Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/11/13
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
c.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Unused low-resolution personal vanity photo by non-notable individual. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 08:56, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 13:36, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Diankanika (talk · contribs)
[edit]No confidence that any of these celebrity glam shots & red carpet shots are own work of uploader as claimed. No camera data, small sizes and etc. Probable COM:COPYVIOs.
- File:Malikahiss.jpeg
- File:173933-mallika-sherawat-promote-her-latest-film-kismat-love-paisa-dill.jpg
- File:Mallika-sherawat-black-dress-sweet-smile-pic.jpg
- File:Mallika-Sherawat-Wallpaper1.jpg
- File:Daytime-emmys-best-michelle-stafford.jpg
- File:Michelle and baby.jpg
- File:Paige.jpeg
- File:Mallika.JPG
- File:Becky herbst.jpg
- File:Rebecca-herbst-red-lipstick.jpg
- File:2013-07-becky-herbst250x375.jpg
- File:Michelle-stafford-net-worth3.jpg
- File:Michelle Stafford Phyllis Newman.jpg
- File:Paige-white-cold-shoulder-top.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:05, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: I've just pulled five different uploads by this user as clear copyvios from getty & Retna - flushing the remainder on the "unclean hands" principle Tabercil (talk) 23:05, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Wrong File ファイルを間違えました 琉宇駈 (talk) 06:17, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 19:32, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Uploader misunderstand Copyright role this file is not cc-by-sa 이강철 (talk) 09:31, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- sorry, I change copyright so cancel please :) --이강철 (talk) 09:44, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Withdraw, bellow the COM:TOO. --Amitie 10g (talk) 06:13, 14 November 2015 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)
Commons:Deletion requests/Commons:European Science Photo Competition 2015/Rules and prizes
Unlikely to be own work by the uploader.
- File:Premratantwosub.ogv
- File:Blactudittp.ogv
- File:Blactfonep.ogv
- File:Blacthrenep.ogv
- File:Blactnep.ogv
- File:Blaconnep.ogv
- File:Seesekahig.ogg
- File:Wcbacfive.ogv
Stefan2 (talk) 14:05, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: obvious copyvios Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:17, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hoàng Đình Thảo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Army coat of arms. Are they in public domain?
- File:Truong TSQ VNCH.jpg
- File:Truong Thiet giap VNCH.jpg
- File:Truong Quanbao VNCH.jpg
- File:Truong Quan y VNCH.jpg
- File:Truong PhaoBinh QLVNCH.jpg
- File:Truong NuQuanNhan VNCH.jpg
- File:Truong Canh sat Quoc gia VNCH.jpg
- File:Hoc vien Canh sat Quoc gia VNCH.jpg
- File:TrungTamHuanLuyen QuangTrung VNCH.jpg
- File:SuDoan 21 Bo binh QLVNCH.jpg
- File:SuDoan 25 Bo binh QLVNCH.jpg
- File:Truong Hasiquan DongDe QLVNCH.jpg
- File:Hanh chinh Tai chinh VNCH.jpg
- File:TrungTamHuanLuyen HaiQuan VNCH.jpg
- File:DPQ & NQ QLVNCH.jpg
- File:Cuc Quan nhu VNCH.jpg
- File:Cuc Cong binh VNCH.jpg
- File:Cuc Truyen tin VNCH.jpg
- File:Cuc Quan van VNCH.jpg
- File:Cuc Quan cu VNCH.jpg
- File:Cuc Quan Y VNCH.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hoàng Đình Thảo (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:COPYVIOS: Series of photos of military men, all claimed "self", but the images appear too old, too halftoned, too reproduced, too variable to be the work of a single individual. User's other uploads were sent to Deletion or "no source."
- File:TranNgocTam1.jpg
- File:DuongVanDuc.jpg
- File:LeVanNghiem.jpg
- File:LeVanKim1.jpg
- File:TonThatDinh4.jpg
- File:NguyenNgocLe1.jpg
- File:Nguyen Khanh2.jpg
- File:LeVanTy6.jpg
- File:LeVanTy5.jpg
- File:TranThienKhiem3.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:33, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hoàng Đình Thảo (talk · contribs)
[edit]No confidence that any of these headshots of men are own work of uploader. Quality and size are too variable, no camera data, several look as if they were copied from half-toned publications. Massive pile of uploads in only a couple days.
- File:HuynhVanCao2.jpg
- File:HoVanTo.jpg
- File:NguyenVanVan1.jpg
- File:NguyenVinhNghi1.jpg
- File:NguyenVanMinh.jpg
- File:DongVanKhuyen.jpg
- File:TranVanTrung1.jpg
- File:PhamQuocThuan.jpg
- File:LamQuangThi2.jpg
- File:PhanTrongChinh1.jpg
- File:ChungTanCang1.jpg
- File:NguyenVietThanh1.jpg
- File:NguyenVanManh.jpg
- File:DuQuocDong.jpg
- File:NgoDzu2.jpg
- File:LuLan.jpg
- File:NguyenDucThang.jpg
- File:NguyenVanLa1.jpg
- File:LinhQuangVien1.jpg
- File:NguyenBaoTri.jpg
- File:LeNguyenKhang1.jpg
- File:DangVanQuang1.jpg
- File:MaiHuuXuan.jpg
- File:TranQuangVinh CĐ.jpg
- File:ThT DangTriHoan hahuyenchi.jpg
- File:DT NguyenVanDong nhac si.jpg
- File:Le Quang Tung DT.jpg
- File:DT LeQuangTung.jpg
- File:LeQuangLuong.jpg
- File:LeVanHung.jpg
- File:LyTongBa1.jpg
- File:LeMinhDao.jpg
- File:LamNguonTanh.jpg
- File:PhamVanPhu3.jpg
- File:PhamVanDong1.jpg
- File:DoMau1.jpg
- File:VanThanhCao.jpg
- File:NguyenGiacNgo1.jpg
- File:NgoQuangTruong.jpg
- File:TranThanhPhong1.jpg
- File:NguyenVanToan.jpg
- File:TranVanMinh KQ 1.jpg
- File:TranVanMinh LQ.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:20, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hoàng Đình Thảo (talk · contribs)
[edit]No confidence that any of these headshots of men are own work of uploader. Quality and size are too variable, no camera data, several look as if they were copied from half-toned publications.
- File:NguyenVanPhuoc1.jpg
- File:HoTrungHau.jpg
- File:VuVanGiai4.jpg
- File:NguyenVanThien.jpg
- File:NguyenHuuHanh1.jpg
- File:NguyenBaLien.jpg
- File:LuuKimCuong.jpg
- File:PhanXuannhuan1.jpg
- File:PhamDangLan.jpg
- File:PhanDinhNiem.jpg
- File:BuiTheLan2.jpg
- File:NguyenKhacBinh1.jpg
- File:DoKeGiai.jpg
- File:VoVanCanh1.jpg
- File:DaoDuyAn.jpg
- File:NguyenDuyHinh1.jpg
- File:PhanDinhSoan1.jpg
- File:TranBaDi.jpg
- File:NguyenHuyAnh1.jpg
- File:LamQuangTho.jpg
- File:BuiDinhDam.jpg
- File:TranVanChon1.jpg
- File:NguyenXuanTrang2.jpg
- File:HoangVanLac1.jpg
- File:TruongQuangAn.jpg
- File:DoanVanQuang.jpg
- File:BuiHuuNhon.jpg
- File:NguyenVanChuan1.jpg
- File:NguyenCao1.jpg
- File:NguyenCao Alber.jpg
- File:TonThatXung1.jpg
- File:NguyenVanQuan.jpg
- File:DuongNgocLam1.jpg
- File:TranTuOai.jpg
- File:LeVanVien.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:22, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hoàng Đình Thảo (talk · contribs)
[edit]No confidence that any of these headshots of men are own work of uploader. Quality and size are too variable, no camera data, several look as if they were copied from half-toned publications.
- File:NguyenHuuTan.jpg
- File:PhamNgocSang1.jpg
- File:NguyenNgocOanh.jpg
- File:HoangCoMinh.jpg
- File:TranQuangKhoi.jpg
- File:NguyenDucKhanh1.jpg
- File:VuDinhDao.jpg
- File:NguyenThanhChau.jpg
- File:TuVanBe1.jpg
- File:LeVanTu.jpg
- File:HuynhBaTinh1.jpg
- File:PhanPhungTien.jpg
- File:DiepQuangThuy.jpg
- File:HoVanKyThoai.jpg
- File:TranDinhTho.jpg
- File:LeVanThan.jpg
- File:DangCaoThang.jpg
- File:PhamHaThanh.jpg
- File:ChuongDzenhQuay.jpg
- File:TranVanNhut.jpg
- File:DoKienNhieu.jpg
- File:NguyenVanKhuong.jpg
- File:NguyenVanLuong1.jpg
- File:DangDinhLinh.jpg
- File:HuynhVanLac.jpg
- File:LyBaHy1.jpg
- File:PhanHoaHiep1.jpg
- File:TruongHuuDuc1.jpg
- File:NgoHanDong2.jpg
- File:VoDinh.jpg
- File:NguyenVanChuc.jpg
- File:NguyenHuuChi.jpg
- File:TranVanCam.jpg
- File:NguyenTrongBao.jpg
- File:PhanDinhThuLamSon1.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:23, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:04, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии. Участница, загрузившая файл, указывает в описании, цитирую, "...Сделана вво время интервью в 2015 году...". Но данное фото встречается в Интернете уже в 2014 году(см. https://vk.com/id13214266?z=photo13214266_287546189%2Falbum13214266_0%2Frev). Да и вообще фото часто встречается в Интернете до загруски на Викисклад. Dogad75 (talk) 07:28, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- Да у вас по всем файлам сомнения... Я смотрю, что политика наполнения и сохранения опубликованных материалов только прописана в Википедии, а все участники наоборот настроены на одно - удалять! удалять! удалять!.. Вы, кстати, в курсе, что уже в некоторых вузах и курсах по психологии, перед выдачей дипломов дают задание создать страничку в Википедии и отстоять каждую её строчку и изображение ни кого при этом не послав куда подальше.. Т.к. такой вечной войны, как тут, нигде больше не найти!.. :( Не тот год, ну, опечаталась, ну бывает.. жесть.. А то, что все мои изображения сделаны одним и тем же фотоаппаратом и это видно в один клик - это ничего? Не доказательства? :( Где-то кто-то в одной из тем на эту тему (а обязательно было их создавать несколько штук???) написал, цитирую: " Если Вы действительно являетесь автором фото, то у Вас должен быть его исходник...". Это шутка или издевательство? Фотография сделана в 2012 году. Т.е., по вашему нормально три года хранить исходники? И вообще - у меня на компьютере почти 3 миллиона обработанных фотосессий. Я должна хранить ещё и 3 миллиона исходников??? Да уж.. очень логично.. Могу, разве что, выслать ещё несколько фотографий с той же фотосессии... Или как?Annkahannka (talk) 04:38, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Authorship proved. Sealle (talk) 09:04, 16 November 2015 (UTC) Sealle (talk) 09:04, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
An unused personal image, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:24, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:29, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope Capricorn4049 (talk) 00:51, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:29, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Unused logo. The uploader seemed to attempt deletion. Leyo 01:25, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:30, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Unused private picture, out of project scope. Leyo 01:30, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:28, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 02:49, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:31, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 02:50, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:31, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope unused — Racconish ☎ 07:16, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:32, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Unused tiny-resolution vanity image of non-notable individual. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 08:07, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:32, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Personal vanity photo of non-notable individual. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 08:11, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:32, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
No educational purpose. Image of an under-age person Shalbat (talk) 14:24, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 03:57, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Used for vandalism Ravave (talk) 08:23, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- Looks indeed like vandalism, see Special:Log/Sasasaul, Special:Log/Federicojr99, Special:Log/Ghbngdfbhdfgh. --Achim (talk) 20:34, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:33, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused poor-quality personal vanity photo of non-notable individual. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 08:54, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:34, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Personal vanity photo of non-notable individual. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 09:05, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:34, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
bandspam, del. on DE Nolispanmo 09:31, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:35, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:07, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:35, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
spam, del. on DE Nolispanmo 11:23, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:36, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
self promotion, out of scope Pippobuono (talk) 14:19, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete, out of scope, only upload of the user. Zauberer = magician. Traumrune (talk) 22:07, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:37, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope
— Racconish ☎ 14:26, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- Support No encyclopedic value and the editor's actions resulted in a block on English Wikipedia. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:21, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope
— Racconish ☎ 15:54, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:38, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational use - as well as the other upload File:Joven midiendo su cintura.jpg Pibwl (talk) 16:10, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:40, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:11, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:40, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
not used personal photo, out of scope Pippobuono (talk) 19:57, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:41, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope? Non-notable drummer? Stefan2 (talk) 23:38, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:42, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Unused userphoto. See COM:SCOPE. Stefan2 (talk) 23:39, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:42, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Ripped from YouTube at 0.01 seconds https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yb3wXAI8gEw Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:11, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:51, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
No indication of own work on this halftoned and tiny image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:15, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by Jameslwoodward --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:51, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
This image looks like it was rephotographed from some unnamed source, probably not user's own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:16, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by Jameslwoodward --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:52, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
With no date on the photo other than 2013, it's hard to know if the copyright has indeed expired on this grainy black and white image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:31, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete One of the person in the photo Nalini Ranjan Chatterjee is dead in 1942, thus the photo is older than 70 year, however with no indication of source, author, previous publication, we can't know if the author is really unknow and thus if he's dead from more than 70 years. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:57, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: No proper source undicated --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:58, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely that this grainy half-toned image is user's own work, more likely copied from an unattributed source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:33, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Unlikely to be own work, no proper source indicated --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:59, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely that this grainy half-toned image is user's own work, more likely copied from an unattributed source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:33, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Unlikely to be own work, no proper source indicated --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:59, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Collage of five images - one is local and freely licensed, but the others are offsite images with unconfirmed licenses that probably aren't free. In fact, one is from a banned source listed on Commons:Bad sources (Official PSDs). Also selfmade collage with no educational value. Hop on Bananas (talk) 02:29, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as per nomination --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:04, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Redundant image to File:Ma Ying-jeou press conference 2015-11-06 (1).jpg. This version is watermarked and scaled down, and was uploaded after the superior image was uploaded. Wylve (talk) 04:18, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:05, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Redundant image to File:Ma Ying-jeou press conference 2015-11-06 (2).jpg. This version is watermarked and scaled down, and was uploaded after the superior image was uploaded. Wylve (talk) 04:27, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:06, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Copy Vio http://revistanam.com/bankieria-me-sexy-shqiptare/ Cult of Green (talk) 04:45, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by Natuur12 --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:06, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
changed to category 최광모 (talk) 04:46, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:07, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
changed to category 최광모 (talk) 04:50, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:07, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
changed to category 최광모 (talk) 05:02, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:08, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
changed to category 최광모 (talk) 05:03, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:08, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
changed to category 최광모 (talk) 05:03, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:08, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
changed to category 최광모 (talk) 05:03, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:09, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
changed to category 최광모 (talk) 05:04, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:09, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
changed to category 최광모 (talk) 05:04, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:09, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
changed to category 최광모 (talk) 05:04, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:09, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
changed to category 최광모 (talk) 05:04, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:10, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
changed to category 최광모 (talk) 05:04, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:10, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
changed to category 최광모 (talk) 05:04, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:10, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
changed to category 최광모 (talk) 05:05, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:11, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
changed to category 최광모 (talk) 05:32, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:11, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
changed to category 최광모 (talk) 05:33, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:11, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
creators will 최광모 (talk) 01:05, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Req by user. --Achim (talk) 14:40, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Pippobuono (talk) 19:31, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:16, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Personal photo apparently used for self-promotion only [1] EEng (talk) 19:57, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Now it's an unused personal image --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:17, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
not used personal photo, out of scope Pippobuono (talk) 20:00, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:18, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Incomplete source info, available here: http://elayersiseva.tumblr.com/post/59882891895 Ytoyoda (talk) 20:01, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Can be found previously published several times, no evidence it's free --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:22, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
not used personal photos, out of scope Pippobuono (talk) 20:05, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:22, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
promotional, out of scope Pippobuono (talk) 20:06, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as per nomination, also text of questionable notability --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:24, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
promotional, out of scope Pippobuono (talk) 20:07, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as per nomination, also text of questionable notability --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:24, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
promotional, out of scope Pippobuono (talk) 20:07, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as per nomination, also copirighted facebook content --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:26, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
promotional, out of scope Pippobuono (talk) 20:08, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as per nomination, also text of questionable notability --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:25, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ~Abigail 16 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Appear to be promo photos, likely copyvio
Ytoyoda (talk) 20:12, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as per nomination, there is a lot of previous publication on the WEB, almost copyright and with bigger esolution available exemple : [2] --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:33, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ~Abigail 16 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing/inconsistent EXIF, found elsewhere on the web, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:~Abigail 16 and previous mass DR with related copyvios. Considering also (example) http://www.bringthenoiseuk.com/201310/music/reviews/album-review-i-see-stars-new-demons (2013) = http://www.bringthenoiseuk.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/i_see_stars_2013.jpg (last modified: 2013, identical exif). Uploaded on 27.11.2015. Last remaining file by this user.
