User talk:Manuelvbotelho

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Manuelvbotelho!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- 18:11, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Manuelvbotelho!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:59, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Manuel Botelho, Slow March, 2012, installation view, Laboratório das Artes, Guimarães, Portugal.jpg was uncategorized on 2 February 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:59, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Carlos Botelho, 1957.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 23:54, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Manuel Botelho CAM FCG 2005 installation view 1.jpg

File:Manuel Botelho CAM FCG 2005 installation view 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:38, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Carlos Botelho, 1971.jpg

File:Carlos Botelho, 1971.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:56, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright issues

I am sorry for the nuisance of this, but although your user name is the same as the artist, Manuel Botelho, we have no way of knowing whether User:Manuelvbotelho is actually the artist Manuel Botelho. We frequently get people who open accounts in notable actors or artists names in order to upload copyrighted material.

In order to protect the artist's copyright we require that he give Commons an appropriate license to use the various images of his work that you have uploaded. Please use the procedure at Commons:OTRS for this. The e-mail should come from manuelvbotelho(at)fba.ul.pt or another address connected with the artist. E-mails from accounts at g-mail or other anonymous places will not be acceptable.

Also, I note that you uploaded File:Carlos Botelho, Lisbon, 1957.jpg after the same image was deleted as File:Carlos Botelho, 1957.jpg. This is a serious violation of Commons rules. If you believe that an image has been incorrectly deleted, you may post a request at Commons:Undeletion requests, but you may not simply upload it again with the same or a different name. It appears that the first time you uploaded it you said that it was an old photograph and the author was unknown. The second time you said it was your own work. Since the artist Manuel Botelho was age 7 in 1957, that seems unlikely. It is also a serious violation of our rules to deliberately misstate the history of an image.

Finally, I assume that there is a family connection between Carlos and Manuel. Neither Carlos Botelho (painter) nor Manuel Botelho mentions the connection. It would be a good addition to both articles if it is correct.

Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 17:04, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dear James

Yes. I am Carlos Botelho's grandson. I am an artist: Manuel Botelho. I was very close to my granfather. We lived in the same building since I was 5, and I believe I was present when the 1957 picture was taken. I can't remember too well or who else was there!:Manuelvbotelho (talk) 17:19, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thank you for a quick reply. First, as I said above, you will need to send a license for the images of your own work to Commons using the procedure at Commons:OTRS. I know this is a nuisance, but I hope that you understand that that is the way that we confirm that you are actually the artist -- we do it to protect your copyright. If you intend to upload more images in the future, it can be a general permission:

"This license covers all images of the work of Manuel Botelho uploaded in the past and the future by User:Manuelvbotelho."

If you want to cover only the past uploads, then you should list them individually:

As for the images of your grandfather, unless you can get licenses for them from the actual photographers, we cannot keep them.

Finally, you should clarify the author of the images of other artists that you have uploaded. Are you actually the photographer of all of these?

Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 17:41, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dear James. I am the author of the photographs of my own works I uploaded. An also of Sá Nogueira (my former teacher and friend), João Abel Manta (former father in law), Abel Manta and Clementina Carneiro de Moura (my first wife's grandparents). An I certainly took the 1971 photo of my grandfather: it was actually published, during his lifetime, in one of his books and my name is mentioned - Botelho. Artistas Portugueses: Ed. S.E.I.T. (it is not a very important publication, and for that reason I didn't include it in Botelho's bibliography. In any case, there is no reaso whatsoever for you to delete this photograph. I am a serious contributer to wikipedia and wikimedia, although I'm still trying to find the right way of dealing with this highly confusing universe.Manuelvbotelho (talk) 17:49, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK, so I think we will delete the 1957 photo and keep the 1971 photo of your grandfather. What about the other artists?

As for your own artwork, the issue is not the copyright in the photos, it is the copyright in your artwork. I know it may seem silly, but our rule is that we Assume Good Faith when you say you are the photographer, but we require OTRS confirmation when we are hosting images of the copyrighted works of a notable artist.

