Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2014/04/29
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
![28 File:"yo" 1962-2014.jpg](#File:"yo"_1962-2014.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
![77 File:Humberto Herrera en "un monton de piedras" Abril 2014.jpg](#File:Humberto_Herrera_en_"un_monton_de_piedras"_Abril_2014.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_by_Klugschnacker_in_Wikipedia_(64).JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![112 File:Viktor Musi . " Composition N 2 ". 195 Х 130.jpg](#File:Viktor_Musi_._"_Composition_N_2_"._195_Х_130.jpg){kind=link}
_in_Ponce,_PR,_from_1987-2009.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Kept: is in use, just not deleted in de wiki Denniss (talk) 14:32, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Apparently uploaded for use on the uploader's en:wp userpage; however, a different image is now used there, so this is out of scope. Moreover, it's a very non-descriptive name; a file with this name should be protected with an image like File:Logo.jpg. Nyttend (talk) 14:43, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. New creations of this file name blocked. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:26, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
Who is this? No name given in description, and the uploader's never added it to any page in any project. If the uploader wants to identify this person and explain why the image is in scope, I'll reconsider. Meanwhile, note that this is presumably different from the image deleted four years ago. Nyttend (talk) 11:10, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- Delete and protect against further uploads - this is an unused personal photo with little educational value per COM:EDUSE. Green Giant supports NonFreeWiki (talk) 11:26, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted The file name was protected against uploads until another Admin deleted it last month. I've reset the protection -- hopefully this time it will stick. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:30, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
I seriously question that this is too simple for copyright. Sven Manguard Wha? 00:52, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 01:51, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
The source site doesn't mention any free license and http://deskarati.com/deskarati-conditions/ only refers to "Fair use", so probably this is a copyright violation. Stegop (talk) 17:13, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: yep, its a copyright violation. JuTa 19:45, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Jarekt as no license (No license since).. which is technically correct, but there is an attempt by the uploader to put a "PD-old-88" tag on it to show how long since the death of the creator. I'm converting this to Nomination to give the uploader some time to work with us on getting the right license on this image instead of just removing it. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:24, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- I added {{PD-Art|PD-old-auto|deathyear=1926}} and {{PD-heir}} since it was released by the family of the artist. I do not see anything wrong with this file, so I will close this DR. If there are any objections let me know and I will reopen it. --Jarekt (talk) 02:24, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
Kept: The licenses seem fine Jarekt (talk) 02:24, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
File:It doesn't matter-What people think of you-If you wish to love and be loved-By any gender-That is your choice-Don't let anyone tell you what to feel-Live and Let Live 2013-10-19 21-04.jpg
[edit]
Out of COM:SCOPE must be realistically useful for an educational purpose. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:10, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 01:50, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
ORICULAIRE 212.195.153.27 17:46, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Kept: No valid reason to delete Rodhullandemu (talk) 19:22, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE due to heavy blurring. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:49, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 01:51, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
ne respecte pas les droits d'auteur Coug-vl (talk) 11:36, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
le fichiers respecte bien les droits d'auteur — Preceding unsigned comment added by KIKIRPA (talk • contribs) 11:38, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
licence pas respectée KIKIRPA (talk) 09:23, 29 April 2014 (UTC) page à supprimer
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:48, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
Please delete the *redirect*, NOT the file itself. The redirect is just a misspelling. Furfur (talk) 12:10, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 14:30, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
Unneeded redirect — hike395 (talk) 06:24, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Kept: denied, we don't delete redirects of old images as this may affect re-users Denniss (talk) 14:31, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
Por que es una broma y no es en serio Fernando javier Martino (talk) 17:06, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Delete Not known person; the title include a big insult; author says it is "a joke, not seriously". Cheers. --Ganímedes (talk) 17:49, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Vandalism Alan (talk) 18:05, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE a biography of someone... text and photo, Photo may be COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:54, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 01:52, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal image with no plausible educational application. Rrburke (talk) 16:53, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 20:25, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Australian Immigration Specialists (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of law firm of questionable notability.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:48, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
As France regrettably has no freedom-of-panorama exception, this sculpture by Aristide Maillol is still copyrighted til end of 2014. So, the image needs to be deleted, but it can be undeleted from January 1, 2015. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:17, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- Therefore it should be kept away from French Wikipedia and only used in Wikipedia in other languages. There already exists a photo of this sculpture, which quotes the German law on freedom to display public works of art. I think it should be left as it is. It's a very nice photo, too. Francis Hannaway (talk) 09:31, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- If the said photo is from a sculpture permanently installed in Germany, then it may be covered by FOP of Germany. What is the filename? --Túrelio (talk) 09:51, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- OK, having read through the blurb (which specifically mentions sculptures by maillol) I accept that it should be deleted. Francis Hannaway (talk) 09:45, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- No idea what you mean by that. --Túrelio (talk) 09:51, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Same problem with:
- File:Statue 1, Jardin des Tuileries, Paris 3 November 2012.jpg
- File:Statue - jardin des Tuileries de nuit (Paris).JPG
- File:Standbeeld Douleur (6226481769) (2).jpg
- File:Maillol La Rivière.JPG
- File:Maillol triple.jpg
- File:Céret - Monument aux morts.jpg
- File:Jardin des Tuileries (2519441206).jpg
- File:Maillol L'Air.jpg
- File:Statue 2, Jardin des Tuileries, Paris September 2009.jpg
.JPG){kind=link}
_(2).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
--Túrelio (talk) 10:24, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination, this artworks are still copyrighted, i.e. the pictures are derivative works of the sculptures. To undelete in 2015 PierreSelim (talk) 06:46, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
As Norway regrettably has only freedom-of-panorama exception for buildings, this sculpture by Aristide Maillol (d. 1944) is still copyrighted til end of 2014. So, the image needs to be deleted, but it can be undeleted from January 1, 2015. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:18, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Artwork still copyrighted, to undelete in 2015 PierreSelim (talk) 06:49, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
File:Night by Aristide Maillol, 1902-1906, view 3 - National Museum of Western Art, Tokyo - DSC08407.JPG
[edit]
Works by Aristide Maillol are protected til end of 2014. No FOP for such works in Japan. Image can be undeleted from January 1, 2015. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:27, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Same problem with:
- File:Night by Aristide Maillol, 1902-1906, view 1 - National Museum of Western Art, Tokyo - DSC08381.JPG
- File:Night by Aristide Maillol, 1902-1906, view 2 - National Museum of Western Art, Tokyo - DSC08379.JPG
Deleted: Artwork still copyrighted not covered by FOP, undelete in 2015 PierreSelim (talk) 06:51, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
This letter is out of COM:SCOPE, must be realistically useful for educational purpose. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:41, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Delete because this is clearly out of scope, with no educational value per COM:EDUSE. Commons is not Linked-In and cannot host user's employment records. Green Giant (talk) 17:28, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 20:36, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE, must be realistically useful for an educational purpose. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:42, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Delete because there is no educational value per COM:EDUSE. Commons is not Linked-In and cannot host users's employment and training records. Green Giant (talk) 17:30, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope, plus unfree logo Ymblanter (talk) 20:36, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
Personal image outside of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:03, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 20:37, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
This diploma is unused and out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:41, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Delete because this is a certificate confirming the uploader has gained a BA but Commons is not Linked-In and cannot host this image simply because it pertains to a user. COM:SCOPE allows users to upload a small number of personal images of themselves for use on userpages in other Wikimedia projects. This image does not fit those criteria, so it is out of scope. Green Giant (talk) 17:21, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 20:35, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 01:30, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused small resolution map to be usable. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 01:31, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 01:30, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
![14:17, 29 April 2014 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2014/04/29#c-EugeneZelenko-2014-04-29T14:17:00.000Z-File:"yo"_1962-2014.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 01:30, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
![01:30, 7 May 2014 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2014/04/29#c-Steinsplitter-2014-05-07T01:30:00.000Z-File:"yo"_1962-2014.jpg){kind=link}
copy http://g-ecx.images-amazon.com/images/G/01/aplus/detail-page/6AM00_FastAction_Fold_Jogger_Pull_Fold_Go2.jpg Benzoyl (talk) 03:03, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for deleting. --Benzoyl (talk) 01:40, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 01:33, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 02:28, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 01:33, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Personal unused image, out of COM:SCOPE. Only upload of user. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:17, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 01:35, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Name of author not known because of age of photograph. Karrattul (talk) 02:30, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- (Then why are you still claiming to be the author on the file description page?) Delete because the uploader does not seem to be willing to provide a source to support the claim that the photograph was first published more than 25 years ago (keeping in mind that publication could occur long after creation) in Nepal (keeping in mind that first publication could take place in a different country from where it was created) – or any truthful source for that matter. —LX (talk, contribs) 04:49, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 01:33, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:18, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 01:34, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE, unusable personal shot. Commons is not Facebook! -- Túrelio (talk) 16:17, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Delete as out of project scope. --Rrburke (talk) 16:56, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 01:28, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE, unusable personal shot; also potentially violating the personality rigths of the depicted person. -- Túrelio (talk) 16:15, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Delete as out of project scope. --Rrburke (talk) 16:55, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 01:28, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE, unusable personal shot; also potentially violating the personality rights of the depicted person. -- Túrelio (talk) 16:15, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Delete as out of project scope. --Rrburke (talk) 16:54, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 01:28, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE, unusable personal shot; also potentially violating the personality rights of the depicted person. Commons is not Facebook! -- Túrelio (talk) 16:17, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Delete as out of project scope. --Rrburke (talk) 16:55, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 01:28, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE, unusable personal shot; also potentially violating the personality rights of the depicted person. Commons is not Facebook! -- Túrelio (talk) 16:17, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Delete as out of project scope. --Rrburke (talk) 16:55, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 01:28, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE, unusable personal shot; also potentially violating the personality rights of the depicted person. -- Túrelio (talk) 16:15, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 01:28, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
2 photos of Dean Zanuck. File:Dean Zanuck.jpg (no exif, uploaded 29.04.2013) configured as "own work". File:Dean Zanuck1.jpg (exif available, uploaded 01.05.2013) configured with permission "written permission from Dean Zanuck to post on his Wiki page" and author = Dean Zanuck. Both files cropped from http://www.imdb.com/media/rm1536998656/nm0953124?ref_=nm_ov_ph (2011). Permission via COM:OTRS needed.
