Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/02/09

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive February 9th, 2016
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image of non-notable individual. No useful description. Not used. Uncategorized. DavidIvar (talk) 00:31, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Denniss (talk) 11:29, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope 125.209.133.21 04:22, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Denniss (talk) 11:29, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope 125.209.133.21 04:22, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Denniss (talk) 11:29, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope 125.209.133.21 04:24, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Denniss (talk) 11:30, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

File:ArmyCommander1.jpg

converted by me to DR from a Speedy by User:Takabeg for "copyright violation" to allow for some discussion as image was on-wiki since 2009. --Túrelio (talk) 13:30, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The nominators rationale was (copied over by me from the image talkpage):
  • We can see four stars on his shoulder mark. Cemal Gürsel was promoted to four star general (O-10) in 1957 (Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı İslam Ansiklopedisi, Cilt 14, p. 326.). This photograph was taken after 1957. This picture is not public domain. Takabeg (talk) 07:12, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:13, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. It's very clear that this photo should not be {{Own work}} of the uploader. Takabeg (talk) 10:14, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: It is, in fact, a mirror of the image deleted in 2011, so this is a speedy. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:44, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

j // / /_/ g 94.112.82.107 13:56, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, Speedy, non-admin closure. Disruptive nonsense nomination. Nominator warned. LX (talk, contribs) 15:59, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image of unknown non notable individuals with masked faces. Unused, uncategorized. Not educationally useful. DavidIvar (talk) 14:07, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Denniss (talk) 16:24, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Restored to allow at least seven days for discussion because of a request at COM:UDR. Green Giant (talk) 00:16, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:20, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image of non notable individual. Not educationally useful DavidIvar (talk) 18:24, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Denniss (talk) 19:16, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be the work of the uploader (who has almost exclusively uploaded copyrighted images) Ahecht (talk) 15:35, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by EugeneZelenko: Commons:Screenshot: movie - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Auf dieser Fotoaufnahme werden als "Beifang" einige moderne Gemälde gezeigt, die man durch eine starke Vergrößerung im Detail analysieren kann. Um Streit mit dem ausstellenden Kunstverein zu vermeiden, habe ich die Ursprungsdatei durch eine Retusche der 3 Bilder etwas abgewandelt und diese bearbeitete Datei mit in meine Bildliste eingestellt. Der Dateiname des von mir freigegebenen Bildes lautet: Schloss Wiligrad, Treppenhalle, grosse Raumhöhe.JPG! Ich bitte um das Löschen der hier vorliegende Ursprungsdatei und das Hochladen der retuschierten Datei! Joachim Müller-Schwerin (talk) 19:45, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, original uploader (on de.wp) request deletion of a recent upload. Reworked version File:Schloss Wiligrad, Treppenhalle, große Raumhöhe.JPG without artwork available.Wdwd (talk) 20:02, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nothing to see, no educational value. Numerous better images of ziplining already available. P 1 9 9   20:27, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Denniss (talk) 21:44, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

می خواهم مشخصات خودم را حذف نمایم محمدحسن شمس صلوات (talk) 12:05, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request, unused personal photo. Taivo (talk) 10:15, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nikolaiho (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons:Derivative works from non-standard font.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader also agrees to delete. Taivo (talk) 11:26, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tkatoni (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader also agrees to delete. Taivo (talk) 11:18, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:58, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of Commons:Project scope. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

changed to category 최광모 (talk) 05:33, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:11, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

creators will 최광모 (talk) 01:05, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Req by user. --Achim (talk) 14:40, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

requester's subpage 최광모 (talk) 04:58, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Req by user. --Achim (talk) 17:12, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screengrab of this (presumably) copyrighted Channel 4 video http://www.channel4.com/news/jeremy-corbyn-on-ttip-trident-and-the-nhs . Global Justice Now do not seem to have used the correct licence on Flickr. JMiall (talk) 12:26, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The pic was edited and added in good faith, based on its Creative Commons License on Flickr. For future reference I am interested to know what tool you used to spot that this pic was a potential screen grab of a TV interview.Bodney (talk) 15:05, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy Delete - I infact nearly uploaded this pic months ago,until i did a further check and found out it was from Ch4 who have a restrictive licence (ARR) so Global Justice made a mistake by tagging this under a free licence but they do not hold the rights for this image..--Stemoc 03:41, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Speedy delete - Screenshot of Channel 4 broadcast subject to copyright. Good faithed upload based on incorrect Flickr licence. WJBscribe (talk) 15:18, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image. Uncategorized, not used. Not educationally useful. DavidIvar (talk) 18:29, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Commons has more images of trams than children being active. Useful for illustration etc. -- (talk) 18:42, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep yes a good picture of a boy with and a educational sample of how to take a good snapshot--Pierpao.lo (listening) 19:08, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, Iceland has quite a cold climate. So it is educational to show, that even in Iceland you can see such things. Taivo (talk) 14:30, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Song. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violation. --JuTa 22:56, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work Biplab Anand (Talk) 16:51, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violation. --JuTa 22:58, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible Copyright violation. Source=http://www.euronics-deutschland.de/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Slider1a.jpg Archie02 (talk) 18:16, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:58, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Its from here this file 2003:4D:2C4E:5C59:1860:54E1:8513:A614 21:33, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-textlogo. --Yann (talk) 17:57, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional logo, no educational value whatsoever. P 1 9 9   15:33, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:59, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nasreddin Ali (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Some personal photos and schoolwork. See COM:SCOPE.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:06, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:35, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Film poster. cant be own work. With highest resolution: https://twitter.com/eleanorwyld/status/535769756985737216 Cap1000 (talk) 03:07, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:35, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ahmed K. Albayati (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused {{Userpage image}}