Finally, please reply here -- it is almost universal on Commons that we keep conversations in one place. This page is on my watch list, so that I will see anything you post here, at least for the next week or two. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 17:56, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. I am the author of all the photos of my own work. I'm writing a new e-mail, and I just hope it will solve all this.Manuelvbotelho (talk) 18:01, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

E-mail sent. Please let me know if it's ok. And please let me know why you deleted Carlos Botelho's page on wikimedia. I don't mind, but this puzzles me. Because on top of it all, there is someone else using that very same name on a wikimedia page.Manuelvbotelho (talk) 18:21, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted Carlos Botelho, (painter), as I said in the edit comment, because it was a gallery with only a single image in it. Do I understand correctly that Carlos Botelho is not related to you?

I must leave my desk now, so please do not expect more before tomorrow. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 18:27, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The other Carlos Botelho born 1964 is not related to us.Manuelvbotelho (talk) 18:30, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

To avoid any further misunderstandings, I am the author of the following photographs:

I am also the author of all the works of art pictured in:

Manuelvbotelho (talk) 19:07, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have added the appropriate OTRS reference to each of the files and closed the DRs. Thank you for your rapid response to this problem. If, as you are "still trying to find the right way of dealing with this highly confusing universe", you have more questions, please do not hesitate to ask. We appreciate it very much when notable artists license their work to Commons and would like to make it as easy as possible. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 23:33, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A million thanks. Regarding Carlos Botelho 1957 photo, let me explain. I started taking photographs systematically around 1968; my grandfather is in many of them, but he was 69 already. I wanted his image as a younger man on the Wikipedia pages. No one knows who took the 1957 photo and it has been published time and again; for what I know, it might even be in the public domain in Portugal (?). The copyright issue is a nightmare. It is killing the Wikimedia and Wikipedia art section. Something should be done to avoid this (in the Portuguese Wikipedia they don’t even allow the fair use of images!).Manuelvbotelho (talk) 08:26, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I sometimes have mixed feelings about copyright, but usually come down on the side of the artist. Remember that we are careful with copyright in order to protect you, the artist. How would you like it if anyone could take a photograph of any of your works in a museum, upload it here at high resolution, and then have posters of it selling all over the world with no royalty to you or the museum and no attribution? Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:08, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You are right. I know. But there might be a way to circumvent this (Fair Use seems better than nothing). You are so kind to offer your help! I have a few further questions:

1 - Is it possible to create a new page on my grandfather (or reopen the old one)? Can I do it? Can you?
2 – Since there is already a page entitled Carlos Botelho on Wikimedia (which is very confusing, and doesn’t match what happens on Wikipedia), how should I name the page so that people can find the original Carlos Botelho (1899-1982)?
3 – It would be very important to have images on the Carlos Botelho Wikipedia pages (particularly the Portuguese one), but this copyright problem is preventing me from doing so. What can I do? My father is nearly 89 years old knows nothing about the Internet, and this licensing business seems like Kafka to me.

Many thanks.Manuelvbotelho (talk) 12:24, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

1) First, start with a category. I have moved

Category:Carlos Botelho to
Category:Carlos Botelho (1964 - ), and created
Category:Carlos Botelho (1899 - 1982).

Commons:Galleries are intended for collections of images. Policy requires at least two images on a gallery page, but generally there is little point unless there are more. For very small numbers, the category should be fine. So, I think there should probably not be a gallery page for your grandfather, at least until there are more images.

2) I have moved

and left a redirect at the old page. If and when you have enough images to create a new page Carlos Botelho (1899-1982), you can change the redirect to a disambiguation page.

3) USA copyright is like Kafka. We do not have a section in Commons:Licensing on Portuguese copyright law, but I will guess that it is simple -- it runs for 70 years after the death of the author. So, we need permission from the copyright holder for anything created by someone who died after 1941. Whoever owns the copyright to your grandfather's work must give permission for images of it on Commons. I assume that is your father. If that is correct, I think we can accept an e-mail permission, signed by your father, that comes from your e-mail address. Of course, if the work is not 2D, then we also need permission from the photographer. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:12, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A MILLION THANKS.Manuelvbotelho (talk) 15:32, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dear James My grandfather Carlos Botelho had 2 children: José Rafael Botelho and Raquel Botelho (please check Carlos Botelho's portuguese page; my father is an architect and there is a page on him also in the Portuguese Wikipedia). Raquel died a few years ago, and Gabriel Botelho de Lima Paula, her only son, is her heir. I spoke to both of them, and they both agreed to upload 9 images of Carlos Botelho's works to Wikimedia. I just sent an e-mail with the licence to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org, and I hope it is the right licence (I'm still highly confused about this licensing business; I'll never understand how to deal with it properly). Now I´ll wait for your ok to upload the images. If there is anything else I need to do please let me know. I don´t want any trouble with my grandfather's work (it means too much to me).Manuelvbotelho (talk) 12:55, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Great. I've read the e-mails and they are good. For clarity, please use the following file names (the same names as in the e-mails):