Gunnex (talk) 23:27, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 01:26, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
File:رواية السلمندر تحت الطبع--رواية واقعية للكاتب الكبير الأستاذ محمد عبد الحميد-عن قصة حياة شاب مثقف من مدينة الزقازي 2013-10-21 00-40.png
[edit]
Out of COM:SCOPE unused. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:24, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 01:34, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE; unused personal shot, more suitable for Facebook and alike. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:09, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 01:27, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status. 4 copyrighted artworks (titled "Obras de la serie (..).jpg) attributed to living Colombian artist/painter Jorge Mantilla Caballero (1947—) and 3 related photos (3x different exifs), sourced & authored with "Jorge Mantilla Caballero" — all files uploaded in a row on 29.04.2013 by Dianarte. Permission needed. Obs.: related eswiki-entry 3x deleted.
- File:Obra de la serie 1.128 Rostros de la Guerra de los mil días.jpg
- File:Obra de la serie Asuntos de Psiquiatría.jpg
- File:Obra de la serie En Carne Propia.jpg
- File:Obra de la serie Decoratorio.jpg
- File:Jorge Mantilla Caballero.jpg
- File:Jorge Mantilla Caballero pintando.jpg
- File:Retrato de Jorge Mantilla Caballero.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 16:02, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 01:29, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 01:30, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF = a mixture of photos (all uploaded on 01.05.2013) grabbed from news sites (example), crops from unknown video (?) sources (example), book covers (example), caricatures (example) etc, involving multiple, unsolved copyright issues.
- File:Khaterate Ahmad ahmad.jpg
- File:Roonamaei salhaye bi gharar 1.jpg
- File:Salhaye bi gharar.jpg
- File:Ravayte pirouzi.jpg
- File:Ezzat shahi.jpg
- File:Roonamaei salhaye bi gharar - mohsen kazemi 3.jpg
- File:Roonamaei salhaye bi gharar - mohsen kazemi 1.jpg
- File:Javad mansouri - mohsen kazemi.jpg
- File:Javad mansouri.jpg
- File:Roonamaei salhaye bi gharar.jpg
- File:Dabbagh.gif
- File:Ahmad ahmad.gif
- File:Khaterate dabbagh.jpg
- File:Yadasht-haye safar.jpg
- File:Neveshtam ta bemanad.jpg
- File:Shabhaye bi mahtab.jpg
- File:Mohsen kazemi 9.jpg
- File:Mohsen kazemi karton.jpg
- File:Mohsen kazemi 10.jpg
- File:Mohsen kazemi 7.JPG
- File:Mohsen kazemi 8.jpg
- File:Mohsen kazemi 6.jpg
- File:Mohsen kazemi 5.jpg
- File:Mohsen kazemi 4.JPG
- File:Mohsen kazemi 3.jpg
- File:Mohsen kazemi 1.jpg
- File:Mohsen kazemi 2.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 23:56, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination; I note that I have only looked at a few of these, so if there are special circumstances relating to specific files, my !vote does not apply there. -Pete F (talk) 20:46, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 01:25, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sicsrocker23 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal picture , out of Project Scope.
Amitie 10g (talk) 03:51, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 01:33, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Zinda tilismath (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promotional images uploaded by a user with the same name as the company packaging and company founder, possible COM:COPYVIOs, but out of scope for promotion/self-promotion.
- File:Zinda Tilismath, Farooky Tooth Powder & Zinda Balm z.jpg
- File:Zinda Tilismath 2.jpg
- File:Zinda Tilismath, Farooky Tooth Powder & Zinda Balm.jpg
- File:Zinda Tilismath.jpg
- File:Late Hakeem Mohd Moizuddin Farooqui.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:09, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 01:35, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Paul Gibson1971 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites.
- File:Sheikh Ahmed Al Juffali..jpg
- File:Ahmed Al Juffali...jpeg
- File:.Ahmed Al Juffali.jpg
- File:Ahmed Al Juffali 7.48.54 PM.jpg
- File:Ahmed.Al Juffali.jpg
- File:Ahmed Al Juffali.jpg
- File:Ahmed Al Juffali..jpg
- File:Ahmed Khaled Ahmed Al Juffali.jpg
- File:Sheikh Ahmed bin Khaled Al Juffali..jpg
- File:Sheikh Ahmed bin Khaled Al Juffali.jpg
- File:Mercedes-Benz Auction Event.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 01:30, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Uploaded by serial copyvio uploader/sock-puppeteer (see here); disparate camera models (e.g. DSC-W220, Canon EOS 400D), some appearing to be professional/promotional (e.g. File:(arash batis)آهنگساز تنظیم کننده وصدابردار17.jpg), some appearing elsewhere before upload here (e.g. File:آرش باتیس(arash batis)آهنگساز تنظیم کننده وصدابردار.jpg is here); some poor quality (e.g. File:Sorinet (arash batis)آهنگساز تنظیم کننده وصدابردار.JPG is blurry enough not to be useable).
%D8%A2%D9%87%D9%86%DA%AF%D8%B3%D8%A7%D8%B2_%D8%AA%D9%86%D8%B8%DB%8C%D9%85_%DA%A9%D9%86%D9%86%D8%AF%D9%87_%D9%88%D8%B5%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%A8%D8%B1%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%B117.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
%D8%A2%D9%87%D9%86%DA%AF%D8%B3%D8%A7%D8%B2_%D8%AA%D9%86%D8%B8%DB%8C%D9%85_%DA%A9%D9%86%D9%86%D8%AF%D9%87_%D9%88%D8%B5%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%A8%D8%B1%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%B1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
%D8%A2%D9%87%D9%86%DA%AF%D8%B3%D8%A7%D8%B2_%D8%AA%D9%86%D8%B8%DB%8C%D9%85_%DA%A9%D9%86%D9%86%D8%AF%D9%87_%D9%88%D8%B5%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%A8%D8%B1%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%B1.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- File:باتیس(arash batis)آهنگساز تنظیم کننده وصدابردار.jpg
- File:Ar(arash batis)آهنگساز تنظیم کننده وصدابردار.JPG
- File:آرش(arash batis)آهنگساز تنظیم کننده وصدابردار.jpg
- File:Sorinet (arash batis)آهنگساز تنظیم کننده وصدابردار.JPG
- File:Arash batis2.JPG
- File:(arash batis)آهنگساز تنظیم کننده وصدابردار17.jpg
- File:آرش باتیس(arash batis)آهنگساز تنظیم کننده وصدابردار.jpg
%D8%A2%D9%87%D9%86%DA%AF%D8%B3%D8%A7%D8%B2_%D8%AA%D9%86%D8%B8%DB%8C%D9%85_%DA%A9%D9%86%D9%86%D8%AF%D9%87_%D9%88%D8%B5%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%A8%D8%B1%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%B1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
%D8%A2%D9%87%D9%86%DA%AF%D8%B3%D8%A7%D8%B2_%D8%AA%D9%86%D8%B8%DB%8C%D9%85_%DA%A9%D9%86%D9%86%D8%AF%D9%87_%D9%88%D8%B5%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%A8%D8%B1%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%B1.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
%D8%A2%D9%87%D9%86%DA%AF%D8%B3%D8%A7%D8%B2_%D8%AA%D9%86%D8%B8%DB%8C%D9%85_%DA%A9%D9%86%D9%86%D8%AF%D9%87_%D9%88%D8%B5%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%A8%D8%B1%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%B1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Эlcobbola talk 19:59, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 01:27, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by LordGodAlmighty1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal picture , out of Project Scope.
Amitie 10g (talk) 03:48, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 01:32, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mohdsuhardi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope: Product catalogues, involing multiple copyright issues, etc.. Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Some files already deleted before (Commons:Deletion requests/File:Carrier Geographical Coverage.jpg + User talk:Mohdsuhardi).
- File:CRProduct.jpg
- File:ChilledWaterProduct.jpg
- File:FullRangeProduct2.jpg
- File:FullRangeProduct.jpg
- File:SustainabilityProduct.jpg
- File:IndustryPioneer.jpg
- File:Fullservicesol.jpg
- File:Geographicalcoverage.jpg
- File:CMB Old.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 19:33, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 01:36, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yorman2290 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Modern art. I think painter identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.
