User talk:Joseolgon/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Image Tagging Image:Igreja_S._Sebastiao.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Igreja_S._Sebastiao.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Zzyzx11 16:57, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
- Oh, now I see what you did: You accidentally removed all that information when you added [[Category:Churches of Braga]] to the page. It has been fixed. Thanks. Zzyzx11 18:31, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Igrega_de_São_Paulo_Braga.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
Joseolgon 08:21, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
Hello. Am a young wikipedian so where can I get advice from. Ariana Michi (talk) 18:40, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Categorias
Vi que criaste a Category:Viana do Castelo train station. Sempre que criar categorias prefira o formato com preposições, ou seja "Train station of Viana do Castelo". Um abraço, Dantadd✉ 18:55, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 02:37, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
Pay attention to copyright | File:Umberto II Italy.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. For images, you may find Commons:Image casebook useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.
|
-User:G.dallorto (talk) 19:44, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
Umberto II
Hallo. In order to be free from any copy-rights, on WikiCOmmons we must have three things for an object:
1) the permission from the artist who created the object if s/he is alive, or of his/her heirs if he has not been dead for at least 70 years. (If the artist has been dead for at least 70 years, the permission is authomatic: the work is in the "Public Domain").
2) the permission of the person who took the picture. In this case, the picture was taken by you, therefore if you give us the permission, this is ok.
3) In some cases, we also need the permission of the owner, if the work is privately hold, but this varies from country to country. As a rule, after 70 years any work of art is free form ANY copyright. Further claims about it have no legal ground. But certain restrictions may apply locally.
In our case, we have (2) and (3). What we are missing is (1), which is the most important thing, because intellectual propriety belongs to the artist of a painting, not to the person who bought it, nor to the sitter which is portrayed in it. Even a museum needs the permission from the artist to publish reproductions of his work. If your museum bought this permission already, then a written declaration for WikiCommons from the museum to be entitled to authorise the publication of the works of that painters will suffice to comply with point 1 as well. So please ask the museum: even if the picture is currently deleted, if the permissin arrives, it can be undeleted in minutes: see for this, this page: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Undeletion_requests ).
And if the museums wants to make itself better known thorugh WikiCommons, we all are very happy to help them: we exist for this reason, in fact: to spread and share knowledge.
I agree on the fact that works of art exist to be admired. But our legislators think the opposite, and since 20 years ago they created stricter and stricter laws making it more and more difficult to publish a reproduction of a work of art, because they want to make money also from works of art whose copyright elapsed long time ago. However, unless we change the law, we have to comply with it. And in our case, either you get the permission from the painter's heirs, or you are not allowed to publish his paintings (ANY of his paintings, not only the Umberto II one, sorry). Please note that the rule says that AS A DEFAULT RULE you may NOT reproduce any copyrighted work, unless you have a permission. In other words, it's you who must demonstrate you have a permission, not the copyright owner who must demostrate you have it not.
Best wishes. --User:G.dallorto (talk) 19:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
You're not right. This is not icons (Orthodox objects of art) but paintings (Catholic). Miniature in the book also can't be "icon" - icons are on the wood plank. --Shakko (talk) 10:15, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
Inscripciones del Museo D. Diego Sousa
Me pondré a clasificar esas inscripciones lo más rápido que pueda.
Un cordial saludo --scutum (talk) 10:07, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Contacto
Preciso de entrar em contacto consigo, pelo que ficaria muito grato se me enviasse uma mensagem para que possa ver o seu endereço e-mail. Por favor escreva umas linhas para lusodana@gmail.com--Lusodana (talk) 07:47, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
GFreihalter (talk) 04:16, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
Hattingen is NOT in Austria
Please note that Hattingen is a German city. I'm referring to your pretty wrong categorizing of for instance File:Hattingen - St Georg in 04 ies.jpg. -- Ies (talk) 18:56, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
Please don't blank pages
Hi Joseolgon,
Thank you for your contributions to Commons. I noticed you blanked Category:Houses in the Alentejo on Commons. If you meant for the page to be deleted, blanking the page is not the right way to do this. A simple real-world comparison to illustrate: You removed the entire text of a page from a thick folder, but the then empty, useless page itself remained in the folder.
Please use {{speedy| type reason here }}
and add it on top of the page you would like to have deleted; This way it will be placed on a special list that administrators check regularly for deletion. Without this it might take a long time before it's noticed.