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:07, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:35, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no FoP in South Korea. This building was completed in 2003. Unfortunately it needs to be deleted.

Conchitoburrito (talk) 07:57, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pusan 1993Nov13 (8).jpg should be excluded as this is a picture of the old station building (pre 2003). This building may also fall under no FoP, but this should be discussed separately if this is the case.Smiley.toerist (talk) 08:23, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • COMMENT: I don't get how this is understood as no FOP? The rules say:

1. Where a building is reproduced into another building;

2. Where a sculpture or painting is reproduced into another sculpture or painting;

3. Where the reproduction is made in order to exhibit permanently at an open place under the proviso to paragraph (1);

4. Where the reproduction is made for the purpose of selling its copies.

The reproductions are made with the possibility of selling copies not the purpose of selling copies and we aren't reproducing the buildings with the photos. I think that this is over worrying to think you can't have photos of these places on Wikimedia. Nesnad (talk) 14:50, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

COMMENT AGAIN: Furthermore, if you insist on these being listed as no FOP isn't it better just to tag them with a not free in Korea template like they do for America instead of just deleting them all? Seems to make sense to me. Cheers, Nesnad (talk) 14:57, 10 February 2016 (UTC) EDIT AGAIN; Oh thats a Wikipedia tag? Hmm. Troublesome. Discuss this people. Nesnad (talk) 14:59, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: #4 in the list is an NC rule. Commons requires that images be free for commercial use. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:42, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violations (no commercial FOP in SoKor, missing COM:OTRS permission from the architect or his heirs). Wikimedia Commons requires images to be reused even commercially (post cards, ads, etc.) in accordance with the allowed licensing. SoKor's copyright laws on FOP is just simply not compatible, and unless their law changes these files should be deleted (and restore only if it's more than 70 years after the architect's death).

@A1Cafel: the file needs to be renamed, however. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:58, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:44, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 15:56, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bigthi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status. Uploaded since 03.11.2015 for a Brazilian motorcycle club, all files (logos etc.) were taken from http://classeamotogrupo.com.br/grupo.php or http://classeamotogrupo.com.br/colete.php (2015 - 2016 © Proibida cópia parcial ou total sem a autorização dos desenvolvedores.), needing permission. Example: File:Colete padrão.jpg + (identical) File:Colete.png --> screenshotted from http://classeamotogrupo.com.br/colete.php = (part) http://classeamotogrupo.com.br/cotele_1.jpg (last modifierd: 07.2015) or File:Sinais.jpg, screenshotted from http://classeamotogrupo.com.br/grupo.php.

They may be also out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used.

Gunnex (talk) 09:53, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:43, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very poor quality picture, not useable for any purpose MMFE (talk) 10:27, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:43, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Requested by the uploader on Norwegian Wikipedia (no:Brukerdiskusjon:4ing#Slette_bilde. 4ing (talk) 10:40, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: We rarely delete images at the request of the subject, even more rarely when they are in use on WP, and never except by a formal takedown notice via OTRS. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:45, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete: copyright book cover is unlikely to be the work of the uploader: it is most likely copyright to Rupa & Co the publisher. We require an OTRS verification to keep this image. Ww2censor (talk) 11:06, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:45, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kklupe (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status. Uploaded in row on 04.11.2015 for Brazilian zoo pt:Jardim Zoológico de Belo Horizonte the image captions in the article indicate to several authors: File:Rinoceronte Ramon Mourão.jpg ("Foto: Ramon Mourão", see also file title), File:Filhote de gorila Herlandes.jpg (" Foto: Herlandes Tinoco") and File:Elefantes Dia Vida Selvagem.jpg ("Foto: Daniel Alves": update: grabbed from Flickr). File:Parque Ecológico da Pampulha.jpg + File:Contação de história.jpg (mysteriously watermarked) is credited with "Foto: Daniel Alves", File:Sede FZB Ramon Mourão.jpg is again a copyrighted work by "Ramon Mourão", File:Jardim Japonês 1.jpg is grabbed from https://www.flickr.com/photos/portalpbh/5415857517 (2011, © All rights reserved by "Portal PBH"/credit: "Foto: Suziane Fonseca") as also (per watermark) File:Trepadeira florida JB.jpg + File:Estufa Caatinga.jpg ("Foto: Suziane Fonseca"), here again grabbed Flickr without permission via https://www.flickr.com/photos/fundacaozoobotanicabelohorizonte/17297876502/ (04.2015, © All rights reserved by "Fundação Zoo-Botânica de Belo Horizonte").