- File:Ánima sola.jpg - posted last year at http://www.oracionesmagicas.com/2013/10/oracion-al-anima-sola-para-dificultades.html
- File:Animas del purgatorio.jpg
- File:1258470875527 f.jpg
- File:Purgat rio.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 01:30, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
I uploaded this file by mistake Kj1595 (talk) 12:21, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 18:31, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Unused low-quality (jpg artifacts or bleedthrough from other pages of a scanned printed original?), have various png and svg alternatives in Category:Isotopes_of_hydrogen DMacks (talk) 14:23, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Ed (Edgar181) 19:15, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE due to unusable low quality. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:20, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 23:26, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
Unknown music group, self promotion, out of Project Scope. Ras67 (talk) 15:19, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:59, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Personal photo with little educational value per COM:EDUSE and per COM:NOTHOST. Green Giant supports NonFreeWiki (talk) 13:25, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:59, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 1Veertje as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: complex logo Krd 19:08, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:59, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, could be found on other web sites. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted -FASTILY 08:59, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Description implies tiny, low resolution image is a DW of some other image, probably a COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:01, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:59, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Mr. Smith? Useless without a description 91.66.63.56 10:49, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted -FASTILY 09:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
no special reason Jorge Seabra (talk) 21:53, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
I dont't believe that the uploader is allowed to put such a file into the Public Domain 91.66.63.56 10:28, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Two sources images have been deleted or are missing, compromising the whole collage Denniss (talk) 09:44, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:59, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
possible copyviol: google earth screenshot Ciaurlec (talk) 10:32, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted -FASTILY 09:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Copyright unknown, possible Flickr washing. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kolë Xhumari.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Savo Gjirja.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Fatmir Efica.jpg, etc. 4ing (talk) 08:45, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Duplicate of another file uploaded already on Wikipedia Kj1595 (talk) 12:23, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Although the size suggests this file might be the original one owned and uploaded by the maker, OTRS permission may be necessary because this website says the content is "copyright 2009 Day Six" ErikvanB (talk) 03:42, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
falsche Farbwiedergabe, neues Bild mit Originalfarben hochgeladen [1] Mehlauge (talk) 12:35, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
![[1]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Corps_Teutonia_Graz_%28Couleur%29.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted -FASTILY 09:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
It's not clear what the image depicts, or if it's under the indicated license. (Photo of a photo with no metadata, possibly a screenshot.) Mike Rosoft (talk) 19:50, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Commercial, non-free picture , out of Project Scope. Amitie 10g (talk) 03:44, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Self promotion Fixertool (talk) 02:48, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Personal picture , out of Project Scope. Amitie 10g (talk) 03:33, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
poor quality, small size, out of scope as documentary image and too cluttered to use as an icon Mercurywoodrose (talk) 17:48, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
possible copyviol: google earth screenshot Ciaurlec (talk) 10:32, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 1Veertje as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: complex logo Krd 19:08, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Self promotion Fixertool (talk) 02:54, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
![02:54, 29 April 2014 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2014/04/29#c-Fixertool-2014-04-29T02:54:00.000Z-File:Humberto_Herrera_en_"un_monton_de_piedras"_Abril_2014.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted -FASTILY 09:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
![09:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2014/04/29#c-Fastily-2014-05-16T09:00:00.000Z-File:Humberto_Herrera_en_"un_monton_de_piedras"_Abril_2014.jpg){kind=link}
Sorry, but I fear this photo violates the copyright of the artist who created the fish-image on the cover. See Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#Product_packaging. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:55, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
May not be covered by COM:FOP#Indonesia = 
Not OK , considering en:Gelora Bandung Lautan Api Stadium (opened 2013, designed by Penta Architecture). Gunnex (talk) 10:54, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 1Veertje as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: complex logo Krd 19:07, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
possible copyviol: google earth screenshot Ciaurlec (talk) 10:32, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
possible copyviol: google earth screenshot Ciaurlec (talk) 10:32, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
possible copyviol: google earth screenshot Ciaurlec (talk) 10:32, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
possible copyviol: viamichelin screenshot Ciaurlec (talk) 22:40, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Seems like the Flickr uploader used some kind of texture, which copyright status is unclear. FDMS 4 15:56, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
DW of Natalia Kills - Kill My Boyfriend - cover as seen on YouTube and all over the web. as shown here, probable COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:20, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 1Veertje as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: complex logo -- Steinsplitter (talk) 13:17, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: non-free architecture; per COM:DM#Slovenia, not de minimis: it is not incidental and could not be replaced at will with some other work. Eleassar (t/p) 20:48, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted -FASTILY 09:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Commercial, non-free picture , out of Project Scope. Amitie 10g (talk) 03:40, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 1Veertje as Copyvio and the most recent rationale was: complex logo -- Steinsplitter (talk) 12:08, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
I uploaded this file by mistake Kj1595 (talk) 12:24, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
possible copyviol: google earth screenshot Ciaurlec (talk) 10:27, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
,_by_Klugschnacker_in_Wikipedia_(64).JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_by_Klugschnacker_in_Wikipedia_(64).JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Sorry, but I fear this photo violates the copyright of the artist who created the fish-image on the cover. See Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#Product_packaging. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:55, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Contemporary sculpture; no FoP in Russia. A.Savin 15:54, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Sorry, but I fear this shot violates the copyright of the artist who created the pinapple-image on the cover. See Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#Product_packaging. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:51, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status: Licensed by uploader Random PC Errors with {{PD-because}} "Produced by Wiltshire council (Local UK Govenement) so is in public domain. Not produced to make money, not copyrighted as well." the source http://history.wiltshire.gov.uk/community/getimage.php?id=1441 indicates to "taken in 2003" and is bylined with "� Wiltshire Council 2011 - � Crown Copyright and Database Rights 2011", failing COM:CRTUK. Gunnex (talk) 17:46, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 1Veertje as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: complex logo Krd 19:07, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Personal image with no plausible educational application. Rrburke (talk) 16:51, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
por que laquiero eliminar . Saviansa (talk) 16:49, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
possible copyviol: google earth screenshot Ciaurlec (talk) 10:33, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
I uploaded this file by mistake Kj1595 (talk) 12:25, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Looks derivative, with symbols above TOO. FDMS 4 15:57, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted -FASTILY 09:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unused DW of "keep calm" poster, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:22, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Contemporary sculpture; no FoP in Russia. A.Savin 15:54, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: non-free architecture. Eleassar (t/p) 20:46, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Built in 2008. No FoP in France. Llann .\m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 20:42, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted -FASTILY 09:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
possible copyviol: google earth screenshot Ciaurlec (talk) 10:34, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Built in 2006. No FoP in France. Llann .\m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 20:21, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
I'm sorry but thats not covered by COM:FOP#Japan.(source is JAPAN PROFESSIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE --Kanko3131 (talk) 07:28, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:02, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
This is a text document, not a media file, and is therefore out of scope. Ahecht (talk) 16:06, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:02, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Aquinodaniel & logs = 4 uploads concerning this tennis player = 3x copyvio. Gunnex (talk) 22:10, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted -FASTILY 09:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Viktor Musi is born in 1963. Copyright violation. 90.2.97.154 22:36, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
![22:36, 29 April 2014 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2014/04/29#c-90.2.97.154-2014-04-29T22:36:00.000Z-File:Viktor_Musi_._"_Composition_N_2_"._195_Х_130.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted -FASTILY 09:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
![09:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2014/04/29#c-Fastily-2014-05-16T09:01:00.000Z-File:Viktor_Musi_._"_Composition_N_2_"._195_Х_130.jpg){kind=link}
No metadata band picture, possibly from Facebook, but mostly likely a COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:05, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
I'm sorry but thats not covered by COM:FOP#Japan.(source is JAPAN PROFESSIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE --Kanko3131 (talk) 07:28, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Built in 2001. No FoP in France. Llann .\m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 20:42, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Personal picture , out of Project Scope.
Amitie 10g (talk) 03:51, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:02, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Violates Cartoon Network's copyright. Copyrighted images do not belong on Commons. JJ98 (talk) 00:12, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
Keep: Hmmm. I'm going to vote "keep" because the title card consists only of words, and I think the coloured splotches in the background are insignificant enough for the de minimis principle to apply. {{PD-textlogo}} is an appropriate tag here. — Cheers, JackLee –talk– 15:54, 2 February 2011 (UTC)- Keep. image is made by author, so you may ask to apply for a form at CN headquartesr, call their PR office, and do the talking with`em stiff officer chumps. Is this segregation of Cartoon Network employs ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Special+Utilizator+$ (talk • contribs) 04:22, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
Kept (non-admin closure). Jujutacular talk 00:33, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
I note this image was discussed in 2011, however we have no evidence that the background is not a work of art that attracts copyright in its own right. The rationale of TOO or PD-textlogo are insufficient to support the conclusion that the background is ineligible for copyright. Fæ (talk) 09:31, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted per nomination. PD-textlogo doesn't fit for this logo. --Krd 11:31, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
DW of a TV b/cast LGA talkedits 07:59, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- This image isn't derivative work as the screen is only small part (less than 50%) images. This image is an illustration of an special ceremony of athletes at the Medals Plaza in Sochi Olympic park. The main subject, the image purpose - action the events on Medals Plaza, instead of the image on the monitor screen--Sergei Kazantsev (talk) 08:23, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, de-minimis not applicable here. Krd 11:27, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
DW of Poster/banner/tapestry.
- File:Canonization 2014- The Canonization of Saint John XXIII and Saint John Paul II (14033298692).jpg
- File:Canonization 2014- The Canonization of Saint John XXIII and Saint John Paul II (14036504115).jpg
- File:Canonization 2014- The Canonization of Saint John XXIII and Saint John Paul II (14036635525).jpg
- File:In anticipation of the Canonization II (14005431991).jpg
- File:In anticipation of the Canonization II (14009063914).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
LGA talkedits 02:09, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- Agree. No FOP in Vatican. José Luiz disc 03:15, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion Krd 11:25, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Amro.elsamra (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability.
- File:Company seal.jpg
- File:CEM0555.jpg
- File:Abc22.jpg
- File:Abc2 -copy.jpg
- File:United Supplies and Agencies Co. S.A.E..jpg
- File:CEM.Concern.jpg
- File:سيم.كونسرن.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:15, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Amro.elsamra (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:17, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:44, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Amro.elsamra (talk · contribs)
[edit]Two types of images here: (1) Personal images outside of COM:SCOPE include all the group shots, pictures of child and family and so on. (2) Images of Lt. General Ibraham El-Orabi, with no source, unlikely to be user's own work and likely COM:COPYVIOs.