Gunnex (talk) 10:02, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:09, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine (see Commons:FOP#Ukraine) アンタナナ 06:58, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: pn Basvb (talk) 13:00, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 07:15, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: pn Basvb (talk) 13:00, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
No author, publication date etc.; no particular reason to believe that this was drawn by an artist who died before 1945 Hchc2009 (talk) 08:04, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: likely an older drawing, but indeed more info on that should be provided. Basvb (talk) 13:01, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Poor quality, low res scan, better high-res version is File:(1)Yerranderie_ruins_of_home.jpg Sardaka (talk) 08:39, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: created a redirect. Next time please use the "upload new version" uption. Basvb (talk) 13:04, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
File:The old church at Yerranderie, New South Wales, Katoomba to Mittagong Trail - Yerr0008.jpg
[edit]
Poor quality, low-res, better version is File:(1)Yerranderie_church.jpg Sardaka (talk) 08:40, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- It is in use atm at en:Katoomba to Mittagong Trail so before deletion usage should be replaces. --MGA73 (talk) 13:37, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: next time please use "upload new version" Basvb (talk) 13:07, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Big copyright notice at the bottom right. Pretty clear flickrwashing I think. -mattbuck (Talk) 08:43, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Agreed. Uploaded in error Andrewrabbott (talk) 08:56, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: pn Basvb (talk) 13:08, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:DW -mattbuck (Talk) 08:46, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: pn Basvb (talk) 13:09, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This is the photograph of a 1902 painting by Fritz Grotemeyer ([3]). He died in 1947. The painting will enter the public domain in Germany in 2018. BrightRaven (talk) 08:56, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: pn Basvb (talk) 13:09, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Copy vio.http://www.imdb.com/name/nm6205746/resumephotos?v=me8080206251 John from Idegon (talk) 09:03, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: pn Basvb (talk) 13:10, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Image is described by the uploader as a "screenshot" and is similar to images published on this Facebook account, so there is doubt over whether it is actually the own work of the uploader as claimed. DAJF (talk) 09:03, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: pn Basvb (talk) 13:10, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Unused logo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 09:39, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: pn Basvb (talk) 13:11, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Unbrauchbare Qualität, dazu ikonographisch fragwürdig. Siehe Diskussion Hormisdas Cantakukuruz (talk) 10:24, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Kept: in use Basvb (talk) 13:14, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
COM:SELFIE, unused, uncategorized, no indication the subject is at all notable. Revent (talk) 11:21, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: pn Basvb (talk) 13:15, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Copyrighted image. http://www.aviacol.net/g/fotos-en-colombia/aerolineas-argentinas-airbus-a340-300-lv-csd-en-eldorado-bogota-skbo-bog-11-04-2012-861.html Helmy oved 07:46, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: pn Basvb (talk) 13:30, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:MasterCard (credit card)
[edit]These have several sentences of text. According to the USCO, even one sentence of text has a copyright.
- File:Bank SinoPac Display Card rear 20151019.jpg
- File:E.Sun Bank Traveling Card Platinum until 2016-06 rear.jpg
. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:37, 13 November 2015 (UTC) The images on these cards are well beyond the ToO. We cannot keep them without free licenses from the copyright holders.
- File:Bank cards (Visa and MasterCard).jpg
- File:Bank SinoPac Display Card face 20151019.jpg
- File:E.Sun Bank Traveling Card Platinum until 2016-06 face.jpg
- File:Tarjeta Sr.Pago.png
- File:Кредитные карты Промсвязьбанка, 2012 год.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:43, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: pn Basvb (talk) 13:18, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Unusable photo of flash reflection. Out of scope Jarekt (talk) 13:14, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: pn Basvb (talk) 13:31, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
COM:SELFIE - Out of project scope Scoopfinder(d) 13:23, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: pn Basvb (talk) 13:31, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
The watermark, which might contain source information, does not seem to refer to the uploader in any way. Stefan2 (talk) 13:33, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: is already deleted Basvb (talk) 13:32, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in the United States. Stefan2 (talk) 13:39, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete — There is a limited freedom of panorama in the United States (17 USC 120), however it does not apply in this case. Allen4names (talk) 10:03, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion Basvb (talk) 13:32, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Unused text document of unclear notability. See COM:SCOPE. Possibly not own work by the uploader. Stefan2 (talk) 13:40, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Basvb (talk) 13:34, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Derivative work of logos, some of them non-free. Stefan2 (talk) 13:42, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Basvb (talk) 13:34, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
The uploader is unlikely to be both the performer and the creation of the video recording. At least two different rights holders seem to be involved. The uploader didn't necessarily compose the music himself either. Stefan2 (talk) 14:07, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Basvb (talk) 13:34, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative of a mural painting. -- Asclepias (talk) 14:07, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Delete as uploader. OSX (talk • contributions) 21:35, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination Basvb (talk) 13:34, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope. Stefan2 (talk) 14:08, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Basvb (talk) 13:34, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope. Stefan2 (talk) 14:09, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Basvb (talk) 13:34, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Seems to be a photo of the uploader, so the uploader is unlikely to be the photographer. Missing evidence of permisson from the photographer. Stefan2 (talk) 14:10, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: pn Basvb (talk) 13:34, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Derivative of a mural painting. -- Asclepias (talk) 14:18, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Basvb (talk) 13:35, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Derivative of a mural painting. -- Asclepias (talk) 14:27, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Basvb (talk) 13:35, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Derivative of a mural painting. -- Asclepias (talk) 14:28, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Basvb (talk) 13:35, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Derivative of a mural painting. -- Asclepias (talk) 14:28, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Basvb (talk) 13:35, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
artist has died in 2014 so cannot have uploaded this picture of art work himself no permission either from some one else MoiraMoira (talk) 14:30, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Basvb (talk) 13:35, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
artist has died in 2014 so cannot have uploaded this picture of art work himself no permission either from some one else MoiraMoira (talk) 14:31, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Basvb (talk) 13:35, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
artist has died in 2014 so cannot have uploaded this picture of art work himself no permission either from some one else MoiraMoira (talk) 14:31, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Basvb (talk) 13:35, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
artist has died in 2014 so cannot have uploaded this picture of art work himself no permission either from some one else MoiraMoira (talk) 14:32, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Basvb (talk) 13:35, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Despite the assertion that the photograph was taken in 1875, there is no obvious proof that it was. Pictoral evidence suggests it pre-dates 1910, but again there is no evidence of this. Without this, we can't give it a suitable licence tag. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:32, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Keep There are no motor vehicles so that photo must be before 1900 and it looks very old. It is very probable that the photgrapher died before 1945. Want we be holier than the pope? Should it deleted here i will it reupload to enWiki with {{PD-US-1923-abroad}}. --Ras67 (talk) 17:26, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- I see where you're coming from, but I have seen Commons do some serious I dotting and T crossing on this sort of thing so I thought a discussion wouldn't hurt. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 21:58, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- I think it is fortuity if the picture become deleted or not. This picture from 1894 was not deleted. --Ras67 (talk) 16:41, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
- I see where you're coming from, but I have seen Commons do some serious I dotting and T crossing on this sort of thing so I thought a discussion wouldn't hurt. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 21:58, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Kept: per reaction Basvb (talk) 13:37, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Derivative of a mural painting. -- Asclepias (talk) 14:39, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Basvb (talk) 13:37, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Derivative of a mural painting. -- Asclepias (talk) 14:41, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
This mural portrait is an example of public art commemorating Fleming in Halifax, Nova Scotia. Is the fact that the art is of poor quality an acceptable reason it should not be in wikipedia?--Hantsheroes (talk) 19:46, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: @User:Hantsheroes: this is not a case of poor quality, it's a copyright issue. Basvb (talk) 13:38, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:13, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Basvb (talk) 13:39, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:13, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Basvb (talk) 13:38, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:15, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted Basvb (talk) 13:38, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of project scope Threeohsix (talk) 15:49, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:26, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Murat YILDIZ (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:25, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pro Auto Rubber Pinetown (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused advertisement of questionable notability.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:26, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
distorted photo Pibwl (talk) 15:59, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:27, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
out of scope - picture with some thoughts, as well File:Think it.jpg and apparently all other user's uploads. Pibwl (talk) 16:01, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:29, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:04, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:30, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
injurious, and bad quality photo, not used for three years Pippobuono (talk) 21:12, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:32, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Shelo Marin (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused private or promotional images of low quality, out of scope.
- File:..6Shelo Marin.jpg
- File:.5Shelo Marin.jpg
- File:4.Shelo Marin.jpg
- File:3Shelo Marin.jpg
- File:1Shelo Marin.jpg
- File:2Shelo Marin.jpg
- File:Shelo Marin.jpg
Achim (talk) 21:19, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:31, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of project scope Threeohsix (talk) 15:16, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:05, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:17, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:05, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
typing error, category not needed
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:06, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:04, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:07, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:05, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:07, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
unnamed person, out of scope - same for File:224 copy.jpg. Unless anybody finds these photos useful as "people of India" (provided they are from India). Pibwl (talk) 16:06, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:08, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:09, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:08, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:09, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:08, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
c.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
c.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The file is out of project scope due to bad quality and lack of educational value. Taivo (talk) 17:30, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:11, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
not used personal photo, out of scope Pippobuono (talk) 20:50, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:12, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
not used personal photo, out of scope Pippobuono (talk) 21:19, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:04, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
out of scope Pibwl (talk) 21:20, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:03, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
out of csope, as well as the other upload File:Fifteam.png Pibwl (talk) 21:25, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:03, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Unused promotional or personal logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:35, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:02, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
out of scope? No proper description, no cat. Pibwl (talk) 22:40, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:13, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Promotional pdf Threeohsix (talk) 15:15, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 20:08, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
please delete this, I am a idiot to contribute to this site...--WPPilot (talk) 00:25, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader's request, unused file Ymblanter (talk) 20:09, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
photographer is a idiot to contribute to Wiki projects}}
Deleted: uploader's request, not in use Ymblanter (talk) 20:10, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
pdf file of no educational purpose Threeohsix (talk) 15:13, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 20:10, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
unused, sole upload, out of scope Pibwl (talk) 22:52, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:22, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
picture has no exifdata so no certainty about copyfree status also no permission from maker MoiraMoira (talk) 17:13, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio, grabbed from twitter. --Achim (talk) 21:20, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
Grafika jest nie precyzyjna może wprowadzać w błąd. Matt Cross'e (talk) 12:04, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- Please clarify your request in English. Thuresson (talk) 23:07, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Self-requested by the original uploader of the basis of the file being misleading. Pinging @Thuresson just to remind them that there is no formal requirement that deletion requests must be filled in English; users not speaking this language are quite allowed to user their native languages instead. odder (talk) 22:20, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
The uploader is not the copyright holder, it needs a proper release Хмеймим (talk) 15:40, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Almost certainly a copyvio. Michael Barera (talk) 01:45, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Requires a free release by the copyright holder. Should this be obtained, please provide proof of permission to COM:OTRS and cite the ticket number while requesting undeletion via COM:UDEL. Thanks! odder (talk) 22:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Totally out of project scope; appears to be a drawing of a private building. odder (talk) 22:25, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://viola.bz/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/artportrait.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:00, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Lack of any Exif metadata and tiny file resolution suggest this is a copyright violation. If this is incorrect, please provide proof of permission to COM:OTRS and cite the ticket number while requesting undeletion via COM:UDEL; thanks! odder (talk) 22:26, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://cdn.fansided.com/wp-content/blogs.dir/307/files/2015/09/hassan-whiteside-nba-miami-heat-orlando-magic-850x560.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:02, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Lack of any Exif metadata and tiny file resolution suggest this is a copyright violation. If this is incorrect, please provide proof of permission to COM:OTRS and cite the ticket number while requesting undeletion via COM:UDEL; thanks! odder (talk) 22:27, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CE7HkdOWgAANarB.png:large. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:07, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Lack of any Exif metadata and small file resolution and poor quality suggest this is a copyright violation. If this is incorrect, please provide proof of permission to COM:OTRS and cite the ticket number while requesting undeletion via COM:UDEL; thanks! odder (talk) 22:29, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://data.whicdn.com/images/167200949/superthumb.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:10, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Lack of any Exif metadata and tiny file resolution suggest this is a copyright violation. If this is incorrect, please provide proof of permission to COM:OTRS and cite the ticket number while requesting undeletion via COM:UDEL; thanks! odder (talk) 22:30, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://i0.wp.com/www.45enord.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/150717-jonathan-vance.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:15, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Lack of any Exif metadata and tiny file resolution suggest this is a copyright violation. If this is incorrect, please provide proof of permission to COM:OTRS and cite the ticket number while requesting undeletion via COM:UDEL; thanks! odder (talk) 22:31, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 19:30, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Way above the threshold of originality, even in the U.S. odder (talk) 22:35, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Poor quality, low-res, better version is File:(1)Yerranderie_Peak.jpg Sardaka (talk) 08:42, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Kept: your other version is a redirect to the same file, and of more it is used. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:57, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
creators will
Deleted: also unused personal image / close up on no quite notable people : out of scope --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:06, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
creators will 최광모 (talk) 11:38, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: also unused personal image / close up on no quite notable people : out of scope --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:07, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://news.sl/drwebsite/uploads/tom-nyuma_001.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:12, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio http://slconcordtimes.com/tom-nyuma-begged-to-be-buried-at-war-grave/ --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:13, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www2.unca.edu.ar/fotos/00003463.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:13, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:17, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
watermark image Biplab Anand (Talk) 16:16, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- Keep A watermark is not a reason for deleting an image. It just needs to be tagged with {{watermark}} and someone will remove it with a photo-editing program. For more information, read Commons:Watermark. - Takeaway (talk) 21:56, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: derivative of a wallpaper http://ubuntu-wallpaper.com/?ref=theredish.com/web --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:20, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural work A.Savin 22:11, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 21:30, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Дагиров Умар (talk · contribs)
[edit]Scans of non-free work.
