Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2024/10/07
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
_(b)_(cropped).png){kind=link}
_-_MoMu_Antwerp_Study_Collection.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_-_MoMu_Antwerp_Study_collection.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
1975 text, possibly above the French ToO. Abzeronow (talk) 01:34, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Keep this is from the Journal officiel de la République française, which is PD no matter the date due to its official status. Should be tagged with Template:PD-JORF. Would be out of scope as text, but COM:INUSE gives it automatic in-scope status. PARAKANYAA (talk) 02:32, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Merci, la proposition de suppression de Abzeronow était en effet un non-sens. Bien cordialement. AntonyB (talk) 07:30, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn, will fix. --Abzeronow (talk) 02:33, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
_(b)_(cropped).png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(b)_(cropped).png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not intended as a new image. Emiya1980 (talk) 01:30, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
_(b)_(cropped).png){kind=link}
Delete per request from creator, unused. I think you could have speedied this. PARAKANYAA (talk) 02:49, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:34, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
_(b)_(cropped).png){kind=link}
Uploaded in error Glo223 (talk) 01:52, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per request from creator, unused. I think you could have speedied this. PARAKANYAA (talk) 02:59, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:33, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
File expect same as File:18_Hanoi_Road_viewed_from_Tsim_Sha_Tsui_Promenade.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by 藝興大廈1612 (talk • contribs) 06:38, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
- Images are far too different for claiming duplicate and current image is in use. Keep. --Túrelio (talk) 07:23, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense, requester blocked indef. --Achim55 (talk) 14:11, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
Use to vandalise the page 住宅 https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/住宅 — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 203.145.94.212 (talk) 04:55, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
Comment But in use and seems like a perfectly valid image. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:51, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Unusable. Long time abuse 203.145.94.43 06:29, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek I found some of the flies from the author of this photo has been already deleted 203.145.94.43 06:31, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
- OK. And don't tell me, but you're the nominator and every voter in this thread, right? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:54, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Vandalism only 203.145.94.203 06:38, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete if this file delete no one can vandalise the page anymore 203.145.94.134 06:44, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Prevent vandalism 203.145.94.29 06:57, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
Info: /24 range blocked for 1 week. --Achim55 (talk) 12:54, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep unless there is some problem with the licensing of the image. (Someone misusing an image for reasons not directly caused by the image is the fault of the vandal, not the image.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:09, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
- Comment I think we know who the vandal is in this thread, and it wasn't the photographer. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:31, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:35, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Poor quality, LTA 203.186.89.198 04:57, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Vandal's request. --Achim55 (talk) 12:45, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
vandalismj only file Student Acti Outlook (talk) 03:04, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Speedy keep not a valid rationale. It is a building. Given the history above this request is probably vandalism. PARAKANYAA (talk) 03:06, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 07:57, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
duplicate Wikiuser3315 (talk) 05:47, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:32, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
{{PD-US}} seems incorrect. Is it below COM:TOO Saudi Arabia? Jonteemil (talk) 00:47, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete we have little information on the Commons page about ToO in Saudi but honestly I think this is high enough that it fails ToO in America which means we can't host it anyways. Even if that doesn't matter whatever ToO Saudi Arabia has probably isn't that low. PARAKANYAA (talk) 02:30, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 18:06, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
1964 Dutch newspaper clipping. Needs VRT permission. Abzeronow (talk) 01:22, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Not in public domain in Netherlands or the US. PARAKANYAA (talk) 02:50, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Delete. --RAN (talk) 15:59, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 18:06, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
File obtained from https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=194658916289607&set=a.194658889622943. No evidence of own work. WikiEditor50 (talk) 01:30, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Unlikely that the uploader took the photo. PARAKANYAA (talk) 02:52, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 18:06, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
File obtained from https://web.archive.org/web/20221227143558/https://soamaps.com/country/MY/113894/smk-kg-chengal (archived web page as original appears to be down). No evidence of own work. WikiEditor50 (talk) 01:39, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Not own work. PARAKANYAA (talk) 03:01, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 18:06, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:05, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. PARAKANYAA (talk) 03:14, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 18:07, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
copyvio from https://50company.nl/over-50company/ no photopgrpher given no metadata Hoyanova (talk) 05:56, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by EugeneZelenko as CSD F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 18:07, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Breyneratc (talk · contribs)
[edit]Per CSD F10 (personal photos by non-contributors)
Nutshinou Talk! 07:57, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Regards, Aafi (talk) 16:08, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Per CSD F10 (personal photos by non-contributors)
Nutshinou Talk! 07:57, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 18:05, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Said CC-BY license not found at YouTube source — Racconish 💬 11:50, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Er ... it's right there. Per COM:WHERE#YouTube. Click "show more". Look. Screenshotted, with bright red arrow. https://imgur.com/a/xDBAJKO --GRuban (talk) 12:41, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Racconish: Hey - you're an administrator! If you feel guilty (and/or just want to help), please click Special:RandomInCategory/License_review_needed and Commons:License review the file that comes up. N times, where N is how guilty you feel.
--GRuban (talk) 13:11, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Racconish: Hey - you're an administrator! If you feel guilty (and/or just want to help), please click Special:RandomInCategory/License_review_needed and Commons:License review the file that comes up. N times, where N is how guilty you feel.