- File:The Great Pyramid of Giza.jpg
- File:Amr El-Samra CISV Photo.jpg
- File:Amr El-Samra Dilmah Photo.jpg
- File:Palm Hills October.jpg
- File:Palm Hills Compound.jpg
- File:Palm Hills.jpg
- File:Shooting Club Residence.jpg
- File:الطالب عمرو إبراهيم السمرة.jpg
- File:Lieutenant General Ibrahim El-Orabi.jpg
- File:الفريق العرابى.jpg
- File:إبراهيم عبد الغفور العرابى.jpg
- File:الفريق إبراهيم عبد الغفور العرابى.jpg
- File:الفريق إبراهيم العرابى.jpg
- File:Amr El-Samra at Jesuites School.jpg
- File:Saint Joseph School.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:48, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Delete because although COM:SCOPE says that customarily users are allowed to upload a small number of personal photos (of themselves) for use on their userpages on other projects, this set of uploads pushes past reasonable custom and into personal webhost territory. Some of these images are school photos which should not be hosted because Commons is not FriendsReunited. The photos of the general are almost certainly copyright violations unless the uploader is/was a government-authorised photographer (which would be something to highlight on a userpage). I say government-authorised because we are talking about a Middle Eastern general who served as Chief of Staff of the Egyptian Armed Forces, no less. They were generally wily and well-connected characters constantly worried about potential assassins (remember the ghost of Sadat). Do we really think they would have let some peasant run up and take a pic for the family album. No sir, these men had big ego's and such people don't want their photos taken by anybody less than an state-approved photographer who is going to capture their best side. No way did our fellow Commoner take these photos and that is why they should be deleted. Green Giant (talk) 17:54, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Krd 11:21, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
DW of a tv b/cast. LGA talkedits 07:58, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- This image isn't derivative work as the screen is only small part (less than 50%) images. This image is an illustration of an medal ceremony of athletes in Sochi Olympic park.--Sergei Kazantsev (talk) 08:21, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, de-minimis not applicable here. Krd 11:27, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be user's own work, small size no meta data, possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:53, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per nom -Pete F (talk) 22:06, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - Clear copyvio, multiple uses on web, here is a use from 2008.[2] --GRuban (talk) 14:35, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion Krd 14:40, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
possibly copyviol: gmaps screenshoot Ciaurlec (talk) 09:12, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
while writing an article on google maps in bengali wikipedia I needed a screenshot of google map. So i did the screenshot of the map. otherwise there were no picture uploaded in commons. Is this a copyright violated work? can you please explain? TechnoAyan (talk) 10:11, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
Unluckly been more a "categorizer" than a stewart i can clearly explain to you how to obtein a license for the "rationale use" of this image for your contry. I note that only few of the other wikipedia used this kind of license the othe preferring to leave article without screenshoots, but as they did it, propably there is a similar way too for Bangladesh.--Ciaurlec (talk) 00:27, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 12:06, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
possible copyviol: gmas screenshot Ciaurlec (talk) 22:21, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Delete per nom; “own work” seems most unlikely. Useless name, too: should probably redirect to File:Name.jpg.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 03:46, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. --Krd 14:42, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
no longer needed 50.4.1.89 20:33, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
- Delete This was once needed?? -Pete F (talk) 22:05, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion Krd 14:40, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
Copyright appears to be asserted by the Ashmolean Museum. Someone can take their own photo in the museum (I was there last week doing exactly that) and release their own version, however this image needs a release from the photographer. Fæ (talk) 17:09, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- File:Domitianus II 2003 reverse.jpg has the same issues.Geni (talk) 17:57, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 11:48, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
Uploader/creator of the montage did not add the authors of the source images thus it violates the copyright of several or all of the source images. Denniss (talk) 14:21, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
Kept: I replaced the 3 images missing source with others. Now all images are sourced Belgrano (talk) 00:56, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
four sources images have been deleted or are missing, compromising the whole collage Denniss (talk) 09:43, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 11:50, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
This is a crop of an image that was deleted as not-free. Damiens.rf 16:39, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Note: I have blanked out a grossly inappropriate personal attack left by Mercy11 from this page. The comment did not in any way address the matter at hand. —LX (talk, contribs) 10:15, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete COM:DW of non-free work. LGA talkedits 04:09, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 11:48, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
This is a crop of an image that was deleted as not-free. Damiens.rf 16:39, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Note: I have blanked out a grossly inappropriate personal attack left by Mercy11 from this page. The comment did not in any way address the matter at hand. —LX (talk, contribs) 10:15, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete COM:DW of non-free work. LGA talkedits 04:02, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 11:48, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
File:Modelo atomico de dalton.png matches File:Tamaña relativo materia.png but is newer and claims ownwork; but also smaller and not a simple-number scaled-down ratio, so suspect that there is some other original DMacks (talk) 14:33, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 11:49, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
Not found on .gov. source. Hardly made by the U.S. government. Probably, just a picture they used to identify the person. Damiens.rf 16:41, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Note: I have blanked out a grossly inappropriate personal attack left by Mercy11 from this page. The comment did not in any way address the matter at hand. —LX (talk, contribs) 10:15, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
- Oh, yeah, if you can't find it, try harder. If you have any imagination try the WayBack machine. Mercy11 (talk) 23:44, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
- Delete absent proof it is original work of US government . LGA talkedits 04:06, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 11:48, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
Not found on .gov. source. Hardly made by the U.S. government. Probably, just a picture they used to identify the person. Damiens.rf 16:42, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Note: I have blanked out a grossly inappropriate personal attack left by Mercy11 from this page. The comment did not in any way address the matter at hand. —LX (talk, contribs) 10:15, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
- Oh, yeah, if you can't find it, try harder. If you have any imagination try the WayBack machine. Mercy11 (talk) 23:45, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
- Delete absent proof it is original work of US government . LGA talkedits 04:05, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 11:48, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
_in_Ponce,_PR,_from_1987-2009.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_in_Ponce,_PR,_from_1987-2009.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Non-free logo. Just because someone uploaded it so a Wikia site, it doesn't mean it became free content. Damiens.rf 16:45, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
_in_Ponce,_PR,_from_1987-2009.jpg){kind=link}
Note: I have blanked out a grossly inappropriate personal attack left by Mercy11 from this page. The comment did not in any way address the matter at hand. —LX (talk, contribs) 10:15, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
_in_Ponce,_PR,_from_1987-2009.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: FASTILY 11:48, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
_in_Ponce,_PR,_from_1987-2009.jpg){kind=link}
Uploaded in a row on 29.04.2013. Unclear copyright status + unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, most likely all grabbed from vk.com.
- File:Y 8fcc6bc7.jpg versus http://vk.com/photo-12770154_263901415 (2011, added by "perevolochnoe")
- File:Y 8ad415c4.jpg versus http://vk.com/photo-12770154_263901416 (2011, added by "perevolochnoe")
- File:Y 9d59ef6b.jpg versus http://vk.com/photo-12770154_263901412 (2011, added by "perevolochnoe")
- File:Y 86d0de6b.jpg versus http://vk.com/photo-12770154_210701172 (2011, added by "perevolochnoe")
- File:Y 285bb1fd.jpg versus http://vk.com/photo-12770154_263901413 (2011, added by "perevolochnoe")
- File:Y 5f4b6447.jpg = ???
- File:Y 5f4b6447.jpg
- File:Y 86d0de6b.jpg
- File:Y 285bb1fd.jpg
- File:Y 9d59ef6b.jpg
- File:Y 8ad415c4.jpg
- File:Y 8fcc6bc7.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 19:11, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 11:49, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by KareemBaligh (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- Delete File:Hamdeen.jpg, File:AlSisiEGYPT.jpg...--i.е. v-mail 17:39, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
- Second image: this is a link of the wider version of the cropped and uploaded image. The image is seen also on official posters and expected to have been adapted by filter from the Facebook page of the figure --Mohamedhp (talk) 18:51, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
- First image: is a more serious violation and has been stolen from a news website that first posted the image 2 years ago. The article can be found to be posted on May 9, 2012. --Mohamedhp (talk) 18:58, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 11:49, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
Collection of promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:5 sec.jpg
- File:Lavrov-Feddy.jpg
- File:Feddy-lavrov.jpg
- File:Os1983.jpg
- File:Feddy1983.jpg
- File:Feddy1984.jpg
- File:Titja-Mashnin.jpg
- File:Au-shushary.jpg
- File:Atsus.jpg
- File:Belomor.jpg
- File:Titja.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 29 April 2014 (UTC) Добрый день. И что я делаю не так? Фотки мои или полностью свободные для публикаций. Это же свободная энциклопедия (когда-то была). Или уже все? Что же мне делать, какие атрибуты поставить? Svinpanov (talk)
- Какие из них Ваши, а какие сделаны другими авторами? Где можно увидеть лицензии для фотографий других авторов? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 11:49, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
Private album with unused portraits of the uploader. Facebook might be interested.
- File:Us Surfing Open Presented by O'Neal.jpg
- File:Dining.jpg
- File:NDSC part 2.jpg
- File:Get together.jpg
- File:Lookin good for the ladies.jpg
- File:Bennett Brothers Brian and Christopher.jpg
91.66.63.56 11:27, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- Delete all, all out of scope. Lewis Hulbert (talk) 13:53, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 11:50, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
User:Anatheóresis
[edit]All tiny, very low quality, no exif, no metada data. Obvious copy from here. Probably single porpouse account to promote an unknown parapsicologycal technic.