- File:Коллаж обложек книг А.Сулейманов Топонимия Чечено-Ингушетии.png
- File:Обложка Топонимия Чечни, Грозный, 2006.jpg
- File:Обложка А.С.Сулейманов Топонимия чечено-ингушетии часть 1.jpg
- File:Обложка Топонимия Чечни (подчищенная).jpg
- File:Обложка А.С.Сулейманов Топонимия чечено-ингушетии.jpg
- File:Обложка А.Сулейманов Топонимия чечено-ингушении 4 часть.jpg
- File:Обложка А.Сулейманов Топониия чечено-ингушении часть 3.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- It is not free? the author died 20 years ago. -- Дагиров Умар (talk) 19:45, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
- Keep I think this is {{PD-ineligible}}. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 21:10, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
- That's my neighbor, I did a photo. long. -- Дагиров Умар (talk) 19:45, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
A.Savin 22:16, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, the first group is eligible for copyright. Not death of writer, but death of cover artist is important. The last photo (from passport) is also not free. Taivo (talk) 21:24, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for sculpture A.Savin 22:34, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 21:31, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
No evidence that pictures like this are exempted from copyright in the country of origin. Stefan2 (talk) 21:05, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:42, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
No evidence that pictures like this are exempted from copyright in the country of origin. Stefan2 (talk) 21:05, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:42, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
a title suggests it's a screenshoot, so a copyright is doubftul Pibwl (talk) 21:24, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:42, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
out of scope, unused Pibwl (talk) 21:43, 13 November 2015 (UTC) In fact redundant, since the user uses another copy File:От Авшаряна.JPG on his page
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:41, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
WWII era photo is unlikely to be the uploader's own work. Diannaa (talk) 21:58, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Also applies to the following uploads:
- File:JHV.jpg
- File:John vere young b&w.jpg
- File:Marna John 1942 cutout.jpg --Diannaa (talk) 22:00, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
These photos were sent to me by Jenny Elmes being scans from family photo album
Deleted: Not own work, copied from a family album. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:41, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
from http://www.neurosciencephd.columbia.edu/profile/shtsang?profile=researcher Diannaa (talk) 22:31, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This article should not be deleted-at least not yet. Correct me if I'm wrong, but those individuals requesting deletion are doing so because of the plagiarism claims, rather than because of the article's subject matter. I am in the process of contacting my primary online sources, which takes time. Their willingness to make this material publicly available on Wikipedia will determine whether rewriting is necessary. Thanks for your patience! Justus727 (talk) 05:02, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Photograph was copied from Columbia.edu website, not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:40, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This college graduation photo is unlikely to be the uploader's own work. Diannaa (talk) 22:32, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
I have been in contact with the offices of Dr. Tsang, and they provided the photo, which they claim has never before been published and thus should have no copyright infringement issues. Justus727 (talk) 04:54, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: "They provided the work" has nothing to do with copyright. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:39, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
image non libre (couverture de livre)
Habertix (talk) 23:13, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:39, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
redundant, not needed Maschen (talk) 12:26, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- It seems to have an obvious educational purpose - math/physics. Is that not enough? Curious not arguing. Rybkovich (talk) 18:44, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Kept: In use. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:59, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 15:29, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:59, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://rssbblog.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/293033_398233700248313_2097759155_n-1.jpg?w=600&h=300.
- File:Pathseekers School.jpg
- File:Dera- Hostels.jpg
- File:Dera- Hostel.jpg
- File:Dera- Langar.jpg
- File:Hostel 10-11.jpg
- File:Dera- Meeting venue.jpg
- File:Dera Housing Colony.jpg
- File:Dera- Meeting venue's inside view.jpg
- File:Dera - Intersection near colony.jpg
- File:Dera - Garden near Library.jpg
- File:Dera- Intersection near canteen.jpg
- File:Bhota Hospital.jpg
- File:Sikanderpur Hospital.jpg
- File:Beas Hospital.jpg
- File:Dera Library.jpg
- File:Dera Baba Jaimal Singh.jpg
- File:Library's view from outside.jpg
- File:Baba Gurinder Singh.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:58, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
Same reason as listed in Commons:Deletion_requests/File:深圳组合图3.jpg: "The source/license and author information of every image used in this collage is missing or is insufficient, compromising the whole file. See also Commons:Collages." Wcam (talk) 15:38, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- I also skimmed through all the images this user uploaded and could not find any image matching any one used in this collage which the uploader claimed as "own work". --Wcam (talk) 15:47, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:57, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
This document contains outdated info 50.74.240.10 15:45, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: No valid reason for deletion. --Amitie 10g (talk) 04:05, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused for four years, text only could be reproduced by typing if ever needed. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:57, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:08, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:57, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-JJrTAY4itd8/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/e2RokQ95z3U/photo.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:09, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:56, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Otto Dix
[edit]Copyright violation, the paintings excerpts shown here are works by de:Otto Dix who died in 1969, so these files won't come into public domain before 2040.
- File:DixportraetHEulenberg200.jpg
- File:Otto Dix, Selbstbildnis 1922.jpg
- File:Otto Dix.jpg
- File:OttoDIX.jpg
Correlatio (talk) 16:13, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Mr. Dix died in 1969. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:56, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
some sci-fi graphics? no proper description, out of scope, and doubtful authorship of anonymous uploader. Same for rest of uploads File:Sequence 21.gif, File:13phy.gif and File:TAKE IT.jpg - no real educational use for any of them Pibwl (talk) 16:40, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:53, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
no real educational use - along with File:Kghkjghkj.jpg, File:Tesurstj.jpg apparently unused wikiversity images Pibwl (talk) 16:43, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused apparently test edits. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:51, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
No PD. Painting made by Marie Rotteveel, see this version, who died in 1956. Ronn (talk) 17:44, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, it has to go, when it was posted the painter was unknown, now that we know it's author we know that it is still under copyright>Robert Prummel (talk) 00:16, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:46, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 18:18, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:45, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
poor quality, low res, better high-res version is File:(1)Yerranderie_ruins.jpg Sardaka (talk) 09:01, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Yerranderie_ruins.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:11, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused file, artwork without obvious educational use. BrightRaven (talk) 10:18, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Comment: File uploaded in 2009, could still be used outside Commons. --Amitie 10g (talk) 06:09, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
- BrightRaven -- unfortunately, you have cut-and-pasted in the same text used by User:Kephir, who received a 3-month ban due to his inability to work cooperatively with others in the area of special or fictional flags. This particular image is somewhat stupid, but special or fictional flags have not usually been deleted just for being "special or fictional", but only if there is some additional aggravating factor (such as being hoaxing or hatemongering). I would really advise you not to go on a general anti-fictitious-flag jihad, since this topic is a somewhat sensitive one on Commons... AnonMoos (talk) 14:49, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
- I have copied and pasted a deletion reason from an official policy page. I would really advise you not to threaten other users, since it is against another policy page. BrightRaven (talk) 23:30, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
- I would really advise you not to start a generalized all-encompassing anti-fictitious flag jihad, because every time that's happened on Commons, it has not ended well. Unfortunately, it's impossible to tell from your original deletion nomination language whether that's your intention or not. AnonMoos (talk) 09:03, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
- I have copied and pasted a deletion reason from an official policy page. I would really advise you not to threaten other users, since it is against another policy page. BrightRaven (talk) 23:30, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused photoshop file, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:02, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
Per Commons:Deletion policy: Self-created artwork without obvious educational use. Takeaway (talk) 10:52, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Re: objection to proposed deletion of File:Border Totterer.jpg by Otterfancier
It is sad to see the establishment turning its back once again upon this noble and graceful creature, the Border Totterer - and especially after so much progress has been made in raising awareness of its plight. It would certainly be a tragedy if it were now condemned to extinction by the actions of the unknowing few, thinking only of the rules. For as Mr Traill put it, when speaking of that distant relative of the Border Totterer, Greyfriars Bobby, "The rules o' the kirkyard are nae the laws o' the land"; in the same way the rules of this community, just and splendid as I am sure they are, must be tempered by the qualities of mercy and understanding. In an age where the Totterer's cousin, the otter, is still regularly hunted down by its other cousin, the Border Terrier, does not this guileless and charming image of the peace and fruitfulness which can exist between the two species serve an "educational" use, as you put it? And if we speak of "artworks", surely the only art on show here is the blind, majestic artistry of nature?
It may be too late, alas, for the Border Totterer. But I hope at least this image will remain as an eternal testament to love, friendship and honour, as long as mustelids and canids walk the earth.
Deleted: Really terrible photoshopping of unattributed images, not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:00, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
Redundant image. This image is watermarked and has a lower resolution than File:Eric Cheung.jpg. The latter image was uploaded earlier than the one proposed for deletion and is in the original resolution. Wylve (talk) 04:50, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- Keep:not redundant now--Hang9417 (talk) 14:46, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete See Commons:Overwriting existing files, you should upload a different file instead. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:13, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
- OK, thanks for reminding me.--Hang9417 (talk) 06:45, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 20:06, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
Source states that the text has a CC-SA-3.0 license, images are not covered. 4ing (talk) 08:36, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 20:06, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
No-FoP Japan - not free enough for change or use of commercial-purpose (until 2040 in Japan, 2060 in the U.S.)
- Lyrics of the song 最上川(Mogami-gawa) is written by昭和天皇(Emperor Shōwa, Hirohito, 1901-1989).[4]
- It says uploading on jawp within the restricted resolution may be safe.
Tokorokoko (talk) 10:01, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: Alan (talk) 20:07, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Missing usable source information. Date is obviously incorrect and the user has history of copyvios. Ytoyoda (talk) 16:27, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 20:08, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
doesn't seem to be in scope Pibwl (talk) 16:32, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 20:08, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Marco mangione (talk · contribs)
[edit]unlikely to be own work
- File:Vinifantiniauto.jpg
- File:Individuale.jpg
- File:Gare 1969 proni.jpeg
- File:Vgranpremioapertura.jpeg
- File:Tulliorossinotaripresutti.jpeg
- File:Corriere laziale.jpg
- File:2vittorie2giorni.jpeg
- File:Lariano73.jpeg
- File:Castelfusano.jpg
- File:Articolo del 1973 di 2 vittorie di Proni in 2 giorni.jpeg
- File:Umbertoealessandro.jpeg
- File:1GranPremioSpallanzaniCiclocross.jpeg
- File:UmbertoProniMobisettimi.jpg
Didym (talk) 17:17, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 20:09, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#France: sculptor Alfred-Alphonse Bottiau (1889–1951)
- File:Eagle at Chateau Thierry-1.JPG
- File:Intérieur mémorial 09623.JPG
- File:Mémorial franco-américain Marne 09617.JPG
- File:Éntrée mémorial 09508.JPG
Labattblueboy (talk) 17:20, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 20:10, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
porque no lo uso y no me interesa usarlo Victor 8 (talk) 17:39, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Razón no válida. Alan (talk) 20:10, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
Copyright violation, this stamp shows a scene of the movie de:Metropolis (Film), whose director de:Fritz Lang died in 1976, so this file will be copyrighted till 2046. Correlatio (talk) 19:29, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 20:12, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine (see Commons:FOP#Ukraine) アンタナナ 20:23, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 20:13, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine (see Commons:FOP#Ukraine) アンタナナ 20:42, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 20:13, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
No Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine Ymblanter (talk) 21:57, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 20:13, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP in Russia for sculpture A.Savin 22:43, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Alan (talk) 20:14, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No FoP in Russia for sculpture, collage contains Soviet sculpture A.Savin 22:44, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 20:14, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: non-free sculpture by Zdenko Kalin (d. 1990). Eleassar (t/p) 22:46, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 20:14, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for sculpture A.Savin 22:47, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- Если российская "свобода панорамы на скульптуры" запрещает скидывать сюда такие файлы, то этот удалите, а на Русской Википедии оставьте. Monoklon (talk) 00:52, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 20:15, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
uploader request The Photographer (talk) 22:56, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Las licencias CC son irrevocables Alan (talk) 20:16, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
Not own work. The author is Stockholms stadsmuseum. Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 10:10, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- Does COM:FOP#Sweden not apply? Basvb (talk) 13:13, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, there is no freedom of panorama in Sweden for text. Taivo (talk) 10:08, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
Not own work. The author is Stockholms stadsmuseum. Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 10:11, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- Does COM:FOP#Sweden not apply? Basvb (talk) 13:13, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, there is no freedom of panorama in Sweden for text. Taivo (talk) 10:10, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
Closed discussions from Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Douaumont ossuary
|
|---|
|
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Per COM:FOP#France: non-free architecture by Léon Azéma (d. 1978), Max Edrei (d. 1972) and Jacques Hardy (d. 1974).
Eleassar (t/p) 13:26, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion except for those that are undoubtely focused on copyrightable subjects SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 20:42, 14 December 2013 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
FOP France and family of deletion request for war memorials. The Douaumont ossuary is an ossuary and monument designed by Léon Azéma (20 January 1888 – 1 March 1978). Will wait to move to images to wikipeida until those images that are likely de minimis are identified.
Labattblueboy (talk) 07:28, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted all but the one. There is no animosity here, but just simple respect for French law and the work of the architect who died in 1978. If it is not legal to keep an image, then we must not, even though we would like to do so. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:34, 27 January 2014 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Per COM:FOP#France: non-free architecture by Léon Azéma (d. 1978), Max Edrei (d. 1972) and Jacques Hardy (d. 1974).
Labattblueboy (talk) 16:26, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:06, 2 December 2015 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
No FoP in France, see also Category:Douaumont ossuary
Herzi Pinki (talk) 15:20, 1 May 2016 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:51, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
As previously noted. Per COM:FOP#France: non-free architecture by Léon Azéma (d. 1978), Max Edrei (d. 1972) and Jacques Hardy (d. 1974). None of the nominated are de minimis or exceptions under Buren v Editions Cellard.
Labattblueboy (talk) 21:47, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Il est impossible d'avoir une vue d'ensemble du cimetière sans avoir le monument en arrière-plan. Or si c'est pour prendre uniquement les tombes, la photographie peut avoir été prise dans n'importe quel cimetière et ne signifie plus grand chose. C'est d'ailleurs ce qu'avaient très bien compris les membres des jurys français et européens lorsqu'ils ont choisi et primé le fichier File:0 Verdun - Cimetière de Douaumont (1).jpg. Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 18:57, 24 September 2018 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination, except 3, acceptable under the Terreaux jurisprudence. --Yann (talk) 04:42, 25 September 2018 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
As previously noted. Per COM:FOP#France: non-free architecture by Léon Azéma (d. 1978), Max Edrei (d. 1972) and Jacques Hardy (d. 1974). None of the nominated are de minimis or exceptions under Buren v Editions Cellard.