I withdraw my nomination. — Racconish 💬 16:58, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish 💬 16:59, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Suwarno2024
[edit]- File:Family standing together.png
- File:5 people standing together.png
- File:Generasi Alpha (2013-sekarang).png
- File:Generasi Z (1997-2012).png
- File:Generasi Y (1981-1996).png
- File:Generasi X (1965-1980).png
- File:Generation X (1965-1980).png
- File:Baby Boomers.png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Out of scope: No realistic educational value --Headlock0225 (talk) 12:28, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 17:57, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused logos.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10 / G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 18:08, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
erreur dans le fichier Céline Husetowski WMFr (talk) 15:00, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:25, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
has google maps Saiphani02 (talk) 16:07, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, obvious copyvio. --Rosenzweig τ 07:25, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
I was planning to publish it, however there is already an existing photo Spacejazz2013 (talk) 16:40, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:24, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
The wrong image has been uploaded, which may not comply with the rules Fofafffffffffffffffffff (talk) 19:14, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:22, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
I uploaded the same photo in a better format: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Gedenken_zum_Jahrestag_des_%C3%9Cberfalls_auf_Israel_am_7_Oktober_2024_21_47_21_467000.jpeg Berlinschneid (talk) 19:48, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:21, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Author Request to Delete the Talk Page--Geographyinitiative (talk) 22:30, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Post which talk page you want deleted. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:24, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 07:31, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
cyber bullying Hoyanova (talk) 15:41, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope, next time use SD F10. --Gbawden (talk) 08:21, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
no permission from given photopgrapher in metadata which clearly state "Copyright holder 2024 Lois Smit, all rights reserved." Hoyanova (talk) 05:58, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 14:03, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
I hate listing this one because it's in use and the user is active, but there's no source listed for the underlying satellite image. I'm going to AGF and suppose the uploader back then didn't know to include that information. I've left a message on their talk page on enwiki. Hopefully it will be resolved before this DR makes its way to the top of the queue.
Please give this DR a bit of time to sit. It's been hosted by Commons for 15 years, it can certainly wait a bit longer - Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 23:48, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, I adpated that from a US military aerial photo from when it was an army base. I added many of the annotations myself. Thank you Kevin Murray 2601:644:9201:4840:B4F3:B20C:8D38:3EE4 00:00, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks Kevin, that's really all we needed. Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 15:58, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Information about map received (PD-USGov). --Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 16:00, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/162629072@N02
[edit]Suspicious flickr account. Official photos but 2 followers, 0 following. All the hallmarks of flickrwashing. PCP
Gbawden (talk) 11:38, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Kept: This account has VRT permission which can be seen in {{IsraeliPoliceLicense}}. They did not upload it in the correct way. I fixed it. -- Geagea (talk) 13:20, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
The 2.0 license at Flickr does not allow derivs or commercial use, so ineligible for Commons Acabashi (talk) 09:40, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
I'm recommended to speedy deleting this file unless the orginal owner of the photo may requesting to changing its license to a CC-BY-2.0, or CC-BY-SA-2.0, or CC0, or Public Domain Mark (PDM). Apipattana (talk) 10:30, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:32, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Great big copyright by Belga news agency on the link provided. https://www.gva.be/cnt/dmf20240201_92541346 Although the user should be congratulated for being honest that this is not their own work. Unknown Temptation (talk) 21:29, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:15, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
Ho sbagliato a caricarlo e poichè c'è mio figlio nudo vorrei la rimozione. grazie 101.56.205.37 11:13, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- non so cosa devo fare sinceramente, sono entrata con i miei dati di accesso adesso, che devo fare per cancellare la mia foto? Angela.pinelli87 (talk) 15:24, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 17:56, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
Please delete this is out of focus. Icem4k (talk) 08:50, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 06:26, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
_-_MoMu_Antwerp_Study_Collection.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_MoMu_Antwerp_Study_Collection.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Possible copyright issue. TobiasMoMu (talk) 11:31, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
_-_MoMu_Antwerp_Study_Collection.svg){kind=link}
- As the original uploader, I'd like to see this deleted. TobiasMoMu (talk) 11:31, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 06:27, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
_-_MoMu_Antwerp_Study_Collection.svg){kind=link}
When I was a kid I created it and know I dont want a kid image of me to be on google OmerBroner!23 (talk) 19:23, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
I am the one how created it delete it Omerbroner (talk) 19:45, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --Túrelio (talk) 06:28, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
blurred, no detail, out of scope GioviPen GP msg 15:56, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per CSD F10. Regards, Aafi (talk) 11:29, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 14:11, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:06, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
Carece de relevancia -ifrasombiIfrasombi (talk) 02:52, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: no permission. --Krd 06:27, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
Isitown? 191.125.170.99 00:50, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Weak delete seems to be from this Tweet. Unless that is the uploader, which it doesn't seem to be, I think it was stolen off there. The lack of metadata makes me lean that way... though I guess it could be the uploader? PARAKANYAA (talk) 02:26, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:27, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
Aerial photograph. Cars look circa 1950s rather than 1930s. Likely restored by URAA, and we'd need publication information to determine actual copyright status. Abzeronow (talk) 01:10, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Dubious own work upload. PARAKANYAA (talk) 02:23, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:27, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
out of scope: unused fictional election apportionment diagram, wrong numbers, maybe based on early projections or preliminary results. A corrected image File:Elecciones estatales de Bremen de 2023 (Bürgerschaft de Bremen).svg was uploaded a few days later by the same user. 2003:E5:371E:AD00:94C:4828:C5F4:A547 01:19, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
- Delete per nom, not in scope. PARAKANYAA (talk) 03:02, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:28, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
No FoP in France, and this looks like a modern building. Abzeronow (talk) 02:03, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, not a historical building. PARAKANYAA (talk) 02:45, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:28, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
Wrong file name identifying the wrong building Oaktree b (talk) 02:58, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy keep since the nominator has removed the deletion rationale and said they will move instead. PARAKANYAA (talk) 03:01, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 06:28, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
This logo has a unique and complex texture, which is unacceptable to consider as {{PD-text}} at this point. This design easily surpasses the threshold of originality. Taichi (talk) 03:06, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Weak delete text-only logos are in... interesting ground in the US, but the pixelation effect and the slashes plus the distortion would make this slightly above ToO. PARAKANYAA (talk) 03:20, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:28, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
This logo has a unique and complex texture, which is unacceptable to consider as {{PD-text}} at this point. This design easily surpasses the threshold of originality. Taichi (talk) 03:06, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete text only logos are confusing in the US, but for once, this is probably more creative than the cyberpunk logo. So delete. PARAKANYAA (talk) 03:15, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:29, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 03:20, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete per nom. PARAKANYAA (talk) 03:26, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:03, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Billboards are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 03:22, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. PARAKANYAA (talk) 03:27, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:03, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
Billboards are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 03:22, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, Poland specifies permanent works. PARAKANYAA (talk) 03:28, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:03, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
No FOP for copyrighted works - ie the posters are copyright protected. Labrang (talk) 08:51, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:03, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
No FOP for copyrighted works - ie the posters are copyright protected. Labrang (talk) 08:53, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:03, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
No FOP for copyrighted works - ie the posters are copyright protected. Labrang (talk) 08:53, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:03, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Shivkumarmunimchandradubey (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused logos.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:03, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Imanol.arozarena (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused logos and advertisement.