- File:Grau con lo aucas.jpg - Claims to be "Assigned to me by the protagonist without CR", wich is impossible to determinate
- File:Joaquín Grau Creador de Anatheóresis2.jpg - It says "my own property", wich is hard to believe since is the same as here
- File:Joaquín Grau Creador de Anatheóresis.jpg - It says he took this picture (with metada) and unplublished; however, the picture is too small and quality too bad.
--Ganímedes (talk) 14:36, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 11:49, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
Uploader claims own work, and elsewhere claims to be the subject's grandson (see File:Lenz Klára Safari.jpg) but the woman in this photo seems to young to have a grandson who could produce a professional portrait such as this. Many of the uploader's other claims of "own work" seem to be dubious or falsified. Psychonaut (talk) 08:46, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:15, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 1Veertje as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: complex logo -- Steinsplitter (talk) 13:16, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- Keep I uploaded this logo with the convincement it is so simple to be under copyright. - Fma12 (talk) 14:47, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- it clearly isn't with the door being visualized over the text. - Vera (talk) 22:30, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- The template clearly says: "simple geometric shapes and/or text" and that's what the door is. - Fma12 (talk) 18:22, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
- it clearly isn't with the door being visualized over the text. - Vera (talk) 22:30, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: This logo is definatly to complex in the Netherlands. It contains several creative elements and therefor it is copyrightable. Natuur12 (talk) 15:25, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
I uploaded this file by mistake Kj1595 (talk) 12:24, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- What is wrong with it? Is the licence incorrect? --Albinfo (talk) 18:57, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Not awnsered the question and in use Natuur12 (talk) 15:24, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
File lacks source and is not part of any article Kj1595 (talk) 12:10, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Kept It lacks source only because User:Kj1595 removed "own work" between the two DRs. Was "own work" not true? Or did he simply vandalize the file page? Note also that, contrary to the claim above, it is in use on WP:DE and, in any event, not being in use is not a reason to delete. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:30, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
Delete This file should be deleted because it is a mashup of two images, one of which has unknown copyright status and the other which is copyrighted to the Korean Central News Agency. In the former case, the picture comes from the Rage Rollercoaster ride at the Adventure Island amusement park in the UK. Since Kim Jong-Un has never been to the UK, it is impossible for him to have riden this ride. Further, the image description claims Kim Jong-Un created this ride for himself, which is blatantly false as well. Lastly, and directly to the copyright point, the latter of the two images used for this mashup is the portrait of Kim Jong-Un posted by the Korean Central News Agency (KCNA) and for which copyright has not been released. See this. This, therefore, is a derivative image of a copyrighted image and is burdened with the copyright from KCNA, making it incompatible with Commons license. --Hammersoft (talk) 18:10, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete -- blatant copyvio. BabelStone (talk) 07:45, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:35, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Codename Lisa as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: This screenshot contains copyright-protected non-free elements of Microsoft Windows. In addition, Firefox license is incompatible with CC-BY-SA 3.0. Maybe de minimis? See also File talk:Firefox 29.png. whym (talk) 11:22, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Hi. Codename Lisa here. The Windows taskbar was previously uploaded to Commons and deleted after a DR. Windows Explorer icon at its full resolution is not de minimis. Finally, an appropriate Firefox screenshot without these elements is already uploaded to Commons. So, we might as well euthanize the image. Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 13:50, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
- Hello again. I though perhaps this link might be helpful: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Windows 8 Taskbar.PNG. Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 20:57, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: A couple of the logo's are copyrighted. Natuur12 (talk) 15:20, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
From here with watermark blanked. Main page says "© Copyright 2011 Laura Olteanu". Not {{Copyvio}}ing because uploader may be able to license this image. COM:OTRS is needed to confirm. Storkk (talk) 09:50, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
www.lauraolteanu.ro is my website. I'm the admin of this site. Stefan Olteanu — Preceding unsigned comment added by Olteanustefan (talk • contribs) 11:38, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- Hi Stefan. If you could confirm that you have the legal ability to license these files, that would be great! Please read COM:OTRS carefully, and follow the instructions there. Cheers, Storkk (talk) 11:19, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:15, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:4.25.14UnionCityHighScholJROTCByLuigiNovi1.jpg The Herald 15:10, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Keep It is not a duplicate. The photos are part of the same set, as they were taken at the same event, but are not the same photo. There are differences in cropping, lighting, color and/or some of the facial expressions in the subjects. Having multiple shots of the same subject from the same event is a common and legitimate practice on the Commons, as it gives those who need free-licensed images greater options to fulfill their needs. Nightscream (talk) 15:12, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Keep It's not a duplicate image. Deletions for duplicate images are for "exact or scaled-down" duplicates. Not different angles/lighting. Dainomite (talk) 22:18, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 15:32, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:4.25.14UnionCityHighScholJROTCByLuigiNovi1.jpg The Herald 15:09, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Keep It is not a duplicate. The photos are part of the same set, as they were taken at the same event, but are not the same photo. There are differences in cropping, lighting, color and/or some of the facial expressions in the subjects. Having multiple shots of the same subject from the same event is a common and legitimate practice on the Commons, as it gives those who need free-licensed images greater options to fulfill their needs. Nightscream (talk) 15:15, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Keep It's not a duplicate image. Deletions for duplicate images are for "exact or scaled-down" duplicates. Not different angles/lighting. Dainomite (talk) 22:20, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 15:28, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:4.25.14UnionCityHighScholJROTCByLuigiNovi1.jpg The Herald 15:09, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Keep It is not a duplicate. The photos are part of the same set, as they were taken at the same event, but are not the same photo. There are differences in cropping, lighting, color and/or some of the facial expressions in the subjects. Having multiple shots of the same subject from the same event is a common and legitimate practice on the Commons, as it gives those who need free-licensed images greater options to fulfill their needs. Nightscream (talk) 15:15, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Keep It's not a duplicate image. Deletions for duplicate images are for "exact or scaled-down" duplicates. Not different angles/lighting. Dainomite (talk) 22:20, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 15:32, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
Small size, unused file, no meta data at all. Possibly non-free image COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:42, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- Delete, no educational use possible without metadata -- what is this?? -Pete F (talk) 22:07, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
- Keep It's used in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volition_(linguistics)#Syntax-Semantics_Interface where it is labeled "Syntactic tree of Sinhalese sentence". It appears to be scanned from a book, but it's just a few words of text, so below the threshold of originality as an artwork. Not being a linguist, I don't know whether diagramming a Sinhalese sentence is below the threshold of originality as a textual work, but I suspect it is. Diagramming an English sentence almost certainly is straight forward and no more copyrightable than a trivial math equation would be. --GRuban (talk) 14:31, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Kept: per GRuban Krd 17:20, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
Uploader claims own work, and elsewhere claims to be the subject's grandson (see File:Lenz Klára Safari.jpg) but the woman in this photo seems to young to have a grandson who could produce a professional portrait such as this. Many of the uploader's other claims of "own work" seem to be dubious or falsified. Psychonaut (talk) 08:40, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:14, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
the painting is not free Hangsna (talk) 10:10, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- No, the painting is not for free. But the picture of the artist Jan Englund is free to use for anyone for the right purpose for those who has the right interest. Jan Englund was a very famous artist from a part of sweden called "roslagen".
- Well, a picture cant be made free if the things in the picture isnt free. I would say that to much of the painting is visible to say that this picture can be free, its to much of the picture to be De minimis. /Hangsna (talk) 11:00, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
No, that is right. The painting that you can see on the picture is not for free. But this picture of the artist Jan Englund is free to use for anyone for the right purpose for those who has the right interest. Jan Englund was a very famous artist from a part of sweden called roslagen. http://www.lexikonettamanda.se/show.php?aid=22699
Thank you Hangsna for your opinion about the image of the artist Jan Englund. All images of artists or their works are not for free. If you see a picture of a work of art that does not mean that the artwork is for free? But this picture is free for use on Wikipedia like any other pictures that are on Wikipedia.
- The licence text now says its released by the uploader that claims this is "Eget arbete" (own work). Its not own work, it shows work made by an artist and therefore it cant be own work, the work is Englunds. You cant give something free (release for everyone to use) if its not yours to give. In this case its not yours to give. /Hangsna (talk) 11:20, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
Thank you Hangsna for your opinion about the image of the artist Jan Englund. It is intended that the picture should be free to use (release for everyone to use) . "The license text now says its released by the uploader That claims this is "Own work" (own work)". How would you like us to change the license text so that it is correct in your opinion? Please feel free to give your opinion. Wikipedia is the free encyclopedia, and any user is free to edit the texts of others or add information to an article. It is also good for users to learn about what is specified correctly or not for those who are not that experienced with using Wikipedia or who are not administrators. An administrator must act in "good faith,"
- It can only be own work if its own work. The painting is 'own work only if Jan Englund would upload it. /Hangsna (talk) 12:35, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
Thank you Hangsna for your opinion about the image of the artist Jan Englund. Jan Englund died in 2010. How can we change and what can we write instead of being accurate in your opinion? It is good if you come with concrete proposals about what to enter instead of (own work) to the picture. It is intended that the picture Should be free to use (release for everyone to use) in Wikipedia that has a general interest and who want to look at famous artists from roslagen. It is also good for us users to learn about what is specified correctly or not for those who are not that experienced with using Wikipedia or who are not administrators. An administrator must act in "good faith". You are free to change "own work" if you think its wrong.
- Thank you for your attention. I have now changed "the source" to the picture.