Well, it seems that most of the files (if not ALL) were grabbed from https://www.flickr.com/photos/fundacaozoobotanicabelohorizonte/ (© All rights reserved by "Fundação Zoo-Botânica de Belo Horizonte"). Multiple permissions needed.

Gunnex (talk) 11:46, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:45, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Joana Cristina Santos (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status and unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Joana Cristina Santos/logs. After having uploaded on 29.01.2016 copyrighted art works for Portuguese painter pt:Concas (which were all deleted per no-permission) the user is switching now (all files uploaded in a row on 08.02.2016) to works by Portuguese artist pt:João Fragoso (1913—2000). The files appears to be scanned from related catalogues (File:Fase Minimalista.jpg + File:S.João de Deus.jpg, and the profile shot File:JF-FOT-0069.jpg as well) and File:Mar das cinco luas.jpg (the onyl one with EXIF) is a photo from 2004.... Further details/sources/etc. needed, considering also this text edit by the user from 01.02.2016 which was partially copy & pasted from http://www.ebiso.oestedigital.pt/_uploads/Not%C3%ADcias/gincana_onofre.pdf (2009)

Gunnex (talk) 12:29, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:45, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused (jpg) logo. No clear scope. Josve05a (talk) 13:06, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:46, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vitautas777 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Advertisement. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:46, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Modern art. I think painter identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:53, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Akholiresearch (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:53, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alexandre Bedeu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF. Uploaded in a row on 04.11.2015 for the Brazilian association football club pt:São Bento Esporte Clube, grabbing files from Facebook, like


Gunnex (talk) 16:44, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:54, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 16:46, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:54, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rockefellera22ount 1

[edit]

Very likely not own work: a great variety of sizes and qualities, none with EXIF data. Many are looking like official portraits.

P 1 9 9   20:45, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:56, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lorcacarlo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Works of a living artist (https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carlo_Maiolini) and photographs claimed as own work, but with no metadata and Facebook or smaller size.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:27, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:57, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Goran kresnik (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:COPYVIOs. Posters and promotional images, not own work.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:31, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:58, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Goran kresnik (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Too small to be useful, unlikely to be own work

Ytoyoda (talk) 15:07, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:06, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://muzyka.wp.pl/gid,680970,title,Ryszard-i-Malgorzata-Riedel-Rozdzielila-ich-dopiero-smierc,galeria.html?ticaid=11672a&_ticrsn=3 Doctore (talk) 00:21, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted on 9 February by NahidSultan. Green Giant (talk) 16:29, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 13:59, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 16:49, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small filesize, no camera metadata, probable professional portrait: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 14:00, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 16:48, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, possible magazine scan (?): uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 14:00, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 16:47, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of copyrighted webpage. Storkk (talk) 14:03, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 16:48, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work (see reverse image search). This file was specifically uploaded for vadalism purposes on de-WP. Headlocker (talk) 19:41, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 16:44, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Also:

{{Anonymous-EU}} puts a work in PD 70 years after the work was made available to the public. These are passport photos. A passport is not a public document and therefore these were not made available to the public until long after their creation, perhaps not until they were scanned and uploaded. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:42, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 16:43, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No exif info, extremely small picture and bad quality - not sure that it is really author's photo. Stolbovsky (talk) 19:51, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 16:42, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Agassiz Almeida (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status: Uploaded since 2013 (the last one on 05.11.2015 via cross-wiki upload from pt.wikipedia.org) for pt:Agassiz Almeida (1935—, Brazilian politician and writer), portraying the political career of Agassiz Almeida in photos from 1964, 1984 and 1987 (some of them photos of photos and/or mysteriously watermarked & cropped). Can't taken by himself and can't also taken by his son "Agassiz Almeida Filho" (who might be the uploader and ptwiki editor). Further details and/or permissions needed.

Considering also that File:Agassiz bio.jpg (uploaded 2013) seems to be previously published via (example) http://ocariri.blogspot.de/2012/02/agassiz-almeida-linduarte-noronha-o.html (2012) = http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-bQdYbS-zPGw/Ty1-z6inz0I/AAAAAAAACPU/iQ5OouHXtuw/s1600/Escritor+Agassiz+Almeida.jpg

Gunnex (talk) 22:35, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 16:41, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Agassiz Almeida (talk · contribs)

[edit]

According to SteinsplitterBot, the last four of these are re-uploads of the files previously deleted via Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Agassiz Almeida. The same reasoning appears to apply to the other two as well.