- File:Logo cash99..png
- File:Logo cash99.svg
- File:Comunidad de servicios 99minutos.png
- File:Mapa de cobertura 99minutos.png
- File:LOGORGB-04.svg
- File:Rutayful-11.svg
- File:Punts99-10.svg
- File:Ruta99.svg
- File:Fullfill.svg
- File:Envios.svg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:03, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:04, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Emialejo858 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:04, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Manojpraveeng (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams.
- File:Concept map of nep 2020.pdf
- File:Intellectual process behind research-1.pdf
- File:Concept map of NEP2020.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:04, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:04, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:04, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Wikiuser2101 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents.
- File:Neee 11.jpg
- File:Conceptual translation1.jpg
- File:Conceptual translation.jpg
- File:Orthologs table.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:04, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents.
- File:Conceptual Translation with Upstream Isoform 1 and Downstream Isoform X1 Without PTMs-3.png
- File:Conceptual Translation with Upstream Isoform 1 and Downstream Isoform X1 Without PTMs-2.png
- File:Conceptual Translation with Upstream Isoform 1 and Downstream Isoform X1 Without PTMs-1.png
- File:Ortholog Table.png
- File:Page 2 Conceptual Translation.png
- File:Page 1 Conceptual Translation.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:04, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
This is an empty page. Could this please get updated again? A discussion at VP is probably needed and it probably shouldn't be deleted but instead be updated by a bot.
Categories that contain itself in some subcategory should also be included. Example: Category:Categories which should only contain MIDI files had Category:MIDI files set so contained itself which probably caused the deepcategory search operator to fail (this is also a problem). Prototyperspective (talk) 17:39, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Why did you nominate this page for deletion? --MZMcBride (talk) 18:39, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Because it is an empty page. Prototyperspective (talk) 21:22, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: I updated the page manually. We can probably get the bot to resume updating this page if there's sufficient interest. Otherwise anyone can run the SQL query here: <https://quarry.wmcloud.org/>. --MZMcBride (talk) 06:03, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep if there are actual plans or reasonable likelihood that the report will be resumed any time soon. If what you linked is a Quarry quere why haven't you put it into a query like Quarry:query/7200 that one can for example find when searching Quarry? Please put it there and then somebody or if possible you could request a bot at Commons:Bots/Work requests (or maybe just add it to this existing thread requesting a bot to update reports). Fixing self-categorization is needed now that deepcategory works with larger categories and is requested to always show results (phab:T376440) and apparently breaks when there is self-categorization anywhere in a branch. Prototyperspective (talk) 10:10, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
- Withdrawing nomination since it has been update now. Thanks for updating it! Prototyperspective (talk) 10:29, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
- You seem very eager to volunteer others. :-) "Why haven't you put it..." and "please put it there..." and "you could request..." and so on. Go for it, be bold, etc. You don't need my involvement. --MZMcBride (talk) 18:06, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
- We are all far more productive if those for whom it would be the least effort do said. This was a blank page, it's quite a stretch to expect me to update it and apparently it was you who created and previously updated it so it's a far lower effort & time required on your side. Moreover, I'm not even close to getting somewhere close to implementing just all the Wikimedia-related things on my list. Prototyperspective (talk) 18:52, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
- You seem very eager to volunteer others. :-) "Why haven't you put it..." and "please put it there..." and "you could request..." and so on. Go for it, be bold, etc. You don't need my involvement. --MZMcBride (talk) 18:06, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
- Withdrawing nomination since it has been update now. Thanks for updating it! Prototyperspective (talk) 10:29, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 06:05, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
have a SVG version of this logo MemCreator (talk) 19:10, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:05, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
FBMD at MD Ovruni (talk) 15:51, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Rosenzweig τ 07:47, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
copyright issue Mickey Đại Phát (talk) 10:48, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 11:15, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
Brief biography of a non-notable individual. Outside of COM:SCOPE. Even if this text were to be needed anywhere on a Wikimedia project, it should be text on that project not a PDF on Commons. In addition, there is an embedded photo of unknown copyright/licensing for which evidence of permission would be needed before being hosted on Commons. Marbletan (talk) 20:17, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 11:13, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
This logo has a unique and complex texture, which is unacceptable to consider as {{PD-text}} at this point. This design easily surpasses the threshold of originality. Taichi (talk) 03:02, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- It might surpass COM:TOO US, but that's not so clear. Compare [1]. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:12, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- And Keep in view of discussion in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Joker Folie à Deux Logo.png. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:46, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
- And
![[1]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/United_States#/media/File:Cyberpunk_2077_logo.svg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Bedivere (talk) 03:58, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
This logo has a unique and complex texture, which is unacceptable to consider as {{PD-text}} at this point. This design easily surpasses the threshold of originality. Taichi (talk) 03:05, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Weak keep or Weak delete Infamously, the File:Cyberpunk 2077 logo.svg was declared not sufficiently original, which I would say is far more creative than this. So I wouldn't say easily. But I am not the US copyright office, so... PARAKANYAA (talk) 03:09, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: erring on the caution side. --Bedivere (talk) 03:57, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
This logo has a unique and complex texture, which is unacceptable to consider as {{PD-text}} at this point. This design easily surpasses the threshold of originality. Taichi (talk) 03:07, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Weak keep The rest of the logo is so simple that I don't think this is more creative than the examples at COM:TOO#United States of America that have been denied registration. The scratches aren't enough. PARAKANYAA (talk) 03:18, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Agreed. Likely to be below COM:TOO US. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:13, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Bedivere (talk) 03:56, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
