Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/02/01

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive February 1st, 2016

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Chicken Cottage.png Commons:Deletion requests/File:Netflix area.svg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Birth Certificate of Ketevan "Keke" Geladze.jpg

[edit]

faked by a compulsive liar who is vandalizing all of the pages surrounding this topic, see: http://www.stalinsociety.org/2016/01/21/anatomy-of-a-forgery/

This was deleted by Natuur12 in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Birth Certificate of Ketevan "Keke" Geladze.jpg. --Stefan2 (talk) 18:41, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lexatis100 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

copyvio (1x cropped, see also exif: copyrighted work by "Raphael Mesquita") via https://enfoquemania.wordpress.com/2015/03/08/rio-valeska-popozuda-sobe-ao-palco-durante-show-de-lexa-no-aniversario-de-12-anos-da-k2l-na-fundicao-progresso/ (03.2015, credit: "Raphael Mesquita / Divulgação ") = https://enfoquemania.files.wordpress.com/2015/03/img_7440.jpg (identical exif)

Gunnex (talk) 12:59, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Info Batch error, tagged with copyvio. Gunnex (talk) 13:00, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Info Similar behaviour as Logoartist22 (talk · contributions · Statistics)... Gunnex (talk) 13:10, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. -- ~ Nahid Talk 20:38, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cerknica.jpg

[edit]

Logo might be above TOO. Josve05a (talk) 00:04, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, clear copyvio, source is Google. This is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 16:29, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:LeeandOrson.jpg

[edit]

Not own work, its a en:Chimes at Midnight movie screenshot, 1956 year so not in PD Cap1000 (talk) 00:27, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 18:17, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kalonglogo.gif

[edit]

Doubtful "own work" (see web article here). The logo is above the TOO in my opinion. - Fma12 (talk) 11:33, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, by user:EugeneZelenko as copyright violation, because the logo surpasses threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 16:26, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Brianz20050803 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All previously deleted files, now sourced to a Flickrwashing account

Ytoyoda (talk) 16:11, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, yeah, Baruto, one of most famous Estonians ... at least in Japan. Taivo (talk) 17:55, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:EHF 2016 map.png

[edit]

In simple words international law is law of stronger!! Crimea is part of russia??? 109.93.190.48 00:29, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, the file is used in multiple projects and cannot be deleted on that reason. Taivo (talk) 18:41, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Мурад Мамедов.jpg

[edit]

not own work: http://www.rusdrama-az.com/mamedov2.html Cap1000 (talk) 02:25, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 19:41, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:POISON123456.jpg

[edit]

Likely from http://www.taringa.net/posts/imagenes/1960809/Fondos-Rock-N---Z.html Ytoyoda (talk) 02:25, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, this external site is itself full of copyvios. Taivo (talk) 19:46, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2-pentyne.png

[edit]

Unused low-res with in-image caption text. Have File:2-pentyne.svg as high quality image-only replacement DMacks (talk) 04:14, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, that's right. Taivo (talk) 19:49, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:GrupoRana.jpg

[edit]

no need for it. a revised version is up. Mccoolarge (talk) 07:16, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 19:55, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tugboat traffic on the Mobile River with ADDSCO 2.jpeg

[edit]

Accidental upload, identical to one of my other uploads. - Tim D. Williamson yak-yak 08:39, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 19:43, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Российская гильдия риэлторов.jpg

[edit]

Logo can't be own or free Bilderling (talk) 08:47, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, surpasses threshold of originality. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 20:02, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Grupo Rana 1992.jpg

[edit]

This file appears to be taken from http://servicios.prensalibre.com/pl/domingo/archivo/revistad/2009/mayo/31/farandula.shtml which prohibits the reproduction of the site without permission and reserves its copy-right. There does not appear to be evidence that the uploader is the copyright holder. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:24, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, I delete also file:GrupoRana1992.jpg and file:Grupo Rana.jpg, which are scaled-down copies. Taivo (talk) 20:08, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Indigo Grey-The Passage-NEW.jpg

[edit]

dublicate to File:Indigo Grey-The Passage-poster.jpg Queryzo (talk) 09:39, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 20:24, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RAMON COVARRUBIAS (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted image, see author = google!

Ies (talk) 17:31, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, by user:Infrogmation as copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 20:22, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fantasmic! at Disneyland Park

[edit]

Author requested: Meant to be a category Elisfkc (talk) 22:00, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 20:19, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gravalaka (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Celebrity photos from various photo shoots. All over the Internet. Certainly not free use.

Majora (talk) 23:56, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, by Christian Ferrer with reason "User is uploading every picture they can find of this person from the Internet. "Self" is dubious at best and there is no evidence that these have been released." Taivo (talk) 20:16, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Nelson Fagundes.jpg

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry speedy deleted. Gunnex (talk) 10:54, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 20:48, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ACOSCA AIR COOLER.jpg

[edit]

Spam (w:Special:Undelete/User:ACOSCA/sandbox). MER-C 10:55, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, small unused photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 20:54, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Logo du groupe Up .jpg

[edit]

Bonjour, en stage au groupe Up, et fervente admiratrice de Wikipedia, j'ai voulu bien faire et remplacer un ancien logo par un nouveau sur une page wikipedia, j'ai chargé ce fichier par erreur alors que c'est une marque déposée, je n'en suis pas l'auteur contrairement à ce qui est indiqué (je n'ai pas fait attention en cochant la case). J'ai voulu le supprimer ou modifier les droits d'auteur par moi-même de suite mais apparemment c'est impossible, il faut l'action d'un administrateur. Merci de le supprimer. Voici le lien vers le site de la marque en question : http://www.up-group.coop/ Ineela Marile (talk) 11:04, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 20:58, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Snor.jpg

[edit]

Not own work, 1979 image taken from http://peterzwaal.nl/snor/ Sonty (talk) 11:22, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, anyway, copyrighted design. Taivo (talk) 21:02, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Suunto G-72.jpg

[edit]

The page of this picture is deleted. Without it the picture is likely redundant. Tjrasanen (talk) 11:46, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, source – Internet, author – unknown. Such photos are not suitable into Commons. Taivo (talk) 21:39, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Photo Bernard-Pictet.jpg

[edit]

Seems copyvio Shev123 (talk) 11:52, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 21:50, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rouge 2003.jpg

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. Uploaded by 1-upload user Gustavo-de-Lara (talk · contributions · Statistics) in 2012, but previously published via (example) http://www.flogao.com.br/rougeestrelas/115291539 (2007, © by "rougeestrelas") = http://cache-assets.flogao.com.br/photos/full/115291539.jpg (even [now] watermarked, but most likely removed by uploader). Gunnex (talk) 11:56, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 21:52, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fahad Fazil.jpg

[edit]

DR started as source/author and tagged "www.metromatinee.com", hence potentially non-free content, Roland zh (talk) 18:37, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: clear copyright violation. --JuTa 23:00, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fahad Fazil.jpg

[edit]

The author on Flickr deleted the file JØ (talk) 04:55, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:24, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fahad Fazil.jpg

[edit]

Flickr Washing http://files.prokerala.com/movies/pics/1280/movie-stills-23261.jpg MediaJet talk 08:24, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The Flickr image was reviewed by FlickreviewR and has proven that the stated license is valid. --173.55.239.44 19:29, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Dhyan-sreenivasan-20131111165127-31103.jpg

[edit]

DR started to verify claimed 'own work' as p.e. thumbnail format and missing exif, Roland zh (talk) 18:37, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: clear copyright violation. --JuTa 22:59, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Michael-fassbender-slow-west-26may15-01.jpg

[edit]

The Premiere of 'Macbeth' during the 68th annual Cannes Film Festival on May 23, 2015 in Cannes, France.Pictured: Michael FassbenderRef: SPL1035454 230515 Picture by: Splash NewsSplash News and PicturesLos Angeles:310-821-2666New York:212-619-2666London:870-934-2666photodesk@splashnews.com Tiana Weinmann (talk) 19:08, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: clear copyright violation. --JuTa 23:04, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Passeig Mise.jpg