For redirects use #REDIRECT[[Target]]
or {{category redirect|Targetcategoryname}}
. For more information please read Blanking. Thanks again. –Krinkletalk 01:42, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
Wikimedia Commons Language Rules
Sr. Joseolgon. Peço que desistes de converter os nomos para Português. A regra da Wikimedia indica o uso de lingua inglês em nomes das categorias. Os nomes dos sitios nos Açores já estão definidos em inglês, e o "redirect" para o variant português é controversial.Ruben JC (Zeorymer) (talk) 14:14, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
- I refer to the following policy guidelines as spelled out in Wikimedia guide:
Wikimedia Commons is a multilingual project. This page contains the project's policy on how multilingual content is used, and what content should be in which language.
- Descriptions at galleries, categories and file description pages can be in any language and should be added in multiple languages. The use of language templates is encouraged to reduce the amount of unnecessary information and visual clutter.
- Gallery names should generally be in the local language. See Commons:Galleries for the exact policy.
- Category names should generally be in English. See Commons:Categories for the exact policy. See also the proposal of Naming categories.
- Creator names should be in form most commonly found in English literature.
- Files can be named in any language. The name of the file should be descriptive. See Commons:File naming for the exact policy.
- Templates can be made in any language. When the text of a template is available in multiple languages, the English version is the authoritative version on which other language versions of the template should be based.
- Policies and guidelines should be written in English and translated to other languages. The English version of the policy or guideline is the authoritative version on which other language versions should be based.
Guidelines are specifically located here: Commons:Language policy Ruben JC (Zeorymer) (talk) 14:40, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
Validação de imagens WLM
Olá Joseolgon, reparei que tens estado a interagir com algumas das imagens que foram carregadas no Wiki Loves Monuments 2011, a categorizar, por exemplo. Nós temos uma ferramenta que trata melhor disso, e de maneira mais rápida. Estarias interessado em nos ajudar a validar as imagens? São uma grande quantidade e bem precisamos ajuda.... manda-me um e-mail via Special:Emailuser/Nuno Tavares por favor, para que te possa enviar as instruções. -- Nuno Tavares ☜ PT 15:01, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
Edifícios de Portugal
Joseolgon. Please do not remove the chapels, churches and other buildings from their root designation: since there is no "by name" way of discovery, it makes it hard for anyone to find a buildin specifically by its name. I refer to "Chapels in Portugal", "Churches in Portugal", etc., where you removed those designations from several chapels/churches. A user going to the "Churches by Portugal" section can not find a "church by name" without going into subcategories that may be unfamiliar to them. Ruben JC (Zeorymer) (talk) 09:28, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 17:15, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Carvalhicas.jpg was uncategorized on 17 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 17:15, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
Eliminação de Categorias
Oi, eu queria saber qual a razão por isso retiraram todas as categorias minha imagem?
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Lisbon_-_Vasco_da_Gama_tower.jpg
Foi porque ele não é considerado uma torre, mas um hotel?
Categorias eliminado: Category:Portugal Category:Towers Category:Towers between 100 and 149 meters Category:Lisbon Category:Vasco da Gama
Espero sua resposta para não cometer mais erros Obrigado, cumprimentos. --Paolo Costa (talk) 15:46, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
Categorias
Caro José Gonçalves. Muito obrigado por me ajudar nas categorias das minhas imagens; isto da wikipedia é muito complicado e ainda estou a tentar perceber como funciona. Devo entretanto assinalar que o Abel Manta da foto de que fiz upload é o pintor nascido em 1888, pai do arquitecto, caricaturista e pintor João Abel Manta (é muito frequente a confusão dos nomes). Não sei a função exacta da categorização... mas se funcionar de modo semelhante às palavras chave talvez fosse útil (?) fazer também a categorização em inglês e/ou usando outros conceitos, como Artista Português... etc.(?). Aguardo notícias suas. Abraço. Manuelvbotelho (talk) 22:49, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
Theatro Circo Door handle (3).JPG
Joseolgon
a quick question, is this handle made of brass?