This logo has a unique and complex texture, which is unacceptable to consider as {{PD-text}} at this point. This design easily surpasses the threshold of originality. Taichi (talk) 03:08, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Weak delete Dangerously close to cyberpunk territory but the paint splash probably contains some originality which makes me lean towards delete. PARAKANYAA (talk) 03:17, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- I'm unconvinced and will follow the closing admin's decision with interest. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:14, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- My question is, is a mere random-looking paint streak above COM:TOO US? I'm skeptical, and that's probably the only thing that could put this above COM:TOO US. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:48, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
- I'm unconvinced and will follow the closing admin's decision with interest. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:14, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 03:55, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
This logo has a unique and complex texture, which is unacceptable to consider as {{PD-text}} at this point. This design easily surpasses the threshold of originality. Taichi (talk) 03:09, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Weak keep The File:Cyberpunk 2077 logo.svg was declared not sufficiently original to get copyright, which I would say is far more creative than this. The texture doesn't help much as it isn't very complicated. Maybe the word placement helps a bit, but is it that much better than Cyberpunk? So I wouldn't say easily. But I am not the US copyright office, so... did they rule on it?
- PARAKANYAA (talk) 03:14, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- I'm unsure about this one. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:15, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah... the texture isn't good enough but the word placement maybe. PARAKANYAA (talk) 05:36, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- I'm unsure about this one. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:15, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Grunge texture is not unique enough to make the logo copyrightable. In fact, the US Copyright Office has actually addressed this and stated: "However, the mere use of text effects (including chalk, popup papercraft, neon, beer glass, spooky-fog, and weathered-and-worn), while potentially separable, is de minimis and not sufficient to support a registration". Di (they-them) (talk) 23:28, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for that, User:Di (they-them)! Could you please add that to COM:TOO US? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:41, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
- Sure thing :) Di (they-them) (talk) 23:42, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
- Awesome, and Keep. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:42, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
- Awesome, and
- Sure thing :) Di (they-them) (talk) 23:42, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for that, User:Di (they-them)! Could you please add that to COM:TOO US? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:41, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Jérémy-Günther-Heinz Jähnick (talk) 16:30, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Bedivere (talk) 03:55, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
This logo has a unique and complex texture, which is unacceptable to consider as {{PD-text}} at this point. This design easily surpasses the threshold of originality. Taichi (talk) 07:48, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 03:54, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
The logo is not just the text but the entire design, including the skulls and skeletons on the sides, is too complex thus exceeding the threshold of originality. Taichi (talk) 07:53, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 03:54, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
Unused and imaginary election apportionment diagram. No educational value Malcolma (talk) 17:10, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:10, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%E5%AE%BF%E8%BF%81%E9%A1%B9%E7%8E%8B%E6%95%85%E9%87%8C%E8%8B%B1%E9%A3%8E%E9%98%81(2).png CHEN HEBING (talk) 07:46, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: G7. --Wdwd (talk) 19:33, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
This is a photo of me for which I did not approve release 2603:900B:408:AF75:6068:6E85:4E5E:4050 17:21, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- If that is true, your grievance should be with the Marine Corps, which released the image, not with us for hosting a copy. - Jmabel ! talk 17:57, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- Please contact our Volunteer Response Team per email at info-commons@wikimedia.org to verify that this is a valid request. And we expect you also to ask for removal of the original file at https://www.dvidshub.net/image/926270/11th-marine-regiment-desert-fire-exercise where this photograph has been published by the Department of Defense. --AFBorchert (talk) 22:02, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Just please review Commons:Deletion requests/File:US Navy 110902-N-BT887-049 Airman Logan Grady secures the tail of an MH-60R Sea Hawk helicopter aboard USS John C. Stennis (CVN 74).jpg to read and see links to all the previous similar deletion nominations of public domain US government works I know of. No valid reason to delete. Perhaps these people should not join the US military if they don't want their image and even name to be published. 23:22, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Weak keep. I am sympathetic to the subject of the image, but I don't see it as a particularly intrusive or identifying image. The image is not in use anywhere significant, so I wouldn't consider it a great loss. Technically, though, a keep. Llwyld (talk) 07:10, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion as per numerous precedents. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:22, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
Uploaded without permission 2603:900B:400:E4E8:5020:783:47FB:93DA 16:04, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep as before. Still available on https://www.dvidshub.net/image/926270/11th-marine-regiment-desert-fire-exercise. --Achim55 (talk) 16:42, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Disruptive nomination. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:22, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy keep Nominator has already been informed to contact VRT. Dmartin969 (talk) 05:44, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion as per previous discussion. Dmartin969 (talk) 05:38, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
Posted without consent 2603:900B:400:E4E8:81FC:CBDA:3CBA:9E4 18:30, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep What consent could possibly be needed for a picture of Marines released by the USMC? (and yes, that is a rhetorical question.) - Jmabel ! talk 17:00, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep per the usual reason that official US works are in the public domain and all similar deletion requests have been kept though in some they have been renamed to remove the names of the people shown. Ww2censor (talk) 23:59, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:23, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
accidental duplicate upload of file found at https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File%3AM068.pdf&page=14 Gowhk8 (talk) 06:25, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected on 10 October 2024 by Túrelio. Regards, Aafi (talk) 16:40, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