[edit]

Copyvio of a protected image, taken from http://www.festacatalunya.cat/articles-mostra-6821-cat-passeig_de_la_misericyrdia.htm Jordi Roqué (Discussió/Talk) 12:28, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, bad user, a lot of copyvios. Taivo (talk) 12:24, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Passeig Canet.jpg

[edit]

Imnage with copyright. URL:http://www.panoramio.com/photo/12997980 Jordi Roqué (Discussió/Talk) 12:35, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, bad user, a lot of copyvios. Taivo (talk) 12:28, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Platja cavaio.jpg

[edit]

Image with copyright URL:http://www.panoramio.com/photo/17611995 Jordi Roqué (Discussió/Talk) 12:38, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, bad user, a lot of copyvios. Taivo (talk) 12:03, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:RestauMise.jpg

[edit]

Copyright URL:http://www.festacatalunya.cat/articles-mostra-6835-cat-restaurant_del_santuari.htm Jordi Roqué (Discussió/Talk) 12:40, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, bad user, a lot of copyvios. Taivo (talk) 12:29, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fàbrica Jover.jpg

[edit]

COpyvio URL:http://www.minube.com/fotos/rincon/119206/556834 Jordi Roqué (Discussió/Talk) 13:04, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, bad user, a lot of copyvios. Taivo (talk) 10:32, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Surfer101 c4f670.jpg

[edit]

highly unlikely that this image is the own creation of a newly established author. No copyright info, etc. given. Mscuthbert (talk) 20:18, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, small unused photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:14, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:CreuCanet.jpg

[edit]

Duplicate, low quality image copied from an earlier update by another user (File:Canet-creu de pedracastell-2012 (2).JPG) Jordi Roqué (Discussió/Talk) 12:56, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:37, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Faculty of Law, University of Delhi.jpg

[edit]

file/image no longer needed. Itsgaurav8 (talk) 13:00, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 13:26, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bigamiya.pdf

[edit]

hindi ma upload ang isang mas magandang artikulo tungkol sa bigamiya dahil sa pagkakapareho nila ng titulo. Angel Sophia C. Bacud (talk) 13:24, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 13:30, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cetelem.png

[edit]

copyrighted logo —Andrei S. Talk 14:02, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, I will delete also file:Cetelem Romania.png due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 13:33, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Krieghoff 02.jpg

[edit]

Falsche Beschreibung des Textes Lothar520 (talk) 16:24, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Krieghoff 02.jpg

[edit]

Falsches Hochladen Lothar520 (talk) 16:33, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: a wrong description is not a deletion reason, just make the correction. P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:06, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Krieghoff 02.jpg

[edit]

versehendliches Duplikat Lothar520 (talk) 15:14, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, copy of file:Theodor Krieghoff beim komponieren am Piano.jpg. Taivo (talk) 19:34, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mohammd Zahid Azmi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, bad composition, bad quality. Taivo (talk) 19:43, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Woman in bra staring.png

[edit]

Out of scope per COM:NOTUSED, bad quality due to size (of the picture, of course...). Grand-Duc (talk) 16:44, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, only 145×251 pixels. Taivo (talk) 21:51, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
[edit]

Wenn schon im Bildnamen "copyright" steht und in der Beschreibung Copyright Bundesregierung/Kugler ist die Linzensierung mehr als fraglich Alnilam (talk) 15:48, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, ja, natürlich. Taivo (talk) 09:54, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Christian lange pst 002.jpg

[edit]

In der Bildbeschreibung steht (Copyright: Bundesregierung/Kugler), also ist die Lizensierung äußerst fraglich Alnilam (talk) 15:51, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, ja, natürlich. Taivo (talk) 09:52, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Escobar2015.jpg

[edit]

EXIF credits ISAAC ORTIZ, authorship not explained in source Ytoyoda (talk) 16:09, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, I will delete most of his uploads as copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 11:19, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wide 33237cb1-b07c-43cd-8b05-742c5ee13d1a.jpg

[edit]

Cross-wiki upload of blatant advertising, out of scope and not in use on any other projects Regards, James(talk/contribs) 16:23, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:00, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ridgeback STD bike 1983.jpg

[edit]

Seemingly a copyrighted image taken from a catalogue or another commercial advertising medium. Ies (talk) 16:36, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, blatant advertising, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:03, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Comercio internacional Unidad 6.pdf

[edit]

para subir unarchivo nuevo Rosana Capote (talk) 17:03, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 12:14, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cerkev sv. Mihaela na Barju 01.jpg

[edit]

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: unfree architecture by J. Plečnik (d. 1957). It is possible to upload it locally. Eleassar (t/p) 17:10, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:18, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hedemorajärnvägsstation1949.jpg

[edit]

hedemorajärnvägsstation1949.jpg Lennean (talk) 23:41, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Skrivit fel information på fel foto Lennean (talk) 23:42, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete!!! wrong photographer.. Lennean (talk) 17:18, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 12:19, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Josef Rudolf Mengele.ogg

[edit]

Josef Mengele did not have a middle name (at least not of Rudolf). This pronunciation was in response to my own request for it at the English Wikipedia when someone had vandalized the Josef Mengele article, leading one to believe that he had a middle name. Bossanoven (talk) 21:37, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: in use Krd 19:24, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Josef Rudolf Mengele.ogg

[edit]

Josef Mengele did not have a middle name. It really does not matter that this file is currently in use; it should be replaced with a correct pronunciation rather than be kept. Bossanoven (talk) 22:32, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: see COM:RENAME Krd 15:45, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Josef Rudolf Mengele.ogg

[edit]

Incorrect file. It is more than merely a problem with the file name; it is a problem with the pronunciation within the file. He did not have a middle name of Rudolf. This is faulty information. Bossanoven (talk) 19:31, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, it does not matter, how bad, erroneous and misleading the file is. It is used in multiple projects and therefore it is kept. Taivo (talk) 14:43, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Le Louvre IMG 20141107 131356 (15141680883).jpg

[edit]

Image quite identical to File:Le Louvre IMG 20141107 131358 (15737391546).jpg. No information about any difference Tangopaso (talk) 20:44, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, differences exist, but are quite small. The photos are taken from same place some seconds apart. This file is deleted, because the other is used. Taivo (talk) 14:59, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Чайка летить.JPG

[edit]

Not useful per COM:EDUSE as this file does not add anything significantly to the existing collection of images in Category:Larus in flight and Category:Larus argentatus (in flight), eg. A, B and C. Deletion proposed on quality grounds due to the bad crop. Grand-Duc (talk) 21:41, 1 February 2016 (UTC) Addendum: another gull underside with a good quality here. Grand-Duc (talk) 21:42, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep - this one is useful, as it's a species (Larus cachinnans) that Commons doesn't have many pics of (unlike L. argentatus!), and shows the wingtip pattern better than any other pic we have of the species. Its broad location (Ukraine) was determinable from the contributor's other uploads. - MPF (talk) 23:13, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK, in that case:  I withdraw my nomination, as the arguments of @MPF: are convincing. I'd suggest a filemove, as it's currently reading "seagull flies" according to Google translate. Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 02:27, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, withdrawn. Taivo (talk) 16:29, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:El baul.png

[edit]

Copyrighted content, no fair use files allowed in Commons C messier (talk) 14:58, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Pink Panther is surely copyrighted and other things are likely also. This is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 18:20, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ichthyothereol fixed.png

[edit]