Labattblueboy (talk) 21:25, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 21:06, 3 October 2018 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
English: Still not free, see previous discussions.
Français : Pas encore libre, voir les discussions précédentes.
VIGNERON (talk) 14:52, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 06:42, 21 September 2020 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Beyond the images having copyright tag in the description text, FOP France. Non-free architecture by Léon Azéma (d. 1978), Max Edrei (d. 1972) and Jacques Hardy (d. 1974).
Labattblueboy (talk) 19:34, 24 January 2021 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 19:08, 31 January 2021 (UTC) |
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(9122415339).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(9124638210).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Files in Category:Douaumont ossuary 8
[edit]FOP France. Non-free architecture by Léon Azéma (d. 1978), Max Edrei (d. 1972) and Jacques Hardy (d. 1974).
Labattblueboy (talk) 23:02, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:34, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Belleau wood
[edit]Per COM:FOP#France, Felix Weihs de Weldon (April 12, 1907 – June 3, 2003)
- File:Belleau Wood Marine Memorial.jpg
- File:Felix de Weldon at the Marine Memorial dedication at Belleau Wood.jpg
Labattblueboy (talk) 16:55, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- I believe I understand the concern with keeping this on Commons. As an official United States Department of Defense photograph, can the picture be moved to the EN Wiki without issue?--KMJKWhite (talk) 02:12, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
- I believe so. Far as I know it's free in the US.--Labattblueboy (talk) 13:48, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
- The images have been reloaded and the respective wiki pages updated. These images can be deleted from Commons.--KMJKWhite (talk) 15:09, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
- I believe so. Far as I know it's free in the US.--Labattblueboy (talk) 13:48, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:10, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Оля Петрова (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low quality / missing EXIF promotional material, copyright violation or needs permission
- File:Сергей и его собака.jpg
- File:Чумаков Сергей в ГУМе.jpg
- File:Чумаков Сергей в свободное время.jpg
- File:Сергей Чумаков - прогулки.jpg
- File:Чумаков Сергей.jpg
- File:Чумаков С.jpg
- File:Сергей Чумаков в гримерке.jpg
- File:Сергей Чумаков на гастролях.jpg
- File:Сергей Чумаков перед концертом.jpg
- File:Сергей Чумаков с собакой.jpg
- File:Сергей Чумаков на прогулке.jpg
A.Savin 16:59, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:10, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#France: Henri Bouchard (December 13, 1875 – November 30, 1960)
- File:Centenaire de la Bataille de la Marne 07443.JPG
- File:Mondement, Monument national de la victoire de la Marne.jpg
- File:Mondement657.jpg
- File:Monument de Mondement-11.JPG
- File:Monument de Mondement-12.JPG
- File:Monument de Mondement-14.JPG
- File:Monument de Mondement-18.JPG
- File:Monument de Mondement-24.JPG
- File:Monument de Mondement-4.JPG
Labattblueboy (talk) 17:08, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- But fr:Monument national de la Victoire de la Marne says "Architecte: Paul Bigot en collaboration avec le sculpteur Henri Bouchard", doesn't this mean that Bigot, who died in 1942, was the primary author? Bever (talk) 14:16, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
- Unless I am mistaken, there is no distinction in French law between primary author and simply author.--Labattblueboy (talk) 21:55, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: It is a pitty but France seems to have a last living author + 70 years after his/her death clause. Natuur12 (talk) 12:13, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
I do not understand, why exactly the poster is in public domain. Probably should be deleted and restored in 2020 after copyright expiring, if the work is anonymous. But if the work is not anonymous, then later. Taivo (talk) 17:43, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:14, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
No FOP in France. Architect Georges-Henri Pingusson died in 1978. Will be public domain in 2049.
- File:Deportation Memorial (5429795107).jpg
- File:Deportation Memorial (5429795735).jpg
- File:Memorial de la Deportation.jpg
- File:Memorial des Martyrs de la Deportation-Paris.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Coyau (talk) 20:48, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
- Keep File:Memorial de la Deportation.jpg, because this artwork is not original : only a large stone block and some writings. No FOP doesnt apply if the artwork is not original. --Tangopaso (talk) 20:57, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
- [edit conflict] Delete three of the images, but Keep File:Memorial de la Deportation.jpg since it only shows a discrete part of the memorial, and those elements of the memorial shown are likely not copyrightable (the side of a slab of concrete (stone) and five simple words, as seen in this photo, likely do not meet the threshold of originality). --Skeezix1000 (talk) 21:01, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
- Keep for File:Memorial de la Deportation.jpg which seems to be below the threshold of originality. Jeriby (talk) 01:45, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete all but Keep File:Memorial de la Deportation.jpg as per the above. russavia (talk) 02:02, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete File:Memorial des Martyrs de la Deportation-Paris.jpg was taken by me. The person giving information at the memorial told me "Photos O.K., but no video". Therefore I assumed it's also O.K. to publish. Legal situation is obviously against. --P e z i (talk) 09:18, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: one kept, rest deleted FASTILY 10:50, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#France: non-free images, Georges-Henri Pingusson (July 26, 1894 – October 22, 1978)
- File:Another city of bridges, Paris.jpg
- File:Memorial de la Deportation.jpg
- File:Mémorial de la déportation.JPG
- File:Square IDF & Memorial.jpg
Labattblueboy (talk) 17:48, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- Keep File:Another city of bridges, Paris.jpg, a photo of the Seine River, and not easy to find the Mémorial des Martyrs de la Déportation in this photo.--Paris 16 (talk) 17:53, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- Keep I agree. --Tangopaso (talk) 18:26, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- Keep per Paris 16. --P e z i (talk) 22:40, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- Keep File:Square IDF & Memorial.jpg This image enters in the Commons:De minimis exception, because the memorial (horizontal cement block) is only a small part of the photo. --Tangopaso (talk) 18:21, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- It's a direct frontal for which the architectural work takes the entire middle of the frame, not some in the corner feature. certainly not de minimis and it's inclusion appears intentional and not as accessory compared to the main represented or handled subject so de minimis for France does not apply.-Labattblueboy (talk) 19:07, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- I insist. It is De Minimis. The memorial is perhaps 10% of the photo. And the memorial is far : it is impossible to read its name. --Tangopaso (talk) 22:55, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- The subject is clearly the memorial; The description in the photo is "entrance of the Memorial of the Deportation." In no world is this De Minimis.--Labattblueboy (talk) 12:26, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
- I insist. It is De Minimis. The memorial is perhaps 10% of the photo. And the memorial is far : it is impossible to read its name. --Tangopaso (talk) 22:55, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- Keep per Tangopaso. --P e z i (talk) 22:40, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- It's a direct frontal for which the architectural work takes the entire middle of the frame, not some in the corner feature. certainly not de minimis and it's inclusion appears intentional and not as accessory compared to the main represented or handled subject so de minimis for France does not apply.-Labattblueboy (talk) 19:07, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- Keep File:Memorial de la Deportation.jpg There was already a discussion about the photo and the decision was : kept (See above). Because the photo is under the treshold of originality. --Tangopaso (talk) 18:25, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- Keep already decided to be kept. --P e z i (talk) 22:40, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- This is a full frontal of the memorial. Of course it's within the scope of originality. The above grade portion of the memorial is expressly designed to look like a crypt. Further this image is effectively of the memorial title.--Labattblueboy (talk) 12:34, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
- Keep File:Mémorial de la déportation.JPG because it is also under the treshold of originality. --Tangopaso (talk) 18:29, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- File:Mémorial de la déportation.JPG is clearly copyrightable, it's certainly a tangible medium of expression and original (e.g. not a cookie cutter suburban home) and definitely not de minimis.--Labattblueboy (talk) 18:46, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- Keep per Tangopaso. --P e z i (talk) 22:40, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- Keep for all files: File:Another city of bridges, Paris.jpg is a cityscape, the Memorial is De Minimis, File:Memorial de la Deportation.jpg seems to be under threshold of originality, the part of the Mémorial depicted in the picture is just a wall with a text on it (maybe the font is copyrightable but really not sure of that, and the picture was kept in a previous DR), File:Mémorial de la déportation.JPG also under threshold of originality AND it's a street view with a lot of other buildings depicted, and then File:Square IDF & Memorial.jpg the Memorial is De Minimis because is in background of a general view of a square (are grass and flowers copyrightable? I don't think so). Jeriby (talk) 09:25, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
- I have to agree that File:Another city of bridges, Paris.jpg is cityscape and consequently, I withdraw the request for that image.
- For the others an exception only applies if the artwork is not intentionally included as an element of the setting, and its presence in the picture must be unavoidable. In what capacity do these images fit that description. In every other case nominated (not every image in the categoy was nominated) the memorial is framed-in intentionally and the architecture of the building in clear. As noted already this is very original design having been designed as a crypt in a modernist style. Per Architectural Digest the memorial is designed to appears anonymous. --Labattblueboy (talk) 13:23, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
- Keep the cityscape. Delete the others as the main subject is clearly the monument. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:44, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
- Keep all of them, unless there's a copyright issue with the background buildings in File:Mémorial de la déportation.JPG. Mere hexagonal prisms aren't copyrightable, and adding "Martyrs Français de la Déportation 1945" to the block doesn't change the situation. Nyttend (talk) 22:42, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
- French law asserts that a work is copyrightable when it bears the "imprint of the personality of the author". In this case the argument is that the artist very intentionally created a modernist themed crypt as he belonged to a modernist school of architecture. Per COM:TO the bar in France is quite low for many works where an artistic intent can be shown. As noted earlier, numerous architectural periodicals have noted the express nature of the memorial appearing as a hexagonal crypt from the outside perspective.--Labattblueboy (talk) 23:29, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
Kept: below TOO and/or DM. Please keep in mind that closings like this are always a bit subjective. Natuur12 (talk) 12:19, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#France: non-free images, work of sculptor Donald Harcourt De Lue (October 5, 1897 – August 26, 1988) and landscaper Markley Stevenson (1885 - 1960)
- File:Am.begraafplaats-Margraten(2).jpg
- File:American cemetery Normandy.jpg
- File:Bassin.jpg
- File:Cimetière américain de Colleville-sur-Mer 00.jpg
- File:Cimetière américain de Colleville-sur-Mer 01.JPG
- File:Cimetière américain de Colleville-sur-Mer 02.jpg
- File:Cimetière américain de Colleville-sur-Mer 2.JPG
- File:Cimetière américain, en Normandie.jpg
- File:Color Gaurd.jpg
- File:Memorial Omaha Beach 292.jpg
- File:Monumento a las bajas aliadas, Normanía, Francia, agosto de 2005.JPG
- File:Normandy American Cemetery and Memorial 4.jpg
- File:Normandy American Cemetery and Memorial DSC 2515 2.jpg
- File:Normandy American Cemetery and Memorial DSC 2531 2.jpg
- File:Normandy American Cemetery and Memorial DSC 2547 2.jpg
- File:Normandy American Cemetery and Memorial2.jpg
- File:Normandy American Cemetery and Memorial3.jpg
- File:NormandyAmericanCemeteryandMemorial1.jpg
- File:Omaha Beach 712 cropped.jpg
- File:Omaha Beach 712.jpg
- File:Statue Granit portant un aigle et symbolisant les Etats-Unis - Cimetière de Colleville-sur-Mer (France).jpg
- File:Statue granit portant un coq et symbolisant la France - Cimetière de Colleville-sur-Mer (France).jpg
- File:Trumans message at the NACM.jpg
- File:Visitor Center - Cimetière Américain de Colleville-sur-Mer - France.jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Labattblueboy (talk) 17:59, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- The first listed ( File:Am.begraafplaats-Margraten(2).jpg), while itself an image of an engraving (and 3D art), is merely the text of the "Collect for Peace", from the 1789 Book of Common Prayer. Itself obviously PD due to age. Revent (talk)
- To be more anally retentive... the text itself is PD, the engraving is 2D art, the photo itself needs a valid license because it is not a 'faithful reproduction', having been taken at an angle, though the originality involved is arguable. Revent (talk) 10:02, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
Bonjour, Plusieurs photos illustrant le Cimetière américain de Colleville-sur-Mer ont été supprimée. Malheureusement les explications … nous sont fournies en anglais, langue que je pratique pas.
Je n'attache évidemment pas d'importance particulière à la partie artistique des photos que j'ai prises, car je ne prétends pas être un photographe professionnel. Mais je souhaiterais aborder des questions de fond qui se posent : -lorsque la photo prise le 12 juillet 2010 (j'ai toutefois omis d'indiquer la date de la prise de photos ce dont je vous prie de m'excuser) montre un ensemble paysager magnifiquement aménagé et entretenu, l'objectif évident est de montrer la qualité du lieu de mémoire ainsi préservé, - de même lorsque la photo prise également le 12 juillet 2010 sur un lieu public présente un "groupe de jeunes visiteurs" qui rendaient un hommage collectif à ceux qui ont donné leur vie (sans que cette manifestation soit liée à un jour représentant un événement particulier) ne peut être que positive dans la démarche pédagogique.
Bref, s'agit-il d'une interdiction de photographier les espaces extérieurs du site (cela se comprend lorsqu'il s'agit des éléments mobiliers à préserver l'intérieur d'un musée, mais il faut nous expliquer s'il s'agit d'un statut d'exception qui permet une censure au droit à l'image sur le territoire français, même si le site bénéficie à juste titre d'un statut particulier.
Le territoire du Cimetière américain de Colleville-sur-Mer, bénéficie en effet d'une concession perpétuelle faite par la France aux États-Unis, comme il est d'usage pour tous les cimetières militaires relatifs aux deux guerres mondiales. Ils ne bénéficient donc pas de l'extraterritorialité. Les photos relatives au cimetière américain d'Épinal n'ont heureusement, elles, eu aucune censure. Mais peut-être que la loi instituant l'espace affecté à une concession perpétuelle à Colleville-sur-Mer a prévu des dispositions spécifiques ?
Il serait plus simple de soumettre, avant autorisation éventuelle de publication (mais sans que cela n'apparaisse comme une exception juridique qui se ferait hors du cadre judiciaire français) les photos au gestionnaire du site, afin qu'il s'assure de l'intérêt que peut avoir cette ou ces photos dans la préservation et la communication de « l'image du lieu de mémoire ».
Le principe me semble d'autant plus regrettable qu'à l'occasion du dimanche de Toussaint de nombreux Français se rendent dans les cimetières, lieux identitaires s’il en fut. Une occasion de faire l’entretien d’une pierre tombale familiale, mais aussi de constater parfois l’abandon du monument voisin. Montrer la qualité d'entretien exceptionnelle du site de Colleville-sur-Mer doit être comprise comme l'installation d'un « bouquet de fleur virtuel » relativement modeste en sus de la présence que nous avons manifestée sur place. Image virtuelle qui – il faut l'espérer – sera renouvelée en permanence par ceux qui - comme nous - sont toujours très attachés à ces lieux de mémoire.