no Commons:Freedom of panorama in Estonia Wkentaur (talk) 09:04, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Bridges tend to be works of engineering and not architecture. There is no mention of bridges being protected works at COM:FOP Estonia, nor is there evidence in statute or case law presented here. In addition, this is a very simple bridge. IronGargoyle (talk) 04:42, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Plain civil engineering structure. -- Herbert Ortner (talk) 20:47, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Regards, Aafi (talk) 16:42, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
COM:BASEDONPHOTO drawing of https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/tupac-shakur-portrait-a-p.jpg without evidence of permission or free licence of the original photo. Belbury (talk) 09:29, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Regards, Aafi (talk) 16:43, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
_-_MoMu_Antwerp_Study_collection.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_MoMu_Antwerp_Study_collection.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Possible copyright issue. TobiasMoMu (talk) 13:39, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
_-_MoMu_Antwerp_Study_collection.jpg){kind=link}
- As the original uploader. We found out there might be a copyright issue with this object. We are looking into this and will re-upload when cleared. TobiasMoMu (talk) 13:41, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Regards, Aafi (talk) 16:44, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
_-_MoMu_Antwerp_Study_collection.jpg){kind=link}
1959 German photograph, unlikely to be the uploader's own work. Need more information on the photograph to determine actual copyright status. Abzeronow (talk) 01:19, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:44, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in Taiwan A1Cafel (talk) 03:25, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:44, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in Taiwan A1Cafel (talk) 03:25, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:44, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Argentina A1Cafel (talk) 03:26, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:44, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Argentina A1Cafel (talk) 03:26, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:44, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Argentina A1Cafel (talk) 03:27, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:44, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Puerto Rico A1Cafel (talk) 03:31, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:44, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in USA, artist Matthew Mazzotta is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 03:33, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:44, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:34, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:44, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:34, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:44, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:36, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:45, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:36, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:45, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:37, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:45, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:38, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:45, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
found here before upload - https://www.shz.de/deutschland-welt/schleswig-holstein/artikel/wechsel-im-innenressortjoerg-sibbel-geht-frederik-hogrefe-kommt-47436123 - needs VRT to confirm ownership which should be applied to all this users uploads Gbawden (talk) 11:34, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:45, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:45, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:45, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:45, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:46, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
1965 advertisement from Switzerland, presumably still under copyright (creator isn't mentioned but can't have died more than 70 years ago). If the uploader "Neues Museum Biel" has acquired the rights to the poster (in addition to it being physically in their collection) and release it under a free license, they should send VRT permission. Gestumblindi (talk) 19:41, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:46, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
File is not published under a CCby license, and could never be uploaded here as such Bronloos (talk) 18:43, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- See more uploads of the same user, under the same conditions. Either all can stay, or all should be deleted. Bronloos (talk) 18:46, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 14:08, 27 October 2024 UTC: Commons:Licensing: promo/press photo --Krdbot 19:45, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:اسم علي عليه السلام.png. Unused and out of scope.
- File:(ﷺ)Name of Mohamed.png
- File:Name of Abo Lu'lu'a Ra.png
- File:محمد الباقر-Mohamed Al Baker.png
- File:موسى الكاظم (ع).png
Name_of_Mohamed.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Jonteemil (talk) 00:17, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:29, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Mistakenly upoaded reaster duplicate of the same vector image: File:Leocad-logo-normal.svg Appsoft4 (talk) 03:52, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:31, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Noorezamzam (talk · contribs)
[edit]These are probably Google Streetview screenshots like another file by this uploader which I deleted. They should be deleted too per the precautionary principle.
- File:Maninagar Shree Swaminarayan Temple, Bear, DE.png
- File:Shree Ram Temple, Metuchen, NJ.jpg
- File:Maninagar Shree Swaminarayan Temple, Chesapeake near Portsmouth, VA.png
Rosenzweig τ 08:13, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:33, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Each person's face is clearly visible.
- (Delete old file) Old version needs to delete, but new version do not have any problem. Please delete old version.--Krorokeroro (talk) 06:18, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Kept: deleted the old version. --Yasu (talk) 15:45, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
このコンテンツは、日本国著作権法第十三条によりパブリックドメインであると記載されていますが、日本国著作権法第十三条に列挙される例に該当しません。このコンテンツは日本の国家機関が発行した機関誌であり、日本の著作権法の保護を受けます。日本の国家機関の発行したものすべてが日本国著作権法第十三条によりパブリックドメインとなるわけではないことに注意してください。1998年に発行されたこのコンテンツは著作権の保護期間を満了しておらず、著作権者の許諾なくコモンズに掲載できません。削除されるべきです。 （English Translate) This content is stated to be in the public domain under Article 13 of the Copyright Law of Japan, but does not fall under the examples listed in Article 13 of the Copyright Law of Japan. This content is a journal published by a Japanese national institution and is protected by Japanese copyright law. Please note that not all publications by Japanese national institutions are in the public domain under Article 13 of the Copyright Law of Japan. This content, published in 1998, is not yet out of copyright protection and cannot be posted on Commons without the permission of the copyright holder. It should be deleted. 革命的共産趣味全ウィキ全共闘 (talk) 11:42, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- KEEP: Japanese Impeachment Court is run by Diet members, and I believe its reports are same as the Official Gudget which copyright use is restricted as a current affairs editorial (art.39). So I think may be reproduced and distributed. However, the Impeachment Court itself does not clearly state how it may be used, so I will inquire about whether it is possible to reproduce it with all work. （日本語）弾劾裁判所は主に参議院と国会議員が運営しており、その報告書は官報同様に著作権制限があるはずです（39条等）。なので複製が可能だと思いましたが、当該裁判所サイトが転載方法を明示しておりませんし、記事作成者も様々なので、念のため同所に可否を問い合せてみます。