Per doi:10.1021/ja00950a044 (natural-product isolation, structure and abs stereo determiniation) and doi:10.1021/jo0104532 (total stereoselective synth) this appears to be the wrong enantiomer. Have File:Ichthyothereol skeletal.png as alternative. Could another chemist please double-check? Assuming so, will replace the uses with this alt ASAP. DMacks (talk) 04:10, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note, the File:Ichthyothereol.png mentioned as incorrect by uploader (and later deleted) that this replaces is not relevant to this issue (was not even structurally correct and contained no stereochem at all). DMacks (talk) 04:12, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! All uses replaced (by which I find that both fr.wp and bg.wp didn't even have the correct relative stereo in their infobox identifiers!). DMacks (talk) 23:55, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 00:13, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cock after anal.jpg

[edit]

Gros doute concernant la pertinence et l'utilité de cette image. Sismarinho (talk) 10:21, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:02, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cock after anal 3.jpg

[edit]

Gros doute concernant la pertinence et l'utilité de cette image. Sismarinho (talk) 10:22, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:02, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cock after anal 2.jpg

[edit]

Gros doute concernant la pertinence et l'utilité de cette image. Sismarinho (talk) 10:22, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:02, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Движение

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Движение (talk · contribs):

Unused photos about non-notable people, out of project scope. Also small photos without metadata, own work is not sure.) Taivo (talk) 10:20, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete All Jordi Roqué (Discussió/Talk) 09:09, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination : Unused photos about non-notable people, out of project scope. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:04, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tinhayrofl (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused map of questionable notability. Should be in SVG or map markup if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: no licenses at all. --JuTa 04:47, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Niftiyevibrahim

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Niftiyevibrahim (talk · contribs):

Small photos without metadata, not own work, but copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 10:27, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:07, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Thorsten

[edit]

THORSTEN (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

There is no freedom of panorama in Uzbekistan. The buildings are apparently modern. OTRS-permission from author (architect or sculptor) is needed. Taivo (talk) 10:30, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:09, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Lado Gudiashvili.jpg

[edit]

With all due respect, there is no freedom of panorama in Georgia Ymblanter (talk) 10:50, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:12, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Andhra avakaya recipe.jpg

[edit]

I no longer want to see this image here Praveen22121 (talk) 10:50, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep But this is not a reason to delete it. That's what happens if you publish it under free license. Taivo (talk) 20:44, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:13, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Andhra avakaya.jpg

[edit]

picture quality is low Praveen22121 (talk) 14:45, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Good enough with a description. Yann (talk) 22:15, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Andhra avakaya.jpg

[edit]

i no longer want to see this image here Praveen22121 (talk) 10:51, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:14, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gustavo281992 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. Uploaded in a row on 04.12.2008 for pt:Itapipoca (Brazilian municipality), most likely by a spontaneous "all-he-can-get grabber". Considering also File:Sertao 2006 70.jpg (150x113px), File:Foto008 zd3wk.jpg (watermark photoshopped), nonsense "permission"/"other versions" information like "GGHFH, EFR, fdffgbf, THTHHDVV, FRF, RRGERG", etc. and a related ptwiki text edit on same day which was copyvioed from (example) http://diariodonordeste.verdesmares.com.br/suplementos/tur/a-terra-dos-tres-climas-1.723954 (2006).

Gunnex (talk) 09:57, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete all. Taivo (talk) 20:30, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 06:37, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Boxing day sales 2015.png

[edit]

Unused file, no clear scope. Promotional in nature. Josve05a (talk) 23:31, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 06:52, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jenny13.jpg

[edit]

Unused personal image. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:09, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:20, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Alex Slagmolen.jpg

[edit]

Unused {{Userpage image}}. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:10, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:20, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fb Logo 00003.png

[edit]

Unused, unidentified logos. No clear scope. Josve05a (talk) 00:19, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:20, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:José Rosales en 2012 junto a uno de sus entrenadores..jpg

[edit]

Unused personal image Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:29, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:21, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:New Concept Technologies.png

[edit]

Unused logo. No clear scope. Josve05a (talk) 00:49, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete also file:New Concept Technologies 1.png due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 19:01, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:22, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:G-fix.gif

[edit]

Unused logos. No clear scope. Josve05a (talk) 00:51, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I add a lot of logos for deletion due to same reason. Uploader is the same. Taivo (talk) 19:21, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:22, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Flag of Tunis Bey-fr.svg

[edit]

Flag is inaccurate to modern historical depictions and better depictions are provided on the 'Bey of Tunis' wikipedia page Nwest2001 (talk) 01:24, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The file is still used 256 times in 36 projects. Taivo (talk) 19:39, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep per COM:INUSE. —Mr. Granger (talk  · contribs) 01:42, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep --Chewbacca2205 (talk) 21:10, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Krd 13:22, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Lin Qinxia 1960.jpg

[edit]

the photo might have been taken in 1960, but it wasn't published in 1960. It was only published after Lin became famous, in 1980s or later, therefore not in the public domain of either PRC or ROC Timmyshin (talk) 02:46, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:22, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by PANDITKRUSHNACHANDRA (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Please see our project scope.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:07, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:23, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Наталья Летова (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Spamer's contribution - ads of a vendor. "How nice is my factory"... Not in use.

Bilderling (talk) 08:39, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete also file:Энергетическая-арматура-5.jpg. Small photos without metadata, inadequate description. Taivo (talk) 20:00, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:23, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Казакова Натали (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Spam. advertising.

Bilderling (talk) 08:49, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:23, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Igor mir

[edit]

Igor mir~commonswiki (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

Book covers. OTRS-permission from copyright holder (publishing houses?) is needed. Taivo (talk) 09:14, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:23, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Billentyu007

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Billentyu007 (talk · contribs):

Historical photos, uploader and author are different. Correct photographer and death year must be given. Taivo (talk) 09:28, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:23, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:ShalyGrat

[edit]

Here are all uploads of ShalyGrat (talk · contribs):

Small photos without metadata, probably not own works, but copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 09:33, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:24, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bindella1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope

— Racconish ☎ 09:43, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by Krd. --Riley Huntley (talk) 09:14, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bindella1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope

— Racconish ☎ 11:28, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:24, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bindella1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope and recreation of previously deleted files. See Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Bindella1

— Racconish ☎ 18:05, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Bindella1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope and some recreation of previously deleted files.

— Racconish ☎ 21:54, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 12:55, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 12:55, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Harleyhuke

[edit]

Here are all contributions of Harleyhuke (talk · contribs):

This is probably self-promotion campaign of wannabe model. But Harley Huke is not mentioned in en.wiki. Photos about her are called selfies – they do not look like that. Mostly small photos, if camera data exists, then usually different. Callie Miller is per en:List of fictional music groups a fictional artist. These photos are out of project scope, also maybe copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 09:40, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Abdul karim shaikh

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Abdul karim shaikh (talk · contribs):

Unused photos about non-notable people (Mourya is not mentioned in en.wiki), out of project scope. (Also small photos without metadata, own work is not sure, maybe copyright violations.) The user was warned in the past not to upload out-of-scope images and I blocked him for a month. Taivo (talk) 09:51, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ahmet Şekerciler.jpg

[edit]

Commons don't host selfie of not notable persons. Sismarinho (talk) 09:57, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Abdullah Nasir 1078

[edit]

Here are all contributions of Abdullah Nasir 1078 (talk · contribs):

Actor Muhammad Abdullah Nasir is unknown to en.wiki, but claims himself to be most famous actor in Europe. Unused photos about non-notable people are out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:59, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:BC interview.jpg

[edit]

Copyvio : http://pebbleinthestillwaters.blogspot.fr/2014/10/author-interview-william-hare-aka-bill.html Sismarinho (talk) 10:10, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:HDFC LOGO.jpg

[edit]

Website clearly contains a copyright. No evidence that uploader is the actual copyright holder of the work. Ricky81682 (talk) 06:38, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I think, that the logo is below threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 19:53, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Krd 13:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Vasters (9230614767).jpg

[edit]

This photo essentialy shows a photo taken in 1956. It seems that there is no permission from the photographer, and no freedom of panorama. Robert Weemeyer (talk) 06:43, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Logo BKZ-4.jpg