La question se pose donc d'une manière plus générale car ce n'est pas le seul lieu de mémoire de ce type en France, quelle que soit la nationalité du cimetière présenté (française, américaine, allemande...). Voir par exemple : le Cimetière américain d'Épinal
Lorsque j'interviens comme contributeur à un article intéressant une commune, je veille à ce que les lieux de mémoire y soient mentionnés au même titre que les sites, monuments historiques, etc... J'ai aussi contribué à des articles comme celui relatif au Maquis du Haut-du-Bois (mon père était en effet maquisards dans celui-ci durant la seconde guerre mondiale).
Ne prenez pas mes propos pour une critique, car j'apprécie énormément le dévouement de tous ceux qui contribuent à l'enrichissement, au suivi et au contrôle des articles, et me soumets à votre jugement quant à la suite à donner à mon humble avis. Avis qui n'est en aucun cas une contestation sur la procédure de suppression éventuelle des photos, mais qui vise seulement à un débat de fond.
En tout cas merci pour tout ce que vous faites.
Bien cordialement à vous--René Dinkel (talk) 10:26, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
- Cemeteries in France are not extra-territorial so even if perceptually donated to a country, French law still applies on said land and consequently French FOP.--Labattblueboy (talk) 12:50, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
- But I can not understand why we should delete an Image on Internet basing in a law in a single country. In my case, I uploaded this image in Spain and I supose that the image is now in a server in USA or at least out of France. Imagine if we should respect all the local laws. Internet is dead. If in France there is a law that specificly say do not use photos of some specific things, block the link to this images. But block only in France. Sorry if my english have mistakes.
- Why delete it? It's a free image. I created this image and I give up any copyrights. Sincerely, Ehud Amir (talk) 19:16, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
- You don't own the copyright of the image, per the laws of France the creator of the architectural piece does.--Labattblueboy (talk) 00:45, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
- Why delete it? It's a free image. I created this image and I give up any copyrights. Sincerely, Ehud Amir (talk) 19:16, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
- But I can not understand why we should delete an Image on Internet basing in a law in a single country. In my case, I uploaded this image in Spain and I supose that the image is now in a server in USA or at least out of France. Imagine if we should respect all the local laws. Internet is dead. If in France there is a law that specificly say do not use photos of some specific things, block the link to this images. But block only in France. Sorry if my english have mistakes.
- Cemeteries in France are not extra-territorial so even if perceptually donated to a country, French law still applies on said land and consequently French FOP.--Labattblueboy (talk) 12:50, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
Internet is global, the Law is local. If we should respect the laws in France, we also should respect other laws arround the world. The end of Wikipedia project.
- That's balderdash, we respect the laws from where the illustration of art comes. In France only personal use of images of copyrighted artwork is allowed, period. On Commons commercial use must be possible. You can upload your picture to the Spanish wikipedia, in Spain exists Freedom of Panorama and nobody from France can ask for payment of rights, which in Spain not exist (Schutzlandprinzip in German). Warm regards --Ras67 (talk) 16:16, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:41, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 18:16, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- I don't see this as original, compare to images at Commons: Threshold of originality in I love Marine the heart represents - love, it also has an I super imposed on it which can be argued as complex. Here the lamp represents ideas or knowledge or something like that - a common representation like the heart is for love. Multiple colors also don't do it - Best western has 3 different ones, Bruce lee has 3. Rybkovich (talk) 18:41, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Yes but the source country is Estonia which likely has a much lower TOO, Natuur12 (talk) 12:34, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#France: non-free images. one of two architects, Thomas Hall Locraft, died Aug. 31, 1959.
- File:Cim-us-memorial-roi david.jpg
- File:Cimetière américain de Saint-Avold 2.jpg
- File:Cimetière-américain-saint-avold.JPG
- File:Cimetière américain de Saint-Avold.jpg
- File:Saint-Avold American Cemetery 01.jpg
- File:Saint-Avold American Cemetery 02.jpg
- File:Saint-Avold American Cemetery 03.jpg
- File:Saint-Avold American Cemetery 04.jpg
- File:Saint-Avold American Cemetery 05.jpg
- File:Saint-Avold American Cemetery 06.jpg
- File:Saint-Avold American Cemetery 07.jpg
- File:SSG Ruben Rivers' gravesite.jpg
- File:Lorraine American Cemetery and Memorial 3.jpg
Labattblueboy (talk) 18:20, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- Added File:Lorraine American Cemetery and Memorial 3.jpg to bulk request.--Labattblueboy (talk) 14:30, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
- While this cemetery where Americans are interred may be on French soil, it should be afforded the same level of courtesy as a consulate since it is managed by the United States Government. Understand that this post in wiki is designed to keep alive the memory of those who fought alongside our French allies. Removal of the photos over a petty and barely sufficient framework is not in keeping with the spirit with which SSG Rivers and others lived and died for. Therefore, I request that you withdraw your request for deletion. Jumpmaster1906
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:33, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#France: non free as architect was Thomas Harlan Ellett (1880-1951)
- File:Cimetière américain saillant st mihiel 01.JPG
- File:Cimetière américain saillant st mihiel 02.JPG
- File:Cimetière américain saillant st mihiel 03.JPG
- File:Cimetière américain saillant st mihiel 04.JPG
- File:Cimetière américain saillant st mihiel 05.JPG
- File:Cimetière américain saillant st mihiel 071.JPG
- File:Cimetière américain saillant st mihiel 08.JPG
- File:St. Mihiel American Cemetery, near Thiaucourt, France. Soldier Monument and Chapel., ca. 1925 - ca. 1935 - NARA - 532059.tif
Labattblueboy (talk) 18:30, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- This one is a bit messy. First, though, I believe that Ellett was the architect of the chapel, not every element in the cemetery. So...
- Keep on File:Cimetière américain saillant st mihiel 01.JPG, File:Cimetière américain saillant st mihiel 05.JPG, and File:St. Mihiel American Cemetery, near Thiaucourt, France. Soldier Monument and Chapel., ca. 1925 - ca. 1935 - NARA - 532059.tif. These photos are not primarily of the chapel, but rather a larger scene. Much like a photo of the entire Louvre square, which contains the copyrighted pyramid, those are not considered derivative works. France had a ruling called the "theory of the accessory"; there was a photo of a street scene with a copyrighted building (la Tour Montparnasse) at the other end (centered and prominent in the photograph); it was ruled to not be a derivative of the building because the photograph was of the wider scene, and not the building in particular. I think the above three are in that category. The NARA one might include part of a statue which may be by Paul Manship (died 1966); but again the photo is from behind and not really focusing on Manship's expression either.
- Keep on File:Cimetière américain saillant st mihiel 04.JPG This does not even show the chapel, so I'm not sure there is anything copyrightable in the first place -- but even if so, I think it's de minimis as well as the "theory of the accessory".
- I agree, I withdraw my nomination for File:Cimetière américain saillant st mihiel 04.JPG.--Labattblueboy (talk) 13:47, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
- Keep on File:Cimetière américain saillant st mihiel 08.JPG This building was done by en:Egerton Swartwout (died 1943).[5] 70pma has passed.
- I think Keep on File:Cimetière américain saillant st mihiel 03.JPG and File:Cimetière américain saillant st mihiel 02.JPG. They are focusing on the eagle sculpture, but I can't find any record of who the sculptor is. Ellett was an architect, not a sculptor, so I don't think that is attributable to him. Would appear to be {{Anonymous-EU}}.
- That brings us to File:Cimetière américain saillant st mihiel 071.JPG and File:Cimetière américain saillant st mihiel 08.JPG, which are primarily of Ellett's work. I guess country of origin for a building is the country where the building is, so even though it's an American architect, and he would not have a U.S. copyright on it at all, and the photo would not be derivative in the US anyways... technically that one is a problem. It's a pretty fringy deletion request (the circumstances are such that the URAA "source country" would probably be the United States), but it is the one which could have some validity. The photo can be moved to en-wiki if it's deleted here (and can definitely be undeleted in 2022).
- Carl Lindberg (talk) 04:33, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
- Disagree Looking at the source provided the credits for St. Mihiel cemetery and memorial are:
- Thomas Ellet (died 1951) the chapel and other architectural features in the St. Mihiel cemetery
- Paul Manship (died in 28 January 1966) the soldier monument and urn in the center.
- Barry Faulkner (died 27 October 1966), Mosaics on the interior walls of the chapels.
- Egerton Swartwout is credited for Mihiel monument at Montec, which is the Montsec American Monument[6] not St. Mihiel American Cemetery and Memorial. Consequently, all of the above a non-free, except File:Cimetière américain saillant st mihiel 04.JPG which I agree a keep.--Labattblueboy (talk) 13:43, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
- OK thanks, I messed that one up -- thought those were the same building. So that is in the same state as the last one, a photo primarily of the building. I still stand by the rest. Carl Lindberg (talk) 15:49, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:32, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
Unfortunately there is no freedom of panorama for publicly displayed artwork in the Philippines. De728631 (talk) 19:21, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Also nominated:
- File:0183jfAlauli Rizal Burgos Bridge Welcome Pilar Bataanfvf 13.JPG
- File:0183jfAlauli Rizal Burgos Bridge Welcome Pilar Bataanfvf 12.JPG
- File:0183jfAlauli Rizal Burgos Bridge Welcome Pilar Bataanfvf 11.JPG
- File:0183jfAlauli Rizal Burgos Bridge Welcome Pilar Bataanfvf 10.JPG
De728631 (talk) 19:26, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for your messages; with all due respect, these paintings were made by inexperienced and anonymous employees, like street sweepers, hence, really no value at all, but perhaps for political purposes; at any rate, I have no objection to the deletion, best regards--Judgefloro 19:34, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- The artistic merit doesn't matter, nor is it important who painted these murals. Even anonymous works are copyrighted for 50 years in the Philippines after their first publication. De728631 (talk) 19:48, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for your messages; with all due respect, these paintings were made by inexperienced and anonymous employees, like street sweepers, hence, really no value at all, but perhaps for political purposes; at any rate, I have no objection to the deletion, best regards--Judgefloro 19:34, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:28, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Gerd Aretz
[edit]German stamps especially those which were printed since 1995 aren't automatically in the public domain. The pictures or photos shown on these stamps are all made or edited by de:Gerd Aretz who died in 2009, so his works won't come into public domain before 2080.
- File:1999-Briefmarkenausstellung.jpg
- File:Rau stamp.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 2000 MiNr2104 Niedersächsischer Landtag.jpg
- File:Bürgerschaft der Freien und Hansestadt Hamburg Briefmarke 1999.jpg
- File:DPAG-1997-ThomasDehler.jpg
- File:DPAG1998-03-12-LandesparlamentBaden-Wuerttemberg.jpg
- File:DPAG1998-03-12-LandesparlamentBayern.jpg
- File:DPAG1998-03-12-LandesparlamentBerlin.jpg
- File:DPAG1998-03-12LandesparlamentBrandenburg.jpg
- File:Jim Knopf Marke.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 1995 Briefmarke 100 Jahre Volleyball.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 1995 Briefmarke Boxweltmeisterschaft.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 1995 Briefmarke Kanu-Weltmeisterschaft.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 1995 Briefmarke Weltgymnaestrada in Berlin.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 1995 MiNr1813 Franz Werfel.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 1995 MiNr1818 Franz Josef Strauß.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 1996 Briefmarke Carlo Schmid.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 1999 MiNr2030 Hessischer Landtag.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 1999 MiNr2037 Landtag Mecklenburg-Vorpommern.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 1999 MiNr2040 Bremer Bürgerschaft.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 1999 MiNr2075 Friedenspreis Buchhandel.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 2000 MiNr2087 AD 2000.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 2000 MiNr2092 Herbert Wehner.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 2000 MiNr2093 Keine Gewalt Frauen.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 2000 MiNr2110 Landtag Nordrhein-Westfalen.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 2000 MiNr2129 Landtag Rheinland-Pfalz.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 2000 MiNr2153 Landtag Saarland.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 2001 MiNr2172 Sächsischer Landtag.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 2001 MiNr2184 Landtag Sachsen Anhalt.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 2001 MiNr2190 Pinocchio.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 2001 MiNr2192 Heidi.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 2001 MiNr2194 Tom Sawyer und Huckleberry Finn.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 2001 MiNr2198 Landtag Schleswig-Holstein.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 2001 MiNr2213 Thüringer Landtag.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 2004 MiNr2396 Kiesinger.jpg
Correlatio (talk) 20:15, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
PS:File:Stamp Germany 2000 MiNr2093 Keine Gewalt Frauen.jpg was not made or edited by Gerd Aretz, but is very likely copyrighted, too. --Correlatio (talk) 20:20, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- The logo in File:Stamp Germany 2000 MiNr2087 AD 2000.jpg was not designed by Gerd Aretz, his contribution to the stamp is {{PD-ineligible}} in my humble opinion. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 09:24, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
- PPS: I've forgotten File:Thomas Dehler (timbre allemand).jpg it is the same stamp as File:DPAG-1997-ThomasDehler.jpg. --Correlatio (talk) 16:15, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:25, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Gerd Aretz
[edit]Per Commons:WikiProject Public Domain/German stamps review, as Gerd Aretz died in 2009.