--JOT news (talk) 05:50, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- 日本国著作権法第39条では「新聞紙又は雑誌に掲載して発行された政治上、経済上又は社会上の時事問題に関する論説（学術的な性質を有するものを除く。）は、他の新聞紙若しくは雑誌に転載し、又は放送し、有線放送し、地域限定特定入力型自動公衆送信を行い、若しくは放送同時配信等を行うことができる。」とありますが、ウィキメディア・コモンズへの掲載はこれらに該当しません。また、仮に39条が適用となるとしても、本コンテンツがパブリックドメインになるわけでもないので、著作物としての保護を受けます。ウィキメディア・コモンズが採用しているライセンスの一定の条件下での自由利用が可能になるわけではありません。日本国政府が発行している官報を例に出しておられますが、官報と本コンテンツはその趣旨や内容が全く異なります。官報は法令などの公布や公告など単なる事実の伝達に過ぎないものですが、本コンテンツは官報とは性質の異なる機関誌であり、著作物である「思想又は感情を創作的に表現したもの」に当たります。官報と本コンテンツを同列に語るのは無理があります。（English Translate）Article 39 of the Copyright Act of Japan states that "Comments on current political, economic or social issues (excluding those of an academic nature) published in newspapers or magazines may be reprinted in other newspapers or magazines, or broadcast, cable broadcast, regionally limited specific input type automatic public transmission, or simultaneous broadcast distribution, etc." However, posting on Wikimedia Commons does not fall under these. Even if Article 39 were to apply, this content would not be in the public domain and would be protected as a copyrighted work. It would not be possible to freely use it under certain conditions of the license adopted by Wikimedia Commons. You have given the example of the Official Gazette issued by the Japanese government, but the purpose and content of the Official Gazette and this content are completely different. The Official Gazette is merely a communication of facts such as the promulgation or announcement of laws and regulations, but this content is a journal of a different nature from the Official Gazette, and is a copyrighted work of "creative expression of ideas or feelings." It is unreasonable to talk about the Official Gazette and this content in the same category. 革命的共産趣味全ウィキ全共闘 (talk) 01:27, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- その後どうなりましたか？著作権の制限があり、コモンズで自由に利用できると主張されるのであれば、「制限があるはず」という曖昧なものではなくて、日本国著作権法第何条に基づき、いかなる理由で可能となるのか、明示してください。（English Translate) What happened after that? If you claim that there are copyright restrictions and that it is freely available on Commons, please clarify under what Article of the Copyright Act of Japan and for what reason, rather than being vague and saying "I believe". 革命的共産趣味全ウィキ全共闘 (talk) 19:20, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:48, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Contenido irrelevante -ifrasombiIfrasombi (talk) 02:57, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused personal photo. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:52, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
Copyright Violation Elvisisalive95 (talk) 02:16, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep I can't see anything that indicates this is not own work. Not studio quality, can't find anything elsewhere on the internet, and the uploader has a history of legitimate contribution. What makes you think it's a copyvio? PARAKANYAA (talk) 03:04, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- I personally meet Brett in Springfield TN, and had a picture taken with her. This is a cropped picture from my personal gallery. GatewayPolitics (talk) 07:10, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: I'll reconsider once proof of it being a copyright violation is provided. Kaasterly (talk) 16:47, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per above. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:53, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
I object to speedy deletion and recommend to keep this logo, as it is not promotiional per se, and has been changed since then, as shown on https://www.segurossucre.fin.ec/historia/ - atthough it was initially tagged by Nv8200pa as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G10 NearEMPTiness (talk) 03:52, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- NearEMPTiness, what's notable about the logo? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:17, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Please keep indeed. I am just objecting to another user's unsubstantiated request for speedy deletion, while I am assuming good faith, because he uploaded excellent photos himself. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 05:20, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- It's great that he uploaded excellent photos, but Commons doesn't host random logos. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:22, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- "Lack of notability" or "randomness" are no reasons for speedy deletion, and this logo has nothing to do with "rationale G10" which "includes only content uploaded to promote goods and services when it is clearly not useful for any educational purpose." @Nv8200pa: could you elaborate, please, the reason for requesting deletion of this particular logo. Do you think it hides the fact that the company appears to be in liquidation? --NearEMPTiness (talk) 06:01, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- This is a deletion request, not a speedy deletion request. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:24, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- In my opinion, a logo is inherent advertising and self-promotion. The logo is not used in a Wikimedia project. The one-word description does not provide context by which the image can be understood. In my opinion, it is not useful for any educational purpose. Nv8200p (talk) 11:11, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- "Lack of notability" or "randomness" are no reasons for speedy deletion, and this logo has nothing to do with "rationale G10" which "includes only content uploaded to promote goods and services when it is clearly not useful for any educational purpose." @Nv8200pa: could you elaborate, please, the reason for requesting deletion of this particular logo. Do you think it hides the fact that the company appears to be in liquidation? --NearEMPTiness (talk) 06:01, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Please keep indeed. I am just objecting to another user's unsubstantiated request for speedy deletion, while I am assuming good faith, because he uploaded excellent photos himself. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 05:20, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment This was a cross-wiki upload from eswiki, but on that date the uploader only edited Anexo:Patrocinios_de_Puma and Historia_del_uniforme_del_Barcelona_Sporting_Club (there are no deleted revisions from that date). Probably intended for es:Historia_del_uniforme_del_Barcelona_Sporting_Club but it was not used. Platonides (talk) 22:44, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: unused logo, no educational value. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:55, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
not a selfie as is claimed as the uplaoder is the lead singer of the band and is portrayed in this non free picture which has no photographer given and is copied from https://www.facebook.com/vivianveronique/?locale=nl_NL Hoyanova (talk) 05:53, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:56, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
not webhost — Draceane talkcontrib. 14:42, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Currently in use on uk:Користувач:Михайло Шевелюк, so therefore this image can be considered in COM:SCOPE. --Ellywa (talk) 08:52, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
It doesn't look like this photo was taken by Михайло Шевелюк, since she is in the photo and it doesn't look like he took a photo with a self-timer. Venzz (talk) 06:47, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, taken from FB, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:56, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
not webhost, source? (watermark) — Draceane talkcontrib. 14:42, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Currently in use on uk:Користувач:Михайло Шевелюк, so therefore this image can be considered in COM:SCOPE. --Ellywa (talk) 08:50, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