[edit]

Logo can't be free. Spamer's contribution - ads of a vendor. Bilderling (talk) 08:37, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Diffusion de tracts pour le Carnaval de Paris 2016 - Photo prise le 31 janvier 2016.jpg

[edit]

Commons don't host personnal images. Sismarinho (talk) 10:33, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:30, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Homog.jpg

[edit]

Uploader is Videoecology, author is V. Filin. Maybe they are not the same person, that case the photo is copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:41, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:30, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Carajavi.png

[edit]

Spam. Non sense. Andreuvv (talk) 22:27, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:32, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Año Nuevo 2016.JPG

[edit]

Commons purpose is not to host selfies of non known people. Andreuvv (talk) 22:37, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:32, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bera Nándor.jpg

[edit]

Selfie of not known person Andreuvv (talk) 22:40, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:32, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jožko Kuliočko (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 15:14, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in category:Hotel Uzbekistan

[edit]

These files are in category:Hotel Uzbekistan:

There is no freedom of panorama in Uzbekistan. 2 files (marked with asterisk) were previously nominated for deletion and kept with rationale "just another straight building". This is incorrect: the building is not straight. Taivo (talk) 10:35, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Unfortunately, have to be deleted since there is no FoP in Uzbekistan. --Ymblanter (talk) 21:05, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Acky69 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

These were my first uploaded files, sorry for the format, you can delete them. In the meantime I changed the content to two licensed .svg files (Diesis_klein + Diesis_gross.svg) and used them in the German wikipedia. Regards --Acky69 (talk) 16:57, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: no license at all. --JuTa 01:58, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Guantanamo -- motivated seller!.jpg

[edit]

poster, need OTRS-permission Motopark (talk) 15:58, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Nominator, could you please provide clearer explanations of whatever concern prompted your nomination, if you ever make another nomination?
  1. The underlying image here is a public domain image;
  2. If it is the rights of the person who created the satirical text that surrounds the image that is your concern, note that they waived enough of those rights for us to use the image when they published it under a {{Cc}} license on flickr. Geo Swan (talk) 16:30, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep -- Nominator hasn't returned here to explain this nomination more fully. Both the satiric comments and underlying photos are freely distributable, so there is absolutely no reason to demand OTRS permission. Geo Swan (talk) 01:00, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete For collages source and license of every used photo is needed. This collage consists 2 photos and I am not convinced, that both of them are published under free license. Taivo (talk) 10:46, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Derivative work, no author's permission. COM:PCP. --Sealle (talk) 05:53, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mechanizmus adície vody.png

[edit]

The first of the two illustrated "mechanism" steps is incorrect (π should attack H+ not other way around; what is here would give a carbanion on the end!). That's a fatal flaw for an image intended to illustrate "mechanism". Have File:Hydrationreaction.png that is higher quality and factually correct to fill that edu-use. Also have other files in Category:Hydration reactions that have some mechanistic detail and/or other structural variations. DMacks (talk) 03:14, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 17:44, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Suunto M-71.jpg

[edit]

This picture is no longer used in wikipedia. Tjrasanen (talk) 11:38, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep But this is not a reason to delete it. Not all photos in Commons must be used. Commons collects photos for future articles and outside of Wikipedia also. Taivo (talk) 21:07, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: within scope and educationally useful. --Yasu (talk) 16:52, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Suunto M-42 light compass.jpg

[edit]

This picture is my upload and this cannot longer be used in wikipedia because the page in question was deleted. Tjrasanen (talk) 11:41, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The photo can still be used in other articles and also in future articles. Taivo (talk) 21:10, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: within scope and educationally useful. --Yasu (talk) 16:55, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Different M311s.jpg

[edit]

This is my uplad and this can no longer be used because the page in question was deleted. Tjrasanen (talk) 11:43, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The photo can still be used in other articles and also in future articles. Taivo (talk) 21:42, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: within scope and educationally useful. --Yasu (talk) 16:55, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ArmyStamps.jpg

[edit]

This picture can no longer be used because the page for which it was uploaded is deleted. Tjrasanen (talk) 11:45, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The photo can still be used in other articles and also in future articles. Taivo (talk) 21:37, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep I think this is within scope, and it could be used in the future. All kinds of connections here: military, navigation, etc. - Tim D. Williamson yak-yak 01:48, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: within scope and educationally useful. --Yasu (talk) 16:56, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Back plates of M311.jpg

[edit]

The page for this picture is deleted. Without it the picture is likely redundant. Tjrasanen (talk) 11:48, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The photo can still be used in other articles and also in future articles. Taivo (talk) 21:43, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep In scope, useful in the future. - Tim D. Williamson yak-yak 02:07, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: within scope and educationally useful. --Yasu (talk) 16:56, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bezels of M311.jpg

[edit]

The page in which this picture has been used has been deleted. Without the page and the connotation in it the picture is likely redundant. Tjrasanen (talk) 11:50, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The photo can still be used in other articles and also in future articles. Taivo (talk) 21:43, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep In scope, useful in the future. - Tim D. Williamson yak-yak 02:06, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: within scope and educationally useful. --Yasu (talk) 16:56, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by INatureX (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:34, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by INatureX (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small size, user with bad history, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 16:21, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, I added filesize in pixels after every filename, only one of them (the smallest) has EXIF data. Probably all copyvios. Taivo (talk) 16:42, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Diploma de gratitudine (2014).jpg

[edit]

Used for user page only, see https://ro.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Utilizator:Adrian_Beldiman&oldid=10370065 //  Gikü  said  done  Monday, 1 February 2016 11:04 (UTC) 11:04, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: derivative work. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:14, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Diploma de gratitudine, 2015, Radio Moldova.jpg

[edit]

Used for user page only, see https://ro.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Utilizator:Adrian_Beldiman&oldid=10370065 //  Gikü  said  done  Monday, 1 February 2016 11:04 (UTC) 11:04, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: derivative work. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:15, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Diploma de onoare, 2015.jpg

[edit]

Used for user page only, see https://ro.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Utilizator:Adrian_Beldiman&oldid=10370065 //  Gikü  said  done  Monday, 1 February 2016 11:04 (UTC) 11:04, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: derivative work. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:15, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Diploma de onoare, Romania-2015.jpg

[edit]

Used for user page only, see https://ro.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Utilizator:Adrian_Beldiman&oldid=10370065 //  Gikü  said  done  Monday, 1 February 2016 11:04 (UTC) 11:04, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: derivative work. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:15, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bilet de la concertul Un colind de dor, 2015 de la Sala cu Orga.jpg

[edit]

Used for user page only, see https://ro.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Utilizator:Adrian_Beldiman&oldid=10370065 //  Gikü  said  done  Monday, 1 February 2016 11:04 (UTC) 11:04, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Copyrighted design. Taivo (talk) 20:56, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: derivative work. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:15, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of G Sheeraj

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of G Shreeraj (talk · contribs):

Small photos without metadata, the user has previously published copyright violations as own work. I suspect copyvios here also. Taivo (talk) 10:58, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I had a look at these when I nominated this user's other contributions for deletion. These remaining pictures may be ok. These are of a temple in India, whereas all the copyright violations related to the scientist Rosalind Franklin. The contributor has used some of these images to illustrate the Kannada language Wikipedia article that he or she has created on this temple: w:kn:ಮಧುಕೇಶ್ವರ ದೇವಾಲಯ. The use of the Kannada language suggests that this contributor lives in or has connections with this area, and so had the opportunity to take these pictures. These do not look like professional photographs: some have poor lighting or have flash shadows. I searched for some of these images on the web and found no significant matches. I can see no halftone artefacts that would indicate a scan from a book or a tourist leaflet. I suggest we keep these. Verbcatcher (talk) 02:40, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Two of the higher-resolution images (File:Shri Adimadhukeshwara temple,Pampavana,Banavasi.jpg and File:Pampavana,Banavasi.jpg) show what I interpret as film grain when the full-resolution file is enlarged. This suggests that these images were scanned from film negatives or transparencies. While this does not proove that the contributor took the original photos it makes it less likely that the images were copied from a website or scanned from a book. It also explains the lack of metadata. Verbcatcher (talk) 19:59, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, all images can be found previously published ex:http://mudnigga.blogspot.fr/2012/10/madhukeshwara-temple-banavasi-sirsi.html. or [1] or [2], the biggest ones are likely upscaled from the web. All are very likely copyvio. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:26, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Absaby Classic.jpg

[edit]

self promotion Bazj (talk) 11:16, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:30, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Magnus Manske upload bot

[edit]

File Upload Bot (Magnus Manske) (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:

The files are out of scope due to bad quality. Taivo (talk) 11:22, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, they are too blurred to can be really useful. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:33, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of user:Snkoha

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Snkoha (talk · contribs):

First group. This is probably a promo campaign of a company, out of project scope. Also small photos without metadata, own work is not sure.