and put "see below" in the permission line and "OTRS tickets:2012022010005609, 2012022010004824" anywhere below. Be sure to put them all in Category:Carlos Botelho (1899 - 1982). You can also put them all in Carlos Botelho (1899 - 1982) with appropriate captions.

Drop a note here, and I'll put the appropriate OTRS template on them. It's possible that between your uploading them and my being back at my desk, someone will hang a "no permission" tag -- don't worry about it. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:24, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Jim. I uploaded the 1st image but I must have done something wrong for in the second I can't see the uploaded image. Here is what I´ve done. 1) I clicked "The copyright owner published this work with the right ..." and "Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 3.0". 2) Below "another reason not mentioned above", I Wrote "OTRS tickets:2012022010005609, 2012022010004824". I'm very confused, and I fear I won't be able to do this right. HELP! Please!Manuelvbotelho (talk) 15:25, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't done many uploads in the last two years and the process has changed a little, so I can't be very helpful. Try simply uploading them as "own work" with the licenses CC-BY-SA and GFDL and then after you're done, let me know. Once they're on Commons, I can deal with the exact way to show the licensing. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:39, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I keep forgetting to log in. I realised later I could keep doing it the way I did it before; I'd rather do that then upload the images as my own work (this might be easier but somehow I just can't do it). Now that you are around I'll try to upload everything and I'll be in touch as soon as its done. Hope all goes well. Manuelvbotelho (talk) 17:00, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Jim. I've done it. But the page layout isn't right and I have no idea how to fix it. And it is necessary to create the disambiguation page, so that Carlos Botelho (1899-1982) doesn't get confused with anyone else. Can you help? I hope everything is ok. Looking forward to hearing from you.Manuelvbotelho (talk) 17:44, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think I solved almost everything, but finding the new page remains a bit tricky and confusing. And there is a disturbing notice in the discussion page - Carlos Botelho (painter) - relating to the deletion of the 1971 photo. Can it be removed? I'm having a new text translated so that Botelho'e English page is as complete and well written as the portuguese one. I really want to do a proper job. And again, many thanks for your precious help. Without it I would be completly lost.Manuelvbotelho (talk) 18:29, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have:

corrected both DAB pages: Carlos Botelho and Category:Carlos Botelho
corrected the name of the cat from Category:Carlos Botelho (1899 - 1982) to Category:Carlos Botelho (1899-1982), removing two spaces, fixing my own mistake.
removed the DR message from Talk:Carlos Botelho (painter) -- you could have done that, since it covered a DR that was closed as keep.
added the Commons media template to Carlos Botelho (painter)
changed the references in Carlos Botelho (painter) to conform to wiki usage, which makes it easier to add more. The citations are not in strict wiki style, but I was not sure whether we were citing books or journals, see Template:Cite Book and Template:Cite journal.

I don't understand "But the page layout isn't right" -- which page? What do you want to do? Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 00:23, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The page layout is fine; all you've done seems PERFECT to me! I'm really happy. Yesterday I uploaded 7 images and this morning one more, from the approved list of 9 - File:Carlos Botelho, Lisbon Bouquet - Ramalhete de Lisboa, 1935.jpg. When I make my mind perhaps I'll upload the last one - if I do that I'll let you know immediately. Thanks for the tip about how to make the notes according to wiki usage. I'll try to adapt. Thanks. Thanks. Thanks. Thanks. Thanks!Manuelvbotelho (talk) 07:44, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You are very welcome. I spend so much of my time as an Admin and Checkuser dealing with people who are doing things we don't want -- vandals, self-promoters, copyright ignorers, and the like -- that it is a great pleasure to be helpful to people who are polite and willing to learn. The fact that you and your grandfather are notable artists, so that Commons is very lucky to have your work, is a bonus. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:06, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Amadeo Avant la Corrida 1912 oil on canvas 60x92cm.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 11:20, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Image description