Deleted: We need permisison for the painting via com:OTRS Natuur12 (talk) 15:16, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:4.25.14UnionCityHighScholJROTCByLuigiNovi1.jpg The Herald 15:10, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Keep It's not a duplicate image. Deletions for duplicate images are for "exact or scaled-down" duplicates. Not different angles/lighting. Dainomite (talk) 22:19, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 15:32, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: non-free obelisk. Eleassar (t/p) 12:06, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Strange folk these Slovenes ... or just another Eleassar's scribal interpretation of the "Slovene copyright". --Hladnikm (talk) 16:32, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- The relief is certainly not simple enough to be PD-ineligible. --Eleassar (t/p) 16:40, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: You must be able to make commercial use of the file or else it is not comatable for commons Natuur12 (talk) 15:22, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
з.к=й\ю пу гкд 188.226.80.44 13:37, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- What?!? --F l a n k e r (talk) 17:45, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- I'll assume this is vandalism, unless someone is able to make sense of this request. SiBr4 (talk) 18:46, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Kept: As above Natuur12 (talk) 15:26, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Duplicate of an existing file which is already uploaded on Wikipedia Kj1595 (talk) 12:19, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- Duplicate of which file? Please indicate. --Albinfo (talk) 20:11, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
- Maybe problem with license. Please check. --Albinfo (talk) 20:13, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Sorry but this is not a valid reason for deletion Natuur12 (talk) 15:23, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
I assume the PD claim is based on this being a coat of arms of sorts, but that part of the PD law covers official symbols of the state. This is a privately-owned team. This doesn't appear to be public domain as uncopyrightable. ~ Rob13Talk 11:57, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Needs a free license from an authorized official of the team via OTRS. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:51, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
Uploader claims own work, and elsewhere claims to be the subject's grandson (see File:Lenz Klára Safari.jpg) but the woman in this photo seems to young to have a grandson who could produce a professional portrait such as this. Many of the uploader's other claims of "own work" seem to be dubious or falsified. Psychonaut (talk) 08:46, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:15, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
Sorry, but I fear this photo violates the copyright of the artist who created the apple-image on the cover. See Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#Product_packaging. Of course, the uploader might try to obtain a permission from Migros company.-- Túrelio (talk) 15:50, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- Depending on your faith, this apple was created either by our Lord, or by the Holy Prophet, or by the divine spaghetti monster, or by Maya the Bee who flew around the apple tree. No copyright for the apple. --Asugar (talk) 15:58, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- Try reading again: I wrote "apple-image". --Túrelio (talk) 16:07, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- Yep. Naturally grown Swiss apple. Do you want me to black it out on the can? --Asugar (talk) 16:11, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- If you black-out all potentially copyrighted portions, the image becomes rather useless. How about reading the second sentence of my first posting? --Túrelio (talk) 16:13, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- The second or the third? Assume i have read it all. If you feel the apple is copyrighted, use freedom of panorama. The picture was taken in a public shop. --Asugar (talk) 16:14, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- Doesn't help, as FOP is not applicable here. Either you provide a permission (OTRS) from the rights holder or you have the crop the upper part away. --Túrelio (talk) 18:24, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- Why not? A 3D artwork in public space... If you don't like the apple, reverse to the version with the black upper part and close this request. --Asugar (talk) 18:39, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- Stop your ad-personam arguing. I don't care about apples, I care about copyright. Recommended reading: Commons:Freedom of panorama. This DR will not be closed by myself, as I have opened it; another admin-colleague will close it at due time. --Túrelio (talk) 18:47, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- I am not arguing ad personam. I am arguing ad malum (for the apple). --Asugar (talk) 19:53, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- Stop your ad-personam arguing. I don't care about apples, I care about copyright. Recommended reading: Commons:Freedom of panorama. This DR will not be closed by myself, as I have opened it; another admin-colleague will close it at due time. --Túrelio (talk) 18:47, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- Why not? A 3D artwork in public space... If you don't like the apple, reverse to the version with the black upper part and close this request. --Asugar (talk) 18:39, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- Doesn't help, as FOP is not applicable here. Either you provide a permission (OTRS) from the rights holder or you have the crop the upper part away. --Túrelio (talk) 18:24, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- The second or the third? Assume i have read it all. If you feel the apple is copyrighted, use freedom of panorama. The picture was taken in a public shop. --Asugar (talk) 16:14, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- If you black-out all potentially copyrighted portions, the image becomes rather useless. How about reading the second sentence of my first posting? --Túrelio (talk) 16:13, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- Yep. Naturally grown Swiss apple. Do you want me to black it out on the can? --Asugar (talk) 16:11, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- Try reading again: I wrote "apple-image". --Túrelio (talk) 16:07, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- Hillarious. Keep. --Geckinger (talk) 08:30, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: com:PACKAGING Natuur12 (talk) 15:33, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
Duplicate of another file uploaded already on Wikipedia Kj1595 (talk) 12:22, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- Keep The file is heavily used in de.wiki. Taivo (talk) 18:39, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Duplicate of which file? Please indicate. --Albinfo (talk) 20:10, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
- Please check license. --Albinfo (talk) 20:13, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Sorry but this is not a proper reason for deletion Natuur12 (talk) 15:22, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
I assume the PD claim is based on this being a coat of arms of sorts, but that part of the PD law covers official symbols of the state. This is a privately-owned team. This doesn't appear to be public domain as uncopyrightable. ~ Rob13Talk 11:57, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Needs a free license from an authorized official of the team via OTRS. Note that the author is not the uploader/. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:52, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:4.25.14UnionCityHighScholJROTCByLuigiNovi1.jpg The Herald 15:08, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Keep It is not a duplicate. The photos are part of the same set, as they were taken at the same event, but are not the same photo. There are differences in cropping, lighting, color and/or some of the facial expressions in the subjects. Having multiple shots of the same subject from the same event is a common and legitimate practice on the Commons, as it gives those who need free-licensed images greater options to fulfill their needs. Nightscream (talk) 15:14, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Keep It's not a duplicate image. Deletions for duplicate images are for "exact or scaled-down" duplicates. Not different angles/lighting etc. Dainomite (talk) 22:20, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 15:28, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
DW of poster - as confirmed here the OTRS ticket does not cover the poster. LGA talkedits 00:16, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- I think that the main part is trivial. See Commons:Threshold of originality. Copyright-protected elements such photos are small and blured. See Commons:De minimis --Butko (talk) 08:49, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. Это малоразличимые чёрно-белые значки, нет предмета для защиты авторских прав. --Vizu (talk) 17:00, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
Delete because the poster is clearly the main focus of the photo taking up more than a quarter of the photo, with everything else slightly blurred, so this is not de minimis. On the contrary most of the outer edges of the photo are inconsequential because they just happen to be behind that fence. Equally, this is not a case of TOO because five of those "icons" are clearly photographs of living people and that can never be below the threshold of originality. The only one I recognise straightaway is one of the Klitschko brothers, although not being a boxing fan I couldn't tell a ring from a slaughterhouse. Clearly they are all notable people, or else nobody would have bothered putting their photos on there. I mean why would you waste ink on a bunch of nobodies? So yes, delete the photo because the Otters ticket doesn't cover the poster. Green Giant (talk) 17:16, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: As above Natuur12 (talk) 15:12, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: user's holiday pic for their Wikipedia user page Qwertyus (talk) 22:21, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
may be useful under the categories below.--Md iet (talk) 11:59, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
Delete this and two other personal photos uploaded by this user. By custom, users are allowed a small number of photos (of themselves) for use on userpages on other projects, per COM:SCOPE, but there is no definition of what that "small number" is. "Usefulness" has just one clear definition - educational usefulness, i.e. it must either be used on an article on another project or thefre must be some credible educational use that is not provided by the ample images we already have. The categories mentioned above already contain several decent photos that aren't dominated by a Wikimedian.
- However, my main concern is a copyright issue, namely that this photo, File:Shanghai tower.JPG and File:Umrah pilgrim at Medina.JPG are claimed as "own work" but clearly the person in the photos did not take the photos. So, either that person in the photos is the user and they are committing copyright violation without crediting the photographer or that person is not the user and therefore there is even less reason to keep all three. Green Giant (talk) 14:55, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:37, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo. Dominic (talk) 05:12, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
so it has, but This image only consists of simple geometric shapes --EEIM (talk) 01:01, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:24, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
I seriously doubt that this is too simple to be exempt from copyright Sven Manguard Wha? 00:55, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
where is copyright, P E S, E up and dash down ,no color. Is too simple.--EEIM (talk) 01:09, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- It's in the arrangement. The letters are distorted in order to create a different shape, which is well above and beyond simple text. Sven Manguard Wha? 01:51, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- I’m inclined to agree; the way the letterforms of the P and S have been modified so as to mirror each other, as well as the ‘gestalt‘ image, make it more than a routine piece of typography.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 07:10, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
- Keep I don't know about Japan, but this certainly does not have a copyright in the USA -- fonts are explicitly not allowed copyright. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:36, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
kept: Probably okey but some country's allow scripts to be copyrighted though. I see less creativity here to assume pd-textlogo doesn't apply. Anyhow, borderline case without any strong arguments to justify deletion. Natuur12 (talk) 15:11, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
Uploader claims that this document by WWII soldier József Lenz is his own work. However, he elsewhere claims to be the grandson of a woman born in 1924, making the claim of authoring a war diary in 1942 preposterous. In short, the uploader cannot be the author of this work, and we have no evidence of permission from the author. Psychonaut (talk) 08:44, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:15, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
A duplicate of File:Overlooking Murphy, North Carolina - NARA - 279828.jpg, but they're different formats, so this can't be speedied. It's a GIF with 265,800 pixels, while the other image is a JPG with 6,648,000 — this image has just 4% of the other one. Since both versions are available, nobody's going to use this one. Nyttend (talk) 01:07, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:13, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
Likely COM:COPYVIO, this image is all over the web as promotional image for this performer. If the uploader is the performer, it's unlikely that she herself took this image. At a minimum, it needs OTRS to be sure of the copyright status of this image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:59, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
CommentAnonymous user (presumed to be the uploader) left the following note on my talk page. User was not logged in at the time and the history shows an IP. I'm moving it to here as it's likely he's unclear on the idea of replying to the nomination as well as being unclear on policy: copyvios, &tc. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:55, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
Why do you want to Sunny Thompson photo file deleted? I work for her and www.marilynforeverblonde.com and I'm trying very hard to get her and show's Wikipedia right. I'm even trying to get the Facebook wiki links and pages right with photos and I'm not getting any luck. This is all very very hard for me and you wanting this photo gone is uncalled for. Why on earth would you do this?