Second group. Logos of non-notable newspapers, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 12:32, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:39, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of JHONERARISTIZABAL

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of JHONERARISTIZABAL (talk · contribs):

Unidentified persons, Jhoner Lopez has no article in es.wiki. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 12:52, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:41, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sara et ayoub.jpg

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private drawing album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:46, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:LAQRACH.pdf

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:46, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:The bestseller.pdf

[edit]

Promo material. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:47, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of user:Anitambabazi

[edit]

Here are all contributuions of Anitambabazi (talk · contribs):

Small photos without camera data, uploader is not author. OTRS-permission from copyright holder is needed. Taivo (talk) 10:05, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 04:02, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Krystek911 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo and diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 04:04, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by EmilyStal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:NOTHOST - purportedly death certificates of uploader's relatives. Uploader is also sock of Loktionov12, with history related to bogus certificates (see here.)

Эlcobbola talk 16:47, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: done by Hystrix. --Érico (talk) 04:05, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by HarshSingh89 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Used for advertisement.

EvergreenFir (talk) 18:57, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 04:06, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cvlsabana01.JPG

[edit]

Promotional Edslov (talk) 19:14, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 04:06, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cvlsabana02.JPG

[edit]

Promotional Edslov (talk) 19:14, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 04:06, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cvlsabana03.JPG

[edit]

Promotional Edslov (talk) 19:14, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 04:06, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ICONO CINTITA.jpg

[edit]

Promotional Edslov (talk) 20:22, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 04:07, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Familia Cintita.jpg

[edit]

Promotional Edslov (talk) 20:22, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 04:07, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cintia Corbata.jpg

[edit]

Promotional Edslov (talk) 20:22, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 04:07, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Dszfsdg.jpg

[edit]

It's just a selfie. Sismarinho (talk) 21:08, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I add a photo for deletion due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 16:06, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 04:08, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Co9man (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 09:26, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Co9man (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Endless mass of quantity-over-quality bulk-importation of images with no differentiation between those that might be useful to Commons and those that are obviously personal and/or of very low (and arguably unusable) quality as listed here. This is just a small proportion of such images, I didn't have time to go through them all.

Ubcule (talk) 22:28, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I kept one photo (Ethiopian coffee). Taivo (talk) 15:48, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Endless number of Flickr user's personal images (i.e. quite blatantly out of scope for Commons), ones of unacceptably poor quality or those whose lack of background detail renders them useless for Commons' purposes (even assuming they'd otherwise have been acceptable, which is questionable).

Unfortunately, while a number of images that were bulk-imported here are applicable to Commons, an incredibly high proportion blatantly aren't, but have been transferred anyway. Perhaps it would be useful to adopt a quality-over-quantity approach here.

Ubcule (talk) 13:21, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, only one kept. The others are mostly out of project scope due to bad quality, but Ringo Starr wall and Mondy photos were also derivative work of copyrighted photos or wall painting. Taivo (talk) 15:48, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Co9man (talk · contribs)

[edit]

How many- if any- of these bulk-imported images are likely to be useful to Commons?

Ubcule (talk) 20:55, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That's a very good argument; thanks for categorising these (and hence making them more useful). I  I withdraw my nomination and vote  Keep instead. Ubcule (talk) 20:28, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn. P 1 9 9  ✉ 17:00, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Co9man (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope images, personal posed photos that were uploaded to flickr and reuploaded here just because they are on a compatible license. Better quality images without these personal poses are available in the same categories. These serve no educational purpose.

—SpacemanSpiff 16:21, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 22:45, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ElLissitsky-Suprem-09.jpg

[edit]

please delete it, the file File:ElLissitsky-Suprem-13.jpg must be renamed with this name. It's not possible until this redirection page is not deleted. Carl Ha (talk) 21:16, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Carl, in looking at El_Lissitzky#About_2_Squares_.28Children_book.2C_1920-22.29, it appears that all of these pages should be renamed to match the page numbers given there, with the cover being either File:ElLissitsky-Suprem-00.jpg or File:ElLissitsky-Suprem-cover.jpg. If that is correct, I'd be happy to do it for you. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:16, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That would be great. Every page should get the number like that: El_Lissitzky#About_2_Squares_.28Children_book.2C_1920-22.29 except (!) p. 12 (File:ElLissitsky-Suprem-13.jpg) must be p.8.--Carl Ha (talk) 17:19, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I hope it's correct now -- see El_Lissitzky#About_2_Squares_.28Children_book.2C_1920-22.29. I'm assuming that the three blank pages (10, 11, 12) exist, but we don't have them. If that's not the case, you may want to remove them from the gallery.
I think this can be closed as a 'keep, since the subject page is now correct. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:21, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I created the gallery. The pages are existing. I will upload them the next days.--Carl Ha (talk) 20:39, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for changing the names.--Carl Ha (talk) 20:40, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: see discussion. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:06, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright notice sent to Wikimedia Commons [Ticket#2016020110016921]

Files uploaded by Urighi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: for now, ongoing OTRS ticket: ticket:2016020110016921. --Jcb (talk) 09:28, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Adrian Beldiman 2014.jpg

[edit]

Used for user page only, see https://ro.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Utilizator:Adrian_Beldiman&oldid=10370065 //  Gikü  said  done  Monday, 1 February 2016 11:04 (UTC) 11:04, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: in use. P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:39, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Pangui chileno

[edit]

Pangui chileno (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:

1947 photos are unlikely to be own work. They can be in public domain due to some other reason, but correct photographer and license are needed. Taivo (talk) 11:09, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: not own work, questionable source and author. P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:41, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Pangui chileno

[edit]

Pangui chileno (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

Small photos and mostly without metadata. Uploader is indefinitely blocked for abusing multiple accounts and uploading copyvios after warnings. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 07:55, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:16, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Mska1980

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Mska1980 (talk · contribs):

Depicted person was born in 1913. Probably the photos were made during 1940s, so own work is unlikely. But they are not enough old for public domain.

