время создания картины и автор неизвестен, нельзя установить, находится ли картина в общественном достоянии Dogad75 (talk) 21:49, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:55, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
"First, it is taken directly from http://www.khorasanzameen.net/ . Second, how is it possible to make such a color image before 1929? Lastly, the attached license only covers images when the author is proven to have died over 70 years ago." Recreation. Contested speedy. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:59, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - According to {{PD-US-expired}}, at least 70 years must elapse after the death of the photographer before uploading this image to Commons. The image was obviously created in 1929 because Habibullah Kalakani was ruler only in that year, and without proof of authorship we don't know when he or she died. It's the uploader's responsibility to provide the author's name and date of death.--Officer (talk) 15:04, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
- This is obviously a painting. Colour paintings existed for quite some time before 1929... That said, there is clearly insufficient information to support the stated PD rationales, so delete. —LX (talk, contribs) 16:01, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
- Whether someone painted it recently or created it using latest technology, the original is a 1929 black and white camera photo. See, e.g., [9] [10] Those 1929 photos also cannot be uploaded to Commons unless 70 years have passed since the death of the photographer.--Officer (talk) 20:26, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
![[9]](http://ftpmirror.your.org/pub/wikimedia/images/wikipedia/ps/b/b9/Habibullah-Kalakani-Bacha-e-Saqao-With-His-Brother.png){kind=link}
- Comment I declined a speedy on this image because the rationale was flawed. (1) The source of the image isn't particularly relevant: either it's in the public domain, in which case it's fine regardless of its source, or it's still copyrighted, in which case no source can make it fine. (2) All the images in Category:Photos of people of Central Asia by Sergey Prokudin-Gorsky are color images created more than a decade before 1929, so yes it was possible. Of course declining a speedy as flawed is different from wanting it to be kept; the deletion arguments here make sense and I don't understand how the contrary position could be tenable. Please note that this is not a recreation; the underlying work is the same as what was deleted before, but this image is 375x480 while the other was 307x400. Nyttend (talk) 22:35, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
- Well, the purpose of a (primary) source is to determine whether it is in the public domain or not, so I'd say it's pretty relevant. But it seems we're all basically in agreement. :) —LX (talk, contribs) 23:07, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
- I mean, if someone can prove that it's PD, we can take it from anywhere we like (using PD-art, if nothing else), and if someone can't, we can't get it from anywhere :-) Image source doesn't have to have information if we can get information about the same image from elsewhere. Nyttend (talk) 23:37, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
- The point is the original photo was shot by an Afghan during the 1929 civil war in Afghanistan. The image proposed for deletion here appears as a recent artwork, which means the artist is likely living somewhere. BTW, in the original photo another Afghan man is standing next to Kalakani but in this image that man is replaced by Quran (Islam's holy book). This suggests that the artist is motivated by religion or politics (e.g., that w:Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi is a good guy and w:Bashar al-Assad is a bad guy).--Officer (talk) 18:52, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
- I mean, if someone can prove that it's PD, we can take it from anywhere we like (using PD-art, if nothing else), and if someone can't, we can't get it from anywhere :-) Image source doesn't have to have information if we can get information about the same image from elsewhere. Nyttend (talk) 23:37, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
- Well, the purpose of a (primary) source is to determine whether it is in the public domain or not, so I'd say it's pretty relevant. But it seems we're all basically in agreement. :) —LX (talk, contribs) 23:07, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
- Comment If that image isn't in the public domain, i wonder why File:Faiz Mohammad Katib Hazara.png, which also has the original author unknown and was published at a later date (1929 vs 1931), has apparently been confirmed as Public Domain. Koopinator (talk) 16:46, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
- Pinging @とある白い猫. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:53, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
- File:Faiz Mohammad Katib Hazara.png obviously qualifies for deletion based on missing information about the date of the author's death. That 2012 review was done when Afghan copyright license was different.--Officer (talk) 08:55, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Officer: I tagged File:Faiz Mohammad Katib Hazara.png as a copyvio. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:45, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Officer: Template:PD-Afghanistan says that "Works of Afghan origin that were no longer under copyright in Afghanistan on July 29, 2016 are not copyrighted in the U.S. due to a previous lack of copyright relations between the U.S. and Afghanistan.", so if that image was PD in 2012 it is also PD in 2019. Koopinator (talk) 15:09, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
- And how is it possible for it to be PD in 2012? We have no idea who the photographer is or where the photo was taken. The uploader must provide that information.--Officer (talk) 23:08, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
- File:Faiz Mohammad Katib Hazara.png obviously qualifies for deletion based on missing information about the date of the author's death. That 2012 review was done when Afghan copyright license was different.--Officer (talk) 08:55, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