El Grafo (talk) 11:15, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:52, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work of the uploader as claimed. JuTa 22:36, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 16:40, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry speedy deleted. Gunnex (talk) 22:42, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 16:40, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal file. —Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 23:00, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 16:39, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal artwork by non-notable artist. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:16, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 16:39, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo of unclear notability. Seems to be out of project scope. The article w:Corporater was deleted due to lack of evidence of notability. Stefan2 (talk) 23:40, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 16:38, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Purely promotional image, spam. Uncle Milty (talk) 02:38, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: spam. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:37, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This images is not linked to any wikimedia pages . Probably this images is taken from other sources without notifying the original author. Thatonewikiguy (talk) 02:53, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:50, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Officialwhizzsystems (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possibly out of scope; main account is globally blocked.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:59, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:51, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:00, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:51, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:00, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:51, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely a copyright violation. Uploader 'claims' the file was originally under a compatible license at Picasa, but this license was never verified, and the file is currently ARR on Picasa. Given the uploader's long history of uploading copyright violations, and an inability to actually verify the licensing of this (it was never saved in web archives, that I can find) I think the precautionary principle applies. Revent (talk) 05:24, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:24, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It depicts the model face in toilet bowl which are culturally insensitives in Far East countries Thatonewikiguy (talk) 05:33, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:24, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture is mostly advetorial and propaganda for a technical college. Nominate for deletion Thatonewikiguy (talk) 05:44, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:24, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is not at all clear that all of the content in the screenshot is in the public domain or a work of the US government-in particular, US government sites to incorporate third-party copyrighted works. Gazebo (talk) 05:59, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete The screenshot, itself, was obtained from a US Army website, that did not itself attribute it as a US Army work. We do not have any actual indication of the copyright status of the particular images shown on the webpage. Without that, we can't claim this is PD. Revent (talk) 07:15, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:24, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The picture do not reflect any particular important events and do not contribute to Commons significantly Thatonewikiguy (talk) 06:14, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:25, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The images do not contribute any of significance to Wikipedia images and no context Thatonewikiguy (talk) 07:17, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:25, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Identifying information contained within Brennie42 (talk) 07:30, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Personal art. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:26, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photographs of identifiable people 최광모 (talk) 09:04, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Public place, this is a protest, so there can be no expectation of privacy, We don't have a summary of the Koean privacy rules, but it seems unlikely to be a problem. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:29, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photographs of identifiable people 최광모 (talk) 09:04, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Public place, this is a protest, so there can be no expectation of privacy, We don't have a summary of the Koean privacy rules, but it seems unlikely to be a problem. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:30, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photographs of identifiable people 최광모 (talk) 09:04, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Public place, this is a protest, so there can be no expectation of privacy, We don't have a summary of the Koean privacy rules, but it seems unlikely to be a problem. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:30, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photographs of identifiable people 최광모 (talk) 09:04, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Public place, this is a protest, so there can be no expectation of privacy, We don't have a summary of the Koean privacy rules, but it seems unlikely to be a problem. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:30, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

empty gallery 최광모 (talk) 09:04, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The gallery was empty only because it had been blanked in advance of the DR noms above. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:34, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 18:07, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:16, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 18:07, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:16, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 18:08, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:18, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 18:08, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:18, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 18:08, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:18, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 18:08, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:18, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 18:08, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:17, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 18:08, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:17, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 18:09, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:17, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 18:09, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:17, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 18:09, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:17, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 18:09, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:17, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 18:09, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:17, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 18:09, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:17, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 18:09, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:17, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 18:09, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:17, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 18:09, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:17, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 18:09, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:17, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 18:09, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:17, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 18:10, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:17, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 18:10, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:17, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 18:10, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:17, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 18:10, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:17, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 18:10, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:17, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 18:10, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:17, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 18:10, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:17, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 18:10, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:17, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 18:10, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:17, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 18:10, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:17, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 18:10, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:17, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 18:10, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:17, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 18:10, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:17, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Alicea en el pais de las maravillas 173.228.249.243 18:12, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: This is by Jessie Willcox Smith who died in 1935. Unfortunately, the WP:EN article doesn;t have a date for this work, so it may or may not be PD-1923. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:23, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not undeleted. Already exists at File:Boys and Girls of Bookland Alice in Wonderland.jpg. holly {chat} 05:46, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and no license at all. --JuTa 17:54, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work', imho rather commercial-oriented advertisements, and media not in use within Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 21:32, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: spam. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:26, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission.