Изображённый человек родился в 1913. Фотографии сделаны во время 1940-х, так что собственная работа невероятно. Но они не достаточно старые для публичной собственности. Taivo (talk) 11:17, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:42, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Proff wikipedia.pdf

[edit]

Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 13:37, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:57, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Album Photo.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope. 4ing (talk) 14:04, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Neutral The photo is used in la.wiki, that means, it is in scope. Big photo with EXIF data, but actually nothing irreplaceable. This is the uploader's only contribution. Quality could be better. Taivo (talk) 19:16, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: personal photo, only added to la.wiki on same day as nomination. P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:01, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Z0HMgAbQ 400x400.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope (WP article up for SD) — Racconish ☎ 14:42, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete used in childish vandalism/attack article now deleted. JohnCD (talk) 15:32, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:56, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Vestfálská suverenita.pdf

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:55, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Lol Great pic.jpg

[edit]

Lowest quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:38, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:51, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ttes.jpg

[edit]

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 17:40, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:04, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Deception and Soullessness.png

[edit]

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 18:12, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:52, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Monkey (75112998).jpg

[edit]

It's a monkey... that's all we know about it, and it's not a particularly good quality photo of a subject we have countless more examples of. Ubcule (talk) 20:21, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete too bad quality. Taivo (talk) 14:49, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:52, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Emporia State Athletics logo.png

[edit]

This image is a copyrighted trademark of the public university Emporia State University as shown on it's website at https://www.emporia.edu/marketing/styleguide/power-e-spirit-mark.html. There is a small trademark logo indicating the institution is holding as an official logo. This image should be deleted and/or moved over to wikipedia and shown with a fair use disclaimer for it's use on various pages. Blanksamurai (talk) 20:40, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per above. P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:06, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Emporia State Athletics logo.png

[edit]

Replaced by official vector duplicate file:Emporia State Athletics logo (vectorised).svg ↔ User: Perhelion 03:37, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:24, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ashish Gaba in Chandigarh.jpg

[edit]

It's just a selfie. Sismarinho (talk) 20:43, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:53, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Votant mutant ou scrutin pleine.jpg

[edit]

No sources indicated for the original images. Gyrostat (talk) 21:24, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  1.  Delete -- in agreement with the applicant -- Yves (Gfsas) (talk) 11:38, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:53, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Феня (кот).png

[edit]

Commons has a problem of very bad cat-photos. Also the photo is not big and it has no camera data, uploader has previously uploaded photos from internet as own work. Taivo (talk) 17:28, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: superseded by many better ones at Category:Tuxedo patterned black and white cats. P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:54, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Marten Toonder (1972).jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by 1Veertje as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: THE OLD VERSION has derivative work in it Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 15:57, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 KeepThis is a promotional picture taken at a press conference for the introduction of a book of Marten Toonder. To have his picture taken the author is standing right next to an image of which he owns the copyright. It is intentional that the image of the bear is in the photo and that this image must be distributed as part of the promotional campaign. By doing so, the author is releasing copyright for this particular bear-image in the way it is used here. The only copyright that applies is the copyright of the photo all together, which is CC-BY. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 16:07, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

De minimus is not some decoration you can ad to a photograph and than have this level of infringement be OK. It's half the darn picture, hardly a incidental feature. Jan, you're making a ton of unfounded assumptions here. It's really not that easy to lose your copyright. Vera (talk) 00:44, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • this picture is released under CC-BY and available online. If you assume that that is not right, you or Stichting Het Toonder Auteursrecht as a rightholder can contact Nationaal Archief who has the copyright of the picture and released it under CC-BY, not the uploader. But as it is only a part of the bear and with a book before and the subject of the picture is the book presentation, not the bear, de minimis can apply . We can OTRS info@toondercompagnie.nl the rightholder of the bear if you want OTRS aassurance and see this as an infringement. --Hannolans (talk) 07:42, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think we need the input of a person at commons who really knows the ins and outs of this. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 08:24, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete It is obvious, that the writer gave permission to take photos, but it is not obvious, that he gave permission to publish them under free license. CC-license did not exist at that time. OTRS-permission from his heirs is needed. Taivo (talk) 10:31, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
No, Nationaal Archief is the copyright holder of the photo. They are entitled to release it under CC-BY. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 15:11, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Taivo and Vera are correct. Derivative of non free content. The National Archive is the copyright holder of the photograph but not of the underlying derivative work. They can probably hoste it under the "citaatrecht" (though it is a borderline case) but citaatrecht (Dutch version of fair use) isn't allowed at Wikimedia Commons. The cropped version is okay though. --Natuur12 (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • I think they can't use citaatrcht within CC-BY. if it is not de minimis, officially they should release the picture under CC-BY, with an explicit exception of the copyright of the bear. They are allowed to publish the bear due to the copyright contract they have with Pictoright to publish their collection. --Hannolans (talk) 08:00, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:City Clipper Primo on C1.jpg

[edit]

All 3 images are in such extremely poor quality that it's a wonder the uploader could even identify the bus themselves..., Anyway although there's no other "normal" images of the vehicles here I don't see why we should make do with the crappy ones when on the EN.WP article there's a link to a Flickr page that have much better qualities, Anyway thanks –Davey2010Talk 23:57, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment at the time of uploading (2008) these were out only photos about Plaxton Primo. Now there are 45 photos in category:Plaxton Primo. Taivo (talk) 18:16, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
They were ? ... Now I feel kinda bad for nominating them, I honestly don't mean to sound funny but to me sending readers here is better than having these images on the article that can't really be seen as such but maybe it's just me , –Davey2010Talk 21:50, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The vehicle is visible and recognizable at these photos. They are not just presentable but we need not to exaggerate their flaws. No need to delete all files which have any better alternative at Commons now. Especially when the photos are described and categorized precisely (unlike many "quality photos"). The other photos are not from the same place, the same operator and line, the same date etc. E.g., I see no other Plaxton Primo in such yellow colour in the category. At least the first image looks well in the thumbnail size. There is no other image of any bus of the defunct City Clipper company at Commons, the photos are a rare and valuable document. --ŠJů (talk) 02:42, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep/Withdrawn. - This entire deletion process is a joke and is seriously flawed .... I could reply to ŠJů but whatever the fuck I say it'll be kept, I disagree entirely with the closure but as the process is so fucking flawed I'd only be wasting my time!. –Davey2010Talk 17:47, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Massafwa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://archive.aawsat.com/2013/07/16/images/sport1.736426.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 00:40, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:BDaniela logo.png

[edit]

Copyrighted image from a website. It even says the file has copyright on the description! Taken from http://www.bdaniela.com/ Edjoerv (talk) 15:58, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 00:39, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Filmplakat Stromboli.JPG

[edit]

Copyright violation. Film poster from 1950. Elly (talk) 16:19, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Film stills would be in public domain, because {{PD-Italy}} applies, but film poster is copyrighted until 70 years after artist's (designer of poster) death. Taivo (talk) 11:57, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 00:37, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Franck Julian Rouas Paris.jpg

[edit]

From http://www.fashionindustrynetwork.com/forum/topics/michael-jackson-perfumes-love Ytoyoda (talk) 16:39, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I add a file for deletion due to same reason. Also derivative work of copyrighted book cover. These are the uploader's last remaining contributions. Taivo (talk) 12:12, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 00:35, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:City of London Police (14728205057).jpg

[edit]

Changed to all rights reserved on flickr; the flickr user is a serial uploader of pictures they did not take themselves. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:41, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 00:30, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Claudia Leitte.jpg

[edit]

Unclear copyright status (uploaded 2010) and unlikely a work by "roger" (photoshopped and initially watermarked) via http://www.ipernity.com/doc/rogernle/5283384?from=5283659&at=1246547239 (not accesable), considering most likely license laundering via http://g1.globo.com/Carnaval2009/0,,MUL1014786-16634,00-CLAUDIA+LEITTE+BATE+RECORDE+E+FAZ+QUASE+HORAS+DE+DESFILE+EM+SALVADOR.html (02.2009, 2000-2011 globo.com Todos os direitos reservados.) = http://g1.globo.com/Carnaval2009/foto/0,,18325781,00.jpg, credited to be a copyrighted work by "Foto: Edgar de Souza/G1" Gunnex (talk) 17:50, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Info Check weblinks (currently down). Gunnex (talk) 18:03, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 00:29, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cerkev na Ježici.jpg

[edit]

No evidence that the image was originally published before 1 January 1970 (see Template:PD-Slovenia). Eleassar (t/p) 20:18, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 00:27, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Benjamin Lacombe (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of permission by "Alyz", the alleged author of these photos.