Sincerely,
David Eaton
Director of Social Media
www.marilynforeverblonde.com
- Delete This definitely requires a license using the procedure at Commons:OTRS. As it stands now, someone who claims to be Sunny Thompson has uploaded an image of Sunny Thompson as "own work". Since the image was obviously not taken by Sunny Thompson herself, at least one part of that is incorrect. It is likely that neither the photographer nor the uploader are actually Sunny Thompson, so we need a license from the actual photographer. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:50, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per Jim's logic. Either Sunny is the uploader (therefore not giving the photographer/copyright holder due credit) or it is someone impersonating Sunny (therefore violating username policy). Green Giant (talk) 21:24, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:09, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, most likely cropped from unknown source, considering also 2 uploads by Mathieu Agron (talk · contribs) on 30.04.2013 = 1x copyvio from Getty Images. Gunnex (talk) 19:46, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Nominating also:
uploaded on same (30.04.2013) by MathieuStone (talk · contribs) = most likely sock of Mathieu Agron (talk · contribs), considering unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, per exif attributed to photographer = Patrick BLANCHARD. Gunnex (talk) 19:56, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:36, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
Image unlikely to be own work, in use on a wiki page of unknown value, possible COM:COPYVIO, perhaps promotion as well. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:39, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- Keep, I am not convinced (but admittedly, not entirely sure) that this exceeds the threshold of originality. Since it is in use, I would err on the side of keeping it, unless it can be more clearly established that somebody legitimately holds copyright to this image. -Pete F (talk) 22:09, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: I would call this to complex. Shading and non basic shapes Natuur12 (talk) 15:54, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Samuelistok (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal image
♫♫ Leitoxx ♪♪ 02:00, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:13, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
Possible copyvio, no sign of release rights. Piastu (talk) 13:51, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
I uploaded this picture. It was taken by my cousin K. Grabowski in 1959 before he made his solo crossing of the Atlantic. I got the picture from his sister, Daisy Grabowski-Richardson, who also published it in the book: Count Christopher de Grabowski, Casting Off. A Solo Atlantic Voyage. Introd. Daisy de Grabowski Richardson, 2012 [2013] (ISBN 9781481247665). She is the owner and agreed to put it free on the commons. M. Zgórniak (obrazkizkrakowa). - Przy okazji proszę uprzejmie o usunięcie z hasła Krzysztof Grabowski (żeglarz) odesłania do kategorii "Odznaczeni Distinguished Flying Cross (Wielka Brytania)". Wiadomość o odznaczeniu DFC nie potwierdziła się. Dziękuję - MZ
- Kategoria na plWiki usunięte. Właścicielka praw majątkowych może przesłać pozwolenie na wykorzystanie (ma moc nie tylko na Wikipedii) wg wzoru dostępnego na stronie Commons:Pozwolenia – i wszystko będzie ok. Piastu (talk) 11:17, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Please make the copyrightholder send evidence of permisison to com:OTRS. Natuur12 (talk) 15:27, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
Author claimed is in the photo. BaseSat (talk) 17:45, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- nope --Ilya (talk) 18:26, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Perission from the photographer is missing Natuur12 (talk) 15:35, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
Book cover, unused, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:31, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- Hello,
- I don't know. The cover is from the edition of 1949, because it is the copy I own, but it is the same as the first edition of 1914.
- I have already deleted the sound files. If you insist on deleting this, go on.
- Flopinot2012 (talk) 10:29, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:13, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
Duplicate of another file uploaded already on Wikipedia Kj1595 (talk) 12:22, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- Keep The file is used in it.wiki. Also, the replacement file is not shown. Taivo (talk) 18:41, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- delete I assume licence isn't correct --Albinfo (talk) 18:59, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
Kept: And why is this license incorrect? Natuur12 (talk) 15:23, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
It's a poor replica of an existing file uploaded on Wikipedia. Kj1595 (talk) 12:15, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Kept: in use --Krd 18:51, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
No reason to believe this image is freely licensed. It was just downloaded from a website where users can upload material without much concerns about copyrights. Damiens.rf 16:32, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Note: I have blanked out a grossly inappropriate personal attack left by Mercy11 from this page. The comment did not in any way address the matter at hand. —LX (talk, contribs) 10:15, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete absent OTRS proof it is licensed correctly as per COM:L . LGA talkedits 04:08, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:33, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 1Veertje as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: complex logo -- Steinsplitter (talk) 12:26, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- I don't get te conversion to a DR, it's fairly straight forward I think. --Vera (talk) 13:44, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Complex logo Natuur12 (talk) 15:24, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
Personal picture , out of Project Scope.
Amitie 10g (talk) 03:49, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:13, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not free. It's a picture of a logo. Damiens.rf 16:36, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Note: I have blanked out a grossly inappropriate personal attack left by Mercy11 from this page. The comment did not in any way address the matter at hand. While the tone of the following part is also inappropriate, I've let it stand because it's got at least some connection to the topic. —LX (talk, contribs) 10:56, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Oh, yeah, and how does this poor soul know "its a picture of a logo"? Just because the poor soul say its a logo, that doesn't make it a logo. If the poor soul had any skills other than making frustrated delete nominations, the poor soul would had found it is simply a derivative of THIS CC-BY-SA. Mercy11 (talk) 23:43, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
- Please comment on the matter at hand rather than on the person making the nomination and what you think of their "soul". Commons:De minimis#Crops of de minimis images explains the problem with your actual argument. —LX (talk, contribs) 10:59, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
- Oh, yeah, and how does this poor soul know "its a picture of a logo"? Just because the poor soul say its a logo, that doesn't make it a logo. If the poor soul had any skills other than making frustrated delete nominations, the poor soul would had found it is simply a derivative of THIS CC-BY-SA. Mercy11 (talk) 23:43, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: com:DW of a copyrigtable logo. Natuur12 (talk) 15:34, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Uploader claims that this document by WWII soldier József Lenz is his own work. However, he elsewhere claims to be the grandson of a woman born in 1924, making the claim of authoring a war diary in 1942 preposterous. In short, the uploader cannot be the author of this work, and we have no evidence of permission from the author. Psychonaut (talk) 08:44, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:15, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: non-free memorial plaque from 1992. Eleassar (t/p) 11:53, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- Keep "Slovene copyright" doesn't allow commercial use of the reproduction of the plaque. I am eager to know the person who is capable of making money by selling my photo of the plaque :) --Hladnikm (talk) 16:31, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- Someone who would write a book about Slovene poets that included this photo? --Eleassar (t/p) 09:51, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: You must be able to make commercial use of the file or else it is not comatable for commons Natuur12 (talk) 15:21, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
copyvio via http://usatodaysportsimages.com/preview/4331193 (2009, USA TODAY Sports-Archive © Mark J. Rebilas) = http://usatodaysportsimages.com/preview/4331193 = (thumb) http://usatodaysportsimages.com/image/thumb/350-350/4331193.jpg or http://usatodaysportsimages.com/image/thumb/800-800/4331193.jpg (watermarked)
Gunnex (talk) 12:50, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- Batch task error. Sould be copyvio. Anyway... nominating also:
- unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, considering also logs (4 uploads, 1x copyvio, 2x copyvio per above). Gunnex (talk) 13:01, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:25, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
An Italian Air Force C-27J operated by Reparto Sperimentale Volo (see badge on tail) during early certification work, it is one of the prototypes hence Spartan logo on tail, image unlikely to have been taken by the United States Air Force and more probably an Alenia publicity image. Note serial number is CSX62127 MilborneOne (talk) 19:09, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
- Comment: Come on, is it really all that uncommon for the U.S. Air Force to photograph other planes? Here's at least one other counterexample: File:CV9035_assessment_(cropped).jpg. Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 05:47, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
- The original image caption was: "The 179th Airlift Wing in Mansfield, Ohio, an Ohio National Guard unit, will be the first unit to convert to C-27J Spartan operations. (Air Force)." Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 05:47, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: probably ok FASTILY 22:40, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
This was previously closed as "probably ok", but that is not the same as "definitely is ok". There is zero evidence that this is the work of the US government. Being published in a US government is not the same as authorship by the US government. Unless a definitive author can be ascertained, this image needs to be deleted. russavia (talk) 03:34, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- I don't have subscriber access, but I do believe AF Times credited it to the U.S. Air Force. That's all I need. Mark Schierbecker (talk) 19:52, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete The AF Times source dates to 2010. That image from 2003 (according to the EXIF ) also exists in the product image gallery at Alenia Aermacchi in slightly higher resolution (700×466px) as larger file size (446kB):[3]. EXIF indicates the image was created in 2003, edited with Adobe Photoshop in 2007. AF Times is not the original source; here is an article from 2008 using the same image and crediting it as "© Alenia Aeronautica". I see no reason whatsoever to think this was a USAF photo. It's not even a USAF plane; doesn't the red-white-green circle indicate Italy? Lupo 08:24, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
![[3]](http://www.aleniaaermacchi.it/en-US/Media/Lists/PhotogalleryHomePageStructureList/fotoLo63.jpg){kind=link}
deleted: As per Lupo. Natuur12 (talk) 15:14, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
por que es de mi autoridad, creado por mi y lo quiro eliminar ya que es la imagen de una marca comercial y a sido rediseñada Saviansa (talk) 16:36, 29 April 2014 (UTC) SAVIANSA VENEZOLANA DE VIAJES.jpg (archivo) 59 KB Saviansa Reverted to version as of 03:31, 3 July 2013 Sí 22:15 25 dic 2013 SAVIANSA VENEZOLANA DE VIAJES.jpg (archivo) 267 KB Saviansa Opreadora de viajes de venezuela fundada en mayo del 2013 No 03:31 3 jul 2013 SAVIANSA VENEZOLANA DE VIAJES.jpg (archivo) 59 KB Saviansa User created page with UploadWizard No 14:21 19 jun 2013 SAVIANSA.jpg (arc
Kept: PD-textlogo Natuur12 (talk) 15:34, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
"Palias" ist eine Verschreibung, die File mit dem richtigen Namen: File: Cantakukuruz (talk) 10:22, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
"Palias" ist eine Verschreibung, die File desselben Urhebers mit dem richtigen Namen: File:Palais Saurau.jpg existiert bereits.--Cantakukuruz (talk) 10:23, 29 April 2014 (UTC) Cantakukuruz (talk) 10:23, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- The file must be renamed, not deleted[4] --217.246.208.242 19:21, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- I have the delete request removed --217.246.208.242 19:26, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- The file must be renamed, not deleted[4] --217.246.208.242 19:21, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
![[4]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Palias_Saurau_Sporgasse_Graz.jpg&diff=122628490&oldid=122582748){kind=link}
Kept: Just ask a rename Natuur12 (talk) 15:18, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
copy right violation, see http://www.njuz.net/drzava-i-rfzo-prave-registar-predlagaca-glupih-zakona/ Atlasowa (talk) 14:36, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- Kako njuz.net može da ima ikakva prava na ovu sliku, molim vas da mi to objasnite?!? localhost_011 (talk)
- (How njuz.net can have any rights to this image, please explain it to me??)