It doesn't look like this photo was taken by Михайло Шевелюк, since she is in the photo and it doesn't look like he took a photo with a self-timer. Venzz (talk) 06:47, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, transmission data in EXIF data. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:57, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
not webhost — Draceane talkcontrib. 14:42, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Currently in use on uk:Користувач:Михайло Шевелюк, so therefore this image can be considered in COM:SCOPE. --Ellywa (talk) 08:52, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
It doesn't look like this photo was taken by Михайло Шевелюк, since she is in the photo and it doesn't look like he took a photo with a self-timer. Venzz (talk) 06:48, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, taken from FB, and out of scope (article deleted). --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:58, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
Personal picture, useless for educational purposes Superspritz (talk) 07:50, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Could be useful. Keep unless there are copyright issues. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:05, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Kept: not personal, in scope of Category:Buildings in Frassinoro. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:03, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
no permission no author obviously meant for advertising webshop in nl-wiki - copyvio from https://www.coolgift.com/nl Hoyanova (talk) 08:38, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:04, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Personalized digital country Estonia. Soon as one post interact with something like posting a image of wall internet responds like hey we know what you are doing.png
[edit]
Unused file. Screenshot from Estonian newspaper called Maaleht. Not own work. VRT-permission from the creator/photographer or rights holder is needed. Estopedist1 (talk) 09:01, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:03, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
No clear educational value, unused, out of the project scope Nutshinou Talk! 09:25, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:04, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
No clear educational value, unused, out of the project scope Nutshinou Talk! 09:25, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- COM:INUSE. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:15, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- I am aware of this policy. For some reason, the Indonesian Wiktionary automatically adds any .jpg file that shares the same name as a page, whether it is fitting or not (this file is unrelated to the definition). The same issue arose in these three random nominations for example, but the files were not considered as being "in use": Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kaos.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Yunior.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Luli.jpg. Nutshinou Talk! 17:52, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Someone needs to fix that practice. I don't think it should be up to Commons to relieve them of the damage from it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:12, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- I am aware of this policy. For some reason, the Indonesian Wiktionary automatically adds any .jpg file that shares the same name as a page, whether it is fitting or not (this file is unrelated to the definition). The same issue arose in these three random nominations for example, but the files were not considered as being "in use": Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kaos.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Yunior.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Luli.jpg. Nutshinou Talk! 17:52, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, not a real use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:05, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
This is a low quality product. Hy.Zen123.124 (talk) 09:27, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Is is fine if I upload a high-resolution version? Peiris (talk) 04:59, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. No, logo is above COM:TOO. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:05, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Operativo R, in Rome, 1964. Carlo Carchietti, Franco di Vito, Giovanni Pizzo, Lucia di Luciano.jpg
[edit]
Giovanni gave permission. How? 191.125.170.99 12:32, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- I apologize for the confusion. His wife is still alive, my company is in close contact with his family and have the permission to use images freely, with aim to educate about artist's life. Conrad.Teller (talk) 13:09, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- That's fine, but she has to contact COM:VRT and tell them that she agrees to the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication you gave this file. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:22, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep In Italy images are protected for a period of 20 years from creation, unless deemed art. --RAN (talk) 04:03, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- What about U.S. copyrights? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:25, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Ticket:2024101510003593 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 08:02, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: 00:04, November 15, 2024, by Krd (No ticket permission since 15 October 2024). --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:06, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
Not taken in 2024 as claimed, subject died in 2006. Suspected not own work either. MKFI (talk) 12:52, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and COM:PRP. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:06, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
•Please delete this page file•I will re-upload the new file• SekisounoAestivum (talk) 16:47, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
•Please delete all files on this error page as soon as possible and I will recreate a new page• SekisounoAestivum (talk) 17:19, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per reasonably prompt uploader request; unused. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:28, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
The source, date and author are unknown, cannot determine copyright. Thyj (talk) 13:52, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:16, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted satellite image, very unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 14:25, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep A human has to operate the shutter for an image to be copyrighted. See monkey selfie copyright dispute and other automated camera case law. --RAN (talk) 03:52, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Whether the monkey selfie is copyrighted should be reconsidered, as satellite images (e.g., from NASA or JMA) cannot be owned as original works. HurricaneEdgar 03:32, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, satellite images are copyrighted. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:15, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
Désolé, doublon avec https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Priorit%C3%A9s_fabrication_environnement2.svg Graineahumus (talk) 15:31, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:07, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
promo, out of scope.This file was initially tagged by GiovanniPen as Dw no source since (dw no source since) GioviPen GP msg 16:50, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:09, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
promo, bad edited, minor, out of scope.