Might be below COM:TOO. {{PD-textlogo}} Josve05a (talk) 22:04, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: still no license at all. --JuTa 10:55, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is the poster for promotional services and it does not serve the encyclopedic contents of the Wikipedia purposes. Thatonewikiguy (talk) 02:07, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, self promotion, not really a contributor. Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:08, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

see w:Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:My Clock as Justice for Mein Kampf: The Great Golden Rapture Clock From the Book of Zecharia Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:03, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination out of scope. Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:13, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

see w:Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:My Clock as Justice for Mein Kampf: The Great Golden Rapture Clock From the Book of Zecharia Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:03, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination out of scope+photomontages without sources. Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:14, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like a press agency photo, not "own work". -- Asclepias (talk) 04:09, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:19, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in the United States. This scupture was installed in 2006. per COM:PACUSA. See [1]. Magnolia677 (talk) 04:45, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:21, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong name 최광모 (talk) 05:00, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:24, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused (jpg) logo. No clear scope. Josve05a (talk) 08:45, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:26, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused (gif) logo. No clear scope. Josve05a (talk) 08:46, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:27, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused (jpg) logo. No clear scope. Josve05a (talk) 08:47, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination article was deleted. Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:28, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused (jpg) logo. No clear scope. Josve05a (talk) 08:51, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:36, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo. No clear scope. Josve05a (talk) 08:52, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:37, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio - clearly labeled cinestars,marathifanbook.com - so not "Own work" Arjayay (talk) 08:56, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:40, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry speedy deleted. Gunnex (talk) 09:27, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:43, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Diogolira (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry 2x speedy deleted.

Gunnex (talk) 09:37, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:44, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 10:16, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:56, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

extremely poor quality, not useable for any purpose MMFE (talk) 10:21, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:57, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Movie poster. No evidence of permission. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:07, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:54, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-respect du droit d'auteur Olivier Tanguy (talk) 11:37, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:22, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Higher resolution versions of this image can be found on the internet. Unclear if uploader owns copyright. Possible copyright violation. Takeaway (talk) 12:13, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:26, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found 25 times on TinEye, not user's file to upload. Mjrmtg (talk) 12:27, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination also a photomonage. Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:27, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:30, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:27, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:34, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:28, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:35, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:29, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:35, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:29, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:38, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:29, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:43, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:30, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:46, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:30, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 13:15, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:31, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:56, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:31, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:09, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Steinsplitter: Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by S judicial

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely own work of the uploader as claimed JuTa 17:22, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Clear copyright violation. --Mys_721tx (talk) 17:03, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no useful description for unknown field, at unknown location with unidentified dog. unused, uncategorized. Not educationally useful. DavidIvar (talk) 17:52, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Consensus to keep. --Riley Huntley (talk) 08:53, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gerd Leibrock (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These are images from the 1920s - 1940s, presumably from Germany. That is far too recent to assume that the photographer has been dead for 70 years. Please remember that the template requires that the author never disclosed his identity. That must be proven -- merely being unknown to Commons does not satisfy the requirement of the law.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:44, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

When the copyright notice is missing on the front side of collector cards it is impossible to determine the originator with a tolerable effort. If you look for „Zigarettenbilder“ and „cigarette card“ in Wikimedia you will find a big lot of such cards, for example:

I think therefore, that this file should not be deleted.--Gerd Leibrock (talk) 14:59, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please keep the file for about 14 days. I will ask permission from Anthony Verebes, son of Hedi Schoop.--Gerd Leibrock (talk) 14:59, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is impossible to determine the originator of this photograph because the copyright notice is missing in the newspaper „12-Uhr-Blatt“ of 12. September 1932. The file should therefore be kept.--Gerd Leibrock (talk) 15:07, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This photograph is a newspaper clip of unknown source as Alan Lareau states in his book. It is therefore impossible to determine the originator of the photograph. The file should be kept.--Gerd Leibrock (talk) 15:12, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please keep the file for about 14 days. I will ask permission from Anthony Verebes, son of Hedi Schoop.--Gerd Leibrock (talk) 15:23, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please keep the file for about 14 days. I will ask permission from Anthony Verebes, son of Hedi Schoop.--Gerd Leibrock (talk) 15:29, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please keep the file for about 14 days. I will ask permission from Anthony Verebes, son of Hedi Schoop.--Gerd Leibrock (talk) 15:29, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please keep the file for about 14 days. I will ask permission from Melodie Hollander, daughter of Friedrich Hollaender.--Gerd Leibrock (talk) 15:31, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is impossible to determine the originator of this photograph because the copyright notice is missing in the exile magazine „Aufbau“ of 5. Janauar 1945 [2]. The file should therefore be kept.--Gerd Leibrock (talk) 15:35, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please keep the file for about 14 days. I will ask permission from Anthony Verebes, son of Hedi Schoop.--Gerd Leibrock (talk) 15:38, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ferdinand Kahn emigrated 1939 to the US and died unmarried in 1951 in Hollywood. There is nobody whom one could ask who was the author of the passport photograph. The file should be kept.--Gerd Leibrock (talk) 15:51, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please keep the file for about 14 days. I will contact Hans Muggli, author ot the website where I found the photograph.--Gerd Leibrock (talk) 15:55, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:12, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gerd Leibrock (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Work of Ursula Stock, who is living. No evidence of permission.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:37, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