Yes I think Joseolgon (talk) 07:07, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
rgds Ringpicker (talk) 05:29, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
File:Anel de Direito.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
GrapedApe (talk) 14:02, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
Lugar dos Afectos (Aveiro)
Prezado Joseolgon, Quando e se possível poderia abrir-me uma categoria para o Lugar dos Afectos, em Aveiro (Portugal), de modo a reunir-lhe as imagens? Grato, Carlos Luis Cruz (talk) 21:13, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
- Muito obrigado, e bem haja! Boas edições, Carlos Luis Cruz (talk) 08:50, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
File:Anel de Direito.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
GrapedApe (talk) 12:10, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
Categories of victims, fatalities, deaths
Categories of victims, fatalities, deaths has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
--ŠJů (talk) 19:45, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
Category:Perseus and Andromeda and Category:Ruggiero rescuing Angelica] are kind of cross-referenced to each other, but it's best not to put images of one category in the other... AnonMoos (talk) 23:12, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
Imagens históricas
Olá! Reparei que acrescentaste Category:Historical images of Braga a uma foto velhinha do “bonde” a vapor (sim, à brasileira, por que «elétrico a vapor» é um oxímoro!) e pus-me a pensar hmm, mas quão antiga tem de ser uma foto para ser histórica? E depois reparei nesta foto, que é a preto e branco e mostra um local histórico, mas foi tirada em 2004…
Acho que fica melhor classificar as imagens por século/década/ano em que foram obtidas, e deixar o utilizador escolher. Claro que isso ia pulverizar as imgens por categorias escassissimamente povoadas, mas tenho a certeza q em 18 milhões de ítens há ainda muitos sobre Braga (e sobre bondes e tantas outras coisas) que ainda não foram categorizados. Ou seja: Há que trabalhar, é o que é! :-)
-- Tuválkin ✉ 23:50, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
- Ups, 2004 é a digitalização, a foto é de 1954. Mas a verdade é que 50 anos em Braga, em termos de antiguidade, é trocos! ;-) -- Tuválkin ✉ 23:51, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Category:Bridges_over_Tagus_River has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Geo Swan (talk) 23:58, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
A Brasileira has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
-- Tuválkin ✉ 23:55, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
File:Rio Lima - Almada Negreiros.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
JuTa 09:08, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
Miscategorization
Olá José. Just to let you know that you miscategorized File:Praia de Santa Maria.JPG as a beach from Brazil. In fact, it is in Cape Verde. Cheers, Waldir talk 15:03, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
ThanksJoseolgon (talk) 15:12, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
Edições estranhas
Olá Joseolgon,
Porquê estas edições estranhas, e aparentemente desprovidas de qualquer lógica? Talvez uma confusão entre o monumento ao Infante e a estátua que é parte desse monumento?
-- Darwin Ahoy! 10:37, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
Category:Statues of figure skaters filled with other types of skaters
Hi there, I see you added several statues of speed skaters and long distance skaters to Category:Statues of figure skaters. Would you please undo these changes? If you cannot find good categories for these files, please create some new ones. --Judithcomm (talk) 14:36, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
Mãe de Água
Olá Joseolgon. O que e exactamente uma "mãe de água? https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sete_Fontes_aqueduto_e_mae_de_agua.JPG. E fora to contexto cultural português, o que seria isso em inglês? Grato. Rui Gabriel Correia (talk) 17:08, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
File:Postman Pat.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Elisardojm (talk) 13:06, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Original Barnstar | |
Olá José Gonçalves como vai? Encontrei uma imagem da estátua de Eça de Queiroz na cidade de Póvoa de Varzim, gostaria de publicá-la em um livro paradidático que terá uma versão de Primo Basílio da Editora Moderna no Brasil. Você pode entrar em contato comigo? marciasato1000@gmail.com Obrigada Marcia Sato (talk) 11:11, 11 April 2015 (UTC) |
Views of Torre de Belém has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
JotaCartas (talk) 03:31, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
File:Disneyland Paris in 2014.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:23, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Category:Sculptures in province of Salamanca has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. |
JT Curses (talk) 20:46, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Josve05a (talk) 11:42, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
Wikimedia Commons has a specific topic
Motopark (talk) 03:15, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Josve05a (talk) 19:45, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
File:Museu do Brinquedo Português 38.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ras67 (talk) 13:55, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
File:Maria Belem 2016.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Darwin Ahoy! 00:20, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Exposição Espadas e Capacetes
Em Julho de 2012 foste a uma exposição no castelo de braga, como se chamava e foi exactamente aonde? --Threeohsix (talk) 19:36, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
- A exposição foi na torre de menagem de Braga, promovida pelo regimento de cavalaria 6 de Braga. Há muitos militares que colecionam este tipo de artefactos de defesa e bélicos e assim organizaram a exposição. Creio que a maior parte dos objectos são propriedade de privados, muitos militares e ex-militares. Obrigado Joseolgon (talk) 21:28, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
- Pequena investigação descobri que foi a colecção de armas de Manuel Francisco de Araújo, logo criei Category:Arms collection of Manuel Francisco de Araújo--Threeohsix (talk) 23:05, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
File:Eiffel Tower in 2014 (5).JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
That's all I'm programmed to do! 🍺💲🚬 11:38, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
File:Eiffel Tower in 2014 (5).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:54, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Disney Paris 1994 (2).jpg
- File:Disney Paris 1994 (3).jpg
- File:Disney Paris 1994 (4).jpg
- File:Disney Paris 1994 (6).jpg
- File:Disney Paris 1994 (7).jpg
Yours sincerely, Elisfkc (talk) 18:03, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
File:Disney Paris 1994 (5).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Elisfkc (talk) 18:03, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:05, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.