A.Savin 20:30, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 00:27, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:CrystalLagoons FernandoFischmann.png

[edit]

violación del copyright http://www.fernandofischmann.com/analista-internacional-destaca-nueva-tecnologia-de-desalinizacion-de-crystal-lagoons-2/ Tarawa1943 (talk) 21:35, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 00:26, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mywikimediaaccount (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status, per COM:ANU#User:Mywikimediaaccount and copyright issues and User talk:Mywikimediaaccount. Related: uploads of coats of arms for various cities, most of them in Canada, falsely claimed by uploader to be licensable via {{Attribution}} (or whatever the uploader choosed randomly as license). Examples: File:Coat of Arms of Prince Edward County.png {{Attribution}} --> sourced with http://www.chilliwack.ca/main/page.cfm?id=35 = "© Copyright 2007-2015 The Corporation of the County of Prince Edward" or File:Coat of Arms of Port Coquitlam.png --> http://www.portcoquitlam.ca/Discover_Port_Coquitlam/About_Port_Coquitlam/City_Logo_and_Coat_of_Arms/Coat_of_Arms.htm = "© City of Port Coquitlam". The coats of arms may be in public domain by other reasons but relevant info must be (per COM:EVID) provided.

Gunnex (talk) 21:41, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 00:25, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:EmanueleGiudice.jpg

[edit]

Violazione di copyright da http://www.emanuelegiudice.it/256_256 Updown (talk) 22:27, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 00:18, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Weihe St. Jakobus der Ältere in Hörgertshausen.jpg

[edit]

Copyright owner is not Uploader and file seems to be scanned from a newspaper Vuxi (talk) 22:45, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Given source is a German newspaper. Author name doesn't match uploader name. No evidence that the photo is licensed as claimed. Green Giant (talk) 00:17, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rustberg (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF/different cameras.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:45, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:JRP 1.jpg

[edit]

From http://torduderire.inube.com/blog/663859/scam-artist-julian-franck-rouas-screwed-the-pooch-the-michael-jackson-perfumes-scam/ Ytoyoda (talk) 16:38, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:44, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gut Isselhorst .jpg

[edit]

From her this file 2003:4D:2C4E:5C6A:4435:B1B7:1F0A:B00D 19:10, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:44, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Isselbrücke.jpg

[edit]

From her this file 2003:4D:2C4E:5C6A:4435:B1B7:1F0A:B00D 19:15, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:43, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:First Tier 4 with caption 1.jpg

[edit]

Cropped version of [3]. This image belongs to Metrolink (see [4]) and there's no evidence of permission. Mackensen (talk) 14:10, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:47, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Judith Reina, niña youtubers de Super Burbujas.JPG

[edit]

Unused personal photo with questionable claim to notability, out of scope. P 1 9 9  ✉ 14:56, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Depicted person is non-notable (no mention neither in en.wiki nor in es.wiki), but this is big photo with camera data and I support keeping this as stock photo. I categorized it as yellow hat and other categories can be added (children of Colombia). Maybe the file should be renamed. Taivo (talk) 19:24, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: beautiful photograph of a body glove tee shirt (with (c) logo). Non-notable person. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:46, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Kerkenie

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Kerkenie (talk · contribs):

The user has uploaded a lot of copyright violations (simply look his talk page) and got indefinitely blocked. The photos are (with one exception) small and without camera data, resolution is different. But scope usually exists, although nothing irreplaceable. Taivo (talk) 11:50, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 00:35, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Nahuel9m

[edit]

Nahuel9m (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

The user has uploaded a lot of copyvios (look his talk page) and got even blocked for that, so this is not a trusted user. Small photos about footballers without metadata. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 12:16, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 00:38, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:1hazardreg.jpg

[edit]

No author or source information; uploader is no longer editing Miniapolis 16:35, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 01:33, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Eses1026

[edit]

Here are last remaining uploads of Eses1026 (talk · contribs):

Derivative work, photos of photos. Who is author of underlying photos and when died (s)he die? Taivo (talk) 12:43, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination: unlikely to be {{Own work}} as claimed. Authorship, and hence copyright situation unclear. --Storkk (talk) 11:28, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:JH galerie cerise.jpg

[edit]

Work of an artist which is still alive Shev123 (talk) 13:15, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 11:31, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:JH cerise.jpg

[edit]

Work of an artist which is still alive Shev123 (talk) 13:15, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 11:31, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Епископ.jpg

[edit]

Probably copyright violation. See: http://www.pravoslavie.ru/68560.html --sasha (krassotkin) 15:42, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, likely copyright violation. --Storkk (talk) 11:33, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Anikha.jpg

[edit]

DR started to verify claimed 'own work' as p.e. rather thumbnail format and missing exif, Roland zh (talk) 21:58, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 11:36, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Esther Anil.jpg

[edit]

DR started to verify claimed 'own work' as p.e. thumbnail format and missing exif, see also File:Anikha.jpg, Roland zh (talk) 22:01, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 11:36, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Esther Anil.jpg

[edit]

Previously published at https://www.instagram.com/p/BtfVs6zlUdF/, three days before upload here. But that file is cropped differently and this file has full metadata. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 22:58, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 10:49, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:KSurendran.jpg

[edit]

DR started to verify claimed 'own work' as p.e. missing exif, as well as media not in use within Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 22:24, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination: if uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS and the photo can be undeleted. --Storkk (talk) 11:37, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wanessa Camargo - REFON.jpg

[edit]

Unclear copyright status considering derived from a photo of pt:Wanessa (Brazilian singer), printed on a truck, failing COM:FOP#Brazil. Gunnex (talk) 13:36, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:43, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mustafa Babanlı, 04.09.2015, ADNSU Akt Zalı.jpg

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like bakisesi.com/uploads/posts/2016-01/1453882166_1453880998_1453818846_1.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:44, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Amardeep singh natt.jpg

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:45, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jachattan Beach.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Thatonewikiguy as no permission, but I cannot find an external source to doubt own work of the uploader as claimed. JuTa 21:32, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:47, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Magic Planet.jpg

[edit]

DR started to verify claimed 'own work' as p.e. rather thumbnail format and missing exif, Roland zh (talk) 22:22, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:48, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Thiagodddiias (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copright status. 2x logos for pt:Ludmilla (cantora), Brazilian singer, uploaded 14.01.2016 [taken from Internet] and licensed with {{PD-textlogo}} ({{PD-shape}}). Seems to be some kind of designed calligraphic signature which may be above COM:TOO.

Gunnex (talk) 12:17, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 11:23, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pułk4UłanówZaniemeńskich (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos and documents. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Historical Polish anonymous photographs were not protected with copyright. Evidence is needed, that the photos were anonymous. Taivo (talk) 10:00, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 11:27, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Logo Familiprix.png

[edit]

Copyrighted corporate logo Lacrymocéphale (talk) 17:08, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination though it is a borderline case. --Natuur12 (talk) 11:27, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Nazriya Nazim.jpg

[edit]

Likely copyright violation, appears with watermarks in multiple online galleries (found using tineye), and without a watermark here. No indication that uploader is copyright holder. Storkk (talk) 10:26, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 15:43, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Nazriya Nazim.jpg

[edit]

DR started as source/author "www.foundpix.com", hence potentially non-free content, Roland zh (talk) 18:36, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: clear copyright violation. --JuTa 23:00, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:MarseilleFluobus.svg

[edit]

Icon not used anymore Superbenjamin (talk) 12:58, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep This is not a proper reason to delete a file. Is there a better file about the same? Taivo (talk) 13:28, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Taivo: I uploaded this file as an icon in a coherent set. There is simply no need for it anymore. --Superbenjamin (talk) 15:46, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:22, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Player Photo 001.jpg

[edit]

 Delete Image is a derivative of a photograph of the player from 1965 or earlier. See this for proof. There's other versions out there as well; [5][6]. What we can determine from this is the image is from at least 1965 or earlier, and was published without copyright markings. This makes it public domain in the U.S., but per terms found at {{PD-US-no notice}}, it is not 'free enough' for Commons. Hammersoft (talk) 15:22, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:53, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Lego Penguin, Free Electrons.png