We have received a message at OTRS #2016021010017368 which purports to be a license from Ursula Stock. However, it is not from her public domain, so it may or may not be authentic. I have requested a license sent from an address at her public domain. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:18, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep, for files in ticket:2016021010017368. Jim, please take a look on my note in the OTRS.--Wdwd (talk) 19:01, 13 February 2016 (UTC). Forget to @Jameslwoodward: . --Wdwd (talk) 12:32, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, Permission from the artist via OTRS, address verified.Wdwd (talk) 21:29, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A logo of not notable Internet community. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 23:33, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 03:38, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cobetadeeper (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Yes, text logos... most likely not own work, and perhaps we could keep one and not five of the essentially same thing. Begins to look promotional especially when coupled with the last file "deeper web".

Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:33, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Out of scope. --Érico (talk) 03:37, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Rodrigolopes (talk) 11:21, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also nominating

Rodrigolopes (talk) 00:15, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 01:17, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 01:17, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused promotional logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:36, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 01:18, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Another duplicate images can be found on here : معاً للنقاش Thatonewikiguy (talk) 01:59, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted both as uncredited derivative of cartoon characters of uknown origin and authorship. --Storkk (talk) 14:04, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo without any educational purpose (low resolution and no objective). Glorious 93 (talk) 02:28, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nominator: Not realistically useful for an educational purpose: out of scope. --Storkk (talk) 14:05, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo without any educational purpose. Glorious 93 (talk) 02:29, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nominator: Not realistically useful for an educational purpose: out of scope. --Storkk (talk) 14:05, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo without any educational purpose. Glorious 93 (talk) 02:29, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nominator: Not realistically useful for an educational purpose: out of scope. --Storkk (talk) 14:06, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo without any educational purpose. Glorious 93 (talk) 02:30, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nominator: Not realistically useful for an educational purpose: out of scope. --Storkk (talk) 14:06, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo without any educational purpose. Glorious 93 (talk) 02:31, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nominator: Not realistically useful for an educational purpose: out of scope. --Storkk (talk) 14:06, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo without any educational purpose. Glorious 93 (talk) 02:31, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nominator: Not realistically useful for an educational purpose: out of scope. --Storkk (talk) 14:06, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Falta Información DreamFallss (talk) 03:02, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Missing EXIF, Watermarked "Fatima Kelley"(?) who should confirm license via COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 14:07, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, newspaper clipping Subhashish Panigrahi (talk) 02:57, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia 15 Event coverage in local news shall not be deleted Naahar (talk) 12:52, 9 February 2016 (UTC)Naahar[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: local news is obviously opyrighted, and uploader states that this is from local news... News organization should contact COM:OTRS to confirm license. --Storkk (talk) 14:09, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, newspaper clipping Subhashish Panigrahi (talk) 02:51, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia 15 Event coverage in Leading local news paper Naahar (talk) 12:43, 9 February 2016 (UTC)naahar[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: local news is obviously copyrighted, news organization should contact COM:OTRS to confirm license. --Storkk (talk) 14:10, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio Subhashish Panigrahi (talk) 02:49, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 14:12, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:07, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: unused pure text PDFs are out of scope. --Storkk (talk) 14:12, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:09, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unused pure text PDF files are out of scope. --Storkk (talk) 14:13, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not oen work as movie poster. With highest resolution: http://cdn4.static.ovimg.com/m/0crfgcy/?width=1200&mode=thumb Cap1000 (talk) 03:13, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 14:14, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation: Metadata Sander Sander (talk) 04:59, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright bildrausch, Rolf Jenni who should confirm license via COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 14:16, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo. No clear scope. Josve05a (talk) 08:50, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 14:18, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio - clearly watermarked Marathi Actors.com - so not own work Arjayay (talk) 08:57, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 14:19, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, original book cover. Draa kul (talk) 15:56, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 13:36, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermarked, low resolution, highly unlikely own work. GRuban (talk) 16:19, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 13:35, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-created artwork without obvious educational use. Unused, uncategorized. No useful description. DavidIvar (talk) 18:27, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Unused file, artwork without obvious educational use. --BrightRaven (talk) 13:27, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Name falsch geschrieben; SternenfelsSternenfes anstatt Hofwart (talk) 21:17, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: duplicate. Please use {{Dup}} in the future. --Storkk (talk) 13:39, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hi - Alan does not have permission to use this photo. It should be deleted or replaced. DianeMcNamara (talk) 22:17, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Alan Light is the author of this photo, so he does not need a permission.--Carniolus (talk) 22:59, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No serious doubt raised regarding Alan Light's authorship... I added a {{Personality rights}} template, but it's a clear keeper. --Storkk (talk) 13:43, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Suinulan rautatieasema 88.112.137.45 09:58, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that your user Junafani has added a picture called Suinulan asema into the Wikipedia. Suinulan asema which means Suinula's railwaystation is a private residence nowadays and the pictures have been taken without permission. I'm requesting that it would be removed immediately from your service. The railwaystation has been our home since 2010. Best Regards Annu Kiili The owner of Suinula's railwaystation, Finland 88.112.137.45 10:06, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Riley Huntley (talk) 20:55, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted, per https://www.flickr.com/photos/64518776@N08/7837094840/ Mattythewhite (talk) 01:45, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 01:05, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Have uploaded a better real image जैन (talk) 07:05, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason to delete Natuur12 (talk) 21:09, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I wasn't aware of Wiki policies at the time I uploaded this file. I don't own necessary copyright for this photo. Nimit (talk) 03:53, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 01:06, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