Hello Manuel, and thank you for uploading the paintings by Alvarez Dominguez. Please note though that the "date" parameter in the description template is for the original date/year of creation of any artwork, not for the date of uploading to Commons. Regards, De728631 (talk) 17:57, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I guess that's one of the multiple problems the occur by using the Upload Wizard. For single files you can however "switch back to the old upload form" where you can edit the templates on purpose. De728631 (talk) 18:03, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Portugal Futurista, 1917.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 09:38, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Manifesto Anti-Dantas, 1915.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 09:38, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

File:K4 - O Quadrado Azul, 1917.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 09:39, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

File:1 Conferência Futurista, Portugal Futurista, 1917.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 09:39, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Salao Bobone Exp C Botelho 1932.JPG

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 06:54, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

File:SPN Exp dos Art Ilust Mod 1942.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 06:54, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

File:SNBA, Salao Inverno 1932-33.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 06:54, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

File:SNBA Exp Pint Esc Arq 1933.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 06:55, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

File:3 Exp Artes Plasticas Fund C Gulbenkian 1986 Premios.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 06:55, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

File:3 Exp Artes Plasticas da Fund Calouste Gulbenkian, 1986.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 06:55, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

File:2 Exp Artes Plasticas Fund C Gulbenkian 1961 Premios.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 06:55, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

File:1 Exp Artes Plasticas Fund C Gulbenkian 1957 Premios.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 06:55, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

copyright breach

Hey, I do not know how to specifically report when any of the images are downloaded from google, and you ikek think that is obtained permission for them.

Alvaro Morata vs. Levante.png is copied from http://www.google.dk/imgres?um=1&hl=da&newwindow=1&biw=1280&bih=933&tbm=isch&tbnid=cRF6o09IPMJ5OM:&imgrefurl=http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1405095-levante-vs-real-madrid-6-things-we-learned&docid=vERycnsjnc0p2M&imgurl=http://cdn.bleacherreport.net/images_root/slides/photos/002/745/502/hi-res-156051740_crop_650.jpg%253F1352677638&w=650&h=476&ei=jiqmUMafPIj5sgaowoDICg&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=188&vpy=310&dur=1018&hovh=192&hovw=262&tx=146&ty=217&sig=107752072466480690223&page=1&tbnh=140&tbnw=198&start=0&ndsp=27&ved=1t:429,r:6,s:0,i:84 He-man33.jpg is from a cartoon so I do not think it can be published under a free license I can not figure out whether Alvaro Morata.png also been copied so I was hoping you could help me. sorry disturbance!--89.249.2.53 12:09, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I know nothing about this subject. You must ask someone else. Sorry!Manuelvbotelho (talk) 12:13, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Almada Negreiros Começar FCG img 7708.jpg

File:Almada Negreiros Começar FCG img 7708.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

. HombreDHojalata.^talk 19:45, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Galego: Tamén en interiores?! Poderías dar unha referencia diso?

--. HombreDHojalata.^talk 19:41, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Galego: Entendo. Daquela hai que coñecer a intención do autor. Sabemos se a obra foi feita para ser mantida permanentemente em locais públicos?^{cite a fonte}

--. HombreDHojalata.^talk 22:28, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Obrigado polas túas explicacións. Un saúdo. --. HombreDHojalata.^talk 22:45, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Fátima (4534736519) 2.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Fátima (4534736519) 2.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ww2censor (talk) 13:43, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Santuário de Fátima (40) - Jul 2008 2.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Santuário de Fátima (40) - Jul 2008 2.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ww2censor (talk) 13:43, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Santuário de Fátima (51) - Jul 2008 2.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Santuário de Fátima (51) - Jul 2008 2.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ww2censor (talk) 13:43, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cropping images