- File:DBP - Nobelpreisträger - 30,50,70 Pfennig - 1978.jpg
- File:1992-ersttagsstempel-sport.jpg
- File:DBP - Bundespräsident Gustav Heinemann - 80 Pfennig - 1982.jpg
- File:DBP - Bundespräsident Heinrich Lübke - 80 Pfennig - 1982.jpg
- File:DBP - Bundespräsident Karl Carstens - 80 Pfennig - 1982.jpg
- File:DBP - Bundespräsident Theodor Heuss - 80 Pfennig - 1982.jpg
- File:DBP - Bundespräsident Walter Scheel - 80 Pfennig - 1982.jpg
- File:DBP 1961 374 Wilhelm Emmanuel von Ketteler.jpg
- File:DBP 1964 431 Hitlerattentat Sophie Scholl.jpg
- File:DBP 1964 432 Hitlerattentat Ludwig Beck.jpg
- File:DBP 1964 433 Hitlerattentat Dietrich Bonhoeffer.jpg
- File:DBP 1964 435 Hitlerattentat Carl Friedrich Goerdeler.jpg
- File:DBP 1964 436 Hitlerattentat Wilhelm Leuschner.jpg
- File:DBP 1964 437 Hitlerattentat Helmuth James Graf von Moltke.jpg
- File:DBP 1964 438 Hitlerattentat Claus Schenk Graf von Stauffenberg.jpg
- File:DBP 1964 Block 3 Hitlerattentat.jpg
- File:DBP 1977 942 Friedrich von Bodelschwingh der Jüngere.jpg
- File:DBP 1978 962 Martin Buber.jpg
- File:DBP 1980 1056 Friedrich Joseph Haass.jpg
- File:DBP 1981 1094 Sporthilfe Rudern.jpg
- File:DBP 1981 1095 Sporthilfe Segelfliegen.jpg
- File:DBP 1982 1154 Tag der Briefmarke.jpg
- File:DBP 1982 Block 18 Bundespräsidenten.jpg
- File:DBP 1984 1220 Eugenio Pacelli.jpg
- File:DBP 1985 1237 Romano Guardini.jpg
- File:DBP 1987 1308 Ludwig Erhard.jpg
- File:DBP 1987 1325 Wilhelm Kaisen.jpg
- File:DBP 1988 1350 Jakob Kaiser.jpg
- File:DBP 1988 1372 Jean Monnet.jpg
- File:DBP 1989 1440 Reinhold Maier.jpg
- File:DBP 1990 1449-1450-R.JPG
- File:DBP 1990 1449-R.JPG
- File:DBP 1990 1450-R.JPG
- File:DBP 1990 1466-R.JPG
- File:DBP 1991 1510-R.JPG
- File:DBP 1991 1556-R.JPG
- File:DBP 1992 1592-1595-R.JPG
- File:DBP 1992 1592-R.JPG
- File:DBP 1992 1593-R.JPG
- File:DBP 1992 1594-R.JPG
- File:DBP 1992 1595-R.JPG
- File:DBP 1993 1689 Heinrich George.jpg
- File:DPAG 2009 Johannes Calvin.jpg
- File:Hannah Arendt.jpg
- File:DBP - Nobelpreisträger, Gerhart Hauptmann - 30 Pfennig - 1978.jpg
- File:DBP - Nobelpreisträger, Hermann Hesse - 50 Pfennig - 1978.jpg
- File:DBP 1975 827 Ricarda Huch.jpg
- File:DBP 1992 1643-R.JPG
- File:DBP 1975 826 Annette Kolb.jpg
- File:DBP 1975 828 Else Lasker-Schüler.jpg
- File:DBP 1975 829 Gertrud von Le Fort.jpg
- File:DBP 1992 1616-R.JPG
- File:Ludwig Beck.jpg
- File:Ludwig Erhard stamp.jpg
- File:DBP - Nobelpreisträger, Thomas Mann - 70 Pfennig - 1978.jpg
- File:Martin Niemöller.jpg
- File:Romano Guardini stamp.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 2000 MiNr2087 AD 2000.jpg
- File:Stamp Hannah Arendt-2.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1981, MiNr 645.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1981, MiNr 646.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1989, MiNr 846.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1990, MiNr 864.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1990, MiNr 865.jpg
- File:Timbre Allemagne 1992 Martin Niemoller obl.jpg
_1981,_MiNr_645.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1981,_MiNr_646.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1989,_MiNr_846.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1990,_MiNr_864.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1990,_MiNr_865.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
— Racconish ☎ 18:04, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama for artwork, including sculptures in Russia (see Commons:FOP#Russia) アンタナナ 23:06, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:26, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
This is Spanish photo. Spain needs not 70, but 80 years from death, so 1900 photos are not necessarily in public domain. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 17:53, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Kept: It's old enough to be in PD Anna (Cookie) (talk) 02:13, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
Sorry, I must nominate the photo again for deletion. I deeply believe, that former closure was wrong. Source country is Spain, which needs 80 years from death, and 1900 is too recent year to assume that without evidence. If the photo is anonymous, then it is OK, but this needs evidence too. The file does not come from museum or archive, but from a blog. If blog owner does not know the author, then this does not mean, that the work is anonymous. Please somebody else close the DR. Taivo (talk) 11:11, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep 116 years old, unknown photographer, doubt below threshold. --Fæ (talk) 07:01, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: every photo has an author, but here "unknown" means "anonymous", so kept per Fæ. Ruthven (msg) 22:26, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
Although this file is hosted on a flickr feed by the US army, it is listed as a courtesy photo (i.e. they were allowed to publish it by the copyright holder). My understanding of the copyright law in play here is that works by the US government (including the army) are free, and not simply all works published or hosted by them. This is why not all images on NASA's website are free, and this appears to be what applies here. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:26, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- Keep If they were allowed to publish it in this manner, there's no issue here. Are you suggesting that the Army has infringed on the photographer's copyright by distributing it under a license not authorised by the photographer? Such an assertion cannot be believed without sourcing (e.g. an article about a successful lawsuit against the Army for copyright infringement in this case), and that's the only way that we can treat this as a copyright problem. Nyttend (talk) 22:51, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: This is clearly not an Army image. I think it is very likely that the person creating the Flickr feed simply added it to the story without even thinking about the fact that he had no right to license it to others. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:07, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Photographs by Simon Hanna
[edit]All of these photos, uploaded to the Financial Times Flickr stream by myself (Scott/Russavia), have "(C) simon hanna 2012" in the EXIF data. Due to uncertain licencing status, all files in this category (and nominated here) need to be deleted.
- File:FT 0010 (7189712635).jpg
- File:FT 0013 (7189711815).jpg
- File:FT 0025 (7189711137).jpg
- File:FT 0030 (7189710379).jpg
- File:FT 0035 (7374951968).jpg
- File:FT 0039 (7189708577).jpg
- File:FT 0040 (7374949944).jpg
- File:FT 0043 (7189707051).jpg
- File:FT 0049 (7374947074).jpg
- File:FT 0050 (7189704161).jpg
- File:FT 0052 (7374945732).jpg
- File:FT 0055 (7189702793).jpg
- File:FT 0058 (7374944204).jpg
- File:FT 0061 (7374943808).jpg
- File:FT 0063 (7374943256).jpg
- File:FT 0066 (7189700389).jpg
- File:FT 0067 (7374941732).jpg
- File:FT 0069 (7189699279).jpg
- File:FT 0072 (7374940644).jpg
- File:FT 0075 (7189697655).jpg
- File:FT 0078 (7189697167).jpg
- File:FT 0080 (7374937654).jpg
- File:FT 0083 (7189694409).jpg
- File:FT 0087 (7374935540).jpg
- File:FT 0089 (7189693287).jpg
- File:FT 0090 (7189692431).jpg
- File:FT 0091 (7189691815).jpg
- File:FT 0093 (7374933230).jpg
- File:FT 0098 (7189690985).jpg
- File:FT 0109 (7189690359).jpg
- File:FT 0111 (7189690097).jpg
- File:FT 0113 (7374931436).jpg
- File:FT 0116 (7189688209).jpg
- File:FT 0118 (7189687315).jpg
- File:FT 0122 (7189686721).jpg
- File:FT 0123 (7189686253).jpg
- File:FT 0126 (7189685775).jpg
- File:FT 0128 (7189685165).jpg
- File:FT 0130 (7374925990).jpg
- File:FT 0138 (7374924898).jpg
- File:FT 0141 (7189682521).jpg
- File:FT 0142 (7189680835).jpg
- File:FT 0146 (7189680441).jpg
- File:FT 0147 (7374922032).jpg
- File:FT 0149 (7374921536).jpg
- File:FT 0150 (7374921058).jpg
- File:FT 0152 (7374919982).jpg
- File:FT 0153 (7189677227).jpg
- File:FT 0154 (7189676367).jpg
- File:FT 0155 (7374917588).jpg
- File:FT 0161 (7189674917).jpg
- File:FT 0162 (7189674121).jpg
- File:FT 0163 (7374915282).jpg
- File:FT 0164 (7374914654).jpg
- File:FT 0165 (7374914026).jpg
- File:FT 0166 (7374913486).jpg
- File:FT 0169 (7189670613).jpg
- File:FT 0172 (7189669817).jpg
- File:FT 0173 (7374910704).jpg
- File:FT 0174 (7374909586).jpg
- File:FT 0176 (7189667455).jpg
- File:FT 0178 (7374908310).jpg
- File:FT 0186 (7189665335).jpg
- File:FT 0188 (7189664773).jpg
- File:FT 0191 (7374905942).jpg
- File:FT 0192 (7374904914).jpg
- File:FT 0193 (7189662503).jpg
- File:FT 0194 (7189660805).jpg
- File:FT 0199 (7189660117).jpg
- File:FT 0201 (7374900628).jpg
- File:FT 0204 (7374899696).jpg
- File:FT 0222 (7189657121).jpg
- File:FT 0224 (7374898060).jpg
- File:FT 0225 (7374896794).jpg
- File:FT 0228 (7374896370).jpg
- File:FT 0229 (7374895708).jpg
- File:FT 0238 (7189653411).jpg
- File:FT 0239 (7189653083).jpg
- File:FT 0241 (7374894484).jpg
- File:FT 0243 (7189651539).jpg
- File:FT 0247 (7374892778).jpg
- File:FT 0247 1 (7189650121).jpg
- File:FT 0251 (7189649713).jpg
- File:FT 0253 (7374891090).jpg
- File:FT 0255 (7374890412).jpg
- File:FT 0262 (7374889186).jpg
- File:FT 0268 1 (7189646505).jpg
- File:FT 0268 2 (7189645381).jpg
- File:FT 0269 (7189644889).jpg
- File:FT 0273 (7374886172).jpg
- File:FT 0280 (7374885064).jpg
- File:FT 0281 (7189642371).jpg
- File:FT 0289 (7189641853).jpg
- File:FT 0290 (7189641199).jpg
- File:FT 0295 (7374882390).jpg
- File:FT 0297 (7189639867).jpg
- File:FT 0298 (7189639435).jpg
- File:FT 0341 (7189713353).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Pricymocks (talk) 13:15, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
- Comment After having gone through all of the Financial Times photos, there are numerous others that I have placed in this category by Simon Hanna, with the same EXIF notes. If deleting files in this DR, please check the category for the stragglers. TempIDforDRs (talk) 05:54, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
Kept: This user was banned by WMF from all activity at Wikimedia projects. This includes filing DRs. Jcb (talk) 18:41, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted I decided nevertheless to delete them all. They were all unused, undescribed and uncategorized. Educational value (a lot of people on some party and on a conference) was not obvious. Some people could be famous, but due to missing description it was impossible to improve the situation. Taivo (talk) 17:37, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Photographs by Simon Hanna
[edit]The images have "(C) www.image-revolver.com/ Simon Hanna 2013" in the EXIF data, therefore the Financial Times CANNOT make these available under a CC licence.
- File:Alan Yentob (BBC) & Stevie Spring (Luxup) (8535919521).jpg
- File:David Giampaolo (Pi Capital) & Eden Collinsworth (EastWest Institute) (8535739531).jpg
- File:Eden Collinsworth & Maarit Glocer (8536845600).jpg
- File:Florentin Collomp (Le Figaro) & Kristina Eriksson (FT) (8536845550).jpg
- File:Lionel Barber, FT Editor (8536845366).jpg
- File:Sarah Baxter (Sunday Times Magazine) & Caroline Michel (PFD) (8536845456).jpg
- File:Sir Geoffrey Owen & Max Wilkinson (8537221098).jpg
_%26_Stevie_Spring_(Luxup)_(8535919521).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%26_Eden_Collinsworth_(EastWest_Institute)_(8535739531).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%26_Kristina_Eriksson_(FT)_(8536845550).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%26_Caroline_Michel_(PFD)_(8536845456).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Хмеймим (talk) 16:35, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Are you seriously suggesting that the Financial Times, a prominent business publication, is going to lay itself open to copyright infringement charges by republishing some photographer's works on Flickr without permission? It's far more likely that they bought the rights to the images and/or that these are works for hire. Don't come back unless you can provide evidence that the photographer has filed and won a copyright infringement lawsuit against the Financial Times for these images. Nyttend (talk) 14:34, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Yes Nyttend, I am. There is a difference between reposting a photo, and reposting a photo under a creative commons licence. As someone who has dealt for some years relicencing and such things, this is quite the common occurrence. Refer to Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Photographs by Conor Ashleigh and Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Files uploaded by Russavia (Conor) for an example, which was reinforce here. Unless there is something from the photographers themselves, the files need to be deleted, not only to protect myself, but also re-users. 101.186.54.25 09:15, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
- No. Without solid evidence that the Financial Times has infringed the photographer's copyright by publishing these in an unauthorised manner, there's no reason to believe that these are infringements or a risk to reusers, and I'm not particularly interested in seeing useful content removed for your protection, anyway. Nyttend (talk) 15:25, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
- Nyttend I have dealt with copyright holders over a number of years, and have an eagle eye for such things. It is standard procedure on this project that if imagery is made available by someone other than the copyright owner, permission needs to be sought. This is especially true when it appears that one party is claiming (C) ARR over images they have taken. As such, I have sent the photographer this email asking for permission to keep them on Commons under CC-BY. Also Nyttend, you comment "I'm not particularly interested in seeing useful content removed for your protection" is quite an petty and nasty thing to say; if you are willing to keep images on the project in order to screw over the copyright holder and punish an editor, then you seriously need to consider what the hell you are doing here. 106.68.30.18 12:20, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
- No. Without solid evidence that the Financial Times has infringed the photographer's copyright by publishing these in an unauthorised manner, there's no reason to believe that these are infringements or a risk to reusers, and I'm not particularly interested in seeing useful content removed for your protection, anyway. Nyttend (talk) 15:25, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted
Nyttend, we have worked together here and on WP:EN for a long time. I respect your opinion but I am very surprised at your naivete here. This kind of thing happens all the time and we are required under the Precautionary Principle to assume the worst when there is a significant doubt over the status of an image. In this case, I think there are three possibilities:
- That the Financial Times simply posted these as Fair Use images of perhaps important people at a perhaps important event.
- Most likely, that the Financial Times has a license to use the images in its print works and in its web activities. Their Flickr maintainer thought he or she was posting correctly under that license, ignoring the fact that the Flickr feed is CC-BY and the license did not permit that.
- Much less likely -- that the Financial Times purchased all rights to the images and, therefore, has the right to license them CC-BY.
Note, by the way, that the images are no longer on Flickr. That, of course, does not change their status if they were validly CC-BY, but it is an additional indication that the license was not correct. Also note that the Financial Times, a highly respected institution, is not listed at http://www.simonhanna.com/Clients-+-Awards/1/caption while a number of much less well known companies are. That proves nothing, but strongly suggests that (1) is correct. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:01, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
Es una muestra muy lejana de lo que es actualmente el buceo profesional Carmenbcn1 (talk) 11:22, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Not being a great image for the subject is not grounds for deletion. James F. (talk) 18:51, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#France: the sculptures are work by Basil Gotto (d. 1954).