This file was initially tagged by GiovanniPen as Dw no source since (dw no source since) GioviPen GP msg 16:52, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- COM:CSD#F3 and COM:CSD#G10 can be applied GioviPen GP msg 17:21, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:10, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
promo, self uploaded unrelevant photo, no description; out of scope GioviPen GP msg 16:53, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:10, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
per https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Kad%C4%B1&oldid=934906185#File:%C5%9EEHZADE_MAHMUD_T%C3%9CRBES%C4%B0_-_panoramio.jpg , suspicious license. there is no indicate that these writings are free licensed. modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 17:30, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:12, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
Anatolii Gremory x BlacsWolf BlacsWolf (talk) 20:57, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Anatolii Gremory x BlacsWolf BlacsWolf (talk) 20:58, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: I think the uploader intended this to be a renaming request, but I think the file should be deleted because it is of no plausible educational use. It appears to be the logo of a YouTube channel with 21 subscribers[2], a Twitch channel with 22 followers[3], and a Discord with 31 members[4]. The uploader has no significant global contributions. The only reason this doesn't qualify for CSD F10 is that it's not a photo. --bjh21 (talk) 22:35, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per User:Bjh21, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:12, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: not sure what this is beyond some sort of weird joke. At best it's an unattributed screenshot. Omphalographer (talk) 20:53, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:13, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
This was made using AI and could cause copyright issues. The AI used is not even disclosed. It also serves very little purpuso as it is really ugly and there are already better illustrations of Gutenberg. Nazazaku (talk) 22:09, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:14, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
Er is niet genoemd wie de auteur van de afbeelding is en de link naar de bronpagina is dood. トトト (talk) 22:58, 7 October 2024 (UTC)--トトト (talk) 23:02, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:14, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
Photograph of a photograph, it is questionable whether uploader owns copyright. - Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 23:25, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Looking at their talk page at enwiki, almost certainly a copyright infringement. Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 23:29, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:14, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
The artist gave permission 191.125.170.99 12:29, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry, he gave when he was alive. Now, my company is in close contact with his family and have the permission to use images freely, with aim to educate about artist's life. Conrad.Teller (talk) 13:06, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- You have to follow the VRT instructions, and you need permission of the photographer. If the photographer was a family member than that should be mentioned in the VRT. --RAN (talk) 16:02, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Ticket:2024101510003593 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 08:02, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:25, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
How old is the artist? 191.125.170.99 12:30, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- The artist, Giovanni Pizzo, has died in 2022. On this image he was around 28. Conrad.Teller (talk) 13:02, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Ticket:2024101510003593 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 08:02, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:24, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
May be copyrighted TV screenshot Mvcg66b3r (talk) 05:39, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy keep COM:INUSE and not a chance for it to be over COM:TOO Brazil. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:02, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sadads (talk) 23:50, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Todonite as Speedy (speedy delete) and the most recent rationale was: F1
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as no evidence was provided. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:05, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep COM:UTIL object - not copyrightable. Not a photograph, so it dosen't matter if the image was made by the uploader or not. see also COM:TOO South Korea, which states "Work" refers to a creation that expresses human thoughts or feelings - not the case here. ~TheImaCow (talk) 15:04, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sadads (talk) 23:50, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AvonetJaeger (talk · contribs)
[edit]{{Wrong license}}
- File:Brun stemma.jpg
- File:Soldato del 33° reggimento fanteria, brigata Livorno. Giordano Brun.jpg
- File:Concessione croce al merito di guerra a soldato 33° fanteria.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Now fixed, PD-EU-no author disclosure, 1918 images --RAN (talk) 04:00, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sadads (talk) 23:50, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
schief, unscharf, zu nichts zu gebrauchen Hans-Jürgen Hübner (talk) 17:03, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete per nom. Not realistically useful, thus out of project scope. ~TheImaCow (talk) 15:14, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep rotated, cropped, rare photo from 1977. --Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 17:36, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sadads (talk) 23:51, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Might not actually be public domain due to the image's publication in 2018, even though the invitation itself was produced in 1910. Spookyaki (talk) 22:41, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion -- public domain doesn't get taken away from slavish reproduction. --Sadads (talk) 23:52, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
No FoP in the United States for artworks and sculptures: {{NoFoP-US}} Nutshinou Talk! 08:32, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:17, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:350th airborne regiment
[edit]The source is not a continuous video stream, but a set of scanned photographs made by various unspecified people ("from the archive" of the YouTube channel owner). There is no reason to believe that all the authors of these photographs have given permission for their works to be published under a free license.
- File:Afghanistan – 350th Airbn. Rgt. awards.jpg
- File:Afghanistan – 350th Airbn. Rgt. compound.jpg
- File:Afghanistan – 5th CO 350th Airbn. Rgt. descent.jpg
- File:Afghanistan – 5th CO 350th Airbn. Rgt. discharged.jpg
- File:Afghanistan – 5th CO 350th Airbn. Rgt. firefight 001.jpg
- File:Afghanistan – 5th CO 350th Airbn. Rgt. firefight 002.jpg
- File:Afghanistan – 5th CO 350th Airbn. Rgt. firefight 003.jpg
- File:Afghanistan – 5th CO 350th Airbn. Rgt. heli landing.jpg
- File:Afghanistan – 5th CO 350th Airbn. Rgt. heli takes off.jpg
- File:Afghanistan – 5th CO 350th Airbn. Rgt. on the move 002.jpg
- File:Afghanistan – 5th CO 350th Airbn. Rgt. on the move 003.jpg
- File:Afghanistan – 5th CO 350th Airbn. Rgt. on the move 004.jpg
- File:Afghanistan – 5th CO 350th Airbn. Rgt. on the move 005.jpg
- File:Afghanistan – 5th CO 350th Airbn. Rgt. on the move 006.jpg
- File:Afghanistan – 5th CO 350th Airbn. Rgt. on the move.jpg
- File:Afghanistan – 5th CO 350th Airbn. Rgt. on the top.jpg
- File:Afghanistan – 5th CO 350th Airbn. Rgt. preparing to dispatch.jpg
- File:Afghanistan – Seized Mujahideen weaponry 001.jpg
- File:Afghanistan – Seized Mujahideen weaponry 002.jpg
- File:Afghanistan – Seized Mujahideen weaponry 003.jpg
- File:Afghanistan – Seized Mujahideen weaponry 004.jpg
- File:Afghanistan – Seized Mujahideen weaponry 005.jpg
- File:Afghanistan – Seized Mujahideen weaponry 006.jpg
Quick1984 (talk) 09:16, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:17, 7 December 2024 (UTC)