After returning to verify the copyright status of this image, I was unable to find information about the author, creation date, or publication history. This presumably makes this a copyright violation until these things are found. A Texas Historian (talk) 05:21, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@A Texas Historian: what makes you doubt the OCLC's 1892 date, which would make this {{PD-US-1923}}? Storkk (talk) 14:17, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 01:07, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Crown copyright is for 50 years, so no notes newer than 1965. and these bank notes are newer than that, the question is if de minimis applies. The impact of this image is that the hair decorations are visibly bank notes, so de minimis cannot apply. KTo288 (talk) 00:23, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes the bank notes are visible, however de minimus applies as the focus is not on any one bank note as they are shown en-mass and no bank note is shown in its entirety, due to being screwed up/bundled up. We have a number of photographs of copyrightable wrapped sweets that have been kept on the same basis, money should not be a special case. -- (talk) 15:45, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per Fae. --Natuur12 (talk) 12:46, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False license, published on flickr by the not copyright owner Cap1000 (talk) 03:18, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 12:46, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolution, missing EXIF. Uploaded by 1-upload user Conceitual (talk · contributions · Statistics). Gunnex (talk) 08:41, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 12:46, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unkorrekte Dublette zu File:Galaxies-AGN-Inner-Structure.svg Rothwild (talk) 08:53, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 12:46, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unkorrekte Dublette zu File:Galaxies-AGN-Inner-Structure.svg Rothwild (talk) 08:54, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 12:46, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unkorrekte Dublette zu File:Galaxies-AGN-Inner-Structure.svg Rothwild (talk) 08:55, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Natuur12 (talk) 12:46, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unkorrekte Dublette zu File:Galaxies-AGN-Inner-Structure.svg Rothwild (talk) 08:55, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 12:47, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status. Uploaded on 03.11.2015 (not "own work") this is the logo of the Brazilian radio station pt:Rádio Grenal which may be (due to the 3D effects of the ball) above COM:TOO. If it is in public domain, proper license tag & attribution should be used. Gunnex (talk) 09:16, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nominating — per above — also:

Gunnex (talk) 09:19, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 12:47, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Declaration of State of Israel 1948.jpg Triggerhippie4 (talk) 10:03, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Not the same and personally I would use this one. --Natuur12 (talk) 12:48, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. There is no proof of {{CC BY-SA 3.0}}. {{PD-TR}} cannot be applied.

File:Kenan Evren.jpg will be affected. Takabeg (talk) 10:08, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 12:48, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This images shows the promotional images of the services which break the Wikipedia as free encyclopedia spirits Thatonewikiguy (talk) 10:22, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 12:48, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

infringe derechos de autoría, autor original es Ecuavisa, Baron1993 se hace pasar por autor de la marca de televisora ecuatoriana.

Ya existe otra página que tiene el logo de Ecuavisa en https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3ALogo_Ecuavisa.svg, la cual se irá actualizando con los nuevos logos del canal del Ecuador. Kovox90 (talk) 22:23, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: I am closing this one as being above TOO. The law in Equador is based on the Chilean Civil Code and our only example listed regarding Chile (not a logo) seems to indicate that there is a low TOO in Chile so unless we have evidence which which suggests otherwise we have to assume that Ecuador also has a low TOO. --Natuur12 (talk) 12:54, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear what this is supposed to represent or illustrate. Seems out of scope. Takeaway (talk) 12:07, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 12:56, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear what this is suposed to represent or illustrate. Out of scope. Takeaway (talk) 12:08, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 12:56, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source, no evidence of PD, dubious licensing. Sealle (talk) 12:32, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 12:56, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate images found at here: Lowkey Thatonewikiguy (talk) 12:53, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 12:56, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It claims public domain, but the public domain claim applies to legislative instruments. This image was copied from DIN 4531 (and says so). German DIN publications are under copyright and are NOT in the public domain which is why they can charge a sizeable price for the specification (EUR 40 in this case). The specification itself carries a copyright notice. 86.153.133.193 12:57, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Imho below TOO. --Natuur12 (talk) 12:57, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A copy of a picture copyrighted to ČTK (http://www.denik.cz/z_domova/byvala-firma-vita-barty-se-prejmenovala-bartuv-bratr-rezignoval-20120313.html) LacoR (talk) 13:25, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