- File:Beaumont hamel newfoundland memorial.jpg
- File:Beaumont monument in France.JPG
- File:Beaumont-Hamel - Official Opening (7 June 1925).jpg
- File:Beaumont-Hamel 07.jpg
- File:Beaumont-Hamel 10.jpg
- File:Beaumont-Hamel 16.jpg
- File:Beaumont-Hamel Newfoundland Memorial 1.JPG
- File:Beaumont-Hamel Newfoundland Memorial monument.jpg
- File:Beaumont-Hamel terre neuvien Caribou.JPG
- File:The newfoundland memorial parks in Beaumont-Hammel.jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
Eleassar (t/p) 22:51, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
- If he was commissioned by the Canadian Government to produce this statue, then I would think the Canadian Government owned the copyright to the statue rather than M Gotto. In that case, wouldn't Crown Copyright apply - it would only apply for 50 years and is hence now expired. Or does the law of France take precedence ? I think we should request a ruling from relevant Canadian authority (http://www.historicplaces.ca ?) before we delete such important photographs. Rcbutcher (talk) 23:52, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
- I think that in France the French law applies. This does not mean though that the copyright holder can't be someone else than the sculptor if the copyright has been transferred to this third party. It would help a lot if you could obtain additional information about this. --Eleassar (t/p) 00:08, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
- OK, I'll contact the Canadian Government and try to get them to give a ruling. Rcbutcher (talk) 05:10, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
- I sent emails to historic monuments & veterans affairs Canada asking for a ruling on ownership of copyright on this. Still waiting for reply. Rcbutcher (talk) 06:33, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
- OK, I'll contact the Canadian Government and try to get them to give a ruling. Rcbutcher (talk) 05:10, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
- I think that in France the French law applies. This does not mean though that the copyright holder can't be someone else than the sculptor if the copyright has been transferred to this third party. It would help a lot if you could obtain additional information about this. --Eleassar (t/p) 00:08, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
- Keep This case is a mirror example of one from two years back for photos associated with Vimy Ridge (Commons:Deletion requests/Canadian National Vimy Memorial & Category talk:Canadian National Vimy Memorial). The only difference between the two is that Beaumont Hamel was a "commission" of the Dominion of Newfoundland (not yet part of Canada) and they purchases the land instead of it being donated in perspicuity. Either way, Gotto would not be the copyright holder; If it were anyone it would be the Crown. The monument is a communal work that involves not only the statue but landscaping and plaques. I have no knowledge of either the Dominion of Newfoundland or Canada ever seeking to press the issue If you are looking for a contact, Veterans Affairs Canada is the administering body for this monument site.--Labattblueboy (talk) 06:34, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
- Keep As per Commons:Deletion requests/Canadian National Vimy Memorial (although the "seem[s] to be covered by Canadian FOP" by the closing admin in that discussion is incorrect - and unnecessary for the scupltures to be considered PD). As an aside, the sculpture in File:Beaumont-Hamel - Official Opening (7 June 1925).jpg is largely draped in the Union Jack, so not sure that it would be a candidate for nomination even if the logic in Commons:Deletion requests/Canadian National Vimy Memorial didn't apply here. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 13:24, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: We cannot assume without proof that the sculptor gave up his copyright. Although I can't cite any French or Canadian examples, we have many cases in the USA and have never seen a case where a sculptor working on a project for the Federal government gave up his copyright. . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:26, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
- @Jameslwoodward: Interesting. So perhaps you'll be taking on all the Marine Corps War Memorial images next? w:Felix de Weldon lived until 2003.
Per COM:FOP#France: the sculptures are work by Basil Gotto (d. 1954).
Labattblueboy (talk) 16:48, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:09, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
Personal images originally from Category:Men
[edit]Unused personal images.
- File:12rafa.jpg
- File:2012 JML Stephane.jpg
- File:Acetino1.jpg
- File:Adil Omar in 2009.jpg
- File:AlbertBlack.jpg
- File:AMProjekt Band.jpg
- File:AnthonyAnthony Ausgang.jpeg
- File:Anuj.jpg
- File:Anush bekal.jpg
- File:Arkemyr på berg.jpg
- File:Arsenalz czw i iws.jpg
- File:Bartosz Kuberacki.JPG
- File:Beach(shooting).jpg
- File:Becho.JPG
- File:Being Rami.jpg
- File:Belrose.JPG
- File:Benja.jpg
- File:Benjamin Martin.jpg
- File:Benjaminbirkbeck.jpg
- File:Bienvenido Vicioso.JPG
- File:Billede 045.jpg
- File:Blake-Harrison.jpg
- File:Blue2212.jpg
- File:Bob the Ravager.jpg
- File:Boorboor.jpg
- File:Brandon Elizondo.jpg
- File:Call center agent 2.jpg
- File:Cantando x.JPG
- File:Carte de visite Damien Levy - Copie.JPG
- File:Carwyn, The Legend.JPG
- File:Caveras.jpg
- File:CHrisLAwn.gif
- File:CollW.jpg
- File:Come jerwin.jpg
- File:Cooke in Swansea, May 2009.jpg
- File:Cookingschool.jpg
- File:Coolbluejinx.jpg
- File:Copia de chucho51.JPG
- File:Copia de DSC04642.JPG
- File:Copy of 7.JPG
- File:Copy of rksingh.JPG
- File:Corderputo.jpg
- File:Corp.jpg
- File:Cris knight101 4594.JPG
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-mattbuck (Talk) 15:43, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:16, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
Unused personal images
[edit]Unused personal images, or without sufficient context to allow identification.
- File:Zach lol.jpg
- File:Zapbeerfull.jpg
- File:Ziad.jpg
- File:Zitoune simple.JPG
- File:Ziya cool2.jpg
- File:Zz555.JPG
- File:Štefan Časar.jpg
- File:Жинкин, Георгий Николаевич.jpg
- File:Комиссаров М.Ю..jpg
- File:Фото019.jpg
- File:سید امیر حسین رضوی (Seyyed Amir Hossein Razavi).jpg
- File:صورة094.jpg
- File:عدنان جبالي.png
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-mattbuck (Talk) 17:25, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
- File:Štefan Časar.jpg has already been nominated for deletion here. Can you please verify in the future whether the images that you want to propose for DR are already nominated? Thank you. Regards, --Eleassar (t/p) 18:10, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:29, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Mattbuck's temporary category
[edit]Fails COM:FOP#United Kingdom - these are all "graphic works", which are not covered by FoP in the UK. Without permission from the copyright holder we cannot keep these.
- File:82 Fazeley St Digbeth.JPG
- File:Acocks Green Community Orchard.JPG
- File:Birmingham Coach Station.JPG
File:Bull Ring Stained Glass.jpg- File:Canal Mural at The Bond.JPG
File:Cat Tile Snowhill Station.JPG- File:Cotteridge Park - railway bridge - artwork (11654440786).jpg
- File:Cotteridge Park - railway bridge - artwork - badger (11653580645).jpg
- File:Cotteridge Park - railway bridge - artwork - blackbird (11653842124).jpg
- File:Cotteridge Park - railway bridge - artwork - cotteridgepark.org.uk (11654330066).jpg
- File:Cotteridge Park - railway bridge - artwork - dogs (11653770193).jpg
- File:Cotteridge Park - railway bridge - artwork - dogs (11653976864).jpg
- File:Cotteridge Park - railway bridge - artwork - dogs (11654392586).jpg
- File:Cotteridge Park - railway bridge - artwork - dogs - dalmatian (11653831483).jpg
- File:Cotteridge Park - railway bridge - artwork - Thanks for Visiting (11653602335).jpg
- File:Cotteridge Park - railway bridge - artwork - Welcome to Cotteridge Park (11653591415).jpg
- File:Cotteridge Park - railway bridge - artwork - Welcome to Cotteridge Park (11653921193).jpg
- File:Custard Factory Archway.JPG
- File:Custard Factory Brown man.JPG
- File:Custard Factory Car park 2.JPG
- File:Custard Factory Car Park.JPG
- File:Custard Factory face.JPG
- File:Custard Factory High Rise.JPG
- File:Custard factory ice cream cones.JPG
- File:Custard factory Jimmy C.JPG
- File:Custard Factory Shop Front.JPG
- File:Custard Factory Spaghetti.JPG
- File:Custard Factory under Arch 1.JPG
- File:Custard Factory under Arch 2.JPG
- File:Digbeth Eugene Booms.JPG
- File:Digbeth Hands.JPG
- File:Digbeth Heath Mill Lane Car Park 2.JPG
- File:Digbeth Heath Mill Lane Car Park.JPG
- File:Digbeth Horror in the Streets.JPG
- File:Digbeth Leprechaun.JPG
- File:Digbeth Mind Control.JPG
- File:Digbeth Octopus.JPG
- File:Hockley Flyover Subway Street Art 1.JPG
- File:Hockley Flyover Subway Street Art 10.JPG
- File:Hockley Flyover Subway Street Art 11.JPG
- File:Hockley Flyover Subway Street Art 12.JPG
- File:Hockley Flyover Subway Street Art 13.JPG
- File:Hockley Flyover Subway Street Art 14.JPG
- File:Hockley Flyover Subway Street Art 15.JPG
- File:Hockley Flyover Subway Street Art 16.JPG
- File:Hockley Flyover Subway Street Art 17.JPG
- File:Hockley Flyover Subway Street Art 18.JPG
- File:Hockley Flyover Subway Street Art 19.JPG
- File:Hockley Flyover Subway Street Art 2.JPG
- File:Hockley Flyover Subway Street Art 20.JPG
- File:Hockley Flyover Subway Street Art 21.JPG
- File:Hockley Flyover Subway Street Art 22.JPG
- File:Hockley Flyover Subway Street Art 23.JPG
- File:Hockley Flyover Subway Street Art 24.JPG
- File:Hockley Flyover Subway Street Art 25.JPG
- File:Hockley Flyover Subway Street Art 26.JPG
- File:Hockley Flyover Subway Street Art 27.JPG
- File:Hockley Flyover Subway Street Art 3.JPG
- File:Hockley Flyover Subway Street Art 4.JPG
- File:Hockley Flyover Subway Street Art 5.JPG
- File:Hockley Flyover Subway Street Art 6.JPG
- File:Hockley Flyover Subway Street Art 7.JPG
- File:Hockley Flyover Subway Street Art 8.JPG
- File:Hockley Flyover Subway Street Art 9.JPG
File:Horse Fair.JPGFile:St Martin de Porres School.JPGFile:St Vincent Mural.JPGFile:The Emergence of Women in the 20th Century.JPGFile:Winson Green Smithy.JPG
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Note to closing admin - please just delete the files, not my category! -mattbuck (Talk) 12:57, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Agreed. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:29, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
Hmm so now you want to delete all Birmingham graffiti photos off here? Ok. Does Brianboro know? Ellrbrown (talk) 21:04, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
- You can't delete the following: Horsefair is a mosaic by Kenneth Budd.
- Winson Green Smithy is a 3D pub sculpture (not 2D graffiti).
- St Martin de Porres School looks like a mosaic also (you got a thing against mosaics - if so you'd request to delete all Kenneth / Oliver Budd works such as the JFK Memorial in Digbeth).
- Cat Tile Snowhill Station is a tile. (the uploader posted it on the Snow Hill Station wikipedia page I think).
Ellrbrown (talk) 21:09, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
- The list above includes sculptures, hand-painted tiles and stained glass, each of which are speciically allowed by COM:FOP#United Kingdom. Andy Mabbett (talk) 21:37, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
- @Ellrbrown: - Those have duly removed from consideration. Thankyou for the heads up. Regarding the graffiti, I don't think there's actual graffiti there (as in vandalism), it looks likely to be legitimate murals which do fail FOP. Stupid ridiculous counterintuitive law that it is. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:10, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
- Ok thanks re the ones mentioned yesterday. I normally call the street art graffiti. These days the art that goes up in Digbeth is part of the City of Colours project. Am always wondering how these artists get onto the Connaught Square site (the demolished part that isn't used as a car park). Although there's a gap in the hoardings near the River Rea. Ellrbrown (talk) 19:42, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
- I've seen this one File:The Emergence of Women in the 20th Century.JPG myself inside The ICC. It's a tapestry. Not sure what the law covers for that though. Ellrbrown (talk) 22:02, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
- That would be OK as it counts as artistic craftsmanship rather than graphic work. Removed from consideration. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:24, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
- I've seen this one File:The Emergence of Women in the 20th Century.JPG myself inside The ICC. It's a tapestry. Not sure what the law covers for that though. Ellrbrown (talk) 22:02, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
- What about mosiacs, such as File:St Vincent Mural.JPG? Andy Mabbett (talk) 10:54, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
- grumble* misleading filenames. -mattbuck (Talk) 11:07, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
- Ok thanks re the ones mentioned yesterday. I normally call the street art graffiti. These days the art that goes up in Digbeth is part of the City of Colours project. Am always wondering how these artists get onto the Connaught Square site (the demolished part that isn't used as a car park). Although there's a gap in the hoardings near the River Rea. Ellrbrown (talk) 19:42, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
- @Ellrbrown: - Those have duly removed from consideration. Thankyou for the heads up. Regarding the graffiti, I don't think there's actual graffiti there (as in vandalism), it looks likely to be legitimate murals which do fail FOP. Stupid ridiculous counterintuitive law that it is. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:10, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
- The list above includes sculptures, hand-painted tiles and stained glass, each of which are speciically allowed by COM:FOP#United Kingdom. Andy Mabbett (talk) 21:37, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
- File:Custard factory ice cream cones.JPG would seem to fall under "de minimis". Andy Mabbett (talk) 10:55, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
- Possible but not certain - the photo is clearly meant to show the artwork. -mattbuck (Talk) 11:07, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Krd 03:21, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Various UK graffiti images
[edit]I've been trawling through Category:Graffiti in the United Kingdom, and I believe that all of the images here nominated are "authorised" graffiti rather than vandalism. This makes them murals, and more importantly 2D graphic works, and so they fail to qualify for freedom of panorama. Thus, lacking any statement by the artists, we must assume these are copyrighted and so must be deleted.
I am aware that some of the ones nominated are less clear-cut than others, so if you have any objections to specific images being deleted then say so and they may be removed from consideration.