- Pinging @とある白い猫. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:53, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: This is a COM:DW of a painting, which indeed has a signature in the lower right corner. Whose signature is it? When was this created and/or published? In what country? Per COM:EVID: "In all cases the uploader must provide appropriate evidence to demonstrate either that the file is in the public domain." The "source" is a mere raw link to the image and, indeed, there no evidence whatsoever on offer here regarding the provenance of this image. This is why the image was deleted the first time ("Время создания картины и автор неизвестен, нельзя установить, находится ли картина в общественном достоянии") and this, frankly, should have been speedied as a recreation of content deleted per community consensus (G4). --Эlcobbola talk 16:25, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
Argentine work, published/created (or sourced with - as indicated) 1982, licensed with {{PD-AR-Photo}}, not in PD in Argentina at COM:URAA-date 01.01.1996 and copyrighted in US till the end of 2077 (+95 years). Gunnex (talk) 21:52, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: I doubt that the URAA has anything to do with this because the work wasn't PD in the US in the first place. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:57, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Unfortunately, this image was not created by Hubble Space Telescope, but from Keck Observatory, see the source (Image: 2005 Keck Adaptive Optics Image of SN 2005gl) C messier (talk) 21:55, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:57, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Its my Picture and i dont want it to be on this page anymore MarkHdxd (talk) 21:56, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Fair enough. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:58, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Сомнительный статус файла, Мухаммаджон Шакури скончался в 2012 году Dogad75 (talk) 21:57, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:58, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Alexander Misel as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.sj33.cn/sc/png/201012/26236.html Bellow the COM:TOO in the PRC? Amitie 10g (talk) 22:10, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- DeleteThe information on the File page are counterfeit. The logo is a copyrighted old logo of Hubei Radio & TV Station in China and is under non-free use in Chinese Wikipedia. zh:File:HBTV_old_logo.png User:Mask59 upload a copy here with wrong license. --Alexander Misel (talk) 01:35, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep，{{PD-shape}}. --Stang 04:33, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep per Stang. Riley Huntley (talk) 03:14, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: There seems to be consensus that this is PD-shape. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:58, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Argentine work, published/created (or sourced with - as indicated) 1988, licensed with {{PD-AR-Photo}}, not in PD in Argentina at COM:URAA-date 01.01.1996 and copyrighted in US till the end of 2084 (+95 years). Gunnex (talk) 21:55, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep See Commons:Massive restoration of deleted images by the URAA. URAA cannot be used as the sole reason for deletion. Cambalachero (talk) 13:57, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Note that Commons:Massive restoration of deleted images by the URAA was overturned in Commons:Review of Precautionary principle. The page you are linking to is therefore null and void. --Stefan2 (talk) 16:13, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- "significant doubt about the freedom of a file under US or local law" = Commons:URAA-restored copyrights = COM:L#Uruguay Round Agreements Act = COM:PRP. Gunnex (talk) 15:48, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- See this open letter by Wikimedia Argentina on the subject. "We acknowledge that the Wikimedia Foundation BoT and its Legal team have repeatedly stated, as has been reinforced in recent communications, that images shouldn’t be deleted unless we receive a takedown notice, and that it has not received a single URAA-motivated notice to date". Or you can see here, for a comment by the Foundation itself. So there is. Profesional lawyers that work for this site say that those files are fine. In regards to the precautory principle, we may concede that there is a doubt, but not a significant doubt (De minimis, an official policy, dismisses another type of potential doubt as minor and inconsequential). Cambalachero (talk) 18:21, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- m:Wikimedia Argentina/Open letter regarding URAA does not discuss whether something is free or not but only whether there is a legal risk for the Wikimedia Foundation to host the content. That page is a complete misunderstanding of COM:PRP: there is no legal risk for the Wikimedia Foundation unless the Wikimedia Foundation fails to comply with a valid takedown notice, but per COM:PRP, we do not host content if there is a risk that third-party content users can run into problems when using the content. Since m:Wikimedia Argentina/Open letter regarding URAA appears to be a complete misunderstanding of COM:PRP, the page is useless.
- m:Legal/Wikimedia Server Location and Free Knowledge makes the same mistake: the page suggests waiting for takedown requests instead of deleting non-free content. If a takedown request arrives, then this means that the community has failed with maintaining its COM:PRP policy and that content users have been at risk, totally contrary to COM:PRP. The page also states that to date, we have not received a single takedown notice under the URAA, but this does not seem to be correct. I doubt that the "Pool Balls" and "Trowel I" in wmf:DMCA Oldenburg carried a copyright notice. Those were first published outside the United States, seemingly before w:Coosje van Bruggen moved to the United States.