[edit]
 Weak oppose I know they're covered by a patent, but not sure models made from the bricks are covered by copyright. That would be like Binney & Smith claiming copyright on a painting because the artist used Liquitex oils. Also, none of the other Lego models I found on Commons had COM:OTRS - Tim D. Williamson yak-yak 02:28, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep I'd agree that a single lego piece could be copyrighted, and on the other hand a complex work built by thousands of lego pieces could be consider a copyrighted work. In this image I see nothing copyrighted. --Krd 16:48, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per above. →Nagy 11:10, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Español septentrional.PNG

[edit]

Non-neutral and unsourced map. I pointed out this in the discussion page, with no answer after 48 days. Jotamar (talk) 19:53, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Not a reason to delete Natuur12 (talk) 14:47, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File talk:Español septentrional.PNG

[edit]

This map reflects a non-factual, ideologically slanted vision of languages in Spain. A long discussion with the author in the talk page (in Spanish) ended in a stalemate, he/she refuses to admit any problem. There is no source for the map, other than an internet page, a sort of blog that is obviously not a vàlid source. Jotamar (talk) 21:24, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't able to manage properly the previous discussion because the author finally appeared and I focused in trying to convince him/her, with no results. The outcome of the other discussion was keep but why? One single editor said no reason to delete. Come on! Lack of neutrality is not a reason to delete? Does that mean that neutrality is only cared for in individual WPs and not in Commons? --Jotamar (talk) 13:54, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Anybody there? --Jotamar (talk) 18:41, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that this page is meant for discussing, not for voting. So I'll explain why the map should be deleted, so any passer-by can grasp the reasoning.

The problem with the map is not the lack of sources, as the admin in the previous deletion request probably thought. The problem is the lack of neutrality. The map takes as starting point a view of languages in Spain according to which there is one national or main language, Spanish, and then a few regional or subordinate languages, such as Basque, Catalan, or Galician. Otherwise it would make no sense that the areas where those other languages are spoken could have their own dialect of Spanish. Such a view corresponds to a Spanish nationalistic ideology, and a very old-fashioned version of that ideology at that. If the map is not deleted in Commons, sooner or later it will appear in any page of any WP, and nobody will be able to control that.

Now, if someone can prove that neutrality is not a concern in Commons, but only in individual WPs, I'll have to forget about the deletion. --Jotamar (talk) 14:21, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The closing admin realised very well that there is a NPOV-problem from a Wikipedian's perspective but please read com:NPOV. Maps don't have to be neutral. While this map must not be used on a Wikipedia project it can have educational value. (Can be used writing a crytical review regarding the idiology for example.) And yes, a source for the base map is missing but this the basemap we use for almost all of our maps so all that has to be done is adding it. Natuur12 (talk) 11:21, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I don't understand your last sentence. Well, it would have been time-saving to know about the page you link. I wasn't able to find it before, I guess it should be linked in a prominent place.
My next concern is this: is there any loophole by which the map could be used in some WP while not appearing in File usage on other wikis? Right now there is no such section in the file page, does it mean it's really not used anywhere? --Jotamar (talk) 18:46, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: We do not oppose even fictional maps here. As long as copyright isn't an issue and arguably there is some potential usage we keep files. While there is no valid reason for deletion was provided by the nominator, I cannot see any usage of this unsourced file aside from a random drawing of a random map. I would be OK even then if it was in some userpage but we do not even have that. -- とある白い猫 ちぃ？ 14:30, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Haller juramareili 01.jpg

[edit]

is it clear, that the artist of the picture died before 1945?? Martin Sg. (talk) 14:03, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Year of publication is marked as 1912 making it PD because it was published (or registered with the U.S. Copyright Office) before January 1, 1923. -- とある白い猫 ちぃ？ 14:39, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Basil Rathbone and Nigel Bruce signed.jpg

[edit]

Wrong license + wrong source. Paulae (talk) 21:34, 1 February 2016 (UTC)Copyrights once lasted 56 years (talk) 00:09, 8 February 2016 (UTC) I own the photo. Studio still images of this era are NOT copyright protected--- any copyright notice on such stills, press books posters and similar publicity material applies ONLY to the films. Instead of deleting the images- which take hours to scan and upload, kindly fix the license type or tell me which license type applies to public domain film images of this era. Further explanation below:[reply]


The copyrights on photos from this era were for the films themselves, not for the stills, which were distributed freely by the studios for any and all for duplication in/by theaters, newspapers, journals, magazines, posters, press kits, etc. and are thus public domain. Nearly all such studio/theater photos and publicity stills up until 1989 are public domain. This view has been backed by the Eighth Circuit Court (See Wikipedia entry below) Wikipedia Commons has no Public Domain classification I know of that recognizes these facts - how else could I have I designated the public domain status of this film still which I own? - but Wikipedia has an entry - which I have presented in an edited version below- that thoroughly discusses the matter- and how the Courts have disallowed copyright protection for stills of this era. 


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Film_still#Public_domain


As explained by film production manager Eve Light Honthaner,[10] publicity photos taken to promote a film actor or other celebrity were not usually copyrighted prior to 1989, and were intended to remain free for publications to use wherever possible:

"Publicity photos (star headshots) have traditionally not been copyrighted. Since they are disseminated to the public, they are generally considered public domain, and therefore clearance by the studio that produced them is not necessary...."[11]......

Film historian Gerald Mast[15] explains how the new 1989 copyright revisions only protected publicity works that complied with all earlier requirements in addition to filing a copyright registration within 5 years of first publication:

According to the old copyright act, such production stills were not automatically copyrighted as part of the film and required separate copyrights as photographic stills. The new copyright act similarly excludes the production still from automatic copyright but gives the film's copyright owner a five-year period in which to copyright the stills. Most studios have never bothered to copyright these stills because they were happy to see them pass into the public domain, to be used by as many people in as many publications as possible."[16]

In the 2011 Eighth Circuit case Warner Bros. Entertainment v. X One X Productions, the court recognized that a selection of publicity stills from two 1939 films were in the public domain because they had not been published with the required notice, or because their copyrights had not been renewed. Although Warner Bros. argued otherwise, the court found that these stills did not share the films' valid copyrights, and that the images' dissemination constituted general publication without notice. Other arguments related to derivative uses of the images were upheld, and an injunction against X One X was granted because certain "products combining extracts from the public domain materials in a new arrangement infringe the copyright in the corresponding film". The decision quoted from Nimmer on Copyright, which explains that, while films were generally registered for copyright protection, "much less care was typically exercised during production and in the publicity office" with photographs taken of the actors on set being "sent off to newspapers before the film’s release, in order to generate a buzz about its opening."[17][18]

"Publicity photos (star headshots) have traditionally not been copyrighted." "Nearly all such studio/theater photos and publicity stills up until 1989 are public domain."Copyrights once lasted 56 years (talk) 00:09, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete The uploader is in charge to specify correct information for source, author and license. --Krd 16:53, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete If uploader cannot provide the requisite correct and complete licencing info within 7 days, it must be deleted under WMF Deletion Policy. Mohsinpathania (talk) 09:18, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


The still was obviously published, and there is no copyright notice visible. We do not simply assume that publicity stills are public domain -- while a great many are, a large number did have copyright notices (and that number increased as awareness sharpened in the 1960s and 1970s). We need to show an actual, distributed copy which does not have a notice. It was possible to put a copyright notice on the back, so best practice is to upload a scan of the back as well (as a separate version under the same filename) then upload the front image on top of it, to show there were no copyright notices on either side. If that is done, it should be {{PD-US-no notice}}; no source would be required. A claim of copyright ownership (which is what the present tag basically claims) is incorrect, however. Owning a copy of the photo in no way means ownership of the copyright. Carl Lindberg (talk) 23:19, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination & discussion particularly Krd and C.Lindberg. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:49, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2016/02/01&oldid=189809003"