By way of information for the future, when you want to crop an image I suggest you use the CropTool that can be activated in your commons Preferences, under Gadgets. The CropTool will then appears in the left side of your screen. It saves everyone a lot of time because it transfers all the correct and appropriate information into the cropped image, such as source, licence, author, etc. It even leaves a backlink to the original and visa versa. That way all the proper information is there and does not need to be manually reviewed by volunteers. You did not add a source to 3 images, so I had to tag them individually, you then added sources, but did not leave a backlink in either the crop or the original, and you also changed one of the licences to something different from the original, so they needed to be reviewed again. I've now re-reviewed them and all has been fixed, but I hope you can see how both of us could have saved a lot of time and frustration in the first place. Good luck. Ww2censor (talk) 16:15, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A million thanks for your help. I still find this somehow confusing! Most of the time I make several changes to the images, some very subtle (not just cropping but also lens corrections, contrast, and so on), and this makes it all more difficult. Sorry for all the trouble.Manuelvbotelho (talk) 16:22, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, there are many ways to do some thing and some are way more efficient than other and take a while to learn or find out about. If you are doing some retouching, you can consider making the crop first and then upload a new version adding a filled in {{Retouched}} template with details of what you did (click on the template link to see how to use it). If not cropping, just overwrite the original image but add the "retouched" template, especially if the work is minor. Ww2censor (talk) 16:30, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Calváro Hungaro Fatima 0631 (19025731359) 2.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Calváro Hungaro Fatima 0631 (19025731359) 2.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 19:08, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Imagens do Políptico da Sé de Évora

Olá! Suponho que pode ler em português. Desculpe estar a maçar. O Manuelvbotelho carregou no Commons em 2015 o seguinte ficheiro que eu usei na entrada Políptico da Sé de Évora: File:Retábulo da Sé de Évora Casamento da Virgem IMG 2730.JPG (que aliás está muito boa). Por acaso, quando tirou esta foto, não tirou fotos das outras pinturas deste Políptico que está no Museu de Évora? Se sim, tem possibilidade e/ou disponibilidade de as carregar no Commons, na mesma categoria? Desculpe a impertinência.Saudações! GualdimG (talk) 19:01, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Caro @GualdimG: , acabo de fazer upload das imagens que tenho desse políptico. Enviei a imagem do conjunto com resolução um pouco maior, o que talvez permita fazer crop das imagens e ajustá-las em photoshop se necessário. Espero que possam servir de ajuda. Felicidades. Manuelvbotelho (talk) 11:36, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Julgo que lhe agradeci "automaticamente" pelas edições/junção de imagens no artigo, mas volto a agradecer a sua disponibilidade para facultar as imagens. Entretanto faço a seguir um novo pedido semelhante. Saudações, GualdimG (talk) 15:59, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tríptico da Igreja Nossa Senhora Pópulo Caldas da Rainha

Boa tarde Manuelvbotelho! Venho mais uma vez maçá-lo. Pretendo editar (estou no princípio) um artigo sobre o referido Tríptico. Mas não disponho de foto próxima do conjunto. Do que consegui ver no Commons sobre o assunto estão as suas fotos da Igreja Nossa Senhora Pópulo Caldas da Rainha, designadamente esta em que se vê o Tríptico na totalidade. E a pergunta e pedido que faço é se o Manuelvbotelho por sorte não terá foto em que se veja apenas o conjunto do Tríptico que estivesse na disposição de carregar no Commons. Em alternativa, pedirei ao Lab para "cortar" o Tríptico da foto, mas se tivesse foto julgo que teria mais qualidade. Muito obrigado pela atenção, e saudações, GualdimG (talk) 15:59, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:0 Livro Carlos Silveira IMG 1919.jpg

File:0 Livro Carlos Silveira IMG 1919.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Yours sincerely, Ies (talk) 11:29, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The photograph in this book cover (File:Carlos Silveira 1995 2.jpg) is my work; I uploaded it in Wikimedia and used it in Carlos Silveira's page in Portuuguese Wikipedia (in the book cover a symmetrical version was used, but the photo is the same); this is the reason why the book cover's photograph has been uploaded as my own work and I can see no reason for this image to be deleted.Manuelvbotelho (talk) 12:42, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Les; actually, although I am the author of the photo, the copyright of the book belongs to "Ordem dos Farmacêuticos" (I just looked it up). I could easily get their permission since I provided all the book's images, but I can't waste any more time with this unimportant question. So, please apply the rules. Greetings.Manuelvbotelho (talk) 13:30, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Image Permission