- Hello localhost_011, njuz.net uses the same picture in a higher resolution and already in December 2013. And 7. jun 2013 [5]. But the file information here says that the photo was taken in April 2014 by Jelena Jovanović - something is wrong here. Can you explain? Who took the photo and when, really? Only this person, the photographer, can agree to the CC by-sa/3.0 license, so that the picture can be uploaded to commons. I am sorry if i am misunderstanding. Can you clarify, please? --Atlasowa (talk) 14:55, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: No free license available Natuur12 (talk) 15:27, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
Works by Maillol become PD only at January 1, 2015. As the original is located indoors, it's hardly covered by Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Poland. Image can be undeleted from January 1, 2015 on. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:11, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- Keep, there are no restrictions to take photos in a museum, considered as public space then, some reproductions of this sculpture were in public domain in Soviet countries, copyright for the sculpture itself will expire soon. Vert (talk) 12:39, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: No evidence that a museum is a public place. Natuur12 (talk) 15:18, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sathjeevan raj (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photos with little educational value per COM:EDUSE and COM:NOTHOST. Please also delete the image that has been moved to File:Sathjeevan raj user pic.jpg as well as the original file. After deletion, please protect File:My pics.jpg from future uploads, unless there is a generic image that can be hosted there. I have not nominated File:സത്ജീവൻ.jpg because it appears to be in use on the uploader's ml-wiki account, but I'm not sure of its educational value unless the user does something other than edit his userpage.
- File:Sathjeevan full.jpg
- File:Inner.jpg
- File:Sathjeevan.jpg
- File:My pics.jpg which is now a redirect to File:Sathjeevan raj user pic.jpg
Green Giant supports NonFreeWiki (talk) 11:36, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:20, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
Bitte diese Bilddatei löschen. Sie ist mein eigenes Werk. Ich habe inzwischen eine neue und bessere Bilddatei von diesem Objekt hochgeladen (und eingebunden). LoisJAbel (talk) 18:29, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Bitte diese Bilddatei löschen. Ich habe inzwischen eine neue und bessere Bilddatei von diesem Objekt hochgeladen (und eingebunden). --LoisJAbel (talk) 17:50, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by Fastily JuTa 09:03, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sultanbayeva Gulmyra (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal images outside of COM:SCOPE. Images (except for family) are only in use on user's self-promotional user page. Uploader has made few to no edits on anything in the project other than their self-promotional user page.
- File:Zhour Wiki.JPG
- File:Hongkong PP.jpg
- File:Kozhakeev okulary.jpg
- File:Pulitzer Hongkong.jpg
- File:Family S.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:09, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. File:Hongkong PP.jpg is an excellent image of Pulitzer Prize winners Paige St. John and Craig F. Walker, which, as can be seen, have articles on the English Wikipedia. File:Pulitzer Hongkong.jpg is not as good a shot but includes those two and two other Pulitzer Prize winners Sara Ganim, and Clifford J. Levy each also with an article. They're from the 2012 Hong Kong Baptist University 5th Annual Pulitzer Prize Winners Workshop, as can be seen by just reading the English language name badge on Walker's shirt and the prominent English language sign in the photo, even if you can't read the Kazakh label on the photo. These are fine contributions, very useful to the encyclopedia, the St. John, Walker, and Levy articles don't even have photos yet, and Ganim doesn't have a very good one, I'm going to add at least the first three there soon. File:Kozhakeev okulary.jpg and File:Zhour Wiki.JPG are apparently a student Wikipedia club at Hong Kong Baptist University which aren't as valuable, but are at least theoretically encyclopedic. Considering those nothing wrong with also including a personal and a family photo. And as for those, there is nothing at all suspicious with having rights to a personal photo taken by a family member; I've sure we've all got hundreds. --GRuban (talk) 00:01, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
- @GRuban: thank you for the clarifications but the important question is who took the photos? It isn't relevant that it might have been a member of their family. If that can be clarified then I would be happy to support keeping the photos. Green Giant (talk) 23:23, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
- She took the photos. Gulmyra Sultanbaeva. Says so right on the tin. All except the self-titled one and the family shot (File:Sultanbayeva Gulmyra.jpg, File:Family S.jpg), naturally, and those ones we can assume good faith that she has the rights to (yes, technically she marked them "own work" as well, but she's not the most experienced user and "it's a work for hire that I own the rights to" doesn't appear as an Upload Wizard option). They're clearly "department store family portrait studio" work, and it's a fair assumption that the fee comes with a rights transfer. You'll notice she doesn't appear in the others. --GRuban (talk) 09:35, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
- "Department store family portrait studio" is exactly the problem here. Too many photos of people, claimed by people as own work when clearly they either used a timer or someone else took the photo. I'm happy to support keeping personal photos as long as the source is changed to reflect the fact that it isn't "own work". Just because hundereds of other users might have done the same, does not mean it automatically becomes OK. If I see such photos I am not going to hesitate to drop the uploader a note and if they don't respond, I'm going to nominate for deletion. Based on those two, I am going to accept that the older lady that appears in four of the photos is either a family member or a friend of the user. With regard to the notability of some of the people in the other photos, I change my opinion to:
- File:Zhour Wiki.JPG - Delete because there is no clear educational value to the photo
- File:Hongkong PP.jpg - Keep per the notable people identified by GRuban
- File:Kozhakeev okulary.jpg - Delete because there is no clear educational value to the photo
- File:Pulitzer Hongkong.jpg - Keep per the notable people identified by GRuban
- File:Family S.jpg - Delete as a family photo that does not fit the COM:SCOPE criteria of being of themselves.
- Green Giant (talk) 11:03, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
- She took the photos. Gulmyra Sultanbaeva. Says so right on the tin. All except the self-titled one and the family shot (File:Sultanbayeva Gulmyra.jpg, File:Family S.jpg), naturally, and those ones we can assume good faith that she has the rights to (yes, technically she marked them "own work" as well, but she's not the most experienced user and "it's a work for hire that I own the rights to" doesn't appear as an Upload Wizard option). They're clearly "department store family portrait studio" work, and it's a fair assumption that the fee comes with a rights transfer. You'll notice she doesn't appear in the others. --GRuban (talk) 09:35, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: As above Natuur12 (talk) 15:35, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE, Commons is not a personal photographic gallery. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:03, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. Photo of contributor, we allow contributors to put their own photos on their own user page. --GRuban (talk) 09:32, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Keep because Gruban has identified this as the user in other uploads by this user. One personal photo is acceptable but for the sake of consistency the user needs to fix the summary to state who took the photo, even if it was their pet gerbil. Green Giant (talk) 11:54, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Discription is not fixed and this looks like a photograph made by a professional photographer so deleted this one under the com:PCP Natuur12 (talk) 15:34, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: non-free memorial. Eleassar (t/p) 11:55, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Oh god, again ... Eleassar has been already blocked due to excessive deletion requests. --Hladnikm (talk) 16:32, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- And promptly unblocked by other (uninvolved) admins. The relief is certainly not simple enough to be uncopyrightable. --Eleassar (t/p) 16:42, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: You must be able to make commercial use of the file or else it is not comatable for commons Natuur12 (talk) 15:21, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 1Veertje as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: complex logo Krd 19:06, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- Keep, it's a too simple logo consisting of simple text and shapes / ceci est un logo trop simple comprenant de texte et des formes simples. Cordially, Romain Rousseau (talk) 22:41, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete The Crown and the ornament before the A are definatly original enough to have a copyright of their own. Natuur12 (talk) 13:52, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
- Comment : I can also crop the logo to only show the text of Ahold.--Romain Rousseau (talk) 19:12, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: probably too complex for Commons. should be uploaded locally under fair use FASTILY 04:27, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