- File:100 3199a.JPG
- File:Art in Cladymore^ - geograph.org.uk - 1533957.jpg
- File:Belin in Manchester - erokism.jpg
- File:Blutate.jpg
- File:Brick Lane Graffiti Usain Bolt 2.jpg
- File:Brick Lane Graffiti Usain Bolt.jpg
- File:By the Gipping river footpath - geograph.org.uk - 1467798.jpg
- File:Car Park Art 01.JPG
- File:Car Park Art 02.JPG
- File:Car Park Art 03.JPG
- File:Car Park Art 04.JPG
- File:Decorated stadium wall - geograph.org.uk - 337679.jpg
- File:Edinburgh (6013692863).jpg
- File:Edinburgh (6013693251).jpg
- File:Edinburgh (6013693589).jpg
- File:Edinburgh (6014241024).jpg
- File:Edinburgh (6014241176).jpg
- File:Edinburgh (6014241498).jpg
- File:Empty Walls Cardiff 2014 - David de la Mano on Buffalo Bar, Windsor Place.jpg
- File:Empty Walls Cardiff 2014 - Ekstraternek on disused shop unit, Wood Street.jpg
- File:Empty Walls Cardiff 2014 - Phlegm on Marland House, Wood Street.jpg
- File:Fabulous Furry Freaks - geograph.org.uk - 977171.jpg
- File:Graffiti (complete).jpg
- File:Graffiti (part 1).jpg
- File:Graffiti (part 2).jpg
- File:Graffiti in Liverpool 086.jpg
- File:Graffiti in Liverpool 68.jpg
- File:Graffiti in Liverpool 69.jpg
- File:Graffiti in Liverpool 70.jpg
- File:Graffiti in Liverpool 71.jpg
- File:Graffiti in Liverpool 72.jpg
- File:Graffiti in Liverpool 74.jpg
- File:Graffiti in Liverpool 75.jpg
- File:Graffiti in Shoreditch, London - Nelson Mandela by Paul Don Smith (9424997560).jpg
- File:Graffiti or art ^ - geograph.org.uk - 873124.jpg
- File:Graffiti Street Art Sokes Croft Bristol - geograph.org.uk - 1437688.jpg
- File:Graffiti Wall, Sweyne Park - geograph.org.uk - 156915.jpg
- File:Graffiti, Dinsdale Place (geograph 3202622).jpg
- File:Grafitti 1 (4876307266).jpg
- File:Grafitti 2 (4875693667).jpg
- File:Harry Brearley by Faunagraphic.jpg
- File:Lokey01.jpg
- File:Lokey02.jpg
- File:Lokey05.jpg
- File:Lokey06.jpg
- File:London graffiti 2013 (1).JPG
- File:London graffiti 2013 (2).JPG
- File:London graffiti 2013 (3).JPG
- File:London graffiti 2013 (4).JPG
- File:London graffiti 2013 (5).JPG
- File:London graffiti 2013 (6).JPG
- File:London graffiti 2013 (7).JPG
- File:London Southbank Centre graffiti 2.JPG
- File:London Southbank Centre graffiti 3.JPG
- File:London Southbank Centre graffiti 4.JPG
- File:London Southbank Centre graffiti 5.JPG
- File:London Southbank Centre graffiti 6.JPG
- File:London Southbank Centre graffiti.JPG
- File:Monty Python Graffiti Leicester.jpg
- File:Potterrow street art (6063730376).jpg
- File:Potterrow street art (6063731468).jpg
- File:Potterrow street art (6063732652).jpg
- File:Potterrow street art (6063733768).jpg
- File:Roxe Graffiti Jam 2008.jpg
- File:Salford Graffiti (7379911994).jpg
- File:Salford Graffiti B&W (7379911154).jpg
- File:SeeNoEvil Inkie 2012.jpg
- File:Shop keepers Cowley road.jpg
- File:Skateboard rink, Victoria Park, Leamington Spa - geograph.org.uk - 1238124.jpg
- File:St John the Baptist, Bristol, graffiti.jpg
- File:Street Art in Hull - geograph.org.uk - 218293.jpg
- File:T13 Events and Market, Belfast, March 2012 (11).JPG
- File:T13 Events and Market, Belfast, March 2012 (16).JPG
- File:T13 Events and Market, Belfast, March 2012 (23).JPG
- File:T13 Events and Market, Belfast, March 2012 (24).JPG
- File:T13 Events and Market, Belfast, March 2012 (27).JPG
- File:T13 Events and Market, Belfast, March 2012 (28).JPG
- File:The Graffiti House, Kentish Town - London.jpg
- File:Think Local (Taken by Flickr user 20th December 2014).jpg
- File:Wall art, Jacqueline's Night Club - geograph.org.uk - 754271.jpg
- File:Authorized graffiti in Car Park - geograph.org.uk - 724023.jpg
- File:ZebrafaceGraffiti.jpg
- File:Flyover graffiti - geograph.org.uk - 1282196.jpg
- File:Graffiti Art, Kensington Street - geograph.org.uk - 368581.jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-mattbuck (Talk) 19:15, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Many of these are not "authorised" graffiti, more that they have been allowed to remain, I feel that there is an essential difference here that you have failed to observe Oxyman (talk) 09:20, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
- Perhaps, and I welcome suggestions as to which of these are authorised and which are not. -mattbuck (Talk) 12:20, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
- All or most of the images here need further discussion and should be nominated individually in order to facilitate such discussions. It is clear that you are just assuming many or most of the material here is authorised with no actual indication being present that this is the case Oxyman (talk) 08:15, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
It's highly inappropriate to add new deletion nominations at the foot of a page which has near its head the words "This deletion debate is now closed." Andy Mabbett (talk) 14:06, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
- I'm not really sure whether we can assess whether they're are 'authorised' or 'audacious' graffiti without a great deal of research. Generally I would assume that graffiti is unauthorized as it usually is, but furnishing the issue either way with proof in any case would be near impossible. Mtaylor848 (talk) 23:54, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted some which attributed a certain artist and where in places where it was likely that they were authorised. Kept most as there is quite a chance that they were not authorised and thus the argument for deletion does not follow. For those separate renominations (or in small groups) are a good option. I might have missed some which clearly state an author. Basvb (talk) 22:38, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
Flickr files by Leonard Bentley
[edit]While the flickr stream of Leonard Bentley [7] holds many nice freely licensed, self-taken images, it also includes a plethora of images from other sources which Bentley also releases under CC-BY-SA, but without any evidence that they have the right to. See for example File:A Yeoman of the Guard (19380035331).jpg, stated to be a Tuck's Oilette from 1908; or File:Admiralty Arch (14726933558).jpg, which is clearly a postcard.
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
I have added Bentley to the "questionable flickr users" list, and unfortunately I think we must delete their entire collection under COM:PRP. G
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(15030559747).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
-mattbuck (Talk) 09:09, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Those that are blatantly PD. I do not see the grounds to delete File:"Equestrian monument in an unidentified location" = Emperor Joseph II in the Josefsplatz, Vienna! (9404901487).jpg, File:Blackall and McDonagh (8651631526).jpg or File:D.I.Y. High Cross (8650532617).jpg. I suggest closing this DR en-mass unless a more detailed review is done before trying this again. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 09:23, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- 52 files are made with a Nikon D810 and 74 with a Canon powershot G10, it seems possible that one or both of these are own work as they are recent and local (East Sussex) files. Maybe there's an option to investigate that a bit further. On the other hand given that there are a few hundred old files, unlikely own work, deleting everything and reuploading more carefully (per Fae) is also an option. Basvb (talk) 10:42, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- I agree that some files are almost certainly own work, but I don't think that we can allow unrestricted uploads on the grounds of the numerous photos which are not own work. Fae is probably right that some are PD, but we need an explicit reason those are PD, not just a vague assertion. -mattbuck (Talk) 13:39, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- 52 files are made with a Nikon D810 and 74 with a Canon powershot G10, it seems possible that one or both of these are own work as they are recent and local (East Sussex) files. Maybe there's an option to investigate that a bit further. On the other hand given that there are a few hundred old files, unlikely own work, deleting everything and reuploading more carefully (per Fae) is also an option. Basvb (talk) 10:42, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- Keep File:"Equestrian monument in an unidentified location" = Emperor Joseph II in the Josefsplatz, Vienna! (9404901487).jpg because it isn't from Leonard Bentley's Flickr stream at all, that name only appears in the description because a person of that name (possibly the same person whose Flickr stream is being discussed here) apparently identified the object, which certainly shouldn't raise any questions about the copyright status. That file comes from the Flickr stream National Library of Ireland, not Leonard Bentley. darkweasel94 17:46, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- Struckthrough, my bad, I thought I got rid of those which weren't explicitly from the photostream. -mattbuck (Talk) 18:17, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- Comment - all the images on his photostream (that I just scanned briefly) appear to be well over 100 years old or photos he took himself. File:Admiralty Arch (14726933558).jpg must be from the 1870s! How would copyright still apply? Wikimandia (talk) 18:48, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- The point of the DR was to decide which images COULD be kept. Some are clear copyvios, some less so, I figured that starting a DR people would help out with that, for instance by striking through images that they think are easy keeps (and adding a rationale). -mattbuck (Talk) 21:34, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- @Wikimandia: That particular photo (File:Admiralty Arch (14726933558).jpg) is marked as being by Aerofilms Ltd., a company that wasn't even founded until 1919. It's from the 1920s at the earliest, and that you're about 50 years off rather makes the point about why these need to be looked at. Revent (talk) 23:02, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- The point of the DR was to decide which images COULD be kept. Some are clear copyvios, some less so, I figured that starting a DR people would help out with that, for instance by striking through images that they think are easy keeps (and adding a rationale). -mattbuck (Talk) 21:34, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Close all as keep. If a shorter list can be constructed, of those that seem to definitely lapse from our inclusion standards, then shorter and more selective nominations can be made. I uploaded File:Tanks crossing Westminster Bridge on Peace Day -- 1919-07-19.jpg Under what conditions can a picture from 1919 still be protected by copyright? Is there any credible reason to believe the image sat, unpublished, for half a century or so? I simply can't agree there would be a scrap of credibility to this assertion, and to act like it was would be to carry PRP to ridiculous extremes. Geo Swan (talk) 21:13, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- Quite easily if the author didn't die until 1946. I've seen photos from the 1890s which are still in copyright. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:33, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- Aren't these all UK images? What does Template:PD-UKGov say about when UK images entered the public domain?
- "It is a photograph created by the United Kingdom Government and taken prior to 1 June 1957; or
- "It was commercially published prior to 1965; or
- "It is an artistic work other than a photograph or engraving (e.g. a painting) which was created by the United Kingdom Government prior to 1965."
- Every one of these images I have looked at seems to have been either a UK government image, or a postcard, or other image that would be best described as "commercially published". So, 1946 doesn't seem relevant to these 100 year old images. Geo Swan (talk) 22:00, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- That applies only to UK Government works... i.o.w. a work of the UK government that was commercially published before 1965. It has nothing at all to do with postcards published by private companies, where the relevant term is either 70 years pma, or 70 years from publication if it is anonymous (and we need evidence that it was actually 'anonymous', for the UK). Revent (talk) 23:10, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- Aren't these all UK images? What does Template:PD-UKGov say about when UK images entered the public domain?
- Quite easily if the author didn't die until 1946. I've seen photos from the 1890s which are still in copyright. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:33, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- The nomination asserts flickr contributor Bentley images should all be considered questionable, because his or her stream "also includes a plethora of images from other sources which Bentley also releases under CC-BY-SA, but without any evidence that they have the right to."
Here, in the 21st Century, practically every US airbase, battalion, naval station, and USN or USCG vessel, has an (amateur) webmaster. Hundreds, or thousands of these amateur webmasters established IDs on flickr, where they upload images that we all realize should be marked as public domain -- under a CC-BY-SA license. I see that flickr has added the ability to license images as {{Cc0}} essentially equivalent to PD. But this is very recent, and practically all the images that should have been licensed as PD or cc0 are licensed as cc-by-sa, because that was the free-est license flickr allowed, up until recently.
Bentley's decision to use cc-by-sa when that was the free-est liscense flickr allowed was completely reasonable, and was not a sign of bad-faith. If we challenge Bentley's images on this basis, are we going to challenge the several thousand DoD images I uploaded from the user-ids of the DoD's amateur web-masters? We might be talking about hundreds of thousands wasteful challenges here.
flinfo reads the exif info, and will over-ride cc-by-sa, when the exif info states the image is PD. Should any uploader should feel free to do this for any flickr image which is clearly PD?
As for 100 year old postcards, that Buckley applied a cc-by-sa license to, postcards are, by their very nature, published. No one can assert 100 year old postcards are still protected by copyright, based on the possibility they sat unpublished for half a century, because they are, by their very nature, demonstrably published. I don't think any 100 year old postcards should have been challenged. Geo Swan (talk) 21:45, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- @Geo Swan: The idea that a 100 year old postcard from the UK, even if published at that time, could not be under copyright is mistaken, as Mattbuck noted above. For UK photographs where the author is 'known' (even if not by us) the copyright terms is 70 years from their death, not based on publication date. Revent (talk) 23:04, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- When has a postcard company not acquired all rights to the images they use? Geo Swan (talk) 17:56, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
- @Geo Swan: That's beside the point. Acquiring the rights to an image does not change the length of its copyright protection. Even a work for hire, where the first owner of the copyright was a company, still normally has a copyright term based on the lifetime of the actual creator of the work. See, for 'proof', the second section of this UK.gov page. Revent (talk) 05:03, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
- @Geo Swan: The idea that a 100 year old postcard from the UK, even if published at that time, could not be under copyright is mistaken, as Mattbuck noted above. For UK photographs where the author is 'known' (even if not by us) the copyright terms is 70 years from their death, not based on publication date. Revent (talk) 23:04, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- Keep for now. This list needs to be more carefully thought through. Many are postcards are clearly in the public domain, such as File:Oxford Circus (22891646886).jpg a postcard by fr:Léon & Lévy - George Levy died in 1913. Some images have matadata that would indicate they are much more likely properly licenced. File:Kingsway Tunnel (15486221195).jpg appear to be a Getty image per this. File:Army Order (15030279140).jpg and File:Army Order (Continued) (15030559747).jpg are clearly UK government works that fell into the public domain in 1969. Make a deletion that groups similar items together instead of such an eclectic mixture of images. Ww2censor (talk) 23:33, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- Comment - Per Raphael Tuck images. Sorry if this is grandmother and sucking eggs. The Raphael Tuck database states that pre-1928 Tuck postcards are in the public domain, presumably whether or not the photographer/tinter is still alive today. Generally, virtually all postcards don't acknowledge a photographer, only a publisher, so how can we tell if or not a postcard is '1923 and 70 years'... the date range of a publisher's publishing might give us an idea. A question might be asked if the Tuck database web site has the authority to waive stuff into the public domain, but if it hasn't I would have thought that it and its own web publications would have been pulled up on this since its inception in 2010. Acabashi (talk) 21:21, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- @Acabashi: It's honestly an awkward point, regarding old UK images. Even if the photographer or artist was not attributed on the work itself, if the publisher kept records, and those records still exist, then under UK law the author is not unknown, as their identity could be determined by a 'reasonable inquiry'. There are undoubtedly many works on Commons that are licensed as 'unknown', when the author is really just 'unknown to us', and we have not truly met the legal grounds for making the assertion that the authorship cannot be determined. At the same time, many of them are probably PD due to expiration anyhow. As far as 'how can we know', the official guidance for such searches is pretty detailed... they don't mean 'a reasonable inquiry', they mean 'every plausible inquiry that has a reasonable chance of yielding the information.' Revent (talk) 05:23, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
- Just as a further comment, the Tuck postcards are a bit of an exception to this, since it is a matter of public knowledge that the records were destroyed by an act of war. Revent (talk) 05:34, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
- @Acabashi: It's honestly an awkward point, regarding old UK images. Even if the photographer or artist was not attributed on the work itself, if the publisher kept records, and those records still exist, then under UK law the author is not unknown, as their identity could be determined by a 'reasonable inquiry'. There are undoubtedly many works on Commons that are licensed as 'unknown', when the author is really just 'unknown to us', and we have not truly met the legal grounds for making the assertion that the authorship cannot be determined. At the same time, many of them are probably PD due to expiration anyhow. As far as 'how can we know', the official guidance for such searches is pretty detailed... they don't mean 'a reasonable inquiry', they mean 'every plausible inquiry that has a reasonable chance of yielding the information.' Revent (talk) 05:23, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
- Comment - Per Raphael Tuck images. Sorry if this is grandmother and sucking eggs. The Raphael Tuck database states that pre-1928 Tuck postcards are in the public domain, presumably whether or not the photographer/tinter is still alive today. Generally, virtually all postcards don't acknowledge a photographer, only a publisher, so how can we tell if or not a postcard is '1923 and 70 years'... the date range of a publisher's publishing might give us an idea. A question might be asked if the Tuck database web site has the authority to waive stuff into the public domain, but if it hasn't I would have thought that it and its own web publications would have been pulled up on this since its inception in 2010. Acabashi (talk) 21:21, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- This deletion request is too general. Many licenses can easily be "repaired" using the information in the file description, see File:Horse Guards (15072321110).jpg for example. Keep for now and reconsider on a one-by-one basis. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 09:18, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
- Could you please help sort them into categories based on potential copyvioness then? -mattbuck (Talk) 11:33, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
Kept, the community clearly opposes mass-deletion of these files; questionable ones could be renominated separately. Materialscientist (talk) 03:22, 11 December 2015 (UTC)