Dear Manuel V Botelho,
I am currently redacting my compiled course notes into a book named "History of Interior Design and Furniture” which will be in turkish language and will be distributed in Turkey. It is a cultural and educational reference book. I would like to use your image which belongs to your copyrights and I reach from the link below,
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Claustro_Mosteiro_dos_Jer%C3%B3nimos_2_IMG_0835.JPG
I will appreciate if you let me know your terms and conditions for the image's usage permission. Your name will be indicated at the end of the book in the photo credits part. And how do you prefer to use your name in the credits part?
Yours Sincerely
Prof. Arch. Mustafa Demirkan
mustafaemindemirkan@gmail.com
--Mustidede (talk) 15:57, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Mustafa Demirkan. You are free to use the image; please just follow the Wikimedia rules, indicating the licence ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/deed.pt ) and author ( Manuelvbotelho ). Best wishes.Manuelvbotelho (talk) 16:18, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:0 Caldas da Rainha Columbano Bordalo Pinheiro IMG 1453.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:0 Caldas da Rainha Columbano Bordalo Pinheiro IMG 1453.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

-BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 18:53, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Ruy Roque Gameiro Monumento aos Mortos da Primeira Guerra Mundial.jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:26, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Manuelvbotelho

Contents

Tip: Categorizing images

File:Carlos Botelho, 1957.jpg

File:Manuel Botelho CAM FCG 2005 installation view 1.jpg

File:Carlos Botelho, 1971.jpg

Copyright issues

File:Amadeo Avant la Corrida 1912 oil on canvas 60x92cm.jpg

Image description

File:Portugal Futurista, 1917.jpg

File:Manifesto Anti-Dantas, 1915.jpg

File:K4 - O Quadrado Azul, 1917.jpg

File:1 Conferência Futurista, Portugal Futurista, 1917.jpg

File:Salao Bobone Exp C Botelho 1932.JPG

File:SPN Exp dos Art Ilust Mod 1942.jpg

File:SNBA, Salao Inverno 1932-33.jpg

File:SNBA Exp Pint Esc Arq 1933.jpg

File:3 Exp Artes Plasticas Fund C Gulbenkian 1986 Premios.jpg

File:3 Exp Artes Plasticas da Fund Calouste Gulbenkian, 1986.jpg

File:2 Exp Artes Plasticas Fund C Gulbenkian 1961 Premios.jpg

File:1 Exp Artes Plasticas Fund C Gulbenkian 1957 Premios.jpg

copyright breach

File:Almada Negreiros Começar FCG img 7708.jpg

File source is not properly indicated: File:Fátima (4534736519) 2.jpg

File source is not properly indicated: File:Santuário de Fátima (40) - Jul 2008 2.jpg

File source is not properly indicated: File:Santuário de Fátima (51) - Jul 2008 2.jpg

Cropping images

File source is not properly indicated: File:Calváro Hungaro Fatima 0631 (19025731359) 2.jpg

Imagens do Políptico da Sé de Évora

Tríptico da Igreja Nossa Senhora Pópulo Caldas da Rainha

File:0 Livro Carlos Silveira IMG 1919.jpg

Image Permission

File source is not properly indicated: File:0 Caldas da Rainha Columbano Bordalo Pinheiro IMG 1453.jpg

Notification about possible deletion

Navigation menu

User talk:Manuelvbotelho

Tip: Categorizing images

Copyright issues

Image description

copyright breach

File source is not properly indicated: File:Fátima (4534736519) 2.jpg

File source is not properly indicated: File:Santuário de Fátima (40) - Jul 2008 2.jpg

File source is not properly indicated: File:Santuário de Fátima (51) - Jul 2008 2.jpg

Cropping images

File source is not properly indicated: File:Calváro Hungaro Fatima 0631 (19025731359) 2.jpg

Imagens do Políptico da Sé de Évora

Tríptico da Igreja Nossa Senhora Pópulo Caldas da Rainha

Image Permission

File source is not properly indicated: File:0 Caldas da Rainha Columbano Bordalo Pinheiro IMG 1453.jpg

Notification about possible deletion

Navigation menu

Search