- COM:DM is a guideline which tells that non-free content which takes up an irrelevant part of an image is acceptable under copyright law. Different countries have different applications of de minimis, and you must always ensure that you comply with the meanings of de minimis under both source country law and United States law. In this case, the photograph takes up the entire picture, not a small obscure part of it.
- Also note that the picture apparently was first published in 1988. At that time, lots of European publications carried a copyright notice. That was maybe also the case in Argentina. If there was a valid copyright notice, then the picture is unfree in the United States per COM:SC instead of COM:URAA. The pages you linked to only discuss content which is unfree per COM:URAA, not content which is unfree per COM:SC. --Stefan2 (talk) 19:03, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Stefan2, this is not the place to discuss the whole issue all over again, but your interpretation is not faithful. There is no legal risk for the WMF to receive DMCAs, specially if these potential DMCA are very unlikely. That's the whole point of the issue. The legal risk only comes if the DMCAs are not answered promptly. I don't like that you try to push your point of view with obvious wrong facts. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:46, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- "there is no legal risk for the Wikimedia Foundation unless the Wikimedia Foundation fails to comply with a valid takedown notice" - I'm not sure if this is actually true. According to en:Online Copyright Infringement Liability Limitation Act, the "safe harbor" only works if the host is not aware that the content is a copyright violation. Having templates that mark it as such, as present in the discussed file, won't look good. --ghouston (talk) 21:32, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- I'm not sure what obvious wrong facts you are talking about. The two linked pages discuss risks for the Wikimedia Foundation, while COM:PRP says that we do not keep material if it is likely that reusers can't use the material without having to rely on certain exemptions from copyright protection. The two situations are only vaguely related, and the two linked pages on Metawiki are therefore out of scope for the whole problem. The Wikimedia Foundation takes the same risk for these files as for the files which are bot-tagged with {{Copyvio}}, and we don't want to keep those files, do we? --Stefan2 (talk) 21:55, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Stefan2, those people are lawyers and work specifically on this case. They have been explicit that "WMF does not see a reason to delete content simply because of general concern about the URAA". You say that they are making mistakes, but, with all due respect, who are you to say that? Are you a lawyer, a reputed expert on copyright law, or just a volunteer of a web site trying to cope with those topics will the limited information and knowledge available and the best intentions? In most cases we have to figure out by ourselves which is the best option, but in this issue we do have the expert and fully-informed authoritative opinion of lawyers. We should respect that and acknowledge their expertise. Cambalachero (talk) 00:17, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Stefan2, this is not the place to discuss the whole issue all over again, but your interpretation is not faithful. There is no legal risk for the WMF to receive DMCAs, specially if these potential DMCA are very unlikely. That's the whole point of the issue. The legal risk only comes if the DMCAs are not answered promptly. I don't like that you try to push your point of view with obvious wrong facts. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:46, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete even without taking URAA into account. This file was likely never PD in the US to begin with. I doubt that this file has been published without some general copyright notice. (We need evidence that there wasn't a notice present anyways and not seeing a notice at the front of the image doesn't qualify.) Natuur12 (talk) 21:29, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- No, it does not have a copyright notice. Argentine law did not require that in a mandatory way, it has a different system, detailed in the art. 30 of the copyright law. Cambalachero (talk) 14:16, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
- Than prove it. In Europe it wasn't mandatory either but still a lot of works had (and still have) a notice. Natuur12 (talk) 14:54, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
- See here, the unedited whole page. No copyright notice anywhere. Cambalachero (talk) 11:19, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- And this magazine doesn't contain a general copyright notice? That also counts. Plus this hardly seems to be the first publication of the photograph since the magazine looks quite new. Natuur12 (talk) 15:40, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- See here, the unedited whole page. No copyright notice anywhere. Cambalachero (talk) 11:19, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- Than prove it. In Europe it wasn't mandatory either but still a lot of works had (and still have) a notice. Natuur12 (talk) 14:54, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
- No, it does not have a copyright notice. Argentine law did not require that in a mandatory way, it has a different system, detailed in the art. 30 of the copyright law. Cambalachero (talk) 14:16, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
- Comment @Cambalachero: I think the Argentine Government under President Kirchner licensed all official photos from the Casa Rosada on Wiki. Not sure where the permission was lodged though. WCMemail 00:25, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & discussion by Natuur. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:33, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