You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.
Thank you!
Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey
Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.
If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks!
Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey
Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.
If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement.
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Thesupermat (talk) 13:14, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
Meet?
Olá, José. Tenho-me "cruzado" várias vezes contigo aqui pelo Commons, e lembrei-me de te perguntar se gostarias de nos encontrarmos para um café um dia destes. Que dizes? Abraço, Waldir talk 14:00, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
Catarina de Bragança
Isto ficava melhor na Wikipédia. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 17:15, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Female politicians of Portugal has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Darwin Ahoy! 18:01, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:55, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
Dozens of inaccurate categories
You have added dozens of images to Category:Palmyra Atoll (e.g. File:Corl0215 (28034598531).jpg). I am going thru them now and fixing them but please, please look at your old edits to see if you've done this again. You've created a lot of work for someone else. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:31, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
- Falas ingles? Espanhol? —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:59, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey
Hi Joseolgon/Archive 1,
The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 01:15, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Reminder: Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey
Hi Joseolgon/Archive 1,
A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 15:24, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Reminder: Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey
Hi Joseolgon/Archive 1,
There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 20:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
Need your presence at Featured video candidates
We request the honor of your presence at Featured video candidates | ||
Dear Joseolgon, Are you Interested in Film Making/Videography/Cinematography or Animated films? . Featured video candidates needs your help and you can help by reviewing , nominating your videos for the FV Tag. You can start reviewing/nominating videos now. Welcome ! -- Eatcha (talk) 08:06, 22 October 2019 (UTC) |
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Elisfkc (talk) 20:08, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Elisfkc (talk) 20:09, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Elisfkc (talk) 20:10, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Elisfkc (talk) 20:12, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
D. Sebastião no Rossio
Boas notícias! Podes atualizar esta informação também em pt:Estação Ferroviária do Rossio, pf? -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 23:01, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, DCB (talk) 22:05, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, DCB (talk) 22:09, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
File:Camillo - 1913 - Diogo de Macedo.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.
|
User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : JotaCartas.
I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 08:40, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
File:Busto de Abel Cardoso-André Pereira 1938.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Túrelio (talk) 18:52, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:2004 in Romania (66).jpg
- File:2004 in Romania (67).jpg
- File:2004 in Romania (68).jpg
- File:2004 in Romania (71).jpg
- File:2004 in Romania (72).jpg
- File:2004 in Romania (73).jpg
Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:52, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Ras67 (talk) 18:13, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
File:2004 in Romania (76).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 02:03, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:55, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:44, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Howhontanozaz (talk) 20:14, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
File:Vinha de Alvaredo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Missvain (talk) 00:28, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:00, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
Taken with DJI FC1102 in Portugal has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
RZuo (talk) 08:09, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
File:Rua Irmão Roby.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 03:12, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
File copyright status
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons. While everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the project, one or more of your file uploads had missing or false information regarding its source and copyright status. Please note that Wikimedia Commons takes copyright rules and infringement very seriously. Files may only be uploaded and included if their copyright status meets the conditions stated in our licensing policy, and if their source is clearly documented. Files that fail to meet those conditions may be deleted, and users who fail to meet them may be blocked. Please follow our first steps, if you haven't already. If you have questions, feel free to ask at the Village Pump copyright question page or on my talk page. Thank you. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 03:23, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
Category change
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:United_States_Minor_Outlying_Islands https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Minor_Outlying_Islands Both need the category "Dependent territories in North America" changing to "Dependent territories in the Caribbean" due to Navassa Island being in the Caribbean.TBAG654321 (talk) 22:33, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Statues in the Pergamonmuseum has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Mharrsch (talk) 14:36, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
File:Academia do Braga 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Hamikos (talk) 16:20, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
File:Fão 2023 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
JustVixo (talk) 20:42, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
File:Fão 2023 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
JustVixo (talk) 20:42, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
File:Fão 2023 5.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
JustVixo (talk) 20:44, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
File:Fão 2023 5.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
JustVixo (talk) 20:44, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 17:00, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
File:O Bom Pastor - António Soares 1939.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
『白猫』Обг. 16:34, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:23, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 02:56, 4 November 2023 (UTC)