From the same uploader File:Judr Bárta.jpg - file atributed to Hans Štembera ([3])--LacoR (talk) 13:29, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 12:57, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 13:56, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 12:58, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely studio portrait: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 13:57, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 12:58, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sadly, this is very unlikely already in public domain. Bigger image at http://donsdepot.donrossgroup.net/dr0602/jm002.jpg (context at this site) gives 1966 as the date. Uploder claimed bogus own work and recent date, possibly fooled by the upload wizzard; his other uploads need scrutiny. -- Tuválkin 13:58, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 12:58, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely professional portrait: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 14:03, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 12:58, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Out of scope. Storkk (talk) 14:04, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 12:58, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 14:04, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 12:58, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, likely TV still: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 14:04, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 12:58, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No metadata, smallish filesize: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 14:05, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 12:58, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Out of scope. Storkk (talk) 14:06, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 12:58, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons isn't a personnal web host (a Flickr like). Sismarinho (talk) 14:12, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 12:58, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

When you look at the yellow poster in the back it is clearly written in Italian. Therefore I strongly doubt that image was taken in the US or by NASA (and in an Airbus Defence and Space facility). Hektor (talk) 14:18, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: NASA credits it as being taken by NASA. This should be good enough. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:01, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a book, I see no reason an author with the name Jura84 would be its owner, moreover there is also an open question about the publisher. So I have strong reasons to suspect it was just downloaded from somewhere and deposited here under incorrect license Helixitta (t.) 14:20, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:01, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The redaktor of the magazine “La Ondo de Esperanto”, Aleksander Korĵenkov, agreed to any use of covers in Wikimedia. This cover is proposed to be deleted in favor of a more representative one: File:Gs25JvyBCU8.jpg Aleks Andre (talk) 14:46, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:01, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gustavo Drago (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Own works ??

2003:45:5C21:3401:E50E:CF01:4D98:D512 15:00, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:01, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons isn't Flickr Sismarinho (talk) 15:01, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:01, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation 2003:45:5C21:3401:E50E:CF01:4D98:D512 15:18, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:02, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation 2003:45:5C21:3401:E50E:CF01:4D98:D512 15:21, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:02, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Diese Datei ist veraltet und entspricht nicht mehr dem aktuellen Stand. Chrille97 (talk) 15:28, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason to delete. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:02, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:PACKAGING Ahecht (talk) 15:40, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:02, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:02, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dubious own work 2003:45:5C21:3401:E50E:CF01:4D98:D512 15:45, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:02, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS ticket required 2003:45:5C21:3401:E50E:CF01:4D98:D512 16:15, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:02, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tico2013 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious "own" works

2003:45:5C21:3401:E50E:CF01:4D98:D512 16:22, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:02, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio of en:Tyrian (video game) Themightyquill (talk) 16:24, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, it's been released under GNU General Public License. I withdraw the nomination. - Themightyquill (talk)

Kept: Withdrawn. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:03, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo. No clear scope. Josve05a (talk) 16:40, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:03, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This images provide no context and showing random people posing for photographs. This is Wikimedia commons , not Facebook to upload personal photos . Thatonewikiguy (talk) 18:34, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:03, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional Edslov (talk) 18:43, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: EXIF lists "Xavi Rubis" as the author and this doesn't match the accountname of the uploader. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:04, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This images is spammy and do not contribute any values to Wikipedia Thatonewikiguy (talk) 18:55, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:04, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality, better version available here: File:OrlandoLasso.jpg Rettinghaus (talk) 19:07, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:04, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Автор и лицензия под сомнением. Логотипы защищены авторским правом. Dogad75 (talk) 19:38, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:04, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think its not own work 2003:4D:2C4E:5C85:1860:54E1:8513:A614 19:54, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:05, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo. No clear scope. Josve05a (talk) 20:45, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:05, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not a personal work. I cropped another picture (File:Victor Segalen1 (cropped).jpg) to get a similar one with a better license. El Funcionario (talk) 21:30, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ceci n'est pas un "travail personnel". Le photographe est inconnu et j'ai essayé de reproduire une image équivalente mais avec une licence correcte. --El Funcionario (talk) 21:32, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: 2012 file which is in use. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:05, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused (jpg) logo. No clear scope. Josve05a (talk) 21:52, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:05, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused (jpg) logo. No clear scope. Josve05a (talk) 23:01, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:05, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo are showing an artwork which are still protected under Mexico's Copyright Law. ProtoplasmaKid (talk) 23:05, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:05, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]